Loading...
2023 11 07 Counciltad 0 � o ta - GEM of the DESERT — City Council agendas and staff reports are available on the City's web page: www. La Quin taCA.pov CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta REGULAR MEETING ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2023 3:30 P.M. CLOSED SESSION 14:00 P.M. OPEN SESSION Members of the public may listen to this meeting by tuning -in live via httD://laauinta.12milesout.com/video/live. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Councilmembers: Fitzpatrick, McGarrey, Pena, Sanchez, Mayor Evans PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda pursuant to the "Public Comments — Instructions" listed at the end of the agenda. The City Council values your comments; however, in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by the Brown Act [Government Code § 54954.2(b)]. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OR (3) OF SUBDIVISION (d) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CASES: 1) RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE AT 4:00 P.M. REPORT ON ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 1 of 7 NOVEMBER 7, 2023 PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda pursuant to the "Public Comments — Instructions" listed at the end of the agenda. The City Council values your comments; however, in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by the Brown Act [Government Code § 54954.2(b)]. ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS, AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION TO OLD TOWN LA QUINTA (WELLS MARVIN) FOR 20 YEARS OF BUSINESS IN THE CITY CONSENT CALENDAR NOTE: Consent Calendar items are routine in nature and can be approved by one motion. PAGE 1. APPROVE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 17, 2023 2. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 605 ON SECOND READING AMENDING CHAPTER 2.60 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE [ORDINANCE NO. 605] 3. ADOPT RESOLUTION TO ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF RIVERSIDE 25 COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT'S ANNUAL INSPECTION REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 13146.4 [RESOLUTION NO. 2023-036] 4. APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES 29 WITH DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR ON-CALL PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROJECT NO. 2022-16 TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT AUTHORITY FOR UP TO $550,000 OF WORK IN FISCAL YEAR 2023/24 5. APPROVE PURCHASE OF A 2,500 GALLON WATER TRUCK FROM WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL, INC. DEALERSHIP 6. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED AUGUST 31, 2023 7. APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED OCTOBER 13, OCTOBER 20, AND OCTOBER 27, 2023 BUSINESS SESSION PAGE 1. APPROVE CANCELLATION OF REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 2, 2024 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 2 of 7 NOVEMBER 7, 2023 2. APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES COORDINATOR WITH COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE PART-TIME EMERGENCY SERVICE COORDINATOR POSITION PUBLIC HEARINGS — 5:00 p.m. or thereafter For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to consideration of that item; comments are limited to three (3) minutes (approximately 350 words). Any person may submit written comments to the City Council prior to the public hearing and/or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the project(s) at the time of the public hearing. If you challenge a project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public hearing. PAGE 1. CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 1, 2023: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2022-0001) AND APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2022-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2022-0001, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 FOR A 252 -UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT, LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS; CEQA: DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PREPARED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CONSISTENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 [RESOLUTION NOS. 2023-037 AND 2023-0381 *Specific Plan 2022-0001 and Site Development Permit 2022-0001 would be conditioned upon and subject to approval by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) of General Plan 2022-0002, a Housing Element Amendment subject to HCD certification pursuant to state Planning and Zoning Law (Gov. Code, § 65000 et seq.) 2. INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 2023-1000 FOR ZONING CODE LANGUAGE CLEAN UP AND CHANGES TO GAME COURT, FLAGPOLE, AND ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) REGULATIONS; CEQA: THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 15061 (b)(3), COMMON SENSE EXEMPTION. LOCATION: CITY-WIDE [ORDINANCE NO. 6061 BUSINESS SESSION (Continued) PAGE 3. INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3.25 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS [ORDINANCE NO. 607] STUDY SESSION — None CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 3 of 7 NOVEMBER 7, 2023 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 1. CITY MANAGER 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK 4. COMMUNITY SERVICES 5. DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT - QUARTERLY REPORT JULY - SEPTEMBER 587 2023 6. FINANCE 7. PUBLIC SAFETY 7-A CODE COMPLIANCE QUARTERLY REPORT - JULY -SEPTEMBER 2023 593 7-B POLICE QUARTERLY REPORT - JULY -SEPTEMBER 2023 595 7-C FIRE QUARTERLY REPORT - JULY -SEPTEMBER 2023 599 8. PUBLIC WORKS MAYOR'S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. CVAG CONSERVATION COMMISSION (Evans) 2. CVAG ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE (Evans) 3. CVAG EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (Evans) 4. GREATER PALM SPRINGS CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU (Evans) 5. IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT - COACHELLA VALLEY ENERGY COMMISSION (Evans) 6. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES DELEGATE (Evans) 7. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT JOINT POLICY COMMITTEE (Evans) 8. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (Evans) 9. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE (Evans & Fitzpatrick) 10. COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (McGarrey) 11. DESERT RECREATION DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick & McGarrey) 12. COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick & Pena) 13. GREATER CV CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INFORMATION EXCHANGE COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick) 14. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (Fitzpatrick) 15. CANNABIS AD HOC COMMITTEE (Pena & Sanchez) 16. CVAG PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE (Pena) 17. CVAG VALLEY -WIDE HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE (Pena) 18. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES - PUBLIC SAFETY POLICY COMMITTEE (Pena) 19. IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT - ENERGY CONSUMERS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (McGarrey) 20. COACHELLA VALLEY MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (Pena) 21. CVAG TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick) 22. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY (Pena) 23. DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Evans & Sanchez) 24. ANIMAL CAMPUS COMMISSION (Sanchez) 25. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES - PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE (Sanchez & Pena) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 4 of 7 NOVEMBER 7, 2023 26. RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (Sanchez) 27. PALM SPRINGS AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 18, 2023 ADJOURNMENT ********************************* The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on November 21, 2023, at 4:00 p.m. at the City Hall Council Chamber, 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Monika Radeva, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing Agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting was posted on the City's website, near the entrance to the Council Chamber at 78495 Calle Tampico, and the bulletin board at the La Quinta Cove Post Office at 51321 Avenida Bermudas, on November 3, 2023. DATED: November 3, 2023 V MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California Public Notices • Agenda packet materials are available for public inspection: 1) at the Clerk's Office at La Quinta City Hall, located at 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253; and 2) on the City's website at www.laquintaca.gov/councilagendas, in accordance with the Brown Act [Government Code § 54957.5; AB 2647 (Stats. 2022, Ch. 971)]. • The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's office at (760) 777-7123, 24 - hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. • If background material is to be presented to the City Council during a City Council meeting, please be advised that 15 copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk for distribution. It is requested that this takes place prior to the beginning of the meeting. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 5 of 7 NOVEMBER 7, 2023 PUBLIC COMMENTS - INSTRUCTIONS Members of the public may address the City Council on any matter listed or not listed on the agenda as follows: WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS can be provided either in-person during the meeting by submitting 15 copies to the City Clerk, it is requested that this takes place prior to the beginning of the meeting; or can be emailed in advance to CityClerkMail(a)-LaQuintaCA.gov, no later than 12:00 p.m., on the day of the meeting. Written public comments will be distributed to Council, made public, and will be incorporated into the public record of the meeting, but will not be read during the meeting unless, upon the request of the Mayor, a brief summary of public comments is asked to be reported. If written public comments are emailed, the email subject line must clearly state "Written Comments" and should include: 1) full name, 2) city of residence, and 3) subject matter. VERBAL PUBLIC COMMENTS can be provided in-person during the meeting by completing a "Request to Speak" form and submitting it to the City Clerk; it is requested that this takes place prior to the beginning of the meeting. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes (or approximately 350 words). Members of the public shall be called upon to speak by the Mayor. In accordance with City Council Resolution No. 2022-027, a one-time additional speaker time donation of three (3) minutes per individual is permitted; please note that the member of the public donating time must: 1) submit this in writing to the City Clerk by completing a "Request to Speak" form noting the name of the person to whom time is being donated to, and 2) be present at the time the speaker provides verbal comments. Verbal public comments are defined as comments provided in the speakers' own voice and may not include video or sound recordings of the speaker or of other individuals or entities, unless permitted by the Mayor. Public speakers may elect to use printed presentation materials to aid their comments; 15 copies of such printed materials shall be provided to the City Clerk to be disseminated to the City Council, made public, and incorporated into the public record of the meeting; it is requested that the printed materials are provided prior to the beginning of the meeting. There shall be no use of Chamber resources and technology to display visual or audible presentations during public comments, unless permitted by the Mayor. All writings or documents, including but not limited to emails and attachments to emails, submitted to the City regarding any item(s) listed or not listed on this agenda are public records. All information in such writings and documents is subject to disclosure as being in the public domain and subject to search and review by electronic means, including but not limited to the City's Internet Web site and any other Internet Web -based platform or other Web -based form of communication. All information in such writings and documents similarly CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 6 of 7 NOVEMBER 7, 2023 is subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act [Government Code § 7920.000 et seq.]. TELECONFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY — INSTRUCTIONS Teleconference accessibility may be triggered in accordance with AB 2449 (Stats. 2022, Ch. 285), codified in the Brown Act [Government Code § 549531, if a member of the City Council requests to attend and participate in this meeting remotely due to `just cause" or "emergency circumstances," as defined, and only if the request is approved. In such instances, remote public accessibility and participation will be facilitated via Zoom Webinar as detailed at the end of this Agenda. *** TELECONFERENCE PROCEDURES — PURSUANT TO AB 2449*** APPLICABLE ONLY WHEN TELECONFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY IS IN EFFECT Verbal public comments via Teleconference — members of the public may attend and participate in this meeting by teleconference via Zoom and use the "raise your hand" feature when public comments are prompted by the Mayor; the City will facilitate the ability for a member of the public to be audible to the City Council and general public and allow him/her/them to speak on the item(s) requested. Please note — members of the public must unmute themselves when prompted upon being recognized by the Mayor, in order to become audible to the City Council and the public. Only one person at a time may speak by teleconference and only after being recognized by the Mayor. ZOOM LINK: https://us06web.zoom.us/m/82540879912 Meeting ID: 825 4087 9912 Or join by phone: (253) 215 —8782 Written public comments — can be provided in person during the meeting or emailed to the City Clerk's Office at CityClerkMail(a)LaQuintaCA.gov any time prior to the adjournment of the meeting, and will be distributed to the City Council, made public, incorporated into the public record of the meeting, and will not be read during the meeting unless, upon the request of the Mayor, a brief summary of any public comment is asked to be read, to the extent the City Clerk's Office can accommodate such request. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 7 of 7 NOVEMBER 7, 2023 CALL TO ORDER CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 1 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES TUESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2023 A regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to order at 3:00 p.m. by Mayor Evans. PRESENT: Councilmembers Fitzpatrick, McGarrey, Pena, Sanchez, Mayor Evans ABSENT: None PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA — None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Councilmember McGarrey said she will recuse herself and abstain from discussion and vote on Consent Calendar Item No. 9 due to a potential conflict of interest stemming from a business relationship, i.e., her employer, Southern California Gas Company, is listed on the Demand Register, and requested that the item be pulled for a separate vote. Council concurred. CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OR (3) OF SUBDIVISION (d) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CASES: 1) COUNCIL RECESSED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE MEETING AND MOVED INTO CLOSED SESSION AT 3:02 P.M. MAYOR EVANS RECONVENED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 4:00 P.M. WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT REPORT ON ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION: City Attorney Ihrke reported no actions were taken in Closed Session that require reporting pursuant to Government Code section 54957.1 (Brown Act). PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilmember Pena led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 1 of 8 OCTOBER 17, 2023 9 PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA PUBLIC SPEAKER: Richard Gray, La Quinta — pleased about the drainage at the north- east corner of Dune Palms Road and Highway 111 being drained into the Whitewater channel; and suggested the City make information about developments such as Chick- fil-A more readily available to residents. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Melissa Labayog, La Quinta — concerned about safety conditions at a nearby short-term vacation rental (STVR); requested that Mayor Evans, and Councilmembers McGarrey and Pena recuse themselves from all discussion/decisions on the STVR at this property near her residence, claiming they have personal or business relationships with the owner Ms. Daniels; explained an incident on the morning of September 16, 2023, and other investigations concerning guests at this property; and requested permanent removal of the STVR permit for this property. City Clerk Radeva said WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA were received from the citizens listed below in alphabetical order, which were distributed to Council, made public, published on the City's website, and included in the public record of this meeting: • Claudia Snyder, La Quinta — regarding a request for public records, currently being processed, related to the DuPont Estate's STVR permit status; and • John Spano, La Quinta — thanking the City for the recently opened bocce ball courts. ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. TALUS — PROJECT STATUS UPDATE President and CEO Robert Green of Robert Green Company provided a detailed update on the Talus La Quinta project funding and refinancing, which is further explained in the staff report under Business Session Item No. 1 on the agenda; explained the challenges currently adversely affecting the hospitality industry and the economic and political factors that continue to drive up construction costs; thanked La Quinta residents, staff and Council for their patience; and provided his cell number for anyone to call should they have questions. Council discussed the state of hotel development in the current post-COVID climate; discouraged by the misinformation circulating in the community regarding the status of the Talus project; all the behind -the -scenes progress of which the residents are unaware; Council passed on public monthly updates from Robert Green while he was primarily working on financing; and encouraged residents to read the staff report presented tonight, and call Councilmembers or Robert Green if anyone has any questions. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 of 8 OCTOBER 17, 2023 10 CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVE SPECIAL JOINT MEETING MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION OF SEPTEMBER 26, 2023 2. APPROVE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 3, 2023 3. AUTHORIZE OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE CITY CLERK AND DEPUTY CITY CLERK TO ATTEND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CITY CLERKS' NEW LAW AND ELECTIONS SEMINAR IN SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, DECEMBER 13 — 15, 2023 4. EXCUSE ABSENCE OF COMMISSIONER CALDWELL FROM THE OCTOBER 10, 2023, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 5. APPROPRIATE FUNDING AND AWARD CONTRACT TO LEONIDA BUILDERS, INC FOR THE COVE TRAILS PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2022-30 6. APPROVE EXTENDING THE LEASE AGREEMENT WITH PACIFIC MOBILE STRUCTURES THROUGH 2025 FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE TRAILER 7. ADOPT RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE EXAMINATION OF (1) SALES AND USE TAX RECORDS, AND (2) TRANSACTION AND USE TAX RECORDS [RESOLUTION NO. 2023-0351 8. APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED SEPTEMBER 29, AND OCTOBER 6, 2023 9. APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY DATED JULY 21, AUGUST 4, AND SEPTEMBER 1, 2023 COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 5: Mayor Evans said this 10 -day project will be partially funded with funds provided by the Visit Greater Palm Springs Tourism Bureau, which provided funding allocations to all Coachella Valley cities to be used at the discretion of each city for improving facilities that enhance visitor experiences; asked staff to mitigate disturbances to trail users; complete the project prior to the Thanksgiving holiday; and directed staff to share closures and parking information with the Desert Mountains Conservancy. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Pena/McGarrey to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-8 as recommended, with Item No. 7 adopting Resolution No. 2023-035. Motion passed unanimously. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 of 8 OCTOBER 17, 2023 11 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 9 COUNCILMEMBER McGARREY RECUSED HERSELF, AND SAID SHE WILL ABSTAIN FROM THE DISCUSSION AND VOTE ON CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 9 DUE TO A POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST STEMMING FROM A BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP WITH HER EMPLOYER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Pena/Sanchez to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 9 as recommended. Motion passed: ayes 4, noes 0, abstain 1 (McGarrey), absent 0. STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSS LAND-BASED FINANCING OPTIONS AND PROVIDE DIRECTION REGARDING FUTURE POLICY UPDATES Principal Management Analyst Hallick presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office; and introduced President and Principal James V. Fabian and Assistant Vice President Chelsea Redmon of Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates, Inc., attending via teleconference, who provided additional information regarding land-based financing options, and the approval process and requirements. Council discussed the size of the assessment district approved in the City of Laguna Beach used as an example in the presentation; the public hearing process; the time it takes (four to six months) to prepare the engineer's report, which includes the cost estimates for undergrounding the utilities, and the proportionate ratio of costs to the utility companies; the time for Assessment District (AD) hearings (18 to 24 months) followed by bond issuance (three months) before beginning the improvements; the time frame for re - petitioning again if an AD or Community Financing District (CFD) initially fails (six months); bond repayment start dates; for private developers, bond issuance not recommended until project is at least 50% completed; the effect of the City's credit rating if it forms a Utility Undergrounding District; authority for a utility provider to form an AD; the City's existing Landscape & Lighting Assessment District (L&L AD), a fixed per parcel assessment that has not increased since 1995 and which no longer covers the annual cost of the L&L AD improvements and maintenance; CFD being a better tool for a L&L AD in that it allows for an escalator to cover increasing cost of services; possibly adding an CFD for L&L; having two ADs for different purposes but on the same parcels; effects of future parcel -splitting and parcel -merging; developer use of ADs/CFDs would be factored into the home price; pre -polling residents early on to gauge support; need to continually update project cost estimates and have enough contingency between initial project conception to final vote; contributions from other utilities (telephone, cable, etc.) to cost of undergrounding; easements are a question for the future; process if property is devalued; means to return excess assessment to property owners; Bond Debt Service Reserve Funds (10% of the bond issuance) is used for nonpayment of assessments; and liens on properties for delinquent assessments take priority over mortgages. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4 of 8 OCTOBER 17, 2023 12 Council reached a consensus and directed staff to move forward with updating the City's policy regarding ADs; and gather information from neighboring cities on ADs they have done. STUDY SESSION ITEM NOS. 2 AND 3 WILL BE HEARD AFTER THE BUSINESS SESSION MAYOR EVANS CALLED FOR A BRIEF RECESS AT 5:46 P.M MAYOR EVANS RECONVENED THE COUNCIL MEETING AT 5:52 PM WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT BUSINESS SESSION 1. APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 5 AND RELATED DOCUMENTS TO PURCHASE, SALE, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (PSDA) WITH SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, SILVERROCK PHASE I, LLC, AND SILVERROCK LAND II, LLC, FOR TALUS LA QUINTA (FORMERLY SILVERROCK RESORT) AND REQUIRE DEVELOPER TO PRESENT MONTHLY PROGRESS UPDATES AT COUNCIL MEETINGS ONCE FINANCING IS CLOSED AND UNTIL THE LUXURY HOTEL IS OPEN City Manager McMillen presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. Council had no further questions or discussion. City Clerk Radeva said a WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT regarding Business Session Item No. 1 was received from La Quinta resident William Cane, La Quinta — in opposition of the proposed Amendment No. 5 to the PSDA; which were distributed to Council, made public, published on the City's website, and included in the public record of this meeting. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Pena/Fitzpatrick to approve Amendment No. 5 and related documents to the Purchase, Sale, and Development Agreement with SilverRock Development Company, LLC, SilverRock Phase I, LLC, SilverRock Land II, LLC, and TALUS La Quinta (formerly SilverRock Resort); authorize the City Manager and City Attorney to make minor revisions and additions as necessary that do not substantively change the business terms, and execute and implement said agreements and other documents necessary; and require developer to present monthly progress updates at Council meetings once financing is closed and until the luxury hotel is open. Motion passed unanimously. 2. APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION FOR THE PURCHASE AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ZOOM CLOUD PHONE SYSTEM AND RELATED SOFTWARE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5 of 8 OCTOBER 17, 2023 13 Management Analyst Kinley and Director of Business Unit and Housing Development Villalpando presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. Council discussed the savings that will result with this contract; the positive move from an analog to digital phone system; cyber security concerns; back -end encryptions; details of using a laptop as a telephone; budget for replacing hardware; users who would need telephones; means to retrieve phone message on a laptop; training included in the contract; transition plans; remote connection via Wi-Fi/cellular services; and injecting Virtual Private Network (VPN) on the Zoom service to enhance security. PUBLIC SPEAKER VIA TELECONFERENCE: Elliott Simpson, Zoom Video Communications Sales Representative for State and Local Government with Carahsoft Technology Corporation — provided a presentation of the Zoom phone application, and answered questions regarding voice messaging, texting, placing calls, etc. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Pena/Sanchez to approve Agreement for Contract Services with Carahsoft Technology Corporation for the purchase and implementation of Zoom Cloud Phone System and related software for a total not to exceed amount of $164,454 for a four-year term; and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement as recommended. Motion passed unanimously. 3. INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2.60 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE CONFLICT-OF-INTEREST CODE [ORDINANCE NO. 6051 City Clerk Radeva presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Pena/McGarrey to take up Ordinance No. 605 by title and number only and waive further reading. Motion passed unanimously. City Clerk Radeva read the following title of Ordinance No. 605 into the record: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2.60 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE CITY'S CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Pena/McGarrey to introduce at first reading Ordinance No. 605 as recommended. Motion passed unanimously. STUDY SESSION — CONTINUED 2. DISCUSS CITY BRANDED MERCHANDISE Marketing Manager Graham presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6 of 8 OCTOBER 17, 2023 14 Council discussed why a municipal corporation is not permitted to make profits; setting up a non-profit corporation to sell City branded merchandise, and designating any profits to providing a public service; cost of establishing and operating a non-profit versus selling items at cost; need to first evaluate consumer demand; example of how an online retailer would sell City goods; utilizing local retailers to sell City goods in their shops; if establish a 501(C)(3) non-profit, possible uses of profits for public purposes, such as community grants, scholarships, etc.; if cost of items includes design costs — establishing a nexus for costs, documenting staff time involved; profits would go to the non -profit's bank account, then transferred into the General Fund; items would be drop -shipped rather than the City maintaining an inventory; City's logo and seal are trademarked, but others can create and sell items stating La Quinta in other designs; certain logo would be reserved for official City use; option to license local retailers to use certain designs which they would print on items and sell; and having different quality levels between free hand-out items, and items for online sale. Council reached a consensus and directed staff to hold off from creating a non-profit corporation; instead, to prepare a timeline and operational plan for City at -cost sales — initially local pop-up sales; and obtain feedback from local retailers. 3. DISCUSS OPTIONS FOR USE OF RECENTLY ACQUIRED HISTORICAL BUILDING LOCATED AT 51001 EISENHOWER DRIVE Management Analyst Kinley and Director of Business Unit and Housing Development Villalpando presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. Council discussed the multitude uses possible for the building due to its great location; no support of leasing it to a business or use for Museum storage; support uses such as visitor's center, sale of City merchandise, and a historical component; adding a restroom extension for hikers; installing interactive kiosks inside and possibly outside if it becomes a visitor center; opening the rear exterior space; adding a digital monitor/billboard monument at the curb; and adding a bike repair station. Council reached a consensus and directed staff to get the cost for adding an exterior restroom. PUBLIC HEARINGS — None DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS — All reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. 3. SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTAL PROGRAM (STVR) CHARACTERISTICS, COMPLIANCE, AND ENFORCEMENT OVERVIEW — QUARTERLY REPORT — JULY -SEPTEMBER 2023 Council discussed the high compliance in the STVR Program; downward trends in the STVR industry; and directed staff to change Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) line color in reports for viewing clarity. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7 of 8 OCTOBER 17, 2023 15 City Clerk Radeva said the administrative citations chart, on page 198 of the agenda packet, corrected a formula error for Second Quarter (published in the 9/19/2023 agenda packet), noting that one citation, of the total 54, was issued for a disturbance matter, and the remaining 53 were for administrative matters; the report included a list of STVR permits per developments/areas within La Quinta, and a graph depicting how the STVR Hotline calls are received, routed, and addressed. MAYOR'S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS Councilmember McGarrey reported on her attendance at the Trilogy Homeowners Association 20th anniversary; Old Town Artisan Studio event; music at the Museum event; Farmer's Market; California Forward Economic Summit; and the Fire Department Open House. Mayor Evans reported on her attendance at the Coachella Valley Mixer; the Coachella Valley Economic Partnership Summit; and California Forward Summit. Mayor Evans suggested to: 1. Establishing an Ad Hoc Committee to review the City's animal ordinance. Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez and Councilmember Fitzpatrick volunteered to do so; and 2. Establishing a Council subcommittee on local energy matters. Council concurred. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS La Quinta's representative for 2023, Councilmember Fitzpatrick reported on her participation in the following organization's meeting: • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION La Quinta's representative for 2023, Councilmember McGarrey reported on her participation in the following organization's meeting: • IID ENERGY CONSUMERS' ADVISORY COMMITTEE ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, a motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Fitzpatrick/Sanchez to adjourn at 7:35 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8 of 8 OCTOBER 17, 2023 16 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 2 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: November 7, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 605 ON SECOND READING AMENDING CHAPTER 2.60 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE RECOMMENDATION Adopt Ordinance No. 605 on second reading. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On October 17, 2023, Council introduced Ordinance No. 605 for first reading to amend Chapter 2.60 of the La Quinta Municipal Code relating to the City's Conflict of Interest Code. The purpose of the Code is to specifically designate positions that make or participate in the making of governmental decisions, which may foreseeably have a material effect on any financial interests of the persons holding those positions. • City officials in the positions designated on the City's Conflict of Interest Code must disclose their financial interests annually and refrain from participation in any decision(s) that may affect them financially. FISCAL IMPACT — None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The annual Statement of Economic Interest filings are the basis for the transparency that the California's Political Reform Act (PRA) requires of public officials. Statements of Economic Interest are public documents filed with the City Clerk. Review of the City's positions, duties, and influence of public officials has resulted in the following recommended changes to Chapter 2.60 of the Municipal Code due to organizational changes over the last year to better align positions with the City's ability to provide high-level services to its community: Add the following titles as designated positions for "limited disclosure" filing: • Associate Planner • Community Services Deputy Director 17 • Deputy Building Official • Finance Manager • Human Resources Manager • Maintenance & Operations Deputy Director • Maintenance & Operations Superintendent • Principal Management Analyst • Public Safety Deputy Director • Senior Accountant • Senior Permit Technician Delete the following titles from the "limited disclosure" designated positions, as these position titles have been eliminated and/or renamed: • Accounting Manager • Community Resources Manager • Community Resources Analyst • Deputy Director of Facilities • Director of Community Resources • Financial Services Analyst • Human Resources Analyst • Public Safety Manager • Senior Emergency Management Coordinator • Traffic Operations Analyst ALTERNATIVES As Council approved this ordinance at first reading, Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Laurie McGinley, Deputy City Clerk Approved by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk 18 ORDINANCE NO. 605 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2.60 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE CITY'S CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE WHEREAS, the Political Reform Act, Government Code Section 81000, et seq., requires state and local government agencies to adopt and promulgate conflict of interest codes; and WHEREAS, the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) has adopted a regulation, Title 2, Division 6, California Code of Regulations Section 18730 – Provisions of Conflict of Interest Codes, which contains the terms of a standard conflict of interest code which can be incorporated by reference; and WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta (City) has adopted by reference the FPPC's regulation as well as a list of designated employees as Chapter 2.60 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (Code); and WHEREAS, the City desires to make changes to the list of designated employees and disclosure categories to reflect the current classifications/positions within the City; and; WHEREAS, the place of filing of the Statements of Economic Interests shall be in accordance with Government Code Section 87500; and WHEREAS, Statements of Economic Interest are public documents available from the City Clerk of the City of La Quinta; and WHEREAS, the City believes these changes are in the best interests of the citizens of the City of La Quinta. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 2.60 Conflict of Interest of the La Quinta Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: 2.60.020 - Designated positions—Disclosure categories. A. Full disclosure on Form 700, Statement of Economic Interest, shall be required from the following positions pursuant to Government Code Section 87200: 19 Ordinance No. 605 Conflict of Interest Code — Amending Section 2.60.020 of the La Quinta Municipal Code Adopted: November 7, 2023 Page 2 of 5 Designated Positions • City Attorney • Assistant and/or Deputy City Attorney(s) • City Manager • Assistant and/or Deputy City Manager(s) • Finance Director/City Treasurer • Mayor • Members of the City Council/Financing Authority/Housing Authority • Members of the Planning Commission • Members of the Successor Agency to the Dissolved Redevelopment Agency • Candidates for any of the positions above B. Limited disclosure on Form 700, Statement of Economic Interest, shall be required from the following officeholders pursuant to Government Code Section 87302: Designated Positions • Animal Control/Code Compliance Supervisor • Assistant Construction Manager • Associate Engineer • Associate Planner • Building Official • City Clerk • Deputy Building Official • Deputy City Clerk • Deputy Director of Community Services • Deputy Director of Public Safety • Director of Business Unit and Housing Development • Director of Design and Development • Director of Public Works / City Engineer • Finance Manager • Hub Manager • Human Resources Manager • Maintenance & Operations Deputy Director • Maintenance and Operations Superintendent • Management Analyst • Marketing Manager • Members of the Community Services Commission • Members of the Financial Advisory Commission • Members of the Housing Commission • Planning Manager 20 Ordinance No. 605 Conflict of Interest Code — Amending Section 2.60.020 of the La Quinta Municipal Code Adopted: November 7, 2023 Page 3 of 5 • Principal Management Analyst • Senior Accountant • Senior Planner • Senior Permit Technician SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 3. POSTING: The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council, shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting to be entered into the permanent record of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta. SECTION 4. CORRECTIVE AMENDMENTS: the City Council does hereby grant the City Clerk the ability to make minor amendments and corrections of typographical or clerical errors to this Ordinance to ensure consistency of all approved text amendments prior to the publication in the La Quinta Municipal Code. SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held this 7t" day of November, 2023, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 21 Ordinance No. 605 Conflict of Interest Code — Amending Section 2.60.020 of the La Quinta Municipal Code Adopted: November 7, 2023 Page 4 of 5 ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 22 Ordinance No. 605 Conflict of Interest Code — Amending Section 2.60.020 of the La Quinta Municipal Code Adopted: November 7, 2023 Page 5 of 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LA QUINTA ) I, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No. 605 which was introduced at a regular meeting on the 17th day of October, 2023, and was adopted at a regular meeting held on the 7th day of November, 2023, not being less than 5 days after the date of introduction thereof. I further certify that the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the City of La Quinta as specified in the Rules of Procedure adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2022-027. MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California DECLARATION OF POSTING I, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was posted on , 2023, pursuant to Council Resolution. MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 23 24 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 3 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING' November 7, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION TO ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT'S ANNUAL INSPECTION REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 13146.4 RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution acknowledging receipt of the Riverside County Fire Department's Annual Inspection Report for fiscal year 2022/23 pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 13146.4. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • State law requires all fire departments to perform annual inspections for compliance with building standards. • State law requires all fire departments to submit an Annual Inspection Report (Exhibit A to the resolution) to its City, and for the municipality to adopt a resolution to acknowledge receipt of the report. All state mandated inspections in the City were performed. FISCAL IMPAC i — None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per state law, the Riverside County Fire Department is submitting the Annual Inspection Report to the City, which includes completed inspections of public and private school facilities, hotels, motels, apartment units and some residential care facilities for fiscal year 2022/23. ALTERNATIVES As this is a state mandated requirement, there are no alternatives. Prepared by: Chris Cox, Fire Safety Supervisor Approved by: Martha Mendez, Public Safety Deputy Director 25 RESOLUTION NO. 2023 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A REPORT MADE BY THE FIRE CHIEF OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE ANNUAL INSPECTIONS OF CERTAIN OCCUPANCIES PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13146.2 AND 13146.3 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 13146.4 was added in 2018, and became effective on January 1, 2019; and WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 13146.4 requires all fire departments, including the Riverside County Fire Department, that provide fire protection services to report annually to its administering authority on its compliance with Health & Safety Code sections 13146.2 and 13146.3; and WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 13146.2 and 13146.3 requires all fire departments, including the Riverside County Fire Department, that provide fire protection services to perform annual inspections in every building used as a public or private school, hotel, motel, lodging house, apartment house, and certain residential care facilities for compliance with building standards, as provided; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of La Quinta intends this Resolution to fulfill the requirements of the California Health & Safety Code 13146.4 regarding acknowledgment of the Riverside County Fire Department's compliance with California Health and Safety Code Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California: expressly acknowledges the measure of compliance of the Riverside County Fire Department with Health and Safety Code sections 13146.2 and 13146.3 in the City of La Quinta for the time period of July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023, as follows: SECTION 1. Educational Group E occupancies, for the purposes of this Resolution, are generally those public and private schools, used by more than six persons at any one time for educational purposes through the 12th grade. The Riverside County Fire Department completed 100% of the annual inspections of the identified Group E occupancies, buildings, structures and/or facilities in the City of La Quinta. SECTION 2. Residential Group R occupancies, for the purposes of this Resolution, are generally those occupancies containing sleeping units, and include hotels, motels, apartments (three units or more), etc. as well as other residential occupancies (including a number of residential care facilities). These residential care 26 Resolution No. 2023 — xxx Riverside County Fire Annual Inspections Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23 Adopted: November 7, 2023 Page 2 of 2 facilities have a number of different sub -classifications, and they may contain residents or clients that have a range of needs, including those related to custodial care, mobility impairments, cognitive disabilities, etc. The residents may also be non-ambulatory or bedridden. The Riverside County Fire Department completed 100% of the annual inspections of the identified Group R occupancies, buildings, structures and/or facilities in the City of La Quinta. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 7th day of November 2023, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 27 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT - ANNUAL INSPECTIONS REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2022 - 2023 RESOLUTION NO. 2023 -XXX EXHIBIT A ADOPTED: NOVEMBER 7, 2023 # Case Initial Inspection Date Occupant Name Address Num Street 1 18-2023 8/4/2022 AVENTINE APARTMENTS 47750 ADAMS ST 2 18-2206 9/2/2022 CORAL MOUNTAIN APARTMENTS 79625 VISTA CORALINA LN 3 17-2285 10/14/2022 LQ CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP 50800 CALLE PALOMA 4 19-2015 11/22/2022 THE CHATEAU @ LAKE LA QUINTA 78120 CALEO BAY 5 18-1787 3/24/2022 SILVERHAWK APARTMENTS 50660 EISENHOWER DR 6 18-2091 4/12/2023 WOLFF WATERS PLACE APTS. 47795 DUNE PALMS RD 7 18-2103 12/28/2022 VILLAGGIO APARTMENTS 80175 AVENUE 52 8 18-1316 4/19/2023 THE PALMS - ASSISTED LIVING 45160 SEELEY DR 9 18-2248 9/23/2022 LA QUINTA COTTAGES 51049 EISENHOWER DR 10 20-1198 12/1/2022 FOURPLEX 51080 AVENIDA MENDOZA 11 18-2590 1/13/2023 TRIPLEX 51165 EISENHOWER DR 12 20-1203 2/15/2023 MULTIPLEX 51100 AVENIDA NAVARRO 13 17-2023 3/8/2023 VILLA TAMPICO (4 PLEX) 77855 CALLE TAMPICO 14 17-2024 3/8/2023 VILLA TAMPICO (4 PLEX) 77835 CALLE TAMPICO 15 17-2043 10/28/2022 HOMEWOOD SUITES BY HILTON 45200 WASHINGTON ST 16,20-0414 10/20/2022 WASHINGTON STREET APARTMENTS 78101 HIDDEN RIVER RD 17 19-0142 9/9/2022 HARRY S TRUMAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 78870 AVENUE 50 18 19-0305 10/19/2022 BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY 77800 CALLE TAMPICO 19 19-0145 9/16/2022 LA QUINTA MIDDLE SCHOOL 78900 AVENUE 50 20 19-0304 11/29/2022 HORIZON / SUMMIT SCHOOL 43330 PALM ROYALE 21 19-0302 12/1/2022 COLONEL MITCHELL PAIGE MIDDLE SCHOOL 43495 PALM ROYALE 22 18-2102 12/2/2022 VILLA CORTINA APARTMENTS 50701 WASHINGTON ST 23 19-1794 2/15/2023 CASITAS LAS ROSAS 50777 SANTA ROSA PLAZA 24 19-1235 2/15/2023 THE PALMS - GRACIOUS LIVING 45190 SEELEY DR 25 19-0577 1/13/2023 CALEO BAY ALZHEIMERS 47805 CALEO BAY 26 18-2254 1/13/2023 LA QUINTA COURTYARD 51020 EISENHOWER DR 27 18-2024 12/30/2022 LEGACY VILLAS (RESIDENTIAL) 48800 LEGACY DR 28,19-0207 11/17/2022 JOHN ADAMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 50800 DESERT CLUB 29 18-2253 3/28/2023 MEDITERRA 43100 PALM ROYALE DR 30 18-1874 4/27/2023 HADLEY VILLAS 78875 AVENUE 47 31 18-1873 2/2/2023 EMBASSY SUITES 50777 SANTA ROSA PLAZA 32 18-1871 1/13/2023 SEASONS @ LA QUINTA 40915 RAINBOW CT 33 20-2306 12/14/2023 RESIDENCE INN - MARRIOTT 79675 HIGHWAY 111 34 18-1872 4/19/2023 LA QUINTA DESERT VILLAS 45245 SEELEY DR 35 20-1221 2/3/2023 STADIUM (CONDOS) @ PGA WEST 55400 PGA BLVD 36,17-2280 4/19/2023 LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL 79255 BLACKHAWK WAY 37 18-0181 3/14/2023 LA QUINTA RESORT - CASITAS 49499 EISENHOWER DR 38 18-1879 3/14/2023 LA QUINTA RESORT - VINTAGE CASITAS 49499 EISENHOWER DR 39 19-2018 3/29/2023 PALM ROYALE - RESIDENTIAL 78259 EMERALD DR 40 19-0469 10/29/2022 VISTA DUNES APARTMENTS 44950 VISTA DUNES 28 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 4 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: November 7, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR ON-CALL PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROJECT NO. 2022-16 TO INCREASE THE CONTRACT AUTHORITY FOR UP TO $550,000 OF WORK IN FISCAL YEAR 2023/24 RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 2 to Agreement for Contract Services with Desert Concepts Construction, Inc. for on-call public works maintenance services Project No. 2022-16 to increase the contract authority for up to $550,000 of work in fiscal year 2023/24; and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Per the purchasing policy, combined amounts paid to vendors/contractors over $50,000 must be approved by the City Council. • In May 2022, Desert Concepts Construction, Inc., (Desert Concepts) was awarded an agreement for on-call public works maintenance services (On -Call Services). This provides flexibility to complete emergency, daily and/or deferred maintenance in a timely manner. • The proposed Amendment No. 2 will increase the spending authority for fiscal year (FY) 2023/24 from $350,000 to a not to exceed amount of $550,000, as City parks and retention areas were damaged from Tropical Storm Hilary (Hilary) and Desert Concepts performed repairs in a timely manner. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the FY 2023/24 budget in various maintenance accounts (101-3005; 101-3008; 215-7004; 101-2002; 202-3004; 202-3006-60691; and 501-0000-71103; 601- 0000-60660; 101-7003-60103) and will be charged to the appropriate account depending on services rendered. If approved, the total amount that can be paid to Desert Concepts for FY 2023/24 would increase from $350,000 to not exceed $550,000 for maintenance services. Remaining years under the Initial Term or any Extended Terms of the Agreement would remain at $350,000. 29 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The purchasing policy requires Council approval for purchases and/or contracts over $50,000. To date in FY 2023/24 the City has utilized Desert Concepts for a variety of services totaling over $330,000. Some of this work includes storm damage repairs from Hilary at SilverRock Event Park ($19,600); the X -Park ($96,450) and the retention basin ($49,000) adjacent to Adams Park. Staff anticipates additional maintenance repairs in FY 2023/24 such as the trellises at the Cove Oasis; fencing repairs along the Bear Creek Trail; exterior building paint maintenance and refresh at City Hall, the Wellness Center, and Library; and roof repairs at City Hall, Fire Station 70, and SilverRock. Desert Concepts can also address any unanticipated maintenance items that may come up in the remainder of FY 2023/24. In May 2022, Desert Concepts was awarded an agreement for On -Call Services. They have a history of providing quality work, the ability to mobilize quickly, and will bid on prevailing wage projects. They have performed a wide range of services including emergency repairs, general construction, concrete sidewalk repairs, heating, ventilation and air conditioning installations, electrical, plumbing, landscape, irrigation, and asphalt repairs. In March 2023, Council approved Amendment No. 1, increasing the annual contract authority from $200,000 to a not to exceed amount of $350,000, in order to keep up with the current job market and rising costs. If approved, Amendment No. 2 (Attachment 1) would allow staff to continue to utilize Desert Concepts for emergency and maintenance services on an as -needed basis for a not to exceed amount of $550,000 for FY 2023/24. ALTERNATIVES Council may deny this request or direct staff to seek Council approval for any future work with Desert Concepts, however, staff does not recommend this as it could adversely affect work schedules. Prepared by: Dianne Hansen, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Amendment No. 2 with Desert Concepts Construction, Inc. 30 ATTACHMENT 1 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTRUCTION, INC. This Amendment No. 2 ("Amendment No. 2") to Agreement for Contract Services ("Agreement") with Desert Concepts Construction, Inc. is made and entered into as of the 7t" day of November, 2023 ("Effective Date") by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA ("City"), a California municipal corporation and Desert Concepts ("Contracting Party"). RECITALS WHEREAS, on or about May 1, 2022, the City and Contracting Party entered into an Agreement to provide On -Call Maintenance Services. The term of the Agreement expires on June 30, 2025; and WHEREAS, on or about June 26, 2023, the City and Contracting Party executed Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement to amend Section 2.1 — Contract Sum and increased the annual spending authority from $200,000 to $350,000 for the life of the Agreement, encompassing the Initial and any Extended Terms; and WHEREAS, the City utilized Contracting Party for unanticipated repairs at City parks and retention areas due to storm damage from Tropical Storm Hilary; and WHEREAS, due to these additional and unanticipated repairs, the City and Contracting Party mutually agree to amend Section 2.1 Contract Sum of the Agreement and increase the spending authority from $350,000 to a not to exceed amount of $550,000 for fiscal year 2023/24 only. Contract Sum shall remain unchanged, at not to exceed $350,000, for any other fiscal years under the Initial or Extended Terms. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenant herein contained, the parties agree as follows: AMENDMENT In consideration of the foregoing Recitals and the covenants and promises hereinafter contained, and for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Section 2.1 Contract Sum is amended to read: 2.1 Contract Sum. For the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Contracting Party shall be compensated in accordance with "Exhibit B" (the "Schedule of Compensation") in a total amount not to exceed Three -Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($350, 000) for the life of the Agreement, encompassing the Initial and any Extended Terms, except for fiscal year 2023/24, the total not to exceed amount shall be Five -Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($550,000), 31 (the "Contract Sum"), except as provided in Section 1.7. 2. "Exhibit B" — Schedule of Compensation is amended as listed in "Exhibit B", attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. In all other respects, the Original Agreement shall remain in effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have executed this Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for Contract Services on the respective dates set forth below. CITY OF LA QUINTA CONTRACTING PARTY a California municipal corporation DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTRUCTION, INC. a California Corporation JON McMILLEN, City Manager Name & Title City of La Quinta, California Dated: Dated: ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 32 Exhibit B Schedule of Compensation With the exception of compensation for Additional Services, provided for in Section 2.3 of this Agreement, the maximum total compensation to be paid to Contracting Party under this Agreement is not to exceed Three -Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($350, 000) for the life of the Agreement, encompassing the Initial and any Extended Terms; except for fiscal year 2023/24, the total not to exceed amount shall be Five - Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($550,000), ("Contract Sum"). The Contract Sum shall be paid to Contracting Party in an amount identified in Contracting Party's schedule of compensation attached hereto for the work tasks performed and properly invoiced by Contracting Party in conformance with Section 2.2 of this Agreement. Initial Term: "Not to exceed" Year 1 (FY2022/23): $350,000.00 "Not to exceed" Year 2 (FY2023/24): $550,000.00 "Not to exceed" Year 3 (FY2024/25): $350,000.00 Possible Extended Term: "Not to exceed" Year 4 (FY2025/26): $350,000.00 "Not to exceed" Year 5 (FY2026/27): $350,000.00 33 34 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 5 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: November 7, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE PURCHASE OF A 2,500 GALLON WATER TRUCK FROM WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC. DEALERSHIP RECOMMENDATION Approve purchase of a 2,500 -gallon water truck from Westrux International Inc. and authorize the City Manager to execute the purchase agreement. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • In June 2023, Council approved fiscal year (FY) 2023/24 budget which included $375,000 for equipment replacement. • The 2000 International water truck in the City's fleet is beyond its useful life. • Westrux International Inc. provided the lowest quote for a water truck at $126,500. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in FY 2023/24 budget in the Machinery & Equipment account no. 501-0000-80100. BAUKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City's current water truck is a model year 2000 International with a 2,000 -gallon tank capacity and after 23 years has reached the end of its useful life. This is a crucial piece of equipment that is used for dust suppression. The City procured quotes for similar water trucks and received three quotes as follows: 1) Westrux International Inc. $126,500 (plus trade-in value) 2) Custom Truck One Source $127,091 (no trade-in value) 3) Commerce Truck Equipment Sales, LLC $141,586 (no trade-in value) Staff requests approval to expend $126,500 to purchase a replacement water truck from Westrux as the lowest bidder. 35 ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Tony Ulloa, Deputy Director Approved by: Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Westrux International, Inc. quote 36 �HTERNATIONA�� P HV607 SBA Sales Proposal For: City of La Quinta Presented By: WESTRUX INT'L., INC. ATTACHMENT 1 37 INTERNATIONAL" Prepared For: City of La Quinta Tony Ulloa 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253-2839 (760)777 - 7052 Reference ID: 33K Water Trk October 18, 2023 Presented By: WESTRUX INT'L., INC. Lucas Berry 15555 Valley View Ave. Santa Fe Springs CA 90670 - (562)404-1020 Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with the following quotation on a new International truck. I am sure the following detailed specification will meet your operational requirements, and I look forward to serving your business needs. Model Profile 2025 HV607 SBA (HV607) AXLE CONFIG: 4X2 APPLICATION: Water Truck MISSION: Requested GVWR: 33000. Calc. GVWR: 33000. Calc. GCWR: 33000 Calc. Start / Grade Ability: 21.45% / 2.17% @ 55 MPH Calc. Geared Speed: 76.6 MPH DIMENSION: Wheelbase: 165.00, CA: 97.90, Axle to Frame: 65.00 ENGINE, DIESEL: (Cummins B6.7 240) EPA 2024, 240HP @ 2400 RPM, 600 Ib -ft Torque @ 1600 RPM, 2600 RPM Governed Speed, 240 Peak HP (Max) TRANSMISSION, AUTOMATIC: (Allison 2500 RDS) 6th Generation Controls, Wide Ratio, 5 -Speed with Overdrive, with PTO Provision, Less Retarder, with 33,000 -Ib GVW and GCW Max, On/Off Highway CLUTCH: Omit Item (Clutch & Control) AXLE, FRONT NON -DRIVING: (Dana Spicer E -1202W) Wide Track, I -Beam Type, 12,000 -Ib Capacity AXLE, REAR, SINGLE: (Dana Spicer 21060S} Single Reduction, 21,000 -Ib Capacity, R Wheel Ends Gear Ratio: 5.57 CAB: Conventional, Day Cab TIRE, FRONT: (2) 11R22.5 Load Range G AH37 (HANKOOK), 501 rev/mile, 75 MPH, All -Position TIRE, REAR: (4) 11R22.5 Load Range G HSR 3 (CONTINENTAL), 494 rev/mile, 75 MPH, All -Position SUSPENSION, REAR, SINGLE: 23,500 -Ib Capacity, Vari-Rate Springs, with 4500 -Ib Capacity Auxiliary Rubber Springs PAINT: Cab schematic 10OWL Location 1: 9219, Winter White (Std) Chassis schematic N/A 38 Proposal: 26486-01 INTERNATIONAL" Vehicle Specifications October 18, 2023 2025 HV607 SBA (HV607) Code Description F/R Wt Tot Wt (Ibs) (Ibs) HV60700 Base Chassis, Model HV607 SBA with 165.00 Wheelbase, 97.90 CA, and 65.00 6136/3644 9780 Axle to Frame. AXLE CONFIGURATION 1ANA AXLE CONFIGURATION {Navistar} 4x2 -27/-108 -135 Notes Pricing may change if axle configuration is changed. ENGINE 12EXT ENGINE, DIESEL {Cummins B6.7 240} EPA 2024, 240HP @ 2400 RPM, 600 Ib -ft 0/0 0 Torque @ 1600 RPM, 2600 RPM Governed Speed, 240 Peak HP (Max) 12VJR EMISSION, CALENDAR YEAR {Cummins B6.7} EPA, OBD and GHG Certified for 0/0 0 Calendar Year 2024 12WZX CARB EMISSION WARR COMPLIANCE for Cummins B6.7 Engines 0/0 0 12WZJ CARB IDLE COMPLIANCE Low NOx Idle Engine, Complies with California Clean 0/0 0 Air Regulations; Includes "Certified Clean Idle" Decal located on Driver Door 12WVG EPA IDLE COMPLIANCE Low NOx Idle Engine, Complies with EPA Clean Air 0/0 0 Regulations; Includes "Certified Clean Idle" Decal on Hood 10UAC VEHICLE REGISTRATION IDENTITY ID for the State of California 0/0 0 12UYE RADIATOR Aluminum, 2 -Row, Cross Flow, Over Under System, 717 Sqln -80/-1 -81 Louvered, with 313 Sqln Charge Air Cooler, Includes In -Tank Oil Cooler Includes DEAERATION SYSTEM with Surge Tank HOSE CLAMPS, RADIATOR HOSES Gates Shrink Band Type; Thermoplastic Coolant Hose Clamps : RADIATOR HOSES Premium, Rubber 12THT FAN DRIVE {Horton Drivemaster} Two -Speed Type, Direct Drive, with Residual 0/0 0 Torque Device for Disengaged Fan Speed Includes : FAN Nylon 12VBR AIR CLEANER with Service Protection Element 10/0 10 12703 ANTI -FREEZE Red, Extended Life Coolant; To -40 Degrees F/ -40 Degrees C, 0/0 0 Freeze Protection 12VYP ENGINE CONTROL, REMOTE MOUNTED No Provision for Remote Mounted 0/0 0 Engine Control 12VXT THROTTLE, HAND CONTROL Engine Speed Control; Electronic, Stationary, 0/0 0 Variable Speed; Mounted on Steering Wheel TRANSMISSION 13BBJ TRANSMISSION, AUTOMATIC {Allison 2500 RDS} 6th Generation Controls, Wide 0/0 0 Ratio, 5 -Speed with Overdrive, with PTO Provision, Less Retarder, with 33,000 -Ib GVW and GCW Max, On/Off Highway 39 3 Proposal: 26486-01 INTERNATIONAL" Vehicle Specifications October 18, 2023 16ZBT 2025 HV607 SBA (HV607) 0/0 0 Code Description F/R Wt Tot Wt 0/0 0 16WBY (Ibs) (Ibs) 13WVV NEUTRAL AT STOP Allison Transmission Shifts to Neutral When Service Brake is 0/0 0 Includes Depressed and Vehicle is at Stop; Remains in Neutral Until Service Brake is : CONSOLE, OVERHEAD Molded Plastic with Dual Storage Pockets, Retainer Released Nets and CB Radio Pocket; Located Above Driver and Passenger 13XAL PTO LOCATION Customer Intends to Install PTO at Left Side of Transmission 0/0 0 13WYY SHIFT CONTROL PARAMETERS {Allison) 1000 or 2000 Series Transmissions, 0/0 0 Performance Programming Side with Toll Ticket Strap 13WLN TRANSMISSION OIL Synthetic; 20 thru 28 Pints 0/0 0 13WVS TRANSMISSION SHIFT CONTROL T -Handle 0/0 0 CLUTCH 11001 CLUTCH Omit Item (Clutch & Control) 0/0 0 REAR AXLES, SUSPENSIONS 14AWD AXLE, REAR, SINGLE {Dana Spicer 21060S) Single Reduction, 21,000 -Ib 0/38 38 Capacity, R Wheel Ends . Gear Ratio: 5.57 14VAH SUSPENSION, REAR, SINGLE 23,500 -Ib Capacity, Vari-Rate Springs, with 4500- 0/62 62 Ib Capacity Auxiliary Rubber Springs 14WMN AXLE, REAR, LUBE (EmGard FE -75W-90) Synthetic Oil; 1 thru 29.99 Pints 0/0 0 FRONT AXLES 2AGE AXLE, FRONT NON -DRIVING {Dana Spicer E -1202W) Wide Track, I -Beam Type, -9/0 -9 12,000 -Ib Capacity FRONT SUSPENSIONS 3ADC SUSPENSION, FRONT, SPRING Parabolic Taper Leaf, Shackle Type, 12,000 -Ib 0/0 0 Capacity, with Shock Absorbers CABS, COWLS, BODIES 16030 CAB Conventional, Day Cab 0/0 0 16ZBT ACCESS, CAB Steel, Driver & Passenger Sides, Two Steps per Door, for use with 0/0 0 Day Cab and Extended Cab 16BAM AIR CONDITIONER with Integral Heater and Defroster 0/0 0 16WBY ARM REST, RIGHT, DRIVER SEAT 3/0 3 16VKB CAB INTERIOR TRIM Classic, for Day Cab 0/0 0 Includes : CONSOLE, OVERHEAD Molded Plastic with Dual Storage Pockets, Retainer Nets and CB Radio Pocket; Located Above Driver and Passenger : DOME LIGHT, CAB Door Activated and Push On -Off at Light Lens, Timed Theater Dimming, Integral to Overhead Console, Center Mounted : SUN VISOR (2) Padded Vinyl; 2 Moveable (Front -to -Side) Primary Visors, Driver Side with Toll Ticket Strap 16WSK CAB REAR SUSPENSION Air Bag Type 0/0 0 40 4 Proposal: 26486-01 INTERNATIONAL" Vehicle Specifications October 18, 2023 2025 HV607 SBA (HV607) Code Description F/R Wt Tot Wt (Ibs) (Ibs) 16WLS FRESH AIR FILTER Attached to Air Intake Cover on Cowl Tray in Front of 0/0 0 Windshield Under Hood 16GED GAUGE CLUSTER Base Level; English with English Electronic Speedometer 0/0 0 Includes : GAUGE CLUSTER DISPLAY: Base Level (3" Monochromatic Display), Premium Level (5" LCD Color Display); Odometer, Voltmeter, Diagnostic Messages, Gear Indicator, Trip Odometer, Total Engine Hours, Trip Hours, MPG, Distance to Empty/ Refill for : GAUGE CLUSTER Speedometer, Tachometer, Engine Coolant Temp, Fuel Gauge, DEF Gauge, Oil Pressure Gauge, Primary and Secondary Air Pressure : WARNING SYSTEM Low Fuel, Low DEF, Low Oil Pressure, High Engine Coolant Temp, Low Battery Voltage (Visual and Audible), Low Air Pressure (Primary and Secondary) 16XJN INSTRUMENT PANEL Flat Panel 0/0 0 16HKT IP CLUSTER DISPLAY On Board Diagnostics Display of Fault Codes in Gauge 0/0 0 Cluster 16SNT MIRRORS (2) Aero Pedestal, Power Adjust, Heated, Turn Signals, Black Heads 0/0 0 and Arms, 6.5" x 14" Flat Glass, Includes 6.5" x 6" Convex Mirrors, for 102" Load Width Notes : Mirror Dimensions are Rounded to the Nearest 0.5" 16VLV MONITOR, TIRE PRESSURE Omit -10/-1 -11 16JNT SEAT, DRIVER {National 2000} Air Suspension, High Back with Integral Headrest, 0/0 0 Vinyl, Isolator, 1 Chamber Lumbar, with 2 Position Front Cushion Adjust, -3 to +14 Degree Angle Back Adjust 16SMN SEAT, PASSENGER {National} Non Suspension, High Back, Fixed Back, Integral 15/8 23 Headrest, Vinyl 16XWD SUNSHADE, EXTERIOR Aerodynamic, Painted Roof Color, with Integral 14/3 17 Clearance/Marker Lights 16WJU WINDOW, POWER (2) and Power Door Locks, Left and Right Doors, Includes 0/0 0 Express Down Feature FRAMES 1CAG FRAME RAILS Heat Treated Alloy Steel (120,000 PSI Yield); 10.250" x 3.610" x 55/243 298 0.375' (260.4mm x 91.7mm x 9.5mm); 456.0" (11582mm) Maximum OAL 1LNG BUMPER, FRONT Contoured, Steel, Painted Gloss Black -17/3 -14 1 MEJ FRAME DIMPLE Dimple on Left and Right Top Flange of Frame Rail to Reference 0/0 0 Rear Axle Centerline 1570 TOW HOOK, FRONT (2) Frame Mounted 8/0 8 1WGR WHEELBASE RANGE 138" (350cm) Through and Including 187" (475cm) 74/-74 0 BRAKES 4091 BRAKE SYSTEM, AIR Dual System for Straight Truck Applications 0/0 0 Includes : BRAKE LINES Color and Size Coded Nylon 41 5 Proposal: 26486-01 INTERNATIONAL" Vehicle Specifications October 18, 2023 2025 HV607 SBA (HV607) Code Description F/R Wt Tot Wt (Ibs) (Ibs) DRAIN VALVE Twist -Type GAUGE, AIR PRESSURE (2) Air 1 and Air 2 Gauges; Located in Instrument Cluster PARKING BRAKE CONTROL Yellow Knob, Located on Instrument Panel PARKING BRAKE VALVE For Truck QUICK RELEASE VALVE On Rear Axle for Spring Brake Release: 1 for 4x2, 2 for 6x4 : SPRING BRAKE MODULATOR VALVE R-7 for 4x2, SR -7 with relay valve for 6x4/8x6 4AZA AIR BRAKE ABS (Bendix AntiLock Brake System) 4 -Channel (4 Sensor/4 0/0 0 Modulator) Full Vehicle Wheel Control System 4GBM BRAKE, PARKING Manual Push -Pull Pneumatic Parking Brake 1/0 1 4XDC BRAKES, FRONT {Meritor 15X4 Q -PLUS CAST) Air S -Cam Type, Cast Spider, -70/0 -70 Fabricated Shoe, Double Anchor Pin, Size 15" X 4", 13,200 -Ib Capacity 4EXP BRAKE CHAMBERS, FRONT AXLE {Bendix} 20 Sqln 2/0 2 4LAG SLACK ADJUSTERS, FRONT {Gunite} Automatic 14/0 14 4WBX DUST SHIELDS, FRONT BRAKE for Air Cam Brakes 10/0 10 4XDR BRAKES, REAR {Meritor 16.5X7 Q -PLUS CAST} Air S -Cam Type, Cast Spider, 0/52 52 Fabricated Shoe, Double Anchor Pin, Size 16.5' X 7", 23,000 -Ib Capacity per Axle 4EXU BRAKE CHAMBERS, REAR AXLE {Bendix EverSure} 30/30 Sqln Spring Brake 0/7 7 4LGG SLACK ADJUSTERS, REAR {Gunite} Automatic 0/14 14 4WDM DUST SHIELDS, REAR BRAKE for Air Cam Brakes 0/10 10 4SPA AIR COMPRESSOR {Cummins} 18.7 CFM 0/0 0 4EBS AIR DRYER {Bendix AD -9} with Heater 17/11 28 4VKC AIR DRYER LOCATION Mounted Inside Left Rail, Back of Cab 13/8 21 4VKJ AIR TANK LOCATION (2) Mounted Under Battery Box, Outside Left Rail, Back of -20/27 7 Cab, Perpendicular to Rail 4732 DRAIN VALVE {Berg} with Pull Chain, for Air Tank 0/0 0 STEERING 5PSA STEERING GEAR {Sheppard M100) Power 0/0 0 5710 STEERING COLUMN Tilting and Telescoping 17/2 19 5CAW STEERING WHEEL 4 -Spoke; 18" Dia., Black 0/0 0 DRIVELINES 6DGA DRIVELINE SYSTEM {Dana Spicer} SPL100, for 4x2/6x2 0/0 0 EXHAUST SYSTEMS 713ME EXHAUST SYSTEM Horizontal Aftertreatment System, Frame Mounted Under 0/0 0 Right Rail Back of Cab, Includes Single Short Horizontal Tail Pipe 7SCP ENGINE EXHAUST BRAKE for Cummins ISB/B6.7/ISL/L9 Engine with Variable 0/0 0 Vane Turbo Charger 42 6 Proposal: 26486-01 INTERNATIONAL" Vehicle Specifications October 18, 2023 2025 HV607 SBA (HV607) Code ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS Description F/R Wt Tot Wt (Ibs) (Ibs) 8000 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM 12 -Volt, Standard Equipment 0/0 0 Includes DATA LINK CONNECTOR For Vehicle Programming and Diagnostics In Cab HAZARD SWITCH Push On/Push Off, Located on Instrument Panel to Right of Steering Wheel HEADLIGHT DIMMER SWITCH Integral with Turn Signal Lever PARKING LIGHT Integral with Front Turn Signal and Rear Tail Light STARTER SWITCH Electric, Key Operated STOP, TURN, TAIL & B/U LIGHTS Dual, Rear, Combination with Reflector TURN SIGNAL SWITCH Self -Cancelling for Trucks, Manual Cancelling for Tractors, with Lane Change Feature : WINDSHIELD WIPER SWITCH 2 -Speed with Wash and Intermittent Feature (5 Pre -Set Delays), Integral with Turn Signal Lever WINDSHIELD WIPERS Single Motor, Electric, Cowl Mounted WIRING, CHASSIS Color Coded and Continuously Numbered 8GHP ALTERNATOR {Delco Remy 28S1} Brush Type, 12 Volt, 160 Amp Capacity, Pad -2/0 -2 Mount, with Remote Sense 8RPR ANTENNA for Increased Roof Clearance Applications 1/0 1 8THB BACK-UP ALARM Electric, 102 dBA 0/3 3 8VUL BATTERY BOX Steel, with Plastic Cover, 18" Wide, 2-4 Battery Capacity, Mounted -36/13 -23 Left Side Back of Cab 8MJT BATTERY SYSTEM {Fleetrite} Maintenance -Free, (2) 12 -Volt 190OCCA Total, Top 7/7 14 Threaded Stud 8HAE BODY BUILDER WIRING Rear of Frame; Includes Sealed Connectors for Tail/ 0/3 3 Amber Turn/Marker/ Backup/Accessory Power/Ground and Sealed Connector for Stop/Turn 8XAH CIRCUIT BREAKERS Manual -Reset (Main Panel) SAE Type III with Trip 0/0 0 Indicators, Replaces All Fuses 8WPH CLEARANCE/MARKER LIGHTS (5) {Truck Lite} Amber LED Lights, Flush 0/0 0 Mounted on Cab or Sunshade 8XLG FUSES, ELECTRICAL (7) Spare Fuses with a Variety of Ratings, Stored in a 0/0 0 Module Located Near the Fuse Block, in the Main Fuse Panel Area 8XKC HEADLIGHTS Halogen, with Daytime Running Lights, Automatic Twilight 0/0 0 Controlled 8XHN HORN, AIR Single Trumpet, Black, with Lanyard Pull Cord 3/0 3 8541 HORN, ELECTRIC (2) Disc Style 1/0 1 8WWJ INDICATOR, LOW COOLANT LEVEL with Audible Alarm 0/0 0 8RPS RADIO AM/FM/WB/Clock/Bluetooth/USB Input/Auxiliary Input 3/0 3 8RMZ SPEAKERS (2) 6.5" Dual Cone Mounted in Both Doors, (2) 5.25' Dual Cone 5/3 8 Mounted in Both B -Pillars 8WTK STARTING MOTOR {Delco Remy 38MT Type 300} 12 Volt, Less Thermal Over- 8/0 8 Crank Protection 8XGT TURN SIGNALS, FRONT Includes LED Side Turn Lights Mounted on Fender 0/0 0 43 7 Proposal: 26486-01 INTERNATIONAL" Vehicle Specifications October 18, 2023 2025 HV607 SBA (HV607) Code FRONT END Description F/R Wt (Ibs) Tot Wt (Ibs) 9WBM FRONT END Tilting, Fiberglass, with Three Piece Construction, Sloped Front -64/-6 -70 9593 FENDER EXTENSIONS Omit 0/0 0 9HAD GRILLE Chrome 0/0 0 9AAB LOGOS EXTERIOR Model Badges 0/0 0 9AAE LOGOS EXTERIOR, ENGINE Badges 0/0 0 SPEEDOMETER, TOOLS, MISC 10AGB COMMUNICATIONS MODULE Telematics Device with Over the Air Programming; 1/0 1 Includes Five Year Data Plan and International 360 10BAE LABEL, DEF "DEF ONLY" 0/0 0 10060 PAINT SCHEMATIC, PT -1 Single Color, Design 100 0/0 0 Includes : PAINT SCHEMATIC ID LETTERS "WL" 10761 PAINT TYPE Base Coat/Clear Coat, 1-2 Tone 0/0 0 FUEL TANKS 15SGJ FUEL TANK Top Draw, Non -Polished Aluminum, D -Style, 16" Tank Depth, 50 US 23/3 26 Gal (189L), Mounted Left Side, Under Cab 15WDG DEF TANK 7 US Gal (26L) Capacity, Frame Mounted Outside Left Rail, Under Cab 0/0 0 15902 FUEL TANK CAP Locking Type 1/0 1 15LMS FUEL/WATER SEPARATOR 12 VDC Electric Heater, Includes Pre -Heater, 1/-1 0 Includes Water -in -Fuel Sensor, Cummins Supplied on Engine WHEELS, TIRES -FRONT 27DTT WHEELS, FRONT {Accuride 288281 DISC; 22.5x8.25 Rims, Powder Coat Steel, 14/0 14 2 -Hand Hole, 10 -Stud, 285.75mm BC, Hub -Piloted, Flanged Nut, with .472" Thick Increased Capacity Disc and with Steel Hubs 7372135809 (2) TIRE, FRONT 11R22.5 Load Range G AH37 (HANKOOK), 501 rev/mile, 75 -18/0 -18 MPH, All -Position WHEELS, TIRES - REAR 28DUK WHEELS, REAR {Accuride 29169} DUAL DISC; 22.5x8.25 Rims, Powder Coat 0/24 24 Steel, 5 -Hand Hole, 10 -Stud, 285.75mm BC, Hub -Piloted, Flanged Nut, with .472" Thick Increased Capacity Disc and Steel Hubs 7372135439 (4) TIRE, REAR 11R22.5 Load Range G HSR 3 (CONTINENTAL), 494 rev/mile, 0/0 0 75 MPH, All -Position WHEELS MISC OPTIONS 29ACD TIRE VALVE CAP Flo-Thru Design 29WLK WHEEL BEARING, FRONT, LUBE {EmGard FE -75W-90) Synthetic Oil 0/0 0 0/0 0 44 8 Proposal: 26486-01 INTERNATIONAL" Vehicle Specifications October 18, 2023 2025 HV607 SBA (HV607) Code WARRANTY 40128 Description Services Section: WARRANTY Standard for HV507, HV50B, HV607 Models, Effective with Vehicles Built July 1, 2017 or Later, CTS -2025A FIR Wt Tot Wt (Ibs) (Ibs) 0/0 0 40NSG CARB COMPANION PLAN {Navistar} for CARB B6.7 and L9 Engines 0/0 0 Total Component Weight: 6104/3997 10101 (Ibs) (Ibs) 1 T&B 2500 Gal Tank 0/0 0 Total Body Allied: 0/0 0 (Ibs) (Ibs) The weight calculations included in this proposal are an estimate of future vehicle weight. The actual weight as manufactured may be different from the estimated weight. Navistar, Inc. shall not be liable for any consequences resulting from any differences between the estimated weight of a vehicle and the actual weight. 45 9 Proposal: 26486-01 INTERNATIONAL" Financial Summary October 18, 2023 2025 HV607 SBA (HV607) Description Total Factory List Price Including Options: Freight Charge Total Freight: Total Factory List Price Including Freight: Total Vehicle Price: Total Body/Allied Equipment: Total Sale Price: Total Per Vehicle Sales Price: Less Trade -In Allowance: Total Net Sales Excluding Taxes: TAX/DOC FEES Total License, Title: Net Sales Price: (US DOLLAR) $3,100.00 $11,313.75 Price $94,901.25 $3,100.00 $98,001.25 $98,001.25 $29,185.00 $127,186.25 $127,186.25 ($12,000.00) $115,186.25 $11,313.75 $126,500.00 Please feel free to contact me regarding these specifications should your interests or needs change. I am confident you will be pleased with the quality and service of an International vehicle. Approved by Seller: Official Title and Date Authorized Signature This proposal is not binding upon the seller without Seller's Authorized Signature Accepted by Purchaser: Firm or Business Name Authorized Signature and Date Official Title and Date The TOPS FET calculation is an estimate for reference purposes only. The seller or retailer is responsible for calculating and reporting/paying appropriate FET to the IRS. The limited warranties applicable to the vehicles described herein are Navistar, Inc.'s standard printed warranties which are incorporated herein by reference and to which you have been provided a copy and hereby agree to their terms and conditions. 46 10 Proposal: 26486-01 Wednesday, October 18, 2023 TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Definitions: as used in this CONTRACT, except provisions relating to the trade in vehicle, "YOU or "YOUR means company and/or buyer and co -buyer. "I", "ME", or "MY" means the seller or dealer. "VEHICLE" means the car, truck, or other VEHICLE described on the first page of this CONTRACT including all the options listed. "Manufacturer" means the company which makes the VEHICLE. "Trade -In" means the car, truck, motorcycle or other vehicle which YOU trade to ME in a partial payment for the vehicle. 2. Purpose: By signing the CONTRACT, YOU agree to buy the VEHICLE from ME. By accepting this CONTRACT, I agree to deliver the VEHICLE to YOU if the VEHICLE is in MY inventory. If the VEHICLE is not in MY inventory, I agree to order the VEHICLE from the manufacturer, and after receiving the VEHICLE from the manufacturer, to deliver the VEHICLE to YOU 3. Price Changes by the Manufacturer: The VEHICLE price stated on the first page of this CONTRACT is based on the current prices the manufacturer charges ME. At any time before I receive the VEHICLE from the manufacturer, the manufacturer has the right to raise the price it charges to ME. If the manufacturer does raise the price, I may raise the price to YOU by the same amount. If I do raise MY price, You may cancel the CONTRACT and get back any down payment YOU have made. If I have not already sold the Trade -In (See paragraph 4), YOU may have the Trade -In back by paying ME the reasonable cost of storage and any repair work or reconditioning I may have done. 4. Trade -In: If you are using a Trade -In to partially pay for the VEHICLE, You may deliver the Trade -In to ME either when YOU sign the CONTRACT or when the VEHICLE is ready for YOU to pick up. If YOU do not deliver the Trade -In to ME when YOU sign this CONTRACT, You agree that at the time YOU deliver the Trade -In and lower the allowance stated on the first page of this CONTRACT. If I do lower the allowance, YOU may cancel this CONTRACT and get back your cash down payment. If YOU deliver the Trade -In when YOU sign this CONTRACT, I may sell the Trade -In at any time and at any price I think proper. If this CONTRACT is cancelled and I have already sold the Trade -In, I will pay YOU the price I received for the Trade -In minus 15% commission, minus any money I spent repairing, storing, insuring or advertising the Trade -In, unless otherwise required by law. 5. Trade -In -- YOUR Responsibilities: At the time YOU deliver the Trade -In to ME, YOU guarantee that YOU own the Trade-in free and clear and agree to furnish proper proof of ownership, including the Certificate of Title or other evidence of ownership. If any outstanding security interests are attached to the Trade -In vehicle, YOU are obligated to satisfy the debt secured and to obtain a release of all liens. If I arrange payment of the debt, and the total amount is greater than the amount shown on the CONTRACT as the balance owing to lien holder, YOU agree to pay the difference to ME in cash immediately upon notice of the deficiency. If the debt is less than the amount shown, I will refund the surplus to YOU. 6. Design Changes by the Manufacturer: The manufacturer has the right to change the design of the VEHICLE, its chassis, its parts or accessories at any time without notice to YOU or to ME. In the event of any change in design, I have no duty to YOU except to deliver the VEHICLE as made by the manufacturer. 7. Delays in Delivery: I am not responsible for delays caused by the manufacturer, or by accidents, fires, or other causes beyond MY control. I do not control the manufacturer and am not part of the manufacturer and do not work for the manufacturer. 8. Taxes: The price of the VEHICLE does not include Federal Taxes, State Sales or Excise Taxes or any other tax or government fee. YOU must pay ME the proper amount of any tax or governmental fee which applies to this sale. 9. New VEHICLE Disclaimer of Warranties: If YOU are buying a new VEHICLE, the VEHICLE will come with the manufacturer's warranty which is a promise from the manufacturer directly to YOU. Unless otherwise agreed in a separate document (see Paragraph 12 below), I expressly disclaim all warranties, express or implied, including any implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. I sell the VEHICLE "AS IS" and make no guarantees of any kind about the Vehicle's quality of performance. YOU have complete responsibility and all the risk for any problems with the VEHICLE. 10. Used VEHICLE Disclaimer of Warranties: Except as may be provided in the Buyer's Guide Window Form and a separate warranty document (see Paragraph 12 below) if YOU are purchasing a used VEHICLE, I expressly disclaim all warranties, express or implied, including any implied warranty or merchantability of fitness for a particular purpose. I sell the VEHICLE "AS IS" and make no guarantees of any kind about the Vehicle's quality or performance. You have complete responsibility and all the risk for any problems with the VEHICLE. I do not guarantee that the VEHICLE will pass an exhaust emissions inspection. 11. Dealer Warranty or Service Contract: If I give a warranty on a used VEHICLE or YOU purchase an extended service contract on a new or used VEHICLE, I may not disclaim implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. The pages of this CONTRACT comprise the entire CONTRACT affecting this purchase. The DEALER will not recognize any verbal agreement, or any other agreement or understanding of any nature. You certify that no credit has been extended by dealer for the purchase of this motor VEHICLE. You certify that you are 18 years of age or older, and acknowledge receiving a copy of 47 this contract. The terms of this CONTRACT were agreed upon and the CONTRACT signed in the dealership on the date noted at top of this form. If DEALER is arranging credit for YOU, this CONTRACT is not valid until a credit disclosure is made as described in Regulation Z and you have accepted the credit extended. NOTICE OF SALESPERSON'S LIMITED AUTHORITY. This contract is not valid unless signed and accepted by Sales Manager or Officer of Dealership. Accepted: X Westrux Signature Accepting Terms of Contract Buyer's Signature Accepting Terms of Contract DEALER'S DISCLAIMER OR WARRANTY The Dealer expressly disclaims all warranties, either expressed or implied on the vehicle sold, except any warranties offered and explained in Paragraphs 9 through 11 listed within this contract. Buyer acknowledges having read and understood the provisions within this contract. Buyer's Signature: X Buyer hereby acknowledges receipt of all necessary title documents from said dealer, and covenants to submit this paperwork to the state DMV or title agency within ten days from the date of invoice. Buyer Signature: X 48 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 6 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: November 7, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED AUGUST 31, 2023 RECOMMENDATION Receive and file revenue and expenditure report dated August 31, 2023. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The report summarizes the City's year-to-date (YTD) revenues and period expenditures for August 2023 (Attachment 1). • These reports are also reviewed by the Financial Advisory Commission. FISCAL IMPACT — None BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Below is a summary of the column headers used on the Revenue and Expenditure Summary Reports: Original Total Budget — represents revenue and expenditure budgets the Council adopted in June 2023 for fiscal year (FY) 2023/24. Current Total Budget — represents original adopted budgets plus any Council approved budget amendments from throughout the year. The FY 2022/23 operating and Capital Improvement Project carryovers to FY 2023/24 will be processed after the year-end audit is completed. Period Activity — represents actual revenues received and expenditures outlaid in the reporting month. Fiscal Activity — represents actual revenues received and expenditures outlaid YTD. Variance Favorable/(Unfavorable) - represents the dollar difference between YTD collections/expenditures and the current budgeted amount. Percent Used— represents the percentage activity as compared to budget YTD. 49 The revenue report includes revenues and transfers into funds from other funds (income items). Revenues are not received uniformly throughout the year, resulting in peaks and valleys. For example, large property tax payments are usually received in December and May. Similarly, Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund payments are typically received in January and June. Any timing imbalance of revenue receipts versus expenditures is funded from the City's cash flow reserve. The expenditure report includes expenditures and transfers out to other funds. Unlike revenues, expenditures are more likely to be consistent from month to month. However, large debt service payments or CIP expenditures can cause swings. Prepared by: Rosemary Hallick, Principal Management Analyst Approved by: Claudia Martinez, Finance Director Attachment: 1. Revenue and Expenditure Report for August 31, 2023 50 August 2023 Revenues General Fund Comparison to 2022 Non -General Fund Transient Occupancy (Hotel) Tax Percent of 448,661 Allocated Interest Percento Mitigation Fees MTD 483,475 YTD Budget Misc. Reimbursements(l) YTD Budget General Fund (GF) $ 1,565,544 $ 2,178,268 2.78% $ 1,989,216 2.91% All Funds $ 2,379,516 $ 3,956,540 3.20% $ 3,381,548 3.18% General Fund August 2023 Expenditures Non -General Fund Comparison to 2022 X -Park Programming July -Sept. $ 101,020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) - Construction (3) ercen o Marketing and Tourism Promotions $ ercen o Developer Reimbursements MTD Sheriff-Other(2) YTD Budget SilverRock Maintenance YTD Budget General Fund $ 1,240,674 $ 2,141,585 2.94% $ 3,105,897 4.80% Payroll (GF) $ 761,950 $ 1,148,020 8.57% $ 2,323,483 16.84% All Funds $ 3,171,209 $ 6,355,580 5.38% $ 6,785,170 6.59% The revenue report includes revenues and transfers into funds from other funds (income items). Revenues are not received uniformly throughout the year, resulting in peaks and valleys. For example, large property tax payments are usually received in December and May. Similarly, Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund payments are typically received in January and June. Any timing imbalance of revenue receipts versus expenditures is funded from the City's cash flow reserve. The expenditure report includes expenditures and transfers out to other funds. Unlike revenues, expenditures are more likely to be consistent from month to month. However, large debt service payments or CIP expenditures can cause swings. Prepared by: Rosemary Hallick, Principal Management Analyst Approved by: Claudia Martinez, Finance Director Attachment: 1. Revenue and Expenditure Report for August 31, 2023 50 Top Five Revenue/Income Sources for August General Fund Non -General Fund Transient Occupancy (Hotel) Tax $ 448,661 Allocated Interest $ 549,339 Mitigation Fees $ 483,475 Gas Tax $ 191,026 Misc. Reimbursements(l) $ 164,670 SilverRock Green Fees $ 70,842 Public Works Dev. Plan Check Fees $ 85,339 Housing Authority Rent Revenue $ 28,731 STVR Registration Fees $ 69,000 Development Impact Fees- Transportation $ 16,992 Top Five Expend itu res/Outlas for August General Fund Non -General Fund X -Park Programming July -Sept. $ 101,020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) - Construction (3) $ 742,302 Marketing and Tourism Promotions $ 65,010 Developer Reimbursements $ 400,000 Sheriff-Other(2) $ 37,860 SilverRock Maintenance $ 175,002 Animal Shelter Contract Service $ 30,493 Software Licenses (4) $ 51,723 Contract Services- Admin $ 23,500 Water- Medians $ 38,297 (')Misc. Reimbursements are for SB90 recovered costs from state -mandated programs (Z)Annual fees for Cal -ID Bureau (3) Ave 50 and 52 pavement rehab and Dune Palms bridge (4)Citywebsite hosting; GoEnforce/GoRequest; Rincon GIS services The revenue report includes revenues and transfers into funds from other funds (income items). Revenues are not received uniformly throughout the year, resulting in peaks and valleys. For example, large property tax payments are usually received in December and May. Similarly, Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund payments are typically received in January and June. Any timing imbalance of revenue receipts versus expenditures is funded from the City's cash flow reserve. The expenditure report includes expenditures and transfers out to other funds. Unlike revenues, expenditures are more likely to be consistent from month to month. However, large debt service payments or CIP expenditures can cause swings. Prepared by: Rosemary Hallick, Principal Management Analyst Approved by: Claudia Martinez, Finance Director Attachment: 1. Revenue and Expenditure Report for August 31, 2023 50 ta (2aigra CGU,IFOKNIA Fund 101 -GENERAL FUND 105 - DISASTER RECOVERY FUND 201- GAS TAX FUND 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 203 - PUBLIC SAFETY FUND (MEAS 210 - FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING F 220 - QUIMBY FUND 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 223 - MEASURE A FUND 225 - INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 226 - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 227 - STATE HOMELAND SECURIT) 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 231- SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 RORF 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUN 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY 243 - RDA LOW -MOD HOUSING FL 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 249 - SA 2011 LOW/MOD BOND FI 250 - TRANSPORTATION DIF FUNC 251- PARKS & REC DIF FUND 252 - CIVIC CENTER DIF FUND 253 - LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT DIF 254 - COMMUNITY & CULTURAL C 255 - STREET FACILITY DIF FUND 256 - PARK FACILITY DIF FUND 257 - FIRE PROTECTION DIF 259 - MAINTENANCE FACILITIES D 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUNC 275 - LQ PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER 299 - INTEREST ALLOCATION FUN[ 310 - LQ FINANCE AUTHORITY DEE 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PR( 405 - SA PA 1 CAPITAL IMPRV FUN 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEM 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOG' 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUN 504 - INSURANCE FUND 601- SILVERROCK RESORT 602 - SILVERROCK GOLF RESERVE 760 -SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PL 761- CERBT OPEB TRUST 762 - PARS PENSION TRUST Report Total: ATTACHMENT 1 For Fiscal: 2023/24 Period Ending: 08/31/2023 Revenue Summary Variance Original Current Period Fiscal Favorable Percent Total Budget Total Budget Activity Activity (Unfavorable) Used 78,478,100 78,478,100 1,565,544 2,178,268 -76,299,832 2.78% 15,000 15,000 0 0 -15,000 0.00% 2,458,600 2,458,600 191,026 191,026 -2,267,574 7.77% 2,922,000 2,922,000 212 512 -2,921,488 0.02% 2,500 2,500 0 0 -2,500 0.00% 156,000 156,000 0 0 -156,000 0.00% 101,500 101,500 0 0 -101,500 0.00% 2,992,000 2,992,000 0 0 -2,992,000 0.00% 50,000 50,000 0 0 -50,000 0.00% 70,000 70,000 3,704 3,704 -66,296 5.29% 2,028,000 2,028,000 0 0 -2,028,000 0.00% 500 500 0 0 -500 0.00% 12,500 12,500 0 0 -12,500 0.00% 5,000 5,000 0 0 -5,000 0.00% 20,500 20,500 1,284 2,676 -17,824 13.05% 0 0 6 59 59 0.00% 55,000 55,000 0 0 -55,000 0.00% 1,401,500 1,401,500 28,731 372,555 -1,028,945 26.58% 30,000 30,000 0 0 -30,000 0.00% 20,000 20,000 6,876 14,776 -5,224 73.88% 36,000 36,000 0 0 -36,000 0.00% 1,520,000 1,520,000 16,992 29,019 -1,490,981 1.91% 751,500 751,500 0 6,318 -745,182 0.84% 501,500 501,500 1,101 4,791 -496,709 0.96% 100,000 100,000 0 1,191 -98,809 1.19% 252,500 252,500 0 2,868 -249,632 1.14% 1,000 1,000 0 0 -1,000 0.00% 100 100 0 0 -100 0.00% 151,500 151,500 318 1,425 -150,075 0.94% 101,000 101,000 972 1,911 -99,089 1.89% 154,000 154,000 475 7,475 -146,525 4.85% 2,500 2,500 0 0 -2,500 0.00% 0 0 549,339 955,002 955,002 0.00% 1,100 1,100 0 0 -1,100 0.00% 17,950,700 17,950,700 0 0 -17,950,700 0.00% 1,500 1,500 0 0 -1,500 0.00% 1,685,000 1,685,000 0 0 -1,685,000 0.00% 2,256,708 2,256,708 3,258 5,803 -2,250,905 0.26% 470,000 470,000 0 0 -470,000 0.00% 1,362,230 1,362,230 0 0 -1,362,230 0.00% 5,277,950 5,277,950 74,407 182,164 -5,095,786 3.45% 87,000 87,000 0 0 -87,000 0.00% 6,000 6,000 0 0 -6,000 0.00% 20,000 20,000 0 0 -20,000 0.00% 100,000 100,000 -64,728 -5,003 -105,003 5.00% 123,608,488 123,608,488 2,379,516 3,956,540 -119,651,948 3.20% Accounts are subject to adjusting entries and audit. The City's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, published annually, is the best resource for all final audited numbers. Page 1 of 3 51 For Fiscal: 2023/24 Period Ending: 08/31/2023 Expenditure Summary Accounts are subject to adjusting entries and audit. The City's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, published annually, is the best resource for all final audited numbers. Page 2 of 3 52 Variance Original Current Period Fiscal Favorable Percent Fund Total Budget Total Budget Activity Activity (Unfavorable) Used 101- GENERAL FUND 72,828,750 72,828,750 1,240,674 2,141,585 70,687,165 2.94% 201- GAS TAX FUND 2,802,400 2,802,400 60,070 78,988 2,723,412 2.82% 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 2,240,160 2,240,160 11,196 27,342 2,212,818 1.22% 210 - FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND 156,300 156,300 0 0 156,300 0.00% 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND 100,000 100,000 0 0 100,000 0.00% 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING F 3,186,915 3,186,915 75,309 190,834 2,996,081 5.99% 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 150,000 150,000 25,206 28,008 121,992 18.67% 223 - MEASURE A FUND 1,865,000 1,865,000 0 0 1,865,000 0.00% 226 - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 12,000 12,000 0 9,750 2,250 81.25% 227 - STATE HOMELAND SECURITI 5,000 5,000 0 0 5,000 0.00% 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 5,500 5,500 0 0 5,500 0.00% 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUN 54,000 54,000 0 1,633 52,367 3.02% 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADM 0 0 0 1,600 -1,600 0.00% 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY 1,596,340 1,596,340 40,269 423,169 1,173,171 26.51% 243 - RDA LOW -MOD HOUSING FL 250,000 250,000 0 0 250,000 0.00% 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 31,500 31,500 3,634 5,484 26,016 17.41% 249 - SA 2011 LOW/MOD BOND FI 250,000 250,000 0 0 250,000 0.00% 250 -TRANSPORTATION DIFFUNC 550,000 550,000 400,000 400,000 150,000 72.73% 251- PARKS & REC DIF FUND 650,000 650,000 0 0 650,000 0.00% 253 - LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT DIF 15,000 15,000 0 0 15,000 0.00% 259 - MAINTENANCE FACILITIES D 180,000 180,000 0 0 180,000 0.00% 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUNC 233,000 233,000 0 13,109 219,891 5.63% 310 - LQ FINANCE AUTHORITY DEE 1,100 1,100 0 0 1,100 0.00% 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PR( 17,950,700 17,950,700 778,310 778,848 17,171,852 4.34% 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEM 1,448,750 1,448,750 38,174 46,487 1,402,263 3.21% 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOG' 3,082,620 3,082,620 135,239 494,090 2,588,530 16.03% 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUN 2,242,200 2,242,200 0 2,788 2,239,412 0.12% 504 - INSURANCE FUND 1,118,000 1,118,000 532 1,097,509 20,491 98.17% 601- SILVERROCK RESORT 5,034,993 5,034,993 359,990 596,337 4,438,656 11.84% 760 -SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PL 12,850 12,850 0 12,833 17 99.87% 761- CERBT OPEB TRUST 1,800 1,800 0 0 1,800 0.00% 762 - PARS PENSION TRUST 30,000 30,000 2,605 5,185 24,815 17.28% Report Total: 118,084,878 118,084,878 3,171,209 6,355,580 111,729,298 5.38% Accounts are subject to adjusting entries and audit. The City's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, published annually, is the best resource for all final audited numbers. Page 2 of 3 52 53 Page 3 of 3 Fund Descriptions Fund # Name Notes 101 General Fund The primary fund of the City used to account for all revenue and expenditures of the City; a broad range of municipal activities are provided through this fund. 105 Disaster Recovery Fund Accounts for use of one-time federal funding designed to deliver relief to American workers and aid in the economic recovery iin the wake of COVID-19. The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) was passed by Congress in 2021 to provide fiscal recovery funds to state and local governments. 201 Gas Tax Fund Gasoline sales tax allocations received from the State which are restricted to street-related expenditures. 202 Library and Museum Fund Revenues from property taxes and related expenditures for library and museum services. 203 Public Safety Fund General Fund Measure G sales tax revenue set aside for public safety expenditures. 210 Federal Assistance Fund Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) received from the federal government and the expenditures of those resources. 212 SLESF (COPS) Fund Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Funds (SLESF) received from the State for law enforcement activities. Also known as Citizen's Option for Public Safe (COPS). 215 Lighting & Landscaping Fund Special assessments levied on real property for city-wide lighting and landscape maintenance/improvements and the expenditures of those resources. 220 Quimby Fund Developer fees received under the provisions of the Quimby Act for park development and improvements. 221 AB939 Fund/Cal Recycle Franchise fees collected from the city waste hauler that are used to reduce waste sent to landfills through recycling efforts, Assembly Bill (AB) 939, 223 Measure A Fund County sales tax allocations which are restricted to street-related expenditures. 224 TUMF Fund Developer-paid Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF) utilized for traffic projects in Riverside County. 225 Infrastructure Fund Developer fees for the acquisition, construction or improvement of the City's infrastructure as defined by Resolution 226 Emergency Mgmt. Performance Grant (EMPG) Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) grant for emergency preparedness. 227 State Homeland Security Programs (SHSP) Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) grant for emergency preparedness. 230 CASP Fund, AB1379 / SB1186 Certified Access Specialist (CASp) program fees for ADA Accessibility Improvements; derived from Business License renewals. Assembly Bill AB 1379 and Senate Bill SB 1186. 231 Successor Agency PA 1 RORF Fund Successor Agency (SA) Project Area (PA) 1 Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund (RORF) for Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) taxes received for debt service payments on recognized obligations of the former Redevelopment Agency (RDA). 235 SO Coast Air Quality Fund (AB2766, PM10) Contributions from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Uses are limited to the reduction and control of airborne pollutants. Assembly Bill AB 2766. 237 Successor Agency PA 1 Admin Fund Successor Agency (SA) Project Area (PA) 1 for administration of the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule ROPS associated with the former Redevelopment Agency RDA . 241 Housing Authority Activities of the Housing Authority which is to promote and provide quality affordable housing. 243 RDA Low-Moderate Housing Fund Activities of the Housing Authority which is to promote and provide quality affordable housing. Accounts for RDA loan repayments (20% for Housing) and housing programs,. 244 Housing Grants Activites related Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) and SB2 grants for housing planning and development. 247 Economic Development Fund Proceeds from sale of City-owned land and transfers from General Fund for future economic development. 249 SA 2011 Low/Mod Bond Fund Successor Agency (SA) low/moderate housing fund; 2011 bonds refinanced in 2016. 250 Transportation DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - transportation related. 251 Parks & Rec. DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - parks and recreation. 252 Civic Center DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - Civic Center. 253 Library Development DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - library. 254 Community Center DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - community center. 255 Street Facility DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - streets. 256 Park Facility DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - parks. 257 Fire Protection DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - fire protection. 259 Maintenance Facilities DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - maintenance facilities. 270 Art In Public Places Fund Developer fees collected in lieu of art placement; utilized for acquisition, installation and maintenance of public artworks. 275 LQ Public Safety Officer Fund Annual transfer in from General Fund; distributed to public safety officers disabled or killed in the line of duty. 299 Interest Allocation Fund Interest earned on investments. 310 LQ Finance Authority Debt Service Fund Accounted for the debt service the Financing Authority's outstanding debt and any related reporting requirements. This bond was fully paid in October 2018. 401 Capital Improvement Program Fund Planning, design, and construction of various capital projects throughout the City. 405 SA PA 1 Capital Improvement Fund Successor Agency (SA) Project Area (PA) 1 bond proceeds restricted by the bond indenture covenants. Used for SilverRock infrastructure improvements. 501 Equipment Replacement Fund Internal Service Fund for vehicles, heavy equipment, and related facilities. 502 Information Technology Fund Internal Service Fund for computer hardware and software and phone systems. 503 Park Equipment & Facility Fund Internal Service Fund for park equipment and facilities. 504 Insurance Fund Internal Service Fund for city-wide insurance coverages. 601 SilverRock Resort Fund Enterprise Fund for activities of the city-owned golf course. 602 SilverRock Golf Reserve Fund Enterprise Fund for golf course reserves for capital improvements. 760 Supplemental Pension Plan PARS Account Su lemental pension savings plan for excess retiree benefits to general employees of the City. 761 Other Post Benefit Obligation Trust (OPEB) For retiree medical benefits and unfunded liabilities. 762 Pension Trust Benefit (PARS Account) For all pension-related benefits and unfunded liabilities. 53 Page 3 of 3 54 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 7 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: November 7, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED OCTOBER 13, OCTOBER 20, AND OCTOBER 27, 2023 RECOMMENDATION Approve demand registers dated October 13, October 20, and October 27, 2023. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY — None FISCAL IMPACT Demand of Cash: City Successor Agency of RDA Housing Authority BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS $ 5,313,473.76 $ 1,000.00 $ 31,274.41 $ 5,345,748.17 Routine bills and payroll must be paid between Council meetings. Attachment 1 details the weekly demand registers for October 13, October 20, and October 27, 2023. Warrants Issued: 212110-212181 212182-212235 212236-212302 Wire Transfers Payroll Tax Transfers Payroll Direct Deposit Payroll Check #37678 $ 650,559.73 $ 1,839,499.70 $ 1,792,680.96 $ 491,933.02 $ 100,472.07 $ 470,510.34 $ 92.35 $ 5,345,748.17 55 Vendor Riverside County Sheriff Department(') T.Y. Lin International Jacobsson Engineering Construction, Inc. Ortiz Enterprises, Inc. Desert Concepts Construction, Inc. (2) Account Name Amount Purpose Various $2,074,898.44 07/01-08/23/23 Police Service Construction $689,464.64 04/01-06/30/23 Dune Palms Bridge Construction Management Services Retention Payable $137,091.83 Jefferson & Ave 53 Roundabout Retention Payment Construction $106,316.40 Dune Palms Bridge Progress Payment Maintenance/Service $97,800.00 Citywide Repairs (1) Payments were made 10/20/23 & 10/27/23 (2) Payments were made 10/13/23 & 10/27/23 Wire Transfers: Thirteen transfers totaled $491,933. Of this amount, $195,079 was to Landmark and $177,797 was to CalPERS (See Attachment 2 for a complete listing). Investment Transactions: Full details of investment transactions, as well as total holdings, are reported quarterly in the Treasurer's Report. 56 Settle Coupon Transaction Issuer Type Par Value Date Rate YTM Maturity United States Treasury T -Bill $ 3,000,000 10/12/2023 0.000% 4.966% Maturity Marlin Business Bank CD $ 248,000 10/17/2023 3.300% 3.300% Maturity Municpal Trust & Savings CD $ 245,000 10/17/2023 3.200% 3.200% Maturity UBS Bank USA CD $ 245,000 10/17/2023 3.350% 3.350% Purchase United States Treasury T -Bill $ 2,000,000 10/18/2023 0.000% 5.536% Purchase United States Treasury Treasury Note $ 1,000,000 10/19/2023 3.625% 4.910% Maturity Jefferson Financial FCU CD $ 245,000 10/19/2023 3.350% 3.350% Purchase Medallion Bank CD $ 248,000 10/20/2023 4.850% 4.850% Purchase Northpointe Bank CD $ 248,000 10/20/2023 4.850% 4.850% Purchase UBS Bank USA CD $ 248,000 10/25/2023 4.900% 4.900% Purchase Healthcare Systems FCU CD $ 248,000 10/27/2023 5.100% 5.100% Prepared by: Jesse Batres, Finance Technician Approved by: Rosemary Hallick, Principal Management Analyst Attachments: 1. Demand Registers 2. Wire Transfers 56 ATTACHMENT 1 Demand Register City of La Quinta Packet: APPKT03620 - 10/13/2023 JB -GSIAFURy75 - Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 101 -GENERAL FUND CENTRAL COMMUNICATIONS 212128 10/2023 - STVR HOTLINE Professional Services 101-6004-60103 623.00 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING, LLC 212137 7/7-7/14/23 - ANNUAL MASTER FEE UP... Advertising 101-1005-60450 840.00 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING, LLC 212137 7/21/23 - CC PHN LQ VILLAGE APTS Advertising 101-6002-60450 420.00 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING, LLC 212137 7/13/23 - NOI DUNE PALMS MIXED USE Advertising 101-6002-60450 441.00 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING, LLC 212137 7/21/23 - HEARING NOTICE FOR LOT AB... Lot Cleaning/Gravel Program 101-6004-60120 420.00 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212129 09/24-10/23/23 - FS #93 CABLE (2415) Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 113.90 VINTAGE E & S INC 212180 08/14/23 - CH LIGHT FIXTURES REPLAC... Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 506.49 PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 212163 CITY T-SHIRTS Promotional Items 101-3007-60134 5,492.25 CHIMATA, PANDU 212130 TOT OVERPAYMENT REFUND SNR #067... TBID Due to VGPS 101-0000-20303 8.83 CHIMATA, PANDU 212130 TOT OVERPAYMENT REFUND SNR #067... TOT - Short Term Vac. Rentals 101-0000-41401 88.25 CASTRO, DANNY 212126 FY 23/24 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 21.83 AVANTSTAY, INC. 212116 CITATION DISMISSAL REFUND LQ200479 Administrative Citations 101-0000-42700 1,000.00 BLACKHAWK BOOSTER 212117 FY 23/24 COMMUNITY SERVICE GRANT Grants & Economic Develop... 101-3001-60510 5,000.00 BLACKHAWK BOOSTER 212118 FY 23/24 COMMUNITY SERVICE GRANT Grants & Economic Develop... 101-3001-60510 5,000.00 BLOOD BANK OF SAN BERNA... 212119 FY 23/24 COMMUNITY SERVICE GRANT Grants & Economic Develop... 101-3001-60510 2,500.00 ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF PA... 212114 FY 23/24 COMMUNITY SERVICE GRANT Grants & Economic Develop... 101-3001-60510 2,000.00 AUTISM SOCIETY INLAND EM... 212115 FY 23/24 COMMUNITY SERVICE GRANT Grants & Economic Develop... 101-3001-60510 2,500.00 CALIFORNIA CAREFORCE 212124 FY 23/24 COMMUNITY SERVICE GRANT Grants & Economic Develop... 101-3001-60510 500.00 THE ROTARY CLUB OF LA QU... 212174 FY 23/24 COMMUNITY SERVICE GRANT Grants & Economic Develop... 101-3001-60510 4,950.00 AAUW CALIFORNIA SPECIAL... 212110 FY 23/24 COMMUNITY SERVICE GRANT Grants & Economic Develop... 101-3001-60510 2,500.00 ORTEGA, ANTHONY 212159 CASp RENEWAL CERTIFICATE REIMB A.... Travel & Training 101-6003-60320 300.00 CASH/PETTY CASH 212125 9/7/23 - WELLNESS FAIR DECOR Consultants/Employee Servic... 101-1004-60104 19.58 CASH/PETTY CASH 212125 9/7/23 - WELLNESS FAIR DECOR Consultants/Employee Servic... 101-1004-60104 26.85 CASH/PETTY CASH 212125 9/7/23 - WELLNESS FAIR GIFT CARD PRI... Consultants/Employee Servic... 101-1004-60104 50.00 CASH/PETTY CASH 212125 9/19/23 - LUNCH FOR DESERT OASIS ST... Consultants/Employee Servic... 101-1004-60104 41.56 CASH/PETTY CASH 212125 07/25/23 - BOTW MEETING SUPPLIES Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 41.04 CASH/PETTY CASH 212125 09/21/23 - SNACKS & DRINKS FOR PRO... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 23.59 CASH/PETTY CASH 212125 09/21/23 - BAGELS FOR PROCUREMENT... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 27.08 CASH/PETTY CASH 212125 07/26/23 - SUPPLY ORGANIZERS FOR OF... Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 8.70 CASH/PETTY CASH 212125 07/23/23 - STORAGE CANISTER FOR PR... Citywide Supplies 101-1007-60403 3.26 CASH/PETTY CASH 212125 09/06/23 - LUNCH FOR STAFF WORKING... Natural Disaster/EOC Activat... 101-2002-60195 20.00 MARTINEZ, CLAUDIA 212154 10/1-10/4/23 CALPERS EDUCATIONAL F... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 1,195.62 LAUREANO, SANDRA 212151 10/1-10/4/23 CALPERS EDUCATIONAL F... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 980.49 ORTEGA, VIRGINIA 212160 10/1-10/4/23 CALPERS EDUCATIONAL F... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 905.85 ALARM MONITORING SERVI... 212112 08/21/23 - FS #32 ANNUAL FIRE INSPECT.. Security & Alarm 101-3008-60123 63.08 DESERT FIRE EXTINGUISHER ... 212136 7/5/23 - WC FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM... Annual Permits/Inspections 101-3008-60196 171.54 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 212175 09/23-10/22/23 - EOC PHONE LINE SVC Telephone - Utilities 101-2002-61300 1,794.98 SANTA FOR HIRE, LLC 212170 12/1/23 - SANTA FOR TREE LIGHTING E... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 670.00 PAX FITNESS REPAIR 212166 FITNESS EQUIPMENT PARTS & LABOR Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 432.36 THE CHAMBER 212173 STATE OF THE CITY ADDITIONAL SEATS Community Engagement 101-3007-60137 1,584.00 LH PRODUCTIONS 212152 9/30/23 AV SERVICES FOR HOMETOWN ... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 8,117.00 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212158 USB FOR HEARINGS Office Supplies 101-6004-60400 39.14 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212158 LABELS FOR MAILERS LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 54.57 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212158 FOLDERS, POST -ITS, & KLEENEX Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 70.95 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY ... 212171 FY 23/24 CH GENERATOR RENEWAL FEE... Annual Permits/Inspections 101-3008-60196 1,009.82 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY ... 212171 FY 23/24 CH GENEATOR FLAT EMISSION... Annual Permits/Inspections 101-3008-60196 160.35 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION ... 212181 SMALLTOOLS Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 317.61 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION ... 212181 SMALLTOOLS Tools/Equipment 101-3005-60432 318.14 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION ... 212181 TENT CANOPY EZ UPS Safety Gear 101-3005-60427 391.90 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION ... 212181 TROWELS Tools/Equipment 101-3005-60432 169.62 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION ... 212181 TENT CANOPY EZ UP Safety Gear 101-3005-60427 195.95 RASA/ERIC NELSON 212167 PARCEL 38668 ONCALL MAP CHECKING ... Map/Plan Checking 101-7002-60183 350.00 RASA/ERIC NELSON 212167 PARCEL 38668 ONCALL MAP CHECKING ... Map/Plan Checking 101-7002-60183 645.00 10/30/2023 12:32:00 PM Page 1 of 10 57 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03620 -10/13/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount RASA/ERIC NELSON 212167 LLA 2023-1000 ONCALL MAP CHECKING ... Map/Plan Checking 101-7002-60183 780.00 ROBERT HALF 212168 9/15/23 - TEMP AGENCY SERVICES A.M... Temporary Agency Services 101-6006-60125 1,575.00 ROBERT HALF 212168 09/22/23 - TEMP AGENCY SERVICES A.... Temporary Agency Services 101-6006-60125 1,575.00 ROBERT HALF 212168 09/29/23 - TEMP AGENCY SERVICES A.... Temporary Agency Services 101-6006-60125 1,575.00 FEDEX 212139 9/21/23 & 9/26/23 - OVERNIGHT MAIL Postage 101-1007-60470 49.90 PATRICK & COMPANY 212164 RCDAS TAGS FOR LICENSING Supplies - Field 101-6004-60425 380.63 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/01/23 - MOUNTED TOOL HOLDER F... Fire Station 101-2002-60670 17.36 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/8/23 - REFRIGERATOR WATER FILTER... Fire Station 101-2002-60670 65.24 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/14/23 - CFL LIGHT BULBS FOR FS #32 Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 81.37 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 07/31/23 - SPRAY PAINT Supplies -Graffiti and Vandali... 101-3005-60423 28.19 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/09/23 - ALL PURPOSE SAND BAGS (30) Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 162.15 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/01/23 - KNEE PADS & UTILITY KNIFE Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 82.57 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/09/23 - ALL PURPOSE SAND BAGS (10) Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 81.24 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/10/23 - RAFTER SQUARE & WHITE PA.. Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 49.84 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/11/23 - EMT CONDUIT Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 22.62 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/23/23 - GLOVES & CABLE TIES Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 71.92 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/10/23 - KNEELING PADS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 64.73 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/11/2023 - EMT CONDUIT RETURN Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 -12.99 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/07/23 - ALL PURPOSE SAND BAGS RE... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 -70.44 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/07/23 - ALL PURPOSE SAND BAGS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 329.86 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 07/31/23 - POCKET KNIFE & LEVEL Tools/Equipment 101-3005-60432 71.69 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/07/23 - IMPACT BIT SETS Tools/Equipment 101-3005-60432 43.43 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/11/23 - SMALL TOOLS Tools/Equipment 101-3005-60432 89.87 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/10/23 - MIXING TUBS & TOWELS Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 45.50 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 8/16/23 CONCRETE ADHESIVE ANCHOR... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 98.07 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/08/23 - MINI TANK WATER HEATER ... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 259.91 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/18/23 - UTILITY PUMP & TRASH CANS Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 574.96 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/16/23 - BUILDING PAPER & MIXING ... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 114.01 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/23/23 - SPRAY PAINT & PAINT SUPPL... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 110.28 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/16/23 - WHEEL METAL CUTTING & G... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 64.15 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/04/23 - DRAIN PLUNGERS FOR CITY ... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 26.17 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 07/31/23 - POCKET KNIFE & TAPE MEAS... Tools/Equipment 101-3008-60432 69.50 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/09/23 - CIRCUIT BREAKER FINDER & ... Tools/Equipment 101-3008-60432 122.82 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/23/23 - ROTARY HAMMER Tools/Equipment 101-3008-60432 582.87 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212153 08/04/23 -TOILET PLUNGER & HARDW... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 108.60 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212153 08/02/23 - ALL PURPOSE SAND BAGS (30) Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 163.45 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212153 08/9/23 - PEGBOARD PANEL & TOOL HO... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 23.72 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212153 08/11/23 - ALL PURPOSE SAND BAGS (1... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 791.67 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212153 08/23/23 - GRINDING WHEELS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 22.69 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212153 08/10/23 - DRAWER LINER ROLL & CLE... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 69.63 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212153 08/04/23 - FILE SET Tools/Equipment 101-3005-60432 21.67 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212153 08/23/23 - WATER FILTER FOR WC Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 66.32 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212153 08/24/23 - HOSE CLAMPS & VINYL TUBI... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 80.90 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212153 08/16/23 - CONCRETE ANCHORS Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 49.55 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212153 08/16/23 - WRENCH SET & TAPE MEAS... Tools/Equipment 101-3008-60432 53.22 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212153 08/24/23 - HANDHELD SPRAYER Tools/Equipment 101-3008-60432 41.30 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212153 08/17/23 - WATER HOSES & UTILITY P... Tools/Equipment 101-3008-60432 1,227.20 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212153 08/14/23 - HAMMER & GLOVES Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 48.51 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212153 08/08/23 - DRILL ATTACHMENT & DIGG... Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 85.68 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212153 08/01/23 - BEVERAGE COOLER Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 9.28 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212153 08/01/23 - UTILITY RAZOR BLADES Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 10.30 FIRST CHOICE A/C & HEATING.. 212140 CH HVAC DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS HVAC 101-3008-60667 79.00 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212147 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electricity - Utilities 101-2002-61101 4,848.99 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212147 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Monticello Park - Uti.. 101-3005-61102 13.59 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212147 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Civic Center Park - U.. 101-3005-61103 4,845.57 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212147 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Fritz Burns Park - Uti.. 101-3005-61105 1,656.52 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212147 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Sports Complex - Uti.. 101-3005-61106 2,226.23 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212147 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Colonel Paige - Utilit.. 101-3005-61108 440.84 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212147 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Community Park - U... 101-3005-61109 6,763.65 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212147 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Adams Park - Utiliti... 101-3005-61110 35.18 10/30/2023 12:32:00 PM Page 2 of 10 58 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03620 - 10/13/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212147 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Velasco Park - Utiliti... 101-3005-61111 14.12 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212147 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Eisenhower Park - U... 101-3005-61113 20.02 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212147 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Desert Pride - Utiliti... 101-3005-61114 13.06 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212147 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electricity - Utilities 101-3008-61101 27,663.53 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212131 WATER SERVICE Water - Civic Center Park - Uti- 101-3005-61202 3,790.76 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212131 WATER SERVICE Water -Pioneer Park - Utilities 101-3005-61207 385.14 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212131 WATER SERVICE Water -Community Park - Util.. 101-3005-61209 7,886.91 EIDE BAILLY LLP 212138 FY 22/23 AUDIT SERVICES Auditors 101-1006-60106 15,500.00 FIRST CHOICE A/C & HEATING.. 212140 WC HVAC MAINTENANCE HVAC 101-3008-60667 529.00 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITIO... 212162 09/2023 CH WATER TREATMENT HVAC 101-3008-60667 125.00 CONVERGINTTECHNOLOGIES.. 212132 06/22/23 - PSCS MAINTENANCE Public Safety Camera System... 101-2001-60692 2,115.00 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 212157 FB EMERGENCY PUMP MOTOR REPLAC... Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 5,823.19 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 212157 10/2023 - FB POOL MONTHLY MAINTEN... Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 6,082.00 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212147 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - SilverRock Event Sit... 101-3005-61115 2,219.09 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212131 WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-2002-61200 270.75 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212131 WATER SERVICE Water -Eisenhower Park - Util.. 101-3005-61203 131.13 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212131 WATER SERVICE Water -Velasco Park - Utilities 101-3005-61205 250.24 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212131 WATER SERVICE Water -Fritz Burns Park- Utili... 101-3005-61204 2,029.65 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212131 WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-3008-61200 869.86 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 212179 TREES (6) Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 633.57 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 212135 SPORTS FIELD LIGHTS (95) Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 4,225.52 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 2023 GOVERNMENT TAX WEBINAR Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 550.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/28/23 - NNA MEMBERSHIP J.DELGA... Membership Dues 101-1006-60351 80.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/09/23 - POSTAGE FOR AP CHECKS Postage 101-1007-60470 1.56 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/20/23 - NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH M... LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 42.70 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 PAPER FIRE TRUCK FOR FIRE PREVENTI... Volunteers - Fire 101-2002-60110 87.93 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/20/23 - FIRE PREVENTION WORK SH... Volunteers - Fire 101-2002-60110 270.18 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 10/02/23 - APWA LUNCHEON PW & D&D Travel & Training 101-7001-60320 333.04 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/11/23 - APWA LUNCHEON Travel & Training 101-7001-60320 333.04 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/07/23 - SAFETY BOOTS J.MIGNOGNA Safety Gear 101-7006-60427 179.44 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/19/23 - LUNCH FOR DESERT OASIS 5... Consultants/Employee Servic... 101-1004-60104 142.94 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 9/5/23 WELLNESS FAIR SNACKS Consultants/Employee Servic... 101-1004-60104 129.48 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/21/23 - RIVCO HEALTH PERMIT FOR ... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 4.91 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/21/23 - RIVCO HEALTH PERMIT FOR ... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 207.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/13/23 - STICKERS FOR X -PARK ANIVE... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 130.50 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 9/11/23 RIBBON & FLORAL ARRANGEM... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 296.31 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 9/8/23 - RACK FOR PING PONG EQUIPM... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 55.06 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/19/23 - FLAG DROP OFF BOXES Office Supplies 101-1002-60400 41.27 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/06/23 - SEAT CUSHINOS, FLOOR MA... Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 148.06 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 8/30-9/1/23 CA JOINT POWERS FORUM... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 333.96 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 8/30-9/1/23 CA JOINT POWERS FORUM... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 373.60 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 8/30-9/1/23 CA JOINT POWERS FORUM... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 -39.64 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/05/23 - COFFEE CUPS FOR LOBBY M... Citywide Supplies 101-1007-60403 87.09 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/20/23 - LED FLASHLIGHTS FOR CODE Office Supplies 101-2002-60400 27.72 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 08/30/23 - STORAGE CONTAINER Disaster Prep Supplies 101-2002-60406 66.84 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 08/30/23 - EMERGENCY SUPPLIES Disaster Prep Supplies 101-2002-60406 139.18 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/12/23 - SCALES FOR WC (2) Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 41.98 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/26/23 - CORNHOLE BAGS FILL PELLE... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 46.55 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/25/23 - HOLIDAY LIGHTS (20) Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 413.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/2023 - MAILCHIMP Membership Dues 101-3007-60351 205.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 10/2023 APPLE MUSIC/STORAGE Membership Dues 101-3007-60351 22.95 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/05/23 -THE HANDLE WONDER COV... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 170.76 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/05/23 - DOORBELL RAIN COVER Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 74.55 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/2023 - DESERT SUN Subscriptions & Publications 101-6001-60352 11.98 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/18/23 - APA CONFERENCE MEAL D,C... Travel & Training 101-6001-60320 16.19 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/16/23 - APA CONFERENCE PARKING ... Travel & Training 101-6001-60320 10.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/15-09/19/23 - APA CONFERENCE FLI... Travel & Training 101-6001-60320 -454.41 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/16/23 - APA CONFERENCE MEAL D.C... Travel & Training 101-6001-60320 15.92 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/16/23 - APA CONFERENCE MEAL D.C... Travel & Training 101-6001-60320 5.99 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/17/23 - APA CONFERENCE PARKING ... Travel & Training 101-6001-60320 10.00 10/30/2023 12:32:00 PM Page 3 of 10 59 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03620 -10/13/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/16-09/19/23 - APA CONFERENCE HO... Travel & Training 101-6001-60320 546.77 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/17/23 - APA CONFERENCE MEAL D,C... Travel & Training 101-6001-60320 47.30 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/18/23 - APA CONFERENCE PARKING ... Travel & Training 101-6001-60320 10.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/16-09/19/23 - APA CONFERENCE J.L... Travel & Training 101-6002-60320 300.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/12/23 - BUILDING CODE BOOKS Subscriptions & Publications 101-6003-60352 110.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/05/23 - CPRS MAINT MANAGEMENT ... Travel & Training 101-3005-60320 1,700.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/06/23 - BOCCE BALLS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 212.01 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/18/23 - COUNCIL MEETING DINNER Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 138.06 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 8/3/23 - SABER SPACE SWORD FOR H.L... Promotional Items 101-3007-60134 2,457.78 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/12/23 - FUEGO APPEARANCE STATE ... Community Engagement 101-3007-60137 350.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 FY 23/24 ERC MEMBERSHIP WITH LCW Membership Dues 101-1004-60351 6,110.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/28/23 - CLOROX WIPES & LYSOL Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 108.51 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/28/23 - WATER FOR PARK CONCERTS Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 167.57 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 9/20-9/22/23 CA LEAGUE CONFERENCE... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 7.03 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 9/6/23 - LEADERSHIP CV GRADUATION T.. Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 28.52 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 9/18/23 - RANCHO MIRAGE STATE OF T... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 95.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 9/18/23 - RANCHO MIRAGE STATE OF T... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 95.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/26/23 - SPECIAL JOINT MEETING DI... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 206.98 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 9/20-9/22/23 CA LEAGUE CONFERENCE... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 409.94 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 9/20-9/22/23 CA LEAGUE CONFERENCE... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 476.49 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/25/23 - COUNCIL MEETING SNACKS Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 56.91 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 9/20-09/22/23 - CA LEAGUE CONFEREN... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 257.96 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 9/20-9/22/23 CA LEAGUE CONFERENCE... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 452.47 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 08/31/23 - CVUSD STATE OF THE CITY S.... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 50.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 8/30-9/1/23 - HOTEL CREDIT D.MCGAR... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 -19.94 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 08/31/23 - CVUSD STATE OF THE CITY D... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 50.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 08/31/23 - CVUSD STATE OF THE CITY J.... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 50.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/25/23 - PROCLAMATION FRAMES Operating Supplies 101-1001-60420 301.63 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/20/23 - UBER RIDE AIRPORT TO HOT... Travel & Training 101-1002-60320 56.20 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 9/20-9/22/23 CA LEAGUE CONFERENCE... Travel & Training 101-1002-60320 418.10 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/05/23 - RIVCO FOUNDATION ON AG... Sponsorships/Advertising 101-3007-60450 208.12 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 DBVA GOLF TOURNAMENT SPONSORSH... Sponsorships/Advertising 101-3007-60450 923.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 08/27-08/30/23 - PWX CONFERENCE T.... Travel & Training 101-7003-60320 1,114.38 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 08/30/23 - PWX CONFERENCE T.ULLOA Travel & Training 101-7003-60320 12.64 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 CA LEAGUE NEW LAWS & ELECTIONS S... Travel & Training 101-1005-60320 550.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 CA LEAGUE NEW LAWS & ELECTIONS S... Travel & Training 101-1005-60320 550.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/27/23 - NOTARY OATH & BOND O.M... Membership Dues 101-1005-60351 70.57 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/15/23 - POSTAGE Operating Supplies 101-1005-60420 35.55 FIRST CHOICE A/C & HEATING.. 212140 FS #93 HVAC CONDENSER FAN MOTOR ... Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 850.00 Fund 101- GENERAL FUND Total: 192,845.58 Fund: 201- GAS TAX FUND NAI CONSULTING INC 212155 08/2023 - HURRICANE HILARY EMERGE... Road Improvements 201-7003-72111 4,637.50 PACIFIC PRODUCTS AND SER... 212161 SIGN POSTS (50) Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 2,813.31 SUMMIT SAFETY LLC 212172 SAFTEY GEAR Safety Gear 201-7003-60427 50.33 UNDERGROUND SERVICE AL... 212178 10/01/23 - DIG ALERT SERVICES Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 85.25 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212147 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electricity - Utilities 201-7003-61101 1,093.79 Fund 201- GAS TAX FUND Total: 8,680.18 Fund: 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND VINTAGE E & 5 INC 212180 08/14/23 - NEW USB RECEPTACLES FOR ... Maintenance/Services 202-3004-60691 909.98 ALARM MONITORING SERVI... 212112 08/29/23 - MUSEUM ANNUAL FIRE INSP... Security & Alarm 202-3006-60123 63.08 ALARM MONITORING SERVI... 212112 09/01/23 - LIBRARY ALARM MAINTENA... Security & Alarm 202-3004-60123 253.39 KONE INC 212150 10/1-12/31/23 - CH ELEVATOR MAINTE... Maintenance/Services 202-3006-60691 682.89 KONE INC 212150 10/1-12/31/23 - MUSEUM ELEVATOR M... Maintenance/Services 202-3006-60691 682.89 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212147 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electricity - Utilities 202-3004-61101 9,239.23 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212147 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electricity - Utilities 202-3006-61101 2,283.37 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITIO... 212162 09/2023 LIBRARY WATER TREATMENT HVAC 202-3004-60667 125.00 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212142 09/13-10/12/23 - MUSEUM PHONE Telephone - Utilities 202-3006-61300 137.83 Fund 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND Total: 14,377.66 10/30/2023 12:32:00 PM Page 4 of 10 60 Demand Register Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTR... 212134 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212153 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212147 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212147 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212131 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212131 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212147 Fund: 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND ALPHA MEDIA LLC 212113 ALPHA MEDIA LLC 212113 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 Fund: 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212147 Fund: 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212158 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 Fund: 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 Packet: APPKT03620 - 10/13/2023 JB Account Name Account Number Amount LA FOND EMERGENCY ELECTRICAL REPA... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 29,200.00 08/11/23 - GLOVES & BLACK PIPE Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 86.25 07/25/23 -GLOVES Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 39.23 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 6,085.82 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61117 2,962.86 WATER SERVICE Water - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61211 12,071.92 WATER SERVICE Water - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61211 8,666.26 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 1,018.39 Professional Services Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total: 60,130.73 09/2023 - RECYCLING RADIO ADS MIX 1... AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 3,500.00 09/2023 - RECYCLING TV ADS AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 3,000.00 09/18/23 - STEEL PLATFORMS AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 2,653.33 Professional Services Fund 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND Total: 9,153.33 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electricity - Utilities 235-0000-61101 2,257.23 NAI CONSULTING INC Fund 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND Total: 2,257.23 BANKER BOXES & KEYCHAIN Operating Supplies 241-9101-60420 45.54 09/21/23 - BETTER PROOFREADER TRAI... Travel & Training 241-9101-60320 145.00 212155 Fund 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY Total: 190.54 09/13/23 - SANDPAPER Operating Supplies 270-0000-60482 Fund 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND Total: Fund: 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS NAI CONSULTING INC 212155 08/2023 - 2021-02 FRITZ BURN PARK IM... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 212155 08/2023 -2022-27 CIVIC CENTER ACTIVIT.. Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 212155 08/2023 COVE TRAILS PARKING LOT IM... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 212155 08/2023 - 2022-12- CAMERAS PHASE 2 Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 212155 08/2023 - 2022-08 CITYWIDE MISC. ADA.. Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 212155 08/2023 2022-03 FRED WARING DRIVE ... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 212155 08/2023 AVE 50 REHAB (WASHINGTON ... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 212155 08/2023 - 2019-01 VILLAGE ART/CULTU... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 212155 08/2023 - 2019-02 AVE 50 BRIDGE Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 212155 08/2023 - CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS LAKE ... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 212155 08/2023 - 2016-03 LQ LANDSCAPE IMP... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 212155 08/2023 - 2023-15- PAVEMENT MANAG... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 212155 08/2023 - 2022-14 AVE 52 PAVEMENT R... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 212155 08/2023 AVE 58 PAVEMENT REHAB JEEF... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 212155 08/2023 - 2021-08 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 212155 08/2023 - 2019-05 HIGHWAY 111 CORR... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 212155 08/2023 - 2011-05 DUNE PALMS BRIDGE Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 212155 08/2023 - 2022-13 SMART INFRASTRUC... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 212155 08/2023 - 2022-05 AVE 50 WIDENING I... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 NAI CONSULTING INC 212155 08/2023 - 2021-01- DUNE PALMS ROAD... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 HERMANN DESIGN GROUP I... 212144 08/2023 CACTUS FLOWER LANDSCAPE ... Design 401-0000-60185 HERMANN DESIGN GROUP I... 212144 08/2023 - CACTUS FLOWER LANDSCAPE... Design 401-0000-60185 HERMANN DESIGN GROUP I... 212144 08/2023 - CACTUS FLOWER LANDSCAPE... Design 401-0000-60185 JACOBSSON ENGINEERING C... 212149 JEFFERSON AVE 53 ROUNDABOUT RETE... Retention Payable 401-0000-20600 NEXTECH SYSTEMS, INC. 212156 SAFETY LIGHTS Construction 401-0000-60188 Fund 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total Fund: 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT H&G HOME IMPROVEMENTS- 212143 EMERGENCY CH WATER LEAK REPAIRS City Bldg Repl/Repair 501-0000-71103 S&D CARWASH MANAGEME... 212169 09/2023 -CAR WASH MEMBERSHIP Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/23/23 - BLADE FLOOR SQUEEGEE Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 08/09/23 -TRAILER HITCH BALL MOUNTS Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 09/18/23 - DMV FEE Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 10/30/2023 12:32:00 PM 10_83 10.83 525.00 175.00 315.00 525.00 180.00 925.00 4,077.50 1,087.50 700.00 525.00 1,750.00 6,500.00 4,175.00 175.00 3,342.50 437.50 2,767.50 1,025.00 175.00 6,615.00 1,500.00 4,950.00 150.00 137,091.83 542.50 180,231.83 9,400.00 839.58 39.12 118.49 25.53 Page 5 of 10 61 Demand Register Vendor Name BMO FINANCIAL GROUP BMO FINANCIAL GROUP BMO FINANCIAL GROUP Payment Number Description (Item) 212120 09/21/23 - KEY LOCK BOX 212120 09/28/23 - TIRES FOR THE 1929 FIRE TR... 212120 09/06/23 - FILL HOSE FOR WATER TRUCK Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212129 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES 212177 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212129 ACORN TECHNOLOGY SERVI... 212111 INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR, INC. 212148 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 212175 FISHER INTEGRATED INC 212141 FISHER INTEGRATED INC 212141 FISHER INTEGRATED INC 212141 TRITON TECHNOLOGY SOLUT... 212176 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 212127 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212142 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 Fund: 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND COOK AND SOLIS CONSTRUC... 212133 Fund: 504 - INSURANCE FUND PATTON DOOR & GATE BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212120 Fund: 601- SILVERROCK RESORT PATTON DOOR & GATE 212165 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212145 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212153 10/30/2023 12:32:00 PM Packet: APPKT03620 -10/13/2023 JB Account Name Account Number Amount Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 154.41 Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 76.42 Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 163.77 Fund 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total: 10,817.32 09/20-10/19/23 - WC CABLE (1909) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 11.59 FY 23/24 HR/FINANCE SOFTWARE Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 77,558.00 09/24-10/23/23 - WC CABLE (4601) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 268.41 10/2023 - IT SERVICES Consultants 502-0000-60104 28,969.00 APPLE 16 INCH MACBOOK PRO 64GB R... Computers 502-0000-80103 4,116.08 09/23-10/22/23 - PHONE LINE SVC Telephone - Utilities 502-0000-61300 3,787.05 07/2023 - MONTHLY FEE Consultants 502-0000-60104 1,100.00 08/2023 CC VIDEO STREAMING & MON... Consultants 502-0000-60104 900.00 08/2023 MONTHLY FEE Consultants 502-0000-60104 1,100.00 10/1-12/31/23 CHAMBER AV EQUIP MA... Maintenance Agreements 502-0000-60300 2,250.00 FY 23/24 ADOBE SUBSCRIPTION RENEW... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 5,922.04 09/25-10/24/23 - CH INTERNET Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 85.98 9/18/23-9/17/24 CONSTRUCTION PERM... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 10,000.00 9/21/23 - SRR DOMAIN RENEWAL Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 55.98 09/22/23 - DOMAIN LQAC.ORG RENEW... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 23.17 09/2023 - EMAIL PROTECTION SOFTWA... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 449.00 09/12/23 - PLOTTER PRINTER REPLACE... Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 413.25 09/20/23 - HDMI CABLES (6) Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 82.98 09/20/23 - IT SUPPLIES Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 147.49 09/20/23 - STORAGE TOTES FOR IT (8) Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 392.40 09/22/23 - KEYBOARD FOR J.DELGADO Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 36.96 10/2023 - HULU SUBSCRIPTION Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 74.99 09/19/23 - COMPUTER MONITOR L.REY... Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 1,633.98 09/28/23 - LAPTOP POWERBANK Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 193.95 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total: 139,572.30 SRR LAKE PUMP & EQUIPMENT REPLAC... Parks 503-0000-71060 27,859.70 Fund 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND Total: 27,859.70 09/27/23 - COVID TEST KITS Operating Supplies 504-1010-60420 260.89 9/11/23 - ERGO, DESK, ARMS, & MATS #... Operating Supplies 504-1010-60420 857.77 9/11/23 - COVID 19 TEST KITS Operating Supplies 504-1010-60420 1,288.69 09/25/23 - AED CPR DEFIBRILLATOR TA... Operating Supplies 504-1010-60420 15.17 09/05/23 - HAND SANITIZER & DISINFEC... Operating Supplies 504-1010-60420 318.39 Fund 504 - INSURANCE FUND Total: 2,740.91 REPLACE DOOR SPRINGS AT SRR Repair & Maintenance 601-0000-60660 505.00 08/01/23 -TOILET SEAT & CEILING LIGHT Repair & Maintenance 601-0000-60660 178.22 08/25/23 - PRESSURE WASHER Repair & Maintenance 601-0000-60660 977.66 08/01/23 - COPPER FITTINGS Repair & Maintenance 601-0000-60660 30.71 Fund 601- SILVERROCK RESORT Total: 1,691.59 Grand Total: 650,559.73 Page 6 of 10 62 Demand Register Fund Summary Fund 101 -GENERAL FUND 201- GAS TAX FUND 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND 504 - INSURANCE FUND 601- SILVERROCK RESORT Account Number 101-0000-20303 101-0000-41401 101-0000-42700 101-1001-60320 101-1001-60420 101-1002-60320 101-1002-60400 101-1004-50252 101-1004-60104 101-1004-60351 101-1005-60320 101-1005-60351 101-1005-60400 101-1005-60420 101-1005-60450 101-1006-60106 101-1006-60320 101-1006-60351 101-1006-60400 101-1007-60403 101-1007-60470 101-2001-60109 101-2001-60692 101-2002-60110 101-2002-60195 101-2002-60400 101-2002-60406 101-2002-60670 101-2002-60691 101-2002-61101 101-2002-61200 101-2002-61300 101-2002-61400 101-3001-60510 101-3002-60420 101-3003-60149 101-3005-60184 101-3005-60320 101-3005-60423 101-3005-60427 101-3005-60431 Grand Total: Account Summary Account Name TBID Due to VGPS TOT - Short Term Vac. R... Administrative Citations Travel & Training Operating Supplies Travel & Training Office Supplies Annual Wellness Dollar ... Consultants/Employee 5... Membership Dues Travel & Training Membership Dues Office Supplies Operating Supplies Advertising Auditors Travel & Training Membership Dues Office Supplies Citywide Supplies Postage LQ Police Volunteers Public Safety Camera Sys... Volunteers - Fire Natural Disaster/EOC Act.. Office Supplies Disaster Prep Supplies Fire Station Maintenance/Services Electricity - Utilities Water - Utilities Telephone - Utilities Cable/Internet - Utilities Grants & Economic Deve... Operating Supplies Community Experiences Fritz Burns Pool Mainten... Travel & Training Supplies -Graffiti and Va... Safety Gear Materials/Supplies Expense Amount 192,845.58 8,680.18 14,377.66 60,130.73 9,153.33 2,257.23 190.54 10.83 180,231.83 10,817.32 139,572.30 27,859.70 2,740.91 1,691.59 650,559.73 Expense Amount 8.83 88.25 1,000.00 2,354.42 301.63 474.30 41.27 21.83 410.41 6,110.00 1,100.00 70.57 148.06 35.55 840.00 15,500.00 4,391.59 80.00 79.65 90.35 51.46 97.27 2,115.00 358.11 20.00 27.72 206.02 82.60 931.37 4,848.99 270.75 1,794.98 113.90 24,950.00 582.85 9,694.90 11,905.19 1,700.00 28.19 587.85 7,445.36 Packet: APPKT03620 - 10/13/2023 JB 10/30/2023 12:32:00 PM Page 7 of 10 63 Demand Register Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-3005-60432 Tools/Equipment 714.42 101-3005-61102 Electric - Monticello Park.. 13.59 101-3005-61103 Electric - Civic Center Pa... 4,845.57 101-3005-61105 Electric - Fritz Burns Park... 1,656.52 101-3005-61106 Electric - Sports Complex... 2,226.23 101-3005-61108 Electric - Colonel Paige -... 440.84 101-3005-61109 Electric - Community Par... 6,763.65 101-3005-61110 Electric - Adams Park - Ut.. 35.18 101-3005-61111 Electric - Velasco Park - ... 14.12 101-3005-61113 Electric - Eisenhower Par... 20.02 101-3005-61114 Electric - Desert Pride - U.. 13.06 101-3005-61115 Electric - SilverRock Even... 2,219.09 101-3005-61202 Water - Civic Center Park.. 3,790.76 101-3005-61203 Water -Eisenhower Park ... 131.13 101-3005-61204 Water -Fritz Burns Park-... 2,029.65 101-3005-61205 Water -Velasco Park - Uti.. 250.24 101-3005-61207 Water -Pioneer Park - Uti.. 385.14 101-3005-61209 Water -Community Park... 7,886.91 101-3007-60134 Promotional Items 7,950.03 101-3007-60137 Community Engagement 1,934.00 101-3007-60351 Membership Dues 227.95 101-3007-60450 Sponsorships/Advertising 1,131.12 101-3008-60123 Security & Alarm 63.08 101-3008-60196 Annual Permits/Inspecti... 1,341.71 101-3008-60431 Materials/Supplies 1,735.13 101-3008-60432 Tools/Equipment 2,096.91 101-3008-60667 HVAC 733.00 101-3008-60691 Maintenance/Services 506.49 101-3008-61101 Electricity - Utilities 27,663.53 101-3008-61200 Water - Utilities 869.86 101-6001-60320 Travel & Training 207.76 101-6001-60352 Subscriptions & Publicat... 11.98 101-6002-60320 Travel & Training 300.00 101-6002-60450 Advertising 861.00 101-6003-60320 Travel & Training 300.00 101-6003-60352 Subscriptions & Publicat... 110.00 101-6004-60103 Professional Services 623.00 101-6004-60120 Lot Cleaning/Gravel Prog.., 420.00 101-6004-60400 Office Supplies 39.14 101-6004-60425 Supplies - Field 380.63 101-6006-60125 Temporary Agency Servi... 4,725.00 101-7001-60320 Travel & Training 666.08 101-7002-60183 Map/Plan Checking 1,775.00 101-7003-60320 Travel & Training 1,127.02 101-7003-60420 Operating Supplies 153.77 101-7003-60432 Tools/Equipment 317.61 101-7006-60427 Safety Gear 179.44 201-7003-60427 Safety Gear 50.33 201-7003-60429 Traffic Control Signs 2,813.31 201-7003-60431 Materials/Supplies 85.25 201-7003-61101 Electricity - Utilities 1,093.79 201-7003-72111 Road Improvements 4,637.50 202-3004-60123 Security & Alarm 253.39 202-3004-60667 HVAC 125.00 202-3004-60691 Maintenance/Services 909.98 202-3004-61101 Electricity - Utilities 9,239.23 202-3006-60123 Security & Alarm 63.08 202-3006-60691 Maintenance/Services 1,365.78 Packet: APPKT03620 - 10/13/2023 JB 10/30/2023 12:32:00 PM Page 8 of 10 64 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03620 - 10/13/2023 JB Account Summary 10/30/2023 12:32:00 PM Page 9 of 10 65 Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 202-3006-61101 Electricity - Utilities 2,283.37 202-3006-61300 Telephone - Utilities 137.83 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 125.48 215-7004-60691 Maintenance/Services 29,200.00 215-7004-61116 Electric - Utilities 7,104.21 215-7004-61117 Electric - Medians - Utilit... 2,962.86 215-7004-61211 Water - Medians - Utiliti... 20,738.18 221-0000-60127 AB 939 Recycling Solutio... 9,153.33 235-0000-61101 Electricity - Utilities 2,257.23 241-9101-60320 Travel & Training 145.00 241-9101-60420 Operating Supplies 45.54 270-0000-60482 Operating Supplies 10.83 401-0000-20600 Retention Payable 137,091.83 401-0000-60103 Professional Services 35,997.50 401-0000-60185 Design 6,600.00 401-0000-60188 Construction 542.50 501-0000-60675 Parts, Accessories, and ... 552.21 501-0000-60676 Vehicle Repair & Maint... 865.11 501-0000-71103 City Bldg Repl/Repair 9,400.00 502-0000-60104 Consultants 32,069.00 502-0000-60300 Maintenance Agreements 2,250.00 502-0000-60301 Software Licenses 94,008.19 502-0000-60420 Operating Supplies 1,267.03 502-0000-61300 Telephone - Utilities 3,787.05 502-0000-61400 Cable/Internet - Utilities 440.97 502-0000-80100 Machinery & Equipment 1,633.98 502-0000-80103 Computers 4,116.08 503-0000-71060 Parks 27,859.70 504-1010-60420 Operating Supplies 2,740.91 601-0000-60660 Repair & Maintenance 1,691.59 Grand Total: 650,559.73 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Project Account Name Project Name Expense Amount **None** **None** **None** 398,561.98 111205P Professional Expense Dune Palms Bridge Imp/BRLKS-52 2,767.50 201603D Design Expense La Quinta Landscape Renovation 6,600.00 201603P Professional Expense La Quinta Landscape Renovation 1,750.00 201606P Professional Expense Civic Center Campus Lake/Irrigati 525.00 201709RP Retention Payable Ave 53 Jefferson St.Roundabout 137,091.83 201901P Professional Expense Village Art Plaza Promenade & Ci 1,087.50 201902P Professional Expense Avenue 50 Bridge Spanning the E 700.00 201905P Professional Expense Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan 1 437.50 202101P Professional Expense Dune Palms Rd Pavement Rehab- 6,615.00 202102P Professional Expense Fritz Burns Park Improvements 525.00 202108P Professional Expense FY 21/22 PMP Slurry Seal Improv 3,342.50 202201P Professional Expense Avenue 50 Pavement Rehab (Wa 4,077.50 202203P Professional Expense Fred Waring Drive Pavement Reh 925.00 202205P Professional Expense Avenue 50 Widening Improveme 175.00 202208P Professional Expense Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Imp 180.00 202212P Professional Expense Phase 11 Camera System 525.00 202213P Professional Expense Smart Infrastructure Improvemei 1,025.00 202214P Professional Expense Avenue 52 Pavement Rehabilitate 4,175.00 202216E General PW Maint - Desert Concep.. General PW Maintenance - Desei 29,200.00 202227P Professional Expense Civic Center Activities Promenadi 175.00 202230P Professional Expense Cove Trails Parking Lot Improver 315.00 202301P Professional Expense Avenue 58 Pavement Rehab (Jeff 175.00 202315P Professional Expense FY22/23 Pavement Management 6,500.00 10/30/2023 12:32:00 PM Page 9 of 10 65 Demand Register Project Account Key 202320E 202320NR 202320P 2324TM ICT 9/11E CONCERTE STVRE TREEE XPARKE Project Account Summary Project Account Name Cyclone Hilary FEMA Reimbursable.. Cyclone Hilary Non -reimbursable c... Cyclone Hilary Professional Expense Construction Expense September 11 Vigil Expense Concert Expense Short Term Vacation Rental Expen... Tree Lighting Ceremony Expense X Park Expenses Grand Total: Project Name Tropical Cyclone Hilary Tropical Cyclone Hilary Tropical Cyclone Hilary FY23/24Traffic Maintenance Imf September 11 Vigil Master Account for all SRR ConCE Short Term Vacation Rental Tracl Tree Lighting Ceremony X P—le b50,559.73 Packet: APPKT03620 - 10/13/202316 Expense Amount 20.00 27,859.70 4,637.50 542.50 296.31 8,328.91 623.00 670.00 130.50 *Project codes are generally used to track Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects, other large public works projects, developer deposits, or city-wide events. Normal operational expenditures are not project coded and, therefore, will report as "none" in this section. 10/30/2023 12:32:00 PM Page 10 of 10 66 Za Q"fra City of La Quinta Demand Register Packet: APPKT03623 - 10/20/23 JD Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 101 -GENERAL FUND INDUSTRIAL HEALTH MEDICA... 212206 08/02/23 - COVID 19 TESTING Consultants/Employee Servic... 101-1004-60104 85.00 INDUSTRIAL HEALTH MEDICA... 212206 09/05/23 - COVID 19 TESTING Consultants/Employee Servic... 101-1004-60104 85.00 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 212201 GARNISHMENT Garnishments Payable 101-0000-20985 222.74 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 212231 CONTRIBUTION United Way Deductions 101-0000-20981 37.00 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING, LLC 212197 8/30/23 - CC PHN LA VILLETTA PUBLICAT.. Advertising 101-6002-60450 420.00 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING, LLC 212197 08/11/23 - PC PHN DUNE PALMS MIXED... Advertising 101-6002-60450 434.28 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING, LLC 212197 08/03/23 - DH SIERRE BLANCA PUBLICAT.. Advertising 101-6002-60450 420.00 TOTAL CARE WORK INJURY C... 212229 09/26/23 - PRE-EMPLOYMENT BACKGR... Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 90.00 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212189 10/03-11/02/23 - FS #93 INTERNET (351... Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 99.99 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212189 09/29-10/28/23 - FS #93 INTERNET (649... Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 99.99 TREK RETAIL CORPORATION 212230 COVER TREK SERVICE ELECTRIC BATTERY.. Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-60175 107.99 TREK RETAIL CORPORATION 212230 BOSCH POWERTUBE MOUNTING KIT- L... Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-60175 28.00 TREK RETAIL CORPORATION 212230 NITERIDER POLICE SYSTEM HEADLIGHT Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-60175 359.00 TREK RETAIL CORPORATION 212230 BOSCH POWERTUBE 625 US EBIKE BATT... Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-60175 850.05 TREK RETAIL CORPORATION 212230 NITERIDER 9307 SIREN HANDLEBAR MO... Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-60175 62.99 TREK RETAIL CORPORATION 212230 NITERIDER POLICE TAIL LIGHT CY Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-60175 62.99 TREK RETAIL CORPORATION 212230 TREK SERVICE ELECTRIC BIKE Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-60175 4,749.99 TREK RETAIL CORPORATION 212230 ELECTRIC BIKE FOR POLICE TAXES Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-60175 482.12 BERUMEN, ALFRED 212185 FY 23/24 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 200.00 ALZHEIMER'S COACHELLA VA... 212182 FY 23/24 COMMUNITY SERVICE GRANT Grants & Economic Develop... 101-3001-60510 500.00 MOJICA, OSCAR 212213 FY 23/24 ANNUAL WELNESS DOLLARS RE.. Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 158.41 KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 212209 AIRBO VIRTUAL BENEFITS BOARD Consultants/Employee Servic... 101-1004-60104 500.00 STOLZOFF, LORA LEE 212226 10/14/23 FACILITY RENTAL DEPOSIT RE... Miscellaneous Deposits 101-0000-22830 500.00 CASTRO, DANNY 212188 09/15-09/19/23 APA CONFERENCE TRA... Travel & Training 101-6001-60320 1,299.51 GARDAWORLD 212204 10/2023 - ARMORED SERVICES Professional Services 101-1006-60103 307.42 PVP COMMUNICATIONS INC 212219 HELMET FOR MOTOR OFFICER TELLES Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-60175 1,369.44 SIGNATURE TINT 212224 FOUL LINE MARKERS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 86.20 VERITAS TECHNOLOGIES LLC 212232 LASERFICHE WORM BACKUP Professional Services 101-1005-60103 1,113.79 DESERT TREE SPRAYING 212198 FIRE ANT TREATMENT AT SRR EVENT PA... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 350.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 212234 09/23-09/27/23 - PLANT REPLACEMENT... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 3,200.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 212234 10/2-10/6/23 - IRRIGATION INSTALL & P... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 3,200.00 NI GOVERNMENT SERVICES I... 212214 09/2023 - SATELLITE PHONES Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites 101-2002-61304 87.35 JENSEN, SHARLA W 212208 10/16/23 - 1 DAY SESSION CLASSES Instructors 101-3002-60107 480.00 JENSEN, SHARLA W 212208 PERSONAL TRAINING 3 SESSIONS CLASS... Instructors 101-3002-60107 396.00 JENSEN, SHARLA W 212208 PERSONAL TRAINING 6 SESSIONS CLASS... Instructors 101-3002-60107 528.00 SHIRY, TERESA 212223 BALLROOM BEGINNING CLASSES Instructors 101-3002-60107 87.50 SHIRY, TERESA 212223 BALLROOM BEGINNING DI CLASSES Instructors 101-3002-60107 210.00 WILLIAMS, BILLEE 212235 PILATES CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 409.50 WILLIAMS, BILLEE 212235 MAT PILATES DI CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 12.60 WILLIAMS, BILLEE 212235 GENTLE YOGA CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 182.00 HEWETT, ATSUKO YAMANE 212205 DEEP STRETCH CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 132.30 HEWETT, ATSUKO YAMANE 212205 DEEP STRETCH DI CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 21.00 BRIGHT 3 MEDIA, INC 212186 MENTAL MUSCLE RELAXATION DI CLASS... Instructors 101-3002-60107 84.00 WILLIAMS, BILLEE 212235 GENTLE YOGA DI CLASSES Instructors 101-3002-60107 25.20 BRIGHT 3 MEDIA, INC 212186 MENTAL MUSCLE RELAXATION CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 189.00 FIELDMAN, ROLAPP & ASSOC... 212200 09/2023 LAND-BASED FINANCING POLI... Professional Services 101-1006-60103 4,572.50 LH PRODUCTIONS 212210 10/14/23 CONCERTS IN THE PARK- VAR... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 8,117.00 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212216 RETURN LABELS LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 -50.37 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212216 BATTERIES Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 9.79 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212216 RETURN CALCULATOR Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 -36.96 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212216 LQ STAMP FOR AR RECEIPTS Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 23.91 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212216 BADGE SUPPLIES & CALCULATOR Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 93.14 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212216 OFFICE SUPPLIES LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 82.05 10/30/2023 12:30:07 PM Page 1 of 5 67 Demand Register Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Packet: APPKT03623 -10/20/23 JD Account Name Account Number Amount DESERT RECREATION DISTRI... 212196 09/2023 FRITZ BURNS POOL OPERATIO... Fritz Burns Pool Programming 101-3003-60184 16,809.16 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 212225 OFFICE SUPPLIES Operating Supplies 101-7002-60420 364.10 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 212225 DESKPAD & WALL CALENDAR Office Supplies 101-7001-60400 78.43 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 212225 PENS Office Supplies 101-3001-60400 60.21 CRIME SCENE STERI-CLEAN, L... 212193 CRIME SCENE CLEAN UP LA30 Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-60175 900.00 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 212212 HUB SHIRTS Operating Supplies 101-6006-60420 326.75 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE... 212183 BLOOD ALCOHOL ANALYSIS Blood/Alcohol Testing 101-2001-60174 66.85 FEDEX 212199 09/21/23 & 09/25/23 - OVERNIGHT MAIL Postage 101-1007-60470 23.51 VERIZON WIRELESS 212233 08/26-09/25/23 - LQPD CELL (6852) Telephone - Utilities 101-2001-61300 888.77 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212191 WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-2002-61200 118.10 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212191 WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-3008-61200 25.41 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY 212227 09/2023 - SUNLINE PASSES Due to SunLine 101-0000-20305 180.00 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY 212227 09/2023 - SUNLINE PASSES Miscellaneous Revenue 101-0000-42301 -9.25 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212202 09/26-10/25/23 - POLICE INTERNET Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2001-61400 528.94 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212202 10/2023 - LQ PARK PHONE Telephone - Utilities 101-3005-61300 48.64 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212202 09/28-10/27/23 - SPORTS COMPLEX PH... Telephone - Utilities 101-3005-61300 38.61 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PUBIL 212192 09/2023 - RADIO MAINTENANCE Operating Supplies 101-2001-60420 136.83 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212191 WATER SERVICE Water -Desert Pride - Utilities 101-3005-61206 280.59 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 212234 01/9/23 ADAMS PARK PLANT/MATERIAL Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 1,546.21 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 212195 BALLAST LIGHTS (10) Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 3,254.08 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212222 07/2023 - BP #1 POLICE SERVICE Sheriff Patrol 101-2001-60161 573,365.08 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212222 07/2023 - BP #1 POLICE SERVICE Police Overtime 101-2001-60162 24,725.28 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212222 07/2023 - BP #1 POLICE SERVICE Target Team 101-2001-60163 116,012.58 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212222 07/2023 - BP #1 POLICE SERVICE Community Services Officer 101-2001-60164 56,088.00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212222 07/2023 - BP #1 POLICE SERVICE Gang Task Force 101-2001-60166 15,006.60 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212222 07/2023 - BP #1 POLICE SERVICE Narcotics Task Force 101-2001-60167 16,078.50 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212222 07/2023 - BP #1 POLICE SERVICE Motor Officer 101-2001-60169 75,788.91 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212222 07/2023 - BP #1 POLICE SERVICE Dedicated Sargeants 101-2001-60170 44,325.77 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212222 07/2023 - BP #1 POLICE SERVICE Dedicated Lieutenant 101-2001-60171 23,902.50 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212222 07/2023 - BP #1 POLICE SERVICE Sheriff - Mileage 101-2001-60172 30,231.68 QUINN COMPANY 212220 WC GENERATOR REPAIRS Machinery & Equipment 101-2002-80101 1,317.13 Fund 101- GENERAL FUND Total: 1,039,645.38 Fund: 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212191 WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 202-3006-61200 385.08 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITIO... 212217 LIBRARY HVAC REPAIRS HVAC 202-3004-60667 1,907.50 Fund 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND Total: 2,292.58 Fund: 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212222 07/2023 - BP #1 POLICE SERVICE COPS Burglary/Theft Prevent... 212-0000-60179 918.48 Fund 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND Total: 918.48 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND CALIFORNIA DESERT NURSER... 212187 PLANTS Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 1,233.94 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212191 WATER SERVICE Water - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61211 2,018.51 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total: 3,252.45 Fund: 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND DESERT ARC 212194 RESIDENT BATTERY PICKUP AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 106.25 Fund 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND Total: 106.25 Fund: 224-TUMF FUND COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOC 0... 212190 R/C 06/2023 TUMF FEES TO FY22/23 TUMF Payable to CVAG 224-0000-20320 -343,220.00 COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOC 0... 212190 R/C 06/2023 TUMF FEES FROM FY23/24 TUMF Payable to CVAG 224-0000-20320 343,220.00 COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOC 0... 212190 09/2023 -TUMF FEES TUMF Payable to CVAG 224-0000-20320 2,550.00 Fund 224 - TUMF FUND Total: 2,550.00 Fund: 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL 212228 2011-05 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Construction 401-0000-60188 329,270.96 T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL 212228 2011-05 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Construction 401-0000-60188 360,193.68 NV5 212215 VILLAGE UTILITIES UNDERGROUNDING ... Design 401-0000-60185 32,403.25 NV5 212215 VILLAGE UTILITIES UNDERGROUNDING ... Design 401-0000-60185 18,804.25 NV5 212215 VILLAGE UTILITIES UNDERGROUNDING ... Design 401-0000-60185 31,610.00 Fund 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total: 772,282.14 10/30/2023 12:30:07 PM Page 2 of 5 68 Demand Register Vendor Name Payment Number Fund: 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT AUTOZONE INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT SO... 212184 FUELMAN 212216 212203 POWERPLAN BF 212218 POWERPLAN BF 212218 POWERPLAN BF 212218 POWERPLAN BF 212218 POWERPLAN BF 212218 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT SO... 212207 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212216 RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC. 212221 VERIZON WIRELESS 212233 MICROSOFT CORPORATION 212211 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212202 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212202 Fund: 601- SILVERROCK RESORT GARDAWORLD 212204 10/30/2023 12:30:07 PM Packet: APPKT03623 - 10/20/23 JD Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount JACK STAND & WINDSHIELD WASHER F... Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 09/2023 - FUEL Fuel & Oil 501-0000-60674 BOLTS Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 310G BACKHOE EQUIPMENT REPAIRS Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 EQUIPMENT 500HR SERVICE Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 310HL BACKHOE EQUIPMENT REPAIR Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 310G BACKHOE EQUIPMENT 1000HR SE... Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 502-0000-60301 Fund 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total: 63.93 416.05 34.80 733.92 1,031.23 2,677.22 1,450.40 6,407.55 07/01-09/30/23 - COPIER CONTRACT 0... Copiers 502-0000-60662 643.35 KEYBOARD/MOUSE Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 47.77 9/1-9/30/23 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATI... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 7,102.50 09/02-10/01/23 - BACKUP SERVER (2183) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 66.17 09/10-10/09/23 - MS AZURE ONLINE SV... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 770.89 10/03-11/02/23 - 2ND CITY INTERNET LI... Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 2,580.00 09/27-10/26/23 - BLACKHAWK/LQ PARK... Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 80.98 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total: 11,291.66 10/2023 - SRR ARMORED SERVICES Bank Fees 601-0000-60455 753.21 Fund 601- SILVERROCK RESORT Total: 753.21 Grand Total: 1,839,499.70 Page 3 of 5 69 Demand Register Fund Summary Fund 101 -GENERAL FUND 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 224-TUMFFUND 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 601- SILVERROCK RESORT Account Number 101-0000-20305 101-0000-20981 101-0000-20985 101-0000-22830 101-0000-42301 101-1004-50252 101-1004-60104 101-1004-60129 101-1005-60103 101-1006-60103 101-1006-60400 101-1007-60470 101-2001-60109 101-2001-60161 101-2001-60162 101-2001-60163 101-2001-60164 101-2001-60166 101-2001-60167 101-2001-60169 101-2001-60170 101-2001-60171 101-2001-60172 101-2001-60174 101-2001-60175 101-2001-60420 101-2001-61300 101-2001-61400 101-2002-61200 101-2002-61304 101-2002-61400 101-2002-80101 101-3001-60400 101-3001-60510 101-3002-60107 101-3003-60149 101-3003-60184 101-3005-60431 101-3005-60691 101-3005-61206 101-3005-61300 101-3008-61200 101-6001-60320 101-6002-60450 101-6006-60420 Grand Total: Account Summary Account Name Due to SunLine United Way Deductions Garnishments Payable Miscellaneous Deposits Miscellaneous Revenue Annual Wellness Dollar ... Consultants/Employee S... Recruiting/Pre-Employm... Professional Services Professional Services Office Supplies Postage LQ Police Volunteers Sheriff Patrol Police Overtime Target Team Community Services Offi... Gang Task Force Narcotics Task Force Motor Officer Dedicated Sargeants Dedicated Lieutenant Sheriff - Mileage Blood/Alcohol Testing Special Enforcement Fu... Operating Supplies Telephone - Utilities Cable/Internet - Utilities Water - Utilities Mobile/Cell Phones/Sate... Cable/Internet - Utilities Machinery & Equipment Office Supplies Grants & Economic Deve... Instructors Community Experiences Fritz Burns Pool Progra... Materials/Supplies Maintenance/Services Water -Desert Pride - Util.. Telephone - Utilities Water - Utilities Travel & Training Advertising Operating Supplies Expense Amount 1,039,645.38 2,292.58 918.48 3,252.45 106.25 2,550.00 772,282.14 6,407.55 11,291.66 753.21 1,839,499.70 Expense Amount 180.00 37.00 222.74 500.00 -9.25 358.41 670.00 90.00 1,113.79 4,879.92 89.88 23.51 31.68 573,365.08 24,725.28 116,012.58 56,088.00 15,006.60 16,078.50 75,788.91 44,325.77 23,902.50 30,231.68 66.85 8,972.57 136.83 888.77 528.94 118.10 87.35 199.98 1,317.13 60.21 500.00 2,757.10 8,117.00 16,809.16 4,886.49 6,750.00 280.59 87.25 25.41 1,299.51 1,274.28 326.75 Packet: APPKT03623 - 10/20/23 JD 10/30/2023 12:30:07 PM Page 4 of 5 70 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03623 - 10/20/23 JD Account Summary *Project codes are generally used to track Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects, other large public works projects, developer deposits, or city-wide events. Normal operational expenditures are not project coded and, therefore, will report as "none" in this section. 10/30/2023 12:30:07 PM Page 5 of 5 71 Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-7001-60400 Office Supplies 78.43 101-7002-60420 Operating Supplies 364.10 202-3004-60667 HVAC 1,907.50 202-3006-61200 Water - Utilities 385.08 212-0000-60179 COPS Burglary/Theft Pre... 918.48 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 1,233.94 215-7004-61211 Water - Medians - Utiliti... 2,018.51 221-0000-60127 AB 939 Recycling Solutio... 106.25 224-0000-20320 TUMF Payable to CVAG 2,550.00 401-0000-60185 Design 82,817.50 401-0000-60188 Construction 689,464.64 501-0000-60674 Fuel & Oil 416.05 501-0000-60675 Parts, Accessories, and ... 98.73 501-0000-60676 Vehicle Repair & Maint... 5,892.77 502-0000-60301 Software Licenses 7,873.39 502-0000-60420 Operating Supplies 47.77 502-0000-60662 Copiers 643.35 502-0000-61400 Cable/Internet - Utilities 2,727.15 601-0000-60455 Bank Fees 753.21 Grand Total: 1,839,499.70 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Project Account Name Project Name Expense Amount **None** **None** **None** 1,059,100.56 111205CT Construction Expense Dune Palms Bridge Imp/BRLKS-52 689,464.64 202206D Design Expense Village Utilities Undergrounding 1 82,817.50 CONCERTE Concert Expense Master Account for all SRR ConCE 8,117.00 Grand Total: 1,839,499.70 *Project codes are generally used to track Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects, other large public works projects, developer deposits, or city-wide events. Normal operational expenditures are not project coded and, therefore, will report as "none" in this section. 10/30/2023 12:30:07 PM Page 5 of 5 71 Demand Register Za Q"fra City of La Quinta Packet: APPKT03629 - 10/27/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 101 - GENERAL FUND GOVERNMENT TAX SEMINAR... 212262 11/30/23 - GOVERNMENT TAX SEMINAR.. Travel & Training 101-1004-60320 550.00 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212245 10/05-11/04/23 - FS #32 CABLE/INTERN... Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 10.52 VINTAGE E & S INC 212300 09/28/23 - SRR EVENT PARK ELECTRICAL... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 487.66 VINTAGE E & S INC 212300 09/28/23 - REPLACED EV CHARGER AT ... Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 1,800.83 VINTAGE E & S INC 212300 10/9-10/10/23 SPORTS COMPLEX & LQ... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 9,218.07 VINTAGE E & S INC 212300 09/28/23 - SRR EVENT PARK ELECTRICAL... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 825.32 PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 212277 CITY POLO SHIRTS Promotional Items 101-3007-60134 1,257.21 PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 212277 CITY BUSINESS CARDS Printing 101-3007-60410 6,303.70 SOUTHWEST AQUATICS INC 212286 10/2023 - LAKE MAINTENANCE SERIVCE Civic Center Lake Maintenan... 101-3005-60117 1,350.00 SOUTHWEST AQUATICS INC 212286 10/2023 - LAKE MAINTENANCE SERIVCE SilverRock Lake Maintenance 101-3005-60189 1,350.00 ALARM MONITORING SERVI... 212238 10/1-12/31/23 -ALARM MONITORING ... Security & Alarm 101-3008-60123 660.00 ALARM MONITORING SERVI... 212238 10/1-12/31/23 - FIRE ALARM MONITOR... Security & Alarm 101-2002-60123 510.00 ALARM MONITORING SERVI... 212238 10/1-12/31/23 -FIRE ALARM MONITOR... Security & Alarm 101-3008-60123 510.00 ALARM MONITORING SERVI... 212238 10/1-12/31/23 - SRR EVENT BLDG MONI... Security & Alarm 101-3008-60123 162.00 ALARM MONITORING SERVI... 212238 10/1-12/31/23 - X-PARK ALARM MONIT... Security & Alarm 101-3008-60123 162.00 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 212297 BASE ROCK FOR YARD STOCK Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 1,007.58 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 212297 DESERT GOLD LANDSCAPE ROCK FOR A... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 749.83 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 212297 ROCK BASE FOR BEAR CREEK TRAIL Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 1,011.19 THE LOCK SHOP, INC 212294 CH EMPLOYEE ENTRY DOOR MAINTENA... Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 195.00 DOOR TECH, LLC 212256 LOBBY DOOR MAINT FOR CH, WC, LIBIR Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 1,206.31 SEALING SYSTEMS INC. 212283 AQUA SEAL CHEMICAL GROUT SALES TAX Sales Taxes Payable 101-0000-20304 -52.76 SEALING SYSTEMS INC. 212283 AQUA SEAL CHEMICAL GROUT Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 710.97 DATA TICKET, INC. 212251 09/2023 - CODE CITATION PROCESSING Administrative Citation Servi... 101-6004-60111 582.32 DATA TICKET, INC. 212251 09/2023 - POLICE CITATION PROCESSING Administrative Citation Servi... 101-6004-60111 310.60 CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFIC... 212244 CALBO TRAINING A.ORTEGA & D.CLAYT... Travel & Training 101-6003-60320 435.00 CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFIC... 212244 CALBO TRAINING J.ANAYA Travel & Training 101-6003-60320 430.00 CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFIC... 212244 CALBO TRAINING T.TUVELL Travel & Training 101-6003-60320 430.00 CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFIC... 212244 CALBO TRAINING E.GHERA Travel & Training 101-6003-60320 430.00 CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFIC... 212244 CALBO TRAINING J.FUSON Travel & Training 101-6003-60320 430.00 L.O. LYNCH QUALITY WELLS &.. 212268 CIVIC CENTER LAKE PUMP MAINTENACE Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 1,922.70 COACHELLA VALLEY KIDS LLC 212246 12/16/23 - BREAKFAST WITH SANTA EV... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 225.00 MCDOWELL AWARDS 212271 CITY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS NAME P... Printing 101-1006-60410 117.45 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTR... 212254 SRR EVENT PARK STORM DAMAGE REPA... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 19,600.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 212299 10/2023 - PARK LANDSCAPE MAINTENA... Landscape Contract 101-3005-60112 67,311.00 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON 212241 06/01-08/31/23 - BANK FEES Administration 101-1006-60102 2,807.25 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITI... 212270 09/20/23 - LEAGUE OF CA CITIES MEETI... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 50.00 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITI... 212270 09/20/23 - LEAGUE OF CA CITIES MEETI... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 50.00 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITI... 212270 09/20/23 - LEAGUE OF CA CITIES MEETI... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 50.00 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITI... 212270 09/20/23 - LEAGUE OF CA CITIES MEETI... Travel & Training 101-1002-60320 50.00 TAG/AMS INC 212293 09/12/23 & 09/13/23 - RANDOM DOT T... Consultants/Employee Servic... 101-1004-60104 180.00 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212275 CASH RECEIPTS FOR AP Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 39.13 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212275 TISSUE & BATTERIES Office Supplies 101-1002-60400 59.29 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212275 PAPER, UTENSILS, TAPE Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 123.58 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212275 CLEAR BINDER SLEEVES Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 27.94 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212275 PAPER PLATES Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 4.14 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212275 CLOROX WIPES Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 17.94 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212275 CITYWIDE MANILA ENVELOPES Forms, Copier Paper 101-1007-60402 23.31 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212275 CITYWIDE COFFEE Citywide Supplies 101-1007-60403 23.73 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 212289 BATTERIES & AIR FRESHENER Office Supplies 101-1002-60400 42.83 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 212289 CITYWIDE PRINTING PAPER Forms, Copier Paper 101-1007-60402 541.51 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 212289 OFFICE CHAIR Office Supplies 101-3001-60400 365.17 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY CO 212285 IRRIGATION PARTS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 190.44 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 212243 BLOOD ALCOHOL ANALYSIS Blood/Alcohol Testing 101-2001-60174 1,205.35 10/30/2023 12:28:48 PM Page 1 of 7 72 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03629 -10/27/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount WOOD, RUSSELL DAVID 212302 08/17/23 - POLICE TOW LA232280061 Sheriff - Other 101-2001-60176 271.00 WOOD, RUSSELL DAVID 212302 08/18/23 - POLICE TOW LA232280061 Sheriff - Other 101-2001-60176 271.00 WOOD, RUSSELL DAVID 212302 7/08/23 - POLICE TOW LA231890028 Sheriff - Other 101-2001-60176 100.00 WOOD, RUSSELL DAVID 212302 8/14/23 - POLICE TOW LA232260001 Sheriff - Other 101-2001-60176 316.75 WOOD, RUSSELL DAVID 212302 8/14/23 - POLICE TOW LA232260003 Sheriff - Other 101-2001-60176 271.00 WOOD, RUSSELL DAVID 212302 08/28/23 - POLICE TOW LA232400063 Sheriff - Other 101-2001-60176 407.25 COURTMASTER SPORTS, INC. 212249 FB PARK PICKLEBALL COURT REPAIRS Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 31,200.00 ROBERT HALF 212282 10/06/23 - TEMP AGENCY SERVICES A.... Temporary Agency Services 101-6006-60125 1,575.00 ROBERT HALF 212282 10/13/23 - TEMP AGENCY SERVICES A.... Temporary Agency Services 101-6006-60125 1,575.00 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE... 212240 BLOOD ALCOHOL ANALYSIS Blood/Alcohol Testing 101-2001-60174 437.56 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE... 212240 BLOOD ALCOHOL ANALYSIS Blood/Alcohol Testing 101-2001-60174 133.70 STERICYCLE, INC 212291 8/18/23 & 9/15/23 - POLICE SHRED LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 38.50 AIR EXCHANGE, INC 212237 FS #32 HOSE REPAIR Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 2,210.85 AIR EXCHANGE, INC 212237 FS #93 HOSE REPAIR Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 2,404.18 PWLC II, INC 212279 10/2023 - L&L MONTHLY MAINTENANCE Landscape Contract 101-2002-60112 1,616.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 212298 09/14-10/13/23 - EOC CELL (7813) Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites 101-2002-61304 247.74 THE LOCK SHOP, INC 212294 KEYS FOR SPORTS COMPLEX Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 18.20 DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SE... 212253 09/2023 - ANIMAL SERVICES Animal Shelter Contract Servi.., 101-6004-60197 27,254.14 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212247 WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-2002-61200 616.92 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212247 WATER SERVICE Water -Monticello Park - Utili... 101-3005-61201 623.91 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212247 WATER SERVICE Water -Fritz Burns Park - Utili... 101-3005-61204 234.51 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212247 WATER SERVICE Water -Seasons Park - Utilities 101-3005-61208 27.87 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212247 WATER SERVICE Water -Community Park - Util.. 101-3005-61209 344.08 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212247 WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-3008-61200 70.49 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212247 WATER SERVICE PM 10 - Dust Control 101-7006-60146 185.27 DESERT RESORT MANAGEM... 212255 09/2023 - SECURITY PATROL SERVICES Professional Services 101-6004-60103 4,018.43 PETRA-1, LP 212278 WC GYM WIPES 4 CASES Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 671.91 FLOCK SAFETY 212259 FLOCK CAMERA SYSTEM Public Safety Camera System... 101-2001-60692 43,125.00 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 212274 FB POOL PUMP/MOTOR REPLACEMENT Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 9,710.24 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 212274 10/2023 - LQ PARK SPLASH PAD MAINT... LQ Park Water Feature 101-3005-60554 2,076.00 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 212274 10/06/23 - LQ SPLASH PAD WATER OUT... LQ Park Water Feature 101-3005-60554 375.25 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 212274 FB POOL HANDRAIL COVERS Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 495.47 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 212274 FB WADING POOL HANDRAIL COVERS Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 349.32 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 212274 REPLACED FB POOL AIR RELIEF VALVE Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 222.13 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 212274 10/11/23 - LQ PARK SPLASH PAD CLEAN... LQ Park Water Feature 101-3005-60554 285.00 SILVERROCK RESORT 212284 7/1-09/30/23 - IST QUARTER SALES AND.. Sales Taxes Payable 101-0000-20304 2,095.00 STATE OF RHODE ISLAND DIV... 212290 7/1-9/30/23 - 3RD QTR STATE TAX WIT... SIT Payable 101-0000-20925 50.74 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PUBIL 212248 07/2023 - RADIO MAINTENANCE Operating Supplies 101-2001-60420 273.66 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212247 WATER SERVICE PM 10 - Dust Control 101-7006-60146 42.39 RIVERSIDE ASSESSOR 212280 09/2023 - RECORDING FEES Due to County Recorder 101-0000-20325 249.00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212281 7/27-8/23/23 - BP #2 POLICE SERVICE Sheriff Patrol 101-2001-60161 639,962.02 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212281 7/27-8/23/23 - BP #2 POLICE SERVICE Police Overtime 101-2001-60162 41,104.76 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212281 7/27-8/23/23 - BP #2 POLICE SERVICE Target Team 101-2001-60163 120,491.83 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212281 7/27-8/23/23 - BP #2 POLICE SERVICE Community Services Officer 101-2001-60164 59,827.20 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212281 7/27-8/23/23 - BP #2 POLICE SERVICE Gang Task Force 101-2001-60166 17,150.40 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212281 7/27-8/23/23 - BP #2 POLICE SERVICE Narcotics Task Force 101-2001-60167 17,150.40 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212281 7/27-8/23/23 - BP #2 POLICE SERVICE Motor Officer 101-2001-60169 97,110.14 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212281 7/27-8/23/23 - BP #2 POLICE SERVICE Dedicated Sargeants 101-2001-60170 39,730.59 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212281 7/27-8/23/23 - BP #2 POLICE SERVICE Dedicated Lieutenant 101-2001-60171 25,496.00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212281 7/27-8/23/23 - BP #2 POLICE SERVICE Sheriff - Mileage 101-2001-60172 34,882.55 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212281 7/27-8/23/23 - BP #2 POLICE SERVICE Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-60175 650.59 Fund 101- GENERAL FUND Total: 1,358,108.05 Fund: 201 - GAS TAX FUND TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 212295 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 686.92 TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 212295 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 475.24 TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 212295 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 178.46 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 HURRICANE HILARY EMERGEN... Road Improvements 201-7003-72111 2,625.00 SOUTHWEST BOULDER & ST... 212287 FILL DIRT Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 122.87 SOUTHWEST BOULDER & ST... 212287 FILL DIRT Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 89.00 Fund 201 - GAS TAX FUND Total: 4,177.49 10/30/2023 12:28:48 PM Page 2 of 7 73 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03629 - 10/27/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND VINTAGE E & S INC 212300 09/28/23 - LIBRARY ELECTRICAL SERVICE Maintenance/Services 202-3004-60691 422.08 ALARM MONITORING SERVI... 212238 10/1-12/31/23 -ALARM MONITORING ... Security & Alarm 202-3004-60123 165.00 ALARM MONITORING SERVI... 212238 10/1-12/31/23 -ALARM MONITORING ... Security & Alarm 202-3006-60123 165.00 ALARM MONITORING SERVI... 212238 10/1-12/31/23 -FIRE ALARM MONITOR... Security & Alarm 202-3004-60123 255.00 ALARM MONITORING SERVI... 212238 10/1-12/31/23 -FIRE ALARM MONITOR... Security & Alarm 202-3006-60123 255.00 ALARM MONITORING SERVI... 212238 10/1-12/31/23 - LUMBER YARD ALARM... Security & Alarm 202-3006-60123 165.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 212299 10/2023 - PARK LANDSCAPE MAINTENA... Landscape Contract 202-3004-60112 930.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 212299 10/2023 - PARK LANDSCAPE MAINTENA... Landscape Contract 202-3006-60112 194.00 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212260 10/13-11/12/23 - MUSEUM PHONE Telephone - Utilities 202-3006-61300 139.99 Fund 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND Total: 2,691.07 Fund: 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212281 7/27-8/23/23 - BP #2 POLICE SERVICE COPS Burglary/Theft Prevent... 212-0000-60179 4,898.58 Fund 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND Total: 4,898.58 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND LANDMARK GOLF MANAGE... 212269 08/2023 - SRR PERIMETER LANDSCAPE ... SilverRock Way Landscape 215-7004-60143 5,278.00 LANDMARK GOLF MANAGE... 212269 09/2023 - SRR PERIMETER LANDSCAPE ... SilverRock Way Landscape 215-7004-60143 5,478.00 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTR... 212254 ADAMS PARK STORM DAMAGE REPAIRS Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 49,000.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 212299 10/2023 - PARK LANDSCAPE MAINTENA... Landscape Contract 215-7004-60112 12,124.00 CREATIVE LIGHTING & ELECT... 212250 10/2023 - LIGHTING MAINTENANCE SER... Consultants 215-7004-60104 6,488.42 HIGH TECH IRRIGATION INC 212265 PIPE CUTTERS Tools/Equipment 215-7004-60432 137.64 PWLC II, INC 212279 10/2023 - L&L MONTHLY MAINTENANCE Landscape Contract 215-7004-60112 62,674.00 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212260 10/7-11/6/23 - PHONE SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 137.39 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212260 10/10-11/09/23 - PHONE SVC Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 42.00 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212266 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 466.47 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212266 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61117 24.68 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212247 WATER SERVICE Water - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61211 3,085.01 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total: 144,935.61 Fund: 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADMIN WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVIC... 212301 BOND ARBITRAGE FEE 2014 SERIES A Consultants 237-9001-60104 500.00 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVIC... 212301 BOND ARBITRAGE FEE 2013 SERIES A Consultants 237-9001-60104 500.00 Fund 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADMIN Total: 1,000.00 Fund: 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, LLC 212288 09/2023 - ONCALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAI... Construction 401-0000-60188 1,881.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 SPORTS COMPLEX LIGHTING R... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 175.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PL... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 3,740.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 AVE 48 ARTAND MUSIC LINE Professional Services 401-0000-60103 350.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 SILVERROCK EVENT SPACE Professional Services 401-0000-60103 350.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 FRITZ BURN PARK IMPROVEM... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 350.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PL... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 700.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 AVE 50 BRIDGE Professional Services 401-0000-60103 1,907.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 AVE 52 PAVEMENT REHAB Professional Services 401-0000-60103 350.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT Professional Services 401-0000-60103 1,437.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 EISENHOWER RETENTION BASI... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 562.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 LQ LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS Professional Services 401-0000-60103 1,362.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS LAKE I... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 525.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 CITYWIDE MISC. ADA IMPROV... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 187.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 COVE TRAILS PARKING LOT IM... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 1,750.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 AVE 50 WIDENING IMPROVEM... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 175.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 DUNE PALMS BRIDGE Professional Services 401-0000-60103 2,562.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 DUNE PALMS ROAD PAVEMENT.. Professional Services 401-0000-60103 420.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 CITYWIDE MISCELLANEOUS AD... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 175.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 HIGHWAY 111 CORRIDOR Professional Services 401-0000-60103 700.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 VILLAGE ART/CULTURAL PLAZA Professional Services 401-0000-60103 1,200.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 FRED WARING DRIVE PAVEME... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 1,542.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 VILLAGE UNDERGROUNDING P... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 175.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 - LA QUINTA X PARK Professional Services 401-0000-60103 350.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PL... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 9,605.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 AVE 50 REHAB (WASHINGTON ... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 387.50 10/30/2023 12:28:48 PM Page 3 of 7 74 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03629 - 10/27/20231B Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount NAI CONSULTING INC 212273 09/2023 AVE 52 MONROE STREET (NEW... Construction 401-0000-60188 175.00 ORTIZ ENTERPRISES INC. 212276 09/2023 DUNE PALMS BRIDGE PROGRE... Retention Payable 401-0000-20600 -5,595.60 ORTIZ ENTERPRISES INC. 212276 09/2023 DUNE PALMS BRIDGE PROGRE... Construction 401-0000-60188 111,912.00 AMERICAN BUSINESS BANK 212239 09/2023 DUNE PALMS BRIDGE RETENTI... Retention Payable 401-0000-20600 5,595.60 HAMMEL, GREEN, AND ABR... 212263 07/2023 - CULTURAL CAMPUS DESIGN Design 401-0000-60185 8,686.75 HAMMEL, GREEN, AND ABR... 212263 08/2023 - CULTURAL CAMPUS DESIGN Design 401-0000-60185 9,412.92 BENGAL ENGINEERING INC 212242 08/2023 - DUNE PALMS LOW WATER C... Design 401-0000-60185 6,039.71 BENGAL ENGINEERING INC 212242 08/2023 - DUNE PALMS LOW WATER C... Design 401-0000-60185 9,296.92 RIVERSIDE ASSESSOR 212280 09/2023 - RECORDING FEES Design 401-0000-60185 50.00 Fund 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total: 178,494.30 Fund: 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT JESSUP AUTO PLAZA 212267 VEHICLE PURCHASE 2023 CHEVY BOLT ... Vehicles, Purchased 501-0000-71031 29,928.00 MYFLEETCENTER 212272 OIL CHANGE FOR CHEVY SILVERADO VIN... Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 158.28 TOWER ENERGY GROUP 212296 08/16-8/31/23 - FUEL Fuel & Oil 501-0000-60674 7,141.44 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST 212258 10/2023 - FLEET LEASES Vehicles, Rentals & Leases 501-0000-71030 3,781.42 HARBOR TRUCK BODIES, INC 212264 VEHICLE FRONT BUMPER CONE HOLDER... Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 3,607.47 Fund 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total: 44,616.61 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACORN TECHNOLOGY SERVI... 212236 STORAGECRAFT SHADOWPROTECT SOF... Consultants 502-0000-60104 1,948.92 DELL MARKETING LP 212252 FY 23/24 SONICWALL SUPPORT SERVICES Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 4,699.35 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 212289 KEYBOARD FOR D.KINLEY Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 184.86 SUPERION, LLC 212292 FY 23/24 HOSTING & MAINT SVCS FOR ... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 41,230.96 VERIZON WIRELESS 212298 09/02-10/01/23 - CITY IPADS (5587) Cell/Mobile Phones 502-0000-61301 1,273.95 VERIZON WIRELESS 212298 09/02-10/01/23 - CITY CELL SERVICE (54... Cell/Mobile Phones 502-0000-61301 3,250.56 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212260 10/4-11/3/23 - DSL SVC Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 422.84 EMPHASYS 212257 12/1/23-11/30/24 INVESTMENT PORTF... Maintenance Agreements 502-0000-60300 707.55 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total: 53,718.99 Fund: 601- SILVERROCK RESORT GARDAWORLD 212261 09/2023 - SRR ARMORED SVCS EXCESS I... Bank Fees 601-0000-60455 9.36 GARDAWORLD 212261 09/2023 - SRR ARMORED SVC TIER PRIG.. Bank Fees 601-0000-60455 30.90 Fund 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT Total: 40.26 Grand Total: 1,792,680.96 10/30/2023 12:28:48 PM Page 4 of 7 75 Demand Register Fund Summary Fund 101 -GENERAL FUND 201- GAS TAX FUND 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADMIN 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 601- SILVERROCK RESORT Account Number 101-0000-20304 101-0000-20325 101-0000-20925 101-1001-60320 101-1002-60320 101-1002-60400 101-1004-60104 101-1004-60320 101-1005-60400 101-1006-60102 101-1006-60400 101-1006-60410 101-1007-60402 101-1007-60403 101-2001-60109 101-2001-60161 101-2001-60162 101-2001-60163 101-2001-60164 101-2001-60166 101-2001-60167 101-2001-60169 101-2001-60170 101-2001-60171 101-2001-60172 101-2001-60174 101-2001-60175 101-2001-60176 101-2001-60420 101-2001-60692 101-2002-60112 101-2002-60123 101-2002-60691 101-2002-61200 101-2002-61304 101-2002-61400 101-3001-60400 101-3002-60420 101-3003-60149 101-3005-60112 101-3005-60117 101-3005-60184 101-3005-60189 101-3005-60431 101-3005-60554 Grand Total: Account Summary Account Name Sales Taxes Payable Due to County Recorder SIT Payable Travel & Training Travel & Training Office Supplies Consultants/Employee 5... Travel & Training Office Supplies Administration Office Supplies Printing Forms, Copier Paper Citywide Supplies LQ Police Volunteers Sheriff Patrol Police Overtime Target Team Community Services Offi... Gang Task Force Narcotics Task Force Motor Officer Dedicated Sargeants Dedicated Lieutenant Sheriff - Mileage Blood/Alcohol Testing Special Enforcement Fu... Sheriff - Other Operating Supplies Public Safety Camera Sys... Landscape Contract Security & Alarm Maintenance/Services Water - Utilities Mobile/Cell Phones/Sate... Cable/Internet - Utilities Office Supplies Operating Supplies Community Experiences Landscape Contract Civic Center Lake Maint... Fritz Burns Pool Mainten... SilverRock Lake Mainten... Materials/Supplies LQ Park Water Feature Expense Amount 1,358,108.05 4,177.49 2,691.07 4,898.58 144,935.61 1,000.00 178,494.30 44,616.61 53,718.99 40.26 1,792,680.96 Expense Amount 2,042.24 249.00 50.74 150.00 50.00 102.12 180.00 550.00 155.66 2,807.25 57.07 117.45 564.82 23.73 38.50 639,962.02 41,104.76 120,491.83 59,827.20 17,150.40 17,150.40 97,110.14 39,730.59 25,496.00 34,882.55 1,776.61 650.59 1,637.00 273.66 43,125.00 1,616.00 510.00 4,615.03 616.92 247.74 10.52 365.17 671.91 225.00 67,311.00 1,350.00 10,777.16 1,350.00 2,959.04 2,736.25 Packet: APPKT03629 - 10/27/2023 JB 10/30/2023 12:28:48 PM Page 5 of 7 76 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03629 - 10/27/2023 JB Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-3005-60691 Maintenance/Services 63,253.75 101-3005-61201 Water -Monticello Park -... 623.91 101-3005-61204 Water -Fritz Burns Park-... 234.51 101-3005-61208 Water -Seasons Park - Ut.. 27.87 101-3005-61209 Water -Community Park... 344.08 101-3007-60134 Promotional Items 1,257.21 101-3007-60410 Printing 6,303.70 101-3008-60123 Security & Alarm 1,494.00 101-3008-60431 Materials/Supplies 18.20 101-3008-60691 Maintenance/Services 3,202.14 101-3008-61200 Water - Utilities 70.49 101-6003-60320 Travel & Training 2,155.00 101-6004-60103 Professional Services 4,018.43 101-6004-60111 Administrative Citation ... 892.92 101-6004-60197 Animal Shelter Contract ... 27,254.14 101-6006-60125 Temporary Agency Servi... 3,150.00 101-7003-60420 Operating Supplies 710.97 101-7006-60146 PM 10 - Dust Control 227.66 201-7003-60429 Traffic Control Signs 1,340.62 201-7003-60431 Materials/Supplies 211.87 201-7003-72111 Road Improvements 2,625.00 202-3004-60112 Landscape Contract 930.00 202-3004-60123 Security & Alarm 420.00 202-3004-60691 Maintenance/Services 422.08 202-3006-60112 Landscape Contract 194.00 202-3006-60123 Security & Alarm 585.00 202-3006-61300 Telephone - Utilities 139.99 212-0000-60179 COPS Burglary/Theft Pre... 4,898.58 215-7004-60104 Consultants 6,488.42 215-7004-60112 Landscape Contract 74,798.00 215-7004-60143 SilverRock Way Landsca... 10,756.00 215-7004-60432 Tools/Equipment 137.64 215-7004-60691 Maintenance/Services 49,000.00 215-7004-61116 Electric - Utilities 645.86 215-7004-61117 Electric - Medians - Utilit... 24.68 215-7004-61211 Water - Medians - Utiliti... 3,085.01 237-9001-60104 Consultants 1,000.00 401-0000-20600 Retention Payable 0.00 401-0000-60103 Professional Services 31,040.00 401-0000-60185 Design 33,486.30 401-0000-60188 Construction 113,968.00 501-0000-60674 Fuel & Oil 7,141.44 501-0000-60675 Parts, Accessories, and ... 3,607.47 501-0000-60676 Vehicle Repair & Maint... 158.28 501-0000-71030 Vehicles, Rentals & Leas... 3,781.42 501-0000-71031 Vehicles, Purchased 29,928.00 502-0000-60104 Consultants 1,948.92 502-0000-60300 Maintenance Agreements 707.55 502-0000-60301 Software Licenses 45,930.31 502-0000-60420 Operating Supplies 184.86 502-0000-61301 Cell/Mobile Phones 4,524.51 502-0000-61400 Cable/Internet - Utilities 422.84 601-0000-60455 Bank Fees 40.26 Grand Total: 1,792,680.96 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Project Account Name Project Name Expense Amount **None** **None** **None** 1,504,974.63 10/30/2023 12:28:48 PM Page 6 of 7 77 Demand Register Project Account Key 111205CT 111205D 111205P 111205RP 151609P 201603P 201606P 201608P 201901D 201901P 201902P 201905P 202008P 202101P 202102D 202102P 202108P 202201P 202203P 202204P 202205P 202206P 202208P 202214P 202230P 202302P 202307P 202315P 202316P 202318E 202320E 202320P 202322P 2324PMPP 2324TMICT STVRE Project Account Summary Project Account Name Construction Expense Design Expense Professional Expense Retention Payable Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Design Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Design Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Professional Expense Fritz Burns Park Pickleball Court Ex... Cyclone Hilary FEMA Reimbursable.. Cyclone Hilary Professional Expense Eisenhower Retention Basin Slope... Professional Expense Construction Expense Short Term Vacation Rental Expen... Grand Total: Project Name Dune Palms Bridge Imp/BRLKS-52 Dune Palms Bridge Imp/BRLKS-52 Dune Palms Bridge Imp/BRLKS-52 Dune Palms Bridge Imp/BRLKS-52 La Quinta X Park La Quinta Landscape Renovation Civic Center Campus Lake/Irrigati SilverRock Event Space Village Art Plaza Promenade & Ci Village Art Plaza Promenade & Ci Avenue 50 Bridge Spanning the E Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan I Avenue 48 Art and Music Line Pr( Dune Palms Rd Pavement Rehab - Fritz Burns Park Improvements Fritz Burns Park Improvements FY 21/22 PMP Slurry Seal Improv Avenue 50 Pavement Rehab (Wa Fred Waring Drive Pavement Reh Sports Complex Lighting Replacei Avenue 50 Widening Improveme Village Utilities Undergrounding I Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Imp Avenue 52 Pavement Rehabilitate Cove Trails Parking Lot Improven Avenue 52 Monroe Street Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Imp FY22/23 Pavement Management FY23/24 Pavement Management Fritz Burns Park Pickleball Court f Tropical Cyclone Hilary Tropical Cyclone Hilary Eisenhower Retention Basin Slop FY23/24 Pavement Management FY23/24 Traffic Maintenance Imf Short Term Vacation Rental Tracl 1,792,680.96 Packet: APPKT03629 - 10/27/2023 JB Expense Amount 111,912.00 15,336.63 2,562.50 0.00 350.00 1,362.50 525.00 350.00 18,099.67 1,200.00 1,907.50 700.00 350.00 420.00 50.00 350.00 1,437.50 387.50 1,542.50 175.00 175.00 175.00 187.50 350.00 1,750.00 175.00 175.00 9,605.00 3,740.00 31,200.00 71,368.60 2,625.00 562.50 700.00 1,881.00 4,018.43 *Project codes are generally used to track Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects, other large public works projects, developer deposits, or city-wide events. Normal operational expenditures are not project coded and, therefore, will report as "none" in this section. 10/30/2023 12:28:48 PM Page 7 of 7 78 ATTACHMENT 2 City of La Quinta Bank Transactions 10/9/2023-10/24/2023 Wire Transaction Listed below are the wire transfers from 10/9/2023-10/24/2023. Wire Transfers: 10/11/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS $128,876.96 10/11/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER- MIDAMERICA $15,796.30 10/12/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - COLONIAL LIFE $8,405.06 10/13/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS $5,476.67 10/13/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS $15,160.44 10/13/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS $28,282.64 10/13/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - LQCEA $468.00 10/13/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - MISSON SQUARE $3,925.00 10/13/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - MISSON SQUARE $13,667.95 10/17/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - STERLING $1,460.39 10/17/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - MIDAMERICA $15,796.30 10/23/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - LANDMARK $195,079.62 10/26/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - J&H ASSET PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC $59,537.69 TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT $491,933.02 "W BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 1 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: November 7, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TIT' APPROVE CANCELLATION OF REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 2, 2024 RECOMMENDATION Approve cancellation of the regular City Council meeting of January 2, 2024. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The City Manager and Executive Team have reviewed pending items and determined that there is no need to hold the January 2, 2024, City Council meeting. • Advance notice of cancelled meetings allows Councilmembers, Staff, and the public to properly plan for deadlines and workflow. FISCAL IMPAC, i There would be cost savings consisting of the time and materials associated with production and delivery of one agenda packet. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City Manager and the Executive Team have reviewed the items requiring Council consideration, and all matters that require Council review have been scheduled for the two Council meetings in December 2023 and the second Council meeting in January 2024. Thus, there is no need to hold a Council meeting on January 2, 2024. The City's Annual Community Workshop is anticipated to be held on February 29, 2024. The recommended December/January regular meetings schedule is: • December 5, 2023 regular meeting • December 19, 2023 regular meeting • January 2, 2024 CANCEL • January 16, 2024 regular meeting • February 29, 2024 Council/Community Workshop Should a pressing situation or matter requiring Council direction or action before the next regular meeting arise, a special meeting would be called. 81 ALTERNATIVES Council may select an alternate date to cancel a meeting or cancel no meetings. Prepared by: Oscar Mojica, Permit Technician Approved by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk E:y, BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: November 7, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA` : APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES COORDINATOR WITH COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE PART-TIME EMERGENCY SERVICE COORDINATOR POSITION RECOMMENDATION Approve Agreement for Emergency Services Coordinator Services with County of Riverside Emergency Management Department to provide a part-time Emergency Service Coordinator position; and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement substantially in the form attached, allowing for minor and non -substantive changes. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • County of Riverside (County) through its Emergency Management Department (EMD), provides emergency management services to cities. • In the past, the City has had an in-house Emergency Service Coordinator (ESC) and has also contracted with County to provide this service. However, given the current job market trends, this in-house position has not been filled. Therefore, staff recommends contracting this service through County. • The addition of a part-time ESC will address the City's need for active management regarding prevention, preparedness, recovery, and response to emergencies. Currently, EMD only has a part-time ESC available to assign to City. • If approved, the ESC will be the City's emergency management point of contact and will be responsible for the coordination of emergency services matters including training of City staff and residents, and will represent the City at meetings, events, and functions. FISCAL IMPACT The annual cost associated with a part-time ESC position for one year is $80,000. If this agreement is approved, its term will commence on November 13, 2023 and end on June 30, 2024; estimated cost for the eight-month contract is $56,000, which includes approximately $5,000 in overtime costs related to official City business outside of normal business hours (after 5:00 p.m., Monday -Friday and weekends), (Exhibits A and B of the agreement). Funds are available in the General Fund — Fire Budget for fiscal year 2023/24. 83 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In the event of an emergency, the City and its employees must do everything possible to protect and preserve residents' safety. An ESC is vital to emergency planning, staff training, community outreach, coordinating exercises, grant management, emergency response, and post -event recovery. Due to current job market trends, the hiring of a full- time ESC has not been feasible; similarly, the County currently can only offer a part-time ESC. The part-time ESC will be dedicated to the City for 20 -hours a week; this person would be responsible for the following services, outlined in detail in Exhibit A: 1.1 Comprehensive emergency management program: The ESC will coordinate a comprehensive program with the overall mission of serving the public to effectively support and recover from a major emergency or disaster, utilizing all standards and applicable laws and regulations within the discipline of emergency management. 1.2 Point of contact: The ESC is the City emergency management point of contact and will be responsible for the coordination with all City personnel and departments and represent the City at all meetings, events, functions, etc., as required. 1.3 Collaboration: The ESC will partner with all local, county, state and federal government agencies, special districts, the private sector, community entities, volunteer and non-profit organizations as necessary in all phases of emergency management. 1.4 Service to Public: The ESC will provide service to the public on matters covered in this agreement consistent with established policies and procedures that promote courteous, efficient service and good public relations. The ESC would be located at City Hall and work a 20 -hour week. The position would be integrated into the Public Safety Department, which allows for coordinated response with public safety personnel. ALTERNATIVES As County EMD is a qualified service provider with specialized knowledge of emergency management response and the City must provide emergency service management, staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Martha Mendez, Public Safety Deputy Director Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachment: 1. Agreement for Emergency Services Coordinator with County 84 ATTACHMENT 1 Agreement No. EM -23-130 AGREEMENT FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES COORDINATOR SERVICES BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF LA QUINTA This Agreement is made as of the date last below written between the County of Riverside ("County") and the City of La Quinta ("City"). The parties agree as follows: 1. This Agreement is effective from November 13, 2023, through June 30, 2024. 2. Through its Emergency Management Department ("EMD"), County shall provide to City the services of an Emergency Services Coordinator ("ESC services") as described in Exhibit A and Attachment 1. 3. City shall pay County for these ESC services as stated in Exhibit B. 4. Either party may terminate this Agreement without cause upon 90 days' written notice to the other party. The Agreement may be terminated with cause upon 30 days' written notice to the other party. County shall be entitled to receive compensation for all properly provided services rendered prior to termination. 5. If City does not appropriate funds in its budget for payment, City shall immediately notify County in writing that such funds are not forthcoming. Such notice shall be deemed to be cause for termination by County or City. County shall nevertheless be entitled to payment for properly provided services rendered prior to termination. 6. At all times during performance of this Agreement, County shall maintain insurance or self-insurance reasonable and appropriate for a public entity the size of County. 7. County shall indemnify and hold harmless City, its departments, agencies, districts, officials, officers and employees from any liability, claim, damage or action based or asserted upon any act or omission of County relating to this Agreement, including but not limited to property damage, personal injury or death. City shall indemnify and hold harmless the County, its departments, agencies, districts, officials, officers and employees from any liability, claim, damage or action based or asserted upon any act or omission of City relating to this Agreement, including but not limited to property damage, personal injury or death. 85 Agreement No. EM -23-130 8. County shall maintain and keep records related to the ESC services in accordance with applicable County standards. In addition to their rights under applicable law, City and its employees and agents shall have the right to review and audit such records during County's normal business hours upon request and reasonable advance notice by City. 9. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in a court of competent jurisdiction in Riverside County, and the parties waive any provision of law providing for a change of venue to another location. 10. This Agreement shall be administered by the Director of EMD or designee on behalf of County, and by City Manager or his or her designee on behalf of City. 11. Notices issues pursuant to this Agreement shall be sent via U.S. Mail to the following: To County: To City: Emergency Management Department City of La Quinta 450 E. Alessandro Blvd. 78495 Calle Tampico Riverside, CA 92508 La Quinta, CA 92253 Attn: Operations Manager Attn: City Manager 12. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be an original, but all of which together will constitute one instrument. Each party of this Agreement agrees to the use of electronic signatures, such as digital signatures that meet the requirements of the California Uniform Electronic Transactions Act ("CUETA," Civ. Code, §§ 1633.1 to 1633.17), for executing this Agreement. The parties further agree that the electronic signatures of the parties included in this Agreement are intended to authenticate this writing and to have the same force and effect as manual signatures. Electronic signature means an electronic sound, symbol, or process attached to or logically associated with an electronic record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the electronic record pursuant to the CUETA as amended from time to time. The CUETA authorizes use of an electronic signature for transactions and contracts among parties in California, including a government agency. Digital signature means an electronic identifier, created by computer, intended by the party using it to have the same force and effect as the use of a manual signature, and shall be reasonably relied upon by the parties. For purposes of this section, a digital signature is a type of "electronic signature" as defined in subdivision (i) of Section 1633.2 of the Civil Code. 2 W. Agreement No. EM -23-130 13. This Agreement represents the full and final agreement between the parties related to this subject matter; and no prior oral or written agreements shall apply. This Agreement may be modified or altered only by a written amendment signed by authorized representatives of both parties. AGREED: County of Riverside M City of La Quinta M Bruce Barton, Director Jon McMillen Emergency Management Department City Manager Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 0 Melissa R. Cushman, Deputy County Counsel COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 3 Dated: 87 Agreement No. EM -23-130 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES 1. Level of Service: County shall provide emergency services utilizing the designated Service Level of an Emergency Services Coordinator ("ESC"), to be provided by County for City. Services to be provided shall vary based on the Service Level Option chosen by the City, as outlined in Attachment 1, and identified in Exhibit B, Payment Provisions. Services include the following: 1.1 Comprehensive emergency management program: The ESC will coordinate a comprehensive program with the overall mission of serving the public in order to effectively support and recover from a major emergency or disaster, utilizing all standards and applicable laws and regulations within the discipline of emergency management. 1.2 Point of contact: The ESC is the City emergency management point of contact and will be responsible for the coordination with all City personnel and departments and represent the City at all meetings, events, functions, etc., as required. 1.3 Collaboration: The ESC will partner with all local, county, state and federal government agencies, special districts, the private sector, community entities, volunteer and non-profit organizations as necessary in all phases of emergency management. 1.4 Service to Public: The ESC will provide service to the public on matters covered in this Agreement consistent with established policies and procedures that promote courteous, efficient service and good public relations. 2. Primary Responsibilities: The ESC will coordinate all activities to address the four phases of emergency management (Refer to Attachment 1 for detailed levels of service). 2.1 Mitigation Phase: Identification and assessment of hazards, risks, threats using proven mitigation methodologies 2.2 Preparedness Phase: 2.2.1 Plan Development/Maintenance 2.2.2 Grants Management 2.2.3 Community Outreach/Education 2.2.4 Training 2.2.5 Exercise Development/Execution 4 :: Agreement No. EM -23-130 2.2.6 Emergency Operations Center ("EOC") Readiness 2.2.7 Volunteer Management 2.3 Response Phase: 2.3.1 Emergency Response 2.3.2 Incident Level Based Response Protocols as delineated in section 7 2.4 Recovery Phase: 2.4.1 Short Term Recovery 2.4.2 Long Term Recovery 3. Provision of Supervision: Supervision over the rendition of services, the standards of performance, the discipline of personnel, and other matters incidental to the performance of such services and the control of personnel so employed shall remain with County. However, City reserves the right to request, in writing, the replacement of any personnel for cause. 4. Provision of Equipment: For the purpose of performing said services, and to ensure standardization of required equipment, County shall furnish and supply standard equipment and supplies at no cost to the City. Any additional equipment required by City will be acquired at City's expense. 5. Response Vehicle: County shall provide the response vehicle, according to County specifications, and shall provide fuel and maintain said vehicle. The vehicle will be utilized as a take home vehicle for response capabilities according to County policy. 6. Office Space and Furniture: 6.1 If available, City shall provide office space, office equipment/supplies and furniture necessary for the ESC to perform their job duties. 6.2 ESC headquarters will beat either County EOC in Riverside or Alternate County EOC in Indio. 7. ESC Availability: 7.1 Day -to -Day: The assigned ESC will be available to the City based on the contracted level of service as indicated in Exhibit B and according to a pre -arranged schedule approved by City. 5 :• Agreement No. EM -23-130 7.2 Local Incident — Affecting One City: If an incident occurs in one of the contracted cities, the assigned ESC will respond to that affected city and will notify cities of the response. 7.3 Local Incident. Regional or Catastroahic Event — AffectinE Contracted Cities: If a local incident, regional or catastrophic event occurs during which multiple contracted cities are affected, the ESC or the EMD Emergency Services Division Manager will contact the city liaisons to make the determination to which city the ESC should respond, based on the following criteria: • The severity of the incident or event • Which city has the greater threat • The current location of the assigned ESC • The availability of additional EMD staff to respond 7.4 Duty Officer Rotation: City agrees for ESC to serve in the EMD Duty Officer rotation. 7.5 Vacation/Sick Leave: EMD Duty Chief, Duty Officer or supervisor will be on call and available to respond when the dedicated ESC is on scheduled or unscheduled leave. 7.6 Overtime/Extraordinary Costs: City agrees that overtime and extraordinary costs for incidents within the exclusive jurisdiction of the City are not included in the annual rate. 7.6.1 Overtime shall mean any request by City to attend city council meeting, community meetings or any official city business outside of normal business hours (after 5:00 pm M -F and weekends). 7.6.2 Extraordinary costs shall mean any reasonable, actual and out of pocket costs associated with an emergency incident within the City's jurisdiction. 0 .o Agreement No. EM -23-130 EXHIBIT B PAYMENT PROVISIONS City shall compensate County for Emergency Services Coordinator ("ESC") services on a quarterly basis as set forth below. 1. Summary of Compensation for Emergency Services Coordinator Services: 1.1 The following chart summarizes the annual rates to be charged by County for services pursuant to this Agreement (refer to Attachment 1 for details). The City's selected option is indicated: Option Item Description Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Total ("X") Jul -Sept Oct -Dec Jan -Mar Apr -Jun Option A: $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $20,000 Base Services Option B: $11,250 $11,250 $11,250 $11,250 $45,000 ESC Services Shared (City Pop < 50,000) Option B: $16,250 $16,250 $16,250 $16,250 $65,000 ESC Services Shared (City Pop > 50,000) X Option C: $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $80,000 50% Dedicated Not Option D: $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $160,000 Available 100% Dedicated 1.2 The compensation payable to County for all services as set forth in this Agreement for the period commencing on or after July 1, 2023, and running through June 30, 2024, eighty thousand dollars ($80,000.00). 2. Overtime or Extraordinary Costs: Any overtime or extraordinary costs as defined in Exhibit A 7.6 are not included in the established rate. The rate for overtime/extraordinary cost is calculated at 1.5 x the EMD Staff's current employee rate and must be approved in advance by the city's authorized agent. 3. Invoicing: The County will invoice the City at the end of each quarter. The payment is due by the 2011 of the following month as follows: a. Quarter 1 (July 1— September 30) — due October 20th b. Quarter 2 (October 1— December 31) — due January 20th c. Quarter 3 (January 1— March 31) — due April 20th d. Quarter 4 (April 1— June 30) — due July 201h 7 91 Attachment 1 SERVICE LEVEL CIPTIONS: Bone A B C D BASE SHARED 0.5 ESC 1.0 ESC PHASE & SERVICE PROVIDED SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES MITIGATION PHASE GRANTS Support & Guidance x x x x x Management x x PREPAREDNESS PHASE CA EMERGENCY SERVICES ACT COMPLIANCE Emergency Organization Coordination x x Annual Disaster Council Meetings x x Disaster Ordinance Review/Update x x Operational Area Agreement Review/Update x x Disaster Service Workers Volunteer Program x x Mutual Aid Agreement Review/Update x x COMMi TTY 9M Events x x x Presentations x x x EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN Provide Template x x x x x Administrative Planning Support & Guidance x x x x Plan Development x x x Periodic Review/Update x x Staff Report & Resolution x Departmental Coordination x LOCALHA7ARD MITIGATION PLAN Provide Template x x x x x Administrative Planning Support & Guidance x x x x Plan Development x x x Periodic Review/Update x x Staff Report & Resolution x Departmental Coordination x MEDICAL HEALTH PLANNING Provide Template x x x x x Administrative Planning Support & Guidance x x x x Plan Development x x K Periodic Review/Update x x Departmental Coordinatbn x DISASTER RECOVERY PLAN Provide Template x x x x x Administrative Planning Support & Guidance x x x x Plan Development x x x Periodic Review/Update x x Staff Report & Resolution x Departmental Coordination x SITUATIONAL AWARENESS & COMMON OPERATING PICTURE Provide Template x x x x x Attachment 1 SERVICE LEVEL OPTIONS: None A 6 C D In House BASE SHARED 0.5 ESC 1.0 ESC PHASE & SERVICE PROVIDED SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES Administrative Planning Support & Guidance x x x x Plan Development x x x Periodic Review/Update x x Departmental Coordination x x x x CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS & x x CONTINUITY OF GOVERNMENT Provide Template x x x x x Administrative Planning Support & Guidance x x x x Plan development x x x Perlod]c Review/Update x x x x Staff Report & Resolution x Departmental Coordination x MASS CARE & SHELTER x x x x x Provide Tempi ate x K x x x Administrative Planning Support & Guidance x x x x Plan development x x x Periodic Review/Update x x Departmental Coordination x TRAINING & EXIERCISE FLAN Provide Template x x x x x Administrative Planning Support & Guidance x x x x Plan Development x x x Periodic Review/Update x x Departmental Coordination x TRAINING SEMS/NIMS Regional x x x x x In House x x x WebEOC Regional x x x x x In House x x Alert& Warning Regional x x x x x In House x x LOC Section-/Pos#ion-Specific Regional x x x x x In House x x ECC Action plan Regional x x x x x In House x x EXERCISE$ Regional x x x x x In -House x x 93 Attachment 1 SERVICE LEVEL OPTIONS: None A B C D BASE SHARED os ESC 1.0 ESC PHASE & SERVICE PROVIDED SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES EOC Readiness Gap Analysis - Structure & Systems ProvideTernplate x x x x x Administrative Planning Support & Guidance x x X X Plan Development x x X Periodic Reviewf Update x x Departmental Coordination x Alert & Warning Support x x x x x WebEOC Support x x x x x Monthly Systems Check Computers x x Video Displays x x Phones x x Radios x ?{ VOLUNTEER MANAGEMENT RACES x x Cam munity Emergency Response Teams x x RESPONSE OPERATIONS Incident Response ........ _................... .......... . * * x x x ... Liaison - State & Federal Partners x x x x x RECOVERY PHASE :i7PERATl01V5 Incident Recovery Response * x* x x x Liaison - State & Federal Partners x x x x x C40RDINATtON Preliminary Damage Assessment x x x x x Applicant Briefing x x x x x Meetings x x x Submittal x x Tracking x x Close -Out x x *' Assistonce By Him * * bependert upon availability 94 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: November 7, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 1, 2023: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2022-0001) AND APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2022-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2022-0001, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 FOR A 252 -UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT, LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS; CEQA: DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PREPARED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CONSISTENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 *Specific Plan 2022-0001 and Site Development Permit 2022-0001 would be conditioned upon and subject to approval by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) of General Plan 2022- 0002, a Housing Element Amendment subject to HCD certification pursuant to state Planning and Zoning Law (Gov. Code, § 65000 et seq.) RECOMMENDATION • Adopt a resolution to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2022-0001. • Adopt a resolution to approve General Plan Amendment 2022-0002, Specific Plan 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, Amendment 2) and Site Development Permit 2022-0001 for the La Quinta Village Apartments, consisting of 252 units located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50. *Specific Plan 2022-0001 and Site Development Permit 2022-0001 would be conditioned upon and subject to approval by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) of General Plan 2022-0002, a Housing Element Amendment subject to HCD certification pursuant to state Planning and Zoning Law (Gov. Code, § 65000 et seq.) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The project site is located on a vacant parcel at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50, the site of the previously approved La Paloma project (Attachment 1). The Applicant is requesting entitlement approval for a 252 -unit apartment project which would include 178 market -rate units and 74 moderate -income affordable units. The project would include site improvements such as landscaping, utility infrastructure, covered parking, clubhouse, pool, spa, barbeque areas, putting course, pickleball court, and dog park. • The project was heard by Council on August 1, 2023, and the public hearing was continued to a date uncertain to allow the applicant to address modifications to the W project including changing the architectural style of the buildings to Spanish Hacienda style, removing all three-story buildings, and removing garages on the north side of the site. The applications were remanded to the Planning Commission (Commission) to review these changes. • The Commission reviewed the changes at their October 10, 2023, regular meeting and recommended Council approve the changes. FISCAL IMPACT — None BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Applicant is proposing the La Quinta Village Apartments: a 252 -unit, multi -family apartment project on the site, which would include 178 market -rate units and 74 moderate - income affordable units. The project is located on a 14.03 -acre vacant parcel, bordered by a residential community to the north, Washington Street to the west, vacant land to the east, and Avenue 50 to the south. Development on the project site was previously approved under La Paloma SP 2004-071 on December 7, 2004, for a multi -unit senior community with independent living, assisted living and memory care units. The La Paloma SP is currently effective for the project site. The current General Plan designation for the site is MHDR (Medium High Density Residential); zoning for the site is RMH (Medium High Density Residential). Public Hearings The project was previously heard by the Commission on March 28 and June 27, 2023. The commission recommended adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), and a favorable recommendation for the General Plan Amendment (GPA). Commission Agenda Packet March 28, 2023 https://www.laguintaca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/48559/638223641604970000 Commission Agenda Packet June 27, 2023 https://www.laguintaca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/48611 /638236566056330000 The project was heard by Council on August 1, 2023, and the public hearing was continued to a date uncertain to allow the applicant to address modifications to the project including changing the architectural style of the buildings to Spanish Hacienda style, removing all three-story buildings, and removing garages on the north side of the site. The applications were remanded to the Commission to review at their October 10, 2023, regular meeting and the Commission recommended Council approval. Council Agenda Packet August 1, 2023 https://www.laguintaca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/48695/638261612183700000 Commission Agenda Packet October 10, 2023 httos://www.laauintaca.aov/home/showpublisheddocument/49263/638324514431200000 N. General Plan Amendment The project site is identified on the City's inventory of sites in its Housing Element to accommodate 280 residential units in the very low- and low-income categories. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65863 (commonly referred to as the state "No Net Loss Law"), a jurisdiction must maintain adequate sites to accommodate its remaining unmet regional housing need allocation (RHNA) by each income category. If a jurisdiction approves a development of a parcel identified in its Housing Element sites inventory with fewer units, per income category, than shown in the Housing Element, it must either make findings that the Housing Element's remaining sites have sufficient capacity to accommodate the remaining unmet RHNA by income level or identify and make available sufficient sites to accommodate the remaining unmet RHNA for each income category. The City is responsible for compliance with the No Net Loss Law, unless a project applicant(s) request in their initial application, as submitted, a density that would result in the remaining sites in the Housing Element not being adequate to accommodate the jurisdiction's share of the regional housing. While the project includes 74 moderate -income units and 178 market -rate units, the project does not include units in the very low -and low-income categories. Therefore, the Applicant must identify additional site(s) that could accommodate 280 very low -and low-income units. This requires a GPA to add another site to the inventory of sites in the Housing Element. The Applicant has identified an additional site, a 12.74 -acre property identified as Site 6 on the draft Housing Element amendment (Attachment 2). Site 6 is located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive and is in a Community Commercial zone that also has the Affordable Housing Overlay and Mixed Use Overlay, which allows for mixed use development — both multi -family residential and commercial development (Attachment 4). The Affordable Housing Overlay allows for a density of up to 30 units per acre and the Mixed Use Overlay allows for mixed use projects up to 24 units per acre. At 280 units, Site 6 would have a density of 22 units per acre, which is consistent with other affordable housing developments in the region. This site is within a "High Resource" area, in that it is immediately adjacent to schools, is in close proximity to businesses on Highway 111 and on Washington Street, and close to job areas which provides for economic opportunities. There is no planned development on Site 6 at this time. The site has been identified only as having the capacity to support 280 units of low- and very low-income affordable housing. If the GPA is approved, including the project as proposed, the City would then re -submit its Housing Element to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). This project is conditioned to not move forward with the "subordinate" entitlements and permits, such as the Specific Plan Amendment, Site Development Permit, and the ensuing construction until and unless HCD has approved the amendment to the Housing Element. Density Bonus The project is proposing 74 units to be designated for moderate -income households, as defined by the City's Density Bonus Section of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC), 77 found at https://Iibrary.municode.com/ca/la quinta/codes/municipal code?nodeld=TIT9ZO CH9.60SURERE 9.60.260DEBOAFHO, which was recently revised to be consistent with current state density bonus law. With 74 moderate income designated units, the project is allowed a 50% density bonus, which would allow for a total of 252 units on the Site. Per the LQMC, a condition would be placed for the project to enter into an agreement with the City to ensure that 74 units are reserved for moderate -income occupants. The agreement ensures continued affordability for a period of 55 years or longer; such agreement shall run with the land, shall be binding upon all successors in interest of the applicant, and shall be recorded in the office of the Riverside County Recorder. Specific Plan The project requires an amendment of the current La Paloma SP to reflect the proposed project (Exhibit C to proposed Resolution). The La Paloma SP contains detailed development principles, guidelines, and programs to facilitate the development of a multi- unit senior housing community. The amended SP (SP 2022-0001) would supersede the La Paloma SP and would detail the development principles, standards, guidelines and use standards for the new La Quinta Village Apartments project. The amended SP establishes some development standards that differ from the LQMC zoning standards, including: • Maximum structure height of 28 feet (ft) within 150 ft of image corridor (Washington Street and Avenue 50); current zoning limits the maximum structure height at 22 ft within 150 ft of image corridor. • Carports allowed within front yard setback; current zoning does not allow any structures, including carports, within front yard setback. • Minimum livable area of 670 square feet (sf); current zoning requires a minimum livable area of 750 sf. • Allowance of fencing and retention basins within perimeter landscape setbacks; current zoning does not allow fencing or retention basins within setback. These standards are allowed to be different with approval of the SP. Projects with affordable housing incorporated are allowed several concessions from the LQMC but the project is proposing for these additional standards to occur within the SP and are not requesting any concessions. All other development standards as they relate to setbacks, heights, lighting standards, open space requirements, and requirements for multi -family projects have been met, including a minimum 75 ft setback from their eastern property line to meet a setback requirement from the Coachella Valley Water District's stormwater channel. SP and current zoning standards are provided in the table below for comparison. Standards differing from the zoning code are highlighted. Standard Specific Plan Medium High Density Zone Minimum Project Size for Multi -Family Projects 20,000 sf 20,000 sf Minimum Frontage for Multi -Family Projects 100 ft 100 ft Maximum Structure Height 28 ft 28 ft Maximum Structure Height at Image Corridor 28 ft 22 ft Maximum Number of Stories 2 2 Minimum Front Yard Setback 20 ft 20 ft Minimum Interior/Exterior Side Yard Setback 5/10 ft 5/10 ft Minimum Rear Yard Setback 15 ft 15 ft Maximum Lot Coverage 60% 60% Minimum Common Open Area 30% 30% Minimum/Average Perimeter Landscape Setback 10/20 ft 10/20 ft Minimum Livable Area 670 sf 750 sf Site Development Permit In order to accommodate all two-story buildings and keep the proposed 252 units, the site plan layout has been reconfigured to include 12 buildings (Attachment 3). A breakdown of the 252 total units is as follows: • 74 of the units are moderate -income affordable deed restricted units • 178 are market rate • 166 units are one (1) bedroom units o 60 are 673 sf, 106 are 755 sf • 86 units are two (2) bedroom units: o All are 960 sf Parking With the revision of the site plan layout, 528 parking spaces are proposed, which is a ratio of 2.09 spaces per unit. The 528 parking spaces exceeds the minimum required parking of 319 spaces. Of the provided spaces, 359 are covered by carports. With the elimination of garages, there are 37 less covered spaces. The carports are at a maximum height of 11 ft and incorporate architecture to match the rest of the development. Building Desigr The architectural style has been revised from contemporary Mediterranean to Spanish Hacienda style. Architectural elements include trellises on second floors to reduce massing and arches, recessed niches, and crown moulding with stucco finish. The color palette consists of earth tones, and incorporates blues, grays, and purples as accents. Landscaninr Landscaping is proposed throughout the project site, including along Washington Street and Avenue 50, as described within the SP. The landscaping remains substantially the same as the prior iteration except for removal of artificial turf. 0 AGENCY AND PUBLIC REVIEW Public Agency Review All written comments received are on file and available for review with the Design and Development Department. All applicable comments have been adequately addressed and/or incorporated in the recommended Conditions of Approval. Public Hearing Notice This project was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on October 27, 2023, and distributed to properties within 1,000 feet of the Site. Staff have received written comments from the public stating their opposition, with concerns regarding traffic, noise, and views (Attachment 4). ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Design and Development Department (Department) prepared a MND consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Exhibit A to EA 2022-0001 Resolution) and circulated it for public review from March 3, 2023, through March 23, 2023, as prescribed by the CEQA Guidelines. The Department determined that the project would have less than significant effects on the environment, with mitigation measures incorporated. The City received eleven (11) public comments during the public review period regarding the traffic, biological, energy, and cultural resources. None of the comment letters triggered modifications to the MND. ALTERNATIVES • Council can elect to approve the project as recommended. • Council may modify the recommended approvals and direct staff to explore alternative sites to Site 6 to identify the capacity for 280 low- and very -low affordable housing units. • Council may reject the project proposal and deny the General Plan Amendment. Denial of the General Plan Amendment would render the other applications moot. Prepared by: Cheri Flores, Planning Manager Approved by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Draft Housing Element Inventory Sites Map Amendment 3. Entitlement Plans 4. Public Comments 100 COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2023 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A 252 -UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT, LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 CASE NUMBER: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2022-0001 APPLICANT: IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on November 7, 2023, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Irwin Partners Architects, to develop the La Quinta Village Apartments project, a 252 -unit apartment project at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50, more commonly described as: 646-070-016 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on October 27, 2023 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the site; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on August 1, 2023, previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approval of General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan and Site Development Permit; and WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, the City Council did continue the public hearing until a date uncertain and remanded the applications to the Planning Commission requesting that the applicant make changes to the project including reducing the number of stories of the units from three to two stories, changing the architectural style of the buildings from Contemporary Modern to Spanish Hacienda style, and removing garages on the north side of the site plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on October 10, 2023, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider changes to the La Quinta Village Apartments project and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2023-016 recommending the Council approve the changes; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did previously, on March 28, 2023, and June 27, 2023, hold duly noticed Public Hearings to 101 Council Resolution No. 2023 -XXX Environmental Assessment 2022-0001 Project: La Quinta Village Apartments Adopted: 2023 Page 2 of 3 consider said applications and recommended the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act to justify approval of said Environmental Assessment: 1. The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Potential impacts can be mitigated to be less than significant levels. 2. The proposed project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity. Potential impacts can be mitigated to be less than significant. 3. The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly. Potential impacts can be mitigated to be less than significant. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case. SECTION 2. That the City Council hereby does recommend adoption of Environmental Assessment 2022-0001 with mitigation measures incorporated [Exhibit A]. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on November 7, 2023, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: /_1:113IF_11► A 102 Council Resolution No. 2023 -XXX Environmental Assessment 2022-0001 Project: La Quinta Village Apartments Adopted: 2023 Page 3 of 3 ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California /_1»:191V 417_F -'I 1101170] N ►vi A WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 103 EXHIBIT A Administrative Draft _ cLa Quinta Village Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 Final Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Lead Agency: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Prepared by: The Altum Group Rich Malacoff, AICP 44-600 Village Court, Suite 100 Palm Desert, CA 92260 r7 G March October 2023 104 Table of Contents Chapter1 Introduction....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview...............................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Authority...............................................................................................................................................1 1.3 Scope of Environmental Review...........................................................................................................1 1.4 Impact Assessment Terminology..........................................................................................................2 1.5 Organization of the Initial Study...........................................................................................................2 1.6 Documents Incorporated by Reference................................................................................................2 Chapter 2 Project Description............................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Project Location and Setting.................................................................................................................4 2.2 Project Description...............................................................................................................................5 2.3 Project -Related Approvals....................................................................................................................5 2.4 Summary of Mitigation Measures........................................................................................................6 Chapter 3 Environmental Evaluation................................................................................................. 15 3.1 Aesthetics............................................................................................................................................16 3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources....................................................................................................18 3.3 Air Quality...........................................................................................................................................19 3.4 Biological Resources...........................................................................................................................27 3.5 Cultural Resources..........................................................................................................................3234 3.6 Energy.............................................................................................................................................35-34 3.7 Geology and Soils............................................................................................................................36 -5 3.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions.............................................................................................................4140 3.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials..................................................................................................434 3.10 Hydrology and Water Quality.........................................................................................................4645 3.11 Land Use and Planning...................................................................................................................4945 3.12 Mineral Resources..........................................................................................................................5159 3.13 Noise...............................................................................................................................................5254 3.14 Population and Housing.................................................................................................................5554 3.15 Public Services................................................................................................................................565§ 3.16 Recreation......................................................................................................................................5955 3.17 Transportation................................................................................................................................6059 DeseFt-SageLa_Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND iiAugust 2023 105 3.18 Tribal Cultural Resources................................................................................................................6466 3.19 Utilities and Service Systems..........................................................................................................6766 3.20 Wildfire...........................................................................................................................................6968 3.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance...............................................................................................7065 Chapter 4 Report Preparers....................................................................................................................757-4 List of Tables Table 1 Surrounding Land Uses......................................................................................................................4 Table 2 Construction -Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions..........................................................22 Table 3 Operational Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions.........................................................................23 Table 4 Maximum Number of Acres Disturbed Per Day..............................................................................24 Table 5 Local Construction Emissions at the Nearest Receptors.................................................................25 Table 6 Local Operational Emissions at the Nearest Receptors..................................................................26 Table 7 Project Related Greenhouse Gas Annual Emissions...................................................................4241 Table 8 Off -Site Traffic Noise Levels........................................................................................................54-53 Table 9 Existing Conditions (2021) Intersection Analysis........................................................................6261 Table 10 Project Completion (2023) Intersection Analysis........................................................................6261 Table 11 Cumulative Intersection Analysis................................................................................................6362 List of Exhibits Exhibit1 Regional Map....................................................................................................................................9 Exhibit2 Vicinity Map....................................................................................................................................10 Exhibit3 Site Plan..........................................................................................................................................11 Exhibit4 Renderings......................................................................................................................................12 Exhibit 5 Avenue 50 Noise Contour Map.......................................................................................................13 Exhibit 6 Washington Street Noise Contour Map..........................................................................................14 Appendix Appendix A Troutdale Village Air Quality, Greenhouse, and Energy Impact Study, MD Acoustics, December 30, 2021. Appendix B Biological Resources Report for the Troutdale Village Project Located in the City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California, ELMT Consulting, December 15, 2021. Appendix C Cultural Resource Investigation in Support of the Troutdale Village Project, PaleoWest, April 25, 2022. Appendix D Troutdale Village Apartments Project Noise Impact Study, MD Acoustics, January 12,2022. Appendix E Troutdale Village Transportation Analysis, Integrated Engineering Group, December 2021. Appendix F Preliminary Hydrology Study for Troutdale Village, Egan Civil, January 22, 2023. Appendix G Troutdale Village Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan, Egan Civil, January 2023. Appendix H Troutdale Village Transportation Analysis, Integrated Engineering Group, April 2023. DeseFt-SageLa_Quinta Villafe SPA No. 3 IS/MND iii MaFek+-Aufust 2023 106 Acronyms AB Assembly Bill AMSL Above Mean Sea Level APN Assessor's Parcel Number AQMP Air Quality Management Plan BMPs Best Management Practices CA EPA California Environmental Protection Agency CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model CALGreen California Green Building Standards Caltrans California Department of Transportation CAP Climate Action Plan CARB California Air Resources Board CBC California Building Code CCR California Code of Regulations CDC California Department of Conservation CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CFC Chlorofluorocarbons CH4 Methane CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level CNPS California Native Plant Society CO Carbon Monoxide CO2 Carbon Dioxide CVMSHCP Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan CVWD Coachella Valley Water District dB Decibel dBA A -weighted decibels DSUSD Desert Sands Unified School District DTSC California Department of Toxic Substances Control DU/AC Dwelling Unit per Acre e.g. Exempli Gratia or "for example" EIR Eastern Information Center EPA Environmental Protection Agency FTA Federal Transit Administration GHG Greenhouse Gas IID Imperial Irrigation District In/sec Inches Per Second IS Initial Study DeseFt-SageLa_Quinta VillaEe SPA No. 3 IS/MND iv MaFek+-Aufust 2023 107 ITE Institute of Engineers Lbs/day Pounds Per Day Leq Equivalent Continuous Sound Pressure Level LST Localized Significance Threshold MGD Million Gallons Per Day MLD Most Likely Descendant MMTCO2e Million Metric Tons of CO2 Emitted MRZ-3 Mineral Resources Zone 3 MWD Metropolitan Water District of Southern California N2O Nitrous Oxides NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NO Nitric Oxide NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide NOx Nitrogen Oxide NPDES National Pollution Discharge Elimination System PDPD Palm Desert Police Department PM Particulate Matter PM10 Particulate Matter Equal to or less than 10 Microns in Diameter PM2.5 Particulate Matter Equal to or less than 2.5 Microns in Diameter PPM Parts Per Million PPV Peak Particle Velocities PRC California Public Resources Code PSI Pounds Per Square Inch PSUSD Palm Springs Unified School District RCALUC Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission RCFD Riverside County Fire Department RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RCS/SCS Regional Transportation/Sustainable Communities Strategy RMS Root Mean Square RTP Regional Transportation Plan RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SB Senate Bill SCAB South Coast Air Basin SCAG Southern California Associations of Government SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SCE Southern California Edison SCS Sustainable Communities Strategy SIP State Implementation Plan SO2 Sulfur Dioxide DeseFt-SageLa_Quinta VillaEe SPA No. 3 IS/MND vAugust 2023 108 SoCal Gas Southern California Gas SOI Sphere of Influence SRA Source Receptor Area SRA State Responsibility Area SSAB Salton Sea Air Basin STC Sound Transmission Class SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers UWMP Urban Water Management Plan VdB Vibration decibels VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled WMP Water Management Plan WQMP Water Quality Management Plan WRP 10 Wastewater Treatment Plant 10 DeseFt-SageLa_Quinta VillaEe SPA No. 3 IS/MND viAugust 2023 109 This page intentionally left blank. DeseFt-SageLa_Quinta VdIaEe SPA No. 3 IS/MND vii August 2023 110 1 INTRODUCTION Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Overview Troutdale Village, LLC. (hereafter, "Applicant") is proposing to develop the DeseFtSage.LLQuinta ViIIaEe Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 Project (hereafter, "Project"), which consists of 252 dwelling units in the City of La Quinta (hereafter, "City"), in Riverside County, California. The Project site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Washington Street and Avenue 50 and is comprised of one parcel totaling approximately 14.03 acres. Currently, the Project site is vacant and is bordered by a residential community to the north, Washington Street to the west, vacant land to the east, and Avenue 50 to the south. The proposed Project will require the following entitlements from the City: 1) Specific Plan Amendment to replace the previous La Paloma Specific Plan (now called gej Quinta Village Specific Plan) for the Project site and substitute for the City of La Quinta Municipal Code and 2) Site Development Permit to allow for the development of 252 dwelling units and associated site improvements. 1.2 Authority The City of La Quinta is the lead agency for the proposed Project. The City Council is the governing body for the approval of the Project and adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Because the Project involves a change to the existing site, the City Council's consideration of the Project and its potential environmental effects is a discretionary action that is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This Subsequent Initial Study (IS) and its appendices have been prepared in accordance with CEQA (Statute), the State's Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA (Guidelines) (as amended, 2018), and the City's CEQA Guidelines for preparation of an IS. This IS, when combined with the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, serves as the environmental document for the proposed Project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA (Public Resources Code 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Section 15000, et seq.). 1.3 Scope of Environmental Review The IS evaluates the proposed Project's potential environmental impacts on the following topics: • Aesthetics • Agricultural and Forestry Resources • Air Quality • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Energy • Geology and Soils • Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Hydrology and Water Quality • Land Use and Planning • Mineral Resources • Noise • Population and Housing • Public Services • Recreation • Transportation • Tribal Cultural Resources • Utilities and Service Systems • Wildfire • Mandatory Findings of Significance DeseFt-Sa-ge,La__Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 1 MaFeh August 2023 111 1 INTRODUCTION 1.4 Impact Assessment Terminology The Environmental Checklist identifies potential impacts using four levels of significance as follows: • No Impact. A finding of no impact is made when it is clear from the analysis that the proposed project would not affect the environment. • Less than significant. A finding of less than significant is made when it is clear from the analysis that a proposed project would cause no substantial adverse change in the environment and no mitigation is required. • Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. A finding of less than significant with mitigation incorporated is made when it is clear from the analysis that a proposed project would cause no substantial adverse change in the environment when mitigation measures are successfully implemented by the project proponent. • Potentially Significant. A finding of potentially significant is made when the analysis concludes that the proposed project could have a substantially adverse impact on the environment related to one or more of the topics listed in the previous section, Scope of the Initial Study. 1.5 Organization of the Initial Study The content and format of this IS meet the requirements of CEQA. This IS contains the following sections: • Chapter 1 Introduction. This chapter provides a brief summary of the proposed Project, identifies the lead agency, summarizes the purpose and scope of the IS, and identifies documents incorporated by reference. • Chapter 2 Proiect Description. This chapter provides a project overview including a description of the regional location and Project vicinity, including Exhibits; and provides a description of the Project elements, e.g., dimensions of the Project, and identifies other agencies that may have permitting authority over the Project. • Chapter 3 Environmental Checklist. This chapter provides a copy of the City's Environmental Checklist and responses to each question posed in the checklist. This chapter also provides a brief description of the sources used to evaluate the proposed Project, a brief description of the existing conditions for each topic, and an analysis of potential environmental impacts. Mitigation measures are also identified where necessary. • Chapter 4 List of Preparers. This chapter identifies City staff and consultants who were responsible for the preparation of this IS and implementation of the Project. 1.6 Documents Incorporated by Reference As allowed by CEQA Guidelines Section 15150, a Mitigated Negative Declaration may incorporate by reference all or portions of another document that is generally available to the public. The document used must be available for public review for interested parties to access during public review of the Subsequent Initial Study and Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this Project. The following documents are incorporated by reference. • City of La Quinta 2035 General Plan, Adopted February 19, 2013 (Amended November 19, 2013) • Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2010111094) for the City of La Quinta General Plan La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND MaFeh August 2023 112 1 INTRODUCTION These documents are also available for review at the La Quinta City Hall at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. The Project specific reports are attached to the Initial Study as appendices. The General Plan and General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report are located on the City's website at: https://www.laguintaca.gov/business/design-and-development/planning-division/2035-1a-quinta-general- plan and https://www.laquintaca.gov/business/lg2035-general-plan/documents, respectively. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND MaFeh August 2023 113 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Chapter 2 Project Description 2.1 Project Location and Setting As detailed in Exhibit 1 Regional Map, and Exhibit 2, Vicinity Map, the Project site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Washington Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta (City), in Riverside County, California. The Project site encompasses Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 646-070-016. Existine General Plan Designation The Project site is designated as "Medium/High Density Residential" under the City's General Plan 2035 Land Use Map. The Medium/High Density Residential designation is designed to accommodate a broad range of residential land uses, including small -lot divisions, duplex, condominium, and apartments. The maximum density of this land use designation is 16 dwelling units per acre. Existing/Proposed Zoning Designation The Project site is zoned "Medium High Density Residential (RMH)" and within an Affordable Housing Overlay per the City's Official Zoning Map and Municipal Code. Per the City's Municipal Code Section 9.30.060, the purpose of the RMH zoning designation is to provide for the development and preservation of medium-high density neighborhoods (eight to twelve dwelling units per acre), except as provided in Section 9.40.020. The Applicant is proposing a Change of Zene to ehan,.,, the o., jet sites z g d,,signatien fr„w, RNAH to "High eens+ty-Des+dentia')," whfei^'-1oPs up-te 16 units peg--ae+eto keep the RMH zoning and apply a Density Bonus which would result in 16 units per acre. The Affordable Housing Overlay designation would remain. Existing Specific Plan Designation The entire Project site is located within the La Paloma Specific Plan (SP 04-071) which would be called Desert SageLa Quinta Village Specific Plan (Specific Plan 2022-0001, SP 04-071 Amendment). Surrounding Land Uses The Project site is bordered by a residential community located immediately north; to the west, the Project site is bordered by Washington Street and beyond is a residential community; to the east, the Project site is bordered by a dry channel and beyond is La Quinta Middle School, YMCA, and the Boys and Girls Club; and to the south, the Project site is bordered by Avenue 50 and beyond is vacant, undeveloped land. See Table 1, Surrounding Land Uses. Table 1 Surrounding Land Uses Direction General Plan Designation Zoning Existing Land Use MHDR - Medium/High Density RM - Medium Density North Residential Residential Residential community MHDR - Medium/High Density RM - Medium Density Avenue 50/Vacant, undeveloped South Residential Residential land Dry channel and La Quinta Middle East OS -N - Open Space Natural FP- Floodplain School, YMCA, and the Boys and Girls Club; West LDR - Low Density Residential RL -Low DensityResidential Washington Street/Residential DeseFt4SaseLa Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 4 MaFeh August 2023 114 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Existing Utility Infrastructure Existing utility infrastructure at the Project site consists of an 18 -inch Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) waterline beneath Washington Street and Avenue 50. Additionally, sewer mains are located on the west side of the site in Washington Street and on the south side of the site in Avenue 50. There are existing power poles located on Washington Street, Avenue 50, and the north property line, which may be undergrounded if practical and allowed by Imperial Irrigation District (IID). 2.2 Project Description As shown in both Exhibit 3, Site Plan, the proposed Project involves the development of 4-1--12 two -and three- story apartment buildings totaling 2-94252 dwelling units on a 14.03 -acre property. The proposed apartment buildings would have a maximum height of 40-28 feet. Of the 2-84252 dwelling units, 21-4178 will be market - rate units and 7-&-74 will be moderate -income affordable units. The Applicant also proposes associated site improvements including landscaping, utility infrastructure, parking spaces, an internal roadway, a clubhouse, pool and spa, barbeque areas, putting course, pickleball court, tot lot, and dog park for the residents. The Project would contain two retention basins along the western side of the Project site and some smaller retention basins throughout the site. The Project would provide for a total of 520 parking spaces, including 456 standard spaces, 12 accessible spaces, and 52 future electric vehicle (EV) capable spaces or as required by CalGreen standards. The Project also would provide two bicycle parking racks, for a total of four spaces. Primary Project access would be provided along the Project site's frontage on Washington Street. The proposed secondary access would be provided along the Project site's frontage on Avenue 50. The internal circulation is a driveway around the perimeter of the site, which would not consist of dead -ends. This design also provides easy access for the fire department and trash collector to all proposed buildings on the site. Street improvements to the Project site's frontages with Washington Street and Avenue 50 would consist of expanded pavement, curb, gutter, median, and sidewalk/bike improvements. 2.3 Project -Related Approvals The discretionary approvals required by the City include: • Specific Plan Amendment No. 2022-001 Change of Zone Ne 20»2_009» • Site Development Permit No. 2022-0001 • Adoption ofLa Quints Village Specific Plan IS/MND (EA2022-0001) • General Plan Amendment No. 2022-0002 Administrative approvals are required by the City related to the design and construction of stormwater drainage infrastructure, Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) for construction of water and sewer infrastructure and connection to the water and sewer distribution and conveyance systems, and Colorado River Basin Regional Water Quality Control Board for issuance of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and approval of the Project's Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). La Quints Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 5 MaFeh August 2023 115 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.4 Summary of Mitigation Measures 13I0-1 Regardless of the time of year, nesting bird surveys shall be performed by a qualified avian biologist no more than three (3) days prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities. Pre - construction surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior. The qualified biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the pre - construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and should be at least 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors and birds -of -prey. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Project -related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012 or most recent version). , censtFuetwen aetivities must begin duFing the nesting biFd seasen (FebFuaFy Ist thFeugh August 31st), a pFe eenstFuetien nesting bard suFvey Sh-all -he PA- Me% than 14 days pFieF te initiatien e Ceunty. The nesting biFd suFvey shall be ce-nd-urae-d- en feet in -side the IaFejeet beundaFy, ineluding a -30-0- feet buffeFfeF passeFines (sengbiFds) and a 500 feet buffe.rfe-F rapteFs in aFeas A -f. suitahle habitat. Inpir-r-prrihip Arizp,; wall he surveyed using bineculars te the extent practical. if nests ar- f-und, an buffer (dependent upen species, the prepesed werk activity, the existing disturbances asseciatedd y.fithl. land eutsidde ef. the site) shall be determined and- deelmarcatedd bythe bielegi-st ith bright orange censtructien fencing, flagging, ce-n-structi— !@the, er ether nqeans te mark the w An have fledged. &ACCPA-ar-,hment Onto the buffe.r shall enly at the disr-retien A -f the qualified bielegist. 13I0-2 Prior to construction and issuance of any grading permit, the City of La Quinta shall ensure compliance with the Coachella Vallev Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) and its associated ImplementinE Agreement and shall ensure the collection of Davment of the CVMSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee.T"^ "nn'".ant s""" pay the CVMSHGP Weal n.,yeleY,., ent Mitigation Fee CUL -1 A qualified archaeologist monitor shall be present during any ground disturbing activities during the project construction phase. In the case that archaeological materials are encountered during ground disturbing activities, work in the area shall cease and any deposits shall be treated according to Federal, State, and local guidelines. No further grading is permitted in the area of the discovery until the City approves the appropriate measure to protect the discovered resources. CUL -2 In the event that human remains are uncovered during ground disturbing activities on the Project site, no further disturbance shall occur, and all work shall cease until the County Coroner has made a DeseFt gel -a Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND MaFGh-August 2023 116 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION determination of the origin and disposition of the remains. Ground disturbing activities and excavations shall not resume until the following has been addressed: 1. The County Coroner has been contacted and determined that no investigation to the cause of death is required, and 2. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are of Native American decent, the Coroner must notify Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will then determine the Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD shall complete the inspection of the site within 48 hours of notification and may recommend means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains, and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resource Code Section 5097.98. GEO-1 Prior to the start of the proposed Project activities, all field personnel will receive a worker's environmental awareness training on paleontological resources. The training will provide a description of the laws and ordinances protecting fossil resources, the types of fossil resources that may be encountered in the Project area, the role of the paleontological monitor, outlines steps to follow in the event that a fossil discovery is made and provides contact information for the Project Paleontologist. The training will be developed by the Project Paleontologist and can be delivered concurrent with other training including cultural, biological, safety, etc. GEO-2 Prior to the commencement of ground -disturbing activities, a professional paleontologist will be retained to prepare and implement a PRMMP for the proposed Project. The PRMMP will describe the monitoring required during excavations that extend into older Quaternary (Pleistocene) age sediments, and the location of areas deemed to have a high paleontological resource potential. Part- time monitoring, or spot checking, may be required during shallow ground -disturbances (< 10 feet below ground surface) to confirm that sensitive geologic units are not being impacted. Monitoring will entail the visual inspection of excavated or graded areas and trench sidewalls. GEO-3 In the event that a paleontological resource is discovered, the monitor will have the authority to temporarily divert the construction equipment around the find until it is assessed for scientific significance and, if appropriate, collected. If the resource is determined to be of scientific significance, the Project Paleontologist shall complete the following: 1. Salvage of Fossils. If fossils are discovered, all work in the immediate vicinity should be halted to allow the paleontological monitor, and/or Project Paleontologist to evaluate the discovery and determine if the fossil may be considered significant. If the fossils are determined to be potentially significant, the Project Paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) should recover them following standard field procedures for collecting paleontological as outlined in the PRMMP prepared for the Project. Typically, fossils can be safely salvaged quickly by a single paleontologist and not disrupt construction activity. In some cases, larger fossils (such as complete skeletons or large mammal fossils) require more extensive excavation and longer salvage periods. In this case the paleontologist should have the authority to temporarily direct, divert, or halt construction activity to ensure that the fossil(s) can be removed in a safe and timely manner. 2. Fossil Preparation and Curation. The PRMMP will identify the museum that has agreed to accept fossils that may be discovered during project -related excavations. Upon completion of fieldwork, all significant fossils collected will be prepared in a properly equipped laboratory to a point ready for curation. Preparation may include the removal of excess matrix from fossil materials and La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 7 MaFeh August 2023 117 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION stabilizing or repairing specimens. During preparation and inventory, the fossils specimens will be identified to the lowest taxonomic level practical prior to curation at an accredited museum. The fossil specimens must be delivered to the accredited museum or repository no later than 90 days after all fieldwork is completed. The cost of curation will be assessed by the repository and will be the responsibility of the client. GEO-4 Upon completion of ground disturbing activity (and curation of fossils if necessary) the Project Paleontologist should prepare a final mitigation and monitoring report outlining the results of the mitigation and monitoring program. The report should include discussion of the location, duration and methods of the monitoring, stratigraphic sections, any recovered fossils, and the scientific significance of those fossils, and where fossils were curated. TCR -1 Prior to any ground disturbing activities on the Project site, an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) shall be present to monitor the site. Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a qualified Archaeologist to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 8 MaFeh August 2023 118 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Exhibit 1 Regional Map r DeseFt-Sagetq Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 9 MaFeh August 2023 119 �. l, �!J�;� �. _ ;�'= lob off:—• "��,.*�+.• f uj �it Ji.l.':� i •i �� C 1�'FiuY li 733law - ase i u�o�'si . .iRi7F . r b . a f �, _ McYt 4 ti iii -j ZON y rk # r•r n4��rY,•.ur�in u7 ��/ ; i .'Y � m W O� i rr■r-0 +erg q!;;I.'� r r 5 ��F` '�� ■�L Y.M1 r .I+� a Qi'}� �„1 ,� P A pr _ � �'4y� � +.wr, w�s � er► e j ��Fi� 1 _ .. .± _�?Y�� .L _C µ ale 1 j•i t.�l,P q Awlt +' irtr- Ci _ y �4� '♦ r •a .Y aff 7 7y! 4 t _ Y�,�� fa °.R�L � ��6� � �x.r Fti ■ri��E�: a i } c_'S�-.. •_'a •, �. CCCC��� ac u:•�e+Y-�DrV4_� i ��Y �J}J' I 35 sauepy m.• a t 155' �'f��e• 8ry- -. ❑_ . - ,r ,� `�,,.� ■�w■.�. :,..ri COY �' i '�` 3ti�'�'fPr +•�wyiN.d� :•�'- a L - '� ■ I. .r.yfY Y''+'iy.�: y. � d 7 w`{`i�•"4rs �•� iY: f �� `'.�"-�Plf +`� S Y 111 �.� Kd. . �tr} f.��i4� '` � .� ► "R �.�w �i < < I. -�.. aLp-,siob ail 01f'--- x'[^Trrf a4ff��,„r�y- 5ai "� ' '�9�'� .""` , • �F'i- q • w '� F=.L�i ��JJ •'f � -'+mow"r��"'...�. , �s�..l �. _ - uC, r �',.5.�•; � `C;er ! - ■, ,,�. -mow.. at�`.'.� !tin R Jr R uAl _ 6.Wf Z3 jj3,Jamau1]asl� •,Rd r n ted"# �e 4.�.Y _ � •r 'may % - .''re. „ .. �-'_ ..:0'', G �L oir FOR .. Exhibit 3 Site Plan 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION a �a SSiz Y3. � f ;nraaaa ffi UM ww� C��CSi �i '._�aaiaaa E a0 h a v�� v'a C 03' Q J DeseFt geLa Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 11 August 2023 121 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Exhibit 4 Renderings Above: View of entre Gecess ^^ ^venu^ 5^. Washington Street entrance. Above: View on Avenue 50 looking towards Washington Street intersection with mountain range in background. DeseFt geLa Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 12 August 2023 122 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Exhibit S Avenue 50 Noise Contour Map m a z r I � t— O J C - O o U �c O +n 6 un O n man LD Wn n C) a E J y A Q$ ti G m LR Q In m N J O wiz +n LM1 �v W C N a C C:l ty IA u o in 0 � L o JF RS' M DeseFt-Sagetq Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 13 MaFeh August 2023 123 a I � L� 00 L•,b'l Rip C C:l N p N ti RS' M „c DeseFt-Sagetq Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 13 MaFeh August 2023 123 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Exhibit 6 Washington Street Noise Contour Map .o z 0 J C 0 on Ln m � oA -0m r, m 1 o f v . 1 h 0 co of o Ln w Fa m J o Ln a x M 91 A J � HeLa Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 14 NAa h August 2023 124 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Chapter 3 Environmental Evaluation ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture and Forestry ❑ Air Quality Resources ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology/Soils ❑ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ❑ Hazards and Hazardous ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality Materials ❑ Land Use/Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population/Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑ Tribal Cultural Resources ❑ Utilities and Service Systems ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ® I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as describe on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature Date La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 15 MaFeh August 2023 125 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.1 Aesthetics 3.1.1 Sources • City of La Quinta, City of La Quinta 2035 General Plan, Adopted February 19, 2013. • City of La Quinta, Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2010111094) for the City of La Quinta General Plan, July 2012. https://www.laguintaca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/15858/635338594527270000 • California Department of Transportation, California State Scenic Highway System Map, 2019 • Google Earth, 2022 3.1.2 Environmental Setting Scenic views from the Project site consists of the San Bernardino (north, northeast, and northwest), Santa Rosa (southwest), and San Jacinto (west) Mountain Ranges. The San Bernardino, Santa Rosa, and San Jacinto Mountains Ranges rise over the valley floor at elevations consisting of 8,716 feet (2,657 meters), 8,011 feet (2,442 meters), and 11,489 feet (3,502 meters), respectively. 3.1.3 Impacts Less than Significant Impact The Project site and the vicinity of the Project site do not contain a scenic vista. The nearest scenic vista consists of scenic views of the San Bernardino Mountains located 7.7 miles north of the Project site; Santa Rosa Mountains located approximately 5.0 miles southwest of the Project site; and San Jacinto Mountains located approximately 1.8 miles west of the Project site. Surrounding the Project site, views of the lower elevations of the aforementioned are partially blocked due to existing development and distance from the mountains; however, views of the middle and upper elevations of these mountains are kept visibly intact. As shown in Exhibit 3, Site Plan, the proposed maximum height for residential buildings at 40-28 feet would comply with the City's Zoning Code. The proposed buildings and site improvements would partially obscure views of the San Bernardino Mountains, Santa Rosa LaDeseFt—Sa-ge,__Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 16 MaFeh August 2023 126 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact p Mitigation Impact P Impact Incorporated AESTHETICS —Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic ❑ ❑ ❑ buildings within a state scenic highway? c) In non -urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which ❑ ❑ ® ❑ would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less than Significant Impact The Project site and the vicinity of the Project site do not contain a scenic vista. The nearest scenic vista consists of scenic views of the San Bernardino Mountains located 7.7 miles north of the Project site; Santa Rosa Mountains located approximately 5.0 miles southwest of the Project site; and San Jacinto Mountains located approximately 1.8 miles west of the Project site. Surrounding the Project site, views of the lower elevations of the aforementioned are partially blocked due to existing development and distance from the mountains; however, views of the middle and upper elevations of these mountains are kept visibly intact. As shown in Exhibit 3, Site Plan, the proposed maximum height for residential buildings at 40-28 feet would comply with the City's Zoning Code. The proposed buildings and site improvements would partially obscure views of the San Bernardino Mountains, Santa Rosa LaDeseFt—Sa-ge,__Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 16 MaFeh August 2023 126 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Mountains, and San Jacinto Mountains - although not substantially more than under existing conditions - and views of these Mountains would continue to be available above the proposed buildings. Therefore, the proposed Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on scenic vistas and impacts would be less than significant. b. No Impact According to the California Scenic Highway Program, the nearest scenic highway is SR -74, which is located approximately 6.2 miles west of the Project site and is classified as an Officially Designated Scenic Highway. Due to the distance between the Project site and SR -74, the Project site is not visible to vehicles driving along SR -74. In addition, there are no historic buildings nor any unique geologic or topographic features such as rock outcrops, bodies of water, ridges or canyons found on or within the Project site. Therefore, due to topography and intervening development, the proposed Project would not substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway. No impact would occur. C. Less than Significant Impact The Project site is located in an urbanized area; therefore, the applicable threshold is whether the proiect would conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality. Under existing conditions, the entire Project site is undeveloped vacant land with sparse desert flora. The surrounding land to the north and west are residential homes, vacant planned residential homes to the south, and a dry channel to the east. Implementation of the Project would result in the visual conversion of the site from vacant, undeveloped land to 2-84252 apartment homes. The Project would be compatible with the size, scale, and aesthetic features of other existing homes located to the north, west, and future homes to the south of the Project site. Furthermore, the Project would be required to comply with the applicable development standards and design guidelines in the DeseFtSageLa Quinta Village Specific Plan and the City of La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC), which regulates the visual quality of new development and ensures that new development does not detract from any scenic attributes/qualities in the surrounding area. The existing zoning of RMH provides for homes up to 28'. LQMC Section 9.50.020, Height Limits and Setbacks Near Image Corridors, requires a maximum height of 22 feet within the first 150 feet from Avenue 50 and Washington Street. An increase above 22' is permitted subject to a minor use permit per LQMC as described in Footnote 2 of Table 9-2 Residential Development Standards ("Any proposed building height over 22 feet requires minor use permit approval and shall not exceed a maximum building height of the existing zone.") The Specific Plan will provide modified standards that will allow a maximum height of 49-28 feet within the first 150 feet from Avenue 50 and Washington Street. As noted above, the 28' is consistent with the maximum permitted building height for homes in the RMH zone. Thus, the Specific Plan which would replace the Minor Use Permit, would be consistent with the provisions of the LQMC. Further, as shown in Exhibit 4, the buildings along the perimeter of the project adjacent to Washing Street and Avenue 50h will not impact the view The deFiRgS (EXhibit 4) that the views will not be impacted. Because the O the mountains. The is r eiiaci ii i , C]CI IIfJIC � 6i ivvd a that Project is in an urbanized area and would not conflict with applicable zoning standards and other regulations governing scenic quality, a less than significant impact would occur from implementation of the Project. d. Less than Significant Impact Under existing conditions, the Project site contains no sources of artificial lighting. The Project would introduce new sources of lighting, including streetlights and security lighting. Subject to City review and approval, all Project lighting would be required to conform to regulations, guidelines, and standards established under LQMC Section 9.150.080, Parking Facility Design Standards, and LQMC Section 9.100.150, Outdoor Lighting, which ensures adequate lighting for public safety while also minimizing light pollution, glare, and public nuisances. Mandatory compliance with the City's Zoning DeseFt-Sa-ge,La__Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 17 MaFeh August 2023 127 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Code would ensure that the Project would not introduce any permanent design features that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. Impacts would be less than significant. 3.1.4 Mitigation No mitigation required. 3.1.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources 3.2.1 Sources • Riverside Map My County, 2022. https.Ilgisl.countyofriverside.us/Html5Viewer/?viewer=MMC Public. 3.2.2 Environmental Setting The Project site is presently vacant, and the ground surface is covered with scattered desert brush, weeds, and minor debris. The Project site has an existing ground surface elevation range from about 40 to 59 feet above mean sea level (AMSC). The Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP) designates the Project site as Urban and Built -Up Land. 3.2.3 Impacts La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 18 MaFeh August 2023 128 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the Project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and ❑ ❑ ❑ Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ❑ ❑ ❑ Williamson Act Contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section ❑ ❑ ❑ 12220(8)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526) or timberland zoned Timberland La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 18 MaFeh August 2023 128 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION a -e. No Impact According to mapping information available from the California Department of Conservation's (CDC) Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP), the Project site is classified as Urban and Built -Up Land. Accordingly, the Project site does not contain any lands mapped by the FMMP as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland); therefore, the Project would not convert such Farmland to non-agricultural use. Furthermore, the Project site is not located within a Williamson Act contract. Lastly, the Project site is zoned for Medium/High Density Residential under existing conditions; therefore, the Project would not conflict with zoning for agricultural use or result in the loss of forest land or convert forest land or timberland to non -forest land. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 3.2.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.2.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.3 Air Quality 3.3.1 Sources • MD Acoustics, Troutdale Village Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Study, December 30, 2021 (Appendix A) 3.3.2 Environmental Setting The Project site is within the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB), which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCAQMD is one of the 35 air quality regulatory agencies in the State of California and all development within the SSAB is subject to SCAQMD's 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (2016 AQMP) and the 2003 Coachella Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan (2003 CV PM10 SIP). The SCAQMD operates and maintains regional air quality monitoring stations at numerous locations throughout its jurisdiction. The SCAQMD is divided into 38 air -monitoring areas with a designated ambient air monitoring station representative of each area. The Project site is located in the City of La Quinta within the County of Riverside in the Coachella Valley (Area 30). The nearest air monitoring station to the Project site is the Palm La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 19 MaFeh August 2023 129 Less than Potentially Significant with Less than No Significant Significant Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Impact Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest ❑ ❑ ❑ land to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in ❑ ❑ ❑ conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? a -e. No Impact According to mapping information available from the California Department of Conservation's (CDC) Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP), the Project site is classified as Urban and Built -Up Land. Accordingly, the Project site does not contain any lands mapped by the FMMP as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland); therefore, the Project would not convert such Farmland to non-agricultural use. Furthermore, the Project site is not located within a Williamson Act contract. Lastly, the Project site is zoned for Medium/High Density Residential under existing conditions; therefore, the Project would not conflict with zoning for agricultural use or result in the loss of forest land or convert forest land or timberland to non -forest land. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 3.2.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.2.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.3 Air Quality 3.3.1 Sources • MD Acoustics, Troutdale Village Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Study, December 30, 2021 (Appendix A) 3.3.2 Environmental Setting The Project site is within the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB), which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCAQMD is one of the 35 air quality regulatory agencies in the State of California and all development within the SSAB is subject to SCAQMD's 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (2016 AQMP) and the 2003 Coachella Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan (2003 CV PM10 SIP). The SCAQMD operates and maintains regional air quality monitoring stations at numerous locations throughout its jurisdiction. The SCAQMD is divided into 38 air -monitoring areas with a designated ambient air monitoring station representative of each area. The Project site is located in the City of La Quinta within the County of Riverside in the Coachella Valley (Area 30). The nearest air monitoring station to the Project site is the Palm La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 19 MaFeh August 2023 129 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Springs — Fire Station (Palm Springs Station) approximately 18 miles northwest of the site. However, this location does not provide all ambient weather data. Therefore, additional data was pulled from the SCAQMD historical data for the Coachella Valley Area (Area 30) for both sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide to provide the existing levels The SSAB exceeds state and federal standards for fugitive dust (PM10) and ozone (03) and is in attainment/unclassified for PM2.5. Ambient air quality in the SSAB, including the Project site, does not exceed state and federal standards for carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxides, sulfur dioxide, lead, sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, or Vinyl Chloride. 3.3.3 Impacts Less than Significant Impact The SCAQMD has established the AQMP to achieve State and Federal air quality standards. On June 30, 2016, the SCAQMD released its Draft 2016 AQMP. The Plan was approved by the California Environmental Protection Agency (CA EPA) on June 15, 2017. Therefore, the applicable air quality plan for the Project is the SCAQMD 2016 AQMP. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that "New or amended General Plan Elements (including land use zoning and density amendments), Specific Plans, and significant projects must be analyzed for consistency with the AQMP." Strict consistency with all aspects of the plan is usually not required. A project should be considered to be consistent with the AQMP if it furthers one or more policies and does not obstruct other policies. The pollutant reducing mechanisms in the AQMP are based, in part, on urban growth projections estimated by the Southern California Associations of Government (SCAG). The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency: 1. Whether the project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. Whether the project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP in 2016 or increments based on the year of project buildout and phase. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 20 MaFeh August 2023 130 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ applicable air quality plan? b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is ❑ ❑ ® ❑ non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ❑ ❑ ® ❑ concentrations? d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Less than Significant Impact The SCAQMD has established the AQMP to achieve State and Federal air quality standards. On June 30, 2016, the SCAQMD released its Draft 2016 AQMP. The Plan was approved by the California Environmental Protection Agency (CA EPA) on June 15, 2017. Therefore, the applicable air quality plan for the Project is the SCAQMD 2016 AQMP. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that "New or amended General Plan Elements (including land use zoning and density amendments), Specific Plans, and significant projects must be analyzed for consistency with the AQMP." Strict consistency with all aspects of the plan is usually not required. A project should be considered to be consistent with the AQMP if it furthers one or more policies and does not obstruct other policies. The pollutant reducing mechanisms in the AQMP are based, in part, on urban growth projections estimated by the Southern California Associations of Government (SCAG). The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency: 1. Whether the project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. Whether the project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP in 2016 or increments based on the year of project buildout and phase. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 20 MaFeh August 2023 130 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Below, Criterion 1 and Criterion 2 are discussed. Criterion 1 - Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations? Based on the air quality modeling analysis contained in Appendix A, short-term regional construction air emissions would not result in significant impacts based on SCAQMD regional and local thresholds of significance. In addition, long-term operational impacts would not result in significant impacts based on the SCAQMD local and regional thresholds of significance shown in Tables 10 and 11 of Appendix A. Based on the information provided above, the proposed Project would be consistent with the first criterion. Criterion 2 - Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP? Consistency with the AQMP assumptions is determined by performing an analysis of the proposed Project with the assumptions in the AQMP. The emphasis of this criterion is to ensure that the analyses conducted for the proposed Project are based on the same forecasts as the AQMP. The AQMP is developed through use of the planning forecasts provided in the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) and Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP). The RTP/SCS is a major planning document for the regional transportation and land use network within Southern California. The RTP/SCS is a long-range plan that is required by federal and state requirements placed on SCAG and is updated every four years. The FTIP provides long-range planning for future transportation improvement projects that are constructed with state and/or federal funds within Southern California. Local governments are required to use these plans as the basis of their plans for the purpose of consistency with applicable regional plans under CEQA. For this Project, the City of La Quinta General Plan's Land Use Plan defines the long-range land use assumptions that are represented in AQMP. The Project has a current land use classification of Medium High Density Residential according to the City of La Quinta Official Zoning Map. The proposed Project is to develop the site with a 2 -94252 -unit apartment complex on 14.03 acres for a density of apprexirnatel 20,2 8 dwelling units per acre. As the Medium High Density Residential Land Use allows for eight to twelve dwelling units per acre, the Project proposes a zene change to Hirth Density Resident4 a Density Bonus allowing for up to 1-&-18 dwelling units per acre. The additional units past the 1-6-12 dwelling units per acre are part of the Project's density bonus for providing affordable units. The Project would be seeking an amendment to the City's General Plan to account for the difference. With approval of the General Plan Amendment, the proposed Project would not result in an inconsistency with the land use designation in the City's General Plan. Therefore, the proposed Project is not anticipated to exceed the AQMP assumptions for the Project site and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the second criterion. Based on the above, the proposed Project would not result in an inconsistency with the SCAQMD AQMP. Therefore, a less -than -significant impact would occur in relation to implementation of the AQMP. b. Less than Significant Impact The proposed Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is non -attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard. Construction Emissions The Project was analyzed to be operational in 2023; therefore, construction is estimated to start no sooner than the first quarter of 2022 and be completed by 2023. The phases of the construction activities which have been analyzed below are: 1) site preparation, 2) grading, 3) building, 4) paving, and 5) La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 21 MaFeh August 2023 131 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION architectural coating. For details on construction modeling and construction equipment for each phase, refer to Appendix A. Construction -Related Regional Impacts The latest version of the CalEEMod model was used to estimate the on-site and off-site construction emissions. The worst-case summer or winter daily construction -related criteria pollutant emissions from the proposed Project for each phase of construction activities are shown below in Table 2. Since it is possible that building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities may occur concurrently towards the end of the building construction phase, Table 2 also shows the combined regional criteria pollutant emissions from building construction, paving, and architectural coating phases of construction. Table 2 Construction -Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions' Activity Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Site Preparation On -Site' 3.17 33.08 19.70 0.04 9.28 5.42 Off-Site3 0.06 0.04 0.56 0.00 0.15 0.04 Total 3.23 33.12 20.26 0.04 9.43 5.46 Grading On -Site' 3.62 38.84 29.04 0.06 5.22 2.93 Off-Site3 0.07 0.04 0.62 0.00 0.17 0.05 Total 3.69 38.89 29.66 0.06 5.39 2.97 Building Construction On -Site' 1.71 15.62 16.36 0.03 0.81 0.76 Off-Site3 1.55 5.06 14.23 0.05 4.06 1.14 Total 3.26 20.68 30.60 0.07 4.87 1.90 Paving On -Site' 1.51 10.19 14.58 0.02 0.51 0.47 Off-Site3 0.05 0.03 0.43 0.00 0.13 0.03 Total 1.56 10.22 15.01 0.02 0.64 0.50 Architectural Coating On -Site' 63.31 1.30 1.81 0.00 0.07 0.07 Off-Site3 0.26 0.15 2.34 0.01 0.69 0.19 Total 63.56 1.46 4.16 0.01 0.76 0.26 Total of Overlapping Phases4 10.16 28.22 35.85 0.06 2.36 1.57 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Thresholds No No No No No No Notes: 'Source: CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0 On-site emissions from equipment operated on-site that is not operated on public roads. a Off-site emissions from equipment operated on public roads. 4 Construction, architectural coatings, and paving phases may overlap. DeseFt-SageLa__Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 22 MaFeh August 2023 132 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 5 The impacts from Construction related Emissions are fully mitigated. Table 2, c*94 R^f ^^* F vis in, Construction -Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the regional emissions thresholds during either site preparation, grading, building construction, architectural coating, or the combined building construction, paving, and architectural coatings phases. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from construction of the proposed Project. Operational Emissions The on-going operation of the proposed Project would result in a long-term increase in air quality emissions. This increase would be due to emissions from the Project -generated vehicle trips and onsite area source emissions from the on-going use of the proposed Project. Operations -Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Analysis The operations -related regional criteria air quality impacts created by the proposed Project have been analyzed through use of the latest CalEEMod model and the input parameters utilized in this analysis have been detailed in Section 6.2.1 of Appendix A. The worst-case summer or winter volatile organic compounds (VOC, NOx, CO, SO2, PM10, and PM2.5) daily emissions created from the proposed Project's long-term operations have been calculated and are summarized below in Table 3. Table 3 Operational Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions' Activity Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)' VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Area Sources2 6.39 0.27 23.49 0.00 0.13 0.13 Energy Usage' 0.13 1.08 0.46 0.01 0.09 0.09 Mobile Sources4 4.67 5.57 37.99 0.08 7.97 2.17 Total Emissions 11.19 6.92 61.94 0.09 8.19 2.39 SCAQMD Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Notes: ' Source: CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0 z Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. s Energy usage consists of emissions from on-site natural gas usage. ^ Mobile sources consist of emissions from vehicles and road dust. s Impacts are fully mitigated from Operational emissions. The project site is approximately 0.28 miles in length at its longest point; therefore the on-site mobile source emissions represent approximately 1/25th of the shortest CalEEMod default distance of 6.9 miles. Therefore, to be conservative, 1/10th the distance (dividing the mobile source emissions by 10) was used to represent the portion of the overall mobile source emissions that would occur on-site. DeseFt-SageLa__Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 23 MaFeh August 2023 133 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION The data provided in Table 3 shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the regional emissions thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from operation of the proposed Project. Cumulative Impacts Cumulative projects include local development as well as general growth within the Project area. However, as with most development, the greatest source of emissions is from mobile sources, which travel well out of the local area. Therefore, from an air quality standpoint, the cumulative analysis would extend beyond any local projects and when wind patterns are considered, would cover an even larger area. Accordingly, the cumulative analysis for the Project's air quality must be generic by nature. The Project area is out of attainment for both ozone and PM10 particulate matter. Construction and operation of cumulative projects will further degrade the local air quality, as well as the air quality of the Salton Sea Air Basin. The greatest cumulative impact on the quality of regional air cell will be the incremental addition of pollutants mainly from increased traffic from residential, commercial, and industrial development along with the use of heavy equipment and trucks associated with the construction of these projects. Air quality will be temporarily degraded during construction activities that occur separately or simultaneously. However, in accordance with the SCAQMD methodology, projects that do not exceed the SCAQMD criteria or can be mitigated to less than criteria levels are not significant and do not add to the overall cumulative impact. The Project does not exceed any of the thresholds of significance and therefore is considered less than significant. c. Less than Significant Impact Construction -Related Local Im Construction -related air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the Project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the Salton Sea portion of the South Coast Air Basin. The proposed Project has been analyzed for the potential local air quality impacts created from construction -related fugitive dust, diesel emissions, toxic air contaminants, and construction -related odor impacts. The emission thresholds were calculated based on the Coachella Valley, source receptor area (SRA) 30, and a disturbance value of four acres per day (see Table 4). The nearest sensitive receptors are the existing dwelling units located adjacent to the north of the Project boundary; therefore, for conservative purposes, the SCAQMD Look -up Tables for 25 meters was used. As shown in Table 5, none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the calculated local emissions thresholds at the nearest sensitive receptors. Therefore, there would be a less -than -significant impact. Table 4 Maximum Number of Acres Disturbed Per Day Activity Equipment Number Acres/8hr-day Total Acres Rubber Tired Dozers 3 0.5 1.5 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 0.5 2.0 Total Per Phase 3.5 Excavators 2 0.5 1.0 Graders 1 0.5 0.5 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 0.5 0.5 Scrapers 2 1 0.5 1 1.0 Wtors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 0.5 1.0 DeseFt-SageLa Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 24 MaFeh August 2023 134 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Total Per Phase 4.0 Notes: '. Source: CalEEMod output and South Coast AQMD, Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds. http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/caleemod-guidance.pdf?sfvrsn=2 Table 5 Local Construction Emissions at the Nearest Receptors Phase On -Site Poll-,UaRtPolluant Emissions (pounds/day)' NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Site Preparation 33.08 19.70 9.28 5.42 Grading 38.84 29.04 5.22 2.93 Building Construction 15.62 16.36 0.81 0.76 Paving 10.19 14.58 0.51 0.47 Architectural Coating 1.30 1.81 0.07 0.07 Total of Overlapping Phases 27.11 32.76 1.39 1.30 SCAQMD Threshold for 25 meters (82 feet) or leSS2 266 1 1,961 1 11.7 6.3 Notes: 'Source: Calculated from CalEEMod and SCAQMD's Mass Rate Look -up Tables for four acres in Coachella Valley Source Receptor Area (SRA 30). Project will disturb a maximum of 4.0 acres per day (see Table 7). 'The nearest sensitive receptor is located adjacent to the north; therefore, the 25 -meter threshold has been used. Operations -Related Local Impacts Project -related air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the Project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the SSAB. The Project has been analyzed for the potential local CO emissions impacts from Project -generated vehicular trips and from the potential local air quality impacts from on-site operations. The following analyzes the vehicular CO emissions and local impacts from on-site operations. Local CO Hotspot Impacts from Project -Generated Vehicular Trips CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential local air quality impacts. Local air quality impacts can be assessed by comparing the future without and with project CO levels to the state and federal CO standards of 20 parts per million (PPM) over one hour or 9 ppm over eight hours. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 25 MaFeh August 2023 135 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION According to the Project's traffic report prepared by IEG (Appendix E), the Project would generate 1,684 average daily trips. The 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide (1992 CO Plan) showed that an intersection which has a daily traffic volume of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day would not violate the CO standard. The volume of traffic at Project buildout would be well below 100,000 vehicles and below the necessary volume to even get close to causing a violation of the CO standard. Therefore, no CO "hot spot" modeling was performed and no significant long-term air quality impact is anticipated to local air quality with the on-going use of the proposed Project. Local Air Quality Impacts from Onsite Operations Table 6, Local Operational Emissions at the Nearest Receptors, shows the calculated emissions for the proposed operational activities compared with the appropriate Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs). The LST analysis only includes on-site sources; however, the CalEEMod software outputs do not separate on-site and off-site emissions for mobile sources. For a worst -care scenario assessment, the emissions shown in Table 6 include all on-site Project -related stationary sources and 10% of the Project -related new mobile sources. This percentage is an estimate of the amount of Project -related new vehicle traffic that would occur on-site. Table 6 Local Operational Emissions at the Nearest Receptors On -Site Emission Source On -Site °^'RPolluant Emissions (pounds/day)' NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Area SourceS2 0.27 23.49 0.13 0.13 Energy Usage 1.08 0.46 0.09 0.09 On -Site Vehicle Emission S4 0.56 3.80 0.80 0.22 Total Emissions 1.91 27.75 1.01 0.43 SCAQMD Threshold for 25 meters (82 feet)' 266 1,961 3.3 1.7 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No Notes: 'Source: Calculated from CalEEMod and SCAQMD's Mass Rate Look -up Tables for four acres in Coachella Valley Source Receptor Area (SRA 30). 2Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment 'Energy usage consists of emissions from generation of electricity and on-site natural gas usage 'On-site vehicular emissions based on 1/10 of the gross vehicular emissions and road dust 'The nearest sensitive receptor is located adjacent to the north; therefore, the 25 meter threshold has been used The data provided in Table 6 shows that the on-going operations of the proposed Project would not exceed the local NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 thresholds of significance. Therefore, the on-going operations of the proposed Project would create a less -than -significant operations -related impact to local air quality due to on-site emissions. In conclusion, the Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations and impacts would be less than significant. d. Less than Significant Impact Potential sources that may emit odors during construction activities include the application of materials such as asphalt pavement. The objectionable odors that may be produced during the construction process are of short-term in nature and the odor emissions are expected to cease upon the drying or hardening of the odor producing materials. Diesel exhaust and VOCs would be emitted La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 26 MaFeh August 2023 136 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION during construction of the Project, which are objectionable to some; however, emissions would disperse rapidly from the project site and therefore should not reach an objectionable level at the nearest sensitive receptors. Due to the short-term nature and limited amounts of odor producing materials being utilized, no significant impact related to odors would occur during construction of the proposed Project. The SCAQMD recommends that odor impacts be addressed in a qualitative manner. An analysis shall determine whether the Project would result in excessive nuisance odors, as defined under the California Code of Regulations and Section 41700 of the California Health and Safety Code, and thus would constitute a public nuisance related to air quality. Potential sources that may emit odors during the on-going operations of the proposed Project would include odor emissions from vehicle emissions. Due to the distance of the nearest receptors from the Project site and through compliance with SCAQMD's Rule 402, no significant impact related to odors would occur during the on-going operations of the proposed Project. 3.3.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.3.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.4 Biological Resources 3.4.1 Sources • ELMT Consulting, Biological Resources Report for the Troutdale Village Project Located in the City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California, December 5, 2021 (Appendix B) 3.4.2 Environmental Setting The City offers unique natural habitats to a range of plants and wildlife due to its climate and natural topography. The City recognizes the value of the wildlands and wildlife and has carefully planned to protect, preserve, and enhance the region's valuable biological resources. The City is located within the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Conservation Plan (CVMSHP). This is a regional plan that is implemented throughout the Coachella Valley in an effort to comply with Federal and State endangered species laws. A literature review and records search for the site was conducted by ELMT Consulting. The literature search identified 16 special -status plant species, 23 special -status wildlife species, and one special -status plant community as having potential to occur within the City of La Quinta quadrangle. ELMT also conducted a field survey of the site on November 3, 2021. The Project site is located at an approximate elevation of 42 to 59 feet above mean sea level (AMSC) and slopes generally from northeast to southwest. The Project site supports one plant community, alkali scrub, and one land cover type that would be classified as disturbed. DeseFt-Sa-geLa__Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 27 MaFeh August 2023 137 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION No special -status plants were observed on the Project site during the field investigation. No fish, amphibians, or hydrogeomorphic features that would provide suitable habitat for fish or amphibians were observed on or within the vicinity of the Project site. The Project site provides suitable foraging and cover habitat for reptilian species adapted to routine human disturbance and desert environments. The only reptilian species observed during the field investigation were Great Basin whiptail (Aspidoscelis tigris tigris) and western side -blotched lizard (Uta stansburiana elegans). The Project site provides suitable foraging and nesting habitat for avian species adapted to routine human disturbance and desert environments. Bird species detected during the field investigation include mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), common raven (Corvus corax), great -tailed grackle (Quiscalus mexicanus), white -crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys), northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos), American kestrel (Falco sparverius), and rock pigeon (Columba liva), and verdin (Auriparus flaviceps). The Project site provides suitable foraging and denning habitat for mammalian species adapted to routine human disturbance and desert environments. However, most mammal species are nocturnal and are difficult to observe during a diurnal field visit. Mammals detected and/or signs observed during the field investigation include desert cottontail (Sylvilagus audubonii), and coyote (Canis latrans). No active nests or birds displaying nesting behavior were observed during the field survey, which was conducted outside of the breeding season. Although subjected to routine disturbance, the ornamental vegetation found on-site has the potential to provide suitable nesting habitat for year-round and seasonal avian residents, as well as migrating songbirds that could occur in the area that area adapted to urban environments. No raptors are expected to nest on-site due to lack of suitable nesting opportunities. Lastly, the Project site is not located within a federally designated Critical Habitat. 3.4.3 Impacts La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 28 MaFeh August 2023 138 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact p Mitigation Impact p Impact Incorporated BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES —Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status ❑ ® ❑ ❑ species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, ❑ ❑ ❑ regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, ❑ ❑ ❑ vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife ❑ ® ❑ ❑ corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 28 MaFeh August 2023 138 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated According to the City's General Plan, the Project site is located within the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP), which aims to conserve over 240,000 acres of open space and protect 27 plant and animal species. cial-Status Veeetation Communities & Critical Habitat Analvsis According to the field survey conducted by ELMT Consulting on November 3, 2021, the Project site supports one plant community: alkali scrub, which is dominated by hoary saltbush (Atriplex canescens) and is indicative of native bush scrub communities that have been devegetated and allowed to revegetate naturally. Common plant species observed in this plant community include cattle spinach (Atriplex polycarpa), barbwire Russian thistle (Salsola paulsenii), burrobrush (Ambrosia salsola), Mediterranean grass (Schismus barbatus), puncturevine (Tribulus terrestris), narrow leaved cryptantha (Cryptantha angustifolia), fanleaf crinklemat (Tiquilia plicata), blue palo verde (Parkinsonia florida), creosote (Larrea tridentate), and honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa). The Project site supports disturbed areas throughout the Project associated with formerly graded areas, unofficial walkways, and recreational vehicle trails, within utility easements along the western and southern boundaries. These areas can be unvegetated or vegetated with a limited variety of hardy native and non-native plant species such as Mediterranean grass, barbwire Russian thistle, and puncture vine. In addition, the northern boundary of the Project site supports disturbed land where ornamental vegetation has invaded the site from adjacent residential developments. Based on observations made during the field survey, the Project would not impact any special -status vegetation community. According to literature review, one special -status plant community was identified as having potential to occur within the La Quinta quadrangle: Desert Fan Palm Oasis Woodland. However, based on the results of the field survey above, this and no other special -status plant community was observed on-site; therefore, no special -status plant community would be impacted by Project implementation. The Project site is also not located within a federally designated Critical Habitat. The nearest designated Critical Habitat to the site is located approximately 1.55 miles to the west for Peninsular bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni). Therefore, the Project would not cause loss or adverse modification of a Critical Habitat and impacts would be less than significant. Special -Status Plant Species Analysis According to literature review, 16 special -status plant species were identified as having potential to occur within the La Quinta quadrangle. Species determined to have a potential to occur within the general vicinity of the site are presented in Table D-1 of Appendix B. No special -status plants were observed on the Project site during the field survey conducted on November 3, 2021. Based on habitat requirements for specific species, the availability and quality of on-site habitats, and the isolation of the site and La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 29 MaFeh August 2023 139 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated According to the City's General Plan, the Project site is located within the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP), which aims to conserve over 240,000 acres of open space and protect 27 plant and animal species. cial-Status Veeetation Communities & Critical Habitat Analvsis According to the field survey conducted by ELMT Consulting on November 3, 2021, the Project site supports one plant community: alkali scrub, which is dominated by hoary saltbush (Atriplex canescens) and is indicative of native bush scrub communities that have been devegetated and allowed to revegetate naturally. Common plant species observed in this plant community include cattle spinach (Atriplex polycarpa), barbwire Russian thistle (Salsola paulsenii), burrobrush (Ambrosia salsola), Mediterranean grass (Schismus barbatus), puncturevine (Tribulus terrestris), narrow leaved cryptantha (Cryptantha angustifolia), fanleaf crinklemat (Tiquilia plicata), blue palo verde (Parkinsonia florida), creosote (Larrea tridentate), and honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa). The Project site supports disturbed areas throughout the Project associated with formerly graded areas, unofficial walkways, and recreational vehicle trails, within utility easements along the western and southern boundaries. These areas can be unvegetated or vegetated with a limited variety of hardy native and non-native plant species such as Mediterranean grass, barbwire Russian thistle, and puncture vine. In addition, the northern boundary of the Project site supports disturbed land where ornamental vegetation has invaded the site from adjacent residential developments. Based on observations made during the field survey, the Project would not impact any special -status vegetation community. According to literature review, one special -status plant community was identified as having potential to occur within the La Quinta quadrangle: Desert Fan Palm Oasis Woodland. However, based on the results of the field survey above, this and no other special -status plant community was observed on-site; therefore, no special -status plant community would be impacted by Project implementation. The Project site is also not located within a federally designated Critical Habitat. The nearest designated Critical Habitat to the site is located approximately 1.55 miles to the west for Peninsular bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni). Therefore, the Project would not cause loss or adverse modification of a Critical Habitat and impacts would be less than significant. Special -Status Plant Species Analysis According to literature review, 16 special -status plant species were identified as having potential to occur within the La Quinta quadrangle. Species determined to have a potential to occur within the general vicinity of the site are presented in Table D-1 of Appendix B. No special -status plants were observed on the Project site during the field survey conducted on November 3, 2021. Based on habitat requirements for specific species, the availability and quality of on-site habitats, and the isolation of the site and La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 29 MaFeh August 2023 139 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION adjacent open space from nearby habitats, it was determined that the Project site does not have potential to support any of the special -status plant species known to occur in the vicinity of the site and all are presumed to be absent. In addition, the Project site is located outside of the known elevation ranges for the majority of the special -status plant species known to occur in the area. Therefore, Project impacts to special -status plant species would be less than significant. Special -Status Wildlife Species Analysis According to literature review, 23 special -status wildlife species were identified as having potential to occurwithin the La Quinta quadrangle. Species determined to have a potential to occurwithin the general vicinity of the site are presented in Table D-1 of Appendix B. No special -status wildlife species were observed on-site during the field investigation. Based on habitat requirements for specific species and the availability and quality of on-site habitats, it was determined that the Project site has a moderate potential to support prairie falcon (Falco mexicanus) and black -tailed gnatcatcher (Polioptila melaneura). It was further determined that all other special -status wildlife species known to occur in the vicinity of the site do not have potential to occur and are presumed to be absent. None of the special -status wildlife species are state or federally listed as threatened or endangered. In order to ensure impacts to these avian species do not occur from implementation of the Project, a pre - construction nesting bird clearance survey shall be conducted prior to ground disturbance as described in Mitigation Measure (MM) BIO -1, below. With implementation of MM 13I0-1, impacts to special -status avian species would be less than significant. The Project site provides suitable foraging and cover habitat for species adapted to routine human disturbance and desert environments that are not special -status species. In conclusion, impacts to reptiles, birds, or mammals would be less than significant. No active nests or birds displaying nesting behavior were observed during the field survey, which was conducted outside of the breeding season. Although subjected to routine disturbance, the ornamental vegetation found on-site has the potential to provide suitable nesting habitat for year-round and seasonal avian residents, as well as migrating songbirds that could occur in the area that area adapted to urban environments. However, with implementation of MM 13I0-1, impacts to migrating songbirds would be less than significant. No raptors are expected to nest on-site due to lack of suitable nesting opportunities. b/c. No Impact No jurisdictional drainage and/or wetland features were observed on the Project site during the field survey. It should be noted that a flood control channel occurs outside of the proposed limits of disturbances, east of the Project site; however, Project activities are not expected to encroach into this channel. Furthermore, no blueline streams have been recorded on the Project site and there is no evidence that the Project contained any streams, riparian habitat, marshes, protected wetlands, vernal pools or sensitive natural communities that would be protected by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) or by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Therefore, no impact would occur. d. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated The Project site has not been identified as occurring in a wildlife corridor or linkage. The site has limited adjacent open space and available open space is entirely surrounded by existing development, limiting its connectivity to surrounding habitats. In addition, there are no riparian corridors, creeks, or useful patches of steppingstone habitat (natural areas) within or connecting the site to a recognized wildlife corridor or linkage. As such, implementation of the proposed Project is not expected to impact wildlife movement opportunities. Therefore, impacts to wildlife corridors or linkages are not expected to occur. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 30 MaFeh August 2023 140 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION e. No Impact The City has not adopted any ordinances regarding tree preservation. As observed during the field survey, the Project site mainly consists of small and medium size shrubs. No trees are located on the Project site under existing conditions. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance and no impact would occur. f. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated The Project site is located within the boundaries of CVMSHCP but is not located within any conservation areas. The Project would be subject to payment of the Development Mitigation fee per Chapter 3.34, Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan Mitigation Fee, as described as MM BI0-2. The fee would mitigate potential impacts to covered species within the CVMSHCP. Although the site is located within the CVMSHCP boundary, as mentioned in Section 2.4.3 (a), the Project site is not located within a biological sensitive or any conservation areas. Because the Project is not located within a conservation area and would implement MM BI0-2, the Project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. 3.4.4 Mitigation 113I0-1 Regardless of the time of year, nesting bird surveys shall be performed by a qualified avian biologist no more than three (3) days prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities. Pre - construction surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior. The qualified biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the pre - construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and should be at least 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors and birds -of -prey. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Proiect-related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012 or most recent version). g—unave� censtruet*en activities must begin during the nesting bird season (February ist thFE)Ugh AUgUst 31St), a pre censtructien nesting bird survey shall Ghe cend--UGted ne mere than 14 days prier te initiatien e Ceunty. The nesting bird survey shall be cendfiur--ted en feet in -sidle the preject beundary, a 300 -feet buffer fer passeFines (sengbirds) and SQ0 fn -n -t -h---ffp-.r fer rapters in areas n -f suitable habitat. h, ffer (dependent upen species, the prepesed werk activity, the existing st h-11--- asseciated iuvith land uses A -u -t -side ef. the site) shall be determined and- deemareatedd by the bielegi�&t beundaFy. if a FapteF nest i -r ebse.rved- in a tFee PFOPOSP-d fA-.r re-Imle-val, the applicant must censult with --- La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 31 MaFGh-August 2023 141 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 113I0-2 Prior to construction and issuance of any grading permit, the City of La Quinta shall ensure compliance with the Coachella Vallev Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) and its associated Imr lementine Aereement and shall ensure the collection of Davment of the CVMSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee.The "^*leant shall pay the CVMSHCP i al Deyei„n..- ent n itigatien Fee 3.4.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation With implementation of MM 13I0-1 and 13I0-2, impacts on biological resources would be less than significant. 3.5 Cultural Resources 3.5.1 Sources PaleoWest, Cultural Resource Investigation in Support of the Troutdale Village Project, April 25, 2022. (Appendix C) 3.5.2 Environmental Setting The Project area is situated east of the Peninsular Ranges in the southern extent of the Coachella Valley at the western edge of the Colorado Desert. The Coachella Valley is bordered by the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa mountains (part of the Peninsular Ranges) to the southwest and by the low, rolling Indio and Mecca hills to the northeast. From the steep slopes of the San Jacinto Mountains, the desert floor descends suddenly at less than 3 kilometers (2 miles) eastward to sea level in the city of Indio, where the Project area is located. A cultural resources survey of the Project area was conducted by PaleoWest on December 15, 2021. The Project site is a vacant, relatively flat parcel that is bounded on the west and south sides by Washington Street and Avenue 50, respectively. The east side of the property abuts a dry storm drain channel. Surficial deposits across the Project area have been disturbed by mechanical and natural processes with modern grading on the western side and undulating dunes on the eastern side. The soils on the western half are not native but a mixture of gravel, construction refuse, modern refuse, and road base from Washington Street and Avenue 50. The soils on the eastern half are native, eolian dune sands with a low density of cobbles. Vegetation within the Project area consists of salt bush (low lying shrubs), patches of mesquite, and bunch grasses. Modern trash was noted throughout the Project area. The landform of the dunes is active with sands migrating around the parcel during wind events. The dunes appear to have been subject to erosion over the years and show signs of deflation. There is evidence of a recent surface brush fire with burned vegetation observed on the ground surface. A transmission line of unknown age was also noted running west -east along the southern extent of the Project area. Although the age of the line is not known, a review of aerial imagery indicates that it was not present before 1972 and as such, is likely modern in age. No new cultural resources were observed. However, cultural materials associated with the previously recorded archaeological sites of 33-001180 and 33-008226 were identified in the Project area. DeseFt geLa Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 32 August 2023 142 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.5.3 Impacts a/b. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated On February 4, 2022, a literature review and records search was conducted at the Eastern Information Center. The records search indicated that 117 cultural resources were previously documented within a one -mile radius of the Project area. Two of the prehistoric archaeological sites, 33-001180 (CA-RIV-1180) and 33-008226 (CA-RIV-6074), were previously documented within the Project area. Site 33-001180 was originally recorded in 1972 as a moderate to heavy surface scatter of prehistoric artifacts in an area of deflating dunes. The site record has been updated over the years to include flaked and ground stone, ceramics, and shell artifacts, as well as fire affected rock (FAR), animal bone, and charcoal. Site 33-001180 is reported to measure 76 by 46 m and is intersected by Avenue 50 and a storm drain channel. Although most of the cultural remains associated with 33-001180 appear to lie east of the storm drain channel and south of Avenue 50, a survey conducted by Parr (1985) noted several concentrations of flaked and ground stone artifacts and modified animal bone immediately north of Avenue 50 in the current Project area. The site likely represents the remains of a habitation locale. Site 33-008226 was recorded in 1998 as a prehistoric habitation site composed of six loci. The site measured 115 by 80 meters and lies within a sandy dune area with creosote brushes and mesquite. The cultural constituents identified within the site include flaked and ground stone, ceramic artifacts, FAR, animal bone and hardened clay. The mapped boundary of Site 33-008226 overlaps with the previously defined boundary of Site 33-001180. During the field survey on December 15, 2021, PaleoWest identified the two previously recorded prehistoric archaeological sites, 33-001180 and 33-008226, in the northeast portion of the Project area. The mapped boundary of Site 33-008226 largely overlaps with Site 33-001180. Therefore, PaleoWest has combined these sites into one resource, herein referred to as 33-1001180 The State of California Department of Parks and Recreation records for both 33-001180 and 33-008226 were updated to note that the two resources have been consolidated. PaleoWest also conducted a Phase II investigation at Site 33-001180 to assess the presence/absence of buried cultural deposits in the Project area. The results of the Phase II investigation indicated that cultural deposits in the Project site are extremely sparse and are limited to the upper 20-30 cm of sediments. The absence of intact features suggests that the area has been extensively disturbed and that any thermal features or structures that were once present in the area have been destroyed. Based on these findings, PaleoWest concluded that the Project area does not contribute to the overall eligibility of the site for La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 33 MaFeh August 2023 143 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact p Mitigation Impact p Impact Incorporated CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ❑ ® ❑ ❑ of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ❑ ® ❑ ❑ outside of formal cemeteries? a/b. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated On February 4, 2022, a literature review and records search was conducted at the Eastern Information Center. The records search indicated that 117 cultural resources were previously documented within a one -mile radius of the Project area. Two of the prehistoric archaeological sites, 33-001180 (CA-RIV-1180) and 33-008226 (CA-RIV-6074), were previously documented within the Project area. Site 33-001180 was originally recorded in 1972 as a moderate to heavy surface scatter of prehistoric artifacts in an area of deflating dunes. The site record has been updated over the years to include flaked and ground stone, ceramics, and shell artifacts, as well as fire affected rock (FAR), animal bone, and charcoal. Site 33-001180 is reported to measure 76 by 46 m and is intersected by Avenue 50 and a storm drain channel. Although most of the cultural remains associated with 33-001180 appear to lie east of the storm drain channel and south of Avenue 50, a survey conducted by Parr (1985) noted several concentrations of flaked and ground stone artifacts and modified animal bone immediately north of Avenue 50 in the current Project area. The site likely represents the remains of a habitation locale. Site 33-008226 was recorded in 1998 as a prehistoric habitation site composed of six loci. The site measured 115 by 80 meters and lies within a sandy dune area with creosote brushes and mesquite. The cultural constituents identified within the site include flaked and ground stone, ceramic artifacts, FAR, animal bone and hardened clay. The mapped boundary of Site 33-008226 overlaps with the previously defined boundary of Site 33-001180. During the field survey on December 15, 2021, PaleoWest identified the two previously recorded prehistoric archaeological sites, 33-001180 and 33-008226, in the northeast portion of the Project area. The mapped boundary of Site 33-008226 largely overlaps with Site 33-001180. Therefore, PaleoWest has combined these sites into one resource, herein referred to as 33-1001180 The State of California Department of Parks and Recreation records for both 33-001180 and 33-008226 were updated to note that the two resources have been consolidated. PaleoWest also conducted a Phase II investigation at Site 33-001180 to assess the presence/absence of buried cultural deposits in the Project area. The results of the Phase II investigation indicated that cultural deposits in the Project site are extremely sparse and are limited to the upper 20-30 cm of sediments. The absence of intact features suggests that the area has been extensively disturbed and that any thermal features or structures that were once present in the area have been destroyed. Based on these findings, PaleoWest concluded that the Project area does not contribute to the overall eligibility of the site for La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 33 MaFeh August 2023 143 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION listing on the California Register of Historical Resources. Furthermore, the data potential of the prehistoric cultural deposits appears to have been realized fully during the Phase II investigations. PaleoWest recommends a finding of no impact to historical or archaeological resources under CEQA. However, due to the sensitivity of the area, PaleoWest recommends that an archaeological monitor be present to observe ground -disturbing construction activities in the Project area, as described in Mitigation Measure CUL -1. With implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL -1, impacts to historical and/or archaeological resources would be less than significant. c. Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated The Project site is vacant, undeveloped, and does not contain any cemeteries or human remains under existing conditions. However, there is always the possibility that human remains could be uncovered during ground disturbing activities. In the unexpected event that human remains are found during ground disturbing activities, those remains would require proper treatment in accordance with all applicable laws. Through the implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL -2, all construction work taking place within the vicinity of the discovered remains must cease and the necessary steps to ensure the integrity of the immediate area must be taken. The State of California Health and Safety Code 7050.5 and the California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5097.98 states that the County Coroner must be notified within 24 hours of the discovered human remains. If the remains discovered are determined by the coroner to be of Native American descent, the coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours. The NAHC would, in turn, contact the Most Likely Descendant (MLD) who would determine further action to be taken. The MLD would have 48 hours to access the site and make a recommendation regarding disposition of the remains. Therefore, with incorporation of Mitigation Measure CUL -2, impacts would be less than significant. 3.5.4 Mitigation CUL -1 A qualified archaeologist monitor shall be present during any ground disturbing activities during the project construction phase. In the case that archaeological materials are encountered during ground disturbing activities, work in the area shall cease and any deposits shall be treated according to Federal, State, and local guidelines. No further grading is permitted in the area of the discovery until the City approves the appropriate measure to protect the discovered resources. CUL -2 In the event that human remains are uncovered during ground disturbing activities on the project site, no further disturbance shall occur and all work shall cease until the County Coroner has made a determination of the origin and disposition of the remains. Ground disturbing activities and excavations shall not resume until the following has been addressed: 1. The County Coroner has been contacted and determined that no investigation to the cause of death is required, and 2. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are of Native American decent, the Coroner must notify Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will then determine the Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD shall complete the inspection of the site within 48 hours of notification and may recommend means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains, and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resource Code Section 5097.98. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 34 MaFeh August 2023 144 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.5.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation With the incorporation of Mitigation Measures CUL -1 and CUL -2, impacts to cultural resources would be reduced to less than significant. 3.6 Energy 3.6.1 Sources • MD Acoustics, Troutdale Village Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Study, December 30, 2021 (Appendix A) • California Energy Commission, 2019 Building Energy Efficient Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings, December 2018 https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2021-06/CEC-400-2018-020-CMF O.pdf • Imperial Irrigation District, Troutdale Village Residential Apartment Project in La Quinta, CA, February 21, 2023. 3.6.2 Environmental Setting Electricity Imperial Irrigation District (IID) provides electricity to the City of La Quinta, including the Project site. Electricity is delivered to IID's substations throughout the City at 92 or 161 kilovolts, and decreased to 12 kilovolts for distribution to its customers. Natural Gas Natural gas for the Project site is provided by the Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas). Natural gas supplies are transported from Texas to the Coachella Valley through three east -west trending transmission lines, which cross the Valley near and parallel to Interstate -10 and continues west to Los Angeles. The pipelines include one 30 -inch line and two 24 -inch lines, with pressures of 2,000 pounds per square inch (PSI). 3.6.3 Impacts a. Less than Significant Impact Energy Use During Construction The Project's construction process would consume electricity and fuel. Project -related construction activities would represent a "single -event" demand and would not require on-going or permanent LaDeseFt—Sa-ge,__Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 35 MaFeh August 2023 145 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Energy — Would the project: a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption ❑ ® ❑ of energy resources, during project construction or operation? b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for ❑ renewable energy or energy efficiency? a. Less than Significant Impact Energy Use During Construction The Project's construction process would consume electricity and fuel. Project -related construction activities would represent a "single -event" demand and would not require on-going or permanent LaDeseFt—Sa-ge,__Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 35 MaFeh August 2023 145 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION commitment of energy resources. The amount of energy and fuel use anticipated by the Project's construction activities are typical for the type of scale of construction proposed by the Project and there are no aspects of the Project's proposed construction process that are unusual or energy intensive. Furthermore, construction equipment would be required to conform to the applicable CARB emissions standards, acting to promote equipment fuel efficiencies. Based on the foregoing, the Project's construction energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary. Impacts during Project construction would be less than significant. Energy Use During Operation Building operations associated with the Project would result in the consumption of natural gas and electricity. The Project provides X4252 dwelling units, which are not inherently energy intensive, and the Project energy demands in total would be comparable to, or less than, other apartment homes of similar scale. A letter from IID dated February 21,2023, stated the district would extend its electrical facilities to serve the Project by upgrading the Marshall Substation Bank 2 from 25 MVA to a 40/50 MVA, adding or reconfiguring distribution backbone line extensions, and adding new distribution feeders to the existing Marshall Station that would extend to the Project. Furthermore, the Project would be required to comply with Title 24 standards, which would ensure that the Project's energy demand would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary. Impacts during Project operation would be less than significant. b. Less than Significant Impact The Project's proposed 244252 apartment homes would be required to comply with the City's Municipal Code, Zoning Ordinance, and other standards including the City's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan provisions. Therefore, the Project would have no impact on plans for energy efficiency. 3.6.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.6.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.7 Geology and Soils 3.7.1 Sources • Riverside Map My County, 2022. https://pisl.countyofriverside.us/Html5Viewer/?viewer=MMC Public • City of La Quinta General Plan, February 19, 2013. • Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2010111094) for the City of La Quinta General Plan, July 2012. https://www.loquintaca. gov/homelshowpublisheddocument/15858/635338594527270000 3.7.2 Environmental Setting The Project site is located in the Coachella Valley portion of the Salton Trough physiographic province and is a geologic, structural depression resulting from large scale regional faulting. The trough is bounded by the San La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 36 MaFeh August 2023 146 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Andreas fault and Chocolate Mountains on the northeast and the Peninsular Range and faults of the San Jacinto Fault Zone on the southwest. The Salton Trough represents the northward extension of the Gulf of California, containing both marine and non -marine sediments since the Miocene Epoch. Tectonic activity that formed the trough continues at a high rate as evidenced by deformed young sedimentary deposits and high levels of seismicity. The surrounding regional geology includes the Peninsular Ranges (Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains) to the south and west, the Salton Sea Basin to the southeast, and the Transverse Ranges (Little San Bernardino and Orocopia Mountains) to the north and east. Hundreds of feet to several thousand feet of Quaternary fluvial, lacustrine, and Aeolian soil deposits underlie the Coachella Valley. The southeastern part of the Coachella Valley lies below sea level. In the past, the ancient Lake Cahuilla submerged the area. Calcareous tufa deposits may be observed along the ancient shoreline as high as an elevation of 45 to 50 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) along the Santa Rosa Mountains from La Quinta southward. Lacustrine (lake bed) deposits comprise the subsurface soils over much of the eastern Coachella Valley with alluvial outwash along the flanks of the valley. The Project site is located in Southern California, which is a seismically active area. The type and magnitude of seismic hazards affecting the site are dependent on the distance of causative faults, the intensity, and the magnitude of the seismic event. Existing ground surface elevations range from 40 to 59 feet AMSL. 3.7.3 Impacts La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 37 MaFeh August 2023 147 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact p Mitigation Impact p Impact Incorporated GEOLOGY AND SOILS —Would the project: a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on ❑ ❑ ❑ other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including ❑ ❑ ® ❑ liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, ❑ ❑ ® ❑ and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial ❑ ❑ ® ❑ risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ❑ ❑ ❑ of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 37 MaFeh August 2023 147 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION a -i. No Impact There are no known active faults crossing or projecting through the Project site. The Project site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone, or within a fault zone identified by the County of Riverside GIS data. Therefore, ground rupture due to faulting is considered unlikely at this site. No impact would occur. a -ii. Less than Significant The Project site is located in a seismically active area of Southern California and is expected to experience moderate to severe ground shaking during the lifetime of the Project. This risk is not considered substantially different than that of other similar properties in the southern California area. As a mandatory condition of Project approval, the Project would be required to construct the proposed buildings in accordance with the California Building Code (CBC), also known as California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 24, Part 2, and the City of La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC), which is based on the CBC with local amendments. The CBC and LQMC (Chapter 8.02) provide standards that must be met to safeguard life or limb, health, property, and public welfare by regulating and controlling the design, construction, quality of materials, use and occupancy, location, and maintenance of all buildings and structures, which have been specifically tailored for California earthquake conditions. In addition, the Project would be required to comply with the site-specific ground preparation and construction recommendations contained in the Project's geological report, which would be required prior to issuance of a grading permit. Mandatory compliance with these standards along with site-specific design and construction measures set forth in the Project's geotechnical report, the CBC, and the LQMC, potential impacts related to seismic ground shaking would be less than significant. As such, implementation of the Project would not expose people or structures to substantial adverse effects, including loss, injury, or death, involving seismic ground shaking. Impacts would be less -than -significant. a -iii. Less than Significant According to Riverside Map My County, the Project site is located within an area with moderate liquefaction susceptibility. However, prior to issuance of a grading permit, a geotechnical report would be required to be submitted for approval. The Project Applicant would be required to comply with the grading and construction recommendations contained within the geotechnical report for the Project to further reduce the risk of seismic -related ground failure due to liquefaction. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not directly or indirectly expose people or structures to substantial hazards associated with seismic -related ground failure and/or liquefaction hazards. Impacts would be less than significant. a -iv. No Impact The Project site is generally flat and contains no substantial natural or man-made slopes under existing conditions. There are no substantial natural or man-made slopes in the Project site vicinity either. Accordingly, development on the subject property would not be exposed to landslide risks and the Project would not pose a landslide risk to surrounding properties. Impacts would be less than significant. DeseFt—Sa-ge,La__Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 38 MaFeh August 2023 148 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ❑ ® ❑ ❑ resource or site or unique geologic feature? a -i. No Impact There are no known active faults crossing or projecting through the Project site. The Project site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone, or within a fault zone identified by the County of Riverside GIS data. Therefore, ground rupture due to faulting is considered unlikely at this site. No impact would occur. a -ii. Less than Significant The Project site is located in a seismically active area of Southern California and is expected to experience moderate to severe ground shaking during the lifetime of the Project. This risk is not considered substantially different than that of other similar properties in the southern California area. As a mandatory condition of Project approval, the Project would be required to construct the proposed buildings in accordance with the California Building Code (CBC), also known as California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 24, Part 2, and the City of La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC), which is based on the CBC with local amendments. The CBC and LQMC (Chapter 8.02) provide standards that must be met to safeguard life or limb, health, property, and public welfare by regulating and controlling the design, construction, quality of materials, use and occupancy, location, and maintenance of all buildings and structures, which have been specifically tailored for California earthquake conditions. In addition, the Project would be required to comply with the site-specific ground preparation and construction recommendations contained in the Project's geological report, which would be required prior to issuance of a grading permit. Mandatory compliance with these standards along with site-specific design and construction measures set forth in the Project's geotechnical report, the CBC, and the LQMC, potential impacts related to seismic ground shaking would be less than significant. As such, implementation of the Project would not expose people or structures to substantial adverse effects, including loss, injury, or death, involving seismic ground shaking. Impacts would be less -than -significant. a -iii. Less than Significant According to Riverside Map My County, the Project site is located within an area with moderate liquefaction susceptibility. However, prior to issuance of a grading permit, a geotechnical report would be required to be submitted for approval. The Project Applicant would be required to comply with the grading and construction recommendations contained within the geotechnical report for the Project to further reduce the risk of seismic -related ground failure due to liquefaction. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not directly or indirectly expose people or structures to substantial hazards associated with seismic -related ground failure and/or liquefaction hazards. Impacts would be less than significant. a -iv. No Impact The Project site is generally flat and contains no substantial natural or man-made slopes under existing conditions. There are no substantial natural or man-made slopes in the Project site vicinity either. Accordingly, development on the subject property would not be exposed to landslide risks and the Project would not pose a landslide risk to surrounding properties. Impacts would be less than significant. DeseFt—Sa-ge,La__Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 38 MaFeh August 2023 148 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION b. Less than Significant Impact During construction of the proposed Project, soils would be disrupted during grading activities due to exposure of uncovered soils, thereby increasing the potential for wind or water -related erosion and sedimentation until construction is completed. Pursuant to State Water Resources Control Board requirements, the Applicant is required to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for construction activities, which involves preparation and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for construction -related activities. The SWPPP will specify the Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would be required to be implemented during construction activities to ensure that waterborne pollution (erosion and sedimentation) is prevented, minimized, and/or otherwise appropriately treated prior to surface runoff being discharged from the subject property. The Project also would be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 to minimize water and windborne erosion. Lastly, the Project would be required to prepare and implement a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), which is a site-specific post - construction water quality management program designed to minimize the release of waterborne pollutants, including pollutants of concern for downstream receiving waters, under long-term conditions via BMPs. The WQMP also is required to establish a post -construction implementation and maintenance plan to ensure on-going, long-term erosion protection. Therefore, with adherence to SCAQMD Rule 403, and preparation of a SWPPP and WQMP, the proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts related to soil erosion. C. Less than Significant The Project site does not contain substantial natural or man-made slopes under existing conditions. Additionally, there are no hillsides in the vicinity of the Project site with a potential to expose the site to landslide hazards. Therefore, no impact would occur related to landslides. Lateral spreading is primarily associated with liquefaction hazards. As previously mentioned in Section 3.7.3(a)(ii), above, the Project Applicant would be required to submit a geotechnical report prior to issuance of a grading permit and comply with the grading and construction recommendations contained within that geotechnical report to further reduce the risk of seismic -related ground failure due to liquefaction. The Project Applicant also would be required to comply with the site-specific ground preparation and construction recommendations contained in the geotechnical report for the Project site, which would attenuate the site's settlement potential. Therefore, impacts associated with liquefaction, lateral spreading, shrinkage/subsidence, and collapse would be less than significant. d. Less than Significant Impact According to the Web Soil Survey, the Project site consists of desert land comprised of Coachella fine sand and Myoma fine sand. Due to the low clay content in underlying soils, these near surface soils can be anticipated to have very low expansion characteristics. The Project site is not located in an area known for expansive soil (as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994)), and the potential for the Project to create substantial risks to life or property, relating to expansive soils, is very low. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. e. No Impact The Project would not involve the use of septic tanks or any other alternative wastewater disposal systems. Therefore, there would be no impacts associated with septic tanks or alternative wastewater systems. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project site does not contain any paleontological resources under existing conditions. However, according to the City's General Plan EIR and the Riverside Map My County, the Project site is located within a High Paleontological Sensitivity due to Pleistocene sediments and sediments from ancient Lake Cahuilla beds. Therefore, a professional paleontologist would be retained to prepare and implement paleontological monitoring and mitigation La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 39 MaFeh August 2023 149 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION plan (PRMMP) as described in Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO-4. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO-4, potential impacts to a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature would be reduced to less than significant. 3.7.4 Mitigation The following mitigation measures are required: GEO-1 Prior to the start of the proposed Project activities, all field personnel will receive a worker's environmental awareness training on paleontological resources. The training will provide a description of the laws and ordinances protecting fossil resources, the types of fossil resources that may be encountered in the project area, the role of the paleontological monitor, outlines steps to follow in the event that a fossil discovery is made and provides contact information for the project paleontologist. The training will be developed by the project paleontologist and can be delivered concurrent with other training including cultural, biological, safety, etc. GEO-2 Prior to the commencement of ground -disturbing activities, a professional paleontologist will be retained to prepare and implement a PRMMP for the proposed project. The PRMMP will describe the monitoring required during excavations that extend into older Quaternary (Pleistocene) age sediments, and the location of areas deemed to have a high paleontological resource potential. Part-time monitoring, or spot checking, may be required during shallow ground -disturbances (< 10 feet below ground surface) to confirm that sensitive geologic units are not being impacted. Monitoring will entail the visual inspection of excavated or graded areas and trench sidewalls. GEO-3 In the event that a paleontological resource is discovered, the monitor will have the authority to temporarily divert the construction equipment around the find until it is assessed for scientific significance and, if appropriate, collected. If the resource is determined to be of scientific significance, the project paleontologist shall complete the following: Salvage of Fossils. If fossils are discovered, all work in the immediate vicinity should be halted to allow the paleontological monitor, and/or project paleontologist to evaluate the discovery and determine if the fossil may be considered significant. If the fossils are determined to be potentially significant, the project paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) should recover them following standard field procedures for collecting paleontological as outlined in the PRMMP prepared for the project. Typically, fossils can be safely salvaged quickly by a single paleontologist and not disrupt construction activity. In some cases, larger fossils (such as complete skeletons or large mammal fossils) require more extensive excavation and longer salvage periods. In this case the paleontologist should have the authority to temporarily direct, divert, or halt construction activity to ensure that the fossil(s) can be removed in a safe and timely manner. 2. Fossil Preparation and Curation. The PRMMP will identify the museum that has agreed to accept fossils that may be discovered during project -related excavations. Upon completion of fieldwork, all significant fossils collected will be prepared in a properly equipped laboratory to a point ready for curation. Preparation may include the removal of excess matrix from fossil materials and stabilizing or repairing specimens. During preparation and inventory, the fossils specimens will be identified to the lowest taxonomic level practical prior to curation at an accredited museum. The fossil specimens must be delivered to the accredited museum or La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 40 MaFeh August 2023 150 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION repository no later than 90 days after all fieldwork is completed. The cost of curation will be assessed by the repository and will be the responsibility of the client. GEO-4 Upon completion of ground disturbing activity (and curation of fossils if necessary) the project paleontologist shall prepare a final mitigation and monitoring report outlining the results of the mitigation and monitoring program. The report shall include discussion of the location, duration and methods of the monitoring, stratigraphic sections, any recovered fossils, and the scientific significance of those fossils, and where fossils were curated. 3.7.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation With implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO-4, impacts associated with geology and soils would be reduced to less than significant. 3.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 3.8.1 Sources • MD Acoustics, Troutdale Village Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Study, December 30, 2021 (Appendix A) 3.8.2 Environmental Setting Constituent gases of the Earth's atmosphere, called atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHG), play a critical role in the Earth's radiation amount by trapping infrared radiation emitted from the Earth's surface, which otherwise would have escaped to space. Prominent greenhouse gases contributing to this process include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), ozone, water vapor, nitrous oxide (N20), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). This phenomenon, known as the Greenhouse Effect, is responsible for maintaining a habitable climate. Anthropogenic (caused or produced by humans) emissions of these greenhouse gases in excess of natural ambient concentrations are responsible forthe enhancement of the Greenhouse Effect and have led to a trend of unnatural warming of the Earth's natural climate, known as global warming or climate change. Emissions of gases that induce global warming are attributable to human activities associated with industrial/manufacturing, agriculture, utilities, transportation, and residential land uses. Transportation is responsible for 41 percent of the State's greenhouse gas emissions, followed by electricity generation. Emissions of CO2 and nitrous oxide (NO2) are byproducts of fossil fuel combustion. Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, results from off -gassing associated with agricultural practices and landfills. Sinks of CO2, where CO2 is stored outside of the atmosphere, include uptake by vegetation and dissolution into the ocean. Table 6 of the Project's greenhouse gas analysis (Appendix A) provides a description of each of the greenhouse gases and their global warming potential. 3.8.3 Impacts La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 41 MaFeh August 2023 151 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact p Mitigation Impact p Impact Incorporated Greenhouse Gas Emissions — Would the project: La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 41 MaFeh August 2023 151 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION a. Less than Significant Impact. The Project allows for the development of X4252 dwelling units. The Project is anticipated to generate GHG emissions from area sources, energy usage, mobile sources, solid waste, water, and construction. The CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0 was utilized by MD Acoustics to calculate the GHG emissions from the Project. As shown in Table 8, the Project would result in approximately 1,963.70 metric tons per year of CO2e (MTCO2e) per year and would not exceed the SCAQMD screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, Project GHG emissions impacts would be less than significant. Table 7 Project Related Greenhouse Gas Annual Emissions Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No CO2 Impact Mitigation Impact Impact 0.00 3.45 Incorporated 0.00 0.00 a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or Energy Usage 0.00 449.10 449.10 indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ environment? 1,300.55 0.08 0.07 11323.36 b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation 26.52 0.00 26.52 1.57 adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of ❑ ❑ ® ❑ greenhouse gases? 0.61 0.01 91.24 Construction' a. Less than Significant Impact. The Project allows for the development of X4252 dwelling units. The Project is anticipated to generate GHG emissions from area sources, energy usage, mobile sources, solid waste, water, and construction. The CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0 was utilized by MD Acoustics to calculate the GHG emissions from the Project. As shown in Table 8, the Project would result in approximately 1,963.70 metric tons per year of CO2e (MTCO2e) per year and would not exceed the SCAQMD screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, Project GHG emissions impacts would be less than significant. Table 7 Project Related Greenhouse Gas Annual Emissions La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 42 MaFeh August 2023 152 Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons/Year)' Category Bio -0O2 NonBio-CO2 CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Area Sources2 0.00 3.45 3.45 0.00 0.00 3.54 Energy Usage 0.00 449.10 449.10 0.02 0.01 451.60 Mobile Sources4 0.00 1,300.55 1,300.55 0.08 0.07 11323.36 Solid Wastes 26.52 0.00 26.52 1.57 0.00 65.70 Water' 5.87 65.71 71.58 0.61 0.01 91.24 Construction' 0.00 27.44 27.44 0.00 0.00 28.26 Total Emissions 32.39 1,846.26 1,878.65 2.28 0.09 1,963.70 City of La Quinta CAP and SCAQMD Draft Screening Threshold 3,000 Exceeds Threshold? No N otes: Source: CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0 2 Area sources consist of GHG emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscape equipment. a Energy usage consist of GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage. 4 Mobile sources consist of GHG emissions from vehicles. s Solid waste includes the CO2 and CH4 emissions created from the solid waste placed in landfills. e Water includes GHG emissions from electricity used for transport of water and processing of wastewater. Construction GHG emissions based on a 30 year amortization rate. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 42 MaFeh August 2023 152 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION b. Less than Significant. The applicable plan for the Project is the City's Greenhouse Gas Plan, which contains goals and supporting measures that reflect and ensure compliance with Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), Senate Bill 32 (SB 32), and the 2017 California Air Resources Board (CARB) Scoping Plan. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) also states that projects that do not exceed the screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year are considered to have less -than -significant GHG emissions and are in compliance with the AQMP. As mentioned in Section 3.8.3(a) above, the GHG emissions generated by the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e. Based on the foregoing, the Project would not have the potential to conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. Impacts would be less than significant. 3.8.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.8.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 3.9.1 Sources • City of La Quinta General Plan, February 19, 2013. • Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2010111094) for the City of La Quinta General Plan, July 2012. https://www.laquintaca. qov/home/showpublisheddocument/15858/635338594527270000 State Water Resources Control Board, GeoTracker. Accessed August 10, 2021, https://www. waterboards. ca. qov/. 3.9.2 Environmental Setting The Project site occurs in an area of the City of La Quinta that has undergone gradual urbanization since the later decades of the 1900's. The general area is comprised primarily of residential, recreational, institutional, and commercial development. A unique feature of the City of La Quinta is the inclusion of golf courses within residential neighborhoods and the residential developments surrounding the site often support meandering golf courses. The Project site is surrounded to the north by residential development; to the east by an undeveloped flood control channel with a sports complex and school facilities beyond; to the south by Avenue SO with undeveloped, vacant land and a golf course beyond; and to the west by Washington Street with residential development and a golf course beyond. The site itself is composed of primarily undeveloped, vacant land and developed portions of adjacent roadways and infrastructure. The site is heavily disturbed due to pedestrian and vehicle traffic associated with surrounding development, historic light grading, and routine weed abatement activities. Historic aerials show these disturbances have been ongoing since at least 1972. DeseFt-SageLa__Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 43 MaFeh August 2023 153 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.9.3 Impacts a. Less than Significant Impact. Proposed construction activities for the development of the Project may involve the use and transport of hazardous materials, which include but not limited to fuels, gasoline, hydraulic fluid, lubricants, and other liquids associated with the operation of heavy equipment utilized for construction. Additionally, materials that are consistent with building construction would also be present onsite and these materials may include paints, solvents, concrete, adhesives, roofing materials, and others. Additionally, transportation, storage, use and disposal of hazardous materials during construction activities would be required to comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local statues and regulations. This includes the preparation of a SWPPP that would outline specific BMPs that would be administered during the construction of the Project in order to prevent the discharge of construction - related pollutants that could contaminate nearby water sources. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA; 42 USC 6901 et seq.) would require businesses with substantial quantities of hazardous materials to adhere to strict requirements in regard to handlings, transportation, and storing of supplies. Furthermore, the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 5101 et seq. protects against the risk to life, property, and the environment that are associated with the transportation of hazardous materials in intrastate, interstate, and foreign commerce. Upon completion of the proposed construction, all hazardous materials would be removed from the Project site. Therefore, with all La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 44 MaFeh August 2023 154 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact p Mitigation Impact p Impact Incorporated HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS — Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and ❑ ❑ ® ❑ accident condition involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within ❑ ❑ ® ❑ one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, ❑ ❑ ❑ would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the ❑ ❑ ❑ project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency ❑ ❑ ❑ evacuation plan? g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ involving wildland fires? a. Less than Significant Impact. Proposed construction activities for the development of the Project may involve the use and transport of hazardous materials, which include but not limited to fuels, gasoline, hydraulic fluid, lubricants, and other liquids associated with the operation of heavy equipment utilized for construction. Additionally, materials that are consistent with building construction would also be present onsite and these materials may include paints, solvents, concrete, adhesives, roofing materials, and others. Additionally, transportation, storage, use and disposal of hazardous materials during construction activities would be required to comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local statues and regulations. This includes the preparation of a SWPPP that would outline specific BMPs that would be administered during the construction of the Project in order to prevent the discharge of construction - related pollutants that could contaminate nearby water sources. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA; 42 USC 6901 et seq.) would require businesses with substantial quantities of hazardous materials to adhere to strict requirements in regard to handlings, transportation, and storing of supplies. Furthermore, the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 5101 et seq. protects against the risk to life, property, and the environment that are associated with the transportation of hazardous materials in intrastate, interstate, and foreign commerce. Upon completion of the proposed construction, all hazardous materials would be removed from the Project site. Therefore, with all La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 44 MaFeh August 2023 154 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION applicable regulations in place, impacts associated with accidental release of hazardous substances during construction activities would be less than significant. Long-term operations of the Project would involve limited use of substances typically associated with individual households. Typical materials would include paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil. The Project would be required to comply with Federal, State, and local regulations to ensure proper use, storage, emission, and disposal of hazardous substances. With mandatory regulatory compliance, the Project is not expected to pose a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, storage, emission, or disposal of hazardous materials, nor would the Project increase the potential for accident conditions which could result in the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Impacts would be less than significant. b. Less than Significant Impact. Accidents involving hazardous materials that could pose a significant hazard to the public or the environment would be highly unlikely during the construction and long-term operation of the Project and are not reasonably foreseeable. As discussed above under Section 3.9.3(a), the transport, use, and handling of hazardous materials on the Project site during construction is a standard risk on all construction sites, and there would be no greater risk for upset and accidents than would occur on any other similar construction site. Upon buildout, the Project site would operate as a residential use. Based on the operational characteristics of residential uses, there is limited use of hazardous substances; however, as discussed above under Section 3.9.3(a), the Project Applicant would be required to comply with all applicable local, State, and Federal regulations related to the transport, handling, and usage of hazardous material. Accordingly, impacts associated with the accidental release of hazardous materials would be less than significant during both construction and long-term operation of the Project. C. Less than Significant Impact. The nearest school to the Project site is Harry S Truman Elementary School located at 78870 Avenue 50. The school is within 0.25 -mile to the east of the proposed Project site. Due to the nature of the proposed use of the Project as a residential development, there would be limited use of hazardous substances. In addition, as previously mentioned under Section 3.9.3 (a), the Project would be required to comply with Federal, State, and local regulations to ensure proper storage, use, emission, and disposal of hazardous substances. Therefore, the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact on schools within a quarter mile of the site. d. No Impact. According to the Department of Toxic Control Substances (DTCS), there are no Federal Superfund sites within the vicinity of the Project site. All environmental cleanups and any permitted hazardous material facilities are listed in the Envirostor database, including Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Lability Act (CERLA) sites as well. Additionally, according to the California State Water Resources Control Board's GeoTracker, the Project site is not located within any cleanup sites. The nearest cleanup site is the La Quinta Country Club, located at 77750 Avenue 50, which is approximately 0.71 -mile west from the Project site. The La Quinta Country Club contained a potential contaminant of concern: gasoline. However, the case has been closed as of February 4, 1992. Therefore, the Project is not located on or within the vicinity of a site that is listed as a hazardous materials site pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Thus, the Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. No impact would occur. e. No Impact. The closest airport to the Project site is the Bermuda Dunes Airport, which is approximately 4.1 miles northeast of the Project site. The Project site is not located within the Airport Influence Area and not DeseFt-Sa-ge,La__Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 45 MaFeh August 2023 155 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION within the Airport Land Use Compatibility Zones. Therefore, the Project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area. No impact would occur. f. No Impact. The Project site does not contain any emergency facilities under existing conditions, nor does it serve as an emergency evacuation route, so there is no potential for the Project to adversely affect an existing emergency response or evacuation plan. During construction and at Project buildout, the proposed Project would be required to maintain adequate emergency access for emergency vehicles as required by the City. As part of the City's discretionary review process, the City of La Quinta would review the Project to ensure that appropriate emergency ingress and egress would be available to -and -from the proposed dwelling units for public safety. Accordingly, implementation of the proposed Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan. No impact would occur. No Impact. According to Map My County, the Project site is not located within a State Responsibility Area (SRA) or a Local Responsibility Area (LRA). The Project site and its surrounding areas are not located within a very high fire hazard area. Therefore, the proposed Project would not expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. No impact would occur. 3.9.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.9.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.10 Hydrology and Water Quality 3.10.1 Sources • Egan Civil, Preliminary Hydrology Study for Troutdale Village, January 22, 2023. (Appendix F) • Egan Civil, Troutdale Village Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan, January 2023. (Appendix G) • FEMA Flood Map Service Center, 2022. • Coachella Valley Water District, 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, 2020. 3.10.2 Environmental Setting The Project site is undeveloped and 100% pervious under existing conditions. The Project site is bound to the south and west with fully improved public streets and storm drain facilities. The existing site is not subject to off-site storm flows and there is no existing on-site retention of storm flow. The proposed impervious area is 65% of the Project site. The new improvements would include paved access around the interior of the site, 34-12 residential buildings with 2-84252 units, paved parking, storm drain, and water and sewer improvements. Two retention basins would be constructed at the west end of the site to collect and store storm runoff generated during the 100 -year design storm per City of La Quinta Drainage Ordinance requirements. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 46 MaFeh August 2023 156 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.10.3 Impacts a. Less than Significant Impact. Construction of the Project would be subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater regulations for construction which are required when there is a soil disturbance of more than one acre. The Applicant will be required to comply with all rules, regulations, and procedures of the NPDES permit for municipal, construction, and industrial activities as outlined by the California State Water Resources Control Board or any of its Regional Water Quality Control Boards (Colorado River Basin - Region 7). A Project -specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must also be prepared to determine and describe the Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be implemented on the Project site. The Project would be required to meet all applicable water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, thus avoiding any violation of such standards or requirements. Any future development and construction of the Project would require compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management (SCAQMD) Rule 403 and 403.1. SCAQM Rule 403 requires the implementation of best available dust control measures (BACM) during active operations that are capable of generating fugitive dust, such as the construction of the proposed Project. SCAQMD Rule 403.1 is a supplemental rule to 403, which applies only to fugitive dust sources that occur in the Coachella Valley. This rule will assist in reducing fugitive dust and resulting PM10 emissions from man-made sources in the Coachella DeseFt-Sag2La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 47 MaFeh August 2023 157 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact p Mitigation Impact p Impact Incorporated HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY —Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface ❑ ❑ ® ❑ or ground water quality? b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such ❑ ❑ ® ❑ that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course ❑ ❑ ® ❑ of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: c.i.) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ site; c.ii.) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ offsite; c.iii.) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater ❑ ❑ ® ❑ drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or c.iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ pollutants due to project inundation? e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater ❑ ❑ ® ❑ management plan? a. Less than Significant Impact. Construction of the Project would be subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater regulations for construction which are required when there is a soil disturbance of more than one acre. The Applicant will be required to comply with all rules, regulations, and procedures of the NPDES permit for municipal, construction, and industrial activities as outlined by the California State Water Resources Control Board or any of its Regional Water Quality Control Boards (Colorado River Basin - Region 7). A Project -specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must also be prepared to determine and describe the Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be implemented on the Project site. The Project would be required to meet all applicable water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, thus avoiding any violation of such standards or requirements. Any future development and construction of the Project would require compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management (SCAQMD) Rule 403 and 403.1. SCAQM Rule 403 requires the implementation of best available dust control measures (BACM) during active operations that are capable of generating fugitive dust, such as the construction of the proposed Project. SCAQMD Rule 403.1 is a supplemental rule to 403, which applies only to fugitive dust sources that occur in the Coachella Valley. This rule will assist in reducing fugitive dust and resulting PM10 emissions from man-made sources in the Coachella DeseFt-Sag2La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 47 MaFeh August 2023 157 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Valley. Although, these rules are intended to protect air quality, they would also assist in supporting water quality protection by preventing sediment track out and erosion. Additionally, a Project specific WQMP (Appendix G) was prepared to determine and describe the Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be implemented on the Project site to address pollutants of concern that may potentially be generated from the use of the Project site. Per the WQMP, the BMP's have been selected and implemented to comply with WQMP Section 3.5 and consists of site design BMP concepts, source control, LID/site design and, if/where necessary, treatment control BMPs. Furthermore, the WQMP prepared for the proposed Project would be required to collect and store 100% of the runoff generated during the 100 -year storm event on-site per City of La Quinta Drainage Ordinance. The on-site retention basins will be designed in a manner that allows the stored volume generated from the 100 -year design storm event to completely evacuate via percolation into the soil within a 72 -hour period. Therefore, the proposed Project would not violate any water quality standards, waste discharge requirements, or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality. Impacts would be less than significant. b. No potable groundwater wells are proposed by the Project and the Project would be served with potable water by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). The primary source of water in the Coachella Valley is groundwater extracted by deep wells and replenished with Colorado River water. The CVWD would provide domestic water service to the Project and is a participant in the Coachella Valley Regional Water Management Group that prepared an Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (WMP) in 2018. The 2018 Integrated Regional WMP determined that long-term regional demand for potable water is expected to increase; however, with continued conservation measures and replenishment of groundwater, it is projected that there will be sufficient supplies available to meet the CVWD demand. Based on the 2018 Integrated Regional WMP projected supply and demand numbers, the CVWD would have a sufficient water supply to serve the Project's water demands. At Project buildout, water would be required to serve the needs of the proposed development of 2-84252 dwelling units. The Project would connect to an existing water line on Avenue 50. No additional water infrastructure or new wells are proposed. The Project would be required to comply with the CVWD's and the City's water -efficiency requirements, such as including the use of drought -tolerant planting materials and limited landscaping irrigation. The Project would also be required to comply with the CVWD's drought restrictions and water reduction measures as applicable. Therefore, compliance and implementation of CVWD and City requirements would ensure that the Project would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. Impacts would be less than significant. c. i -iv. Less than Significant Impact. Prior to development of the Project site, the City will review and approve the proposed civil plans to ensure the proposed development is in compliance with the City's Municipal Code, which requires the Project to retain the runoff volume from a 100 -year, 24-hour storm event for the entire Project site. In addition, the Project's WQMP (Appendix G), includes BMPs, both of which are requirements for the City's NPDES implementation. The implementation of BMPs would allow for the reduction in pollutants of concern and help reduce the impacts both short and long term of water quality during the construction and operation of the Project. The implementation of BMPs is consistent with the Project - specific WQMP and complies with City requirements would ensure the design of the Project would not La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 48 MaFeh August 2023 158 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION result in erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The Project would result in a less than significant impact to downstream water bodies. d. Less than Significant Impact. The majority of the Project site is not located within a flood zone; however, the eastern side of the Project site is located within the U.S Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Zone AE due to the Project site being adjacent to the Coachella Water District's Whitewater River Storm Water Channel. CVWD provided a letter dated April 5, 2022, which stated approval on the 75 -foot setback. Therefore, no channel improvements would be required for the Project. Furthermore, the Project site is not located within the vicinity of any other water bodies. Due to the Project site location being far away from the ocean, lakes, or dams, there is no possibility of dam failure, tsunami or seiche. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. e. Less than Significant Impact. As described in Section 2.10.3 (b), projected Project water demand does not exceed the projected water supply per the 2018 Integrated Regional WMP. There would be sufficient water supplies to serve the Project. The Project will adhere to all applicable water quality standards and will implement a Project specific WQMP (Appendix G) approved by the City and the Regional Water Quality Control Board for both construction and operational activities. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. Impacts would be less than significant. 3.10.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.10.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.11 Land Use and Planning 3.11.1 Sources • City of La Quinta, City of La Quinta 2035 General Plan, Adopted February 19, 2013. • City of La Quinta, Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2010111094) for the City of La Quinta General Plan, July 2012. https://www.loquintaca. gov/homelshowpublisheddocument/15858/635338594527270000 3.11.2 Environmental Setting The Project site is designated as "Medium/High Density Residential" per the City's General Plan 2035 Land Use Map and is zoned as "Medium High Density Residential (RMH)" and within the Affordable Housing Overlay per the City's Official Zoning Map. The Applicant prepeses a Change of Zone to change the site's zening designatioi4 to "High Density Residential (RH)." Under existing conditions, the Project site is bordered by a residential community located immediately north; to the west, the Project site is bordered by Washington Street and beyond is a residential community; to the east, the Project site is bordered by a dry channel and beyond is vacant, undeveloped land; and to the south, the Project site is bordered by Avenue 50 and beyond is vacant, undeveloped land. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 49 MaFeh August 2023 159 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.11.3 Impacts a. No Impact Development of the Project would not physically disrupt or divide the arrangement of an established community. Under existing conditions, the Project site is bordered by a residential community located immediately north; to the west, the Project site is bordered by Washington Street and beyond is a residential community; to the east, the Project site is bordered by a dry channel and beyond is vacant, undeveloped land; and to the south, the Project site is bordered by Avenue 50 and beyond is vacant, undeveloped land. No impact would occur. b. Less Than Significant Impact The development of the Project would consist of 2-84252 residential homes. Under existing conditions, the Project site is designated as "Medium/High Density Residential" per the City's General Plan 2035 Land Use Map and zoned "Medium High Density Residential (RMH)" and within the Affordable Housing Overlay per the City's Official Zoning Map. Because the Project would be consistent with the underlying General Plan land use designation, the Project would not conflict with the City's General Plan. As previously mentioned, t Change of Zeme ,.,, uld inherently ereate he site will remain as Residential Medium High (RMH) and apply a density bonus to provide some affordable units. ^ ;s+^^^., with the City's z g designatien. Prior to the development of the Project site, the City would review and approve the proposed architectural plans to ensure the proposed development meets the City's development standards for the Medium/High Density Residential land use and High Density Residential Medium High zone. Therefore, the Project would be developed in accordance with the proposed density requirement, zoning designation, and would comply with all applicable policies contained in the General Plan and all applicable development regulations and standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. The Project also would not conflict with any applicable goals, objectives, and policies of the SCAQMD's AQMP, SCAG's Connect SoCal, and SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. Impacts would be less than significant. 3.11.4 Mitigation No mitigation required. b- Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 50 August 2023 160 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact LAND USE AND PLANNING — Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? E] b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific ❑ ❑ N ❑ plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? a. No Impact Development of the Project would not physically disrupt or divide the arrangement of an established community. Under existing conditions, the Project site is bordered by a residential community located immediately north; to the west, the Project site is bordered by Washington Street and beyond is a residential community; to the east, the Project site is bordered by a dry channel and beyond is vacant, undeveloped land; and to the south, the Project site is bordered by Avenue 50 and beyond is vacant, undeveloped land. No impact would occur. b. Less Than Significant Impact The development of the Project would consist of 2-84252 residential homes. Under existing conditions, the Project site is designated as "Medium/High Density Residential" per the City's General Plan 2035 Land Use Map and zoned "Medium High Density Residential (RMH)" and within the Affordable Housing Overlay per the City's Official Zoning Map. Because the Project would be consistent with the underlying General Plan land use designation, the Project would not conflict with the City's General Plan. As previously mentioned, t Change of Zeme ,.,, uld inherently ereate he site will remain as Residential Medium High (RMH) and apply a density bonus to provide some affordable units. ^ ;s+^^^., with the City's z g designatien. Prior to the development of the Project site, the City would review and approve the proposed architectural plans to ensure the proposed development meets the City's development standards for the Medium/High Density Residential land use and High Density Residential Medium High zone. Therefore, the Project would be developed in accordance with the proposed density requirement, zoning designation, and would comply with all applicable policies contained in the General Plan and all applicable development regulations and standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. The Project also would not conflict with any applicable goals, objectives, and policies of the SCAQMD's AQMP, SCAG's Connect SoCal, and SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. Impacts would be less than significant. 3.11.4 Mitigation No mitigation required. b- Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 50 August 2023 160 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.11.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.12 Mineral Resources 3.12.1 Sources City of La Quinta, Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2010111094) for the City of La Quinta General Plan, July 2012. https://www.laguintaca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/15858/635338594527270000 3.12.2 Environmental Setting The majority of the City of La Quinta is located in mineral resource zone 1 (MRZ-1), which indicates that little likelihood exists for the presence of significant mineral resources. The western portion of the City is located in MRZ-3, which are areas containing known or inferred mineral occurrences of undetermined mineral resources significances. According to Exhibit III -11, Mineral Resource Zone Map, of the City's General Plan EIR, the Project site is located within MRZ-1. 3.12.3 Impacts a -b. Less Than Significant Impact. According to the City's General Plan EIR, the Project site is located in an MRZ-1 zone, which indicates it is located in an area where there is little likelihood for presence of significant mineral resources. The Project site is currently designated Medium/High Density under the City's General Plan and zoned Medium High Density Residential. Neitherthe existing land use or zoning designation allow for mineral production. In addition, the General Plan consists of several policies that would protect mineral resources and prevent land use incompatibility impacts from mining. Furthermore, if a potential mineral extraction operation were to be located within the Project site, it would be incompatible both with the land use designation and surrounding land uses. Therefore, development of the Project would result in a less than significant impact relating to mineral resources. 3.12.4 Mitigation No mitigation required. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 51 MaFeh August 2023 161 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local ❑ ❑ ® ❑ general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? a -b. Less Than Significant Impact. According to the City's General Plan EIR, the Project site is located in an MRZ-1 zone, which indicates it is located in an area where there is little likelihood for presence of significant mineral resources. The Project site is currently designated Medium/High Density under the City's General Plan and zoned Medium High Density Residential. Neitherthe existing land use or zoning designation allow for mineral production. In addition, the General Plan consists of several policies that would protect mineral resources and prevent land use incompatibility impacts from mining. Furthermore, if a potential mineral extraction operation were to be located within the Project site, it would be incompatible both with the land use designation and surrounding land uses. Therefore, development of the Project would result in a less than significant impact relating to mineral resources. 3.12.4 Mitigation No mitigation required. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 51 MaFeh August 2023 161 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.12.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.13 Noise 3.13.1 Sources • MD Acoustics, Troutdale Village Apartment Project Noise Impact Study, January 12, 2022. (Appendix D) 3.13.2 Environmental Setting Noise Noise has been defined as an unwanted sound. Sound becomes unwanted when it interferes with normal activities, when it causes actual physical harm, or when it has adverse effects on health. Noise is measured on a logarithmic scale of sound pressure level known as a decibel (dB). A -weighted decibels (d BA) approximate the subjective response of the human ear to broad frequency noise source by discriminating against very low and very high frequencies of the audible spectrum. They are adjusted to reflect only those frequencies which are audible to the human ear. Vibration According to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise Impact and Vibration Assessment Manual, vibration is the periodic oscillation of a medium or object. The rumbling sound caused by the vibration of room surfaces is called structure -borne noise. Sources of ground -borne vibrations include natural or human made causes. In addition, vibration sources may be continuous, such as factory machinery, or transient, such as explosions. There are several different methods that are used to quantify vibration. The peak particle velocity (PPV) is defined as the maximum instantaneous peak of the vibration signal. The PPV is most frequently used to describe vibration impacts to buildings. Human body responds to average vibration amplitude often described as the root mean square (RMS). The RMS amplitude is defined as the average of the squared amplitude of the signal and is most frequently used to describe the effect of vibration on the human body. Decibel notation (VdB) is commonly used to measure RMS. Decibel notation (VdB) serves to reduce the range of numbers used to describe human response to vibration. Typically, ground -borne vibration generated by man-made activities attenuates rapidly with distance from the source of the vibration. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 52 MaFeh August 2023 162 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.13.3 Impacts a. Less than Significant Impact. Project construction noise would occur due to the use of equipment that includes a combination of trucks, power tools, concrete mixers, and portable generators that when combined can reach high levels. The number and mix of construction equipment is expected to occur in stages such as site preparation, grading, building construction, and architectural coating. To describe the Project construction noise levels, measurements were collected for similar activities at several construction sites. Since the reference noise levels were collected at varying distances, all construction noise level measurements presented in Table 6 of Appendix D, have been adjusted to describe a uniform reference distance of 50 feet. Construction Noise Analysis Construction noise is considered a short-term impact and would be considered significant if construction activities are taken outside the allowable times (7 AM to 7 PM) as described in LQMC Section 6.08.050(A). Construction is anticipated to occur during permissible hours. Construction noise will have a temporary or periodic increase in the ambient noise level above the existing within the Project vicinity. Furthermore, noise reduction measures are provided to further reduce construction noise. The impact is considered less than significant. Construction noise level projections are provided below. Typical operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve one or two minutes of full power operation followed by three to four minutes at lower power settings. Noise levels will be loudest during the grading phase. A likely worst-case construction noise scenario during grading assumes the use of a grader, a dozer, two (2) excavators, two (2) backhoes, and a scraper operating at 290 feet from the nearest sensitive receptor (north residences). Assuming a usage factor of 40 percent for each piece of equipment, unmitigated noise levels at 290 feet have the potential to reach 70 dBA Leq and 74 dBA Lmax at the nearest sensitive receptors during grading. Noise levels for the other construction phases would be lower and range between 63 to 66 dBA. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 53 MaFeh August 2023 163 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact p Mitigation Impact p Impact Incorporated NOISE — Would the project result in: a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards ❑ ❑ ® ❑ established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ground borne noise levels? c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a ❑ ❑ ❑ public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? a. Less than Significant Impact. Project construction noise would occur due to the use of equipment that includes a combination of trucks, power tools, concrete mixers, and portable generators that when combined can reach high levels. The number and mix of construction equipment is expected to occur in stages such as site preparation, grading, building construction, and architectural coating. To describe the Project construction noise levels, measurements were collected for similar activities at several construction sites. Since the reference noise levels were collected at varying distances, all construction noise level measurements presented in Table 6 of Appendix D, have been adjusted to describe a uniform reference distance of 50 feet. Construction Noise Analysis Construction noise is considered a short-term impact and would be considered significant if construction activities are taken outside the allowable times (7 AM to 7 PM) as described in LQMC Section 6.08.050(A). Construction is anticipated to occur during permissible hours. Construction noise will have a temporary or periodic increase in the ambient noise level above the existing within the Project vicinity. Furthermore, noise reduction measures are provided to further reduce construction noise. The impact is considered less than significant. Construction noise level projections are provided below. Typical operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve one or two minutes of full power operation followed by three to four minutes at lower power settings. Noise levels will be loudest during the grading phase. A likely worst-case construction noise scenario during grading assumes the use of a grader, a dozer, two (2) excavators, two (2) backhoes, and a scraper operating at 290 feet from the nearest sensitive receptor (north residences). Assuming a usage factor of 40 percent for each piece of equipment, unmitigated noise levels at 290 feet have the potential to reach 70 dBA Leq and 74 dBA Lmax at the nearest sensitive receptors during grading. Noise levels for the other construction phases would be lower and range between 63 to 66 dBA. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 53 MaFeh August 2023 163 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Off -Site Traffic Noise Analysis Traffic generated by the operation of the Project will influence traffic noise levels in surrounding off-site areas. As previously mentioned, the Project is anticipated to generate approximately 2,079 average daily trips. The modeling is theoretical and does not take into account any existing barriers, structures, and/or topographical features that may further reduce noise levels. Therefore, the levels are shown for comparative purposes only to show the difference in with and without project conditions. In addition, the noise contours for 60, 65 and 70 dBA CNEL were calculated. The potential off-site noise impacts caused by an increase of traffic from operation of the proposed project on the nearby roadways were calculated for the following scenarios: Existing without Project and Existing with Project. Table 8 compares the two scenarios and shows the change in traffic noise levels as a result of the proposed Project. It takes a change of 3 dB or more to hear a perceptible difference. Table 8 Off -Site Traffic Noise Levels As shown on Table 8, the maximum change in noise level generated from the Project is 0.2 dBA. Therefore, noise impacts to off-site receptors due to Project -generated trips would be less than significant. On -Site Traffic Noise Analysis Traffic noise from the local roadway network was evaluated and compared to the City's noise compatibility matrix. Per the City's Land Use Compatibility (LQMC Section 9.100.210), multi -family residential is conditionally acceptable up to 65 dBA CNEL. As shown in Table 5 of Appendix D, traffic 70 dBA CNEL noise projections from Washington Street will reach up to 173 feet from the centerline of the roadway. Residential structures are located approximately 180 feet away from Washington Street centerline and fall within the 70 to 65 dBA CNEL contour of the roadway and are located within the conditionally acceptable region for multiple -family residential. In order to ensure interior levels of 45 dBA CNEL, all residential windows would be designed with sound transmission class (STC) ratings of 28 to achieve a 25 dB reduction, as described in Mitigation Measure N0I-1, below. With implementation of Mitigation Measure N0I-1, on-site traffic noise would be reduced to a less than significant impact. b. Less than Significant Impact The Project does not propose or require uses or activities that would be considered substantive sources of on-going vibration. For the purposes of this analysis, and to substantiate whether the Project would result in "exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels," applicable criteria developed by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) were employed. The Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual indicates that received vibration levels of 0.10 Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) (equal to 0.071 Root Mean Square Amplitude [RMS]) could be strongly perceptible (Caltrans La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 54 MaFeh August 2023 164 CNEL at 60 Feet dBA 1,2 Change Existing Existing potential Segment Without With in Significant Roadway Project Project Noise Impact Level Washington St Eisenhower Dr to Avenue 50 69.7 69.9 0.2 No Avenue 50 Washington St to Jefferson St 67.6 1 67.7 1 0.1 No Notes: Exterior noise levels calculated at 5 feet above ground level. z Noise levels calculated from centerline of subject roadway. As shown on Table 8, the maximum change in noise level generated from the Project is 0.2 dBA. Therefore, noise impacts to off-site receptors due to Project -generated trips would be less than significant. On -Site Traffic Noise Analysis Traffic noise from the local roadway network was evaluated and compared to the City's noise compatibility matrix. Per the City's Land Use Compatibility (LQMC Section 9.100.210), multi -family residential is conditionally acceptable up to 65 dBA CNEL. As shown in Table 5 of Appendix D, traffic 70 dBA CNEL noise projections from Washington Street will reach up to 173 feet from the centerline of the roadway. Residential structures are located approximately 180 feet away from Washington Street centerline and fall within the 70 to 65 dBA CNEL contour of the roadway and are located within the conditionally acceptable region for multiple -family residential. In order to ensure interior levels of 45 dBA CNEL, all residential windows would be designed with sound transmission class (STC) ratings of 28 to achieve a 25 dB reduction, as described in Mitigation Measure N0I-1, below. With implementation of Mitigation Measure N0I-1, on-site traffic noise would be reduced to a less than significant impact. b. Less than Significant Impact The Project does not propose or require uses or activities that would be considered substantive sources of on-going vibration. For the purposes of this analysis, and to substantiate whether the Project would result in "exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels," applicable criteria developed by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) were employed. The Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual indicates that received vibration levels of 0.10 Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) (equal to 0.071 Root Mean Square Amplitude [RMS]) could be strongly perceptible (Caltrans La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 54 MaFeh August 2023 164 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual (Caltrans) September 2013, p. 38). For the purposes of this analysis, received vibration levels exceeding 0.10 PPV (0.071 RMS) would be considered potentially significant. Ground borne vibration levels resulting from construction activities occurring within the Project site were estimated by using data published by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Typical Project construction equipment would generate vibration levels of 0.003 PPV (small bulldozer) to 0.089 PPV (larger bulldozer) as measured at 25 feet. As with received noise levels, received vibration levels attenuate with distance. In general, manmade ground -borne vibrations attenuate rapidly with distance from the source. At a distance of 290 feet, a large bulldozer would yield a worst-case 0.006 peak particle velocity (PPV) (in/sec) which is below the threshold of perception and any risk of damage. Therefore, the Project would not result in or cause exposure of persons to, or generation of, excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise. Impacts would be less than significant. C. No Impact The nearest airport to the Project site is the Bermuda Dunes Airport, located approximately 4.1 miles northeast of the Project site. The Project site is not located within the airport influence area boundary. Furthermore, the noise compatibility contours provided in the Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (RCALUCP) show that the Project site is outside of the 65 dBA CNEL noise contour for the Bermuda Dunes Airport. Therefore, the Project would not expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels associated with airports. No impact would occur. 3.13.4 Mitigation N0I-1 Prior to building permit issuance, the Project Applicant shall ensure all residential windows be designed with sound transmission class (STC) 28 to achieve a 25 dB reduction. 3.13.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation With implementation of Mitigation Measure N0I-1, all Project -related noise impacts would be reduced to less - than -significant levels. 3.14 Population and Housing 3.14.1 Sources • United States Census Bureau, Quickfacts. July 1, 2021. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/laguintacitycaIifornia/PST045219 3.14.2 Environmental Setting According to the United States Census Bureau, the City of La Quinta had a population of 37,558 in 2020, and the population increased by 0.2% from 2010. The number of households from 2016-2020 was 16,292 with an average household size at 2.55 persons per household. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 55 MaFeh August 2023 165 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.14.3 Impacts a. Less than Significant Impact. The Project Applicant proposes the future development of 24-252 residences on 14.03 acres of undeveloped land. According to the United States Census Bureau, the person per household from 2016-2020 in the City of La Quinta is 2.55, which calculates to an estimate of 724 residents. This only leads to a negligible increase in population and is consistent with current population growth projections. Furthermore, the Project site is surrounded to the north and west by residential homes and would be accessible via existing roads and infrastructure. No roads or infrastructure would need to be extended to serve the Project. Because the anticipated increase in population based on the proposed residences would be negligible, within current population growth projections, and induced population growth is also expected to be negligible. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. b. No Impact. The proposed development of 2S4252 residences would take place on a vacant parcel. No structures or housing will be eliminated as a result of the Project and no persons would be displaced. Therefore, there would be no impacts relating to the displacement of people or housing. 3.14.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.14.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.15 Public Services 3.15.1 Sources • City of La Quinta, City of La Quinta 2035 General Plan, Adopted February 19, 2013. • City of La Quinta, Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2010111094) for the City of La Quinta General Plan, July 2012. https://www.loquintaca.govlhomelshowpublisheddocument/15858/635338594527270000 La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 56 MaFeh August 2023 166 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact p Mitigation Impact p Impact Incorporated POPULATION AND HOUSING —Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes ❑ ❑ ® ❑ and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement ❑ ❑ El housing elsewhere? a. Less than Significant Impact. The Project Applicant proposes the future development of 24-252 residences on 14.03 acres of undeveloped land. According to the United States Census Bureau, the person per household from 2016-2020 in the City of La Quinta is 2.55, which calculates to an estimate of 724 residents. This only leads to a negligible increase in population and is consistent with current population growth projections. Furthermore, the Project site is surrounded to the north and west by residential homes and would be accessible via existing roads and infrastructure. No roads or infrastructure would need to be extended to serve the Project. Because the anticipated increase in population based on the proposed residences would be negligible, within current population growth projections, and induced population growth is also expected to be negligible. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. b. No Impact. The proposed development of 2S4252 residences would take place on a vacant parcel. No structures or housing will be eliminated as a result of the Project and no persons would be displaced. Therefore, there would be no impacts relating to the displacement of people or housing. 3.14.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.14.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.15 Public Services 3.15.1 Sources • City of La Quinta, City of La Quinta 2035 General Plan, Adopted February 19, 2013. • City of La Quinta, Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2010111094) for the City of La Quinta General Plan, July 2012. https://www.loquintaca.govlhomelshowpublisheddocument/15858/635338594527270000 La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 56 MaFeh August 2023 166 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.15.2 Environmental Setting Fire Protection Services Fire protection is provided through a contract with the Riverside County Fire Department. There are three City - owned fire stations, each staffed with full-time paid and volunteer firefighters: Fire Station No. 32 at 78-111 Avenue 52; Fire Station No. 70 at 54001 Madison Street; and Fire Station No. 93 at 44-555 Adams Street. Emergency response in the City is also available through Riverside County Fire Department stations in other cities. These include Station No. 55, located in Indian Wells; Station No. 88, in Indio; and Station No. 39, located at the Desert Resorts Airport, east of the City's eastern Sphere of Influence. County Fire dispatches all calls through its centralized Emergency Command Center, where responding stations are determined based on location and need. Average Fire Department response times are between 5 and 7 minutes. La Quinta has an Insurance Service Office (ISO) of 4, based on a scale of 1 through 10, with 1 being the highest rating. Ratings are reviewed periodically. A variety of criteria are used to determine the ISO rating, such as staffing levels, response times, safety history and building code standards. Police Protection Services Police protection services are provided through contract with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. Riverside County Sheriff's Station is located at 86-625 Airport Boulevard, Thermal, CA 92274. The Civic Center Community Policing Office is located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. Schools There are two school districts providing public education to students in kindergarten through 12th grade in La Quinta: Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD) and Coachella Valley Unified School District (CVUSD). Developers are required to pay school mitigation fees for residential and commercial development, which includes the proposed Project. Parks The City of La Quinta currently operates 11 City parks, the Civic Center Campus, and three nature preserve areas. The City of La Quinta also contains one public and 22 privately owned and operated golf courses, seven of which are open and available for public use. The City of La Quinta's designated recreational open space totals approximately 5,259 acres. DeseFt-Sa-ge,La__Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 57 MaFeh August 2023 167 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.15.3 Impacts a -i. Less than Significant Impact Fire protection services in La Quinta are provided through a contract with the Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD). The nearest fire station (No. 32) is located at 78-111 Avenue 52, approximately 1.0 -mile southwest from the Project site. Based on the Project site's proximity to the existing fire station, the Project would be adequately served by fire protection services and no new or expanded unplanned facilities would be required. Additionally, the Project would feature fire safety and fire suppression activities, including type of building construction, fire sprinklers, a fire hydrant system, and paved access. The La Quinta Fire Department and/or RCFD will review and approve Project plans to ensure all applicable fire standards and regulations are met. In addition, the Development Impact Fees paid for the project will fund this project's "fair -share" of capital Improvements for Fire that are needed from this development. Therefore, impacts associated with fire protection services would be less than significant. a -ii. Less than Significant Impact The La Quinta Police Department serves under contract by the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. The Community Policing Office is located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, which is located approximately 0.5 -mile southwest from the Project site. Based on the Project site's proximity to the existing police station and the Sherriff's Thermal Sub -Station, the Project would be adequately served by police protection services and no new or expanded unplanned facilities would be required. The La Quinta Police Department, through the Riverside County Sheriff Department, will review and approve Project plans to ensure all applicable police standards and regulations are met. In addition, the Development Impact Fees paid for the project will fund this project's "fair -share" of capital Improvements for police that are needed from this development. Therefore, impacts associated with police protection services would be less than significant. a -iii. Less than Significant Impact The nearest school is Harry S Truman Elementary, which is located approximately 0.2 -mile east of the Project site at 78870 Avenue 50. The addition of the future 2-84252 homes would not significantly increase the number of students within nearby schools. The Project is La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 58 MaFeh August 2023 168 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new of physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire Protection? ❑ ® ❑ ii) Police Protection? LLJ iii) Schools? LLJ iv) Parks? LLJ V) Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ a -i. Less than Significant Impact Fire protection services in La Quinta are provided through a contract with the Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD). The nearest fire station (No. 32) is located at 78-111 Avenue 52, approximately 1.0 -mile southwest from the Project site. Based on the Project site's proximity to the existing fire station, the Project would be adequately served by fire protection services and no new or expanded unplanned facilities would be required. Additionally, the Project would feature fire safety and fire suppression activities, including type of building construction, fire sprinklers, a fire hydrant system, and paved access. The La Quinta Fire Department and/or RCFD will review and approve Project plans to ensure all applicable fire standards and regulations are met. In addition, the Development Impact Fees paid for the project will fund this project's "fair -share" of capital Improvements for Fire that are needed from this development. Therefore, impacts associated with fire protection services would be less than significant. a -ii. Less than Significant Impact The La Quinta Police Department serves under contract by the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. The Community Policing Office is located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, which is located approximately 0.5 -mile southwest from the Project site. Based on the Project site's proximity to the existing police station and the Sherriff's Thermal Sub -Station, the Project would be adequately served by police protection services and no new or expanded unplanned facilities would be required. The La Quinta Police Department, through the Riverside County Sheriff Department, will review and approve Project plans to ensure all applicable police standards and regulations are met. In addition, the Development Impact Fees paid for the project will fund this project's "fair -share" of capital Improvements for police that are needed from this development. Therefore, impacts associated with police protection services would be less than significant. a -iii. Less than Significant Impact The nearest school is Harry S Truman Elementary, which is located approximately 0.2 -mile east of the Project site at 78870 Avenue 50. The addition of the future 2-84252 homes would not significantly increase the number of students within nearby schools. The Project is La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 58 MaFeh August 2023 168 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION required to pay the State mandated school impact fees which would assist in mitigating impacts to schools. Therefore, this fee would assure that impacts would be less -than -significant levels. a -iv. Less than Significant Impact The City of La Quinta requires new developments to dedicate land for recreational purposes or pay in -lieu fees and payment of Development Impact Fees. The Project would result in a negligible population increase and a negligible demand for park facilities. Therefore, this fee will assure that the impacts to City parks would be less than significant. a -v. Less than Significant Impact The Project would result in less than significant impacts to other public facilities. It is not expected that the Project would result in an increase in population that would require the provision of additional public facilities within the City of La Quinta. Access to the Project site is provided by existing roads and would connect to existing utility infrastructure. New public roads or public transportation facilities, or other public facilities, are not required. Regardless of the negligible impact to public services, the Development Impact Fees will be paid for the Project which will fund this project's "fair -share" of capital Improvements for other public facilities that are needed from this development. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 3.15.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.15.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.16 Recreation 3.16.1 Sources • City of La Quinta, City of La Quinta 2035 General Plan, Adopted February 19, 2013. • City of La Quinta, Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2010111094) for the City of La Quinta General Plan, July 2012. https://www.lapuintaca. pov/home/showpublisheddocument/15858/635338594527270000 3.16.2 Environmental Setting The City of La Quinta currently operates 11 City parks, the Civic Center Campus, and three nature preserve areas. La Quinta's three nature preserves are also available for public recreation, as they all contain trails for hiking and bicycling. There are also a number of public pocket parks located within existing subdivisions. La Quinta is home to one public and 22 privately owned and operated golf courses, seven of which are open and available for public use. La Quinta's designated recreational open space totals approximately 5,259 acres. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 59 MaFeh August 2023 169 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.16.3 Impacts a/b. Less than Significant Impact. The Project's development of X4252 dwelling units would result in a negligible population increase and a negligible demand for park facilities. Since the Project will provide a pickleball court, pool and spa, barbeque areas, tot lot, multiple open recreational spaces, and a dog park, there is a low potential for the Project to increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur, as well as a low potential for construction or expansion of recreational facilities which may have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Furthermore, because the Project is consistent with the existing land use and zoning designation, the City's General Plan has already accommodated for the new residents from this Project. Therefore, the Project would have a less than significant impact on recreational facilities within the City. 3.16.4 Mitigation No mitigation required. 3.16.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.17 Transportation 3.17.1 Sources • Integrated Engineering Group, Troutdale Village Transportation Analysis, December 2021. (Appendix E) • Integrated Engineering Group, Troutdale Village Transportation Analysis, April 2023. (Appendix H) 3.17.2 Environmental Setting The Project trip generation was calculated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition). It is estimated that the Project would generate 1,684 total daily trips, 109 AM peak hour trips and 134 PM peak hour trips. Project trip distribution and assignment were developed in coordination with the City of La Quinta staff based on the land use characteristics of the proposed Project and surrounding area, existing travel patterns within DeseFt geLa Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 60 MaFGh-August 2023 170 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? a/b. Less than Significant Impact. The Project's development of X4252 dwelling units would result in a negligible population increase and a negligible demand for park facilities. Since the Project will provide a pickleball court, pool and spa, barbeque areas, tot lot, multiple open recreational spaces, and a dog park, there is a low potential for the Project to increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur, as well as a low potential for construction or expansion of recreational facilities which may have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Furthermore, because the Project is consistent with the existing land use and zoning designation, the City's General Plan has already accommodated for the new residents from this Project. Therefore, the Project would have a less than significant impact on recreational facilities within the City. 3.16.4 Mitigation No mitigation required. 3.16.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.17 Transportation 3.17.1 Sources • Integrated Engineering Group, Troutdale Village Transportation Analysis, December 2021. (Appendix E) • Integrated Engineering Group, Troutdale Village Transportation Analysis, April 2023. (Appendix H) 3.17.2 Environmental Setting The Project trip generation was calculated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition). It is estimated that the Project would generate 1,684 total daily trips, 109 AM peak hour trips and 134 PM peak hour trips. Project trip distribution and assignment were developed in coordination with the City of La Quinta staff based on the land use characteristics of the proposed Project and surrounding area, existing travel patterns within DeseFt geLa Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 60 MaFGh-August 2023 170 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION the study area, anticipated travel patterns to and from the Project site, and approved projects located in the vicinity of the Project site. Per the City of La Quinta VMT Analysis Policy (June 2021), the Project qualifies for the small project screening criterion as an affordable housing project. The SunLine Transit Agency (STA) is the main transit agency servicing the City of La Quinta. Currently, STA operates Route 7 within the vicinity of the project. Route 7 operates seven days a week and connects to Indian Wells and Palm Desert north of the site. Weekday and weekend service frequency is 90 minutes. Bus stops for Route 7 are currently located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Washington Street and Avenue 50 for northbound service and at the southwest corner for southbound service. Pedestrian accessibility and connectivity from the Project site to these bus stops is provided along the east and west sides of Washington Street with signalized crossings at the intersection where the bus stops are located. Pedestrian crosswalks are generally provided at signalized intersections along Washington Street with sidewalks on the east side. Buffered Class II bike lanes are provided in both directions along Washington Street and along the south side along Avenue 50, east of the Project site. 3.17.3 Impacts a. Less than Significant Impact. Trip generation represents the amount of traffic which is both attracted to and produced by a development. The Project's Traffic Report (Appendix E) utilized the trip generation rates for multi -family housing for low-rise and mid -rise homes provided in the Institute of Engineers Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition. As shown in the modeling conducted by IEG, through use of the ITE trip generation rates, the Project is anticipated to generate approximately 1,684 total daily trips, 109 AM peak hour trips, and 134 PM peak hour trips. IEG conducted analyses for two scenarios: Existing Conditions (2021), Project Completion Year (2023) (Existing Plus Ambient Plus Project) Conditions, Cumulative (Existing Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project) Conditions. As shown in Table 9, Existing Conditions (2021) Intersection Analysis, all analyzed intersections are operating at an acceptable LOS under Existing Year (2021) Conditions. Therefore, no improvements are required La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 61 MaFeh August 2023 171 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated TRANSPORTATION — Would the project: a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, ❑ ❑ ® ❑ roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with ❑ CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous ❑ ❑ intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access a. Less than Significant Impact. Trip generation represents the amount of traffic which is both attracted to and produced by a development. The Project's Traffic Report (Appendix E) utilized the trip generation rates for multi -family housing for low-rise and mid -rise homes provided in the Institute of Engineers Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition. As shown in the modeling conducted by IEG, through use of the ITE trip generation rates, the Project is anticipated to generate approximately 1,684 total daily trips, 109 AM peak hour trips, and 134 PM peak hour trips. IEG conducted analyses for two scenarios: Existing Conditions (2021), Project Completion Year (2023) (Existing Plus Ambient Plus Project) Conditions, Cumulative (Existing Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project) Conditions. As shown in Table 9, Existing Conditions (2021) Intersection Analysis, all analyzed intersections are operating at an acceptable LOS under Existing Year (2021) Conditions. Therefore, no improvements are required La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 61 MaFeh August 2023 171 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Table 9 Existing Conditions (2021) Intersection Analysis Intersection Intersection Control Existing Conditions Delay (a) LOS (b) AM/PM Peak 1. Washington Street & Avenue 50 Signalized 20.7/16.4 C/B 2. Washington Street & Eisenhower Drive Signalized 15.0/13.7 B/B 3. Washington Street & Avenue 48 Signalized 13.2/11.9 B/B Notes: (a) Delay refers to the average control delay for the entire intersection, measured in seconds/vehicle. (b) LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition and performed using Synchro 10 The second scenario, Project Completion (2023) was analyzed with a two percent annual growth factor for two years applied to the existing counts. As shown in Table 10, Project Completion (2023) Intersection Analysis, all analyzed intersections are operating at an acceptable LOS under Project Completion (2023) conditions. Therefore, no additional improvements are required. Table 10 Project Completion (2023) Intersection Analysis Intersection Existing Conditions Project Completion Conditions Delay (a) LOS (b) Delay (a) LOS (b) AM Peak/PM Peak 1. Washington Street & Avenue 50 20.7/16.4 C/B 22.2/17.4 C/B 2. Washington Street & Eisenhower Drive 15.0/13.7 B/B 16.3/14.7 B/B 3. Washington Street & Avenue 48 13.2/11.9 B/B 14.6/12.7 B/B Notes: (a) Delay refers to the average control delay for the entire intersection, measured in seconds/vehicle. At unsignalized intersections, delay refers to the worst movement. (b) LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition and performed using Synchro 10 The third scenario analyzed is Cumulative (Existing Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project). The Cumulative Conditions traffic volumes were developed by adding cumulative project trips to the Project Completion Conditions traffic volumes. As shown in Table 11, Cumulative Intersection Analysis, all analyzed intersections are operating at an acceptable LOS under Cumulative Conditions. Therefore, no additional improvements are required. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 62 MaFeh August 2023 172 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Table 11 Cumulative Intersection Analysis Intersection Existing Conditions Cumulative Conditions Delay (a) LOS (b) Delay (a) LOS (b) 1. Washington Street & Avenue 50 20.7/16.4 C/B 22.4/17.7 C/B 2. Washington Street & Eisenhower Drive 15.0/13.7 B/B 16.4/14.8 B/B 3. Washington Street & Avenue 48 13.2/11.9 B/B 14.8/12.8 B/B Notes: (a) Delay refers to the average control delay for the entire intersection, measured in seconds/vehicle. At unsignalized intersection, delay refers to the worst movement. (b) LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition and performed using Synchro 10 As previously mentioned in Section 3.17.2, STA operates Route 7 within the vicinity of the Project site. Bus stops for Route 7 are currently located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Washington Street and Avenue 50 for northbound service and at the southwest corner for southbound service Pedestrian accessibility and connectivity to and from the Project is provided along the east and west sides of Washington Street with signalized crossings at the intersection where the bus stops are located. Existing bike lanes are located along the Project site's frontage with Washington Street and along the south side of Avenue 50, east of the Project site. The Project would not interfere with the existing bus stops, sidewalks, and bike lanes. In conclusion, the Project would not conflict with the City's General Plan. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. Impacts would be less than significant. b. Less than Significant Impact. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 sets forth guidelines for implementing Senate Bill 743 (SB 743) for reduction of GHG emissions and development of multimodal transportation networks. SB 743 requires amendments to the CEQA Guidelines to provide for an alternative criteria to the LOS methodology for evaluating transportation impacts. Generally, "vehicle miles travelled" or VMT is considered as the most appropriate measurement of transportation impacts. VMT refers to the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project. Per the City of La Quinta VMT Analysis Policy and screening criteria for development projects, the proposed Project, consisting of X4252 multifamily units of which 7-0-74 units are affordable housing units, can be presumed to not have a significant transportation related CEQA impact by qualifying for small and local serving projects screening criteria as affordable housing. Furthermore, as discussed in the GHG section above, the project is estimated to generate less than 3,000 MTCO2e, which also qualifies for screening criteria. Therefore, Project impacts related to VMT would be less than significant. c/d Less than Significant Impact. The types of traffic generated from the Project (i.e., passenger cars) would be compatible with the type of traffic observed along roadways within the Project vicinity under existing conditions. In addition, prior to development of the Project site, the City will review and approve the proposed architectural plans to ensure all proposed improvements within the public right-of-way would be installed in conformance with City Design Standards and that no hazardous transportation design features would be introduced through implementation of the Project. In addition, the Riverside County La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 63 MaFeh August 2023 173 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Fire Department, City Fire Services, and the City Police Department will review the proposed site plan to ensure that all safety design features and measures related to emergency access and geometric design are compliant with existing standards prior to final Project approval. Accordingly, the Project would not create or substantially increase safety hazards due to a design feature or incompatible use or result in inadequate emergency access. Impacts would be less than significant. 3.17.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.17.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.18 Tribal Cultural Resources 3.18.1 Sources PaleoWest, Cultural Resource Investigation in Support of the Troutdale Village Project, April 25, 2022. (Appendix C) AB 52 Tribal Consultation Letters 3.18.2 Environmental Setting The Project site is situated east of the Peninsular Ranges in the southern extent of the Coachella Valley at the western edge of the Colorado Desert. The Coachella Valley is bordered by the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa mountains (part of the Peninsular Ranges) to the southwest and by the low, rolling Indio and Mecca hills to the northeast. From the steep slopes of the San Jacinto Mountains, the desert floor descends suddenly at less than 3 kilometers (2 miles) eastward to sea level in the city of Indio, where the Project site is located. PaleoWest contacted the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) on October 19, 2021, for a review of the sacred lands file (SLF). The NAHC responded on November 30, 2021, stating that the SLF was completed with negative results; however, the NAHC requested that 16 individuals representing 11 Native American tribal groups be contacted to elicit information regarding cultural resource issues related to the proposed Project. PaleoWest sent outreach letters to the 11 recommended tribal groups on December 21, 2021. These letters were followed up by phone calls on January 12, 2022. To date five Tribes have responded to the notification letters: Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, Quechan Historic Preservation Department, Los Coyote Band of Cahuilla and Cupeno Indians, Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians, and Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 64 MaFeh August 2023 174 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.18.3 Impacts a.i. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated As previously discussed in Section 3.5.3(a) and (b), the Project site contains two previously recorded prehistoric archeological sites, which have been combined by PaleoWest into one resource: 33-001180. The resource likely represents a Late Prehistoric Period habitation site, much of which has been destroyed by development in the surrounding area. PaleoWest concluded after a Phase II investigation that the portion of Site 33-001180 in the Project area does not contribute to the overall eligibility of the site for listing on the CRHR. However, due to the sensitivity in the area, Mitigation Measure CUL -1 would be implemented to ensure historical and archaeological resources would be less than significant. a.ii. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated As previously mentioned in Section 3.18.2, PaleoWest contacted the NAHC on October 19, 2021, for review of the SLF. The NAHC responded on November 30, 2021, stating that the SLF was completed with negative results; however, the NAHC requested that 16 individuals representing 11 Native American tribal groups be contacted to elicit information regarding cultural resource issues related to the Project. PaleoWest sent outreach letters to the 11 recommended tribal groups on December 21, 2021. These letters were followed up by phone calls on January 12, 2022. To date, six Tribes have responded: Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, Quechan Historic Preservation Department, Los Coyote Band of Cahuilla and Cupeno Indians, Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians, Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians, and Morongo Band of Mission Indians. The Soboba Band of Indians stated the Tribe would defer to the Torres -Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, the Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, and the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians. The Quechan Historic Preservation Department sent an email indicating the Tribe does not wish to comment on the La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 65 MaFeh August 2023 175 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of ❑ ® ❑ ❑ historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section ❑ ® ❑ ❑ 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. a.i. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated As previously discussed in Section 3.5.3(a) and (b), the Project site contains two previously recorded prehistoric archeological sites, which have been combined by PaleoWest into one resource: 33-001180. The resource likely represents a Late Prehistoric Period habitation site, much of which has been destroyed by development in the surrounding area. PaleoWest concluded after a Phase II investigation that the portion of Site 33-001180 in the Project area does not contribute to the overall eligibility of the site for listing on the CRHR. However, due to the sensitivity in the area, Mitigation Measure CUL -1 would be implemented to ensure historical and archaeological resources would be less than significant. a.ii. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated As previously mentioned in Section 3.18.2, PaleoWest contacted the NAHC on October 19, 2021, for review of the SLF. The NAHC responded on November 30, 2021, stating that the SLF was completed with negative results; however, the NAHC requested that 16 individuals representing 11 Native American tribal groups be contacted to elicit information regarding cultural resource issues related to the Project. PaleoWest sent outreach letters to the 11 recommended tribal groups on December 21, 2021. These letters were followed up by phone calls on January 12, 2022. To date, six Tribes have responded: Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, Quechan Historic Preservation Department, Los Coyote Band of Cahuilla and Cupeno Indians, Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians, Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians, and Morongo Band of Mission Indians. The Soboba Band of Indians stated the Tribe would defer to the Torres -Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, the Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, and the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians. The Quechan Historic Preservation Department sent an email indicating the Tribe does not wish to comment on the La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 65 MaFeh August 2023 175 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Project and stated they defer to more local tribes. The Environmental Department of the Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla and Cupeno Indians responded that they have no information to share and no comment on the Project. The Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians also stated that the Tribe would like to defer to the closest tribes in that area, Torres -Martinez and Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians. They further noted that the Tribe does not have any comment regarding the Project. The Morongo Band of Mission Indians stated the Project was not located within the boundaries of the ancestral territory and traditional use area of the Cahuilla and Serrano people of the Morongo Band of Mission Indians. The Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians stated that they are not aware of any cultural resources that would be impacted by the Project but would like to be informed if any additional resources, beyond the two resources already identified within the Project site, are identified during development of the Project. A representative of the Ramona Band of Cahuilla requested that the letters be resent for review. The letter was resent to the Tribe on January 12, 2022. On January 28, 2022, the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians responded stating that the Project site is located within the Tribe's Traditional Use Area and therefore, requested to monitor during Project construction. On April 19, 2022, the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians requested a formal government to government consultation under AB -52, a cultural resources inventory by a qualified archaeologist prior to any development activities, a copy of the records search with associated survey reports and site records from the information center, copies of any cultural documentation, a representative from the Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource, and an informational meeting with the developer, lead agency, and archaeologist. There was a joint SB18 and AB52 Revie conducted and on July 21, 2022, The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians stated the Desert Sage Apartments project had addressed all the Tribals Historic Preservation Office concerns and proper mitigation measures have been proposed to ensure the protections of tribal cultural resources, thus concluding AB52 consultation efforts. With implementation of Mitigation Measure TCR -1, as described below, impacts to tribal cultural resources would be less than significant. 3.18.4 Mitigation TCR -1 Prior to any ground disturbing activities on the Project site, an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) shall be present to monitor the site. Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a qualified Archaeologist to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. 3.18.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation With implementation of Mitigation Measure TCR -1, impacts regarding tribal cultural resources would remain less than significant. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 66 MaFeh August 2023 176 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.19 Utilities and Service Systems 3.19.1 Sources • City of La Quinta, City of La Quinta 2035 General Plan, Adopted February 19, 2013. • City of La Quinta, Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2010111094) for the City of La Quinta General Plan, July 2012. https://www.laguintaca. gov/homelshowpublisheddocument/15858/635338594527270000 3.19.2 Environmental Setting Domestic Water Domestic water for the majority of the City is provided by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). Groundwater is the principal source of municipal water supply in the Coachella Valley. The main groundwater source for the entire valley is the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin, Indio Subbasin, and the Whitewater River Subbasin. The Whitewater River Subbasin underlies a major portion of the valley floor and encompasses approximately 400 square miles. Wastewater CVWD also provides wastewater and sewage collection and treatment services in the City and Sphere of Influence (SOI). CVWD sewer lines utilize a system of trunk lines ranging in diameter from 4 to 24 inches. There are 18 -inch diameter force mains in Washington Street, Jefferson Street, Madison Street, and Avenues 50, 58, and 60. There are two CVWD wastewater treatment plants that serve La Quinta. Water Reclamation Plant 7 (WRP-7) is located at Madison Street and Avenue 38, northeast of the City in Indio. It provides wastewater treatment for development in the City north of Miles Avenue. The capacity of WRP-7 is 5 million gallons per day (MGD), and the plant processes approximately 2.8 to 3.0 MGD. It has the capacity to expand to 7.5 MGD. The Mid -Valley Water Reclamation Plant (WRP-4), located in Thermal, serves lands in the City and SOI that are located south of Miles Avenue. The Mid -Valley plant has a current capacity of just under 10 MGD, and processes approximately 5 MGD. Solid Waste Solid waste disposal services in the City of La Quinta are provided by the commercial vendor, Burrtec. Solid waste collected from the City of La Quinta residents and businesses is hauled to the Edom Hill Transfer Station in Cathedral City and is then transported to Lambs Canyon in the City of Beaumont. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 67 MaFeh August 2023 177 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.19.3 Impacts a -e. Less than Significant Impact. Domestic Water CVWD provides domestic water services to the Project site. CVWD based its water demand calculations for its UWMP on the City's Anticipated Land Use Plan which the Project will remain consistent with its designated land use. Additionally, the Project would be required to implement all water conservation measures imposed by CVWD under normal and drought conditions over the life of the Project. These include requirements of Executive Order B-29-15, which was issued in 2015 and is still in effect. This Executive Order mandates reductions in water use by 36% in the Coachella Valley. In response to the Executive Order, CVWD has adopted restrictions on water use that include limiting days on which landscaping can be irrigated, a prohibition on the use of fountains or water features, a prohibition on irrigation by any means other than drip or micro -spray systems, and a requirement that hotels offer their guests the option of not having towels and linens laundered daily. Should additional restrictions or regulations be implemented, the Project would be required to comply with them also. No new wells or additional water infrastructure or entitlements will be required. Based on the foregoing, CVWD would be able to fulfill the Project's demand during normal and dry years. Impacts would be less than significant. La Cluinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 68 MaFeh August 2023 178 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development ❑ ❑ ® ❑ during normal, dry and multiple dry years? c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local ❑ ❑ ® ❑ infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid ❑ ❑ ® ❑ waste? a -e. Less than Significant Impact. Domestic Water CVWD provides domestic water services to the Project site. CVWD based its water demand calculations for its UWMP on the City's Anticipated Land Use Plan which the Project will remain consistent with its designated land use. Additionally, the Project would be required to implement all water conservation measures imposed by CVWD under normal and drought conditions over the life of the Project. These include requirements of Executive Order B-29-15, which was issued in 2015 and is still in effect. This Executive Order mandates reductions in water use by 36% in the Coachella Valley. In response to the Executive Order, CVWD has adopted restrictions on water use that include limiting days on which landscaping can be irrigated, a prohibition on the use of fountains or water features, a prohibition on irrigation by any means other than drip or micro -spray systems, and a requirement that hotels offer their guests the option of not having towels and linens laundered daily. Should additional restrictions or regulations be implemented, the Project would be required to comply with them also. No new wells or additional water infrastructure or entitlements will be required. Based on the foregoing, CVWD would be able to fulfill the Project's demand during normal and dry years. Impacts would be less than significant. La Cluinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 68 MaFeh August 2023 178 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Wastewater Wastewater generated from the Project site would be treated at either CVWD's WRP 7 or WRP 4, which contains an excess of 2.0 MGD or 5 MGD, respectively. Implementation of the Project would generate wastewater at a rate of 230 gallons per day per dwelling unit. As the Project includes the development of 2-84252 dwelling units, the Project would generate approximately 65,320 gallons per day of wastewater. Therefore, implementation of the Project would result in an approximately 3.3 percent or 1.3 percent of the total capacity of wastewater treated at WRP 7 or WRP 4, respectively. This increase is considered minimal as these plants currently treat approximately 5 MGD (WRP 7) or 10 MGD (WRP 4) and would not result in a significant impact. StnrmwatPr The City requires on-site retention basins for all new developments to manage surface water flows and reduce runoff from sources such as stormwater and landscape irrigation. The Project complies with this requirement by including two on-site retention basins to ensure stormwater is retained on-site. Additional measures to address onsite stormwater management are described in Section 3.10, Hydrology and Water Quality. Project -related impacts to stormwater management systems are expected to be less than significant. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Snlid WattP Solid waste disposal service for the City would be provided by Burrtec, which is required to meet all local, regional, state, and federal standards for solid waste disposal. Implementation of the Project would generate solid waste at a rate of 12.23 pounds per dwelling unit per year. As the Project includes the development of 2-84252 dwelling units, the Project would generate approximately 1.7 tons of solid waste per year. Solid waste generated at the Project site would be transported to the Edom Hill Transfer Station in northern Cathedral City and disposed of at Lamb Canyon Landfill in the City of Beaumont, which has a remaining capacity of 19.2 million cubic yards (2015). Due to the small scale of the Project, the Lamb Canyon Landfill has more than enough capacity to serve the proposed Project. Furthermore, Burrtec is required to meet all local, regional, state, and federal standards for solid waste disposal. Impacts would be less than significant. 3.19.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.19.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.20 Wildfire 3.20.1 Sources California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), Map of CAL FIRE's Fire Severity Zones in Local Responsibility Areas — Western Riverside County, December 24, 2009. Accessed August 13, 2021 https://osfm.fire. ca. pov/media/6754/fhszl map60.pdf La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 69 MaFeh August 2023 179 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION • CAL FIRE, Fire Hazard Severity Zones in SRA, November 7, 2007. Accessed August 31, 2021 https.11osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/6752/fhszs map60.pdf 3.20.2 Environmental Setting The Project site is located within an area of the City that is somewhat developed. According to CAL FIRE maps, the Project site is not located within a very high fire hazard severity zone or a fire hazard severity zone in a State Responsibility Area (SRA). 3.20.3 Impacts The Project site is not located in or near SRA or lands within a very high fire hazard severity zone; therefore, the Project would not exacerbate wildfire hazard risks or expose people or the environment to adverse environmental effects related to wildfires. As such, no impact would occur. 3.20.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.20.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance 3.21.1 Sources All sources previously listed were used to support the conclusions made in this section. La Cluinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 70 MaFeh August 2023 180 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated WILDFIRE — If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project: a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response ❑ ❑ ❑ plan or emergency evacuation plan? b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project ❑ ❑ ❑ occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or ❑ landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes? The Project site is not located in or near SRA or lands within a very high fire hazard severity zone; therefore, the Project would not exacerbate wildfire hazard risks or expose people or the environment to adverse environmental effects related to wildfires. As such, no impact would occur. 3.20.4 Mitigation No mitigation is required. 3.20.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation Not applicable. 3.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance 3.21.1 Sources All sources previously listed were used to support the conclusions made in this section. La Cluinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 70 MaFeh August 2023 180 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 3.21.2 Environmental Setting The environmental setting for the project site is summarized within Sections 2.1 through 2.20 of the Initial Study for each environmental issue. 3.21.3 Impacts a. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. All impacts to the environment, including impacts to habitat for fish and wildlife species, fish and wildlife populations, plant and animal communities, rare and endangered plants and animals, and historical and pre -historical resources were evaluated as part of this Initial Study. Throughout this Initial Study, where impacts were determined to be potentially significant, mitigation measures have been imposed to reduce those impacts to less than significant. Accordingly, with incorporation of the mitigation measures imposed throughout this Initial Study, the Project would not substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels with mitigation incorporated. b. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The environmental evaluation of this Initial Study concluded that, with adherence to all mitigation measures, the Project's cumulatively considerable impacts would be mitigated to less than significant levels. c. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project could result in environmental impacts to humans directly or indirectly. All Project environmental impacts would be less than significant or less than La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 71 MaFeh August 2023 181 Potentially Less than Less than Significant Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, ❑ ® ❑ ❑ reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection ❑ ® ❑ ❑ with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, ❑ ® ❑ ❑ either directly or indirectly? a. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. All impacts to the environment, including impacts to habitat for fish and wildlife species, fish and wildlife populations, plant and animal communities, rare and endangered plants and animals, and historical and pre -historical resources were evaluated as part of this Initial Study. Throughout this Initial Study, where impacts were determined to be potentially significant, mitigation measures have been imposed to reduce those impacts to less than significant. Accordingly, with incorporation of the mitigation measures imposed throughout this Initial Study, the Project would not substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels with mitigation incorporated. b. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The environmental evaluation of this Initial Study concluded that, with adherence to all mitigation measures, the Project's cumulatively considerable impacts would be mitigated to less than significant levels. c. Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project could result in environmental impacts to humans directly or indirectly. All Project environmental impacts would be less than significant or less than La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 71 MaFeh August 2023 181 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION significant with mitigation incorporated. The Project would, therefore, not result in environmental effects which would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. 3.21.4 Mitigation 113I0-1 Regardless of the time of year, nesting bird surveys shall be performed by a qualified avian biologist no more than three (3) days prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities. Pre - construction surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior. The qualified biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the pre - construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and should be at least 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors and birds -of -prey. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Prosect -related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012 or most recent version). If ^^••^irJAhIe PFe ^^+ eenstFuetien aetivities must begin duFing the nesting biFd seasen (FebFu@Fy ist thFeugh August 31st), a pFe eenstFuetien nesting biFd suFvey Shall -he ee-Ind-ur-Aed- Ine Imle-Ire than 14 days pFieF te initi.atie—P ef. Ceunty. The nesting bird survey shall be ce-nduraed en feet in -side the preject beundary, including a -30-0- feet -h---4er fer passeFiRes (SE)RgbiFdS) and a 5()() fA-A-* -h'-'ffeF fA-F PaptE)FS OR aFP -a-1; A -f sluffitab'P hAhitat beHRdaFy. if a Fapter nest i-,; Ah';P.rvPd i.p. a tFee pFepe-sed fA-.r relmleval, the applicaRt FRust eE)nr- -it with 113I0-2 Prior to construction and issuance of any grading permit, the City of La Quinta shall ensure compliance with the Coachella Vallev Multiale Saecies Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) and its associated Imalementine Aereement and shall ensure the collection of aavment of the CVMSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee.The Applicant shall pay the CVMSHCP i ^ al Deyel^rm ent Mitigation C„^ CUL -1 A qualified archaeologist monitor shall be present during any ground disturbing activities during the project construction phase. In the case that archaeological materials are encountered during ground disturbing activities, work in the area shall cease and any deposits shall be treated according to Federal, State, and local guidelines. No further grading is permitted in the area of the discovery until the City approves the appropriate measure to protect the discovered resources. DeseFt geLa Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 72 August 2023 182 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CUL -2 In the event that human remains are uncovered during ground disturbing activities on the project site, no further disturbance shall occur, and all work shall cease until the County Coroner has made a determination of the origin and disposition of the remains. Ground disturbing activities and excavations shall not resume until the following has been addressed: 1. The County Coroner has been contacted and determined that no investigation to the cause of death is required, and If the County Coroner determines that the remains are of Native American decent, the Coroner must notify Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will then determine the Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD shall complete the inspection of the site within 48 hours of notification and may recommend means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains, and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resource Code Section 5097.98. GEO-1 Prior to the start of the proposed Project activities, all field personnel will receive a worker's environmental awareness training on paleontological resources. The training will provide a description of the laws and ordinances protecting fossil resources, the types of fossil resources that may be encountered in the Project area, the role of the paleontological monitor, outlines steps to follow in the event that a fossil discovery is made and provides contact information for the Project Paleontologist. The training will be developed by the Project Paleontologist and can be delivered concurrent with other training including cultural, biological, safety, etc. GEO-2 Prior to the commencement of ground -disturbing activities, a professional paleontologist will be retained to prepare and implement a PRMMP for the proposed Project. The PRMMP will describe the monitoring required during excavations that extend into older Quaternary (Pleistocene) age sediments and the location of areas deemed to have a high paleontological resource potential. Part-time monitoring, or spot checking, may be required during shallow ground -disturbances (< 10 feet below ground surface) to confirm that sensitive geologic units are not being impacted. Monitoring will entail the visual inspection of excavated or graded areas and trench sidewalls. GEO-3 In the event that a paleontological resource is discovered, the monitor will have the authority to temporarily divert the construction equipment around the find until it is assessed for scientific significance and, if appropriate, collected. If the resource is determined to be of scientific significance, the Project Paleontologist shall complete the following: Salvage of Fossils. If fossils are discovered, all work in the immediate vicinity should be halted to allow the paleontological monitor, and/or Project Paleontologist to evaluate the discovery and determine if the fossil may be considered significant. If the fossils are determined to be potentially significant, the Project Paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) should recover them following standard field procedures for collecting paleontological as outlined in the PRMMP prepared for the project. Typically, fossils can be safely salvaged quickly by a single paleontologist and not disrupt construction activity. In some cases, larger fossils (such as complete skeletons or large mammal fossils) require more extensive excavation and longer salvage periods. In this case, the paleontologist should have the authority to temporarily direct, divert or halt construction activity to ensure that the fossil(s) can be removed in a safe and timely manner. 2. Fossil Preparation and Curation. The PRMMP will identify the museum that has agreed to accept fossils that may be discovered during project -related excavations. Upon completion of fieldwork, La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 73 MaFeh August 2023 183 3 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION all significant fossils collected will be prepared in a properly equipped laboratory to a point ready for curation. Preparation may include the removal of excess matrix from fossil materials and stabilizing or repairing specimens. During preparation and inventory, the fossils specimens will be identified to the lowest taxonomic level practical prior to curation at an accredited museum. The fossil specimens must be delivered to the accredited museum or repository no later than 90 days after all fieldwork is completed. The cost of curation will be assessed by the repository and will be the responsibility of the client. GEO-4 Upon completion of ground disturbing activity (and curation of fossils if necessary) the Project Paleontologist should prepare a final mitigation and monitoring report outlining the results of the mitigation and monitoring program. The report should include discussion of the location, duration and methods of the monitoring, stratigraphic sections, any recovered fossils, and the scientific significance of those fossils, and where fossils were curated. TCR -1 Prior to any ground disturbing activities on the Project site, an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) shall be present to monitor the site. Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a qualified Archaeologist to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. 3.21.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation With incorporation of the above-mentioned mitigation measures, all Project -related impacts in regard to Mandatory Findings of Significance would be reduced to less than significant. La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 74 MaFeh August 2023 184 5 REFERENCES Chapter 4 Report Preparers Lead Agency Carlos Flores, Senior Planner City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 The Altum Group Rich Malacoff, AICP Subconsultants Air Quality, Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Noise Mike Dickerson, INCE, Principal — MD Acoustics Tyler Klassen, Air Quality Specialist — MD Acoustics Francisco Irarrazabal, Acoustical Consultant— MD Acoustics Biological Resources Travis McGill, Director — ELMT Consulting Cultural Resources Roberta Thomas, Senior Archaeologist, M.A., RPA — PaleoWest Archaeology Hydrology, WQMP Benjamin Egan, PE, PLS, Engineer — Egan Civil, Inc. Transportation, VMT George Ghossain, PE, MSCE, MPA, Principal Engineer— Integrated Engineering Group La Quinta Village SPA No. 3 IS/MND 75 MaFeh August 2023 185 Responses to Comments RTC -1 OCTOBER 2023 186 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK OCTOBER 2023 RTC -2 187 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS Response to Comment Letter A Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Xitlaly Madrigal, Cultural Resources Analyst March 6, 2023 A-1 The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) appreciates your efforts to include the Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) in the Troutdale Village project. We have reviewed the documents and have the following comments: *The Mitigated Negative Declaration document included standard mitigation measures to address impacts to cultural resources. We found these measures to be sufficient. Again, the Agua Caliente appreciates your interest in our cultural heritage. If you have questions or require additional information, please call me at (760) 423-3485. You may also email me at ACBCI-THPO@aguacaliente.net. A-1 Response: The comment supports the analysis contained in the Draft IS/MND and states the mitigation measures provided for cultural resources is appropriate. The City appreciates ACBCI's review and confirmation of the required mitigation measures. No additional environmental issues under CEQA are raised, and no revisions or changes to the Final IS/MND are required to address or respond to the comment, and no further response is required. RTC -3 OCTOBER 2023 188 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK OCTOBER 2023 RTC -4 189 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS Response to Comment Letter B Desert Sands Unified School District Patrick Cisneros, Director, Facilities Services March 10, 2023 B-1 This is in response to your request for comments on the above referenced project and its effect on public schools. Please be advised, all actions toward residential and commercial development will result in an impact on our school system. The District's ability to meet the educational needs of the public with new schools has been seriously impaired in recent years by local, state, and federal budgets that have an impact on the financing of new schools. As you are aware, there is a school mitigation fee that is currently collected on all new development at the time building permits are issued. B-1 Response: The City acknowledges the comments and agrees that the project would be required to comply with the payment of all statutorily required impact fees, including the school mitigation fee. As stated in the Draft IS/MND, "The Project is required to pay the State mandated school impact fees which would assist in mitigating impacts to schools. Therefore, this fee would assure that impacts would be less - than -significant levels." (Draft IS/MND, pages 57-58) Accordingly, the Draft IS/MND has adequately documented that through regulatory compliance, the project would have a less -than -significant impact on schools and no further analysis or revisions to the Final IS/MND are required. RTC -5 OCTOBER 2023 190 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK OCTOBER 2023 RTC -6 191 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS Response to Comment Letter C Angie Lafferty March 22, 2023 C-1 I attended the Troutdale presentation yesterday. The following are of great concern: C-1 Response The comment is an introduction to comments which follow. Please refer to Response to Comments C- 2 through C-6, below. C-2 Entering the proposed community traveling south on Washington will require a u -turn at Washington and 50th. Currently, u -turns are not allowed. There will not be a left turn from 50th Ave into Troutdale, a u -turn will be required at 50th and Park Ave. The intersection is already saturated with traffic from the two schools, YMCA and Boys and Girls Club C2 Response The comment restates information regarding the project's access. The comment does not raise a specific issue with respect to the analysis in the Draft IS/MND. Transportation, including consistency with pedestrian and bicycle mobility and compliance with adopted design standards, is addressed in Section 3.17. As analyzed therein, impacts were found to be less than significant. With respect to the implication that U-turns at an existing congested intersection may have an environmental impact, it is noted that such "level of service" issues such as signal delay are no longer considered environmental topics under CEQA. Therefore, because the comment does not raise a specific environmental issue under CEQA, no further response can be provided or is required. C-3 The high density of units and cars/traffic will be detrimental to mental and physical health. C3 Response The comment raises general environmental issues include traffic and physical health, which are addressed in the Sections 3.3, Air Quality, and 3.17, Transportation, of the Draft IS/MND. Because no specific issue with the analysis is raised by the comment, no more specific response can be provided. Please refer to Sections 3.3 and 3.17 of the Draft IS/MND. C-4 The design of complex is not in line with the surrounding community. The three story buildings along 50th Ave will block the view of our majestic mountains. I believe it is in the City's plan to protect our views? C4 Response The proposed project has been revised to reduce the maximum proposed building height from 40' to 28', down from three -stories to two -stories. underlying zone. RTC -7 OCTOBER 2023 192 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS C-5 Per the LQ General Plan - In 2009 CVWD reported that a total of 160,000 acre ft of water was pumped over water replenishment, resulting in an overdraft of 23,912 acre-feet, in the Lower Whitewater subbasin, which serves the City and other communities in the eastern Coachella Valley. Is there a recent report, I would imagine there has been a greater amount of overdraft since 2009. The ground water is essential now and for future generations, are we overdeveloping? C5 Response The comment raises an environmental issue, water supply, which is analyzed in Section 3.19, Utilities and Utility Systems, of the Draft IS/MND. As described therein, the Draft IS/MND found that "CVWD would be able to fulfill the Project's demand during normal and dry years. Impacts would be less than significant" because the project is consistent with the underlying land uses assumed in the CVWD's water projects and because the project would be required to comply with all water conservation measures mandated by CVWD. The comment does not raise a specific issue with the analysis in the Draft IS/MND; therefore, no more detailed response can be provided. C-6 Evidently there is a bridge planned for the wash on 50th Ave, if so, wouldn't it make sense to construct the bridge prior to any development with in the area? C6 Response The referenced bridge is not a component of the proposed project and is not subject to the Draft IS/MND. No further response is required. RTC -8 OCTOBER 2023 193 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS Response to Comment Letter D DUNA La Quinta Homeowners Association Keith G. Meyer, President Duna La Quinta HOA No. 1 March 22, 2023 D-1 I am the President of Board of Directors for Duna La Quinta HOA No. 1, which is located on Avenue 50 between Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive. Duna La Quinta includes three HOAs, totaling 184 single family and condominium units. I also am a registered Professional Traffic Engineer in the state of California, having prepared numerous environmental documents and traffic assessments during my career. I have reviewed the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and Transportation Analysis (TA) supporting the Troutdale Village Project and find them to be inadequate in the following areas: D-1 Response The comment serves as an introduction to comments which follow. Please refer to Responses D-2 through D-22, for responsive information. D-2 Simultaneous Approval of Environmental Assessment, General Plan Amendment, Zoning Change, and Specific Plan for the Troutdale Residences. Due to the requested increase in building height from 22 ft to 40 ft in the City Municipal Code, this project would be precedent -setting in the City of La Quinta and would change the character of La Quinta residential communities forever. This alone requires a separate environmental process and public hearing process. It should not be buried within one project. D-2 Response The comment raises issues related to building heights, which is addressed in the Aesthetics section of the Draft IS/MND. The comment does not raise a specific issue with the adequacy of the analysis, rather, it expressed the opinion of the commenter that increasing building heights from 22' to 40' should be analyzed as a separate environmental process. The Aesthetics analysis in the Draft IS/MND analyzes the potential for the project to include building heights up to 40'. However, between the circulation of the Draft IS/MND and preparation of the Final IS/MND, the project has been revised to reduce the maximum building heights to 28' which is permitted within the RMH zoning district. Further, the total number of units has been reduced from 284 to 252 to reduce the bulk and scale of the project. No further analysis is required because the reduction in unit counts and lower buildings heights would reduce impacts compared to the less -than -significant impacts disclosed in the Draft IS/MND. D-3 Violation of City General Plan Image Corridors. Avenue 50 is an "Image Corridor", per the City's General Plan. Threats to the City's scenic image corridors include inappropriate and unattractive land uses. The three-story buildings proposed as part of the project are unacceptable, unlike any surrounding uses, and a violation to this policy. The Specific Plan for the project should be denied as it raises the allowable building height from 22 ft. to 40 ft. We therefore conclude the IS/MND's finding of No Significant Impact is unsupported. RTC -9 OCTOBER 2023 194 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS D-3 Response As analyzed in Section 3.1.1 of the Draft IS/MND, the project proposed to increase building heights from 22' to 40'; however, the project included a Specific Plan that allows for development standards and regulations to be developed for individual sites. As analyzed in the Draft IS/MND," the Project would be required to comply with the applicable development standards and design guidelines in the Troutdale Specific Plan and the City of La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC), which regulates the visual quality of new development and ensures that new development does not detract from any scenic attributes/qualities in the surrounding area." Further, the Draft IS/MND demonstrates that such building heights, "will not impact the view of the mountains" (as shown in Figure 4 of the Draft IS/MND) and in combination with the Specific Plan and compliance with the LQMC, the project was determined not to conflict with applicable zoning standards and other regulations governing scenic quality. Nonetheless In response, the project has been revised between the circulation of the Draft IS/MND and preparation of the Final IS/MND. Specifically, as described in Response to Comment D-2, the project has been revised to reduce the maximum building heights to 28' which is permitted within the RMH zoning district and the Specific Plan allows for 28' height within Image Corridors. Further, the total number of units has been reduced from 284 to 252 to reduce the bulk and scale of the project. No further analysis is required because the reduction in unit counts and lower buildings heights would reduce impacts compared to the less -than -significant impacts disclosed in the Draft IS/MND. D-4 Study Intersections. Limiting the traffic study to three local intersections is inadequate, since major employment, entertainment and shopping are located north and east, and project traffic will travel to further intersections. The more congested intersections of Avenue 50/Jefferson Street and Highway 111/Washington Street must be included in the analysis. D-4 Response Please refer to Response to Comment D-13 which describes how the Study Area was determined. As described therein, the Study Area was determined based on direction from the City. It is noted that the existing traffic -generated uses are not part of the proposed project; therefore, they would be part of the existingtraffic which is included in the analysis. Finally, the comment raises an issue, intersection level of service, that is no longer considered for purposes of traffic impacts under CEQA. D-5 Background Data Collection is not representative of current existing conditions and thus renders any traffic operation analysis useless. The project TA does not consider peak season special events in La Quinta that have a major impact on area roadways, particularly Washington Street and Avenue 50. D-5 Response Regarding the existing traffic levels, please refer to Response to Comment D-14 through 17, below. Regarding the reference to "peak season events", neither CEQA nor the City of La Quina require that projects analyze all conditions. Further, as noted above, level of service is no longer the applicable RTC -10 OCTOBER 2023 195 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS measure for determining impacts under CEQA. Thus, no further analysis is required and no revisions to the Final IS/MND are required. D-6 Assumptions of Traffic Distribution are arbitrary, not based on empirical evidence, and have significant impact on the traffic forecasts, rendering the current forecasts and traffic operations useless. D-6 Response The traffic distribution was determined by a registered traffic engineer in consultation with the City of La Quinta, in accordance with the City's Traffic Impact Study Guidelines in Engineering Bulletin (EB) 06- 13. The comment has not provided any evidence that the distribution is not correct. D-7 VMT Analysis Exemption. This exemption violates the consultant's own workplan agreement with the City. Not providing this evaluation violates CEQA guidelines, since the development is underserved by transit. D-1 Response Please refer to Response to Comment D-20 which clarifies that the project was analyzed per the City's VMT requirements in EB 06-13 and determined to be exempt. D-8 Lack of Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Analysis. This evaluation should be included, as pedestrian crossings of Avenue 50 and Washington Street will have a significant impact on traffic signal operations. It is noted that the traffic consultant's signal operations evaluations do not consider any pedestrian activations. The Project's adjacency to Truman Elementary and La Quinta Middle Schools needs to be assessed as to the effects to children walking along the project site, as well as impact to parent dropoff/pickup queues, which can create significant congestion along Avenue 50 and affect signal timing at Washington Street. D-8 Response Preliminarily, the analysis does address the adequacy of pedestrian and bicycle accessibility in accordance with EB 06-13. The project proposes to provide pedestrian paths and bicycle facilities along both property frontages consistent with the City of La Quinta General Plan. Additionally, the project will be constructing a bicycle facility along the south side of Avenue 50. In addition, as explained above, level of service (congestion) is no longer considered for purposes of determining Transportation impacts under CEQA, therefore, the requested analysis is not required for purposes for the IS/MND and no revisions to the Final IS/MND are required. Nonetheless, the traffic analysis does include improvements as described above for multi -modal transportation improvements. D-9 Lack of Street Improvements. It is unconscionable thatthe City would allow a development of this magnitude to occur without bringing Avenue 50 to its full section. The traffic improvement plan, at a minimum, must provide widening of Avenue 50 to the east of Washington Street to the full Primary Arterial Standard. This would allow left RTC -1 1 OCTOBER 2023 196 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS turning traffic to store in the left turn lane and would provide for pedestrian and bicycle safety. Even with these improvements, we are concerned about left turning traffic backing up from the westbound double left turn lanes at Washington Street. In addition, due to excessive speeds along Washington Street, deceleration and acceleration lanes should be provided before and after the Project entrance on the northbound side of Washington Street. This is no different than what has been provided on the southbound side of Washington Street at the entrances to La Quinta Country Club D-9 Response Please refer to Response to Comment D-21, below, which explains that the project is conditioned to provide the required roadway improvements along its entire frontages along Washington Street and Avenue 50. In addition, and as explained above, CEQA no longer provides for impacts to be assessed based on level of surface, therefore, the comment does not address an environmental issue within the meaning of CEQA and no revisions to the Final IS/MND are required. D-10 This project would be precedent -setting and change the character of La Quinta residential communities forever. We urge the City of La Quinta to reject the Environmental Assessment, General Plan Amendment, Zoning Change, and Specific Plan for the Troutdale Residences, and require separate Environmental Impact Statements for the Project and for the Citywide General Plan amendment that would raise building heights in residential communities. D-10 Response The city wishes to clarify that the proposed project includes a Specific Plan that would only apply to the project site, and would not change any citywide building height for residential communities. Implementation of a Specific Plan only covers those particular parcels/properties within the boundaries of that Specific Plan, and the requirements of a Specific Plan can not be applied to other parcels without amending the boundaries of the Specific Plan. With respect to the change in proposed building heights specific to the project site, please see Response to Comments D-2 and D-3, above. D-11 Simultaneous Approval of Environmental Assessment, General Plan Amendment, Zoning Change, and Specific Plan for the Troutdale Residences. In general, it is recommended that environmental clearance be conducted separately for general plan amendments and specific plans, as these two types of plans have different scopes and scales. This allows for a more detailed and comprehensive evaluation of the potential environmental impacts of each project. Due to the General Plan Amendment request to increase building height from 22 ft to 40 ft in the City Municipal Code, this project would be precedent -setting in the City of La Quinta and would change the character La Quinta residential communities forever. This alone would require a separate environmental process and public hearing process. It should not be buried within one project. D-11 Response The comment restates the same comment as Comment D-2. Please refer to Response to Comment D- 2 and D-3, above. In addition, the project description has been revised to eliminate the three-story RTC -12 OCTOBER 2023 197 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS components of the project, resulting in a final project that would be a maximum of 28' and two stories, and the total number of units has been reduced. D-12 Image Corridor Impact. Avenue 50 is an "Image Corridor", per the City's General Plan. Threats to the City's scenic image corridors include inappropriate and unattractive land uses, unattractive or inadequate landscaping, inadequately buffered parking, high walls, and berms that block views, and overhead power lines that degrade views. The City states that "recognizing that these Image Corridors create the sense of place in La Quinta, their protection must always be in the forefront of community and transportation design". The Project IS/MND states "The Project would be compatible with the size, scale, and aesthetic features of other existing homes located to the north, west, and future homes to the south of the Project site. " This statement is clearly false, as there are no two or three-story homes in the vicinity of the Project. The Project IS/MND states "LQMC Section 9.50.020, Height Limits and Setbacks Near Image Corridors, requires a maximum height of 22 feet within the first 150 feet from Avenue 50 and Washington Street. The Specific Plan will provide modified standards that will allow a maximum height of 40 feet." We argue that the project clearly violates the City's General Plan and existing Municipal Code by raising the building height allowance and significantly impacting the views of the mountains along the Avenue 50 corridor. This General Plan Amendment should be separated out due to its City-wide importance. D-12 Response Please refer to Responses to Comments D-2, D-3, D-10 and D-11, above. Further, with respect to the 150' setback from Avenue 50, the project proposes to increase heights to 28' which can be requested in Specific Plan development standards and is proposed as such. D-13 Study Intersections. The Traffic Study includes three Study Area Intersections: 1. Washington Street and Avenue 50 2. Washington Street and Eisenhower Drive 3. Washington Street and Avenue 48 Limiting the traffic study to these three intersections is inadequate, seeing as traffic distributes primarily north and east. Major employment, entertainment and shopping are located north and east, therefore, the more congested intersections of Avenue 50/Jefferson Street and Highway 111/Washington Street must be included in the analysis. D-13 Response The project study area was scoped and approved by the City of La Quinta in accordance with the City of La Quinta General Plan. The revised TA included updated traffic counts, as requested bythe Planning RTC -13 OCTOBER 2023 198 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS Commission at the March 28, 2023 Public Hearing, and also added the analysis of intersections of Washington Street and Sagebrush Avenue and Moon River Drive/Park Avenue and Avenue 50. D-14 Background Data Collection. This is the basis for all traffic forecasts and operations. We find the background data collection contained in the TA to be inadequate in both the year and month the data was collected. Given the inaccuracies of the base data, the forecasts and results are not defensible. Traffic data was counted in November 2021. In 2021, the California economy and travel were still recovering after the fall from the peak year of 2019 due to the Covid pandemic. Strong demand for overnight accommodations and increased residential prices led to large gains in visitors to Coachella Valley in 2022 and 2023. This is witnessed by the variation in Palm Springs airport passenger traffic which was 42% higher in 2022 than in 2021. In January 2023, the Palms Springs airport passenger traffic was 42% higher than January 22. This traffic change directly affects Washington Street, Eisenhower Drive and Avenue 50 as they are the gateways to La Quinta Resort, other resorts in La Quinta, and part time residential properties in the area Therefore, the baseline traffic data must be updated to current conditions. D-14 Response The original traffic count data were collected on November 9, 2021 and approved by City staff in accordance with EB 06-13. However, at March 28, 2023 public hearing, La Quinta Planning Commission requested that the Transportation Analysis be updated to reflect new traffic counts consistent with existing conditions. New count data was collected the following week on March 30, 2023, and included in the revised analysis. D-15 In November of each year, the Coachella Valley is not fully occupied with visitors and residents. As a result, traffic volumes on the subject roadways are not as high as they are in February and March, when the valley economy is in full swing, rental properties are full and out of city visitors are in attendance for the season and at special events. This is again witnessed by the variation in Palm Springs airport passenger traffic which was 48% higher in March 2022 than in November 2021. Therefore, the baseline traffic data must be updated to current conditions. D-15 Response Please refer to Response to Comment D-14. D-16 Special Event considerations. There is no discussion of the impact to special events that greatly impact the Washington Street and Avenue 50 corridors, specifically, the Coachella and Stagecoach music festivals, the BNP Open Tennis tournament (because of the relationship to the La Quinta Resort) and the La Quinta Ironman. D-16 Response Special events assessment is not typically included in a project level analysis since these events are considered to be temporary and seasonal in nature, Agencies typically evaluate these types of events RTC -14 OCTOBER 2023 199 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS on a case-by-case basis through the development of appropriate traffic management strategies that adequately addresses and control the temporary increased traffic. D-17 Assumptions of Traffic Distribution. a. The scoping document submitted to City staff proposed that traffic would be distributed as follows: i. 60% to the north on Washington Street ii. 15% to the south on Washington Street iii. 15% to the west on Avenue 50 iv. 10% to the east on Avenue 50 The assumptions used for distribution have no empirical basis. Logic however would suggest that, as a residential development, there is no expectation that any traffic would travel west on Avenue 50 since there are no retail, commercial, entertainment or substantive employment destinations. As a traffic professional and long-time resident of La Quinta, I would estimate that traffic would be more logically distributed to 70% north on Washington, 20% to the east on Avenue 50 and 10% to the south on Washington Street. The traffic consultant should consult the Citywide transportation forecast model as the most defensible source of Origin -Destination distribution. The reason this is important is that access to the development will be right -turn -in and out along Washington and Avenue 50, thus forcing at least 50% of the traffic coming from Washington north to make U-turn at Avenue 50. This will increase the left turn pocket requirements and increasing the signal time allowance for that phase. D-17 Response The trip distribution has been updated and all assumptions were reviewed and approved by City staff in accordance with EB 06-13. D-18 VMT Analysis Exemption. The project Traffic Analysis assumes to not have a significant transportation related CEQA impact by supposedly qualifying for the small project screening criterion as an affordable housing and small project. The affordable housing components of the development are 22%, thus meeting the CEQA threshold of 20% affordable units for exemption. Thus, However, 221 housing units of the project are market rate, and the site is served by low quality transit service (limited to Sunline Transit Route 7) which operates at 90 -minute intervals in either direction. There is no transit service along Avenue 50. As a result, we will argue that the project is NOT exempt from CEQA required VMT impact analysis of the project in accordance with CEQA. Further, the traffic consultant stated in its scoping document with the City, that it "will conduct a VMT assessment per City's revised VMT Guidelines dated June 2021 and submit for City staff review and approval." This was never done and therefore a violation of the agreement with the City. D-18 Response VMT impacts were considered in accordance with the City of La Quinta Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis Policy (VMT Policy) adopted July 13, 2021 via Planning Commission Resolution 2021-007and incorporated in EB 06-13. The VMT Policy establishes a Small Projects exemption that "applies to projects with low trip generation per existing CEQA exemptions or result in a 3,000 Metric Tons of RTC -15 OCTOBER 2023 200 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (MTCO2e) per year screen level threshold" which is based on the Riverside County Climate Action Plan and SCAQMD draft interim guidance for assessing project -level GHG impacts. The Draft IS/MND determines the proposed project would have total annual CO2e emissions of approximately 1,964 MTCO2e, which is below the 3,000 MT CO2e screening threshold. Therefore, VMT Screening Assessment was conducted and included in the traffic report. The Project was concluded to be presumed to have a less than significant impact and is exempt from preparing a full VMT analysis per the City of La Quinta VMT Policy. D-19 Lack of Pedestrian and Bike Analysis. The Transportation Analysis, and indeed the entire IS/MND, is absent any discussion of pedestrian or bicycle flow, safety or impacts to signalization. Assuming 2.5 persons per unit, the addition of 268 residences will add approximately 700 residents to the area. A portion of the residents will bike and walk for recreation or for school. Additional pedestrian activations of the signal at Avenue 50/Washington Street will reduce the available green time for through vehicles. Since there is no sidewalk on the east side of Washington Street south of Avenue 50, all pedestrian traffic must cross Washington Street thus affecting the signal timing. In addition, there is no sidewalk on the south side of Avenue 50 east of Washington Street, therefore all pedestrian traffic must cross Avenue 50, again affecting signal timing. The adjacency of Truman Elementary and La Quinta middle schools are of great concern, as many school children already walk and bike to school, with others picked up by buses and parents queuing their vehicles along Avenue 50. D-19 Response The adequacy of pedestrian and bicycle accessibility is discussed in the Transportation Analysis, in accordance with EB 06-13. The project proposes to provide pedestrian paths and bicycle facilities along both property frontages consistent with the City of La Quinta General Plan. Additionally, the project will be constructing a bicycle facility along the south side of Avenue 50. D-20 Access to the project site is proposed via two gated driveways, one along Washington Street (approximately 220 ft. north of Avenue 50) and one along Avenue 50 (approximately 210 feet east of Washington Street). This is a great source of concern as, previously noted, the majority of traffic will approach the Project on Washington Street and will have to either make a U-turn at the 50th streetlight to head back north or turn into the property or make a left turn from eastbound Avenue 50 into the gate controlled secondary driveway. Avenue 50 is currently only one lane westbound at this location with no sidewalks on the south side and no center turn lane. There are no bike lanes on this section of Avenue, nor on Avenue 50 west of Washington Street. There are no full roadway section improvements proposed as mitigation. This is inadequate for the proposed development as left turning traffic will impede through traffic on eastbound Avenue 50 (as well as double left turning traffic from southbound Washington Street) and will be a safety hazard for bicyclists. In addition, the double left turn on westbound Avenue 50 to southbound Washington Street routinely backs up and will back up into the access location for the Project. Lastly, traffic on Washington Street consistently exceeds the posted speed limit and provides a safety hazard for right turning vehicles to and from the proposed main entrance on Washington Street. RTC -16 OCTOBER 2023 201 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS RM The traffic improvement plan, at a minimum, must provide widening of Avenue 50 to the east of Washington Street to the full Primary Arterial Standard. This will allow left turning traffic to store in the left turn lane and will provide for pedestrian safety and bicycle lanes. In addition, due to excessive speeds along Washington Street, deceleration and acceleration lanes should be provided before and after the Project entrance on the northbound side of Washington Street. ,to RM 108" Pi imary Arterial W This is no different than what has been provided on the southbound side of Washington Street at the entrances to La Quinta Country Club. RTC -17 OCTOBER 2023 202 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS D-20 Response The project is conditioned to provide the required roadway improvements along its entire frontages along Washington Street and Avenue 50 including sidewalks, bicycle lanes and vehicular travel lanes consistent with the City of La Quinta General Plan. All required improvements will be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. D-21 CLOSING In closing, the Duna La Quinta Homeowners Association is opposed to this project, particularly due to the intensification of zoning, the increase in allowable building height from 22 ft. to 40 ft., the misrepresentation of actual traffic conditions, and the significant impact to the views along Avenue 50. We are greatly disturbed that the City of La Quinta would allow this zoning and general plan change to municipal height codes to go forward, particularly given the potential impact to the residential communities adjacent to the project and throughout the City of La Quinta Again, this project would be precedent -setting and change the character of La Quinta residential communities forever. We urge the City of La Quinta to reject the Environmental Assessment, General Plan Amendment, Zoning Change, and Specific Plan forthe Troutdale Residences, and require separate RTC -18 OCTOBER 2023 203 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS Environmental Impact Statements for the Project and for the Citywide General Plan amendment that would raise building heights in residential communities. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. D-21 Response The comment restates claims made in Comments D-2, D-3, D-10, D-11 and D-12 regarding building heights and a request to prepare a separate environmental document. Please refer to Response to Comments D-2, D-3, D-10, D-11 and D-12. Further, as noted above, the project has been revised to reduce maximum building heights to 28', thus, the comment has been addressed through revisions to the project. These changes do not require revisions to the analysis in the Final IS/MND because they would reduce the physical effects of the project on the environment by reducing building heights previously analyzed in the Draft IS/MND. RTC -19 OCTOBER 2023 204 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK OCTOBER 2023 RTC -20 205 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS Response to Comment Letter E Imperial Irrigation District Donald Vargas, Compliance Administrator II March 23, 2023 E-1 The IID has reviewed the project information and has the following comments: 1. IID will not begin any studies, engineering or estimate costs to provide electrical service to the project until the applicant submits a customer project application (available at http://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=12923 and detailed loading information, panel sizes, project schedule and estimated in-service date. 2. However, based on the preliminary information provided to IID, the district can accommodate the power requirements of the project by upgradingthe Marshall Substation bank no. 2, from a 25 MVA to a 40/50 MVA transformer and adding one (1) new distribution feeder (conduit and cable) out of the Marshall Substation to the proposed development. It will also require underground/overhead distribution backbone circuit reconfigurations of existing facilities and regular distribution line extensions. E1 Response The comment supports the analysis contained in the Draft IS/MND and states IID can provide service to the project. The city appreciates IID's review. No additional environmental issues under CEQA are raised, and no revisions or changes to the Final IS/MND are required to address or respond to the comment. RTC -21 OCTOBER 2023 206 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK OCTOBER 2023 RTC -22 207 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS Response to Comment Letter F California Department of Fish and Wildlife Kim Freeburn, Environmental Program Manager March 23, 2023 F-1 Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) and Existing Mitigation Measure B10-2. CDFW recommends replacing existing Mitigation Measure BIO -2 with the following mitigation measure to reduce impacts to less than significant: MM BIO -2: CVMSHCP Compliance Prior to construction and issuance of any grading permit, the City of La Quinta shall ensure compliance with the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) and its associated Implementing Agreement and shall ensure the collection of payment of the CVMSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. F-1 Response: The City will replace existing Mitigation Measure BIO -2 in the revised IS/MND with the above recommended mitigation measure. F-2 Nesting Bird Surveys and Mitigation Measure BI0-1. CDFW recommends that disturbance of occupied nests of migratory birds and raptors within the Project site be avoided any time birds are nesting on-site. CDFW recommends replacing existing Mitigation Measure BIO -1 with the following mitigation measure to reduce impacts to less than significant: MM BIO -1: Nesting Bird Surveys Regardless of the time of year, nesting bird surveys shall be performed by a qualified avian biologist no more than three (3) days prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities. Pre -construction surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior. The qualified biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found duringthe pre -construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest bufferto be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and should be at least 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors and birds - of -prey. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. F-2 Response: RTC -23 OCTOBER 2023 208 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS The City will replace existing Mitigation Measure BIO -1 in the revised IS/MND with the above recommended mitigation measure. F-3 Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia) Due to the potential for burrowing owl to move into disturbed sites, CDFW recommends that prior to commencing Project activities, focused and preconstruction surveys for burrowing owl be conducted by a qualified biologist in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012 or most recent version). CDFW recommends the revised MND include specific avoidance and minimization measures to ensure that impacts to burrowing owls are reduced to less than significant. CDFW recommends the revised MND include the following mitigation measure to reduce impacts to less than significant: MM BIO -Ll: Burrowing Owl Surveys Prior to the start of Project activities, focused burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist according to the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012 or most recent version). If burrowing owls are detected during the focused surveys, the qualified biologist and Project proponent shall prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall describe proposed avoidance, minimization, and monitoring actions. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall include the number and location of occupied burrow sites, acres of burrowing owl habitatthat will be impacted, details of site monitoring, and details on proposed buffers and other avoidance measures if avoidance is proposed. If impacts to occupied burrowing owl habitat or burrow cannot be avoided, the Burrowing Owl Plan shall also describe relocation actions that will be implemented. Proposed implementation of burrow exclusion and closure should only be considered as a last resort, after all other options have been evaluated as exclusion is not in itself an avoidance, minimization, or mitigation method and has the possibility to result in take. If impacts to occupied burrows cannot be avoided, information shall be provided regarding adjacent or nearby suitable habitat available to owls along with proposed relocation actions. The Permittee shall implement the Burrowing Owl Plan following CDFW review and approval. Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Project -related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012 or most recent version). Preconstruction surveys should be performed by a qualified biologist following the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If the preconstruction surveys confirm occupied burrowing owl habitat, Project activities shall be immediately halted. The qualified biologist shall coordinate with CDFW and prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. F-3 Response: The City appreciates CDFW's concerns that habitat assessments conducted outside of the burrowing owl breeding season have less potential to detect burrowing owl. Note that based on the results of the Biological Technical Report, no burrows greater than 4 inches in diameter were observed capable of supporting burrowing owl in disturbed habitat onsite duringthe November 3, 2021 habitat assessment. RTC -24 OCTOBER 2023 209 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS Further, soils onsite have been mechanically disturbed and compacted from pedestrian and vehicle traffic, routine weed abatement activities, historic light grading, and adjacent development. Soil compaction on the project site discourages use by fossorial species. While the City acknowledges that burrowing owls have a potential to move onto disturbed areas on the project site, this first portion of this comment requests focused burrowing owl surveys to be conducted, which are not necessary. As previously noted, no suitable burrows were observed onsite during the initial field investigation, the site has been subject to routine anthropogenic disturbances, and is isolated from occupied burrowing owl habitat, by existing development; therefore, impacts have been appropriately determined to be less than significant. As such, focused surveys for burrowing owl are not warranted. Out of an abundance of caution, and to ensure burrowing owl remain absent from the project site, the City will clarify M -BIO -1 to add the second portion of the recommended language for pre -construction nesting bird surveys as it pertains to pre -construction burrowing owl clearance surveys: Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Project -related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012 or most recent version). No additional mitigation is required. F-4 Desert Tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) CDFW is concerned that the field assessment was insufficient in timing and scope to detect desert tortoise on the Project site. Chapter 4 of the Desert Tortoise (Mojave Population) Field Manual indicates that "surveys should be conducted during the desert tortoise's most active periods (April through May or September through October)" (USFWS, 2009, p. 4-8). Based on a review of CNDDB and BIOS, the Project site is within the range of desert tortoise, and vegetation on the project site provides suitable habitat for desert tortoise. CDFW recommends that priorto commencing Project activities, both focused and preconstruction surveys for desert tortoise should be conducted by a qualified biologist. F-4 Response: The City appreciates CDFW's concerns; however, the habitat assessment was conducted on November 3, 2021, three days after desert tortoise's most active known period (September -October). Further, the project site is located in an urban setting, and no burrows capable of supporting desert tortoise were observed duringthe habitat assessment. Although alkali scrub known to support desert tortoise occurs onsite, the lack of burrows and location within an urban setting would prevent this species from foraging, nesting, or dispersing in that habitat on the project site. Further, the project site is isolated from occupied desert tortoise habitat by existing development. There are no undeveloped habitats connecting to the project site that would support desert tortoise movement. As such, focused surveys for desert tortoise are not warranted and no additional mitigation is required. F-5 Special -Status Plant Surveys CDFW is concerned that the field assessment was not conducted at the appropriate time of year to detect special -status plants on the Project site, and that the presence of special -status plant species onsite was RTC -25 OCTOBER 2023 210 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS not determined through floristic based surveys. As such, special -status plant surveys are recommended to be conducted prior to disturbance activities to ensure no special -status plants are onsite. MM BIOJCj: Special -Status Plant Surveys A thorough floristic -based assessment of special -status plants and natural communities, following CDFW's Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Natural Communities (CDFW 2018 or most recent version) shall be performed by a qualified biologist prior to commencing Project activities. Should any state -listed plant species be present in the Project area, the Project proponent shall obtain an Incidental Take Permit for those species not covered under the CVMSHCP prior to the start of Project activities. F-5 Response: The City appreciates CDFW's concerns; however, as stated in the Biological Technical Report, elevation at the project site is not suitable for most of the special -status plants known to occur within the region. Further, the project site has been mechanically disturbed and compacted by weed abatement activities, light grading, and pedestrian/vehicle traffic, which negatively impacts seedbank and promotes proliferation of non-native plant species. Finally, as the City is a Permittee to the CVMSHCP, and the project is a covered activity, potential project impacts to any CVMSHCP covered plant species would be considered less than significant and no additional mitigation is required. F-6 Minimizing Impacts to Other Species CDFW is concerned about the potential for previously undetected wildlife to occur on the Project site and to be injured or killed by ground -disturbing and construction activities. To reduce impacts to less than significant, CDFW recommends inclusion of a mitigation measure to allow non -listed, non -special - status terrestrial wildlife to leave or be moved out of harm's way. F-6 Response: The City acknowledges CDFW's concerns. Such impacts are not considered under any of the applicable CEQA thresholds; therefore, there are no potentially significant impacts to non -listed wildlife. F-7 Artificial Light Because of the potential for artificial lighting at night to negatively impact wildlife, CDFW recommends a revised MND include the following mitigation measure: MM BIO -Ll: Artificial Light During Project construction and operation, the City of La Quinta shall eliminate all nonessential lighting throughout the Project area and avoid or limit the use of artificial light during the hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are most active. The City shall ensure that lightingfor Project activities is shielded, cast downward, and does not spill over onto other properties or upward into the night sky following International Dark -Sky Association standards. The City shall ensure use of LED lighting with a RTC -26 OCTOBER 2023 211 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS correlated color temperature of 3,000 Kelvins or less, proper disposal of hazardous waste, and recycling of lighting that contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycler. F-7 Response The City acknowledges and appreciates CDFW's concern that impacts to biological resources from proposed artificial light sources were not adequately addressed in the MND. The City has adopted development regulations which include standards related to light and glare which all projects, including the proposed project, are required to comply with. These standards are incorporated as part of La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC) Section 9.10.150. With regulatory conformance to the LQMC, artificial light sources would be shielded and directed away from adjacent properties and impacts would be less than significant. F-8 Construction Noise The MND indicates that noise levels would be highest during grading due to use of "a grader, a dozer, two (2) excavators, two (2) backhoes, and a scraper" and that noise levels may reach 70 to 74 dBA. Other construction phases are estimated to generate noise between 63 and 66 dBA, which exceeds exposure levels that may adversely affect wildlife species (55 to 60 dBA). Because of the potential for construction noise to negatively impact wildlife, CDFW recommends the revised MND include specific avoidance and minimization measures to ensure that impacts to wildlife are reduced to less than significant. F-8 Response: The City acknowledges and appreciates CDFW's concern. The City's Municipal Code, Section 6.08.050 Disturbances by Construction Noise, limits hours of operation for construction activity based on time of year. From October 1 through April 30th, hours are limited from 7:OOAM to 5:OOPM Monday through Friday and 8:OOAM to 5:OOPM on Saturday. Between May 1 and September 30th, hours are extended to 6:OOAM to 7:OOPM Monday through Friday but remain 8:OOAM to 5:OOPM on Saturday. In addition, the General Plan Chapter IV, Environmental Hazards, Noise Section establishes goals and policies related to both construction and operational noise. Through regulatory conformance with the LQMC and La Quinta General Plan, construction noise would be limited and would be less than significant as disclosed in the Draft IS/MND. F-9 CDFW Lake and Streambed Alteration (LSA) Program A flood control channel occurs east of the project site. The MND does not include avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures to prevent impacts from Project -related construction, including staging and access, to either the flood channel or biological resources that use the flood channel. Fish and Game Code section 1602 requires an entity to notify CDFW prior to commencing any activity that may do one or more of the following: substantially divert or obstruct the natural flow of any river, stream, or lake; substantially change or use any material from the bed, channel or bank of any river, stream, or lake; or deposit debris, waste or other materials that could pass into any river, stream or lake. F-9 Response: RTC -27 OCTOBER 2023 212 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS The City appreciates CDFW's concern that potential project impacts to the flood control channel east of the project site were not adequately addressed or mitigated for in the MND. Note that the Biological Technical Report states that project activities are not expected to encroach into the flood control channel and as such, a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement from CDFW is not required. Further, there are already regulations in place related to impacts to drainages under Section 1600 of the Fish and Game Code, as well as sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act. If the proposed project footprint changes to result in impacts to these regulated drainage areas, the project would comply with existing regulations related to the regulatory permits which may require additional environmental review; however, because such impacts are not currently anticipated, no additional mitigation measures are required. Additionally, Standard Best Management Practices will be in place during construction to prevent potential indirect impacts to the adjacent flood control channel. F-10 Environmental Data CEQA requires that information developed in environmental impact reports and negative declarations be incorporated into a database which may be used to make subsequent or supplemental environmental determinations. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21003, subd. (e).) Accordingly, please report any special -status species and natural communities detected during project surveys to the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). F-10 Response The City thanks CDFW for this information. F-11 Environmental Document Filing Fees The project, as proposed, would have an impact on fish and/or wildlife, and assessment of environmental document filing fees is necessary. Fees are payable upon filing of the Notice of Determination by the Lead Agency and serve to help defray the cost of environmental review by CDFW. Payment of the environmental document filing fee is required in order for the underlying project approval to be operative, vested, and final. (Cal. Code Regs, tit. 14, § 753.5; Fish & G. Code, § 711.4; Pub. Resources Code, § 21089.) F-11 Response The City thanks CDFW for this information and will comply with payment of the Notice of Determination environmental document filing fee. RTC -28 OCTOBER 2023 213 LA QUNITA VILLAGE APARTMENTS FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / RESPONSES TO COMMENTS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK OCTOBER 2023 RTC -29 214 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration La Quinta Village Apartments Project OCTOBER 2023 Prepared for: CITY OF LA QUINTA 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Contact: Ms. Cheri L. Flores, Planning Manager Prepared by: DVw6 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 Contact: Sean Kilkenny Printed on 30% post -consumer recycled material. 216 Table of Contents SECTION PAGE NO. 1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................................................1 2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table.........................................................................................3 TABLE 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program...................................................................................................3 DUDEK OCTOBER 2023 217 La Quinta Village Apartments / Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK DUDEK OCTOBER 2023 218 1 Introduction The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that a public agency adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) take affirmative steps to determine that approved mitigation measures are implemented after project approval. The lead or responsible agency must adopt a reporting and monitoring program for the mitigation measures incorporated into a project or included as conditions of approval. The program must be designed to ensure compliance with the MND during project implementation (California Public Resources Code, Section 21081.6(a)(1)). This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) will be used by the City of La Quinta (City) to ensure compliance with adopted mitigation measures identified in the MND for the proposed La Quinta Village Apartment Project (project) located at intersection of Washington Street and Avenue 50 in La Qunita, California (project) when construction begins. The City, as the lead agency, will be responsible for ensuring that all mitigation measures are carried out. Implementation of the mitigation measures would reduce impacts to below a level of significance for biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils and tribal cultural resources. The remainder of this MMRP consists of a table that identifies the mitigation measures by resource for each project component. Table 1 identifies the mitigation monitoring and reporting requirements, list of mitigation measures, party responsible for implementing mitigation measures, timingfor implementation of mitigation measures, agency responsible for monitoring of implementation, and date of completion. With the MND and related documents, this MMRP will be kept on file at the following location: City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 DUDEK OCTOBER 2023 219 Whitewood South Apartment Project/ Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK DUDEK OCTOBER 2023 220 2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Biological Resources BIO -1 Regardless of the time of year, nesting bird surveys shall be performed by a qualified avian biologist no more than three (3) days prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities. Pre -construction surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior. The qualified biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the pre - construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and should be at least 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors and birds -of - prey. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Project -related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012 or most recent version). DUDEK Prior to the start of Project applicant City of La Quinta construction OCTOBER 2023 221 Whitewood South Apartment Project/ Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 11310-2 Prior to construction and issuance of any grading permit, the City of La Quinta shall ensure compliance with the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) and its associated Implementing Agreement and shall ensure the collection of payment of the CVMSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. Cultural Resources Prior to the start of Project applicant City of La Quinta construction CUL -1: A qualified archaeologist monitor shall be Prior to operation Project applicant City of La Quinta present during any ground disturbing activities during the project construction phase. In the case that archaeological materials are encountered during ground disturbing activities, work in the area shall cease and any deposits shall be treated according to Federal, State, and local guidelines. No further grading is permitted in the area of the discovery until the City approves the appropriate measure to protect the discovered resources. CUL -2: In the event that human remains are Prior to and during Project applicant City of La Quinta uncovered during ground disturbing activities on the construction Project site, no further disturbance shall occur, and all work shall cease until the County Coroner has made a determination of the origin and disposition of the remains. Ground disturbing activities and excavations shall not resume until the following has been addressed: 1. The County Coroner has been contacted and determined that no investigation to the cause of death is required, and If the County Coroner determines that the remains are of Native American decent, the Coroner must notify Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), DUDEK OCTOBER 2023 222 Whitewood South Apartment Project/ Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program DUDEK OCTOBER 2023 223 Party Responsible Party Responsible Date of Completion/ Mitigation Measure Timing ImplementationImplementation for - which will then determine the Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD shall complete the inspection of the site within 48 hours of notification and may recommend means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains, and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resource Code Section 5097.98. Geology and Soils or GEO-1 Prior to the start of the proposed Project Prior to the start of Project applicant City of La Quinta activities, all field personnel will receive a worker's construction environmental awareness training on paleontological resources. The training will provide a description of the laws and ordinances protecting fossil resources, the types of fossil resources that may be encountered in the Project area, the role of the paleontological monitor, outlines steps to follow in the event that a fossil discovery is made and provides contact information for the Project Paleontologist. The training will be developed by the Project Paleontologist and can be delivered concurrent with other training including cultural, biological, safety, etc. GEO-2 Prior to the commencement of ground- Prior to ground- Project applicant City of La Quinta disturbing activities, a professional paleontologist breaking activities will be retained to prepare and implement a PRMMP for the proposed Project. The PRMMP will describe the monitoring required during excavations that extend into older Quaternary (Pleistocene) age sediments, and the location of areas deemed to have a high paleontological resource potential. Part- time monitoring, or spot checking, may be required during shallow ground -disturbances (< 10 feet below ground surface) to confirm that sensitive geologic DUDEK OCTOBER 2023 223 Whitewood South Apartment Project/ Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure Timing ImplementationImplementation Party Responsible for Party Responsible Date of Completion/ - units are not being impacted. Monitoring will entail the visual inspection of excavated or graded areas and trench sidewalls. GEO-3 In the event that a paleontological resource Prior to Project applicant City of La Quinta is discovered, the monitor will have the authority to construction and temporarily divert the construction equipment during around the find until it is assessed for scientific construction significance and, if appropriate, collected. If the resource is determined to be of scientific significance, the Project Paleontologist shall complete the following: 1. Salvage of Fossils. If fossils are discovered, all work in the immediate vicinity should be halted to allow the paleontological monitor, and/or Project Paleontologist to evaluate the discovery and determine if the fossil may be considered significant. If the fossils are determined to be potentially significant, the Project Paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) should recover them following standard field procedures for collecting paleontological as outlined in the PRMMP prepared for the Project. Typically, fossils can be safely salvaged quickly by a single paleontologist and not disrupt construction activity. In some cases, larger fossils (such as complete skeletons or large mammal fossils) require more extensive excavation and longer salvage periods. In this case the paleontologist should have the authority to temporarily direct, divert, or halt construction activity to ensure that the fossil(s) can be removed in a safe and timely manner. DUDEK OCTOBER 2023 224 Whitewood South Apartment Project/ Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measure Timing ImplementationImplementation Party Responsible for Party Responsible Date of Completion/ - 2. Fossil Preparation and Curation. The PRMMP will identify the museum that has agreed to accept fossils that may be discovered during project -related excavations. Upon completion of fieldwork, all significant fossils collected will be prepared in a properly equipped laboratory to a point ready for curation. Preparation may include the removal of excess matrix from fossil materials and stabilizing or repairing specimens. During preparation and inventory, the fossils specimens will be identified to the lowest taxonomic level practical prior to curation at an accredited museum. The fossil specimens must be delivered to the accredited museum or repository no later than 90 days after all fieldwork is completed. The cost of curation will be assessed by the repository and will be the responsibility of the client. GEO-4 Upon completion of ground disturbing Following Project applicant City of La Quinta activity (and curation of fossils if necessary) the completion of Project Paleontologist should prepare a final ground disturbing mitigation and monitoring report outlining the results activities of the mitigation and monitoring program. The report should include discussion of the location, duration and methods of the monitoring, stratigraphic sections, any recovered fossils, and the scientific significance of those fossils, and where fossils were curated. DUDEK OCTOBER 2023 225 Whitewood South Apartment Project/ Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Tribal Cultural Resources TCR -1 Prior to any ground disturbing activities on Prior to ground - the Project site, an approved Agua Caliente Native disturbing American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) shall be activities present to monitor the site. Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a qualified Archaeologist to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Aqua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. DUDEK Project applicant I City of La Quinta OCTOBER 2023 226 Whitewood South Apartment Project/ Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK DUDEK OCTOBER 2023 227 COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2023 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 252 -UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT, LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 CASE NUMBERS: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2022-0002 SPECIFIC PLAN 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, AMENDMENT 2) SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 APPLICANT: IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on November 7, 2023, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Irwin Partners Architects for approval of a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, and Site Development Permit for the La Quinta Village Apartments project, a 252 -unit apartment project located on the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50, more particularly described as: APN 646-070-016 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on October 27, 2023 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the site; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on August 1, 2023, previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approval of General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan and Site Development Permit; and WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, the City Council did continue the public hearing until a date uncertain and remanded the applications to the Planning Commission requesting that the applicant make changes to the project including reducing the number of stories of the units from three to two stories, changing the architectural style of the buildings from Contemporary Modern to Spanish Hacienda style, and removing garages on the north side of the site plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on October 10, 2023, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider changes to the La Quinta 228 Council Resolution 2023 -XXX General Plan Amendment 2022-0002, Specific Plan 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, Amendment No. 2), Site Development Permit 2022-0001 Project: La Quinta Village Apartments Adopted: 2023 Page 2 of 7 Village Apartments project and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2023-015 recommending the Council approve the changes; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did previously, on March 28, 2023 and June 27, 2023, hold duly noticed Public Hearings to consider said applications and recommended the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration; and General Plan Amendment 2022-0002 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said General Plan Amendment, as conditioned [Exhibits A and B]: 1. Internal General Plan Consistency. The amendment is internally consistent with goals, objectives, and policies of the general plan, which are not being amended. The project proposes 252 units, with 74 designated as moderate - income units, on a site that is shown in the Housing Element as 280 low- or very low-income units. An alternate 12.74 -acre site to accommodate these 280 very low- to low-income units has been designated and is identified as Site 6 in the draft Housing Element amendment (Exhibit A). The additional site is required to be identified by the Project to comply with Government Code Section 65863, commonly referred to as the state "No Net Loss Law". Site 6 is commercially designated under the City's Community Commercial designation and benefits from the Affordable Housing Overlay, which allow for multi -family residential development. The property not only allows for multi -family residential but mixed-use development as well. The Affordable Housing Overlay allows for a density up to 36 units per acre and mixed-use projects allow for density up to 24 units per acre, however this site is projected at 22 units per acre, which is more consistent with development in the region. The site is within a "High Resource" area, and its proximity to shopping centers at Highway 111 and Washington Street and proximity to schools makes it an ideal site for affordable housing. Additionally, the La Quinta Village Apartment project includes 74 moderate -income level affordable units which would count for the City's RHNA goals. 2. Public Welfare. Approval of the amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. As part of the project, a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be adopted to mitigate any potential impacts. 3. General Plan Compatibility. In the case of amendments to the General Plan policy diagram, no changes are proposed. 229 Council Resolution 2023 -XXX General Plan Amendment 2022-0002, Specific Plan 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, Amendment No. 2), Site Development Permit 2022-0001 Project: La Quinta Village Apartments Adopted: 2023 Page 3 of 7 4. Property Suitability. In the case of amendments to the General Plan policy diagram, no new designation is proposed. 5. Change in Circumstances. No amendments are proposed to the General Plan policy diagram. Specific Plan Amendment 2022-0001 (Amendment 2 to Specific Plan 2004-071, La Paloma) WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said Specific Plan Amendment, as conditioned [Exhibits C and D]: 1. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the land use, policies and programs of the General Plan, as it allows for development of a medium high density residential project in the Medium/High Density land use designation, which supports 4-16 units per acre residential density and is designed to accommodate a broad range of residential land uses, including apartment projects. Approval of the Specific Plan Amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare, as the project is consistent with the existing land uses as a multi -family residential development and will be consistent with surrounding residential development and is nearby schools and neighborhood commercial uses. 2. Specific Plan 2022-0001 is compatible with zoning on adjacent properties which are also residential. The project proposes a medium high density residential project and is surrounded by Medium Density Residential land uses, including a vacant site to the south and existing residential to the north. 4. Specific Plan 2022-0001 is suitable and appropriate for the subject property, as the project's land use is intended for multi -family residential projects which this project proposes. Site Development Permit 2022-0001 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said Site Development Permit, as conditioned [Exhibit E]: 230 Council Resolution 2023 -XXX General Plan Amendment 2022-0002, Specific Plan 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, Amendment No. 2), Site Development Permit 2022-0001 Project: La Quinta Village Apartments Adopted: 2023 Page 4 of 7 1. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Medium/High Density Residential. The City's General Plan Medium/High Density Residential designation is designed to accommodate a broad range of residential land uses, including apartment projects. The City's General Plan policies relating to Medium/High Density Residential encourage a broad range of residential uses within the City, and the proposed use maintains those policies. The proposed project is consistent with the following Goals, Programs, and Policies: • Goal LU -2 as the project consists of high-quality design that complements and enhances the City. The project design uses high- quality contemporary style, and utilizes varying roof lines and wall depths, along with a complementary color palette. • Goal LU -5 as the project provides a broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City. The project provides for apartments, which creates a different housing type and choice for residents within the City. This includes 74 moderate -income level units. • Policy LU -5.2 in considering changes in market demand in residential product type to meet the needs of current and future residents. The project is changing from a senior residential project to a multi -family apartment project to respond to market demand in residential product type to provide residents with apartments. • Goal SC -1 in that it provides a community that provides the best possible quality of life for all its residents by providing alternative housing types within La Quinta meanwhile providing a project that incorporates open space and common area with a pool for its residents, along with barbecue areas, pickleball courts, a dog park, and putting green. • Policy ED -1.2 in supporting and assisting in the retention of existing businesses, and the recruitment of new businesses. The apartment project provides additional residences nearby to Highway 111, along Washington Street, and close to the City's Village Commercial area which will allow for a working base close by to support and assist in the retention of existing businesses and recruitment of new businesses. • Goal H-1 in providing housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population. The apartment project of this type provides a diverse type of residential product. • Policy H-1.3 to direct new housing development to viable areas where essential public facilities can be provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are available. The housing development was directed to a viable area where essential public facilities can be provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are all available. • Goal H-2 in assisting in the creation and provision of resources to support housing for lower and moderate -income households and Policy 231 Council Resolution 2023 -XXX General Plan Amendment 2022-0002, Specific Plan 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, Amendment No. 2), Site Development Permit 2022-0001 Project: La Quinta Village Apartments Adopted: 2023 Page 5 of 7 H-2.1 which is to increase housing choices for lower and moderate - income households. This project increases the housing choices for moderate -income households. The project would include 74 moderate - income level units, providing more housing choices for moderate - income households. 2. The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Medium High Density Residential zone as well as the development standards of the City's Zoning Code and in terms of architectural style and landscaping. The project satisfies the zone's intent to provide for the development of medium high density neighborhoods with two and three-story multi -family dwellings. The project is generally consistent with the residential development standards and permitted use table, except deviations as established within the Specific Plan. 3. The Design and Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2022-0001 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Department has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect because mitigation measures have been incorporated. 4. The architectural design of the project, including, but not limited to, the architectural style, scale, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details, roof style and other architectural elements are compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the City. The contemporary style utilizes a high-quality design that is compatible with other approved and constructed residential projects within the City. 5. The site design of the project including, but not limited to, project entries, interior circulation, pedestrian and bicycle access, pedestrian amenities, screening of equipment and trash enclosures, exterior lighting, and other site design elements are compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the City. 6. Project landscaping, including, but not limited to, the location, type, size, color, texture, and coverage of plant materials, has been designed so as to provide visual relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements and vistas, screen undesirable views, provide a harmonious transition between adjacent land uses and between development and open space, and provide an overall unifying influence to enhance the visual continuity of the project. The proposed project is consistent with the landscaping standards and plant palette and implements the standards for 232 Council Resolution 2023 -XXX General Plan Amendment 2022-0002, Specific Plan 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, Amendment No. 2), Site Development Permit 2022-0001 Project: La Quinta Village Apartments Adopted: 2023 Page 6 of 7 landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan and Zoning Code. The permanent overall site landscaping utilizes various tree and shrub species to enhance the building architecture and provide adequate relief and screening from Washington Street and Avenue 50. WHEREAS, the La Paloma Specific Plan (SP 2004-071) was adopted on December 7, 2004, and amended on July 19, 2011, and is the effective Specific Plan for the site. The proposed La Quinta Village Apartments Specific Plan (SP2022-0001), upon the date it becomes effective, shall repeal and replace SP 2004-071 and its amendment; and WHEREAS, prior to Specific Plan 2022-0001 becoming effective, prior to Site Development Permit 2022-0001 being eligible for approval, and prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the City's update to the Housing Element shall be approved by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) within 180 days of approval by City Council of GPA2022-0001. This approval by HCD must include certification of the City's Housing Element after adding "Site 6", as noted in Exhibit A, to the inventory of sites within the City to accommodate the City's share of very low- and low-income units per the City's RHNA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case. SECTION 2. That the above project is determined to be consistent with the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project (EA 2022-0001). SECTION 3. That it does hereby approve General Plan Amendment 2022-0002, Specific Plan 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, Amendment 2), and Site Development Permit 2022-0001, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval [Exhibits B, D, E]. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on November 7, 2023, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 233 Council Resolution 2023 -XXX General Plan Amendment 2022-0002, Specific Plan 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, Amendment No. 2), Site Development Permit 2022-0001 Project: La Quinta Village Apartments Adopted: 2023 Page 7 of 7 ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 234 HOUSING PURPOSE The Housing Element of the La Quinta General Plan establishes the City's policy relative to the maintenance and development of housing to meet the needs of existing and future residents. Jurisdictions within the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) region must complete the statutory housing element update for a planning period that extends from 2022 to 2029. The 2022 Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) proposes that La Quinta provide the regulatory framework to facilitate the development of new housing units potentially affordable to a range of income levels. The City's RHNA is 1,530 units for the 2022-2029 planning period. The RH NA includes housing planning goals for very low, low, moderate, and above moderate income households. The City's RHNA by affordability level is 420 units of housing affordable to very low income households, 269 affordable for low income households, 297 affordable for moderate income households, and 544 above moderate income units. The Housing Element demonstrates the land resources, financial resources, market trends, and governmental efforts that have the potential to facilitate and encourage housing development and rehabilitation to meet the RHNA. Setting The City of La Quinta is one of nine cities in the Coachella Valley. A world- renowned vacation destination, La Quinta's population varies by season. La Quinta's permanent population is estimated at 40,660 persons in 2020. The seasonal population exceeds lo,000, increasing the City's population by 25% during winter months. La Quinta households are generally wealthier than other areas of Riverside County. The median household income of La Quinta in 2018 was $79,889, significantly higher than the Riverside County median household income of $63,948• A 1W4:1131r_1 235 This income trend is related to the types of new housing available in La Quinta. La Quinta is home to many master planned communities. Although the number of multifamily units in the City increased by more than 30% from 2012 to 2019, multifamily units continue to represent less than 7 percent of the total housing stock. Housing Resources California housing element law allows local governments to obtain credit toward their RHNA housing goals in three ways: constructed and approved units, vacant and underutilized land, and the preservation of existing affordable housing. Moderate income households are able to afford some new and fairly new rental and for sale units. Very Low and Low income households, however, will continue to require subsidized affordable housing. Housing Plan The housing element sets forth a comprehensive housing plan consisting of goals, policies, and programs to address existing and projected housing needs. The detailed programs provided are designed to identify sites to exceed the RHNA, assist the development of affordable housing, remove governmental constraints to housing, preserve the existing housing stock, provide equal housing opportunities, and promote energy and water conservation in residential uses. Quantified Objectives The goals, policies, and programs will guide housing -related decision making and facilitate attainment of the 2022-2029 RHNA housing targets. As shown in Table II -i, future units both planned and to be planned, make up the bulk of new construction counted toward the RHNA. Each jurisdiction must establish quantified objectives by income category to prepare to meet or exceed the RHNA for the 2022-2029 planning period. The City of La Quinta's quantified objectives are based on constructed and approved units and land resources for new housing and programs created to address other existing and projected housing needs. Achieving the City of La Quinta's quantified objectives will rely on third party financing. The City will continue to participate in the development of affordable housing with private party partners. Please see the Housing Resources section. 2 236 Table lk Quantified Objectives 2022-2029 Type of Housing Extremely Low Very Low I Low Moderate Above Moderate Total New Construction New Units 210 210 1 269 297 544 1,530 Rehabilitation/Conservation Residential Rehabilitation 10 15 30 35 90 Conservation 237 INTRODUCTION Purpose The Housing Element of the La Quinta Plan establishes the City's policy relative to the maintenance and development of housing to meet the needs of existing and future residents. These policies will guide City decision making and set forth a housing action program through 2029. These commitments are an expression of the City's desire to facilitate adequate housing for every La Quinta resident. The City's housing policy is consistent with the statewide housing goal of "attainment of decent housing and a suitable living environment for every California Family." The purpose of the Element is to establish official policy which: ❖ Identifies existing and projected housing needs, and inventories resources and constraints that are relevant to meeting these needs. The assessment and inventory include: Community Profile Housing Profile Land Resource Inventory Governmental and Nongovernmental Constraints Analysis Analysis of Special Needs Housing Identification of Assisted Units "At Risk" of Conversion ❖ Identifies the community's goals, objectives, and policies relative to the preservation, improvement, and development of housing. ❖ Sets forth a schedule of actions (programs) the City is undertaking or intends to undertake to implement the policies and achieve the goals and objectives of the Housing Element. The Housing Element has been designed to address key housing issues in the City. These issues include appropriate housing types to meet the needs of all segments of the community while maintaining a low density character, provision of affordable housing for special needs groups in the community, and the maintenance of the existing housing stock. Consistency with State Planning Law California Government Code requires that every City and County prepare a Housing Element as part of its General Plan. In addition, State law contains specific requirements for the preparation and content of Housing Elements. Sections 6558o to 65589.8 of the California Government Code contain the legislative mandate for the housing 4 238 element. State law requires that the City's Housing Element consist of "identification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs and a statement of goals, policies, quantified objectives, financial resources, and scheduled programs for the preservation, improvement and development of housing." State law also requires that the City evaluate its housing element approximately every eight years to determine its effectiveness in achieving City and statewide housing goals and objectives, and to adopt an updated Element that reflects the results of this evaluation. State law is very specific about the content of the Housing Element and makes it clear that the provision of affordable housing is the responsibility of all local governments. The City is expected to contribute toward regional housing needs and to contribute to the attainment of state housing goals. The most recent updates to Housing Element law occurred in 2017, when a series of bills were passed into law to address the State's determination that California was experiencing a State-wide housing crisis. The laws passed in 2017 addressed a wide range of housing -related issues, including Housing Elements, which are summarized below. • SB 2 established a recordation fee for real estate documentation which would fund planning grants for affordable housing and affordable housing projects. • SB 3 placed a $4 billion general obligation bond on the November 2o18 ballot to fund affordable housing, farmworker housing, transit - oriented development, infill infrastructure and home ownership. • SB 35 mandated a streamlined approval process for infill affordable housing projects in communities that have not, according to the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) met their affordable housing allocation (RHNA). • AB 72 allowed HCD to find a housing element out of compliance with State law, and to refer the non-compliant element to the State Attorney General for action at any time during a Housing Element planning period. • AB 73 provided State -funded financial incentives for local jurisdictions which choose to create a streamlined zoning overlay for certain affordable housing projects. • SB 166 required that development proposals on local jurisdictions' sites inventory cannot be reduced in density without findings, and/or the identification of additional sites to result in `no net loss' of affordable housing units in the sites inventory. 5 239 • SB 540 provided State funding for the planning and implementation of workforce housing opportunity zones for very low, low and moderate income households. • AB 571 modified the farmworker tax credit program to allow HCD to advance funds to migrant housing center operators at the beginning of each planting season, and allowed migrant housing to remain open for up to 275 days annually. • AB 678 amended the Housing Accountability Act to limit a local jurisdiction's ability to deny low and moderate income housing projects by increasing the required documentation and raising the standard of proof required of a local jurisdiction. • AB 686 (approved in 2o18) required a public agency to administer its programs and activities relating to housing and community development in a manner that affirmatively furthers fair housing. • AB 879 amended the annual reporting requirements of local jurisdictions to HCD regarding proposed projects, including processing times, number of project applications and approvals, and required approval processes. • AB 1397 amended the requirements of adequate sites analysis to assure that sites are not only suitable, but also available, by requiring additional information in site inventories. • AB 1505 allowed local jurisdictions to adopt local ordinances that require affordable housing units on- or off-site when approving residential projects. • AB 1515 established a `reasonable person' standard to consistency of affordable housing projects and emergency shelters with local policies and standards. • AB 1521 placed restrictions on the owners of affordable housing projects when terminating or selling their projects. General Plan Consistency The goals, policies, standards, and proposals within this element relate directly to and are consistent with all other General Plan elements. The Housing Element identifies programs and resources required for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing to meet the existing and projected needs of its population. The Housing Element is affected by development policies contained in the Land Use Element, which establishes the locations, types, intensity, and distribution of land uses throughout the City and defines the buildout land use scenario. In designating total acreage and density of residential development, the Land Use Element places an upper limit on the number and types of housing units constructed in the City. The acreage designated for a range of commercial and office uses creates 6 240 employment opportunities for various income groups. The presence and potential for jobs affects the current and future demand for housing at the various income levels in the City. In addition, the Land Use Element has been updated in accordance with Senate Bill 244. There are no disadvantaged unincorporated communities in the City's Sphere of Influence. The Circulation Element also affects implementation of the Housing Element. The Circulation Element establishes policies for providing essential streets and roadways to all housing that is developed. The policies contained in the other elements of the General Plan affect the quality of life of the citizens of the City through the control of the amount and variety of open space and recreation areas, acceptable noise levels in residential areas, and programs to provide for the safety of residents. The Housing Element utilizes the most current data available. Data sources include the U.S. Census, American Community Survey, California Department of Finance (DOF), Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), Riverside County, and various City documents and resources, among others. Scope and Content The Housing Element is organized in the following manner: ❖ Introduction: A statement of the purpose of the Housing Element and statutory requirements, a statement of the relationship between the Housing Element and other General Plan elements, the scope, content and organization of the Element, and a summary of the public participation process. ❖ Evaluation of Past Element: A summary of the achievements and an evaluation of the effectiveness of the past Housing Element. ❖ Housing Vision Statement: A statement describing the future vision of housing in La Quinta as developed by the citizens and elected officials of the City. The policies in the Housing Element are designed to bring this vision to fruition. ❖ Community Profile and Housing Profile: A discussion of the characteristics of the population, households, and housing stock in La Quinta, including growth and affordability trends. 7 241 ❖ Fair Housing: A discussion of the City's commitment to and implementation of federal and state fair housing laws, as well as identified issues, concerns, and strategies. ❖ Housing Needs: An analysis of groups in the City that may have special housing needs, the implications of the affordability of housing stock in relation to household income, and projected housing needs. ❖ Housing Constraints: A discussion of governmental and nongovernmental constraints to the development of housing and opportunities for energy conservation in residential planning, design, construction, and rehabilitation. ❖ Housing Resources: An inventory of constructed and approved units, land available for residential development, and underutilized sites available for residential redevelopment, and an analysis of the ability of these projects and sites to meet the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). ❖ Preservation of At Risk Units: A description of any assisted, affordable multifamily units that are eligible to convert to market rate within 10 years of the planning period. ❖ Goals, Policies, and Programs: A description of housing goals, policies, and programs responsive to the City's current and projected housing needs. Also included is a summary of the City's quantified objectives for new residential construction, rehabilitation, and financial assistance during the planning period. EFFECTIVENESS OF THE 2014-2021 HOUSING ELEMENT To develop appropriate programs to address the housing issues identified in this Housing Element Update, the City of La Quinta has reviewed the effectiveness of the housing programs adopted in the 2014-2021 Housing Element. The State of California requires an assessment of the previous housing program to identify areas of accomplishment as well as areas in which improvement could occur following the implementation of new or modified programs. The following section reviews the progress in implementation of the programs, the effectiveness of the Element, and the continued appropriateness of the identified programs. Analysis of the past element is quantified where such information is available. 8 242 As described in the evaluation of Policies and Programs below, the City continued to assist households with special needs, including seniors, disabled residents and persons experiencing homelessness (see evaluation of Policies 5.3, 5.4 and 5.5; and Programs 4.4•b, 5.5•a, and 5.5•b below). These programs resulted in benefits to these special needs populations, including the furtherance of programs by housing homeless residents at the Coral Mountain apartments; through CVAG's regional housing efforts for Coachella Valley homeless persons; and by the major rehabilitation and new units provided for seniors and disabled seniors at the Washington Street apartments. The policies and programs were very effective in assisting special needs populations. The results of the analysis provided the basis for developing the comprehensive housing strategy for the 2022-2029 planning period. Adequate Sites for Housing GOAL H -i Provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population. •'• Policy H-1.1 Identify adequate sites to accommodate a range of product types, densities, and prices to address the housing needs of all household types, lifestyles, and income levels. Program 1.1.a: To address the City's RHNA allocation for extremely low income households, 26 of the 68 new units at the Washington Street Apartments will be designated for extremely low income households. The additional 19 units identified in the RH NA will be given priority either at Washington Street Apartments, or at projects on sites identified in the Vacant Land Inventory (Table II - 50) ■ Objective: Encourage the provision of 45 extremely low income units in new projects during the planning period. ■ Timing: 2015 for 26 units, 2015-2021 as projects are constructed for 19 units ■ Funding Source: Private Funding, Tax Credit Financing, Other sources as identified ■ Responsible Agency: Planning Department ■ Evaluation: 9 243 ■ Renovation and expansion of Washington Street Apartments was completed in November 2019, resulting in the rehabilitation of existing 72 units and construction of 68 new units, for a total of 140 units. Twenty-four (24) of the 68 new units were designated for extremely low income households. The additional 19 units identified in the RHNA were not constructed. The program will be modified to address the 2022-2029 RHNA allocation. ❖ Policy H-1.2 Focus housing growth within existing City boundaries until it is necessary to pursue annexation or development in planning areas for affordable housing. Evaluation: No annexations were needed for the construction of affordable housing during the 2014-2021 planning period. The Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) continues to offer increased opportunities for affordable fordable housing development by allowing it at higher densities within all commercial zones and several residential sites. This policy was successful and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy H-1.3 Direct new housing development to viable areas where essential public facilities can be provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are available. ■ Evaluation: ■ The City continued to look at projects for affordable housing on infill sites and in areas where transit and employment were readily available. Coral Mountain Apartments and Washington Street Apartments were both planned on such sites and their construction has been completed. ■ In 2016, the City introduced the mixed use (MU) overlay in the zoning code (La Quinta Municipal Code Chapter 9.140) to facilitate the development of mixed use projects that include both multifamily residential and commercial components in a cohesively designed and constructed manner. Mixed use projects will locate residents in proximity to services, employment, and transportation hubs and provide interconnected multi-purpose paths for alternative modes of transportation. Mixed use projects can claim incentives, including reduced parking requirements, reduced plan check and inspection fees, and density bonuses. The policy will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. 10 244 Assist in the Development of Affordable Housing GOAL H -i Assist in the creation and provision of resources to support housing for lower and moderate income households. ❖ Policy H-2.1 Increase housing choices for lower and moderate income households. ❖ Policy H-z.z Support public, private, and nonprofit efforts in the development of affordable housing. ❖ Policy H-2.3 Pursue a variety of forms of private, local, state, and federal assistance to support development of affordable housing. Program H -2-3.a: Collaborative Partnerships The City shall meet with parties interested in affordable housing development to discuss types of incentives available and requirements for obtaining assistance, discuss appropriate sites for affordable housing, and foster professional collaboration between the City and affordable housing stakeholders. ■ Objective: Continue to collaborate with nonprofits and the development community to develop affordable housing. ■ Timing: Project -by -project basis, by request, or on an annual basis. ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: The City Manager's office supports affordable housing efforts and coordinates regularly with affordable housing partners such as Lift to Rise. The City will continue to assist affordable housing developers in securing third party financing. During the 2014-2021 planning period, Coral Mountain Apartments was completed with Desert Cities Development. This program was successful and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H -2.3.b: Affordable Housing Renter -to -Owner Transition Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) provides federal tax credits for private developers and investors that agree to set 11 245 aside all or a portion of their units for low income households. LI HTC projects can transition from rental to ownership units. The units must remain rentals for 15 years, at which time some projects convert to ownership units. Typically a portion or all of the rent paid for the 5 years prior to the conversion is put toward the purchase of the unit. This enables lower income households to invest in the property in which they have been living and benefit from its appreciation. Existing stalled condominium and townhome projects are prime opportunities for low income tax credits to be used for renter -to - owner programs. ■ Objective: Investigate the use of LIHTCs to finance affordable single-family attached rental development that can transition, after 15 years, into moderate income ownership housing. ■ Timing: Complete study by end of fiscal 2015 ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: Investigation into the use of LIHTCs to finance affordable single-family attached rental development was not completed. However, it is still considered important. This program will continue into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H -2-3.c: Affordable Housing Renter -to -Owner Transition There are many resources that the City, nonprofits, or for-profit developers may utilize to subsidize the construction and maintenance of affordable housing. Some of the most prominent resources are described below. ■ Objective: Advertise other financial resources through the affordable housing page of the City's website, apply for grants and competitive loans, and form partnerships with the development community to obtain additional financial resources. ■ Timing: Update website with funding information and partnership opportunities every six months or earlier if appropriate. ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department 12 246 Low Income Tax Credits Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) provides federal tax credits for private developers and investors that agree to set aside all or a portion of their units for low income households. A minimum of zo percent of the units must be affordable to low income households and 40 percent of the units must be affordable to moderate income households. Community Reinvestment Act The Community Reinvestment Act provides favorable financing to affordable housing developers. The Redevelopment Agency, development community, and local, regional, and national banks are encouraged to work together to meet their obligations pursuant to the Community Reinvestment Act. California Housing Finance Agency Program The California Housing Finance Agency (CHFA) has three single- family programs for primarily moderate and middle income homebuyers: the Home Ownership Assistance Program and the Affordable Housing Partnership Program. Each provides permanent mortgage financing for first-time homebuyers at below-market interest rates. HOME Funds HOME is the largest Federal block grant distributed to state and local governments for the creation of lower income housing. Cities apply when Notices of Funding Availability are issued. Neighborhood Stabilization Program HUD's Neighborhood Stabilization Program makes emergency assistance grants available to local governments for the acquisition, redevelopment, and renting or resale of foreclosed properties at -risk of abandonment. Riverside County First -Time Homebuyers Program Continue participation in the Riverside County First -Time Homebuyers Program for low and moderate income households. Mortgage Credit Certificate The Riverside County Mortgage Credit Certificate Program is designed to assist low and moderate income first time homebuyers. Under the Mortgage Credit Certificate Program, first-time homebuyers receive a tax credit based on a percentage of the interest paid on their mortgage. This tax credit allows the buyer to qualify more easily for home loans, as it increases the 13 247 effective income of the buyer. Under federal legislation, 20 percent of the funds must be set aside for buyers with incomes between 75 and 8o percent of the county median income. Finance Agency Lease -Purchase Program Riverside/San Bernardino County Housing Finance Agency Lease Purchase Program provides down payment assistance and closing costs for eligible households up to 140 percent of the area median income. Housing Choice Voucher (formerly Section 8) Referrals Housing Choice Vouchers allow lower income households to use rental subsidies anywhere in the County, including La Quinta. Evaluation: Information about financial resources and partnership opportunities available for subsidizing the construction and maintenance of affordable housing was not provided on the City's website. However, it continues to be a priority, and City staff plans to accomplish this task by 2022. This program will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H -2-3.d: Sweat Equity and Shared Equity Sweat equity and shared equity programs provide lower and moderate income households with ownership assistance. Sweat equity refers to the exchange of time and effort, usually in the form of construction activities, for an affordable ownership opportunity. • Objective: Continue to work with organizations that offer sweat and shared equity housing programs to lower and moderate income households in La Quinta. • Timing: Meet with organizations annually or more frequently (if requested or advantageous) to identify opportunities for coordinated efforts or potential housing projects. • Funding Source: General Fund • Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: The City has worked with both Habitat for Humanity and the Coachella Valley Housing Coalition in the development of sweat equity homes in the past. However, no units were built in collaboration with the City during the 2014-2021 planning period. This program has been successful in the past and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. 14 248 Removal of Governmental Constraints to Housing GOAL H-3 Create a regulatory system that does not unduly constrain the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing affordable to all La Quinta residents. ❖ Policy H-3.1 Remove unnecessary regulatory constraints to enable the construction or rehabilitation of housing that meets the needs of La Quinta residents, including lower income and special needs residents. Evaluation: In 2017, the City adopted Ordinance No. 561 to amend Municipal Code Section 9.6o.ogo (previously "Second Residential Units") to establish development standards and criteria for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). Under these amendments, ADUs are permitted as accessory uses in all residential zones and qualifying units can receive allowances for parking requirement exemptions and utility connection exemptions. The amendments reduce regulatory constraints associated with ADU development and expand housing opportunities for lower-income residents. The City will continue to monitor all municipal code requirements to assure that they do not impose a constraint on the development of affordable housing. This policy will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy H-3.2 Coordinate the development of affordable housing with the provision of key utilities to ensure prompt and adequate service. Evaluation: All new project development plans are provided to the utility providers for review and comment on a case-by-case basis. The City coordinates with utility providers to assure that adequate utilities are in place and operational to serve the needs of residents. This policy is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy H-3.3 Incentivize the development of affordable housing to facilitate the development of housing for the City's lower and moderate income households. 15 249 Evaluation: In 2oi6, the City introduced the mixed use (MU) overlay in the zoning code (La Quinta Municipal Code Chapter 9.140) to facilitate the development of mixed use projects that include both multifamily residential and commercial components. The City also amended and completed Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) regulations and district boundaries in ordinances passed in 2016 and 2oig. This program will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H -3.3.a: Priority Water and Sewer Service In compliance with state law, the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) must create procedures to provide priority water and sewer service to lower income residential project. The law also prohibits the denial or conditioning the approval of service without adequate findings, and requires future water management plans to identify projected water use for lower income residential development. ■ Objective: Route the adopted Housing Element to the CVWD and notify them of changes and future updates to the Housing Element. ■ Timing: Upon Housing Element adoption ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: CVWD is responsible for compliance with state law. The City will provide the adopted Housing Element to CVWD, notify them of changes and future updates, and continue to coordinate with them in the processing of applications in a timely manner. This program will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H -3.3.b: Reduced Parking Standards There are several potential opportunities to reduce parking standards for special types of development in La Quinta. While the City already has special parking standards for multifamily senior housing, there is potential to further reduce those requirements, particularly for lower and moderate income senior housing. The compact, mixed-use character of the Village area may also foster opportunities for parking reductions or joint -use opportunities. Lower and moderate income households may own fewer vehicles than above moderate income households, 16 250 and be more inclined to walk or use public transportation. Incentives such as reduced parking requirements could be offered for affordable housing developments. ■ Objective: Study the potential impacts of adopting reduced parking requirements or shared parking standards for senior housing and housing in the Village, particularly for projects serving lower and moderate income households. ■ Timing: Zoning Ordinance Update 2014 ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: The City updated Incentive Based Parking Adjustments (Zoning Code Section 9.150.050) in 2017 which allows a reduction in parking spaces of up to fifteen percent, subject to approval by the Planning Commission. Section 9.150.050.6 addresses opportunities for parking reductions in the Village Build -Out Plan Area, including potential reductions of fifty percent and other variations subject to approval by the director. The program is complete and will not be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H -3.3.c: Encourage Lot Consolidation Several small lots in the Village Commercial would have improved development potential through lot consolidation. The City will study, identify, and adopt regulatory incentives to encourage and facilitate lot consolidation. Potential incentives include fee deferral or reductions, parking requirement reduction, and relief from various other development standards that could potentially increase the cost of the project. ■ Objective: Identify opportunities and adopt incentives for lot consolidation in the Village Commercial zone ■ Timing: July 1, 2015 ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: The City completed the La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan and EIR in 2017. Ordinance No. 553 amended several chapters of the Municipal Code related to development standards for the Plan area; development standards are provided in Section 9.70.110. Projects in the Plan area are encouraged to implement the standards and incentives of Section 9.140.090, the mixed use overlay, which encourages development on lot assemblages or lots greater than one acre. Per Section 9.140.o9o.F, mixed use development can benefit from density bonuses, modified parking requirements, 1] 251 expedited permit processing, and fee reductions. Parking requirement reductions and variations in the Village Build -Out Plan area are addressed in Section 9.150.05o.B. Although the regulatory portion of this program is complete, the need for lot consolidation in the Village remains, and the program will be modified to address this. GOAL H-4 Conserve and improve the quality of existing La Quinta neighborhoods and individual properties. ❖ Policy H-4.1 Protect the quality of La Quinta's neighborhoods through the rehabilitation of both affordable and market -rate homes. Evaluation: The rehabilitation of both affordable and market -rate homes is an ongoing process supported by the City. The rehabilitation Of 72 existing units at Washington Street Apartments, an affordable housing project, was completed in 2oig. This policy will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy H-4.2 Promote financial and technical assistance to lower and moderate income households for housing maintenance and improvements. Evaluation: The City continues to support Riverside County and other third -party programs to fill this need. The City provides information on the HERO financing program for energy efficiency home improvements. City staff will conduct research on technical assistance available by agencies, including County assistance programs, and direct households to these programs when appropriate. This policy will be extended into the 2022- 2029 planning period. ❖ Policy H-4.3 Encourage the retention and rehabilitation of existing single-family neighborhoods and mobile home parks that are economically and physically sound. 18 252 ❖ Policy H-4.4 Enhance neighborhoods that presently provide affordable housing with drainage, lighting and landscape amenities, and parks and recreation areas. Program H -4.4.a: Housing Condition Monitoring To better understand the City's housing needs the quality and condition of the housing stock must be inventoried on a regular basis. The inventory should focus on older neighborhoods, such as those south of Calle Tampico, west of Washington Street, and north of Highway 111. ■ Objective: Maintain an inventory of housing conditions (updated approximately every five years) to enable the City to properly target Code Compliance and rehabilitation resources. ■ Timing: Complete by June 30, 2014 ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: There was no activity during the 2014-2021 planning period. City staff will conduct a housing condition survey in the 2022-2023 Fiscal Year. This program will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H -4.4.b: County of Riverside Senior Residential Rehabilitation The Minor Senior Home Repair program allocates grants up to $250 per year for lower income seniors for minor housing repairs, such as painting doors or trim, or repairing a window. The Enhanced Senior Home Repair Program provides major rehabilitation and repair for low income seniors, providing a one- time grant for repairs to homes owned and occupied by seniors and/or persons with disabilities. The maximum level of assistance for this program is $3,000 per year. ■ Objective: Continue to refer code violators and interested parties to the County of Riverside Minor and Enhanced Senior Home Repair programs and other local resources. Assist homeowners in completing applications as necessary. ■ Timing: Throughout planning period, on a case-by-case basis ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department 19 253 Evaluation: The City does not operate its own senior home repair program; however, the City Manager's office coordinates with lower income households and refers them to the Riverside County Economic Development Agency, as appropriate. This program is an ongoing effort and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H -4.4.c: County of Riverside Home Repair Grant The County of Riverside Economic Development Agency Home Repair Program provides lower income households with up to $6,00o for home repairs such as a new roof, new air -conditioner, or a handicap ramp. As a jurisdiction in Riverside County, lower income La Quinta households are eligible for this grant. ■ Objective: Refer code violators and interested parties to the County of Riverside for home repair grants. ■ Timing: Throughout planning period, on a case-by-case basis ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: To the extent that these County programs have been funded, the City has referred homeowners to the appropriate County staff. This effort is ongoing and the program will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H -4.4.d: Rehabilitation Resources List Lower and moderate income homeowners may need assistance in affording important home repairs and improvements. The City can assist these households by compiling and sharing a listing of local, state, and federal programs offering rehabilitation assistance. ■ Objective: Provide a rehabilitation resources list on the affordable housing and code compliance pages of the City's website. Use the list, in online or printed form, as a reference for code violators. ■ Timing: Create list by June 30, 2014 ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department 20 254 Evaluation: City staff has not prepared a list of rehabilitation resources for home repairs and improvements; however, such an effort is still considered important. This program will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Equal Housing Opportunity GOAL H-5 Provide equal housing opportunities for all persons. ❖ POlicy 5.1 Provide the regulatory framework to create an environment in which housing opportunities are equal. Evaluation: The City complies with all housing laws regarding equal housing opportunities, including updates on accessory dwelling units (ADUs) in 2017 and again in 2020/2021. The City regularly reviews and amends its Municipal Code to assure that all aspects of it comply with the law. This policy is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy 5.2 Encourage and support the enforcement of laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination in lending practices and in the sale or rental of housing. Evaluation: The City complies with all housing laws and distributes fair housing information. The City monitors housing complaints and refers all complaints to the Riverside County Fair Housing Council, which has jurisdiction over such matters. This policy is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ POlicy 5.3 Encourage support services for the Coachella Valley's senior and homeless populations through referrals and collaborative efforts with non -profits and other jurisdictions. Evaluation: The City provides funding to and participates in CVAG's homelessness programs and provides financial assistance to Martha's Village and Kitchen and Coachella Valley Rescue Mission for homeless prevention services, in 21 255 addition to providing bus passes for homeless people and collaborating with non -profits to provide rapid rehousing and other services. This policy involves ongoing efforts and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy 5.4 Assist in the creation of a continuum of care for the homeless population and those transitioning into permanent housing. Evaluation: The City provides ongoing support for the CVAG Homeless Committee and participation in CVAG's homelessness programs. In the 2014-2021 planning period, the City housed five homeless families in Coral Mountain apartments through the Homeless Prevention Program. This program will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy 5.5 Improve quality of life for disabled persons by facilitating relief from regulatory requirements that may create barriers to accessible housing and promoting universal design. Evaluation: During the 2014-2021 planning period, the City further amended the Zoning Code Section 9.60.320 to refine procedures for requesting, submittal, and review of applications for reasonable accommodation. The City continues to facilitate development of accessible housing for all its residents. This program is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H -5.5.a: Regional Facilities for the Homeless Continue to support and collaborate with the Coachella Valley Association of Governments Homelessness Committee efforts to maintain a regional homeless facility that provides housing as well as supportive services. Continue to contribute, if funds allow, $25o,000 annually to CVAG's efforts to provide housing and support services across the Coachella Valley. ■ Timing: City staff will continue to collaborate with CVAG throughout the planning. ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department 22 256 Evaluation: The City participated in and collaborated with CVAG's Homelessness Committee to provide supportive programs for homeless people in the Coachella Valley. After the closure of Roy's Desert Resource Center in 2017, CVAG contracted with a non-profit to operate its Coachella Valley Housing First program and initiated the CVHEART program to coordinate and expand regional homelessness efforts. The City worked with homeless shelters and re -housing programs directly and through CVAG. Continuing support of these programs will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H -5.5.b: Transitional Housing and Permanent Supportive Housing Transitional housing typically accommodates homeless people for up to two years as they stabilize their lives and does not meet emergency needs. Transitional housing includes training and services that are vital for rehabilitating and enriching the lives of the formerly homeless. Transitional housing facilities provide families and individuals with a safe place within which to rebuild their lives and prepare for independence. Permanent supportive housing is affordable housing with on- or off-site services that help a person maintain a stable, housed, life. ■ Objective: The Zoning Ordinance shall allow transitional and supportive housing as a residential use in all zones which allow for residential development, and subject only to those restrictions that apply to similar residential uses (single or multi -family units) of the same type in the same zone, and will not be subject to any restrictions not imposed on similar dwellings, including occupancy limits. ■ Timing: Coordinate with 2009/2011 General Plan Update ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Planning Department Evaluation: Several zoning ordinance amendments were completed in the 2014-2021 planning period. The amendments define homeless shelters and transitional shelters; allow transitional and supportive housing with a conditional use permit in the Medium Density, Medium -High Density, and High Density Residential zones; and allow transitional shelters with a conditional use permit within Regional Commercial and Major Community Facilities zones. Emergency shelters are allowed in all commercial zones. This program was completed and will not be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. 23 257 Program H -5.5.c: Fair Housing Referrals Fair housing organizations provide dispute resolution and legal assistance to tenants and landlords in conflict. Such services are particularly important for lower and moderate income households unable to afford counsel. ■ Objective: Continue to refer tenants and landlords to the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County. Provide information on fair housing resources on the City's website and at City Hall. Identify and coordinate with local nonprofits, service organizations and community groups that can assist in distributing fair housing information. ■ Timing: Referral service as needed. Information to be placed on website and local groups identified by January 2014 ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: City staff referred residents to the County Fair Housing Council as needed. The City website provides information on the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County (FHCRC) and how to contact the FHCRC. This program is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H -5.5.d: Directory of Services While numerous services are available to special needs and lower income households, it can be difficult to readily have access to these resources. A directory provides the contact information necessary to seek housing assistance. ■ Objective: Develop an online directory of services and information to provide La Quinta residents with contact information for community organizations and service providers that address special needs. ■ Timing: Update website by March 2014 ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: The City website includes directories of affordable rental and ownership housing developments, as well as information about senior home purchase loan programs, personal finance resources, and other housing resources. City housing staff will continue to add additional information as needed. This program involves ongoing efforts and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. 24 258 Energy and Water Conservation GOAL H -6.i Provide a regulatory framework that facilitates and encourages energy and water conservation through sustainable site planning, project design, and green technologies and building materials. ❖ Policy H-6.1 Promote higher density and compact developments that increase energy efficiency and reduce land consumption. Evaluation: The zoning ordinance was amended in 2017 to include standards for mixed use and planned unit development (PUD). The purpose of the PUD is to allow flexibility in the design of residential projects, and encourage the development of creative, high-quality residential projects that provide attractive living environments in a setting that is different from standard single family home development. The City also continues to promote energy efficiency through rebate programs provided by utility companies and other agencies. This policy is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy H-6.2 Facilitate housing development and rehabilitation that conserves natural resources and minimizes greenhouse gas emissions. Evaluation: New and renovated units at Washington Street Apartments were completed in 2019 and built to meet or exceed the most recent energy efficient building standards. Energy -conserving materials and systems include faucet flow restrictors, Energy Star -rated appliances and roofs, dual -glazed windows, and vented kitchen range hoods. The City website provides information about numerous home energy efficiency products, programs, and services, including financial assistance and residential rebate programs, that help homeowners conserve natural resources and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This policy is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy H-6.3 Encourage and enforce green building regulations or incentives that do not serve as constraints to the development or rehabilitation of housing. 25 259 Evaluation: The City adopts and enforces the California Building Code (CBC) and California Green Building Standards Code per State requirements. The 2019 CBC updates include solar and green building requirements. This policy will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy H-6.4 Focus sustainability efforts on measures and techniques that also assist the occupant in reducing energy costs; therefore reducing housing costs. Evaluation: The City has supported several residential developments that incorporate sustainable efforts and help reduce the occupant's energy costs. These properties include Coral Mountain Apartments and Washington Street Apartments for disabled seniors and veterans; both were completed during the 2014-2021 planning period. The City continues to promote its Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan and implement sustainability principles and measures in the General Plan. This policy will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. ❖ Policy H-6.5 Use and encourage emerging technologies to reduce high demands for electricity and natural gas including use of passive solar devices and where feasible other renewable energy technologies (e.g., biomass, wind, and geothermal). Program H -6.5.a: Green and Sustainable La Quinta Program Continue to implement the Green and Sustainable La Quinta Program. ■ Objective: Implement green goals, policies, and programs that accurately represent the City's direction in resource conservation and minimizing greenhouse gas emissions. Implement design standards for residential and commercial structures that encourage solar protection to directly result in energy conservation. ■ Timing: As projects are proposed ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Community Development Department Evaluation: The Green and Sustainable La Quinta Program includes providing information on the City's website about home improvement programs, financial resources and rebates, recycling programs, water and energy 26 260 conservation measures, and other resources that facilitate resource conservation and greenhouse gas emission reductions. The City adopted and enforces the 2019 California Building Code and California Green Building Code that require design standards that encourage solar protection to directly result in energy conservation. The City also implements the policies and programs of its Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan and General Plan. This program is ongoing and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H -6.5.b: Energy Conservation Partners In working toward a sustainable La Quinta, the City and its residents will need to collaborate with utilities and service providers. Partnerships with the Coachella Valley Water District, Imperial Irrigation District, Southern California Gas, Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, Sunline Transit District, Coachella Valley Association of Governments, Southern California Association of Governments and other entities will be an important component of making La Quinta a more livable city. ■ Objective: Continue to meet with and seek insight from utilities, service providers, and other entities involved in energy conservation efforts appropriate for La Quinta. ■ Timing: As part of regular coordination meetings with utilities ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Community Development Department Evaluation: The City coordinates with utility companies to promote and implement energy conservation programs in residential construction. The City website includes descriptions of and contact information for home improvement energy conservation measures and financing programs, including rebates, offered by SoCalGas, Imperial Irrigation District, CVWD, and Burrtec Waste and Recycling. Development plans and construction activities are closely coordinated with utilities during planning and operational purposes. This program is ongoing and will be extended through the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H -6-5-c: Imperial Irrigation District Programs The Imperial Irrigation District (IID) is proactive in energy savings via conservation programs, product rebates, and general tips. An average home owner can save up to to percent on energy/energy bills by taking advantage of IID programs. Home owners can utilize the free "Check Me!" program, which checks the Z] 261 refrigerant charge and airflow of their air conditioning/heating units. I I D also offers a rebate on the purchase of higher efficiency air conditioning units, high efficiency refrigerators, programmable thermostats, and ENERGY STAR equipment. City staff has held several meetings with IID representatives to discuss opportunities for collaboration to conserve energy in La Quinta, including water management opportunities for golf courses and golf -oriented communities. ■ Objective: Maintain contact with IID to market energy efficiency programs and rebates that are most beneficial to La Quinta residents and homeowners. ■ Timing: Quarterly through Desert Cities Energy Partnership meetings ■ Funding Source: General Fund, IID program funds, and potential AB 811 special assessment district funds ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Community Development Department Evaluation: The City's Going Green website provides information on IID programs and rebates through links to their websites, including the Residential ENERGY STAR product rebate program. IID continues to offer free, in-home residential and commercial energy audits and follow-up lists of recommendations intended to reduce electricity consumption and costs. The City promotes these programs through meetings with Homeowners' Association boards and various City sponsored events to encourage La Quinta residents and businesses to sign up for energy audits and reduction programs. However, IID's future is currently unknown; in addition to continuing to recommend IID as a conservation resource, the City will need to explore additional opportunities for residents to acquire energy savings via conservation programs, products, rebates, and general tips. This program will be modified for the 2022-2029 planning period. Program H -6-5.d: Weatherization Assistance The Federal Department of Energy's Weatherization Assistance Program, in conjunction with state and local programs, provide low or no cost weatherization and insulation services to reduce the heating and cooling costs for low income households. ■ Objective: Encourage low income homeowners or renters to apply for free energy audits, home weatherization, and utility rebate programs by advertising available programs on the City's website and at City Hall. 28 262 ■ Timing: Advertise annually as program funds are available ■ Funding: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Building and Safety Department, City Manager's Office Evaluation: The City website and distribution materials/flyers describe and provide contact information for Imperial Irrigation District's free energy audits for homes, home energy efficiency surveys, financing programs and tax credits, and rebates and incentive programs. The City also promotes SoCalGas' free energy and water conservation kit for residential customers and no -cost, energy-saving home improvements for income -qualified homeowners and renters. This program is successful and will be extended into the 2022-2029 planning period. However, the focus will continue to be on local and regional, not federal, programs, which will be reflected in revisions to the program. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION California Government Code requires that local governments make a diligent effort to achieve public participation from all economic segments of the community in the development of the housing element. The City's public outreach efforts focused on community and stakeholder workshops, information disseminated through the City's website, electronic mail notifications, and public hearings. Together, this input helped the City understand and respond to the housing needs of the community. The Housing Element draft was also posted on the City's website. Community and Stakeholder Workshops Workshop invitations were sent to local and regional development entities, advocacy groups, and interested parties via email. In addition, workshops were advertised on the City's website and in email blasts to the City's extensive resident email list. The workshops consisted of a Planning Commission presentation, two City Council updates, a Housing Commission presentation and a public workshop attended by more than 15 community members. The comments received at these workshops included the following, which are addressed in this Housing Element: ❖ Concerns about how to address overpayment by both owners and renters. ❖ The difficulty of financing new projects, which now require two or three times as many funding sources as in the past. 29 263 ❖ Concerns regarding whether short term vacation rentals are impacting the availability of housing for permanent residents. ❖ Assuring that land inventory sites for all types of housing. ❖ Assuring that development standards, fees and processing times reflect the needs of affordable housing projects. ❖ January 12, 2021 to present the process of the Update, discuss the City's RHNA allocation and seek input from the Commission. The Commission had no questions or comments. ❖ Joint Planning Commission and City Council Study Session on August 3, 2021, to inform the members on the comments received by HCD, and discuss the distribution of sites. The members had several questions and comments on the need for housing, including creative housing solutions like tiny homes; the City's ongoing efforts to provide it, and the challenges associated with funding projects. The comments and questions led to amendments and additions to policies and programs which are included in this Element. The amendments included changes to programs to develop incentives, including fee reductions and development standard concessions for affordable housing projects, and working closely with the development community to secure funding from all available sources. The participants' concerns were considered in the preparation of the goals, policies and programs, including additions and changes that further commit the City to partnering with affordable housing developers in the development of projects in the future; the City's recent actions to limit short term vacation rentals; and including inventory sites of varying sizes and locations close to services, transit, schools and job centers. The Element was posted on the City's website, and a public comment period provided from September 10 to 24, 2021. The public comment period was advertised through Facebook and Instagram posts, and a Nextdoor announcement from the City, and an email blast to all those invited to the community workshops (see Appendix A). City received no comments during the comment period. State Review and Public Hearings The Draft Element was submitted to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for review and certification. The City has received and responded to review comments from HCD to address its concerns. 30 264 The Housing Element was posted on the City's website for 3o days prior to City Council hearing. The posting was advertised on the City's website, on its Facebook page, and individual emails sent to all of the housing advocates, developers and residents who participated in the City's workshops (see Appendix A). HOUSING VISION STATEMENT A Housing Vision Statement was developed based on key housing issues and through cooperation of the citizens and elected officials of the City of La Quinta when the General Plan was adopted. It has been reviewed periodically, but remains true to the City's goals and aspirations. The housing policies and programs included in this Housing Element are designed to bring this vision to fruition. "The City of La Quinta's vision of the future for housing focuses on encouraging the provision of suitable housing for all City residents while maintaining and enhancing the City's high quality of life for its residents. Through its housing programs, the City will facilitate the maintenance and improvement of its existing housing stock resources, and encourage the production of a variety of new housing to meet residents' needs, while preserving the overall character of the City." COMMUNITY PROFILE The housing needs of the City are determined by characteristics of the population (age, household size, employment, and ethnicity) and the characteristics of housing available to that population (i.e., number of units, tenure, size, cost, etc.). This section explores the characteristics of the existing and projected population and housing stock in order to identify potentially unmet housing needs in La Quinta. This information provides direction in updating the City's Housing Element goals, policies, and programs. The demographics used in this section are derived from US Census data for z000 and 2010; US Census American Community Survey (ACS) 3 and 5 year estimates data, California Department of Finance, and the City of La Quinta. Population The City of La Quinta is one of nine cities in the Coachella Valley subregion of Riverside County. The Coachella Valley includes the cities of Cathedral City, Coachella, Desert Hot Springs, Indian Wells, Indio, La 31 265 Quinta, Palm Desert, Palm Springs, and Rancho Mirage, as well as large areas of unincorporated Riverside County. La Quinta ranks high in population growth among California's 482 cities. During the 199os, the population of La Quinta grew by 111.3 percent, making it the fastest growing city in the Coachella Valley at the time. The number of residents in the City increased from 11,215 to 37,467 between 1990 and 201o. The population further increased to 40,704 by 2o18, a smaller increase of 8.6 percent compared to the previous two decades. The absolute increase in population for cities in the Coachella Valley provides another perspective for analysis when size is taken into consideration. For example, Indio grew by the greatest number of people from 2010 to 2o18, with an increase of approximately 15,199 people. La Quinta experienced the fourth largest numerical increase, with an added population of 3,237• Table 11-2- Population I-2Population Growth City/Region 2000 2010 Census 2000-2010 2018 ACS 2010-2o18 La Quinta 23,694 37,467 58.1 13,773 40,704 8.6 3,237 Coachella Valley 255,788 346,518 35.5 90,730 382,296 10.3 35,778 Riverside County 1,545,387 2,i89,641 41.7 644,254 2,383,286 8.8 193,645 Source: 20oo and 2010 Census; American Community Survey 2014-2o18 5 -Year Estimates Table II -3 Population Growth In Coachella Vallev Cities City 2000 2010 Census Change 2000-2010 2018 ACS Change 2010-2o18 Cathedral City 42,647 51,200 20.1 8,553 54,037 5.5 2,837 Coachella 22,724 40,704 79.1 17,980 44,849 10.2 4,145 Desert Hot Springs 16,582 25,938 56.4 9,356 28,430 9.6 2,492 Indian Wells 3,816 4,958 29.9 1,142 5,317 7.2 359 Indio 49,116 76,036 54.8 26,920 91,235 20.0 15,199 La Quinta 23,694 37,467 58.1 13,773 40,704 8.6 3,237 Palm Desert 41,155 48,445 17.7 7,290 52,124 7.6 3,679 Palm Springs 42,807 44,552 4.1 1,745 47,525 6.7 2,973 Rancho Mirage 13,249 17,218 30.0 3,969 18,075 5.0 857 Total 1 255,790 1 346,5i8 1 35.5 1 90,728 1 382,296 1 10.3 35,778 Source: 2000 and 2010 Census; American Community Survey 2014-2018 5 -Year Estimates 32 266 Seasonal Population The seasonal or part time resident population is not included in the population estimates compiled by the Census Bureau because people are classified according to the location of their primary residence. The California Department of Finance (DOF) provides a yearly estimate of total built housing units and an estimate of the number of vacant units. In resort communities like La Quinta, the number of vacant units reflects the number of units that are not occupied year-round, as well as those that are ready for year-round occupancy but have not been inhabited. According to the 2010 Census, the overall vacancy rate for La Quinta is 36.9%, while the seasonal vacancy rate is 27.5%. According to the 2018 ACS Census, the overall vacancy rate for La Quinta is 38.3%, while the seasonal vacancy rate is 31.8%. Age Composition Table II -4, Age Distribution, shows the change in age groups from 2010 to 2018. In 2018, children and youth groups (ages o-19) comprised 23.8 percent of the population, young and middle -age adults (20 to 54 years) represented 36.5 percent and all age groups over 55 years made up 39.8 percent. The data show that the population is slowly aging. In 2018, the median age in La Quinta was 47.1 years, significantly older than Riverside County and the State of California averages of 35.8 and 36.7 years, respectively. This represents a 3% increase in the City's median age since 2010, when the median age was 45.6 years. Table II -4 indicates that the rate of growth in the o-19 age groups slightly declined from 2010 to 2018. The 20-54 age groups reflect a slower growth rate, making up 2.8% less of the City's population in 2018. Conversely, growth in the 55+ age category shows a 3.5% increase in the share of City population compared to 2010. Table II -4 Aare Distribution Age Group # 2010 % 201$ # Under 5 years 1,784 4.8 2,048 5.0 5 to 9 years 2,136 5.7 2,549 6.3 10 t0 14 years 2,624 7.0 2,212 5.4 15 to 19 years 2,544 6.8 2,877 7.1 20 to 24 years 1,629 4.3 1,635 4.0 25 to 34 years 3,239 8.6 3,567 8.8 35 to 44 years 4,457 11.9 4,231 10.4 45 to 54 years 5,435 14.5 5,413 13.3 55 to 59 years 2,652 7.1 2,849 7.0 6o to 64 years 3,151 8.4 3,318 8.2 33 267 Table II -4 Age Distribution Age Group 2010 # % 2018 # 65 to 74 years 4,989 13.3 5,929 14.6 75 to 84 years 2,217 5.9 3,127 7.7 85 years & over 610 1.6 949 2.3 Total 37,467 1 100 40,704 100 Median age 45.6 0.1 47.1 1,176 Source: 2010 U.S. Census Tables P12 and P13; American Community Survey 2014-2018 s -Year Estimates, Tables DPoS and Bo1002 Race and Ethnicity Table II -5 describes the racial and ethnic distribution of the population for 2010 and 2018. Residents who categorize themselves as white comprise the largest race/ethnicity. The distribution remains largely stable from 2010 to 2018 with a small increase in the Asian group and a decrease in the American Indian and Alaska Native group. The percentage of Hispanic or Latino residents increased slightly from 30.3% to 34.1%. Table II -5 Population by Race/Ethnicity Race/Ethnicity 2010 2018 One Race White 29,489 78.7 32,239 79.2 Black or African American 713 1.9 772 1.9 American Indian and Alaska Native 230 0.6 48 0.1 Asian 1,176 3.1 1,529 3.8 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific 41 0.1 20 <0.1 Islander Some Other Race 4,595 12.3 4,757 11.7 Two or More Races 1,223 3.3 1,339 3.3 Total 37,467 100 40,704 100 Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 11,339 30.3 13,872 34.1 Source: 2010 U.S. Census, Tables P3 and P12H; American Community Survey 2014- 2018 5 -Year Estimates, Table DPoS Employment The economy of the Coachella Valley was traditionally agriculture - driven, but has gradually shifted to tourism, service industries, and residential uses. Although employment patterns typically induce housing demand, the regional economy of the Coachella Valley differs from most parts of the state. Here, employment is created by housing demand, manifested in the construction and staffing of resorts and second homes. Tourism and 34 268 resort development are leading indicators that predict employment and housing demand. Although the tourist economy is seasonal in the Coachella Valley, it is generally stable and does not typically suffer the severe effects of recessions as do other regions dependent on manufacturing and consumer related goods. And with the benefit of desert weather, the resorts in the La Quinta area are increasingly operating year-round. There is, however, some seasonal fluctuation in the labor market, which can further compound the problem of economic stability in the lower income sectors of the labor force, affecting their ability to sustain themselves in the off season (summer) months. According to the US Census Bureau (2014-2ol8 American Community Survey), in 2o18 the civilian labor force over 16 years comprised 17,18o persons. Table II -6 shows the types of employment by industry held by La Quinta residents in 2o18. The majority of jobs held by La Quinta residents were in "educational services, health care, and social assistance", followed by "arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation, and food service" industries, "retail trade," and "professional, scientific, management, administrative, and waste management" industries. As shown in Table II -7, more than one-third (37.1%) of the City's civilian employed labor force is employed in "management, business, science, and arts" occupations, followed by "sales and office" occupations (26.5%) and "service" occupations (2o.8%). Table II -8 shows the major employers in the City of La Quinta. The largest employers are in the nonmanufacturing economy and are directly related to the provision of services, including education, big box retail, and recreational and resort activities. In 2019 the City surveyed its major commercial and hospitality facilities to identify major employers in the city limits. The largest employers surveyed include Desert Sands Unified School District, La Quinta Resort & Club/PGA West, Wal-Mart, Costco, and Home Depot. The Great Recession, with onset in late 2007, saw high unemployment and job losses in the Coachella Valley. At the lowest point, about every seventh person lost their job.' Regional employment started to increase in 2011, but annual growth was still slowerthan pre -Recession levels until 2017, suffering more impact than western Riverside County, the state, and nation. The construction sector was hit hardest regionally, with approximately 70% of jobs lost and only 14% recovered by December 2019 Greater Palm Springs Economic Report, Coachella Valley Economic Partnership, Figure 24. 35 269 2017.2 The Retail Trade and Wholesale Trade sector lost around 6,700 jobs but has basically returned to pre -Recession levels. Two sectors have fully recovered and even added jobs: Education and Health Services and, to a lesser extent, Leisure and Hospitality. Between 2012 and 2019, annual unemployment rates in La Quinta saw an overall decline from a high of 7.5% in 2012 to a low of 4.1% in 2019.3 However, analysis of employment data from 2005 to 2017 shows that, as of December 2017, La Quinta had not fully recovered the job losses it incurred during the Great Recession. The City lost about 30% of jobs, relative to peak employment, and had recovered only about 5%.4 This scenario is roughly the same for seven other Coachella Valley cities; only Palm Springs and Rancho Mirage had recovered and exceeded their previous peaks. Future employment opportunities for City residents will include a variety of new retail, service, and entertainment jobs at the luxury Montage and Pendry hotels that are under construction at the SilverRock Golf Resort, a Residence Inn recently constructed on Highway 111, as well as other development resulting from the City's 2019 Highway 111 Corridor Plan. CV Link, a 49 -mile long regional, multimodal pathway under construction, will run north of the Highway 111 corridor and is anticipated to support new business and employment opportunities. Z ]bid, Figures 25 and 26. 3 California Employment Development Department annual unemployment rates (labor force), not seasonally adjusted, not preliminary. 4 2019 Greater Palm Springs Economic Report, Coachella Valley Economic Partnership, Figure 28. 36 270 Table II -6 Employment by Industry (2o18) Industry Employed Persons % of Employed Persons Agriculture, forestry, fishing, hunting, mining 352 2.0 Construction 1,056 6.1 Manufacturing 691 4.0 Wholesale Trade 242 1.4 Retail Trade 2,479 14.4 Transportation and warehousing, and utilities 657 3.8 Information 199 1.2 Finance, insurance, real estate, rental, leasing 1,309 7.6 Professional, scientific, management, admin., waste management 1'977 11.5 Educational services, health care, social assistance 3,373 19.6 Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation, food services 2'947 17'2 Other services, except public administration 1,021 5.9 Public Administration 877 5.1 Total civilian employed 16 years and over 1 17,180 100.0 Source: American Community Survey 2014-2o18 5 -Year Estimates, Table 52403 Table II -7 Employment by Occupation (2o18) Occupation # % Management, business, science, and arts occupations 6,368 37.1 Service occupations 3,577 20.8 Sales and office occupations 4,547 26.5 Natural resources, construction, and maintenance occupations 1,588 9.2 Production, transportation, and material moving occupations 1,100 6.4 Total civilian employed population 16 years and over 1708o 100.0 Source: American Community Survey 2014-2o18 5 -Year Estimates, Table 52401 37 271 Table II -8 Principal Emplovers in Citv of La Quinta Name of Employer Employed Persons Description Desert Sands Unified School District 2,852 Government La Quinta Resort & Club/ PGA West' 1,412 Hotel & Golf Resort Wal-Mart Super Center 300 Retailer Costco 290 Retailer Home Depot 212 Retailer Target 18o Retailer Lowe's Home Improvement 150 Retailer Imperial Irrigation District 134 Utility Company In N Out 84 Fast Food Restaurant Vons 83 Grocery Store Rancho La Quinta 77 Golf Resort Traditions Golf Club 71 Golf Resort Source: City of La Quinta 2018/19 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. ' La Quinta Resort & Club and PGA West are accounted for as one entity; as such, their employment numbers are reported together as of FY 2015-16. Many La Quinta residents work in other communities, and many residents from other cities work in La Quinta. Table II -9 describes the employment locations of La Quinta residents. As shown, only 23.1% of City residents work in La Quinta. A quarter (25.0%) work in Palm Desert. Table II -9 Commuting Patterns Where La Quinta Residents Work No. of La Quinta Residents % of Total Indio 1,o87 14.1 Cathedral City 254 3.3 Palm Desert 1,933 25.0 Palm Springs 827 10.7 Coachella 438 5.7 La Quinta 1,788 23.1 Desert Hot Springs 44 o.6 Rancho Mirage 879 11.4 Indian Wells 484 6.3 Source: 2019 Greater Palm Springs Economic Report, Coachella Valley Economic PartnershlD. Table 6. Based on 2015 data. General Income Characteristics Income can often vary significantly by region, industry, and type of job. Table II-io describes average income per worker by industry in the Coachella Valley. As shown, the highest -paying sectors are Finance/Insurance/Real Estate, Government, and Information, with incomes averaging around $50,000 to $6o,000. The lowest -paying sectors include Retail Trade, Other Services, and Leisure and Hospitality, with incomes averaging around 131,000. 38 272 Table II -10 Average Income by Industrv. Coachella Vallev Industry Average Income per Worker, 2017 Agriculture $29,571 Construction $45,488 Manufacturing $46,340 Retail Trade $32,281 Information $50,493 Finance, Insurance, Real Estate $59,726 Professional and Business Services $43,736 Education and Health Services $48,322 Leisure and Hospitality $31,513 Government $58,711 Other Services $31,836 Logistics $45,114 Source: 2019 Greater Palm Springs Economic Report, Coachella Valley Economic Partnership. Figure 2q The median household income in La Quinta in 2018 was $79,889, higher than the Riverside County median household income of $63,948• Since 2010, the median income for La Quinta residents has increased, with the 2010 median family income reported as $57,768 for the County of Riverside and $67,444 for the City of La Quinta. Household income estimates (2018) by total households are provided in Table II -11. Table II -11 2o18 Household Income Estimates Income Category Households % of Households Less than $10,000 901 5.8% $10,000 -14,999 386 2.5% $15,000 - 24,999 846 5.5% $25,000 - 34,999 1,384 8.9% $35,000 - 49,999 1,771 11.4% $50,000 - 74,999 21201 14.2% $75,000 - 99,999 1,792 11.6% $100,000 -149,999 2,872 18.5% $150,000 -199,999 1,254 8.1% $200,000 or more 2,098 13.5% Total 115,505 100.0% Median Income $79,889 Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5 -Year Estimates, Table DP03 39 273 HOUSING PROFILE This section provides an overview of La Quinta's existing housing stock. Since the establishment of the La Quinta Hotel in 1926, La Quinta has been considered a world class resort and has been a favored location for vacation and retirement homes. Generally, single-family residences were constructed on an individual basis from the 1950s until the La Quinta Country Club area was developed in the 196os. In 1975, a brief building boom began due to speculation. Recessions in the 198os and early 199os resulted in an oversupply of housing and little construction in the City. A rebound occurred beginning in the late 199os. As a result, the City has seen a rapid increase in residential development of all types, but predominantly single-family units. There are many projects clustered around recreation amenities. In many of these communities, second units and guest houses (typically used to house guests, extended family members, and service workers) are processed concurrently with the primary unit. The bust of subprime lending practices in the early and mid -2000s led to the Great Recession, which resulted in a steep decline in home values, rapid increase in foreclosures, and decrease in the number of households eligible to enter the ownership housing market. Construction of new housing slowed in La Quinta and many regional and national markets. Housing Characteristics Between 2012 and 2019, the number of housing units in the City increased by 1,179 units from 23,585 to 24,764 units. This change represents a 5.0 percent increase (see Table II -12). There are five types of housing units for which data is presented in Table II -12: detached and attached single family units, multifamily in a building Of 2 to 4, or 5 or more units, and mobile homes. The predominant type of dwelling unit in the City of La Quinta continues to be single-family detached. Together, detached and attached single-family homes comprised 88.0 percent of all units in the City in 2019. The number of multifamily (5 or more) units in the City increased by 31.9% from 2012 to 2019, although multifamily units represented 11.1 percent of the total housing stock in 2019. 40 274 Table II -13 shows the number of building permits issued for new residential construction in La Quinta between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2020, covering nearly all of the 2014-2021 planning period. The data show that 944 permits were issued. The majority (92.7%) were for single-family detached units, 4.0% were for single-family attached units, 2.2% were for multi -family 3-4 units, and 1.1% were for multi -family 5+ units. Table II -12 Housing Stock Trends - 2012 to 2019 Building Type 2012 2019 Change 2012- Single -Family Detached 2019 Units % of Units % of # 21 2.2% Multi -Family, 5+ units 10 Total' Total Permits: Total' 100.0% Single -Family 18,622 79.0 19,310 78.o 688 3.7 Detached Single -Family 2,387 10.1 2,476 10.0 89 3.7 Attached Multifamily, 2-4 1,127 4.8 1,140 4.6 13 1.2 units Multifamily, 5 or 1,218 5.2 1,607 6.5 389 31.9 more units Mobile Homes 231 1.0 231 1.0 0 0 Total Dwelling 23,585 100.0 24,764 100.0 1,179 5.0 Units Source: Department of Finance Table E-5, 2012 and 2019. ' differences due to roundime Table II -13 New Residential Construction, 2014-2020 Building Permit Type No. of Permits' Percent of Total Residential Dwellings: Single -Family Detached 875 92.7% Single -Family Attached 38 4.0% Multi -Family 3-4 units 21 2.2% Multi -Family, 5+ units 10 1.1% Total Permits: 944 100.0% Source: La Quinta Building Division ' Permits issued between 1/01/14 through 12/31/20 Households Before current housing problems can be understood and future needs anticipated, housing occupancy characteristics need to be identified. The following is an analysis of household type, growth, tenure, and vacancy trends. By definition, a "household" consists of all the people occupying a dwelling unit, whether or not they are related. A single person living in an apartment is a household, just as a couple with two children living in the same dwelling unit is considered a household. 41 275 From 2010 to 2o18, the number of La Quinta households grew from 14,802 to 15,505 at a 4.6% rate, as shown in Table II -14. In 2o18, the majority of households (56.7%) consisted of married couple families, followed by non -family households (29.2%). Table II -14 Household Growth Trends (2010 - 2o18) Year Number of # Increase % Increase Household Family households: S 70.8 2010 14,820 - - 2oi8 15,505 1 685 1 4.6 Source: 2010 U.S. Census, Table P28; American Community Survey 2014-2o18 5 -Year Estimates, Table DP02 Table II -15 Household Tvves Household Type No. of Households % of Total Family households: 10,977 70.8 Married couple family 8,797 56.7 Male householder, no wife present 747 4.8 Female householder, no husband present 1,433 9.2 Non -family households 4,528 29.2 Total Households 15,505 loo Average Household Size 2.62 Source: American Community Survey 2014-2o18 5 -Year Estimates, Table DP02 Housing Tenure The number of owner -occupied housing units in the City has not fluctuated much since 2010. In 2018, La Quinta owners occupied 76 percent of total units in the City, compared to 75.2 percent in 2010. Vacancy The vacancy rate is a measure of the general availability of housing. It also indicates how well the types of units available meet the current housing market demand. A low vacancy rate suggests that many households have found housing. However, fewer vacant housing units remain available and households needing housing may have difficulty finding housing within their price range. A high vacancy rate may indicate either the existence of a high number of units undesirable for occupancy or an oversupply of housing units. 42 276 As shown in Table II -16, the vacancy rate in La Quinta was 38.3 percent (9,638 units) in 2018, reflecting the seasonal resort character of the City. Among the vacant units, 31.8 percent of total housing units in the City are for seasonal, recreational, or occasional use. On that basis, the City's actual net vacancy rate is 6.5%, including 353 units available for rent, 596 available for sale, 271 rented or sold and awaiting occupancy, and 414 of other vacant status. Of the 15,505 (61.7%) occupied housing units in the City, about 71.8% are owner -occupied, and 28.2% are renter -occupied. The homeowner vacancy rate is 5.o%, and the rental vacancy rate is 7.4%, both of which are moderately low. Table II -16 Vacancy Status Vacancy Status Units Percentage Occupied Units Owner -occupied 11,125 44.2 Renter -Occupied 4,380 17.4 Subtotal 15,505 61.7 Vacant Units For rent 353 1.4 Rented, not occupied 28 0.1 For sale only 596 2.4 Sold, not occupied 243 1.0 For seasonal, recreational, or occasional use 8,004 31.8 For migrant workers o 0 Other vacant 414 1.6 Subtotal 9,638 38.3 Total Units 25,143 100 Vacancy Rate: Homeowner vacancy rate - 5.0 Rental vacancy rate 7.4 Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5 -Year Estimates, Tables DP04 and 625004 Age and Condition of Housing Housing age is a factor for determining the need for rehabilitation. Without proper maintenance, housing units deteriorate over time. Also, older houses may not be built to current housing standards for fire and earthquake safety. Approximately 71.4 percent of the housing stock in the City of La Quinta has been built since 199o, and about 44 percent of the current stock has been constructed since 2000 (see Table II -12). Less than 5 percent was constructed prior to 1970. 43 277 The oldest homes in the City are found in the Cove neighborhood. Of the older single-family homes, many are well maintained and are mostly occupied by long term residents. A small proportion of older homes have not been well-maintained. These homes are typically smaller than new homes in the City; some less than 1,000 square feet. As land values increase, it will become economically viable to replace or rehabilitate some of these structures. These homes are primarily in the Cove area and behind City Hall. Outside of the Cove area, the homes are generally newer. Many new units in these other areas are custom homes in gated communities and are maintained by their owners in accordance with the requirements of a homeowners association. Table II -17 Age of Housing Stock in La Quinta Year Built Total Percentage After 2014 125 0.5 2010-2013 276 1.1 2000-2009 10,651 42.4 1990-1999 6,901 27.4 1980-1989 4,235 16.8 1970-1979 1,762 7.0 1960-1969 460 1.8 1950-1959 459 1.8 1940-1949 153 0.6 Before 1939 121 0.5 Total Stock 25,143 100.0 Source: American Community Survey 2014-2oi8 5 -Year Estimates, Table DP04 Housing is considered substandard when conditions are found to be below the minimum standards of living defined by Section loos of the Uniform Housing Code. Households living in substandard conditions are considered as needing housing assistance even if they are not seeking alternative housing arrangements. According to a 2007 City-wide housing conditions survey (see Housing Conditions Survey, below), the majority of units needing minor or moderate rehabilitation are in the Cove area. Many of the housing units in the Cove area are more than 30 years old. After 30 years homes generally require major rehabilitation, such as a new roof or updated plumbing. 44 278 Another measure of potentially substandard housing is the number of housing units lacking adequate kitchen and plumbing facilities. In La Quinta, there are 83 units (0.54% of all units) lacking complete kitchens and 61 units (0.39% of all units) lacking plumbing facilities. More homeowner units have deficiencies than rental units. These homes could potentially benefit from rehabilitation programs. Table II -18 Housing Units Lacking, Facilities Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates, Tables 625053 and B25049 Housing Conditions Survey The last citywide survey of housing conditions was conducted in November 2007. Homes were evaluated based on the condition of structural elements (walls, supports, columns), doors and windows, paint and cosmetics, roofing, and landscape and streetscape. The survey found that most homes were in good condition and required little or no maintenance or repairs. Approximately 7% of the housing stock (1,408 units) was categorized as "Deferred Maintenance" and needed minor repairs, such as refreshed paint and landscaping. Thirty- six (36) units were designated "Minor Rehabilitation" and demonstrated numerous deferred maintenance conditions; 83% of these units were in the Cove. Twenty-three (23) units designated "Moderate Rehabilitation" were in a deficient state and needed major roof repair, window replacement, or similar repairs; 87% of them were in the Cove. Four (4) units were designated "Substantial Rehabilitation or Replacement"; they required complete replacement of roofs, walls, and/or other structural elements and their condition endangered the health, safety, or well-being of occupants. The City has not conducted a housing conditions survey since 2007; however, one is planned for fiscal year 2021/2022. The Code Compliance staff is proactive in its work to track property maintenance. As described above, the primary area where maintenance issues occur is in the Cove. The City offers programs that assist homeowners and apartment complex owners with home maintenance and repair costs. Homeowners interested in reducing their utility bills 45 279 Owner -Occupied Units Renter -Occupied Units Total Total Percent Total Percent Percent No. Units of Total No. Units in of Total No. of Total Type of Deficiency in City Units City Units Units Lacking complete 69 11,125 0.62 14 4,380 0.32 83 0.54 kitchen facilities Lacking plumbing 61 11,125 0.55 0 4,380 0 61 0.39 facilities Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates, Tables 625053 and B25049 Housing Conditions Survey The last citywide survey of housing conditions was conducted in November 2007. Homes were evaluated based on the condition of structural elements (walls, supports, columns), doors and windows, paint and cosmetics, roofing, and landscape and streetscape. The survey found that most homes were in good condition and required little or no maintenance or repairs. Approximately 7% of the housing stock (1,408 units) was categorized as "Deferred Maintenance" and needed minor repairs, such as refreshed paint and landscaping. Thirty- six (36) units were designated "Minor Rehabilitation" and demonstrated numerous deferred maintenance conditions; 83% of these units were in the Cove. Twenty-three (23) units designated "Moderate Rehabilitation" were in a deficient state and needed major roof repair, window replacement, or similar repairs; 87% of them were in the Cove. Four (4) units were designated "Substantial Rehabilitation or Replacement"; they required complete replacement of roofs, walls, and/or other structural elements and their condition endangered the health, safety, or well-being of occupants. The City has not conducted a housing conditions survey since 2007; however, one is planned for fiscal year 2021/2022. The Code Compliance staff is proactive in its work to track property maintenance. As described above, the primary area where maintenance issues occur is in the Cove. The City offers programs that assist homeowners and apartment complex owners with home maintenance and repair costs. Homeowners interested in reducing their utility bills 45 279 through upgrades now have an alternative to tapping their mortgage for home equity loans. Through partnership with the City of La Quinta, HERO and Ygrene are offering low -fixed interest rates and flexible payment terms of up to 20 years, with repayments made through property taxes. Currently, both programs offer a wide array of home energy products including: windows, skylights, and doors; heating, ventilation, and air conditioning; solar panels; roofing and insulation; artificial turf; and drip irrigation. In addition, Ygrene also offers pool pumps and related equipment and lighting products; HERO offers electric vehicle charging stations and water heating products. Rooms per Unit Table II-ig shows the number of bedrooms per unit, ranging from no bedroom (studios) to five or more bedrooms. Table II-ig also describes the number of bedrooms per unit, in relation to the total number of units for both 2011 and 2018. The most prominent change proportionally was in no -bedroom (studio) units, which increased 1.7 percent from 2011 to 2018. This change may be a combination of additional guest houses, a popular addition in the City, and accessory dwelling units, which have in recent years become more common. Table II-ig Bedrooms Per Unit, 201111-M8 Bedrooms Per Unit 2011 % of Total 2o18 % of Total % Change Studio (no bedroom) 172 0.8 622 2.5 1.7 1 1,145 5.2 1,307 5.2 0 z 4,046 18.3 4,278 17.0 -1.3 3 11,772 53.3 13,305 52.9 -0.4 4 4,441 20.1 5,125 20.4 0.3 5+ 506 2.3 5o6 2.0 -0.3 Total 22,082 100 25,143 100.0 Source: 2009-2013 and 2014-2o18 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates, Tables 625041. ' This category represents percent change in proportional terms. Table II-zo identifies the number of bedrooms in a dwelling unit by tenure. Three-bedroom units constituted the majority of housing stock (approximately 55 and 49.4 percent, respectively) of both owner and rental units. In ownership units, those with two, three, or four bedrooms made up 96.7 percent of units, while the same bedroom mix made up only 82.1 percent of rental units. As would be expected, rental units contained a much higher proportion of one -bedroom units, providing housing for those who are young, mobile or do not earn enough to enter homeownership. 46 280 Table II -20 Bedrooms in Dwelling Unit by Tenure, M8 Tenure Number Percentage Owner Occupied 11,125 100 Studio (no bedroom) 42 0.4 1 bedroom 93 0.8 2 bedrooms 1,721 15.5 3 bedrooms 6,124 55.0 4 bedrooms 2,912 26.2 5 or more bedrooms 233 2.1 Renter Occupied 4,380 100 Studio (no bedroom) 78 1.8 1 bedroom 697 15.9 2 bedrooms 989 22.6 3 bedrooms 2,165 49.4 4 bedrooms 443 10.1 5 or more bedrooms 8 0.2 Total 15,505 100 Studio (no bedroom) 46 0.8 1 bedroom 686 5.1 2 bedrooms 2,200 17.5 3 bedrooms 7,655 53.5 4 bedrooms 2,952 21.6 5 or more bedrooms 332 1.6 Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates, Tables 625042. Housing Costs This section discusses values of ownership housing, and average rental prices for rental housing. La Quinta's for -sale and rental properties range from multimillion -dollar estates to very low-income subsidized units. Home Values The table above compares median housing values in Coachella Valley cities from 2013 to 2018. La Quinta's median housing value was $348,400 in 2013, which was lower than Rancho Mirage and Indian Wells, but higher than the other cities. Its median value increased l0.8% over the 5 - year period, which was the third lowest percent increase in the region. However, the City's median housing value still ranks third highest in the Coachella Valley. 47 281 Table II -21 Regional Median Housing Value Trends, 2013 - 20i8 Jurisdiction Median Value, owner -occupied units 2013 2018 % Change 2013-2018 Desert Hot Springs $121,600 $174,900 43.8% Palm Springs $267,800 $367,900 37.4% Cathedral City $179,500 $259,900 44.8% Rancho Mirage $518,000 $499,900 -3.5% Palm Desert $308,000 $335,400 9.0% Indian Wells $604,600 $706,800 16.9% La Quinta $348,400 $386,200 1o.8% Indio $192,600 $267,900 39.1% Coachella $137,600 $207,300 50.7% Source: American Community Survey 2009-2013 and 2014-2018 5 -Year Estimates, Table B25077 Table II -22 shows that nearly a third (32.5%) of owner -occupied units were valued between $300,000 to $499,999 in 2018, followed by 26% in the $500,000 to $999,999 range and 21.6% in the $200,000 to $299,999 range. Currently, 36% of owner -occupied units are worth $500,000 or more, and 31.6% are valued below $300,000. Table II -22 Housing Values in La Quinta, 2018 Owner -occupied units value Number Percent Less than $50,000 240 2.2% $50,000 to $99,999 153 1.4% $100,000 to $149,999 135 1.2% $150,000 to $199,999 581 5.2% $200,000 to $299,999 2,404 21.6% $300,000 to $499,999 3,612 32.5% $500,000 to $999,999 2,888 26.0/ $1,000,000 or more 1,112 10.0% Total 11,125 100 Median (dollars) 386,200 Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5 -Year Estimates, Table DP04 New Homes While the volume of new homes shrank by 30.6% from 2017 to 2018, the median price of new homes also decreased by 27.4% from 2018 to 2019.5 Although housing starts do not compare to pre -Recession levels, the market has recovered slowly. 48 282 During the 2014-2021 planning period, the City and non-profit organizations arranged financing for rehabilitation and expansion of affordable housing units at the Washington Street Apartments. The project, located on approximately 11.5 acres, included the substantial rehabilitation of all 72 existing units, construction of 68 new units, construction of 2 new community buildings, laundry facilities, a fitness center, and 2 swimming pools. The Coral Mountain project was also constructed during this period, providing 174 low and moderate income units. Currently pending residential housing projects are listed in the following table. As shown, approximately 2,822 single-family and multi -family units are either under review, approved, or under construction. Table II -23 Pendine~ Residential Proiects Development Name Acres No. of Dwelling Units Type of Dwelling Units Status Mountain Village Residences 0.22 6 multi -family apts. under review Estate Collection at Coral Mountain 20 57 single-family approved SilverRock Phase 1 46.6 29 Single-family approved Travertine 800 1,200 single-family under review Centre at La Quinta 22 133 multi -family condos approved Desert Club Apartments 0.7 16 multi -family apts. approved Floresta 20.8 82 single-family under construction Residence Club at PGA West 3 11 single-family approved Canyon Ride 28.3 74 single-family approved Codorniz 15 142 single-family under construction SilverRock Phase 2 30.5 66 hotel branded condos approved Estates at Griffin Lake 30 78 single-family approved Monterra 14 40 single-family in final phase Signature at PGA West 42 230 single-family approved The Peak Mixed Use 0.38 8 multi -family apts. under review La Quinta Penthouses 12.74 8 multi -family apts. under review Jefferson Street Apartments 5.36 42 multi -family apts. under review Coral Mountain Resort 320 600 single-family under review Total Units: 2,822 Rental Costs The rental housing market in La Quinta includes apartments, townhomes, condos/co-ops, and single-family homes. Table II -24 shows median gross rent by number of bedrooms, according to the American Community Survey. The median gross rent is $1,473. 49 283 Table II -24 Median Gross Rent by Bedrooms (2o18) No. of Bedrooms Median Gross Rent* No bedroom $797 1 bedroom $396 2 bedrooms $1,206 3 bedrooms $1,731 4 bedrooms $2,176 5+ bedrooms not provided Median Gross Rent: $1,473 * estimated, renter -occupied housing units paying cash rent Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5 -Year Estimates, Table 13250:1 Online listings show that current market rental rates generally range from approximately $1,330 to $1,80o for a 1 -bedroom unit; $1,400 to $3,500 for a 2 -bedroom unit; $2,000 to $4,500 for a 3 -bedroom unit; and $2,400 to $5,000 for a 4+ -bedroom unit.6 Although rental rates for some units are much higher than reflected in these ranges, they are generally outliers and not reflective of the majority. No studio apartment listings were found in the search. Affordable Rental Units The majority of apartment rental properties are offered at costs comparable to the average rental costs for the Coachella Valley as a whole. The affordability of rental housing in La Quinta is not directly tied to the density of the project; rather, prices range based on condition, on-site amenities, location, and unit size. New rental projects in La Quinta, particularly affordable projects, are incorporating more aspects of sustainable design and green building. There are 28 affordable single-family rental units in La Quinta, all of which have 3 bedrooms. Additionally, there are nine affordable multi- family housing complexes offering a total of 912 affordable multi -family rental units,? including HUD apartments, Section 8 apartments, public housing apartments, non-profit senior and family low-income apartments, and Low-income tax credit apartments (LI HTC).8 Five of the complexes are available to residents of all ages, including the following: Vista Dunes Courtyard Homes, constructed in 2008, provides 80 rental units affordable to extremely low, very low, and low income households. Vista Dunes was the first very low-income multifamily 6 Rent.com, accessed June 1, 2020. Affordable Housing Program, Single -Family Rental Units and Multi -Family Rental Units, City of La Quinta, updated July 8, 2020. 8 LowlncomeHousing.us, accessed June 1, 2020. 50 284 project of its size in the country to achieve LEED Platinum certification. The project provides a swimming pool, playground, basketball court, and large community multipurpose room. Vista Dunes offers one- to three-bedroom apartments. Wolff Waters Place, built in Zoog, includes 216 green -built one- to four- bedroom apartments that are affordable to extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income households. Wolff Waters Place is a Low -Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) project. Aventine Apartments provides zo units for low and moderate income households. Coral Mountain Apartments includes 174 units for low and moderate income households. Villa Cortina Apartments provides 116 moderate income restricted rentals. Four apartment complexes are dedicated to senior affordable rentals, including: Hadley Villas (79 units) offers extremely low, very low, and low income one -bedroom villas and accepts HUD subsidies. Depending on availability, rent will be based on 30% of the Adjusted Gross Income for persons qualifying for low income housing. Seasons At Miraflores La Quinta is a Low -Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) apartment with 116 extremely low and very low income one - to two-bedroom apartments. The LIHTC gives incentives to builders and developers to provide affordable housing to low income persons. The maximum rent charged is based on the Area Median Income (AMI). Seasons At La Quinta is a Low -Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) apartment and provides 87 extremely low, low, and moderate income apartments. Washington Street Apartments was recently renovated and expanded and re -opened in late 2019. It provides 140 units for extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income seniors, nearly doubling its previous capacity. Thirteen (13) of these units are affordable through Section 8. 51 285 HOUSING NEEDS The following analysis of current City housing conditions addresses housing needs and concerns relative to various segments of the population. Several factors will influence the degree of demand or need for new housing in La Quinta in coming years. The four major "needs" categories considered in this element are: Overpayment: renters and homeowners who pay more than 30 percent of their gross incomes for shelter. Overcrowding: In response to higher housing prices, lower income households must often be satisfied with smaller, less adequate housing for available money. Special Needs: Special needs are those associated with demographic groups that call for very specific program responses, such as preservation of residential hotels or the development of four- bedroom apartments. State law specifically requires analysis of the special housing needs of the elderly, the disabled, single - parent households, large families, farm workers, and homeless persons. Future Housing Needs: To meet future needs of local and regional population and employment growth, SCAG developed the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), which establishes both the projected need for non -market -rate housing and the "fair share" distribution of the projected need to each jurisdiction in each market area. Overpayment and Housing Affordability State housing policy recognizes that cooperative participation of the private and public sectors is necessary to expand housing opportunities to all economic segments of the community. Historically, the private sector generally responds to the majority of the community's housing needs through the production of market -rate housing. However, the percentage of the population on a statewide basis who can afford market -rate housing is declining. The State of California and HUD determined that affordable housing should consume no more than 30 percent of household gross income for lower and moderate -income households. A household spending greater than 30 percent of their gross income on housing is considered to be overpaying. 52 286 Table II -25 lists the percentage of renters and homeowners who overpay for housing, based on 2012-2016 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data. CHAS data are compiled by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to evaluate the extent of housing problems and needs, particularly for low income households, based on Census data. Approximately 36.8 percent of all households in La Quinta spent more than 30 percent of their income on housing costs ("overpay"). A roughly equal proportion of owner and renter households (36.5% and 37.3%, respectively) experienced overpayment. Among extremely low-income households, 61.5 percent of renters and 78.4 percent of homeowners overpaid for housing. Among very low-income households, 7o.8 percent of renters and 85.6 percent of homeowners overpaid for housing. Among low-income households, 64.9 percent of renters and 69.5 percent of homeowners overpaid. Furthermore, many of these households were actually paying more than 50 percent of their gross household income for housing ("severely overpaying"). Note that the proportions of households overpaying or severely overpaying are higher for lower-income households as a group, indicating that the cost burden of overpayment falls disproportionately on lower-income households and renters. These overpayment estimates reflect the need for affordable housing in the City, particularly for lower income households for rental and purchase. 53 287 Table II -25 Overpayment by Income Category and Tenure Household Income' Owners Renters Households % Households less than or = 3o% HAMFI (Extremely Low Income) 58o 870 overpaying 455 78.4 535 61.5 severely overpaying 385 66.4 350 40.2 >30% to less than or =5o% HAMFI (Very Low Income) 835 565 overpaying 715 85.6 400 7o.8 severely overpaying 475 56.9 220 38.9 >50% to less than or=8o% HAMFI (Low Income) 1,375 655 overpaying 955 69.5 425 64.9 severely overpaying 510 37.1 18o 27.5 Subtotal: All lower-income households 2,790 2,090 Subtotal: All lower-income HH overpaying 2,125 76.2 1,36o 65.1 Subtotal: All lower-income HH severely overpaying 1,370 49.1 750 35.9 >8o% to less than or =l00% HAMFI (Moderate Income) 755 425 overpaying 415 55.0 125 29.4 severely overpaying 150 19.9 55 12.9 >100% HAMFI (Moderate and Above Moderate Income) 7,o8o 2,095 overpaying 1,340 18.9 235 11.2 severely overpaying 295 4.2 15 0.7 Total Households 1o,625 4,610 Total Households Overpaying 3,88o 36.5 1,720 37.3 Total Households Severely Overpaying 1 1,815 1 17.1 820 1 17.8 1 HAMFI = HUD Area Median Family Income. HUD and CA HCD use different terminology/methodology to define Household Income, but they are roughly equivalent. The table above matches HCD's terminology ("extremely low, very low, low") commonly used in HE documents to HUD categories, where appropriate. Note that "moderate" refers to 80%-120% of AMI, and thus is noted in two HUD categories accordingly. "Overpaying" is defined as spending >30% of gross household income on housing costs. "Severely overpaying" is defined as spending >50% of gross household income on housing costs. Source: U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, CHAS data for La Quinta, based on 2012-2o16 ACS. A distinction between renter and owner housing overpayment is important because, while homeowners may overextend themselves financially to afford a home purchase, the owner maintains the option of selling the home and may realize tax benefits or appreciation in value. Renters, on the other hand, are limited to the trends of the rental market. Overpayment among the moderate and above moderate -income categories is a reflection of current economic conditions. In addition, some owner households choose to allocate a higher percentage of their disposable monthly income on housing costs because this allocation is justified in light of investment qualities of ownership. 54 288 Table II -26 identifies the affordable rents and purchase prices, by income category, for a one-person household, a two -person household, and a family of four. Affordable rental rates and ownership (mortgage) costs are generally based on 30 percent of gross income. Table II -26 Affordable Housing Costs by Annual Income Income Category' Annual Income Limit Maximum Affordable Monthly Rent Payment 2 Maximum Affordable Monthly Mortgage Payment 3 Maximum Affordable Home Purchase Price Single -Person Household Extremely Low (0-30% of AMI) $15,850 $396 $452 $58,750 Very Low (30%-50% of AM I) $26,400 $660 $753 $97,750 Low (50%-80% of AMI) $42,200 $1,055 $1,054 $136,900 Moderate (80%-120% of AMI) $63,250 $1,581 $1,933 $251,100 Above Moderate (120%+ of AMI) $63,250+ Above $1,581 Above $1,933 Above $251,100 Median $52,700 $1,318 Two -Person Household Extremely Low (0-30% of AMI) $18,100 $453 $508 $66,000 Very Low (30%-50% of AMI) $30,150 $754 $847 $110,000 Low (50%-80% of AMI) $48,200 $1,205 $1,186 $154,000 Moderate (80%-120% of AMI) $72,300 $1,808 $2,174 $282,400 Above Moderate (120%+ of AMI) $72,300+ Above $1,808 Above $2,174 Above $282,400 Median $60,250 $1,506 Four -Person Household Extremely Low (0-30% of AMI) $26,200 $655 $565 $73,450 Very Low (30%-50% of AMI) $37,650 $941 $941 $122,200 Low 50%-80% of AMI $60,250 $1,506 $1,318 $171,250 Moderate 80%-120% of AMI $90,350 $2,259 $2,4i6 $313,650 Above Moderate (120%+ of AMI) $90,350+ Above $2,259 Above $2,416 Above $313,650 Median $75,300 $1,883 ' AMI = area median income. 2 Based on 30 percent of monthly income. 3 From Riverside County/City of La Quinta zozo Affordable Ownership Housing Cost Limits. Assumes single -person household lives in 1 -bedroom unit; 2 -person household lives in 2 -bedroom unit; 4 -person household lives in 3 -bedroom unit. 4 Converts the "Maximum Affordable Monthly Mortgage Payment" to a home value, assuming 10% down, 15-yearfixed, 4.0% interest rate, 1.25% taxes and homeowner's insurance monthly. Source: HCD zozo State Income Limits Affordability of Homeownership Home values have generally increased in the Coachella Valley during 2013 to 2018 (see Table II -21). Some new and fairly new homes are for sale at prices that are affordable to median and moderate -income households (see Table II -22). However, many homes are out of reach for lower income and many moderate households in the City. Table II -22 shows that La Quinta has a wide range of housing values. The median housing value is $386,200. Units valued at less than $1oo,000, which 289 would be affordable to extremely low income households and very low single -person households, comprise only 3.6% of all units in the City. Only 4.8% of ownership units are valued at less than $15o,000, and only lo% of ownership units are valued at less than $200,000, which would be in the range affordable to low-income households. Therefore, it could be challenging for extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income households to enter the homeownership market. To expand homeownership opportunities, the City coordinates with nonprofit agencies that provide relief to low-income residents and develop affordable ownership units, and assists with securing third party financing. The City also supports the use of affordable housing rent -to -own transition programs; developers who agree to set aside all or a portion of their units for low-income households can receive federal tax credits under the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program, and lower income residents have opportunities to invest and gain equity in their homes. The City also provides interested homeowners with information about grants and other resources available for home repairs and/or rehabilitation. Affordability of Rental Costs As shown previously in Table II -26 median rent for a 1 -bedroom unit is $396; the above table shows that single -person households in all income categories could afford a monthly rent payment of $396 or higher and, therefore, should be able to afford a 1 -bedroom unit. Median rent for a 2 -bedroom unit is $1,2o6; however, the table above shows that two - person households in the extremely low and very low-income categories would not have enough income to afford such a unit. Median rent for a 3 -bedroom unit is $1,731; however, the table above shows that four - person households in the extremely low, very low, and low-income categories would not have enough income to afford such a unit. Hundreds of lower and moderate -income households are served by existing affordable housing and other projects. With the market -rate rental market essentially closed to extremely low and very low-income households, however, it is evident that their major source of affordable housing will continue to be found through income -restricted housing projects, housing voucher programs, accessory dwelling units, and employee/guest houses. Overcrowding The Bureau of the Census defines overcrowded housing units as "those in excess of one person per room average" and severely overcrowded housing units as "those in excess of 1.5 persons per room average". 56 290 Overcrowding may occur when a family or household cannot afford adequate living space, houses extended family members, or is sharing inadequate living space with nonfamily members. When more than one family shares a housing unit it is called doubling. Households with lower incomes may permit overcrowding to derive additional income, or there may be insufficient supply of housing units in the community to accommodate the demand. La Quinta has 577 overcrowded and severely overcrowded housing units, which represents 3.7% of the total 15,505 occupied units in the City. Table II -27 shows that 3.2 percent of the total occupied housing units were moderately overcrowded in 2o18, an increase from 2.4 percent from 2009-2011. A higher incidence of overcrowding was experienced among the rental tenure group. Although renter households constituted only 28.2 percent of all households in the City, approximately 1o.9 percent of renters experienced overcrowded conditions, with 1.6 percent of all renters experiencing severe overcrowding. In comparison, within owner -occupied households, o.9 percent experienced overcrowded conditions, with o.1 percent experiencing severe overcrowding. Table II -27 Overcrowding Source: American Community Survey 2014-2o18 5 -Year Estimates, Table 625014. Note: Universe is total households in occupied housing units. Housing units that exceed 1.o or more persons per room are considered moderately overcrowded. Housing units that exceed 1.5 or more persons per room are considered severely overcrowded. Special Populations The state requires that the special needs of certain disadvantaged groups be addressed in the Housing Element. Selected populations with special housing needs include seniors, persons with disabilities, large families, single -parent households, the homeless, and farm workers. 57 291 Owner Renter Total Households %of %of %of Status Number Owner Number Renters Number Total Not Overcrowded 11,025 99.1 3,903 89.1 14,928 96.3 Moderately Overcrowded 86 0.8 406 9.3 492 3.2 Severely Overcrowded 14 0.1 71 1.6 85 0.5 Total 11,125 1 100.0 1 4,380 1 100.0 1 15,505 1 100.0 Source: American Community Survey 2014-2o18 5 -Year Estimates, Table 625014. Note: Universe is total households in occupied housing units. Housing units that exceed 1.o or more persons per room are considered moderately overcrowded. Housing units that exceed 1.5 or more persons per room are considered severely overcrowded. Special Populations The state requires that the special needs of certain disadvantaged groups be addressed in the Housing Element. Selected populations with special housing needs include seniors, persons with disabilities, large families, single -parent households, the homeless, and farm workers. 57 291 Seniors The special housing needs of senior residents are an important concern for the City of La Quinta, since many retired persons residing in the City are likely to be on fixed low incomes. Besides affordability concerns, seniors may have special needs related to housing design and location. With regard to housing design needs, seniors may require ramps, handrails, and lower cupboards and counters, etc., to allow greater access and mobility. They also may need special security devices for their homes for greater self-protection. Seniors may also have special needs regarding location, such as the need for access to public facilities (i.e., medical and shopping) and transit. In many instances, seniors prefer to stay in their own dwellings rather than relocate to a retirement community and may need assistance making home repairs or modifications. Every effort should be made to maintain their dignity, self-respect, safety, and quality of life. As shown in the following table, 5,883 householders (37.9% of all householders) are 65 years or older. Senior households comprise 43.8% of all owner -occupied units, and 23.0% of all renter -occupied units. Table II -28 City of La Quinta Senior Households by Tenure Householder Age Owner -Occupied Renter -Occupied Households %' Households Non -Senior Households Under 65 years 6,251 56.2 3371 77.0 Senior Households 65 to 74 years 3,015 27.1 524 12.0 75 to 84 years 1,519 13.7 3z6 7.4 85 years and over 340 3.1 159 3.6 Subtotal, Senior Households 4,874 43.8 1,009 23.0 Total Households 11,125 100.0 4,380 100.0 Source: American Community Survey 2014-2018 5 -Year Estimates, Table 825007 ' differences due to roundinpr According to the American Community Survey, an estimated 896 seniors have incomes below the poverty level, which represents 9.0% of all seniors in the City. The 2020 federal poverty guideline for one person is $12,76o. The major source of income for most seniors is Social Security, and the average Social Security monthly benefit is $1,503.9 Therefore, a single senior paying 30% of their monthly Social Security income on housing costs would pay $451 toward housing costs. However, La Quinta 9 Social Security Administration Fact Sheet, December 2019 Beneficiary Data. 58 292 median rents are $797 for a studio unit, and $396 for a one -bedroom unit (most likely not a separate unit given the relative price). A two -person senior household would have $902 available for housing costs, but median rents are $1,2o6 for a 2 -bedroom unit. Therefore, Social Security alone most likely cannot adequately cover housing costs in the City. Table II -29 Senior Incomes Below the Poverty Level Age Group No. of Residents with Income in Past 12 Months Below Poverty Level 65 to 74 years 541 75 years and over 355 Total 896 Source: 2014-2o18 ACS 5 -Year Estimates, Table 617001 Apart from privately owned housing units, the City has several affordable rental options for senior living as discussed previously under rental units. They include: Seasons Senior Apartments, which offers 87 senior units in the extremely low, low, and moderate affordable price range; Seasons at Miraflores, a project completed in 2003 that supplies 118 senior units in the extremely low and very low income price range; Washington Street Apartments, which offers 14o extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income rentals (13 of these units are affordable through Section 8); and Hadley Villas Senior Apartments, an affordable project completed in 2004 that offers 79 units in the extremely low, very low, low, and above moderate income price range. Continued construction of multifamily units will aid greatly in meeting the needs of seniors currently overpaying for rental units. Numerous senior support services are provided by various organizations, including those listed in the following table. There are also numerous privately operated assisted living facilities and home care service providers in the City and Coachella Valley. 59 293 Table II -30 Senior Resources Organization Services Provided Assisted living and home care providers (various private providers) Housing, personal care, health care, housekeeping, meals Braille Institute Coachella Valley Neighborhood Center Rehabilitation, enrichment classes, in-home support for the visually impaired La Quinta Wellness Center Health/fitness programs, social events, classes, homebound outreach, food distribution Eisenhower Memory Care Center Adult day center for neuro -cognitive impairments FIND Food Bank Food distribution Hidden Harvest Food distribution Jewish Family Services of the Desert Advocacy, case management services Riverside County Office on Aging Medical case management, counseling, transportation assistance, meals Salvation Army Food distribution, social events, community programs Senior Advocates of the Desert Public benefits and social services assistance, emergency financial assistance SunLine Transit Agency For seniors and disabled residents: Half -Fare Program, Taxi Voucher Program, Sun Dial paratransit service, bus travel training People with Disabilities A "disability" is a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one of more major life activities. Housing elements must analyze the special housing needs of people with disabilities. Senate Bill No. 812 2011) requires that the analysis include individuals with developmental disabilities. A developmental disability is defined by Section 4512 of the Welfare and Institutions Code as "a disability that originates before an individual becomes 18 years old, continues or can be expected to continue indefinitely, and constitutes a substantial disability for that individual." This includes intellectual disabilities, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, autism, and related conditions, but does not include other handicapping conditions that are solely physical in nature. Physical and developmental disabilities can hinder access to housing units of traditional design, and potentially limit the ability to earn adequate income. The three major housing needs of the disabled are access, location, and affordability. Housing needs for individuals with disabilities can range from traditional independent living environments, to supervised group quarters, to institutions where medical care and other services are provided onsite. Important housing considerations for this group include proximity to public transportation, accessibility of the home and surroundings, access to medical and other public services, and affordability. 60 294 Disabled persons often require specially designed dwellings to provide access not only within the dwelling, but to and from the unit. Special modifications to permit free access are very important in maintaining safety, independence and dignity. The California Administrative Code Title 24 Requirements set forth access and adaptability requirements for the physically handicapped. These regulations apply to public buildings such as government facilities and motels, and require that ramps, larger door widths, restroom modifications, etc., be designed to enable free access to the handicapped. Such standards are not mandatory of new single-family residential construction. A number of disabled persons receive supplemental Social Security Income and are on fixed incomes. Increasing inflation and housing costs adversely affect these individuals' ability to secure affordable housing. The 2014-2o18 ACS identified 4,722 persons in the City with disabilities, of which 2,484 (52.6%) were persons over the age of 65. Individuals may be affected by one or more types of disability. The second most affected age groups are residents 18 to 64 years (42.2%). The table below identifies the number of disabilities, by type, for La Quinta residents. The most prevalent disabilities are ambulatory difficulties (26.6%) and independent living difficulties (17.8%). Group homes are listed as residential care facilities in the Zoning Ordinance, and are permitted by right in all residential zones. There are no use -specific standards for group homes, and they would require only a building permit for construction if occurring in a single family home environment, and with approval of a Site Development Permit if proposed as an apartment or similar multi -family project in the higher density zones. This same requirement also applies to apartment or multi -family project for any type of housing. 61 295 Table II -31 City of La Quinta Number of Disabilities. by Disability Tvne' Disability by Age and Type Number of Disabilities Percent of Total Disabilities' Under a e 18 242 2.8 Hearing Difficulty 4 0.05 Vision Difficulty 91 1.1 Cognitive Difficulty 130 1.5 Ambulatory Difficulty o 0.0 Self -Care Difficulty 17 0.2 Independent Living Difficulty Ages 18-64 3088 37.4 Hearing Difficulty 291 3.4 Vision Difficulty 413 4.8 Cognitive Difficulty 845 9.9 Ambulatory Difficulty 746 8.8 Self -Care Difficulty 38o 4.5 Independent Living Difficulty 513 6.o Ages 65+ 5,088 59.7 Hearing Difficulty 1,024 12.0 Vision Difficulty 420 4.9 Cognitive Difficulty 548 6.4 Ambulatory Difficulty 1,530 18.0 Self -Care Difficulty 56o 6.6 Independent Living Difficulty 1,006 11.8 Total Disabilities 8,518 100.0 Total Civilian Non -Institutionalized Population with a Disability 4,722 differences due to rounding * data not provided Source: American Community Survey 2014-2o18 5 -Year Estimates, Table S1810 The California Department of Developmental Services (DDS) implements a statewide system of community-based services for people with developmental disabilities and their families. DDS contracts with the Inland Regional Center (IRC) in Riverside to provide and coordinate local services in Riverside County, including the City of La Quinta. IRC currently (2021) serves 172 clients who are La Quinta residents. Facilities and services in the Coachella Valley that assist persons with developmental and physical disabilities include: o La Quinta Wellness Center connects seniors with Riverside County Meals on Wheels, an outreach program for homebound seniors, and SunLine Transit Agency for Dial -a -Ride transportation services. 62 296 o Angel View, a non-profit organization based in Desert Hot Springs, operates 19 six -bed group homes for children and young adults with developmental and physical disabilities. The homes provide 24-hour nursing and/or attendant care and can accommodate loo+ individuals at a time. There are 16 homes in the Coachella Valley, including 12 in Desert Hot Springs, 3 in Palm Springs, and 1 in Thousand Palms. o The Inland Regional Center uses person -centered planning when developing a Consumer's Individual Program Plan (IPP). The IPP outlines the goals developed by the Consumer and their support team, as well as the services and supports they will receive to help those goals. Many of the services/supports listed in the IPP are funded by Inland Regional Center. However, services and supports may also be provided by other agencies such as the Social Security Administration, school districts, county agencies, etc. o Canyon Springs in Cathedral City is a State developmental center operated by DDS with 55 licensed beds for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The treatment program at Canyon Springs is designed to provide its residents with work/job training, including formal educational opportunities and new home life and living skills. Referrals for admission are made by Regional Centers. Each person is assessed and will participate in developing and carrying out an Individual Program Plan. Residents have opportunities to participate in a variety of integrated activities in natural environments at home, at work, and in the community. o Desert AIDS Project - Palm Springs: Dedicated to providing support, care, and treatment to people with AIDS and related illnesses and education to the general community. The Desert AIDS project serves the psychological needs of AIDS clients, provides case management, anonymous HIV testing, legal services, a program of protection and prevention, and referral and recreational services. o FISH of Lower Coachella Valley - Coachella: Provides 2-3 days of emergency food for families/individuals in need. Clients may return for assistance every 14 days. o Desert Arc - Palm Desert: A comprehensive service delivery agency for people with developmental and intellectual disabilities; it provides programs to develop or enhance self-help skills, life enrichment skills, and prevocational and vocational skills. 63 297 o Braille Institute - Palm Desert: A nonprofit school providing daytime classes and other support programs and services for people with blindness and vision loss in the Coachella Valley. Large Family Households The 2014-2o18 ACS reported 1,543 households in the City of La Quinta with five or more persons, which constitutes 10 percent of all households. This represents a 17 percent increase from the 2009-2011 ACS (1,319 households). Large -family households generally require larger dwellings with more bedrooms to meet their housing needs, but these households often experience difficulty securing adequate housing suitable for their expanded needs due to income limitations and/or lack of adequate housing stock. Difficulties in securing housing large enough to accommodate all members of a household are heightened for renters, as multifamily rental units are typically smaller than single- family units. Table II -32 presents tenure of housing units by number of persons in the household based on 2014-2o18 ACS data. The table shows that large households are roughly equally comprised of owner occupied and renter occupied households (805 owner occupied, 738 renter occupied). Large owner -occupied units comprise 7.2 percent of all owner -occupied housing, and large renter -occupied units comprise 16.8 percent of all renter -occupied units. Table II -32 Large Households by Tenure Number of Persons in Household Owner -Occupied Households % Renter -Occupied Households %1 One to Four 10,320 92.8 3,642 83.2 Five 577 5.2 410 9.4 Six 228 2.0 264 6.o Seven or More o 0 64 1.5 Total Households with 5+ Persons 805 7.2 738 16.8 Total Households 11025 100 4,380 100 differences due to rounding Source: American Communitv Survey 2014-2o18 5 -Year Estimates. Table B2500q Multifamily housing rental stock consists primarily of one-, two -and three-bedroom units. Single family development in the Cove is made up largely of units with three bedrooms, although four-bedroom units are also present in limited supply. As shown in Table II -32, there are 3,284 units with 4 or more bedrooms, which exceeds the current number of large families. Citywide single-family construction activity has created a 64 298 supply of housing for large families not available in multifamily housing, although prices for larger units tend to be affordable only to moderate and above moderate income households. Suitable housing products for large families include those with sufficient bedrooms that are near childcare facilities, schools, recreational areas, and public transit. In the current housing stock, 577 units (3.7% of all units citywide) are overcrowded, and the majority (82.7%) of them are rental units. There are 332 units with 5 or more bedrooms (1.6% of total units citywide), and only 8 of them are rental units, so there may be a need for additional larger units, particularly rental units. Given the lack of larger rental units, programs that assist large families with homeownership would be beneficial. Reduced parking standards for units with 5 or more bedrooms may also incentivize development of larger rental units. For instance, certain affordable housing developments may be granted a maximum parking ratio of two and one- half parking spaces for four or more bedrooms (La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.60.26o.E. Incentives and Concessions). Single -Parent Households Single -parent heads of household constitute a group with serious housing concerns. In general, families with single -parent heads of household may experience a higher incidence of poverty than other household configurations. In particular, female -headed households can experience lower incomes, higher living expenses, higher poverty rates, and low rates of homeownership. Finding adequate and affordable housing is a high priority. Special considerations for this population include proximity to schools, childcare, employment, and health care. Table II -33 Single -Parent Household Characteristics Source: American Community Survey 2014-2ol8 5 -Year Estimates, Table DP02; ACS 2o18 SUDDlemental Estimates Detailed Table K201701 65 299 No. of Household Type Households % of Total Total households 15,505 100 Male -headed households 747 4.8 With own children under 18 437 2.8 Female -headed households 1,433 9.2 With own children under 18 788 5.1 Total Families, Income in the Past 12 Months Below Poverty Level 625 100 Male Householders, Income in the Past 12 Months Below Poverty Level 0 0 Female Householders, Income in the Past 12 Months Below Poverty Level 255 40.8 Source: American Community Survey 2014-2ol8 5 -Year Estimates, Table DP02; ACS 2o18 SUDDlemental Estimates Detailed Table K201701 65 299 As shown in Table II -33, there were 2,18o single -parent -headed family households in La Quinta, or 14% of all households, in 2018. Male -headed family households comprise 4.8% of all households, and female -headed family households comprise 9.2%. As shown in the table above, of the 1,433 female -headed family households in La Quinta, more than half (55%) of the female -headed households have children under age 18. While no male -headed households were below the poverty level in the past 12 months, female -headed households comprise 40.8% of all families with incomes below the poverty level. The number of single -parent -headed and female -headed family households both declined compared to 2010 (2,026 single -parent households, of which 1,461 were female -headed). However,17.8 percent of the City's female -headed families live in poverty as compared to 16.1 percent in 2010. Many single parents do not have the resources to enter the housing market as a homeowner. Although the incidence of single -parent households below the poverty level is low (1.6% of all households) in the City, addressing the housing needs for single parents may require innovative housing solutions. Strategies need to be considered to provide more housing opportunities to these households, such as new multifamily housing, mixed-use units, and subsidized single-family housing. Flexible educational programs and job training services can help householders obtain higher paying jobs. Farmworkers Based on an analysis of farm labor and the diminishing amount of farmland in the City of La Quinta and surrounding rural areas, the need for farm worker housing has declined. Most agricultural land and farmworker housing in the Coachella Valley are located in the eastern valley in and around the communities of Coachella, Thermal, and Mecca. While the zoning map includes a Low -Density Agriculture/Equestrian Residential Overlay, there is no land designated specifically for agricultural uses in the City's General Plan and zoning maps. There are also no zoning policies or restrictions specific to farms or farmworker housing. Based on 2014-2018 ACS data, there were 352 persons employed in "agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining" in the City in 2018, which constitutes 2% of the City's civilian employed population 16 years and over (see Table II -6). It is probable that a number of occupations classified as agricultural are related to nursery operations or landscape maintenance. 66 300 Responsibility for providing housing for farm workers originally lay with the growers that employed the workers. This practice was discontinued, however, due to high costs for liability insurance and maintenance. Low income groups often need housing near work. For farmworkers, this means that housing is needed in rural, agricultural areas rather than urban areas. In the Coachella Valley, the principal housing options for migrant and local seasonal farm workers are family-owned homes, private rental houses, second units, apartments, and mobile homes. Farmworker housing does not appear to be a significant need in La Quinta. Nevertheless, farmworker households will benefit from rental subsidies and incentives provided by the City for developers to maintain affordable units that are available to all segments of the population. Extremely Low -Income Households Extremely low-income (ELI) households are households earning less than 30 percent of the HUD Area Median Family Income (HAMFI). The AMI for a 4 -person household in Riverside County is $75,300. ELI household incomes are defined by HCD and HUD as those earning less than $26,2oo. These households often face significant financial challenges to affording adequate housing and, therefore, are considered a subpopulation with special housing needs. Table II -34 Housing Problems for Extremely Low -Income Households * housing problems include incomplete kitchen facilities, incomplete plumbing facilities, more than 1 person per room (overcrowding), and cost burden greater than 30% of income. Source: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, CHAS, based on the 2012-2o16 ACS. Existing Needs According to 2012-2o16 CHAS data, there are 1,45o extremely low- income households (9.5% of total households) in La Quinta, consisting of 58o owner households and 87o renter households. Proportionally more owners (79.3%) than renters (62.1%) experience housing problems, including incomplete kitchen and plumbing facilities, overcrowding, and cost burden greater than 30% of income (overpayment). 67 301 Owners Renters Total Total Number of ELI Households 580 870 1,450 Percent with any housing 79.3% 62.1% 69.0% problems* Percent with Cost Burden >30% of 78.4% 61.5% 68.3% income Percent with Cost Burden >50% of 66.4% 40.2% 50.7% income * housing problems include incomplete kitchen facilities, incomplete plumbing facilities, more than 1 person per room (overcrowding), and cost burden greater than 30% of income. Source: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, CHAS, based on the 2012-2o16 ACS. Existing Needs According to 2012-2o16 CHAS data, there are 1,45o extremely low- income households (9.5% of total households) in La Quinta, consisting of 58o owner households and 87o renter households. Proportionally more owners (79.3%) than renters (62.1%) experience housing problems, including incomplete kitchen and plumbing facilities, overcrowding, and cost burden greater than 30% of income (overpayment). 67 301 Extremely low-income households are sensitive to unexpected changes in income and expenditures, so overpayment for housing could result in an inability to meet other important or emergency needs. Projected Needs To calculate projected housing needs, the City assumed 50% of its very low income regional housing need assessment (RHNA) are extremely low income households. From its very low income need of 420 units, the City has a projected need of 210 units for extremely low income households. Many of the City's existing and proposed very low-income rental projects provide housing affordable to extremely low-income individuals, couples, and families with children. Extremely low-income households are also eligible to receive rental assistance in La Quinta through the County of Riverside Housing Authority's Section 8 voucher program. Small ELI households may also find an affordable housing option in Single Room Occupancy (SRO) hotels, accessory dwelling units (ADUs), and guest houses. SROs are permitted in the Regional Commercial zone with a Conditional Use Permit. A guest house/employee quarters is permitted as an accessory use in all residential zones, and can provide on-site living quarters for a homeowner's family members, staff, and guests. During the 2014-2021 planning period, the City updated the Zoning Code to remove constraints to the development of ADUs. ADUs are permitted as an accessory use in all residential zones and have some flexibility regarding parking and utility requirements. SROs, guest houses/employee quarters, and ADUs may be important resources for ELI households, including seniors on a fixed-income, single -parents, disabled persons, college students, and low-wage earning workers. Homeless Persons The Riverside County Department of Public Social Services completed a homeless count in 2020 for all cities and some unincorporated areas in the County. The Homeless Point -In -Time (PIT) Count is a federally mandated annual count of homeless individuals used to evaluate the extent of homelessness. The data provide a snapshot of homelessness on a particular date and time. The 2020 PIT Count for Riverside County determined there were 3 unsheltered persons in La Quinta, including individuals living on streets or in vehicles, encampments, storage structures, or other places unfit 68 302 for human habitation.10 This represents o.1% of the unsheltered individuals in Riverside County, and 0.5% of County Supervisory District 4 which includes the Coachella Valley and the City of Blythe. The actual number of homeless may be higher given that many individuals, particularly women and youth, remain hidden for safety or stay in locations where they cannot be seen. This represents a decrease from the County's 2019 PIT Count (9 individuals in La Quints). Fluctuations in the number of homeless individuals documented from year to year may be due to actual increases or decreases and/or changes in counting and surveying methods, such as increased coverage by more volunteers or enhanced promotion and awareness strategies of the overall count. Table II -35 describes the demographic characteristics of unsheltered people in La Quinta. 10 zozo Riverside County Homeless Point -In -Time Count and Survey Report, County of Riverside Department of Public Social Services, June zozo, pages 83 and 122. 69 303 Table II -35 Characteristics of Unsheltered Individuals in La Quinta Source: zozo Riverside County Homeless Point -In -Time Count and Survey Report, County of Riverside Department of Public Social Services, June zozo. Dales 83 and 122. Particularly sensitive homeless subpopulations include veterans, the chronically homeless, those with mental health conditions and physical disabilities, victims of domestic violence, and others. The zozo PIT Count also identified pet owners because of concerns that unsheltered individuals were not seeking shelter because they wanted to keep their pets. As shown in the following table, of the 3 unsheltered individuals interviewed in La Quinta, one had substance abuse issues, one was newly homeless, and one was a pet owner. 70 304 Number Percent of Total Race American Indian o o% Asian o o% Black 1 33% White z 66% Multiple Races o o% Native Hawaiian o o% Unknown Race o o% Ethnicity Hispanic z 66% Non -Hispanic 1 33% Ethnicity Unknown o o% Gender Male 3 l00% Female o o% Trans ender o o% Gender Non -Conforming o o% Unknown Gender o o% Age Adults (>24 yrs) 3 i00% Youth (18-24) o o% Children (< 18) o o% Unknown Age o o% Living Situation Woods 1 33% Vehicle 1 33% Street 1 33% Encampment o o% Under Bridge o o% Park o o% Other o o% Bus o o% Abandoned Building o o% TOTAL UNSHELTERED INDIVIDUALS = 3 Source: zozo Riverside County Homeless Point -In -Time Count and Survey Report, County of Riverside Department of Public Social Services, June zozo. Dales 83 and 122. Particularly sensitive homeless subpopulations include veterans, the chronically homeless, those with mental health conditions and physical disabilities, victims of domestic violence, and others. The zozo PIT Count also identified pet owners because of concerns that unsheltered individuals were not seeking shelter because they wanted to keep their pets. As shown in the following table, of the 3 unsheltered individuals interviewed in La Quinta, one had substance abuse issues, one was newly homeless, and one was a pet owner. 70 304 Table II -36 Homeless Unsheltered Subpomlations Subpopulation Number' Percent of Total Substance Abuse 1 33% PTSD o 0% Mental Health Conditions o 0% Physical Disability o 0% Developmental Disability o 0% Brain Injury o 0% Victim of Domestic Violence o 0% AIDS or HIV o 0% Veterans o 0% Chronically Homeless o 0% Adults Only 3 100% Children Only o 0% Families with Children o 0% Pet Owners 1 33% Newly Homeless 1 33% Seniors (>_ 6o) o 0% Jail Release (within last 12 months) o 0% ' Results of interviews with 3 homeless individuals. Source: 202o Riverside County Homeless Point -In -Time Count and Survey Report, County of Riverside Department of Public Social Services, June zozo, DaLles 8,� and 122. Emergency, transitional, and supportive housing facilities and services can serve some of the short- and long-term needs of homeless individuals. Emergency shelters provide temporary shelter, often with minimal supportive services. Supportive housing is linked to support services intended to improve the individual's ability to independently live and work in the community. Transitional housing is provided with financial assistance and support services to help homeless people achieve independent living within 24 months. Supportive and transitional housing are often in apartment -style units. If a person or family finds themselves homeless, they may go to regional facilities provided by the county, City of Indio, or City of Palm Springs for assistance. The available homeless facilities in the Coachella Valley are listed in Table II -37. A recent analysis of Coachella Valley homelessness found that emergency shelter and transitional housing are not operating at full capacity; the occupancy rate was 79% in 2o18 despite high rates of unsheltered single adults." Lower occupancy may be partially because some beds are reserved for domestic violence victims and youth rather than the general population. " "The Path Forward: Recommendations to Advance an End to Homelessness in the Coachella Valley," Barbara Poppe and Associates, November 27, 2018, page 21. 71 305 The Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG), of which the City of La Quinta is a member, contracted with Path of Life Ministries to operate its Coachella Valley Housing First program that placed people in permanent housing before addressing issues such as joblessness or behavioral health. Program results were positive, with 81% of the 242 people who exited the program in the first year able to find permanent housing, and all participants who exited the program more than doubling their monthly incomes.12 In late 2019, CVAG initiated an effort to advance the goals of CV Housing First through a collaborative approach called the Coachella Valley Homelessness Engagement & Action Response Team (CVHEART).13 The program is expected to establish a formal structure for regional homelessness policies and programs, identify funding opportunities for future projects, and expand multi -agency cooperation and participation. In addition to its own efforts to end homelessness, the City of La Quinta's membership in CVAG will assure its continued participation in regional efforts. The City's zoning permits emergency shelters by right in all nonresidential districts except Village Commercial. The non-residential zones, including Neighborhood Commercial, Community Commercial and Regional Commercial, are all located on major arterial roadways, and close to transit stops. This allows for easy access to services and transport. Emergency shelters proposed in an existing building would require no permitting other than building permits for tenant improvements (if any). If an emergency shelter were to be proposed as a new building, it would be subject to approval of a Site Development Permit, which would be approved by either the Director or the Planning Commission (Director approval is allowed for buildings under 10,000 square feet on pads within existing commercial centers). The Site Development Permit consists of a review of site plan and building design to assure compliance with the City's development standards. A Site Development Permit, therefore, does not affect the use proposed, and emergency shelters are permitted by right. The findings for a Site Development Permit require consistency with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance; conformance with CEQA; and compatibility of site design, landscaping and architecture to surrounding buildings. The Site Development Permit addresses only zoning standards, and does not address land use. Therefore, the use of the building is not considered, and the permit is based on an analysis of setbacks, building heights and 12 "CV Housing First Program Evaluation: Examining the Clients Served in the First Year: July 2017 to June 2o18," Health Assessment and Research for Communities, September 2o18, page 55• 13 "CV Heart: A Collaborative and Regional Approach to Homelessness in Coachella Valley," Greg Rodriguez, January zozo. 72 306 parking spaces. There are no parking requirements for emergency shelters. Program H -5.4.b. has been added to assure that emergency shelters are added to the parking table, and that parking only be required for employees. There are over 38o acres of vacant commercial land in the City (Land Use Element, Table II -3). Transitional shelters for homeless persons or victims of domestic abuse are conditionally permitted in Regional Commercial and Major Community Facilities zoned districts. One use that may potentially provide housing for those in need of shelter is single room occupancy (SRO) hotels. SRO hotels, as defined in the municipal code, are residential facilities that are rented on a weekly or longer basis that may or may not have private bathroom and kitchen facilities. SRO hotels are conditionally permitted in Regional Commercial zoned districts. 73 307 Table II -37 Coachella Valley Homeless Shelter Resources Shelter Name Type of Shelter City Clientele or Needs Number Served of Beds Martha's Village and Kitchen Emergency Indio General 120 Shelter From The Storm Emergency Palm Desert Domestic Violence zo County of Riverside, Desert Emergency Cathedral City, General 90 (30 in Healthcare District and (seasonal) Palm Springs, each city) Foundation' Desert Hot Springs Operation Safe House Emergency Thousand Palms Transitional: youth, 20/15 /Transitional young adults Path of Life Ministries Inc. Emergency/ Undisclosed — General 12/2 Rapid Rehousing Coachella Valley Coachella Valley Rescue Emergency/ Indio families with children, 3oo/18 Mission Rapid Rehousing individuals Desert AIDS Project Permanent Palm Springs HIV/AIDS 80 Desert Horizon Permanent Desert Hot Jewish Family 18 Springs Services Desert Vista Permanent Palm Springs Jewish Family 40 Services Desert Vista Permanent Permanent Palm Springs Disabled Men and 35 Supportive Housing Expansion Women (new in 2o18) Riverside University Health Permanent Cathedral City Behavioral Health 25 System — Behavioral Health Episcopal Community Services Permanent Scattered Site — Persons With 40 Coachella Valley Disabilities and Chronically Homeless Shelter Plus Care TBRA Permanent Indio Persons With 23 Disabilities/ Mentally III Source: "The Path Forward: Recommendations to Advance an End to Homelessness in the Coachella Valley," Barbara Poppe and Associates, November 27, 2o18, Appendix 3. ' dhcd.org. FAIR HOUSING The California Fair Employment and Housing Act generally prohibits housing discrimination with respect to race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial status, source of income, disability, genetic information, or veteran or military status. AB 686 requires that all housing elements due on or after January 1, 2021, must contain an Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH) consistent with the core elements of the analysis required by the federal Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Final Rule of July 16, 2015. 74 308 Understate law, AFFH means "taking meaningful actions, in addition to combatting discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics." The City has completed the following: 1. Include a Program that Affirmatively Furthers Fair Housing and Promotes Housing Opportunities throughout the Community for Protected Classes (applies to housing elements beginning January 1, 2019). 2. Conduct an Assessment of Fair Housing, which includes summary of fair housing issues, an analysis of available federal, state, and local data and local knowledge to identify fair housing issues, and an assessment of the contributing factors to the fair housing issues. 3. Prepare the Housing Element Land Inventory and Identification of Sites through the lens of Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing. To comply with AB 686, the City has completed the following outreach and analysis. Outreach As discussed in the Public Participation section of this Housing Element, the City focused its outreach efforts on community and stakeholder workshops, study sessions, information disseminated through the City's website, electronic mail notifications, and public hearings. The community and stakeholder workshops consisted of a Planning Commission presentation (December 8, 2020), a City Council update (December 15, 2020), a Housing Commission presentation (January 12, 2021) a Joint Planning Commission and City Council Study Session presentation (August 3, 2021) and a public workshop (January 13, 2021) attended by more than 15 community members. The City received a variety of comments at these workshops, including: ❖ Concerns about how to address overpayment by both owners and renters. ❖ Concerns regarding whether short term vacation rentals are impacting the availability of housing for permanent residents. ❖ Assuring that land inventory sites are provided for all types of housing. 75 309 ❖ The difficulty of financing new projects, which now require two or three times as many funding sources as in the past. ❖ Assuring that development standards, fees and processing times reflect the needs of affordable housing projects. Workshop invitations were sent to local and regional development entities, advocacy groups, and interested parties via email. In addition, workshops were advertised on the City's website, social media, and in email blasts to the City's extensive resident email list. Once certified by HCD, the Housing Element Update will be presented in public hearings before both the Planning Commission and City Council, with the documents available for public review at City Hall and on the City's website. Assessment of Fair Housing California Government Code Section 65583 (lo)(A)(ii) requires the City of La Quinta to analyze areas of segregation, racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity, and disproportionate housing needs, including displacement risk. The 2021 California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) Opportunity Areas rate resource levels based on access to effective educational opportunities for both children and adults, concentration of poverty, environmental pollution, and employment levels and proximity to jobs, among others. High and highest resource areas are those with high index scores for a variety of educational, environmental, and economic indicators. Moderate resource areas have access to many of the same resources as high and highest resource areas but may have fewer educational opportunities, lower median home values, longer commutes to places of employment, or other factors that lower their indices for educational, environmental, and economic indicators. As shown in Exhibit II -14 TCAC Opportunity Areas, the majority of the urban area in the City is considered "High Resource". Portions along the northern and western boundaries are considered "Highest Resource", and one area on the eastern boundary adjacent to the City of Indio and unincorporated Riverside County is considered "Moderate Resource". The southern end of the City is considered "High Segregation & Poverty". Areas of high segregation and poverty are those that have an overrepresentation of people of color compared to the County, and at least 30% of the population in these areas is below the federal poverty line ($26,5oo annually for a family of four in 2021). Within the City and surrounding jurisdictions, TCAC and HCD designated portions of the City of Indio as "Low Resource," which have the most limited access to all resources. 76 310 Rancho Mirage Thousand Palms Palm Desert Rosa San Jacinto Mountains Natrona! Monument 1 L ���init;i Indio Indio Coachella Coac9ella U TCAC Opportunity Areas 2021 � Highest Resource U High Resource Q Moderate Resource (Rapidly Changing) Moderate Resource Low Resource t High Segregation & Poverty Missing/Insufficient Data Sources Esn, USGS. NOAH Q City Boundaries If ^ Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021 1 c IF, 'I City of La Quinta General Plan Exhibit J TERRA NOVA TCAC Opportunity Areas 11-14 11. W04 i RQSEA" BIC La Quinta, California 311 Integration and Segregation Patterns To assess patterns of segregation and integration, the City analyzed four characteristics: race and ethnicity, income, disability, and familial status. Race and Ethnicity The diversity index was used to compare the racial and ethnic diversity within the City and surrounding communities. Diversity Index ratings range from o to loo, where higher numbers indicate higher diversity among the measured groups. As shown in Exhibit II -15 Diversity Index, the City exhibits a range of diversity ratings. The Cove and Village area, the southern end of the City, the area just north of Highway 111, and an area on the eastern boundary adjacent to the City of Indio and unincorporated Riverside County have relatively high diversity (7o-85). Portions of the northwestern and southeastern City have lower diversity (below 4o). The remaining areas are rated mid-range (40-70) on TCAC's diversity index. The surrounding areas have comparable diversity ratings as La Quinta, though areas of higher diversity are found in City of Indio to the east. According to the 2015-2019 American Community Survey, over half (57.3%) of La Quinta residents identify as White, non -Hispanic, whereas over half (64.2%) of the Indio residents to the east identify as Hispanic. The City of La Quinta can be viewed as a demographic transition point from the west to east Coachella Valley, with the proportion of White, non -Hispanic population between those in Indio (34.7%) to the east and Bermuda Dunes (58.5%) to the north, Palm Desert (66%) and Indian Wells (88.1%) to the west. The southern end of the City falls in part of a larger area designated a TCAC Area of High Segregation and Poverty in 2020 and 2021, and is also in Tract 456.05, which is designated a racially or ethnically concentrated area of poverty (R/ECAP) by HUD (2009-2013) (Exhibit II -17). However, these designations are most likely not true for this part of the City due to data granularity reasons, as analyzed in detail below. This area, as part of Census Tract 456.05, is in a Hispanic Majority Tract with a predominant gap >5o% between Hispanic and other race/ethnicity groups (Exhibit II -16). More urban areas in the City fall in White Majority Tracts (predominant gap >50%). Similarly, much of the lower diversity areas in the Cities of Indian Wells and Palm Desert are also in White Majority Tracts. 78 312 Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021 N N Aa P, 'I City of La Quinta General Plan exhibit L j TERRA NOVA Diversity index ' 11-15 1�AWNo a KSEA"P Mc La Quinta, California 79 313 L Rancho ` Mirage I Palm Desert Indian Wells Predominant Population Hispanic Majority Tracts Slim (gap < 10%) Sizeable (gap 10% — 50%) Predominant (gap > 50%) White Majority Tracts Slim (gap < 10%) Sizeable (gap 10%— 50%) Predominant (gap > 50%) j� City Boundaries Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021 r, 'I Il. / TERRA NOVA City of La Quinta General Plan White/Hispanic Majority Tracts La Quinta, California zo3�5 GENERAL PLAN N �0 Exhibit II -16 80 314 A close examination of the HCD AFFH maps and the R/ECAP area in La Quinta reveals that the designation is least likely due to demographics within the area, but rather its location in Census Tract 456.05, which spans a large area of unincorporated Riverside County in the east Coachella Valley. As shown in Exhibits II -16 and II -17, from a data granularity perspective, the R/ECAP and Hispanic Majority Tract designations cover the entire Tract 456.05 and do not tell any difference within the tract. Similarly, the Area of High Segregation and Poverty (202o and 2021) designations are specific to Block Group 4 under Tract 456.05 which covers more unincorporated Riverside County area than La Quinta City area (see Exhibit II-2ob). The area in La Quinta under R/ECAP designation is roughly bounded by Avenue 6o on the north, and consists of vacant land, Coral Mountain Golf Club and Trilogy La Quinta, a retirement community. Based on local knowledge and property values at Coral Mountain and Trilogy, this area of the City is not an area with concentrated poverty. This area will be further analyzed in Income subsection below for any potential for segregation and concentration of poverty. HCD has not published the adjusted Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence (RCAA) methodology for California as of August 2021. While no data has been released on RCAA, the national metric may be referenced for general considerations here: RCAA is defined as census tracts where 1) 8o% or more of the population is white, and z) the median household income is $125,000 or greater (slightly more than double the national the median household income in 2o16). As shown in Exhibit II -18, Census Tract 456.o8 along the eastern City boundary (roughly between Avenue 54 and Avenue 6o) has a median income greater than $125,000. Census data reveals that this tract has 89.6% white population that is not Hispanic. The area may have the potential to be a RCAA. While another area to the north also has a median income greater than $125,000, it is in a tract with fewer than 8o% white, non - Hispanic population and may not qualify as a RCAA. While introducing various housing choices may alleviate the potential RCAA situation in these areas, they are mostly built out with retirement communities and offer very limited opportunities for education, employment, services/amenities, and transit. Therefore, the City has prioritized providing more affordable housing in areas that offer ample opportunities to meet the needs of lower-income households. Income The City also assessed the concentrations of households below the poverty line across the City to analyze access to adequate housing and jobs. As shown in Exhibits II -18 and II -19, the bulk of the City has a very low percentage of residents (less than 10%) who fall below the poverty 315 line ($26,500 for a family of four in 2021), and the central and northern portions of the City as well as the southern Cove area have a low percentage (10%-20%) of residents below the poverty line. Note that the southern end of City, as part of Tract 456.05 that is designated as R/ECAP, shows a higher percentage (38.2%) of residents below the poverty line, but this percentage represents the entire tract rather than just the portion in La Quinta. 82 316 -r. _ •rte .r , ���: .,.�• �� p � _ �, , catnetaral City - ri �... , Rancho Mira a Palm Desert Palmi<� naiOs�J Springs I La Quinta T Coachella 17 t 00 RlECAP and Areas of High Segregation and Poverty TCAC Area of High Segregation and Poverty 2020 (Block Group) Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (RIECAPs) - (HUD. 2009 - 2013) 0 - Not a RIECAP 1 - RlECAP Area E 0 City Boundaries Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021 P, 'I City of La Quinta General Plan J TERRA NOVA R/ECAP and Areas of High Segregation and Poverty PLAWOW• MMARM x+c La Quinta, California t '-LL USGS, NOAk Soulces: Esn, Gamin. USGS, NN A co 0 Exhibit 11-17 $3 317 Median Income 2015-2019 < $30,000 < $55,000 < $87,100 (HCD 2020 State Median Income) < $125,000 Desert Hot Springs � Greater than $125,000 Q City Boundaries 1111. A* Cathedral City P,31nr spllllq Thousand Pal Rancho Mirage IPalm Desert Santa Rosa San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021 F, 'I City of La Quinta General Plan J TERRA NOVA Median Income KWiINO { RESEenol. INC La Quinta, California La Quu1ta Indio Coacllcfla Coachella Sources: Esri, USGS. NOAk Sources: &rr, Garnum GS, NPS N f\ 1C, Exhibit Palm II -18 $4 318 Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021 r 1 J TERRA NOVA PLAI9 W & NE61"C. INC City of La Quinta General Plan Poverty Status La Quinta, California N N 10 Exhibit 11-19 $5 319 The poverty status trend saw some minor changes from 2014 to 2019. The percentage of residents who fall below the poverty line in the northern Cove and Village area and an area on the eastern City boundary (north of Avenue 54) have lowered over time from 10-20% to below to%, while the percentage in the northern City increased from below lo% to 10-2o%. The southern end of City as part of Tract 456.05, showed 42% of residents below the poverty line in 2014, though this percentage captures the entire tract and does not specifically indicate any change within the La Quinta area. The HUD Low to Moderate Income Population maps at Tract and Block Group levels (Exhibit II-2oa and b) illuminate how data granularity affects interpretation. The map in Exhibit II-2oa at tract level is less detailed/refined, showing the percentage of low to moderate income population for entire census tracts; in contrast, the map in Exhibit 11-2ob has a finer resolution at block group level, showing the percentages for each block group, which is a smaller geographical unit than the census tract. Census Tract 456.05 consists of a portion of City of La Quinta which includes vacant land, a private golf club and a private retirement community, and rural agricultural communities in unincorporated Riverside County. The southern end of La Quinta is part of Block Group 4 of Census Tract 456.05. Block Group 4 shows 42% of low -moderate income (LMI) population, whereas Tract 456.05 shows 79% of LMI population. This gap in percentage of LMI population can be attributed to the demographical difference between the La Quinta portion and the remaining unincorporated County area. The larger unincorporated County area skews the percentage of LM I population to the higher side. This phenomenon also occurs in the Predominant Population map (Exhibit 11-16), which shows the entire Census Tract 456.05, including the southern La Quinta area, as a Hispanic Majority Tract with a predominant gap >5o% between Hispanic and other race/ethnicity groups. This contradicts local demographic knowledge of this area, as there is no evidence showing a significantly higher ratio of Hispanic population than surrounding areas in the City. In summary, while currently available data are not specific to the southern end of the City of La Quinta and are inconclusive on the area's potential for segregation and concentration of poverty, based on local knowledge and judgment, the area in southern La Quinta is least likely to experience segregation based on race/ethnicity or low income, or qualify as an Area of High Segregation and Poverty or R/ECAP. As shown in Table 11-16 of this Housing Element, the City of La Quinta has a vacancy rate of 7.4% for rental units and 5.0% for ownership units. 86 320 Correcting for seasonal or recreational units, which are considered vacant by the Census but are not available or used for permanent occupancy, the overall vacancy rate is 6.5%. These vacancy rates are quite low and may indicate limited room for mobility and high demand for affordable units. 321 Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021 IF, 1 City of La Quinta General Plan L A TERRA NOVA Low to Moderate Income Population by Census Tract KAhr $AESEuro.mc La Quinta, California \ N n 10 203�S ' GENERAL PLAN 8 322 Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021 r -I City of La Quinta General Plan L J TERRA NOVA Low to Moderate Income Population by Census Tract vtwama t RESER" xK La Quinta, California �,- zExhibit o • • GENERAL PLAN 323 Disability According to the 2015-2019 ACS, the City of La Quinta has a low percentage of population with a disability, with the majority of areas in the City being 10%-2o% and some areas being below to%. Compared to the 2010-2014 ACS, the northern Cove and Village area now have a lower percentage (<lo%) than in 2014 (10%-20%). Small portions on the northern City boundary show a higher percentage of population with a disability (10%-20%) compared to 2014 (<lo%), though such data represent the entire Tract 452.14 which also covers part of Bermuda Dunes. Given the overall low percentages of population with a disability and limited space/time variation in the City of La Quinta, the population with a disability appears to be integrated in all communities such that they have equal access to all housing and economic opportunities. The City has a no -fee application process for reasonable accommodation, and assisted more than double the disabled residents between 2014 and 2020 (from 91 to 188 residents) in Housing Authority owned properties. The City's Municipal Code Section 9.60.32o establishes a procedure for reasonable accommodation application, review and appeal processes, during which the City shall provide assistance to ensure an accessible process. The City will continue to refer lower income households to Riverside County for home repair grants, which can provide up to $6,000 for repairs including a handicapped ramp (Program H-4.4.0. Familial Status The 2015-2019 ACS reveals that the City of La Quinta has relatively few single -person households (<20% in most areas) and a higher percentage of couple households (>4o% except in the mid -Cove area and a small area in the southeast corner). The percentage of children in married -couple households is at least 40% throughout the City except for a small area in the northeast corner. The mid -Cove area, the area south of Highway 111, and the southern end of City see slightly higher percentage of children in female -headed single -parent households (20%-4o%). Note that data for the southern end of City may not be representative as it is based on the entire tract which may have different demographics than the City area. The household makeup of the City suggests there is likely demand for units with at least two bedrooms for family and non -family households. Assessment and Actions Given the factors discussed above, there is no evidence of segregation based on disability in the City, but there is potential for segregation based on income and opportunity to improve racial integration within La Quinta. As shown in Exhibits II -18 and II -19, the concentrations of lower income households are not limited to La Quinta. The City of Indio 90 324 to the east has an areas with over 40% population living below the poverty line, which is more concentrated than all surrounding areas. Areas with 30%-40% population living below the poverty line are seen in the cities of Cathedral City, Palm Springs and Desert Hot Springs to the west, and the City of Coachella to the east, as well as unincorporated Riverside County areas. With a median income higher than the state level in 2019 ($77,839 in La Quinta; $75,235 in California, 2015-2019 ACS), the City is not considered disadvantaged economically (median income is 80% or less than the statewide average), although certain areas in/around the Cove and Village area and south of the Highway 111 are below the threshold. Concentrations of households with similar incomes may indicate a uniform development pattern and need for more varied housing stock. If availability and distribution of affordable housing are improved, it will encourage a more economically diverse community. As shown in Exhibit II -21, Job Proximity Index, the majority of the City is rated with medium proximity to employment opportunities (Jobs Proximity Index between 4o and 80). One area along the eastern City boundary north of the Highway 111 and the bottom of the Cove area have lower Jobs Proximity Index scores of 19-35. Two areas in the western City have high Jobs Proximity Index scores (>80). In contrast to the TCAC Opportunity Areas (Exhibit II -14), this suggests that access to jobs is not the single driver behind the concentration of lower income households, but rather the type of jobs and housing available and other socioeconomic factors. The City completed the La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan and EIR in 2017. The Village area is generally located north and south of Calle Tampico, east of Eisenhower Drive and west of Washington Street, and north of Avenue 52. Projects in the Village area are encouraged to implement the standards and incentives of Municipal Code Section 9.140.090, the mixed use overlay, which encourages development on lot assemblages or lots greater than one acre. The mixed use overlay was introduced in 2016 to facilitate the development of mixed use projects that include both multifamily residential and commercial components. Per Section 9.140.o9o.F, mixed use development can benefit from density bonuses, modified parking requirements, expedited permit processing, and fee reductions. The City also amended and completed Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) regulations in ordinances passed in 2016 and 2019. The City intends to apply the Affordable Housing Overlay to all sites identified in the Vacant Land Inventory (Program l.i.b.), including sites in the Village area and along the Highway 111 corridor. These measures are expected to expand housing options and foster a more economically diverse community. 91 325 The City was awarded an Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 3 Grant for "La Quinta Village Complete Streets - A Road Diet Project" in the amount of 17,313,000. This project included the construction of five new roundabouts in the La Quinta Village where pedestrian, bicycle, golf cart, and automobile traffic exist. The new roundabouts will help accommodate non -vehicular traffic, making roadways safer and more accessible to pedestrians and bicycles in the La Quinta Village. The project also reduced four traffic lanes to two lanes along Calle Tampico and Calle Sinaloa from Eisenhower to Desert Club Drive, and along Eisenhower from Calle Tampico to Calle Sinaloa. This area will be used as space for designated bike and golf cart lanes. The reduced lanes and crosswalks added midblock will provide pedestrians with safer access to Civic Center Park, Old Town La Quinta, and the Benjamin Franklin Elementary School. The City recognized the impacts on small businesses due to the COVID- 19 pandemic, and established a $1.5 million COVID-19 Small Business Emergency Economic Relief Program. The Program helps provide small businesses with emergency cash flow in the form of zero percent interest loans of $5,000 to $zo,000, and up to $500,00o exclusively for restaurants that were open for pickup and delivery orders in the City. La Quinta residents had access to rental assistance through United Lift, a rental assistance program coordinated between Riverside County, United Way of the Inland Valleys, and Lift To Rise. The program goal was to keep lo,000 families and residents housed. The program provided $33 million in rental assistance between June and November 2020. Eligible recipients were renters in Riverside County with a current lease agreement who are either individuals or families earning 8o percent or below of the area's median income, or who can document a loss of income due to COVID-19 economic impacts, leaving them unable to make their rent. 92 326 < 80 (Closest Proximity)I Santa Rosa San Jacinto Mountains Q City Boundaries National Mafument j- j - 6 L Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021 IF, 'I L J TERRA NOVA nt"O.w a KUMC.. we City of La Quinta General Plan Jobs Proximity Index La Quinta, California M�0 Exhibit K.. ;11-21 GENERAL PLAN 327 Access to Opportunity The City reviewed TCAC Opportunity Areas identified in Exhibit 11-14, and identified one inaccurate designation: the southern end of the City is categorized as "High Segregation & Poverty" by TCAC/HCD, which includes vacant land, Coral Mountain Golf Club and Trilogy La Quinta, a retirement community. As discussed above, this portion of the City falls in census tracts (456.05 and 456.09) that consist of primarily agricultural/rural communities in the unincorporated Riverside County, and the census -tract -based designations and data do not accurately reflect the portion in La Quinta. This area has large vacant parcels with potential for housing development, and is zoned for commercial and residential developments at various densities. In addition to the Composite Score of TCAC Opportunity Areas shown in Exhibit II -14, the City also analyzed individual scores for economic, education and environmental domains. Most of the City scores in the highest range (>0.75) which indicates more positive economic outcome. The southern end of City, lower Cove area, and a portion just north of Highway 111 score slightly lower (0.50-0.75) in the economic domain. The upper Cove, Village and area just north, as well as small areas along the eastern City boundary score lower (0.25-0.50), which indicates relatively less positive economic outcome. Areas identified with less positive economic outcome are found in the adjacent cities of Indio, Indian Wells, Palm Desert and census designated place of Bermuda Dunes. Areas identified with less positive economic outcome (<0.25) are seen in the cities of Indio, Coachella and unincorporated communities in the eastern valley. The area north of Highway 111 scores in the highest range (>0.75) which indicates more positive education outcomes, and the west side of the City scores slightly lower (0.50-0.75). The eastern City is identified with less positive education outcomes (<0.25), which is also seen in portions of the cities of Indio and Coachella, as well as the unincorporated eastern Coachella Valley. There is no data on environmental domain for the Cove area and an area in the eastern City roughly between Avenue 54 and Avenue 60. Most of the City falls in the highest score range (0.75-1) which indicates more positive environmental outcomes. The southern end of City (in Census Tracts 456.05 and 456.09) is identified with less positive environmental outcomes (<0.25). Similar to other HCD data, the environmental domain score is also based on census tracts and may not represent the City portion accurately. The eastern Coachella Valley in general, except portions of the cities of Indio and Coachella, is identified with less positive environmental outcomes (<0.25). 94 328 The Cove area is surrounded by the Santa Rosa Mountains on three sides, and the only access to the local and regional roadway network is on the north. This topographical constraint results in further proximity to jobs the further down the Cove the area is, (Job Proximity Index score decreases from 40-6o to <20). The east side of the City generally has medium proximity to jobs (Job Proximity Index score between 40-60). As noted, the City encourages mixed-use development in the Village area, which is directly north of the Cove, in the La Quinta Village Build - Out Plan adopted in 2017. Future development and redevelopment in the Village will improve job proximity in the Cove area. Comparing Exhibit II -21, Jobs Proximity Index to Exhibits II -18 through II -2o reveals that concentration of lower income households is not directly related to job proximity. These findings confirm the following trends: 1. Jobs that are near housing may not meet the needs of the residents located there, creating a jobs/housing imbalance and lower job proximity. 2. Someone may be able to both work and live in an area with a high concentration of jobs; however, they may still only be able to access positions with low wages and find it hard to afford housing costs. Existing affordable housing projects in the City of La Quinta range from apartments to single-family homes. According to the City's AB 987 database, as of July 8, 2020, there are 40o affordable single-family ownership units with two to five bedrooms. These units are dispersed in various neighborhoods in the western, central and northern City. The eastern and southern City consists primarily of private resorts and golf clubs. There are 28 affordable single-family rental units as of July 8, zozo, all of which have three bedrooms. These units are located in and around the Cove area. Additionally, there are nine affordable multi -family housing complexes offering a total of 912 affordable multi -family rental units,14 including HUD apartments, Section 8 apartments, public housing apartments, non-profit senior and family low-income apartments, and Low-income tax credit apartments (LIHTC).'S Villa Cortina Apartments provides 116 moderate income restricted rentals. Seasons At La Quinta is a Low -Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) apartment and provides 87 extremely low, low, and moderate 14 Affordable Housing Program, Single -Family Rental Units and Multi -Family Rental Units, City of La Quinta, updated July 8, 2020. 'S LowlncomeHousing.us, accessed June 1, 2020. 95 329 income apartments for seniors only. These two projects are located adjacent to the Village area near Calle Tampico & Washington Street. Residents have walking access to the various retail, dining and services in the Village area, as well as La Quinta Library, Civic Center Park and La Quinta Museum. The DSUSD Adams State Pre -School and John Adams Elementary School are located to the west within walking distance, and Benjamin Franklin Elementary School is located approximately 1/3 -mile away to the west. Bus stops at Calle Tampico & Washington Street are served by SunLine Transit Agency's Route 7. There are five affordable housing projects south of Highway 111 between Washington Street and Jefferson Street. Hadley Villas (79 extremely low to low income one -bedroom villas) and Seasons At Miraflores La Quinta (116 extremely low and very low income one- to two-bedroom apartments) are dedicated to seniors. Aventine Apartments (20 low and moderate income units), Wolff Waters Place (216 green -built one- to four- bedroom apartments for extremely low to moderate income households), and Coral Mountain Apartments (174 low and moderate income units) are open to all ages. These projects have close proximity to various retail, grocery, dining and services in the Highway 111 corridor, which also offers ample employment opportunities with a variety of commercial developments. La Quinta Park and La Quinta High School are located north of Highway 111 on the other side of Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel. Amelia Earhart Elementary School and John Glenn Middle School are located approximately 1.2 miles to the north. The area is well served by Bus Routes 1,1X and 7 and bus stops are within walking distance of these communities. In the northern City, Vista Dunes Courtyard Homes provides 8o one- to three-bedroom apartment units affordable to extremely low to low income households. A LEED Platinum certified community, the project provides a swimming pool, playground, basketball court, and large community multipurpose room. Pioneer Park (with a dog park) and Desert Pride Park are located across Miles Avenue to the south. There are two day care centers across Adams Street to the east. Amelia Earhart Elementary School and John Glenn Middle School are located approximately 2/3 -mile to the east, and La Quinta High School at similar distance to the southeast. The project is less than a mile north of the Highway 111 corridor. The project is served by SunLine Bus Route 7 with stops at Miles Avenue & Adams Street. Washington Street Apartments is located in the northwestern corner of the City and provides 140 units for extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income seniors. The City of Palm Desert Joe Mann Park is 96 330 within walking distance to the northwest, as well as neighborhood serving plazas at Washington Street & Hovley Lane. The project is served by SunLine Bus Route 7 with stops just north on Washington Street. Within a half -mile radius of the project, James Monroe Elementary School is located to the northeast, Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School and Horizon School to the south, Montessori School of the Valley campuses to the west. None of the currently affordable single-family rental units are at risk of losing affordability restrictions during or within to years of the planning period. Some of the single-family ownership units are at risk of losing affordability restrictions during the next planning period, and monitors sales to encourage preservation of these units. As shown in Table II -52, there are no rental units at risk of conversion during the planning period. In addition to planned and pending affordable housing projects described in the Land Inventory (Tables III -47 & III -48) of this Housing Element, the City will establish a program to encourage accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and Junior ADUs as described in Program H -2.1.a and assess their effectiveness in expanding housing choices in the highest resource areas. Disproportionate Housing Need and Displacement Risk The AFFH Guidance for All Public Entities and for Housing Elements (April 2021 Update) defines `disproportionate housing needs' as `a condition in which there are significant disparities in the proportion of members of a protected class experiencing a category of housing need when compared to the proportion of members of any other relevant groups, or the total population experiencing that category of housing need in the applicable geographic area.' Disproportionate housing needs may include things like overcrowding, overpayment, housing conditions disproportionately affecting protected classes, including displacement risk. Overcrowding As discussed under Housing Needs (Table II -27), overcrowding is not a significant issue in the City of La Quinta. As of the 2014-2018 ACS, 3.7% of all occupied units in the City are considered overcrowded, which include primarily renter units (82.7%, 477 units) rather than owner units (17.3%, loo units). lo.9% of all renter households experience overcrowding. The overall overcrowding rate (3.7%) in La Quinta has increased from 2.3% in 2014; specifically, overcrowding has improved slightly for owners but worsened for renters. Compared to an overcrowding rate of 6.9% in the Riverside County (2018), overcrowding in La Quinta is less significant. 97 331 The renter overcrowding rate (10.9%) is only slightly lower than that of the County (11.8%). Households with lower incomes may permit overcrowding to derive additional income, or there may be insufficient supply of housing units in the City to accommodate the demand, especially rental units. Unit size and affordability can be key contributors to overcrowding, and the City may need more affordable rental units of various sizes to meet the need of the community. Homelessness In 2020, there were 3 unsheltered homeless persons in La Quinta according to the PIT Count for Riverside County. The City allows homeless shelters in the Regional Commercial and Major Community Facilities zones with a conditional use permit. Single -room occupancy units are also conditionally allowed in the Regional Commercial zone in the City. Program H -5.4.a and H -5.4.b commit the City to bring its Zoning Ordinance in compliance with AB 101 for Low Barrier Navigation Center requirements on homeless shelters, and with state law for emergency shelters, transitional and supportive housing. Overpayment The median rent in La Quinta can be out of reach for lower income households with two or more persons; however, as shown in Exhibit II - 22, La Quinta has less prevalent overpayment by renters (<6o% of renter households City-wide) in 2019 compared to surrounding jurisdictions, which have areas with over 60% of renter households overpaying. Overpayment is considered a chronic issue that needs to be addressed both locally and regionally. As is shown in Table II -25 (Overpayment by Income Category and Tenure), as of the 2012-2016 CHAS, between both renters and owners, 71.4% of lower income households in La Quinta pay at least 30% of their income toward housing costs. Regionally, overpayment among renters is especially prevalent (>8o%) in the north side of the City of Palm Springs, south side of Desert Hot Springs, and adjacent unincorporated areas of Riverside County as well as the south side of the City of Coachella. The overpaying rate more than doubles for lower-income owners (76.2 percent) than that of all owner households (36.5%). Overpayment increases the risk of displacement for residents who are no longer able to afford their housing costs. Geographically speaking, overpayment among homeowners is more prevalent than among renters in the City of La Quinta, although the reverse is true for the region. As shown in Exhibit II -23, most of La Quinta has a homeowner overpayment rate between 40%-60%, and the area north of Highway 111 has a lower overpayment rate below 40%. Regionally, overpayment among 98 332 homeowners is below 8o% except a small area in the City of Coachella, and areas with between 6o% -8o% homeowner overpayment are found in the cities of Rancho Mirage, Cathedral City, Palm Springs, Desert Hot Springs and the adjacent unincorporate Riverside County area as well as the City of Coachella. The City has included Programs H -1.1.a, H -2.1.b, H - 2.3.b to incentivize development of affordable housing and has included an action in Program H -5.2.a to connect minority populations to lending programs for homeownership. 99 333 Spri Palm Springs Cathed City Overpayment by Renters 2015-2019 < 20% - 40% - 60% _ 60% - 80% > 80% Q City Boundaries Thousand Palms Rancho Mirage I Palm Desert Indian Well Santa Rosa San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021 F' 'I L J TERRA NOVA PLF ING a KSEMC. luc City of La Quinta General Plan Overpayment by Renters La Quinta, California Indio La Quinta S U.J1.. F. i U%'I N� --I I... L Coachella Coachella 100 334 Overpayment by Home Owners 2015-2019 Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021 r 1 L J TERRA NOVA' nAMI*M $ RESEA" xc City of La Quinta General Plan Overpayment by Owners La Quinta, California AN Exhibit II -23 101 335 Substandard Housing Conditions In La Quinta, less than a third (28.6%) of the housing stock is older than 30 years, and less than 5% is over 50 years old. Older homes are typically found in the Cove area. After 30 years homes generally require major rehabilitation, such as a new roof or updated plumbing. As discussed earlier, a 2007 City-wide housing conditions survey found that the majority of 59 units in need of minor or moderate rehabilitation were in the Cove area. The Code Compliance staff track property maintenance and planned for a housing conditions survey in fiscal year 2021/2022. The repair costs can be prohibitive such that the owner or renter live in unhealthy, substandard housing conditions or the renter is displaced if the house is designated as uninhabitable and the owner does not complete repairs. To prevent these situations, the City offers programs that assist homeowners and apartment complex owners with home maintenance and repair costs. Homeowners interested in reducing their utility bills through upgrades now have an alternative to tapping their mortgage for home equity loans. Through partnership with the City of La Quinta, HERO and Ygrene offer a wide array of home energy products at low -fixed interest rates with flexible payment terms of up to 20 years (see Programs H -4.4.a through H -4.4.d). Mortgage Loan Indicators Data related to home loan applications is made available annually through the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, through the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (NMDA). The data is organized by census tracts rather than local jurisdictions, and thus the following analysis is based on census tracts located entirely within the City of La Quinta (451.09, 451.10, 451.20, 451.2116, and 456.08). Among first mortgage loan applications originated in La Quinta in 2020, 74.3% were made to white applicants. For 19.9% of loans issued, race data was not available. Among first mortgage loan applications originated in La Quinta in 2020, Asian (39, 1.8%), Black or African American (30, 1.4%), American Indian or Alaska Native (6, 0.3%) and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (5, 0.2%) homebuyers received a small percentage of total mortgage loans. The percentages of originated loans for white, Asian and Black or African American groups are lower than the corresponding race distribution of La Quinta. Considering the 19.9% of loans with unavailable data on race and geographical area covered in the analysis, the pattern is largely consistent with the City-wide race distribution. HMDA data combines data on Hispanic or Latino identity within other race categories; approximately 10.3% (224) of 2,181 originated loan 6 The northeast corner of Tract 451.21 is located in City of Indio, which consists of a gas station and convenience store. These commercial properties do not affect home mortgage data. 102 336 applications went to borrowers identifying as Hispanic or Latino. The majority (239, 68.5%) of the 349 first mortgage loan applications that were denied were denied to white applicants (including 3o borrowers that also identified as Hispanic or Latino). Nine (2.6%) applications were denied to Asian borrowers, five (1.4%) were denied to borrowers identified as Black or African American, three (0.9%) were denied to borrowers identified as American Indian or Alaska Native and one (0.3%) were denied to Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander borrowers. For 82, or 23.5% of denied loan applications, race data was not available. The racial distribution in denied applications are roughly proportional to that in originated loan applications, except for the variations in American Indian or Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander groups due to small numbers of applications. Therefore, the denied loan distribution is considered largely consistent with the City-wide race distribution. In 2019, the origination rate to white applicants was higher than in 2020, with 77.1% of the 1,222 first mortgage loans originated for home purchases going to white residents. Black (1.6%, or 20 loans) residents had a marginally higher share of loans originated in 2019 as compared to 2020, while Asian (1.1%, or 14 loans) had a somewhat lower share of loans originated in 2019 as compared to 2020. The origination rates for American Indian or Alaska Native (0.2%, or 2 loans) and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (0.1%, or 1 loan) groups in 2019 were marginally lower than in 2020. Race data was not available for 17.9% of first mortgage loans originated. Of the 262 first mortgage loans that were denied in 2019, 74.0% were denied to white applicants (194 loans, including 26 borrowers that also identified as Hispanic or Latino). Seven (2.7%) applications were denied to Asian borrowers, three (1.1%) were denied to borrowers identified as Black or African American. Approximately 10.6% of loans originated and 11.8% of loans denied were for applicants who identify as Hispanic or Latino, though these loans are also counted within other race categories. As described in Policies H-1.4 and H-5.5, the City will strive to ensure equal access to lending programs for people in all segments of the population and prevent any discriminatory practices based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, or disability. 103 337 Trnrt d-c;R nci Source: Housing and Community Development, 2021 r , City of La Quinta General Plan L J TERRA NOVA Sensitive Communities - Urban Displacement Project PLANNING & RESEARCH, INC. La Qumta, California Sensitive Communities Vulnerable p City Boundaries NF- AOW 20�3�5 GENERAIPLAN N iN Exhibit II -24 104 338 Displacement Risk The Urban Displacement Project (UDP) is a research and action initiative of the University of California Berkeley and the University of Toronto. UDP conducts community -centered, data -driven, applied research toward more equitable and inclusive futures for cities, and contributed the Sensitive Communities map to HCD's AFFH Data Viewer. Communities are designated sensitive if "they currently have populations vulnerable to displacement in the event of increased redevelopment and drastic shifts in housing cost." The following characteristics define vulnerability: • Share of very low-income residents is above zo%; and • The tract meets two of the following criteria: o Share of renters is above 40%, o Share of people of color is above 50%, o Share of very low-income households (5o% AM I or below) that are severely rent burdened households is above the county median, o They or areas in close proximity have been experiencing displacement pressures (percent change in rent above County median for rent increases), or o Difference between tract median rent and median rent for surrounding tracts above median for all tracts in county (rent gap). The Sensitive Communities - Urban Displacement Project map (Exhibit II -24) shows that two areas in the City are designated as vulnerable: the northern Cove area (Tract 451.2o) and a small area in southeastern City (part of Tract 456.og). Tract 451.2o has 25%-50% low to moderate income (LMI) population (Exhibit II-zoa), but the Village area (Block Group 3 in Tract 451.2o) has 50%-75% LM population, higher than the average tract (Exhibit II-zob). Sites z & 3 in the Vacant Land Inventory (Table II -5o) are located within Block Group 3 of Tract 451.20 which will increase affordable housing supply in this area and help alleviate displacement risks for lower income households. The entire Tract 456.og is designated as vulnerable, which spans large areas in the City of Coachella and unincorporated County and only a tiny portion in the City of La Quinta. As shown in Exhibit II -24, the portion within La Quinta consists of vacant land only, and is thus not considered a sensitive community nor subject to displacement. 105 339 Enforcement and Outreach Capacity The City enforces fair housing through periodical reviews of its policies and code for compliance with State law and investigation of fair housing complaints. The City of La Quinta regularly updates their policies and codes to reflect changes in State law. The City is set to meet housing element deadlines through efforts from both staff and consultants. The City will prioritize programs with action items on zoning code updates to facilitate housing. The City has included an action in Program H -2.2.a to update its Zoning Ordinance on density bonus provisions according to AB 2345• Program H -2-3.b requires the City to develop incentives for inclusion of affordable housing units in mixed use projects in the Highway 111 corridor. Other programs include assessing affordability of accessory dwelling units (H -2.1.a) and updating homeless shelter provisions to comply with AB 101 (Low -Barrier Navigation Centers) (H - 5.4•a). These changes will be completed at regular Zoning Ordinance update in 2021-2022. Apart from zoning and development standards, fair housing issues can occur in rental, lending and purchase of housing including discriminatory behaviors by landlords, lenders, and real estate agents. Typical cases range from refusal to grant reasonable accommodation requests or allow service animals to selective showing of property listings based on familial status, sex, religion, or other protected class, and more. The City complies with fair housing law on investigating such complaints by referring discrimination cases to the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County, Inc. (FHCRC), a non-profit organization approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that works with individuals and government agencies to ensure that fair housing laws are upheld. Services include anti -discrimination education and investigation, landlord -tenant dispute mediation, foreclosure prevention, pre -purchase consulting, credit counseling, and training. The City website describes and provides a link to FHCRC. On August 9, 2021, FHCRC provided housing discrimination records in La Quinta during the 2014-2021 planning period. Of the 52 complaint records, physical disability (21, 40%) and sex (15, 29%) were the two main bases, followed by mental disability (5,10%). Three each were based on national origin and age, two based on familial status, and one each based on race, source of income and arbitrary. The race/ethnicity distribution data shows 40% of the records were filed by persons identified as "White Non Hispanic" and 38% by persons identified as "White & Hispanic". Six records (12%) were filed by persons identified as "Black Non Hispanic", and 5 records (10%) were filed by persons that 106 340 "Chose not to respond to race (not Hispanic)". Additional details including case status/outcome were not provided on these records, and thus they are inconclusive to identify any patterns. HUD's Region IX Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO) provided case records for La Quinta in July 2021. Five fair housing cases were filed with their office during the previous planning period, two based on disability and retaliation, one each based on disability/race, and the other based on race and retaliation. Three of these cases were closed with conciliation or successful settlement, and two others were closed due to no cause determination. All five cases were handled through the Fair Housing Assistance Program (FHAP), in which HUD funds state and local agencies that administer fair housing laws that HUD has determined to be substantially equivalent to the Fair Housing Act. California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) is the only certified agency for FHAP in California. Because state law has additional protected classes than federal law, DFEH may have additional case records. A request was made in July to DFEH, but they were not able to provide data as of August 13, 2021. FHCRC and FHEO were not able to provide specific locational information for cases either because they do not track the geographic origin of complaints or due to confidentiality concerns. However, given the number of FHEO case records and their outcome, the City of La Quinta would have a low potential for any patterns or concentrations of fair housing issues in the City. However, the City continues to work with agencies and local organizations to affirmatively further fair housing through outreach and support and referral for housing discrimination cases (Programs H -1.4-a, H -5.2.b and H -5.2.c). Sites Inventory The City extends into the Santa Rosa Mountains in the west and south, and much of the area in the southwestern City is designated as Open Space - Natural on the General Plan and not available for development. The City is largely built out, and future housing development will occur as mainly infill projects and on the south side of the City where there are larger vacant parcels. The City identified sufficient sites to meet the RHNA in La Quinta's sixth cycle inventory (see Exhibit II -25 and Table II - 5o). The vacant land inventory only includes parcels that the City has identified as having the potential to develop during the 2022-2029 planning period. Sites 1-3, 7-9, 11 and 13 are identified for lower income units, Sites 10 and 12 are identified for moderate income units, and Sites 15 through 20 are identified for above moderate income units. 10] 341 As shown in the inventory map (Exhibit II -25), the sites identified for future housing development are located in different parts of the City in various zoning districts and dispersed to the greatest extent possible with available lands, which will encourage a mix of household types across the City. Most of the sites identified for this Housing Element, primarily those located along the Highway 111 corridor, which could generate 655 lower income units, and near the Cove area, could result in 36 units in the Village of small -lot development and housing affordable to lower-income households. Above moderate income units will be built in the southern City on larger lots and could generate 456 units. The vacant sites that are zoned suitably for multiple income categories and could generate 182 units are distributed in the central and north sides of the City, which combat potential segregation and concentration of poverty by providing a variety of housing types to meet the needs of residents in these areas. Integration and Segregation: Race and Income Sites in the inventory are dispersed in areas ranging from lowest to highest diversity ratings (Exhibit II -15), although some of the sites south of the Highway 111 and near the Cove area are in areas with lower median incomes (<$55,000, see Exhibit II -18). However, these areas are also High Resource areas due to location within the Highway 111 corridor and proximity to the Village area, and could generate 691 lower income units. The vacant land inventory will increase housing supply for lower and moderate income households in the High Resource areas by 1.147 units, and is not expected to exacerbate any existing patterns of segregation based on race and income. The City examined the opportunity area map prepared by HCD and TCAC (Exhibit II -14) and identified inaccurate designations for the southern end of the City. The area is generally bounded by Avenue 6o on the north and Monroe Street and City boundary on the other sides. This area consists of vacant land, Coral Mountain Golf Club and Trilogy La Quinta (a retirement community). As discussed above, it shows as "High Segregation & Poverty" most likely due to its location in a larger census tract that includes primarily unincorporated rural/agricultural communities. Based on local knowledge and data, the area in southern La Quinta is least likely to experience segregation based on race/income or qualify as Area of High Segregation and Poverty. Sites 17-20 are located in or adjacent to this area and designated for above moderate income units. The vacant land inventory will increase housing supply in the southern end of the City, and is not expected to improve or exacerbate existing conditions regarding integration and segregation based on race and income. 1o8 342 Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty and Affluence fluence As noted, the R/ECAP is designated at census tract level for Tract 456.05, which spans a large area of unincorporated Riverside County and a small portion in the City of La Quinta (Exhibits II -16 & II -17). Due to data granularity reasons and local knowledge discussed above, this designation is most likely inaccurate for the small area in La Quinta. Consisting of vacant land, Coral Mountain Golf Club and Trilogy La Quinta, a retirement community, this area should be designated as "Moderate Resource" or better, with potential drawbacks being its distance from job opportunities and schools. Sites 17 and 18 in this area are designated for above moderate income units. As the R/ECAP designation most likely does not apply to this area of the City, the vacant land inventory will not improve or exacerbate existing conditions regarding R/ECAP. There is one potential RCAA in the City, Census Tract 456.08 along the eastern City boundary (Exhibit II -18) with a median income greater than $125,000 and 89.6% non -Hispanic white population. Sites 15, 16, 19, and 20 would provide 305 above moderate income units in this area. Based on the opportunity area map (Exhibit II -14) and local knowledge and data, Census Tract 456.08 is not in the Highest Resource area of the City, is mostly built out with retirement communities, and offers very limited opportunities for education, employment, services/amenities, and transit. Therefore, the City has prioritized providing more affordable housing in areas that offer ample opportunities such as the northern City. The vacant land inventory may exacerbate the potential for RCAA in Census Tract 456.08; however, this housing sites distribution serves to maximize access to opportunities for households that need affordable housing. Access to Opportunity The opportunity area map designates the majority of the City as "Highest Resource" or "High Resource", which indicate areas whose characteristics have been shown by research to support positive economic, educational, and health outcomes for low-income families— particularly long-term outcomes for children. As discussed above, local knowledge and data indicate that the appropriate designation for the southern end of the City should be "Moderate Resource" or better. Using the statewide opportunity area map, local knowledge, and indicators of segregation, displacement risk, and access to opportunity as overlays to the City's vacant land inventory, the City was able to identify sufficient sites for 1,072 affordable units in La Quinta's sixth cycle inventory (see Exhibit II -25 and Table II -50) in areas identified by log 343 TCAC/HUD as either "Highest Resource" or "High Resource" with the highest Jobs Proximity Index scores. Sites 17 and 18 designated for 151 above moderate income units fall in the "High Segregation & Poverty" area, which is an inaccurate designation as discussed above and in fact the area qualifies for "Moderate Resource" or better. Several sites identified for affordable housing providing 655 units are located along the Highway 111 corridor, which offers a variety of resources and amenities. Two bus routes serve the area, which provide local and regional connectivity in the City, Coachella Valley and San Bernardino County (a commuter route). The Highway 111 corridor area features walkable streets and neighborhoods, and provides walking access to retail, restaurants, grocery and personal services. There are elementary and high schools and public parks nearby. Similarly, the sites in the inventory near the Village area, which would generate 36 lower income units also have easy access to the various retail, dining and services there, as well as La Quinta Library, Civic Center Park and La Quinta Museum. There are two elementary schools and one preschool in the Village area and vicinity. SunLine Bus Route 7 serves the Village area. These future housing sites affirmatively further fair housing through their proximity to jobs, education and transit, neighborhood retail and services, all of which can reduce the overall cost of living for lower-income households. The stores, restaurants and offices in both the Highway 111 and Village commercial districts provide various job opportunities. The City analyzed environmental constraints, including wildfire zones, loo -year special flood hazard areas and geological hazard zones, and confirmed that none of the sites identified are within or near any identified hazard zones that cannot be mitigated with standard construction techniques. With the implementation of standard requirements such as site-specific geotechnical studies, the sites identified in the vacant land inventory will not subject future residents to any environmental hazards. Evidence provided by the HUD tables and maps reveal there are no disparities in access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods, except that the southern City area has an inaccurate designation for less positive environmental outcomes due to its location in a larger tract. When compared with the east Coachella Valley and areas north of the Interstate -1o, the City scores higher in the environmental domain. Overall, the vacant land inventory is expected to improve access to opportunities for households in need by increasing affordable housing stock in high and highest resource areas. 110 344 Disproportionate Housing Needs The fair housing assessment identified that there is likely demand for units with at least two bedrooms for family and non -family households based on the household makeup of the City. Among the areas that over 40% of renters and owners experience overpayment, Tract 451.20 is further designated as vulnerable/sensitive community regarding displacement risk. Tract 451.2o has a relatively high (25%-50%) low to moderate income (LMI) population (Exhibit II-zoa), with the Village area (Block Group 3 in Tract 451.2o) having 50%-75% LM population. The City completed the La Quinta Village Build -Out Plan and EIR in 2017. Projects in the Village area are encouraged to implement the standards and incentives of Municipal Code Section 9.140.090, the mixed use overlay, which encourages development on lot assemblages or lots greater than one acre and facilitates the development of mixed use projects that include both multifamily residential and commercial components. Per Section 9.140.090.F, mixed use development can benefit from density bonuses, modified parking requirements, expedited permit processing, and fee reductions. Sites z & 3 in the vacant land inventory will be able to take advantage of the mixed use overlay incentives and increase affordable housing supply in the Village area. The City also intends to apply the Affordable Housing Overlay to all sites identified in the vacant land inventory (Program l.l.b.), including sites in the Village area and along the Highway 111 corridor. These measures are expected to expand housing options for various income levels and foster a more economically diverse community. The City is also implementing traffic improvements including new roundabouts in the Village area, where pedestrian, bicycle, golf cart, and automobile traffic exist. The new roundabouts will help accommodate non -vehicular traffic, making roadways safer and more accessible to pedestrians and bicycles in the area and meeting the transportation needs of all segments of the community. Contributing Factors Discussions with community members and organizations, government agencies, affordable housing developers, and the assessment of fair housing issues identified several factors that contribute to fair housing issues in La Quinta, including: 111 345 • Low vacancy rates and limited availability of affordable, accessible units in a range of sizes, especially for lower-income renters, families with children and disabled people. • Lack of access to opportunity due to high housing costs including rising rents and stagnant income. • Lack of information made easily available to all segments of the community on landlord, tenant and buyer rights and opportunities. This may indirectly contribute to discriminatory practices during leasing and lending processes. Based on this assessment, these contributing factors largely stem from a common issue of limited options and supply. The City identified two priorities to further fair housing: expand availability of affordable housing and combat discriminatory practices through education. Programs under Policies H-1.4 and H-5.52 focus on information dissemination to all segments of the City population for affirmatively furthering fair housing and combating discrimination. Additionally, the City has incorporated meaningful actions that address disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity for all groups protected by state and federal law, through preservation and new development of affordable housing and encouraging a variety of housing products including accessory dwelling units and other creative housing solutions such as shipping container conversions. (See Programs H -1.1.a, H -2.1.a through H -2.1.c, H -2-3.a through H -2-3.d, H -3.3.b, H -4.4.a through H - 4.4.e). HOUSING CONSTRAINTS Constraints to the provision of adequate and affordable housing are posed by both governmental and nongovernmental factors. These factors may result in housing that is not affordable to lower and moderate income households or may render residential construction economically infeasible. Constraints to housing production significantly impact households with lower incomes and special housing needs. To accurately assess the housing environment in the City of La Quinta, close consideration needs to be given to a series of constraints; the housing market, infrastructure, and environmental and governmental factors that impact the cost of housing. 112 346 Nongovernmental Constraints Although housing costs in the Coachella Valley region are, on average, below other metropolitan areas in Southern California, the cost of renting or purchasing adequate housing in La Quinta continues to be influenced by a number of market factors. Costs associated with labor, raw land, materials, and financing influence the availability of affordable housing. Land and Construction Costs Land costs include the costs of raw land, site improvements, and all costs associated with obtaining government approvals. Factors affecting the costs of land include overall availability within a community, environmental site conditions, public service and infrastructure availability, aesthetic considerations, and parcel size. The cost of land is an important component in determining the cost of housing development. Land in the Coachella Valley has been and remains relatively affordable compared to other Southern California markets. A 2020 survey of single- and multi -family undeveloped residential land sales in La Quinta shows that vacant residential land ranges from $99,00o for a 0.12 -acre parcel in the Cove to $1.5 million for a 0.47 -acre parcel in Tradition. The average cost is $448,493 per acre. Construction costs can constitute up to 50 percent of the cost of a single-family detached home. Labor costs are usually two to three times the cost of materials, and thus make up 17 to 20 percent of the total cost of a new home. Labor costs are based on a number of factors, including housing demand, the number of contractors in the area, and union status of workers. However, state law requires the payment of prevailing wages for most private projects built under an agreement with a public agency providing assistance to the project, except for certain types of affordable housing. All cities are affected by these laws. In the Coachella Valley, construction costs for single-family dwelling units generally range between $235 to over $275 per square foot (excluding site improvements).'? Construction costs for vertical multi- family units generally range from $125 to $145 per square foot, based on typical 50-70 unit project with a 2 to 3 story garden style, Type V wood building." A survey of regional affordable housing developers determined that the average construction cost for affordable housing units in the Coachella Valley is approximately $317,074 per unit. Costs can vary widely depending on a number of factors, including but not limited 17 Gretchen Gutierrez, CEO, Desert Valleys Builders Association, March 2021. '$ Chris Killian, Senior Vice President of Construction, National Core, March 2021. 113 347 to, location, project site, unit size, bedroom count, finishes, fixtures, amenities, building type, and wage and hiring requirements. Other determining factors include site-specific terrain and soil conditions, environmental factors, and availability of infrastructure. The construction cost of housing may be considered a constraint to affordable housing in the La Quinta area. The City cannot directly control construction costs. Hence, increases in these costs amplify the need for subsidies to achieve affordability in residential units. Through density bonus provisions, the City provides incentives and relief to the development community in exchange for the inclusion of affordable housing into a project. Financing Interest rates impact both the purchase price of the unit and the ability to purchase a home. Interest rates are determined by national policies and economic market conditions and local government has no impact on these rates. Historical market trends reveal that when interest rates are high, a potential homeowner's ability to secure a loan decreases. Conversely, when rates are low, homeownership becomes more accessible to more families. The La Quinta market has demonstrated that when interest rates are low, the majority of housing demand focuses on single-family homes. When interest rates are high (in excess of about 12 percent) for any length of time, only a small percentage of new home buyers can qualify for monthly mortgage payments on the average market rate single- family home. At this point, demand shifts to lower priced units, usually multifamily, and construction trends follow. First-time home buyers are the group most impacted by financing requirements. The currently low mortgage rates (at or below 4 percent) facilitate first-time home buying. Typically, conventional home loans will require 5 to zo percent of the sale price as a down payment, which is one of the largest constraints to first-time home buyers. When interest rates are low, they are not generally a serious constraint to affordable housing. Further, lower interest rates help support home purchases by low and moderate income households, who may not be able to qualify at higher rates. There is no evidence that nongovernmental constraints affect the City's ability to meet the RHNA. Furthermore, the City cannot influence banks, lending institutions or the suppliers of building materials. Although the City will continue to work with the affordable housing development 114 348 community to reduce costs and encourage development through fee waivers, density bonus provisions and other means over which it has control, it cannot impact the national economy. Governmental Constraints The City has traditionally exercised authority in the areas of land use controls, site improvement requirements, building codes, fees, and other regulatory programs. General Plan Land Use Designations The two General Plan residential designations are Low Density Residential and Medium/High Density Residential. The densities of individual parcels are further refined in the Zoning Ordinance. Under General Plan Program LU -7.1.a (Policy LU -7.1), the City has established a mixed-use overlay that allows for the construction of housing to be integrated in various ways, such as above office space or commercial uses. The overlay is applied to all commercial zones. The mixed use overlay works together with the affordable housing overlay to raise densities to 24 units per acre (not including density bonus). The density ranges allowed for each residential district used to calculate housing at build out are listed in Table II -38. Table II -38 Residential General Plan and Zoning Districts General Plan Zoning Density Purpose Very Low Density Up to z units One -to two-story single-family Residential (RVL) per acre detached homes on large lots; at Low Density the southeastern boundary of the City. Low Density Up to 4 units Single-family attached and Residential (RL) per acre detached development, both in a country club setting and in standard subdivisions. Agriculture/ Applied to Allows continuation of Equestrian underlying agricultural activities in Vista Residential Overlay residential Santa Rosa area. (AGER) designations Medium Density Up to 8 units One -to two-story single-family Residential (RM) per acre detached and attached homes on Cove Residential medium to small sized lots; (RC) clustered small dwellings, such as Medium High one to two-story single-family Density condominiums, townhomes, or apartment and duplexes. 115 349 Table II -38 Residential General Plan and Zoning Districts General Plan Zoning Density Purpose Medium High Up to 12 One -to two-story, single-family Density Residential units per detached homes on small lots; (RMH) acre one -to two-story single-family attached homes; one -and two- story townhomes, condominiums and multifamily dwellings. Mobile home parks may be allowed with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. High Density Up to 24 One -to two-story single-family Residential (RH) units per attached homes; one -to three - acre for story townhomes and multifamily affordable dwellings. Duplex and multiplex housing sites development is the most common. Mobile home parks or subdivisions with common area amenities and open space may also be allowed subject to a Conditional Use Permit. General Regional Up to 24 High density residential uses are Commercial Commercial (CR) units per permitted with a Conditional Use Commercial Park acre for Permit. (CP) affordable Community housing and Commercial (CC) with mixed Neighborhood use overlay Commercial (CN) Office Commercial (CO) Village Commercial Village Commercial Up to 24 Medium High and High Density (VC) units per residential land uses are acre for appropriate. Live/work housing is affordable also appropriate. housing and with mixed use overlay Tourist Commercial Tourist Commercial Up to 24 Multifamily residential and (CT) units per condominium development is acre with permitted with a Conditional Use mixed use Permit. overlay Source: City of La Quinta General Plan and Zoning Code 2021 Zoning Code The residential zone portions of the Zoning Code impact housing affordability in several ways. The Zoning Code regulates such features as building height and density, lot area, setbacks, minimum units, and 116 350 open space requirements for each zoning district. Development standards for the six residential zoning classifications and two overlay districts are provided in Table II -39• Residential land use regulations allow for single-family detached development by right at allowable densities between o and 12 units per acre. Single-family detached housing at higher densities may be achieved with a specific plan for individual projects as long as overall density is not exceeded. Single-family attached and multifamily development is permitted by right at densities between 8 and 24 units per acre and these types of residential uses are also permitted in lower density zones under the provisions of a specific plan. A variety of residential development is possible in the City, ranging in average density from less than two units per acre for lands designated Low Density to 24 units per acre for affordable housing in the High Density and all Commercial categories. If a density bonus is utilized, greater residential densities may be achieved in any zone. Table II -38 identifies the list of permitted uses by residential district. The Zoning Ordinance also includes Supplemental Residential Regulations, which address a wide range of issues, from how to measure building height, to satellite dish installation and recreational vehicle storage. These standards are not subjective, and serve to clarify requirements for specific uses. Lower Density Residential Districts The RVL and RL zones provide for low density residential uses with densities consistent with the General Plan LDR designation (up to four units per acre). Single-family development in lower density zones is allowed through a building permit, following administrative review for consistency with the Zoning Code and state requirements. Developments requiring a tract map to establish new lots of record are reviewed by various City departments and adopted through Planning Commission and City Council public hearings. Typical conditions of approval relate to environmental quality such as erosion control, storm drainage, and access. Higher density uses, such as patio homes, duplexes, attached single- family dwellings, townhomes, and condominiums, may be permitted in RVL and RL zones when part of a specific plan or planned unit development (PUD), as long as the overall density of the project does not exceed that permitted by the underlying zone. The specific plan is reviewed by various City departments and a determination is made by 11] 351 the City Council at a regularly scheduled public hearing. Specific plans are typically adopted by resolution and are common throughout the City. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs), and guest houses are permitted as accessory uses in all residential districts. ADUs and JADUs are permitted in any residential zone, and guest houses are permitted on any single-family residential lot. In the RVL and RL zones, more than one guesthouse may be permitted with director approval. The City's ADU requirements may not be consistent with current State law. Program 2.1.a provides for the modification of the Zoning Code to comply with current law. These types of housing units are described further below. Residential care facilities with 6 or fewer persons, and senior citizen residences with 6 or fewer persons, are also permitted in all residential districts. Congregate living facilities with 6 or fewer persons are permitted in all residential districts, except RH. Development in the Cove, under RC zoning, allows for development and preservation of the character of the Cove, with one story single-family detached dwellings. The Zoning Code also establishes a minimum 7,200 - square -foot lot size, which may require lot consolidation in some circumstances. However, as the majority of the Cove was originally subdivided into 5,000 square foot lots, existing lots less than 7,200 square feet are considered buildable nonconforming lots. Medium and High -Density Residential Districts The RM, RMH, and RH zones allow an upper range of development density consistent with the General Plan Medium/High Density Residential designation. Minimum side yards and setbacks are required where a project abuts an exterior boundary or a public street. However, lot coverage, width, and setbacks within a project are variable to allow for clustering or creative lot configurations, as well as creating space for desired recreational and open space amenities. As shown in Table II -39, the development standards in the RMH and RH zones are not a constraint: front yard setbacks for apartments are 20 feet, side yards 5 to 15 feet, and rear yard setbacks 15 to 20 feet. Given that apartments include parking areas surrounding the buildings, front and rear setbacks of this dimension allow for the placement of driveways, parking spaces and carports, and do no limit the use of the site. As demonstrated at the Wolff Waters and Coral Mountain Apartments, the Zoning Ordinance does not constrain the development of multifamily housing. Multifamily development is allowed in all three zones with a Site Development Permit approved at regularly scheduled Planning Commission public hearings. 118 352 The City's Zoning Code allows for innovation in design standards and densities as long as the overall density and dwelling unit capacity is not exceeded. Residential compatibility standards have been incorporated into the Zoning Code, which governs conditions where higher or lower density uses are proposed than the General Plan designation. As explained previously, ADUs, JADUs, and guest houses are permitted as an accessory use in all residential districts, including the RM, RMH, and RH zones. In the CR, RM, RMH, and RH zones, only one guesthouse may be permitted on a lot unless otherwise approved through a specific plan. Residential care facilities with 6 or fewer persons, and senior citizen residences with 6 or fewer persons, are also permitted in all residential districts. Additionally, senior group housing with 7 or more persons are permitted with a minor use permit in the RM, RHM, and RH districts. Supportive and transitional housing is permitted with a conditional use permit in the RM, RHM, and RH districts. Congregate living facilities with 6 or fewer persons are permitted in all residential districts, except RH. Residential Uses in Nonresidential Districts There are development opportunities for residential uses in several of La Quinta's nonresidential zones (Table II -39). Multifamily housing is permitted with a Conditional Use Permit in all commercial zones except Major Community Facilities (MC). Residential uses are to be developed at densities consistent with the High Density residential designations. The Village Build -Out Plan Area encourages residential development in mixed use projects according to the standards and incentives of the Mixed Use Overlay. Maximum permitted densities are 25-30 units per acre, depending on location, which are higher than those permitted in any residential zone or the Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) (up to 24 du/ac). Maximum building height is 45 feet, which is higher than that permitted in any residential zone (maximum 40 feet). As such, the Village Build -Out Plan Area does not constrain development. As with most commercial zones, projects can be developed in the Village Commercial District that are loo percent residential in use, as there is no requirement that a project be a mix of residential and nonresidential uses. Development standards specific to the Village currently include a 45400t maximum height. Residential floors generally range from 10-12 feet in height. If a project contains solely residential uses, the 45400t height limit does not constrain development. 119 353 Mixed use projects consisting of both multifamily residential and commercial/office components are permitted in all commercial districts except MC. The Mixed Use Overlay also facilitates mixed use projects. Uses may be integrated vertically (residential over commercial) or horizontally (residential next to commercial). Residential densities range between 12 and 24 units per acre, although higher densities may be achieved through density bonuses, including a density bonus of lo% where at least 30% of total project square footage consists of retail uses. Maximum heights vary from 35 to 6o feet, depending on the underlying district, but heights may be up to 25% more than the base district if approved in the site development permit. The Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) allows development of affordable housing at higher densities within commercial zones (CC, CP, CN, CR, and VC) and other sites identified on the zoning map. The AHO provides increased and enhanced opportunities for affordable housing development, including maximizing the housing potential of vacant and underutilized sites. Zoning Code Section 9.60.26o describes opportunities for granting density bonuses and other incentives and concessions for the development of units affordable to low and very low income households, senior citizen housing, mobile home parks, and moderate income households. Available concessions may include reductions in setback or parking requirements, modifications of architectural design requirements, or other approved measures that can result in cost reductions to the developer. As provided in Program H- 3 -1.a, the AHO will be applied to all affordable inventory sites, with a density increase to 30 units per acre. Rooming and boarding houses and senior group housing are permitted in the VC zone if a minor use permit is approved. Single Room Occupancy (SRO) hotels are conditionally permitted in the CR zone. Emergency shelters are permitted in all commercial zones except VC. Transitional shelters for homeless persons or victims of domestic abuse are permitted in the CR and MC zones with a conditional use permit. Transitional and supportive housing are permitted in the Medium, Medium -High and High Density residential zones with a conditional use permit. This is not consistent with other residential uses, which are permitted uses in the same zones. Program H -5.4.b requires that these uses be changed to permitted uses in those zones. 120 354 Table II -39 2021 Residential Development Standards' Development Standard RVL RL RC RM RMH RH Min. Lot Size for Single- 20,00 7,200 7, 200 5,00 3,600 2,000 Family Dwelling(sq ft) 0 0 Min. Project Size for Multifamily Projects N/A N/A N/A N/A 20,000 20,000 (sq ft) Min. Lot Frontage for Single -Family Dwellings 100 60 60 50 40 N/A (ft)' Min. Frontage for N/A N/A N/A N/A 100 100 Multifamily Projects (ft) Max. Structure Height 28 28 17 28 28 40 (ft) z Max. No. of Stories z 2 1 z z 3 Min. Front Yard Setback (ft)3 30 20 20 20 20 20 Min. Garage Setback (ft)4 30 25 25 25 25 25 Min. Interior/ Exterior 10/20 5/10 5/10 5/10 5/10 10/15 Side Yard Setback (ft)5, 7 20 for new Min. Rear Yard Setback lots/10 (ft)7 30 for 10 15 15 20 existing recorde d lots' Max. Lot Coverage 40 50 60 60 60 60 (% of net lot area) Min. Livable Area 2,500 1,400 1,200 1,400 1,400 (M F: MF: Excluding Garage (sf) 750 750) Min. Common Open N/A N/A N/A 30% 30% 30% Area' Min./Average Perimeter Landscape Setbacks 10/20 10/20 N/A 10/20 10/20 10/20 (ft)6 -8 for notes, see Zoning Code Table 9-2. Source: Table 9-2, City of La Quinta Zoning Code 2021. 1 Residential uses in Commercial zones are subject to the RH development standards. 121 355 Table II -40 2021 Permitted Residential Uses by Residential Zoning District 122 356 Residential ZoningDistrict Low Low Cove Medium Medium High Land Use High RVL RL RC RM RMH RH Single -Family Detached P P P P P S Single -Family Detached patio homes (i.e., "zero PUD PUD PUD PUD PUD PUD lot -line") Duplex PUD PUD X PUD P P Single -Family Attached PUD PUD X PUD P P Townhome PUD PUD X P P P -dwellings Condominium Multifamily PUD PUD X P P P Apartment Multifamily X X X P P P Mobile Home Park C C C C C C Mobile Home Subdivision and Manufactured Home on individual P P P P P X lots, subject to Section 9.6o.18o Resort Residential, subject to Section P P X P P P 9.60.310 Guesthouses, subject to Section A A A A A A 9.6o.1oo Second residential units subject to A A A A A A Section 9.6o.o90 Group Living and Care Uses Congregate Living Facility (<_6 persons) P P P P P X Congregate Care Facility C C C C C C Residential Care Facility (<6 persons) P P P P P P Senior Citizen Residence (<_6 P P P P P P persons) 122 356 Table II -40 2021 Permitted Residential Uses by Residential Zoning District Source: Table 9-1, City of La Quinta Zoning Code 2021 P = Permitted use; C = Conditional use permit; M = Minor use permit; S= Specific plan; A = Accessory use; X = Prohibited use, PUD = Planned unit development Table II -41 2021 Permitted Residential Uses by Nonresidential Zoning District Land Use Residential ZoningDistrict Low Low Cove Medium Medium High Land Use Village Commercial Park Commercial High Commercial RVL RL RC RM RMH RH Senior Group Facilities CR Housing (7+ X X X M M M persons) Time share facilities, Family home X X X X subject to Section M M M M M M 9.60.280 and Bed and breakfast M M M M M M inns X C dwelling as a Supportive housing X X X C C C Transitional housing X X X C C C Source: Table 9-1, City of La Quinta Zoning Code 2021 P = Permitted use; C = Conditional use permit; M = Minor use permit; S= Specific plan; A = Accessory use; X = Prohibited use, PUD = Planned unit development Table II -41 2021 Permitted Residential Uses by Nonresidential Zoning District Land Use Zoning District Regional Commercial Community Neighbor- Tourist Office Major Village Commercial Park Commercial hood Commercial Commercial Community Commercial Commercial Facilities CR CP CC CN CT CO MC VC Existing Single- Family home X X X X X X X P Townhome and Multifamily C C C C C C X C dwelling as a primary use Residential as an accessory use, e.g., caretaker M M M M M M M M residences per Section 9.1 oo.16o Resort Residential, subject to S X C X P X X P Section 9.60.310 123 357 Table II -41 2021 Permitted Residential Uses by Nonresidential Zoning District Land Use Zoning District Regional Commercial Community Neighbor- Tourist Office Major Village Commercial Park Commercial hood Commercial Commercial Community Commercial Commercial Facilities CR CP CC CN CT CO MC VC RV Rental Parks and Ownership X X X X M X X X Membership Parks Emergency P P P P P P P X Shelter Rooming/ Boarding X X X X X X X M Housing Senior Group Housing X X X X X X X M Single Room Occupancy (SRO) Hotel, subject to C X X X X X X X Section 9.100.250 Transitional Shelters for homeless C X X X X X C X persons or victims of domestic abuse Single-family residential X X X X X X X X Mixed-use projects, subject to Section P P P P P P X P 9.110.120 Hotels and motels P X P X P X X P Timeshare facilities, fractional ownership, P X P X P X X P subject to Section 9.60.28o Source: Table 9-5, City of La Quinta Zoning Code 2021 P = Permitted use; C = Conditional use permit; M = Minor use permit; A = Accessory use; X = Prohibited use 124 358 Density Bonus California law (Government Code Sec. 65915 et seq.) allows for an increase in the density of a residential development when a developer donates land or constructs affordable housing as a part of a project. A density bonus of 20 percent above the maximum permitted density may be granted if a project includes 5 percent of the units at rates affordable to very low income households or to percent of the units at rates affordable to low income households. If to percent of the total units are affordable to moderate income households in a common interest development, then the project is eligible to receive a 5 percent density bonus. In addition, a sliding scale requires additional density bonuses above the base 20 percent. The maximum density bonus is 35 percent over the maximum allowable density under the applicable zoning and General Plan designation. With a density bonus, allowable residential densities range from 2.7 units per acre in the RVL zone to 32 units per acre in the high density and mixed-use zones and specific plans. Projects that are restricted to senior residents are also eligible for a density bonus of 20 percent without any income -restricted units. The density bonus is not required to exceed 20 percent and is not subject to the sliding scale mentioned above unless a minimum number of income - restricted units are included. Effective January 1, 2021, AB 2345 amends the state's Density Bonus Law to increase the maximum density bonus from 35% to 50% for projects that provide at least: 1) 15% of total units for very low income households, 2) 24% of total units for low income households, or 3) 44% of total for -sale units for moderate income households. AB 2345 also decreases the threshold of set-aside low income units required to qualify for concessions or incentives from zoning or development regulations, and decreases the number of parking spaces required for 2 and 3 -bedroom units. Density bonus projects within % mile of a major transit stop that provide unobstructed access to the transit stop may also qualify for reduced parking requirements. Program 4-2.2.a directs the City to amend the Zoning Ordinance accordingly to assure compliance with AB 2345• Accessory Dwelling Units In 2020/2021, to comply with AB 2299, the City modified Zoning Code Section 9.60.090 pertaining to Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). The modifications ease barriers to development of ADUs. ADUs are 125 359 independent living quarters on existing home lots, the use of which is subordinate and incidental to the main building or use. They can provide affordable rental opportunities for lower and moderate income households, including seniors, disabled persons, single parents, domestic employees, and extended family members. ADUs create additional housing opportunities on already developed or developing parcels and can provide a source of income for homeowners. They are often referred to as "casitas" throughout the Coachella Valley. ADUs are permitted in all residential -only zones and can be attached or detached to the primary residence. Conditions on the ADU require that no interest in the ADU(s) may be sold separately from the remainder of the property, though the unit may be rented (not less than 3o days); that the lot contain an existing single-family dwelling that conforms to the minimum lot size requirement; that the ADU is no larger than 1,200 square feet or 30 percent of the primary home; and must have a minimum of one off-street parking space on the same lot that the ADU is located. Parking requirements may be waived in certain circumstances, including when the ADU is within one-half mile of public transit or one-half block of a car -share station, within an architecturally and historically significant district, part of an existing primary residence or accessory structure, and/or required to obtain a parking permit from the City. The City's ADU requirements may not be consistent with current State law. Program 2.1.a provides for the modification of the Zoning Code to comply with current law. Guest Houses Guest houses are detached or attached units with sleeping and sanitary facilities, which may include full bathroom and/or kitchen or cooking facilities. Standards and criteria for the establishment of guest houses are provided in Zoning Code Section 9.6o.loo. The purpose of guest houses is to provide free on-site housing for relatives, guests and domestic employees. This type of unit can be particularly important to provide housing opportunities for the City's extremely low income workforce. Guest houses are permitted as accessory uses in all residential zones on any single-family lot, but are not permitted when duplexes, triplexes, or apartments occur on the lot. A guest house may not exceed 30 percent of the square footage of the primary structure and must conform to lot coverage requirements. Manufactured Housing Requirements Manufactured housing and mobile homes are considered housing alternatives, especially for serving the needs of lower-income households. Manufactured homes and mobile home subdivisions are 126 360 permitted uses in all residential zones, except for High Density Residential, subject to the provisions of Zoning Code Section 9.6o.180, which requires approval of a minor use permit by the Planning Commission prior to the placement of a manufactured home on a single- family lot to ensure that it is consistent with the development standards of the single-family zone. Mobile home parks are permitted with a conditional use permit in all residential districts. Short -Term Vacation Rentals Municipal Code Section 3.25 defines a short-term vacation rental (STVR) unit as a privately owned residential dwelling such as, but not limited to, a single-family detached or multifamily attached unit, apartment house, condominium, cooperative apartment, duplex, or any portion of such dwellings, rented for occupancy for dwelling, lodging, or sleeping purposes for a period of 30 consecutive calendar days or less, counting portions of calendar days as full days. Homeowners are required to obtain a STVR permit and business license, manage the unit in accordance with established regulations, and collect transient occupancy taxes (TOT) at a rate of 10% of the rent charged. In 2021, the City reviewed its STVR standards and made modifications to limit permitting and strengthen the enforcement regulations, following residents' concerns regarding over -saturation and lack of management at some locations. STVRs provide homeowners with opportunities to increase their incomes, which can offset their housing costs. STVRs comprise 1,170 of the 25,143 housing units, or 4.6% of the housing stock in the City, and are not considered a constraint to housing. Low Barrier Navigation Centers Assembly Bill (AB) 101 requires that Low Barrier Navigation Centers (LBNC) be a by -right use in areas zoned for mixed use and nonresidential zoning districts permitting multifamily uses. LBNCs provide temporary room and board with limited barriers to entry while case managers work to connect homeless individuals to income, public benefits, permanent housing, or other shelter. Program H -5.4.a of this Housing Element directs the City to review and revise the Zoning Ordinance, as necessary, to ensure compliance with AB 101, and to modify the definition of "homeless shelter" to include this use. Parking Requirements Parking requirements in the City of La Quinta, shown in Table II -42, are typical for a city of its size with resort -oriented characteristics. The parking requirements are based on unit size for market housing, and are permitted to be reduced based on alternative analysis methodology. 12] 361 Additionally, the parking requirements for special needs uses are relatively minimal and facilitate the construction of such uses. Reductions in required parking spaces are often a concession granted to affordable housing developers through the City's density bonus provisions. Overall, the parking requirements do not directly constrain the development of housing. Table II -42 Parking Requirements for Residential Uses Land Use Minimum Off -Street Guest Spaces Parking Spaces Single -Family Detached, 2 spaces per unit in a 0.5 guest space per unit if Single -Family Attached garage no on -street parking is and Duplex Tandem garages allowed in available RC zone Mobile Home Park 2 covered spaces per unit 0.5 guest space per unit (tandem permitted) Apartments, townhomes, and condominiums: (1) Studio 1 covered space per unit 0.5 guest space per unit (2) One- and Two- 2 covered spaces per unit 0.5 guest space per unit Bedrooms (3) Three or More 3 covered spaces per unit, 0.5 guest space per unit Bedrooms plus 0.5 covered space per each bedroom over three Employee Quarters 1 covered or uncovered space. This space shall not be tandem. Senior Housing (excluding 1 covered space per unit 0.5 guest spaces per unit single family units) Senior Group Housing, 0.5 covered spaces per unit 0.5 guest space per unit Senior Citizen Hotel, and Congregate Care Facility Source: Table 9-11, City of La Quinta Zoning Code 2021 Subdivision Improvement Requirements The City maintains subdivision improvement requirements that contribute to the cost of housing. In many cases, a developer may be required to provide any or all of the required improvements within a subdivision or a single residential project. Although the provision of these improvements or actions required to meet subdivision requirements may cumulatively add costs to the provision of housing, they are not considered a deterrent, as they are required throughout California with public safety as the underlying factor. Subdivision regulations are provided in Municipal Code Title 13; pertinent improvements include: 128 362 • Full -width street improvements for all internal subdivision streets and alleys shall be installed; • Where a subdivision borders a public street, the developer shall provide half -width right-of-way improvements, plus one additional travel lane on the opposite side of the centerline if it does not already exist; • Additional rights-of-way or easements shall be provided, where necessary, to accommodate roadway slopes, drainage structures, bicycle or equestrian paths and trails, and other facilities related to subdivision development; • Minimum landscape setback widths shall be 50 feet from Highway 111, 20 feet from other arterial streets, 20 feet from primary arterial streets, 10 feet from secondary arterial streets, and to feet from collector streets; • The size and configuration of streets shall comply with Exhibits 11-2 and 11-3, as amended, of the General Plan circulation element. Cul-de-sacs shall have a minimum curb radius of 45 feet for private streets and 38 feet for public streets; • Private streets are limited to 36 feet in width when parking is double loaded, 32 feet when single loaded; • Sidewalks are required to be provided on both sides of the street within public rights-of-way of all General Plan designated arterial and collector streets, for local streets in residential areas and in areas designated rural residential overlay where densities exceed 3 du/ac; • Transit facilities, such as bus turnouts and covered bus shelters and benches, are required if a bus stop occurs adjacent to the development site, on General Plan designated arterial and collector streets; • Street width transitions, pavement elevation transitions and other incidental work deemed necessary for public safety may be required to ensure that new construction is safely integrated with existing improvements; • Improvements shall include traffic signs, channelization markings/devices, street name signs, medians, sidewalks, and mailbox clusters; • The developer shall provide improvements connecting the subdivision to the domestic water supply and distribution system operated by the Coachella Valley Water District, and is required to connect to an existing sewer collection system; • Prior to the completion of homes or occupancy of permanent buildings within the subdivision, the subdivider shall install traffic -control devices and street name signs along access roads to the homes or buildings. 129 363 Local Processing and Permit Procedures The cost of holding land by a developer during the evaluation and review process is frequently cited by builders as a contributing factor to the high cost of housing. The California Government Code establishes permitted time periods for local agencies to review and act upon private development proposals. Typical local development application processing times identified in Table II -43 reflect both single- and multifamily uses. State -imposed time restrictions are identified in Table 11-44• Table II -43 Local Development Processing Times Item Typical Length of Time From Submittal to Public Hearin Site Development Permit 9-12 weeks Conditional Use Permit 8-10 weeks Tentative Tract Map 10-12 weeks Variance 8-10 weeks Zoning Amendments or Zone Change 9-12 weeks General Plan Amendment 12-16 weeks Specific Plan 12-16 weeks Environmental Documentation Runs with application Source: City of La Quinta 2021 Table II -44 State Development Processing Time Limits Item State Maximum General Plan Amendment None Zone Chane None Subdivision Action on Tentative Map 5o Days Environmental Documentation/CEQA Review of Application for Completeness 3o Days Determination of NEG DEC or El Requirement' 3o Days Completion of NEG DEC Requirement 105 Days Certification of Final EIR 1 Year Source: California Permit Streamlining Act, 1977 ' The City attempts to process the Negative Declaration so that it runs with application La Quinta's City Council directed, during the last Housing Element cycle, that staff look at opportunities for development streamlining. The original Zoning Code changes were brought forward after review by a specially formed committee, which proposed a wide range of changes, many focused on moving review and approval authority to staff level decisions, or to the Planning Commission rather than the City Council. 130 364 This effort included Site Development Permits and other permits, which now can be approved by staff under specific circumstances, and a change in permitted and conditionally permitted uses that removed conditional use permits from a number of land uses in varying zones. Since the original amendments, the City annually completes a "Code Tune Up," which includes specific Zoning Code items that have arisen through each year. As a result of these processing changes, the City's entitlement process is one of the most efficient in the Coachella Valley. Site Development Permit The purpose of the site development permit (SDP) process is to review detailed plans for proposed development projects to ensure that the standards of the Zoning Code, including permitted uses, development standards and supplemental regulations, are satisfied. If the proposed project is part of a previously adopted specific plan, the review and approval of SDP application may be streamlined as called for in the specific plan. The SDP process enables the Planning Commission to review the site plan, architectural, lighting and landscape plans, and related development plans. The Planning Commission does not exercise discretionary review over the proposed land use; the focus on the SDP is on issues of site planning and design. The findings for a Site Development Permit require consistency with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance; conformance with CEQA; and compatibility of site design, landscaping and architecture to surrounding buildings. A SDP may take a minimum of g weeks for review, but the process could take as long as 3 months, or longer, if unforeseen complications arise. To reduce the amount of time required for plan review, the City provides the opportunity for a conceptual design review (sometimes referred to as a pre -application review) prior to formal application submittal to give the applicant information on City requirements and project feedback prior to committing to the application process. This conceptual review can save the applicant both time and money, making the proposed development more cost effective. Minor Use Permit A Minor Use Permit (MUP) is required for the following residential land uses: senior group housing (7+ persons) in RM, RMH, and RH zones; timeshare facilities in all residential zones; and manufactured homes on single-family lots. Most MUPs are administratively approved by Planning Division staff. On rare occasions, the project may be reviewed by the Planning Commission at a public hearing to ensure that it is consistent with the development standards in single-family zones. 131 365 Conditional Use Permit A conditional use permit (CUP) is required for congregate care facilities in any residential designation; mobile home parks in any residential designation; supportive and transitional housing in RM, RMH, and RH zones; multifamily housing in non-residential zones (except affordable land inventory sites which will be subject to the AHO (see Program 3.1.a), which allows multifamily projects by right); SRO hotels in the CR zone; and transitional shelters for homeless persons or victims of domestic violence in the CR and MC zones. The requirement for a CUP requires a public hearing before the Planning Commission. However, a CUP is often processed concurrently with an SDP; therefore, no additional time is required for the processing of the CU P. Typical findings required to approve a CUP are consistency with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, consistency with the Zoning Code, compliance with CEQA, and certification that the proposed project is neither detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the public nor injurious to adjacent uses. The most common specific conditions of approval relate to mitigating environmental impacts such as erosion, storm water runoff, and traffic. These conditions are necessary to protect environmental integrity and public health and safety and are not considered a constraint to housing development. Discussions with affordable housing developers have consistently indicated that the City's CUP process does not inhibit the process or cost of building affordable housing. With the inclusion of the AHO on all affordable housing sites identified in Table 11-51, there will be no need for Conditional Use Permits, and this constraint will be eliminated. Specific Plan Specific plans are unique regulations designed to provide more flexibility than permitted through the Zoning Code. The processing of a specific plan can add 12 weeks to the project schedule. However, the additional entitlement rights, flexibility in design and use, and infrastructure negotiations obtained through the specific plan process generally outweigh the impacts of the additional time expenditure. Specific plans must be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council at a public hearing. In La Quinta, specific plans are adopted by resolution. The required findings for approval are consistency with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan; certification that the 132 366 project does not create conditions that are detrimental to public health, safety, and welfare; and proof that uses are compatible with nearby uses and the property is suitable for the proposed project. The City allows the concurrent processing of applications to accelerate the process. For example, for a specific plan that also requires a CUP, both permits would be processed at the same time so no additional review time is necessary. Overall, the processing periods and procedures are not considered a constraint to the production of housing by the development community. The City processes residential projects within statutory time frames. The processing period is typically expedited for projects within adopted specific plan areas, as environmental review has been conducted and standards have been imposed, e.g., exactions and payment schedules, design, etc., for the entire area and in itself does not significantly impact housing construction costs. Permitting Mixed Use Development Mixed use development can provide a lively, walkable, and convenient living and visiting experience. Mixed Use is allowed in most commercial zones in the City. The City has not determined any conditions of approval specific to mixed use development; conditions are determined on a case-by-case basis, reflecting the context and design of each project. Affordable housing developers in the area have indicated that the process in La Quinta has not posed a constraint to affordable housing projects. Development and Processing Fees Development fees and other assessments cover the costs for infrastructure, environmental protection, public services, and utilities incurred by residential development. These fees impact the cost of housing and may, therefore, reduce the ability for unassisted market - rate housing to provide units affordable to low income households. The City describes current fees and exactions that are applicable to housing development projects on its website, consistent with Government Code §6594o.l(a)(1)(A). The City imposes Developer Impact Fees on new development to fund the expansion and/or construction of public facilities, such as fire stations and parks and recreation facilities, as they are required and demanded. Government Code Section 6600l requires jurisdictions to identify the purpose and use of impact fees and determine whether there is a reasonable relationship between the use of a fee and type of development upon 133 367 which it is imposed, the need for the facility and type of development on which the fee is imposed, and the fee amount and the public facility cost attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. Current City developer impact fees (Table II -45) are based on the City's "Development Impact Fee Study" dated September 23, 2019 and adopted February 4, 2020, which demonstrates that reasonable relationships between development, public facilities, and fees exist. The City also charges fees for application and permit processing, plan checks, environmental analyses, and special studies. Some fees are a flat rate, and some require additional payment to cover costs of additional analysis by City staff and/or third party service providers. Planning fees are generally collected at the outset of the application process; others, like building fees, are collected at permit issuance. In addition to City fees and assessments, developers of new dwellings are obligated to pay fees imposed by other government agencies, such as Coachella Valley Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan fees, Fish and Game fees, Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF), and other special district assessments, as applicable. Table II -46 presents an overview of City fees for an average 1,500 - square -foot tract home with a two -car garage in a low density subdivision and an average 950 -square -foot multifamily home with a two -car garage. Table II -47 identifies fees for various planning actions, such as zoning changes, tentative tract maps, and conditional use permits. Based on the fees presented in these tables, and the average cost of building a single family home in the City ($386,200), the development fees per unit would be about 138,613 per unit, or lo% of the building cost. Given that the City's fee schedule and development impact fees are consistent with those of other Coachella Valley cities, and that affordable housing projects are often exempted from fees, the costs associated with City fees are not considered a constraint to the development of affordable housing. In addition to these fees, all residential development in La Quinta and elsewhere in California is required to pay the State -mandated school impact fee, which varies by school district and adjusts from year to year. For residential development, the school impact fee is currently $3.79 per square foot in the Coachella Valley Unified School District (CVUSD) and $4.08 per square foot in the Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD). The City has no control over this fee, and as it is charged in all cities, it cannot be considered a constraint on development in La Quinta. 134 368 While the fees charged by the City add to the cost of housing and, therefore, are a constraint to the provision of affordable housing, infrastructure improvements and processing must be paid. Instead of offering fee reductions or waivers for affordable housing projects, the City offers other incentives to promote infill or affordable housing development through Zoning Code Section 9.60.26o, which allows density bonuses for affordable housing and concessions that may include a waiver or reduction in site development standards, or a modification that can result in actual cost savings to the developer. A comparison of the City's fees with other communities in the Coachella Valley indicates that the City generally charges comparable fees to other cities. Table II -45 Impact Fees Per Unit of Development Land Use Type Development Units Total Feel Residential (SFD) Dwelling Unit $9,380 Residential (SFA) Z Dwelling Unit $7,719 Residential (MFO) 3 Dwelling Unit $6,113 Office/Hospital 1,000 SF $7,589 General Commercial 1,000 SF $9,191 Tourist Commercial/Lodging Room4 $2,864 Source: City of La Quinta, effective July 1, 2020 ' Residential -single-family detached. Z Residential -single-family attached 3 Residential -multi -family and other 4 Guest room or suite 5 Net Acre 6 Includes fees for park improvements, community/cultural, library, Civic Center, maintenance facilities, fire, and transportation. 135 369 Table II -46 Development Fees for Typical Single -Family and Multifamily Homes Source: City of La Quinta 2021 Calculated on a 950 -square -foot unit valued at $181,030 (average value of single-family attached unit, per building permits issued 2014-2020) 2 Calculated on a 1,5oo-square-foot home valued at $299,933 (average value of single-family detached unit, per building permits issued 2014-2020) 3 $1,371/unit at o-8 DU/AC; $571/unit at 8.1-14 DU/AC; and $254/unit at >14 DU/AC; fees are passed through to the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission 4 Assumes 1 furnace,1 refrigeration unit,1 cooling unit 5 Assumes plumbing fixtures (MF unit = 5 fixtures, SF unit = 8 fixtures), water heater, installation of water piping, sewer connection 6 Connection and meter installation (assumes 1 -inch pipe, 1 -inch backflow device, and %-inch meter) 7 Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee passed through to CVAG 8 SMIP fees are passed through to the CA Department of Conservation 136 370 Cost Per Unit Type of Fee I Multifamily I Single -Family z Building Fees (includes permit and plan check) New Construction Permit $1,855.18 $2,389.24 Plan Check $1,311.69 $1,585.99 Mechanica14 $104.64 $104.64 Plumbing5 $228.07 $308.56 Electrical $214.13 $233.45 Strong Motion Instrumentation Program $24 $38 99 ($0.50 or valuation x 0.00013)$ Grading $148.12 $148.12 Other Fees Development Impact Fee $6,113 $9,380 Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan 3 $571 $1,371 TUM F7 $1,330 $2,310 CVWD Sewer -New Connection Fee $4,851 $4,851 CVWD Water- New Connection Feel $3,600 $3,600 Fish and Game Fee (unfinished lot) Negative Declaration -flat $3,220 fee $3,220 $3,220 Art in Public Places (Total Value) Based on project valuation charged at one $20 $X50 quarter of 1 percent of anything over $200,000 or $20 minimum Quimby fees (if in -lieu of land Based on per -acre Based on per -acre dedication—fee payment only option d FMV of land FMV of land for tracts of <50 lots/units) Total $23,591 $29,791 Source: City of La Quinta 2021 Calculated on a 950 -square -foot unit valued at $181,030 (average value of single-family attached unit, per building permits issued 2014-2020) 2 Calculated on a 1,5oo-square-foot home valued at $299,933 (average value of single-family detached unit, per building permits issued 2014-2020) 3 $1,371/unit at o-8 DU/AC; $571/unit at 8.1-14 DU/AC; and $254/unit at >14 DU/AC; fees are passed through to the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission 4 Assumes 1 furnace,1 refrigeration unit,1 cooling unit 5 Assumes plumbing fixtures (MF unit = 5 fixtures, SF unit = 8 fixtures), water heater, installation of water piping, sewer connection 6 Connection and meter installation (assumes 1 -inch pipe, 1 -inch backflow device, and %-inch meter) 7 Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee passed through to CVAG 8 SMIP fees are passed through to the CA Department of Conservation 136 370 Table II -47 Planning Department Fee Schedule Item/Type Permit Base Fee* Conditional Use Permit $6,413 Planned Unit Dev. $6,413 Amendment $3,126 Time Extension $1,691 Site Development Permit Amendment $4,669 Time Extensions $1,691 Planning Commission $8,9o9 Administrative $7,621 Modification by Applicant $400 Development Agreement $3,327 Minor Adjustment $400 Variance $2,415 Minor Use Permit $400 Amendment $400 Final Landscape Plan $1,771 Housing SB 33o Application Review $1,288 Conceptual Design Review $2,254 Street Name Change $1,852 Historical Structures Landmark Designation/Cert of Appropriateness $1,320 General Plan Amendment $10,465 Specific Plan $1o,68o Amendment $4,776 Temporary Use Permit- Minor, Standard $400 Minor, Requiring Addl. Effort $400 Major, Standard $2,093 Major, Requiring Add]. Effort $2,093 Zoning Certificate of Compliance $505 Change of Zone $9,392 Zoning Text Amendment $9,445 Director's Determination $405 Letter, Basic Property Info $263 Letter, Addl. Research Required $1,369 Sign Permit $355 A -Frame Sign Permit $o Sign Program $2,844 Sign Program Amendment $966 Tentative Parcel Map $5,045 Waiver $1,369 Amendment $3,005 Revision $3,005 Time Extension $966 Amended Final Parcel Map $4,025 137 371 Table II -47 Planning Department Fee Schedule Item/Type Permit Base Fee* Tentative Tract Map $8,372 Revision $3,971 Amendment $3,971 Time Extension (CC or PC) $1,852 Time Extension (Admin) $1,047 Tentative Condominium Map $8,372 Amended Final Tract Map $6,440 Appeals $1,500 Environmental Review Environmental Assessment $483 Recordation of Exemption $161 Initial Study (ND/MND) $3,220 Environmental Impact Report $8,855 Zoning Clearance - Planning Plan Check Alteration/Addition - Resid. $81 New Construction - SF Resid. $161 New Construction - 2-4 Units $242 New Construction - 5+ Units $644 New Construction - non-resid. $322 Alteration/Addition - non-resid. $161 Source: City of La Quinta, adopted July 21, 2020 * In addition to the fees identified here, the City will pass through to the applicant any fees imposed by other agencies and any discrete costs incurred from the use of outside service providers required to process the specific application. Building Codes and Enforcement The City of La Quinta has adopted the following State Codes: 2019 California Building Code, 2019 California Mechanical Code, 2019 California Plumbing Code, 2019 California Energy Code, and the 2019 California Electrical Code. In addition, the City enforces the 2019 California Fire Code, Residential Code, and Green Building Standards Code. Overall, the Building Codes adopted by the City of La Quinta do not pose any special constraints on the production or cost of housing. The City has not made substantive amendments to the code that would adversely affect housing. The City of La Quinta enforces the Health and Safety Code, as it pertains to housing, which provides minimum health and safety standards for the maintenance of the existing housing supply. These standards are intended to provide for safe and sanitary housing that is fit for human habitation. The enforcement of the Health and Safety Code is normally handled on a complaint -response basis. 138 372 The most common housing -related problem is illegal additions/garage conversions. Warnings are issued with a referral to the City and other agencies for remediation assistance. The Housing Code mandates that health and safety deficiencies be corrected in accordance with construction standards that were in effect at the time the structure was built. In cases where property owners refuse to correct deficiencies, enforcement of the Housing Code relies on civil sanctions. Constraints to the Provision of Housing for Persons with Disabilities State law, per Senate Bill 52o, requires that in addition to an analysis of special housing needs for persons with disabilities, the Housing Element must analyze potential governmental constraints to the development, improvement and maintenance of housing for persons with disabilities. Programs must be included to remove constraints to providing adequate housing for persons with disabilities. The City maintains general processes for individuals with disabilities to make requests for reasonable accommodation through Section 9.60.320 of the Zoning Code, the permit processing process, and building codes. A reasonable accommodation request is reviewed and approved by the Director, based on the following findings: a. Whether the subject property will be used by an individual with disabilities protected under fair housing laws; b. Whether the requested accommodation is necessary to make housing available to an individual with disabilities protected under fair housing laws; c. Whether the requested accommodation would impose undue financial or administrative burdens on the city; d. Whether the request for accommodation would require a fundamental alteration in the nature of a city program or law; e. Potential impacts on surrounding land uses; f. Alternative reasonable accommodations that may provide an equivalent level of benefit; The City's process is administrative, and does not result in a constraint for persons requiring accommodation. Congregate living facilities with six or fewer persons are permitted by right in all residential zones except High Density; congregate care facilities with seven or more are permitted with a conditional use permit in all residential zones. Furthermore, residential care facilities and senior citizen residences of six or fewer persons are permitted in all residential zones. Senior homes of more than six are permitted subject to a Minor Use Permit in the RM, RMH, RH, and VC zones. 139 373 The Zoning Code also includes provisions for the reduction of parking requirements for affordable, senior and special needs housing, including senior and/or group homes, if a project proponent can demonstrate a reduced need for parking. The City also enforces ADA standards for the number of parking spaces required for persons with disabilities. There are no conditions or requirements imposed for group homes that would affect the development or conversion of residences to meet the needs of persons with disabilities. There are no minimum distance standards between two or more special needs housing developments. The City of La Quinta has adopted the 2019 California Building Code, as well as the 2019 California Mechanical, Electrical, Energy, Fire, Residential, Green Building, and Plumbing Codes. No amendments have been made to the codes that would diminish the ability to accommodate persons with disabilities. There are no restrictions on requests for retrofitting of homes for accessibility, such as ramps and handrails. Requests for such retrofits are handled as any other minor improvement to a home necessitating a building permit, with the exception that the design must meet all applicable standards and ADA requirements, and is reviewed at the inspection phase for conformance to construction requirements. Although requests for retrofit of existing homes have been extremely limited in the past few years, a number of homes advertised for resale in the Cove area have been retrofitted or built specifically for persons with physical disabilities and are described as such. The public review process for the approval of group or senior homes is no different from any other permitted use in the applicable zone. Where a group or senior home is permitted by right, no public hearing is required. The project is brought to the Planning Commission if a MUP is required, and is subject to consideration and approval as any other use permitted by MUP. Where a senior group home may be requested with a MUP as part of a specific plan, the use would be considered and approved within the established public hearing process as part of the total specific plan and subject to the applicable Zoning Code provisions. Environmental and Infrastructure Constraints Development of new housing in La Quinta will continue to take place throughout the City. Public services and infrastructure are being upgraded and expanded within the City. Major flood control programs have been funded by the City and constructed by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) for the protection of the Cove Area. In response to growth, Desert Sands and Coachella Valley Unified School Districts 140 374 operate several elementary schools, middle schools, and high schools that serve La Quinta residents. Three Riverside County Fire Department stations serve the City. The potable water system in the City is operated and administered by CVWD. The sanitary sewage collection and treatment system in the City is operated and administered by CVWD, which extends service based upon approved designs and improvements constructed by the private developer. Senate Bill (SB) 1o87 requires water and sewer providers to create procedures to provide priority water and sewer service to lower income residential projects. The law also prohibits the denial or conditioning the approval of service without adequate findings and requires future water management plans to identify projected water use for lower income residential development. The City routes the Housing Element update to CVWD to facilitate consistency with these requirements. The City of La Quinta is served by Southern California Gas Company. The Southern California Gas Company has indicated that the future supply of natural gas will meet demand generated by additional development in the City. Major infrastructure improvements, including full -width streets, water and sewer mains, and stormwater systems, are the responsibility of the developer to install with any development. Developers are required to provide parks or in -lieu fees as part of a residential development. When infrastructure improvements are made that benefit other properties, the subdivider is reimbursed from the area fund when other properties in the area are developed. Non -Governmental Constraints Projects requiring a Site Development Permit generally apply for building permits with 3o -go days of approval. The building permit plan check process is expedited, and if plans are submitted with only minor deficiencies, building permits will be issued within 30 to 6o days of submittal. The City has not received requests for projects at densities lower than that proposed in the Land Use Inventory, and works with applicants to assure that the targeted density is achieved or exceeded. Opportunities for Energy Conservation The City has adopted a comprehensive Green and Sustainable La Quinta Program to enhance the City's conservation of resources and to reduce 141 375 environmental impacts of existing and future conditions. This program will allow the City to consider a wide range of programs that will address energy, water, air quality, solid waste, land use, and transportation. Current Regulations and Programs Title 24 Regulations On a regulatory level, the City enforces the State Energy Conservation Standards (Title 24, California Code of Regulations). These standards incorporated into the City's Building Code provide a great deal of flexibility for individual builders to achieve a minimum "energy budget" through the use of various performance standards. These requirements apply to all new residential and commercial construction as well as remodeling and rehabilitation construction where square footage is added. Compliance with Title 24 on the use of energy-efficient appliances and insulation has reduced energy demand stemming from new residential development. Green Building Programs Two prominent green building programs are California Green Builder, recognized by the California Energy Commission, and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), which is sponsored by the US Green Building Council. Both programs involve a third -party certification process, have different environmental goals, and apply to different types of development. Green Builder is a voluntary environmental building and certification program for residential construction. Certified homes incorporate water -efficient landscaping and fixtures, utilize high efficiency insulation and ventilation systems, contain environmentally sound building materials, initiate waste reduction methods during construction, and must be 15 percent over existing Title 24 energy efficiency standards. LEED is a national rating system for green buildings. Primarily focused on commercial and multifamily residential projects, LEED requires the developer to register their project with the US Green Building Council, which in turn reviews the project for conformance and assigns points based upon various efficiency, materials quality, and design factors. Once the Council has reviewed the project, it issues a certification based upon the number of points achieved in each category. City Projects The City has undertaken an aggressive series of green building programs that demonstrate the opportunities available to reduce the overall 142 376 environmental impact of new developments. The Title 24 energy efficiency requirements significantly increase the overall energy efficiency of all new construction, and now require photovoltaic systems for residential projects, and will require them for commercial projects in 2030. Vista Dunes Courtyard Homes Located at 78-990 Miles Avenue (just west of Adams Street), the Vista Dunes project consists of 8o affordable courtyard -oriented single-family and duplex homes. This LEED Platinum certified development includes photovoltaic cells to generate electrical power. This feature will annually save $720 per unit in electric utility costs. Water saving improvements will reduce water usage by 1,900,00o gallons per year for the entire project. It is estimated that this project exceeds Title 24 by 28 percent. Some of the units will exceed Title 24 requirements by 30 percent or more. At the time of its development, Vista Dunes Courtyard Homes was the first LEED Platinum certified multifamily affordable housing development of its size in the country. The City maintains a photographic history of the project and produced a video for educational purposes. Further, tenants will be educated on energy efficiencies through written materials, a DVD and the project operator, CORE Housing Management. Wolff Waters Place Housing Project This affordable housing development exceeds Title 24 requirements by 24 percent and will save approximately 2,000,000 gallons of water from interior water use alone. Compliance with the CVWD Ordinance will further reduce exterior water use. The project is LEED certified and includes solar hot water for laundry buildings, a transit friendly location with a bus stop and shopping within walking distance, low -water -use landscape and irrigation, dual flush toilets, low -flow water fixtures, energy-efficient lights, ENERGY STAR appliances, recycled building materials, paint with low volatile organic compounds, reduced construction waste, advanced indoor air handling systems, underground parking, high efficiency air conditioning units, and a tenant training program. It also includes an onsite childcare center; for residents using the childcare center, the proximity of the daycare center to housing units reduces vehicle miles traveled and associated greenhouse gas emissions. 143 377 Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan In conjunction with the adoption of its 2013 General Plan, the City adopted a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan. The Plan provides residents, business owners and land owners with a broad range of measures designed to reduce energy use and the use of fossil fuels. The Plan will be effective in reducing costs for existing homes and for new residential development. It will also allow changes in driving patterns, transit use and other measures that will reduce the City's dependence on traditional energy sources. Future City Programs/Actions The City seeks to encourage and enforce regulations or incentives that do not serve as constraints to the development or rehabilitation of housing. The City should focus on measures and techniques that assist the occupant in reducing energy costs, thereby increasing the amount of income that can be spent on housing, childcare, health care, or other necessary costs. The continued implementation of the City's Green and Sustainable La Quinta Program will require ongoing participation of many city departments and agencies. The program includes the City's adherence to and promotion of green building practices, efficient energy usage, and implementation of conservation measures. The City provides information to developers based on research of best building practices and operational practices, such as commercial recycling programs provided in AB 1826. Program costs could include energy audit upgrades for existing facilities and buildings, irrigation and landscape modifications to City -maintained properties, City fleet vehicles, and City maintenance equipment. The City's 2013 General Plan includes a Livable Community Element that provides direction on building siting, mixed use site planning, and energy reduction techniques. The element also includes a suite of policies and programs designed to lower energy costs, promote healthy living, and encourage high quality design. Under the direction of the City Manager's Office, Community Development and Community Services Department staff plays an instrumental role in educating the community on water conservation programs and resources. Energy Conservation Partners In developing a better La Quinta, the City cannot be successful without a sound relationship with Coachella Valley Water District, Imperial Irrigation District, Southern California Gas, Burrtec Waste and Recycling 144 378 Services, Sunline Transit District, Coachella Valley Association of Governments, SCAG, and other entities. Additionally, many of the areas of concern, such as air quality and regional transportation, cannot be addressed without strong regional, state and federal programs. Utility Programs The City of La Quinta has a strong working relationship with local utility providers, including the Imperial Irrigation District (IID). IID is proactive in creating energy savings via conservation programs, home energy audits, product rebates, and general consumer tips. I I D indicates that an average home owner can reduce energy use by to percent more by taking advantage of IID programs. IID offers rebate programs on the purchase of higher efficiency air conditioning units, the high efficiency refrigerators, and programmable thermostats. Additionally, product rebates are offered on ENERGY STAR equipment such as home and office electronics. IID also offers free in-home energy audits to its residential customers. Other utility programs assist residential customers with energy and water conservation and cost reduction. SoCalGas offers rebates on energy-efficient appliances, incentives for solar thermal water heating, and grants and assistance programs to reduce energy costs. The City works cooperatively with CVWD to promote and enforce, as required, water conservation programs, including those affecting homeowners and home builders. Burrtec offers programs that reduce solid waste and increase recycling opportunities. HOUSING RESOURCES Regional Housing Needs Assessment State Housing Law requires that SCAG identify future housing needs in each jurisdiction. To meet this mandate, SCAG develops the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), which establishes both the projected need for housing and the fair share distribution of the projected need to its member jurisdictions. The RHNA calculates the projected new construction necessary to accommodate the anticipated population through October 2029. State housing law requires that cities and counties demonstrate adequate residential sites that could accommodate development of housing to satisfy future housing needs. 145 379 The 2021 RHNA proposes that La Quinta construct 1,53o new housing units to accommodate housing needs for all income groups during the planning period January 2022 through October 2029. These units are distributed by income category as illustrated in Table II -48. According to SCAG, 42o new units are needed to accommodate very low income households. Consistent with HCD methodologies, 50% (210) of these units are assumed to be for extremely low income (ELI) households, and the remaining 50% (21o) are assumed to be for very low income households. A total of 269 new units are needed to accommodate low income households, 297 new units are needed for moderate income households, and 544 new units (provided through market -rate housing) are needed for above moderate income households. The City's 1,53o -unit future housing need is a 6.2 percent increase in the number of existing dwelling units (24,764 in 2019). Table II -48 2022-2029 Regional Housing Needs Assessment Household Income Levels Income as a Percent of County Median RHNA Allocation Percent Extremely Low' --- 210 13.7 Very Low Less than 50% 210 13.7 Low 51%-80% 269 17.6 Moderate 81%-120% 297 19.4 Above -Moderate Over i20% 544 35.6 Total 1,530 100% Source: Regional Housing Needs Assessment for Southern California, 2021, prepared by SCAG. ' Extremely Low Income (ELI) category is a subset of the Very Low Income category. ELI households are defined by HCD as those with incomes less than 30% of AMI. The number of ELI units is assumed to be so% of all Very Low Income units. California housing element law allows local governments to obtain credit toward its RHNA housing goals in three ways: constructed and approved units, vacant and underutilized land, and the preservation of existing affordable housing. The City will rely on the construction of new units on vacant lands to meet its housing needs between 2022 and 2029. Meeting the Need for Affordable Housing With the loss of redevelopment set-aside funds, the State has limited the City's ability to provide funding for new affordable housing projects. The City, however, continues to be committed to addressing its housing need. 146 380 The City continues to market its land in the Village (sites #2 through #6 in the land inventory, which could produce up to 42 additional units of very low and low income housing. Additional efforts will be made toward expanding housing opportunities in the Highway 111 corridor, on lands owned by private parties. Highway 111 provides access to jobs, transit, and has successfully integrated the Coral Mountain project, which the City built in the last planning period. To that end, site #13, owned by the City, has been added to the inventory, and is projected to provide 116 units for very low and low income households. The balance of the units, as shown in Table II -51, will be accommodated on multiple sites throughout the City, and will be developed through a combination of private development projects, and public/private partnerships where the City can participate if resources allow. The City has only recently seen an increase in inquiries regarding ADUs, and it is expected that with the latest additions to the Zoning Code (2021) to address changes in State law, that interest will increase. A program has been added to encourage, monitor and reevaluate the demand for ADUs throughout the planning period as a tool to expand affordable housing options for City residents. As discussed earlier in this Element, current conditions in the real estate market make it possible for moderate income households to afford market rate housing. Further, the rental market offers a broad range of units at rental rates, with a median gross rent of $1,473 per month. Table II -49 demonstrates the affordability of market rate rentals and home purchases in La Quinta for a moderate income four -person household. 147 381 Table II -49 Affordability of Housing 2021 As shown in the table, the rental and resale market can accommodate some of the City's expected moderate income households during the 2022-2029 planning period. Available Land for Housing The Housing Element must identify available sites within the City that can accommodate the RHNA. The land inventory includes an analysis of the realistic capacity of the sites. An evaluation of zoning, densities, market demand, record of affordable housing development, and financial feasibility will establish the ability of available sites to provide housing for all income levels. Available Vacant Land The vacant land inventory only includes parcels that the City has identified as having the potential to develop during the 2022-2029 planning period. Additional vacant sites are located in the City but are not assumed to have the potential to satisfy the current RHNA for lower income households. The development potential for Village Commercial (VC) sites is assumed to be improved through logical consolidation with adjacent vacant lots. The City has seen interest in the development of more dense residential projects in the Village, indicating that the development community has an interest and is participating in lot consolidation which could result in additional units in this part of the City. The City will encourage and facilitate lot consolidation in this district through incentives provided in Program H -3.3.b. The City will also continue to consider City -owned lands, not on the inventory, for affordable housing projects in the Village. The City's flexible 148 382 Ownership Rental Median Existing Single $386,200 N/A Family Purchase Price Monthly Mortgage $2,047 N/A Costs (PITT) Median Gross Monthly N A / $1,473 Rent 30% of Monthly Moderate Household $2,259 $2,259 Income' Affordability $z�z $786 Gap/Overage ' Per HCD, the annual income limit for a moderate income 4 -person household in Riverside County is $90,350. Therefore, the monthly income is $7,529, and 30% is $2,259• As shown in the table, the rental and resale market can accommodate some of the City's expected moderate income households during the 2022-2029 planning period. Available Land for Housing The Housing Element must identify available sites within the City that can accommodate the RHNA. The land inventory includes an analysis of the realistic capacity of the sites. An evaluation of zoning, densities, market demand, record of affordable housing development, and financial feasibility will establish the ability of available sites to provide housing for all income levels. Available Vacant Land The vacant land inventory only includes parcels that the City has identified as having the potential to develop during the 2022-2029 planning period. Additional vacant sites are located in the City but are not assumed to have the potential to satisfy the current RHNA for lower income households. The development potential for Village Commercial (VC) sites is assumed to be improved through logical consolidation with adjacent vacant lots. The City has seen interest in the development of more dense residential projects in the Village, indicating that the development community has an interest and is participating in lot consolidation which could result in additional units in this part of the City. The City will encourage and facilitate lot consolidation in this district through incentives provided in Program H -3.3.b. The City will also continue to consider City -owned lands, not on the inventory, for affordable housing projects in the Village. The City's flexible 148 382 development and use standards further facilitate the development of a range of housing types. The Table also includes 456 units for above moderate income households. These are all associated with approved projects which are expected to develop during the planning period. In addition, existing vacant single family lots are located throughout the City which only require building permit approvals, and two large planned communities are currently in the entitlement process, and would result in more than 2,822 units in the City, as shown in Table III -23. Table II -51 provides a summary of the vacant land with residential development potential within the City. A map showing the parcel locations is provided in Exhibit II -25. As shown on the map, inventory lands are geographically distributed throughout the City and are not concentrated in any areas. As such, they further fair housing principles. The City owns some of the sites shown in Table 11-51. Some of these lots are located in the Village, and are small lots that the City has assembled over several years. The City is marketing the lots as consolidated parcels, and will complete lot mergers (as provided in Program H -1.1.b) to facilitate their sale. Two sites are located in the center of the City, and will be marketed for joint venture with the affordable housing development community. Sites will be offered, consistent with the Surplus Land Act, through Requests for Proposals. Table II -51 includes sites which were in the City's inventory in the prior planning period, but no sites have been included in the inventory for two consecutive previous planning periods. 149 383 Table II -50 Vacant Land Inventory Map Key APN Acres Existing GP Existing Zoning Projected Density Projected Yield Very Low, Low and Moderate Income Sites 1 646-070-016 13.84 MHDR RMH (AHO) 20 28o 2 770156007 0.23 VC VC 14 4 770156010 0.39 VC VC 14 5 77o181oo9 0.36 VC VC 14 5 3 (City Owned) 773078005 0.11 MC/VC MC/VC 14 1 773078006 0.11 MC/VC MC/VC 14 1 773078007 0.11 MC/VC MC/VC 14 1 773078o16 0.12 MC/VC MC/VC 14 2 773078017 0.12 MC/VC MC/VC 14 z 773078034 1.11 MC/VC MC/VC 14 15 6 609070053 CG CC (AHO) 22 7 604-032-042 1.88 MHDR RMH 12 zz 8 (City Owned) 600-030-010 2.72 of MHDR RMH 11.29 19 52 9 600-390-024 15.14 CG CP/CR 18 273 10* 600080001 0.19 MHDR RM 10 z 600080002 0.19 MHDR RM 10 z 600080003 0.19 MHDR RM 10 2 600080004 0.19 MHDR RM 10 2 600080005 0.19 MHDR RM 10 z 600080006 0.19 MHDR RM 10 2 600080007 0.19 MHDR RM 10 2 600080008 0.19 MHDR RM 10 2 600080009 0.21 MHDR RM 10 2 600080041 2.4 MHDR RM 10 24 11 643-020-025 4.81 CG CR 26 126 12* 600340050 4.46 MHDR RM 8 36 600340051 13.01 MHDR RM 8 104 13 (City Owned) 600-020-057 6.42 CG CR 18 116 Total Very Low, Low and Moderate Income Sites 1,367 *Moderate income site Above Moderate Income Sites Acres Existing GP Existing Zoning Projected Density Projected Yield 15 Various 40.76 LDR/OS-R RVL/PR 3 90 16 Various 37.43 LDR RL/PR 3 60 150 384 Table II -50 Vacant Land Inventory Map Key APN Acres Existing GP Existing Zoning Projected Density Projected Yield 17 Various 29.56 LDR RL 3 94 18 Various 20.72 LDR RL 3 57 19 Various 33.07 LDR RL 3 85 20 Various 28.76 LDR RL 3 70 Total Above Moderate Sites 456 Total All Sites 151 385 I 1 L A TERRA NOVA PILWl 6 ws..C, INC City of La Quinta General Plan Inventory Map La Quinta, California ExNhit 11-25 152 386 13 120F 6 ' I L FRED WARINi.pf ., Y i r. _.... _._._. _._._�� i MIL� 1 i,... 56th AVE. 7 m i 1 !f i ♦, ............i ISS._,+ ; •� i kN io i� N OS ii AL 1 z52nd AVE. ; -................ , ........... BEL � CC Q IL i 101 c0 W 91 Q 11AL 3 I 1 L A TERRA NOVA PILWl 6 ws..C, INC City of La Quinta General Plan Inventory Map La Quinta, California ExNhit 11-25 152 386 13 120F ` 1 1 i,... 56th AVE. i kLn Zoning o � kN io i� N OS a a LU 1 z52nd AVE. ; -................ , � CC Q LL LL i CN c0 W — � s Q CP 3 54th AVE. k 15�' CR A CT FP (( - GC 2!:� k MC ! OS 20 16 _ PR - RC 190 i ! _ RH i RL 18 ! ; RM ......_..._ _........... _._. _._._._..._._ _,� 60th AVE. - RMH i ; 17 ROW RVL i ' ! VC ,......._._._._._._.i 62nd AVE_ ....... i ! i ! i ! 1 ' i i N i 64th AVE. ' - I -,- .--..i ..i Miles_ I 1 L A TERRA NOVA PILWl 6 ws..C, INC City of La Quinta General Plan Inventory Map La Quinta, California ExNhit 11-25 152 386 Site Adequacy Analysis The sites shown in Table II -5o, above, all accommodate residential development at various densities. Site 1 is residentially designated, and benefits from the Affordable Housing Overlay, which increases its density potential (please see below). Residential development in La Quinta, particularly that for affordable housing projects, has been built at or near the maximum allowable densities. For example, development in the RM zone generally occurred at the maximum density of 8 units per acre or above through density bonus provisions. Miraflores Apartments were constructed at a density Of 11.2 units per acre in the RM zone in 2003. In 2004, Hadley Villas Apartments were developed at a density of 7.8 units per acre in the RM zone. In 2001, the Aventine Apartments were constructed at a density Of 14.3 units per acre in the RH zone. The City's most recent restricted affordable projects have also been completed within existing residential densities: Wolff Waters Place was built at 14.7 units per acre, the Washington Street Apartments' expansion was completed at a density of 8 units per acre, Vista Dunes was built at a density of 10 units per acre, and the Coral Mountain Apartments were built at a density of 16 units per acre. In order to expand the analysis of realistic capacity, other cities in the Coachella Valley were analyzed. As the area operates as a region, with similar building trends, zoning requirements and land use patterns, an analysis of regional trends is appropriate. The following projects are planned or under construction regionally: Palm Springs: • Monarch Apartments, will provide 6o units affordable to very low and low income households on -3 6 acres, at a density of 17 units per acre. The project is fully funded and will break ground in October of 2021. Palm Desert: • Carlos Ortega Villas, consists of 72 units on 3.48 acres affordable to very low and low income households, at a density of 21 units per acre. • Vitalia, 270 units affordable to very low and low income households on 12 acres approved in 2021, at a density of 23 units per acre. • Millennium SARDA site, 240 units affordable to very low and low income households on 10 acres, under contract in 2021, at a density of 24 units per acre. 153 387 Indio: • Arroyo Crossing 1 is currently under construction, and provides 184 units on 6.4 acres affordable to very low and low income households, at a density of 29 units per acre. • Arroyo Crossing z, will provide 216 units affordable to very low and low income households on 7.3 acres, at a density of 30 units per acre. The project was approved in 2021. In the region, projects ranging in density from 17 to 29 units per acre are being funded and can be built to accommodate lower income households. Therefore, the densities for larger projects, ranging from 18 to 26 units per acre, can be achieved in La Quinta. In the past, the City has applied the Affordable Housing Overlay to specific inventory sites which were zoned for non-residential uses. This strategy is being modified (see Program 3.1.a) to apply to all inventory sites, and to increase the AHO density to 30 units per acre, even though, as demonstrates above, affordable housing projects in the region are being built at lower densities. The 3o unit per acre density will be the base on which density bonus provisions will be applied, as described in Program 3.1.a. Units built using the AHO must be affordable to lower income households, unless they are identified as moderate income sites in Table II -5o. As provided in Program 3.1.a, the AHO will allow three story construction (consistent with the existing High Density Residential Zone), and shall be analyzed to assure that development standards are sufficient to allow the 3o unit per acre density. Site 2 consists of three small lots in the Village, on Desert Club Drive. The three lots have been approved for 14 apartments which are to be affordable to moderate income households. The three lots may be merged by the owner, but can proceed as three lots without further City processes. The owner has been finalizing building plans and construction is expected in 2022. As shown in Table III -49, market rental rates in the City are affordable to moderate income households. Therefore, these units have been included for moderate income households. Three sites in Table II -5o are over 10 acres in size. Although the State does not believe that these sites can be developed for affordable housing, the Coachella Valley is experiencing development of lower income projects on larger sites, including two projects in Palm Desert described above. Nevertheless, in order to encourage the development of affordable projects on these sites, Program 3.1.a has been added, which provides incentives for subdivision of larger sites. 154 388 Site 6 is one of these aforementioned sites over to acres in size. It is commercially designated and benefits from the Affordable Housing Overlay. The site is 12.74 acres under the City's Community Commercial zoning designation, which allows for multifamily residential development. The property not only allows for multifamily residential but mixed use development as well. The Affordable Housing Overlay allows for a density up to 30 units per acre and mixed use projects allow for density up to 24 units per acre, but this site is proposed at zz units to the acre, more consistent with development in region. The site is within a "High Resource" area, per Exhibit II -14, and its proximity to Highway 111 and bordering of a middle school makes it an ideal site. It should also be noted that Site lo, which includes multiple small lots for 42 moderate income units, is an approved apartment project which is being constructed on land previously owned by the City, which was successfully sold to a private developer. The project is expected to be constructed in the next two years. The parcels previously were developed as single family homes, which the City bought to widen Jefferson Street. Upon completion of the widening, the lots were marketed to the private development community, and an apartment project was proposed in 2019, and approved in zozo for the site. The City therefore has experience in the assembly of smaller lots for the successful development of housing. Finally, sites 15 through zo are provided to accommodate above moderate income households. These sites are all located in existing approved communities or tract maps, and require only residential building permits to proceed to construction. Environment and Infrastructure Analysis None of the parcels identified in the vacant land inventory are located in areas of topographic constraint or have known environmental hazards. The sites identified in the vacant land inventory are adjacent to existing urbanized development and are within service hook-up distance of existing water and sewer systems as well as all dry utilities in adjacent streets. All providers have sufficient capacity to accommodate the growth generated by the units listed in Table II -51. According to the latest Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) Urban Water Management Plan (2015), the implementation of water conservation, groundwater recharge, and water source substitution management strategies will ensure that adequate water resources are available to existing and future residents of La Quinta. 155 389 Affordability Analysis It is expected that development of affordable housing units will be accomplished through public-private partnerships, with a focus on two areas of the City: the Village for smaller projects that bring residents into the expanding commercial downtown, and along Highway 111, building upon the success of the Coral Mountain apartments. It is important to note that the sites identified provide a variety of land sizes to allow flexibility in types of projects, and exceed the City's need for very low and low income units, allowing for greater opportunities for a mix of market and affordable units within projects. As described above, the median sales price for a home is approximately $386,2oo and the median gross rent for an apartment unit is approximately $1,473 per month. In comparison, the maximum affordable sales price for a moderate income family of four is $313,650 and the maximum affordable rent for a moderate income couple is $1,8o8 per month. Moderate income households, therefore, can afford to rent in the City and are able to afford homes that are lower than the median price currently. Some moderate income households, especially one and two person households or larger families, will need assistance to purchase a home. The City will continue to work with affordable housing developers to participate in projects and provide streamlining, financial assistance and fee reductions wherever possible. However, it is important to note, as identified by participating affordable housing developers in the City's workshop and outreach, that funding affordable housing projects has been made much more difficult with the loss of local redevelopment funds, and that these developers must identify and secure twice or three times the funding sources that were previously necessary to fund projects. This constraint is one that the City cannot control and cannot alleviate. General proforma analyses were conducted using land costs (average of $448,493 per acre of vacant residential land in La Quinta) and construction costs ($317,074 per unit of affordable housing according to affordable housing developers contacted in the preparation of this Update) to estimate the capacity of land in La Quinta to support affordable housing. The results indicate that homeownership products will remain available to moderate income households without a very large subsidy. The developers of ownership projects require financial returns through the one-time sale of the housing units. 156 390 A generally accepted minimum project size for affordable housing development is 50 units. Like their higher density counterparts, lower density sites able to accommodate 50 units are eligible for funding mechanisms such as Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTCs), a type of restricted development that must meet strict size and amenity guidelines to compete forfunding. High density is also nota determining factor in obtaining other resources, such as HOME funds and Community Development Block Grant program funding. The RM and RMH sites identified in Table II -50, would both allow a minimum project size consistent with these requirements. Financial and Regulatory Subsidies A subsidy can be financial or regulatory in nature. Financial subsidies are found in federal, state, local, and private programs and organizations focused on the production of affordable housing. Developers in La Quinta use and leverage many sources of financial assistance. Projects may seek funding from LIHTCs, tax-exempt bonds, Community Development Block Grants, HOME funds, other HUD grant programs, and commercial banking resources. Regulatory subsidies can take many forms, including fee waivers or deferrals, flexible development standards, and increased densities. Higher densities generally increase the financial feasibility of a residential project as a developer is able to sell more housing units on the same amount and cost of land (even with slightly lower sales prices associated with smaller, attached units). The City's vision recognizes the importance of providing affordable housing for its residents and employees. Accordingly, the City supports affordable housing development through financial and regulatory subsidies and permits densities up to 24 units per acre with the Affordable Housing Overlay (higher densities are permitted through density bonus provisions). The City is thereby able to achieve both the goal of maintaining lower density community character while also producing its fair share of affordable housing. Vacant Land Opportunities The City has established a strong record of providing assistance to affordable multifamily housing projects (townhomes and apartments), ranging in density from 7.8 to over 20 units per acre. Single-family detached assisted housing was also developed, with City assistance, at densities as low as 4.4 units per acre and up to 7.8 units per acre. 157 391 La Quinta is able to achieve market-driven moderate income housing through the relative affordability of land, the local market demand for lower maintenance housing types, and reasonable development impact and entitlement fees. La Quinta has a solid record of working with local nonprofits and affordable housing developers to accommodate the housing needs of its lower income residents. The vacant land inventory provides the City and affordable housing developers with a map of opportunity areas. The moderate income housing need can be met without any mixed-use development. However, the City recognizes that mixed-use developments will play a role in moderate and above moderate housing opportunities in the future. Both the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance have been modified to encourage Mixed Use development. The City's efforts to promote mixed use development have had limited success. According to the development community, mixed use projects cannot be financed in La Quinta, due to a lack of such projects in the region. Mixed use properties are therefore not included in this inventory. Fair Housing According to the Fair Housing analysis (see "Fair Housing" section), the City has a low segregation level, no racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, equal access to opportunity, and no disproportionate housing needs. The sites identified above will not exacerbate any such conditions. 158 392 PRESERVATION OF AT RISK UNITS State Government Code requires that localities identify and develop a program for their Housing Elements for the preservation of affordable multifamily units assisted under various federal, state and local programs. In the preservation analysis, localities are required to provide an inventory of assisted, affordable units that are eligible to convert to market rate within five years of the end of the planning period (2034)• Income -restricted housing units sometimes change to market rate due to expiration of subsidies, mortgage prepayments, or expiration of affordability restrictions. An inventory of all assisted multifamily projects is provided in Table II -51. The earliest possible date of conversion for any of the City's restricted multifamily housing stock is 2051 for the extremely low and low income units at Seasons Senior Apartments. There are no at risk units in the City. 393 Table II -51 Assisted Multifamily Project Inventory Source: City of La Quinta ' Rental assistance for anyone <_ 5o% AMI or lower Maintenance of the at -risk housing units as affordable will depend largely on market conditions, the status of HUD renewals of Section 8 contracts, and the attractiveness of financial incentives, if warranted. 16o 394 Earliest Extremely Very Low Moderate Above Project Date of Low Low (80%) (1zo%) Moderate Total Conversion (30%) (50%) (120%+) Aventine Apartments 2056 --- --- 10 10 --- 20 (4775o Adams St) Hadley Villas Senior Apartments 2059 65 12 1 1 79 (78875 Avenue 47) Seasons at Miraflores Senior Apartments 2057 45 71 --- --- --- 116 (47747 Gertrude Way) Seasons La Quinta Senior Apartments 2051 19 --- 37 31 --- 87 (50915 Rainbow Ct.) Vista Dunes Courtyard Homes 2o63 8 64 8 --- --- 8o (44950 Vista Dunes Lane) Washington Street (senior) Apartments' 2o66 24 72 42 2 --- 140 (42800 Washington) Wolff Waters Place PlaceDune 2065 43 56 37 8o --- 216 Palms Road) Coral Mountain Apartments 2070 --- 36 138 z --- 176 (79625 Vista Coralina Lane) Total N/A zoo 311 273 125 1 914 Source: City of La Quinta ' Rental assistance for anyone <_ 5o% AMI or lower Maintenance of the at -risk housing units as affordable will depend largely on market conditions, the status of HUD renewals of Section 8 contracts, and the attractiveness of financial incentives, if warranted. 16o 394 GOALS, POLICIES, AND PROGRAMS The following goals, policies, and programs set forth a comprehensive housing plan for the City of La Quinta during the 2022-2029 planning period. Adequate Sites for Housing GOAL H-1 Provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population. ❖ Policy H-1.1 Identify adequate sites to accommodate a range of product types, densities, and prices to address the housing needs of all household types, lifestyles, and income levels. Provide new housing choices by increasing affordable housing supply in higher opportunity areas and throughout the community, and improve housing mobility through encouraging various housing options such as accessory dwelling units and creative housing solutions. Program i.i.a: To address the City's RHNA allocation for extremely low income households, 15% of units on the City's land on Highway 111 (site #13) will be assigned to extremely low income households. The City shall negotiate very low income units for all other projects on sites identified in the Vacant Land Inventory (Table II -50) individually to reach the target of 210 units during the planning period. ■ Timing: June 2025 for Highway 111 project, as projects are constructed for additional units ■ Funding Source: Private Funding, Tax Credit Financing, Other sources as identified ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Housing Program l.i.b: The City will merge its parcels in the Village (as listed in Table II -51) to facilitate the consolidation of these lots for sale through the Surplus Land Act. ■ Timing: June 2023 for lot mergers. June 2024 for RFPs and land sales. 161 395 ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Housing Program ti.c: To encourage the development of housing for extremely low, low and special needs residents, the City will develop a program of incentives for the subdivision of larger sites, to include application fee waivers, DIFfee reductions and expedited processing. The City will contact the owners of the three sites listed in Table II -5o and encourage that they subdivide the land and take advantage of the City's incentive program. ■ Timing: June 2022 for development of program. June 2023f or initial contacts with land owners, and annually thereafter. ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Planning Division, City Manager's Office/Housing •'• Policy H-1.2 Focus housing growth within existing City boundaries until it is necessary to pursue annexation or development in planning areas for affordable housing. ❖ Policy H-1.3 Direct new housing development to viable areas where essential public facilities are provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are available. ❖ Policy H-1.4 The City shall promote and affirmatively further fair housing opportunities throughout the community for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, familial status, disability, source of income, veteran or military status, or other characteristics protected by the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Government Code Section 65oo8, and any other applicable state and federal fair housing and planning law. Assist in the Development of Affordable Housing GOAL H-2 Assist in the creation and provision of resources to support housing for lower and moderate income households. 162 396 •'• Policy H-2.1 Increase housing choices for lower and moderate income households in areas of higher need and throughout the community. Address disproportionate housing needs and alleviate disproportionate cost burdens on lower and moderate income households by providing more affordable housing units. Program H -2.1.a: Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) The City will modify its Zoning Ordinance to comply with State law regarding ADUs and JADUs and provide for the reduced parking standards, setbacks and other incentives included in the law. The City shall establish a program to encourage the building of ADUs and JADUs, with a goal of z new units per year throughout the planning period, and monitor their development to gauge if they are affordable alternatives for housing. The program will include tracking annual permits, an annual survey of rents in ADUs, and whether any ADUs are accepting housing subsidy or restricting their units to very low or low income households. ■ Timing: Zoning amendments June 2022. Monitoring program beginning June 2023. ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department Program H -2.1.b: City -owned Lots Aggressively pursue development of the City's central -city properties (sites 8 and 13) to generate up to 168 units of extremely low, very low and low income units on these parcels. To implement this program, the City will establish a schedule for Requests for Proposals and include incentives. These incentives may include elimination of Development Impact Fees, financial assistance in the form of land contributions, and density bonuses as provided in the Zoning Ordinance. In addition, the City will consider affordable housing for other City -owned lots in the Village when marketing the land for development, including mixed use projects that combine retail and residential uses. Wherever possible, include 15% affordable units in these projects ■ Timing: Annually, beginning with June 2023. ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Housing 163 397 Program H -2.1.c: Creative Housing Solutions In order to expand the variety of housing options for extremely low and low income households in the City, study, research and pursue the amendments to the Zoning Code and subdivision ordinance that would be required to allow creative housing solutions, including "tiny homes," prefabricated or "kit" homes, shipping container conversions, and other options available in the market as they arise. Present the findings of the research to the Planning Commission and Council for their consideration. This program could generate up to 4 units per year in creative housing solutions. ■ Timing: Research June 2024. Planning Commission and City Council Study Session no later than June 2025. Amendments per Council direction by the end of 2025. ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department ❖ Policy H-2.2 Support public, private, and nonprofit efforts in the development of affordable housing. Program H -2.2.a: Density Bonus Amendments Revise the Zoning Ordinance to ensure compliance with Assembly Bill (AB) 2345 as it pertains to Density Bonus requirements. • Timing: June 2022 regular Zoning Ordinance update • Funding Source: General Fund • Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department ❖ Policy H-2.3 Pursue a variety of forms of private, local, state, and federal assistance to support development of affordable housing throughout the community. Program H -2-3.a: Collaborative Partnerships The City shall continue to meet with affordable housing development entities to discuss types of incentives available and requirements for obtaining assistance, discuss appropriate sites for housing for extremely low, low and special needs residents, and foster professional collaboration between the City and affordable housing stakeholders. This program could result in 2 new partnership projects during the planning period. 164 398 ■ Timing: Project -by -project basis, by request, or on an annual basis. ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department Program H -2-3.b: Mixed Use in the Highway 111 Corridor In order to take advantage of the high density residential permitted in the Mixed Use overlay, develop a menu of incentives, including reduction in development fees, density bonuses and other provisions for the inclusion of affordable housing units in Mixed Use projects within the Highway 111 Plan area. This program could result in 100 to Soo new units of affordable housing in the Corridor. ■ Timing: Menu of incentives, June 2023. As projects are proposed ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Housing Program H -2-3.c: Affordable Housing Renter -to -Owner Transition There are many resources that the City, nonprofits, or for-profit developers may utilize to subsidize the construction and maintenance of affordable housing. This program, in conjunction with Program H -2-3.a, could result in 2 new partnership projects during the planning period. Some of the most prominent resources are described below. ■ Timing: Update website with funding information and partnership opportunities by June 2022, and every six months thereafter. ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Housing Low Income Tax Credits Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) provides federal tax credits for private developers and investors that agree to set aside all or a portion of their units for low income households. A minimum of 20 percent of the units must be affordable to low income households and 40 percent of the units must be affordable to moderate income households. 165 399 Community Reinvestment Act The Community Reinvestment Act provides favorable financing to affordable housing developers. The Redevelopment Agency, development community, and local, regional, and national banks are encouraged to work together to meet their obligations pursuant to the Community Reinvestment Act. California Housing Finance Agency Program The California Housing Finance Agency (CHFA) has three single- family programs for primarily moderate and middle income homebuyers: the Home Ownership Assistance Program and the Affordable Housing Partnership Program. Each provides permanent mortgage financing for first-time homebuyers at below-market interest rates. HOME Funds HOME is the largest Federal block grant distributed to state and local governments for the creation of lower income housing. Cities apply when Notices of Funding Availability are issued. Neighborhood Stabilization Program HUD's Neighborhood Stabilization Program makes emergency assistance grants available to local governments for the acquisition, redevelopment, and renting or resale of foreclosed properties at -risk of abandonment. Riverside County First -Time Homebuyers Program Continue participation in the Riverside County First -Time Homebuyers Program for low and moderate income households. Mortgage Credit Certificate The Riverside County Mortgage Credit Certificate Program is designed to assist low and moderate income first time homebuyers. Under the Mortgage Credit Certificate Program, first-time homebuyers receive a tax credit based on a percentage of the interest paid on their mortgage. This tax credit allows the buyer to qualify more easily for home loans, as it increases the effective income of the buyer. Under federal legislation, 20 percent of the funds must be set aside for buyers with incomes between 75 and 8o percent of the county median income. 166 400 Finance Agency Lease -Purchase Program Riverside/San Bernardino County Housing Finance Agency Lease Purchase Program provides down payment assistance and closing costs for eligible households up to 140 percent of the area median income. Housing Choice Voucher (formerly Section 8) Referrals Housing Choice Vouchers allow lower income households to use rental subsidies anywhere in the County, including La Quinta. Program H -2.3.d: Sweat Equity and Shared Equity Continue to work with organizations that offer sweat and shared equity housing programs to lower and moderate income households in La Quinta, with a goal of assisting z to 4 households annually. Sweat equity and shared equity programs provide lower and moderate income households with ownership assistance. Sweat equity refers to the exchange of time and effort, usually in the form of construction activities, for an affordable ownership opportunity. • Timing: Meet with CVHC and Habitat for Humanity annually or more frequently (if requested) to identify opportunities for coordinated efforts or potential housing projects. • Funding Source: General Fund • Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Housing Removal of Governmental Constraints to Housing GOAL H-3 Create a regulatory system that does not unduly constrain the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing affordable to all La Quinta residents. ❖ Policy H-3.1 Remove unnecessary regulatory constraints to enable the construction or rehabilitation of housing that meets the needs of La Quinta residents, including lower income and special needs residents. Program 3A.a: All properties listed in the Affordable Housing Inventory for extremely low, very low and low income units shall have the Affordable Housing Overlay applied. Further, the AHO text shall be amended to allow 30 units per acre and to allow 3 story development. The analysis that accompanies the Zone text amendment shall demonstrate that the development standards 167 401 being applied to the AHO, including setbacks, height and parking requirements, allow a density of 30 units per acre. Consistent with Government Code Section 65583•Z(h) and (i), the AHO will permit owner -occupied and rental multifamily residential use by right for developments in which at least 20 percent of the units are affordable to lower income households during the planning period. These sites shall be zoned with minimum density of zo units per acre and development standards that permit at least 16 units per site. ■ Timing: October 2022 for Zoning Map and text amendments ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Planning Division ❖ Policy H-3.2 Coordinate the development of affordable housing throughout the community with the provision of key utilities to ensure prompt and adequate service. ❖ Policy H-3.3 Incentivize the development of affordable housing to facilitate the development of housing for the City's lower and moderate income households throughout the community. Program H -3.3.a: Priority Water and Sewer Service Route the adopted Housing Element to the CVWD and notify them of changes and future updates to the Housing Element. In compliance with state law, the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) must create procedures to provide priority water and sewer service to lower income residential project. The law also prohibits the denial or conditioning the approval of service without adequate findings, and requires future water management plans to identify projected water use for lower income residential development. ■ Timing: Upon Housing Element adoption ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department, Coachella Valley Water District Program H -3.3.b: Encourage Lot Consolidation Although not on the Site's Inventory, several small lots in the Village Commercial would have improved development potential through lot consolidation. The Village Build Out Plan and Zoning Code amendments have been completed to encourage 168 402 consolidation. The City continues to market its land in the Village, and will also work with private land owners and developers to assemble larger holding to allow multi -family projects which increase the number of residents in the Village. The City will consider potential incentives including fee deferral or reductions, parking requirement reduction, and relief from various other development standards that could potentially increase the cost of the project, resulting in 1 new project per year. ■ Timing: As City staff reviews projects in the Village ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department GOAL H-4 Conserve and improve the quality of existing La Quinta neighborhoods and individual properties, including targeting areas of higher need and concentration of lower income households. ❖ Policy H-4.1 Protect the quality of La Quinta's neighborhoods through the rehabilitation of both affordable and market -rate homes. ❖ Policy H-4.2 Promote financial and technical assistance to lower and moderate income households for housing maintenance and improvements. ❖ Policy H-4.3 Encourage the retention and rehabilitation of existing single-family neighborhoods and mobile home parks that are economically and physically sound. ❖ Policy H-4.4 Enhance neighborhoods that presently provide affordable housing with drainage, lighting and landscape amenities, and parks and recreation areas, including targeting areas of higher need and concentration of lower income households. Employ government and non-government resources to preserve and revitalize neighborhoods and communities and thereby provide protection against disinvestment -based displacement. 169 403 Program H -4.4.a: Housing Condition Survey & Monitoring Complete an inventory of housing conditions (updated approximately every five years) to enable the City to properly target Code Compliance and rehabilitation resources. To better understand the City's housing needs the quality and condition of the housing stock must be inventoried on a regular basis. The inventory should focus on older neighborhoods, such as those south of Calle Tampico, west of Washington Street, and north of Highway 111. ■ Timing: Complete by June 2023 ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department Program H -4.4.b: Habitat for Humanity Residential Rehabilitation Program Complete the Memorandum of Understanding with Habitat for Humanity to implement the "Brush with Kindness" program. The program will be implemented by Habitat volunteers who will donate time for repair and maintenance programs, including yard work, weed abatement, window replacements, roof repairs, and air conditioning repair. Residents will be prioritized to focus on seniors, veterans, the disabled, low and very low income residents, and those in affordably -designated homes. The first-year City contribution will be $40,000, and the annual amounts will be reviewed every year based on the success of the program. ■ Timing: MOU by June 2022, assist 6 households annually through the planning period ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Habitat for Humanity, City Manager's Office/Housing Program H -4.4.c: County of Riverside Home Repair Grant Refer code violators and interested parties to the County of Riverside for home repair grants. The County of Riverside Economic Development Agency Home Repair Program provides lower income households with up to $6,00o for home repairs such as a new roof, new air -conditioner, or a handicap ramp. As a jurisdiction in Riverside County, lower income La Quinta households are eligible for this grant. 1]0 404 ■ Timing: Throughout planning period, refer 5 households annually ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department, City Manager's Office/Housing Program H -4.4.d: Rehabilitation Resources List Provide a rehabilitation resources list on the affordable housing and code compliance pages of the City's website. Use the list, in online or printed form, as a reference for code violators. Lower and moderate income homeowners may need assistance in affording important home repairs and improvements. The City can assist these households by compiling and sharing a listing of local, state, and federal programs offering rehabilitation assistance. ■ Timing: Create list by June 2022. Distribute to 15 households annually. ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department, Community Resources Department, City Manager's Office/Housing Equal Housing Opportunity GOAL H-5 Provide equal housing opportunities for all persons. ❖ Policy 5.1 Provide the regulatory framework to create an environment in which housing opportunities are equal. ❖ Policy 5.2 Encourage and support the enforcement of laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination in lending practices and in the sale or rental of housing. Program H -5.2.a: Collaborate and coordinate with government agencies (e.g. Fair Housing Council of Riverside County) and nonprofit groups (e.g. Habitat for Humanity) to support outreach and expansion of lending programs for homeownership among minority populations. Advertise workshops and webinars held by these organizations on financial resources for homeownership on 1]1 405 the City website, under News page and Directory of Services (see Program H -5.2.c). This program could result in homeownership for 5 minority households annually. • Timing: Annually (June) with adoption of budget, subject to available funding. • Funding Source: General Fund • Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Housing Program H -5.2.b: Fair Housing Referrals Continue to refer up to 10 tenants and landlords annually to the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County. Provide information on fair housing resources on the City's website and at City Hall. Identify and coordinate with local nonprofits, service organizations and community groups that can assist in distributing fair housing information. Fair housing organizations provide dispute resolution and legal assistance to tenants and landlords in conflict. Such services are particularly important for lower and moderate income households unable to afford counsel. ■ Timing: Referral service as needed. Information to be maintained on website ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Housing Program H -5.2.c: Directory of Services Maintain the online directory of services and information to provide La Quinta residents with contact information for community organizations and service providers that address special needs. While numerous services are available to special needs and lower income households, it can be difficult to readily have access to these resources. A directory provides the contact information necessary to seek housing assistance. ■ Timing: Update website annually ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Housing 1]2 406 ❖ Policy 5.3 Encourage support services for the Coachella Valley's homeless populations through referrals and collaborative efforts with non -profits and other jurisdictions. Program H -5.3.a: Regional Facilities for the Homeless Continue to support and collaborate with the Coachella Valley Association of Governments Homelessness Committee efforts to maintain a regional homeless facility that provides housing as well as supportive services. The Strategic Plan created by the Homelessness Committee establishes a continuum of care for the Coachella Valley. ■ Timing: City staff will continue to collaborate with CVAG throughout the planning period and work with the appropriate facilities directly. ■ Funding Source: Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office/Housing ❖ Policy 5.4 Assist in the creation of a continuum of care for the homeless population and those transitioning into permanent housing. Program H -5.4.a: Low Barrier Navigation Centers Review and revise, as necessary, the Zoning Ordinance to ensure compliance with Assembly Bill (AB) lol as it pertains to Low Barrier Navigation Centers. Modify the definition of "homeless shelter" to include this use. • Timing: June 2022 at regular Zoning Ordinance update • Funding Source: General Fund • Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department Program H -5.4.b: Zoning Amendments for Emergency Shelters, Transitional and Supportive Housing Revise the Zoning Ordinance to require that homeless shelters only be required to provide parking for employees; and that Transitional and Supportive Housing be permitted uses in the Medium, Medium -High and High density residential zones. • Timing: June zozz at regular Zoning Ordinance update • Funding Source: General Fund • Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department 173 407 ❖ Policy 5.5 Improve quality of life for disabled persons by facilitating relief from regulatory requirements that may create barriers to accessible housing and promoting universal design. Energy and Water Conservation GOAL H-6.1 Provide a regulatory framework that facilitates and encourages energy and water conservation through sustainable site planning, project design, and green technologies and building materials. ❖ Policy H-6.1 Promote higher density and compact developments that increase energy efficiency and reduce land consumption. ❖ Policy H-6.2 Facilitate housing development and rehabilitation that conserves natural resources and minimizes greenhouse gas emissions. ❖ Policy H-6.3 Encourage and enforce green building regulations or incentives that do not serve as constraints to the development or rehabilitation of housing. ❖ Policy H-6.4 Focus sustainability efforts on measures and techniques that also assist the occupant in reducing energy costs; therefore reducing housing costs. ❖ Policy H-6.5 Use and encourage emerging technologies to reduce high demands for electricity and natural gas including use of passive solar devices and where feasible other renewable energy technologies (e.g., biomass, wind, and geothermal). Program H -6-5.a: Going Green La Quinta Program Implement green goals, policies, and programs that accurately represent the City's direction in resource conservation and minimizing greenhouse gas emissions. Implement design standards for residential and commercial structures that encourage solar protection to directly result in energy conservation. 174 408 ■ Timing: As projects are proposed ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department Program H -6-5.b: Energy Conservation Partners Continue to meet with and seek insight from utilities, service providers, and other entities involved in energy conservation efforts appropriate for La Quinta. In working toward a sustainable La Quinta, the City and its residents will need to collaborate with utilities and service providers. Partnerships with the Coachella Valley Water District, Imperial Irrigation District, Southern California Gas, Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, Sunline Transit District, Coachella Valley Association of Governments, Southern California Association of Governments and other entities will be an important component of making La Quinta a more livable city. ■ Timing: As part of regular coordination meetings with utilities ■ Funding Source: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office, Design and Development Department Program H -6-5.c: Energy Efficiency Programs Investigate all potential energy efficiency programs and provide a list of programs on the City's Going Green website. In addition to programs that may become available through IID, investigate other opportunities, including state and federal incentives, and promote them on the Going Green website. ■ Timing: Ongoing as programs are identified ■ Funding Source: General Fund, IID program funds, and other programs as identified ■ Responsible Agency: City Manager's Office, Design and Development Department Program H -6-5.d: Weatherization Assistance Encourage low income homeowners or renters to apply for IID and SCG programs, including free energy audits, home weatherization, and utility rebate programs by advertising available programs on the City's website and at City Hall. ■ Timing: Advertise annually as program funds are available ■ Funding: General Fund ■ Responsible Agency: Design and Development Department, City Manager's Office 175 409 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX EXHIBIT B CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 1 OF 2 GENERAL The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this General Plan Amendment or the Project. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. No later than thirty (30) days after approval of this General Plan Amendment, the applicant shall execute and deliver to the City an indemnification agreement (with release of claims against the City) in a form approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, memorializing applicant's obligations under this condition of approval. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. GPA2022-0001 shall comply with all applicable conditions and mitigation measures for the following related approvals: Environmental Assessment 2022-0001 Specific Plan 2022-0001 Site Development Permit 2022-0001 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 3. The applicant requested in its initial application, as submitted, a density that would result in the remaining sites in the City's Housing Element not being adequate to accommodate the City's share of low- and very low-income units under the City's inventory of sites, as approved by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in accordance with the City's regional housing need assessment (RHNA) pursuant to Section 65584. Therefore, pursuant to Government Code section 65863(e), the applicant is required to ensure compliance with the state "no net loss" law set forth in Section 65863. 4. Prior to Specific Plan 2022-0001 becoming effective, prior to Site Development Permit 2022-0001 being eligible for approval, and prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the City's update to the Housing Element shall be approved by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) within 180 days of approval by City Council of GPA2022-0001. This approval by HCD must include certification of the City's Housing Element after adding "Site 6", as noted in Exhibit A of the Planning Commission Resolution, to the inventory of sites within the City to accommodate the City's share of low- and very low-income units under the RHNA. If, within 180 days of approval by City Council, HCD does not approve and/or certify the City's Housing Element after being updated by GPA2022-0001 and the adding of "Site 6," then GPA2022-0001 shall be repealed on its own accord without the need for further action by City Council and Specific Plan 2022-0001 shall not become effective, 410 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023-00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2022-0001 ADOPTED: PAGE 20F2 Site Development Permit 2022-0001 shall not be approved, and no grading, construction, or building permit for the Project may be issued by the City. Pursuant to Government Code section 65863(e) and the applicant's obligation to ensure there is "no net loss" of the City's share of low- and very low-income units under the City's inventory of sites, the applicant shall have the obligation to reimburse the City for any and all costs incurred by the City (including staff time and attorney's fees) in furtherance of obtaining HCD's approval and/or certification of the City's Housing Element after being updated by GPA2022-0001 and the adding of "Site 6"; applicant's obligation to reimburse the City shall be regardless of whether or not HCD approves and/or certifies the GPA2022-0001 and the adding of "Site 6." No later than thirty (30) days after approval of this General Plan Amendment, the applicant shall execute and deliver to the City a reimbursement agreement in a form approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, memorializing applicant's obligations under this condition of approval. 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits for any dwelling unit, an applicant shall agree to, and the city shall ensure, that the designated 74 moderate -income units are subject to a recorded affordability restriction of 55 years or longer to ensure continued affordability (Affordability Covenant). The Affordability Covenant shall be in a form approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, and shall require, among other terms and conditions, eligibility criteria as determined by state law for selecting eligible households, rental limits, annual income verification for current households, and the unit numbers designated as the 74 moderate -income units. The Affordability Covenant shall be binding upon all successors in interest of the applicant and shall be recorded in the office of the Riverside County Recorder. 6. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 7. The property owner shall submit to the Design and Development Department on an annual basis by January 30 of every year a record of rent payments for the 74 designated moderate -income units that meet the Riverside County moderate income rent limits. 411 EXHIBIT C La Quinta Village Specific Plan La Paloma Specific Plan Amendment Amendment No. 2 City of La Quinta Adopted xx,xx, 2023 Resolution Number xxxx Prepared For: Troutdale Village, LLC. 1800 Blankenship Road #325 Linn, Oregon 97068 Prepared BY: Altum Group Rich Malacoff, AICP Heather Boland Jordan Parrish 44600 Village Court, Suite 100 Palm Desert, California 92260 412 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction/Purpose.............................................................................................. 5 ExecutiveSummary.............................................................................................................. 6 TheProcess............................................................................................................................ 6 Relationship to Other Agencies........................................................................................... 7 Relationship to the General Plan......................................................................................... 7 Section2 Specific Plan.......................................................................................................... 10 ProjectDescription...............................................................................................................10 ArtIn Public Places..............................................................................................................1 1 Infrastructure Phasing..........................................................................................................1 1 Grading / Drainage / Flood Control..................................................................................1 1 ErosionControl....................................................................................................1 1 SWPPP / NPDES / PM 10........................................................................................12 Hydrology.......................................................................................................... 12 Flood Control Master Plan....................................................................................12 On -Site Storm Water Design / PWQMP..............................................................................12 NuisanceWater.................................................................................................. 13 Utilities...............................................................................................................13 SewerPlan......................................................................................................... 13 WaterPlan............................................................................................................................13 CVWDWell Site...................................................................................................13 ElectricalPlan.......................................................................................................................13 OtherUtilities.........................................................................................................................13 Section3 Land Use Plan........................................................................................................ 15 LandUse...............................................................................................................................15 DevelopmentStandards.....................................................................................................15 Additional Development Standards..................................................................................17 Specific Plan Minor Modifications......................................................................................18 Specific Plan Amendments...................................................................................18 Modifications to Approved Grading Plan................................................................19 ParkingRequirements..........................................................................................................19 Carports................................................................................................................................19 413 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 TrashEnclosures...................................................................................................20 Fencingand Walls...............................................................................................................20 Lighting.................................................................................................................................22 Section 4 Circulation Overview.............................................................................................24 Off -Site Circulation System..................................................................................................23 On -Site Circulation System..................................................................................................23 PublicTransportation...........................................................................................................23 Section 5 Design Guidelines..................................................................................................24 LandscapeConcepts...........................................................................................25 ApprovalProcess.................................................................................................26 Development Standards.......................................................................................27 Signage.................................................................................................................................27 General Architectural Theme.............................................................................................27 AdministrativePlan.............................................................................................. 35 Implementation Program..................................................................................... 35 Site Development Permit...................................................................................... 36 List of Exhibits Exhibit 1 Regional Location Map Exhibit 2 Project Vicinity Map Exhibit 3 USGS Map Exhibit 4 Site Plan Exhibit 5 City Zoning Map Exhibit 6 City General Plan Map Exhibit 7 Image Corridor Exhibit Exhibit 8 Photo Array Exhibit 9 FEMA Map Exhibit 10 Civil Site Plan Exhibit 11 Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit 12 Preliminary Utility Plan Exhibit 13 First Floor Plan 414 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Exhibit 14 Second Floor Plan Exhibit 15 Third Floor Plan Exhibit 16 Roof Plan Exhibit 17 Unit Plans Exhibit 18 Clubhouse Exhibit 19 Bldg. 1 - Elevations Exhibit 20 Bldg. 2 - Elevations Exhibit 21 Bldg. 3 - Elevations Exhibit 22 Bldg. 3 - Elevations Exhibit 23 Bldg. 4 - Elevations Exhibit 24 Bldg. 5 - Elevations Exhibit 25 Bldg. 6 - Elevations Exhibit 26 Bldg. 7 - Elevations Exhibit 27 Bldg. 8 - Elevations Exhibit 28 Bldg. 9 - Elevations Exhibit 29 Bldg. 10 -Elevations Exhibit 30 Bldg. 11 Elevations Exhibit 31 Exterior Elevations Exhibit 32 3D Views Exhibit 33 3D Views & Materials Board Exhibit 34 Line of Sight Diagram Exhibit 35.1 Site Lighting Plan Exhibit 35.2 Site Lighting Plan Exhibit 36.1 Site Photometric Plan Exhibit 36.2 Site Photometric Plan Exhibit 37 Light Fixture Cut Sheets Exhibit 38 Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit 39 Typical Building Planting Exhibit Exhibit 40 Slope Planting Exhibit Exhibit 41 Pool Area Exhibit 42 Entry Exhibit 43 Wall & Fence Plan 415 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 This page intentionally left blank. IV 416 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Section 1 - Introduction/Purpose The purpose of the La Quinta Village Specific Plan, previously known as the La Paloma Specific Plan, is to set forth the detailed development principles, guidelines, and programs to facilitate the development of a 14.03 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta. (Exhibit 2 - Vicinity Map). The project is designed and will be managed as a multi -family apartment project. The community will consist of one- and two-bedroom units with a mix of market -rate and moderate -income units. This Specific Plan proposes development standards for the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 (APN: 646-070-016). This Specific Plan Amendment will replace previous Specific Plans and substitute for the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC). Any issue not addressed in the Specific Plan will defer to the La Quinta Municipal Code. For the sake of clarity, the parcel on the southeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 is not part of this Specific Plan similarly as it was in the amended 2011 version of the La Paloma Specific Plan. The 2011 La Paloma Specific Plan removed this parcel from the designated specific plan area and reverted it back to the underlying standards for Residential Medium (RM) zoning. This parcel was previously included within the 2004 Pacific Retirement Services and Westport La Quinta LP (Specific Plan 2004-071). This Specific Plan is intended to meet the requirements for a Specific Plan as set forth in State law and City of La Quinta regulations. The State authorizes cities and counties to adopt Specific Plans, as appropriate, in implementing their General Plans. Such a plan is to include the detailed regulations, conditions, programs, and any proposed legislation that is necessary for the systematic implementation of the General Plan. The Specific Plan provides the linkage between the General Plan (and the general goals and policies of the City) and the detailed implementation of that plan with tools such as zoning ordinances, subdivision ordinances, and the like. The Government Code (Section 65451) sets forth the minimum requirements of a Specific Plan and states: "A Specific Plan shall include a text and diagram or diagrams which specify all of the following in detail: 1. The distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land, including open space, within the area covered by the plan. 2. The proposed distribution, location, and extent and intensity of major components of public and private transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy, and other essential facilities proposed to be located within the area covered by the plan and needed to support the land uses described by the plan. 3. Standards and criteria by which development will proceed, and standards for the conservation, development, and utilization of natural resources, where applicable. 4. A program of implementation measures including regulations, programs, public works projects, and financing measures necessary to carry out paragraphs (1), (2), and (3)." The establishment of specific performance, design, and development standards is set forth to guide the development of the subject property in such a way as to implement 5 417 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 the General Plan while maintaining some flexibility to respond to changing conditions which may be a factor in any long-term development program. The document also acts to augment the City's Zoning Ordinance by providing design guidelines, a tailored list of permitted and prohibited uses for the site, and unique development standards. The site plan, architectural, and landscape illustrations in the Specific Plan establish a design theme with detailed perspectives. These illustrations are conceptual and do not constitute precise pre -construction drawings. Executive Summary La Quinta Village Apartments is a proposed multi -family apartment project located on 14.03 acres on the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta (Exhibit 2 - Project Vicinity Map). The General Plan designation of the site is Medium High Density Residential (Exhibit 6 - General Plan Map). The zoning designation is Medium High Density Residential (RMH) (Exhibit 5 - City Zoning Map). The project site fronts Washington Street which is designated by the City's General Plan as a major arterial and abuts Avenue 50 designated as a primary arterial. The site is vacant, generally flat, and has been grubbed and leveled in the past. The site was previously entitled for single-family subdivision in the early 1990's but the entitlements have since expired. Property to the immediate east is the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) evacuation channel. Further east on the far side of the channel is a Sports Complex, the La Quinta Middle School, and single-family residences. Surrounding property to the north is subdivided and mostly developed with single family residences. Directly west across Washington Street is the La Quinta County Club. Property to the south is vacant and zoned for Medium Density Residential. Site photos are illustrated on Exhibit 8 - Photo Array. The project will operate as a multiple -family residential apartments with a mix of moderate -income units (74 Units) and market -rate Units (178 Units). The project will incorporate amenities such as a clubhouse, pool and spa, barbeque areas, pickle ball court, tot lot and dog park. (Exhibit 4 - Site Plan). Additionally, the project site will be environmentally responsible and will take steps both during and after construction to ensure minimal impact to the surrounding neighborhood and a positive long-term impact on those who will reside and work at La Quinta Village Apartments. The Environmental Conservation Element of the General Plan identifies the site as having no significant issues constraining the property. The Process The purpose of a Specific Plan is to provide a detailed plan for a selected area within the City for the purpose of implementing the General Plan. The Specific Plan outlines and directs all facets of development for the site. The standards of development delineated in this Specific Plan create a link between the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Implementation of the Specific Plan is intended to carry out the goals and policies contained in the La Quinta General Plan. 6 418 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 The project will require approvals from the Planning Commission and City Council for the Specific Plan Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Site Development Permit, Density Bonus Agreement, and the Implementation of Assembly Bill 330. In addition, the City will review the engineering and building construction documents which must also be consistent with the Specific Plan and Site Development Permit approvals. The project and the various applications that are necessary to complete the entitlement process shall be consistent with the City ordinances, policies, and regulations of the City of La Quinta unless otherwise approved within this Specific Plan. Relationship to Other Agencies In addition to the City's approvals and actions, permits will be needed from the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) for connection to water and sewer lines. Other infrastructure extensions or connections will be required by the Imperial Irrigation District (IID) for electrical power, Frontier for telephone service, Southern California Gas Company for natural gas, and Spectrum for cable TV service. The Coachella Valley Water District controls a portion of the sloped area adjacent to Avenue 50. They control any drainage into the channel and any alterations or landscape of its property. Relationship to the General Plan All development within the La Quinta Village Specific Plan shall be consistent with the provisions of the La Quinta General Plan. The proposed General Plan Land Use for the site is shown in Exhibit 6. Among the important provisions of the General Plan that will be implemented upon the development of La Quinta Village Specific Plan include: • Land Use - Medium High Density Residential uses should be located close to park/open space uses such as neighborhood and community parks (such as Saguaro Park), schools (including John Adams Elementary Schools and La Quinta Middle School STEM Academy), or other recreational facilities. • Land Use - Medium High Density Residential Uses can be used to provide transition areas between low density residential uses and high-density commercial uses along arterial roadways. • Circulation - The Circulation Element of the General Plan outlines the design and location of required street improvements to complete the transportation system in the City. La Quinta Village Apartments will complete the unfinished portions of two important links in the City's circulation network: Washington Street and Avenue 50. Potential improvements may include sidewalks, bicycle lanes, bus stops, and signal improvements. • Primary Image Corridors - In addition to roadway improvements, the Project will refine the Image Corridors. Washington Street is identified as a Primary Image Corridor and Avenue 50 is shown as a Secondary Image Corridor. The Specific Plan will modify the height requirements but will maintain the striking 7 419 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 viewsheds that define the City of La Quinta. The 150 -foot setback on Washington Street and Avenue 50 are shown on Exhibit 7 - Image Corridor Exhibit. • Water Quantity and Quality -The Specific Plan outlines the use of drought tolerant planting, irrigation techniques, and incorporates a grading concept designed to detain stormwater on-site. • Infrastructure - The Specific Plan incorporates plans to complete the infrastructure that lies adjacent to the project site. The La Quinta Village Specific Plan seeks to establish a well-defined planning framework that implements the goals, policies, and objectives of the City's 2035 General Plan. As a comprehensive development plan, it ensures a cohesive, integrated framework for the development of multiple family housing. This chapter provides a summary discussion to demonstrate that the La Quinta Village Specific Plan is consistent with the City's General Plan and that the La Quinta Village Specific Plan results in the implementation of applicable goals and policies included in the City's General Plan. Table 1 - General Plan Consistency Analysis General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Finding Land Use Goal LU -2: High quality design that The La Quinta Village community complements and enhances the city. incorporates high quality desert architectural themes and materials into the building aesthetic. Policy LU -2.4: Planning for all major The proposed residential buildings have been community facilities shall carefully consider broken up and set back from the northern the potential impacts to adjacent property line to reduce the impact of its mass development, particularly residential on the adjoining single-family neighborhood. development. Program LU -2.7a: Continue to utilize the This development will pay the required QUIMBY Act to charge park fees and allow QUIMBY Act fees. for park development. Goal LU -5: A broad range of housing types Providing both market -rate and moderate - and choices for all residents of the city. income rentals fills the need for this type of housing, which is not being satisfied currently. In addition, the variation in apartment size, accessibility, and affordability provides opportunities for a great variety of residents in La Quinta. Housing Policy H-2.1: Increase housing choices for This development will provide 74 affordable lower and moderate -income households. units and 178 market -rate income units which provides more housing options in the City of La Quinta. 8 420 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 General Plan Goal or Policy I Consistency Finding Policy H-6.1: Promote higher density and compact developments that increase energy efficiency and reduce land consumption. Goal H-5: Provide equal housing opportunities for all persons. Policy 5.5: Improve quality of life for disabled persons by facilitating relief from regulatory requirements that may require barriers to accessible housing and promoting universal design. La Quinta Village Apartments provides 18 dwelling units per acre while minimizing its impact on the nearby single-family neiahborhoods. La Quinta Village Apartments will provide affordable moderate -income units and accessible units, providing a greater variety of housing types in the City of La Quinta. La Quinta Village Apartments will provide ground floor accessible units. The pool, spa, parking, and other recreational spaces will be compliant with accessibility regulations. Circulation Program CIR 1.10a: Review new and redeveloping projects along all major roadways with the intent of limiting access and aligning and/or consolidating access drives in a manner which minimizes the use of existing and planned signalized intersections. Policy CIR 1.12: As a means of reducing vehicular traffic on major roadways and to reduce vehicle miles travels by traffic originating in the city, the city shall pursue development of a land use pattern that maximizes the interactions between adjacent or nearby land uses. Policy CIR 1.17: To preserve the aesthetic values on the city's streets, optimum landscape setback shall be maintained along all designated General Plan Image Corridors and shall be identified in the City's Municipal Code. Access will be provided along a primary and major arterial road. The access points have been designed to minimize interruptions at the intersection of Washington Street and Avenue 50. Due to the community's proximity to the school, children will be able to walk safely to school. Additionally, La Quinta Village Apartments is near a Sunline route, which will allow its residents to have easy access to public transit services. Both Washington Street and Avenue 50 are image corridors and have a 150 -foot setback with a 22 -foot height restriction which will be raised to 28 feet to accommodate Spanish the roofing. The viewshed will still provide beautiful panoramic views of the Santa Rosa Mountains. Natural Resources Policy OS 2.3: Encourage the preservation of open space in privately owned development projects. Goal SC -1: A community that provides the best possible quality of life for its residents. La Quinta Village Apartments provides 4.5 to 5 acres of open space areas for its residents, above the minimum required per the city's municipal code. The community will have intricate pedestrian pathways for its residents that provide connectivity throughout the site. La Quinta Village Apartments will provide open space and recreational amenities such as a clubhouse, pool and spa, barbeque areas, putting course, fitness center, and office space. 421 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Section 2 - Specific Plan Project Description The project site consists of a 14.03 -acre parcel located on the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta. The site is currently vacant but has been cleared and grubbed. It was previously approved for the development of a single-family tract of houses (Tentative Tract Map 26148) in the late 1980's and the approval was extended into the early 1990's. However, the entitlements were allowed to lapse. To the north, the project site abuts a mostly built out established tract of single- family homes which are accessed from Washington Street at Sagebrush Avenue. La Quinta Village Apartments is a proposed multiple family residential development that will offer 252 -units of which 178 will be market -rate and 74 will be moderate income affordable units. The housing type will be a mix of one- and two-bedroom units with a total of 132 one -bedroom units and 120 two-bedroom units. The project will have two- story apartment buildings with a maximum height of 28 feet with a Spanish hacienda architectural design aesthetic. The proposed density is 18 dwelling units per acre, which includes the use of a Density Bonus for Affordable Housing from LQMC Section 9.60.260. In contrast to the City of La Quinta's Zoning Ordinance, this Specific Plan will allow for the moderate -income affordable housing density bonus to be applied without requiring the affordable units to be offered to the public for purchase. The density permitted in the Medium High Density Residential zoning allows for 8 to 12 units per acre. The project amenities will include a dog park, pickle ball court, putting green, swimming pool and spa, barbeque areas, tot lot, and clubhouse. Inside the clubhouse there will be offices, restrooms, showers, a fitness center, and a community area. This apartment community will be managed by a management company that will develop and enforce all community standards and rules. La Quinta Village will be an environmentally sustainable community that will help facilitate and encourage health and wellness for its residents and employees. The project will create community connectivity through access to public transportation. Recycling within the project using collection bins will also be encouraged. Water and energy efficiency will be implemented throughout the project by using high -efficiency, low -flow rate plumbing fixtures and Energy Star rated appliances. Architectural features such as colors, materials, and shading devices will also reduce the project's energy demands. Landscaping will meet or exceed CVWD water budget requirements. Parking for the facility is primarily located directly off the perimeter drive along both Avenue 50 and Washington Street. The perimeter drive is proposed to provide fire and safety equipment access and servicing to the complex. The site plan complies with required landscape setbacks on both Washington Street and Avenue 50 and employs a single vehicular access from each street to the site. These standards are consistent with the adopted image corridors regulations established in the General Plan. The site is irregular in shape and the development is constrained by parcel geometry, additional street dedication on Washington to comply with the General Plan, and the city staff request for additional right-of-way to accommodate a dedicated right turn lane. The project proponent previously dedicated full General Plan Right -of- Way for both streets. 10 422 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 The project is within the image corridor of both Washington Street and Avenue 50. The image corridor setback is measured 150 feet from the right-of-way line as defined in the parcel map. Portions of buildings fronting on Washington Street and Avenue 50 are within the 150 -foot setback. A detailed discussion of the Image Corridors is included later in the Specific Plan. There is a 75 -foot building setback from Coachella Valley Water District Stormwater Channel located to the east of the project site. No buildings are allowed within the 75 - foot setback; however, carports are permitted. Art In Public Places The requirement for art in public places will be satisfied in accordance with Section 2.65 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Infrastructure Phasing The infrastructure improvements required in conjunction with this development will be installed and completed prior to occupancy of the facility. All adjacent infrastructure improvements adjacent to the site will be improved with the initial development of the property. Grading / Drainage / Flood Contro The site will be mass graded and it is anticipated that there will be a net -import of material to the site. Overall, it is anticipated that approximately 36,000 cubic yards of import will be moved to the site. Stormwater, including that from a 100 -year event, will be stored in above ground retention facilities. As an alternative, a regional assessment could be undertaken to determine the feasibility of discharging flows into the channel after first flush. To do this, the City and CVWD would have to see an analysis that shows there is adequate capacity in the channel when the subject property discharges storm flows. Due to the adjacent Evacuation Channel, CVWD has noted that the channel water surface elevation is established at 48 feet above sea level. The City Engineer will require that the site development plan and street improvement plans for Avenue 50 are designed and constructed to provide a minimum elevation of 50 feet to prevent flooding. The Conceptual Grading Plan is shown in Exhibit 11. Erosion Control The grading operations shall include adequate provisions for wind and water erosion control both during and after grading operations have ceased. The details of erosion control shall be included in the project's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and PM 10 Plan. • Pre -watering - The site shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading operations. • During Grading - Once grading has commenced, and until grading has been completed, watering of the site and/or other treatment(s) determined to be appropriate shall be ongoing. 423 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 • Post Grading - All disturbed areas shall be treated to prevent erosion for the term that the area will remain undeveloped. Final landscape and irrigation shall be installed as soon as feasible after grading operations have been completed. SWPPP/NPDES/PM 10 Since the Coachella Valley experiences periods of moderate to heavy wind conditions, wind-blown dust and sand is a concern with mass grading operations, especially those more than five acres in size. Because of health concerns, the Environmental Protection Agency has instituted a plan in the valley to curb excess small particle dust (PM 10). The City also participates in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System program. The City of La Quinta requires SWPPP, NPDES and PM 10 plans to control the wind- and water - born erosion associated with such grading operations. The project will comply with the City's requirements relative to these programs. Hydrology La Quinta Village lies in a Zone X Other Areas flood zone as determined by FEMA, Community Panel Number 06065C-2241 G, revised August 20, 2008. Zone X includes areas to be outside the 500 -year event. There are no tributary flows that must be accommodated in the development of the site (Exhibit 8 - Photo Array). Flood Control Master Plan The stormwater drainage system in the City of La Quinta is administered by CVWD. The system consists of improvements to the natural drainage channels that run through the city. There is an existing storm drain located in Washington Street that collects storm water and conducts that flow into the adjacent Evacuation Channel via a storm drain in Avenue 50. Water collected in this channel then feeds into the Whitewater River and to the Salton Sea. On -Site Storm Water Design / PWQMP The City of La Quinta in conjunction with CVWD requires each development to include provisions for handling storm water attributed to the site. The design storm, which creates the worst-case scenario is a 100 -year, 3 -hour event. Each development project must either retain the 100 -year stormwater on site or discharge it into an approved storm water system after first flush containments have been removed. The initial storm water design concept for the La Quinta Village Apartments is to retain the storm water on-site in above -ground basins. A Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) will be submitted as part of the Site Development Permit, showing how the first flush containments will be collected and removed from the storm water prior to percolation or dewatering. Nuisance Water Nuisance water attributed to the project will be collected and directed to the above- ground retention basin areas if this is the final method chosen for handling stormwater. If a direct discharge approach is proven feasible, nuisance water will be directed to one 12 424 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 or more dry wells if needed. The amount of nuisance water is expected to be reduced due to the use of water efficient landscape and irrigation materials. Utilities La Quinta Village Apartments is well served by utilities and is situated in a corridor planned for a relatively intense scope of urban development. Utility extensions will be minimal with most utilities existing at the perimeter of the site. Some upgrades will be required by the individual utility companies providing service to the property. Several overhead utility lines exist along Washington Street, Avenue 50, and along the Evacuation Channel. It is the intent of the development to underground all the adjacent overhead utility lines except for the transmission lines along the northern property line and the transmission lines following the alignment of the channel, as required by the City of La Quinta, and regulated by the Imperial Irrigation District (Exhibit 12 - Preliminary Utility Plan). Street improvements implementing the project's conditions of approval will be installed concurrently with the construction of the project and will be completed prior to occupancy of the facility. Sewer Plan Sanitary sewer facilities for La Quinta are provided by CVWD. Sewer mains are located on the west side of the site in Washington Street, in Avenue 50, and in the Evacuation Channel at the southeast corner of the site. Sewage will flow by gravity to the main. No upsizing of facilities will be required. The on-site sewer system will be private (Exhibit 12 - Preliminary Utility Plan). Water Plan Water facilities for La Quinta are provided by CVWD. An 18 -inch main exists in Washington Street and there is also an 18 -inch main in Avenue 50. The on-site water lines will be connected into the existing infrastructure network in at least two places to avoid "dead- end" lines. CVWD Well Site No well site is required for the property. The nearest well is located outside the site near the northeast corner of the project. Electrical Plan The Imperial Irrigation District (IID) provides electric facilities in the City of La Quinta. IID indicates that the design of the electrical service will depend on final load calculations for the overall project. IID will require the installation of underground facilities throughout the project. Existing power poles located on Washington Street and Avenue 50 may be undergrounded if practical and allowed by IID. Other Utilities 13 425 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Natural gas is provided by the Southern California Gas Company. The nearest facility is a 6 -inch line located in Washington Street. The project site will independently connect into the gas line. Television cable service is provided by Spectrum Cable with the nearest facilities located in Washington Street at Saguaro Drive abutting the site. Landline Telephone service will be provided by Frontier Communications. Facilities exist in both Washington Street and Avenue 50. Frontier expects to serve the project from these locations. Waste disposal service is provided by Burrtec Waste Industries. The project also proposes implementing recycling facilities within the project using collection bins and instructing occupants and employees to use. Waste and recycling materials will be deposited by residents at various locations throughout the site. Burrtec will collect the refuse and recyclables. 14 426 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Section 3 - Land Use Plan Land Use The land use designation for the site is Medium High Density Residential (RMH). This designation allows multi -family housing. Development Standards The development standards outlined in this document are specific to this development and may differ from the La Quinta Municipal Code. The uses and development standards will be in accordance with the provisions of the La Quinta Municipal Code and General Plan regulations. Should conflict occur between the regulations and the Specific Plan, the provisions of the Specific Plan and supporting text shall prevail. Any matter not addressed in the La Quinta Village Specific Plan shall defer to the La Quinta Municipal Code. Residential Permitted Uses Apartments/condominium for multi -family housing. Including the following: garages, carports, patio covers, decks, gazebos, outdoor terraces, fences and walls, clubhouses, swimming pools and spas, cabanas, barbeque, passive and active recreations such as picnic tables, pickleball and tennis courts, community gardens. Guesthouses, Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), Junior Dwelling Units subject to LQMC 9.60.090 or applicable change in State Law. Congregate Care Facilities are only permitted subject to the rules and regulations of the State of California. Home Occupation Permits subject to LQMC 0.210.060 Child Day Care or Family Day Care Facilities as an accessory use, serving 6 or fewer children, subject to LQMC 9.60.190. Licensed Service Animals or in -training are exempt. Utility Facilities such as water, sewer, cable, electricity, and gas are permitted uses. Telecommunication facilities will be allowed subject to LQMC 9.170 Residential Prohibited Uses Kennels and Catteries Keeping of barnyard, wild, exotic, reptiles, and dangerous animals. Agriculture Uses except for community gardens Storage, parking, maintenance of recreation vehicles or mobile homes. Maintenance of autos and trucks. Single Family Residential Dwellings as a Primary Use 15 427 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Residential Development Standards Minimum Project Size for Multi -Family Projects 20,000 SQ. FT. Minimum Frontage for Multi -Family Projects 100 Feet Maximum Structure Height 3 28 Feet Maximum Structure Height at Image Corridor 3, a 28 Feet Maximum Number of Stories 2 Minimum Front Yard Setback 20 Feet Minimum Interior/Exterior Side Yard Setback 1, 2,7 5/10 Feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback 15 Feet Maximum Lot Coverage 60% Minimum Common Open Area 5 30% Minimum/Average Perimeter Landscape Setback 10/20 Feet Minimum Livable Area 6 670 SQ. FT. General Notes: 1 Parking and carports are permitted within front, interior/exterior side, and rear setbacks. 2 To avoid monotony on the street side -yard, buildings can extend into the setback area if the average of 20 feet is maintained. 3 Only residential and commercial structures are included in the height restrictions. Potential utilities facilities such as water, sewer, cable, electricity, phone, cell, and gas are not included. 4 The maximum structure height equals 28 feet for all buildings within 150 -feet of any general plan -designated image corridor. Height restriction shall not include roof -mounted equipment screening and parapet walls. 5 Common open area equals percent of net project area. Perimeter landscape setbacks are adjacent to perimeter streets: first number equals minimum at any point; second number equals minimum average over entire frontage. 6 Excludes garage and private open space. 7 For interior side yards, if the building is over 17 feet in height, the setback is 5 feet plus 1 foot for every foot over 17 feet in height or fraction thereof, to a maximum of 10 feet. The additional setback may be provided entirely at grade level or a combination of at grade and airspace above the 17 -foot building. Density Calculations: The density used for the calculation refers to Medium High Density Residential standards and Density Bonus allowances for moderate -income affordable units respectively, LQMC Section 9.30.070 and Section 9.60.260 (G) (4). Calculation: RMH Density Allowed = 12 du/ac Acres = 14.03 12 du/ac x 14.03 acres = 168 Total Allowable Units (Base) Percentage of Density Bonus = 50% New Density = 18 du/ac 18 du/ac x 14.03 acres = 252 Maximum Allowable Units with Density Bonus Percentage of Moderate -Income Units = 440 44% moderate -income percentage x 168 base units 16 428 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 = 74 Minimum Required Moderate -Income Units Breakdown of Units: Market Rate Units 178 Affordable Units 74 Total Number of Units = 252 The calculations for the gross area shall include all dedicated lands for right-of-way, drainage, retention basins, and utilities. This gross area shall be used to calculate the gross density for the property. Note: The Specific Plan will allow the use of the Density Bonus for rental units in addition to home ownership, which is currently allowed per the La Quinta Municipal Code regardless of affordable income level. Additional Development Standards General Requirements: A. Architectural projections such as roof overhangs, chimneys, awnings, and canopies may encroach a maximum of two feet into any required setback provided such projections are no closer than three- and one-half feet from any property line. B. Roof structures not associated with living area such as parapet walls, air conditioners, chimneys, and other such structures shall not be included in the measurement of height. Only parts of the building that are directly related to living area shall be part of the height calculation. Height shall be measured from finished grade. C. Masonry walls and/or decorative fencing a maximum of six feet in height shall be used along the perimeter of the property and along public streets within perimeter landscaping setbacks. Ornamental iron and tubular steel fencing is permitted to be used in any location on the lot. D. Parking shall be screened from public views on the street frontage by use of walls, fences, landscaping, or decorative berms. E. Roof mounted utility and mechanical equipment including, but not limited to, air conditioning and heating shall be screened and an integral part of the roof design. Screening parapets will be a maximum of five feet. Ground mounted utility and mechanical equipment may be located within setback areas and shall be screened with, but not limited to, landscape planting, walls, and fencing. F. Architecturally integrated parapets to screen roof equipment shall not be included in the building height. G. For multi -family residential, the minimum livable area shall be 670 square feet. 17 429 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 H. Parking, carports, pickleball court, and dog park are permitted to be located within setbacks. Specific Plan Minor Modifications The following constitute minor modifications to the Specific Plan not requiring a Specific Plan Amendment and are subject to review and approval by the Design and Development Director. The Design and Development Director shall have the discretion to refer any such requests for modification to the Specific Plan development standards using the criteria found in the La Quinta Municipal Code Sections 9.200.90 or 9.200.110: • Change in utility provider. • A maximum shift of ten percent (10%) of the total number of various unit types provided the total number of units or density for the entire Specific Plan area does not exceed that established in the Specific Plan Amendment. • Minor changes to development standards can be approved by the Development Services Manager or their designee subject to LQMC Section 9.210.040. • Minor changes to the landscape materials, wall materials, wall alignment, entry design, and streetscape design, which are consistent with the conceptual design set forth in the design guidelines, contained within in the Specific Plan. • Minor changes to the design guidelines, which are intended to be conceptual in nature only, and are intended to be flexible in implementation. • Other modifications of similar nature to those listed above, which are deemed minor by the Planning Manager, which are in keeping with the purpose and intent of the approved La Quinta Village Specific Plan and which are in conformance with the General Plan. • Changes in site plan due to requirements from the electrical, phone, gas, sewer, or water purveyor. o Building changes from these types of changes can be approved by the Design and Development Director if it does not include more than seven (7) buildings on site and do not exceed the maximum height allowed. Prior to the Design and Development Director making a written determination as to the substantial conformance of a revised plan in accordance with the standards set forth in the approved La Quinta Village Specific Plan, the applicant shall prepare a written request that addresses the nature of the revisions and how the revised plan complies with the adopted Specific Plan standards. The applicant's request shall be accompanied by appropriate graphic and/or technical information that supports the revisions. Specific Plan Amendments Amendments to the La Quinta Village Specific Plan may be requested by the applicant by submitting the Specific Plan Amendment Application to the Design and Development Department with the required fees as required by the City Council. The request must comply with Section 65453(a) of the California Government Code and Chapter 9.240 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Amendments shall be processed pursuant to the provisions of the Government Code for Specific Plan Amendments. In the event the proposed amendment requires supplemental environmental analysis pursuant to the 18 430 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the applicant(s) are responsible for preparing the necessary CEQA documentation. Any amendment will be subject to a public hearing requirement for which a 500 -foot radius notification of the public hearing will be required or will need to comply with the public hearing notification requirements of Section 9.200.100 of the La Quinta Municipal Code, whichever is the greater requirement. Modifications to Approved Grading Plan Final grading may vary from the project's approved Site Development Permit within the following restrictions: Finish grade elevations may vary by up or down .5 feet within the first 50 feet adjacent to the northerly property line and 1.0 feet up or down elsewhere on the site. 2. Final grading plans may be altered due to minor changes in building configuration, door locations, parking lot revisions, CVWD requirements and changes in ADA paths of access. Parking Requirements The Specific Plan allows standards to be different from those found in the City's Municipal Code. However, California Government Code Section 65915 does mandate specific parking standards when providing affordable units. Within the City's Municipal Code Section 9.60.260 (K), the By -Right parking incentive and parking ratios apply to the entire development and shall not be restricted to only the affordable units. The parking ratios are listed as follows: 1 -bedrooms require 1 parking space per unit and 2 -bedrooms require 1.5 spaces per unit. Although only 319 parking spaces are required per code, the minimum total parking spaces will exceed the number required. For the Community Center, 1 parking space for every 300 square feet of gross floor area shall be provided. The parking required for each unit will be sufficient for guest parking and encourage other modes of transportation. In addition to satisfying the required parking minimums, La Quinta Village Apartments will provide 196 extra parking stalls. Provision of future electric vehicle charging station connections is recommended and may be installed at a future date or as mandated per California Green Building Code (CalGreen). Carports In La Quinta Village Apartments, carports must have relatively flat or shed roofs and be made of metal or photovoltaic panels to endure the harsh desert environment. Carports should be complementary to the architecture of the apartment buildings. For the safety of residents, the carports shall have lighting. All electrical conduits shall be screened from public view. Carports should be placed as close to the corresponding building as possible for the convenience of the future residents if parking stalls are assigned. 19 431 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Trash Enclosures Trash enclosures shall comply with LQMC Section 9.100.200 in addition to the following standards outlined in the Specific Plan. Trash enclosures shall be placed in locations to be approved by the City of La Quinta and Burrtec Disposal to ensure the facility is accessible and secure. The location shall be outside public view as much as possible and be enclosed by block walls with metal gates and a pedestrian entrance. The walls of the trash enclosure shall complement the building in color and material. Fencing and Walls The function of walls and/or fences in the La Quinta Village Specific Plan will be to provide safety, security, and privacy to all the tenants. All fencing shall complement the architecture and landscaping on-site. Block walls and fencing in the La Quinta Village Specific Plan shall comply with LQMC Section 9.60.010 and the following: • Maximum height of 6 -feet except for tennis/pickleball courts may be 16 -feet. • Block walls are the preferred barrier along the perimeter. • In areas where existing masonry walls are present and in good condition, the walls will be stuccoed and painted to match. In areas where there is either no wall or fence, a new six -foot -high masonry wall will be erected as indicated by landscape plans. • A minimum six -foot -high decorative masonry wall will be necessary along both public streets to reduce the noise levels impinging on the residential uses. • To provide surface relief on block walls along the frontage, there shall be a decorative pilasters placed at the project entries. • Block walls shall be composed of masonry block with a decorative cap and matching grout. • Gates shall be aesthetically pleasing and automatic as opposed to manual. Gates shall have a Knox Box or other means of access for police and fire emergencies as approved by the Riverside County Fire Department. • The use of vinyl, wood, wire, chain link, serpentine, and barbed wire fences are strictly prohibited and shall not be used anywhere on-site. • Chain link fencing shall only be allowed for use around the perimeter of pickle ball and/or tennis courts. • Fencing shall be allowed to be within perimeter landscaping setbacks and around above -ground retention basin areas. Lighting All on-site lighting shall comply with LQMC Section 9.100.150 and the following: 20 432 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 • Lighting within the project site boundaries shall be complementary to the buildings and consistent with the scale and character of the project. • The adjoining properties shall be protected against glare of lighting fixtures and be designed to provide safety to the future residents. • Brightly colored and/or blinking lights are not allowed. • The location, design, type, and size of all exterior lighting shall be reviewed and approved by the City of La Quinta Planning Department and the Riverside County Sheriff Department. • A photometric plan with lumen intensity (candle -feet) and specification sheets that detail the material used will be required. Lighting on the property will be 1 - candle -foot on site and 0 -candle -foot at the property lines. • All lighting at the property line shall have back-flow screens to prevent spillover to the adjacent residential properties • All building mounted lighting shall be firmly attached to the building and shall not be capable of pivoting or being moved. When mounted on buildings adjacent to surrounding properties, lighting shall also be focused down directly on the ground to avoid spillover to adjacent properties. • All freestanding lighting in the parking area shall comply with the following: 1. The lights shall be contained lights with either a rounded fixture or shoebox fixture. 2. Lighting shall be focused directly down to prevent spillover to adjacent properties. 3. The total height of any freestanding fixture shall not exceed 18 -feet and shall have a metallic post. 4. The post shall connect to a concrete base with a beveled edge and decorative surface. Under no circumstance shall the base have the marking from the container that the concrete is formed in. 5. All connections between the pole and the base shall have a metal box screening the connection. 6. Lighting fixture placement shall provide the appropriate illumination for outdoor areas such as parking and pedestrian walkways. 7. The lighting level shall have the number of candle -feet that allows face recognition from 100 -feet. 8. Use of illuminated bollards for walkways is recommended. 9. Untreated bollards with rolled concrete are unacceptable and will not be allowed. Yellow bollards shall only be used when required by law but shall not have rolled concrete at the top of the bollard. 21 433 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 10. Whenever possible, bollards shall be used as a light fixture to enhance safety and provide additional amenity. Bollards not used for lighting shall have a decorative cover. 22 434 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Section 4 - Circulation Overview The La Quinta Village Specific Plan proposes to develop the adjacent street system in a manner consistent with the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. The property is located on Washington Street which is designated by the General Plan as a major arterial requiring a half street of 64 feet. The site also abuts Avenue 50 which is designated as a primary arterial for which the General Plan calls for a half street of 54 feet. Off -Site Circulation System The existing conditions around the site include partial improvements on both abutting public streets. The General Plan standards for improvements, which will be required in conjunction with this project, are consistent with other recent road improvements for both Washington Street and Avenue 50. The construction of the required improvements will continue the process of implementing the adopted General Plan Circulation Plan. Expanded pavement, curb, gutter, median and sidewalk/bike path improvements are planned for the project's two street frontages. Signal upgrades may be required in addition to relocation to the ultimate improvement location. On -Site Circulation System The 14.03 -acre site will be serviced by the main access on Washington Street and a secondary access on Avenue 50. The internal circulation is a driveway around the perimeter of the site which will have no dead -ends. The design also provides easy access for fire department and trash collection access to all buildings. Public Transportation A bus turnout and a relocated bus shelter on Washington Street is required as a part of the project's public street improvements per Sunline Transit requirements and Public Works Department. Prior to issuance of building permits for individual Site Development Permits, applicants shall submit a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan to the Public Works and Design and Development Departments. The plans shall address capital improvement and operational standards as set forth in the City's TDM Ordinance. Any transit related improvements required by the Sunline Transit Agency as a condition to development will not constitute compliance with the plan submittal requirements. 23 435 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Section 5 - Design Guidelines Landscape Concepts This section of the La Quinta Village Specific Plan contains development standards, design concepts, guidelines, and special treatment plans for the implementation of landscaping throughout the site. The landscape material chosen shall be compatible with the desert climate, water efficient, and compliment the character of the surrounding community. A preliminary landscape plan can be seen below in Figure 2.4 Landscape Plan. -� ,F- FAL Figure 2.4, Conceptual Landscape Plan 24 436 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 The landscape plan found in Figure 2.4 is conceptual and shall be approved by the Planning Commission via the Site Development Plan (SDP). The final landscape plan shall be approved by the Design and Development Director or his/her designee and shall be designed to perform the following functions: 1. Landscaping shall be in scale with adjacent buildings and be of an appropriate size at maturity to accomplish its intended purpose. 2. Provide a functional and aesthetically pleasing appearance. 3. Landscaping shall be used to complement the building architecture. 4. Landscaping shall comply with AB 1881 Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and LQMC Section 8.13. 5. Provide a visual buffer of buildings from adjacent properties. 6. Provide landscape material that will provide shading and complement the architecture. 7. Provide an attractive and well-defined entrance and street frontage that will define the project. 8. Street frontages shall be consistent with the surrounding area. 9. Provide dust and erosion control during construction and natural color soil binder with native seasonal flowers to be used between phases with a 3 -year life to be replaced when needed. 10. Landscaping shall be used to screen undesirable views. 11. Preserve and protect the special attributes of the area and minimize adverse effects on the natural environment to the greatest extent possible. Approval Process 1. The conceptual landscape plan shall be approved by the City Council along with the Specific Plan and Site Development Permit. 2. The final landscape plan with all planting and irrigation details shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. a) The final landscape plan shall include any direction provided by the Planning Commission and/or City Council. b) The Planning Manager can make minor changes to the landscape plan including moving landscape areas or changes in species. c) Any appeals can be made subject to the appeal process on page 32 of this document and found in LQMC Section 9.200.1 10. 25 437 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Development Standards 1. Selected plant material shall be low maintenance and drought tolerant. 2. Plant materials shall be water efficient. 3. Landscape areas shall have decomposed granite, ground cover, crushed rock, boulders, and turf. The use of turf shall be limited by the requirements of the Coachella Valley Water District. 4. Plants are to be grouped with plants with similar needs and irrigation requirements for efficiency and optimal growth. 5. Desert friendly trees with canopies shall be planted throughout the site to provide shade to uncovered parking and outdoor gathering areas. 6. The canopy trees shall be a mixture of trees of different sizes such as 15 -gallon and 24 -inch box. The use of 15 -gallon trees shall not exceed 50% of the total number of canopy trees used on site. 7. Trees shall be planted no less than 10 feet on center to avoid crowding and overlapping of canopies. 8. All trees shall have an adequately sized planting area. Parking area planters shall be a minimum of 5 feet x 5 feet and be clearly shown on the final landscape plan. 9. All landscaping shall be within planters bounded by a curb at least six inches high in the parking area. 10. Root barriers shall be used when trees are planted within 5 feet of pedestrian walkways and buildings. 11. The parking lot area will be landscaped with one tree per 10-12 parking spaces except for where carports are located and the frontage along Washington Street. All trees shall be 24 -inch boxes. 12. All canopy trees shall be double staked to prevent swaying and shifting, which can damage the roots underground by breaking them. Palm trees are not required to have staking. 13. Plantings such as trees and/or shrubs shall not obstruct views for safety and security purposes and shall not interfere with fire equipment access. 14. All trees, shrubs, and ground covers must be properly maintained. All dead or dying plants shall be replaced within 10 days of being reported to the property owner. Maintenance for seasonal planting will be required in the off season to remove all dead or frost damaged growth, leaf litter, or other debris. Irrigation systems must be maintained to ensure survivability of plant material. 15. All landscaped areas shall be designed so that plant materials are protected from vehicle damage, encroachment, or overhang. 16. Concrete mow strips shall be used between different types of planting material or different colors of decomposed granite. 26 438 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 17. Use of redwood headers, metal dividers, and rubber tubing as a separation between planting materials is strictly prohibited. 18. The spacing of shrubs shall be appropriate to the species that is used. 19. Plant material shall not interfere with designated emergency areas, fire equipment, or electrical transformers. 20. Decorative gravel/crushed rock/ and/or decomposed granite may also be used as groundcover. The maximum size of decomposed granite shall be 3/8 - inch which ensures a variety of sizes. The gravel can be composed of rubble or cobble and should have a range of 4-6 inches diameter. 21. Maintenance of landscape shall be the responsibility of the property owner and shall be performed according to proper horticultural standards. 22. Nothing in this subsection shall preclude the installation of additional landscaping and the planting of additional trees which can be approved by the Planning Manager. 23. The perimeter landscaping setbacks shall be a minimum of 10 feet or be an average of 20 feet, including Washington Street and Avenue 50 frontages. Fencing and landscaped retention basins shall be allowed to encroach into the perimeter landscaping setbacks. The landscape concept follows a "lush oasis" theme while emphasizing water efficient materials, colors, and form. A planting palette is shown in Exhibits 37-41. Entry areas are treated with a formal layout of Date Palms, Palo Brea, and Mulga Trees that frame the entrance. Perimeter areas are treated with Indian Rosewood and Tipuana Tipu trees. The landscaping around the buildings will be Tipuana Tipu, Swan Hill, and Mulga which complement the architecture of the buildings. In general, the proposed landscaping will create an attractive street frontage and a pleasing environment for future residents. Signage Project identification signs are anticipated at each entry. The signage will be consistent with the City of La Quinta sign ordinance. Such signs shall be architecturally integrated with the wall and landscape designs and limited to one project identification sign on each frontage with no more than 24 square feet of sign face per sign. Other minor signs will be consistent with city or state/federal requirements. See Exhibit 42 - Entry for the main project (monument) sign. General Architectural Theme La Quinta Village Specific Plan will provide multiple family dwelling units and will endeavor to provide a welcoming atmosphere with open space to avoid the feeling of high bulk and density. The architecture will support this goal and provide a pleasant atmosphere for future residents of La Quinta Village Apartments. The La Quinta Village Specific Plan will include the following policy statements to support the goals of the City's General Plan and La Quinta Village Specific Plan: 1. Provide clean and crisp architectural forms and materials. 27 439 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 2. Indoor/outdoor spaces will blend with the landscape shape. 3. Provide the use of natural materials and colors to be reflective of the dramatic desert surroundings. 4. Architecture and Landscaping will complement each other and create a pleasant environment. 5. Maintain the Image Corridors on both Avenue 50 and Washington Street. The Image Corridors on Avenue 50 and Washington Street are measured 150 -feet from the right-of-way line as indicated on the parcel map and as shown on Exhibit 7. On Washington Street, building 1 is completely within the 150 -foot image corridor setback and building 6 is partially within the setback. Building 6 is a 2 -story building and extends approximately 22 feet into the setback. In the final analysis, the view of the Santa Rosa Mountains is not impacted since they are to the north and west of the project site and are most impacted by the buildings on the other side of Washington Street. Therefore, this project has no impact on residential or vehicular views from Washington Street. Exhibit 33, View 8 confirms there is no impact on the view from Washington Street. On Avenue 50, Buildings 6 and 7 are entirely within the 150 -foot setback and within this Specific Plan allowable height requirements. Exhibit 33 shows Views 8, 9, and 10 that have the views from both Washington Street and Avenue 50. Views 8 and 9 show the impact of Avenue 50 from Buildings 6 and 7. A minuscule amount of the Santa Rosa Mountains view may be blocked, but the view will still be visible for people driving from the west. Notably, this view will mostly be impacted by other unrelated projects to the west. These renderings make it clear that the beautiful views of the Santa Rosa Mountains will still be visible. La Quinta is known for its stunning views and this project will not interfere with those views. Therefore, the Specific Plan will allow a maximum height of 28 feet within the 150 -foot Image Corridor. It will only apply to this property and not anywhere else in the City of La Quinta. Preserving the viewsheds is desirable to the developers of this Project because they will make it more desirable to future tenants. Creating more multi -family housing will benefit the City of La Quinta, the Coachella Valley, and Riverside County by helping to alleviate the housing crisis that we all face. La Quinta Village Apartments consists of two-story multiple -family dwelling buildings with a Spanish hacienda architectural style expressed with stucco finish, parapet walls, Spanish the roofing, stucco reglets, and metal railings. Exterior color schemes convey a traditional Spanish palette with hints of accent colors. The gated community also includes a clubhouse, carports, open space with meandering walking paths, several shade structures with barbeques and picnic tables, a putting green, pickleball court, dog park, shaded tot lot, and a pool area with a spa, cabanas, fire pits, and barbeques. 28 440 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Figure 1 - Primary entrance on Washington Street. The architectural site plan has a main access on Washington Street and a secondary access on Avenue 50. The clubhouse and pool will be placed at the terminus of the Washington Street entrance with four (4) buildings surrounding it. The remaining eight (8) buildings will frame the remainder of the property. The carports are located throughout the property so each building has convenient parking. The clubhouse, pool, cabanas, barbeque areas, and tot lot are at the center of the property. The dog park and pickleball courts are located on the south side adjacent to Avenue 50. Figure 2 - Rendering of entrance on Avenue 50. Carports sizes will vary and will have support columns with flat metal roofs or photovoltaic panels. The carports will be metal so that they can weather well in the harsh desert environment. 29 441 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 The Spanish hacienda style clubhouse building will be a traditional white color with multi- level roofs, architectural pop -outs, door and window trims, and louvred awnings over the front windows. The main clubhouse room includes bi-fold doors to provide an indoor - outdoor relationship to the pool deck area. The pool deck area includes access to the pool, spa, showers, and restrooms. The residential buildings will be similar in concept and composed of traditional Spanish tones including white, off-white, and brown with accent colors. Covered breezeways provide access from both sides (long side) of each building with a stairway. The buildings will have architectural pop -outs for surface relief and a multi -height roofline. The facades will be detailed with stucco reglets creating a geometric pattern which will subtly enhance the building design. The exterior doors and windows will have a header stucco trim to provide relief. Each unit will have a door that leads to a covered balcony with a tube steel railing painted black in a decorative design or to a covered patio with a low wall. Vinyl windows and fiberglass doors will be bronze in color to provide a contrast to the light stucco wall colors. Each of the long sides of the buildings will have separate units on each side. The units will not have a railroad flat floor plan. The ends of the buildings include architectural pop -outs and stucco recessed niches for surface relief. Buildings are designed as four-sided architecture with the street view facade very similar to the courtyard facade. To prevent clutter, electric and water meters will be screened at the breezeways of each apartment building. Figure 3 - View on Avenue 50 looking towards Washington Street intersection with mountains in the background. The architecture will provide a positive living space for the future residents and make a positive contribution to this neighborhood of La Quinta and to the city as a whole. The administration and implementation section of this document is provided herein to further define the relationship between the La Quinta Village Specific Plan, City of La Quinta development codes and standards, and the process by which the La Quinta Village Specific Plan will obtain additional discretionary approvals as the project proceeds through the phases of the development process. 30 442 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Administrative Plan 1. La Quinta Village Specific Plan Upon its approval/adoption, the La Quinta Village Specific Plan as approved by the La Quinta City Council will become the primary document governing land use regulations. The La Quinta Village Specific Plan has development standards and land use regulations that will replace the corresponding standards in the City of La Quinta's Municipal Code. Where the Specific Plan does not address a standard or subject, the applicable City code and/or ordinance shall apply. The Corresponding Site Development for the La Quinta Village Apartments shall run with the property once the project is built and is transferrable to future owners of the property. The Site Development Permit shall expire if a building permit is not issued within two (2) years from approval of the Second Reading of the Specific Plan by the City Council. Prior to the expiration of the Site Development Permit, the property owner may apply for a two (2) year time extension to be approved by the Planning Commission on an annual basis. The time extension must be submitted prior to the expiration date of the project. 2. Interpretation Unless otherwise provided, should ambiguities occur concerning the content and appropriate application of the La Quinta Village Specific Plan, said ambiguities shall be resolved by the Planning Manager of the City of La Quinta or his/her designee, in a manner most consistent with the intent, goals and policies set forth in the La Quinta Village Specific Plan and the City's General Plan as outlined in Section 9.200.110. The Director's decision is appealable to the Design and Development Director and or Planning Commission in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code. Implementation Program According to Government Code 65451 of the California Planning Law, the La Quinta Village Specific Plan shall include a program for implementation including regulations, conditions, programs, and additional measures as necessary to carry out the plan. In response to this requirement, the Implementation Program for the SP and Mitigated Negative Declaration consists of the following: 1. Environmental Review and Mitigation Monitoring Program The Specific Plan has been subjected to Environmental Review pursuant to the provisions of CEQA for a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Mitigation Measures adopted for this project shall comply during all stages and phases of the project's construction and operation of the facility. 2. Adoption of the La Quinta Village Specific Plan and Approval of the Site Development Permit. 31 443 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 The La Quinta Village Specific Plan shall be approved by Ordinance which includes a first reading, second reading, and then take effect 30 days after the second reading. The Site Development Permit will be processed concurrently with the Specific Plan and shall take effect after the 30 -days have expired. 3. Grading and Improvement Plans A Precise Grading Plan (PGP) will be submitted to the City for approval Site Development Permit. Approval of a grading plan(s) will allow the developer(s) to begin grading the site for development. A National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), PM -10 Plan, and hydrology study will be required prior to approval of the PGP. Improvement plans such as street, water, sewer, and drainage plans will need to be submitted to the City of La Quinta and all affected agencies for review and approval prior to issuance of a grading permit(s). 4. Project Maintenance During construction, maintenance of all facilities will be the responsibility of the developer. After the property has been improved, ongoing maintenance of private facilities including streets, street lighting, landscaping, entry documentation and similar items will be the responsibility of the property owner. Site Development Permit Site-specific development of the site shall be subject to Site Development Permit and approval by both the Planning Commission and City Council for the City of La Quinta. If the Specific Plan is processed separately from the Site Development Permit, then the Site Development Permit shall be acted on by the La Quinta Planning Commission. 32 444 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX EXHIBIT D CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 1 OF 2 GENERAL The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Specific Plan or the Project. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. No later than thirty (30) days after conditional approval of this Specific Plan, the applicant shall execute and deliver to the City an indemnification agreement (with release of claims against the City) in a form approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, memorializing applicant's obligations under this condition of approval. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Specific Plan 2022-0001 shall comply with all applicable conditions and mitigation measures for the following related approvals: Environmental Assessment 2022-0001 General Plan Amendment 2022-0001 Site Development Permit 2022-0001 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 3. The applicant requested in its initial application, as submitted, a density that would result in the remaining sites in the City's Housing Element not being adequate to accommodate the City's share of low- and very low-income units under the City's inventory of sites, as approved by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in accordance with the City's regional housing need assessment (RHNA) pursuant to Section 65584. Therefore, pursuant to Government Code section 65863(e), the applicant is required to ensure compliance with the state "no net loss" law set forth in Section 65863. 4. Prior to Specific Plan 2022-0001 becoming effective, prior to Site Development Permit 2022-0001 being eligible for approval, and prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the City's update to the Housing Element shall be approved by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) within 180 days of approval by City Council of GPA2022-0001. This approval by HCD must include certification of the City's Housing Element after adding "Site 6", as noted in Exhibit A of the Planning Commission Resolution, to the inventory of sites within the City to accommodate the City's share of low- and very low-income units under the RHNA. If, within 180 days of approval by City Council, HCD does not approve and/or certify the City's Housing Element after being updated by GPA2022-0001 and the adding 445 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 20F2 of "Site 6," then GPA2022-0001 shall be repealed on its own accord without the need for further action by City Council Specific Plan 2022-0001 shall not become effective, Site Development Permit 2022-0001 shall not be approved, and no grading, construction, or building permit for the Project may be issued by the City. Pursuant to Government Code section 65863(e) and the applicant's obligation to ensure there is "no net loss" of the City's share of low- and very low-income units under the City's inventory of sites, the applicant shall have the obligation to reimburse the City for any and all costs incurred by the City (including staff time and attorney's fees) in furtherance of obtaining HCD's approval and/or certification of the City's Housing Element after being updated by GPA2022-0001 and the adding of "Site 6"; applicant's obligation to reimburse the City shall be regardless of whether or not HCD approves and/or certifies the GPA2022-0001 and the adding of "Site 6." No later than thirty (30) days after the City Council's conditional approval of this Specific Plan, the applicant shall execute and deliver to the City a reimbursement agreement in a form approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, memorializing applicant's obligations under this condition of approval. 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits for any dwelling unit, an applicant shall agree to, and the city shall ensure, that the designated 74 moderate -income units are subject to a recorded affordability restriction of 55 years or longer to ensure continued affordability (Affordability Covenant). The Affordability Covenant shall be in a form approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, and shall require, among other terms and conditions, eligibility criteria as determined by state law for selecting eligible households, rental limits, annual income verification for current households, and the unit numbers designated as the 74 moderate -income units. The Affordability Covenant shall be binding upon all successors in interest of the applicant and shall be recorded in the office of the Riverside County Recorder. 6. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 7. The property owner shall submit to the Design and Development Department on an annual basis by January 30 of every year a record of rent payments for the 74 designated moderate -income units that meet the Riverside County moderate -income rent limits. 446 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX EXHIBIT E CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 1 OF 19 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit or the Project. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. No later than thirty (30) days after conditional approval of this Site Development Permit, the applicant shall execute and deliver to the City an indemnification agreement (with release of claims against the City) in a form approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, memorializing applicant's obligations under this condition of approval. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Site Development Permit shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code §§ 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web Site at www.laquintaca.gov. 3. The Site Development Permit shall expire twenty-four (24) months after City Council approval and shall become null and void in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.200.080 unless a building permit has been issued. A time extension may be requested per LQMC Section 9.200.080. 4. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Exemption Form — Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) • La Quinta Design Planning Division • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD) • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) • State Water Resources Control Board • SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) 447 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 2OF19 • South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 5. Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant, who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's ("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent ("NOI") and Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP") to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 448 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 30F19 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. D. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. E. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. F. The provision for the funding and perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs as required; and the applicant shall execute and record an agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs is required. 7. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 8. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 9. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 10. Site Development Permit 2022-0001 shall comply with all applicable conditions and mitigation measures for the following related approvals: Environmental Assessment 2022-0001 Specific Plan 2022-0001 General Plan Amendment 2022-0001 449 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 4 OF 19 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 11. The applicant requested in its initial application, as submitted, a density that would result in the remaining sites in the City's Housing Element not being adequate to accommodate the City's share of low- and very low-income units under the City's inventory of sites, as approved by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in accordance with the City's regional housing need assessment (RHNA) pursuant to Section 65584. Therefore, pursuant to Government Code section 65863(e), the applicant is required to ensure compliance with the state "no net loss" law set forth in Section 65863. 12. Prior to Specific Plan 2022-0001 becoming effective, prior to Site Development Permit 2022-0001 being eligible for approval, and prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the City's update to the Housing Element shall be approved by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) within 180 days of approval by City Council of GPA2022-0001. This approval by HCD must include certification of the City's Housing Element after adding "Site 6", as noted in Exhibit A of the Planning Commission Resolution, to the inventory of sites within the City to accommodate the City's share of low- and very low-income units under the RHNA. If, within 180 days of approval by City Council, HCD does not approve and/or certify the City's Housing Element after being updated by GPA2022-0001 and the adding of "Site 6," then GPA2022-0001 shall be repealed on its own accord without the need for further action by City Council and Specific Plan 2022-0001 shall not become effective, Site Development Permit 2022-0001 shall not be approved, and no grading, construction, or building permit for the Project may be issued by the City. Pursuant to Government Code section 65863(e) and the applicant's obligation to ensure there is "no net loss" of the City's share of low- and very low- income units under the City's inventory of sites, the applicant shall have the obligation to reimburse the City for any and all costs incurred by the City (including staff time and attorney's fees) in furtherance of obtaining HCD's approval and/or certification of the City's Housing Element after being updated by GPA2022-0001 and the adding of "Site 6"; applicant's obligation to reimburse the City shall be regardless of whether or not HCD approves and/or certifies the GPA2022-0001 and the adding of "Site 6." No later than thirty (30) days after the City Council's conditional approval of this Site Development Permit, the applicant shall execute and deliver to the City a reimbursement agreement in a form approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, memorializing applicant's obligations under this condition of approval. 450 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 5OF19 13. Prior to the issuance of building permits for any dwelling unit, an applicant shall agree to, and the city shall ensure, that the designated 74 moderate -income units are subject to a recorded affordability restriction of 55 years or longer to ensure continued affordability (Affordability Covenant). The Affordability Covenant shall be in a form approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, and shall require, among other terms and conditions, eligibility criteria as determined by state law for selecting eligible households, rental limits, annual income verification for current households, and the unit numbers designated as the 74 moderate - income units. The Affordability Covenant shall be binding upon all successors in interest of the applicant and shall be recorded in the office of the Riverside County Recorder. 14. The property owner shall submit to the Design and Development Department on an annual basis by January 30 of every year a record of rent payments for the 74 designated moderate -income units that meet the Riverside County moderate - income rent limits. PROPERTY RIGHTS 15. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction, and reconstruction of essential improvements. 16. The applicant shall offer for dedication all public street rights-of-way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, site development permit, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 17. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Washington Street (Major Arterial, 128' ROW) — The standard 64 feet from the centerline of Washington Street except for additional variable right of way dedication to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 2) Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial 108' ROW) — The standard 54 feet from the centerline of Avenue 50 except for additional variable right of way dedication to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 451 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 6OF19 18. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. Pursuant to this requirement, the Applicant shall include in the submittal packet containing the rough grading plans submitted for plan checking, an offsite street geometric layout, drawn at 1" equals 40 feet, detailing the following design aspects: median curb line, outside curb line, lane line alignment including lane widths, left turn lanes, deceleration lane(s) and bus stop turnout(s). The geometric layout shall be accompanied with sufficient professional engineering studies to confirm the appropriate length of all proposed turn pockets and auxiliary lanes that may impact the right of way dedication required of the project and the associated landscape setback requirement. 19. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street right-of-way shown on the approved Site Development Permit are necessary prior to approval of the improvements dedicating such right-of-way, the applicant shall grant the necessary right-of-way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 20. At locations where the onsite finished grade has an elevation differential with respect to the arterial street top of curb exceeding 11.0 feet, the applicant shall comply with, and accommodate, the maximum slope gradients in the parkway area and sidewalk requirements by installing retaining walls between the sidewalk and the back of the landscaped area as needed as approved by the City Engineer. 21. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas. 22. Direct vehicular access to Washington Street and Avenue 50 is restricted, except for those access points identified on the Site Development Permit, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. 23. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 24. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property after the date of approval of the Site Development Permit unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 25. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 452 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 7OF19 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties and Development) for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 26. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be near vertical with a 1/8" batter and a minimum height of 0.1'. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 27. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses.) A. OFF-SITE STREETS 1) Washington Street (Major Arterial; 128' R/W): Widen the east side of the street at locations where additional street width is needed to accommodate: a) The applicant shall construct a concrete bus stop pad north of the primary entry drive on Washington Street as required by SunLine Transit and approved by the Planning Manager and the City Engineer. Bus turnout shall be provided if required by SunLine Transit for the bus stop. b) A deceleration/right turn only lane shall be provided at the Washington Street Primary Entry as determined by the City Engineer. Other required improvements in the Washington Street right-of-way and/or adjacent area include: c) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. d) 6 -foot -wide sidewalk. e) Extend the existing raised median on Washington Street north of Avenue 50 to line up with the curb face on the south side of the primary entrance to prevent southbound Washington Street traffic from making illegal left turns into the project entrance on Washington Street as approved by the City Engineer. f) Establish a Class II Level II benchmark in the Washington Street right of way and file a record of the benchmark with 453 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 8OF19 the County of Riverside. 2) Avenue 50 (Primary Arterial; 108' R/W): Widen the south side of the street along the project boundary within the existing City right-of-way or obtain right-of-way dedication from landowners on the south side of Avenue 50, if needed, to accommodate: a) At the Avenue 50/Washington Street intersection, a right turn only lane, a golf cart/ bike lane on the north side and south side of Avenue 50, a westbound thru lane, two eastbound thru lanes, and dual westbound left turn lanes as approved by the City Engineer. b) Along the project frontage, a golf cart/ bike lane on the north side and south side of Avenue 50, two westbound thru lanes, two eastbound thru lanes, and a painted median as approved by the City Engineer. Other required improvements in the Avenue 50 right-of-way and/or adjacent area include: c) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. d) 6 -foot -wide sidewalk. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the project boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, standard knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. The applicant is responsible for construction of all improvements mentioned above. 28. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20 -year life pavement, and the site-specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c./5.5" c.a.b. 454 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 9OF19 Primary Arterial 4.5" a.c./6.0" c.a.b. Major Arterial 5.5" a.c./6.5" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 29. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 30. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Washington Street - Primary Entry: Right turn movements in and out are allowed. Left turn movements in and out are prohibited. B. Avenue 50 - Secondary Entry for Residence Only: Right turn in and out movements are allowed. Left turn movements in and out are prohibited. 31. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 32. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings, and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 33. Standard knuckles and corner cut-backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. PARKING LOTS and ACCESS POINTS 34. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and in particular the following: A. The parking space and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking space design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. 455 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 10 OF 19 B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where accessibility is required including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans to evaluate ADA accessibility issues. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking space lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2 -foot overhang for standard parking spaces and 18 feet with a 2 -foot overhang for accessible parking space or as approved by the City Engineer. One van accessible parking space is required per 8 accessible parking spaces. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, accessibility route to public streets and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 35. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 36. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On -Site Rough Grading Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal B. PM10 Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal C. Erosion Control Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal D. Final WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through D to be submitted concurrently. 456 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 11 OF 19 E. On -Site Precise Grading Plan 1" = 30' Horizontal F. Off -Site Street Improvement/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1" = 4' Vertical G. Off -Site Signing & Striping Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal The Off -Site street improvement plans shall have separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the parkway area. H. On -Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping/Storm Drain Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 "= 4' Vertical NOTE: E through H to be submitted concurrently. (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200 -feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On -Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1 -foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. "On -Site Precise Grading" plans shall normally include all on-site surface improvements including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements and accessibility requirements. 37. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the "Plans, Notes and Design Guidance" section of the Public Works Department at the City website (www. laguintaca.gov). Please navigate to the Public Works Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 457 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 12 OF 19 38. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. 39. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the EOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 40. Prior to constructing any off-site improvements on Washington Street and Avenue 50, the applicant deposit securities equivalent to both a Performance and Labor & Material Bonds each valued at 100% of the cost of the off-site improvements required on Washington Street and Avenue 50. 41. In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 42. Depending on the timing of the development of this Site Development Permit, and the status of the off-site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off-site improvements. B. Construct additional off-site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this tentative tract map. D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. 458 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 13 OF 19 Off -Site Improvements should be completed on a first priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off -Site Improvements in the first phase of construction. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. GRADING 43. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 44. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 45. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. A final WQMP prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California, and F. A grading bond in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the grading bond requirements. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. 459 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 14 OF 19 Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 46. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 47. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.230(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition requirement. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e., the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6) of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 48. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the preliminary grading plan, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval. 49. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one foot higher from the building pads in adjacent developments or as approved by City Engineer. 50. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. 51. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (05) from the elevations shown on the approved Site Development Permit Site Plan, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance finding review. 52. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation, and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The a.s PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 15 OF 19 data shall be organized by lot number and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. nRAINAr,F 53. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology study for the Troutdale Village project (SDP2022-0001), or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. 54. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site including the half -street tributary area on Washington Street and Avenue 50 during the 100 - year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be either the 1 hour, 3 -hour, 6 hour or 24-hour event producing the greatest total run off. 55. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 56. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 57. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on-site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 58. For on-site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 59. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways unless approved by the Planning Manager and the City Engineer. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained 461 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 16 OF 19 in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 60. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 61. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 62. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 63. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. A. For post -construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. B. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. C. The developer/owner shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. I ITII ITIFR 64. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 65. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all 462 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 17 OF 19 utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 66. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. Applicant may request a waiver from undergrounding poles, such as the poles on the northern property line, consistent with the City's undergrounding waiver guidelines in the La Quinta Municipal Code. Waiver must be approved by City Council. 67. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 68. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on-site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 69. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. 70. All new and modified landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 71. Lighting plans shall be submitted with the final landscaping plans for a recommendation to the Planning Manager for his approval. Exterior lighting shall 463 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 18 OF 19 be consistent with LQMC Section 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting). All freestanding lighting shall not exceed 18 feet in height and shall be fitted with a visor if deemed necessary by staff to minimize trespass of light off the property. The illuminated carports shall be included in the photometric study as part of the final lighting plan submittal. 72. All water features shall be designed to minimize "splash" and use high efficiency pumps and lighting to the satisfaction of the Design and Development Director. They shall be included in the landscape plan water efficiency calculations per Municipal Code Chapter 8.13. 73. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view. Utility transformers or other ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be fully screened with a screening wall or landscaping and painted to match the adjacent buildings. 74. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing and approval to the Design and Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Manager approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit unless the Planning Manager determines extenuating circumstances exist which justifies an alternative processing schedule. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Manager and/or City Engineer. 75. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition" or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 76. The final design of the perimeter landscaping, particularly the perimeter wall/fence, shall be included with the Final Landscape Plan submittal. PUBLIC SERVICES 77. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by SunLine Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer. MAINTENANCE 78. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 464 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 19 OF 19 79. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, access drives, sidewalks, common areas, and stormwater BMPs. FEES AND DEPOSITS 80. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 465 tilt WWI r -64". v A. & lew WWI wkjo 40 O-W"O p 7 .0 )04 44m WAOi 10�4� 0404&0,411 A 1: 1 � tii" I I RM 0 AV, - . . - �aw IN —Alf low ATTACHMENT 2 64th AVE. _._._._._._........ ._._._._._._._._._._.i Miles Updated 03.10.2023 0 0.5 1 2 Housing Inventory Sites 117 _._._._._._._i 6d 1 i , j �f FRED WARIN� DR.,_._._.� ♦, i '♦ i ♦ �S MILt701VE. ; ♦ ��♦ ; 1._._._._.� - '♦ ; �♦ _._._._._._.i 1 1 X._._._._._.AL 1 $_._._._._. .. L i 10 , D ,• GF + i 90 i Z , . 11 13L , i z .. 120 3 - i 1 i i1 r ' 50th AVE. i._._._._,_._._._. 'T iz Zoning 1 1 ° IN p !Q 1 _ OS ; i O W p 52nd AVE. ......-,-,_,-,-,-,„. CC j ' oz W U. r IV% CN 1 2 W co 6z ;o _ CP 1 3 54th AVE. ! 15� CR FP GC 1 2 L ' MC 1 1 OS i 20 16 ® PR RC i ' 19 1 RH 1 1 _ RL 1 � . - 1 - RM 1 _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._ 60th AVE............ - 18 ! RMH ROW 17 �._.. RVL 1 ' 1 _ VC .._._._._._._._._._.i , 62nd AVE. i• i i ! 1 i ! ! ! N i - 1 i 64th AVE. _._._._._._........ ._._._._._._._._._._.i Miles Updated 03.10.2023 0 0.5 1 2 Housing Inventory Sites 117 PROJECT DATA El12& TAO 1EC,^.FU11':11 C" wY HNGTON 6TFL-ETR AWARE So °.ae.EQ.iIFf2BCE11LL'KOEfl 13�2=11i em .CRRES to NN POl LOT 1 1,17 023'59) DESERT CLUB I.VJ10R TR 2 Lc: t S,Ill'.-Hen Nano DESERT CLUB 1. -OR TR 2 Arms Ol] B4 rVL TlaeL1IR.• V.I;TYne N':,p EO P.': B 0:3 „ap Phi P DID R;HIIP 1.9: P. -I PROPOSED TIYO STORY AP:ART69a1T BUILDINGS LATH CLUBHOUSE, GAR':GES. CARPORTS POOL, ANO COIt.1.SA41TY SPFCESAND NECESSARY HARDSCAPE AND LANCSCAPE mR.r.9Pn r.AD 'e - AH UAa1MEeIA S�LAia E%)STING 30141NG DENSITY RESIDENTIAL RIrn�.:' '035-` UNITS PER ACRE) Is 12 UNITS PER BASE DENSITY: N OJ ACRF5112 UNITS ACRE= ,OB EASE UNITS INCLUDES /•FFORDAFILE OENITY BO`I:IS OVERLAY INCL Pp'-JiTXFp jpONC{ Ple,-.'EDIUI:;HIGA DENSIT RESIDENTIAL Are, (SF) 18-12 UNITS PERACRE) 1-BCdA ,Lmenl V11TN DENSITY BONUS. SEE PROJECT INFO BELOYF SITAR BUILDING FOOTPRINT 611.14G B SF1 14 03 ACRES 102196 Sle LIM LOT CO:'ERAGE 631.OF NETLOTAREA=)G6 eeS 08 SF LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED 15y.213901 SF TOTALBUILDING/,RSA 259,190 IF TOTALPROPSED O. YELLING UNITS 252 UNITS 121:,9%5F LAIN. C01.1 .'ON OPEN/aL\RECUIRED OF NET PROJECT AREA- 19],344 O 45F CaArACIN OPEN AREAPRO`:IOEO zt 6::=211111 EF ACTIVE RECREATIONAREr. REQUIRED: 3T.OF CO AIVO14 OPEN AREA REQUIRED =55001 SF ACT4E REMEr TIONAREA PROVIDED 11 P;.. 57.110 SF Witi FRDPTT5EF0i" 2D-0 ,'lar.'3A.IINTERIORSIDEYARDSETORCK 50- I.1NII %E RIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK 10.0- LRY.AR.IREARIAROSETBVCK 15-0- UI16PERI I.'ETER-DECAPE SETBACK 10.0" AVG PER II.IETEN V 0SCAPE5ETBACK: 20-C' 1.!AK NO OF STORIES ALLOWED PER RUH ZONING 2 PER DU IMA GE14ERAL PLNN EXHIBIT 36 T,RnAAgr n.IZQECCRRIppR .4S.N6Ybt4111li SECOND7,RY PAGE CORRIDOR A'RJIJEAS P. -AGE CORRIDOR SETBACK: 1104, ALLOLJAELE BLDG HEIGHTATII'7,GE CORRIDOR: 2240- I—I.1GTa'1 STREET I T: H4rE 50) SEE EPEtIRIG:CNI FOR ADD 160" BYLOlB5.S4H5IBILom OCCUPANCY TYPES: R 2,A 2 A 3 /NO B CONSTRUCTION TYPE I'YFEV-A SPRINKLERS YES FULLY SPRINKLER ED(NFPAIJ) ALLO'NABLE bJILDING HEIGHT PER RI,rH IONIr4G: 28-0- PROPOSEOBUILDING HEIGHTATCLUBHDUSE to -0' PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT AT2 STORY BLDGS 27-6- i{iNE4HdiLBEEB¢88:♦1II1228EAPJ7tcA9L,E CODE 0,1 LHE1Wl.'PE2kIIIII fgB 2212EALIMRS& DURDINO PROJECT INFORMATION UNITMIX - T21i4g6tY1tlli RIrn�.:' '035-` ES TOTAL PARKt:G SPACES 522 BASE DENSITY: N OJ ACRF5112 UNITS ACRE= ,OB EASE UNITS Un11Tvx U"'IN-m0 01y Are, (SF) TOLA(SF) 1-BCdA ,Lmenl to -ADA 34 673 22682 1-BedApar nI to -STD 30 6"20."0 I BRUHRS1 SPACE PER UNIT REQUIRED 1 -Bed Apart ern 16 ADA 34 755 25610 1-Bdd Apadmenl 16-STO 3: 755 25,670 2 -Bed Ap,d.ent 2AADA68 -ET R/,TE UNITS 176 uN1T MIF AIPFHCEVTAOEE: 960 65 280 A9eA ARNbmr6 2A -STD 52 960 _ O VD 151 TOTAL UNIT? 252 752 TOTALU!IITS 2S2 GEF ROFF3I ebARD FARKIRC SPICES: 151lrcroPlalry,9�. 201 aq R . DENSITY CALCULATJONS - T21i4g6tY1tlli RIrn�.:' '035-` ES TOTAL PARKt:G SPACES 522 BASE DENSITY: N OJ ACRF5112 UNITS ACRE= ,OB EASE UNITS Cly P.i...,n, r..rr•.r.1•..a...o..r .1o.. PdBEItlB80IIQ5 TOTAL UNITS PROPOSED 252UNIT5 F RRIPt EVSPACESREQ0 P GRIP.-r00R1•VRFTL1_--n aC.D �'N3 r R PER LOIRC 9802W(K) 01 FIGHT DAPI INCEIE INCENTIVE, T 55': DENSITY BONUS IS BEING PROPOSED _300 = 10,:PAC7 11RVhG SPADE 0 V X l fi) P- COVERED SFS DAAD PARVNG SPACE IS K 19-) FOLLOY:ING PARKING RATIOS SNAL APPLY TO THE ENTIRE DEVELOHM7(INRUDll:G HARKETPATE LISTS) 14 DJAGRES, 18 UNITS'ACRE. 252 PROPOSED UNITS S__ FEV = FUn1REEVPAR•UN3 1111E 11 1'S) I BRUHRS1 SPACE PER UNIT REQUIRED FOR5a=:DENSITY BONUS. ­. OF BASE UNITS NEEDTO BE 1.!ODERATE INCOI: E UNITS FEVHC=FUTUREA'ACCESSIS-'ERUeR35FACE(0'%19'74SASlE 2 -Bp UNITS: 15 SPACES PEA UNIT REQUIRED FEVVAN ��__- BASED GNLD.•C 9 GD 260 DE119TV BONUS PERCENTAGES FEUI'AR' FUNRE DI'A.I PARGIL SRAS I9% III)+B'F151E Bldg 6- Elevations NC ill . VIA- TJ MODERATE NCOIE UNITS , HC. ACESSIBLEST:NDARD PARK.::G SPACE is' %111.1 A:SLE TA L I-rry .e FalFeaYu HC Van -ET R/,TE UNITS 176 uN1T MIF AIPFHCEVTAOEE: NC YAN=ACCES9BLEV2.4PA%.0NGSPACF(T%15")♦S'AJILE II�.COVERED STNAARD PAR04C SPACES: 151(Irou 0111a-0 MAyW VOM1'RA�PKlIJF Wrt!_ T{ 1321 BEO UNIT5152 T9':: 01252 UNITS) L`I2aFDUI1IT!WY.I� PUNITAI 141L= DESIGNATED YAA 1. PAIRING5?A20XA) UILiRSIPIN�G Umelet,TIIISRW's==. : :611sun VliVgFF1 71w+ I q.N1 1 151 TOTAL UNIT? 252 752 TOTALU!IITS P= Si PAFKIHG SPICE (I'I A -) (TY I7') GEF ROFF3I ebARD FARKIRC SPICES: 151lrcroPlalry,9�. A22 MARKET-RATEUNITS PRDVIDEO: MDOERATEINCOME UNITS PROVIDED: U,Ra1?T AffFc=sesF'AAn.r..sE, - gs1-BED IN TI 3910- UNITS 1527'7 0111 UNITS) I TOTAL6PAK "I 1.-11x .._ 178 TOTAUr RKET RATE UNITS PRO 'D 74 TOTALOODERATE INCOIJE UNITS PROVE Gross Building Area _Common Area C-Iculatlon, Area(SIF) _ AIakISFI a 01 124 6]67 SF PER FLOOR Bld5,{ LFEIYI Fir- CLUBHOUSE RESIDENTACTIVITY 976 1I4102 IS ill 1.111SFPER R.OD-{ Fire Riser MECHANICAL 12 M. 22.695 SOF FEAR PLED!{ 112SF G'YI.1 RESIDENTACTIVITY 72 5 &d004 20.576 RRFL HALL CIRCULATION 1 66 Blda 05 29612 M.LWSF PER FLOOR HK SERVICE7G BIdg06 24.393 121%5 SF PER FLOOR ORice AD,IINISTR7ATION 290 7 1112 50,:]6 12 619 5 SF PER FLOOR RR RESTROOI.IS 124 B10ROB 22994 1.+475FPERFLOOR ShoxOr RESTROOrAS 68 Bldg 09 27.131 I3,51135FPER FLOOR Star SERVICE 111 Bld 10 19407 a 7lISSF PER FLOOR W118or CIRCULATION 36 Btl0 1• 1T.Tiay B 024 5 SF PER FLOOR NANICAL 12 ,'DRY 3.D19 2.578 Sq 1t 278,502 SO N M01 DA'ELLAGUNIT HASP 5F IANAgIAf PPA'ATE RATIO 09 B4LGOIFr :NG AAU, 1'XLUCESIAP PollL.nx1, a,,..�,,,n r. 1•rtrl.R'_ F.V EACH BUILDING HAS ONE FIRE RISER- SEE CIVIL FOR LOC, -,TIONS aF Paa1 OR Raw. F RIVE �i1)A 1 1 AIRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 245 FischerAvdnue. Suit. B.2 Cash Mesa CA 92626 (714)5572440 w.ipaoc com ARCHITECTURE PL AN 111 NG CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. : LSLOT _i Y:a! al5 �R PARKING CALCULATIONS Parking Calc, - T21i4g6tY1tlli RIrn�.:' '035-` ES TOTAL PARKt:G SPACES 522 TOTAL pLWG SPAELEg11fEF9LmCAl&BEtD TOTA.PARKI. S2 FI(es-.1 Cly P.i...,n, r..rr•.r.1•..a...o..r .1o.. PdBEItlB80IIQ5 C F RRIPt EVSPACESREQ0 P GRIP.-r00R1•VRFTL1_--n aC.D �'N3 r R PER LOIRC 9802W(K) 01 FIGHT DAPI INCEIE INCENTIVE, T CP _300 = 10,:PAC7 11RVhG SPADE 0 V X l fi) P- COVERED SFS DAAD PARVNG SPACE IS K 19-) FOLLOY:ING PARKING RATIOS SNAL APPLY TO THE ENTIRE DEVELOHM7(INRUDll:G HARKETPATE LISTS) FEV S__ FEV = FUn1REEVPAR•UN3 1111E 11 1'S) I BRUHRS1 SPACE PER UNIT REQUIRED FEV EIC 1 FEVHC=FUTUREA'ACCESSIS-'ERUeR35FACE(0'%19'74SASlE 2 -Bp UNITS: 15 SPACES PEA UNIT REQUIRED FEVVAN ��__- 1 FEUI'AR' FUNRE DI'A.I PARGIL SRAS I9% III)+B'F151E Bldg 6- Elevations NC Bldgs 7&12 -El -lions HC. ACESSIBLEST:NDARD PARK.::G SPACE is' %111.1 A:SLE TA L I-rry .e FalFeaYu HC Van r NC YAN=ACCES9BLEV2.4PA%.0NGSPACF(T%15")♦S'AJILE II�.COVERED STNAARD PAR04C SPACES: 151(Irou 0111a-0 MAyW 1,19 141L= DESIGNATED YAA 1. PAIRING5?A20XA) UILiRSIPIN�G Umelet,TIIISRW's==. : :611sun VliVgFF1 71w+ I q.N1 1 151 3D Vi P= Si PAFKIHG SPICE (I'I A -) (TY I7') GEF ROFF3I ebARD FARKIRC SPICES: 151lrcroPlalry,9�. A22 S22_ U,Ra1?T AffFc=sesF'AAn.r..sE, - TOTAL6PAK "I 1.-11x .._ (NOT RESTRICTED TOONLY AFFO0.DABIP UNITS) PARKING RATIOS PER LQFIC 9 W..250 ARE LISTED ABOVE . ga: 1321 -BR UI In R I SPACIINIT REO AREO.172 120 2 &1 WITS 14 S SPACESAINir REQUIRED = 180 M UNM(LEUM I SPACEPER JMSFDFCR RSFLOORAREA 2- TOTA.SPACE50.EQUIPED: 719 TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 522 I:igIR11Eg PA tlG,IYDCPES111FDEPRVIDED 3iSCCCVEQU410iiB' 159 UNCOVERED trl:rtc. PROVIDED JSG COVERED 159 Ur:COVERED TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 356 COVERED ♦ 165 UNCOVERED = 5221CTAL NOTE: ADA AND FEY PARKING 6 INCLUDED EI THE OVERALL PARKING COUNT - T21i4g6tY1tlli RIrn�.:' '035-` ES TOTAL PARKt:G SPACES 522 TOTAL pLWG SPAELEg11fEF9LmCAl&BEtD TOTA.PARKI. S2 FI(es-.1 A03 I.QFS l0-:OFTOTA. PARKING SPACES 523 15x IpF \anvR\EMIGL Fu.:2esl 2%OFSISf59W1EDPA0.KINGSPACES 10.99 - LONG TERN .�N/A TOTAL HC SPACESREQTY 11 RRIPt EVSPACESREQ0 P GRIP.-r00R1•VRFTL1_--n aC.D �'N3 r R MOF 7 4TIA551GIE�PARKIFZ SPACES 0.25 FUTURE EVSPACES PROVIDED 52 MTI:. BICYCLE PARKING REQ'D 2 TOTAL HC SPACES RC D 1 TOTAL BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED A ADA CAR SPACES REO'D 15 PFR GLERYLA A.306A.I: mLC'7tOC6GrIGF 7IYCING ADAVANSPACES REQD I Si ACF;ICYSPKES)bP22BE CFSUPP01T4HG R114P9 ELELToYJL VEHICLE SUPR.Y C0'JmRDR(Ase). TOTAL ADA SPACES PROVIDED 12 t.1FNo¢p T0069DN5IRATE MOIEI:F'S [AGOk]TYa. All CAPACITY FOR FACILRATII:G FUTURE EJ CHARGING Al26 LOPEOULRFNF T FOR EVSPACES TO BE CONSTRUCTED OR AVATIABLEUIMLEV CHARGERS ARE INSTALLED FORUSE La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 VICINITY MAP r� SHEET INDEX T1 TI VI C1 CIVIL SITE PLAN C2 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN 0 PRELUAINRRY UTILITY -PLAN ARCHITECTURAL 401 Sit -Plan A02 First Floor Plan A03 Seuan dFloor Plan A01 Rod Plan A05 LAV, Pians A05 Clubhouse A07Bldg 1- Eldvalions AIB Bldg 2-Elev;llians A09 Bldg 3 -EI -1.1z AID BIdg.4-EIdvJUpn7 All Bldg : - Ele.alions Al26 dg 5- Elevations Ata Bldg 6- Elevations A14 Bldgs 7&12 -El -lions A1S BIdg. 8 -Elevations A16 Bldg 9- Bid valions /07 Bldg 10-Elevolions A18 Bldg 11-Eldvalions A19 III I., Elev-6ons A20 3D Vi A21 3D V -S R Llalerialz Boats A22 lino d Sight DiOgrams LP -1 Conceptual Lo,dscape Plan LP -2 T3pcY Buildm3 Planting E.rI LP -3 Slope Planlin) EFIdO LP4 PoolArea LP -5 Entry LP-fi CancdplualWall& Fcned Plan PROJECT TEAM OWNER Troutdale Village. LLC 1800 Blankenship Rd, Sulle 325 WestLinn. Oregon 7068 T: (503) 807.8652 JKII P.) kcr ARCHITECT 245 PANIIE•TA Ve. Suite 245 , tiles,. CA 26 Suilc B2 Costa ,157-2 CA 92626 T: 714-557-2:46 com Sherry Braun CIVIL Egan Ci,A Inc 42945 Madia S!IaaL SutloA krdlo.CA92201 T:(760)4047663 N. egaDivil CHKn Seven Egan, Project Designer LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Hellman Design Group. Inc 77899 Wall Road. Suilc 102 Palm Do.d. CA 92211 T: 760 77/-9131 W: hog-inccom Jose Estrada. VP. P7ojM t.ldnagor ELECTRICAL RTM Engineering Consultants 39249 Leopard Sired Suite A-101 Palm Desert, CA 92211 T: 1760N 983.2007 LV: x ;mer co, victor Leen, PE. Principal ATTACHMENT 3 Title T1 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE' 10/19/2023 21014 La Ouinta SO V4 468 1. - -_- - ---- - -- ---- lull./ pMT rIE: AAL: - � IT I I 4 ..: � I II r. I I =1: 1 _ i. l..r,.ii,4 1..,. �. S I r n -•A'r'm+.� • Tilsry f I '•� i 1 if rt i• i --. 1 9ELTp BLDG. 3 PAD=51.5 PR DE .6AYN Tor xvNPAD5 Y•6 Y116UMI* � r • "1� � 6T14b2n ,c •--,- _ _ BLDG.2 $ I' :: Y PAD=51.0 BLDG. 11 BiAG.12 • TSTORY I18 UNR5 - - - — -- -- _ _ ' ...... 5A,5U1Pff /l�7-` I I _ BLDG. 10 PAD -5d - • � _ - - _ PAD 53 5 :smR+" LwFa i 1 7IMAGE [e�i[r OR P�: GHi RE�`TFi.T , - ..- -' NµN - '{ 2STORYl16 UNITS _ _ _ fD0�PAq' �� — / •f:`� ~• - Tll FOOTPRNT-T,SWt SF •^ i 'ir I dI m, ROOM 3— nlll i1 .•i _ - — --- - _ _ I AAuc r>r�r, ��E. JcS -3'X Iti •• 0 P _p. J ... .r� /� f �f r -r• ' �+ - dC I- T• _ CLUB ... - - YAWN .. .. _ -•• ! . -. ' • `- IN 4 HOUSE �,.1 ��� '/, :A'•:�,. fir•.'I t. 1 �� _ ) PAD=62.0 - —. .�; .. _ _ .., r.1 �v. J R, ... r;. -T i• � - - AkE3i !;. 1", BLDG. 4 4 1 PAD --53.0 �- II.. 2 -STORY 116 UNITS �. ,�� - I Y 1. FOOTTNNT-1,SODl7' lam` LAWN BLDG. 9 l r X44? / �•', I, ,j' -�� PAD =53.5 �, I - if r -�•�- .. - 2STORYI16UNIT5 .. - :ice! Ir •��. . _ = FOOTPRINT T.SODt BLDG. 5 < I o FF1R i OOTORV 116 UNITS r/I FOO7PRINI.7,BW2 SF �___ r TT ` y - J �•': jf - I ;( { .I• I..: `.i Ir BLDG. 8 - .,.•L _ J: �• J .,1±• 1 �I. ,� r: f ..: PAD 53.0. 1' 2 -STORY 116 UNITS: {" / , ^_ __ _ __ _ ��� FOOTPRWT.15WtW I �/. _ 'ire• µ y PxTOO6P:T�.A9As -i AIs - TER .'.•it, _ X11 • _ - . r I - . . BLDG. 6 BLDG. 7 PAD 5 0 PAD 52.0 �- ' ' 25TORVl•L UH1i - - 2 &TORV : 11 UNITS _ FOO PNIM-7,5002 55' FOO PRWT-1,SODl •T-cr-lur.!. )-sTaLx^ _ -a-' _ ,T Lire r�_. ---------=--= --- ---- __ --------_---- --- - - - - - -- =-- —= _ — — - - - -_----- - - - = ------------ WWII- IENd4 j0• Cyt -_=- — = - ----- 1 H --— `�' �44== — - - a 1RUIFrc I AW - -- --'-.. t1A All I--- ABBREVIAIl� SCALE: 1"0' C/L CENTERLINE TP TOP OF PAVEMENT EG E%I STING GROUND TO TOP OF CURB FL FLOW LINE TF TOP OF FOOTING FS FINISH SURFACE TW TOP OF WALL Ia GRADE BREAK (%%,%%) EXISTING ELEVATION SWALE PRINTED ON: 08/15/2023 �j�� 1 }}1���� j' BENCHMARK: F1+mffFri .CONTrf pLAN CHECKED BY: I }I� C �+,�I' II Y BENONIRC TOP OF QF6 Az006 / DFIATIO: 252,27 TC / DATA: IGVD29 FT MARK BY DATE REVISIONS APPR DATE QRO'FESp/a E G A N CIVIL , INC . APPROVED BY: IN 11iE CITY OF LA OUINTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DH ll.C�lj itS'11L 2IS DESCRIPT1Ri TDP OF CUB AT THE BUR AS 9 ON THE CITY OF ROCHO MIRAGE 9 OA,y! f �T STREET PIANS FDR THE KESS.ER OFFICE BUILDING, SHEET s OF 9 ON FILE IN THE �44�w-'A�� f��. c _ LA OUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS OFFICE OF CM ENGINEER OF THE CITY a RANCHO MIRKE AS PUN N VEER EOMN71 + y NO 8nk 5287. lA OBIiifA CA 8714 -5482 OWL o DIAL a BASS DF BEARINGS, o m ,, = m PRO NU WW DATE DATE CIVIL SITE PLANBEFORE 3 YOU DIG 1 THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS S'JFNV AAE WED ON THE GUFORNA � NO. 73070 � PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: :�- = COORDINATE SYSTEM (CCSB]), ZONE N, (2017.50 EPOCH) AS PER GOA INVERSE ]: * TRAFFIC Um FILE NOAIHER TOLL FREE CALCULATIONS BETWEEN CO"NUOSLY OPERATING REFERENCE (C.O,R.S) STATION'S f{ CAY1L t 252 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX AT LF15T TA'O D115 RFO(E ]aJ Oltl P491 AND PINI PER PUBLISHED VALUES PROVIDED BY THE SCRIPPS ORBR AND tP Oi CAL1F� DATE: 06/06/2023 WASHINGTON ST h AVENUE 50, LA OIIINTA, CA 92253 A PUB If SERVICE BY UD__ROIOIAO SERVICE ALERT PERVAVEM MRAY CENTER (SOPAC. ), BONG: NORTH 76 59 35.49 WEST. BENJAMIN DANIEL EGA RaE. 73070 REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY: DATE LANDSCAPE AFT! 646-070-016 469 a :Lj LL ' O• -- P>-r••Y. uH= '� t -t 'I I rl - — _ - - - - SE _ _ eAx — ! 1 -IJ TT Pi l �i -----; - _- ----I F- ---_ ----- - -- _ -= I-- j ---I - ---- -----= - - - -� I I- _ _ - - - I I- I a 5a -B I , uwn -- uwn uwr BLDG. 3 PT PAD751 SAs1 BLDG. 1 1 I _ i-ST17Rr�16LON iA! �: BTA ai n PAD =50.0 -- — - _ FDomRrrr. vsow sF hl 2 -STORY 116 UNITS [ I F007PRIN7-7.MW BLDG.2 — PAD=51.0I 2STORY I IS UNITS _ _- BLDBLDG. 12 - FaoRRM-75WfSF BLDG. 10 _ - PAD=54.54.5 PAD=53.5 25TORY I16 UNR5 25TORYII6 UNITS ! 2 -STORY 116 UNITS FOOTPi11M.i.50Qx SF FOOTPRINT .7SIM FOOTPRINT -75WA SIF •. _ . I - 6 ¢ HOUSE CL t. 50 aimLAM J uuu i-SYORY • 16 uN15 � �% � _ I,�• —'! - �� o - - r•omrnlu7 2 FI1c ra BLDGI _ 1 _ - --- - — - --- uwn . 9 PAD=53.5 1III - - -- 2 -STORY I IBUNRS ' _�_ r ! I•I FOOTPRINT. •71XU yIF. I ILII I r _ I BLDG.5 i' y1 PAD 51.5 2 -STORY 116UNITS r _ �; 1 ❑. FOOTPRINT-7,SOOA SF II` I __ �•r \�• I V BLDG.8 PAD=53.0 Ltd _ _ _ . - -- L- : - � _ E _ 2 -STORY / 16 UNITS s= ---' IY _ - - - _ - _ I OUT. INQR14 70�0 1 1 ILI ; BLDG. 6 _ BLDG. 7 PAD =50.0 PAD=52.0 ! _ C - i3_ lId UNITS , 2 -STORY 116 TWIT -- - . � FOO7PRPTf-T,SWx SF - - - � - _ ___ _ _- — - _ __ - • - FODTPRIM-1500SSF LINE -- _3,11 --- - - "--- - - - -- - ---- �- - - =- •-0- c0`-- - �- -�� --- - — �v- .---3- =----------------_ .. -- i^• . Rrs6-vti7nr - - -- Tr. ak�EFct`vSic�.T-- — _ '-_ - _ - - __ - - -_- - - -- - -- _— �� �--_ 1 --- - —-- --- i - g --- - --D-o PIa------------ RI`— r[D' TR4TIC LAWAvO-- -- --- --_ _-- -� ...ARi iD£ LATE . . t- WA rc —40 0 40 ABBREVIATIONS EARTHCRK WANITIES C/L CENTERLINE TP TOP OF PAVEMENT RAW CUT: 5,500 YARDS SCALE: _ EG EXISTING GROUND TO TOP OF CURB RAW FILL: 47,400 YARDS FL FLOW LINE TF TOP OF FOOTING IMPORT: 41,900 YARDS FS FINISH SURFACE TW TOP OF WALL THE ABOVE QUANTITIES ARE AN ENGINEERS ESTIMATE ONLY AND GBGRADE BREAK (XX,XX) EXISTING ELEVATION ARE PROVIDED FOR GRADING PERMIT PURPOSES. CONTRACTOR CP COVERED PARKING SN'ALE SHALL VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES FOR THIS BID PURPOSES. A�i PRINTED ON: 08/16/2023 BENC�jl B•��'��• COUNTY cKNCA/ TOP OF CUS JZOD5 / ELEVATIO: 252.27 TO / DATIY: tGVD2S FT uARrt By 1uTe REVISIONS uATr VE,O�ES lIO* APPROVED BY: PLAN CHECKED Br: IN THE CIN OF LA OUINTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 7 1f� DESCRIPTION: TOP OF OM AT TIE BOR AS SKRN OI TIE CITY OF RAV00 MIRAGE 0 YR A,(•rF �r E G A N CIVIL, INC. SHEET L dddSSSVC ...LLLLLL DIAL Ruuu .L}. sTP'..ET Pi.115 FOR THE KESSER OFFICE BUILDING, slfrET s OF 9 O! FILE IN RE LA OUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS CSZi_i.J OFFICE of crtr ENGINEER of THE crtr of RANCHO ulw; As PLAN NIIIaa Eo6Donl y y P43 &(�X 5PBP. LA iilliNfM1. CA 8PPd9.5 awL D, BEFORE CALL .=I -QE RFaRINOs� �•+'" -7�1 ,� 17'O! 4od-7568 WWYI. GA DAA CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN Slg 3 YOU DIG AHE "' OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON THE CAJFORNIA O• I,� Df V PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: COORDINATE SYSTEM (CCSB3), ZONE A (2017-50 EPOCH) AS PER CRO INVERSE * * TRAFFIC TOLL FREE !-g1••TFT-A13j CALCUTA70NS BETWEEN CONIIN'VOSLY &ORATING REFERENCE (CORS) STATIONS df O ~-S S LTTY FILE NUT1EiR P/9I AND RN1 PER PUBUSHED VALUES PRONGED EY THE SCRPPS ORBIT AND 7f iY1L F 2ON UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX AT LF1 II __PINE ETD[ YOU OIG FGF OALLFa DATE: 06/06/2023 WASHINGTON ST k AVENUE 50. LA OUINTA, CA 92253 A PLBLIC 5C4710E Bf U�RBrara SERVICE ALERT PERMANENT ARRAY CENTER (S OPA C. ), BEING: NORTH 76 59� 35.49' WEST. BENJAMIN DANIEL EGAN, R C.E 73070 RENEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY: DATE LANDSCAPE APN 616-07o-016 470 1_f �- 1L l !=CJI l %I IL F I[ - _ i � 0.oo' � -I — — =-_ � � _ t o=Fnn LINE_ - -� I _ � _ - -- _ 1 1 � - I _ ` ...-- .-•ten - I _ ��� 11 F"- _ } TRASH j`EI - _ I.Ow ,]� - j`�_1.I1 '�J 4," IE 1 TRAEN r I -�_ nrunrt - _ +1.0 ]E .-} �..- urid /" LAWN FSrd F[3R f Q.O. lW P[ BLDG, 3 5 +r FnL x�� PAD P1L.OEi" Qew BLDG_ 1- eiva -PAD=50,0 FOOTPRINT -],SWT 6F - a J / -1 \" -2STORY/16 UNITS - _ _- . FOOTPRINT-]SWiSF - _ ��4�' - - .. / PSTdAYAl6UIllTA - - 1 yr, ��i BLDG. 11 _- BLDG" 12 - J l I BLDG. 10_ _ PAD=5451 PAD=55,0 I �i 2STORY I!UMTS )-STORYJ]6 UNR5 - I I LaLAW. SCF r156 L'HFP: I :N F M1T-)SOD SF FOOTPR NT -),SW SF 1 I — 1 _ �TFd[Y LkE QC! FBE Rme ROBI-, z� = — — O 3RD' 16i WON •„ 7yLF� L�QI YASR — -� �' / ¢ eLua HOUSE J - a - � parksz.a ICJ x+' s DnuAE IAWH BLDG" 4. f •. 4 PAD -53 0 / L•' f 1 _ '.i :.6TORY 11L HMi5 rI � " o }} i – FanLVRwT_;efarsF 7 BLCtG" I� z _:rcnYri�HNFTa /' �� I BLDG. 5 ` _ RL REM �5f - PAD -51"5 it i • I _ r1 FMTPRW? ].SO}_SF AS _ I 1 FIRE 71n, I •�' BLDG 8 L" + PA )=53N0 [ f ; T0",'S s II Lam,- _ ) FG'STP4Jif. F.'�pf.EF'. I -- �t,4iF1At`i! fAT&['Idif✓– Ilk"-1:'D0.1ER�t1k — -- 5:; � ^7 -S'• -m I -Lm, C tgamwmJKGI➢.a - .6�� - _ _ - a' Ami lu1N � 0, YFi PR7DEF.HR9W 8G TRASH I . I BLDG, 1 BLDG,7 j — PAD -50"0 + 1 PAD=52"0 _ -' I .smRrATA UHTT5 il! — :rsiw•r,6 F96TiWMr-v,.g I Ff<1TRPfIT:9WM. GP: 1S i1_ I _ _ F - - 12t' . 1 R[9R�-f'Ae J SD S7 Sp r _ mr f iEB rnlEcrlfH P01Ri - — r IO_ HIRIGATIO1 NE -,- - r i/92Nf z0 o- 40 5v i2- IJ SCALE: 1"=40' PRINTED ON: 08/16/2023 REVISIONO R94F5 $/ PLAN CHECKED BY, OFF O I2Wfi / M AT THE BOR ASI SI O 27 TO / Y OF NGD MIRAGE FT y/,Rµ er DAT¢ o^TE 9 °'4.1 E G A N CIVIL, INE. r. ^PPRovEo BY: IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SHEET `� f� "'L�L_J ICI�J-1f31111L -llll• ST�TIPTRhISs IM FOR THOP E IFSAIIt OFFICE WILDING, SHEET 9N THE 1OF 9 ON FILE THE ?w91� OA �!'Fl r� LA OUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS DIAL CALL OFFICE O CI ENGINEER 6 KCI 6 RANCHO MIRAGE AS PLAN 1AHA EDSWl7, M i ('� K Cjryq 1A 19k CA 82248 -sea? aCIVIL PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN SHEETS 3 BEFORE BASIS OF HEARINGS'v ll-� m ROAR"(8'�'3 W"IcANCfHum DATE YOU DIG THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON THE CRJFORNM w NPREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: K ) COOROINAIE SYSTEM (CCSB]), ZONE N, (2D17 50 EPOCH) AS PER GRID INVERSE i' ti ] AF IRAFFlC LAY FILE NUMOER TOLL FREE 1-5C]-I:i-}I?j CALCUUTIONS BETWEEN CDNTINUOSLY OPERAIING REFERENCE (C -QRS) STATIONS �! CIy LL �� OJ DIG P491 AND PIN1 PER PUBUSHED VALUES PROVIDED BY THE SCRIPPS OREN AND 'FF P TSN SHIT APARTMENT COMPLEX A MICSER/1� AT LEAST TWO �UOE9FOU0 n R�RE Y4TA'Iff ALERT PER ARRAY CENTER (S QP,AD.), BONG: NORTH 76. 59 3:L49 WEST. EC CFT,fiO GATE: Ofi/06/2023 WASHINGTON ST @AVENUE 50, LA DDINTA, CA 92253 BENJAMIN DANIEL ELAN, RGE 77070 REVIEVlcD AND RECOMMENDED BY: WE LANDSCAPE APN 646-070-016 471 PROPERTY LINE- INTII 5IDEY•ARA SETBACK.Ly `�;-""M1S `.` I. 'V... '.. ••+-. .•-. '.. .._ .. .SEI91pEYARp SEMINUAUM 5.8" ACK PWS I'-0"POR L�4J?'. (E)P-H Pc •..j •. -. --. _ ._ - - �-� +Vcw PLUCe x•�L�-'.. :'-�l5`� •�- \S9'FPY-0'W , ], -- -_- _. _ - - _ - - _FOGTTOVEN-i T.6 NaU6WNGHEIGHT. I.riIJLIHMSETSACx 17P:II:. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ / 9LDrK WALL + P P P ✓' P P P P P P I nWP P P P P P P P P >• PIP ' a F P I. P■ P P P! F P. F F! P IIII F >' P P P F F n a n ! P F a r r I^ r r• Pµr T P r! +P r r r• I� ! DESERiSCaPE T - (] . . .I rte_ O a6d AREA I ISI I l a e. I I i 1 1 iM1 - I I 1 F v ��-� ^ a P W I P P PIP P F C C S i CP i . 1 LP � ENCE�IlRE V sETBACti PERT BVILOIpgO. KT !t CARp(1RT TRASry EHCEOBLNi - , GRPORT Y Cl]!ACHE1JaVALIEY J r SETBACK LINE LP _ tr ,r-J WATF]R [prCTpiG'✓✓ 4 / POIVER POLE I l PFR LPTBACMIlt LINE APIh UNDERGROUND, _ CP ' NH LP CP CP a CP EP ITC IHC LP CP CP CP CP CP LP CI• EF CP IUP Cv Ca LT CA C1 CP LP LP CP CP CP CP CP CP LP LP ! P I.Ih ICP LP LP 'LP CP CP CP CP CP LP CP CP '.n[' P CP CP CP LP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP C l SETBACK 'i.11NIr.1Ut.110'-0" RELOCATYP LP -. _ �_ _- - l - _ __ - - ! C �. % •PROPERTY LINE STOP &SHELTER CP CP^•� - N+INJ{S'pRA :� Ire CP CP / •. S f - ]:.. - r l LP CP fty } CP CP P - OEEEF.FSCAPE _ _ I LP � F[V FRY SSS CP T CP � QM * F � •.. LP cp I' Too. S � FEY M CP CP PDITIR6 ICJ WAnF CORAfOT7Rl IGYi-f 1iE5TR1LTiPN LP i� LP - IQ UnHb Tobi Fslf F]EMT FEY - __-- LP LP L09R5>& PP i BId¢ 1 cP CP } PRY F[Y f_ cP CP PROPERTYLI 25fory �,, EV CP 4 r '• 1 CP CP C-r f;I p' CP / r 16 Unf T9W CP cP Bldg.2 rTr PRY cP CP /(///'` ll _ I A ,+ 1LETesrTa,lw- -. CP cr 2Story - r� R'.-•Fs _ i s 11Y CP CP / 91dg. 71 Bldg. 12 I DO ! ( 'IB Unlb Tobl - - � FiY pEy Bldg. 10 # T 29tnry `(/ P 2Story I v l CP cP r F3:Y PES 2 Story cP CP 1E Vnila TD1al� ,./ �' r---�- 24 units Taal I M v + CP v '16 Unlb Tobi CP CP C� _ % SVI.eCEO r ill/' CP C l CP CP - ,.707 Lor r� I He rx -.1 / CP CP J P E p 3.0 - LT P I rer 1 I CP CP F 11MRFWAM I - I FEY FEV S - 1 PEO GA-r-_ IF CP {{Nell FITV �__:� .� N /ICP C>• 1 _ L'P I , P.6. orrk aeo F, .. FEL' FEV - / RRl1T �� Bldg 4 P N)l:YL II FP 4P / xr cP II i `meq Il :t4 Unlb Tabs PEv Delp f-erw'� :�}P d cP ! . I CP W IG Ir-IIr 1/ t , FFRI �Y C[utrlloYle - n GJ rl I R•. ILP CP 11 }' r T Story ��I l I CP •I LP ry I V L(!V `j it - rFR i p LP# 1 b FEY ! I�r KNO,L. Aw 81110 FEY f CP -.-.• ' IW •. 7 ! .fes �� Z _ _ VM!GLt:.l;•A.T.E_ 3_—_-______ _ 41 FEV - '� 'P17RT CP . 0 1 I . l_.. �_-L��� BBD P0.EA CFCp y w p 11 - P P P P P P P P i(C l V `4 _ J ' - BICYCLE, -_� •1 1 FEV - PED3ATE �� Awl I RACK FEV a Q C7 v\ V - rffLE F fXMIRTSCAPE P I )Zy FEV CPPER CT a Q EIECEL SITESIGN DBA -- 4 .' CP PERI m CF [�� LANE r CBC 1109A B B P 0 V y FEV EP I C� I � I 9 FEII FEV CP I I �� U) * Bldg. 6 � >s, eF .�"'7 Bldg. 9 , GJ Q I• RETEHTIO. aryl P P 2Story _ 2Story I CP / N-� li I 04 Unka Tota FEY cP - , : 24 UnIts Total .. ! CP a� CP / V TNI}- a Ir cp CP m • P ` P I :I. , N HV'DRAHT— OESERTSCAPE +I CP I) v +++ ■ 1 I P 55 -+ f F--Bldg. B u ! I 1 + P rr CP CP CP CP CP LP CP CF CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP LP CP Cv CP CPA CP CP Cf Cp tv CP CP CP CP 2 $SOry P CP ! I I _ � 1 bP�lfirr...:= ItU UnNa Total — ^ ~ � �IN. cP J-�-- CARPORT Ll E CORRIDOR 4 1-C N.OF T r� :.tY i I ' FIT RFSTR)LT1C'l+ }� � ~ �-�-LINE OF IMAGE CORRIf)OR � �� f Ir � I j LARPORf TARSN ENCl h % 1 HEIGFfT RESTRICTION ,.gyp. _ '-n ,� CP I I _ CP LINE OF IMAGE CORRIDOR PROPERTY LINE • Cc..A,.PPT _ I!PAAT '� t '6l I HEIGHT RESTRICTION cP CP CP CP CPI CP CP CP CP LP LP LP CP CP CP h cP CP CP C CP -CP CPT1C CP-1.'P ' I I Yn xPwe:d1! } i s � � �-^C. ! � � T �•..pJl ! _ .-. — — _ _ _ .-. — — — I F pOILO DESERTSCAPE CP T /- SET9AINr CK.LIRE IN1 hIYDRAN I- .. ..� -.� + RAPT{-� CR' I ` ��'CP -f PERRIETER J $ldg• 5 VE II Ii I.JW65CAJ•ING' ..@RUT 1 2S[Ory q 24 Unto TOW - - PICKLEi El, (POWER POLET C�T 1 EIK9E ,C �- I 24 lfniLL TGPa1 Tf, :UNDERGROUND, I pE=_pPECH'1C lU,WI 8 _��j {{�J TYP 1 ......ff _ _ - P 1 OGC WALL AGCESSIBLE � - - - - � - l - Irl - q - _ E' BLOCK WALL TTSC•Ir-E PFPI SIT - - - SICW PER - WTL'SA'SSE'k l r-h}ETER - - - CESE - - - - �� �� IGN _ PndLe7.lt -F ~a - _ '\ -- •�) ^ i - � - _.~-F f '' V Ty ' ANDMCAPINGSETBACK NOTE: SII:U.IUIIS_ACR Y•[LL p a1Q�R A 3E 20" SETBACK RO '�:� __ •Ii F'`u• �F- _ PPERTY LINE (NOT APAR'-) sEE SPECIDC IaN FDR [y�.01 FOL4'�7+hL IRF"JRISAT[W ___ EXTERIOR SIDEY PROPERTY - POWER PGLE TO SEI. I CREST. �CATED VERTiGAL.CFiE91r ----•�----------- ,.. - •- ,• -: :--: �. I._ '---------- - - - - - - — - - - - - --- (11 AGE CORRIDOR) BE UNDERGROUND, FIDEYARD SETBACK: kAR65Er6AC� gp!!!E!pn° - 1.1AXIM11UA7SETBACKOF25'-0" TYP• FOOT OVER 17-0" 5-0"SETBACKPLUSETB FOR EVERY RIGHT-OF-WAY PER PARCEL A1AP FOOT OVER 1]'-0" IN BUILDING HEIGHT, LIAXIM11UA15ETBACK OF 10'-0" AVENUE 50 CRlaDlwl Fxlrlr CekLalYoTn VNIY 1d6t Pv➢fi6C� PAeKTxG Renpc PG Lec TAeLP M.� Au[wr.aLF emLcluo HElrwrr yy-SET ngpyE [La.nDE rLailE . Ana RPL EIR4 Type llpkme Gey An!}SFT Tbh Imo) clYP_TN PBI LQMC 9. S1 260(K) O1-RIGHT PARKING D:CENnLE, THE `•'-T Site Plan _ 2 1,FOLL0:.IN. PARKIY.G ­S SHALL APRT TO THE ENTIRE RPS C%%ITHOUTAR=AINCR�SE) Plrst Ffee[ 1-BCtl FpRHmcnl 1R•A[yL 51 an C=COHPACT PARKO:G SPACE(E,5'X 10') DR'EL PD.1(INCWDIY.G H: KEl`1:.TEUN-)=TOFEETFLLO'::ED CLUBHOUSE RESIDENTACTIVITY 978 1-BCtl Apartment lA-STD 30 673 20.190 CP 309 CP=CO\ERED ST;J:DARD PARKING SPAM IT X 17) \VI SL'f.Le iflT- '•D LRUxrR: 15PACEPERU'NITREO'= tA+dF ��4 �� � i'Ip.sG Il -AOR �; ✓} N .BLDG 6 1A..w I Icwo4 ,ww 1,..yt n.4gA 3, IT 1A_13LDG 3 OAQA +.-AW 4r J A aLnG 2 . jam, i�lsp 1 Y k w:il S" 8LDG4 f Rtle�wr[ i I . 14AGs u.Ana ® IbA4l1 BLDG 5lot LEGEND PROPOSED ENCLOSURE LOCATION FOR METERS AND SWITCHGEAR EQUIPMENT .PINI PA IRWIN PARTNERS 4,A C M I T E C T A 145 Fischer Avenue, Sulle 3-2 Cosle Mesa CA 92625 (714) 557 2445 www Ipaoc com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 10J11A YFaC,sGAW Ie.IW " . 5LDG 7 .� 1lNgs, u+,ya 1L✓tAA 4l. La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street 8 Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 A& /jN> First Floor Plan ��JJ�J�f SCALE -I" =30' i/ TYP. FIRE RISER ENLARGED PLAN SGI.E:1a- = 1'-0' First Floor Plan A02 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Quinta SO V4 473 I I I I EN C n VIA ROOF BELOW H 711 !, t V� 010 1 ■�_ _�� �- �a r_ _rill - t&i .� � ,� u � - �S •SF' '6 r- sem.. �.1.+� rte$ Rui' ,�.!■ �� ONIPANIDA IR.ININPARTNERS A, R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suit, B-2 Cost, Mese CA 92626 (]14) 55] 2448 'Pa"C' M ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 IND Second Floor Plan SCALE:T =30' Second Floor Plan A03 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Ouinta SO V4 474 ,r 'r r ,• ;r ;r ,r ■�_ _�� �- �a r_ _rill - t&i .� � ,� u � - �S •SF' '6 r- sem.. �.1.+� rte$ Rui' ,�.!■ �� ONIPANIDA IR.ININPARTNERS A, R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suit, B-2 Cost, Mese CA 92626 (]14) 55] 2448 'Pa"C' M ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 IND Second Floor Plan SCALE:T =30' Second Floor Plan A03 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Ouinta SO V4 474 E - SLOG 3 ri r,: r: BIAG 2 .. r. tt ss,n• V awy V Lw 0AsV. - W�Mnn-j IPAIRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 245 FischerAvenue, Suite 6.2 C -I, Mese CA 92626 (714) 557 2446 —Ip...— ARCHITECTURE wwIpaoc—ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING w GENERAL NOTES: - PER LA QUINTA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN, PARAPET WALLS SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 5' TALL TO SCREEN/HIDE HVAC EQUIPMENT - SEE SHEET A21 FOR LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAMS - PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS SHALL MEET MINIMUM QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN JOINT APPENDIX JA11 (2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE) - PRELIMINARY SOLAR CARPORT SHOWN ABOVE. FINAL LAYOUTTO BE DETERMINED La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 AL IN>Roof Plan SCALE: 1' =3a' Roof Plan A04 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 1011WO23 21014 La Quinta SO V4 475 READYROGR. NO ENSION LESS THAN 5'-0" Z!,DIM LEGEND EACH SUBAREA MUST BE AT LEAST 160 SF IF TOTAL ROOF AREA EXCEEDS 10,000 SF SOLAR READY ZONE SOLAR ZONE ON STEEP SLOPED ROOFS MUST BE ORIENTED BETWEEN 110 AND 270 DEGREES OF I TRUE NORTH, ORIENTATION DOES NOT APPLY ON ROOFS SLOPED LESS THAN 2:12 HVACCONDENSERS L_1 MUST BE FREE OF ROOF PENETRATIONS AND ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT MIN, 15°/, OF TOTAL ROOF AREA IS REQ'D TO BE SOLAR READY, EXCLUDING ANY SKYLIGHT AREA FIRE ACCESS, 4'-0" CLEAR MIN. CARPORT ROOF BELOW TOTAL ROOF AREA INCLUDES ROOF/OVERHANG OF THE BUILDING OR ROOF/OVERHANG OF - ANOTHER STRUCTURE LOCATED WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR ON COVERED PARKING INSTALLED WITH THE BUILDING PROJECT TOTAL ROOF AREA: 214,504 SF SOLAR READY MINIMUM: 15% OF TOTAL ROOF AREA SOLAR READY MIN. REQUIRED: 32,176 SF SOLAR READY PROVIDED: 32,176 SF SOLAR READY ZONES ARE LOCATED ON CARPORTS ONLY, NO SOLAR ON BUILDING ROOFS IPAIRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 245 FischerAvenue, Suite 6.2 C -I, Mese CA 92626 (714) 557 2446 —Ip...— ARCHITECTURE wwIpaoc—ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING w GENERAL NOTES: - PER LA QUINTA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN, PARAPET WALLS SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 5' TALL TO SCREEN/HIDE HVAC EQUIPMENT - SEE SHEET A21 FOR LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAMS - PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS SHALL MEET MINIMUM QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN JOINT APPENDIX JA11 (2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE) - PRELIMINARY SOLAR CARPORT SHOWN ABOVE. FINAL LAYOUTTO BE DETERMINED La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 AL IN>Roof Plan SCALE: 1' =3a' Roof Plan A04 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 1011WO23 21014 La Quinta SO V4 475 2r-%2 Nadard ALE 1�4" = s'{� 2 Bed -ADA 2AS�AE� e �IPA 1 W1N PARTNERS Is C N I} f 0 T 9 245 FischerAvenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (7,4)5572448 www'Peoc com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING SECOND FLOOR UNITS - STANDARD .� B 1 Bed - Standard GROUND FLOOR UNITS - ACCESSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH CBC 11A ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS ♦ ' La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 1 . 1 Bed _ADA 1A1 Bed - Standard CALF 1M" = 1"' 1 Bed -ADA Unit Plans 476 A05 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 o5Clul7house Floor Pian SCALE: 1d+' 1'a' <ND :PI PA 1RW1N PARTNERS Is A n 1 s[ r s 245 FischerAvenue, Suite B-2 Caste Mese CA 82626 (714)5572448—ip—ccom ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING POOL DECK mini L RECESSED WINDOW IF lai;.A.U.A.,A....I.I. i;..-t�I a.1 1.1 EXTERIOR LIGHT rYP `. • •Front• oC1uhhouse - Right Elevation SCALE 1f4' = 14f• M rVE RISER La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. oClubhouse - Rear ElevatFon sr I P• va^ = na• 1 � I�TIl m 8 o1 Clubhouse - Left Elevation SCI": 1.14' c 1'.7 .:1 SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ SCHEME 2• STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW360 WHITE, OR EQ ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM, COLOR:BLACK Clubhouse A06 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/1912023 21014 La Ouinle SO V4 477 -01I PA IRW1N PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue• SUN, B-2 Costa Id— CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 .Jp,oc.cc, ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING alp �IRi�1AI�I�Iwiwlwl�lAiwi:'���;�+ Al i.RiMiwi I EiMilnnAINiA rii ai 1111 1iwlli�i ����� ��'K�iiliKi iiti�f �l a• a a��iiRiRiil�i �iiiEiiiiiiii�rfii�I lam. .Iilaaiwraunlwtwlwlw+aralil alalwral■ atwralararalatalalalalalatala ala wlalrr+. - ilwrwiwr a klwlalrr I irl iwraialwra■ r I I Ia el- nl�llllffll II!!iI�IIIIIII'll : I III!P'll� IIIII�IIIIIIIII! I!li�f�1111_ ILlblllllll IV'Iiilllhl _ FEW I On EMENNERN a ■Ell on .l M. it 11 11 111 �� �glIY7!!ll Vlll I —c=- -,-�GH!OrSI L VINYL V4NDOW FIBER GLASS L L�,,E MR —L,� L L MCCO REGLET :.g 1 Front Elevation re=3d3P��ssyy��iicEx'"ii===���s-ii f"xx xsi:i-ii° ••••r=•=sns. iiiitAii,SGZYFiLRiiP�Tir'nwr�si a}a atlLl�;1,LL"€�=E?::sei::::. III Ili III�II I"III IIII 11 °IIII LLI�1p_�__' 11 .11- :111 In 1111!11 '. ROOFING . .I FREaCHxr,-e' La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 028 171 Rig61t Elevation �s Rei 1� IMMUNE Fvu� COLOR SCHEREI o 1 Bldg 1 Rear Elevation 5C41AI • 1'-w SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. FASCIA. TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING. OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA. TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR ED - ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR BLACK Bldg. 1 - Elevations A07 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 478 i3Oc:.aa94xN Si2T � 3 Root FRENCH DOOR FIR£ RISER i RBldg 2 Left Elevation PAINTED BLACK, TYP OpB1 912 Front Elevation I1IaMIlIIIIa Fill+il,a LD-CORATIVE SHUTTERS "1p00 CORBELS 7Bldg 2 Right Elevation SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR ED. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW300 WHITE, OR EQ - ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING �] Root .tt m +s FRENCHDOOR Bldq 2 Rear Elevation SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR ED. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW300 WHITE, OR EQ - ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE 479 ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM, COLM DLACK IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldg. 2 - Elevations 10IPA A R C H I T E C T S Troutdale Village, LLC. A08 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 245 Fischer Avenua, Suite B-2 Costa Mese CA 92626 La QUlnta, California 92253 PROJECT (714)5572448 wipaaccom 0//21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/ ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 21014 La Ouinla SDO V4 V4 479 ........... .... .. rl � I F FE 777 TIGER .0. � 3 Root Rw MCI - 1 oBtdg 3 Left Elevation $UALZ- 118' - 1-T M 'I STrw RAY>a "Amm 11 C9. "R. All M DECORATIVE ''-THEME S-0 REG— EXTERIOR LIGHT, ttP o Mdp� Front Elevation , SiL OBldg 3 Rluht Elevation '<At -E'. 11V = V -D' SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS D E639 3C9LO CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR SCHEME STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ, ACCENT DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. 480 ---- -- — — — — — C FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS - DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, ------- FR OR EQ. mn HT T ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING LV1WLWrNbW MANUIR WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING FxTARuaqi wp PA—D iuK, STYLE: BARCELONA o1Bldg 3 Rear Elevation COLOR: CASA GRANDE wjd-L ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUR TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS &WINDOWS COLORBRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR Slldl. COLOR BLACK OjIPAIRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldg. 3 - Elevations A FI C H I T E C T S Troutdale Village, LLC. A09 245 Fischer Avenue, Suit, 6.2 Cost, Mesa CA 92626 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 (714)557 2448 www — 1,a.ia PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING coNs ULTING 21014 La Quinta SO V4 480 ,.r•,•..:=..c;.11-.;:.; �:��.;1`�:ti�;`,r•.`•.^�:`- ....fit I sll�,11 I�1 ■■ _ III�II ' ' I• 11 i11 11 � X111 .2I PA 1RW 1N PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 245 FischerAvenue, Suite B-2 Cosla Masa CA 92626 (7 14) 557 2448 www ipaoc com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 41111111111111110 ,'!'•I•_1.7.I/_glll_r, r r -•amu s•'' _ rrrr!ra•,!•;;;;:,, ... ... - :� I �� 1� on: :: 1�� �1�11_ i i i . I � �..._RF'FETII F RING .j _ IN w11Rw!11! w I11i1iti!AIRIFIARI .•�lil _--��Iwlil�tlMlwfXlAlli'i!i'f!i!i'Alwlit){itw-611i wllslwlwlwlwlrlwha�:pim ilrin'i1al,�lll�l;��l4rulm•` ------ Ili' IIIA I�IIlllll! !Illll iIIR"' •=,''c".IiID ,a Illi ill 1. I' 77J iaj�'liwei� l;llpFL IIII��. 04 EM DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ - ACCENT 1 FR�- DUNN EDWARDS n' "V FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS _ 22 Sa-.11— o 1 Fill FIL- - DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, a. X OR ED, :'If1VL WIN DOW .TL_C.: REGLET DECORATNE TIDE STEEL RAILING SLTkAF; FlBER GlA55 —RIORUGHT.T . PAINTED BLACK, TYP FnF HDwR o�Bldg 4 Rear Elevation A SCALE 1R' - T -W _--��Iwlil�tlMlwfXlAlli'i!i'f!i!i'Alwlit){itw-611i wllslwlwlwlwlrlwha�:pim ilrin'i1al,�lll�l;��l4rulm•` ------ Ili' IIIA I�IIlllll! !Illll iIIR"' •=,''c".IiID ,a Illi ill 1. I' 77J iaj�'liwei� l;llpFL IIII��. DUNN EDWARDS La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 ' r ■■ .Vth Elevation IISji:I�lA16a mgjiiiw ilil-i h.1o,.�.IIF7. NIAI.I.IRIal it --- s' �"i Fra Fcx SCHEME 2 .pE[lRNTI']E SHUTTSA TYP 1 Bldg 4 Rear Elevation B 0 1 SCALE -11W = 1'4r SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW360 WHITE, OR EQ ACCENT DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS 8 WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM, COLOR: BLACK Bldg. 4 - Elevations A10 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/1912023 21014 La Quinta SO V4 481 SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ, FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR ED, SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW360 WHITE, OR EQ ACCENT DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS 8 WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM, COLOR: BLACK Bldg. 4 - Elevations A10 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/1912023 21014 La Quinta SO V4 481 ..................... . . BUILDING 4-A ......................... FEW Li u DECORATIVE tiff!/E RIEEi PAI�Iti,^, EXTERIORUGHT,TVP PAINTEDBBACK,TVP g � nm m F �AA Bldg 4 Front Elevation Overall �i s�:A , ar 91 ! STUCCO RECIET LFY GAYS FRENCH pOCR S! OqBldg 4 Front Elevation B %J-WABE:1W = 1'-9 SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, SCHEME 2: STUCCO11 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ, FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING -- — CONCRETE TILE ROOFING - - �� STYLEMANUF: WESBARCELONA ROYAL ROOFING __ e�E SME: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE - �'� "� ��'0f ROOFING TOO ROOFING TUBE STB RNK,T %SUCCO REGLET EXTERIOTM1T MANUF: TBD PAINTED BLACK, TVP. EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP Bldg 4 Front Elevation A COLOR: TBD O5GAL� 1,n• 1•.p• VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR BLACK ■OIPA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldg. 4 -Elevations ■ i A R` H I T E>,` Troutdale Village, LLC. All 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 (714)5572448--iir-- La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 1 011 912 02 3 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 210141a Quinta SD V4 482 !/E.: i� C�'�"• .............................—.......:............... _iF[H[i!!-'I'CIFli11 E . c a� iL ■moi- 11 SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, SCHEME 2: STUCCO11 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ, FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING -- — CONCRETE TILE ROOFING - - �� STYLEMANUF: WESBARCELONA ROYAL ROOFING __ e�E SME: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE - �'� "� ��'0f ROOFING TOO ROOFING TUBE STB RNK,T %SUCCO REGLET EXTERIOTM1T MANUF: TBD PAINTED BLACK, TVP. EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP Bldg 4 Front Elevation A COLOR: TBD O5GAL� 1,n• 1•.p• VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR BLACK ■OIPA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldg. 4 -Elevations ■ i A R` H I T E>,` Troutdale Village, LLC. All 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 (714)5572448--iir-- La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 1 011 912 02 3 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 210141a Quinta SD V4 482 'moi[" " iCz; aril � fai IR°rilliliii�iiili.li�R�R al I al'a�iiiaiiiiiaiii��Rl a t '>IIiiA;lililiiwiaii i nliiiiaial iiiiriiir�riair�aiili rliiIN I rlrir�riii.a"`11R.RIlililllli ili li�iiiiiliiliiwis iwilii i i`dill _ _ _ I Ali Eli 13i111rli1ifilil IR1r[ .ilr'r1 � 1+rlrlrlilrlrllllR•111!RIAIR!al R'llt+il11iI1111R RIRS!-:i Rlll>Rlwll+illlili!r!rl!'ila!�111rI�IJr+rlrlr+rlrl�rl R'� � +la•rlrl 1if11illlifili!11i!illfiillitlfiiitUlA .. ■ ■ ■ ■ - ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ iii■ w■ ■ ■ ■ ___ • ■ ■ ■■I 71 M1 CC L.: is iijii IIII .._ 191 R_�I �I;,I 22' 10��.`Bldg 5 Left Elevation V SCALE: 1!B" = 1'-0" 02SIN 5 Right Elevation SCALE. 1fS = 1'-V lsl,l.l-I_I "ERli��illl�iri!1i�lslllrJlill!-I Niillfililr�lilififl+ifilrlllrlrlilil�.,, i' IIIIIII!III IIIIIPII''' I �I Illlnl III!I:IIIIII I L OEmRATri Stlt[RER`.. VINYLYIINOOw ---O�wn LGCII I L5rF aAII LTIIBB STL WiLIM FRENCH DOOR EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP PMNIEp BUCI( TYP o 1 Bldg 5 Rear Elevation SCALE: 1/B" = 1'-0" I PA IRWIN PARTNERS ,A R C H I T E C T 5 245 FischerAvenue, Suite B-2 Costa v— CA 92626 IF14)5572446 ,v,ipooacom ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinla, California 92253 ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM, COLOR: BLACK Bldg. 5 - Elevations Al2 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Ouinta SO V4 483 SCHEME 1 - STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ, FASCIA. TRELLIS. CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM, COLOR: BLACK Bldg. 5 - Elevations Al2 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Ouinta SO V4 483 SCHEME 2, STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ FASCIA, TRELLIS. CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM, COLOR: BLACK Bldg. 5 - Elevations Al2 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Ouinta SO V4 483 WOOD F:- .- - . STUCCO RECESS �+3Y FUER � nBldg 6 Left •Elevation scALe ve° = r-0 -_ � r-^-W-1?E TILE ROOFING iRIilRlilili°RIi1�l�f`li1 IR illl f111�iR1�lNI^ �'��li� •�� � �� � ��.lwlll�l�1�1�Iw I11RI�IR 1001stom- IR111R1 1lR1RI11 11111R�'- - '11fR111111IRf■11!■11M II!:!.II IIII�II IIIII IIIII II'lll�ll� II•�' , �' ®® ii :o 1M NSI 11 IUIIIIIHIIgII 1 I� PAINTED BLACK, TYP ;IPAIRWIN PARTNERS ■ A R C H I T E C T S 245 FischerA, Ue, Suile B-2 C,s Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2446 W-ipaoc.o ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING I>r rs¢a:>trtaawu�I"rA;11";L 02Bldg 6 Right Elevation S. 111 = 1,-,,. kIR1R1R1RlRIR1 fR1�1AIRliiIRIR�� � T' m -w--i!i!ili'-12-1-11iRli'ilA.l- RIaRI)AIl1RIRIR1RIRllN1)AIRtiRfR�EI ■IRI■I�' e�rllli!R11+w II: Ifllllllllll IIIII ;II :I' II ! rumn La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 REGLET 01 Bldg 6 Rear Elevation SCALE 1ftl" = 1'-0' SCHEME I: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EO ACCENTI DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ, FASCIA. TRELLIS. CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, SCHEME2: iiii iiiiiiiiiii'iii 111.11'RIRIi!RIRI■IR�RIRIRIRIRISI_ STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. Ion 'IIIII 'il III' IIIII _IIIIII;II DUNN EDWARDS �� 1 DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR ECL FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS" �+3Y FUER � nBldg 6 Left •Elevation scALe ve° = r-0 -_ � r-^-W-1?E TILE ROOFING iRIilRlilili°RIi1�l�f`li1 IR illl f111�iR1�lNI^ �'��li� •�� � �� � ��.lwlll�l�1�1�Iw I11RI�IR 1001stom- IR111R1 1lR1RI11 11111R�'- - '11fR111111IRf■11!■11M II!:!.II IIII�II IIIII IIIII II'lll�ll� II•�' , �' ®® ii :o 1M NSI 11 IUIIIIIHIIgII 1 I� PAINTED BLACK, TYP ;IPAIRWIN PARTNERS ■ A R C H I T E C T S 245 FischerA, Ue, Suile B-2 C,s Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2446 W-ipaoc.o ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING I>r rs¢a:>trtaawu�I"rA;11";L 02Bldg 6 Right Elevation S. 111 = 1,-,,. kIR1R1R1RlRIR1 fR1�1AIRliiIRIR�� � T' m -w--i!i!ili'-12-1-11iRli'ilA.l- RIaRI)AIl1RIRIR1RIRllN1)AIRtiRfR�EI ■IRI■I�' e�rllli!R11+w II: Ifllllllllll IIIII ;II :I' II ! rumn La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 REGLET 01 Bldg 6 Rear Elevation SCALE 1ftl" = 1'-0' SCHEME I: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EO ACCENTI DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ, FASCIA. TRELLIS. CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUR WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUR TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS 8 WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR:BLACK Bldg. 6 - Elevations A13 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 1 011 912 02 3 21014 La Quinla SO V4 484 SCHEME2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENTI DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR ECL FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS" DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUR WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUR TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS 8 WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR:BLACK Bldg. 6 - Elevations A13 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 1 011 912 02 3 21014 La Quinla SO V4 484 II}Zlq•RIQi...........M.i7.l'R......m..... ..::..s�7.�^�)�iRII:IAIAI�I�ll�iirll Ililili!i<lili!il1!i!illli'ililRl ....... IIIIIIIIP11,11111 II�IIUI1IWr IIIY I�I�I u1 I IFF' I,I� 1Z Len t_ievaiion 6CALE 178' 1'-0' -I - =-- TILE ROOFING all L 111 1111!'M I �I�III �� 11 iI�IR� Rla!ala r-. Mal M TG �1Fial Floe DECORATIVE "LL ,'l I- Ertiy[;p REGLET TERIOR LIGHT, ttP 04Bldgs 7 & 12 Front Elevation SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0' 02131dgs 7 & 12 Right Elevation $SALE 1- • 1'•P .a .JRool SCHEMEI: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. FASCIA TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ 485 rG F ROOFING 'k N� CONCRETE TILE ROOFING LOECORATIVE m'�Oo [^-aREL--li:Rhll�•]v!=1GERGL�•._ Tw..iL FLIM::: -COLIR SCHEMEI •STUi'�fECLET MANUR WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING SHUTTERS FFtEYCH WOR P,VrtFp BLACB. ttP EXTE+[ORLI E%iERIOR LIGHr, ttP STYLE: BARCELONA 01 Bld s 7 & 12 Rear Elevation COLOR: CASA GRANDE SCALE: Itr = T-0' ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUR TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR: BLACK •�I PA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldgs. 7 & 12 - Elevations A R C H I T E C T S Troutdale Village, LLC. A14 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 34E Fia_ r Aran*, Ewe B3 Ca In ! jHwi CA 914N La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 (714)5572448 wwwivao«om ATE: 10/192023 PLOT DATE-1 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 21014 ulrlta SO V4 485 -1 N Is' M I WIRI!AIi101iIRIM M'111111'a'ela!wr�l _ wlywiRia air..a..a is s �._ _ �. _. �, aiaiaiaraiaraia iai araraia a iaraia ia�aia iaiaia aia.aie�..i ■ .� ��_ 11 11 1 ■■ ■e ®_ 11 NMI 11MMI ■■ licil� �IIIVIIII X111 r I_..°11_.Ill ll�l! — — Illlll,lll�;�.;�1 I_III.I �I' IIIIF-1 17, F1 171 711TH I 1 0O;UC,� C, LCIL CICVdLIUII SCRLE: 1iL" 1'4 Q A 81dg 8 Front Elevation SCALE ng' . Y� 02Bldg 8 Right Elevation SCALE:I,MI = 1=0' Il�lililEl�I��Rljtl�itl�lililil'a _ SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ, FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW360 WHITE, OR EQ. 'M ACCENT DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ, FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, T.R �3 Rool L �� PL •lam '�BPh' �r FLrt rs+ mm y 02Bldg 8 Right Elevation SCALE:I,MI = 1=0' Il�lililEl�I��Rljtl�itl�lililil'a _ SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ, FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW360 WHITE, OR EQ. 'M ACCENT DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ, FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, 486 ti ROOFING Ftrt tpw CONCRETE TILE ROOFING I_,•�,;L:;,,,q-;; F6FRGL44f sf�ea�uLer �1:IUE:F%LA4tlC [mvascHEraEz FRENCH DOOR PAINTED BLACK, ttP L[>�flPAM1£ oEere*R�avnFz —ERIOR LIGHT, TYP o1 Bldg 8 Rear Elevation MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE SCALE: 1/8' = T-0" ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM, CDLOR BLACK IPA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldg. 8 - Elevations Troutdale Village, I_I_C. A15 245 Fischer Avenue, Suile B-2 C -I. Mesa CA 92626 (,14)5572448—1paoacom NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT 0/1 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 21014 La Quinta SD V4 486 EXTERIOR LIGHT WP P7,1111 n 0u . T•P 1 IoM Left Elevation uALE 1m 1'-0 FkPHGH LYm, p O4 Bldg 9 - Front Elevation SCALL ve' = 1'_T O//Bldg 9 Right Elevation_ LSCALE; 1,16' = "-J' • IPAIRWIN PARTNERS A ii C H I T E C T B 245 FischerAvenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 w,ipaac com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 FRENCH DOOR 01 Bldg 19 Rear Elevation SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EO, ACCENTI DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EO_ FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EO. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQL ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ FASCIA TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS NTUBE STEEL, OR SIM, COLOR; _81,�4CK Bldg. 9 - Elevations A16 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Ouinla SD V4 487 --"&M@_,:lo 81dg 10 Left Elevation SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" ■ Bldg 10 - Front Elevation SCALE: 1/8' = 1'-0" a aral�tarairl z r = rlarair ri>Alairlal�alN. __ �1�r1 r+alrl�lRllr!t'r�i a rIJM!�I*I�Iwl�l>A1�lRI>A!Ar�l�..- LFIRERMR Bldg 10 Right Elevation SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" ^,^I + �^� al^,ala+a+alaral :^ , : :_1^=I^�^I z� a IAirRirlr a i irtiiiilnlwiiiwiilrw,■irlaialalalaraaa+ii`RIM.6iiiiriiiili�ii ii{iii`eii+iii will: ' �I•i eim'e ,rlr rlr rirlr+riilirti�l rri.w.x ilr!aria+rn����lmlmnia��_r�IsrgL aialala�larrilafalaallarallliralaia+rr>rlrr+aa+�' R!E31rlx: a + s��q�ilr+--*-r�i�rriarria:�l■.- NEI 17 II111141 Vllllllll — �'I f IIIllillll ilf iilll X1111 �Illllln — Ililllllllil,- IIIA' VIII: Illlli'lll 070 AN Mal Bldg 10 Rear Elevation uw2rcmowl SCHEMEI: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ_ FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, SCHEME2- STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE. OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EO. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR:CASA GRANDE +R.R •M+++q ravNMI LFIRERMR Bldg 10 Right Elevation SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" ^,^I + �^� al^,ala+a+alaral :^ , : :_1^=I^�^I z� a IAirRirlr a i irtiiiilnlwiiiwiilrw,■irlaialalalaraaa+ii`RIM.6iiiiriiiili�ii ii{iii`eii+iii will: ' �I•i eim'e ,rlr rlr rirlr+riilirti�l rri.w.x ilr!aria+rn����lmlmnia��_r�IsrgL aialala�larrilafalaallarallliralaia+rr>rlrr+aa+�' R!E31rlx: a + s��q�ilr+--*-r�i�rriarria:�l■.- NEI 17 II111141 Vllllllll — �'I f IIIllillll ilf iilll X1111 �Illllln — Ililllllllil,- IIIA' VIII: Illlli'lll 070 AN Mal Bldg 10 Rear Elevation uw2rcmowl SCHEMEI: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ_ FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, SCHEME2- STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE. OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EO. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR:CASA GRANDE 488 ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. COL .BLACK IPA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldg. 10 - Elevations A R C H I T E C T S Troutdale Village, LLC. A17 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 245 FmO.r Av Rn Smm B-2 Cosi. Ales. CA 92626 La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT 21014 1,141557 2445 . ip... 0/1 PLOT DATE: 10/192023 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 21014 La Quinta SD V4 488 Oa7.lxYjanNwaa IIIr5I PIRWIN PARTNERS A R A C H l i E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 C-1, Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2445 www ipaoc com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING .� nBldg 11 Left Elevation SCA1i,fa- r.m tint Floor - FIBER GLASS L STUCCO REGLET FRENCH DOOR O4 [w�Bldg 11 Front Elevation OBldg 11 Right Elevation EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP PAINTED BI -ACK, TYP Fn mmon La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 01 Bldg 11 Rear Elevation SCALE 1W - 1'•T SCHEMEI: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ, ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ, FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR, HI.ACK Bldg. 11 - Elevations A18 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Quina SO V4 489 SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW360 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR, HI.ACK Bldg. 11 - Elevations A18 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Quina SO V4 489 1I PA IRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T 6 245 FischerAvenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 82626 IT 14) 557 244a www ipaoc com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING •J a5.�r�clWr Or 3T"Fb 08Pool Equip. Side Elevation ScaaE 316 = 1'-B DECO—VE EXTERIOR LIGHT, TVP 07Poal_ Ettu,p. Front Elevation SCALE 3/16'• 1'.O' T�Fa�rrq�? CARPORT BY DTHERE FDR 'n EFEREI.CE CINLI OGTypical Carport Side Elevation SCAT£ 174' a 1'-0' La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 D5Typical Carport Plan SCALE 3.16•= VW +11' 2 Second Floor 9iiiiiiiiiiiw iiiiiiii i>•iiiiw �� ■iiiiiii ilii MM MEliiM ws*wl■>wwiiw■ i Typical Trash Enclosure Side Elevation 043Cuc- l a1,4r +11' 2 Second Floor In ■iilt'i®ilaiiiiiiiiiiil ■ iiG4>T.®iiiiii ! iiiiiiii■�i liliiiliiw■■■■Riiiii 1 ■ =EEEEEEEEEEEE=EEMiiiiii 03Tylpical Trash Enclosure Rear Elevation .11' 2 Second Floor 1. 1 First Floor 02Typical Trash Enclosure Front Elevation SCALE: 1w s 1'.P 0 Typical Trash Enclosure Plan 1 SCALE 114' = V.IT Exterior Elevations A19 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 490 02 View of Building 3 with Building 4 and putting green in background, 01 View of clubhouse from Washington Street main entry. (B Bird's-eye view of property. 89i �j� IRWIN PARTNERS T C i [� IRAP10o H r e c r s 245 Fischer Ar ,n Suite B-2 C-, Mesa CA 92626 (714)5572448 w.-ipa..— ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 03 View of pool area and shade structure I r f _ 0-, �� C BUILDING NUM1IBER -x.1:1 �� � O VIEN'NUI.IEEB Key Plan 07 View of Buildings 4 & 5. La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 OView of open parking along north property line. 05 View of rear portion of parcel. OB View of carports near building 8, 3D Views A20 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOTDATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Quinta SO V4 491 10 View on Washington Street with deceleration lane on far left See location of view on sheet A17 Key Plan. La Quinta Village Apartments Paint Schemes Color Board DUNN - EDWARDS PAINTS Scheme 1 Scheme 2 STUCCO 1 STUCCO 1 DEW352 DEW360 ANTIQUE WHITE WHITE ACCENT 1 ACCENT 1 DE6341 DET606 VULCAN MEEK MOSS GREEN FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DE6390 DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING CHOCOLATE PUDDING joIPAIRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T& 245 FischerAvenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 1]14)5572446 w.ipaoccom ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING TILE ROOFING WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS & FENCING TUBE STEEL, OR SIM, COLOR:BLACK TRASH ENCLOSURES CMU WALLS, SPLIT FACE METAL ROOF METAL GATES CARPORTS BY OTHERS STEEL SUPPORTS & METAL ROOF, OR SIM, PICNIC AREA SHADE STRUCTURES BY OTHERS TBD POOL AREA CABANAS BY OTHERS TBD 09 View on Avenue 50 looking towards Washington Street intersection with mountains in the background. See location of view on sheet A17 Key Plan. View of entry access on Avenue 50. See location of view on sheet A17 Key Plan. La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 3D Views & Materials Board A21 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10119/2023 21014 La Quinta SO V4 492 VIEW FROM WASHINGTON STEET - BUILDINGS 1 & 2 VIEW FROM WASHINGTON STEET - BUILDING 4 & CLUBHOUSE ^(LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAM - WASHINGTON STREET TOWARDS AVENUE 50 O {JSCA;•E 1.n• . TV VIEW FROM AVENUE 50 - BUILDINGS 5 & 6 leI pA IRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 7=5 Fv_hv+ A• —, Sum 32❑cule Mesa CA MM (714) 557 2448 w Ipaoc com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 f/%'�LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAM - WASHINGTON STREET AVENUE 50 r of LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAM - AVENUE 50 SGEE: Vr = ra Line of Sight Diagrams A22 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Quinla SO V4 493 -.4-0- .4-0 -32.0- •x2.0 -201V tow- J •+a+a- 1 LT WASHINGTON A — STREET - ............. � �—cam T r ' � ..... �-,�a1iXG•iTALL�s1Rli!A�3LE 3itii-'.._� .i. —_--p0ya�c--• -- •-_ �lEHTCX 9NA1 SIXlG WM1FENCINGXEN'SIGE>•'MX`IE:: DECEL IPNe VIEW FROM AVENUE 50 - BUILDINGS 5 & 6 leI pA IRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 7=5 Fv_hv+ A• —, Sum 32❑cule Mesa CA MM (714) 557 2448 w Ipaoc com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 f/%'�LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAM - WASHINGTON STREET AVENUE 50 r of LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAM - AVENUE 50 SGEE: Vr = ra Line of Sight Diagrams A22 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Quinla SO V4 493 k , _ � r � � - � �� # fit, � � �t � •�_ low��� I_ + [f'�3 ice!�z:u: r BLD(' 9 BLDG 5 i fl f k BLDG s ` I r of. ZONE 2: 55" ESTIMATED ANNUAL APPLIED MTM USE TREE AND SHRUB LOW - DRIP / BUBBLER _ s .*;w • y -+ �s �' y ETO X PF X LA X 0.62 / "148 / IE = EAAAU 58.0 X .20 X 102,383 X 0.62 / 748 / .90 = 1,0-157-1 TREE AND SHRUB MODERATE- DRIP / BUBBLER BL BLDG B DG 7 f �~ t I r +� ETO X PF X LA X 0.62 / 748 / IE = EAAAU ///jjj �- 55.0 X .50 X 65,256 X 0-62 / 748 / -90 = 1,525 il.��{I` •. -:.h _ - - '� .. � TURF HIGH- ROTOR -`.+ l•� +� -;� �� '� ETO X P _ F X LA X 0.62 / 748 / IE EAAAU 55,0 X .70 X 35,479 X 0,62 / 745 / -50 = 1,405-31 _ _ , .}- _ _ e• TURF HIGH- DRIP --- ETO X PF X LA X 0.62 / 748 / IE = EAAAU ------ _ - �# A 4 s - - - - - - - - - -------- 55, 0 X .70 X 1,090 X 0.62 / 745 / .90 = 40.76 AMSWE 50 — _-- `� `� - TURF HIGH - 5PRAY r ,4 ETO X PF X LA X 0.62 / 745 / IE = EAAAU - _ _ — • — - -- — - — - - ---- - — — — • -- - — - _ -- 55.0 X 0.70 X 1,679 X 0.62 / 748 / .75 = 75-34 y _............. ,.,,. ...,. ...... WwW......._....�,..,�„`......,......., .._._ .. - - ..,..,.._........ :.........-.-..........:.. MAXIMUM ANNUAL APPLIED WATER USE ETO X .45 X LA X 0.62 / 745 = MAAWU REFER TO SLOPE PLANTING EXHIBIT ACCENT PAVING SHADE STRUCTURE WITH PICKI JEEBALL COURT DOG PARK 55,0 X .45 X 211,452 X 0.62 / 745 = 4575.14 PICNIC TABLES PUTTING GREEN AREA - 3,161 POOL AND SPA AREA - 1,434 ESTIMATED ANNUAL APPLIED WATER USE TOTAL - 4,441-2 POOL RECREATION AREA MAXIMUM ANNUAL APPLIED WATER USE TOTAL - 4,575.14 ESTIMATED LANDSCAPE SQUARE FT. TOTAL - 211,452 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN LP -1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLANH,i7� I ERMNN DESIGN V ROUP 77-R99 \\'OLF RD - SUITE 1°2 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENT a 401 a& PALM DESERT, CA 91211 PARKER DEVELOPMENT PH 2754. EXP °1,� CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA YALE: I"=4m' PH (76°)7777-913 Fnx �760� 777-9132 494 f y= � 'may ��r,`'� � �� • / y a� 1�FM.7 I_ + [f'�3 ice!�z:u: r BLD(' 9 BLDG 5 i fl f k BLDG s ` I r of. ZONE 2: 55" ESTIMATED ANNUAL APPLIED MTM USE TREE AND SHRUB LOW - DRIP / BUBBLER _ s .*;w • y -+ �s �' y ETO X PF X LA X 0.62 / "148 / IE = EAAAU 58.0 X .20 X 102,383 X 0.62 / 748 / .90 = 1,0-157-1 TREE AND SHRUB MODERATE- DRIP / BUBBLER BL BLDG B DG 7 f �~ t I r +� ETO X PF X LA X 0.62 / 748 / IE = EAAAU ///jjj �- 55.0 X .50 X 65,256 X 0-62 / 748 / -90 = 1,525 il.��{I` •. -:.h _ - - '� .. � TURF HIGH- ROTOR -`.+ l•� +� -;� �� '� ETO X P _ F X LA X 0.62 / 748 / IE EAAAU 55,0 X .70 X 35,479 X 0,62 / 745 / -50 = 1,405-31 _ _ , .}- _ _ e• TURF HIGH- DRIP --- ETO X PF X LA X 0.62 / 748 / IE = EAAAU ------ _ - �# A 4 s - - - - - - - - - -------- 55, 0 X .70 X 1,090 X 0.62 / 745 / .90 = 40.76 AMSWE 50 — _-- `� `� - TURF HIGH - 5PRAY r ,4 ETO X PF X LA X 0.62 / 745 / IE = EAAAU - _ _ — • — - -- — - — - - ---- - — — — • -- - — - _ -- 55.0 X 0.70 X 1,679 X 0.62 / 748 / .75 = 75-34 y _............. ,.,,. ...,. ...... WwW......._....�,..,�„`......,......., .._._ .. - - ..,..,.._........ :.........-.-..........:.. MAXIMUM ANNUAL APPLIED WATER USE ETO X .45 X LA X 0.62 / 745 = MAAWU REFER TO SLOPE PLANTING EXHIBIT ACCENT PAVING SHADE STRUCTURE WITH PICKI JEEBALL COURT DOG PARK 55,0 X .45 X 211,452 X 0.62 / 745 = 4575.14 PICNIC TABLES PUTTING GREEN AREA - 3,161 POOL AND SPA AREA - 1,434 ESTIMATED ANNUAL APPLIED WATER USE TOTAL - 4,441-2 POOL RECREATION AREA MAXIMUM ANNUAL APPLIED WATER USE TOTAL - 4,575.14 ESTIMATED LANDSCAPE SQUARE FT. TOTAL - 211,452 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN LP -1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLANH,i7� I ERMNN DESIGN V ROUP 77-R99 \\'OLF RD - SUITE 1°2 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENT a 401 a& PALM DESERT, CA 91211 PARKER DEVELOPMENT PH 2754. EXP °1,� CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA YALE: I"=4m' PH (76°)7777-913 Fnx �760� 777-9132 494 TYP. BUILDING PLANTING EXHIBIT PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA LPLAY EQUIPMENT NOTE: PIV, FDC, HYDRANT LOCATIONS 514ALL NOT BE OBSTRUCTED FROM ACCESS BY VEGETATION. A MINIMUM 3 -FEET RADIUS AROUND EACH DEVICE CIRI U- .RENCE SHALL BE FREE OF OBSTRUCTIVE VEGETATION, WITH CONSIDERATION OF MATURE PLANT GROWTH PLANT LIST SYMBOL QTY. BOTANICAL NAME SIZE WATER ;EES 4 PALMS DALBERGIA 515500 24" BOX 02 LOU "INDIAN R05EWIOOD" TIPUANA TIPIU TRASH x AGAVE 51SALANA OLEA EUROPAEA I SWAN HILL' MULTI -TRC ACACIA STENOPHYLLA 24" BOX 02 LOW "SHOESTRING ACACIA" SINGLE TRC STND. ACACIA SALICINA 24" BOX 02 LOU 'WILLOW ACACIA" SINGLE TRC STND. PARKIN50NIA PRAECOX 24" BOX 02 LOW "PALO BREA" SINGLE TRC STND. ACACIA ANEURA 24" BOX 02 LOW 'TMULGA" SINGLE TRC STND. EUCALYPTUS PAPUANA 24" BOX 02 LOU ,GHOST GUM" SINGLE TRC STND. PHOENIX DACTYLIFERA IS' 5TH 05 MOD ZAPIDI DATE PALM' DIAMOND CUT WASHINGTONIA ROBIUSTA 15' 5TH 05 MOD 'MEXICAN FAN PALM" 05 MOD YELLOW BELLS" ® LEUCOPHYLLUM LANGMANIAE 5 GAL. 02 LOW LYNS LEGACY' v OLEA EUROPAEA 5 GAL. 02 LOW . - ! 1G F G) [lJL•ar1 .• - • 5 GAL. 05 MOD CORAL BELLS' © LEUCOPHYLLUM ZYGOPHYLLUM 5 GAL 02 LOU 'CIMARRON' � � BLDG. 3 5 GAL. 05 MOD !'JOMlt70D BEAUTY' _ r CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 5 GAL. 05 MOD 0 G=RASSES = MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS 5 GAL. 05 MOD REGAL MIST' BLDG 2 LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 5 GAL. Qo a (io G) PLATINUM BEAUTY' oo� 5 GAL. 05 MOD VARIEGATA' * � . La.J G OUNDCOVER 4 VINES DALEA GREGGII 5 GAL. 02 LOW TRAILING INDIGO BUSH" ' 77 L L: CAR155A 5 GAL 05 MOD 'GREEN CARPET' 0 f� 5 GAL. TYP. BUILDING PLANTING EXHIBIT PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA LPLAY EQUIPMENT NOTE: PIV, FDC, HYDRANT LOCATIONS 514ALL NOT BE OBSTRUCTED FROM ACCESS BY VEGETATION. A MINIMUM 3 -FEET RADIUS AROUND EACH DEVICE CIRI U- .RENCE SHALL BE FREE OF OBSTRUCTIVE VEGETATION, WITH CONSIDERATION OF MATURE PLANT GROWTH PLANT LIST SYMBOL QTY. BOTANICAL NAME SIZE WATER ;EES 4 PALMS DALBERGIA 515500 24" BOX 02 LOU "INDIAN R05EWIOOD" TIPUANA TIPIU 24" BOX 05 MOD "TIPIU TREE" AGAVE 51SALANA OLEA EUROPAEA 36" BOX 02 LOW SWAN HILL' MULTI -TRC ACACIA STENOPHYLLA 24" BOX 02 LOW "SHOESTRING ACACIA" SINGLE TRC STND. ACACIA SALICINA 24" BOX 02 LOU 'WILLOW ACACIA" SINGLE TRC STND. PARKIN50NIA PRAECOX 24" BOX 02 LOW "PALO BREA" SINGLE TRC STND. ACACIA ANEURA 24" BOX 02 LOW 'TMULGA" SINGLE TRC STND. EUCALYPTUS PAPUANA 24" BOX 02 LOU ,GHOST GUM" SINGLE TRC STND. PHOENIX DACTYLIFERA IS' 5TH 05 MOD ZAPIDI DATE PALM' DIAMOND CUT WASHINGTONIA ROBIUSTA 15' 5TH 05 MOD 'MEXICAN FAN PALM" 05 MOD DESERT ACCENTS CAE5ALPINIA PULGHEW1 MA 15 GAL. AGAVE 51SALANA 15 GAL. 02 LOW "SISAL" AGAVE ANGUSTIFOLIA 15 GAL 02 LOW CARIBBEAN AGAVE" 'SIERRA 5OUOUET' AGAVE GEMINIFLORA 5 GAL. 02 LOU) "TWIN -FLOWERING AGAVE" 02 LOU HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA 5 GAL 02 LOW 'DESERT FLAMENCO' SENNA ARTEMI5IO[pE5 5 GAL 0 ECHINOGACTUS GRI5 JII 5 GAL. 02 LOU) "GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS" © SHRUBS 5 GAL. 05 MOD LP -2 I,UATER GON5ERVATION 5T_A_TF-MFNT �7 7� LANDSCAPING 15 CONSISTENT WITH THE HERMANN DESIGN V ROUP RELMUIR3IENTS OF THE GOACHELLA VALLEY WATER .�/�'l/yJ 77-899 WOLF RD. DISTRICT ORDNANCE 1302.1. THE IRRIGATION 0, 10' 70 30, SUITE 102 SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR EFFICIENT PALM DESERT, CA PER!FOR1ANCE WITH CONSERVATION IN MIND. POINT SOURCE DRIP/ BUBBLER SYSTEMS WILL PROVIDE 92211 DIRECT WATER TO THE SHRUBS AND TREES_ LIC# 2754, EXP 04/30/22 SCALE: P-10' PH (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132495 DATE 8/15/73 CAE5ALPINIA PULGHEW1 MA 15 GAL. 02 LOW "RED BIRD OF PARADISE" LEUCOPHYL[:UM MIN05UM 5 GAL 02 LOW 'SIERRA 5OUOUET' LEUCOF'HYLLUM FRUTESCEN5 5 GAL. 02 LOU WHITE CLOUD' ® SENNA ARTEMI5IO[pE5 5 GAL 02 LOW FEATf ERY C.4%IA" © TECOMA STAN5 5 GAL. 05 MOD YELLOW BELLS" ® LEUCOPHYLLUM LANGMANIAE 5 GAL. 02 LOW LYNS LEGACY' v OLEA EUROPAEA 5 GAL. 02 LOW LITTLE OLLIE' W55ELIA EOUISETIFORMI5 5 GAL. 05 MOD CORAL BELLS' © LEUCOPHYLLUM ZYGOPHYLLUM 5 GAL 02 LOU 'CIMARRON' CAR[SSA MACROCARPA 5 GAL. 05 MOD !'JOMlt70D BEAUTY' r CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 5 GAL. 05 MOD LITTLE JOHN' G=RASSES = MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS 5 GAL. 05 MOD REGAL MIST' *F LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 5 GAL. 05 MOD PLATINUM BEAUTY' • DIANELLA TASMANIGA 5 GAL. 05 MOD VARIEGATA' G OUNDCOVER 4 VINES DALEA GREGGII 5 GAL. 02 LOW TRAILING INDIGO BUSH" 0 CAR155A 5 GAL 05 MOD 'GREEN CARPET' 0 EVOLVULU5 GLOMERATUS 5 GAL. 02 LOU "HAWAIIAN BLUE EYES" ® BOUGANVILLEA 5 GAL 05 MOD 'LA JOLLA' - DURANTA REPENS 5 GAL. 5TK 05 MOD "SKY FLOWER" LP -2 I,UATER GON5ERVATION 5T_A_TF-MFNT �7 7� LANDSCAPING 15 CONSISTENT WITH THE HERMANN DESIGN V ROUP RELMUIR3IENTS OF THE GOACHELLA VALLEY WATER .�/�'l/yJ 77-899 WOLF RD. DISTRICT ORDNANCE 1302.1. THE IRRIGATION 0, 10' 70 30, SUITE 102 SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR EFFICIENT PALM DESERT, CA PER!FOR1ANCE WITH CONSERVATION IN MIND. POINT SOURCE DRIP/ BUBBLER SYSTEMS WILL PROVIDE 92211 DIRECT WATER TO THE SHRUBS AND TREES_ LIC# 2754, EXP 04/30/22 SCALE: P-10' PH (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132495 DATE 8/15/73 s! a WALL SLOPE PLANTING EXHIBIT PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA PLANT LIST SYMBOL QTY. BOTANICAL NAME SIZE WATER :EES 4 BALMS DALBERGIA 515500 24" BOX 03 LOW "INDIAN ROSEWOOD" • TIPUANA TIPU 24" BOX 05 MOD 4 MPU TREE" AGAVE 51SALANA OLEA EUROPAEA 36" BOX 02 LOW ' 'SWAN HILL' MULTI -TRK ■ ACACIA STENOPHYLLA BOX LOW SHOESTRING ACACIA" TN SINGLE TRK STND. SIN c ACACIA 5ALICINA 24" BOX 02 LOW "WILLOW ACACIA" SINGLE TRK. STND. " • PAWINSCNIA PRAECOX 24" BOX 02 LOW "PALO BREA" SINGLE TRK STND. ACACIA ANEURA 24" BOX 02 LOW - "MULGA" SINGLE TRK STNO. + EUCALYPTUS PAPUANA 24" BOX 02 LOW "GHOST GUM" SINGLE TRK STND. PHOENIX DACTYLIFERA 15' 5TH 05 MOD 'ZAWIDI DATE PALM' DIAMOND CUT WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA IB' BTH 05 MOD "MEXICAN FAN PALM" DESERT ACCENTS SHRUBS AGAVE 51SALANA 15 GAL 02 LOW "SISAL" CAESALPINIA PULCHERRIMA 15 GAL. AGAVE ANGUSTIFOLIA 15 GAL. 02 LOW "CARIBBEAN AGAVE" • AGAVE GEMINIFLORA 5 GAL. 02 LOW "TWIN -FLOWERING AGAVE" 02 LOW HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA 5 GAL. 02 LOW DESERT FLAMENCO' • ECHINOCACTUS GRUSON11 5 GAL. 02 LOW "GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS" 'WHITE CLOUD' LUATER CONSERVATIQNaSTATEMENT 7� T� LANDSCAPING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ilERMANN DESIGN GROUP REOUIREMENT9 OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 77-899 WOLF RD. DISTRICT ORDINANCE 1 THE IRRIGATION � 0 10 20 30' SUITE 102 SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR EFFICIENT PALM DESERT, CA PERFORMANCE WITH CONSERVATION IN MIND. POINT SOURCE DRIP / BUBBLER SYSTEMS WILL PROVIDE 92211 DIRECT WATER TO THE SHRUBS AND TREES. LIC# 2754, EXP 04/30/22 SCALE: 1••10' PH. (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132496 DATE 8/15/73 SHRUBS CAESALPINIA PULCHERRIMA 15 GAL. 02 LOW "RED BIRD OF PARADISE" ' LEUCOPHYLLUM PRUIN05UM 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'SIERRA BOUCIUET' LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTE5CENS 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'WHITE CLOUD' SENNA ARTEM15101DES 5 GAL. 02 LOW "FEATHERY CASSIA" ® TEC0MA STANS 5 GAL. 05 MOD "YELLOW BELLS" LEUCOPHYLLUM LANGMANIAE 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'LYNS LEGACY' ■ OLEA EUROPAEA 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'LITTLE OLLIE' RUSSELIA EOUISETIFORMIS 5 GAL. 05 MOD "CORAL BELLS" ® LEUCOPHYLLUM ZYGOPHYLLUM 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'CIMARRON' w CARISSA MACROCARPA 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'BOXWOOD BEAUTY' ® CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'LITTLE JOHN' GRA88ES MUHLEN6ERt.IA CAPI1-LAR15 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'REGAL MIST' • LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'PLATINUM BEAUTY' • DIANELLA TASMANICA 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'VARIEGATA' GROUNDCOVER 4 VINES IQ DALEA GREGGII 5 GAL. 02 LOW �S+ TRAILING INDIGO BUSH" CARISSA 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'GREEN CARPET' EVOLVULUS GLOMERATUS 5 GAL. 02 LOW "HAWAIIAN BLUE EYES" {y BOUCANVILLEA 5 GAL. 05 MOD LA JOLLA' .�� DURANTA REPEN5 5 GAL. STK 05 MOD NOTE: "SKY FLOWER' PIv, FDC, HYDRANT LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE O55TRLIC7ED FROM ACCE5S 57 VEGE7,47 ONL A MINIMUM ERADIUS AROUND EACH DEVICE A ■ CIRCUMFERENCE SHALL BE FREE OF OBSTNJCTIVE E ��— VEGETATION, WITH CONSIDERATION OF MATURE Ji PLANT GROWTH. LUATER CONSERVATIQNaSTATEMENT 7� T� LANDSCAPING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ilERMANN DESIGN GROUP REOUIREMENT9 OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 77-899 WOLF RD. DISTRICT ORDINANCE 1 THE IRRIGATION � 0 10 20 30' SUITE 102 SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR EFFICIENT PALM DESERT, CA PERFORMANCE WITH CONSERVATION IN MIND. POINT SOURCE DRIP / BUBBLER SYSTEMS WILL PROVIDE 92211 DIRECT WATER TO THE SHRUBS AND TREES. LIC# 2754, EXP 04/30/22 SCALE: 1••10' PH. (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132496 DATE 8/15/73 ACCENT PAVING POOL AREA PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA WITH NOTE: PI V, FDC, HYDRANT LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE OBSTRUCTED FROM ACCESS BY VEGETATION A MINIMUM 3 -FEET RADIUS AROUND EACH DEVICE CIRCUMFERENCE SHALL BE FREE OF OBSTRUCTIVE VEGETATION, WITH CONSIDERATION OF MATURE PLANT GROWTH PLANT L15T SYMBOL QTY. BOTANICAL NAME SIZE WATER USE :EES E PALMS DALBERGIA 515500 24" BOX 02 LOW "INDIAN ROSEWOOD" 0 TIPUANA TIPU 24" BOX 05 MOD "TIPU TREE" X AGAVES15ALANA G OLEA EUROPAEA 361, BOX 02 LOW ' 'SWAN HILL' MULTI -TRC ■ AGAGIA STETRIN BOX LOW. ACACIA "SHOESTRING ACACIA" TN SINGLE TRC STND. SIN ACACIA SALICINA 24" BOX 02 LOW "WILLOW ACACIA" SINGLE TRC STND. PARCIN50NIA PRAECOX 24" BOX 02 LOW "PALO BREA" SINGLE TRC STND. ACACIA ANEURA 24" BOX 02 LOW "MULGA" SINGLE TRC 5TND. • EUCALYPTUS PAPUANA 24" BOX 02 LOW "GHOST GUM" SINGLE TRC 57ND. PHOENIX DAGTYLIFERA 15' BTH 05 MOD 7AI-IIDI DATE PALM' DIAMOND CUT WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA IB' 5TH 05 MOD "MEXICAN FAN PALM" DESERT ACCENTS SHRUBS 7� 7� HERMANN DESIGN GROUP X AGAVES15ALANA 15 GAL 02 LOW "SISAL" 02 LOW 77-899 WOLF R R AGAVE ANGU5TIFOLIA 15 GAL. 02 LOW "CARIBBEAN AGAVE" LEUCOPHYLLUM PRIUINOSUM 5 GAL AGAVE GEMINIFLORA 5 GAL. 02 LOW "TWIN -FLOWERING AGAVE" SCALE: 1"=10' y HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA 5 GAL 02 LOW 'DESERT FLAMENCO' WHITE CLOUD' O ECHINOGACTU5 G-RU50NII 5 GAL. 02 LOW "GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS" 02 LOW LP -4 WATER CONSERVATION STATEMENT SHRUBS 7� 7� HERMANN DESIGN GROUP LANDSCAPING 15 CONSISTENT WITH THE CAE5ALPINIA PULCHERRIMA 15 GAL 02 LOW 77-899 WOLF R R "RED BIRD OF PARADISE" o' 10' iii�'JJ 20, 30, SUITE 102 PAL[v1 DESERT, CA 0 q LEUCOPHYLLUM PRIUINOSUM 5 GAL 02 LOW 'SIERRA BOUQUET' SCALE: 1"=10' y LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESGENS 5 GAL. 02 LOW WHITE CLOUD' SENNA ARTEMISIOIDES 5 GAL 02 LOW "FEATHERY CASSIA" ® 7GOMA S 5 GAL 05 MOD BELLS" LEUCOPHYLLUM LANGMANIAE 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'LYNS LEGACY' ® OLEA EUROPAEA 5 GAL 02 LOW 'LITTLE OLLIE' . RUSSELIA EQUISETIFOW15 5 GAL 05 MOD "CORAL BELLS" ® LEUGOP14YLLUM ZYGOPHYLLUM 5 GAL. 02 LOW .CIMARRON' CARI55A MACROCARPA 5 GAL 05 MOD 'BOXUUOOD BEAUTY' ® CALLISTEMON VIMINALI5 5 GAL 05 MOD 'LITTLE JOHN' GRASSES MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'REGAL M15T' LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'PLATINUM BEAUTY' ® DIANELLA TA5MANICA 5 GAL, 05 MOD 'VARIEGATA' 5ROUNDGOvE�B v1NES DALEA GREGGII 5 GAL. O2 LOW TRAILING INDIGO BUSH" CARI55A 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'GREEN CARPET' EVOLVULUS GLOMERATUS 5 GAL. 02 LOW "HAWAIIAN BLUE EYES" 4 BOUGANVILLEA 5 GAL 05 MOD LA JOLLA' es DURANTA REPEN5 5 GAL. STK 05 MOD "SKY FLOUFER" LP -4 WATER CONSERVATION STATEMENT 7� 7� HERMANN DESIGN GROUP LANDSCAPING 15 CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 77-899 WOLF R R DISTRICT ORDINANCE 1302.E THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR EFFICIENT PERFORMANCE WITH CONSERVATION IN MIND_ POINT o' 10' iii�'JJ 20, 30, SUITE 102 PAL[v1 DESERT, CA 0 SOURCE DRIP /BUBBLER SYSTEMS WILL PROVIDE \�/ 922] 1 DIRECT WATER TO THE SHRUBS AND TREES LIC# 2754, EXP 04/30/22 SCALE: 1"=10' PH (760) 777-9131 497 FAX (760) 777-9132 R Ty 'T ENTRY 6' HT. BLOCK I WALL MONUMENT SIGN DECORATIVE CAP PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA VEHICULAR GATES WATER FEATURE NOTE: PIV, FDC, HYDRANT LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE OBSTRUCTED FROM ACCESS BY VEGETATION. A MINIMUM 3 -FEET RADIUS AROUND EACH DEVICE CIRCUMFERENCE SHALL BE FREE Cr- OB57RllCTIVE VEGETATION, WITH CONSIDERATICN OF MATURE PLANT GROWTH. LJATEf2 GON8ERVATION 57HTEMENT LANDSCAPING 15 CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ORDINANCE 1302.1. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR EFFICIENT 0 10 20 30' PERFORMANCE WITH CONSERVATION IN MIND. POINT SOURCE DRIP / BUBBLER SYSTEMS WILL PROVIDE DIRECT WATER TO THE SHRUBS AND TREES. SCALE: I"=10' LP -5 HERMANN DESIGN GROUP 77-899 WOLF RD. SUITE 102 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 LIC# 2754, EXP 04/30/22 PH (760) 777-9131 498 FAX (760) 777-9132 DATE 8/15/23 CONCEPTUAL WALL AND FENCE PLAN PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA LEGEND EXI5TING BLOCK WALL TO REMAIN IN PLACE W HT. BLOCK WALL WITH STUCCO FINI5H TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE &' HT. 5PLITFACE TAN COLOR BLOCK WALL WITH FLAT CAP TAN COLOR 6'-6" HT. PILASTER WITH STUCCO FINISH WITH DECORATIVE TAN COLOR CAP MONUMENT SIGN LP -6 HERMANN DESIGN V ROUP 77-899 WOLF RD. ® = 40' 80 1147' SUITE 102 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 LIC# 2754, EXP 04/30/22 SCALE:"=4O' PH. (760) 777-9131 499 FAX (760) 777-9132 DATE H/IS/�3 ATTACHMENT 4 WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT Public Hearing No. 1 La Quinta Village Apartments November 7, 2023 500 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM ANONYMOUS RESIDENT PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 7:34 PM To: Laurie McGinley Subject: La Quinta Village Apartments is approved, the Washington/Fred Waring parcel will be rezoned for low income housing. EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. To Whom it may Concern: I was just notified today about the possible development of low income housing next to my neighborhood in Desert Breezes. Having this development at Washington and 50th has no impact on me, but moving it to the area of Fred Waring and Washington has a large impact on my property values as well as my community. I would therefore request this approval be rejected outright or at least tabled until the surrounding neighbors have an opportunity to review this. Since I am just hearing about this now in a very brief email, could you please provide me with all the information prior to approving it?? I believe everyone needs to be made aware of this prior to approval and construction. This is a very busy intersection and already has a lot of traffic and more will just create more problems. Please send me all information on file for this and honor my immediate rejection for this project. Thank you for your time. Anonymous 501 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM DOUGLAS BARR PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO THE PROJECT From: douglas barr <barrhelp@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2023 12:26 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: WRITTEN COMMENTS EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. My name is Douglas Barr I live in La Quinta I am writing to comment on the 11/7/23 hearing about development of massive apartment complex at Washington and 50th. In my opinion, the City should not allow this development. 1. This area flooded with the Hillary hurricane, and thus is unsafe. 2. It is unnecessary because the City has other multifamily developments in existence and being developed now. 3. It will cause massive unnecessary traffic, safety, noise and environmental degradation. 4. Residents of the apartment complex will not have nearby ancillary services, without having to increase the traffic along 50th Ave. or Washington Ave. 502 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM DEAN BLACK PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: Dean Black <deanblack@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 7:59 AM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Fred Waring and Washington Parcel Affordable Housing Proposal Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Some people who received this message don't often get email from deanblack@comcast.net. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. To whom it may concern, Please forward this email along to the LaQunita city council for consideration. We are adamantly opposed to the parcel across from the Desert Breezes community where we have our home. We are asking that you consider the impact to surrounding communities if the existing commercial zoning is disregarded in lieu of the proposed low-income housing project. To deprive the owner of the right to develop much needed retail and restaurant space we have been waiting for would not only deprive the community of options currently unavailable but would also further drive up the crime rate in a community that is already affordable to many, not to mention invite costly litigation that could drag on for months if not years. We work hard to maintain the grounds and surrounding areas while keeping our costs low through volunteer hours. We hope you will do the right thing and adhere to the original zoning that was established for a reason. 503 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM RESIDENTS ZORAN & JANE BRAJKOVIC PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: Jane Brajkovic <janebrajkovic63@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2023 9:51 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Oppose Affordable Housing at Fred Waring and Washington Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged [Some people who received this message don't often get email from janebrajkovic63@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** To the Mayor and City Council We currently own property at Desert Breezes which is situated on Washington and Fred Waring. I recently read about the possibility of changing the zoning of the commercial property at Washington and Fred Waring to affordable housing. We oppose this option! We feel strongly to keep the existing commercial property as it is intended for hoping for more retail business around our community such as restaurants or specialty stores. With the large number of homes in our community there is great need for more retail business we can support. Kind regards, Zoran & Jane Brajkovic Sent from my iPhone 504 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM BETHAN CLAYTON PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: Bethan <jbethanclayton@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 8:20 AM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Housing project on Fred Waring and 50th Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed [Some people who received this message don't often get email from jbethanclayton@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** I find it difficult to believe that you are even thinking about building on that land! If it is going to look anything like the project on Jefferson and hwy 111, there is going to be a mass exodus of residence! This is a lovely area. I have worked my whole life to live in a community like this. I live in Desert Breezes, directly across the street. We have the great tennis gardens and wonderful church right here in this lovely community. I'm begging you as just a single woman. Please find somewhere else for your project! I'm guessing none of the people making this decision live anywhere close to this, so it doesn't affect them! Sincerely, Bethan Clayton Sent from my iPhone 505 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM RESIDENT KAREN CULVER PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO THE PROJECT From: Karen Culver <culver@web-ster.com> Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2023 8:58 AM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: We are strongly opposed to low income housing in that location Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged [Some people who received this message don't often get email from culver@web-ster.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ] ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Sent from my iPhone 506 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM MICHAEL DALY PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: Michael Daly <mike_d@mdb-interiors.com> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2023 12:01 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: FWW property Some people who received this message don't often get email from mike_d@mdb-interiors.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. TO whom it may concern I understand the city of LaQuinta is contemplating approving a planned development for low income apartments at the above parcel. I kindly ask to reconsider the redesignation of this land. Michael Daly Confidentiality Notice: This communication and any accompanying document(s) are confidential and privileged. They are intended for the sole use of the addressee. 507 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM ROBERT FREEMAN PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: Robert Freeman <rsfree_44@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 2:39 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Proposed low income housing Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed [Some people who received this message don't often get email from rsfree_44@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Good afternoon La Quinta, I am voicing my concern regarding the property on Washington Street and Fred Waring. As a longtime homeowner in Palm Royale Country Club, it is imperative that the city communicate with surrounding homeowners the changes that would potentially affect our respective properties. I'm certain that you have heard from others that are equally concerned about the zoning change with the above stated corner. Please provide the proposed meetings that would affect the property indicated, and any potential changes that are taking place regarding zoning and the low income housing proposal. We are very concerned about this and how it would affect our property values and potential crime that would come with low income housing. Furthermore, as you know, Washington, and Fred Waring is an extremely busy intersection. Low income housing would certainly enter in and create potential for additional traffic issues and subsequent delays in travel. Please provide upcoming meeting dates for city council and planning commission. Our community would be directly affected with this proposed change, and we are very concerned. Sincerely, Robert Freeman 78307 Scarlet Court La Quinta, CA 92253 508 Sent from my Phone 509 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM MARK HASIUK PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: Mark Hasiuk <mhasiuk@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 9:53 AM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Washington/Waring development Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Some people who received this message don't often get email from mhasiuk@hotmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. To whom it may concern, As a resident and homeowner in La Quinta, I was very troubled to learn of a potential low-income housing project on the corner of Washington St. and Fred Waring. If this project is approved, I will do everything I can to make sure the elected officials responsible will be voted out next election. regards Mark Hasiuk 604-505-1195 510 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM KAMMIE HERTZ PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: Kammie <kammiehertz@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 2:01 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Low Income Housing Proposal for Washington St. and Fred Waring Importance: High Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Some people who received this message don't often get email from kammiehertz@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear Council & Planning Commission, We are close to retirement and purchased a condo for that purpose years ago to live full-time when that happens. We still don't live locally and have no way of attending a City Council meeting given such short notice for the November 7" meeting. Had we known that the City could, without transparency reclassify the vacant lot on the corner of Washington and Fred Waring from commercial use to low-income housing, we simply would have not invested all our retirement savings in this condo. This will create a hardship and seriously derail the value of our condo and we will not recover financially. We did our due diligence before purchasing at Palm Royale (across the street) and were excited that in the future we would have access to commercial uses during our retirement. Not the potential issues that come with low-income housing. Most importantly safety and appraised value for our home come to mind. The City already took a portion of our land via eminent domain on the corner to expand the street in the last few years and did not repair or replant the area leaving it barren and vulnerable. What the City did do is build a retaining wall that now allows anyone to jump over our fence with ease. We have had a significant increase in crime and mail theft since then. I don't feel we should have our dreams of retirement end because of this short-sighted proposal. This letter is to voice my objection to the lack of transparency when trying to use land for low-income housing in La Quinta. And earnestly want the City Council to consider if this was in their backyard, how would they feel? Thank you, Kammie Hertz Sent from Mail for Windows 511 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY PROPERTY OWNER GEORGE HICKS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: George Hicks <geohcks@aol.com> Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2023 2:48 PM To: City Clerk Mail Cc: Pat Slack Subject: Fred Waring & Washington Parcel (FWW) Affordable Housing Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Some people who received this message don't often get email from geohcks@aol.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. To the Mayor and Council Members of the City of La Quinta: I am the owner of 4 properties in the city of La Quinta. 2 of these properties are located in Palm Royale Country Club across the street from the subject parcel. I am unable to attend the scheduled public meeting on November 7, 2023 at city hall so I submit this in lieu of my attendance. I am writing to make it clear that I am admittedly opposed to the Planning Commission's decision to approve the development and change of designation of this parcel owned by The Mayer Corporation. The Planning Commission approved this development and re designation of this parcel to "affordable housing" on October 10, 2023. This was only brought to our attention August 1, 2023. The owners of the FWW parcel intend it to be a commercial development and believed to be the highest and best use. Again, I cannot express how extremely opposed I am to the proposal of low and very low income housing on this parcel. It will not be an asset but will become a problem only creating issues we don't want in the neighborhood. Thank you for your time, George Hicks 512 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM SUSAN HUNTER PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: Susan Hunter <susanhunter@mindspring.com> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 8:31 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: FWW - Fred Waring & Washington Parcel (FWW) Affordable Housing Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Some people who received this message don't often get email from susanhunter@mindspring.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. I am writing to express my concern for the potential development of low to very low income housing on the FWW. This parcel was intended to be developed for commercial use and it seems that the change of use was done in a way that was not transparent nor honoring the original plans for this property. The development of this property for commercial use will bring needed services and tax revenue to the city, as well as to nearby residents (of which I am one). Please do not vote to approve the change of designated use for this property. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this feedback. Susan Hunter 77760 Cape Verde Dr. Palm Desert Desert Breezes community 513 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM RESIDENT JERRY JUHL PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO THE PROJECT From: Jerry Juhl <jerryiuhl@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2023 11:06:26 AM To: levans@Lagintaca.gov <levans@Lagintaca.gov> Cc: ssanchez@Lagtintaca.gov <ssanchez@Lagtintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@lag uintaca.gov>; dmcgarrey@Lagintaca.gov <dmcgarrey@Lag intaca.gov>; John Pena <ipena@laquintaca.gov>; Deborah McGarrey <dmcgarrey@la-quinta.org> Subject: Proposed Apartment Complex You don't often get email from ierryluhl@aol.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. As a neighboring resident I strongly oppose the building of an apartment complex at the corner of Washington and Avenue 50. Consider the impact of traffic, public fields and most of all school students exposure and heightened risks. Jerry Juhl 79015 River Rock Road La Quinta, CA 92253 514 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM MARILYN KERSHNER PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: Marilyn Kershner <marilyn.kershner@icloud.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 3:16 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: As a property owner at Palm Royale I am against the low income project. There are a few schools there and the young students need their parking on sports events. They need safe spaces not higher crime. I urge you to see all the sports activities after... ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Sent from my iPhone 515 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM BRIGITTE MCALLISTER PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: Brigitte McAllister <Brigitte@outlook.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 4:50 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: FRED WARING & WASHINGTON PARCEL (FWW) AFFORDABLE HOUSING Some people who received this message don't often get email from brigitte@outlook.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. As a homeowner in Desert Breezes (adjacent to the parcel in question) we received a copy of a letter discussing the potential intent to change the FWW parcel from a mixed use commercial development to an affordable housing development with "over 200 low and very low affordable units". We were given this email address as a possible way to express our concerns if we are unable to attend the City Council hearing set for Nov 71n The original development was to include dining and retail facilities that would seem better suited for a plot of land that is located so close to multiple housing communities, the Tennis Garden, and hotels ... we don't currently have much that is within walking distance of our home, and this new commercial development would increase the walk -score of all of the communities surrounding the parcel. I believe all cities should strive to increase their walk -scores as yet another way to lower the consumption of fuel. Conversely, the expectation of 200+ units would result in an increase in traffic and the need for support services for that many additional residents. Gaining access to/from Desert Breezes is already challenging at times due to existing traffic ... it is hard to imagine how increasing the population on the parcel across the street would not make a significant negative impact on that traffic situation. I am a strong supporter of affordable housing in the proper locations, but I do not believe that the FWW Parcel is the correct location for the reasons I shared above. Thank you in advance for sharing my concerns with the appropriate individuals. -Brigitte McAllister 43567 Via Magellan Palm Desert, CA 92211 425-445-3699 Sent from Mail for Windows 516 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM PALM ROYAL COUNTRY CLUB PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: Paula Tapia <ptapia@drminternet.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 11:33 AM To: City Clerk Mail Cc: Pat Slack; Melisa Torres Subject: Public Comment -- Palm Royale CC Correspondence - Attn: City Council and Planning Commission Attachments: 10.31.23 PRCC City of LQ Correspondence.pdf Importance: High Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Some people who received this message don't often get email from ptapia@drminternet.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Good morning, Please find attached correspondence that our client Palm Royale CC is submitting for public comment. If you need additional information from our team, please advise. Kindly acknowledge receipt of email. Thank you, Paula Tapia, CCAM, CMCA, AMS, PCAM Executive Vice President PPO 17681 Desert Resort Management — an Associa®Company 42-635 Melanie Place, Ste. 103, Palm Desert, CA 92211 Office: 760-346-1161 Direct: 760-610-7741 Associa® Equity Management and Realty Services 42-430 Winchester Road, Temecula, CA 92590 Office: 951-296-5640 Associa® — To bring positive impact and meaningful value to every community. Great at lace ce To Work. LGra 10 Work, Certifiedtffied 0#aK56A AOIA IS CERTIFIED A A CREAT PLACE TO WORK! 1 517 Three ways to connect: Subscribe to the blog • Like us on Facebook • Tell us about your experience! Notice: This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Please virus check all attachments to prevent widespread contamination and corruption of files and operating systems. The unauthorized access, use, disclosure, or distribution of this email may constitute a violation of the Federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act. 518 City Council & Planning Commission — City of La Quinta c/o City Clerk 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Council & Planning Commission, We as a community have heard some rumors regarding the undeveloped area on the corner of Washington St. and Fred Waring, we have some concerns on the direction you might have chosen. Comments have been made proposing the change from the low-income housing project planned for Avenue 50 and Washington St. to the undeveloped area noted previously. We are not against low-income Housing. We know your decision could have many long-lasting impacts on us. When we purchased here, we knew the property across the street was designated commercial. We expected in time that it would be developed with medical offices, pharmacy, restaurants, and other essential services. That we feel would be in the best interest of our community. Our community is made up of an older population. There are many other HOAs in this area that would benefit from the commercial development of this property. Having these services available to us within walking distance would be invaluable. Obviously low-income housing does bring the concern of a higher crime rate. Currently in this area law enforcement struggles to keep up with what is currently going on in our area. We ask you to hold public hearings on this. We know that when the property owner found out about the proposed location change for the project, they asked to present their concerns at the October 10, 2023 planning meeting. Our community was never made aware that this would be a topic at any Council or Planning Commission meeting. Now we've been told this is on the agenda for the November 7, 2023 City Council meeting at 4 PM. Since the agenda doesn't come out until November 3, 2023. We are trying to get up to speed. We will be advising our members; this will be their only opportunity to speak on this subject at this time. Or they can email their concerns to cityclerkmail@laquintaca.gov. If the location of the project is not finalized and other locations such as Washington St. and Fred Waring are being considered, we request additional open meetings on this subject. That would create a more transparent process. We have also become aware the City has many other parcels available for this type of development project. On Behalf of the Palm Royale Country Club Board of Directors, Pat Slack, Board President patricslack@me.com 519 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM RESIDENTS KENNY & CAROL STORM PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: KENNY STORM <kcstorm@comcast.net> Sent: Friday, November 3, 2023 8:02 AM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Low- Income Housing at the corner of Washington St. and Fred Waring Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Some people who received this message don't often get email from kcstorm@comcast.net. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. My husband and I have lived at Palm Royale Golf & Country Club for twelve years. When we first decided to purchase in Palm Royale, we noticed the vacant lot across the street was designated commercial, so we were excited about a development with retail businesses within walking distance from us. Palm Royale Golf & Country Club is a 354 -unit condominium development comprised of essentially elderly individuals, many of whom are elderly single women. In the last few years, our community has experienced a higher rate of crime. Low-income housing could contribute to an even higher crime rate in our community. In addition, our development is surrounded by a four -to -five-foot perimeter wall anyone could jump over to gain access to our community. There is no guard at our front entrance making our community vulnerable to intruders. In conclusion, we are requesting the City reconsider the development of over 200 low-income residential units across the street from Palm Royale Golf & Country Club. Kenny & Carol Storm, Palm Royale Residents kcstorm@comcast.net 520 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING' November 7, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITL- : INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 2023-1000 FOR ZONING CODE LANGUAGE CLEAN UP AND CHANGES TO GAME COURT, FLAGPOLE, AND ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) REGULATIONS; CEQA: THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 15061 (b)(3), COMMON SENSE EXEMPTION. LOCATION: CITY-WIDE RECOMMENDATION A. Make a finding, included in Ordinance No. , that adopting this ordinance is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) Review of Exemptions — Common Sense Rule and is consistent with the previously approved General Plan 2035 Environmental Impact Report. B. Move to take up Ordinance No. by title and number only and waive further reading. C. Move to introduce at first reading, Ordinance No. to amend various sections of Title 9 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. EXECU i ivt 5UIVIIVIAKY • Planning Staff periodically reviews the municipal zoning code and proposes amendments to update or clarify these items. • The proposed text amendments include updating language to meet State housing law regulations for ADUs. These text amendments implement a Program identified in the City's certified Housing Element 2021-2029. • The proposed text amendments include modifying standards for tennis and game courts, flagpoles, the minimum front yard setback for garages in residential zones, and zoning code language clean up regarding the Floodplain District. • On October 10, 2023, the Planning Commission (Commission) considered the proposed amendments and recommended Council approval s proposed, except for those pertaining to flagpole regulations. FISCAL IMPACT: — None 521 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Zoning Text Amendments Council has periodically adopted zoning text amendments to clean up, update, and clarify standards. The Code amendments are included as text amendment redlines as Exhibit A. A matrix of proposed amendments (Attachment 2) summarizes each amendment and lists the code section where the amendments are found. The proposed amendments are explained below: Accessory Dwelling Units. Update regulations to meet State housing law: a. Clarifies that ADUs can be attached to or located within a detached garage located on the same lot as the primary dwelling. b. Increases the total floor area allowed for ADUs from 800 square feet to 850 square feet, or 1,000 square feet for a unit that provides more than one bedroom, if the primary dwelling is less than 1,600 square feet. c. Construction of an ADU shall not constitute a Group R occupancy change under the Building Code, unless the Building Official or Code Compliance Officer makes a written finding based on substantial evidence that the construction of the ADU could have a specific, adverse impact on public health and safety. Building Official may change the occupancy code of a space that was uninhabitable space or was only permitted for nonresidential use to be converted for residential use. Group R occupancy change may require rated separation/construction. d. No parking requirements for an ADU that is submitted with a permit application to create a new dwelling unit provided that the ADU or parcel satisfies any other instances such as location within '/z mile walking distance of public transit, ADU is located within a historic district, and the ADU is part of the primary residence or an accessory structure. e. ADUs may be located within the front yard setback if an 800 square foot ADU cannot be located in any other location on the site with four -foot side and rear yard setbacks, and in compliance with all other development standards. For ADUs that comply with the four feet rear and side yard setbacks, a junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU) may be added on the same parcel, with the following additional standards: • ADU height limit of 16 feet on a lot with an existing or new single-family or multifamily dwelling. • ADU height of 18 feet for a detached ADU where the parcel is within one '/2 mile walking distance of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor. 522 • An additional two feet in height is allowed to accommodate a roof pitch on the ADU that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit. • Height of 18 feet for a detached ADU on an existing or proposed multifamily, multistory dwelling. • Height of 25 feet or the height limitation that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower, for an attached ADU to a primary dwelling. g. ADUs are allowed in existing multifamily dwellings. If the existing multifamily dwelling has rear or side setbacks of less than four feet, no modification of the existing multifamily dwelling shall be required. h. Construction of new ADU shall not trigger a requirement for fire sprinklers to be installed in the existing primary dwelling unit. i. Demolition permit for a detached garage that is replaced with an ADU shall be reviewed with the application for the ADU and issued at the same time. No noticing for the garage demolition shall be required. If the Director denies an application for an ADU or JADU, the Director shall include written comments to the applicant of how the application can be remedied by the applicant. Written comments from the Director shall be returned to the applicant within 60 days of the application being found complete. k. An application for an ADU and JADU cannot be denied on the basis of non- conforming zoning conditions, building code violations, or unpermitted structures that do not present a threat to public health and safety and are not affected by the construction of the ADU. 2. Tennis and other Game Courts. Modify standards to allow tennis and other game courts (such as pickleball) to be built at existing grade and to be set back at least 20 feet from front, and 10 feet from the side or rear property lines where a block wall six (6) feet in height exists or shall be required to be constructed along those property lines. The current Code requires the same setback requirements but requires that the court be lower in grade by four feet from the surrounding grade if located within 30 feet of any side or rear property line. 3. Flagpoles. Where the yard abuts open space, a golf course, or a street, allow flagpoles to be located at least five feet from the property lines. The current Code prohibits flagpoles located on yards that abut another residential lot, and this would remain in place. The current Code allows flagpoles on yards that front a street or open space or a golf course, but with a minimum 10 -foot setback from the property lines. A yard is the front, side, and rear yards which are the minimum setback distances as measures from property lines, as established in the development standards for the applicable zoning district. These yards determine how close the front, sides or rear of a house can be from these property lines. For example, in the Cove, the typical front yard 523 setback is 20 feet, the side yard setbacks are 5 feet, and the rear yard setback is 10 to 15 feet. When you account for these setback distances, the area that is not within these setback areas is the "buildable area" of a lot. If a house is located greater distances from these yards, a flagpole is allowed to be located within the buildable area, subject to the applicable height limit for a building structure. This is not common as most houses extend to the full buildable area, but for larger properties there may be open space area where a flagpole is allowed to be located within the remaining buildable area. See example below: The Commission did not recommend any changes to the current Code requiring that flagpoles maintain at least 10 feet distance from property lines. 4. Garage setback from front yard. Remove the 25 -foot setback requirement for garages; the 20 -foot setback for the building would remain in place. The Code currently has a footnote that states that roll -up garage doors are allowed to be setback 20 ft. The purpose of the current Code 25 -foot setback for garages was to account for tilt up (overhead) garage doors, which are no longer common. Roll -up garage doors are now most common. 5. FP Floodplain District. Remove the word "Overlay" from the Code language that refers to the Floodplain District as a "Floodplain Overlay District". The Floodplain District is a base district, not an overlay district; this correction will make it consistent with other Code sections that refer to the Floodplain District. 524 PUBLIC REVIEW Public Notice This zoning ordinance amendment was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on October 27, 2023. Two written comments were received, one is in favor of the proposed flagpole regulations, but suggests allowing Homeowners Associations to decide on their respective flagpole regulations, and the other letter expresses that the current or proposed flagpole regulations do not fit all situations and suggests that Homeowners Associations should regulate their own flagpole standards. (Attachment 2). Any written comments received will be handed out at the City Council hearing. Planning Commission Review At its regular meeting of October 10, 2023, the Commission recommended approval of all proposed amendments except for those pertaining to flagpole regulations. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Design and Development Department has determined that the project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of CEQA, Common Sense Exemption, in that it can be seen that the project would not cause any adverse impacts on the environment. ALTERNATIVES Council may elect to: • Approve the zoning ordinance amendments as proposed. • Approve the zoning ordinance amendments with modifications. • Deny the zoning ordinance amendments. • Continue the zoning ordinance amendments and direct staff to conduct further study on one or more of the zoning ordinance amendment items, and return to Council for consideration. Prepared by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachments: 1. Code Change Matrix 2. Written Comments 525 ORDINANCE NO. XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF TITLE 9 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on November 7, 2023, hold a duly noticed public hearing for review of a City -initiated request of Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2023-1000 to amend various sections of Title 9 of the La Quinta Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, previous to said Public Hearing, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta did, on October 10, 2023, adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2023- 017 recommending the City Council adopt all code amendments, except for those pertaining to flagpole regulations; and WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice for this request in The Desert Sun newspaper on October 27, 2023, as prescribed by the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, Title 9 of the Municipal Code contains the chapters that address permitted uses, development standards, development review, and permitting procedures; and WHEREAS, the proposed zoning text amendments are necessary to update or clarify development standards; and WHEREAS, the proposed zoning text amendments are necessary to be in compliance with State housing law regulations for accessory dwelling units, and implements a Program identified in the City's certified 2021-2029 Housing Element; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all public testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons wanting to be heard, the City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify adoption of said Zoning Ordinance Amendment, enclosed as Exhibit A, and incorporated herewith by this reference: 1. Consistency with General Plan The code amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan. The proposed amendments are supported by Policy LU -1.2 for land use decisions to be consistent with General Plan policies and programs and uphold the rights and needs of property owners and the public; and 526 Ordinance No. XXX Amendment to Title 9 Adopted: , 2023 Page 2 of 4 2. Public Welfare Approval of the code amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. The amendment meets State housing law regulations for development of accessory dwelling units, allow for site design flexibility for various residential features, clarifies language in the municipal zoning code, and does not incorporate any changes that affect the regulation and/or provision of public services, utility systems, or other foreseeable health, safety, and welfare considerations. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. TITLE 9 shall be amended as written in "Exhibit A" attached hereto. SECTION 2. The proposed zone text amendment has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (CEQA) as amended (Resolution 83-63). The zone text amendments are consistent with the previously approved findings of the General Plan 2035 EIR (Environmental Assessment 2012-622) as the proposed amendments implement the goals, policies, and programs of the General Plan. SECTION 3. That the City Council does hereby approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2023-1000, as set forth in attached "Exhibit A" for the reasons set forth in this Ordinance. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 5. POSTING: The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least two public places designated by resolution of the City Council, shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta. SECTION 6. CORRECTIVE AMENDMENTS: That the City Council does hereby grant the City Clerk the ability to make minor amendments to "Exhibit A" to ensure consistency of all approved text amendments prior to the publication in the La Quinta Municipal Code. SECTION 7. SEVERABILITY: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the 527 Ordinance No. XXX Amendment to Title 9 Adopted: , 2023 Page 3 of 4 fact that any one or more section, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held this November 7, 2023, by the following vote: AYES: Ll [s] 2615 ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California /_1»:Z9117/ 417_E -'M 1101170] N ►yi A WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 528 Ordinance No. XXX Amendment to Title 9 Adopted: , 2023 Page 4 of 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LA QUINTA ) I, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No. (enter number) which was introduced at a regular meeting on the (date) day of (month), (year), and was adopted at a regular meeting held on the (date) day of (month), (year), not being less than 5 days after the date of introduction thereof. I further certify that the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the City of La Quinta as specified in the Rules of Procedure adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2022-027. MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California DECLARATION OF POSTING I, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was posted on , pursuant to Council Resolution. MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 529 ORDINANCE NO. XXX ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 2023-1000 ADOPTED: , 2023 PROJECT: 2023 CODE TUNE UP 9.50.030 - Table of development standards. A. Definitions. See Chapter 9.280. EXHIBIT A B. Table of Standards. Table 9-2 and the illustrations in Section 9.50.040, following, set forth standards for the development of property within residential districts. However, standards different from those in Table 9-2 shall apply if special zoning symbols described in Section 9.20.030 are designated on the official zoning map. Table 9-2 Residential Development Standards Development Standard District RVL RL RC RM RMH RH Minimum lot size for single-family dwellings 20,000 7,200 7,200 5,000 3,600 2,000 (sq. ft.) Minimum project size for multifamily projects n/a n/a n/a n/a 20,000 20,000 (sq. ft.) Minimum lot frontage for single-family 100 60 60 50 40 n/a dwellings (ft.) Minimum frontage for n/a n/a n/a n/a 100 100 multifamily projects (ft.) Maximum structure 28 28 17 28 28 40 height (ft.) 2 Maximum number of 2 2 1 2 2 3 stories Minimum front yard 30 20 20 20 20 20 setback (ft.) 3 Minimum gar -age sem} 30 2� 2-52-52-52-54 Minimum interior/exterior side 10/20 5/10 5/10 5/10 5/10 10/15 yard setback (ft.) 54,6, 1 20 for new Minimum rear yard lots and 10 setback (ft.)76 30 for existing 10 15 15 20 recorded lots 87 Maximum lot coverage 40 50 60 60 60 60 (% of net lot area) Minimum livable area 2,500 1,400 1,200 1,400 1,400 (multifamily: 750 for excluding excluding garage (sq. ft.) multifamily Minimum common open n/a n/a n/a 30% 30% 30% area 65 Minimum/average perimeter landscape 10/20 10/20 n/a 10/20 10/20 10/20 setbacks (ft.) 65 Symbol Description of Special Zoning Symbols Used as per Section 9.20.030 60 -RM -10,000 60 -foot minimum lot frontage, medium density residential zoning, 10,000 17/1 square foot minimum lot size, 17 -foot maximum building height at one story RL 10,000 Low density residential zoning, 10,000 square foot minimum lot size, 17 -foot 17/1 maximum building height at one story 530 Development Standard District RVL RL RC RM RMH RH RM Medium density residential zoning, 17 -foot maximum building height at one 17/1 story RL Low density residential zoning, 17 -foot maximum building height at one story 17/1 * As shown on the approved specific plan for the project. ** As provided in the underlying base district. 1 Minimum lot frontage on cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall be 35 feet. Minimum lot frontage for flag lots shall be 15 feet. 2 Not including basements. Also, notwithstanding above table, the maximum structure height equals 22 feet for all buildings within 150 feet of any general plan -designated image corridor, except in the RC zone, which is 17 feet. Any proposed building height over 22 feet requires minor use permit approval and shall not exceed a maximum building height of the existing zone. 3 , Pprojects with 5 or more adjacent single-family dwelling units facing the same street shall incorporate front setbacks varying between 20 feet and 25 feet or more in order to avoid streetscape monotony. For side -entry type garages, the garage setback may be reduced to 20 feet in the RVL district and 15 feet in all other residential districts. 54 The following are exceptions to the minimum side setbacks shown: For interior side yards in the RL, RM and RMH districts, if the building is over 17 feet in height, the setback is 5 feet plus 1 foot for every foot over 17 feet in height or fraction thereof, to a maximum setback of 10 feet. The additional setback may be provided entirely at grade level or a combination of at grade and airspace above the 17 -foot building. For RH, 5 feet minimum plus 1 foot additional setback for every foot of building height above 28 feet, or fraction thereof, up to a maximum setback of 15 feet when said height above 17 feet is located between 5 and 10 feet from said side yard property line. For interior setbacks, if the building is over 28 feet in height the setback is 10 feet plus 1 foot for every foot over 28 feet in height or fraction thereof, to a maximum setback of 15 feet. The additional setback may be provided entirely at grade level or may be a combination of at grade and airspace above the 28 -foot building height. 65 Common open area and perimeter landscape requirements do not apply to single-family detached projects unless a specific plan is required. Common open area equals percent of net project area. Perimeter landscape setbacks are adjacent to perimeter streets: first number equals minimum at any point; second number equals minimum average over entire frontage (thus, 10/20). See Section 9.60.230 and additional landscape/open area standards. 76 Rear and side yard setbacks for residential units abutting the image corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet with the exception of RVL zone district where it only applies to the side yard. 87 Existing recorded lots prior to May 1, 1997. ( Ord. 588 § 2(Exh. A), 2-2-2021; Ord. 584 § 2, 2020; Ord. 562 § 1, 2017; Ord. 550 § 1, 2016; Ord. 466 § 1, 2009; Ord. 434 § 2, 2007; Ord. 325 § 1, 1998; Ord. 299 § 1, 1997; Ord. 284 § 1, 1996) 531 9.60.090 Accessory dwelling units. A. Purpose. This section provides standards and criteria for the establishment of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units, consistent with California Government Code Section 65852.2, subdivision (a)(1) and 65852.22. Accessory dwelling units shall be permitted only in the zones that allow single family or multifamily uses: RVL, RL, RC, RM, RMH, RH, CR, CP, CC, CN, TC, CO and VC zone districts. Junior accessory dwelling units are permitted in single family zones: RVL, RL, RC, RM, RMH, and RH zone districts. B. Definitions. See Chapter 9.280. For purposes of this section, "second residential unit," "second dwelling unit," "second unit," and "granny flat" as defined in Section 9.280.030 (or successor section) shall not apply, and, instead, "accessory dwelling unit" as defined in California Government Code Section 65852.2(i)(4) (or successor section in the Government Code) shall apply. An accessory dwelling unit shall be either "attached" or "detached" to the primary residence as described in Government Code Section 65852.2(i)(4) (or successor statute). In addition, the following definitions shall apply for purposes of this section: 1. "Junior accessory dwelling unit" means a unit that is no less than one hundred fifty (150) square feet and no more than five hundred (500) square feet in size and contained entirely within a single-family residence. A junior accessory dwelling unit may include separate sanitation facilities, or may share sanitation facilities with the existing structure. 2. "Living area" shall have the same meaning as California Government Code Section 65852.2(i)(1) (or successor section in the Government Code), notwithstanding any provision in Section 9.280.030 of this code to the contrary. 3. "Primary residence" shall have the same meaning as "dwelling, main or Primary residence" as defined in Section 9.280.030 (or successor section). 4. "Public transit" means a location, including but not limited to, a bus stop or train station, where the public may access buses, trains, subways, and other forms of transportation that charge set fares, run on fixed routes and are available to the public (consistent with Government Code Section 65852.2, subdivision 0)(9). C. Standards for Accessory Dwelling Units. The following standards shall apply to accessory dwelling units: 1. Except as provided in Government Code Section 65852.26, the accessory dwelling unit may be rented separate from the primary residence, but may not be sold or otherwise conveyed separate from the primary residence. 2. The lot is zoned to allow single-family or multifamily dwelling use and includes a proposed or existing dwelling. 3. The accessory dwelling unit is either attached to, or located within, the proposed or existing primary dwelling, including attached garages, storage areas or similar uses, or an accessory structure or detached from the proposed or existing primary dwelling and located on the same lot as the proposed or existing primary dwelling, including detached garages. 4. The total floor area of an attached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the primary dwelling or eight hundred fift�r (699850) square feefeet, or 1,000 square feet for a unit that provides more than one bedroom, if the primary dwelling is less than one thousand six hundred (1,600) square feet. 5. The total floor area for a new detached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed one thousand two hundred (1,200) square feet. 6. An accessory dwelling unit shall include a kitchen and bathroom. (Supp. No. 3, Update 2) Created: 2022-11-20 16:31:11 [EST] Page 1 of 5 532 7. An efficiency unit as defined by Section 17958.1 of the California Health and Safety Code must be a minimum of one hundred fifty (150) square feet. 8. No passageway shall be required in conjunction with the construction of an accessory dwelling unit. 9. No setback shall be required for an existing living area or accessory structure or a structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure that is converted to an accessory dwelling unit or to a portion of an accessory dwelling unit, and a setback of no more than four (4) feet from the side and rear lot lines shall be required for an accessory dwelling unit that is not converted from an existing structure or a new structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure. 10. The building code requirements in effect at the time a building permit is secured shall apply to detached dwellings. The construction of an accessory dwelling unit shall not constitute a Group R occupancy change under the building code, as described in Section 310 of the California Building Code (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), unless the building official or Code Compliance officer makes a written finding based on substantial evidence in the record that the construction of the accessory dwelling unit could have a specific, adverse impact on public health and safety. Nothing in this clause shall be interpreted to prevent the Building Official from changing the occupancy code of a space that was unhabitable space or was only permitted for nonresidential use and was subsequently converted for residential use pursuant to this section. 11. The accessory dwelling unit must be approved by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and the Regional Water Quality Control Board where a private sewage disposal system is being used or proposed. 12. Parking requirements for accessory dwelling units shall not exceed one (1) parking space per accessory dwelling unit or per bedroom, whichever is less. These spaces may be provided as tandem parking on a driveway. a. Off-street parking shall be permitted in setback areas or through tandem parking, unless specific findings are made that parking in setback areas or tandem parking is not feasible based upon specific site or regional topographical or fire and life safety conditions. b. There shall be no additional parking requirement for an accessory dwelling unit in any of the following instances: i. The accessory dwelling unit is located within one-half (1/2) mile walking distance of public transit. ii. The accessory dwelling unit is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district. iii. The accessory dwelling unit is part of the proposed or existing primary residence or an accessory structure. iv. When on -street parking permits are required but not offered to the occupant of the accessory dwelling unit. V. When there is a car share vehicle located within one (1) block of the accessory dwelling unit. vi. When a permit application for an accessory dwellina unit is submitted with a permit (Supp. No. 3, Update 2) application to create a new single-family dwelling or a new multifamily dwelling on the same lot. provided that the accessory dwellina unit or the parcel satisfies anv other criteria listed in this subsection Created: 2022-11-20 16:31:11 [EST] Page 2 of 5 533 C. When a garage, carport, or covered parking structure is demolished in conjunction with the construction of an accessory dwelling unit or converted to an accessory dwelling unit, those off-street parking spaces need not be replaced. 13. One (1) accessory dwelling unit and one (1) junior accessory dwelling unit is permitted per lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling if all of the following apply: a. The accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit is within the proposed space of a single-family dwelling or existing space of a single-family dwelling or accessory structure and may include an expansion of not more than one hundred fifty (150) square feet beyond the same physical dimensions as the existing accessory structure. An expansion beyond the physical dimensions of the existing accessory structure shall be limited to accommodating ingress and egress. b. The space has exterior access from the proposed or existing single-family dwelling. C. The side and rear setbacks are sufficient for fire and safety. d. The front yard setback of the underlying zone shall apply, unless either the attached or detached units does not permit at least an 800 square foot accessory dwelling unit with four -foot side and rear yard setbacks to be constructed in compliance with all other development standards. The junior accessory dwelling unit complies with the requirements of California Government Code Section 65852.22. 14. One (1) detached, new construction, accessory dwelling unit that does not exceed four (4) -foot side and rear yard setbacks for a lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling. The accessory dwelling unit may be combined with a junior accessory dwelling unit described in subsection D, if the accessory dwelling unit+t complies with the following: A total floor area limitation of not more than eight hundred (800) square feet. A height limitation of sixteen (16) feet on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit. C. A height of 18 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit that is within one-half of one mile walking distance of a major transit stop or a high-quality transit corridor, as those terms are defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code. d. An additional two feet in height to accommodate a roof pitch on the accessory dwelling unit that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit. e. A height of 18 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily, multistory dwelling. f. A height of 25 feet or the height limitation that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower, for an accessory dwelling unit that is attached to a primary dwelling. 15. Multiple accessory dwelling units are permitted within the portions of existing multifamily dwelling structures that are not used as livable space, including, but not limited to, storage rooms, boiler rooms, passageways, attics, basements, or garages, if each unit complies with state building standards for dwellings. One (1) accessory dwelling unit is permitted within an existing multifamily dwelling and up to twenty-five (25) percent of the existing multifamily dwelling units may contain an accessory dwelling unit. (Supp. No. 3, Update 2) Created: 2022-11-20 16:31:11 [EST] Page 3 of 5 534 Not more than two (2) accessory dwelling units that are located on a lot that has an existing multifamily dwelling, but are detached from that multifamily dwelling are permitted, and are subject to a -height limits$f sixteen (16) fee as listed in subsection 14, and four (4) -foot rear yard and side setbacks. C. If the existing multifamily dwelling has a rear or side setback of less than four feet, no modification of the existing multifamily dwelling shall be required. 16. Accessory dwelling units shall not be required to provide fire sprinklers if they are not required for the primary residence. The construction of an accessory dwelling unit shall not trigger a requirement for fire sprinklers to be installed in the existing primary dwelling. 17. A demolition permit for a detached garage that is to be replaced with an accessory dwelling unit shall be reviewed with the application for the accessory dwelling unit and issued at the same time. The applicant shall not be required to provide written notice or post a placard for the demolition of a detached garage that is to be replaced with an accessory dwelling unit, unless the property is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district. 4-718. An accessory dwelling unit that is rented must be rented for terms longer than thirty (30) days. Under no circumstances shall an accessory dwelling unit be eligible for a short short- term vacation rental permit. 4-819. In the event of any conflicts between the standards set forth in this section and those set forth in the regulations of the applicable zoning district, the provisions of this section shall prevail. 420. The applicant shall pay to the city all applicable fees imposed on such new development of an accessory dwelling unit or new or rehabilitated primary residence that will include an accessory dwelling unit, provided, however, that no impact fee shall be imposed upon the development of an accessory dwelling unit less than seven hundred fifty (750) square feet, and any impact fees charged for an accessory dwelling unit of seven hundred fifty (750) square feet or more shall be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit. D. Standards for Junior Accessory Dwelling Units. The following standards shall apply for junior accessory dwelling units: 1. Junior accessory dwelling units shall be limited to one (1) per residential lot zoned for single- family residences with a single-family residence already built or proposed to be built, on the lot. r:r_marnr_�zr.-.nnrr_rar.'rra�r.�rn:n�.... .nrnm:r.�nrnarmi�a�n�a�nrsa. MZ MOM 28. Prior to issuance of occupancy approval of the accessory dwelling unit, the city may require the property owner to enter into a restrictive covenant with the city prohibiting the sale of the junior accessory dwelling unit separate from the sale of the single-family residence, including a statement that the deed restriction may be enforced against future purchasers; and restricting the size and attributes of the junior accessory dwelling unit that conforms with this section. 34. A junior accessory dwelling unit must be constructed within the walls of the proposed or existing single-family residence. 46. A junior accessory dwelling shall provide a separate entrance from the main entrance to the proposed or existing single-family residence. 56. A junior accessory dwelling unit shall include an efficiency kitchen, which shall include all of the following: (Supp. No. 3, Update 2) Created: 2022-11-20 16:31:11 [EST] Page 4 of 5 535 a. A cooking facility with appliances, and b. A food preparation counter and storage cabinets that are of reasonable size in relation to the size of the junior accessory dwelling unit. 67. Parking: A junior accessory dwelling unit shall not require parking in addition to that required for the proposed or existing single-family residence. 78. For the purposes of providing service for water, sewer, or power, including a connection fee, a junior accessory dwelling unit shall not be considered a separate or new dwelling unit. E. A permit application for an accessory dwelling unit or a junior accessory dwelling unit shall be considered and approved ministerially without discretionary review or a hearing. The director, or his/her designee, shall act on the application within sixty (60) days from the date the application is found complete if there is an existing single-family or multifamily dwelling on the lot. If the permit application to create an accessory dwelling unit or a junior accessory dwelling unit is submitted with a permit application to create a new single-family dwelling on the lot, the director may delay acting on the permit application for the accessory dwelling unit or the junior accessory dwelling unit until the issuance of a building permit for the new single-family dwelling. If the applicant requests a delay, the sixty (60) -day time period shall be tolled for the period of the delay. 1. If the director denies an application for an accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit, the director shall, within the time period described above, return in writing a full set of comments to the applicant with a list of items that are defective or deficient and a description of how the application can be remedied by the applicant. 2. The director shall not deny an application for a permit to create an accessory dwelling unit due to the correction of nonconforming zoning conditions, building code violations, or unpermitted structures that do not present a threat to public health and safetV and are not affected bV the construction of the accessorV dwelling unit. F. If an application for an accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit is submitted or required to be submitted with any other applications that require or permit ministerial or discretionary review under the code, nothing in this section precludes the processing and review of those other applications pursuant to those other provisions in the code. ( Ord. 602 Exh. A, 2022; Ord. 588 § 2(Exh. A), 2-2-2021; Ord. 561 § 1, 2017; Ord. 550 § 1, 2016; Ord. 445 § 2, 2007; Ord. 299 § 1, 1997; Ord. 284 § 1, 1996) (Supp. No. 3, Update 2) Created: 2022-11-20 16:31:11 [EST] Page 5 of 5 536 9.60.150 - Tennis and other game courts. A. Permits Required. Construction of tennis and other game courts, including fencing, may be permitted as indicated in Section 9.40.030. Enclosed game courts shall comply with Section 9.60.050, Storage and other accessory buildings. All lighted game courts, where permitted, shall require approval of a minor use permit by the director or conditional use permit by the planning commission processed in accordance with Section 9.210.020. B. Development Standards. Game courts shall meet the following minimum development standards: 1. Fences. A maximum twelve (12) -foot -high fence (measured from the finished grade of the court) shall be allowed. Fences may include a dark, nonreflective screening material. If the fencing is chain link, it shall be vinyl -coated or painted in a dark color such as dark green or black. 2. Setbacks. Minimum setbacks from property lines for game courts shall be: a. Front yard: twenty (20) feet. b. Side yard: ten (10) feet. c. Rear yard: ten (10) feet. The preceding minimum setbacks shall be increased by three (3) feet for every foot of abutting court fence height over eight (8) feet. ln�diaddition, Of +r^m a side or roar property lino is loss than thirty (30) foo+e g �the finish grade of the nor+ shall be a l 3. Block Wall. Where the tennis or -game court is setback 10 to 30 feet from the front, side, or rear property lines, a block wall six (feet) in height shall exist or shall be constructed along those property lines. 43. Lighting. Game court lighting shall conform to the requirements of Section 9.60.160 (Outdoor lighting). In addition, a maximum of eight (8) lights (i.e., eight (8) individual light sources) shall be permitted and mounting standard height shall not exceed eighteen (18) feet measured from the court surface. Courts shall not be lighted after 10:00 p.m. 54. Glare. The surface area of any game court shall be designed, painted, colored and/or textured to reduce the reflection from any light source. 65. Landscaping. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained between the court fence and property line. A landscape plan shall be submitted with the building permit application, reviewed and approved by the director, and implemented at the same time as court construction. ( Ord. 584 § 2, 2020; Ord. 550 § 1, 2016; Ord. 299 § 1, 1997; Ord. 284 § 1, 1996) 537 9.60.340 - Flagpoles. Flagpoles shall be allowed in all residential zoning districts subject to the following standards: A. Height of flagpoles shall not exceed twenty (20) feet. B. Flagpoles shall not bea-r-e allowed within any yard, except if a yard abutsti-pg another res'dento gpoles shall maintain a minimum setback distance of 5 feet from any property line.—The MiRiMUM setbaGk for flagpoles shall be teR (10) feet frGm any property 1i C. Installation of flagpoles shall require a building permit. D. Flagpoles that were installed prior to February 14, 2019, but otherwise meet the height limitation in this section, shall be allowed to remain in place so long as a building permit is obtained if there was no building permit issued previously. Proof of installation or existence of flagpoles prior to February 14, 2019 may be required. 538 9.110.060 - FP Floodplain District. A. Purpose and Intent. To protect life and property from flood flows and to establish criteria for land use consistent with state law and with the criteria promulgated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. B. Development Standards. Development standards shall be as required for needed flood control improvements and shall conform to the supplemental requirements for the FP district set forth in Section 9.140.030. C. District Boundaries. The FP „district shall include all areas within the city that are designated as "Special Flood Hazard Areas Inundated by One Hundred -Year Flood" on Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). These include the "A" and "AO" flood hazard zones. The boundaries of the FP district are generally shown on the official zoning map. See FEMA FIRM maps for specific locations. (Ord. 550 § 1, 2016; Ord. 284 § 1, 1996) 539 ATTACHMENT 1 ------------ .. AM Section(s), Reason( Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) regulations per 9.60.090 Changes in state law. state law Minimum garage setback for residential - change 9.50.030 Change standard to what footnote says --roll up doors are most to 20 ft instead of 25 in RL and up common now. Remove the requirement that court must be lower grade; allow Tennis and other Game Courts 9.60.150 at least 10 feet from front, side, and rear setbacks with 6 -foot block wall along property lines. Provide additional opportunity where the yard abuts open Flagpoles 9.60.340 space, a golf course, or a street, allow flagpoles to be located at least 5 feet from any property lines. Floodplain District — remove the word "Overlay" 9.110.060 Consistency with other code sections that call FP a base district from "Floodplain Overlay District" not overlay. 540 ATTACHMENT 2 WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT Public Hearing No. 2 ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 2023-1000 November 7,2023 541 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT MICHAEL BROADWELL PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - FLAGPOLE REGULATIONS From: Mike Broadwell <mikeb@awbottling.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 12:45 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Written Comments. Mike Broadwell, La Quinta concerning Flag Poles. Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Some people who received this message don't often get email from mikeb@awbottling.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. City Council Members. I understand there will be a vote on November 7th to change the Flag Pole regulations. The proposed change from 10 feet to 5 feet from the backyard property line that backs up to a golf course or an open area should be approved. Most neighborhoods in La Quinta have HCIA's that already have rules and regulations on Flag Poles already. In my opinion, HCIA's should decide Flag Pole issues not the city. There are a lot of homes that do not have an area 10 feet from the back property line and should not be blocked on their ability, and their right to put in a Flag Pole. I do not understand the issue as it is ok to have major view blocking palm trees within a few feet of your neighbors property but not a Flag Pole. I love the American spirit of the people of La Quinta that are patriotic and want to fly our country's flag! I am in favor of the proposed changes and believe they still do not do far enough in favor of the American Flag. Please approve the proposed change on November 7th. Thankyou! Mike Broadwell IMPORTANT NOTICE: This electronic mail message, including any attachments, may contain privileged and confidential information that is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the intended recipient, or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this electronic mail message in error, you are hereby notified that any retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or taking of any action in reliance upon information of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by email and delete this message and destroy any paper copies. Thank you for your cooperation. 1 542 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENTS SAM & SHARON DICKINSON PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - FLAGPOLE REGULATIONS From: Sam and Sharon Dickinson <1samdickinson@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 10:18 AM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: written comments Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Some people who received this message don't often get email from lsamdickinson@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Sam Dickinson 52218 Aracena La Quinta Ca. Flag Poles City Council members, On November 7th you will be voting on a change to the cities flag pole regulation. Although this is an improvement on the current regulation, I don't think it goes far enough. A majority of the homes in La Quinta are in a HOA. Why not let the HOA's control flag poles. My HOA has a max of 15ft. and you can only fly the U.S. flag. Sometimes one size doesn't fit every situation. Below is a picture of where my flag used to be. I removed it after the HOA asked me to. Yes it was 2 feet from my neighbors property. We chose that location not to upset our neighbors, but because the palm trees they planted inside of 2 ft. of our property were already blocking our view of the Mts. We would rather look at our flag. Their palms and my pole only blocked sky for them. Yes when the wind blows in their direction it flys over their property. But wind or no wind their palm tree hangs over my property. Our flag pole was lighted by one up light, just like palm trees are. Not sure why a pole flying the American Flag holds less value than a palm tree, do you? 543 Below is one of my neighbors flag pole. It is 3 1/2 feet from his back property line. He only has neighbors on the one side, where all the large palms are. He can't move back farther unless he goes closer to their property. Which they don't want. I think those 4 palms within 2 feet of the property line block a lot more view than one flag pole. 544 Below is another neighbor flag pole that is 5 ft. from his neighbors property. The only way to move it farther away is to move it much closer to the back end of his property. But his neighbor didn't want that. So he located it just where his neighbor wanted it. 545 If the HOA's had control both flag poles could stay and both neighbors would be happier Most homes on golf courses don't have big backyards and 99% have pools. This leaves few areas to locate a flag pole. Why make it harder. Andalusia HOA didn't even know there is a permit requirement. And I'm sure most of the HOA's are also unaware of it. So why not let HOA's decide. Besides we all know how much they like to make up rules. My point is when it comes to flag poles one rule doesn't fit all situations. Many times less government is better government. Thanks for your time, Sam Dickinson USAF retired 546 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT DARRELL MAYEUX PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - FLAGPOLE REGULATIONS From: Darrell Mayeux <darrellmayeux@me.com> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2023 10:25 AM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: "Written comments" re Flag Pole ordinance from D Mayeux, resident of Andalusia CC, La Quinta [Some people who received this message don't often get email from darrellmayeux@me.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** HOAs have well thought out regulations developed to fit the preferences of the majority of the residents of that community. Where no HOA exists, it is important that the city establish regulations that best suit the majority of those homeowners. If an HOA has a regulation, especially regarding esthetic issues, it should be respected as appropriate for those particular homeowners and not "overridden" by a city ordinance. The proposed change to the city's flagpole regulation is at least a modest step in that direction. Respectfully, Darrell Mayeux Andalusia CC 547 548 BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 3 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 7, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3.25 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS RECOMMENDATION • Move to take up Ordinance No. by title and number only and waive further reading. • Move to introduce at first reading, Ordinance No. to amend Chapter 3.25 of the La Quinta Municipal Code related to Short -Term Vacation Rentals. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • On February 21, 2023, Council directed staff to schedule study sessions to discuss Chapter 3.25 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC) related to Short -Term Vacation Rentals (STVRs). • On March 21, 2023, and May 16, 2023, Council held study sessions and discussed possible additions and amendments to LQMC Chapter 3.25. • Based on Council's discussion, comments, and direction, proposed is an ordinance to amend Chapter 3.25. FISCAL IMPACI — None. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS At the February 21, 2023, regular meeting, Council received an update on the STVR program characteristics, performance, and enforcement for 2022 and comparison to 2021 calendar years; and public comments from representatives in support and in opposition of the permanent ban on the issuance of new STVR permits in non-exempt areas currently in place. Based on the information presented, Council directed staff to schedule study sessions to discuss STVR regulations under LQMC Chapter 3.25. On March 21, 2023, and May 16, 2023, Council held study sessions and discussed several possible amendments and additions to Chapter 3.25 presented for consideration. Based on Council's discussion, comments, and direction, proposed is an ordinance to add language and amend existing provisions of Chapter 3.25 as follows: Add definitions for newly added regulations; 2. Add Section 3.25.045 to establish requirements for an apartment complex; 3. Add language under Section 3.25.050, Subsection (B), to clarify that transfers of properties to trusts or entities whose beneficiaries and/or membership are the same as the original owners of the property or transfers to heirs do not constitute a change of ownership and shall not result in the cancellation of an existing STVR permit; 4. Add the Estates at Griffin Lake Specific Plan, which governs the Mery Griffin Estate property, to the list of allowable exemptions under Section 3.25.055, Subsection (A)(4); 5. Add a provision to exempt Homeshare STVR permits from the ban on the issuance of new STVR permits under Section 3.25.055, Subsection (C); 6. Add Subsection (E) under Section 3.25.055, adding a provision requiring future revisions to Section 3.25.055 to be adopted by no less than four-fifths (4/5) majority vote of the City Council; 7. Add Section 3.25.056 to establish an exemption for potentially qualifying homeowners associations from the ban on the issuance of new STVR permits under Section 3.25.055, as well as related regulations and requirements; 8. Add Section 3.25.057 to establish an exemption for large lots from the ban on the issuance of new STVR permits under Section 3.25.055, as well as related regulations and requirements; 9. Add Subsection (H) to Section 3.25.070 to reiterate that Homeshare STVR permits require the owner(s) to occupy the dwelling during the transient stay; and shall comply with all requirements of the Chapter 3.25, or any other applicable federal, state, or local laws or codes, including being available or having a designated person available 24/7 to respond to the location within 30 minutes to address or resolve complaints regarding the condition, operation, or conduct of occupants of the STVR unit or their guests. 10. Add language to Section 3.25.070, Subsection (N), to clarify that, if a hosting platform provides a designated field to list the STVR permit number and the number of approved bedrooms, this satisfies the City's permitting requirements for STVR advertisements; 11. Add Subsections (E)(4) and (E)(5) to Section 3.25.090 to establish fines specific for advertising without a STVR permit; and 12. Miscellaneous minor modifications throughout Chapter 3.25 to align the language with existing processes and/or to ensure language clarity and consistency. Section 3.25.055 Amendments — background: To address the rapid influx of STVR use from visitors outside the City when the then - applicable statewide "stay at home" order was in effect to limit and prevent the spread of COVID-19, the City imposed a moratorium on the issuance of new STVR permits in non- exempt areas on August 4, 2020, via Executive Order No. 10, issued pursuant to the authority then -available under the proclaimed local emergency relating to COVID-19. After numerous public meetings and input from the STVR ad-hoc committee, effective May 20, 2021, the moratorium (among other provisions) was codified as a permanent ban on the issuance of new STVR permits in non-exempt areas via the addition of Section 3.25.055 of the LQMC. Permit -holders may renew existing permits, but permits cannot be transferred to the new owner of a previously licensed STVR. No new permits in non-exempt areas have been issued since August 4, 2020. New permits continue to be issued for the few exempt areas zoned for tourist commercial, village commercial, and communities expressly developed to allow STVRs vis-a-vis conditions of approval related to entitlement approvals, specified agreements, or locations, which are depicted on the map in Attachment 3. A citizen ballot initiative, Measure A (Nov. 2022), proposing to phase-out and permanently ban non -hosted STVRs in non-exempt areas in La Quinta by December 31, 2024, qualified for the November 2022 ballot. "Non -hosted" STVRs, as defined by Measure A, did not include "Homeshare" STVRs in the proposed ban, and the proponents expressly indicated their intent to allow Homeshares. Measure A was not approved by the qualified voters. Currently, there are a total of 17 Homeshare STVR permits in La Quinta, which were permitted prior to the moratorium on new STVR permits. The current permanent ban on the issuance of new STVR permits in non-exempt areas applies to all permit types, including Homeshares. Chapter 3.25 defines Homeshare STVR permit as follows: "Homeshare short-term vacation rental permit" is a type of STVR permit whereby the owner hosts visitors in the owner's dwelling, for compensation, for periods of 30 consecutive calendar days or less, while the owner lives on-site and in the dwelling, throughout the visiting occupant's stay. Section 3.25.056 Proposed Addition — summary: Section 3.25.056 Homeowner Association (HOA) Exemption — develop and add a process by which qualifying residential developments that are governed by an HOA that allows STVR uses within its governing documents, in non-exempt areas, would be able to apply for an exemption from the ban if specified criteria, supported by evidence are met, and be considered by Council at a public meeting. Council previously considered this exemption at the April 20, 2021, March 21, 2023, and May 16, 2023, regular meetings. If such an exemption is approved, the requirements that would apply are generally summarized below, and Section 3.25.056 in redline is included as Exhibit A to the proposed ordinance: • Use of the residential dwellings as STVRs is authorized under the HOA Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs). • The voting membership of the HOA approves by no less than the vote required under the CC&Rs for the residential development, or if no vote requirement is specified, a simple majority vote (50% + 1 vote) to be exempted from the non -issuance of new permits, and such vote confirms that all residential dwellings within the HOA may apply for a new STVR permit. • The HOA certifies that it has complied with any other voting requirements that must be followed pursuant to the CC&Rs or other operative documents governed by the HOA in connection with the voter -approval as stated above. • Applications for this exemption may be submitted only once within any three-year period, and the vote of the voting membership of the HOA must have been conducted within the previous 12 months from the date of application submittal. • A complete application shall be considered by Council at a public meeting, and the findings and decision of the Council shall be adopted via a resolution. Council's decision shall be final. Section 3.25.057 Proposed Addition — summary: Section 3.25.057 Large Lot Exemption — develop and add a process by which a residential dwelling in non-exempt areas would be able to apply for an exemption from the ban if specified criteria, supported by evidence are met, and be considered by Council during a public hearing. Council previously discussed this exemption at the March 21, 2023, and May 16, 2023, regular meetings, and requested additional information which is provided below. If such an exemption is approved, the requirements that would apply are generally summarized below, and Section 3.25.057 in redline is included as Exhibit A to the proposed ordinance: • Large lot size on which the residential dwelling is located and built is comprised of a single parcel that is not less than 25,000 square feet. Per Council's directions from the previous discussion in March 2023, staff conducted a search of all parcels within City limits to prepare an inventory of parcels that are at least 25,000 square feet or greater, which was presented on May 16, 2023, and is included as Attachment 2. The results show that a total of 70 parcels fit the criteria, of which: ✓ 4-4 12 are properties located within areas that are exempt from the ban on STVR permits currently in place: • 10 lots at Polo Villas # 13-20 and # 22-23 along Madison St, north of Avenue 52; • 2 lots at M+e�.,rv, Griffin Estate # 24 and 72; • 2 loots a�the Calle Foriunt Ir Neighborh loGated within the Village Commorniol DiStrint Zeno ✓ 30 are properties located within HOAs; thus limiting their eligibility to apply for an exemption as HOA approval would be required, and it is unlikely that it would be granted: • 14 lots at Estates at La Quinta # 43-52 and # 54-57; (1 Active STVR permit on # 52) • 8 lots at PGA West — Legends # 21, # 62-63, # 65-68, and # 70; (1 Active STVR permit on # 63) • 2 lots at PGA West — Norman # 40 and # 71; • 2 lots at PGA West — Palmer and Nicklaus # 64 and # 69; • 4 lots at the Village of the Palms # 58-61 ✓ 26 properties remain as potentially eligible to apply for a large lot exemption, of which 4 are currently permitted STVRs as they had a permit prior to the ban: • 4 lots in north La Quinta, along Westward Ho # 1-4; • 3 lots in the Cove # 5-6 and # 8; • 2 lots along Avenida Fernando, north of the La Quinta Resort Specific Plan # 11-12; • 9 lots at the Highland Palms Neighborhood # 25-33; (4 Active STVR permits on # 26-27, # 29, and # 33) • 2 lots along Madison St # 34-35; • 3 lots along Avenue 50 # 36-38; • 1 lot north of Avenue 58 by Palo Verde Estates # 39; • 2 lots immediately north of the Estates at La Quinta # 41 and # 42 • 2 lots at the Calle Fortuna Neighborhood located within the Village Commercial District Zone • Written authorization that use of the single parcel as an STVR is not prohibited or inconsistent with any recorded instruments governing the use of the land, such as HOA CC&Rs; • Verification of the number of bedrooms; • Adequate on-site parking spaces; • Physical distance of the residential dwelling from adjacent properties, such as location and distance of outdoor gathering spaces, pools, and other living spaces from neighboring properties; 11/8/2023 THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE IN BLUE AND STRICKEN OUT WAS UPDATED TO CORRECT A CLERICAL ERROR • A complete application shall be considered by Council at a public hearing in accordance with existing City regulations for public hearings pursuant to LQMC Section 9.200.100(D), following notification to all properties within 500 feet from the single parcel; and the findings and decision of the Council shall be adopted via a resolution. Council's decision shall be final. The 500 feet radius is consistent with existing state and local entitlement approval notification requirements [Section 9.200.100(D)], such as general plan amendments, zoning code amendments, zone changes, specific plans, and development agreements; staff recommends staying consistent with existing requirements. To provide a point of reference, Attachment 4 shows the 500 feet radius for 3 properties from the list of parcels potentially eligible to apply for the large lot exemption. • Generally ensuring that allowing an STVR unit at the proposed site will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare or injurious to or incompatible with other properties in the vicinity. The proposed process would involve a separate application and determination to address the unique characteristics and circumstances that may apply to residential properties in non- exempt areas and aims to provide a mechanism for the City to exempt properties from the ban that are located within a qualifying large lot and do not have the typical environment and elements of a single-family dwelling. If an exemption is granted, the property owner would still need to apply for and meet all the criteria to obtain a new STVR permit. The intent to allow limited exemptions from the ban for residential dwelling in non-exempt areas per the proposed Large Lot Exemption may best be explained by pictures. For instance, Attachment 1 depicts the location of the 9.25 -acre property, of which the built -out area accounts for only 5,553 square feet and consists of seven (7) bedrooms spread between the main dwelling, guest house, and servants quarters; it includes a large pool and patio, horse stables, and outside gardens/resting areas; it is surrounded by approximately 5 -acres of orchards; and it is located behind a private gate. ALTERNATIVE Council may elect not to introduce the proposed ordinance; approve only some of the amendments and/or additions; or instruct staff to make additional/different amendments. Prepared by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachments: 1. Large Lot Example — property on Madison St, north of Avenue 52 2. Large Lots Inventory Map 3. STVR Areas Map 4. Radius Maps of 500 feet ORDINANCE NO. XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTIONS AND AMENDING SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 3.25 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS WHEREAS, Chapter 3.25 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC) relates to short-term vacation rentals, including permitted uses, short-term vacation rental process and permitting procedures, requirements, violations, fines, etc.; and WHEREAS, the City has the authority to regulate residential uses, including short- term vacation renal uses, operating within the City; and WHEREAS, the proposed additions and amendments to Chapter 3.25 are intended to: 1. Add definitions for newly added regulations; 2. Add Section 3.25.045 to establish requirements for an apartment complex; 3. Add language under Section 3.25.050, Subsection (B), to clarify that transfers of properties to trusts or entities whose beneficiaries and/or membership are the same as the original owners of the property or transfers to heirs do not constitute a change of ownership and shall not result in the cancellation of an existing short-term vacation rental permit; 4. Add the Estates at Griffin Lake Specific Plan, which governs the Mery Griffin Estate property, to the list of allowable exemptions under Section 3.25.055, Subsection (A)(4); 5. Add a provision to exempt Homeshare short-term vacation rental permits from the ban on the issuance of new short-term vacation rental permits under Section 3.25.055, Subsection (C); 6. Add Subsection (E) under Section 3.25.055, adding a provision requiring future revisions to Section 3.25.055 to be adopted by no less than four-fifths (4/5) majority vote of the City Council; 7. Add Section 3.25.056 to establish an exemption for potentially qualifying homeowners associations from the ban on the issuance of new short-term vacation rental permits under Section 3.25.055, as well as related regulations and requirements; 555 Ordinance No. XXX Chapter 3.25 Short -Term Vacation Rentals — Additions and Amendments Adopted: Month Date, 2023 Page 2 of 4 8. Add Section 3.25.057 to establish an exemption for large lots from the ban on the issuance of new short-term vacation rental permits under Section 3.25.055, as well as related regulations and requirements; 9. Add Subsection (H) to Section 3.25.070 to reiterate that Homeshare STVR permits require the owner(s) to occupy the dwelling during the transient stay; and shall comply with all requirements of the Chapter 3.25, or any other applicable federal, state, or local laws or codes, including being available or having a designated person available 24/7 to respond to the location within 30 minutes to address or resolve complaints regarding the condition, operation, or conduct of occupants of the STVR unit or their guests. 10. Add language to Section 3.25.070, Subsection (N), to clarify that if a hosting platform provides a designated field to list the short-term vacation rental permit number and the number of approved bedrooms, this satisfies the City's permitting requirements for owners of short-term vacation rentals that advertise their short-term vacation rental units; 11. Add Subsections (E)(4) and (E)(5) to Section 3.25.090 to establish fines specific for advertising without a short-term vacation rental permit; and 12. Miscellaneous minor modifications throughout Chapter 3.25 to align the language with existing processes and/or to ensure language clarity and consistency. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 3.25 shall be amended as written in "Exhibit A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 3. POSTING: The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council, shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting to be entered into the permanent record of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta. SECTION 4. CORRECTIVE AMENDMENTS: the City Council does hereby grant the City Clerk the ability to make minor amendments and corrections of typographical or clerical errors to "Exhibit A" to ensure consistency of all approved text amendments prior to the publication in the La Quinta Municipal Code. 556 Ordinance No. XXX Chapter 3.25 Short -Term Vacation Rentals — Additions and Amendments Adopted: Month Date, 2023 Page 3 of 4 SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held this (date) day of (month), 2023), by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 557 Ordinance No. XXX Chapter 3.25 Short -Term Vacation Rentals — Additions and Amendments Adopted: Month Date, 2023 Page 4 of 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LA QUINTA ) I, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No. (enter number) which was introduced at a regular meeting on the (date) day of (month), 2023, and was adopted at a regular meeting held on the (date) day of (month), 2023, not being less than 5 days after the date of introduction thereof. I further certify that the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the City of La Quinta as specified in the Rules of Procedure adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2022-027. MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California DECLARATION OF POSTING I, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was posted on , 2023, pursuant to Council Resolution. MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 558 Title 3 - REVENUE AND FINANCE EXHIBIT A Chapter 3.25 SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS Chapter 3.25 SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS 3.25.010 Title. This chapter shall be referred to as the "Short -Term Vacation Rental Regulations." ( Ord. 590 § 1(Exh. A), 3-16-2021; Ord. 586 § 1(Exh. A), 12-15-2020; Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501§2,2012) 3.25.020 Purpose. A. The purpose of this chapter is to establish regulations for the use of privately owned residential dwellings as short-term vacation rentals that ensure the collection and payment of transient occupancy taxes (TOT) as provided in Chapter 3.24 of this code, and minimize the negative secondary effects of such use on surrounding residential neighborhoods. B. This chapter is not intended to provide any owner of residential property with the right or privilege to violate any private conditions, covenants and restrictions applicable to the owner's property that may prohibit the use of such owner's residential property for short-term vacation rental purposes as defined in this chapter. C. The requirements of this chapter shall be presumed to apply to any residential dwelling that has received a short-term vacation rental permit. A rebuttable presumption arises that, whenever there is an occupant(s), paying rent or not, of a residential dwelling that has received a short-term vacation rental permit, the requirements of this chapter shall apply, including but not limited to any suspension or other modifications imposed on a short-term vacation rental permit as set forth in this chapter. The city manager or authorized designee shall have the authority to implement any necessary or appropriate policies and procedures to ^ ple eT,rapply the rebuttable presumption set forth in this section. ( Ord. 590 § 1(Exh. A), 3-16-2021; Ord. 586 § 1(Exh. A), 12-15-2020; Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) 3.25.030 Definitions. For purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the meaning respectively ascribed to them by this section: "Advertise, ""advertisement, ""advertising, ""publish, " and "publication" mean any and all means, whether verbal or written, through any media whatsoever whether in use prior to, at the time of, or after the enactment of the ordinance arnendiRg this ehapte�adding this definition, used for conveying to any member or members of the public the ability or availability to rent a short-term vacation rental unit as defined in this section, or used for conveying to any member or members of the public a notice of an intention to rent a short-term vacation rental unit as defined in this section. For purposes of this definition, the following media are listed as examples, which are not and shall not be construed as exhaustive: verbal or written announcements by proclamation or outcry, newspaper advertisement, magazine advertisement, handbill, written or printed notice, printed or poster display, billboard display, e-mail or other electronic/digital messaging platform, electronic commerce/commercial Internet websites, and any and all other electronic media, television, radio, satellite -based, or Internet website. La Quinta, California, Municipal Code (Supp. No. 3, Update 3) Created: 2023-01-29 19:14:29 [EST] Page 1 of 21 559 "Apartment complex" means a group of three (3) or more apartment buildings comprised of apartments, as defined in Section 9.280.030 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code, in a single ownership, with most or all units occupied on a rental basis. "Applicable laws, rules and regulations" means any laws, rules, regulations and codes (whether local, state or federal) pertaining to the use and occupancy of a privately owned dwelling unit as a short-term vacation rental. "Applicant" means the owner of the short-term vacation rental unit. "Authorized agent or representative" means a designated agent or representative who is appointed by the owner and is also i -s responsible for compliance with this chapter with respect to the short-term vacation rental unit. "Booking transaction" means any reservation or payment service provided by a person or entity who facilitates a home -sharing or vacation rental (including short-term vacation rental) transaction between a prospective occupant and an owner or owner's authorized agent or representative. "City manager" means that person acting in the capacity of the city manager of -for the city of La Quinta or authorized designee. "Declaration of non-use" means the declaration described in Section 3.25.050. "Dwelling" has the same meaning as set forth in Section 9.280.030 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code; "dwelling" does not include any impermanent, transitory, or mobile means of temporary lodging, including but not limited to mobile homes, recreational vehicles (RVs), car trailers, and camping tents. "Estate home" is defined as a single-family detached residence with five (5) or more bedrooms, subject to evaluation criteria and inspection of the property pursuant to Section 3.25.060(D)(1). An estate home is a sub -type of short-term vacation rental unit and shall be subject to a general short-term vacation rental permit, primary residence short-term vacation rental permit, or homeshare short-term vacation rental permit, as applicable, pursuant to this chapter. "General short-term vacation rental permit" is a type of short-term vacation rental permit that is neither a homeshare short-term vacation rental permit nor a primary residence short-term vacation rental permit. "Good neighbor brochure" means a document prepared by the city that summarizes the general rules of conduct, consideration, and respect, including, without limitation, provisions of this code and other applicable laws, rules or regulations pertaining to the use and occupancy of short-term vacation rental units. "Homeowners association" or "HOA" means the "association," as defined in California Civil Code section 4080 (or successor provision) of the Davis -Stirling Common Interest Development Act (Civil Code section 4000 et seq. (or successor provisions), that serves as the nonprofit corporation or unincorporated association created for the purpose of managing a common interest development, as defined in Civil Code section 4100 (or successor provision). "Homeshare short-term vacation rental permit" is a type of short-term vacation rental permit whereby the owner hosts visitors in the owner's dwelling, for compensation, for periods of thirty (30) consecutive calendar days or less, while the owner lives on-site and in the dwelling, throughout the visiting occupant's stay. "Hosting platform" means a person or entity who participates in the home -sharing or vacation rental (including short-term vacation rental) business by collecting or receiving a fee, directly or indirectly through an agent or intermediary, for conducting a booking transaction using any medium of facilitation, including but not limited to the Internet. "Large lot" means a single "parcel," as defined in Section 9.280.030 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code, that meets all of the criteria set forth in Subsection (A) of Section 3.25.057. (Supp. No. 3, Update 3) Created: 2023-01-29 19:14:29 [EST] Page 2 of 21 560 "Local contact person" means the person designated by the owner or the owner's authorized agent or representative who shall be available twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week with the ability to respond to the location within thirty (30) minutes for the purpose of: (1) taking remedial action to resolve any &U -C-4 complaints; and (2) responding to complaints regarding the condition, operation, or conduct of occupants of the short-term vacation rental unit. A designated local contact person must obtain a business license otherwise required by Sections 3.24.060 and 3.28.020 (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. "Management company" means any individual or entity, whether for profit or nonprofit, and regardless of entity type, such as a limited liability company, corporation, or sole proprietorship, that is retained by an owner to be the owner's authorized agent or representative, or is the owner of a short-term vacation rental unit subject to this chapter, and is engaged in or represents itself to be engaged in the business of managing real property. "Notice of permit modification, suspension or revocation" means the notice the city may issue to an applicant, authorized agent or representative, local contact person, occupant, owner, responsible person, or any other person or entity authorized to be issued such notice under this code for a short-term vacation rental unit, upon a determination by the city of a violation of this chapter or other provisions of this code relating to authorized uses of property subject to this chapter. "Occupant" means any person(s) occupying the dwelling at any time. "Owner" means the person(s) or entity(ies) that hold(s) legal and/or equitable title to the subject short-term vacation rental unit. "Primary residence" means a dwelling where an owner spends the majority of the calendar year on the property used as a short-term vacation rental unit, and the property is identified in the Riverside County assessor's record as the owner's primary residence. "Primary residence short-term vacation rental permit" is a type of short-term vacation rental permit whereby the short-term vacation rental unit is the owner's primary residence, as defined herein in this section. "Potentially qualifying homeowners association" or 'potentially qualifying HOA" means the association, as defined in California Civil Code section 4080 (or successor provision) of the Davis -Stirling Common Interest Development Act (Civil Code section 4000 et seg. (or successor provisions), that serves as the nonprofit corporation or unincorporated association created for the purpose of managing a planned development, as defined in Civil Code section 4175 (or successor orovision). that has sinele-familv dwellines. as defined in Section 9.280.030 of this code. and each single-family dwelling is an equal -voting member of the homeowners association. "Property" means a residential legal lot of record on which a short-term vacation rental unit is located. "Qualified and certified large lot" has the meaning as set forth in Section 3.25.057. "Qualified and certified homeowners association" has the meaning as set forth in Section 3.25.056. "Rent" has the same meaning as set forth in Section 3.24.020 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. "Rental agreement" means a written or verbal agreement for use and occupancy of a privately -owned residential dwelling that has been issued a short-term vacation rental permit, including a dwelling that may have a permit which has been or is under suspension. "Responsible person" means the signatory of an agreement for the rental, use and occupancy of a short-term vacation rental unit, and/or any person(s) occupying the short-term vacation rental unit without a rental agreement, including the owner(s), owner's authorized agent(s) or representative(s), local contact(s), and their guests, who shall be an occupant of that short-term vacation rental unit, who is at least twenty-one (21) years of age, and who is legally responsible for ensuring that all occupants of the short-term vacation rental unit and/or (Supp. No. 3, Update 3) Created: 2023-01-29 19:14:29 [EST] Page 3 of 21 561 their guests comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject short-term vacation rental unit. "Short-term vacation rental permit" means a permit that permits the use of a privately owned residential dwelling as a short-term vacation rental unit pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, and which incorporates by consolidation a transient occupancy permit and a business license otherwise required by Sections 3.24.060 and 3.28.020 (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. A short-term vacation rental permit is one (1) of the following types: (1) general short-term vacation rental permit, (2) primary residence short-term vacation rental permit, or (3) homeshare short-term vacation rental permit, as defined in this section. "Short-term vacation rental unit" means a privately owned residential dwelling, such as, but not limited to, a single-family detached or multiple -family attached unit, apartment house, condominium, cooperative apartment, duplex, or any portion of such dwellings and/or property and/or yard features appurtenant thereto, rented for occupancy and/or occupied for dwelling, lodging, or any transient use, including but not limited to sleeping overnight purposes for a period of thirty (30) consecutive calendar days or less, counting portions of calendar days as full days, by any person(s) with or without a rental agreement. "STVR" may be used by city officials as an abbreviation for "short-term vacation rental." "Suspension" means that short-term vacation rental permit that is suspended pursuant to Section 3.25.090. "Tenant" or "transient, " for purposes of this chapter, means any person who seeks to rent or who does rent, or who occupies or seeks to occupy, for thirty (30) consecutive calendar days or less, a short-term vacation rental unit. ( Ord. 595 § 1(Exh. A), 6-15-2021; Ord. 590 § 1(Exh. A), 3-16-2021; Ord. 586 § 1(Exh. A), 12-15-2020; Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) 3.25.040 Authorized agent or representative. A. Except for the completion of an application for a short-term vacation rental permit and business license, the owner may designate an authorized agent or representative to ensure compliance with the requirements of this chapter with respect to the short-term vacation rental unit on his, her or their behalf. Nevertheless, the owner shall not be relieved from any personal responsibility and personal liability for noncompliance with any applicable law, rule or regulation pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject short-term vacation rental unit, regardless of whether such noncompliance was committed by the owner's authorized agent or representative or the occupants of the owner's short-term vacation rental unit or their guests. B. The owner must be the applicant for and holder of a short-term vacation rental permit and business license and shall not authorize an agent or a representative to apply for or hold a short-term vacation rental permit and business license on the owner's behalf. The owner's signature is required on all short-term vacation rental application forms, and the city may prescribe reasonable requirements to verify that an applicant or purported owner is the owner in fact. ( Ord. 590 § 1(Exh. A), 3-16-2021; Ord. 586 § 1(Exh. A), 12-15-2020; Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501§2,2012) 3.25.045 Apartment complex — short-term vacation rental permit requirements. A. The owner of an apartment complex may apply for a short-term vacation rental permit only if all individual apartment units are operated as short-term vacation rental units, and there is no long-term rental of apartment units, with the exception of an on-site property manager, proof of which shall be provided to the city upon submittal of a short-term vacation rental permit application. (Supp. No. 3, Update 3) Created: 2023-01-29 19:14:29 [EST] Page 4 of 21 562 3.25.050 Short-term vacation rental permit—Required. A. The owner is required to obtain a short-term vacation rental permit and a business license from the city before the owner or the owner's authorized agent or representative may rent or advertise a short-term vacation rental unit. No short-term vacation rental use may occur in the city except in compliance with this chapter. No property in the city may be issued a short-term vacation rental permit or used as a short-term vacation rental unit unless the property is a residential dwelling that complies with the requirements of this chapter. B. A short-term vacation rental permit and business license shall be valid for one (1) year and renewed on an annual basis in order to remain valid. A short-term vacation rental permit and business license renewal application shall be submitted no earlier than sixty (60) calendar days but no IateF than thirty (30) calendar days prior to the permit's expiration date, but no later than the permit's expiration date. Failure to renew a short-term vacation rental permit as prescribed in this section may result in the short-term vacation rental permit being terminated. A new owner of a property (or a new person and/or new entity that owns or controls a business or organization or other entity of any kind, such as a limited liability company, which is the owner of a property) previously operated as a short-term vacation rental unit by the former owner (or by a former person or entity that owned or controlled the business or organization or other entity of any kind that continues to be the owner of the property) may not renew the previous owner's short-term vacation rental permit and shall apply for a new short-term vacation rental permit, pursuant to this chapter, if the new owner (or new person and/or new entity that owns or controls a business or organization or other entity of any kind that continues to be the owner of a property) wants to continue to use the residential dwelling as a short-term vacation rental unit. For purposes of this subsection, a transfer of a short-term vacation rental unit with a valid short-term vacation rental permit resulting from any of the following shall not be deemed a transfer to a new owner which would otherwise trigger the reauirement to apply for and obtain a new short-term vacation rental permit: (a) Transfers to an entity of any kind, such as a limited liability company or a trust, where the member(s) of the entity or beneficiary(ies) of the trust is(are) the owner(s) of the real Property with a valid short-term vacation rental permit, and the proportionate interest(s) of the owner(s) are the same for the real property placed in the entity. (b) Transfers that take effect upon the death of an owner to an heir designated by the owner (by devise, bequest, or similar transfer upon death) who is any of the following: (i) surviving spouse or domestic partner; or (ii) surviving sibling related by blood or in law, such as a brother, sister, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, step -brother, or step -sister; or (iii) surviving parent or grandparent by blood or in law, such as a mother, father, mother-in-law, father-in-law, step- mother, step -father, grandmother, grandfather, grandmother -in-law, grandfather -in-law, step - grandmother, or step -grandfather; (iv) surviving child or grandchild, such as a daughter, son, daughter-in-law, son-in-law, step -daughter, step -son, granddaughter, grandson, granddaughter - in -law, grandson -in-law, step -granddaughter, or step -grandson. (c) Transfers to a trust with the beneficiary(ies) identified as an heir described in Subsection B(2)(b) above. If an owner or an owner' s authorized agent or representative, pursuant to all applicable laws, constructs additional bedrooms to an existing residential dwelling or converts non -bedroom spaces and areas in an existing residential dwelling into additional bedrooms, the owner or owner"s authorized agent or representative shall notify the city and update the short-term vacation rental unit' -s online registration profile upon city approval of the addition or conversion so that the city may (Supp. No. 3, Update 3) Created: 2023-01-29 19:14:29 [EST] Page 5 of 21 563 confirm that such conversion is consistent with this chapter and the code, including all applicable provisions in Title 8 of the code, and reissue the short-term vacation rental permit so that it accurately identifies the number of approved bedrooms, if the owner wants to continue to use the dwelling as a short-term vacation rental unit. The city may conduct an on-site inspection of the property to verify compliance with this chapter and the code. Code compliance inspections may be billed for full cost recovery at one (1) hour for initial inspection and in thirty (30) -minute increments for each follow-up inspection pursuant to subsection D. For purposes of this chapter, ""reissue"" or ""reissuance"" of a short-term vacation rental permit means a permit that is reissued by the city, with corrected information, as applicable, to be valid for the balance of the existing one (1) -year permit and license period. C. A short-term vacation rental permit and business license shall be valid only for the number of bedrooms in a residential dwelling equal to the number of bedrooms the city establishes as eligible for listing as a short- term vacation rental unit _P"'1 shall Ret e ed the .. .,.,h.,.- ef. beefs ee., _PIII.,,,.,- ble fel, the r .,. be of eccup r+ s„+ f.,r+h in SS,,,.+,,,., 2-5.070. The allowable number of bedrooms shall meet all applicable requirements under federal, state and city codes, including, but not limited to, the provisions of Section 9.50.100 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) governing ""additional bedrooms"" and all applicable building and construction codes in Title 8 of this code. A short-term vacation rental permit shall not be issued for, or otherwise authorize the use of, additional bedrooms converted from non -bedroom spaces or areas in an existing residential dwelling except upon express city approval for the additional bedrooms in compliance with this code, including Section 9.50.100 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time), and upon approval of an application for a new or renewed short-term vacation rental permit as provided in subsection B. A short-term vacation rental permit and business license shall not be issued, and may be suspended or permanently revoked, if the property, or any building, structure, or use or land use on the property is in violation of this code. The city may conduct an inspection of the property prior to the issuance or renewal of a short-term vacation rental permit and/or business license. Code compliance inspections may be billed for full cost recovery at one (1) hour for initial inspection and in thirty (30) -minute increments for each follow-up inspection. For purposes of this subsection, a code violation exists if, at the time of the submittal of an application for a new or renewed short-term vacation rental permit or business license, the city has commenced administrative proceedings by issuing written communication and/or official notice to the owner or owner's responsible authorized agent or representative of one (1) or more code violations. For purposes of this chapter, "building," "structure," and "use or land use" have the same meanings as set forth in Section 9.280.030 (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. A short-term vacation rental permit and business license shall not be issued or renewed, and may be suspended or permanently revoked, if any portion of transient occupancy tax has not been reported and/or remitted to the city for the previous calendar year by the applicable deadline for the reporting and/or remittance of the transient occupancy tax. A short-term vacation rental permit and business license shall not be issued or renewed, and may be suspended or permanently revoked, if the residential dwelling to be used as a short-term rental unit lacks adequate on-site parking. For purposes of this subsection, "adequate on-site parking" shall be determined by dividing the total number of occupants commensurate with the approved number of bedrooms as provided in the table under Section 3.25.070 by four (4), such that the ratio of the maximum allowedtetal number of overnight occupants to on-site parking spots does not exceed four to one (4:1). For example, a residential dwelling with five (5) bedrooms may permissibly host a total number of ten (10) to twelve (12) overnight occupants and therefore requires three (3) on-site parking spots. On-site parking shall be on an approved driveway, garage, and/or carport areas only in accordance with Section 3.25.070(R), and no more than two (2) street parking spots may count towards the number of on-site parking spots necessary to meet the "adequate on-site parking" requirement under this subsection. (Supp. No. 3, Update 3) Created: 2023-01-29 19:14:29 [EST] Page 6 of 21 564 G. An owner or owner's authorized agent or representative who claims not to be operating a short-term vacation rental unit or who has obtained a valid short-term vacation rental permit and business license pursuant to this chapter, may voluntarily opt -out of the requirements of this chapter, prior to the issuance or expiration of a short-term vacation rental permit and business license that are applicable to the short-term vacation rental unit, only upon the owner, the owner's authorized agent or representative and/or the owner's designated local contact person executing, under penalty of perjury, a declaration of non-use as a short-term vacation rental unit, in a form prescribed by the city (for purposes of this chapter, a "declaration of non-use"). Upon the receipt and filing by the city of a fully executed declaration of non-use, the owner or owner's authorized agent or representative shall be released from complying with this chapter as long as the property is not used as a short-term vacation rental unit. Use of the property as a short-term vacation unit after the city's receipt and filing of a declaration of non-use, is a violation of this chapter. If, after a declaration of non-use has been received and filed by the city, the owner or owner's authorized agent or representative wants to use that property as a short-term vacation rental unit, the owner shall apply for a new short-term vacation rental permit and business license and fully comply with the requirements of this chapter and the code; provided, however, that if a short-term vacation rental permit is or will be suspended on the date an owner or owner's authorized agent or representative submits to the city a declaration of non- use for the short-term vacation rental unit under suspension, then the owner may apply for a new short- term vacation rental permit and business license only after twelve (12) consecutive months have elapsed from the date of the declaration of non-use, and the owner and owner's authorized agent or representative otherwise shall fully comply with the requirements of this chapter and the code. ( Ord. 595 § 1(Exh. A), 6-15-2021; Ord. 590 § 1(Exh. A), 3-16-2021; Ord. 586 § 1(Exh. A), 12-15-2020; Ord. 577 § 1, 2019; Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) 3.25.055 Non -issuance of new short-term vacation rental permits; periodic council review. A. Commencing May 20, 2021, which is the effective date of the eOrdinance No. 596 which addeclif g this section, there shall be no processing of, or issuance for, any applications for a new short-term vacation rental permit, required by this chapter to use or operate a short-term vacation rental unit in the city, except applications for a new a short-term vacation rental permit covering a short-term vacation rental unit that meets one (1) or more of the following: 1. A residential dwelling within a residential project located in the CT Tourist Commercial District zone, as defined in Section 9.70.070 (or successor section) of this code and depicted in the city's official zoning map. 2. A residential dwelling within a residential project located in the VC Village Commercial District zone, as defined in Section 9.70.100 (or successor section) of this code and depicted in the city's official zoning map. 3. A residential dwelling within a residential project subject to a development agreement with the city, or subject to a condition of approval(s) attached to any entitlement approved by the city (including but not limited to a specific plan, subdivision map, or site development permit), pursuant to which short- term vacation rentals are a permitted use, and the residential dwelling's use as a short-term vacation rental is authorized under a declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs), for the residential project. 4. A residential dwelling within the area covered by the SilverRock Resort Specific Plan or the Estates at Griffin Lake Specific Plan. 5. A residential dwelling is located adjacent to the CT Tourist Commercial District zone, as defined in Section 9.70.070 and depicted in the city's official zoning map, and within the following boundaries; west of Avenida Obregon, south of the Avenida Fernando, east of Calle Mazatlan, and north of the (Supp. No. 3, Update 3) Created: 2023-01-29 19:14:29 [EST] Page 7 of 21 565 driveway access between Calle Mazatlan and Avenida Obregon that serves as a southern boundary for the La Quinta Tennis Villas/Tennis Condos area identified on page 25 of the La Quinta Resort Specific Plan, 121 E—Amendment 5 (as may be subsequently amended from time to time). For purposes of this subsection, "adjacent to" means across the street from or accessible by a driveway or service road designed to provide access to area(s) within the CT Tourist Commercial District zone. B. The city manager or authorized designee shall have the authority to implement policies or procedures to review and verify whether an application for a new short-term vacation rental permit meets the criteria set forth in this section. C. This section shall not apply to applications for a homeshare short-term vacation rental permit or applications for a renewal of an existing short-term vacation rental permit and business license, submitted in compliance with this chapter, including when the short-term vacation rental permit is under suspension during the time for processing the renewal application. Applications for renewals must be submitted as prescribed by this chapter. Any short-term vacation rental unit, covered by a permit that is subject to an application for renewal, which is under temporary suspension in violation of this chapter or any other provisions of this code, shall not become permitted to use the dwelling as a short-term vacation rental unit until all violations that led to the temporary suspension have been remedied and the suspension has expired. Any revoked short-term vacation rental permit shall not be eligible for renewal or new short-term vacation rental permit. D. The city council shall periodically review the impacts or effects, if any, caused by the non -issuance of new short-term vacation rental permits set forth in this section. The city manager or authorized designee shall prepare a report assessing impacts or effects, if any, for the council to review at a regular or special meeting. E. Commencing on , which is the effective date of Ordinance No. XXX adding this Subsection (E), this section may not be amended by the city council, except by no less than four-fifths (4/5) majority vote of the city council. ( Ord. 596 § 2, 2021; Ord. 595 § 1(Exh. A), 6-15-2021; Ord. 591 § 1(Exh. A), 4-20-2021) 3.25.056 Single-family residences in potentially qualifying homeowners associations; Voting rocedure for exemption from non -issuance of new short-term vacation rental permits. A. If none of the exemations in Subsections (A) or (C) of Section 3.25.055 of this code applies. the board of directors of a potentially qualifying homeowners association may voluntarily submit, only one time during any three (3) year period, to the city an application and request to be exempted from the non -issuance of new short-term vacation rental permits set forth in Section 3.25.055 only if, at the date of submittal of an application for exemption pursuant to this section, all of the following criteria are met: 1. Use of short-term vacation rentals is authorized under a declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) for the residential project governed by the potentially qualifying homeowners association; 2. The votine membership of the ootentially aualifvine homeowners association aooroves. by no less than the vote required under the CC&Rs for the residential development (or, if no vote requirement is specified in the CC&Rs, by no less than fifty percent (50%) plus one (1) vote) to be exempted from the non -issuance of new short-term vacation rental permits that otherwise applies pursuant to Section 3.25.055, and such vote was approved within the previous twelve (12) months from the date of submittal of the application, and such vote confirms that all residential dwellings within the residential project governed by the potentially qualifying homeowners association may apply for a new short-term vacation rental permit pursuant to this chapter as a result of the vote of the voting membership; a (Supp. No. 3, Update 3) Created: 2023-01-29 19:14:29 [EST] Page 8 of 21 566 3. The potentially qualifying homeowners association certifies that it has complied with any other voting requirements that must be followed pursuant to the CC&Rs or other operative documents for the residential proiect governed by the potentially qualifying homeowners association in connection with the voter -approval obtained pursuant to paragraph 2 of this subsection; and 4. If not already clearly and unambiguously stated in the CC&Rs, and if certification from the city council is obtained pursuant to this section, the CC&Rs will be amended to clearly and unambiguously state that the voting requirements of the potentially qualifying homeowners association have been met to allow for an owner of a residential dwelling within the residential project to apply for a new short-term vacation rental permit pursuant to this chapter. B. If the requisite voting membership of the potentially qualifying homeowners association approves, pursuant to this section, to be exempted from the non -issuance of new short-term vacation rental permits that otherwise applies pursuant to Section 3.25.055, the provisions regarding the non -issuance of new short-term vacation rental permits in Section 3.25.055 shall no longer apply to any of the residential dwellings within the residential project governed by the potentially qualifying homeowners association upon review of the application from the potentially qualifying homeowners association and certification by the city council that the criteria set forth in this section have been met. An application submitted pursuant to this section shall be reviewed and considered as follows: Submittal of Application. An application for a finding of exemption under this section and certification as a "qualified and certified homeowners association" shall be completed in a form approved by the city manager or authorized designee, and shall be submitted for processing to the city clerk's office. Applications shall be filed with the city clerk, who shall forward to the planning department together with all resolutions from the board of the potentially qualifying homeowners association, maps, plans, documents and other materials required by the city clerk or director of the planning department. 2. Determination of Completeness. The city clerk's office and planning department shall coordinate with the applicant to make a determination whether the application is complete or incomplete. Upon the determination that the aDDlication is complete by the citv clerk. the citv clerk shall schedule review and consideration of the complete application by the city council. 3. Consideration of the Application at a Public Meeting. The city council shall review and consider the application at a public meeting, and the city council shall be the decision-making authority for the application. Consideration of the application shall be set within ninety (90) days from the determination by the city clerk of a complete application. Notice of the public meeting at which the application will be considered shall comply with applicable state law under the Ralph M. Brown Act, California Government Code section 54950 et seg. At the public meeting, the city council shall receive written comments and any other evidence or testimony relating to the application. At the public meeting, the city council may take action on the application, or continue the application to a specified date. 4. Required Findings. No application presented to the city council pursuant to this section may be approved or conditionally approved unless the city council makes written findings, based on submitted evidence, that all of the requirements in Subsection (A) of this section have been met. 5. Decision. The city council shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. With the concurrence of the applicant, an application may be withdrawn prior to the issuance of a decision by the city council. The decision on an application, including any required findings and any other reasons that serve to explain the determination plus all conditions of approval, shall be in writing. An approval or approval with conditions from the city council shall be adopted by resolution and accompanied with the certification from the city that the single parcel subject to the application meets the criteria for a qualified and certified large lot. 6. The decision of the city council shall be the final decision of the city on the application. (Supp. No. 3, Update 3) Created: 2023-01-29 19:14:29 [EST] Page 9 of 21 567 C. Upon certification by the city that the criteria in this section have been met, then the potentially qualifying homeowners association shall be identified as a "qualified and certified homeowners association" for purposes of this section and this chapter. After receiving certification, an owner of a residential dwelling within the residential project governed by the qualified and certified homeowners association may apply for a new short-term vacation rental permit pursuant to this chapter, and the owner will be subject to the same requirements of any other short-term vacation rental permit application, use, and operation governed by this chapter. If, subsequent to certification by the city as a qualified and certified homeowners association, the declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) no longer allow the use of short-term vacation rentals within the residential development, the certification issued by the city shall no longer be valid and shall be null and void, and owners of a residential dwelling within the residential project may no longer use or rely on this section as grounds for an exemption from the non -issuance of new short-term vacation rental permits in Section 3.25.055. Any application submitted pursuant to this section shall be subject to any fees established by resolution of the city council and shall identify, by addresses, assessor's parcel numbers (APNs), and any other identifying information requested by the city, all residential dwellings purported to be covered by the vote of the voting membership of the potentially qualifying homeowners association. The city manager or authorized designee shall have the authority to implement policies or procedures to review and verify whether an application and request to be exempted from Section 3.25.055 meets the criteria set forth in this section and any other criteria reasonably necessary for verification of such application and request. F. The city council may periodically review the impacts or effects, if any, caused by this section concurrently with its periodic review provided for in subsection (D) of Section 3.25.055. G. Nothing in this section does or shall be interpreted in any manner as affecting any requirements under state law, including but not limited to the Davis -Stirling Common Interest Development Act in Part 5 (commencing with Section 4000) of Division 4 of the California Civil Code. 3.25.057 Large lots; Exemption from non -issuance of new short-term vacation rental permits. A. If none of the exemptions in Subsections (A) or (C) of Section 3.25.055 of this code applies, the owner of a large lot may voluntarily submit to the city an application and request to be exempted from the non -issuance of new short-term vacation rental permits set forth in Section 3.25.055 only if, at the time of submittal of an application for exemption pursuant to this section, all of the following criteria are met: 1. The "lot area," as defined in 9.280.030 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code, is comprised of a single parcel that is no less than 25,000 square feet; The single parcel has at least one existing dwelling, as defined in this chapter, in use or available for u 3. The single parcel is not, nor will the single parcel ever be for the duration of the period of any qualified exemption under this section, subject to a subdivision under the Subdivision Map Act in Division 2 (commencine with Section 64410) of Title 7 of the California Government Code or under Title 13 of this code (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time). 4. The single parcel is not, nor will the single parcel ever be for the duration of the period of any qualified exemption under this section, subject to a reduction in the square footage of the lot area by lot line adjustment, parcel merger, or other action that creates a legal parcel under the Subdivision Map Act in Division 2 (commencine with Section 64410) of Title 7 of the California Government Code or under Title 13 of this code (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time). (Supp. No. 3, Update 3) Created: 2023-01-29 19:14:29 [EST] Page 10 of 21 568 5. If the single parcel is within a residential project governed by a homeowners association, the use of the single parcel as a short-term vacation rental unit is authorized under the homeowners association's covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) and any other applicable governing documents for the residential project governed by the homeowners association; 6. Use of the single parcel as a short-term vacation rental unit is not prohibited or otherwise inconsistent with any recorded instruments governing the use of the single parcel; and The single parcel has adequate on-site parking pursuant to this chapter for use as a short-term vacation rental unit. B. Subject to the application and review provisions in this section, if the city determines the single parcel meets the criteria of a large lot to be exempted from the non -issuance of new short-term vacation rental permits that otherwise applies pursuant to Section 3.25.055, the provisions regarding the non -issuance of new short- term vacation rental permits in Section 3.25.055 shall no longer apply to, or be applicable as long as the single parcel meets the criteria in this section, to the large lot upon certification by the city that the criteria set forth in this section have been met. 1. Upon certification by the city that the criteria in this section have been met, then the single parcel shall be identified as a "qualified and certified large lot" for purposes of this section and this chapter. 2. Upon certification by the city of the single parcel as a qualified and certified large lot pursuant to this section, an owner of a residential dwelling within a qualified and certified large lot may apply for a new short-term vacation rental permit pursuant to this chapter and shall be subject to the same requirements of any other short-term vacation rental permit application, use, and operation governed by this chapter. 3. The city may impose any necessary or proper conditions of approval with the certification of a single parcel as a large lot pursuant to this section, including conditions that would terminate the exemption from compliance with Section 3.25.055 if the large lot is subdivided or used in violation of the requirements of this section. Additionally, the city may require as a condition of approval that the owner of the qualified and certified large lot execute a land use covenant, in a form approved by the city and recorded in the county recorder's office against the single parcel, memorializing the terms and conditions applicable to the laree lot for use as a short-term vacation rental unit. owner of real oroaerty that is no loneer or is not in compliance with the criteria in this section to be a qualified and certified large lot shall have no right or authority to advertise, use, or operate said real property as a short-term vacation rental unit. Any short-term vacation rental permit (either new or renewal permit) issued by the city in reliance of said real property having previously been located within a qualified and certified large lot shall no longer be valid upon said real property no longer being in compliance with this section. 5. An owner of a qualified and certified large lot who is the successor in interest to the owner who applied for and received the certification of the single parcel as a qualified and certified large lot does not need to re -apply for an exemption from Section 3.25.055 under this chapter as long as the single parcel determined to be the qualified and certified large lot remains in compliance with this section. 6. It is the expressed intent of the city council that an application for exemption from Section 3.25.055, submitted to the city pursuant to this section, need only occur one time as long as the current owner of a qualified and certified large lot remains in compliance with this section whenever a new or renewal application for a short-term vacation rental permit is submitted to the city and for the duration of the term of the issued short-term vacation rental permit. It is also the expressed intent of the city council that the current owner of real property that may have previously been a qualified and certified large (Supp. No. 3, Update 3) Created: 2023-01-29 19:14:29 [EST] Page 11 of 21 569 lot may be required by the city to submit a new application for exemption from Section 3.25.055, Dursuant to this section, if the real oroaerty no longer meets the criteria set forth in this section. C. Any application submitted pursuant to this section shall be subject to any fees established by resolution of the city council and shall identify, by addresses, assessor's parcel number (APN), and any other identifying information requested by the city, the real property purporting to be a large lot. D. An application submitted pursuant to this section shall be reviewed and considered as follows: 1. Submittal of Application. An application for a finding of exemption under this section and certification as a large lot shall be completed in a form approved by the city manager or authorized designee. Applications shall be filed with the city clerk, who shall forward to the planning department together with all maps, plans, documents and other materials required by the city clerk or director of the planning department. Determination of Completeness. The city clerk's office and planning department shall coordinate with the applicant to make a determination whether the application is complete or incomplete. Upon the determination that the application is complete by the city clerk, the city clerk shall schedule review and consideration of the complete application by the city council. 3. Public Hearing and Consideration of the Application. The city council shall hold a public hearing on the application, and the city council shall be the decision-making authority for the application. The public hearing shall be set within ninety (90) days from the determination by the city clerk of a complete application. The public hearing shall be noticed in accordance with Section 9.200.100(D) (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. At the public hearing, the city council shall receive written comments and any other evidence or testimony relating to the application. At the public hearing, the city council may take action on the application, or continue the application to a specified date. 4. Required Findings. No application presented to the city council pursuant to this section may be approved or conditionally approved unless all of the following findings and requirements are met: a. The single parcel subject to the application is in a residential zone, is a legal non -conforming use, or is in a zone that otherwise would allow for residential uses. b. The applicant is the owner of the single parcel subject to the application. C. The exemption under this section is required for the applicant as owner to be able to apply for a short-term vacation rental permit and use a dwelling or dwellings on the parcel as a short-term vacation rental unit under this chapter. d. Approval of the application will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare or incurious to or incompatible with other properties or land uses in the vicinity. Included with this assessment shall be whether approval of the application and issuance of a certification that the single parcel is a qualified and certified large lot results in multiple exemptions under this section being concentrated in one geographic location of the city in a manner than may be incompatible with other properties or land uses in the vicinity. 5. Decision. The citv council shall aDDrove. aDDrove with conditions. or denv the aaDlication. With the concurrence of the applicant, an application may be withdrawn prior to the issuance of a decision by the city council. The decision on an application, including any required findings and any other reasons that serve to explain the determination plus all conditions of approval, shall be in writing. An approval or approval with conditions from the city council shall be adopted by resolution and accompanied with the certification from the citv that the sinele Darcel subiect to the aor lication meets the criteria for a qualified and certified large lot. 6. Appeal. The decision of the city council shall be the final decision of the city on the application. (Supp. No. 3, Update 3) Created: 2023-01-29 19:14:29 [EST] Page 12 of 21 570 E. Subiect to the review and approval provisions in this section, the city manager or authorized designee shall have the authority to implement policies or procedures to review and verify whether an application and request to be exempted from Section 3.25.055 meets the criteria set forth in this section and any other criteria reasonably necessary for verification of such application and request. F. The city council may periodically review the impacts or effects, if any, caused by this section concurrently with its periodic review provided for in subsection V of Section 3.25.055. 3.25.060 Short-term vacation rental permit—Application requirements. A. The owner or the owner's authorized agent or representative must submit the information required on the city's short-term vacation rental permit application form provided by the city, which may include any or all of the following: 1. The name, address, and telephone number of the owner of the subject short-term vacation rental unit; 2. The name, address, and telephone number of the owner's authorized agent or representative, if any; 3. The name, address, and twenty-four (24) -hour telephone number of the local contact person; 4. The ad -d -Fess ef the pFepesed shert te.rnq v_ae..Atie.m. Fp-RA-al. -HRit-, Intemet listing site and listing numbeFj fReservedl 5. The number of bedrooms shall not exceed the number of permitted bedrooms allowable foo the number of occupants as et forth in Section 3.25.070. The allowable number of bedrooms shall meet all applicable building and construction requirements under federal, state and city codes, including, but not limited to, the provisions of Section 9.50.100 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) governing "additional bedrooms" and all applicable building and construction codes in Title 8 of this code; 6. Acknowledgement of receipt of all electronically distributed short-term vacation rental information from the city, including any good guest„eig#bef brochure; 7. The owner or owner's authorized agent or representative who has applied for a short-term vacation rental permit shall provide the city with written authorization that issuance of a short-term vacation rental permit pursuant to this chapter is not inconsistent with any recorded or unrecorded restrictive covenant, document, or other policy of a homeowner association (HOA) or other person or entity which has governing authority over the property on which a short-term vacation rental unit will be operated; in furtherance of this requirement, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that an owner or owner's authorized agent or representative does not have written authorization for the issuance of a short-term vacation rental permit if a HOA or other person or entity which has governing authority over the property has submitted to the city a duly -authorized official writing, which informs the city that short-term vacation rentals of thirty (30) consecutive days or less are not permitted on the property applying for a short-term vacation rental permit; and Such other information as the city manager or authorized designee deems reasonably necessary to administer this chapter. B. The short-term vacation rental permit application shall be accompanied by an application fee as set by resolution of the city council. A short-term vacation rental permit and business license shall not be issued or renewed while any check or other payment method cannot be processed for insufficient funds. C. The city may determine the maximum number of bedrooms in a residential dwelling with multiple bedrooms eligible for use as a short-term vacation rental unit upon issuance of a short-term vacation rental permit. (Supp. No. 3, Update 3) Created: 2023-01-29 19:14:29 [EST] Page 13 of 21 571 When determining the maximum number of bedrooms eligible for use as short-term vacation rentals, the city shall consider the public health, safety, and welfare, shall comply with building and residential codes, and may rely on public records relating to planned and approved living space within the residential dwellings, including, but not limited to, title insurance reports, official county records, and tax assessor records. Owners of residential dwellings that exceed five thousand (5,000) square feet of developed space on a lot may apply for additional bedrooms. An owner and/or owner's authorized agent or representative may not advertise availability for occupancy of a short-term vacation rental unit for more than the approved number of bedrooms listed in the short-term vacation rental permit issued by the city pursuant to this chapter. In addition to any other rights and remedies available to the city under this chapter, the first violation for failing to advertise the approved number of bedrooms may be subject to a fine by an administrative citation, and a second or subsequent violation for failing to advertise the approved number of bedrooms may result in a revocation (which may include permanent revocation) of the short-term vacation rental permit and/or any affiliated licenses or permits pursuant to the provisions set forth in Section 3.25.100. Short-term vacation rental permit applications shall comply with the following: A short-term vacation rental permit application for thean estate home shall be subject to evaluation and inspection of the property to ensure that the short-term vacation rental unit will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare or injurious to or incompatible with other properties in the vicinity. Evaluation and inspection shall include, but not be limited to: verification of the number of bedrooms, adequate on-site parking spaces, availability of nearby street parking, physical distance of t#ean estate home from adjacent properties, such as location and distance of outdoor gathering spaces, pools, and other living spaces from neighboring properties. The city manager, or designee, shall have the authority to impose additional conditions on the use of thean estate home as a short-term vacation rental unit to ensure that any potential secondary effects unique to the subject short-term vacation rental unit are avoided or adequately mitigated. A short-term vacation rental permit application may be denied if the applicant has failed to comply with application requirements in this chapter, or has had a prior short-term vacation rental permit for the same unit revoked within the past twelve (12) calendar months. In addition, upon adoption of a resolution pursuant to subsection H, the city may limit the number of short-term vacation rental units in a given geographic area based on a high concentration of short-term vacation rental units. The city shall maintain a waiting list of short-term vacation rental permit applications for such geographic areas where the city determines, based on substantial evidence after a noticed public hearingand public heaFing, there is a higher than average concentration of short-term vacation rental units that either affects the public health, safety, and welfare or significantly negatively impacts the character and standard of living in a neighborhood within that geographic area, or both. Short-term vacation rental permit applications may take up to, and the city shall have, thirty (30) calendar days to process. AR appliGatiOR fOF a Fenewal of a shoFt term vacation rental permit and business license tire^ feF the eity to ^ s the Fenewal ^ plieatien. Nothing in this subsection or chapter shall be construed as requiring the city to issue or deny a short-term vacation rental permit in less than thirty (30) calendar days, as no permit shall be issued until such time as application review is complete. No short-term vacation rental use may occur in the city without a valid short-term vacation rental permits issued in accordance with this chapter. Upon a change of ownership of a property (or upon a new person and/or new entity owning or controlling a business or organization or other entity of any kind, such as a limited liability company, which is the owner of a property) licensed to operate as a short-term vacation rental unit, the owner or owner's authorized agent or representative shall notify the city of such change immediately. The existing short-term vacation rental permit shall be terminated, unless subject to Section 3.25.050(B)(2), and the property must cease operating (Supp. No. 3, Update 3) Created: 2023-01-29 19:14:29 [EST] Page 14 of 21 572 as a short-term vacation rental immediately. Failure to comply may result in a fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for a continuing violation of this subsection F. G. Immediately upon a change of an owner' s authorized agent or representative, local contact, or any other change pertaining to the information contained in the short-term vacation rental application, the owner or owner"s authorized agent or representative shall update the short-term vacation rental unit"s online registration profile used by the city for the implementation of the short-term vacation rental regulations. Failure to update immediately update this information may result in a violation of this chapter, including but not limited to a suspension or revocation of a short-term vacation rental permit, until all information is updated. H. The city manager or authorized designee s# may prepare, for adoption by resolution by the city council, a review procedure and criteria to evaluate the limitation for issuance of STVR permits and/or STVR applications for geographic areas within the city as set forth in subsection D. ( Ord. 590 § 1(Exh. A), 3-16-2021; Ord. 586 § 1(Exh. A), 12-15-2020; Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) 3.25.065 Short-term vacation rental permit—Grounds for denial. A. In addition to any other grounds provided in this chapter, an application (including renewal application) for a short-term vacation rental permit may be denied if use of the short-term vacation rental unit has been, will be, or is apt to become any one (1) or more of the following. 1. Prohibited by any local ordinance or by any state or federal law, statute, rule or regulation; 2. A public nuisance; 3. In any way detrimental to the public interest; 4. Prohibited by zoning laws and ordinances. B. An application (including renewal application) for a short-term vacation rental permit may also be denied on the grounds that the applicant has knowingly made a false statement in a material matter either in his/her/their application or in his/her/their testimony before the city manager or other body hearing such testimony. C. This section is intended to be, and shall be construed as being, in alignment with the grounds for denial of a business license set forth in Section 3.28.080 (or successor section) of this code. ( Ord. 591 § 1(Exh. A), 4-20-2021) 3.25.070 Operational requirements and standard conditions. A. The owner and/or owner"s authorized agent or representative shall use reasonably prudent business practices to ensure that the short-term vacation rental unit is used in a manner that complies with all applicable laws, rules and regulations pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject short-term vacation rental unit. An estate home may be established for short-term vacation rental use subject to evaluation and inspection of the property pursuant to Section 3.25.060(D)(1). An estate home established for short-term vacation rental use is required to be equipped with a noise monitoring device(s) that is operable at all times. (Supp. No. 3, Update 3) Created: 2023-01-29 19:14:29 [EST] Page 15 of 21 573 B. The responsible person(s) shall be an occupant(s) of the short-term vacation rental unit for which he, she or they signed a rental agreement for such rental, use and occupancy, and/or any person(s) occupying the short-term vacation rental unit without a rental agreement, including the owner, owner' s authorized agent or representative, local contact(s) and their guests. No non -permanent improvements to the property, such as tents, trailers, or other mobile units, may be used as short-term vacation rentals. The total number of occupants, including the responsible person(s) and children regardless of age, allowed to occupy any given short-term vacation rental unit may be within the ranges set forth in the table below. By the issuance of a short-term vacation rental permit, the city or its authorized designees, including police, shall have the right to conduct a count of all persons occupying the short-term vacation rental unit in response to a complaint or any other legal grounds to conduct an inspection resulting from the use of the short-term vacation rental unit, and the failure to allow the city or its authorized designees the ability to conduct such a count may constitute a violation of this chapter. The city council may by resolution further restrict occupancy levels provided those restrictions are within the occupancy ranges set forth below. Number of Bedrooms Total of Overnight* Occupants Total Daytime** Occupants (Including Number of Overnight Occupants) 0—Studio 2 2-8 1 2-4 2-8 2 4-6 4-8 3 6-8 6-12 4 8-10 8-16 5 10-12 10-18 6 12-14 12-20 7 14 14-20 8 16 16-22 9 18 18-24 *Overnight (10:01 p.m. -6:59 a.m.) **Daytime (7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.) C. The person(s) listed as the local contact person in the short-term vacation rental unit's online registration profile shall be available twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week, with the ability to respond to the location within thirty (30) minutes to complaints regarding the condition, operation, or conduct of occupants of the short-term vacation rental unit or their guests. The person(s) listed as a local contact person shall be able to respond personally to the location, or to contact the owner or the owner's authorized agent or representative to respond personally to the location, within thirty (30) minutes of notification or attempted notification by the city or its authorized short-term vacation rental designated hotline service provider. No provision in this section shall obligate the city or its authorized short-term vacation rental designated hotline service provider to attempt to contact any person or entity other than the person(s) listed as the local contact person. D. The owner, the owner's authorized agent or representative and/or the owner's designated local contact person shall use reasonably prudent business practices to ensure that the occupants and/or guests of the short-term vacation rental unit do not create unreasonable or unlawful noise or disturbances, engage in disorderly conduct, or violate any applicable law, rule or regulation pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject short-term vacation rental unit. E. Occupants of the short-term vacation rental unit shall comply with the standards and regulations for allowable noise at the property in accordance with Sections 9.100.210 and 11.08.040 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. No radio receiver, musical instrument, phonograph, Created: 2023-01-29 19:14:29 [EST] (Supp. No. 3, Update 3) Page 16 of 21 574 compact disk player, loudspeaker, karaoke machine, sound amplifier, or any machine, device or equipment that produces or reproduces any sound shall be used outside or be audible from the outside of any short- term vacation rental unit between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time. Observations of noise related violations shall be made by the city or its authorized designee from any location at which a city official or authorized designee may lawfully be, including but not limited to any public right-of-way, any city -owned public property, and any private property to which the city or its authorized designee has been granted access. Prior to occupancy of a short-term vacation rental unit, the owner or the owner's authorized agent or representative shall: Obtain the contact information of the responsible person; Provide copies of all electronically distributed short-term vacation rental information from the city, including any good guestneighbor brochure to the responsible person and post in a conspicuous location within the short-term vacation rental unit, in a manner that allows for the information to be viewed in its entirety; and require such responsible person to execute a formal acknowledgement that hem/she/they is are legally responsible for compliance by all occupants of the short-term vacation rental unit and their guests with all applicable laws, rules and regulations pertaining to the use and occupancy of the short-term vacation rental unit. This information shall be maintained by the owner or the owner's authorized agent or representative for a period of three (3) years and be made readily available upon request of any officer of the city responsible for the enforcement of any provision of this code or any other applicable law, rule or regulation pertaining to the use and occupancy of the short-term vacation rental unit. G. The owner, the owner's authorized agent or representative and/or the owner's designated local contact person shall, upon notification or attempted notification that the responsible person and/or any occupant and/or guest of the short-term vacation rental unit has created unreasonable or unlawful noise or disturbances, engaged in disorderly conduct, or committed violations of any applicable law, rule or regulation pertaining to the use and occupancy of the subject short-term vacation rental unit, promptly respond within thirty (30) minutes to immediately halt and prevent a recurrence of such conduct by the responsible person and/or any occupants and/or guests. Failure of the owner, the owner's authorized agent or representative and/or the owner's designated local contact person to respond to calls or complaints regarding the condition, operation, or conduct of occupants and/or guests of the short-term vacation rental unit within thirty (30) minutes, shall be subject to all administrative, legal and equitable remedies available to the city. H. dThe owner of a short-term vacation rental unit that has a valid Homeshare short-term vacation rental permit shall occupy the dwelling during the transient stay. A violation of any provision of this chapter, this code, or any other applicable federal, state, or local laws or codes, by the owner, owner's authorized agent or representative and/or the owner's designated local contact person shall be subject to all administrative, legal and equitable remedies available to the city. I. Trash and refuse shall not be left or stored within public view, except in proper containers for the purpose of collection by the city's authorized waste hauler on scheduled trash collection days. The owner, the owner's authorized agent or representative shall use reasonably prudent business practices to ensure compliance with all the provisions of Chapter 6.04 (Solid Waste Collection and Disposal) (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. J. Signs may be posted on the premises to advertise the availability of the short-term vacation rental unit as provided for in Chapter 9.160 (Signs) (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. K. The owner, the owner's authorized agent or representative and/or the owner's designated local contact person shall post a copy of the short-term vacation rental permit and a copy of the good guestnei� Created: 2023-01-29 19:14:29 [EST] (Supp. No. 3, Update 3) Page 17 of 21 575 brochure in a conspicuous place within the short-term vacation rental unit, and a copy of the good guestneig;=ibar brochure shall be provided to each occupant of the subject short-term vacation rental unit. L. Unless otherwise provided in this chapter, the owner and/or the owner's authorized agent or representative shall comply with all provisions of Chapter 3.24 concerning transient occupancy taxes, including, but not limited to, submission of a monthly return in accordance with Section 3.24.080 (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code, which shall be filed monthly even if the short-term vacation rental unit was not rented during each such month. M. Guesthouses, detached from the primary residential dwelling on the property, or the primary residential dwelling on the property, may be rented pursuant to this chapter as long as the guesthouse and the primary residential dwelling are rented to one (1) party. The owner and/or the owner's authorized agent or representative shall post the number of authorized bedrooms and the current short-term vacation rental permit number at the beginning or top of any advertisement that promotes the availability or existence of a short-term vacation rental unit; provided, however, this requirement may be satisfied if a hosting platform used by the owner and/or owner's authorized agent or representative provides a designated field(s) to post the number of authorized bedrooms and the current short-term vacation rental permit number for the short-term vacation rental unit. In the instance of audio -only advertising of the same, the short-term vacation rental permit number and the number of authorized bedrooms shall be read as part of the advertisement. 0. The owner and/or owner's authorized agent or representative shall operate a short-term vacation rental unit in compliance with any other permits or licenses that apply to the property, including, but not limited to, any permit or license needed to operate a special event pursuant to Section 9.60.170 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. The city may limit the number of special event permits issued per year on residential dwellings pursuant to Section 9.60.170 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time). The city manager, or designee, shall have the authority to impose additional conditions on the use of any given short-term vacation rental unit to ensure that any potential secondary effects unique to the subject short-term vacation rental unit are avoided or adequately mitigated, including, but not limited to, a mitigating condition that would require the installation of a noise monitoring device to keep time -stamped noise level data from the property that will be made available to the city upon city's reasonable request. Q. The standard conditions set forth herein may be modified by the city manager, or designee, upon request of the owner or the owner's authorized agent or representative based on site-specific circumstances for the purpose of allowing reasonable accommodation of a short-term vacation rental unit. All requests must be in writing and shall identify how the strict application of the standard conditions creates an unreasonable hardship to a property such that, if the requirement is not modified, reasonable use of the property #eras a short-term vacation rental unit would not be allowed. Any hardships identified must relate to physical constraints to the subject site and shall not be self-induced or economic. Any modifications of the standard conditions shall not further exacerbate an already existing problem. R. On-site parking shall be on an approved driveway, garage, and/or carport areas only; this section does not impose restrictions on public street parking regulations. Recreational vehicles may be parked in accordance with the provisions set forth in Section 9.60.130 (or successor provision, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. ( Ord. 590 § 1(Exh. A), 3-16-2021; Ord. 586 § 1(Exh. A), 12-15-2020; Ord. 577 § 1, 2019; Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) (Supp. No. 3, Update 3) Created: 2023-01-29 19:14:29 [EST] Page 18 of 21 576 3.25.080 Recordkeeping and hosting platform duties. A. The owner or the owner's authorized agent or representative shall maintain for a period of three (3) years, records in such form as the tax administrator (as defined in Chapter 3.24) may require to determine the amount of transient occupancy tax owed to the city. The tax administrator shall have the right to inspect such records at all reasonable times, which may be subject to the subpoena by the tax administrator pursuant to Section 3.24.140 (Records) (Transient Occupancy Tax) (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. B. Hosting platforms shall not complete any booking transaction for any residential dwelling or other property purporting to be a short-term vacation rental unit in the city unless the dwelling or property has a current and valid short-term vacation rental permit issued pursuant to this chapter, which is not under suspension, for the dates and times proposed as part of the booking transaction. The city shall maintain an online registry of active and suspended short-term vacation rental permits, which hosting platforms may reference and rely upon for purposes of complying with subsection B. If a residential dwelling or other property purporting to be a short-term vacation rental unit matches with an address, permit number, and/or current and valid permit dates (not under suspension) set forth in the city's online registry, the hosting platforms may presume that the dwelling or other property has a current and valid short-term vacation rental permit. The provisions of this subsection B shall be interpreted in accordance with otherwise applicable state and federal law(s) and will not apply if determined by the city to be in violation of, or preempted by, any such law(s). ( Ord. 590 § 1(Exh. A), 3-16-2021; Ord. 586 § 1(Exh. A), 12-15-2020; Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501§2,2012) 3.25.090 Violations. A. Additional Conditions. A violation of any provision of this chapter or this code by any applicant, occupant, responsible person, local contact person, owner or owner's authorized agent or representative (including a management company), shall authorize the city manager, or designee, to impose additional conditions on the use of any given short-term vacation rental unit to ensure that any potential additional violations are avoided. B. Permit Modification, Suspension and Revocation. A violation of any provision of this chapter, this code, California Vehicle Code, or any other applicable federal, state, or local laws or codes, including, but not limited to, applicable fire codes and the building and construction codes as set forth in Title 8 of this code, by any applicant, occupant, responsible person, local contact person, owner, or owner's authorized agent or representative (including a management company), shall constitute grounds for modification, suspension and/or revocation (which may include permanent revocation) of the short-term vacation rental permit and/or any affiliated licenses or permits pursuant to the provisions set forth in Section 3.25.100. C. Notice of Violation. The city may issue a notice of violation to any applicant, occupant, responsible person, local contact person, owner, owner's authorized agent or representative (including a management company), or hosting platform, pursuant to Section 1.01.300 (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code, if there is any violation of this chapter committed, caused or maintained by any of the above parties. D. Two (2) Strikes Policy. Subject to a minor violation reprieve request, two (2) violations of any provision of this chapter or this code within one (1) year by any applicant, occupant, responsible person, local contact person, owner, owner's authorized agent or representative (including a management company), with respect to any Created: 2023-01-29 19:14:29 [EST] (Supp. No. 3, Update 3) Page 19 of 21 577 one (1) residential dwelling shall result in an immediate suspension of the short-term vacation rental permit with subsequent ability to have a hearing before the city, pursuant to this chapter, to request a lifting of the suspension. For purposes of this subsection, a "minor violation reprieve request" means a written request submitted to the city's code enforcement officer for relief from counting one (1) or more violations within the one (1) year period as a minor violation, and "minor violation" means a violation of a particular section of this code that resulted in minimal impact on the use and enjoyment of the adjacent and nearby properties caused by any of the following: 1. Minor debris or trash containers left in view as a first offense; 2. A short-term vacation rental permit number or bedroom count not posted on an advertisement as a first offense; 3. A short-term vacation rental permit number or bedroom count posted in the wrong location on an advertisement as a first offense; or 4. Over occupancy due to a minor child not associated with a disturbance. A determination of whether a code violation is a minor violation shall be based on substantial evidence presented to the code enforcement officer relating to that violation. Administrative and Misdemeanor Citations. The city may issue an administrative citation to any applicant, occupant, responsible person, local contact person, owner, owner's authorized agent or representative (including a management company), or hosting platform, pursuant to Chapter 1.09 (Administrative Citations) (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code, if there is any violation of this chapter committed, caused or maintained by any of the above parties. Nothing in this section shall preclude the city from also issuing an infraction citation upon the occurrence of the same offense on a separate day. An administrative citation may impose a fine for one (1) or more violations of this chapter in the maximum amount allowed by state law or this code in which the latter amount shall be as follows: 1. General Short -Term Vacation Rental Violations (Occupancy/Noise/Parking) a. First violation: one thousand dollars ($1,000.00); b. Second violation: two thousand dollars ($2,000.00); C. Third violation: three thousand dollars ($3,000.00). Operating a Short -Term Vacation Rental Without a Valid Short -Term Vacation Rental Permit. a. First violation: t#reeone thousand and five hundred dollars ($31,5000.00); b. Second or more violations: f+vethree thousand dollars ($51000.00); C. Third or more violations: five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) d. In addition to the fines set forth above, the first, second, third, or subsequent violation of operating a short-term vacation rental unitST-VR without a valid short-term vacation rental permit shall be cause for an owner (or person and/or entity that owns or controls a business or organization or other entity of any kind, such as a limited liability company, which is the owner of a property) to be prohibited for all time from being eligible to be issued a short-term vacation rental permit and/or business license for use of a property as a short-term vacation rental unit. Hosting a Special Event at a STVRshort-term vacation rental unit w -Without a Special Event Permit as Arequired by Section 9.60.170 (or Ssuccessor -Pprovision, as Mmay -9be Aamended ;=_from Ttime to Ttime) of Tthis Qode. a. First violation: five thousand dollars ($5,000.00); b. Second violation: five thousand dollars ($5,000.00). (Supp. No. 3, Update 3) Page 20 of 21 Created: 2023-01-29 19:14:29 [EST] 578 4. Advertising a Short -Term Vacation Rental Without a Valid Short -Term Vacation Rental Permit by Person(s) or Entity(ies) Other Than a Management Company. a. First violation: one thousand dollars ($1,000.00); b. Second violation: two thousand dollars ($2,000.00); C. Third violation: three thousand dollars ($3,000.00). 5. Advertising a Short -Term Vacation Rental Without a Valid Short -Term Vacation Rental Permit by a Management Company. a. First violation: one thousand and five hundred dollars ($1,500.00) b. Second violation: three thousand dollars ($3,000.00); C. Third or more violations: five thousand dollars ($5,000.00); d. In addition to the fines set forth above, the first, second, third, or subsequent violation of advertising a short-term vacation rental unit without a valid short-term vacation rental permit by a management company shall be cause for the management company to be prohibited from being used to advertise or operate a short-term vacation rental unit at the property identified for not having a valid short-term vacation rental permit. Additionally, repeat violations, which is three (3) or more violations of this Subsection (E)(5), by a management company for advertising a short-term vacation rental unit without a valid short-term vacation rental permit shall be cause for the management company to be prohibited for all time from being eligible to be issued a short-term vacation rental permit and/or business license in the citv for such orooerty management purposes. Public Nuisance. In addition to any and all rights and remedies available to the city, it shall be a public nuisance for any person or entity to commit, cause or maintain a violation of this chapter, which shall be subject to the provisions of Section 1.01.250 (Violations public nuisances) (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. ( Ord. 590 § 1(Exh. A), 3-16-2021; Ord. 586 § 1(Exh. A), 12-15-2020; Ord. 578 § 1, 2019; Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017; Ord. 501 § 2, 2012) 3.25.100 Appeals. A. Any person aggrieved by any decision of a city officer made pursuant to this chapter may request a hearing before the city manager in accordance with Chapter 2.08 (or successor provisions, as may be amended from time to time) of this code. B. Notwithstanding any provisions in Section 2.08.230 or otherwise in the code, the decision by the city manager of an appeal brought under this chapter shall be the final decision by the city for any violation of a short-term vacation rental permit issued under this order, except for any administrative citation imposing a fine, which shall be processed and subject to an administrative appeal pursuant to Chapter 1.09 of the code. ( Ord. 590 § 1(Exh. A), 3-16-2021; Ord. 586 § 1(Exh. A), 12-15-2020; Ord. 572 § 1, 2018; Ord. 563 § 1, 2017) (Supp. No. 3, Update 3) Created: 2023-01-29 19:14:29 [EST] Page 21 of 21 579 oiov- y vani5a Bear CU i a ■ I ,IN vraTra ui "ED' C7 rig 52nd A 52nd Ave a[ 5Z 1 ryers 'Iia Sa,ma Vo GLvDna N AL3 Q i artriers` atigle -inuway V. AM`: TSL. •I ,ry _ Y . �v F -W a W FIG:z iq�- 6w pf -M 111111 0 . &WE- 4 NVa. d a i W�� f T" - 0 E WN i fa Rancho Ga Qv Rancho OF Quint mo Thil t U -IUD Quints Country io ko nue 50 "';avenue 50 Avenue 50 Avenue 50 • .Mand P til oQ .10 -"Mjw„� Club 0 La inta Mountain View Countr C&AU ZIPT II Avenue 52 t. city t -M 111111 0 . &WE- 4 NVa. d a i W�� f T" - a r a� or CALIFORNIA - ATTACHMENT 3 STVR ZONES STVR Exempt Areas Map ID Development Name Zoning 1 Homewood Suites Tourist Commercial District (La Quint@ Desert Villas - Center Pointe) 2 Legacy Villas Tourist Commercial District & Development Agreement 3 La Quint@ Resort including Spa & Tennis Villas Tourist Commercial District & Adjacent to TC District 4 Embassy Suites (Casitas Las Rosas) Village Commercial District 5 Village Commercial Village Commercial District 6 SilverRock Specific Plan Tourist Commercial District- Undeveloped 7 Codorniz- HOA Approval Required Entitlement Approval a Signature at PGA West (Haciendas) Tourist Commercial District 9 Puerta Awl Entitlement Approval 10 Southwest corner Avenue 62 & Madison St Tourist Commercial District- Undeveloped 11 Northwest corner Avenue 64 & Madison St Tourist Commercial District- Undeveloped 12 Polo Villas Residences Development Agreement 13 Mery Griffin Estate Entitlement Approval ry Boundary -VR Exempt Zone -VR Exempt Zone - )AApproval Required )rth La Quinta we d La Quinta )uth La Quinta N 1 582 Miles )k } La Quinta _ _ r Lalli: Yucata AN O� I a � PJe� "' o�D o—Calle Hidalgo m � y E — R R ma d Mo�teZu R v = m a� 'a m Calle Sinaloa � a v � Calle.Sinaloa - � - o ' a d +a 0 Q � Galle-Uulango Boundary 1 .1 11 I ParcelJEJ M 1- 1 00 i • � I AvenidaLarge Lot Inventory Parcel Information Address: 51251 Obregon Cove)... - feet 583 10 1. y CI'ufb s � T fills � w - 1 Ap Eisenhower Ar. fi f C �� I" 3 � Q , CalleArroba D � �- � L' iu C. I I I • I /� f 1 jiI r5 a- k S" T ' City Boundary N _Parcel 0 5 0 L. Feet A 500 ft Buffer from Parcel Large Lot Inventory Parcel Information Address: 54038 Avenida Bermudas (Cove) APN: 774-225-019 CALIFORNIA Size: Approx. 35,826 square feet 585 586 DEPARTMENTAL REPORT ITEM NO. 5 & � DESIGN &DEVELOPMENT GEM of the DESERT — QUARTERLY REPORT The Design and Development Department consists of three divisions: Building, The Hub, and Planning r LrU Building Division The Building Division administers and issues all residential and commercial building permit applications, reviews plans (plan checks), and conducts on-site building inspections for compliance with the La Quinta Municipal Code and California Building Standards Code. PLAN CHECK AND BUILDING PERMITS Ep Plan Check Submittals 260 0 from Q3 2022 Building Permits Issued 2 /0 % from Q3 2022 -----r-- -7----------7----------1-----------I------ 1,049 ---- 895 -- -- -- ------------ 776 583 574 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 -------; ----- i 799 709 675 543 447 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 587 Plan Check Fees $14673433rd Quarter Total 1 � _ I I $263k $201k $139k $110k $146k 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Building Permit Fees $1561 10 1 3rd Quarter Total $139k $153k $98k $50k $51k . $56k 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER -60% from 03 2022 total of $390,122 I I I I I '.p•fv I n yJ�UK $159k 2019 2020 2021 2022 $85k $ $40k $39k $ $67k ■ 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER -27% from 03 2022 total of $201,266 1 � _ I I $263k $201k $139k $110k $146k 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Building Permit Fees $1561 10 1 3rd Quarter Total $139k $153k $98k $50k $51k . $56k 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER -60% from 03 2022 total of $390,122 I I I I I '.p•fv I n yJ�UK $159k 2019 2020 2021 2022 V14 T H E H U B The Hub serves as a one-stop permit center. It is the central location for obtaining permits for planning, building, engineering, business licenses, and special events. The Hub also issues licenses and permits for items such as garage sales, home occupations, HVAC/windows/waterheater/utility change outs, pool drains, and re -roofs. Business Licenses 9 % from Q3 2022 Other Permits 19 % trom Q3 2022 181 237 n. 217 208 241 ■■ . 138 - 150 136 .. 150 120 no 156 136 .. 2022 2023 JULY 2022 2023 2022 2023 AUGUST SEPTEMBER 2022 2023 JULY 2022 2023 AUGUST 2022 2023 SEPTEMBER --------------- - ---- 632 761' - - - - 639 i 222 � 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Includes all phone calls received by the Concierge, the Hub general line, and all Permit Technicians. JUL 2023 AUG 2023 SEP 2023 0 1000 2000 3000 ----294----------- __ 481 ---- 324 408 392 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Includes all visitors checked in by the Concierge. JUL 2023 AUG 2023 SEP 2023 L J 0 250 500 589 The Planning Division administers the zoning and development standards and works with residential and commercial developers, architects, builders, and businesses to ensure that development is consistent with the City's Zoning Code and General Plan. Planning staff coordinates with the Planning Commission, whose primary function is to develop and maintain the City's General Plan, consider development applications, as well as to serve as an advisory body to the City Council. APPLICATIONS RECEIVED 2022 2023 JULY 7 2022 2023 AUGUST 3 2 % from Q3 2022 2022 2023 SEPTEMBER ,- - --------- 28 26 28 28 19 i 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 • Relocation of ground -mounted mechanical equipment for new single-family home located at 53325 Humbolt Boulevard. • Temporary Use Permit for a temporary generator for the recreation pool buildings at the SolTerra residential development located at the southeast corner of Adams Street and Auto Center Drive. • Minor Adjustment to increase the maximum yard structure height by 10% at 54218 Avenida Martinez. • Special Event Permit for a private event within the Mery Griffin Estate at 81345 Avenue 54. • Special Event permit for the La Quinta High School 2023 Homecoming Parade through Old Town La Q uinta. • Temporary Parcel Map to subdivide an existing 19.3 -acre lot into two parcels at the southeast corner of Adams Street and Auto Center Drive. • Tentative Tract Map Revision to modify the existing Conditions of Approval and remove a lettered lot for an existing well site at the Sierra Blanca residential development located west of Monroe Street between Avenue 54 and Airport Boulevard. • Sign Program Amendment to allow two building -mounted signs and a 6 ft. freestanding monument sign at a commercial building on Dune Palms Road. • Recommended City Council approval of the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Tentative Parcel Map, Minor Use Permit, Site Development Permit, and Minor Adjustment for a mixed use project consisting of two commercial buildings and up to 180 apartment units at the northeast corner of Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road. 590 La Quinta Development In Progress Enzo's Addition Montage Residences Talus Home Depot Tool Rental Center Desert Club Apartments Longhorn Steakhouse 591 592 ta oa (& GEM ofthe DESERT — DEPARTMENTAL REPORT ITEM NO. 7-A PUBLIC SAFETY QUARTERLY REPORT Code Compliance /Animal Control July 1 - September 30, 2023 Site Inspections* 914 790 809 687 609 609 580 653667 630589 611 542 477 496 519 439 391 1 Ian Feb �n 4nr May lun Alin Sep ■ 2022 2023 *Site inspections are required to confirm violations and include STVR inspections and regular code complaints (e.g., trash containers, landscaping, property maintenance issues, etc.). Administrative Citations Property Maintenance 25% Signs Animal Control 3% Building Code 15% Vehicle Issues 19% Business License 12% Hearing Types: • 21 Administrative Hearings • 6 Administrative Appeal Superior Court Quarter Highlights: • $21,618 was collected in unreported TOT on one property caught operating without a STVR Permit. Collaboration between Code and City Clerk Staff. 593 False Alarms 137 166 166 • $193,969 in fees collected to 102 107 date • City Staff outreach to businesses with multiple false alarms. July August September ■ 2022 2023 A false alarm means the activation of a security alarm system necessitating response by peace officers when an emergency does not exist. A service fee is due to the city after an excessive number of false alarms (defined as three or more false alarms) within a one-year period have been received from a particular business, residence, or property. Animal Control Update Impounds 25 WE 15 0,0 Riverside County Animal Services W. Outcomes «N 9 5 12 9 — 3 ■ 1 ■ 0,0 Riverside County Animal Services W. Outcomes «N Department of Animal Services – Coachella Campus has walk-in hours from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. In the event of a pet emergency, animal control question, or if you are interested in adopting, fostering or rescuing, please call 951-358-7387. Potential adopters, fosters, or resources can also send an email to shelterinfo@rivco.org or visit their website at: https://www.rcdas.org//. 594 14 12 9 — 3 1 Department of Animal Services – Coachella Campus has walk-in hours from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. In the event of a pet emergency, animal control question, or if you are interested in adopting, fostering or rescuing, please call 951-358-7387. Potential adopters, fosters, or resources can also send an email to shelterinfo@rivco.org or visit their website at: https://www.rcdas.org//. 594 taQwkta -- GEM ofthe DESERT — — DEPARTMENTAL REPORT ITEM NO. 7-B LA QUINTA SHERIFF'S STATION QUARTERLY REPORT Statistics Average Response Time p 29.45 2 30.77 9.5 20.18 20.36 14.09• 6.74 5.48 Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 ■ July -22 Jul -23 37.46 27.07 25.33 22.36 17.74 13.62 5.�5.4 Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 ■ Aug -22 Aug -23 37.25 29.11 25.85 25.52 Number of Calls for Service 466 400 383 305 170166 2528 Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 ■ July- 22 Jul -23 480 431 367362 142160 1825 '' �M Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 ■ Aug -22 Aug -23 ■ Sep -22 Sep -23 401 414 353327 178180 21 22 Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 ■ Sep -22 Sep -23 Priority 1 — Involve circumstances that pose a clearly defined threat to human life or property; Priority 2 — Involve circumstances of an urgent but not life-threatening nature (e.g. minor assaults and batteries); Priority 3 — Involve circumstances which are neither urgent nor life threatening (e.g. disturbances of the peace); Priority 4 — Incidents occurring in the past or "cold" calls. 595 15.6 6.08 14.42 ,14 Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Number of Calls for Service 466 400 383 305 170166 2528 Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 ■ July- 22 Jul -23 480 431 367362 142160 1825 '' �M Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 ■ Aug -22 Aug -23 ■ Sep -22 Sep -23 401 414 353327 178180 21 22 Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 ■ Sep -22 Sep -23 Priority 1 — Involve circumstances that pose a clearly defined threat to human life or property; Priority 2 — Involve circumstances of an urgent but not life-threatening nature (e.g. minor assaults and batteries); Priority 3 — Involve circumstances which are neither urgent nor life threatening (e.g. disturbances of the peace); Priority 4 — Incidents occurring in the past or "cold" calls. 595 Crime Statistics RSO is transitioning to a new program, therefore these statistics are temporarily unavailable, but will be included in the next quarterly report. Collisions DUI Injury Collision, 11 Non Injury and Private Property Collision, 74 DUI Collisions, 11 Fatality, 1 Actions by Teams: Traffic Injury Collision, 30 DUI Arrests, 29 Special Enforcement Team & Business District • Actions: 340 • Property Recovered: $49,200. • Narcotics Seized: Meth 0.85 oz / Fentanyl 0.028 oz Traffic Team • Actions: 571 Community Service Officers & Crime Prevention Specialists • Actions: 1,205 • Community Meetings: 1 • Trainings:1 School Resource Officers • Actions: 114 Citations Other Hazard Citations, 281 Excessive Speed Citations, 116 Seat Belt Citations, 6 Other Non - Hazard Citations, 157 Gang Task Force • Actions in La Quinta: 9 • Narcotics Seized: Meth 0.003 oz • Recovered Firearms: 1 Narcotics Task Force • Actions in La Quinta: 42 • Narcotics Seized: Meth .5 lbs. / Cocaine 1.1 lbs. / Fentanyl Pills 5 lbs. / Opiate Pills 505 Citizens on Patrol • Actions:4 • Hours Donated: 291.5 hours 596 Public Safety Camera System Statistics Public Safety Camera System (PSCS) went live on September 20, 2021, since then, La Quinta Sheriff's Department (LQSD) and City staff have been using the system to monitor City property, traffic accidents, traffic flow, police investigations, and managing special events. stem Statistics: • Processed 32 public records requests from citizens and insurance companies. • 207 videos related to police investigations have been queried. • Of those queried, 112 videos related to police investigations have been exported. • No businesses have opted out of the PSCS. Significant Incidents Involving the PSCS and FLOCK: • On August 13, 2023, La Quinta deputies responded to the 78000 block of San Marino Court regarding a domestic disturbance. The suspect, a 57 -year-old La Quinta male, pushed and punched his wife of 20 years while she was holding her children during an argument. The husband fled the location prior to Deputies' arrival and the FLOCK camera system was used to locate his vehicle. A vehicle stop was conducted, and the husband was arrested without incident. He was booked at the jail in Indio. • On July 11, 2023, Telephone Reporting Unit received a report of a fraudulent use of a credit cards. La Quinta SET Deputies assumed the investigation and conducted follow-up at the locations where the fraudulent credit cards were used. Deputies were able to identify the suspect, 31, transient of San Jacinto, who was currently on probation. Deputies contacted probation and had the suspect meet in person with his probation officer. Probation detained the suspect and deputies took him into custody. Under Miranda, suspect admitted to manufacturing the credit cards using dark web websites and admitted to all the fraudulent transactions. The suspect was transported and booked at the Indio jail for identify theft, unauthorized used of credit cards, commercial burglary, and violation of probation. • On August 13, 2023, La Quinta Deputies responded to PGA West Norman Course regarding a theft of an ice maker valued over $9000. During the investigation, deputies learned a similar ice maker was posted on Facebook Marketplace around the time it was stolen. The information was passed on to La Quinta SET, and using Flock, they were able to identify a suspect vehicle. On August 23, 2023, La Quinta SET conducted a Buy/Bust Operation by contacting the account holder, a 38 -year-old Cathedral City male, about the ice maker. He confirmed he was still in possession and La Quinta SET scheduled to meet up with him in Cathedral City. Once La Quinta SET confirmed the ice maker was at the address, a search warrant was authored for the residence, and he ice maker was recovered. During the operation, the suspect vehicle left the location and was stopped. The driver, a 38 -year-old Desert Hot Springs male, was detained. Further investigation revealed the Cathedral City male and Desert Hot Springs male stole the ice maker together. They were both booked at the jail in Indio. 597 598 ta oa (& GEM ofthe DFSERT — DEPARTMENTAL REPORT ITEM NO. 7-C FIRE DEPARTMENT QUARTERLY REPORT Incident Response Activity Average Enroute to On -Scene Time Inci562 • - • - !1 516 ' Qtr. 2023 1 Medical 885 945 False Alarm 100 124 259 218 Public Service 90 71 Assistance 66.93 Traffic Collision 51 57 64.75 32 46 4.93 10 4 q 1 4.77 1 Standby 4 19 <5 +5 +10 +20 Average % 0 to 5 Other Fire 5 6 Minutes Minutes Minutes Minutes Min Min Residential Fire 4 2 1st Qtr 2022 1st Qtr 2023 Vehicle Fire 2 9 Enroute Time: When a unit has been acknowledged as responding. Rescue 4 6 On -scene Time: When a unit has been acknowledged as Ringing Alarm 1 12 being on -scene. Other Miscellaneous 2 0 Hazardous Materials 1 1 Automatic Aid 1 St Q 1 St Commercial Fire 1 0 1 1 2S 7 LQ Resources Responding 1,055 1,133 Multi -Family 0 0 in LQ Dwelling Fire LQ Resources Aiding Other 668 806 Wildland Fire 1 6 Jurisdictions Incident Total In La 1,151 1,258 Resources Aiding LQ 416 478 Quinta 599 For this quarter, Truck 86 recorded 19 responses, and Truck 33 had 3 responses in the City of La Quinta. Ebmumumvelft • Construction Plan Reviews — 79 • Planning Case Reviews — 6 • Construction inspections — 642 • Facility Inspections — 88 • Review and Inspection Service — During this period, the average turnaround time for plan reviews was 5-6 weeks; and the average turnaround time for inspections was 3-5 business days. With the new Fire Safety Supervisor on Staff as of September 21, these turnaround times are expected to be reduced soon. Annual Review and Inspection Trends - La Quinta 1660 1217 1022 859 47A 508 478 603 2018 2019 2020 Total reviews conducted Significant Incident Report j KiYA 3009 2476 576 341 2022 2023 - to September Total inspections/actions completed 23CARRU110499: On July 28, 2023, CAL FIRE/Riverside County Firefighters responded to a reported single family structure fire in the City of La Quinta. The first arriving engine company reported smoke visible from the attic of a single -story home. Firefighters were able to knock the fire down in less than 15 minutes due to aggressive and coordinated fire attack. One adult was displaced but did not require assistance. The cause of the fire is under investigation. 23CARRU117745: On August 11, 2023, CAL FIRE/Riverside County Fire Department was dispatched to a medical aid at the La Quinta Resort. The patient was located at the pool. The engine arrived on scene to find an 8 -year-old boy sitting with his father after a near drowning incident. The patient was alert and oriented when the fire department arrived. The patient was treated by fire department staff and transported by AMR to JFK Memorial Hospital for further evaluation. 23CARRU138636: On September 18, 2023, CAL FIRE/Riverside County Fire Department responded to a report of a residential structure fire with victims trapped inside a single-family home in La Quinta. The first arriving fire resource reported a 1500 square foot single family dwelling, well involved with fire with multiple exposures. Additional resources were ordered to assist with the fire. Firefighters quickly deployed hose lines and initiated a search of the residence. All occupants of the home had exited the residence; however, one occupant had minor smoke inhalation and was transported to a local area hospital. Firefighters were also hampered with down power lines to the rear of the structure. Firefighters contained the fire to the building of origin. 600 REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEM NO. 27 aw. W_.4 21 palm INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Airport Conference Room, Palm Springs International Airport 3400 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Wednesday, October 18, 2023 - 5:30 P.M. Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361, this meeting may be conducted by teleconference. There will be in-person public access to the meeting location. To submit your public comment to the Airport Commission electronically. Material may be emailed to: Christina. Brown(a)palmsprings.gov - Transmittal prior to the start of the meeting is required. Any correspondence received during or after the meeting will be distributed to the Airport Commission and retained for the official record. This is a hybrid in-person and virtual meeting. To virtually observe the meeting or to virtually provide public comments, please use the following Zoom link https://us02web.zoom.us/i/86019815290?pwd=ZitOZDIVeGZhNUNEQTVkU29nTUdPdzO9 or call (669) 900-6833 and enter Meeting ID: 860 1981 5290 - Passcode: 583916 City of Palm Springs: Riverside County: Margaret Park City of Cathedral City: Tony Michaelis City of Palm Desert: Kevin Wiseman Aftab Dada - Chair David Feltman Kevin J. Corcoran Vice Chair J Craig Fong City of Indian Wells: Robert Berriman City of Coachella: Denise Delgado City of Rancho Mirage: Keith Young Gerald Adams Tracy Martin Todd Burke M. Guillermo Suero City of La Quinta: Kathleen Hughes City of Desert Hot Springs: Jan Pye City of Indio: Rick Wise Daniel Caldwell Dave Banks Palm Springs City Staff Scott C. Stiles Harry Barrett Jr., A.A.E. Jeremy Keating City Manager Airport Executive Director Assistant Airport Director 1. CALL TO ORDER — PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. POSTING OF AGENDA 3. ROLL CALL 4. ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Limited to three minutes on any subject within the purview of the Commission 601 Airport Commission Meeting Agenda October 18, 2023 — Page 2 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of the Airport Commission Regular Meeting of May 17, 2023 7. INTRODUCTIONS AND PRESENTATIONS: 7.A Airport Commissioner Dave Banks (Palm Springs) 7.113 Jake Ingrassia, Communications and Marketing Specialist 7.0 Interim City Attorney Oscar Verdugo 8. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS: 8.A Measure J Funds 8.113 Airport Master Plan Update 8.0 Marketing and Air Service Update 8.11) Turo 8.E Financial Summary Update 8.F Concessions Update 8.G Projects and Airport Capital Improvement Program Update 9. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT 10. COMMISSIONERS REQUESTS AND REPORTS 11. REPORT OF COUNCIL ACTIONS: 11.A Past City Council Actions 11.113 Future City Council Actions 12. RECEIVE AND FILE: 12.A Airline Activity Report September 2023 12.113 Airline Activity Report Fiscal Year Comparison 13. COMMITTEES: 13.A Future Committee Meetings 13.113 Committee's Roster ADJOURNMENT: The Airport Commission will adjourn to a Regular Meeting on November 15, 2023, at 5:30 P.M. .y. Palm Springs Airport Commission Report — October 18, 2023 Meeting Introduction of New Commissioner and New Staff: Dave Banks — Airport Commissioner Palm Springs, Jake Ingrassia — Communications and Marketing Specialist, Oscar Verdugo — Interim City Attorney Discussion and Action Items: Measure J Funds: $1.5 million balance available for airport to use in a manner that will "upgrade the passenger experience at the airport". After a lengthy discussion it was voted on to use this money on the Shade Area Phase 1 and on Shade Structure in Uber/Lyft/Taxi area. Balance of funding would go towards Restroom Capacity & ADA Renovation and Carpet Replacement of which the airport would pay 50% of the cost on these two items. Airport Master Plan: It has been narrowed down to two plans after having public meetings and gaining more public buy -in. One is more conservative with renovating and adding wings on each side of the current airport terminal which is deemed a national historical building and the other plan which is more aggressive is a new airport on the south side. The December commission meeting will be a deep dive into both concepts with the goal of presenting at February City Council. Marketing and Air Service Update: Daniel Meier reported that based on October 12, 2023 information for the future — November is 0.1% down from November actual 2022 and December is 4.8 % behind. Preparing for the snowbirds, Canadian service will rev up in early November. Turo: Peer to Peer Vehicle Sharing at the airport as part of our technological expansion has been proposed. It is similar to a AirBNB where instead of vacation car rentals, individuals can rent their own personal vehicles to the public. Governor Newsom requires TURO to secure an operating permit at any airport that they service by July 1, 2024. Since the car rental revenue is the single largest revenue stream currently at the airport, majority of commissioners were not in favor of this program at this time but is committed to remaining adaptable for future needs and additional non - aeronautical revenue vital to the airport's success. Financial Summary Update —Victoria Carpenter, Finance Director, was brief with her report as the meeting had been very long and simply stated that the airport continues to be profitable and is now entering our high season. Financial breakdowns were in commissioners packets. Concessions Update —Jeremy Keating, Assistant Airport Director, notes that there is progress continues and the addition of the new Aviation Planner has been beneficial. They held a public concession update to demonstrate transparency and 60 people attended. Then they also had a "shark tank" style of meeting with potential vendors to give them a better understanding of what type of concessions would be appealing to our market. They received positive feedback on both meetings. More signage is going up in two weeks. Projects and Airport Capital Improvement Program: New building official are doing their best in dealing with a new system and many new city staff which are taking longer than anticipated to move projects along. Weekly meetings have been scheduled. 603 Executive Director Report — Harry Barrett reminded all of us that this is a 30 month plan to create a master plan valid through year 2045. Updates are as follows: • FAA provided an approval of PSP's aviation forecast through 2043. In early December a review is planned with the entire airport commission • Common Use Passenger Processing System — regional jet concourse gates have all been fully converted into a common use platform between airlines. Renovation of gate 5 & 7 of Bono concourse is nearly complete and fully converted. • Outbound baggage handling system — in design process • Baggage claim expansion and renovation — in design process • Public Parking Electrification — Lot D — PSP was approved for expansion of electric infrastructure and airport staff have ordered the Level 2 chargers which will arrive in coming weeks. • Sterile Area Shade Structures — Awaiting permit, Design approved • Employee and Economy Parking Lots reconfiguration — in process • Restroom Renovation — Solicitation for bids closed and cost proposals received • Taxiway W and Al rehabilitation — in design • Feasibility study for Federal Inspection Station (international air service) — in process. Airport staff is continuing discussions with Customs and Boarder Protection regional leadership about PSP plans to expand international air service. 604 WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 7, 2023 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT KATHLEEN MIRABAL MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - FRITZ BURNS PARK TEMPORARY PARKING LOT ADDITION From: Kathleen <kathleen.mirabal@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 6, 2023 9:53 AM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Written Comments - Temporary Fritz Burns Parking Lot - Urgent Need for Lights for Pedestrians ISome people who received this message don't often get email from kathleen.mirabal@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Hi, I am reaching out as a concerned citizen regarding the new temporary Fritz Burns Parking lot. The crosswalks on Avenida 52/Bermudas are already extremely dangerous and I worry that having more pedestrians cross through there will lead to an increase in fatalities. I believe the city should at least install flashing beacon lights at that corner, similar to how there is on Villa & Sinaloa, to avoid the tragedies that are waiting to happen. I live in the cove and I see how fast and reckless drivers pass through the roundabouts, especially at night. There's a desperate need for more lights or awareness of pedestrians after dark - most notably during the winter months when it gets dark in the cove by 5. Please take these comments into account - the cost to install a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) is under $50k, often only $25k, and could save countless lives. Sincerely, Kathleen Mirabal La Quinta Cove Resident WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT Business Session No. 3 STVR Program Chapter 3.25 Code Amendments November 7, 2023 541 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENTS MARY & TOM BROHARD OPPOSING PROPOSED LARGE LOT EXEMPTION BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 3 - CHAPTER 3.25 PROPOSED STVR PROGRAM CODE AMENDMENTS From: tbrohard0@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 8:40 AM To: Monika Radeva Cc: tbrohard0@gmail.com Subject: La Quinta, CA: City Council Meeting 11/7/2023 - STVR - Proposed Large Lot Exemption EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Monica — Please share this email with the City Council. Thank you. Tom Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, and Councilmembers — Mary and I have been full-time residents for 20 years at 81905 Mountain View Lane in the Estates at La Quinta. Our community has changed from resident -occupied homes to only 2 of the 14 homeowners being full-time residents today. I have served the community on our Board of Directors for 17 years. We sincerely appreciate the actions of Code Compliance when STVR violations are reported. Unfortunately, we have at least three properties that are and have been continuing violators of the City's STVR laws. These properties have continued to rent these homes and the owners have been fined multiple times, totaling over $10,000 each. As the City fines are a cost of doing business, the City should raise the fines further to deter illegal STVR. We also believe that no Large Lot Exemption should be given for any property with prior STVR violations and multiple fines. We and many other homeowners in the Estates at La Quinta do not support the Large Lot Exemption proposed to be added to the City's STVR Ordinance. Our 14 lots represent 20 percent of the 70 large lots in the City affected by the change. The 70 lots represent a nominal number of the residential lots in La Quinta, and we do not understand why this Exemption is being considered. Twelve of the lots in the Estates at La Quinta are 1.25 acres, about 55,000 square feet, with two lots at the Mountain View Lane cul-de-sac very slightly larger. If a large lot exemption is needed, then apply it to lots greater than those in the Estates at La Quinta. Applications from a lot should also be allowed only once every three years as with HOA's. The proposed notice of 500 feet for an owner applying for an exemption must be carefully checked by the City for accuracy. The distance of 500 feet for the notice goes well beyond our tract boundaries and includes properties in PGA West (Montera), Griffin Ranch, and the County east of Monroe Street where a large subdivision is under construction. Will the responses to the notices be weighted to favor the views of immediately adjacent properties over others? Annual review and monitoring of each STVR permit should be made. Noise monitoring must be included in the reviews and overseen by the City to validate its accuracy. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these comments for consideration. We ask that the Large Lot Exemption be continued to a later date until such time as these issues and questions are resolved. Respectfully, Mary and Tom Brohard 81905 Mountain View Lane Estates at La Quinta (760) 398-8885 Tbrohard0@gmail.com CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT MISHAEL PATTON SUPPORTING FOUR-FIFTHS MAJORITY VOTE FOR 3.25.055 & OPPOSING PROPOSED HOMESHARE EXEMPTION BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 3 - CHAPTER 3.25 PROPOSED STVR PROGRAM CODE AMENDMENTS From: Mishael Patton <mishaelpatton@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 11:10 AM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Written Comments for 11/7 City Council Meeting Some people who received this message don't often get email from mishaelpatton@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Re: Amending Chapter 325 of the La Quinta Municipal Code Related to STVRs Hello Monika: Mishael Patton here of 54-290 Avenida Martinez in La Quinta. I definitely support adding a provision requiring future revisions to Section 3.25.055 to be adopted by no less than four- fifths (4/5) majority vote by City Council. I have kept an eye on what has been happening with STVRs in other U.S. cities. Many cities have found managing STVR problems impossible. And then there is the problem of residents being left to report problems. I know of two people who feel like they cannot report incidents for fear of retribution. I have also noticed that, by your own statistics, most complaints are about illegal, non registered STRVs. How are these complaints followed up on? How are fines collected? How much staff time and attorney time is consumed by illegal STRVs? Are illegal STRVs being successfully eliminated? I do not support the provision to exempt Homeshare STVR permits from the ban on the issuance of new STVR permits that requires owner(s) to occupy the dwelling during transient stays. This seems like an invitation for unmonitored STRVs in disguise. How would you enforce this new measure? This exemption seems like an invitation for more problems. Thank you, Mishael Patton MishaelPatton@gmail.com 54290 Avenida Martinez, La Quinta 92253 760-902-6513 WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT Public Hearing No. 1 La Quinta Village Apartments November 7, 2023 500 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 -WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS SUBMITTED ANONYMOUSLY PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: Sent: Monday, November 6, 2023 4:38 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Meeting on 11/7/2023 - General Plan 2022-0002 Amendment Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Some people who received this message don't often get email fro . Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. To the Honorable Linda Evans and the LaQuinta City Council, This message is sent as an anonymous homeowner in the Desert Breezes community to express my strongest opposition to the General Plan 2022-0002 Amendment, which proposes to relocate all of the 280 low-income and very low-income units from the development site originally called Troutdale located at Washington and Avenue 50 to Washington and Fred Waring. My opposition to this plan is based on several factors which include the adverse impact on the properties at Desert Breezes, Southwest Church and Indian Wells Tennis Gardens. The concentration of low and very low income housing all in one place fails to promote diversity in the community. Such a decision will increase the likelihood that the community shall have higher rates of crime when all the low and very low income housing is concentrated in one place. It would be much better for the planning commission to integrate low and very low income properties throughout the community to promote stronger communities. This would mean the plan for the site at Washington and Avenue 50 should have some low and very low income units in the plan. Currently this plan has no low and no very low income units. This also means that any plan for the development of any other sites should also have the same requirement to include some low and very low income units in the planned development. My opposition is also based on my understanding that the current property owner of the land at Washington and Fred Waring has an alternative development plan for this parcel. The current property owner's plan should be considered before approving any changes to shift all the low and very low income units to the parcel at Washington and Fred Waring. Making a decision that results in an adverse impact to current property owner is not respectful to all the parties, but especially to the current property owner. Thus this decision should be delayed to allow ample time for reconsideration of all parcels. Please note I have no idea who owns this property, just that there is an alternative plan in the works. Finally, it is my understanding that the developer of the Washington and Avenue 50 parcel is a party from outside the Coachella Valley area and that there are at least two members of the decision making bodies that have conflicts of interest related to this proposed plan. Parties/developers that do not live and work in the valley should not have decisions made that are favorable to them and for which there are conflicts of interest of some of the decision makers in which such decisions adversely affect the longstanding residents, religious organizations and businesses of the valley. Making this decision in favor of the outside developer and against the interest of the local residents, church organizations and tennis gardens, would lead some to conclude that these conflicts of interest are not limited to just the individuals that have recused themselves. Rather some might conclude there are more conflicts of interest than the ones disclosed. If such a decision is made, it will reflect poorly on the remaining decision makers. There are other options available to the City of LaQuinta that should be considered and evaluated in public hearings before any decision to approve the request before the city at this time. Thus I request that either a decision to deny this request be made or the decision be delayed until more evaluation and consideration can be performed so that strategic decisions that are in the best interest of all stakeholders can be identified and adopted. Respectfully, Anonymous CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 -WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS SUBMITTED ANONYMOUSLY PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: Sent: Monday, November 6, 2023 12:17 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Opposition to General Plan 2022-0002 Amendment Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Some people who received this message don't often get email fro MLearn why this is imnortant EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. To the Honorable Linda Evans and the LaQuinta City Council, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the General Plan 2022-0002 Amendment, which proposes to relocate the state -mandated housing element of 280 low-income and very low-income units from site 3 at the corner of Washington Avenue and 501h Avenue to site 6 at the corner of Washington Avenue and Fred Waring. Although I understand the city's need to comply with the state mandate and am sensitive to the need for affordable housing, the truth is that relocating these units at the behest of an out-of-state developer is really no different than a hedge fund buying a company's assets and not accepting any of its liabilities. It takes its profits and leaves without a second thought to those impacted by its decisions. The staffs suggestion that this is the ideal location for meeting the housing element requirements is short- sighted. It seems that the city is placing all of the required housing element units for low and very low-income units on the far north side of the city away from the majority of its homes, especially expensive ones. Couching it in terms of a "high resource" area does not take away from the fact this is really segregated housing. This amendment adversely affects the city of Palm Desert as property owners on the west side of Washington Avenue, in the well-established development of Desert Breezes, will have dramatically declined property values and thus Palm Desert's property tax base will be reduced. Additionally, this is not neighborly. The nearest Palm Desert properties are zoned as Golf and Resort neighborhoods; the very people who support many LaQuinta businesses. I firmly believe there are better alternatives that can achieve the city's goals without compromising the integrity and harmony of our neighborhoods. I encourage the city to explore other options and work with the city of Palm Desert and its property owners to find a more amicable solution. 1. Consider Distributed Low -Income Housing: Rather than concentrating all low-income housing in the north end of LaQuinta. Rationale: This approach promotes socio-economic integration. It prevents the creation of isolated communities and potentially fostering segregation. Instead, it promotes inclusivity. 2. Explore Public -Private Partnerships: It is an effective way to meet the housing needs of the community while reducing the burden on taxpayers. Rationale: Utilizing private -sector expertise and resources can be more cost-effective and result in well-designed, quality housing developments that blend seamlessly with existing neighborhoods. It often leads to innovative solutions and sustainable developments while relieving the burden on city resources. This could include lot consolidation of small lots in the Village Commercial area to make way for multi -family projects with incentives from the City. This helps meet a city goal. 3. Revise Zoning and Land Use Regulations: identify areas that could be repurposed or rezoned to accommodate affordable housing without disrupting the character of the neighborhood. Current zoning code Section 9.60.260 permits troubling options that could further negatively impact Palm Desert properties like Desert Breezes. Rationale: This can identify opportunities for affordable housing in areas that don't disrupt existing commercial or resort -oriented zones. It preserves the character of neighboring cities. In conclusion, I urge you to reconsider the proposed amendment and explore alternative innovative solutions to meet your city's housing needs. Thank you for your attention to this critical matter. I appreciate your dedication and commitment to making well-informed decisions. Sincerely, Anonymous CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM RESIDENTS CHARLES CIUP & CAROLYN BRANDON; PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSING THE PROJECT From: Nkaya Brandon <nkayabrandon@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, November 6, 2023 5:36 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: VOTE NO on LQ Village Apartments 50th/Washington [Some people who received this message don't often get email from nkayabrandon@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Dear City Council, PLEASE VOTE NO on the current plan development of LQ Village Apartments for the corner of 50th and Washington Ave LQ. We have been to ALL the Planning Commission and City Council meetings about this project with our neighbors as we all live nearby off 50th and Orchard Lane. The proposed project may be a good one for elsewhere in LQ for the City to get more housing, but on area on that corner, for that much density it will have a truly horrible consequences to the people who live there and drive it everyday. We won't go into ALL the traffic issues and safety and and and and and ... that have been gone over in depth at the prior meetings because of VALID VERY good concerns by the Commission and Council. We do want to bring up however that: The developer admitted at the last Planning Commission meeting that the original plan they created for traffic for this project to work for 215 apartment residences and all the service vehicles and guests was for the residents heading South from 111 to go off Washington at Eisenhower, and drive Eisenhower (past the LQ Resort) to 50th Ave. For them to turn left at the light on 50th (which is now a SINGLE LANE in both directions) back to Washington and turn Left at the light into the development. Or they could take 111 East to Jefferson to 50th and travel back a few miles to enter after crossing the wash past the school field. For ANYONE living in La Quinta, neither of these "miles out of the way" routes would be ones that residents would actually take instead of traveling about a mile up the road where they'd have to take a U -Turn. The City recently changed 50th Ave between Eisenhower and Washington to single lanes with bike lanes to take care of the true traffic needs of all the golf communities that livd on and use that stretch of the road. Adding the huge amount of residents from this complex on that single lane road, all trying to make a left hand turn at the light at Washington would back up traffic and would be disastrous. We IMPLORE the City to consider projects like this for the many open lots anywhere NORTH of 48th Ave to the 10 Fwy. From 48th Ave SOUTH on Washington, we IMPLORE the City to keep "The Gem of the Desert" - retaining our view corridors and single story housing for both the special character that our town has and the property values of the similar type of residents that surround the proposed development. The current design of our great town is single story homes and developments for miles and miles around the area, keeping the feel at this end of La Quinta as a residential area. Once you allow this 2 story VERY high density for the lot size project there, not only will it GREATLY impact the area residents, it will set the precedent for more crowded, taller apartment housing developments to be built in the Southern La Quinta and Cove areas. This corner is a Vitally important one in our City. It is a threshold property, a gateway to Old Town and the Cove and will set the tone for what is to come. If developed as proposed there, the density will turn us into another 'same as anywhere else' City - where we will lose our charm. Can you imagine a development like what is proposed in the residential areas of Carmel California - a City known for its character and charm? I bring this example up because we too are lucky enough to live in a character and charmed City here in La Quinta. PLEASE be VERY, VERY CAREFUL with the GIFT of this town that we have and where you develop. s I suggest, there is still plenty of land North of 48th to the 10 fwy where this project would be the right size fo the land and be much closer to amenities and to work places for residents. There is MUCH more public transit at that end of the City, compared with the VERY seldom running buses at 50th and Washington. The traffic will be significantly impacted as anyone who actually lives here can tell - which doesn't' seem to jive with the developers traffic studies they propose. There is another VITAL LOSS that is about to happen for La Quinta IF you vote for this project: Please consider the families of La Quinta. All the ones who go to the school on 50th and Boys and Girls Club and the Sports Field. They will forever more be parking (as they do now) on 50th Ave from the wash for miles all the way to our street at Orchard Lane whenever they attend any school function or game for their children. While we're seniors and don't have children in the school, we see cars lined up and parked along those miles on who have to haul all the sports equipment, chairs, and tend to the safety of their children next to a 50 mph roadway in daylight and in dark. By adding this development, you take away any hope of there ever being any facility, parking, park, anything that might benefit them, the school, and the clubs in the area. By adding this development, you will be adding greatly to the population density at that corner, which will horribly impact the already severely difficult situation of many families keeping themselves and their children safe at family events in our city at this location. Is there really no better way to show we care about La Quinta families and school life? We think there is for sure. PLEASE leave a legacy of your time on City Council with something that made the City proud and retains its charm and specialness. PLEASE vote NO for this project on that property. We can Do SO Much better for that land and the families that live in our community. Imagine that WIN! Thank you. Best wishes, Carolyn Brandon & Charles Ciup 50240 Woodmere LQ 92253 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM RESIDENT CAROLYN CROWSON PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: karijeanc@aol.com Sent: Monday, November 6, 2023 12:25 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Undeveloped area on corner of Washington St. and Fred Waring Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Some people who received this message don't often get email from karijeanc@aol.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear Council & Planning Commission, I have been a homeowner in the Palm Royale Country Club development since 2004. 1 purchased with the understanding that the above corner would be developed with medical offices, pharmacy, restaurants and other essentail services. I am not against low income housing, however, I do not want it to be on this parcel of land. I am concerned about crime in our development as a result. We were not informed of your intent and I feel that public hearings need to ensue before moving forward. Sincerely, Carolyn Crowson 78-353 Terra Court La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM KAY CURTIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: Kay Curtis <kaycurtisrealtor.com@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 6:29 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Low Income Housing Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Completed Some people who received this message don't often get email from kaycurtisrealtor.com@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear City Council Members, I was recently made aware that the parcel at Fred Waring and Washington on the Northeast corner is being considered for a low income housing project. And, I was told that this location is being considered rather than the original site at Washington and Ave. 50. I would like to know the following: 1) Why was the site changed. 2) What are the demographics, as to what type of low income is being discussed. 3) Does the Council have a artist rendering of what the housing project looks like? 4) Have there been any studies conducted regarding traffic and community needs and activities in this area. I am a retired real estate agent and live accross the street. We have experienced a lot of negative impact to our neighborhood in the past couple of years due to increased traffic, excessive speeding on the streets and some vandalism on our campus. I am concerned about a potential adverse effect this type of housing would have on our community. As a retired agent I have seen the negative impact that Section 8 can cause in a neighborhood. I would ask the council to consider a better use of this property that would enhance the adjoining neighborhoods. Thank you for your time and consideration with this request. Respectfully, Kathryn Curtis 78163 Indigo Dr. La Quinta ca 92253 530 908-7872 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM DESERT BREEZES PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: Board <jenbdbboard@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 6, 2023 1:15 PM To: Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov> Cc: Tania Flores <tfIores@laquintaca.gov>; Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>; Tera Willis <tera@vintagegroupre.com>; Sierra Carr <scarr@drminternet.com> Subject: Re: Washington and 50th La Quinta Apartments Project EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Good afternoon Cheri, Thank you very much for your call last Thursday. Attached is the letter from the Desert Breezes community opposing the amendment of the commercial parcel at Washington and Fred Waring in place of La Quinta Village Apartments' low-income housing parcel, as suggested by the developer. Yes please read this at the meeting. Thank you so much, Jennifer Blair Desert Breezes On Nov 2, 2023, at 9:27 AM, Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov> wrote: Hi Jennifer, Thanks for chatting with me this morning. Here is my email. You may send in a letter and if you would like to have it read out at the meeting please let me know and I will let the City Clerk know to do that. Have a nice day! LALLOR IA Cheri L. Flores I Planning Manager City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. 760-777-7067 www.laquintaca.gov I CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM DESERT BREEZES PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH WPXt M;"�q City Council & Planning Commission City of La Quinta c/o City Clerk 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Council & Planning Commission, We have been alerted by a neighboring community that the La Quinta Village Apartments development has added an amendment swapping the parcel at Avenue 50 and Washington with the parcel at Washington and Fred Waring. We oppose the approval of this amendment to the La Quinta Village Apartments development. As we understand it, this swap has the potential for the state to force the owners of this land to develop low-income housing instead of developing commercial services. The addition of low-income housing at this location, in lieu of commercial services, is unfortunate. Many of our homeowners purchased their homes knowing the parcel at Washington and Fred Waring was zoned commercial, ensuring retail services close by. While we support the need for low-income housing, a large development of its kind across the street from our community presents a greater need for law enforcement already overwhelmed by the current issues happening in our area. This parcel is also along a bustling corridor, across the street from one of the largest tennis tournaments on the West Coast. Traffic explodes during the season making it difficult for our homeowners to enter and exit their own community. The addition of a much larger community of low-income housing across the street would create an enormous traffic jam and increase the opportunity for accidents. We ask you to consider other parcels instead of one at Washington and Fred Waring. We ask that you remove this amendment from the condition of approval for the La Quinta Village Apartments. We ask that the City of La Quinta keep us informed on the state of the parcel on Washington and Fred Waring. On behalf of Desert Breezes, Jennifer Blair, Casas President Hugh Cousins, Masters President, Villas President Dottie Fazio, Timeshares President 77750 Calle Las Brisas South, Palm Desert, CA 92211 • jenbdbboard@gmail.com CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM RESIDENTS JANET & DANIEL GETTINGS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: Janet Gettings <janet.gettings@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 11:58 AM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Low income housing proposal Washington/Fred Waring Some people who received this message don't often get email from janet.gettings@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. 78351 Terra Cotta Court La Quinta 92253 11-07-23 City Of La Quinta Town Council To Whom It May Concern: We have recently been made aware of a proposed change to land usage in our immediate community, with a possible rezoning from commercial to residential property allowance. There has been no official notice from Council in this regard to adjacent property owners such as ourselves. We live in the Palm Royale complex which is situated on the corner of Washington and Fred Waring, right across the street, from the lot which is designated for Commercial use. When we purchased our condo 11 years ago, we knew that property was slated to be developed for commercial use, such as grocery stores, cafes, and medical/dental offices to serve the immediate community. The proposition for rezoning to allow for low income housing, instead of commercial services, is a drastic change which needs community consultation and clear communication as to the rationale for such a change. No such communication has come from the City of La Quinta to its residents. In addition, the Fred Waring/Washington intersection is extremely congested and dangerous already. As a volunteer for the Tennis Tournament at the Indian Wells Tennis centre, I can attest to the fact how frightening it is to walk along Fred Waring toward the light to cross. People have been killed crossing Fred Waring, and am sure the La Quinta Police have records of just how fast cars are driving down that street and the number of accidents which are already occurring. With 200 more homes, there will be possibly hundreds more cars using an already overstressed thoroughfare. There are no amenities, such as grocery stores or other services, within easy walking distance. It is not a safe area to be walking due to the speeding traffic and congestion. Recently there was a serious accident, right at our gate, which involved a car leaving the street entirely to avoid hitting someone who swerved from the left turning lane, and then striking another vehicle exiting from our complex, but was still on our property. We look forward to hearing from the City Of Quinta regarding the process for making such a drastic decision which not only directly impacts current residents but changes what has been slated for commercial completion for many years. Janet and Daniel Gettings 4anet.gettings@gmail.com CITY COUNCIL MEETING -NOVEMBER 7, 2023 -WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM RESIDENT JENNIFER HASIUK PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: Jen Hasiuk <jenhasiuk@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2023 8:28 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Washington/Waring development Some people who received this message don't often get email from jenhasiuk@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. To whom it may concern, As a resident and homeowner in La Quinta, I was very troubled to learn of a potential low-income housing project on the corner of Washington St. and Fred Waring. If this project is approved, I will do everything I can to make sure the elected officials responsible will be voted out next election. Regards, Jennifer Hasiuk CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM JANICE HURLBURT PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: Janice Hurlburt <janicehurlburt3@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 10:51 AM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: City Council Meeting and Agenda for Nov. 7th - remaining unmet RHNA for the La Quinta Village Apartments. Attachments: traffic study for Washington street -Fred Waring.png; traffic turning movement.PNG Some people who received this message don't often get email from janicehurlburt3@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. My name is Janice Hurlburt at 77-565 Calle Las Brisas, Palm Desert I would not support a General Plan Amendment as stated below in published documents (cut and pasted here from page 97 of 604 pages). We live across the street in the community of Desert Breezes in the City of Palm Desert. I have lived in this community since 2006 and have seen increased traffic at this intersection. I understand the purpose of looking for sufficient sites to accommodate the remaining unmet RHNA for each income category but for this location to be considered is not realistic. (• Adopt a resolution to approve General Plan Amendment 2022-0002, Specific Plan 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, Amendment 2) and Site Development Permit 2022- 0001 for the La Quinta Village Apartments, consisting of 252 units located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50.) I have attached a 2014 traffic study showing you the volume of traffic for this intersection. Imagine what the traffic study would look like today! See the area highlighted in Yellow. This is not a suitable site to recommend to meet the remaining unmet RHNA for the La Quinta Village Apartments. Therefore I would oppose this recommendation. Thank you, Janice Hurlburt General Plan Amendment The project site is identified on the City's inventory of sites in its Housing Element to accommodate 280 residential units in the very low- and low-income categories. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65863 (commonly referred to as the state "No Net Loss Law"), a jurisdiction must maintain 1 adequate sites to accommodate its remaining unmet regional housing need allocation (RHNA) by each income category. If a jurisdiction approves a development of a parcel identified in its Housing Element sites inventory with fewer units, per income category, than shown in the Housing Element, it must either make findings that the Housing Element's remaining sites have sufficient capacity to accommodate the remaining unmet RHNA by income level or identify and make available sufficient sites to accommodate the remaining unmet RHNA for each income category. The City is responsible for compliance with the No Net Loss Law, unless a project applicant(s) request in their initial application, as submitted, a density that would result in the remaining sites in the Housing Element not being adequate to accommodate the jurisdiction's share of the regional housing. While the project includes 74 moderate -income units and 178 market - rate units, the project does not include units in the very low -and low-income categories. Therefore, the Applicant must identify additional site(s) that could accommodate 280 very low -and low-income units. This requires a GPA to add another site to the inventory of sites in the Housing Element. The Applicant has identified an additional site, a 12.74 - acre property identified as Site 6 on the draft Housing Element amendment (Attachment 2). Site 6 is located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive and is in a Community Commercial zone that also has the Affordable Housing Overlay and Mixed Use Overlay, which allows for mixed use development - both multi -family residential and commercial development (Attachment 4). The Affordable Housing Overlay allows for a density of up to 30 units per acre and the Mixed Use Overlay allows for mixed use projects up to 24 units per acre. At 280 units, Site 6 would have a density of 22 units per acre, which is consistent with other affordable housing developments in the region. This site is within a 'High Resource" area, in that it is immediately adjacent to schools, is in close proximity to businesses on Highway 111 and on Washington Street, and close to job areas which provides for economic opportunities. There is no planned development on Site 6 at this time. The site has been identified only as having the capacity to support 280 units of low- and very low-income affordable housing. If the GPA is approved, including the project as proposed, the City would then re -submit its Housing Element to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). This project is conditioned to not move forward with the "subordinate" entitlements and permits, such as the Specific Plan Amendment, Site Development Permit, and the ensuing construction until and unless HCD has approved the amendment to the Housing Element. Janice Hurlburt Online Management Digital Marketing Agency 0 ® m 0760-898-4060, leave a msg. https://www.janicehurlburt.com/online-visibility/ _janicehurlburt3@gmail.com 4 2:06 a palmdesert.gov oil 5G v.ak new ,... KvnWm 1111 14az •• �� Nu 2LAo'•nr i?7N�6ar 61A6 A30 a},15 }-91RYdme 3n1 92L 1111 R IY Faoa} 199fi 4161 Gf7fi � av�rl uow 16L0 1535 t6d6 I-PKYtlIme 1151 UII N72 Pl6lfanu 09fi1 dill OM3 nywrl a+x0VR+0 VOLUME WaOingwri sl NIo Free wars ng or P.3: Thv ldil DM: 3311 MIA P*nI Or CAW 6217 020 n4..d S+aaf7nto VOLUME Washington St N/C3 Ho I.y Ln 1mc 1v19r2Y3a Oily: P.M D-1 I+ryut f. Ck18. M7, M CQ15 11¢7 ce 35 ac ni I+aa 311 Ina1 x14 314,1 634 >.Ix 59a 3 IWILV 70TALS Nu 58 ED wa I'll, ArO Pp. rod 0ac00 NG so E8 Wb ][ TOTAL 635 da3$ 13 50 353 z56 all X30 1P 17 dl 1130 357 310 .1 OM 14 717 26 114 iI 291 IBIS COS 1195 327 1350 721 2785 0190 I6 16 31 117 162 3]2 7]4 01:15 13 I2 25 13:Ss 167 N 665 0+ -aa I9 Ss 31 limon 351 366 219 515 9 1115 31 1S7s 4�3 ]4n 450 gal791 673 9113 P2A0 56 30 11 U90 02:15 9 fi IS 1135 sit 315 am Ea." 7 ie 21 1190 517 346 935 OMS 14 M 11 I1 25 715 1135 439 1%7 439 5413 a]8 3130 Okm 3S SO 75 15-9 160 196 661 Pk1S 9 6 17 15:15 889 836 931 Ou90 IS L 11-10 a% 37x 27 9 135 445._ 19" 1195_ $24 425 a95 _ 0§0 M 0490 26 16AY OCAS 28 24 52 16:25 361 366 727 OLW 34 14 40 1699 351 366 719 Ow9 u U. 16 13 M 191 . 939 af05 196 1537 0690 11 3fi 71 1190 363 329 742 05:15 54 a1 105 11:SS UP 439 P74 Ps:3a 70 55 lis 1130 175 399 695 05-,15 101 275 66 196 161 474 17AS 302 1350 355 1572 552 2922 9073 113 1190 744 370 sl$ 0&15 136 M 216 "As 269 M 517 06.30 193 114 337 1430 27I 225 546 Psas 3Le 537 !® 566 a a Is31s1Q14 91gayiw>.gp� P2 -9a int 13E 539 11.0D 717 x37 391 111S '31199 7P9 1945 16o 170 399 03:]0 71I 1930 172 179 3p OMS 399 UT9 in 318 1]57 7E3fi 1935 122 6]0 US ]19 311 1389 0.— 289 377 667 667 20-06 172 160 332 04:15 ''31 117 616 m -1s I. 137 305 06:W 331 952 6� 1030 lit 127 20 n353 .)PI 1955 z0:.s. 791 138 954 345 171 761 2190 3B3 113 201 09:15 262 273540 2135 156 119 275 09-90 1711 261 559 u90 Ila 106 C22 0945 166 1116 290 1121 526 223] 2135 93 5" 100 450 193 991 10-00 278 In 5% x1m 0u 171 914 z5a 671 u 700 182 219 910 4!9 2230 90 77 W SVAs 305 1195 33.3 ]229 i�TaLa. 23M5 59 519 .54, x91 LIE —tAk. 3.31 d'n 21" 11:16 388 339 687 23-15 48 80 B4 11:30 L— 376 352 iib Siii 676 }pl 15 35 39 ]s 6s38 TutA" 1657 5134 707615 [3111 n351 SP1zfx sFzx a6Bx scilix So9x as ]x - 1 I 4+ARw�.�. RlY fatlw 19 im a.?G1 P.9W F+81 a.TR If.IK vd.m. KfY}aM I/ai 1+31 9d65 P.91a 9.9A 2-110— 3'31 IS11 7Mfi 1-6Yd.'r 3135 772+ 5314 7-7MM4 WW P7+7 6+-49 • tnia IPii n4..d S+aaf7nto VOLUME Washington St N/C3 Ho I.y Ln 1mc 1v19r2Y3a Oily: P.M D-1 I+ryut f. Ck18. M7, M CQ15 11¢7 ce 35 ac ni I+aa 311 Ina1 x14 314,1 634 >.Ix 59a 3 " palmdesert.gov Intersection Turning Movement Pm pared 6y' National Dat;_ Surveying Services Pro" I6: 14-6212-122 1 8 0 1 0 0 B oay: I riumday D City? Palm D L,.M 0 t 1 9 a D 1 Date: 12111/2014 B B 2 0B AFS 1 0 0 1 0 0 NSJEW SMe¢ts' VJa�Yn�ton A T_-asningtan 58 51 1L'8 Fred Waring Or 6 0 Fred Wad1K1 Df NORTN6O0ND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NL NT NR 51. ST SR EL ET EA VOL WT WR TOTAL LANES- 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 7A0 AM 58 218 17 26 177 44 14 46 28 17 130 99 831 7:15 AN 100 261 15 23 167 96 32 67 38 30 259 Iia 1141 730 AM 123 305 2 35 224 69 M 82 56 24 297 85 1338 1-45 AM 97 256 3 32 231 73 47 134 fib IS 742 70 1266 .. AM 92 186 0 44 257 82 30 96 62 22 162 56 1079 8-15 AN 64 185 5 27 222 65 49 99 60 29 204 55 1062 8-30 AM 83 247 5 34 270 67 3374 49 18 146 46 1072 8-45 AM 76 2L5 8 30 197 74 45 91 61 19 174 49 1039 NL NT NRSL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR T47A1 TORRLVOLUMES: 683 1873 55 251 1745 565 295 688 412 174 1814 533 8878 APPROACH %'s : 26.16% 71.73% 2,114'0 9213% 68.1445 22.06% 20.58% 49,6845 24.759'0 7.50% 69-54% 22-46?6 PEAK HR START TIME : 715 AM F PEAK HR VOL. ; 402 1008 20 134 879 310 145 379 722 41 960 324 PEAK Hit Fq�-fqR : 0,831 0.864 4,7$5 6.847 C6tafgolL : Siyndiizcc 4 qOJ 0 I ;' ' 00* LUMPS NB 56 E6 W9 0 1 8 0 1 0 0 B D D o 0 t 1 9 a D 1 0 B B 2 0B 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 MB 58 EB 1L'8 3 6 0 B B CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM MAYER CORP (VAUGHN, ESQ. SZR LAW PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: James Vaughn <JVaughn@szrlaw.com> Sent: Monday, November 6, 2023 8:58 AM To: Council; City Clerk Mail Cc: Ihrke, Bill; Jon McMillen; Cheri Flores; RJ Mayer; Tom Weigel; Erika Crempa Subject: November 7, 2023 City Council Meeting - Public Hearing Agenda Item No. 1 - Objection to Proposed GPA No. 2022-0002 for La Quinta Village Apartments Attachments: Letter to La Quinta City Council re GPA 2022-0002 (11-6-23).pdf EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear Mayor Evans and Honorable City Councilmembers: Please see the attached correspondence objecting to the above -referenced General Plan Amendment proposal to revise the recently approved Housing Element and move a 280 -unit affordable housing designation for very low- and low- income categories from the La Quinta Village Apartments site to the 25 -acre commercial property owned by the Mayer Corporation at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive. Please include this letter in the record of proceedings for this matter. Best regards, James D. Vaughn, Esq. Stowell, Zeilcnga, Ruth, Vaughn & Treiger LLP jvaughn(a,szrlaw.com 1 www.szrlaw.com Office: 805.446.1496 1 Direct: 805.446.7609 1 Mobile 805.551.0688 4695 MacArthur Court 4590 East Thousand Oaks Blvd. Suite 200 Suite 100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Westlake Village, California 91362 November 6, 2023 Via Email Only (council@laquintaca.gov and cityclerkmail@laquintaca.gov) Mayor Evans and City Councilmembers c/o City of La Quinta City Clerk 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: Objection to Proposed General Plan Amendment 2022-0002 (La Quinta Village Apartments) Dear Mayor Evans and Honorable Councilmembers: We represent the Mayer Corporation ("Mayer"), owner of the undeveloped real property located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive (the "Mayer Property"). This letter shall serve as Mayer's formal, written objection to the application of Irwin Partners ("Applicant") for the above -referenced General Plan Amendment (the "GPA Request") to revise the City's recently adopted and HCD- approved Housing Element for the planning period 2022-2029 (the "Housing Element"). As explained in more detail below, Mayer objects to the GPA Request on both public policy and legal grounds. Most significantly, the Mayer Property has been long - designated in the City's General Plan for commercial development that will generate significant tax revenue for the City's General Fund. Approving the Applicant's GPA Request would encumber the Mayer Property with the requirement to accommodate 280 affordable housing units, consuming more than half of the Mayer Property and preventing effective master planning of the full site for its highest and best use. In addition, the GFA Request would violate the applicable housing element laws because the designated 12.74 -acre portion of the Mayer Property fails to satisfy the statutory requirements for the Housing Element's site inventory of "suitable and available" land for affordable housing. DAVID C. RUTH 1956.2016 STOWELL, ZEILENGA, RUTH, VAUGHN & TREICrER LLP DAVID T. STOWELL JAMES D. VAUGHN ATTORNEYS AT LAW ADAM K. TREIGER LOS ANGELES I VENTURA OFFICE ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE 4590 E. THOUSAND OAKS BLVD 4695 MACARTHUR COURT OF COUNSEL SUITE 100 SUITE 200 RICHARD S• ZEILENGA AVNEET SIDHU WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91362 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 STEPHANIE SMITH TEL: (805) 446-1496 + FAX: (005) 446-1490 www.szriaw.com November 6, 2023 Via Email Only (council@laquintaca.gov and cityclerkmail@laquintaca.gov) Mayor Evans and City Councilmembers c/o City of La Quinta City Clerk 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: Objection to Proposed General Plan Amendment 2022-0002 (La Quinta Village Apartments) Dear Mayor Evans and Honorable Councilmembers: We represent the Mayer Corporation ("Mayer"), owner of the undeveloped real property located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive (the "Mayer Property"). This letter shall serve as Mayer's formal, written objection to the application of Irwin Partners ("Applicant") for the above -referenced General Plan Amendment (the "GPA Request") to revise the City's recently adopted and HCD- approved Housing Element for the planning period 2022-2029 (the "Housing Element"). As explained in more detail below, Mayer objects to the GPA Request on both public policy and legal grounds. Most significantly, the Mayer Property has been long - designated in the City's General Plan for commercial development that will generate significant tax revenue for the City's General Fund. Approving the Applicant's GPA Request would encumber the Mayer Property with the requirement to accommodate 280 affordable housing units, consuming more than half of the Mayer Property and preventing effective master planning of the full site for its highest and best use. In addition, the GFA Request would violate the applicable housing element laws because the designated 12.74 -acre portion of the Mayer Property fails to satisfy the statutory requirements for the Housing Element's site inventory of "suitable and available" land for affordable housing. DAVID C. RUTH 1956.2016 Mayor Evans and City Councilmembers November 6, 2023 Page 2 The La Quinta Village Apartments Proiect. Applicant is seeking City Council approval of a 252 -unit apartment project (the "Proposed Project") on approximately 14.03 acres of residentially zoned property located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 that is designated to accommodate 280 affordable housing units in the very low- and low-income categories ("Applicant's Property"). Applicant's Property is identified in the Housing Element site inventory as Site No. 1, projecting a density of 20 units per acre for a total of 280 affordable units. See General Plan Housing Element Table II -50, at pp. 142-143. We understand that Applicant purchased the property in or about 2019 with full knowledge of this affordable housing designation, which has been identified in the Housing Element as an affordable housing site for multiple housing cycles. Nevertheless, Applicant is proposing a project that proposes no very low- or low- income units. As a result, the Proposed Project would require the City to dramatically revise its recently approved Housing Element and add one or more additional undeveloped properties to the site inventory to accommodate these 280 affordable units (which constitutes more than 30% of the total number of very low- and low-income units). Because this major change to the Housing Element's site inventory is being requested by the Applicant, the City has required the Applicant to identify alternative property to add to the City's Housing Element site inventory to accommodate the 280 affordable units and comply with the Government Code §65863 requirement that the Housing Element identify sufficient affordable housing sites at all times during the housing cycle. Rather than identify other residentially zoned properties, Applicant is requesting that the City move the 280 -unit affordable housing designation from Applicant's property to the Mayer Property, despite the fact that the Mayer Property has been planned for commercial development for many years and is designated as such in the City's General Plan. Surprisingly, Applicant proposed the Mayer Property for the affordable housing designation without even contacting Mayer or inquiring as to Mayer's development plans for its property. The Mayer Property Is Ideally Situated For Commercial Uses That Will Generate Substantial Tax Revenue for the City, The Mayer Property has been zoned and designated in the City's General Plan for Community Commercial/General Commercial development for decades and was acquired by Mayer approximately 17 years ago for that purpose. The Mayer Property is located at the busiest intersection in the City outside of Highway 111 and is across Washington Street from the Indian Wells Tennis Garden complex. This location makes the Mayer Property an ideal site for restaurant, hospitality and other commercial uses that will provide substantial tax revenues to help ensure the long-term financial health of the City. Mayor Evans and City Councilmembers November 6, 2023 Page 3 In 2008, the City approved the necessary entitlements to develop the Mayer Property with a neighborhood commercial center anchored with a supermarket and drug store, and accompanied by other retail uses and medical office buildings. This development followed the design of another successful Mayer commercial project in Palm Desert. Unfortunately, when the "great recession" hit, the anchor tenants backed out of the project and the development could not be successfully built. For approximately 10 years, the City granted extensions for the 2008 entitlements and during that time, Mayer spent substantial funds completing traffic improvements to the property to benefit the City and maintain the Mayer Property as an attractive commercial development site. Although the 2008 entitlements have now expired, Mayer continues to pursue potential anchor tenants and financial partners to develop a master planned commercial development on the 25 -acre Mayer Property. Current development concepts include a hotel on a portion of the site, along with a complimentary mix of restaurants, retail and other sales tax generating uses. Accommodating Applicant's request to move the long-standing affordable housing designation from its residentially zoned property to the commercial Mayer Property will make it much more difficult to attract the necessary anchors to successfully develop the Mayer Property. The 2$0 -unit designation would consume approximately half of the Mayer Property and require development of the housing at a density of 22 units/acre, leaving only about 12 acres for tax revenue generating uses. This affordable housing designation would severely constrain the Mayer Property and interfere with Mayer's ability to master plan the entire site. Given the challenges in attracting financing and tenants for hospitality and other retail projects under current market conditions, granting Applicant's GFA Request will create a major obstacle to successfully developing the Mayer Property. Sacrificing the immense transient occupancy and sales tax generating potential of the Mayer Property to accommodate Applicant's Proposed Project is simply not in the City's best interests. For that reason, we urge you to reject Applicant's request to amend the City's recently approved Housing Element. The Mayer Property Fails to Satisfy the Statutory Requirements for a Replacement Site for Affordable Housing. In addition to the clear policy grounds for rejecting the requested Housing Element amendment, the Proposed Project would also violate the applicable Housing Element statutes. Linder Government Code Sections 65863 and 65863.2, the Housing Element must contain a site inventory that identifies sufficient "suitable and available" sites to accommodate residential development satisfying the City's Regional Housing Needs Allocations (RHNA) for all income levels. Under Section 65583.2, the City must find that the properties on the site inventory can successfully be developed with the allocated affordable housing units within the current planning period (2022-2029), taking into account a number of requirements, including property size and adequacy of available utilities. Here, the City cannot properly make these required findings because the Mayer Property fails to satisfy multiple statutory requirements. Mayor Evans and City Councilmembers November 6, 2023 Page 4 Section 65583.2(b)(5) provides that "Parcels included in the inventory must have sufficient water, sewer, and dry utilities supply available and accessible to support housing development or be included in an existing general pian program or other mandatory program or plan ... to secure sufficient water, sewer, and dry utilities supply to support housing development." The City cannot properly find that the Mayer Property satisfies this statutory requirement because IID has publicly indicated that it lacks sufficient infrastructure to supply electricity to undeveloped properties in the Mayer Property area, and neither IID nor the City have an adopted plan or program to supply the needed electricity within the current planning period. While this same constraint may apply to most or all undeveloped property within the City, HCD has approved the current Housing Element. That does not mean that. the City can lawfully amend the Housing Element, or successfully obtain HCD approval, where it cannot make this finding required under Section 65583.2(b)(5) and (c). Under Section 65583.2(c)(2)(B), the City cannot find a proposed site to be "suitable and available" if it exceeds 10 acres, unless the City "can demonstrate that sites of equivalent size were successfully developed during the prior planning period for an equivalent number of lower income housing units ... unless the locality provides other evidence to the department that the site can be developed as lower income housing." We do not believe that any very low- or low-income housing projects on more than 10 acres were successfully developed within the City during the prior planning period. Likewise, we do not believe the City can provide sufficient evidence to HCD that the Mayer Property can be developed successfully with 280 units of very low- or low-income units in the current planning period, particularly given the IID infrastructure challenges described above and the lack of available and sufficient public funding for such a large affordable housing project. Finally, and most -importantly, Mayer does not intend to develop the Mayer Property as an affordable housing project. Mayer representatives previously notified you of this fact and will be present at the hearing on the Proposed Project to reiterate this fact. While it is certainly conceivable that some housing units could be successfully incorporated into a master planned commercial or mixed-use project on the Mayer Site, particularly hospitality -focused units that allow short term vacation rentals, it is simply false to state that 12.74 acres of the Mayer Property is "suitable and available" for development of 280 affordable housing units during the current housing cycle. Mayer has no intention to develop its property with 280 affordable housing units and it would have made that clear to Applicant if asked. Conclusion. The bottom line is that the Mayer Property is not the right choice to include on the City's Housing Element site inventory for 280 very low- and low-income units. Mayer has no objection to the other entitlement applications for the Proposed Project, but it objects to the GPA Request for all of the policy and legal reasons set forth above. Accordingly, we urge you to either require the Applicant to identify one or more other Mayor Evans and City Councilmemhers November b, 2023 Page 5 properties to include on the site inventory, rather than the Mayer Property, or reject the Proposed Project as inconsistent with the City's General Plan. Very truly yours, ames D. Va n, Esq. JDVIec cc: Bill Ihrke, Esq. Jon McMillen Cheri Flores RJ Mayer Tom Weigel CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM RESIDENT PATRICK MEAD PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: KATHY MEAD <rpmkam1 @verizon.net> Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 11:11 AM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: General plan amendment for property on N.E. Corner of Washington & Fred Waring Some people who received this message don't often get email from rpmkaml@verizon.net. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. My name is Patrick Mead, I live at 78331 Terra Cotta Ct, La Quinta,CA ARE I would not support a General Plan Amendment as stated below in published documents (cut and pasted here from page 97 of 604 pages). We live across the street in the community of Palm Royal,in La Quinta. I have lived in this community since 2022. I understand the purpose of looking for sufficient sites to accommodate the remaining unmet RHNA for each income category but for this location to be considered is not realistic. (• Adopt a resolution to approve General Plan Amendment 2022-0002, Specific Plan 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, Amendment 2) and Site Development Permit 2022- 0001 for the La Quinta Village Apartments, consisting of 252 units located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50.) I have attached a 2014 traffic study showing you the volume of traffic for this intersection. Imagine what the traffic study would look like today! See the area highlighted in Yellow. This is not a suitable site to recommend to meet the remaining unmet RHNA for the La Quinta Village Apartments. Therefore I would oppose this recommendation. Thank you, Patrick Mead General Plan Amendment The project site is identified on the City's inventory of sites in its Housing Element to accommodate 280 residential units in the very low- and low- income categories. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65863 (commonly referred to as the state "No Net Loss Law"), a jurisdiction must maintain adequate sites to accommodate its remaining unmet regional housing need allocation (RHNA) by each income category. If a jurisdiction approves a development of a parcel identified in its Housing Element sites inventory with fewer units, per income category, than shown in the Housing Element, it must either make findinas that the Housina Element's remainina sites have sufficient caDacity to accommodate the remaining unmet RHNA by income level or identify and make available 1 sufficient sites to accommodate the remaining unmet RHNA for each income category. The City is responsible for compliance with the No Net Loss Law, unless a project applicant(s) request in their initial application, as submitted, a density that would result in the remaining sites in the Housing Element not being adequate to accommodate the jurisdiction's share of the regional housing. While the project includes 74 moderate -income units and 178 market -rate units, the project does not include units in the very low -and low-income categories. Therefore, the Applicant must identify additional site(s) that could accommodate 280 very low -and low-income units. This requires a GPA to add another site to the inventory of sites in the Housing Element. The Applicant has identified an additional site, a 12.74 -acre property identified as Site 6 on the draft Housing Element amendment (Attachment 2). Site 6 is located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Fred Waring Drive and is in a Community Commercial zone that also has the Affordable Housing Overlay and Mixed Use Overlay, which allows for mixed use development — both multi -family residential and commercial development(Attachment 4). The Affordable Housing Overlay allows for a density of up to 30 units per acre and the Mixed Use Overlay allows for mixed use projects up to 24 units per acre. At 280 units, Site 6 would have a density of 22 units per acre, which is consistent with other affordable housing developments in the region. This site is within a "High Resource" area, in that it is immediately adjacent to schools, is in close proximity to businesses on Highway 111 and on Washington Street, and close to job areas which provides for economic opportunities. There is no planned development on Site 6 at this time. The site has been identified only as having the capacity to support 280 units of low- and very low-income affordable housing. If the GPA is approved, including the project as proposed, the City would then re -submit its Housing Element to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). This project is conditioned to not move forward with the "subordinate" entitlements and permits, such as the Specific Plan Amendment, Site Development Permit, and the ensuing construction until and unless HCD has approved the amendment to the Housing Element. Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM RESIDENT FAITH RAINES PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: Faith Raines <faithinpr@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 6, 2023 3:50 PM To: Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov>; Jon McMillen <jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; Deborah McGarrey <dmcgarrey@la- quinta.org>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; wihrke@laquintaca.gov; Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: La Quinta Village & down -zoning Fred Waring property Some people who received this message don't often get email from faithinpr@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Good afternoon, all. I am a resident of Palm Royale Country Club and have recently found out that the La Quinta Village project developers have identified the property located on the northeast corner of Fred Waring and Washington as an alternative location for "low/very low income" zoning. The La Quinta Village Apartments project, previously Troutdale Village and also La Paloma a few years prior, was already identified as "affordable housing" for 2013-2021 and then as 280 low/very low income for 2022-29 by the city. The current developer knows this but, in the mayor's own words, wants to "kick -the -can" to the next property owner. This is absolutely absurd and has caused an uproar in the north La Quinta community. Absurd because of the three low-income housing areas currently in La Quinta, TWO are within 1.5 miles of our community. Although the La Quinta Village project seems to think this property is more accessible and convenient, I disagree. The Fred Waring property is a mile away from the nearest grocery store and on such an extreme -traffic corner, more turn lanes were needed. During the Tennis season it's even worse. Per the Mayor's own statement, state law requires "walkability" to schools, work, public transportation, grocery stores for people with limited resources. The current La Quinta Village project is more suited for this as: • The Grocery Outlet and various food outlets are only 1/2 mile away. • The La Quinta Library is less than a mile and offers a wide variety of resources from ESL to career assistance. • The Boys & Girls Club is barely over 1/2 mile away and most kids who participate in the Boys and Girls Club are considered at risk for different issues, and many are from low-income families. • The YMCA is also barely over 1/2 mile away and provides financial assistance and income -based memberships. During the August 1st meeting, Cheri Flores said she was advised by the city attorney that they did not need permission to pass down the zoning to the Fred Waring property owners. Bill Ihrke, the City Attorney agreed with this and stated "the state law requirement, which is "pretty much" governed under the planning and zoning law on how any zoning amendment may occur and does NOT require the consent of the property owners for a particular rezoning." Let's call this what it is ... down -zoning. This is when the real "kicking -the -can" starts. The City of La Quinta has allowed these developers to rezone their projects and pass the low-income zoning to any unsuspecting property owner they identify, and the City Attorney thinks it's ok not notifying them of down -zoning their property. How is this ok? Is this how the City of La Quinta operates? The city council has made two recent land purchases. Being that these were purchased by the city's housing authority, for use as "affordable housing" then I think this would be a valid argument against down -zoning the Fred Waring/Washington Property. The first is a 6.24 -acre parcel northeast of Highway 111 and Dune Palms Road in Jan 2023 (Costco area). The second parcel the city owns is a block just west (Best Buy) consisting of 15.14 acres that was purchased Feb 2022. BOTH slated for "affordable housing" with 5.1 acres of the recently purchased parcel slated only for housing, according to Gil Villalpando, the city's housing development director. Villalpando said in an interview, "Someone can work at Home Depot, walk to work and be able to go up and down (the area) ... That was the same thought when we got the property next to Best Buy." This is the same thought used by the developers for the La Quinta Village project by proposing Fred Waring property since it was "walkable" to stores, which I have contradicted above. However, the city owned properties are the clear choice for "affordable housing" due to their proximity to employment, shopping, schools, and transportation. Lastly, the economic impact of the regulatory change may be so severe as to constitute a regulatory taking. The Fred Waring property was purchased as a long-term investment and the property is zoned for commercial use and can reasonably be sold for commercial development. Under the doctrine of regulatory takings, a regulation that goes "too far" in burdening property rights can be recognized as a Fifth Amendment taking. Down -zoning (changing the zoning designation for property from a more intensive use to a more restrictive use) can possibly rise to the level of a regulatory taking. I hope you'll take all of my views under consideration regarding down -zoning the Fred Waring/Washington property. Thank you, Faith Raines Palm Royale Country Club cc: Linda Evans, Mayor Steve Sanchez, Mayor Pro Tem Jon McMillen, City Manager Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Council Member Deborah McGarrey, Council Member John Pena, Council Member William Ihrke, City Attorney Cheri Flores, Planning Manager CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM JUDY & BLAINE PALMQUIST PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS - OPPOSED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL SWITCH From: Blaine Palmquist <judyandblaine@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 5, 2023 7:57 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Fwd: proposed property development at corner of Fred Waring and Washinton Some people who received this message don't often get email from judyandblaine@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Blaine Palmquist <iudyandblaine@gmail.com> Date: Sun, Nov 5, 2023 at 4:28 PM Subject: proposed property development at corner of Fred Waring and Washinton To: <cityclerk@laquinta.gov> As property owners at Palm Royale C.C., It has come to our attention that the property across Fred Waring from us might become a housing development rather than what we always understood to be zoned for a commercial development. This proposal appears to be lacking in consideration of many processes, given the following facts: 1. The traffic near this intersection (7 lanes) cannot safely accommodate the additional traffic that a high density development such as this would produce. There are already 3 housing developments plus a school immediately south of this proposed development. 2. We were led to believe this area was zoned for commercial development, which would obviously be very attractive not only to the several hundred Palm Royale residents, but also to the previously mentioned neighborhoods. 3. In the last two years, our gated area has experienced a major increase in thefts, vandalism, and other crime from those who climb/sneak in, etc. It's safe to assume that a high-density development such as this would only exacerbate this growing problem to the present neighborhoods. It has become a concern for our own safety, and also a major expense for repairs, replacements, added security etc. We appreciate this opportunity to voice our concerns, and ask for your prudent consideration and wise, logical decision making; taking into consideration the residents who have already invested time, money, taxes,and care in where we already live. Yours truly, Judy and Blaine Palmquist. CITY OF LA QUINTA REQUEST To SPEAK FORM MEETING DATE: 1 UT23 Please give this completed form to the City Clerk along with any materials you wish Councilmembers to receive. This form is to assure accuracy in preparing the minutes as to spelling of names and addresses, as well as to allow staff to follow-up on requests made by members of the public. Completion of this form is voluntary. Once submitted to the City Clerk, this form becomes a public record. Matters LISTED on the Agenda Agenda Item No.: 0 -11 - Subject: 1Subject: I cu -- [] Support 0 oppose 0 Matters NOT Listed on the Agenda Subject: The Council welcomes your comments, but is prohibited by State law from discussing matters not listed on the published agenda; your input will be taken under consideration and referred to staff for possible future action. MEETING PROTOCOL: PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO 3 MINUTES THE MAYOR WILL CALL YOU TO THE PODIUM AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME DURING THE MEETING; PLEASE DIRECT YOUR COMMENTS TO THE MAYOR ONLY (not Councilmembers or staff or audience) do not wish to speak but leave thesefor the Council to consider: iI _k , l G� {1- �� �vtiG�t, "� 4 � l i G pcomments t e -V_511 TSLL w'kll f �►SL jk X1,4— 4_e_ oAk Ayuq t,` u1.,(%�r D6-tJQ- f e.G Y�-l-�yf; [ ��� � 01r �4'],-o t✓ �I n r I�L�`\��.�Lrl� I `l-�L �L - G4YL[l. 4. � f r 1 ! lL►� L►. l.� L'L! i 4 4tiL� ,� �� lL�.. KTP b _t k -L Speaker Identificat . ion: 6VIUv } Name F ���_� `j�.1u G,� . ; : {_ rr�.{ _ r (( ( 1)A 2-1 Address4 't U Organ ization/Business 7-71 Phone e-mail I.]. YES, I wish to subscribe to the City's "Quail Mail" service to receive emails about meetings & events. Visit the City's website for more information: www,t.aQuintaCA,gov It, WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT Public Hearing No. 2 Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2023-1 000 November 7, 2023 541 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENTS MATTHEW ANTOUN PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - FLAGPOLE REGULATIONS From: Matthew Antoun <m.ryan.antoun@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 9:39 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Flagpole Issue - against zoning change Some people who received this message don't often get email from m.ryan.antoun@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear City Counsel, Thank you very much for your time in reviewing this email. I am against the flagpole zoning change. I have been watching tonight and saw Mike speak - we tried to call in but were not able to connect with the Zoom. Mike has misrepresented the facts (I am the neighbor he spoke of); I have complained to our HOA multiple times about his flagpole as it blocks our view. I feel it is an unnecessary placement, was put in without considering the zoning law, and he has plenty of room to comply with the flagpole regulations of the city. I appreciate you considering this issue and I am against changing the zoning. I am also for Steve's idea of making the flagpoles closer to the homes. I also feel like the planning commission got this right. Thank you so much for your time Best, Matt 7j, CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENTS RAMON & KELLY BAEZ PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - FLAGPOLE REGULATIONS From: Ramon Baez <rfbaez7@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 5, 2023 1:18 PM To: City Clerk Mail Cc: Kelly Baez Subject: Flag Poles Attachments: Letter to La Quinta re Flag Poles.pdf Some people who received this message don't often get email from rfbaez7@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear City Clerk, Please find the attached letter for the November 7th City Council meeting. Thank you, Ramon and Kelly Baez $1245 Andalusia, La Quinta, CA 92253 rfbaez7 gmail.com I CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENTS RAMON & KELLY BAEZ PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - FLAGPOLE REGULATIONS Ramon and Kelly Baez 81245 Andalusia La Quinta, CA 92253 (760) 565-3505 rfbaez7 gmail.com 5 November 2023 La Quinta City Council 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear City Council, It was brought to our attention that the City Council is reviewing the local regulation for Flag Poles in neighboring communities. Our understanding this will be discussed at the meeting scheduled for November 7, 2023. We believe that Homeowner Associations (HOAs) have well thought out regulations developed to fit the preferences of the majority of the residents of that community. Where no HOA exists, it is important that the city establish regulations that best suit the majority of those homeowners. If an HOA has a regulation, especially regarding esthetic issues, it should be respected as appropriate for those particular homeowners and not "overridden" by a city ordinance. The proposed change to the city's flagpole regulation is at least a modest step in that direction. Thank you for your consideration in allowing the HOAs to manage this process in the city of La Quinta. Sincerely, Ramon & Kelly Baez CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT SAM DICKINSON PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - FLAGPOLE REGULATIONS From: Sam and Sharon Dickinson <1samdickinson@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 7:48 AM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: written comments Some people who received this message don't often get email from lsamdickinson@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. flag poles Sam Dickinson La Quinta, Ca. So why is this matter even before the City Council? It all started when our neighbor didn't like our HOA approved flag pole. After not getting satisfaction with the HOA, he did a great job in researching and found out there was a city regulation that our HOA didn't know about. He went to the city and had them issue violations to all three home owners in Andalusia. After talking to your code compliance officer Cole it turns out these are the only violations for flag poles he has ever issued. Our flag pole was removed 5 days after our HOA asked us to remove it. Maybe there is a need for the city to have a flag pole regulations, but surely not one telling us where we can fly the U.S. flag on our property. Why is the location so important? It can't be because of obstructing a neighbors view. If that were the case we would have regulations on large palm trees that are planted within one foot of our property line and hang 3 1 ft over into our property and block ten times the amount of view. It can't be the lighting, because you up light a flag pole just like palm trees. Most, if not all, single family developments in La Quinta have a HOA. They already have flag pole regulations. In our HOA, flag poles can only be a max of 15 feet and you can ONLY fly the U.S. Flag. Most HOA's I talked to didn't even know the city had a regulation. Why not let the HOA's decide on something as simple as where to locate a flag pole? My wife and I loved sitting in our backyard and looking at our country's flag flying. It reminds us how blessed we are to be American citizens and live in the United States of America. Sorry but palm trees don't give us that same feeling. Some people have said, "I have nothing against the U.S. Flag, but I don't like looking at the pole". I'm sorry the U.S. Flag comes with a pole. During my 21 years in the Air Force I traveled the world to many places that didn't like seeing the U.S. flag. But I never thought that my U.S. flag would be a trigger point for another U.S. citizen. Thank you for your time, Sam Dickinson `a CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT SHARON DICKINSON PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - FLAGPOLE REGULATIONS From: Sharon Dickinson <1sharondickinson@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 10:25 AM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: written comments Some people who received this message don't often get email from lsharondickinson@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Flag poles Sharon Dickinson La Quinta Ca. There is an old saying that I feel fits today, Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I think that there isn't anything that can be placed or planted in a backyard that is prettier than the flag of the United Sates of America. There are some who disagree with that statement. That's fine. That's their opinion but why should their opinion bare more weight than mine and effect where an American flag and it's pole can be placed in my yard. To me it's no different than a palm tree or a water feature. There are many communities here in La Quinta that are governed by the rules and regulations of their HOA's. The HOA at Andalusia has rules in place as to the height restriction which a flag pole can be and you can only fly the United States of America flag. The position of the flag and its pole has to be approved by the HOA before it can be put up. That seems to be a simple solution. I would like to see the individual HOAs oversee their flag pole regulations as no two communities are alike and the cookie cutter approach that the City has doesn't fit some of the yard layouts. I hope the the City Council will recognize the importance of backing the rights of those who cherish the flag of the United States of America and their desire to fly it in their backyards. The symbol it represents for those who served this country, like my husband who served 21 years in the Air Force, is extremely powerful. To all those brave men and women who 1 served and to me I go back to my earlier saying, Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Please let HOAs handle the flag and its pole regulations as they see fit. Thank you, Sharon Dickinson ra CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT MARTY ELLEN PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - FLAGPOLE REGULATIONS From: Marty Ellen <martyellen53@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2023 1:46 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Written Comments from Martin Ellen, residence in LaQuinta re: US flagpoles Some people who received this message don't often get email from martyellen53@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. As a resident in LaQuinta, I'm in favor of the proposal to reduce to 5 feet from 10 feet the rear positioning of the flagpole. That said, I propose the city allow all communities managed by HOA's allow the HOA to regulate flagpoles. Most homes in La Quinta are in a HOA, so let the HOA's control flag poles. HOA's are duly elected from their residents and control all other matters relating to property aesthetics/nuisances. Palm trees block views much more than Flag poles. For example, absent an HOA prohibition, you can have 5 palm trees within a foot of your neighbors property, but not one flag pole. I love looking at the U.S. Flag, it makes me feel proud, more than ever now. The City doesn't need to control this issue. Please forward this to all council members. Thank you, Marty Ellen Sent from my iPhone CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT STEVE GROCOTT PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - FLAGPOLE REGULATIONS EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. From: Steve Grocott Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 12:23 PM To: TFlores@LaQuintaCA.gov Cc: Jennifer Nelson <inelson@laquintaca.gov> Subject: city manager/ Flagpole Issue / Hi Miss Flores, This is a past letter that had been sent to Jon McMillen some months ago concerning an ongoing flagpole issue we have here in Andalusia Country Club, La Quinta. The City Council is looking at a revision in tonight's commission meeting in which we are opposing here by a number of residents. Attached are some pictures of this flagpole from our living room, bedroom (video) and patio area. I also provided some past correspondence to the City Manager and an outline on my discussion tonight. Please distribute to the City Council as needed. Please confirm that you have received this E mail. Thank you for your help Steve Grocott CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT STEVE GROCOTT PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - FLAGPOLE REGULATIONS 11/6/23 City Council Meeting 11/7/23 Good evening, My name is Steve Grocott and live with my wife in la Quinta at the Andalusia country club. I am here tonight in opposition to the loosening of any current setback limits for flagpoles from 10 X 10 feet to 10 X 5 feet that is being proposed. In fact I would like to propose a more common sense approach to these 15 foot lighted flagpoles that create a sharp contrast to the natural beauty of La Quinta and can affect many of the surrounding residents. We have had 3 flagpoles go up in Andalusia and all 3 have come under a dispute with surrounding neighbors that have been impacted. These aluminum flagpoles are 15 feet high and are required to be lighted all night per the American flag protocol. With a 5 -foot flag on the pole these flags are only 5 feet from a property line with a 10 foot setback. In our particular case, the flag pole and Flag were located in the far west corner of our neighbors property line. Far Away from his living room but in front view of our front room and bedroom windows. 15 feet high and lit all night and looming above our patio. Until this happens to you as a neighbor you really don't feel or see the impact as it has affected our everyday life and our property values. (Pictures/videos) We have been dealing with this now for over 5 months and our HOA made major mistakes and did not even know of required permits or setbacks that the city has precedent over. We bought into La Quinta for the natural views of the mountains, golf courses and sunsets but these flagpoles are a direct contrast to the natural beauty of the area. Don't get me wrong, I love the American Flag and very patriotic in nature but we these smaller lots you see on the golf course communities these flagpoles are too tall and too forward to the outside property lines of a golf course or open land. Neighbors on each side are impacted up and down the line and even across fairways. My wife and I spoke in front of the planning commission weeks ago and they unanimously recommended to NOT change the current setbacks to you the city council. We were very happy about that and In fact, with some members even questioning why these setbacks were so close to the outside property lines. So here is our "more common sense approach" >> We would like to see the setbacks start from the house forward and not from the outside property line. It is all about the Angles. When the flagpole is upfront to the golf course property line the angle it creates is a V for neighbors to see due to it being out front to golf course. If the setbacks were from the house forward you create a flat angle ------ and as you view out you do not see the pole from your patio view and would be to your far right or left of your viewing area. So in this case, with the setbacks starting from the house , views would not be greatly impeaded and the pole people could have their poles. In many HOA's flags are required to be attached to their house but I am not going that far. So respect ale my last question is how do I get this proposal considered and in front of the planning commission and city council for their review and assessment?? I have a growing list of 30 neighbors that is getting larger each day as the season opens that agrees that something needs to be done with flagpole guidelines and enforcement. Thank you, for your time and consideration on this issue. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT STEVE GROCOTT PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - FLAGPOLE REGULATIONS 6/13/23 Flagpole Issue Morning Mr. McMillen, My name is Steve Grocott and I was in City Hall yesterday checking with Officer Woods for an update on the ongoing flagpole issue going on in the Andalusia community. I would like to provide some history and some perspective from my side on this issue. There have been 3 fifteen -foot lighted flagpoles put up in Andalusia and all of them have been disputed by neighbors impacted. Let me be clear, I am not against the American flag only the 15' flagpole that sits on these small lots that can be seen up and down the property lines and across fairways. In my case which is the most egregious, my neighbor Sam Dickerson (58218 Aracena) , installed a flagpole that is 18" from my property line and stands in front of our living room and bedroom and looms over our patio. When the wind blows his 5' flag flies over our palm trees and property line. This flagpole is lighted at night and affects our everyday life every time we look out at our once pristine view. Sam positioned his pole in the far right corner of his property 120 feet away from his front room viewing area and it is now 30' from our front room sliding window. He comes out in the evening sits and takes a look at the flag and then back into his house. It is in our view 24/7. 1 am sure his wife did not want this flagpole in view from their living room. We bought into La Quinta for the beautiful views of the mountains and golf course and now it is impacted greatly by a shiny metal pole that changes this view into the look of an industrial park. My wife and family are distraught over this happening and have been dealing with this over 2'h months now. Our HOA made mistakes in the beginning of this process and they know it just looking at the reaction when they came over and saw the flagpole first hand from our vantage point. Everybody, including friends and neighbors, Officer Woods and our realtor all had the same reaction on how this pole location could be approved by the HOA. Per our realtor this will also affect our property value. When I pushed back on this flagpole the HOA initially told me the city did not have any jurisdiction on these matters. The HOA rules and regulations (2004) are poorly written with no setbacks, flag sizes or specific parameters. The HOA did NO due diligence when granting this location and now they are letting the city enforce something they should have while avoiding their own liability. I have moved forward looking at what my legal options are toward the HOA working with Dave Baron and Bruce Bauer of SBEMP on possible property value damages. I pursued and asked your Code and Compliance department about this issue and found out they do have jurisdiction and they came out promptly to inspect and confirm what I was stating. They started the compliance process and moved forward. Your C&C department has been great but it worries me that this matter is still under some type of review. As I stated, this flagpole is impacting us 24/7 and Sam should not be granted anymore delays or any type of variance. From my understanding no permits have been taken out to this point and the flagpole is still standing in front of us. The flagpole should be taken down before any permit is granted and the city should do a thorough review of any new location. The 10 foot setbacks would put the lighted pole next to his pool and still in line with our bedroom window. I would implore the city to have him move the pole closer to his house to take it away from his pool and out of our bedroom viewing area. (As a side note, all flags should be deemed by the HOA to be attached to the house to avoid all these flagpole issues) Please let us know what is going on moving forward and if you have any questions from my end please feel free to call or Email me. You are also welcome to come by and see this flagpole firsthand from our living room and bedroom windows to see what we see. Thank you for your time and enjoy your weekend Steve Grocott 650-867-1306 1 & -4w "** 0 'NA 'F ,2*'•' � 3 � tJA-:§. w_ _ _ a-.~ \�41 : 13%���\ - ^ - a<� .- . CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT KIRK NEWBY PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - FLAGPOLE REGULATIONS From: Kirk Newby <knewby58@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 6, 2023 1:55 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Written Comments - Flagpole Regulations Some people who received this message don't often get email from knewby58@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. To City Counsel - Written Comments regarding Flagpole regulations Home owner: Kirk Newby Address: 81751 Andalusia, La Quinta, CA 92253 Esteemed Counsel Members and related authorities - I am writing about your review of flagpole regulations. I live within a community that is governed by HOA rules that I was able to review prior to purchase of our property and may now participate in any proposed changes. My position would be that the city should defer to the HOA governing body on such aesthetic issues to preserve the rights I bought into as part of this community. Further, with regard to flags and flagpoles. With respect to many precepts from our constitution as well as the Pledge of Allegiance often recited, though perhaps not often enough, I find the display of the American Flag thought provoking and inspirational. Surely a bold statement regarding life, liberty and justice for all by patriotic display of our flag is a needed point of emphasis for all citizens of this great nation. One such flag billows above Silver Rock in the mountains to the south. May we continue to see many more. Sincerely, Kirk Newby CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT RICHARD RAMAGE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - FLAGPOLE REGULATIONS From: Dick Ramage <dickandgail@earthlink.net> Sent: Monday, November 6, 2023 12:43 PM To: Monika Radeva Subject: City Council meeting November 7th Attachments: Letter to city council.docx [You don't often get email from dickandgail@earthlink.net. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT RICHARD RAMAGE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - FLAGPOLE REGULATIONS Dear City Council Members am writing to you in regards to your upcoming meeting on November Th and wish to make a comment on your agenda item regarding flag poles. I personally do not currently have a flag pole but I am on the advisory board of our subdivision. I have witnessed how emotionally charged this issue can become between neighbors. I also feel very strongly that it is important for the City of La Quinta to have rules regulating this issue, especially if there is no HOA. Most homes that are on a golf have small back yards and are more likely to also have a swimming pool and be governed by an HOA. I urge you to allow HOA by-laws to take precedent over the city ordinance. For years HONs have regulated this issue that are appropriate for their residents in their association. appreciate your consideration on this important matter Best regards Richard Ramage HAND OUTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 7, 2023 PROJECT DATA PROJE[TA CIF* FE G.XBIF':R S� W+01WGT9N 6TTJ9FT E AL24;1'c z0 Amm2mloaC4 Imlim 6x0070 016 r< ..,..I nn Lefia IIEB,p emm BASE DENSITY: U 03 ACRES P 12 UNITS ACRE= We EASE UNITS 13 61 ACRES FM N POR LOT 1 I77 023.02) DESERT CLUB I,VUIOR 1112 Lot I Sero. -nen N. -P OESERI CLUB INVVIOR M 2 /Kit's Oil BA M1!!LLVTIPeIRIR.•cl.l'FTYne V..P BPPk I...'a P.,: B 0230 , PL4 P 090 P;;nan L.. Pc`.I SPROPOSED T1YO STORY AP:.RT69a1T BUILDINGS LATH CLUBHOUSE, GAR,:GES, CARPORTS POOL. MA CO I.MM IANOSCAPE SPACESAND NECESSARY HARDSCAPE AND EXIE 01M. FIN H IAEDIUNIHIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 1401AGRE5, 18 UNITS'ACRE. 252 PROPOSED UNITS (11-12 UNITS PER ACRE) FEVHC=FUNREEVACCE551E'EPA 'i35FJ E(5'%19'){SASIE 2-BRUNITS: 15 SPACES PEA UNIT REQUIRED INCLUDES AFFORDABLE DENITY BOrLIS OVERLAY Pp'-JiTXFp jpONC{ FIR,I'EDIUI:;HIG!I DENSITI RESIDENTIAL W-12 UNITS PERACRE) BA,ED O ILIA•'C 9413260 DENSITY BONUS PERCENTAGES LIITH DENSITY BONUS. SEE PROJECT INFO BELOYr SITAR 611.1'G E SF11A 03 ACRES I BUILDING FOOTPRINT T02j995F NAX LOT CO:'ER7,DE 63!,OF NETLOTAREA. 1W 69909 SF LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED 35y 213:)1 SF TO1I ILDING/,ri 259,190 SF TOTALPROPSED DNYELLING UNITS 252 WITS 121:,9%SF CAN. Col.! .'ON OPEN AIE\REQUIRED 2,-, OF NEr PROJECT AREA-IL],3:1 B 4 SF COIAPACH OPEN AREAPRO':IOEO 3461:=2111e25F ACTIVERI IONA' IA. REQUIRED: W.01FCOI.B.'IX4 OPENARE:, REQUIRED=55 BOJ SF ACTIVE RECRv.T)ONAREA PROVIDED 11 lr�-0,110 SF Wali F1a:DNnERIi : 2D U I.".BEIINTERQ,ISIDEYARDSETBFUCK ST L 'IAVL1-RK)R SIDE' YARD SETBACK GIVII I REAR IAR0 SET11- 15-0• DIN, PERII.'ETER IJ,NDECAPE SETBACK 10.0" ANG PERI IIETERLANOSCAPESETBACK: 20-0' NVU( NO OF STORIES ALLOWED PER RIAH ZONING 2 PER A OU IFRAGENERALPr+ E%HSIT36 PgnAARr BAADECWRIOOR wA9.9mUYhi STREET SECONDARY Ih!AGE CORRIDOR .1'RXJE� 11.!AGE CORRIDOR SETBACK: L•0'4- ALLOLJABLE BLDG HEIGHT ATIF'AGE CORRIDOR: 224- It\-.SH,YGTGY STREET 9 A: ENUE 50) "'SEE EPE66l C3N1 PUR'ADD NOI BYLD1Hg.£DHSIBLLCIT4B OCCUPANCY TYPES: 8 2,A I A 3 IRO B CONSTRUCTION TYPE I'l III SPRINKLERS YES FULL) SPRINKLER EDINF PAtp) ALLO':JABLE BJILDING HEIGHT PER RIN111 2DNING: 2T 0- PROPOSEDBUILDINGHEIGHTATCLUBHOUSE 19-0' PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT AT2 STORY BLOGS 27- t1�13nEL1BEPffi1a1gmI2�eY.171L2HE,E iQ[g.E1SBE]!MESJe2111�IseL fpH misz•�IE41R� W6IBIBB s11pLs PROJECT INFORMATION 1-BIIApallmenl 1h -STD 30 613 20,110 1 -Bed Apallmcnl 16 -ADA 34 755 25610 1-B11 Apatlmcnt 16 -STD 34 155 25,670 2-Bcd ApVln,ent 2AADA6B 960 65280 1aS0 APArbr1vr11 2nSTD 52 960 49.920 292 2G0.912.g n DENSITY CALCULATIONS city r< ..,..I nn PdBBINf8EIIQ5 BASE DENSITY: U 03 ACRES P 12 UNITS ACRE= We EASE UNITS B VI PER L01RC 9111 ,11 BYFIGHT PAPI.TNG INCENTIVE, THE TOTAL UNITS PROPOSED 252UNITS 300 7011-T 011 PARKING =C0•'PAC]PARVhG SPAOEp 9'X Ifi) 5' X P=COVERED Sr,,;AD PARVNG SPACE is X 19-) FOLLDY:RIC PARKING RATIOS SHAL APPLY TO THE ENTIRE DEVELOPRBNT(INCLUDINGHARKETFVVEUItITS) 59': DENSITY BONUS IS BEING PROPOSED 51 FEv= FLIUREEJP-INa SPACE(9 X 19) 1-BRUHITS 1 SPACE PER UNIT REQUIRED 1401AGRE5, 18 UNITS'ACRE. 252 PROPOSED UNITS 1 FEVHC=FUNREEVACCE551E'EPA 'i35FJ E(5'%19'){SASIE 2-BRUNITS: 15 SPACES PEA UNIT REQUIRED FEV VAN FO RS3-.DENSITY BONUS.4 1.OF BASE UNITS NEEDTO BE F.!OO811 INCOI: E UNITS HE BA,ED O ILIA•'C 9413260 DENSITY BONUS PERCENTAGES H. ACE55]BLESTANDARD PARCI:G SPACE I9'%Is').'AISLE ° I_m Ae.AlreaMl TIC Van 4Y.. 14,111. TJ MDDEAATE ric L UN s. NC VAN =ACCESSIBLE V'ANPAR,UNG SPACE I9' X 157 t S' IUSLE V..COVERED STANDARD PARFUZ SPACES: 15111-PIn', 0 Lli li MARKET RATE UNITS 179 WIT MII AIPFBSPITAOE9: YOM1'RA�11K!!�`.IFUFBRS T4T4 1321 BED UNIT515239':: 01252 UNITS) 1.41,=0ESIGIATW HAIL \'FY PAaG!::NSFAtF(9'%]9) UIiFiE�CJy1AFT FAGF}':G SFK=9: 511arvu.-I UN[mvilm SEDtI�FM[IIWD W.0:71-P.+A...1 A11 TOTAL UNITS 252 L^]29EDUIIIT!SNY.h PI�UNIr51 252 TOTALUNITS P=STA 11D PAAKWG I-I9'%19'1(9'%I7') IM Pi17510.a,44D FARYL>C 5114-M 35111In°.•y1.1VIFF, BIdB I. Elevalianz MARKET-RAIEUNITS PRDVIDEO: MDOMATEWCOME UNITS PROVIDED: AOS Fs _ 911 -BED UNITS 19 I BED UNITS 152 7'S 0174 UNITS) .11111 Bldg 3-Elevm,dn ,on: �T7L!AP7,CE5 5,211-n , ne, ex- A10 178 TOTAuAARKET RATE UNITS PR01'D 74 TOTALOODERATE INCOIJE UNITS P -VO A11 Gross Building Area Comn,an Arca Calculations Al2 ANN) Sf 1ANHISFI Ata BId9 6- El -d ons Bltlg 01 1p224 9 36 SF PER FLOOR Lfirst F109r CLUBHOUSE RESIDENT ACTIVITY 9 02 13534 7.1sISFIN'R 10..w F've Riser h1ECHANICAI 12 12 Bop 07 22.6951SeF PFA PLOOR GYLI RESIDENTACTIVITY 725 M04 2G.526 15:HN9F RN.FLOOR HAIL CIRCULATION /B6 Bldg 05 29 G12 14.1101 PER FLOOR HK SERVICE 36 Bldg06 2'.393 121%5 SF PER FLOOR ORice ADMINISTRATION 290 0"07812 50.438 12605 SF PER FLOOR RR RESTROOIAS 124 841 22294 11.147 SF PER FLOOR Sir. RESTROONIS 62 Bldg 09 274131 11591.5 SF PER FLOOR Sh` SERVICE 111 Bldg 10 19.407 9733 S SF PER FLOOR We'Sor CIRCULATION 36 wo 11 ITN649 A 024 5 SF PER FLOOR WH LiB11ANICK 12 CIImlquw LISTUPFI 31019 2,57�9RR 279,502 a0 N :NG FAFA 1'XLUC•SIAP ARNADALults EAvtl OAELL/1GUNIT HASP 3P NW MU[A PHFVAi EPATID BR 89LGDMF 1MP�PollN.1 7U P•.a EACH BUILDING HAS 0\E FIRE RISER`SEE CIVIL FOR LCCATIONS DuvB'UIM:%G ',Or PSDIIDED V.TIH oI'aY.31'.ALLS W 1:r1HPI HaFLg'TA3 CI:TNI at FaDF OA Roof AB},E I.303PI69f)T11I V 1SAADGAI WEiEIPA IRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B.2 Cada Mesa CA 92626 (11415 .572449 w.ipaoc corn ARCHITECTURE PL AN N I NG CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. a PARKING CALCULATIONS T I I T ■ ti j a °IIMLiG� II7B,SRI>ml!@ES£BYia£IIEdB51ti4`r�A�s2'n 29611UHL•H1GiLP2H1[Atlflld6LffiYL (NOT RESTRICTED TO ONLY AFFORDiBIJ: UNITS) PARKING RATIOS PER LQFIC 9 W.260 ARE LISTED ABOVE Utah 1321 -BR UIInI I SPACEREO ARED .132 1202 'NIIT I UNITS 13 S SPACESAINir REQUIRED =180 CQ!S1Elt;M(CE2a4 I SPACE PER 3W SF OFCROSSFL000. AREA PF 2 TOTA.SPACESREQJIRED: 319 TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 522 £D'RHER PARrraHHOLPEf11130ER&E619M11011.11BDL1 Gj-$'GHr..K11ixG Ilei¢ Ur:Oc. OVIOED. 3S.C.0 RED 159 UNCOVERED Yie TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 356 COVERED ♦ 165 UNCOVERED = 5.'2 TOTAL NOTE: ANDA AND FEVPARKING 6 INCLUDED N THE OVERALL PARKING COUNT RKYI'C WAH6720HS Efm18EFT1FeHlDtlH LEQIII1FfltQt41&BEtB RI[rf�.i�.. �_ _ _ _ TOTAL PARK9:G SPACE, 522 TOTAL PARKING SPACESSn SHOii-TTR,M ' 03S ` ID": OFTOTA. PARXING SPAffS S22 I-UF1-IEHIOLF :H:) 2 1O SIS ASSIC PA0.KIHGSPA�S 10,99 LD_ TERN 0 N/A TOTAL HE SPACES11i 11 RITIPE EVSPACES RFQb P arcC00. n>7IODRI•d9ElFti 'a Di.Yr:'Ir FIITUREEVSPACEEPROVIDED 52 SSOF 14TMSSIGIEO PARKING SPACE, 9.25 MI BKYCLE PARKING REQ -02 TCTFL HC SPACES REQD 1 TOTAL BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED A ADA CAR SPACES REQ D 15 PER GLGAYL//L10E.9.I:0L[TR1G'N7111[2F PLU INC ADAVANSPACES REQ D 1 74MIEVSWESI OPABE CFSUPP ill. F711P9 TOTAL ADA SPACES PROVIDED 12 ELFAR.IL 4DIIOE SUPPLY EQ"JIRnFTIT (!M1u). P:ITIEDEp TO DEHJNSTRATE MDIEI:T'S CAWBU]TY9. CAPACITY FOR FACILITATING FUTURE EV CHARGING BQBFQULRFJIEeT FOR EVSPACES TO BE cuisrRUCTED OR AVAILABLEFlfILEV CHARGERS ARE INSTALLED FORUSE La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street 8 Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 VICINITY MAP CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - HAND-OUT BY APPLICANT IRWIN PARTNERS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS city r< ..,..I nn PdBBINf8EIIQ5 C B VI PER L01RC 9111 ,11 BYFIGHT PAPI.TNG INCENTIVE, THE CP 300 7011-T 011 PARKING =C0•'PAC]PARVhG SPAOEp 9'X Ifi) 5' X P=COVERED Sr,,;AD PARVNG SPACE is X 19-) FOLLDY:RIC PARKING RATIOS SHAL APPLY TO THE ENTIRE DEVELOPRBNT(INCLUDINGHARKETFVVEUItITS) FEV 51 FEv= FLIUREEJP-INa SPACE(9 X 19) 1-BRUHITS 1 SPACE PER UNIT REQUIRED FEV HC 1 FEVHC=FUNREEVACCE551E'EPA 'i35FJ E(5'%19'){SASIE 2-BRUNITS: 15 SPACES PEA UNIT REQUIRED FEV VAN 1 IV VA4 FUTURE EV VAR 1-1. SPAS I9 X ID)"I AI HE HE 9 H. ACE55]BLESTANDARD PARCI:G SPACE I9'%Is').'AISLE ° I_m Ae.AlreaMl TIC Van Y NC VAN =ACCESSIBLE V'ANPAR,UNG SPACE I9' X 157 t S' IUSLE V..COVERED STANDARD PARFUZ SPACES: 15111-PIn', 0 Lli li 1N 1.41,=0ESIGIATW HAIL \'FY PAaG!::NSFAtF(9'%]9) UIiFiE�CJy1AFT FAGF}':G SFK=9: 511arvu.-I UN[mvilm SEDtI�FM[IIWD W.0:71-P.+A...1 A11 151 P=STA 11D PAAKWG I-I9'%19'1(9'%I7') IM Pi17510.a,44D FARYL>C 5114-M 35111In°.•y1.1VIFF, BIdB I. Elevalianz 522 AOS Fs _ A09 Bldg 3-Elevm,dn ,on: �T7L!AP7,CE5 5,211-n , ne, ex- °IIMLiG� II7B,SRI>ml!@ES£BYia£IIEdB51ti4`r�A�s2'n 29611UHL•H1GiLP2H1[Atlflld6LffiYL (NOT RESTRICTED TO ONLY AFFORDiBIJ: UNITS) PARKING RATIOS PER LQFIC 9 W.260 ARE LISTED ABOVE Utah 1321 -BR UIInI I SPACEREO ARED .132 1202 'NIIT I UNITS 13 S SPACESAINir REQUIRED =180 CQ!S1Elt;M(CE2a4 I SPACE PER 3W SF OFCROSSFL000. AREA PF 2 TOTA.SPACESREQJIRED: 319 TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 522 £D'RHER PARrraHHOLPEf11130ER&E619M11011.11BDL1 Gj-$'GHr..K11ixG Ilei¢ Ur:Oc. OVIOED. 3S.C.0 RED 159 UNCOVERED Yie TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 356 COVERED ♦ 165 UNCOVERED = 5.'2 TOTAL NOTE: ANDA AND FEVPARKING 6 INCLUDED N THE OVERALL PARKING COUNT RKYI'C WAH6720HS Efm18EFT1FeHlDtlH LEQIII1FfltQt41&BEtB RI[rf�.i�.. �_ _ _ _ TOTAL PARK9:G SPACE, 522 TOTAL PARKING SPACESSn SHOii-TTR,M ' 03S ` ID": OFTOTA. PARXING SPAffS S22 I-UF1-IEHIOLF :H:) 2 1O SIS ASSIC PA0.KIHGSPA�S 10,99 LD_ TERN 0 N/A TOTAL HE SPACES11i 11 RITIPE EVSPACES RFQb P arcC00. n>7IODRI•d9ElFti 'a Di.Yr:'Ir FIITUREEVSPACEEPROVIDED 52 SSOF 14TMSSIGIEO PARKING SPACE, 9.25 MI BKYCLE PARKING REQ -02 TCTFL HC SPACES REQD 1 TOTAL BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED A ADA CAR SPACES REQ D 15 PER GLGAYL//L10E.9.I:0L[TR1G'N7111[2F PLU INC ADAVANSPACES REQ D 1 74MIEVSWESI OPABE CFSUPP ill. F711P9 TOTAL ADA SPACES PROVIDED 12 ELFAR.IL 4DIIOE SUPPLY EQ"JIRnFTIT (!M1u). P:ITIEDEp TO DEHJNSTRATE MDIEI:T'S CAWBU]TY9. CAPACITY FOR FACILITATING FUTURE EV CHARGING BQBFQULRFJIEeT FOR EVSPACES TO BE cuisrRUCTED OR AVAILABLEFlfILEV CHARGERS ARE INSTALLED FORUSE La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street 8 Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 VICINITY MAP CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 7, 2023 - HAND-OUT BY APPLICANT IRWIN PARTNERS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 - LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PROJECT TEAM OWNER Tr..Idple Village. LLC 1800 Blankenship Ra, Sulle 325 WeslLtnnN Oregon 7068 T: (503) 807.8652 DCII P.) kcr ARCHITECT In IMM O! 245 lIchenr-r Suilc 62 Cosa LiesII-CA 92626 T: 714-557-2442 on, W:1\ vN.ipaxc Sherry Braun CIVIL Egan Cilik lPC '2945 Lladio S!reck SuiLCA Iad1.CA92201 1(760140,17663 W: egalsI can Se -Egan, Project Designer LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Hchhann Design Group. Inc 77899'Vol(R,NRL Suilc 102 Palm Chosen, CA 92211 T: 760 77/-9131 W: hag-inccom Jos. Estrada. VP. PlOjecl t.ldndgcr ELECTRICAL RTM Engineering C. -I ants 39249 Leopard Strecl Suite A-101 Palm Des-, CA 92211 1:(760)983.2007 LV: -V vin,ec con, victor Leen, PE. Pri cipal Title T1 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE' 10/19/2023 21014 La Ouinta SO V4 SHEET INDEX 11 Tat, • - VI R. -- C1 CIVIL SITE PLAN C2 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN C3 PRELN,1INARY UTILITI-PLAN ARCHITECTURAL A01 Site Plan A02 First Floor Plan A03 SCu3nd Floor Plan f ABI Rod Plan A05 llnil Pians A11 CIUDNouse Aa, BIdB I. Elevalianz AOS Bldg 2 -Elcvalions _ A09 Bldg 3-Elevm,dn ,on: A10 BIdg.4-EICV A11 Bldg 4-Ela,alions Al2 Bldg S- EICV:9lions Ata BId9 6- El -d ons A14Bldgs 7512 -El -lions F15 BItl9.8-Elevations A16 6 d 9- Etc valions /07 Bldg 10-Elevdlions A18 BI 0911-Elcvalions A19 E9lerior ElCvaOons A20 3D ViCAs A21 3D V1o77s E Llalelials Boats A22 lino ot Eight Diagrams IANOS[APF LP -1 Conceptual Landscape Plan LP -2 T)pi r Building Plan0n9 E.II LP -3 Slope Pldnlin)E{Nioil LP4 PoolArca LP -5 Entry LP-fi CanceplualWall S Fence Plan PROJECT TEAM OWNER Tr..Idple Village. LLC 1800 Blankenship Ra, Sulle 325 WeslLtnnN Oregon 7068 T: (503) 807.8652 DCII P.) kcr ARCHITECT In IMM O! 245 lIchenr-r Suilc 62 Cosa LiesII-CA 92626 T: 714-557-2442 on, W:1\ vN.ipaxc Sherry Braun CIVIL Egan Cilik lPC '2945 Lladio S!reck SuiLCA Iad1.CA92201 1(760140,17663 W: egalsI can Se -Egan, Project Designer LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Hchhann Design Group. Inc 77899'Vol(R,NRL Suilc 102 Palm Chosen, CA 92211 T: 760 77/-9131 W: hag-inccom Jos. Estrada. VP. PlOjecl t.ldndgcr ELECTRICAL RTM Engineering C. -I ants 39249 Leopard Strecl Suite A-101 Palm Des-, CA 92211 1:(760)983.2007 LV: -V vin,ec con, victor Leen, PE. Pri cipal Title T1 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE' 10/19/2023 21014 La Ouinta SO V4 1. - -_- - ---- - -- ---- lull./ pMT rIE: AAL: - � IT I I 4 ..: � I II r. I I =1: 1 _ i. l..r,.ii,4 1..,. �. S I r n -•A'r'm+.� • Tilsry f I '•� i 1 if rt i• i --. 1 9ELTp BLDG. 3 PAD=51.5 PR DE .6AYN r Tor xvNPAD5 Y•6 Y116UMI* � r • "1� � 6T14b2n I FooTPRwr-T,S6Dt5F - - . �� / ,c •--,- _ _ BLDG.2 $ I' :: Y PAD=51.0 BLDG. 11 BiAG.12 • TSTORY I18 UNR5 - - - — -- -- _ _ ' ...... 5A,5U1Pff /l�7-` I I _ BLDG. 10 PAD -5d - • � _ - - _ PAD 53 5 :smR+" LwFa i 1 7IMAGE [e�i[r OR P�: GHi RE�`TFi.T , - ..- -' NµN - '{ 2STORYl16 UNITS _ _ _ fD0�PAq' �� — / •f:`� ~• - Tll FOOTPRNT-T,SWt SF •^ i 'ir I dI m, ROOM 3— nlll i1 .•i _ - — --- - _ _ I AAuc r>r�r, ��E. JcS -3'X Iti •• 0 P _p. J ... .r� /� f �f r -r• ' �+ - dC I- T• _ CLUB ... - - YAWN .. .. _ -•• ! . -. ' • `- IN 4 HOUSE �,.1 ��� '/, :A'•:�,. fir•.'I t. 1 �� _ ) PAD=62.0 - —. .�; .. _ _ .., r.1 �v. J R, ... r;. -T i• � - - AkE3i !;. 1", BLDG. 4 4 1 PAD --53.0 �- II.. 2 -STORY 116 UNITS �. ,�� - I Y 1. FOOTTNNT-1,SODl7' lam` LAWN BLDG. 9 l r X44? / �•', I, ,j' -�� PAD =53.5 �, I - if r -�•�- .. - 2STORYI16UNIT5 .. - :ice! Ir •��. . _ = FOOTPRINT T.SODt BLDG. 5 < I o FF1R i OOTORV 116 UNITS r/I FOO7PRINI.7,BW2 SF �___ r TT ` y - J �•': jf - I ;( { .I• I..: `.i Ir BLDG. 8 - .,.•L _ J: �• J .,1±• 1 �I. ,� r: f ..: PAD 53.0. 1' 2 -STORY 116 UNITS: {" / , ^_ __ _ __ _ ��� FOOTPRWT.15WtW I �/. _ 'ire• µ y PxTOO6P:T�.A9As -i AIs - TER .'.•it, _ X11 • _ - . r I - . . BLDG. 6 BLDG. 7 PAD 5 0 PAD 52.0 �- ' ' 25TORVl•L UH1i - - 2 &TORV : 11 UNITS _ FOO PNIM-7,5002 55' FOO PRWT-1,SODl •T-cr-lur.!. )-sTaLx^ _ -a-' _ ,T Lire r�_. ---------=--= --- ---- __ --------_---- --- - - - - - -- =-- —= _ — — - - - -_----- - - - = ------------ WWII- IENd4 j0• Cyt -_=- — = - ----- 1 H --— `�' �44== — - - a 1RUIFrc I AW - -- --'-.. t1A All I--- ABBREVIAIl� SCALE: 1"0' C/L CENTERLINE TP TOP OF PAVEMENT EG E%I STING GROUND TO TOP OF CURB FL FLOW LINE TF TOP OF FOOTING FS FINISH SURFACE TW TOP OF WALL Ia GRADE BREAK (%%,%%) EXISTING ELEVATION SWALE PRINTED ON: 08/15/2023 �j�� 1 }}1���� j' BENCHMARK: F1+mffFri .CONTrf pLAN CHECKED BY: I }I� C �+,�I' II Y BENONIRC TOP OF QF6 Az006 / DFIATIO: 252,27 TC / DATA: IGVD29 FT MARK BY DATE REVISIONS APPR DATE QRO'FESp/a E G A N CIVIL , INC . APPROVED BY: IN 11iE CITY OF LA OUINTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DH ll.C�lj itS'11L 2IS DESCRIPT1Ri TDP OF CUB AT THE BUR AS 9 ON THE CITY OF ROCHO MIRAGE 9 OA,y! f �T STREET PIANS FDR THE KESS.ER OFFICE BUILDING, SHEET s OF 9 ON FILE IN THE �44�w-'A�� f��. c _ LA OUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS OFFICE OF CM ENGINEER OF THE CITY a RANCHO MIRKE AS PUN N VEER EOMN71 + y NO 8nk 5287. lA OBIiifA CA 8714 -5482 OWL o DIAL a BASS DF BEARINGS, o m ,, = m PRO NU WW DATE DATE CIVIL SITE PLANBEFORE 3 YOU DIG 1 THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS S'JFNV AAE WED ON THE GUFORNA PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: ��� COORDINATE SYSTEM (CCSB]), ZONE N, (2017.50 EPOCH) AS PER GOA INVERSE ]: * TRAFFIC UTTY FILE NOAIHER TOLL FREE CALCULATIONS BETWEEN CO"NUOSLY OPERATING REFERENCE (C.O,R.S) STATION'S f{ CAY1L t 252 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX AT LF15T TA'O D115 RFO(E ]aJ Oltl P491 AND PINI PER PUBLISHED VALUES PROVIDED BY THE SCRIPPS ORBR AND tP Oi CAL1F� DATE: 06/06/2023 WASHINGTON ST h AVENUE 50, LA OIIINTA, CA 92253 A PUB If SERVICE BY UD__ROIOIAO SERVICE ALERT PERVAVEM MRAY CENTER (SOPAC. ), BONG: NORTH 76 59 35.49 WEST. BENJAMIN DANIEL EGA RaE. 73070 REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY: DATE LANDSCAPE AFT! 646-070-016 a :Lj LL ' O• -- P>-r••Y. uH= '� t -t 'I I rl - — _ - - - - SE _ _ eAx — ! 1 -IJ TT Pi l �i -----; - _- ----I F- ---_ ----- - -- _ -= I-- j ---I - ---- -----= - - - -� I I- _ _ - - - I I- I a 5a -B I , uwn -- uwn uwr BLDG. 3 PT PAD751 SAs1 BLDG. 1 1 I _ i-ST17Rr�16LON iA! �: BTA ai n PAD =50.0 -- — - _ FDomRrrr. vsow sF hl 2 -STORY 116 UNITS [ I F007PRIN7-7.MW BLDG.2 — PAD=51.0I 2STORY I IS UNITS _ _- BLDBLDG. 12 - FaoRRM-75WfSF BLDG. 10 _ - PAD=54.54.5 PAD=53.5 25TORY I16 UNR5 25TORYII6 UNITS ! 2 -STORY 116 UNITS FOOTPi11M.i.50Qx SF FOOTPRINT .7SIM FOOTPRINT -75WA SIF •. _ . I - 6 ¢ HOUSE CL t. 50 aimLAM J uuu i-SYORY • 16 uN15 � �% � _ I,�• —'! - �� o - - r•omrnlu7 2 FI1c ra BLDGI _ 1 _ - --- - — - --- uwn . 9 PAD=53.5 1III - - -- 2 -STORY I IBUNRS ' _�_ r ! I•I FOOTPRINT. •71XU yIF. I ILII I r _ I BLDG.5 i' y1 PAD 51.5 2 -STORY 116UNITS r _ �; 1 ❑. FOOTPRINT-7,SOOA SF II` I __ �•r \�• I V BLDG.8 PAD=53.0 Ltd _ _ _ . - -- L- : - � _ E _ 2 -STORY / 16 UNITS s= ---' IY _ - - - _ - _ I OUT. INQR14 70�0 1 1 ILI ; BLDG. 6 _ BLDG. 7 PAD =50.0 PAD=52.0 ! _ C - i3_ lId UNITS , 2 -STORY 116 TWIT -- - . � FOO7PRPTf-T,SWx SF - - - � - _ ___ _ _- — - _ __ - • - FODTPRIM-1500SSF LINE -- _3,11 --- - - "--- - - - -- - ---- �- - - =- •-0- c0`-- - �- -�� --- - — �v- .---3- =----------------_ .. -- i^• . Rrs6-vti7nr - - -- Tr. ak�EFct`vSic�.T-- — _ '-_ - _ - - __ - - -_- - - -- - -- _— �� �--_ 1 --- - —-- --- i - g --- - --D-o PIa------------ RI`— r[D' TR4TIC LAWAvO-- -- --- --_ _-- -� ...ARi iD£ LATE . . t- WA 16 —40 0 40 ABBREVIATIONS EARTHCRK WANITIES C/L CENTERLINE TP TOP OF PAVEMENT RAW CUT: 5,500 YARDS SCALE: _ EG EXISTING GROUND TO TOP OF CURB RAW FILL: 47,400 YARDS FL FLOW LINE TF TOP OF FOOTING IMPORT: 41,900 YARDS FS FINISH SURFACE TW TOP OF WALL THE ABOVE QUANTITIES ARE AN ENGINEERS ESTIMATE ONLY AND GBGRADE BREAK (XX,XX) EXISTING ELEVATION ARE PROVIDED FOR GRADING PERMIT PURPOSES. CONTRACTOR CP COVERED PARKING SN'ALE SHALL VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES FOR THIS BID PURPOSES. A�i PRINTED ON: 08/16/2023 BENC�jl B•��'��• COUNTY cKNCA/ TOP OF CUS JZOD5 / ELEVATIO: 252.27 TO / DATIY: tGVD2S FT uARrt By 1uTe REVISIONS uATr VE,OiE6llO* APPROVED BY: PLAN CHECKED Br: IN THE CIN OF LA OUINTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 7 1f� DESCRIPTION: TOP OF OM AT TIE BOR AS SKRN OI TIE CITY OF RAV00 MIRAGE 0 YR A,(•rF �r E G A N CIVIL, INC. SHEET L dddSSSVC ...LLLLLL DIAL Ruuu .L}. sTP'..ET Pi.115 FOR THE KESSER OFFICE BUILDING, slfrET s OF 9 O! FILE IN RE LA OUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS CSZi_i.J OFFICE of crtr ENGINEER of THE crtr of RANCHO ulw; As PLAN NIIIaa Eo6Donl y y P43 &(�X 5PBP. LA iilliNfM1. CA 8PPd9.5 awL D, BEFORE CALL .=I -QE RFaRINOs� �•+'" -7�1 ,� 17'O! 4od-7568 WWYI. GA DAA CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN Slg 3 YOU DIG AHE "' OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON THE CAJFORNIA O• I,� Df V PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: COORDINATE SYSTEM (CCSB3), ZONE A (2017-50 EPOCH) AS PER CRO INVERSE * * TRAFFIC TOLL FREE !-g1••TFT-A13j CALCUTA70NS BETWEEN CONIIN'VOSLY &ORATING REFERENCE (CORS) STATIONS df O ~-S S LTTY FILE NUT1EiR P/9I AND RN1 PER PUBUSHED VALUES PRONGED EY THE SCRPPS ORBIT AND 7f iY1L F 2ON UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX AT LF1 II __PINE ETD[ YOU OIG FGF OALLFa DATE: 06/06/2023 WASHINGTON ST k AVENUE 50. LA OUINTA, CA 92253 A PLBLIC 5C4710E Bf U�RBrara SERVICE ALERT PERMANENT ARRAY CENTER (S OPA C. ), BEING: NORTH 76 59� 35.49' WEST. BENJAMIN DANIEL EGAN, R C.E 73070 RENEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY: DATE LANDSCAPE APN 616-07o-016 LF IL I[ - ` i I o. po1-I J— - - - --_ � --',R7fAF, LITE L _ - -- ---- ---- --- - ------------T_ -- --- --- .I ��� 11 F"- _ }� TRASH j`EI - _ I.Ow - j`�_1.I1 '�J 4," IE 1 TRAEN r I -�_ _ ° I Rrunn - _ +1.o IE -} c..- uwd /" LAWN FSrd F[3R f Q.O. BLDG, 3 5 �r FOOL �,W Play PAD P1t.OEi- QAw BLDG_ }- CiA�ua -PAD=50,0 -2STORY/16 UNITS - _ _- . FOOTPRINT-]SWiSF — _ ��4�' - - .. / PSTdAYAl6UIllTA - - 1 yr, ��i BLDG. 11 _- BLDG" 12 - I BLDG. 10_ _ PAD=5451 PAD=55,0 I �i 2STORY I!UMTS )-STORYJ]6 UNR5 - I I La LAW. SCF r156 L'HFP: I :N F M1T-)SOD SF FOOTPR NT -),SW SF �T7rd[Y L]'E e N F AE Rme xul I II _ —rIn 11�xv — Q , M61A — 7yLF� L�QI WiN { - -� �' ¢ eLUa GRff I II/. Q HOUSE - � paO-sz.a ICJ xA' s wuLE IAWH BLDG" 4. f •. 4 PAD -53 0 / L•' f 1 _ '.i :.6TORY 11L UMi5 rI � " Q _ }} i - FanLVRRT_;eisF ) BLCtG" I� z _:rcnYri�HNFTa i' �� I BLDG. 5 _ WE REM �V! j - PAD -51"5 it i • I _ r1 FMTPRW? ].SO}_SF AS FIRE 71n, I •�' { { { BLDG 8 L" ' PA )=sUNuITS Lam,- _ ) FG'STP4Jif. F.'�pf.EF'. -SL G�, or�wx-m I -Lm. 6rA,N GT�.� 5450- - a' mw lu1H � 0 m� I YR7DEF.HR9W 8G TRASH I . I BLDG, 1 BLDG,7 j - PAD -50"0 + 1 PAD=52"0 _ -' I .smRrATIf uHTTs il! — :rsiw•r,6 F96FwnWr-v,mg _ f ' '• ` I Ff<1TRPfIT:9WM. �: 1B i1_ I _ _ F - - 12t' . 1 R[9R�-f'Ae J SD S7 Sp r _ r � . i _ TA1—NkT PWN< mr 1k8 rnWEcrIf1Y Pplld - - O_ 119IGATIv1 NE — — - -,- - r _ CIkE i/92Nf z0 o- 40 5v i2- IJ SCALE: 1"=40' PRINTED ON: 08/16/2023 BENCHMARK- EwGI REVISIONS R94F5$/ PLAN CHECKED BY, OF C O y2006 / ELEVAM AT THE BOR TION SI ON T E / Y OF N ID MIRAGE F � er I DATE A � oA^TE R °ai E G A N CIVIL, INE. r. APPRovEo BY: IN THE CITY OF LA OUINTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SHEET `� 0STREETTPRhISS FOR THE IFSAEA OFFICE WILDING, SHEET 910E 9 ON FIDE ilTHE R49AY 0A k!'F[ r� LA OUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS DIAL cAii OFFICE D CITY ENGINEER D E CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGEAS RAR NAM EDBD l7, a r �� > s�g}> SII 9k EA x2248 -52x2 aCIVIL PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN CHEF 3 BEFORE BASIS OF HEARINGS' A+ -� n FT m ��OIARM WPLNIGANCfHum DATE YOU DIG THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON THE CAUFORNIA MA NO•'. V�U '^ PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: K ) COOROINAIE SYSTEM (CCSB]), ZONE N, (2D17 50 EPOCH) AS PER GRID INVERSE i' ti ] AF IRAFFlC LAY FILE NUMOER TOLL FREE t-6C]--dee-}I?j CALCUUTIONS BETWEEN CDNIINUOSLY OPERAIING REFERENCE (C -QRS) STATIONS 'Cr cIYLy +� 252 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX AT LEAST TWO s11S BERR✓E YOI DIG P491 AND PIN1 PER PUBUSHED VALUES PROVIDED BY THE SCRIPPS ORBIT AND 'FFE CAAIipP DATE: 06/06/2023 WASHINGTON ST @ AVENUE 50, LA DUINTA, CA 92253 A p�L1C BER/ICE BY pOERGROUO gTrvlff ALERT PER ARRAY CENTER (SO P,AC), BONG: NORTH 78' 59' 35.49' WEST. BENJAMIN DANIEL ELAN, RGE 77070 REVIEV✓-cD AND RECOMMENDED BY: pAIE GNDSCAPE APN 646-070-016 PROPERTY LINE- INTII 5IDEY•ARA SETBACK.Ly `�;-""M1S `.` I. 'V... '.. ••+-. .•-. '.. .._ .. .SEI91pEYARp SEMINUAUM 5.8" ACK PWS I'-0"POR L�4J?'. (E)P-H Pc •..j •. -. --. _ ._ - - �-� +Vcw PLUCe x•�L�-'.. :'-�l5`� •�- \S9'FPY-0'W , ], -- -_- _. _ - - _ - - _FOGTTOVEN-i T.6 NaU6WNGHEIGHT. I.riIJLIHMSETSACx 17P:II:. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ / 9LDrK WALL + P P P ✓' P P P P P P I nWP P P P P P P P P >• PIP ' a F P I. P■ P P P! F P. F F! P IIII F >' P P P F F n a n ! P F a r r I^ r r• Pµr T P r! +P r r r• I� ! DESERiSCaPE T - (] . . .I rte_ O a6d AREA I ISI I l a e. I I i 1 1 iM1 - I I 1 F v ��-� ^ a P W I P P PIP P F C C S i CP i . 1 LP � ENCE�IlRE V sETBACti PERT BVILOIpgO. KT !t CARp(1RT TRASry EHCEOBLNi - , GRPORT Y Cl]!ACHE1JaVALIEY J r SETBACK LINE LP _ tr ,r-J WATF]R [prCTpiG'✓✓ 4 / POIVER POLE I l PFR LPTBACMIlt LINE APIh UNDERGROUND, _ CP ' NH LP CP CP a CP EP ITC IHC LP CP CP CP CP CP LP CI• EF CP IUP Cv Ca LT CA C1 CP LP LP CP CP CP CP CP CP LP LP ! P I.Ih ICP LP LP 'LP CP CP CP CP CP LP CP CP '.n[' P CP CP CP LP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP C l SETBACK 'i.11NIr.1Ut.110'-0" RELOCATYP LP -. _ �_ _- - l - _ __ - - ! C �. % •PROPERTY LINE STOP &SHELTER CP CP^•� - N+INJ{S'pRA :� Ire CP CP / •. S f - ]:.. - r l LP CP fty } CP CP P - OEEEF.FSCAPE _ _ I LP � F[V FRY SSS CP T CP � QM * F � •.. LP cp I' Too. S � FEY M CP CP PDITIR6 ICJ WAnF CORAfOT7Rl IGYi-f 1iE5TR1LTiPN LP i� LP - IQ UnHb Tobi Fslf F]EMT FEY - __-- LP LP L09R5>& PP i BId¢ 1 cP CP } PRY F[Y f_ cP CP PROPERTYLI 25fory �,, EV CP 4 r '• 1 CP CP C-r f;I p' CP / r 16 Unf T9W CP cP Bldg.2 rTr PRY cP CP /(///'` ll _ I A ,+ 1LETesrTa,lw- -. CP cr 2Story - r� R'.-•Fs _ i s 11Y CP CP / 91dg. 71 Bldg. 12 I DO ! ( 'IB Unlb Tobl - - � FiY pEy Bldg. 10 # T 29tnry `(/ P 2Story I v l CP cP r F3:Y PES 2 Story cP CP 1E Vnila TD1al� ,./ �' r---�- 24 units Taal I M v + CP v '16 Unlb Tobi CP CP C� _ % SVI.eCEO r ill/' CP C l CP CP - ,.707 Lor r� I He rx -.1 / CP CP J P E p 3.0 - LT P I rer 1 I CP CP F 11MRFWAM I - I FEY FEV S - 1 PEO GA-r-_ IF CP {{Nell FITV �__:� .� N /ICP C>• 1 _ L'P I , P.6. orrk aeo F, .. FEL' FEV - / RRl1T �� Bldg 4 P N)l:YL II FP 4P / xr cP II i `meq Il :t4 Unlb Tabs PEv Delp f-erw'� :�}P d cP ! . I CP W IG Ir-IIr 1/ t , FFRI �Y C[utrlloYle - n GJ rl I R•. ILP CP 11 }' r T Story ��I l I CP •I LP ry I V L(!V `j it - rFR i p LP# 1 b FEY ! I�r KNO,L. Aw 81110 FEY f CP -.-.• ' IW •. 7 ! .fes �� Z _ _ VM!GLt:.l;•A.T.E_ 3_—_-______ _ 41 FEV - '� 'P17RT CP . 0 1 I . l_.. �_-L��� BBD P0.EA CFCp y w p 11 - P P P P P P P P i(C l V `4 _ J ' - BICYCLE, -_� •1 1 FEV - PED3ATE �� Awl I RACK FEV a Q C7 v\ V - rffLE F fXMIRTSCAPE P I )Zy FEV CPPER CT a Q EIECEL SITESIGN DBA -- 4 .' CP PERI m CF [�� LANE r CBC 1109A B B P 0 V y FEV EP I C� I � I 9 FEII FEV CP I I �� U) * Bldg. 6 � >s, eF .�"'7 Bldg. 9 , GJ Q I• RETEHTIO. aryl P P 2Story _ 2Story I CP / N-� li I 04 Unka Tota FEY cP - , : 24 UnIts Total .. ! CP a� CP / V TNI}- a Ir cp CP m • P ` P I :I. , N HV'DRAHT— OESERTSCAPE +I CP I) v +++ ■ 1 I P 55 -+ f F--Bldg. B u ! I 1 + P rr CP CP CP CP CP LP CP CF CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP LP CP Cv CP CPA CP CP Cf Cp tv CP CP CP CP 2 $SOry P CP ! I I _ � 1 bP�lfirr...:= ItU UnNa Total — ^ ~ � �IN. cP J-�-- CARPORT Ll E CORRIDOR 4 1-C N.OF T r� :.tY i I ' FIT RFSTR)LT1C'l+ }� � ~ �-�-LINE OF IMAGE CORRIf)OR � �� f Ir � I j LARPORf TARSN ENCl h % 1 HEIGFfT RESTRICTION ,.gyp. _ '-n ,� CP I I _ CP LINE OF IMAGE CORRIDOR PROPERTY LINE • Cc..A,.PPT _ I!PAAT '� t '6l I HEIGHT RESTRICTION cP CP CP CP CPI CP CP CP CP LP LP LP CP CP CP h cP CP CP C CP -CP CPT1C CP-1.'P ' I I Yn xPwe:d1! } i s � � �-^C. ! � � T �•..pJl ! _ .-. — — _ _ _ .-. — — — I F pOILO DESERTSCAPE CP T /- SET9AINr CK.LIRE IN1 hIYDRAN I- .. ..� -.� + RAPT{-� CR' I ` ��'CP -f PERRIETER J $ldg• 5 VE II Ii I.JW65CAJ•ING' ..@RUT 1 2S[Ory q 24 Unto TOW - - PICKLEi El, (POWER POLET C�T 1 EIK9E ,C �- I 24 lfniLL TGPa1 Tf, :UNDERGROUND, I pE=_pPECH'1C lU,WI 8 _��j {{�J TYP 1 ......ff _ _ - P 1 OGC WALL AGCESSIBLE � - - - - � - l - Irl - q - _ E' BLOCK WALL TTSC•Ir-E PFPI SIT - - - SICW PER - WTL'SA'SSE'k l r-h}ETER - - - CESE - - - - �� �� IGN _ PndLe7.lt -F ~a - _ '\ -- •�) ^ i - � - _.~-F f '' V Ty ' ANDMCAPINGSETBACK NOTE: SII:U.IUIIS_ACR Y•[LL p a1Q�R A 3E 20" SETBACK RO '�:� __ •Ii F'`u• �F- _ PPERTY LINE (NOT APAR'-) sEE SPECIDC IaN FDR [y�.01 FOL4'�7+hL IRF"JRISAT[W ___ EXTERIOR SIDEY PROPERTY - POWER PGLE TO SEI. I CREST. �CATED VERTiGAL.CFiE91r ----•�----------- ,.. - •- ,• -: :--: �. I._ '---------- - - - - - - — - - - - - --- (11 AGE CORRIDOR) BE UNDERGROUND, FIDEYARD SETBACK: kAR65Er6AC� gp!!!E!pn° - 1.1AXIM11UA7SETBACKOF25'-0" TYP• FOOT OVER 17-0" 5-0"SETBACKPLUSETB FOR EVERY RIGHT-OF-WAY PER PARCEL A1AP FOOT OVER 1]'-0" IN BUILDING HEIGHT, LIAXIM11UA15ETBACK OF 10'-0" AVENUE 50 CRlaDlwl Fxlrlr CekLalYoTn VNIY 1d6t Pv➢fi6C� PAeKTxG Renpc PG Lec TAeLP M.� Au[wr.aLF emLcluo HElrwrr yy-SET ngpyE [La.nDE rLailE . Ana RPL EIR4 Type llpkme Gey An!}SFT Tbh Imo) clYP_TN PBI LQMC 9. S1 260(K) O1-RIGHT PARKING D:CENnLE, THE `•'-T Site Plan _ 2 1,FOLL0:.IN. PARKIY.G ­S SHALL APRT TO THE ENTIRE RPS C%%ITHOUTAR=AINCR�SE) Plrst Ffee[ 1-BCtl FpRHmcnl 1R•A[yL 51 an C=COHPACT PARKO:G SPACE(E,5'X 10') DR'EL PD.1(INCWDIY.G H: KEl`1:.TEUN-)=TOFEETFLLO'::ED CLUBHOUSE RESIDENTACTIVITY 978 1-BCtl Apartment lA-STD 30 673 20.190 CP 309 CP=CO\ERED ST;J:DARD PARKING SPAM IT X 17) \VI SL'f.Le iflT- '•D LRUxrR: 15PACEPERU'NITREO'= tA+dF ��4 �� � i'Ip.sG Il -AOR �; ✓} N .BLDG 6 1A..w I Icwo4 ,ww 1,..yt n.4gA 3, IT 1A-13LDG 3 OAQA +.-AW 4r J A aLnG 2 . jam, i�lsp 1 Y k w:il S" 8LDG4 f C4tle�wr[ i I . 14AGs u.Ana ® IbA4l1 BLDG 5lot LEGEND PROPOSED ENCLOSURE LOCATION FOR METERS AND SWITCHGEAR EQUIPMENT .PINI PA IRWIN PARTNERS 4,A C M I T E C T A 145 Fischer Avenue, Sulle 3-2 Cosla Mesa CA 92625 (714) 557 2445 www Ipaoc com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 10J11A YFaC,4GAW Ie.IW " . 5LDG 7 .� 1S A04 u+,ya 1L✓tAA 4l. La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street 8 Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 A& /jN> First Floor Plan ��JJ�J�f SCALE -11-301 i/ TYP. FIRE RISER ENLARGED PLAN SCALE"Irr = 1'-0' First Floor Plan A02 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Quinta SO V4 I I I I EN C n VIA ROOF BELOW H 711 !, t V� 010 1 ■�_ _�� �- �a r_ _rill - t&i .� � ,� u � - �S •SF' '6 r- sem.. �.1.+� rte$ Rui' ,�.!■ �� ONIPANIDA IR.ININPARTNERS A, R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suit, B-2 Cost, Mese CA 92626 (]14) 55] 2448 'Pa"C' M ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 IND Second Floor Plan SCALE:T =30' Second Floor Plan A03 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Ouinta SO V4 ,r 'r r ,• ;r ;r ,r ■�_ _�� �- �a r_ _rill - t&i .� � ,� u � - �S •SF' '6 r- sem.. �.1.+� rte$ Rui' ,�.!■ �� ONIPANIDA IR.ININPARTNERS A, R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suit, B-2 Cost, Mese CA 92626 (]14) 55] 2448 'Pa"C' M ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 IND Second Floor Plan SCALE:T =30' Second Floor Plan A03 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Ouinta SO V4 E - SLOG 3 ri r,: r: BIAG 2 .. r. tt ss,n• V awy V Lw 0AsV. - W�Mnn-j IPAIRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 245 FischerAvenue, Suite 6.2 C -I, Mese CA 92626 (714) 557 2446 —Ip...— ARCHITECTURE wwIpaoc—ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING w GENERAL NOTES: - PER LA QUINTA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN, PARAPET WALLS SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 5' TALL TO SCREEN/HIDE HVAC EQUIPMENT - SEE SHEET A21 FOR LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAMS - PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS SHALL MEET MINIMUM QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN JOINT APPENDIX JA11 (2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE) - PRELIMINARY SOLAR CARPORT SHOWN ABOVE. FINAL LAYOUTTO BE DETERMINED La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 AL IN>Roof Plan SCALE: 1' =3a' Roof Plan A04 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 1011WO23 21014 La Quinta SO V4 READYROGR. NO ENSION LESS THAN 5'-0" Z!,DIM LEGEND EACH SUBAREA MUST BE AT LEAST 160 SF IF TOTAL ROOF AREA EXCEEDS 10,000 SF SOLAR READY ZONE SOLAR ZONE ON STEEP SLOPED ROOFS MUST BE ORIENTED BETWEEN 110 AND 270 DEGREES OF I TRUE NORTH, ORIENTATION DOES NOT APPLY ON ROOFS SLOPED LESS THAN 2:12 HVACCONDENSERS L_1 MUST BE FREE OF ROOF PENETRATIONS AND ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT MIN, 15°/, OF TOTAL ROOF AREA IS REQ'D TO BE SOLAR READY, EXCLUDING ANY SKYLIGHT AREA FIRE ACCESS, 4'-0" CLEAR MIN. CARPORT ROOF BELOW TOTAL ROOF AREA INCLUDES ROOF/OVERHANG OF THE BUILDING OR ROOF/OVERHANG OF - ANOTHER STRUCTURE LOCATED WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR ON COVERED PARKING INSTALLED WITH THE BUILDING PROJECT TOTAL ROOF AREA: 214,504 SF SOLAR READY MINIMUM: 15% OF TOTAL ROOF AREA SOLAR READY MIN. REQUIRED: 32,176 SF SOLAR READY PROVIDED: 32,176 SF SOLAR READY ZONES ARE LOCATED ON CARPORTS ONLY, NO SOLAR ON BUILDING ROOFS IPAIRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 245 FischerAvenue, Suite 6.2 C -I, Mese CA 92626 (714) 557 2446 —Ip...— ARCHITECTURE wwIpaoc—ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING w GENERAL NOTES: - PER LA QUINTA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN, PARAPET WALLS SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 5' TALL TO SCREEN/HIDE HVAC EQUIPMENT - SEE SHEET A21 FOR LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAMS - PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS SHALL MEET MINIMUM QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN JOINT APPENDIX JA11 (2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE) - PRELIMINARY SOLAR CARPORT SHOWN ABOVE. FINAL LAYOUTTO BE DETERMINED La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 AL IN>Roof Plan SCALE: 1' =3a' Roof Plan A04 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 1011WO23 21014 La Quinta SO V4 2r-%2 Nadard ALE 1�4" = s'{� 2 Bed -ADA 2AS�AE� e �IPA 1 W1N PARTNERS Is C N I} f 0 T 9 245 FischerAvenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (7,4)5572448 —'Peoc com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING SECOND FLOOR UNITS - STANDARD I .� B 1 Bed - Standard GROUND FLOOR UNITS - ACCESSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH CBC 11A ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS ♦ ' La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 1 . 1 Bed _ADA 1A1 Bed - Standard CALF 1M" = 1"' 1 Bed -ADA Unit Plans A05 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 o5Clul7house Floor Pian SCALE: 1d+' 1'a' aND :PI PA 1RW1N PARTNERS Is A n 1 s[ r s 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Caste Mese CA 82626 (714)557 448 —ip—ccom ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING POOL DECK mini L REC€SEED WINDOW IF lai;.A.U.A.,A....I.I. i;..t�I a.1 1.1 DECORATIVE .5TUCCOREIALIET EXTERIOR LIGHT rYP `. • •Front• oC1uhhouse - Right Elevation SCALE 1f4' = 14f• M rVE RISER La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. oClubhouse - Rear ElevatFon sr I P• va^ = na• 1 � I�TIl m 8 o1 Clubhouse - Left Elevation SCAL@: 1.14' c 1'.7 .:1 SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ SCHEME 2• STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW360 WHITE, OR EQ ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM, COLOR:BLACK Clubhouse A06 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/1912023 21014 La Ouinle SO V4 -01I PA IRW1N PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue• SUN, B-2 Costa Id— CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 .Jp,oc.cc, ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING alp �IRi�1AI�I�Iwiwlwl�lAiwi:'���;�+ Al i.RiMiwi I EiMilnnAINiA rii ai 1111 1iwlli�i ����� ��'K�iiliKi iiti�f �l a• a a��iiRiRiil�i �iiiEiiiiiiii�rfii�I lam. .Iilaaiwraunlwtwlwlw+aralil alalwral■ atwralararalata1a1a1a1a1atala ala wlalrr+. - ilwrwiwr a k1wlalrr I irl iwraialwra■ r I I Ia el- nl�llllffll II!!iI�IIIIIII'll : I III!P'll� IIIII�IIIIIIIII! I!li�f�1111_ ILlblllllll IV'Iiilllhl _ FEW I On EMENNERN a ■Ell on .l M. it 11 11 111 �� �glIY7!!ll Vlll I —c=- -,-�GH!OrSI L VINYL V4NDOW FIBER GLASS L L�,,E MR —L,� L L MCCO REGLET :.g 1 Front Elevation re=3d3P��ssyy��iicEx'"ii===���s-ii f"xx xsi:i-ii° ••••r=•=sns. iiiitAii,SGZYFiLRiiP�Tir'nwr�si a}a atlLl�;1,LL"€�=E?::sei::::. III Ili III�II I'lll_!III_ll III LLI�1p_p�__' 11 .11- :111 ll•I'I 1111!11 '. ROOFING . .I FREaCHxr,-e' La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 028 171 Rig61t Elevation �s Rei 1� IMMUNE Fvu� COLOR SCHEREI o 1 Bldg 1 Rear Elevation 5C41AI • 1'-w SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. FASCIA. TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING. OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR BLACK Bldg. 1 - Elevations A07 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA. TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR ED - ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR BLACK Bldg. 1 - Elevations A07 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 i3Oc:.aa94xN Si2T � 3 Root FRENCH DOOR -cIn RISER i RBldg 2 Left Elevation PAINTED BLACK, TYP OpB�g12 Front Elevation Sii22' �Root LD-CORATIVE SHUTTERS "1p00 CORBELS 7Bldg 2 Right Elevation SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR ED. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW300 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING �] Root .tt m +s MENC ui.s FgENCH DOOR Bldq 2 Rear Elevation SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR ED. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW300 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM, COLM DLACK IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldg. 2 - Elevations 10IPA A R C H I T E C T S Troutdale Village, LLC. A08 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 245 Fischer Avenua, Suite B-2 Costa Mese CA 92626 La QUlnta, California 92253 PROJECT (714)5572448 wipaaccom 0//21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/ ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 21014 La Ouinla SDO V4 V4 ........... .... .. rl � I F FE 777 TIGER ..,2a' RL ..T.O. PL, MCI- 1Rw 1 oBtdg 3 Left Elevation $UALZ- 118' - M ,I STrw RAY>a "Amm 11 C9. "R. All M DECORATIVE ''-THEME STUCCO REG— EXTERIOR LIGHT, ttP o Mdp� Front Elevation , SiL OBldg 3 Rluht Elevation '<ALE. 11V = V -D' SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS D E639 3C9LO CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR SCHEME STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ, ACCENT DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR ED, FASCIA. TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, -------- FR OR EQ. mn HT T ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING LYIWLWrNbW MANUR WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING FxTARuaqi wp PANG STYLE: BARCELONA o1Bldg 3 Rear Elevation COLOR: CASA GRANDE wjd-L ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUR TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS &WINDOWS COLORBRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR Sllkd. COLOR BLACK OjIPAIRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldg. 3 - Elevations A FI C H I T E C T S Troutdale Village, LLC. A09 245 Fischer Avenue, Suit, 6.2 Cost, Mesa CA 92626 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 (714)557 2448 wwwIpa-- PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING EoNs ULTING 21014 La Quinta SO V4 ,.r•,•..:=..c;.11-.;:.; �:��.;1`�:ti�;`,r•.`•.^�:`- ....fit I sll�,11 I�1 ■■ _ III�II ' ' I• 11 i11 11 � X111 .2I PA 1RW 1N PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 245 FischerAvenue, Suite B-2 Cosla Masa CA 92626 (7 14) 557 2448 www ipaoc com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 41111111111111110 ,'!'•I•_1.7.I/_glll_r, r r -•amu s•'' _ rrrr!ra•,!•;;;;:,, ... ... - :� I �� 1� on: :: 1�� �1�11_ i i i . I � �..._RF'FETII F RING .j _ IN w11Rw!11! w I11i1iti!AIRIFIARI .•�lil _--��Iwlil�tlMlwfXlAlli'i!i'f!i!i'Alwlit){itw-611i wllslwlwlwlwlrlwha�:pim ilrin'i1al,�lll�l;��l4rulm•` ------ Ili' IIIA I�IIlllll! !Illll iIIR"' •=,''c".IiID ,a Illi ill 1. I' 77J iaj�'liwei� l;llpFL IIII��. 04 EM DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ - ACCENT 1 FR�- DUNN EDWARDS n' "V FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS _ 22 Sa-.11— o 1 Fill FIL- - DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, a. X OR ED, :'If1VL WIN DOW .TL_C.: REGLET DECORATNE TIDE STEEL RAILING SLTkAF; FlBER GlA55 —RIORUGHT.T . PAINTED BLACK, TYP FnF HDwR o�Bldg 4 Rear Elevation A SCALE 1R' - T -W _--��Iwlil�tlMlwfXlAlli'i!i'f!i!i'Alwlit){itw-611i wllslwlwlwlwlrlwha�:pim ilrin'i1al,�lll�l;��l4rulm•` ------ Ili' IIIA I�IIlllll! !Illll iIIR"' •=,''c".IiID ,a Illi ill 1. I' 77J iaj�'liwei� l;llpFL IIII��. DUNN EDWARDS La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 ' r ■■ .Vth Elevation IISji:I�lA16a mgjiiiw ilil-i h.1o,.�.IIF7. NIAI.I.IRIal it --- s' �"i Fra Fcx SCHEME 2 .pE[lRNTI']E SHUTTSA TYP 1 Bldg 4 Rear Elevation B 0 1 SCALE -11W = 1'4r SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW360 WHITE, OR EQ ACCENT DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS 8 WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM, COLOR: BLACK Bldg. 4 - Elevations A10 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/1912023 21014 La Quinta SO V4 SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ, FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR ED, SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW360 WHITE, OR EQ ACCENT DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS 8 WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM, COLOR: BLACK Bldg. 4 - Elevations A10 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/1912023 21014 La Quinta SO V4 ..................... . . BUILDING 4-A ......................... FEW Li u DECORATIVE tiff!/E RIEEi PAI�Iti,^, EXTERIORUGHT,TVP PAINTEDBBACK,TVP g � nm m F �AA Bldg 4 Front Elevation Overall �i s�:A , ar 91 ! STUCCO RECIET LFY GAYS FRENCH pOCR S! OqBldg 4 Front Elevation B %J-WABE:1W = 1'-9 SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, SCHEME 2: STUCCO11 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ, FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING -- — CONCRETE TILE ROOFING - - �� STYLEMANUF: WESBARCELONA ROYAL ROOFING __ e�E SME: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE - �'� "� ��'0f ROOFING TOO ROOFING TUBE STB RNK,T %SUCCO REGLET EXTERIOTM1T MANUF: TBD PAINTED BLACK, TVP. EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP Bldg 4 Front Elevation A COLOR: TBD O5GAL� 1,n• 1•.p• VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR BLACK ■OIPA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldg. 4 -Elevations ■ i A R` H I T E>,` Troutdale Village, LLC. All 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 (714)5572448--iir-- La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 1 011 912 02 3 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 210141a Quinta SD V4 !/E.: i� C�'�"• .............................—.......:............... _iF[H[i!!-'I'CIFli11 E . c a� iL ■moi- 11 SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, SCHEME 2: STUCCO11 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ, FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING -- — CONCRETE TILE ROOFING - - �� STYLEMANUF: WESBARCELONA ROYAL ROOFING __ e�E SME: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE - �'� "� ��'0f ROOFING TOO ROOFING TUBE STB RNK,T %SUCCO REGLET EXTERIOTM1T MANUF: TBD PAINTED BLACK, TVP. EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP Bldg 4 Front Elevation A COLOR: TBD O5GAL� 1,n• 1•.p• VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR BLACK ■OIPA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldg. 4 -Elevations ■ i A R` H I T E>,` Troutdale Village, LLC. All 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 (714)5572448--iir-- La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 1 011 912 02 3 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 210141a Quinta SD V4 'moi[" " iCz; aril � fai IR°rilliliii�iiili.li�R�R al I al'a�iiiaiiiiiaiii��Rl a t '>IIiiA;lililiiwiaii i nliiiiaial iiiiriiir�riair�aiili rliiIN I rlrir�riii.a"`11R.RIlili!llli ili li�iiiiiliiliiwis iwilii i i`dill _ _ _ I Ali Eli 13i111rli1ifilil IR1r[ .ilr'r1 � 1+rlrlrlilrlrllllR•111!RIAIR!al R'llt+il11iI1111R RIRS!-:i Rlll>Rlwll+illlili!r!rl!'ila!�111rI�IJr+rlrlr+rlrl�rl R'� � +la•rlrl 1if11illlifili!11i!illfiillitlfiiitUlA .. ■ ■ ■ ■ - ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ iii■ w■ ■ ■ ■ ___ • ■ ■ ■■I 71 M1 CC L.: is iijii IIII .._ 191 R_�I �I;,I 22' 10��.`Bldg 5 Left Elevation V SCALE: 1!B" = 1'-0" 02SIN 5 Right Elevation SCALE -.IIS = 1'-V lsl,l.l-I_I "ERli��illl�iri!1i�lslllrJlill!-I Niillfililr�lilififl+ifilrlllrlrlilil�.,, i' IIIIIII!III IIIIIPII''' I �I Illlnl III!I:IIIIII I L OEmRATri Stlt[RER`.. VINYLYIINOOw ---O�wn LGCII I L5rF aAII LTIIBB STL WiLIM FRENCH DOOR EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP PMNIEp BUCI( TYP o 1 Bldg 5 Rear Elevation SCALE: 1/B" = 1'-0" I PA IRWIN PARTNERS ,A R C H I T E C T 5 245 FischerAvenue, Suite B-2 Costa v— CA 92626 IF14)5572446 ,v,ipooacom ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinla, California 92253 ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM, COLOR: BLACK Bldg. 5 - Elevations Al2 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Ouinta SO V4 SCHEME 1 - STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ, FASCIA. TRELLIS. CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM, COLOR: BLACK Bldg. 5 - Elevations Al2 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Ouinta SO V4 SCHEME 2, STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ FASCIA, TRELLIS. CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM, COLOR: BLACK Bldg. 5 - Elevations Al2 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Ouinta SO V4 WOOD F:- .- - . STUCCO RECESS �+3Y FUER � nBldg 6 Left •Elevation scALe ve° = r-0 -_ �­r-^-W-1?E TILE ROOFING iRIilRlilili°RIi1�l�f`li1 IR illl f111�iR1�lNI^ �'��li� •�iw w we. w w,..lwlll�l�1�1�Iw I11RI�IR 1001stom- IR111R ON!RI✓M1RI11R1✓r3 1lR1RI11 11111R�'- - '1RfR111RIRIRf■IR!■IRM II!:!.II IIII�II I!III IIIII II'lll�ll� II•�' , 11 ®® :: so „NpI IUIIIIIHIIgII 1 I� PAINTED BLACK, TYP ;IPAIRWIN PARTNERS ■ A R C H I T E C T S 245 FischerA, Ue, Suile B-2 C,s Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2446 W-ipaoc.o ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING I>r rs¢a:>trtaawu�I"rA;11";L La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 02Bldg 6 Right Elevation S. 111 = 1,-,,. 11RIRIRIRIR� ■�w w' ------ --- ----------- — ------- hi! l--RIRI■Iw' e�rllir!RIR+w X11 ::I ■■, :: �" Ifllllllllll hi! REGLET 01 Bldg 6 Rear Elevation SCALE 1ftl" = 1'-0' SCHEME I: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EO ACCENTI DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ, FASCIA. TRELLIS. CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, "" w 1i1l1i.1i1i'1RiiRiiii RiRii■iRi�iiR'IiRiIiR STUCCO 1 IiRiIiSLI_- DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. I I17 I_IIIIII;II DUNN EDWARDS I DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR ECL _� - �+3Y FUER � nBldg 6 Left •Elevation scALe ve° = r-0 -_ �­r-^-W-1?E TILE ROOFING iRIilRlilili°RIi1�l�f`li1 IR illl f111�iR1�lNI^ �'��li� •�iw w we. w w,..lwlll�l�1�1�Iw I11RI�IR 1001stom- IR111R ON!RI✓M1RI11R1✓r3 1lR1RI11 11111R�'- - '1RfR111RIRIRf■IR!■IRM II!:!.II IIII�II I!III IIIII II'lll�ll� II•�' , 11 ®® :: so „NpI IUIIIIIHIIgII 1 I� PAINTED BLACK, TYP ;IPAIRWIN PARTNERS ■ A R C H I T E C T S 245 FischerA, Ue, Suile B-2 C,s Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2446 W-ipaoc.o ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING I>r rs¢a:>trtaawu�I"rA;11";L La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 02Bldg 6 Right Elevation S. 111 = 1,-,,. 11RIRIRIRIR� ■�w w' ------ --- ----------- — ------- hi! l--RIRI■Iw' e�rllir!RIR+w X11 ::I ■■, :: �" Ifllllllllll hi! REGLET 01 Bldg 6 Rear Elevation SCALE 1ftl" = 1'-0' SCHEME I: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EO ACCENTI DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ, FASCIA. TRELLIS. CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUR WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUR TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS 8 WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR:BLACK Bldg. 6 - Elevations A13 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 1 011 912 02 3 21014 La Quinla SO V4 SCHEME2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENTI DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR ECL FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS" DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUR WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUR TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS 8 WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR:BLACK Bldg. 6 - Elevations A13 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 1 011 912 02 3 21014 La Quinla SO V4 II}Zlq•RIQi...........M.i7.l'R......m..... ..::..s�7.�^�)�iRII:IAIAI�I�ll�iirll Ililili!i<lili!il1!i!illli'ililRl ....... IIIIIIIIP11,11111 II�IIUI1IWr IIIY I�I�I u1 I IFF' I,I� 1Z Len t_ievaiion 6CALE 178' 1'-0' -I - =-- TILE ROOFING all L 111 1111!'M I �I�III �� 11 iI�IR� Rla!ala r-. Mal M TG �1Fial Floe DECORATIVE "LL ,'l I- Ertiy[;p REGLET TERIOR LIGHT, ttP 04Bldgs 7 & 12 Front Elevation SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0' 02131dgs 7 & 12 Right Elevation $SALE 1- • 1'•P .a .JRool SCHEMEI: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. FASCIA TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ rG F ROOFING 'k N� CONCRETE TILE ROOFING LOECORATIVE m'�Oo [^-aREL--li:Rhll�•]v!=1GERGL�•._ Tw..iL FLIM::: -COLIR SCHEMEI •STUi'�fECLET MANUR WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING SHUTTERS FFtEYCH WOR P,VrtFp BLACB. ttP EXTE+[ORLI E%iERIOR LIGHr, ttP STYLE: BARCELONA 01 Bld s 7 & 12 Rear Elevation COLOR: CASA GRANDE SCALE: Itr = T-0' ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUR TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR: BLACK •�I PA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldgs. 7 & 12 - Elevations A R C H I T E C T S Troutdale Village, LLC. A14 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 34E Fia_ r Aran*, Ewe B3 Ca In ! ,t CA 914N La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT NO: 21014 (714)5572448 wwwivao«om ATE: 10/192023 PLOT DATE-1 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 21014 ulrlta SO V4 -1 N Is' M I WIRI!AIi101iIRIM M'111111'a'ela!wr�l _ wlywiRia air..a..a is s �._ _ �. _. �, aiaiaiaraiaraia iai araraia a iaraia ia�aia iaiaia aia.aie�..i ■ .� ��_ 11 11 1 ■■ ■e ®_ 11 NMI 11MMI ■■ licil� �IIIVIIII X111 r I_..°11_.Ill ll�l! — — Illlll,lll�;�.;�1 I_III.I �I' IIIIF-1 17, F1 171 711TH I 1 0O;UC,� C, LCIL CICVdLIUII SCRLE: 1iL" 1'4 Q A 81dg 8 Front Elevation SCALE ng' . Y� 02Bldg 8 Right Elevation SCALE:I,MI = 1=0' Il�lililEl�I��Rljtl�itl�lililil'a _ SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ, FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW360 WHITE, OR EQ. 'M ACCENT DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ, FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, T.R �3 Rool L �� PL •lam '�BPh' �r FLrt rs+ mm y 02Bldg 8 Right Elevation SCALE:I,MI = 1=0' Il�lililEl�I��Rljtl�itl�lililil'a _ SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ, FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW360 WHITE, OR EQ. 'M ACCENT DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ, FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, ti ROOFING Ftrt tpw CONCRETE TILE ROOFING I_,•�,;L:;,,,q-;; F6FRGL44f sf�ea�uLer �1:IUE:F%LA4tlC [mvascHEraEz FRENCH DOOR PAINTED BLACK, ttP L[>�flPAM1£ oEere*R�avnFz —ERIOR LIGHT, TYP o1 Bldg 8 Rear Elevation MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE SCALE: 1/8' = T-0" ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM, CDLOR BLACK IPA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldg. 8 - Elevations Troutdale Village, I_I_C. A15 245 Fischer Avenue, Suile B-2 C -I. Mesa CA 92626 (,14)5572448—1paoacom NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT 0/1 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 21014 La Quinta SD V4 EXTERIOR LIGHT — P7,1111 n Du . T•P 1 IoM Left Elevation uALE 1m 1'-0 rkPHGHLYm• p 04 Bldg 9 - Front Elevation KCAL£ ve• = 1'_T //Bldg 9 Right Elevation_ O SCALE; 1.16' = "-J' • IPAIRWIN PARTNERS A ii C H I T E C T B 245 FischerAvenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (7 14) 557 2448w,ip— com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 FRENCH ODOR 01 Bldg 19 Rear Elevation SCALE: SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EO, ACCENTI DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EO_ FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EO. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQL ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ FASCIA TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS NTUBE STEEL, OR SIM, COLOR; _81,�4CK Bldg. 9 - Elevations A16 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Ouinla SD V4 --"&M@_,:lo 81dg 10 Left Elevation SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" ■ Bldg 10 - Front Elevation SCALE: 1/8' = 1'-0" r rrrlrtrrairl z r = rlrrair ri>Alrirlrl�rlN. __ �1�r1 rrilrl�lRllr!t'r�i a rIJM!�I*I�Iwl�l>A1�lRI>A!Ar�l�..- LFIRERMR Bldg 10 Right Elevation SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" iIAirrrRii^rarl^railm3ni111_iia�wIsUrgs r.rlrlr.riIlr^alr�r^rrIarl,r^rrraiaaiMIR illlir>rlrrraar�' R1!1E" "ii�li1^l=I^j ^rzzi�arr liiarrtriigalmimesOrarrir...i *� 1 HIN1111!11111 lr!r. NEI : �l■.- 070 AN l 1 o3mm — �'I f II Illillll ilfiilll X1111 �Illllln — Ililllllllil,- IIIA' VIII: Illlli'lll I;::1!!!!Bldg 10 Rear Elevation '!'!,I11�111 uw2rcmowl SCHEMEI: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ_ FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, SCHEME2- STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE. OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR Ea FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR:CASA GRANDE +R.R •Mr++q ravNMI LFIRERMR Bldg 10 Right Elevation SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" iIAirrrRii^rarl^railm3ni111_iia�wIsUrgs r.rlrlr.riIlr^alr�r^rrIarl,r^rrraiaaiMIR illlir>rlrrraar�' R1!1E" "ii�li1^l=I^j ^rzzi�arr liiarrtriigalmimesOrarrir...i *� 1 HIN1111!11111 lr!r. NEI : �l■.- 070 AN l 1 o3mm — �'I f II Illillll ilfiilll X1111 �Illllln — Ililllllllil,- IIIA' VIII: Illlli'lll I;::1!!!!Bldg 10 Rear Elevation '!'!,I11�111 uw2rcmowl SCHEMEI: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ_ FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ, SCHEME2- STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE. OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR Ea FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR:CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. COL .BLACK IPA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Bldg. 10 - Elevations A R C H I T E C T S Troutdale Village, LLC. A17 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 245 FmO.r Av Rn Smm B-2 Cosi. riles. CA 92626 La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT 21014 1,141557 2445 . ip... 0/1 PLOT DATE: 10/192023 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 21014 La Quinta SD V4 IIIr5I PIRWIN PARTNERS A R A C H l i E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 C-1, Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2445 www ipaoc com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING .� nBldg 11 Left Elevation SCAr~E,fa- r.m tint Floor - FIBER GLASS L STUCCO REGLET FRENCH DOOR O4 [w�Bldg 11 Front Elevation OBldg 11 Right Elevation EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP PAINTED BI -ACK, TYP Fn mmon La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 01 Bldg 11 Rear Elevation SCALE 1W - 1'•T FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW360 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR, HLACK Bldg. 11 - Elevations A18 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Quina SO V4 SCHEMEI: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ, ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ, FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW360 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM COLOR, HLACK Bldg. 11 - Elevations A18 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Quina SO V4 •J a5.�r�clWr Or 3T"Fb 08Pool Equip. Side Elevation ScaaE 316 = 1'-B DECO—VE EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP 07Poal_ Ettu,p. Front Elevation SCALE 3/15'• 1'.O' T�Fa�rrq�? CARPORT BY DTHERE FDR 'n EFEREI.CE DNLI OGTypical Carport Side Elevation D5Typical Carport Plan SCALE 9.16•= VW +11' 2 Second Floor diiiiiiiiiiiw ii■!ii■■giiiii i>•iiiiw �� ■iiii■■ii i■■ii iii■■iiiiii■i ws*wl■>wwiiw■ ilii Typical Trash Enclosure Side Elevation 04scALE 1r4• a1,4r +11' 2 Second Floor In ■ilial®iaiiii■■iiiiiil ■ iiG4>T.®iiiiii ! ■wiw■iiiiii�ii liliiiliiw■■■■Riiiii 1 ■ ■■i■■i■■iii =EEEEEEEEEEEE=EEMiiiiii 03Tylpical Trash Enclosure Rear Elevation .11' 2 Second Floor 1. 1 First Floor 02Typical Trash Enclosure Front Elevation SCALE: 1w s 1'.P 0 Typical Trash Enclosure Plan 1 SCAT E 114' = V.IT IPA IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments Exterior Elevations A R C H I T E C T 6 Troutdale Village, LLC. A19 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mese CA 82626 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 IT14) 557 244a www iPeoc coR, La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT 011 21014 PLOT DATE: Quinta SO 23 V4 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 21014 LB Ouinla SD V4 02 View of Building 3 with Building 4 and putting green in background, 01 View of clubhouse from Washington Street main entry. Bird's-eye view of property. 03 View of pool area and shade structure I r f BUILDING NU...ER -x.1:1 �� � O VIEN'NUI.IEEN Key Plan 07 View of Buildings 4 & 5. OView of open parking along north property line. 05 View of rear portion of parcel. OB View of carports near building 8. i �j� IRWIN PARTNERS La Quinta Village Apartments 3D Views i [7" R° IN T E C T s Troutdale Village, LLC. A20 NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 245 Fischer Ave,ue. Suite B-2 C ­,Mesa CA 92626 La Quinta, California 92253 PROJECT 011 21014 1 714j5w.-ip.paoc-com 912023 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 2101PLOT DAT :1 4 La Quina SD V4 10 View on Washington Street with deceleration lane on far left See location of view on sheet A17 Key Plan. La Quinta Village Apartments Paint Schemes Color Board DUNN - EDWARDS PAINTS Scheme 1 Scheme 2 STUCCO 1 STUCCO 1 DEW352 DEW360 ANTIQUE WHITE WHITE ACCENT 1 ACCENT 1 DE6341 DET606 VULCAN MEEK MOSS GREEN FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DE6390 DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING CHOCOLATE PUDDING joIPAIRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T& 245 FischerAvenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 1]14)5572446 w.ipaoccom ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING TILE ROOFING WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR:TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR:BRONZE RAILINGS & FENCING TUBE STEEL, OR SIM, COLOR:BLACK TRASH ENCLOSURES CMU WALLS, SPLIT FACE METAL ROOF METAL GATES CARPORTS BY OTHERS STEEL SUPPORTS & METAL ROOF, OR SIM, PICNIC AREA SHADE STRUCTURES BY OTHERS TBD POOL AREA CABANAS BY OTHERS TBD 09 View on Avenue 50 looking towards Washington Street intersection with mountains in the background. See location of view on sheet A17 Key Plan. View of entry access on Avenue 50. See location of view on sheet A17 Key Plan. La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 3D Views & Materials Board A21 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10119/2023 21014 La Quinta SO V4 VIEW FROM WASHINGTON STEET - BUILDINGS 1 & 2 VIEW FROM WASHINGTON STEET - BUILDING 4 & CLUBHOUSE ^(LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAM - WASHINGTON STREET TOWARDS AVENUE 50 O {JSCA;•E 1.n• . TV VIEW FROM AVENUE 50 - BUILDINGS 5 & 6 leI pA IRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 7=5 Fv_hv+ A• —, Sum 32❑cule Mesa CA MM (714) 557 2448 w Ipaoc com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 f/%'�LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAM - WASHINGTON STREET AVENUE 50 r of LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAM - AVENUE 50 SGEE: Vr = ra Line of Sight Diagrams A22 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Quinla SO V4 -.4-0- .4-0 -32.0- •x2.0 -201V tow- J •+a+a- 1 LT WASHINGTON A — STREET - ............. � �—cam T r ' � ..... �-,�a1iXG•iTALL�s1Rli!A�3LE 3itii-'.._� .i. —_--p0ya�c--• -- •-_ �lEHTCX 9NA1 SIXlG WM1FENCINGXEN'SIGE>•'MX`IE:: DECEL IPNe VIEW FROM AVENUE 50 - BUILDINGS 5 & 6 leI pA IRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 7=5 Fv_hv+ A• —, Sum 32❑cule Mesa CA MM (714) 557 2448 w Ipaoc com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 f/%'�LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAM - WASHINGTON STREET AVENUE 50 r of LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAM - AVENUE 50 SGEE: Vr = ra Line of Sight Diagrams A22 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/19/2023 21014 La Quinla SO V4 k , _ � r � � - � �� # fit, � � �t � •�_ low��� I_ + [f'�3 ice!�z:u: r BLD(' 9 BLDG 5 i fl f k BLDG s ` I r of. ZONE 2: 55" ESTIMATED ANNUAL APPLIED MTM USE TREE AND SHRUB LOW - DRIP / BUBBLER _ s .*;w • y -+ �s �' y ETO X PF X LA X 0.62 / "148 / IE = EAAAU 58.0 X .20 X 102,383 X 0.62 / 748 / .90 = 1,0-157-1 TREE AND SHRUB MODERATE- DRIP / BUBBLER BL BLDG B DG 7 f �~ t I r +� ETO X PF X LA X 0.62 / 748 / IE = EAAAU ///jjj �- 55.0 X .50 X 65,256 X 0-62 / 748 / -90 = 1,525 il.��{I` •. -:.h _ - - '� .. � TURF HIGH- ROTOR -`.+ l•� +� -;� �� '� ETO X P _ F X LA X 0.62 / 748 / IE EAAAU 55,0 X .70 X 33,479 X 0,62 / 745 / -50 = 1,405-31 _ _ , .}- _ _ e• TURF HIGH- DRIP --- ETO X PF X LA X 0.62 / 748 / IE = EAAAU ------ _ - �# A 4 s - - - - - - - - - -------- 55, 0 X .70 X 1,090 X 0.62 / 745 / .90 = 40.76 AMSWE 50 — _-- `� `� - TURF HIGH - SPRAY r ,4 ETO X PF X LA X 0.62 / 745 / IE = EAAAU - _ _ — • — - -- — - — - - ---- - — — — • -- - — - _ -- 55.0 X 0.70 X 1,679 X 0.62 / 748 / .75 = 75-34 y _............. ,.,,. ...,. ...... WwW......._....�,..,�„`......,......., .._._ .. - - ..,..,.._........ :.........-.-..........:.. MAXIMUM ANNUAL APPLIED WATER USE ETO X .45 X LA X 0.62 / 745 = MAAWU REFER TO SLOPE PLANTING EXHIBIT ACCENT PAVING SHADE STRUCTURE WITH PICKI JEEBALL COURT DOG PARK 55,0 X .45 X 211,452 X 0.62 / 745 = 4575.14 PICNIC TABLES PUTTING GREEN AREA - 3,161 POOL AND SPA AREA - 1,434 ESTIMATED ANNUAL APPLIED WATER USE TOTAL - 4,441-2 POOL RECREATION AREA MAXIMUM ANNUAL APPLIED WATER USE TOTAL - 4,575.14 ESTIMATED LANDSCAPE SQUARE FT. TOTAL - 211,452 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN LP -1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLANH,i7� I ERMNN DESIGN V ROUP 77-R99 \\'OLF RD - SUITE 102 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENT a 401 a& PALM DESERT, CA 91211 PARKER DEVELOPMENT PH 2754. EXP O1 3 YALE: I"=4m' PH (760)777-913] CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA FAX "°0,777.9,32 f y= � 'may ��r,`'� � �� • / y a� 1�FM.7 I_ + [f'�3 ice!�z:u: r BLD(' 9 BLDG 5 i fl f k BLDG s ` I r of. ZONE 2: 55" ESTIMATED ANNUAL APPLIED MTM USE TREE AND SHRUB LOW - DRIP / BUBBLER _ s .*;w • y -+ �s �' y ETO X PF X LA X 0.62 / "148 / IE = EAAAU 58.0 X .20 X 102,383 X 0.62 / 748 / .90 = 1,0-157-1 TREE AND SHRUB MODERATE- DRIP / BUBBLER BL BLDG B DG 7 f �~ t I r +� ETO X PF X LA X 0.62 / 748 / IE = EAAAU ///jjj �- 55.0 X .50 X 65,256 X 0-62 / 748 / -90 = 1,525 il.��{I` •. -:.h _ - - '� .. � TURF HIGH- ROTOR -`.+ l•� +� -;� �� '� ETO X P _ F X LA X 0.62 / 748 / IE EAAAU 55,0 X .70 X 33,479 X 0,62 / 745 / -50 = 1,405-31 _ _ , .}- _ _ e• TURF HIGH- DRIP --- ETO X PF X LA X 0.62 / 748 / IE = EAAAU ------ _ - �# A 4 s - - - - - - - - - -------- 55, 0 X .70 X 1,090 X 0.62 / 745 / .90 = 40.76 AMSWE 50 — _-- `� `� - TURF HIGH - SPRAY r ,4 ETO X PF X LA X 0.62 / 745 / IE = EAAAU - _ _ — • — - -- — - — - - ---- - — — — • -- - — - _ -- 55.0 X 0.70 X 1,679 X 0.62 / 748 / .75 = 75-34 y _............. ,.,,. ...,. ...... WwW......._....�,..,�„`......,......., .._._ .. - - ..,..,.._........ :.........-.-..........:.. MAXIMUM ANNUAL APPLIED WATER USE ETO X .45 X LA X 0.62 / 745 = MAAWU REFER TO SLOPE PLANTING EXHIBIT ACCENT PAVING SHADE STRUCTURE WITH PICKI JEEBALL COURT DOG PARK 55,0 X .45 X 211,452 X 0.62 / 745 = 4575.14 PICNIC TABLES PUTTING GREEN AREA - 3,161 POOL AND SPA AREA - 1,434 ESTIMATED ANNUAL APPLIED WATER USE TOTAL - 4,441-2 POOL RECREATION AREA MAXIMUM ANNUAL APPLIED WATER USE TOTAL - 4,575.14 ESTIMATED LANDSCAPE SQUARE FT. TOTAL - 211,452 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN LP -1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLANH,i7� I ERMNN DESIGN V ROUP 77-R99 \\'OLF RD - SUITE 102 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENT a 401 a& PALM DESERT, CA 91211 PARKER DEVELOPMENT PH 2754. EXP O1 3 YALE: I"=4m' PH (760)777-913] CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA FAX "°0,777.9,32 TYP. BUILDING PLANTING EXHIBIT PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA LPLAY EQUIPMENT NOTE: PIV, FDC, HYDRANT LOCATIONS 514ALL NOT BE OBSTRUCTED FROM ACCESS BY VEGETATION. A MINIMUM 3 -FEET RADIUS AROUND EACH DEVICE CIRI U- .RENCE SHALL BE FREE OF OBSTRUCTIVE VEGETATION, WITH CONSIDERATION OF MATURE PLANT GROWTH PLANT LIST SYMBOL QTY. BOTANICAL NAME SIZE WATER ;EES 4 PALMS DALBERGIA 515500 24" BOX 02 LOU "INDIAN R05EWIOOD" TIPUANA TIPIU TRASH x AGAVE 51SALANA OLEA EUROPAEA I SWAN HILL' MULTI -TRC ACACIA STENOPHYLLA 24" BOX 02 LOW "SHOESTRING ACACIA" SINGLE TRC STND. ACACIA SALICINA 24" BOX 02 LOU 'WILLOW ACACIA" SINGLE TRC STND. PARKIN50NIA PRAECOX 24" BOX 02 LOW "PALO BREA" SINGLE TRC STND. ACACIA ANEURA 24" BOX 02 LOW 'TMULGA" SINGLE TRC STND. EUCALYPTUS PAPUANA 24" BOX 02 LOU ,GHOST GUM" SINGLE TRC STND. PHOENIX DACTYLIFERA IS' 5TH 05 MOD ZAPIDI DATE PALM' DIAMOND CUT WASHINGTONIA ROBIUSTA 15' 5TH 05 MOD 'MEXICAN FAN PALM" 05 MOD YELLOW BELLS" ® LEUCOPHYLLUM LANGMANIAE 5 GAL. 02 LOW LYNS LEGACY' v OLEA EUROPAEA 5 GAL. 02 LOW . - ! 1G F G) [lJL•ar1 .• - • 5 GAL. 05 MOD CORAL BELLS' © LEUCOPHYLLUM ZYGOPHYLLUM 5 GAL 02 LOU 'CIMARRON' � � BLDG. 3 5 GAL. 05 MOD !'JOMlt70D BEAUTY' _ r CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 5 GAL. 05 MOD 0 G=RASSES = MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS 5 GAL. 05 MOD REGAL MIST' BLDG 2 LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 5 GAL. Qo a (io G) PLATINUM BEAUTY' oo� 5 GAL. 05 MOD VARIEGATA' * � . La.J G OUNDCOVER 4 VINES DALEA GREGGII 5 GAL. 02 LOW TRAILING INDIGO BUSH" ' 77 L L: CAR155A 5 GAL 05 MOD 'GREEN CARPET' 0 f� 5 GAL. TYP. BUILDING PLANTING EXHIBIT PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA LPLAY EQUIPMENT NOTE: PIV, FDC, HYDRANT LOCATIONS 514ALL NOT BE OBSTRUCTED FROM ACCESS BY VEGETATION. A MINIMUM 3 -FEET RADIUS AROUND EACH DEVICE CIRI U- .RENCE SHALL BE FREE OF OBSTRUCTIVE VEGETATION, WITH CONSIDERATION OF MATURE PLANT GROWTH PLANT LIST SYMBOL QTY. BOTANICAL NAME SIZE WATER ;EES 4 PALMS DALBERGIA 515500 24" BOX 02 LOU "INDIAN R05EWIOOD" TIPUANA TIPIU 24" BOX 05 MOD "TIPII TREE" AGAVE 51SALANA OLEA EUROPAEA 36" BOX 02 LOW SWAN HILL' MULTI -TRC ACACIA STENOPHYLLA 24" BOX 02 LOW "SHOESTRING ACACIA" SINGLE TRC STND. ACACIA SALICINA 24" BOX 02 LOU 'WILLOW ACACIA" SINGLE TRC STND. PARKIN50NIA PRAECOX 24" BOX 02 LOW "PALO BREA" SINGLE TRC STND. ACACIA ANEURA 24" BOX 02 LOW 'TMULGA" SINGLE TRC STND. EUCALYPTUS PAPUANA 24" BOX 02 LOU ,GHOST GUM" SINGLE TRC STND. PHOENIX DACTYLIFERA IS' 5TH 05 MOD ZAPIDI DATE PALM' DIAMOND CUT WASHINGTONIA ROBIUSTA 15' 5TH 05 MOD 'MEXICAN FAN PALM" 05 MOD DESERT ACCENTS CAE5ALPINIA PULGHEW1 MA 15 GAL. AGAVE 51SALANA 15 GAL. 02 LOW "SISAL" AGAVE ANGUSTIFOLIA 15 GAL 02 LOW CARIBBEAN AGAVE" 'SIERRA 5OUOUET' AGAVE GEMINIFLORA 5 GAL. 02 LOU) "TWIN -FLOWERING AGAVE" 02 LOU HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA 5 GAL 02 LOW 'DESERT FLAMENCO' SENNA AFETEMI5IO[pE5 5 GAL 0 ECHINOGACTUS GRI5 JII 5 GAL. 02 LOU) "GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS" © SHRUBS 5 GAL. 05 MOD I,UATER GON5ERVATION ST_A_TF-MENT LANDSCAPING 15 CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ORDNANCE 1302.1. THE IRRIGATION 0' 10' 20 30, SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR EFFICIENT PEF <)R1ANCE WITH CONSERVATION IN MIND. POINT SOURCE DRIP / BUBBLER SYSTEMS WILL PROVIDE DIRECT WATER TO THE SHRUBS AND TREES_ SCALE= I"=10' LP -2 HERMANN DESIGN V ROUP 77-699 WOLF RD. SUITE 102 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 LIC# 2754, EXP 04/30/22 PH (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132 DATE 8/15/73 CAE5ALPINIA PULGHEW1 MA 15 GAL. 02 LOW "RED BIRD OF PARADISE" LEUCOPHYL[:UM MIN05UM 5 GAL 02 LOW 'SIERRA 5OUOUET' LEUCOF'HYLLUM FRUTESCEN5 5 GAL. 02 LOU WHITE CLOUD' ® SENNA AFETEMI5IO[pE5 5 GAL 02 LOW FEATf EFZY C.4%IA" © TECOMA STAN5 5 GAL. 05 MOD YELLOW BELLS" ® LEUCOPHYLLUM LANGMANIAE 5 GAL. 02 LOW LYNS LEGACY' v OLEA EUROPAEA 5 GAL. 02 LOW LITTLE OLLIE' W55ELIA EOUISETIFORMI5 5 GAL. 05 MOD CORAL BELLS' © LEUCOPHYLLUM ZYGOPHYLLUM 5 GAL 02 LOU 'CIMARRON' CAR[SSA MACROCARPA 5 GAL. 05 MOD !'JOMlt70D BEAUTY' r CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 5 GAL. 05 MOD LITTLE JOHN' G=RASSES = MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS 5 GAL. 05 MOD REGAL MIST' *F LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 5 GAL. 05 MOD PLATINUM BEAUTY' • DIANELLA TASMANIGA 5 GAL. 05 MOD VARIEGATA' G OUNDCOVER 4 VINES DALEA GREGGII 5 GAL. 02 LOW TRAILING INDIGO BUSH" 0 CAR155A 5 GAL 05 MOD 'GREEN CARPET' 0 EVOLVULU5 GLOMERATUS 5 GAL. 02 LOU "HAWAIIAN BLUE EYES" ® BOUGANVILLEA 5 GAL 05 MOD 'LA JOLLA' - DURANTA REPENS 5 GAL. 5TK 05 MOD "SKY FLOWER" I,UATER GON5ERVATION ST_A_TF-MENT LANDSCAPING 15 CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ORDNANCE 1302.1. THE IRRIGATION 0' 10' 20 30, SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR EFFICIENT PEF <)R1ANCE WITH CONSERVATION IN MIND. POINT SOURCE DRIP / BUBBLER SYSTEMS WILL PROVIDE DIRECT WATER TO THE SHRUBS AND TREES_ SCALE= I"=10' LP -2 HERMANN DESIGN V ROUP 77-699 WOLF RD. SUITE 102 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 LIC# 2754, EXP 04/30/22 PH (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132 DATE 8/15/73 s! a WALL SLOPE PLANTING EXHIBIT PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA PLANT LIST SYMBOL QTY. BOTANICAL NAME SIZE WATER :EES 4 BALMS DALBERGIA 515500 24" BOX 03 LOW "INDIAN ROSEWOOD" • TIPUANA TIPU 24" BOX 05 MOD 4 MPU TREE" AGAVE 51SALANA OLEA EUROPAEA 36" BOX 02 LOW ' 'SWAN HILL' MULTI -TRK ■ ACACIA STENOPHYLLA BOX LOW SHOESTRING ACACIA" TN SINGLE TRK STND. SIN c ACACIA 5ALICINA 24" BOX 02 LOW "WILLOW ACACIA" SINGLE TRK. STND. " • PAWINSCNIA PRAECOX 24" BOX 02 LOW "PALO BREA" SINGLE TRK STND. ACACIA ANEURA 24" BOX 02 LOW - "MULGA" SINGLE TRK STNO. + EUCALYPTUS PAPUANA 24" BOX 02 LOW "GHOST GUM" SINGLE TRK STND. PHOENIX DACTYLIFERA 15' 5TH 05 MOD 'ZAWIDI DATE PALM' DIAMOND CUT WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA IB' BTH 05 MOD "MEXICAN FAN PALM" DESERT ACCENTS SHRUBS AGAVE 51SALANA 15 GAL 02 LOW "SISAL" CAESALPINIA PULCHERRIMA 15 GAL. AGAVE ANGUSTIFOLIA 15 GAL. 02 LOW "CARIBBEAN AGAVE" • AGAVE GEMINIFLORA 5 GAL. 02 LOW "TWIN -FLOWERING AGAVE" 02 LOW HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA 5 GAL. 02 LOW DESERT FLAMENCO' • ECHINOCACTUS GRUSON11 5 GAL. 02 LOW "GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS" 'WHITE CLOUD' LUATER CONSERVATIQNaSTATEMENT 7� T� LANDSCAPING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ilERMANN DESIGN GROUP REOUIREMENT9 OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 77-899 WOLF RD. DISTRICT ORDINANCE 1 THE IRRIGATION � 0 10 20 30' SUITE 102 SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR EFFICIENT PALM DESERT, CA PERFORMANCE WITH CONSERVATION IN MIND. POINT SOURCE DRIP / BUBBLER SYSTEMS WILL PROVIDE 92211 DIRECT WATER TO THE SHRUBS AND TREES. LIC# 2754, EXP 04/30/22 SCALE: 1••10' PH. (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132 DATE 8/15/73 SHRUBS CAESALPINIA PULCHERRIMA 15 GAL. 02 LOW "RED BIRD OF PARADISE" ' LEUCOPHYLLUM PRUIN05UM 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'SIERRA BOUCIUET' LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTE5CENS 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'WHITE CLOUD' SENNA ARTEM15101DES 5 GAL. 02 LOW "FEATHERY CASSIA" ® TEC0MA STANS 5 GAL. 05 MOD "YELLOW BELLS" LEUCOPHYLLUM LANGMANIAE 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'LYNS LEGACY' ■ OLEA EUROPAEA 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'LITTLE OLLIE' RUSSELIA EOUISETIFORMIS 5 GAL. 05 MOD "CORAL BELLS" ® LEUCOPHYLLUM ZYGOPHYLLUM 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'CIMARRON' w CARISSA MACROCARPA 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'BOXWOOD BEAUTY' ® CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'LITTLE JOHN' GRA88ES MUHLEN6ERt.IA CAPI1-LAR15 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'REGAL MIST' • LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'PLATINUM BEAUTY' • DIANELLA TASMANICA 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'VARIEGATA' GROUNDCOVER 4 VINES IQ DALEA GREGGII 5 GAL. 02 LOW �S+ TRAILING INDIGO BUSH" CARISSA 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'GREEN CARPET' EVOLVULUS GLOMERATUS 5 GAL. 02 LOW "HAWAIIAN BLUE EYES" {y BOUCANVILLEA 5 GAL. 05 MOD LA JOLLA' .�� DURANTA REPEN5 5 GAL. STK 05 MOD NOTE: "SKY FLOWER' PIv, FDC, HYDRANT LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE O55TRLIC7ED FROM ACCE5S 57 VEGE7,47 ONL A MINIMUM ERADIUS AROUND EACH DEVICE A ■ CIRCUMFERENCE SHALL BE FREE OF OBSTR1ICTIVE E ��— VEGETATION, WITH CONSIDERATION OF MATURE Ji PLANT GROWTH. LUATER CONSERVATIQNaSTATEMENT 7� T� LANDSCAPING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ilERMANN DESIGN GROUP REOUIREMENT9 OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 77-899 WOLF RD. DISTRICT ORDINANCE 1 THE IRRIGATION � 0 10 20 30' SUITE 102 SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR EFFICIENT PALM DESERT, CA PERFORMANCE WITH CONSERVATION IN MIND. POINT SOURCE DRIP / BUBBLER SYSTEMS WILL PROVIDE 92211 DIRECT WATER TO THE SHRUBS AND TREES. LIC# 2754, EXP 04/30/22 SCALE: 1••10' PH. (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132 DATE 8/15/73 ACCENT PAVING POOL AREA PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA WITH NOTE: PI V, FDC, HYDRANT LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE OBSTRUCTED FROM ACCESS BY VEGETATION A MINIMUM 3 -FEET RADIUS AROUND EACH DEVICE CIRCUMFERENCE SHALL BE FREE OF OBSTRUCTIVE VEGETATION, WITH CONSIDERATION OF MATURE PLANT GROWTH PLANT L15T SYMBOL QTY. BOTANICAL NAME SIZE WATER USE :EES E PALMS DALBERGIA 515500 24" BOX 02 LOW "INDIAN ROSEWOOD" 0 TIPUANA TIPU 24" BOX 05 MOD "TIPU TREE" X AGAVES15ALANA G OLEA EUROPAEA 361, BOX 02 LOW ' 'SWAN HILL' MULTI -TRC ■ AGAGIA STETRIN BOX LOW. ACACIA "SHOESTRING ACACIA" TN SINGLE TRC STND. SIN ACACIA SALICINA 24" BOX 02 LOW "WILLOW ACACIA" SINGLE TRC STND. PARCIN50NIA PRAECOX 24" BOX 02 LOW "PALO BREA" SINGLE TRC STND. ACACIA ANEURA 24" BOX 02 LOW "MULGA" SINGLE TRC 5TND. • EUCALYPTUS PAPUANA 24" BOX 02 LOW "GHOST GUM" SINGLE TRC 57ND. PHOENIX DAGTYLIFERA 15' BTH 05 MOD 7AI-IIDI DATE PALM' DIAMOND CUT WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA IB' 5TH 05 MOD "MEXICAN FAN PALM" DESERT ACCENTS SHRUBS 7� 7� HERMANN DESIGN GROUP X AGAVES15ALANA 15 GAL 02 LOW "SISAL" 02 LOW 77-899 WOLF R R AGAVE ANGU5TIFOLIA 15 GAL. 02 LOW "CARIBBEAN AGAVE" LEUCOPHYLLUM PRIUINOSUM 5 GAL AGAVE GEMINIFLORA 5 GAL. 02 LOW "TWIN -FLOWERING AGAVE" SCALE: 1"=10' y HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA 5 GAL 02 LOW 'DESERT FLAMENCO' WHITE CLOUD' O ECHINOGACTU5 G-RU50NII 5 GAL. 02 LOW "GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS" 02 LOW LP -4 WATER CONSERVATION STATEMENT SHRUBS 7� 7� HERMANN DESIGN GROUP LANDSCAPING 15 CONSISTENT WITH THE CAE5ALPINIA PULCHERRIMA 15 GAL 02 LOW 77-899 WOLF R R "RED BIRD OF PARADISE" o' 10' iii�'JJ 20, 30, SUITE 102 PAL[v1 DESERT, CA q LEUCOPHYLLUM PRIUINOSUM 5 GAL 02 LOW 'SIERRA BOUQUET' SCALE: 1"=10' y LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESGENS 5 GAL. 02 LOW WHITE CLOUD' SENNA ARTEMISIOIDES 5 GAL 02 LOW "FEATHERY CASSIA" ® 7GOMA S 5 GAL 05 MOD BELLS" LEUCOPHYLLUM LANGMANIAE 5 GAL. 02 LOW 'LYNS LEGACY' ® OLEA EUROPAEA 5 GAL 02 LOW 'LITTLE OLLIE' . RUSSELIA EQUISETIFOW15 5 GAL 05 MOD "CORAL BELLS" ® LEUGOP14YLLUM ZYGOPHYLLUM 5 GAL. 02 LOW .CIMARRON' CARI55A MACROCARPA 5 GAL 05 MOD 'BOXUUOOD BEAUTY' ® CALLISTEMON VIMINALI5 5 GAL 05 MOD 'LITTLE JOHN' GRASSES MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'REGAL M15T' LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'PLATINUM BEAUTY' ® DIANELLA TA5MANICA 5 GAL, 05 MOD 'VARIEGATA' 5ROUNDGOvE�B v1NES DALEA GREGGII 5 GAL. O2 LOW TRAILING INDIGO BUSH" CARI55A 5 GAL. 05 MOD 'GREEN CARPET' EVOLVULUS GLOMERATUS 5 GAL. 02 LOW "HAWAIIAN BLUE EYES" 4 BOUGANVILLEA 5 GAL 05 MOD LA JOLLA' es DURANTA REPEN5 5 GAL. STK 05 MOD "SKY FLOUFER" LP -4 WATER CONSERVATION STATEMENT 7� 7� HERMANN DESIGN GROUP LANDSCAPING 15 CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 77-899 WOLF R R DISTRICT ORDINANCE 1302.E THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR EFFICIENT PERFORMANCE WITH CONSERVATION IN MIND_ POINT o' 10' iii�'JJ 20, 30, SUITE 102 PAL[v1 DESERT, CA SOURCE DRIP /BUBBLER SYSTEMS WILL PROVIDE \�/ 922] 1 DIRECT WATER TO THE SHRUBS AND TREES LIC# 2754, EXP 04/30/22 SCALE: 1"=10' PH (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132 R Ty 'T ENTRY 6' HT. BLOCK I WALL MONUMENT SIGN DECORATIVE CAP PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA VEHICULAR GATES WATER FEATURE NOTE: PIV, FDC, HYDRANT LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE OBSTRUCTED FROM ACCESS BY VEGETATION. A MINIMUM 3 -FEET RADIUS AROUND EACH DEVICE CIRCUMFERENCE SHALL BE FREE Cr- OB57RllCTIVE VEGETATION, WITH CONSIDERATICN OF MATURE PLANT GROWTH. LJATEf2 GON8ERVATION 57HTEMENT LANDSCAPING 15 CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ORDINANCE 1302.1. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR EFFICIENT 0 10 20 30' PERFORMANCE WITH CONSERVATION IN MIND. POINT SOURCE DRIP / BUBBLER SYSTEMS WILL PROVIDE DIRECT WATER TO THE SHRUBS AND TREES. SCALE: I"=10' LP -5 HERMANN DESIGN GROUP 77-899 WOLF RD. SUITE 102 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 LIC# 2754, EXP 04/30/22 PH (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132 DATE 8/15/23 CONCEPTUAL WALL AND FENCE PLAN PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA LEGEND EXI5TING BLOCK WALL TO REMAIN IN PLACE W HT. BLOCK WALL WITH STUCCO FINI5H TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE &' HT. 5PLITFACE TAN COLOR BLOCK WALL WITH FLAT CAP TAN COLOR 6'-6" HT. PILASTER WITH STUCCO FINISH WITH DECORATIVE TAN COLOR CAP MONUMENT SIGN LP -6 HERMANN DESIGN V ROUP 77-899 WOLF RD. ® = 40' 80 1147' SUITE 102 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 LIC# 2754, EXP 04/30/22 SCALE:"=4O' PH. (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132 DATE H/IS/�3 POWER POINTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 7, 2023 City Council Regular Meeting November 7, 2023 s' OWL CALIF City Council Regular Meeting November 7, 2023 CLOSED SESSION IN PROGRESS v .S w �• • s � � :. y cAIMR QA Pledge of Allegiance ' 11/8/2023 �,. "Nt 77 11/8/2023 CALI1•( RNIA a City Council Meeting November 7, 2023 Presentation } � s } w. F a City Council Meeting November 7, 2023 131 - Approve Cancelling Regular City Council Meeting of January 2, 2024 '� } CA I..I w. F a City Council Meeting November 7, 2023 B2 - Approve Agreement For Emergency Service Coordinator with County of Riverside Background • City has had an in-house Emergency Service Coordinator (ESC) and contracted with County to provide services in the past. Staff recommends contracting this service through the County. • County Emergency Management Department (EMD), provides emergency management services to cities. • A part-time ESC will address the City's need for active management regarding prevention, preparedness, recovery, and response to emergencies. Agreement Details • Term: November 13, 2023, through June 30, 2024 • Estimated cost for the eight-month contract is $56,000, which includes approximately $5,000 in overtime costs related to official City business outside of normal business hours. • The part-time ESC will dedicate 20 -hours a week to the City. Scope of Emergency Services This position would be responsible for the following services: 1.1 Comprehensive emergency management program 1.2 Point of contact 1.3 Collaboration 1.4 Service to Public Questions? CALHIORNIA "P. - a City Council Meeting November 7, 2023 B3 - STVR Program Code Amendments t.l Y 1,17 STVR Program Background • Moratorium —Aug. 4, 2020 to Jun. 1, 2021 via Executive Order No. 10 & succeeding amendments • Permanent Ban — May 20, 2021 — LQMC Section 3.25.055 • No new permits have been issued outside of exempt areas since August 4, 2020 • Existing permits can be renewed, but not transferred • Quarterly updates on the STVR Program since 2021 500 Ell September 2023 Total STVR Permits: 1,232 (Estate Permits: 64) 1 1 Aa 0 Homeshares E Primary Residence E General Permits 17 November 7, 2023 18 Active STVR Permits Decline Since Jan. 2021 2021 — declined by 201 permits or 19.38% (from 1,037 to 836 — Jan. to Dec.) 2022 — declined by 81 permits or 9.69% (from 836 to 2023 Qs -1-3 — declined by 28 permits or 3.7%(from 755 755 — Jan. to Dec.) to 722 — Jan. to Sept.) La Quinta Mid La Quinta PermitNorth -a Totals ExemptSTVR a Citywide Totals :• �• 18 Density in STVR Banned Areas 15.5% *-- 14.5% 11.r3% 10.3% 9.8% 11.9% November 7, 2023 9.6% 9.3% 62% 5.3% 5.0% 4.8% 5.496 .5 . 4.5% 4.4, JAN -21 JAN -22 JAN -23 SEP -23 North LQ Mid LQ —*--Cove --*—South LQ (PGA West) 19 Revenue Type 2020 2021 2022 2023 Q-1, 2, & 3 Transient Occupancy Tax Revenue (TOT) $ 4,513,084.58 $ 5,921,343.52 5 6,586,847.92 $ 5,144,781.95 Citation Fine Collections:„ 327,111.82 $ 447,960.01 80,760.00 $ 213,375.02 SNR Permit Fee $ 307,781.00 $ 758,780.00 $ 943,150 $ 698,250.00 SNR Permit Inspection Fee $ 9,425.00 $ 1,950.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 1,950.00 SNR Permit Business License Fee (estrnzafed) $ 55,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 47,000.00 $ 36,548.00 Total STVR Permits/Licensing Fees : s 372,206.00 010,730.00 $ 991,449.99 $ 736.748.00 otal Annual STVR Revenues: $ 5,212,402.40 $ 7,190,023.53 $ 7,759,047.91 $ 6,094,904.97 20 10 November 7, 2023 21 STVR Citations: 2022 & Q-1, 2 & 3 of 2023 Permitted vs. Unpermitted Q-12022 Q-2 2022 Q-3 2022 Q-42022 Q-12023 Q-2 2023 Q-3 2023 22 STVR Citations: 2022 & Q-1, 2 & 3 of 2023 Administrative vs. Disturbance l Q-12022 Q-22022 Q-32022 Q-42022 Q-12023 Q-22023 Q-32023 M Administrative Citations 0 Disturbance Citations 11 STVR Program Code Amendments March 21 and May 16, 2023 — discussed several code amendments to Chapter 3.25 • Apartment Complex (proposed Section 3.25.045) • Transfers to trust or entities with the same membership or to heirs is not change of ownership (Section 3.25.050) • Add Griffin Lake Specific Plan to allowable exemptions under Section 3.25.055 (A)(4) • Exempt Homeshare STVR permits from the current ban under Section 3.25.055 (C) STVR Program Code Amendments • Require no less than 4/5 majority vote for future revisions to Section 3.25.055 governing the current ban • Add exemption for HOAs if its current membership votes to allow STVRs as a permitted use (Section 3.25.056), to be considered by Council at a public meeting • Add exemption for large lots of 25,000 sq. ft. (Section 3.25.057) to be considered by Council at a public hearing • Reiterate Homeshare STVR permits require the owner to occupy the dwelling during the transient stay under Section 3.25.070 (H) C STVR Program Code Amendments • Clarify hosting platforms that provide a designated field for STVR permit number and number of bedrooms comply with regulations regarding STVR advertisements under Section 3.25.070 (N) • Add fines specific to advertising without a permit under Sections 3.25.090 (E)(4) and (E)(5) • Miscellaneous minor language modifications throughout to align the language with existing processes or to ensure clarity and consistency STVR Program Code Amendments Section 3.25.055 Non -issuance of new STVR permits (ban); periodic review • Add a provision requiring 4/5 majority vote of the Council to adopt future code amendments to this section • Add a provision to exempt Homeshare STVR permits in non-exempt areas from the ban STVR Program Code Amendments Proposed Section 3.25.056 HOA Exemption — develop and add a process for qualifying residential projects governed by HOAs where STVRs are authorized under the CC&Rs: • Voting membership of the HOA approves pursuant to CC&Rs or by 50%+1 to be exempted from the ban; vote must be conducted within the previous 12 months • HOA certifies that it has complied with any other voting requirements pursuant to the CC&Rs • Application may be submitted once within 3 -year period • Application shall be considered by Council at a public meeting STVR Program Code Amendments Proposed Section 3.25.057 Large Lot Exemption — develop and add a process by which a residential dwelling in non-exempt areas would be able to apply for an exemption from the ban if specified criteria are met: • Large lot size of 25,000 sq. ft. • HOA authorization pursuant to CC&Rs • Verification of bedrooms • Adequate on-site parking • Physical distance from adjacent residential properties, evaluate active STVR units within 500 ft. • Application shall be considered by Council at a Public Hearing • Notification of properties within 500 feet �Lyitlit-total number of � � Fens allowed within the City to rm-avimm of - • Limit tetal number of exemptienc a;IIA-Wed within to maArnm isof�3 • 9.25 acre property • 5 acres of orchards*,,, • 5,553 sq. ft. - 7 bedrooms between the main dwelling, guest house, & servants quarters • Large pool & patio area Outside gardens & resting areas • Horse stables ft 7 QUESTIONS -F City Council Meeting November 7, 2023 PH1 — La Quinta Village Apartment Project EA2022-0001, GPA2022-0002, SP2022-0001, & SDP2022-0001 CALIP �ti•' - _ Ir y _ _ r P.F — .IM � 1 � '��� '• r{y I'+4.t* 'hit Wn�.''.•�p ram`• ;ya q� '��.R`F�. �i�-.����� „ pei .; C Project Location Project Proposal • 252 -unit apartment project — 178 market -rate units — 74 moderate -income affordable units • Applications include: — General Plan Amendment — Specific Plan Amendment — Site Development Permit — Environmental Assessment Council Hearing • Aug 1, Council asked applicant to make changes to the project including: — Change architectural style to Spanish Hacienda — Reduce buildings to two-story only — Remove garages on north side of site • Applications remanded to Planning Commission to review changes — Oct 10, Commission recommended approval Project Changes • Site plan layout changed to accommodate 252 units — Architectural style Spanish Hacienda — 12 buildings in project, all are two story — Garages removed • Specific Plan language and Mitigated Negative Declaration updated November 7, 2023 37 9 19 11 INS m: :: ■ �M11[ ■l 11 111 :1 :: I111_ 11 y 11 Building 1 Building 2 11[,11: :: `I��III �IIIi1i� C: ::'�iill Building 3 1 Building 4 r I>. �,' 1 � �■�li ii irai ai iw Building 4 r View on Avenue 50 -.dmlmw-- �-= View on Washington Street C: C, General Plan Amendment • Site identified on City's inventory in Housing Element for 280 very low- to low-income units • City must maintain adequate sites to accommodate its remaining unmet RHNA by income category • If City approves a development identified on its Housing Element with fewer units than identified in Housing Element, the development applicant must identify an additional site to accommodate November 7, 2023 Ell 6 Fred Waring Dr ul 23 i i i 7N i w i i i IOD 90 23 J `-... .� 7-.. �..-a°:u Yi' "#y.(.ty"4: �j� a :ti �• �� . 'ter !I ��y:hws'siY�1:.1 � �l L!���} �� 7 i. G T �]j� - ■ r • - . ,� 'Palm Royale Alp wl �V�l' � �.�I � ���►►�' �xi��s L htd�li 1� General Plan Amendment • If GPA approved, City would need to re- submit its Housing Element to HCD • Project is conditioned to not move forward with any construction until HCD has approved the amended Housing Element Specific Plan Amendment • Project requires an amendment of the existing La Paloma Specific Plan • Amended Specific Plan would supersede La Paloma and detail the development standards for La Quinta Village Apartments Specific Plan differences from Municipal Code CEQA • Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) prepared • Department determined project would have less than significant effects, with mitigation • City received (11) comments during public review period — Traffic, biological, cultural resources comments — Mitigation measures address these -lnri— - --- Nt -40 EL dr �� l Existing Zoning: Medium High Density Zone VZOPIAMS �qV�� +� :�►■ _ i�� Traffic Site • Access off Washington and Avenue 50, with right i n/right out for both • Project will add sidewalks, bike/golf cart lanes on Avenue 50 and Washington Street, extend median November 7, 2023 m7 REVISED PROPOSAL ALL 2 -STORY BUILDINGS SPANISH HACIENDA ACHITECTURAL STYLE REMOVED GARAGES ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE NOVEMBER 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 56 56 November 7, 2023 COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Development Standards RMH Zoning Proposed AHO Density 168 Units 252 Units 281-505 Units Maximum Structure Height 28 Feet 28 Feet 40 Feet Maximum Structure Height at Image Corridor 22 Feet 28 Feet 22 Feet Maximum Number of Stories 2 Stories 2 Stories 4 Stories Minimum Livable Area 750 SF 670 SF 600 SF Parking Totals 420 Spaces 522 Spaces 330-593 Spaces NOVEMBER 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 57 61FA 58 29 November 7, 2023 W 7a 705LMKI11MWW �AgaeVMD 1 cy O7W �CKOP^ 178 Market -Rate Units 74 Moderate -Income Units .V 30 November 7, 2023 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS MARSHAL SUBSTATION Upgrades to IID Marshal Substation from 25 MVA to 40/50 MVA AVENUE 50 Widening to provide additional traffic lane and bike lane connecting Park Avenue & Washington Street WASHINGTON STREET Dedicated deceleration lane at primary entry, new bus turnout and relocated bus shelter, extending existing median NOVEMBER 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 61 61 62 31 ❑ = New Traffic Lane = New Bike Lane E= Future Bike Lane ❑ = Striping BL�G.6 i YA�50.6 j fs t6r0Ari A6� 8 ULuL.4'i ----- -- --a-,- , - Lu'� 63 64 November 7, 2023 BLDG.7 PAD --520 94 xmmarr�eaH !' 5.5' raorsanr-IA1�F TRWT C LIVE _ - — — _ mARrriv� -%11 d. —KI F 51D •RAFF1 L F Additional Vehicle Lane and Bike Lane connecting Park Ave. and Washington St. = Proposed Bridge = Raised Median = Roadway JJJL r .W. ! a/V atom r ��`ro•i Fp A. �.. �7 • �.� '•fir a . . Future raised median to prohibit illegal left turns into Project 32 November 7, 2023 65 33 ❑ = New Deceleration Lane ❑ = New Bus Turnout = Relocated Bus Shelter L�= Extended Existing Median —. ' -- ---- ICL WASHINGTON STREET — � •.3.�_! — �qp - �... 19 -SECTION LI =STREET f OM C/ MARSHA I: �N 51 T e — N WASHINGTON2�• • Dedicated Deceleration Lane at Primary Entry Relocated Bus Stop w/ Dedicated Bus 33 c i4 View from Washington Street SPANISH ARCHITECTURAL STYLE ALL 2 -STORY BUILDINGS 000� � I 40� View of Clubhouse Primary entry on Washington Street AL i � a Amenities include Pool & Spa, BBQ Areas, Dog Park, Shaded Tot Lot, Pickleball Court, and Putting Green P�Mql. 7 73 MIS November 7, 2023 ,'� r f fill I 'M'{�mrrr.a�rn rtwma Erpr ••�i�x:u��.w I fi Tree line and uncovered parking xeel+aa.aenxmaooar ■oaelr.rwrx .s.�ewcn.etnr Llaaaer cane �ro„gs� along . property line No garages on-site 74 37 November 7, 2023 Vil Proposed: No Garaqes Alternate Option: 55 garages 76 I W 7 . __. - - . Garages to replace some proposed uncovered parking and landscaping MM Proposed: No Garages on 63guaro Read 77 78 November 7, 2023 39 C,rt Drive Aule 26 FOM MI& Ex6 mg CMU Block wall F..- Aaeixnea 6'hW F—WV Alternate Option: `.`oma "e -DS`a roP� 55 garages f� r , i;✓:s' iii j I NO Dive Ausle '16 Feet Wl9e _oa.ge Edg CMU131-1,well —Ih-26F., ilx@rk Aaazm d'h'Vh F. V r r,rvynmrsea�d 77 78 November 7, 2023 39 November 7, 2023 /to Complies with Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) Designation NO Change to Land Use Designation 7 Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) designation remains Complies with Residential Medium High (RMH) Zoning NO Zone Change T 20 Project Site is slated for 280 Very -Low to Low-income Units by the City of La Quinta General Plan Housing Element Table 11.68 Vacant Land Inventairy M.P I APN ACRS Exrsting GP Exeti� Pmjecked P -R ted Key Ion6�g Gensily Yield W,y Lnw, Inw and Moderate h—.Sit. 6460yn016 1 14,03 1 MHOR Azo r5v Proposing to relocate 280 Very -Low to Low-income units closer to Highway 111 Corridor 81 PARKING Required without Ratios: HTToraaole • 2 Spaces per Unit • 0.5 Guest Spaces per Unit 252 units x 2 spaces/unit = 504 spaces for units 252 units x 0.5 Guest spaces/unit = 126 spaces for Guests 630 Total Spaces Required NOVEMBER 2023 82 November 7, 2023 Proposedf SiteIHGOR � li#� i ■ MILES AVE — 4 L I I I Project Site Required with Affordable Ratios: • 1 Space per 1 -Bedroom Unit • 1.5 Spaces per 2 -Bedroom Unit • No Guest Spaces Required 132 1 -Bed units x 1 space/unit = 132 spaces 120 2 -Bed units x 1.5 spaces/unit = 180 spaces 312 Spaces for Units Required 7 Spaces for Clubhouse 319 Total Spaces Required LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS Parking Provided Ratios: • 1 Space per 1 -Bedroom Unit • 2 Spaces per 2 -Bedroom Unit • 0.5 Guest Spaces per Unit 132 1 -Bed units x 1 space/unit = 132 spaces 120 2 -Bed units x 2 spaces/unit = 240 spaces 252 units x 0.56 spaces/unit = 143 spaces for Guests 372 Spaces for Units Provided 7 Spaces for Clubhouse 522 Total Spaces Provided Parking Pass System to regulate parking & visitors 82 41 November 7, 2023 ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING .... CalGreen Requirements EV Chargers — Level 2 Chargers Installed 5% x 522 total spaces = 26 Spaces EV Ready — Equipped with Low Power Receptacles 25% x 522 total spaces = 131 Spaces EV Capable - For Future Use 10% x 522 total spaces = 52 Spaces 209 Total EV Spaces Required NOVEMBER 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 83 83 OVERFLOW PARKING What if the Village holds special events for its residents? Where will Village residents and their guests park? Will they be parking in the Sagebrush neighborhood? Drafted Overflow Parking Management Plan to provide strategies to be implemented during special events & holidays Professional Valet Service to park vehicles on-site Proposed off-site parking at Sports Complex and shuttle bus service NOVEMBER 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 84 84 42 TRAFFIC STUDY DURING PEAK SEASON APRIL 2023 November 7, 2023 New traffic study conducted April 2023. Previous study conducted during December 2020. Study Area Intersections Project Trip Generation Study Time Periods Washington /Avenue 50 Washington / Sagebrush Ave. Washington / Eisenhower Dr./Rancho La Quinta Drive Washington / Avenue 48 Avenue 50 / Moon River Dr./Park Ave. 1,556 Total Daily Trips 108 AM Peak Hour Trips 125 PM Peak Hour Trips Weekday AM Hours: 7:OOAM — 9:OOAM Weekday PM Hours: 4:OOPM — 6:OOPM Peak Hours for Analysis per City of LQ Less than significant impact due to study area intersections operating at acceptable Level of Service (LOS) under Project Completion Conditions. Existing deficient operation conditions at Moon River Dr./Park Ave. and Avenue 50 due to AM student drop off for Harry S. Truman Elementary School. No improvements are required. SOURCE, FROUFDAiE VILIAGE TRANSPORFA FION ANAI YSIS, INTEGRA TED ENGINEERING GROUP, APRII 2023, NOVEMBER 2023 85 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS NG NEEDS AHO DISTRICTACCOM'S INCREASIONGAANDGENIHANCINGIONAL HOUS NOGUSIOPPORTUNITIES Development Standards o Density: MINIMUM 20 units per acre = 281 Units Maximum 36 units per acre = 505 Units O Maximum Structure Height at Image Corridor: 22 Feet' (28' w/MUP) o Maximum Structure Height: 40 Feet o Maximum Number of Stories: 4 Stories O Minimum Livable Area: 600 SF O By -Right Parking Incentive applies: 1 space per 1 -Bed, 1.5 spaces per 2 -Bed o No parking allowed in 15 Foot rear setback nor in 10 Foot exterior side yard setback o If approved by City, allows for retention basins within landscape setbacks o Carport Setback: 20 Feet 85 LQMC 9.110.100: Allows rental multifamily residential units By -Right for developments with at least 20% of units affordable to low, very low, and extremely low-income households at a density of at least 20 units per acre and at least 16 units per site. NOVEMBER 2023 86 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 86 43 November 7, 2023 CITY ZONING ORDINANCE - RMH Development Standards o Density: 8-12 units per acre = 168 Units o Maximum Structure Height at Image Corridor: 22 Feet' (28' w/MUP) O Maximum Structure Height: 28 Feet o Maximum Number of Stories: 2 Stories o Minimum Livable Area: 750 SF O Parking: 2 spaces per unit, 0.5 guest spaces per unit o No parking allowed in 15 Foot rear setback nor in 10 Foot exterior side yard setback o If approved by City, allows for retention basins within landscape setbacks o Carport Setback: 20 Feet General Notes: 1. Any proposed building height over 22 feet requires Minor Use Permit and shall not exceed the maximum building height of the existing zoning. For RMH, the maximum building height is 28 feet. NOVEMBER 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 87 87 LA QUINTA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN Development Standards O Density: 12 units per acre = 168 base units O Density Bonus: 50% (additional 6 units per acre) = 252 total units o Maximum Structure Height at Image Corridor: 28 Feet O Maximum Structure Height: 28 Feet O Maximum Number of Stories: 2 Stories o Minimum Livable Area: 670 SF O By -Right Parking Incentive applies: 1 space per 1 -Bed, 1.5 spaces per 2 -Bed O Allows for parking within setbacks including rear and exterior side yard setbacks o Allows for fencing and retention basin within landscape setbacks o Allows carports within 15 -foot rear building setback NOVEMBER 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 88 88 LIVABLE AREA Reduction of livable area allowed by the City. Existing developments with units providing less than 750 SF of livable area: Affordable Multi -Family Rentals: o Wolff Waters Place:1 Bedroom — 633 SF Market -Rate Multi -Family Rentals: o Silverhawk Apartments:1 Bedroom "The Falls" — 670 SF 1 Bedroom "Aqua Rose' — 743 SI Affordable Senior Living Rentals: o Seasons at La Quinta: l Bedroom — 609 SF o Seasons at Miraflores: 1 Bedroom — 700 SF o Hadley Villas:1 Bedroom — 540 SF Average ER November 7, 2023 Wolff Waters Place 1 Bedroom Floor Plan 633 SF Proposed La Quinta Village Apts 1 Bedroom Floor Plan ipj tl} T Ill1w� PROTECT SITE A'cr..c ,Y r IM� MARSHAL SUBSTATION OF Lj i-� Upgrades to IID Marshal Substation From 25 MVA to 40/50 MVA - - • - • - • - • • • • • • -me, 45 November 7, 2023 WILL SHORT-TERM RENTALS BE ALLOWED? Will units become Airbnbs? Will units sit empty the majority of the year? NO Leasing Term Commitment of One Year Minimum Providing local housing for growing full-time community Serving local businesses by reducing travel time from other desert communities NOVEMBER 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 91 91 WHAT IS AFFORDALE HOUSING? Limits set by California Department of Housing and Community Development based on Federal Limits set by HUD AFFORDABLE :* LOW-INCOME Different levels of Affordability Above Moderate -income (Market -Rate) Moderate -income Low-income Very Low-income Extremely Low-income Acutely Low-income *Based on Area Median Income (AMI) Definition: Area Median Income — midpoint of a region's income distribution. In a region, half of households earn more than the median and half earn less than the median. This is NOT the average income. SOURCE. HTTFS://WWW tAQUINTACA. GOV/RES/DENTS/[OCA[-RESOURCES/AFFORDABt E-HOUSING/INCOME-tiMITS NOVEMBER 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 92 92 Em November 7, 2023 COUNTY 2023 RENT LIMITS (MODERATE) LA QUI NETAIHDOUSIING AUTHORITY Income levels based on Department of Housing and Community Development Income Limits dated June 6, 2023 1 -Bedroom 2 -Bedroom Monthly Affordable Rent: $2,079 Monthly Affordable Rent: $2,339 1 Person Household 2 Person Household 3 Person Household Median Income: $66,150 Median Income: $75,600 Median Income: $85,050 Maximum Income: $79,400 Maximum Income: $90,700 Maximum Income: $102,050 NOVEMBER 2023 93 Annual Income Limit for Moderate ranges from $79,400 - $149,700 Median Income for Moderate ranges from $66,150 - $124,750 *Based on Household Size* Definition: Annual Income — Gross income from all sources for all members of the household SOURCE. Hrrvs✓/WWW.eAQUINrACA.cOv HOMEiSHowvu8115HEOOocuMENri4e493 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS AFFORDABLE RENT EXAMPLE MODERATE INCOME UNITS 93 Income Levels based on Department of Housing and Community Development Income Limits dated June 6, 2023 EXAMPLE The AMI for a 2 -person household is $75,600. The maximum income to be eligible for moderate -income housing is $90,700. NOVEMBER 2023 94 For rental tenants in a 2 -person household, the maximum rent for moderate -income is $2,079 / month for a 1 -Bedroom $2,339 / month for a 2 -Bedroom Annual Income Limit for Moderate ranges from $79,400 - $149,700 Median Income for Moderate ranges from $66,150 - $124,750 *Based on Household Size* Definition: Annual Income — Gross income from all sources for all members of the household SOURCE. Hrres[uwww. tAQu,NrACA.coveHOMEiSHOwvuauSHE9OOCUMENri4R4s3 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 94 47 All units to receive high quality interior finishes' regardless if they are moderate -income or market -rate. N ^^` City Council Meeting November 7, 2023 PH2 - ZOA2023-1000 Zoning Code Updates Y Background I • Staff periodically reviews the municipal zoning code and proposes amendments to update or clarify standards and opportunities for development code streamlining and design flexibility Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) • 850 sq ft ADU floor area allowed; 1,000 sq ft allowed if more than one bedroom. If primary dwelling is less than 1,600 sq ft. • Construction of ADU shall not constitute a Group R occupancy change, unless Building Official makes a written finding based on substantial evidence that ADU could have a specific, adverse impact on public health and safety. • No parking requirement for ADU that is submitted with permit for new dwelling unit - must satisfy location requirements. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) • ADU allowed in front setback if 800 sq ft ADU cannot be located in any other location on the site w/ four -foot side and rear yard setbacks. • ADU and Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit (JADU) can be combined on one property. ADU has additional standards. • Construction of ADU shall not trigger a requirement for fire sprinklers to be installed in the existing primary dwelling. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) • Application for demo of detached garage to be replaced by application for new ADU shall be reviewed at same time. No noticing required unless property is located within historic district. • Owner occupancy not required within single family residence. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) • If application for ADU is denied must include comments to applicant with a list of items that are defective or deficient and a description of how the application can be remedied. • Application for ADU cannot be denied on the basis of non- conforming zoning conditions, building code violations, or unpermitted structures that do not present a threat to public health and safety and are not affected by the construction of the ADU. Tennis and Other Game Courts • Allow tennis and other game courts (such as pickleball) at existing grade to be set back at least 20 feet from front, 10 feet from side, or rear property lines where a block wall six (6) feet in height exists or is required to be constructed along those property lines. • Current Code requires that tennis and other game courts be set back at least 20 feet from the front property line, 10 feet from the side or rear property lines, and requires that the court be lower in grade by four feet from the surrounding grade if located within 30 feet of any side or rear property line. Tennis/Game Courts L LU LU � I I FRONT YARD REAR YARD �............. Tennis/Game Courts Zo' ------ : --------------------------------------------------- _4 II It •; w 20' LU -130'10, H -11 -�-------- - - - - -- - - I FRONT YARD • I \ ---T--- ---------------------I---T--- -------------- ---------- -F ------- _.._.._.._......�i10� I- Flagpoles 6' HIGH BLOCK WALL REAR YARD Proposed: Where a yard abuts open space, a golf course, or a street, allow flagpoles to be located at least 5 feet setback from anv property line. • Current Code prohibits flagpoles located on yards that abut another residential lot; this would remain in place. • Current Code allows flagpoles on yards that abut a street or open space or a golf course, but with a minimum 10 -foot setback from anv property line. Flagpoles • Correction to ExhibitA redline Code amendments: Flagpoles shall not be allowed within any yard, except if a yard abuts open space, a golf course, or a street, flagpoles shall maintain a minimum setback distance of 5 feet from or a street.. Flagpoles �.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.. REAR YARD FRONT YARD I ' w I GOLF LU COURSE OR OPEN ' SPACE I._.._.._.._.._..—..—..—..— STREET o Flagpoles �.._.._.._.._.._.._.._..__.. REAR YARD FRONT YARD I Lu i Lu i GOLF i COURSE OR OPEN i io• SPACE I._.._.._.._.._..-..-..-..- 10, io• STREET iv 10, Flagpoles �..—.._.._.._.._.._.._..__.. REAR YARD FRONT YARD I i i ; GOLF Lu N ; i COURSE 17OR OPEN io SPACE I. _..._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._ lo' STREET io' o Flagpoles �.._.._.._.._.._.._.._..__.. REAR YARD FRONT YARD I Lu i Lu i GOLF i COURSE OR OPEN i io• SPACE I._.._.._.._.._..-..-..-..- 10, io• STREET iv lo- Flagpoles REAR YARD 1 1 , FRONT YARD 1 � 1 1 1 _ 1 _ _ �-�------ ._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._..------i----- 1 LU Lu 10, 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 , 'I , 1 , 1 I � I 1 • I � I 1 , 1 , 1 1 � 1 HI � �• 5-I STREET 10' FRONT YARD Lu Lu 10, Flagpoles I I 51 STREET 10' GOLF COURSE OPEN SPACE REAR YARD GOLF COURSE OR OPEN SPACE Flagpoles �..—..—..—..—..—.._.._.._.. REAR YARD WL FRONT YARD i I i GOLF i COURSE OR OPEN SPACE I._.._.._.._..—..—.. STREET o- Flagpoles �.._.._.._.._.._.._.._..__.. REAR YARD FRONT YARD Lu Lu Lu Ln i ion i i GOLF - i COURSE OR OPEN . i SPACE I._.._.._.._.._..—..—..—..— io• STREET 10' 10' Flagpoles - �..—.._.._.._.._.._.._..__.. REAR YARD FRONT YARD i Lu Lu Lu lo' STREET 10' lo, Flagpoles ' S- i i FRONT YARD i ----*--- — -----rt _.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._,._ s' i Lu Lu 'rF 10, I()' STREET 10' 10, GOLF COURSE OR OPEN SPACE REAR YARD io GOLF COURSE OR OPEN SPACE Garage Setback from Front Yard • Remove the 25 -foot setback requirement for garages; the 20 -foot setback for the building would remain in place. • 25 -foot setback was to account for tilt -up (overhead) garage doors. 0 Roll -up garage doors are now most common. 10' Flagpoles s � �..�..�..�..�..�..�..�..__iN REAR YARD MMAi FRONT YARD � 10' LU i i ; GOLF N ; i COURSE OR OPEN I SPACE i 10, 10' STREET 10• Garage Setback from Front Yard • Remove the 25 -foot setback requirement for garages; the 20 -foot setback for the building would remain in place. • 25 -foot setback was to account for tilt -up (overhead) garage doors. 0 Roll -up garage doors are now most common. C: FP Floodplain District • Remove the work "Overlay" from the Code language that refers to the Floodplain District as a "Floodplain Overlay District". • Floodplain District is a base district, not an overlay district Recommendation • Adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2023-1000 and find that these amendments are exempt from CEQA review. _ _- - CALIFORNIA