Loading...
2023 12 19 Counciltad 0 � o ta - GEM of the DESERT — City Council agendas and staff reports are available on the City's web page: www. La Quin taCA.pov CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta REGULAR MEETING ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2023 3:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION 14:00 P.M. OPEN SESSION Members of the public may listen to this meeting by tuning -in live via http://laguinta.12milesout.com/video/live. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Councilmembers: Fitzpatrick, McGarrey, Pena, Sanchez, Mayor Evans PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda pursuant to the "Public Comments — Instructions" listed at the end of the agenda. The City Council values your comments; however, in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by the Brown Act [Government Code § 54954.2(b)]. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OR (3) OF SUBDIVISION (d) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CASES: 1) 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OR (3) OF SUBDIVISION (d) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CASES: 1) RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 1 of 8 DECEMBER 19, 2023 RECONVENE AT 4:00 P.M. REPORT ON ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda pursuant to the "Public Comments — Instructions" listed at the end of the agenda. The City Council values your comments; however, in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by the Brown Act [Government Code § 54954.2(b)]. ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS, AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION — 2024 DRAFT TRAFFIC RELIEF PLAN UPDATE PRESENTATION BY DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AARON HAKE CONSENT CALENDAR NOTE: Consent Calendar items are routine in nature and can be approved by one motion. PAGE 1. APPROVE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 5, 2023 2. ADOPT RESOLUTION DESIGNATING SPEED LIMIT FOR AVENUE 50 FROM EISENHOWER DRIVE TO WASHINGTON STREET [RESOLUTION NO. 2023-043] 3. ADOPT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING STAFF TO EXECUTE AND FILE APPLICATIONS TO, AND AGREEMENTS AND ASSURANCES WITH THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNORS OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES TO OBTAIN FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR ANY EXISTING OR FUTURE GRANT PROGRAM ON BEHALF OF LA QUINTA [RESOLUTION NO. 2023-044] 4. APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO HOST VENUE AGREEMENT WITH WORLD TRIATHLON CORPORATION TO HOST THE IRONMAN 70.3 INDIAN WELLS — LA QUINTA TRIATHLON FOR ONE ADDITIONAL YEAR 5. ALLOCATE FUNDING AND AWARD CONTRACT TO ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT FOR THE CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2023-15, LOCATED IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS 6. AWARD CONTRACT TO CONSERVE LANDCARE FOR LA QUINTA LANDSCAPE RENOVATION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2016-031, LOCATED AT THE CACTUS FLOWER DEVELOPMENT CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 2 of 8 DECEMBER 19, 2023 7. ACCEPT AVENUE 50 AND AVENUE 52 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NOS. 2022-01 AND 2022-14, LOCATED ALONG AVENUE 50 AND AVENUE 52 IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS 8. REJECT ALL BIDS FOR EISENHOWER BASIN SLOPE REPAIR PROJECT NO. 2023-22 9. APPROVE RECIPIENT FOR THE 2024 LA QUINTA SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARD 10. EXCUSE ABSENCE OF COMMISSIONER HERNANDEZ FROM THE DECEMBER 12, 2023, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 11. RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ANNUAL REPORT 12. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED JUNE 30, 2023 13. RECEIVE AND FILE FIRST QUARTER FISCAL YEAR 2023/24 TREASURY REPORTS FOR JULY, AUGUST, AND SEPTEMBER 2023 14. APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED NOVEMBER 17, DECEMBER 1, AND DECEMBER 8, 2023 15. RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 MEASURE G SALES TAX 179 COMPLIANCE REPORT 16. RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FEE 187 REPORT BUSINESS SESSION PAGE 1. APPOINT A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO SERVE AS MAYOR PRO 201 TEMPORE FOR ONE YEAR 2. APPOINT MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO SERVE ON VARIOUS OUTSIDE AGENCIES FOR 2024 3. APPROPRIATE $866,000 FROM GENERAL FUND RESERVES AND TRANSFER TO ENTERPRISE FUND, APPROVE PURCHASE OF GOLF CARTS FOR SILVERROCK GOLF COURSE, AND APPROVE ASSOCIATED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 3 of 8 DECEMBER 19, 2023 STUDY SESSION PAGE 1. DISCUSS FINANCIAL OPTIONS FOR THE VILLAGE UNDERGROUNDING FEASIBILITY STUDY PROJECT NO. 2022-06 PUBLIC HEARINGS — 5:00 p.m. or thereafter For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to consideration of that item; comments are limited to three (3) minutes (approximately 350 words). Any person may submit written comments to the City Council prior to the public hearing and/or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the project(s) at the time of the public hearing. If you challenge a project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public hearing. PAGE 1. CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 19, 2023: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO: 1) 233 ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (EA 2021-0006 ), AND 2) APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2021-0001, ZONE CHANGE 2021- 0001, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2021-0002 (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) FOR AN 80 -UNIT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2021-0004 (TTM 37950); CEQA: DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PREPARED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CONSISTENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; PROJECT NAME: LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58; LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 58 BETWEEN MADISON STREET AND MONROE STREET [RESOLUTION NOS. 2023-045 AND 2023-046] DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 1. CITY MANAGER 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK 4. COMMUNITY SERVICES 5. DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT 6. FINANCE 7. PUBLIC SAFETY 8. PUBLIC WORKS MAYOR'S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. CVAG CONSERVATION COMMISSION (Evans) 2. CVAG ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE (Evans) 3. CVAG EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (Evans) 4. GREATER PALM SPRINGS CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU (Evans) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 4 of 8 DECEMBER 19, 2023 5. IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT — COACHELLA VALLEY ENERGY COMMISSION (Evans) 6. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES DELEGATE (Evans) 7. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT JOINT POLICY COMMITTEE (Evans) 8. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (Evans) 9. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE (Evans & Fitzpatrick) 10. COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (McGarrey) 11. DESERT RECREATION DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick & McGarrey) 12. COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick & Pena) 13. GREATER CV CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INFORMATION EXCHANGE COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick) 14. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (Fitzpatrick) 15. CANNABIS AD HOC COMMITTEE (Pena & Sanchez) 16. CVAG PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE (Pena) 17. CVAG VALLEY -WIDE HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE (Pena) 18. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES — PUBLIC SAFETY POLICY COMMITTEE (Pena) 19. IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT — ENERGY CONSUMERS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (McGarrey) 20. COACHELLA VALLEY MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (Pena) 21. CVAG TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick) 22. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY (Pena) 23. DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Evans & Sanchez) 24. ANIMAL CAMPUS COMMISSION (Sanchez) 25. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES — PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE (Sanchez & Pena) 26. RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (Sanchez) ADJOURNMENT ********************************* The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on January 16, 2023, at 4:00 p.m. at the City Hall Council Chamber, 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 5 of 8 DECEMBER 19, 2023 DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Monika Radeva, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing Agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting was posted on the City's website, near the entrance to the Council Chamber at 78495 Calle Tampico, and the bulletin board at the La Quinta Cove Post Office at 51321 Avenida Bermudas, on December 15, 2023. DATED: December 15, 2023 V MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California Public Notices • Agenda packet materials are available for public inspection: 1) at the Clerk's Office at La Quinta City Hall, located at 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253; and 2) on the City's website at www.laquintaca.gov/councilagendas, in accordance with the Brown Act [Government Code § 54957.5; AB 2647 (Stats. 2022, Ch. 971)]. • The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's office at (760) 777-7123, 24 - hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. • If background material is to be presented to the City Council during a City Council meeting, please be advised that 15 copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk for distribution. It is requested that this takes place prior to the beginning of the meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS - INSTRUCTIONS Members of the public may address the City Council on any matter listed or not listed on the agenda as follows: WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS can be provided either in-person during the meeting by submitting 15 copies to the City Clerk, it is requested that this takes place prior to the beginning of the meeting; or can be emailed in advance to CityClerkMail(ar,LaQuintaCA.gov, no later than 12:00 p.m., on the day of the meeting. Written public comments will be distributed to Council, made public, and will be incorporated into the public record of the meeting, but will not be read during the meeting unless, upon the request of the Mayor, a brief summary of public comments is asked to be reported. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 6 of 8 DECEMBER 19, 2023 If written public comments are emailed, the email subject line must clearly state "Written Comments" and should include: 1) full name, 2) city of residence, and 3) subject matter. VERBAL PUBLIC COMMENTS can be provided in-person during the meeting by completing a "Request to Speak" form and submitting it to the City Clerk; it is requested that this takes place prior to the beginning of the meeting. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes (or approximately 350 words). Members of the public shall be called upon to speak by the Mayor. In accordance with City Council Resolution No. 2022-027, a one-time additional speaker time donation of three (3) minutes per individual is permitted; please note that the member of the public donating time must: 1) submit this in writing to the City Clerk by completing a "Request to Speak" form noting the name of the person to whom time is being donated to, and 2) be present at the time the speaker provides verbal comments. Verbal public comments are defined as comments provided in the speakers' own voice and may not include video or sound recordings of the speaker or of other individuals or entities, unless permitted by the Mayor. Public speakers may elect to use printed presentation materials to aid their comments; 15 copies of such printed materials shall be provided to the City Clerk to be disseminated to the City Council, made public, and incorporated into the public record of the meeting; it is requested that the printed materials are provided prior to the beginning of the meeting. There shall be no use of Chamber resources and technology to display visual or audible presentations during public comments, unless permitted by the Mayor. All writings or documents, including but not limited to emails and attachments to emails, submitted to the City regarding any item(s) listed or not listed on this agenda are public records. All information in such writings and documents is subject to disclosure as being in the public domain and subject to search and review by electronic means, including but not limited to the City's Internet Web site and any other Internet Web -based platform or other Web -based form of communication. All information in such writings and documents similarly is subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act [Government Code § 7920.000 et seq.]. TELECUNFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY — INSTRUCTIONS Teleconference accessibility may be triggered in accordance with AB 2449 (Stats. 2022, Ch. 285), codified in the Brown Act [Government Code § 54953], if a member of the City Council requests to attend and participate in this meeting remotely due to `just cause" or "emergency circumstances," as defined, and only if the request is approved. In such instances, remote public accessibility and participation will be facilitated via Zoom Webinar as detailed at the end of this Agenda. *** TELECONFERENCE PROCEDURES — PURSUANT TO AB 2449*** APPLICABLE ONLY WHEN TELECONFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY IS IN EFFECT CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 7 of 8 DECEMBER 19, 2023 Verbal public comments via Teleconference — members of the public may attend and participate in this meeting by teleconference via Zoom and use the "raise your hand" feature when public comments are prompted by the Mayor; the City will facilitate the ability for a member of the public to be audible to the City Council and general public and allow him/her/them to speak on the item(s) requested. Please note — members of the public must unmute themselves when prompted upon being recognized by the Mayor, in order to become audible to the City Council and the public. Only one person at a time may speak by teleconference and only after being recognized by the Mayor. ZOOM LINK: https://us06web.zoom.us/m/82540879912 Meeting ID: 825 4087 9912 Or join by phone: (253) 215 —8782 Written public comments — can be provided in person during the meeting or emailed to the City Clerk's Office at CityClerkMail(a-)LaQuintaCA.gov any time prior to the adjournment of the meeting, and will be distributed to the City Council, made public, incorporated into the public record of the meeting, and will not be read during the meeting unless, upon the request of the Mayor, a brief summary of any public comment is asked to be read, to the extent the City Clerk's Office can accommodate such request. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 8 of 8 DECEMBER 19, 2023 CALL TO ORDER CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 1 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES TUESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2023 A regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to order at 4:00 p.m. by Mayor Evans. PRESENT: Councilmembers Fitzpatrick, McGarrey, Pena, Sanchez, Mayor Evans ABSENT: None PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA PUBLIC SPEAKER: Ashelanna Ruby, La Quinta — said she has been a Coachella Valley resident for 14 years; purchased an existing business, "Cooking with Class," at Caleo Bay Park in La Quinta in 2022; complained about the severe backlog and delays of La Quinta's building and fire permits and plan check review and processing she experienced while trying to complete tenant improvements on the leased business location, which caused a disagreement with the property owner, and eventually resulted in termination of her lease; and noted she should not have to pay any outstanding plan check fees as the severe delays by City caused the closing of her business. City Manager McMillen said staff would investigate the matter and contact Ms. Ruby. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Don Shoffstall, La Quinta — provided the 2022 election results for the multiple Homeowner Associations (HOAs) within the PGA West community for Measure A, a citizen initiative petition that proposed to phase-out and permanently ban non -hosted short-term vacation rentals (STVR) in non-exempt areas by January 1, 2025, which was not approved by the qualified votes; and recommended that annually the City incorporate residents' participation in its periodic review of the STVR program's impacts and effects. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA City Clerk Radeva said minor revisions to Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 and 2 on pages 14 and 30 of the agenda packet will be announced during Council's consideration of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Pena said he will recuse himself from discussion and vote on Consent Calendar Item No. 5 due to a potential conflict of interest stemming from the proximity of his real properties to the vacant parcels being considered under this Agenda item, and requested that it be pulled for a separate vote. Council concurred. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 1 of 5 DECEMBER 5, 2023 9 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. PRESENTATION ON THE SALTON SEA MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE BY MIGUEL HERNANDEZ, PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICER AT THE CALIFORNIA NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY Mr. Hernandez provided an update on the restoration efforts for the Salton Sea pursuant to the Salton Sea Management Program. Council discussed appreciation of the progress being made to mitigate the human and animal health hazards resulting from the Sea; public tours available to view the mitigation projects; the City's resolution in support of importing sea water; and State and Federal funding available. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Alena Callimanis, La Quinta — said she was a kayaking instructor in North Carolina, and stated that access for kayaks to enter the Salton Sea disappeared when water importing ceased; and the project done by the United Arab Emirates shows water importation is feasible, and suggests that the Army Corp of Engineers consult with those engineers. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 21, 2023 2. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 607 ON SECOND READING AMENDING CHAPTER 3.25 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS [ORDINANCE NO. 607] 3. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 608 ON SECOND READING ADDING SUBSECTION 3.25.070(S) TO CHAPTER 3.25 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS TO ESTABLISH THAT APARTMENTS ARE NOT ELIGIBLE TO APPLY FOR OR OBTAIN A SHORT- TERM VACATION RENTAL PERMIT [ORDINANCE NO. 608] 4. ADOPT RESOLUTION TO APPROVE FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 38298 LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CALLE TAMPICO AND WASHINGTON STREET [RESOLUTION NO. 2023-040] 5. ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO: 1) DECLARE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS 770- 123-011, 770-124-010, AND 770-124-012 LOCATED IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA AS SURPLUS LAND, AND 2) DECLARE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 770-125-003, LOCATED IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA AS EXEMPT SURPLUS LAND; EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 15312 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT [RESOLUTION NOS. 2023-041 AND 2023-042] CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 of 5 DECEMBER 5, 2023 10 6. AUTHORIZE OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR ONE CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICER TO ATTEND THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS ACADEMY TO OBTAIN THEIR CODE ENFORCEMENT CERTIFICATION IN CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, JANUARY 22-26, FEBRUARY 26 — MARCH 1, AND MARCH 11-15,2024 7. AUTHORIZE OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE FINANCE DIRECTOR AND THREE FINANCE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES TO ATTEND THE CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, JANUARY 30 — FEBRUARY 2, 2024 8. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 2023 COMMENTS ON CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NOS. 1 AND 2 City Clerk Radeva noted the following revisions for the record: • Consent Calendar Item No. 1 — paragraph two, on page 14 of the agenda packet (or page 8 of the November 21, 2023, Council minutes), shall read as follows: 'As amended by City Attorney ►h ke to designate alternate site 6 ("Darby') and to add the following recital to Resolution No. 2023-039 under the findings of GPA 2022-0002" • Consent Calendar Item No. 2 — Subsection 3.25.055(E), on page 30 of the agenda packet (or page 7 of Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 607), shall go into effect on January 4, 2024, and shall read as follows: "E. Commencing on January 4, 202, Dec-ember21202 , which is the effective date of Ordinance No. 607 adding this Subsection (E), this section may not be amended by the city council, except by no less than four-fifths (4/5) majority vote of the city council. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Pena/McGarrey to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 and 2 as amended, and Nos. 3-4 and 6-8 as recommended, with Item Nos. 2 and 3 adopting Ordinances 607 and 608, respectively; and Item No. 4 adopting Resolution No. 2023-040. Motion passed unanimously. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 5 COUNCILMEMBER PENA RECUSED HIMSELF, AND SAID HE WILL ABSTAIN FROM THE DISCUSSION AND VOTE ON CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 5 DUE TO A POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST STEMMING FROM THE PROXIMITY OF HIS REAL PROPERTIES TO THE VACANT PARCELS UNDER CONSIDERATION MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Fitzpatrick/McGarrey to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 5 as recommended, adopting Resolution Nos. 2023- 041 and 2023-042. Motion passed: ayes - 4, noes - 0, abstain - 1 (Pena), absent - 0. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 of 5 DECEMBER 5, 2023 11 BUSINESS SESSION 1. INTERVIEW AND APPOINT A RESIDENT TO SERVE ON THE FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION (FAC) Council waived presentation of the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. Mayor Evans explained the process the Council follows in conducting interviews and appointing members, and provided a summary of the roles and responsibilities of the members serving on the FAC. Council interviewed the following two applicants, in alphabetical order, who gave a brief presentation of their experience and qualifications: • Geoffrey Kiehl • Mark Sussman MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers McGarrey/Sanchez to appoint Geoffrey Kiehl to serve on the Financial Advisory Commission for an unexpired term ending June 30, 2024. Motion passed unanimously. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Mark Sussman, La Quinta — commented on the need to address the financial benefits of the lithium mining component at the Salton Sea. STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSS CONSTRUCTION STAGING ALTERNATIVES FOR AVENUE 50 BRIDGE PROJECT NO. 2019-02 Management Analyst Mignogna presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. Council discussed the proposed road closures and detour routes, and its effects to the nearby residential communities and schools; expressed general support for the full road closure as presented under Alternative 2; anticipated project timeline and construction schedule; financial benefits of full -closure versus staged construction, as well as a shorter construction timeline; importance of robust community outreach; and possible overlap of construction timelines of the La Quinta Village Apartments development and the Avenue 50 Bridge project; and coordination with local utilities. Council reached a consensus and directed staff to proceed with Alternative 2 — Full Roadway Closure, as presented. PUBLIC HEARINGS — None DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS — All reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4 of 5 DECEMBER 5, 2023 12 MAYOR'S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS Council reported their attendance at the annual Historic Casita Lighting, which included the Lumberyard building this year, held at the La Quinta Museum on November 30, 2023; and the annual Tree Lighting Ceremony held at the Civic Center Park on December 1, 2023. Mayor Evans thanked all agencies and parties that helped make the 2023 Indian Wells — La Quinta Ironman 70.3 Triathlon event a success, held on December 3, 2023; and reported on her attendance at the following events: Riverside County Sheriff's Department Coffee with a Cop; Media Day for the upcoming American Express Golf Tournament slated to be held in January 2024; the La Quinta Resort and Club's Annual Tree Lighting, and announced that the Long Horn Steakhouse restaurant in La Quinta is now open. Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez reported on his and Councilmember Pena's attendance at the Rancho La Quinta Homeowners Association Thanksgiving Day Ceremony for U.S. Marine Corp, which welcomed marines from the Air Ground Combat Center in 29 Palms. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Councilmember Pena encouraged the Council to tour the Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District in Indio, California. La Quinta's representative for 2023, Mayor Evans reported on her participation in the following organizations' meeting: • CVAG EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE La Quinta's representative for 2023, Councilmember Fitzpatrick reported on her participation in the following organizations' meeting: • CVAG TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MAYOR EVANS RECESSED THE MEETING TO CITY HALL'S ANNUAL OPEN HOUSE MEET AND GREET AT 5:23 P.M. MAYOR EVANS RECONVENED THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 6:11 P.M. WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, a motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Fitzpatrick/McGarrey to adjourn at 6:11 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5 of 5 DECEMBER 5, 2023 13 14 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 2 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 19, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION DESIGNATING SPEED LIMIT FOR AVENUE 50 FROM EISENHOWER DRIVE TO WASHINGTON STREET RECOMMENDATION Adopt resolution designating legal speed limits on Avenue 50, between Eisenhower Drive and Washington Street, as recommended in the 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The City Traffic Engineer recommended that a speed survey be conducted on this street segment due to recent changes which affected the operating conditions. The engineering and speed survey accounts for: 1) prevailing speed, 2) accident history, and 3) roadway characteristics not apparent to the motorist. • The survey designated this segment for a 5 mile per hour speed limit reduction from 45 to 40 (Exhibit A to the proposed Resolution). FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact as the speed limit signs are within the approved annual budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In order to enforce speed limits using radar, speed limits must be set in accordance with the California Vehicle Code (CVC). Per the CVC, vehicle speeds are determined by the behavior of a majority of drivers during normal driving conditions. Jurisdictions may not establish arbitrary speed limits. The City made changes to a portion of Avenue 50, between Eisenhower Drive and Washington Street, by reducing the former 4 -lane roadway to 2 lanes and adding buffered bike/cart lanes. As such, it is desirable to resurvey the prevailing speeds and determine if speed limit adjustments are necessary. Avenue 50, between Eisenhower Drive and Washington Street, was recently re -surveyed, and the City Traffic Engineer recommends reducing the existing speed limit from 45 mph to 40 mph. 15 The 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey presents the following recommended speed limit for this roadway segment: Street Segment Posted Proposed Avenue 50 Eisenhower Drive to Washington Street 45 40 Staff requests approval for the recommended speed limit. This speed limit will help drivers maintain a speed that is safe and consistent with the majority of other users. ALTERNATIVES No alternative is recommended. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director/City Engineer `[ RESOLUTION NO. 2023 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING SPEED LIMIT WHEREAS, the California Vehicle Code authorizes cities to designate and regulate speed zones within their jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it appropriate to designate speed limits on the following local street to facilitate safe and orderly traffic flow; and WHEREAS, said designation shall be made by resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it appropriate to designate speed limits for one street segment; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of Title 12.20.020 of the La Quinta Municipal Code, an engineering and traffic survey has been performed on the specified street; and WHEREAS, the following designated prima facie speed limit is based on the results of the 2017 Engineering and Traffic Survey 2023 Amendment dated June 27, 2023, included as Exhibit A, and incorporated herewith by this reference: Street Segment Speed Limit (mph) Avenue 50 Eisenhower Drive to Washington Street 40 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: the aforementioned prima facie speed limit is most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and to be reasonably safe. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 19th day of December 2023, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 17 Resolution No. 2023 -XXX Designate Speed Limit on Avenue 50 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 2 of 2 LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 18 RESOLUTION NO. 2023 -XXX EXHIBIT A ADOPTED: DECEMBER 19, 2023 W WILLDAN December 3, 2023 Mr. Bryan McKinney, P.E. City Engineer Public Works Department City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Subject: 2017 Engineering and Traffic Survey December 2023 Amendment Dear Mr. McKinney: As requested, Willdan has completed a review of the recommended speed zones on one segment in the City of La Quinta. The Engineering and Traffic Study dated January 5, 2017 is hereby amended to include the updated speed limits for this segment identified below that supersede the previous speed limit recommendations. 1- Avenue 50 — Eisenhower Drive to Washington Street We are pleased to submit the enclosed recommendation and supporting documentation for the above segment. The Engineering and Traffic Survey for the above segments was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC, following procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated November 2014, and as required by Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code. The Report is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued use of radar for traffic speed enforcement. We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of La Quinta and the assistance and cooperation afforded to us during the course of this study. Very truly yours, WILLDAN Nicolle Spann, P.E., T.E. Traffic Engineer Enclosure � ��tOFES51p Q�dfE551p�, yQ`ti, LE S. �b1412 S. LU = Y ren w Z rr�•, No_ 91787 TR 2933 FF �' �R T�. OF CAL���£ OF CAVO''' Engineering and Planning j Energy Efficiency and Sustainability I Financial and Economic Consuding I National Preparedness and Interoperabiii#y 552.908.5200 1 800.499.4484 1 fax: 552.695.2120 1 13191 Crossroads Parkway North, Suite 405, Industry, California 91746-3443 1 www.willdan.com 19 Table 1 Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes Emir I%° l U % in osted Prop. Street Segment Dist. Dir. 85 /O Mi. peed Speed Remarks (Mi.) Speed pace pace -� Limit Limit Eisenhower Drive to CA Washington StreetMUTCD MMEMMMEMEN OPTION 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of La Quinta Page 2 20 POSTED NEW No STREET FROM TO SPEEED POSTED CHANGE LIMIT SPEED LIMIT 1 Avenue 50 Eisenhower Drive Washington Street 45 40 -5 Emir I%° l U % in osted Prop. Street Segment Dist. Dir. 85 /O Mi. peed Speed Remarks (Mi.) Speed pace pace -� Limit Limit Eisenhower Drive to CA Washington StreetMUTCD MMEMMMEMEN OPTION 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of La Quinta Page 2 20 CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Avenue 50 between Eisenhower Drive and Washington Street DATE: 11/6/23 TIME: 15:00 OBSERVER: Steve Librinq LOCATION: 1 C kRT I: HIGHWAY & ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Sight Distance Obstructions? E/B W/B Notes es or no 1. Horizontal Yes Horizontal Curve 2. Vertical No 3. Superelevation (%) None 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Paved Paved 5. Profile Conditions (grade,%) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics None At -Grade Driveways on north (at grade, dustpan, etc) side only 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without No No Sidewalk on South sidewalks (yes or no) side only 8. Adjacent Land Use Residential Residential (residential, commercial, office, etc) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets No offsets TS at Eisenhower & (spacing, feet -offsets, yes or no) Washington 10. Pavement Condition Good Good (good, satisfactory, poor) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Light Light 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, 1 lane with buffered 1 lane with buffered 2 lanes, divided with undivided, painted, or raised median) bike/cart lane bike/cart lane a raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment 31' 26' 11' raised median (width, feet — straight or curved) 14. Street Length 0.77 mi 1,175 1,171 2,346 total 15. Average Daily Traffic Collected on 8/31/16 16. Traffic Flow Characteristics Light Light (heavy, moderate, light) 17. Uniformity with the Community Yes Yes (yes or no) 18. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover No No No parking allowed (yes or no) on both sides 19. Street Lighting Only at traffic signal Only at traffic signal locations locations Page 3 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of La Quinta 21 CITY OF LA QUINTA ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET: Avenue 50 between Eisenhower Drive P P and Washington Street LOCATION: 1 A A Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Southbound ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Westbound RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 78-250 Avenue 50 Date of Radar Measurement 11/6/23 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 3:00 PM — 4:00 PM 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 41 44 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 35-44(81%) Average Speed (mph) 41 Number of Samples Observed 197 Posted Limit (mph) 45 RT III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2020 TO 12/31/2022 Number of Midblock 0 Accidents Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 1.24 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0.00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS California MUTCD Option 2 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided. CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). C 12/1/2023 TE 2933 Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Num 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of La Quinta Page 4 22 A Direction Bi-directional ❑ Northbound* ❑ Southbound ❑ Eastbound * ❑ Westbound RT II: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Radar Measurement 78-250 Avenue 50 Date of Radar Measurement 11/6/23 Time of Radar Measurement (24 hour) 3:00 PM — 4:00 PM 50%ile (mph) 85%ile (mph) 41 44 10 mph Pace (% of Vehicles) 35-44(81%) Average Speed (mph) 41 Number of Samples Observed 197 Posted Limit (mph) 45 RT III: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Evaluated 1/1/2020 TO 12/31/2022 Number of Midblock 0 Accidents Midblock Expected-Statewide/Year 1.24 per MVM Accident Rate Acc/MVM Actual 0.00 per MVM PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS California MUTCD Option 2 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided. CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). C 12/1/2023 TE 2933 Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Num 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of La Quinta Page 4 22 PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS California MUTCD Option 2 RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH * May be used in cases where two or more separate roadways are provided. CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of La Quinta was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). C 12/1/2023 TE 2933 Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Num 2023 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of La Quinta Page 4 22 CITY OF QUINTA DATE: 11/06/23 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 3:OOPM TO 4:OOPM FOR -••Di TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 OBSERVATION •.Midblock ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 •. OBSERVER: ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 •MMENTS: Resurvey for road WEATHER: SUNNY ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 diet recently 000completed ROAD SURFACE:D. • ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 -. ••. ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 ©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:RADAR 000 ©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ©00 ©©©©©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ©0© ©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 ©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■ Om® :• :• :• :• • ©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■■ ®0® ©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 ©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■■ ®0® ©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■■■■ D®0 ©©©©©©©©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 00� • ©©©©©©©©©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 ©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 . , ©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 ,. - ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 ©■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 "' ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 • ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 .-.. . ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 . � � ��• • ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 . ... - . � - - � - � � ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 • ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 000 C:\Users\local_NSpann\INetCache\Content. Outlook\CFC6P7XA\RADAR FORM Ave 50 - Eisenhower to Washington 24 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 3 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 19, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING STAFF TO EXECUTE AND FILE APPLICATIONS TO, AND AGREEMENTS AND ASSURANCES WITH THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES TO OBTAIN FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR ANY EXISTING OR FUTURE GRANT PROGRAM ON BEHALF OF LA QUINTA RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager, Finance Director/City Treasurer, and/or Emergency Services Deputy Director, to execute and file applications to, and agreements and assurances with the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services to obtain federal financial assistance for any existing or future grant program on behalf of the City. EXL%,U I WE JUIVIIVIIAMT • During August 19-21, 2023, Tropical Storm Hilary (Hilary) occurred in southern California and impacted the City of La Quinta. • On November 21, 2023, the President approved the Major Disaster Declaration for California. • Subsequently to the disaster declaration, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) announced that federal disaster assistance would be made available to the state of California to supplement recovery efforts in the areas affected by Hilary. • The California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (CaIOES) is the state agency that facilitates both the state California Disaster Assistance Act (CDAA) and FEMA Public Assistance programs. • In order to submit both federal and state requests for public assistance, a designation of the applicant's (City's) agent resolution must be submitted to Cal OES. FISCAL IMPACT The City has incurred costs from Tropical Storm Hilary for emergency and permanent work due to damages from the storm, and more impacts may yet be identified. The FEMA program will reimburse the costs for 75% of eligible, approved projects. CDAA will 25 reimburse the costs for 75% of the local share of the eligible, approved projects (18.75% of the total project costs). The City would be responsible for the remaining 25% of the local share, or 6.25% of the total project costs. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS During August 19-21, 2023, unprecedented tropical storm Hilary occurred in southern California. On August 20, 2023, Hilary impacted the City of La Quinta, requiring emergency work and causing permanent damage to the City's infrastructure. The City has completed some of the emergency infrastructure repairs that were an immediate threat to the life and safety of the community, and some repairs are still needed. On November 21, 2023, the President approved the Major Disaster Declaration for California. Subsequently to the disaster declaration, FEMA announced that federal disaster assistance would be made available to the state of California to supplement recovery efforts in the areas affected by Hilary. CalOES facilitates both the state CDAA and FEMA Public Assistance programs, and as part of their facilitation, held an applicant's briefing on December 7, 2023, which provided an overview of the requirements for all potential funding and grants. A resolution designating the City's authorized agent(s) must be filed with Cal OES along with the public assistance applications through the grant portal in order to allow the City to submit requests for federal and state public assistance. Staff requests that the City Manager, Finance Director and Emergency Services Deputy Director are all authorized to execute and file applications to CalOES, and also to execute and file any agreements and assurances necessary as related to the funding programs or grants. ALTERNATIVES — None. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Claudia Martinez, Finance Director Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director RESOLUTION NO. 2023 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AGENT(S) TO EXECUTE AND FILE APPLICATIONS TO, AND AGREEMENTS AND ASSURANCES WITH THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES TO OBTAIN FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR ANY EXISTING OR FUTURE GRANT PROGRAM ON BEHALF OF CITY OF LA QUINTA WHEREAS, On November 21, 2023, the President approved the Major Disaster Declaration for California; and on November 22, 2023, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) announced that federal disaster assistance would be made available to the State of California to supplement recovery efforts in the areas affected by Tropical Storm Hilary, which occurred August 19-21, 2023; and WHEREAS, a resolution designating the City of La Quinta's ("City") authorized agent(s) must be filed with California Governer's Office of Emergency Services along with the public assistance application(s) through the grant portal to allow the City to submit requests for federal and state public assistance, included as Exhibits A and B to this Resolution, and incorporated herewith by this reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the (1) City Manager, (2) Finance Director / City Treasurer, (3) Public Safety Deputy Director, or other officer(s) or employee(s) of the City designated in writing by the City Manager, to the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services are hereby appointed and authorized, as listed in attached Exhibits A and B, incorporated herewith to this Resolution, to represent the City with authority to execute for and on behalf of the City, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, applications for the purpose of obtaining federal financial assistance provided by the federal department of Homeland Security and awarded through the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services, for any existing or future grant program(s), including, but not limited to any of the following: Federally declared Disaster (DR), Fire Mitigation Assistance Grant (FMAG), California State Only Disaster (CDAA), Immediate Services Program (ISP), Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC), Legislative Pre -Disaster Mitigation Program (LPDM). SECTION 2. That the City Council hereby authorizes its agent(s), as listed in Section 1 of this Resolution, and attached Exhibits A and B, incorporated herewith by this 27 Resolution No. 2023 — xxx Designation of Applicant's Agent(s) for the City of La Quinta to the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 2 of 2 reference, to provide to the Governor's Office of Emergency Services for all matters pertaining to such state disaster assistance the assurances and agreements required. SECTION 3. This resolution is effective for all open and future disasters or grants declared up to three (3) years following the date of approval. SECTION 4. This resolution shall go into effect upon adoption and the City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 19th day of December 2023, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2023 -XXX - EXHIBIT A elQES STATE OF CALIFORNIA Adopted: December 19, 2023 CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES DESIGNATION OF APPLICANT'S AGENT RESOLUTION NON -STATE AGENCIES OES-FPD-130 (Rev. 10-2022) RECOVERY DIRECTORATE FINANCIAL PROCESSING DIVISION Cal OES ID No: DESIGNATION OF APPLICANT'S AGENT RESOLUTION FOR NON -STATE AGENCIES BE IT RESOLVED BY THE City Council OF THE City of La Quinta (Governing Body) (Name of Applicant) THAT City Manager OR (Title of Authorized Agent) Finance Director/City Treasurer OR (Title of Authorized Agent) Public Safety Deputy Director (Title of Authorized Agent) is hereby authorized to execute for and on behalf of the City of La Quinta (Name of Applicant) a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, this application and to file it with the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services for the purpose of obtaining federal financial assistance for any existing or future grant program, including, but not limited to any of the following: - Federally declared Disaster (DR), Fire Mitigation Assistance Grant (FMAG), California State Only Disaster (CDAA), Immediate Services Program (ISP), Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC), Legislative Pre -Disaster Mitigation Program (LPDM), under - Public Law 93-288 as amended by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988, and/or state financial assistance under the California Disaster Assistance Act. - Flood Mitigation Assistance Program (FMA), under Section 1366 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968. - National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) 42 U.S. Code 7704 (b) ((2) (A) (ix) and 42 U.S. Code 7704 (b) (2) (B) National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program, and also The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018, Div. F, Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-141 - California Early Earthquake Warning (CEEW) under CA Gov Code - Gov, Title 2, Div. 1, Chapter 7, Article 5, Sections 8587.8, 8587.1 1, 8587.12 That the City of La Quinta , a public entity established under the (Name of Applicant) laws of the State of California, hereby authorizes its agent(s) to provide to the Governor's Office of Emergency Services for all matters pertaining to such state disaster assistance the assurances and agreements required. 29 Rev. 10-2022 Page 1 of 4 OES-FPD-130 STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECOVERY DIRECTORATE 9 CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES FINANCIAL PROCESSING DIVISION DESIGNATION OF APPLICANT'S AGENT RESOLUTION NON -STATE AGENCIES OES-FPD-130 (Rev. 10-2022) Please check the appropriate box below 0 This is a universal resolution and is effective for all open and future disasters/grants declared up to three (3) years following the date of approval. ❑ This is a disaster/grant specific resolution and is effective for only disaster/grant number(s): Passed and approved this 19 day of December 20 23 Linda Evans, Mayor (Name and Title of Governing Body Representative) Councilmembers Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Deborah McGarrey, (Name and Title of Governing Body Representative) John Pena, and Steve Sanchez (Name and Title of Governing Body Representative) CERTIFICATION Monika Radeva duly appointed and City Clerk of (Name) (Title) City of La Quinta do hereby certify that the above is a true and (Name of Applicant) correct copy of a resolution passed and approved by the City Council of the City of La Quinta on the 19 (Name of Applicant) (Signature) (Governing Body) day of December City Clerk (Title) , 20 23 30 Rev. 10-2022 Page 2 of 4 OES-FPD-130 SESSTATE OF CALIFORNIA UrCALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES LIST OF AUTHORIZED AGENTS OES-FPD-012 (Rev. 09-2022) Entity Name: Cal OES ID: City of La Quinta List of Authorized Agents RECOVERY DIRECTORATE FINANCIAL PROCESSING DIVISION RESOLUTION NO: 2023-OXXX - EXHIBIT B ADOPTED: DECEMBER 19,2023 • Enter each Authorized Agent (AA) as listed on the Designation of Applicant's Agent Resolution (Cal OES 130) for Non -State Agencies or as it appears on the Signature Authority (Cal OES 130SA) for California State Agencies. • Check box to receive electronic copies of Cal OES Notification of Obligation and/or Payment packages. (Minimum 1 AA.) • Email addresses must use an email that shares the official entity URL. Email Authorized Agent Name Authorized Agent Title Email Address Pkg? Jon McMillen City Manager �JMcMillen@LaQuintaCA.gov Claudia Martinez Finance Director/City Treasurer FcMartinez@LaQuintaCA.gov Martha Mendez Public Safety Deputy Director FmMendez@LaQuintaCA.gov I E I E I E I E -An Approved Contact may be designated by an AA to request or receive information on grant payment status. Add them by inputting their information below. (Ex. Accounting/Admin offices) Must use an official email URL. Email Approved Contact Name Approved Contact Title Email Address Pkg? E I E 31 Please use a second page if more space is needed. Rev. 09-2022 OES-FPD-012 32 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 4 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 19, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO HOST VENUE AGREEMENT WITH WORLD TRIATHLON CORPORATION TO HOST THE IRONMAN 70.3 INDIAN WELLS — LA QUINTA TRIATHLON FOR ONE ADDITIONAL YEAR RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 5 to Host Venue Agreement with World Triathlon Corporation to host the IRONMAN 70.3 Indian Wells — La Quinta Triathlon for one additional year; and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The fifth IRONMAN 70.3 Indian Wells — La Quinta Triathlon (Event) occurred on December 3, 2023. • The Host Venue Agreement expires thirty days after the December 2023 Event. • Under Amendment No. 5, the Cities of La Quinta and Indian Wells are seeking to extend the agreement with World Triathlon Corporation for one additional year to host an Event in 2024. • All the terms and financial obligations would remain the same. FISCAL IMPACT The $75,000 host sponsorship would be paid in 2024 using funds budgeted in the Community Experiences Account No. 101-3003-60149. 93ACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City partnered with Indian Wells and World Triathlon Corporation to host the Event since 2018. Following the inaugural race the route was reconfigured to create a more efficient course with minimal traffic impacts. Since then, coordinated efforts between the participating agencies resulted in improved traffic flow, no major injuries, and timely removal of traffic control equipment after the race. The Event attracts professional and amateur athletes from around the world, establishing La Quinta as an international destination. The 2022 economic impact report indicates that 33 the Event produced over $5,700,000 in economic benefits for the region. If approved, Amendment No. 5 would extend the Host Venue Agreement for an additional year. All terms of the existing agreement would remain the same including each agency's resource commitments, financial participation by the Greater Palm Springs Convention & Visitors Bureau and World Triathlon Corporation covering traffic, police, and fire costs associated with the Event. If Amendment No. 5 is approved, all terms and obligations will continue through the 2024 race and staff will collaborate with partnering agencies to assess the Event and implement improvements to the race route, traffic plan, and community outreach efforts. Based on continued positive performance, staff will work with all parties on a new long-term agreement for the triathlon. ALTERNATIVES Council may elect not to amend the agreement and not host the Event in 2024. Prepared by: Michael Calderon, Management Analyst Approved by: Christina Calderon, Community Services Deputy Director Attachment: 1. Amendment 5 to Host Venue Agreement with World Triathlon Corporation, LLC 34 ATTACHMENT 1 AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO HOST VENUE AGREEMENT WITH WORLD TRIATHLON CORPORATION This Amendment No. 5 ('Amendment No. 5") to Host Venue Agreement is made and entered into as of the 30th day of November 2023 (the "Amendment No. 5 Effective Date") by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA ("City"), a California municipal corporation, the CITY OF INDIAN WELLS ("IW"), a California municipal corporation, and WORLD TRIATHLON CORPORATION ("WTC"), a Florida Corporation. RECITALS WHEREAS, on or about December 19, 2017, City, IW, and WTC (collectively referred to as the "Parties" from hereto) entered into that certain Host Venue Agreement (the "Original Agreement") to authorize WTC to prepare and conduct an IRONMAN 70.3 Indian Wells - La Quinta triathlon (the "Event") each year of the Original Agreement; and WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1, executed on or about May 20, 2019, amended Section 1(d)(ii) to change the Race Date for the 2019 Event from December 15, 2019, to December 8, 2019; and WHEREAS, Amendment No. 2, executed on or about December 19, 2019, amended Section 1(d)(iii) to change the Race Date for the 2020 Event from December 13, 2020, to December 6, 2020; and WHEREAS, Amendment No. 3, executed on or about December 9, 2020, amended Section 1(d)(iii) to change the race date for the 2020 Event from December 6, 2020, to December 5, 2021, due to the novel coronavirus pandemic and extend the Term for one additional year thirty (30) days after the 2021 Event; and WHEREAS, Amendment No. 41 executed on or about November 30, 2021, amended the Agreement to extend the Term for two additional years to thirty (30) days after the 2023 Event. The Original Agreement, and Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 are collectively referred to as the "Agreement." The Term of the Agreement currently expires January 2, 2024; and WHEREAS, the Parties mutually agree to extend the Term of the Agreement for one additional year from thirty (30) days after the 2023 Event to thirty (30) days after the 2024 Event pursuant to Section 2 of Agreement; and Page 1 of 6 35 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals and mutual covenant herein contained, the Parties agree as follows: AMENDMENT 1. Section 2 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: Term of Agreement. This Agreement is effective beginning on the Effective Date and will continue in effect until the date that is thirty (30) days after the 2024 Event, unless this Agreement is sooner terminated in accordance with the terms of this Agreement (the "Term"). 2. Section 1(d)(vi) is hereby added to the Agreement and read as follows: Section 1(d)(vi). Sunday, December 8, 2024 3. Section 3(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended to include the following sentence: With respect to the Event taking place in 2024, the Annual Payment amounts paid to WTC by the Hosts shall remain the same as compared to previous Race Years and such Annual Payments for the 2024 Event shall be paid to WTC by September 30th of 2024. 4. The table of Restricted Sponsorship Categories in Exhibit D is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following list: • Airlines • Alcohol malt beverage and non -alcohol malt beverages • Automobiles, electric vehicles, electric buses, and electric scooters • Bike wear (including technical bike apparel, helmets, and footwear) • Bikes, bike components, bike trainers, bike parts (including pedals), bike devices (including computers, GPS devices, power meters, and any other connected devices) • Charities • Compression Wear • Digital virtual multisport software/platforms including swimming, cycling and/or running • Energy Drinks • Event registration or transaction processing software/services • Eyewear and related accessories Page 2 of 6 36 • Financial Services, Wealth Management, Cryptocurrency & Life Insurance • Hand/wrist devices including watches, global positioning devices (GPS) and any other connected devices • Heart Rate Monitors • Online Fundraising Platform • Photography Services • Recovery Devices and Wearables including ice -based products, vibration & percussive massage, heat/cold/thermal wearables, contrast therapy, compression (e.g., pneumatic boots), vibration rollers/balls/sticks, handheld meditation, TENS & stim devices • Running Wear (including footwear and apparel) • Swim Wear (including wetsuits, swim caps, and swim goggles) • Timing Services • Travel Booking Services, Tour Operator Services, Athlete Premium Experiences, and Training Camps • Treadmills In all other respects, the original Agreement shall remain in effect. [Three (3) signature pages directly follow this page] Page 3of6 37 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City, IW, and WTC have executed this Amendment No. 5 to the Agreement on the respective dates set forth below. CITY OF LA QUINTA a California municipal corporation JON MCMILLEN, City Manager City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California Dated: Page 4 of 6 38 CITY OF INDIAN WELLS a California municipal corporation CHRISTOPHER J. FREELAND, City Manager City of Indian Wells, California ATTEST: ANNA GRANDYS, City Clerk City of Indian Wells, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: JEFF BALLINGER, City Attorney City of Indian Wells, California Dated: Page 5 of 6 39 WORLD TRIATHLON CORPORATION ANDREW MESSICK, Chief Executive Officer Dated: Page 6 of 6 40 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 5 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 19, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ALLOCATE FUNDING AND AWARD CONTRACT TO ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT FOR THE CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2023-15 LOCATED IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS RECOMMENDATION Allocate $2,061,790 in fiscal year 2022/23 Pavement Management Plan Funding; award a contract to All American Asphalt for the Citywide Slurry Seal Improvements Project No. 2023-15 located in various locations throughout the city; and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract and approve future change orders within the project budget amount. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Fiscal year (FY) 2022/23 Pavement Management Plan (PMP) improvements include over 1,800,000 feet of slurry (Attachment 1): ✓ Avenida Martinez: over 290,000 square feet of slurry ✓ Avenida Mendoza: over 260,000 square feet of slurry ✓ Calle Madrid: over 119,000 square feet of slurry, including striping additional parking lanes ✓ Avenida La Fonda: over 160,000 square feet of slurry ✓ Washington Street, between Eisenhower and Avenue Montero: over 180,000 square feet of slurry including bike lanes with buffers; and ✓ Monroe Street: over 755,000 square feet of slurry including striping bike lanes with buffers. ✓ Additive Alternate No. 1: Widen portions of southbound Monroe Street south of Avenue 52 to include a minimum 6 -foot -wide bike lane from Avenue 52 to Avenue 62. • All American Asphalt of Corona, California, submitted the lowest responsible and responsive bid at $1,786,790.47 (Attachment 2). Staff recommends awarding the base bid in the amount of $1,396,768 and additive alternates in the amount of $390,022. FISCAL IMPACT The 2022/23 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) allocates $1,500,000 of General Funds with $787,000 in carry-over funding. The following is the project budget: 41 Original Budget Proposed Budget* Design/Professional: $ 60,000 $ 75,000 Construction: $ 1,396,768 $ 1,786,790 Inspection/Testing/Survey: $ 5,000 $ 20,000 Contingency: $ 38,232 $ 180,000 Total Budget: $ 1,500,000 $ 2,061,790 41 *Note: • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) will reimburse the City the cost to adjust sewer manholes in the anticipated amount of $11,400. • It is anticipated there will be $225,210 remaining in carry-over funding BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The PMP funds improvements to maintain and upgrade City roadways. The PMP is divided into phases, and the City typically implements PMP projects during the summer, when traffic congestion is lower. This fiscal year's improvements will slurry over 1,800,000 square feet of pavement and include minor pothole repairs and minor striping improvements. The striping improvements include better delineation for the bike lanes and add green paint backgrounds. Staff recommends awarding additive alternate no. 1 to widen portions of southbound Monroe Street to provide a consistent minimum 6 -foot -wide bike lane from Avenue 52 to Avenue 62. On November 8, 2023, staff solicited construction bids from qualified contractors. The City received five (5) bids on December 4, 2023. All American Asphalt of Corona, California, submitted the lowest responsible and responsive bid at $1,786,790.47. The bids came in higher than the engineer's estimate due to the market increase in signing and striping materials. Staff will increase future estimates to account for the market increase and review future project scopes. The bid items including asphalt are also higher than anticipated; however, asphalt is subject to varying rates in the market and may decrease in the future. Contingent upon approval to award the project on December 19, 2023, the following is the project schedule: Council Considers Project Award Execute Contract and Mobilize Construction (35 Working Days) Accept Improvements ALTERNATIVES December 19, 2023 December 20, 2023, to January 19, 2024 January 22 to March 18, 2024 April 2024 Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachments: 1: Vicinity Map 2: Bid Comparison 42 ATTACHMENT 1 FY 2022/23 Pavement Management Plan Improvement Vicinity Map FRO WAWDR hwy i7! WASHINGTON ST. PROJECT SITE AVE. LA FONDA FF. PROJECT SITE AVE. MENDOZA+AVE. MARTINEZ PROJECT SITE CALLE MADRID cAecE 1117AT PROJECT SFE HWY i1} AVENUE 48 3 �J- AVENUE 50 AVENUE WCINITY MAP SSSCC\\ABLE ASF jNO 1� A.11E 90 AVFNVE 61 AVENUE 82 MOROE STREET PROJECT SITE 43 44 Bid Opening Date: 12/04/2023 Engineer's Estimate - Base Bid Item Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Cost 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 106,000.00 $ 106,000.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $ 120,000.00 $ 120,000.00 3 Sawcut, Remove and Dispose of Existing LF 100 $ 45.00 $ 4,500.00 Dust Control Concrete Curb; Curb and gutter 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Construct 6" Curb and Gutter per City of Earthwork CY 1,300 $ 4 La Quinta Standard 201, 3" Dowel into LF 90 $ 120.00 $ 10,800.00 5,400 Adjacent Existing Concrete Curb 5.00 $ 27,000.00 6 Construct 5" Asphalt Concrete Pavement Over 6" Aggregate Base Construct 6" Curb per City of La Quinta 20,430 $ 5.50 $ 5 Standard 210, 3" Dowel into Adjacent LF 10 $ 110.00 $ 1,100.00 3.00 Existing Concrete Curb 10,842.00 8 Signing and Striping, Including All Incidentals LS 6 Crack Seal and Type 1, Latex Emulsion SF 33,295 $ 0.35 $ 11,653.25 Sub -Total Additive Alternative No.1 Bid: Aggregate Slur 299,204.00 $ 5.00 $ 192,915.00 $ 117.00 7 Crack Seal and Type II, Latex Emulsion SF 1,800,670 $ 0.35 $ 630,234.50 $ 45.00 Aggregate Slur $ 36.00 $ 11,952.00 $ 11,520.40 $ 42.00 8 Pavement Repair Type I: 2" Grind and SF 38,583 $ 3.00 $ 115,749.00 $ 311,000.00 Asphalt Concrete Overlay $ 1,396,768.43 $ 1,415,392.45 $ 1,495,683.80 Pavement Repair Type II : Edge Repair $ 3,498,981.00 9 AC Showing; Grind AC Shoving 2" Below SF 90 $ 35.00 $ 3,150.00 Adjacent Surface and 2" Overlay Pavement Repair Type III: Remove AC 10 (4 1/2"), Compact Existing Base, and SF 332 $ 30.00 $ 9,960.00 Variable Overlay (4 1/2" - 5 1/2" 11 Signing and Striping, Including All LS 1 $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 Incidentals Sub -Total Base Bid: $ 1,163,146.75 BID ADDITIVE ALTERNATE NO. 1 Item Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Unit Price 1 Total Cost 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 24,000.00 $ 24,000.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 3 Dust Control LS 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 4 Earthwork CY 1,300 $ 57.69 $ 74,997.00 5 Remove Roadway Section to Full Depth Required for Proposed Roadway Width SF 5,400 $ 5.00 $ 27,000.00 6 Construct 5" Asphalt Concrete Pavement Over 6" Aggregate Base SF 20,430 $ 5.50 $ 112,365.00 7 2" Grind and Asphalt Concrete Overlay SF 3,614 $ 3.00 $ 10,842.00 8 Signing and Striping, Including All Incidentals LS 1 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 110,347.38 Sub -Total Additive Alternative No.1 Bid: $ 299,204.00 BID ADDITIVE ALTERNATE NO. 2 Item Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Cost 1 Lower Sewer Manhole to Grade per EA 8 $ 1,100.00 $ 8,800.00 Roy Allen Slurry Seal, Inc. CVWD Standards Hardy & Harper, Inc. Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price 2 Raise Sewer Manhole to Grade per EA 8 $ 1,400.00 $ 11,200.00 $ 76,000.00 CVWD Standards $ 70,000.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 57,000.00 Sub -Total Additive Alternative No.1 Bid: $ 20,000.00 Unit Price Unit Price FY 22/23 Pavement City Bid Management Plan Project No. 2023-15 Comparison $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ American Asphalt South, Inc. Unit Price Total Cost 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 172,000.00 $ 172,000.00 86.00 $ 8,600.00 184.00 $ 16,560.00 165.00 $ 1,650.00 1.00 $ 33,295.00 0.34 $ 612,227.80 3.60 $ 138,898.80 23.00 $ 2,070.00 35.00 $ 11,620.00 409,000.00 $ 409,000.00 $ 1,465,921.60 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Pavement Unit Price 70,000.00 300,000.00 84.00 180.00 158.00 0.80 0.32 3.50 23.25 34.70 348,000.00 $ 48,000.00 ATTACHMENT 2 All American Asphalt Roy Allen Slurry Seal, Inc. Coatings Co. Hardy & Harper, Inc. Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost $ 152,000.00 $ 152,000.00 $ 76,000.00 $ 76,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 57,000.00 $ 57,000.00 $ 153,500.00 $ 153,500.00 $ 300,000.00 $ 1,980,000.00 $ 1,980,000.00 $ 128.00 $ 12,800.00 $ 88.00 $ 8,800.00 $ 8,400.00 $ 114.00 $ 11,400.00 $ 78.00 $ 7,020.00 $ 190.00 $ 17,100.00 $ 16,200.00 $ 182.00 $ 16,380.00 $ 195.00 $ 1,950.00 $ 170.00 $ 1,700.00 $ 1,580.00 $ 270.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 0.87 $ 28,966.65 $ 0.35 $ 11,653.25 $ 26,636.00 $ 1.12 $ 37,290.40 $ 0.32 $ 576,214.40 $ 0.33 $ 594,221.10 $ 576,214.40 $ 0.48 $ 864,321.60 $ 2.86 $ 110,347.38 $ 3.70 $ 142,757.10 $ 135,040.50 $ 5.00 $ 192,915.00 $ 117.00 $ 10,530.00 $ 24.00 $ 2,160.00 $ 2,092.50 $ 117.00 $ 10,530.00 $ 45.00 $ 14,940.00 $ 36.00 $ 11,952.00 $ 11,520.40 $ 42.00 $ 13,944.00 $ 425,000.00 $ 425,000.00 $ 395,549.00 $ 395,549.00 $ 348,000.00 $ 311,000.00 $ 311,000.00 $ 1,396,768.43 $ 1,415,392.45 $ 1,495,683.80 $ 3,498,981.00 Unit Price Unit Price Total Cost $ 17,000.00 $ 17,000.00 $ 48,000.00 $ 48,000.00 $ 13,000.00 $ 13,000.00 $ 105.00 $ 136,500.00 $ 4.40 $ 23,760.00 $ 6.60 $ 134,838.00 $ 3.70 $ 13,371.80 $ 14,500.00 $ 14,500.00 292,149.00 $ $ 400,969.80 Unit Price Unit Price Unit Price Total Cost $ 7,150.00 $ 7,150.00 $ 89,100.00 $ 89,100.00 $ 10,450.00 $ 10,450.00 $ 297.00 $ 386,100.00 $ 12.10 $ 65,340.00 $ 14.30 $ 292,149.00 $ 7.00 $ 25,298.00 $ 340,600.00 $ 340,600.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 1,216,187.00 Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost $ 650.00 $ 5,200.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 1,450.00 $ 11,600.00 $ 1,375.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 2,750.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 775.00 $ 6,200.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 1,450.00 $ 11,600.00 $ 1,375.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 2,750.00 $ 22,000.00 $ $ 11,400.00 $ $ 24,000.00 $ $ 23,200.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 44,000.00 Grand Total Base Bid Including Additive Alternates No. 1 & 2 : $ 1,482,350.75 $ 1,786,790.47 $ 1,840,362.25 $ 1,872,454.00 $ 19940,141.00 $ 4,759,168.00 Total Base Bid Including Additive Alternate No. 1 $ 1,462,350.75 $ 1,775,390.47 $ 1,816,362.25 $ 1,849,254.00 $ 19918,141.00 $ 4,715,168.00 Base Bid Only $ 1,163,146.75 $ 1,396,768.43 $ 1,415,392.45 $ 1,465,921.60 $ 1,495,683.80 $ 3,498,981.00 Miscalculations and rounding errors 45 46 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 6 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 19, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: AWARD CONTRACT TO CONSERVE LANDCARE FOR LA QUINTA LANDSCAPE RENOVATION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2016-031 LOCATED AT THE CACTUS FLOWER DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATION Award a contract to Conserve LandCare for the La Quinta Landscape Renovation Improvements Project No. 2016-031, located at the Cactus Flower development on the south side of Fred Waring Drive and east side of Dune Palms Road; and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract and approve future change orders within the project budget amount. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The seventh and final phase of the Measure G funded La Quinta Landscape Renovation project is located at the Cactus Flower development on the south side of Fred Waring Drive and east side of Dune Palms Road (Attachment 1). • The project includes: o Over 47,000 square feet of turf removal. o Over 104,000 square feet of new and refreshed landscape and irrigation. o Additive Alternate for an approximately 2,800 square foot mini sports park with pickleball courts and table tennis located on an unused portion of Buttercup Lane. • Conserve LandCare of Thousand Palms, California, submitted the lowest responsible and responsive bid at $1,217,000 (Attachment 2). Staff recommends awarding the base bid in the amount of $1,152,564 and the additive alternate in the amount of $64,436. FISCAL IMPACT The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) has allocated $9,963,148 to Landscape Renovation projects, $9,043,914 of Measure G Funds, $426,073 of General Funds, $479,661 of Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) reimbursement, and $13,500 of Arts in Public Places Funds. The following is the project budget: 47 *Note: This is the last phase in the multi-year Landscaping Renovation Project. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The seventh and final phase of the Measure G funded La Quinta Landscape Renovation project is located in the Cactus Flower development. The improvements for this phase will convert over 47,000 square feet of turf to desert landscaping, which will reduce maintenance and watering costs and over 104,000 square feet of new and refreshed landscaping and irrigation which includes wall cleaning and painting to complete the renovation effort. Additionally, a mini sports park that would include pickleball courts and table tennis was included as an additive alternative. On November 9, 2023, staff solicited construction bids from qualified contractors. The City received three (3) bids on December 4, 2023. Conserve LandCare of Thousand Palms, California, submitted the lowest responsible and responsive bid at $1,217,000. Contingent upon approval to award the project on December 19, 2023, the following is the project schedule: Council Considers Project Award Execute Contract and Mobilize Construction (60 Working Days) Accept Improvements ALTERNATIVES December 19, 2023 December 20, 2023 to January 19, 2024 January 22, 2024 to April 15, 2024 May 2024 Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Bid Comparison 48 Total Budget (All Phases)* Expended To Date Phase 7 Cactus Flower Professional: $ 547,258 $ 269,007 $ 30,000 Design: $ 699,212 $ 538,146 $ 82,110 Inspection/Testing/Survey: $ 677,242 $ 68,925 $ 40,000 Construction: $ 6,970,407 $ 5,652,528 $ 1,217,000 Contingency: $ 1,069,029 $ 0 $ 134,000 Total Budget: $ 9,963,148 $ 6,528,606 $ 1,503,110 *Note: This is the last phase in the multi-year Landscaping Renovation Project. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The seventh and final phase of the Measure G funded La Quinta Landscape Renovation project is located in the Cactus Flower development. The improvements for this phase will convert over 47,000 square feet of turf to desert landscaping, which will reduce maintenance and watering costs and over 104,000 square feet of new and refreshed landscaping and irrigation which includes wall cleaning and painting to complete the renovation effort. Additionally, a mini sports park that would include pickleball courts and table tennis was included as an additive alternative. On November 9, 2023, staff solicited construction bids from qualified contractors. The City received three (3) bids on December 4, 2023. Conserve LandCare of Thousand Palms, California, submitted the lowest responsible and responsive bid at $1,217,000. Contingent upon approval to award the project on December 19, 2023, the following is the project schedule: Council Considers Project Award Execute Contract and Mobilize Construction (60 Working Days) Accept Improvements ALTERNATIVES December 19, 2023 December 20, 2023 to January 19, 2024 January 22, 2024 to April 15, 2024 May 2024 Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Bid Comparison 48 VICINITY MAP CACTUS FLOWER LANDSCAPE RENOVATION .. o •::::::::::s::::::::'::.............::::::::r R :: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::.................... ... ......: � .............. ............................ .......................::: .............'�i:::: if1 et�to: Lax:::::::::..:::::::::::::::::: . • • :::::::::::::::::: a:::::: �::: �...... .. ...........,.................. Y:::......... ........ ::: rf... ..... .......i ':::::.77 'f2kH%`11�At}': ::::... :: 5... :: :::::::::::::::: ' :::::::::: .F:::'::" :.:: ::.. ��x .::::::::: �fl:??l::::::::::::::::::::::: :.. Q C :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.. !::::::::: ' :;:::::::::::::::::'::::::: YS :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::; Iur{:::::::::::::::::..............:::::::..................::::::::::...o ......:...... .... :1 tip.. tr ... ...rte................ ::o-j::Dr :................................................... .......................... ..................::::::: C.. r :: :Iaiicraar.... • �,�Il�t'Y tl:drt o w ................................. ... o...............?.......... ... 0.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::dl:::'.. ::::::::::..�.............................. ... ... .. ........................... :......:::::::::::: ...�............... #d ::;;:::::::::::::::p:::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ..:::::::::::::::•3-.fit:=']A1M:::::::.... .................... ....} ......................................... /•�..:::::::::::::::::::: L � .......... ::::::.......??CS. ................................................. .......................................... � 1 1ti::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .. is .... :7fYV4i1: "IA: `:::::::::::::: �..............I.. ... . .. � .......::::. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: t�::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ................................. ............................ .... ........................... .. ` ::::::::::......................... j:.....................::::::.. e?'�z.:7 Y. ::::::: ........:.....:......................................................................... r................:............. a ........: :: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::........ ............ ,3.�.:.:..:r..:J..:..:..:..:8..:1..:G..:..:..:..:.r.:.:.:. :.:.:.:.:...:...:...:...:...:...:........s..�....a....t............................... � .. ::::::::::::.::: Owl ::::::::.s ........................................................................................................... ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: �*:.k:..........::::::':::::::: .................................... .................................... ............:::::::::: ; :::::::::::::�:::::: ::::ESiafle .r....................::::::::::.... s.......... ............................... ............ :: ::: 1::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::':::::::::::::::: ............................ ::::::::::::::::. z...:::::: ,....................................... .. �,. ..0 ............ ...........I .. ..�...... ..................:::V.::::::::.�T... rte......... ::::::.. :::::i,...y ................�[.......... pp. . ............ ... �1 ... c................ ':::::::::::::::::::: ':::::::::::............. fs................ .::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: �5................. :...g ..........:::: ..........]... p ...... :::::'.'.......... ::............... .:::::: y,.............x C::::::::::.::: .' ................. .::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::... ::::::::::::::::::::............: C :::::::::::::::::: ::.m ...........::: ::... .:.......................................::::: ...........................:: :::::::::",:: ::::,::::::::::::::' ::::::::::...........SdG:s '�{..........:::.. ............. ................................ ........... .::::::::::'::':' :..# Rain:6:::::::;:::..::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::'4t::::::::::::::'...�rd lullAdx f .�......................... .........:......:... .......... ................................... ........has :det:Rey:::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: '':::::::::::::::::::::: 0 'IMPORTANT" Maps and data are to be used for reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are not necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards. The County of Riverside makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content (the source is often third party), accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Any use of this product with respect to accuracy and precision shall be the sole responsibility of the user. 0 1 3 009 Feet REPORT PRINTED ON... 5/26/2023 3:15:05 PM © Riverside County GIS ATTACHMENT Legend Blueline Streams City Areas World Street Map Notes 49 go] La Quinta Landscape Renovation Improvement - Cactus Flower Bid Opening Date: 12/04/2023 City Project No. 2016-031 ATTACHMENT 2 Bid Comparison Engineer's Estimate - Base Bid Item Item Description JUnitl Quantity I Unit Price I Total Cost OVERALL PROJECT 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 42,000.00 $ 42,000.00 2 Traffic Control (Includes Traffic Control Plans and Engineering) LS 1 $ 26,820.00 $ 26,820.00 3 Dust Control LS 1 $ 15,909.00 $ 15,909.00 4 lClearing and Grubbing LS 1 $ 143,649.00 $ 143,649.00 CACTUS FLOWER PLAN IMPROVEMENTS 5 Demolition and Disposal LS 1 $ 2,681.00 $ 2,681.00 6 Soil Preparation and Fine Grading LS 1 $ 14,038.00 $ 14,038.00 7 Modify, Relocate, and Repair Existing Lighting Electrical System w/ new Fixtures LS 1 $ 117,500.00 $ 117,500.00 8 1 Install New Sleeving per City Standard LSI 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 9 Sidewalk Replacement per City Code and Concrete Pads SF 280 $ 10.00 $ 2,800.00 10 Wall Cleaning LS 1 $ 60,576.00 $ 60,576.00 11 Keystone Block - 2 Course Stack SF 1,084 $ 75.00 $ 81,300.00 12 Keystone Block - 3 Course Stack SF1 1,542 $ 75.00 $ 115,650.00 13 Keystone Block - 4 Course Stack SF 1,360 $ 75.00 $ 102,000.00 14 Keystone Block - 5 Course Stack SF 1,100 $ 75.00 $ 82,500.00 15 Furnish and Install - Landscape Boulders EA 111 $ 125.00 $ 13,875.00 16 Furnish and Install - 3/8" Minus w/20% Fines- Decomposed Granite - Desert Gold SF 1,295 $ 1.88 $ 2,434.60 17 Furnish and Install - 3/8" Crushed Rock - Apache Brown SF 1,835 $ 1.88 $ 3,449.80 18 Furnish and Install - 3/8" Crushed Rock - Desert Gold SF 88,675 $ 1.30 $ 115,277.50 19 Furnish and Install - 12"-18"Sierra Cobble SF 1,045 $ 2.00 $ 2,090.00 20 Furnish and Install - 6" Minus Crushed - Baja Cresta Rubble SF 7,455 $ 3.50 $ 26,092.50 21 Furnish and Install - 6" Minus Crushed - Cresta Rubble SF 3,680 $ 3.50 $ 12,880.00 22 Furnish and Install PermaLoc Header - Asphalt Edge LF 1,730 $ 10.00 $ 17,300.00 23 Furnish and Install Landscaping per Plan LS 1 $ 74,405.00 $ 74,405.00 24 Furnish and Install Irrigation per Plan LS 1 $ 258,759.00 $ 258,759.00 25 90- Day Maintenance Period LS 1 $ 1,816.00 $ 1,816.00 JEFFERSON PARKWAY PLAN IMPROVEMENTS 26 Demolition and Disposal LS 1 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 27 Soil Preparation and Fine Grading LS 1 $ 558.00 $ 558.00 28 Keystone Block - 2 Course Stack SF 20 $ 75.00 $ 1,500.00 29 Furnish and Install - Landscape Boulders EA 4 $ 125.00 $ 500.00 Page 1 of 2 Conserve LandCare Unit Price Unit Price Total Cost Total Cost $ $ 32,500.00 $ 32,500.00 $ 48,300.00 $ 48,300.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 56,000.00 $ 56,000.00 $ $ 14,300.00 $ 14,300.00 $ 15,200.00 $ 15,200.00 $ 123,400.00 $ 123,400.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 40.00 $ 11,200.00 $ 12,100.00 $ 12,100.00 $ 35.00 $ 37,940.00 $ 35.00 $ 53,970.00 $ 35.00 $ 47,600.00 $ 35.00 $ 38,500.00 $ 110.00 $ 12,210.00 $ 4.00 $ 5,180.00 $ 4.00 $ 7,340.00 $ 1.50 $ 133,012.50 $ 12.00 $ 12,540.00 $ 2.50 $ 18,637.50 $ 2.50 $ 9,200.00 $ 12.00 $ 20,760.00 $ 110,400.00 $ 110,400.00 $ 275,800.00 $ 275,800.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 700.00 $ 700.00 $ 100.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 110.00 $ 440.00 Page 1 of 2 Desert Concepts Construction, Inc. Urban Habitat Unit Price Unit Price Total Cost Total Cost $ $ 60,889.00 $ 60,889.00 $ 25,300.00 $ 25,300.00 $ 15,139.00 $ 15,139.00 $ 71,784.00 $ 71,784.00 $ $ 4,622.00 $ 4,622.00 $ 27,849.00 $ 27,849.00 $ 176,000.00 $ 176,000.00 $ 1,269.00 $ 1,269.00 $ 42.40 $ 11,872.00 $ 10,566.00 $ 10,566.00 $ 37.20 $ 40,324.80 $ 37.30 $ 57,516.60 $ 37.20 $ 50,592.00 $ 37.10 $ 40,810.00 $ 186.60 $ 20,712.60 $ 5.40 $ 6,993.00 $ 4.00 $ 7,340.00 $ 2.52 $ 223,461.00 $ 25.52 $ 26,668.40 $ 4.00 $ 29,820.00 $ 4.19 $ 15,419.20 $ 17.00 $ 29,410.00 $ 91,120.00 $ 91,120.00 $ 287,332.00 $ 287,332.00 $ 17,103.00 $ 17,103.00 $ $ 559.93 $ 559.93 $ 2,920.00 $ 2,920.00 $ 185.85 $ 3,717.00 $ 284.00 $ 1,136.00 Desert Concepts Construction, Inc. Unit Price Total Cost $ 82,000.00 $ 82,000.00 $ 110,000.00 $ 110,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 19,000.00 $ 19,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 98,000.00 $ 98,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 14.00 $ 3,920.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25.00 $ 27,100.00 $ 25.00 $ 38,550.00 $ 25.00 $ 34,000.00 $ 25.00 $ 27,500.00 $ 980.00 $ 108,780.00 $ 4.50 $ 5,827.50 $ 4.50 $ 8,257.50 $ 4.75 $ 421,206.25 $ 7.00 $ 7,315.00 $ 7.50 $ 55,912.50 $ 7.50 $ 27,600.00 $ 28.00 $ 48,440.00 $ 160,000.00 $ 160,000.00 $ 120,000.00 $ 120,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 50.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 980.00 $ 3,920.00 51 Bid Opening Date: 12/04/2023 La Quinta Landscape Renovation Improvement - Cactus Flower City Project No. 2016-031 Engineer's Estimate - Base Bid Item Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Cost 30 Furnish and Install - 3/8" Crushed Rock - Apache Brown SF 3,556 $ 1.88 $ 6,685.28 31 Furnish and Install - 6" Minus Crushed - Baja Cresta Rubble SF 164 $ 3.50 $ 574.00 32 Furnish and Install PermaLoc Header - Asphalt Edge LF 25 $ 10.00 $ 250.00 33 Boring for Lateral Line LF 60 $ 8.00 $ 480.00 34 Furnish and Install Landscaping per Plan LS 1 $ 2,168.00 $ 2,168.00 35 IFurnish and Install Irrigation per Plan LS 1 $ 6,990.00 $ 6,990.00 36 190 - Day Maintenance Period I LSI 1 $ 186.00 $ 186.00 Sub -Total Base Bid: $ 1,360,743.68 BID ADDITIVE ALTERNATE NO. 1 - CACTUS FLOWER MINI SPORTS PARK Item Item Description Unitl Quantity Unit Price Total Cost AA1-1 Site Control LS 1 $ 2,980.00 $ 2,980.00 AA1-2 Dust Control LS 1 $ 1,768.00 $ 1,768.00 AA1-3 Clearing and Grubbing LS 1 $ 15,961.00 $ 15,961.00 AA14 I Demolition and Disposal LS 1 $ 2,681.00 $ 2,681.00 AA1-5 Fine Grading LS 1 $ 1,560.00 $ 1,560.00 AA1-6 3" Asphalt Concrete Over 4" Aggregate Base Over 12" Scarified and Compacted Native SF 700 $ 3.00 $ 2,100.00 AA1-7 Asphalt Crack Fill SF 3,340 $ 1.50 $ 5,010.00 AA1-8 On Interlocking concrete Pavers (Installation SF 740 $ 6.00 $ 4,440.00 AA1-9 Concrete Banding - 2' Wide, 6" Thick LF 72 $ 6.00 $ 432.00 AA1-10 Pickleball Court Synthetic Surfacing SF 3,100 $ 3.50 $ 10,850.00 AA1-11 Pickelball Fence and Gates per Plan LS 1 $ 18,870.00 $ 18,870.00 AA1-12 Pickleball Net and Posts LS 1 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 AA1-13 Benches - 6' Length EA 1 2 1 $ 1,400.00 $ 2,800.00 AA1-14 Drinking Fountain and 1" Water Service Line EA 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Sub -Total Additive Alternative No.1 Bid: $ 75,952.00 Grand Total Base Bid Including Additive Alternate No. 1 : $ 1,436,695.68 Base Bid Only $ 1,360,743.68 Miscalculations and rounding errors Page 2 of 2 $ 1,217,000.00 $ 1,152, 564.00 Conserve LandCare Unit Price Unit Price $ Total Cost $ 4.00 $ 14,224.00 $ 2.50 $ 410.00 $ 12.00 $ 300.00 $ 120.00 $ 7,200.00 $ 1,700.00 $ 1,700.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 11200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 4,440.00 $ 1,152,564.00 Page 2 of 2 $ 1,217,000.00 $ 1,152, 564.00 Unit Price Unit Price Total Cost $ 308.00 $ 308.00 $ 250.00 $ 250.00 $ 800.00 $ 800.00 $ 8,400.00 $ 8,400.00 $ 600.00 $ 600.00 $ 8.00 $ 5,600.00 $ 1.00 $ 3,340.00 $ 6.00 $ 4,440.00 $ 34.00 $ 2,448.00 $ 2.50 $ 7,750.00 $ 14,200.00 $ 14,200.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 6,200.00 $ 6,200.00 $ 64,436.00 Page 2 of 2 $ 1,217,000.00 $ 1,152, 564.00 $ 1,527,817.33 $ 1,392,160.33 Desert Concepts Construction, Inc. Urban Habitat Unit Price Unit Price $ Total Cost $ 3.80 $ 13,512.80 $ 6.00 $ 984.00 $ 17.00 $ 425.00 $ 83.00 $ 4,980.00 $ 1,508.00 $ 1,508.00 $ 12,021.00 $ 12,021.00 $ 484.00 $ 484.00 $ 17,168.00 $ 1,392,160.33 $ 1,527,817.33 $ 1,392,160.33 Desert Concepts Construction, Inc. Unit Price Unit Price Total Cost $ 1,100.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 2,675.00 $ 2,675.00 $ 2,686.00 $ 2,686.00 $ 4,042.00 $ 4,042.00 $ 772.00 $ 772.00 $ 28.05 $ 19,635.00 $ 6.05 $ 20,207.00 $ 23.20 $ 17,168.00 $ 95.25 $ 6,858.00 $ 12.00 $ 37,200.00 $ 1,559.00 $ 1,559.00 $ 6,741.00 $ 6,741.00 $ 1,544.00 $ 3,088.00 $ 11,926.00 $ 11,926.00 $ 135,657.00 $ 1,527,817.33 $ 1,392,160.33 Desert Concepts Construction, Inc. Unit Price Unit Price Total Cost Total Cost $ 4.50 $ 16,002.00 $ 12.50 $ 2,050.00 $ 28.00 $ 700.00 $ 200.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 18,000.00 22.00 $ $ 1,597,080.75 $ 1,832,780.75 $ 1,597,080.75 52 Unit Price Total Cost $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 18.00 $ 12,600.00 $ 5.00 $ 16,700.00 $ 22.00 $ 16,280.00 $ 35.00 $ 2,520.00 $ 28.00 $ 86,800.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 38,000.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 235,700.00 $ 1,832,780.75 $ 1,597,080.75 52 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 19, 2023 STAFF REPORT CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 7 AGENDA TITLE: ACCEPT AVENUE 50 AND AVENUE 52 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NOS. 2022-01 AND 2022-14, LOCATED ALONG AVENUE 50 AND AVENUE 52 IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS RECOMMENDATION Accept the Avenue 50 and Avenue 52 Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements Project Nos. 2022-01 and 2022-14 as complete; authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Office of the County Recorder; and authorize staff to release retention in the amount of $127,847, thirty-five days after the Notice of Completion is recorded. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The Avenue 50 and Avenue 52 Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements projects included pulverization, grinding, asphalt overlay, signing and striping, curb ramp replacement and utility adjustment on- o Avenue 50 from Washington Street to Eisenhower Drive o Avenue 52 from Desert Club to SilverRock/Talus Way o Avenue 52 from Madison Street to Monroe Street • The work is complete and Council acceptance will close the contract and allow final payment. FISCAL IMPACT The following is the financial accounting for Project No. 2022-01 & 2022-14: Original Contract Amount $ 2,467,520 Contract Change Order nos. 1 - 4 $ 89,418 Final Contract Amount $ 2,556,938 Project Budget $ 2,797,520 Final Contract Amount ($ 2,556,938) Design & Professional Costs $ 39,430 Inspection, Survey, Plans, & Other Construction Costs 18992 Anticipated Funds Remaining* $ 182,160 53 * All costs to date have been accounted for and no further costs are anticipated. There are adequate funds to close this project; the final retention amount of $127,847 will be paid from account number 401-0000-20600. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 20, 2023, Council awarded a $2,467,520 contract to Granite Construction Company. On July 6, 2023, a Notice to Proceed was issued with a 40 -working day completion time starting on July 24, 2023 and ending on September 18, 2023. The project was deemed substantially complete on October 20, 2023. No liquidated damages or early completion incentives are recommended. Contract Change Order 1 was issued for joint seal sidewalk and concrete patch. Contract Change Order 2 was issued for sidewalk removal, base fill, unsuitable soils, and MMAX material change. Contract Change Order 3 was issued for time and materials. Contract Change Order 4 was issued for final quantity adjustments and days added due to Tropical Storm Hilary. The project construction effort is complete and is in compliance with the plans and specifications. Staff recommends acceptance and release of the retention thirty-five days after the Notice of Completion is recorded. ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Carley Escarrega, Administrative Technician Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Vicinity Map 54 Vicinity Map ATTACHMENT 1 Avenue 50 and Avenue 52 Pavement Rehabilitation ................................. s.............. 'IMPORTANT" Maps and data are to be used for reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are not necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards. The County of Riverside makes no RC)IT warranty or guarantee as to the content (the source is often third party), accuracy, timeliness, or .. ................................. . _ .iF�.-.� -tet :: 0 6,019 12,037 Feet the user. :: : A : :1 ++ . yn . t-$, ry: a�te.Y. r�.yS��(�p��+++ .. is ,} ;y�+ If 7:Y .............. 6rV RU A:� ::� :::::::::::::::......:::::: ; .:Q .............................. ......::::::::::::::::::: .. .. .. .. .. ... .................:::........... _.................................... ....... .......... c :: it StS:: . y ... .. ......... :. ................................ ................................-............................................................................................... ................................................ a'Gluinta:::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r �.. 77 ._------a.. 0i . :pry..c........ ......... .................................... ........................................................................................ 1' . ... Legend Blueline Streams City Areas World Street Map Notes Projects 2022-01 and 2022-14 55 'IMPORTANT" Maps and data are to be used for reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are not necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards. The County of Riverside makes no RC)IT warranty or guarantee as to the content (the source is often third party), accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Any use of this product with respect to accuracy and precision shall be the sole responsibility of 0 6,019 12,037 Feet the user. REPORT PRINTED ON... 5/4/2023 11:10:37 PM © Riverside County GIS 55 56 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 8 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 19, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: REJECT ALL BIDS FOR EISENHOWER BASIN SLOPE REPAIR PROJECT NO. 2023-22 RECOMMENDATION Reject all bids for Eisenhower Basin Slope Repair Project No. 2023-22. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • This project is located at the Eisenhower Retention Basin on the west side of Eisenhower Drive, between Coachella Drive and Avenida Fernando (Attachment 1). • The project will repair slopes that failed due to Tropical Storm Hilary. The engineered soil that covers a specialized slope liner washed off in many areas and needs to be placed back to protect the liner from UV light. • Leonida Builders, Inc. of Acton, California, submitted the lowest responsible and responsive bid at $280,395. (Attachment 2). • Staff recommends rejecting all bids in order to re -scope the project to potentially decrease cost and to prepare an environmental document through the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process to satisfy the requirement to request funding from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). FISCAL IMPACT The cost to advertise the project is included in the Construction budget. City Staff is working with the other stakeholders, specifically FEMA and the California Office of Emergency Services (CaIOES), for opportunities to cost share. The following is the anticipated project budget: BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS 57 Total Budget Professional/Design: $ 10,000 Inspection/Testing/Survey: $ 20,000 Construction: $ 180,000 Contingency: $ 50,000 Total Budget: $ 260,000 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS 57 Damage caused to the Eisenhower Retention Basin during Tropical Storm Hilary exposed a specialized liner along the basin slopes. The liner cannot be exposed to UV light for a long period of time or it will degrade. On November 16, 2023, staff solicited construction bids from qualified contractors. The City received three (3) bids on December 11, 2023. Leonida Builders, Inc. of Acton, California submitted the lowest responsible and responsive bid at $280,395. The bids ranged significantly as estimated costs were higher than the anticipated project budget. Staff recommends rejecting all bids and revising the scope of work for the project to reduce uncertainty and potentially reduce the cost and range of bids. The project will be brought back to Council to approve the plans, specifications, and engineer's estimate with the revised scope. Additionally, rejecting all bids allows staff to prepare an environmental document through NEPA to fall into the schedule of construction and satisfy the requirements for requesting FEMA funding. Contingent upon approval to reject all bids on December 19, 2023, the following is the project schedule: Council Considers Re -Advertisement Council Considers Project Award Execute Contract and Mobilize Construction (20 Working Days) Accept Improvements January 16, 2024 February 20, 2024 February 21, 2024, to March 18, 2024 March 2024 to April 2024 May 2024 ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Bid Comparison 58 .l . - !�i�1 .+sem rll.Tt4'r��esweak jay i yee'".,''�1i;� � �ji�`µ;;I '�Si���ipf!"� X►� T,��i'I`ll��:i ,1Y�Y�'{��1�1 e � .. �� �`J i� �, 4YYYNY�r �/J W���54 _ �, � '� �' • .yic�'� f it -t i• 9�ralar• �r ���� y�1Y��`' Op, Project c - #ANK 1' x.17 Lp ma lks 70, 1 ° 4`.31 Itt �'�j,i'.} ai o �'er•p'.'■yt + `' + >dhb- '1PM �C vvA ;V. , ..Avenue <, �•-�i �` ,• �'�f�A�A�..c �` '�biAl�,��� I � Er ", , J/ ���} yfjy�lr�,� � _. „aY i�nwaf • \IN �cIL / ♦ r b ..• 1f.1 �+! * rirr'" > E $ f 4 Alii�IjN}1e. i•y3 � �♦ _. i.. �!• _� t la �lF� � *Er �Itd'+�'ti1i1C',� •� ��' _ �1�...` �- .. �{ cue E t! ♦♦ IE I�-. Il►d►ti•IRMRR44F �' .y. Ag -- F''' F�`� �. ��C�J/.JriJr�lJJiJiiJ�itJi•y■ ," 9 Y y,,, �'l I cif 6+ *� 1 j 9ail �1 � i�� �7: a YRq : y ' '_1 �,l�y�cL7lP'� f ��"��e01�1k'#• .� i We Bid Opening Date: 12/11/2023 Eisenhower Rentention Basin Slope Repair Attachment 2 City Project No. 2023-22 Bid Comparison Grand Total Base Bid: $ 183,643.00 Miscalculations and rounding errors Leonida Builders, Inc. Engineer's Estimate - Base Bid Total Cost $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 Item Item Description Unit Quandt $ 25,000.00 Unit Price Total Cost 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 21,000.00 $ 21,000.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 3 Dust Control/ PM -10 Plan LS 1 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 4 Clearing and Grubbing LS 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 5 Mass Excavation to toe of original slope invert (Trucking is Specialty) CY 2,686 $ 8.00 $ 21,488.00 6 S A Repair 60mil LLDPE Smooth Nominal Linei SF 5,000 $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 7 Repair Liner Cover Material 1 -ft. thick per Geotechnical Engineer's recommendatior CY 685 $ 63.00 $ 43,155.00 8 Repair Slopes in Areas with No Liner Utilizing Material in Basin LS 1 $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 9 Scarification of Bottom of Basin LS 1 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 Sub -Total Base Bid: $ 183,643.00 Grand Total Base Bid: $ 183,643.00 Miscalculations and rounding errors Leonida Builders, Inc. Unit Price Total Cost $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 20.00 $ 53,720.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 55.00 $ 37,675.00 $ 63,000.00 $ 63,000.00 $ 21,000.00 $ 21,000.00 $ 280,395.00 $ 280,395.00 Three Peaks Corporation Unit Price Total Cost $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 30,766.00 $ 30,766.00 $ 20,846.00 $ 20,846.00 $ 36,544.00 $ 36,544.00 $ 47.00 $ 126,242.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 89.00 $ 60,965.00 $ 22,222.00 $ 22,222.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 335,585.00 $ 335,585.00 Granite Construction Company Unit Price Total Cost $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 63,000.00 $ 63,000.00 $ 64,450.00 $ 64,450.00 $ 50.00 $ 134,300.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 165.00 $ 113,025.00 $ 115,000.00 $ 115,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 577,775.00 $ 577,775.00 61 62 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 9 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 19, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE RECIPIENT FOR THE 2024 LA QUINTA SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARD RECOMMENDATION Approve Marge Dodge for the 2024 La Quinta Senior Inspiration Award. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Riverside County's annual Senior Inspiration Award Program (SIA) recognizes outstanding senior citizens for their volunteer service. • In November 2023, Staff requested nominations from local community organizations and received two nominees • The Community Services Commission (CSC) reviewed the nominations at the December 11, 2023, meeting, and recommended Marge Dodge for the SIA. FISCAL IMPACT - None BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Riverside County's annual SIA recognizes senior citizens, 65 years of age or older, for their volunteerism and active engagement in the community. In November 2023, Staff solicited nominations from several local organizations including Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce, La Quinta Historical Society, La Quinta Rotary Club, and Riverside County Fire Department (Attachment 1). The following nominations were received (Attachment 2): • Patty Andersen — Nominated by Friends of the Desert Mountains • Marge Dodge — Nominated by Scope Events LLC. (La Quinta Art Celebration) Only one nomination can be submitted from each Coachella Valley city. The CSC considered the nominees during the December 11, 2023, meeting and unanimously recommended Marge Dodge as the 2024 SIA recipient. Marge Dodge is active with several local organizations including the La Quinta Art Celebration Board of Directors, Friends of the College of the Desert Library, Literary 63 Society of the Desert, and Old Town Artisan Studios. She serves as a volunteer leader during the La Quinta Art Celebration managing the front gates, training volunteers, and assisting with guest services. Marge is passionate about serving the community and her infectious positivity has had lasting impacts on countless La Quinta residents and visitors. The award will be presented at the annual SIA luncheon on March 28, 2024, at Aqua Caliente Resort Casino in Rancho Mirage. ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Michael Calderon, Management Analyst Approved by: Christina Calderon, Community Services Deputy Director Attachments: 1. 2024 Nomination Request Letter 2. 2024 SIA Nomination Forms 64 ATTACHMENT 1 CU "a CALIFORNIA - November 1, 2023 ---- NAME OF ORGANIZATION NAME OF CONTACT Thank you for your continued support and involvement with the City of La Quinta. This letter is to invite you to assist us with seeking nominations for an outstanding senior. Since 1992, and now in its 32nd year, the County of Riverside and the nine incorporated cities of the Coachella Valley have sponsored the Senior Inspiration Awards Luncheon. Annually, each city selects one recipient as their outstanding senior for this event. The event will be held at the Agua Caliente Resort Casino Spa in Rancho Mirage on March 28, 2024. This is our collective opportunity to recognize our senior residents who have gone above and beyond for our community. Nominations are now being accepted, and we invite you to submit one or more names, along with a brief summary (maximum 150 words), stating why this senior should be recognized for the La Quinta Senior Inspiration Award Honoree. The County has provided the following criteria for potential honorees: • The honoree should be at least 60 years or older. • Reside and/or volunteer in La Quinta. • Be actively involved in community affairs. • Personifies a healthy, active and contributing attitude and lifestyle. Nomination Forms are enclosed for your use and submission. Please complete one or more Nomination Forms and return to Caroline Doran at the Wellness Center, 78-450 Avenida La Fonda, La Quinta CA 92253 no later than November 17, 2023. You can also email the forms to her at: cdoran(o)laguintaca.gov. Our deadline is needed to ensure the nominees are reviewed by our Community Services Commission with recommendations to follow to the La Quinta City Council, who makes the final approval. We have provided a list of our previous honorees for your convenience. We're proud of the contributions our residents make to our community. Let's continue to highlight and recognize the great work being accomplished by our La Quinta seniors. Thank you! Sincerely, Linda Evans, Mayor City of La Quinta r 65 M.- ATTACHMENT 2 SV1RAT]O�A/ Ln Riverside County Supervisor V. Manuel Perez presents 32nd ANNUAL SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARDS 2024 The Senior Inspiration Awards is a beloved event in its 321 year. Every year, the County of Riverside and the Coachella Valley's nine cities honor senior citizens 60 years of age and older who inspire others through their volunteerism and active engagement in the community. This annual event honors these unsung heroes for their ongoing contribution and dedication to our communities. If you would like to nominate someone for this honor, please complete this form and return to Caroline Doran, Attention: Caroline Doran at 78450 Avenida La Fonda, La Quinta, CA 92253 or via email at cdoran@laquintaca.gov Community Nomination Form Deadline: November 17, 2023 Eligible recipients must: -Be at least 60 years old -Reside and/or volunteer in the Coachella Valley or Palo Verde Valley -Be actively involved in community affairs for a lengthy period of time -Deserve to receive recognition and/or may not otherwise receive recognition for his or her service to the community -Personify a healthy, active, and contributing attitude and lifestyle Nominee Name of Nominee Mailing Address Email Organization Individual Volunteers With Years with Organization Hours Volunteered Nominator Name of Nominator City or Organization Reason for Nomination Email Phone Phone Ms. Patty Anderson is the nomination of Tammy Martin from Friends of the Desert Mountains. Upon further inquiry Patty is instrumental in assisting with many facets. Not only updating the website calendar, but she is the person who resolves issues with the inventory system in their gift shop. When Ms. Anderson is not indoors solving computer problems, she is outdoors repairing the trails in the San Jacinto Mountains (30+ miles have been repaired). Trails in the lower desert have been maintained and repaired (Palm Springs, Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert and our very own City of La Quinta Trails). Ms. Anderson assisted with creating the trail in the Indio Badlands, and the new Kim Nicol trail loop in Desert Hot Springs. Of the ten years volunteering with FODM, over S00 miles were worked and repaired by Ms. Anderson and the FODM team. Ms. Anderson volunteers in the Annual Public Lands Day FODM property clean-up, she helps man the watch tower located in San Jacinto Mountain Range, she is the lead person for one of the many different zones at the Annual Coachella Valley Wildflower Festival which is a huge success. Foremost, Ms. Anderson promotes FODM by taking many photos to promote all the wonderful activities FODM is involved in. .: Ln Riverside County Supervisor V. Manuel Perez presents 32nd ANNUAL SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARDS 2024 The Senior Inspiration Awards is a beloved event in its 321 year. Every year, the County of Riverside and the Coachella Valley's nine cities honor senior citizens 60 years of age and older who inspire others through their volunteerism and active engagement in the community. This annual event honors these unsung heroes for their ongoing contribution and dedication to our communities. If you would like to nominate someone for this honor, please complete this form and return to Caroline Doran, Attention: Caroline Doran or Monica Castaneda at 78450 Avenida La Fonda, La Quinta, CA 92253 or via email at cdoran@laquintaca.gov or mcastaneda@laquintaca.gov Community Nomination Form Deadline: November 17, 2023 Eligible recipients must: -Be at least 60 years old -Reside and/or volunteer in the Coachella Valley or Palo Verde Valley -Be actively involved in community affairs for a lengthy period of time -Deserve to receive recognition and/or may not otherwise receive recognition for his or her service to the community -Personify a healthy, active, and contributing attitude and lifestyle Nominee Name of Nominee Marge Dodge Mailing Address Email Organization Individual Volunteers With _ Years with Organization Total = 19 years Hours Volunteered Nominator Name of Nominator Kathleen Hughes City or Organization Phone La Quinta Arts events (La Quinta Arts Foundation and SCOPE Events) SCOPE Events, LLC Email Phone Marge Dodge is a valuable leader for the La Quinta Arts Celebration; Board of Directors (BOD), l�trl nodes o�`rthle ol�ltege ooi�th - - League of America Pe Women, BOD 2004 -present; Muses & Patrones Circle of McCallum Theater, BOD 2014-2021; Literary Society of the Desert, Advisory Board 2021 -present; Old Town Artisan Studios, Advisory Board 2021 -present; supporting other non -profits for women and education. 69 Nominee Senior Inspiration Awards: Ms. Marge Dodge, Leader La Quinta Arts Events (La Quinta Arts Foundation and SCOPE Events) Ms. Marge Dodge is a Volunteer Leader who manages the entry gates for the Art Events, and entails many duties listed below: o Cash handling at the front gates — train volunteers o Choosing, training volunteers to work at the entry points o Consistently knowledgeable on how many guests, vendors, artist, volunteers, and workers are at the event at a given time (anyone can audit event and Marge can give an accurate account of all participants. o Handles ticket processing with Art Celebration finance- volunteers and staff o Volunteered her home for the Artist Home Hosting Program: artist stay at Marge's home without cost during their participation in the Art Ms. Marge Dodge is a volunteer with a myriad of organizations included on the nomination form. 70 City of La Quints CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 10 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 19, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: EXCUSE ABSENCE OF COMMISSIONER HERNANDEZ FROM THE DECEMBER 12, 2023, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RECOMMENDATION Excuse absence of Commissioner Alfonso Hernandez from the December 12, 2023, Planning Commission meeting. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Commissioner Hernandez requested to be excused from the December 12, 2023, Planning Commission meeting due to a family emergency. • Commissioner Hernandez has no excused or unexcused absences for fiscal year 2023/24. FISCAL IMPACT No meeting attendance compensation is paid to absent members. BAGKGROUNWANALYSIS Section 2.06.090 of the La Quinta Municipal Code states: "If any member of a board, commission or committee absents him or herself from two consecutive regular meetings or absents him or herself from a total of three regular meetings within any fiscal year, his/her office shall become vacant and shall be filled as any other vacancy. A board, commission or committee member may request advance permission from the city council to be absent at one or more regular meetings due to extenuating circumstances, and/or may request the city council to excuse an absence after -the -fact where such extenuating circumstances prevented the member from seeking advance permission to be absent. If such permission or excuse is granted by the city council, the absence shall not be counted toward the above -stated limitations on absences." ALTERNATIVES Council may deny this request, which would result in the absence being counted toward the Commissioner's limitation on absences as noted above. Prepared by: Oscar Mojica, Permit Technician Approved by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk 71 72 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 11 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 19, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ANNUAL REPORT RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the fiscal year 2022/23 Art in Public Places Annual Report. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Per the Municipal Code, the City must expend or commit fees from the Art in Public Places (APP) program within two years of receipt and monies collected must be accounted for in a separate fund. • An annual review of administrative expenses is required. There were no administrative expenses for fiscal year 2022/23. • Attachment 1 presents the required analysis; the City has complied with the time limit for expenditure of fees and there are no findings to report. FISCAL IMPACT — None BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City's APP fund is governed by the La Quinta Municipal Code. Annually, the City must demonstrate that it has complied with the following: • A determination whether or not the fees have been committed for use within two years of collection. Fees may be used for: ✓ Cost of public art and installation; ✓ Cost to purchase or lease art sites; ✓ Waterworks, landscaping, lighting and other objects, which are an integral part of the artwork; ✓ Frames, mats, pedestals and other objects necessary for the proper presentation and installation of the artwork; ✓ Walls, pools, landscaping or other architectural or landscape architectural elements necessary for the proper aesthetic and structural placement of the artwork; ✓ Maintaining and repairing artwork; ✓ Administrative expenses to otherwise implement the APP program; ✓ Endowments; and ✓ Art Replacement 73 • Review administrative expenses to ensure they were reasonably assessed to implement this program and that they do not exceed five percent of the total funds in the account on July 1 of any year or $25,000 in any fiscal year. If fees collected are not committed for the aforementioned uses, they are returned to the contributor. Staff analyzed APP fund revenues and expenditures, no reimbursements are due to contributors and there were no administrative costs. During 2022/23, APP funds were used to purchase art pieces, paint art wall murals, and maintain and preserve art pieces as detailed in Attachment 1. During fiscal year 2022/23, the City unveiled Monument" created by Artist CJ Rench to hor who gave their lives while serving their country. The monument is pictured here and is located at the Civic Center Campus on Calle Tampico. Each year this report is also provided to the Desert Valley Builders Association (DVBA), the Building Industry Association (BIA), and the Gas Company. The City received a letter of satisfaction from the DVBA (Attachment 2). To date, no other correspondence has been received regarding this report. ALTERNATIVES a monument titled "Gold Star Family As this report is a requirement of the Municipal Code, staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Virginia Ortega, Finance Manager Approved by: Claudia Martinez, Finance Director Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachments: 1. Art in Public Places FY 2022/23 Annual Financial Report 2. Desert Valley Builders Association Review 74 ATTACHMENT 1 City of La Quinta Art in Public Places (Fund 270) FY 2022/23 The Art in Public Places fund is used to account for fees paid in lieu of acquisition, installation, replacement, maintenance and repair of approved art works at approved sites. The fees are refundable if not expended or committed within two years. Two Year Test Beginning Using First In First Out Method Ending % Complete* Fund Balance Revenues Fund Balance Account Description at 7/1/2022 FY 22/23 at 6/30/2023 Revenues & Other Sources: Expenditures Committed Unspent Developer fees 509,026 83,086 92,512 Interest income (223,753) 12,626 536,248 Transfers In from the General Fund 41,679 50,000 (5,174) Total Sources 692,026 $ 145,711 63,345 Expenditures & Other Uses 35,414 June 30, 2022 764,614 Art Purchases 120,748 48,347 67,175 Maintenance of Public Art 833,697 59,625 108,047 Project Administration 137,150 - 24,000 Transfers Out for Construction Art Project $ 426,331 75 111205 Dune Palms Bridge Improvements Total Uses 193,965 108,047 1% 201608 SilverRock Event Space 75 302,247 96% Total Available $ 833,697 $ 37,664 $ 871,361 Two Year Test Capital Projects and Expenses Using First In First Out Method Committed % Complete* Beginning Revenues Summary of Funds Fund Balance Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent June 30, 2019 509,026 119,733 92,512 760,000 (223,753) June 30, 2020 536,248 197,457 41,679 697,200 (5,174) June 30, 2021 692,026 135,933 63,345 729,200 35,414 June 30, 2022 764,614 189,831 120,748 766,522 67,175 June 30, 2023 833,697 145,711 108,047 734,211 137,150 Total Revenue For Last Five Years 24,000 1 $ 788,665 $ 426,331 100% 111205 Dune Palms Bridge Improvements Result: Two Year Spent or Committed Test Met. Future commitments for unspent funds are detailed below. Art in Public Places Expenses and Future Commitments Capital Projects and Expenses FY 22/23 Committed % Complete* % funded with fee Sculpture Restorations and Maintenance 58,553 100% 100% Acknowledgement Plaques and Signs 3,019 100% 100% Civic Center Art: "Long Skinny Heart" by Anthony Hansen 1,400 100% 100% Civic Center Art: "Microcosm Quartet" by Delish Glass LLC 7,000 100% 100% Civic Center Art: "Oasis" by Amejko Artistry 2,500 100% 100% LQAC Art Purchase: "Geometric Table" by Les Powers 4,500 100% 100% LQAC Art Purchase: "La Quinta's Harmony" by Sherman Charles 7,000 100% 100% Monument (balance): "Gold Star Family Monument" by CJ Rench 24,000 - 100% 100% 111205 Dune Palms Bridge Improvements - 193,965 24% 1% 201608 SilverRock Event Space 75 302,247 96% 4% 201709 Jefferson/Avenue 53 Roundabout 5,000 92% 0.15% FY 2023/24 Budget for Art Purchases and Maintenance - 233,000 18% 100% Total 108,047 1 734,211 * Percentage completed as of June 30, 2023 75 2023 BOARD OF WRECTORB PRESIFJlr3 Todd Hooks Agra Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Inamaueatirtre Fast President Deborah McGarrey Southern Califomia Gras Company P1 VICE FRESIDENT Tom Dubose Dubose Design Group, Inc. ,S ECItET4R i'i! RLASUIZER Pedro Rincon Osborne Rincon CPAs "CE PR,t S DENT OFASSOCTA TES Allan Levin Allan Levin & Associates CHIEF EYECUTrV ' !ZFFICER Gretchen Gutierrez DIRECTORS Fred Bel V 1023 PAC Chairnmrrlr NobeIl Energy Solations Brian Benedetti Brian Benedetti Construction Mark Benedetti Dene Callanan CaiBest Title Mario Gonzales GHA Companies Joe IIayes First Bank 7eremny liaos Freevolt Dave Lippert Lippert Construction, Inc Paul Mahoney PMA Advertising Bruce Maize Orr Builders Russ Martin Mission Springs Water District Dan Olivier Nethery Mueller Olivier Alan Pace Petra Geosciences Kevin Pillow AC Houston Lumber John Powell, Jr. Coachella Valley Water District Mike Rowe MSA Consulting Phil Smith Sunrise Company Alissa Vatter Fidelity National Title Jeff Wattenbarger Wattenbarger Construction ATTACHMENT 2 mtttttl• 9A desert valleys builders association December 12, 2023 City of La Quinta Claudia Martinez, Finance Director 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Ms. Martinez, Thank you for providing the Desert Valleys Builders Association with the opportunity to review and comment on the City of La Quinta's 202212023 14rt in Public Places Annual .deport. The DVBA is satisfied that the City has met its annual reporting obligations pursuant to the City Municipal Code and the Mitigation Fee Act, Acer 34360 Gateway Drive 0 Pch Desert ® CA 92211 (760) 776-1001 office a (760) 776-7002 fax www,TheDVBA.org 76 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 19, 2023 STAFF REPORT CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 12 AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED JUNE 30, 2023 RECOMMENDATION Receive and file revenue and expenditure report dated June 30, 2023. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The report summarizes the City's year-to-date (YTD) revenues and period expenditures for June 2023 (Attachment 1). • These reports are also reviewed by the Financial Advisory Commission. FISCAL IMPACT — None BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Below is a summary of the column headers used on the Revenue and Expenditure Summary Reports: Original Total Budget — represents revenue and expenditure budgets the Council adopted in June 2021 for fiscal year 2022/23. Current Total Budget — represents original adopted budgets plus any Council approved budget amendments from throughout the year, including carryovers from the prior FY. Period Activity — represents actual revenues received and expenditures outlaid in the reporting month. Fiscal Activity — represents actual revenues received and expenditures outlaid YTD. Variance Favorable/(Unfavorable) - represents the dollar difference between YTD collections/expenditures and the current budgeted amount. Percent Used — represents the percentage activity as compared to budget YTD. 77 June 2023 Revenues Comparison to 2022 Percent of Percent MTD YTD Budget YTD of Budget General Fund (GF) $ 18,426,879 $ 90,893,246 106.00% $ 76,623,512 105.87% All Funds $ 20,220,322 $ 148,475,289 75.23% $ 132,456,657 76.90% June 2023 Expenditures Comparison to 2022 General Fund Percent of Percent MTD 3,865,568 YTD Budget 1,764,633 YTD of Budget General Fund $ 10,079,574 $ 66,002,347 57.74% $ 51,834,255 58.28% Payroll (GF) $ 1,182,917 $ 22,291,044 92.98% $ 12,371,006 90.04% All Funds $ 5,925,572 $ 112,769,190 47.48% $ 87,780,792 44.74% General Fund Non -General Fund Measure G Sales Tax $ 3,865,568 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Transfers In $ 1,764,633 Sales Tax $ 3,077,053 County Government Revenue -Library/Museum $ 1,684,444 Transient Occupancy (Hotel) Tax $ 2,642,594 County Sales Tax (Measure A) $ 709,418 Property Tax in Lieu of Vehicle Fees $ 2,535,881 Technology Support Internal Service Fund ' $ 556,677 Fire Service Credit $ 2,221,565 Developer Impact Fees- Transportation $ 513,431 Ton Five Expenditures/Outlays for June General Fund Non -General Fund Sheriff Contract (April to June) $ 3,699,394 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) - Construction (2) $ 1,841,538 Transfers Out (to CIP) $ 1,338,005 2021 Series Bond Interest $ 758,545 Fire Service and Ladder Truck Q4 $ 447,621 Contribution to Other Agencies (3) $ 631,170 Marketing & Tourism Promotions $ 234,126 Parks $ 529,028 Plan Checks $ 196,033 1 Transfers Out- Measure A Fund to CIP $ 333,969 (')Internal Service Funds are used to account for activities involved in rendering services to departments within the City; quarterly journal entries move revenue into these funds. (Z) CIP Construction: ADA improvements; landscape conversion; Dune Palms bridge. (')Contribution to Other Agencies: payment to City of Indio for Jefferson Street slurry. The revenue report includes revenues and transfers into funds from other funds (income items). Revenues are not received uniformly throughout the year, resulting in peaks and valleys. For example, large property tax payments are usually received in December and May. Similarly, Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund payments are typically received in January and June. Any timing imbalance of revenue receipts versus expenditures is funded from the City's cash flow reserve. The expenditure report includes expenditures and transfers out to other funds. Unlike revenues, expenditures are more likely to be consistent from month to month. However, large debt service payments or CIP expenditures can cause swings. Prepared by: Rosemary Hallick, Principal Management Analyst Approved by: Claudia Martinez, Finance Director Attachment: 1. Revenue and Expenditure Report for June 30, 2023 78 ta (2�LV k. A1.IFORNIA Fund 101 -GENERAL FUND 105 - DISASTER RECOVERY FUND 201- GAS TAX FUND 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 203 - PUBLIC SAFETY FUND (MEAS 210 - FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING F 220 - QUIMBY FUND 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 223 - MEASURE A FUND 225 - INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 226 - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 227 - STATE HOMELAND SECURIT) 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 231- SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 RORF 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUN 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADM 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY 243 - RDA LOW -MOD HOUSING FL 244 - HOUSING GRANTS (Multiple, 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 249 - SA 2011 LOW/MOD BOND FI 250 - TRANSPORTATION DIF FUNC 251- PARKS & REC DIF FUND 252 - CIVIC CENTER DIF FUND 253 - LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT DIF 254 - COMMUNITY & CULTURAL C 255 - STREET FACILITY DIF FUND 256 - PARK FACILITY DIF FUND 257 - FIRE PROTECTION DIF 259 - MAINTENANCE FACILITIES D 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUNC 275 - LQ PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER 299 - INTEREST ALLOCATION FUN[ 310 - LQ FINANCE AUTHORITY DEE 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PR( 405 - SA PA 1 CAPITAL IMPRV FUN 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEM 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOG' 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUN 504 - INSURANCE FUND 601- SILVERROCK RESORT 602 - SILVERROCK GOLF RESERVE 760 -SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PL 761- CERBT OPEB TRUST 762 - PARS PENSION TRUST Report Total: ATTACHMENT 1 For Fiscal: 2022/23 Period Ending: 06/30/2023 Revenue Summary Accounts are subject to adjusting entries and audit. The City's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, published annually, is the best resource for all final audited numbers. Page 1 of 3 79 Variance Original Current Period Fiscal Favorable Percent Total Budget Total Budget Activity Activity (Unfavorable) Used 68,321,100 85,749,100 18,426,879 90,893,246 5,144,146 106.00% 5,003,505 5,003,505 -5,080,472 46,930 -4,956,575 0.94% 2,691,011 2,691,011 382,331 2,425,859 -265,152 90.15% 2,867,000 2,867,000 1,679,084 3,664,080 797,080 127.80% 2,000 2,000 1,488 4,529 2,529 226.45% 156,000 391,126 5 181,600 -209,526 46.43% 101,000 101,000 32,215 169,921 68,921 168.24% 2,483,300 2,483,300 56,242 2,511,913 28,613 101.15% 25,000 25,000 0 0 -25,000 0.00% 64,000 64,000 26,956 98,967 34,967 154.64% 1,875,000 1,875,000 729,027 2,102,263 227,263 112.12% 0 0 41 294 294 0.00% 12,100 12,100 0 0 -12,100 0.00% 5,000 5,000 0 4,896 -104 97.92% 20,200 20,200 1,313 20,058 -142 99.30% 0 0 -438,454 19,725,996 19,725,996 0.00% 54,400 54,400 24,860 102,063 47,663 187.62% 0 0 11,204 15,108 15,108 0.00% 1,451,500 1,574,500 213,408 1,593,961 19,461 101.24% 20,000 20,000 95,604 136,908 116,908 684.54% 0 0 0 160,000 160,000 0.00% 15,000 15,000 14,626 129,615 114,615 864.10% 25,000 1,412,009 16,795 59,764 -1,352,245 4.23% 1,020,000 1,020,000 506,630 1,810,531 790,531 177.50% 501,000 501,000 305,464 963,656 462,656 192.35% 301,000 301,000 144,734 541,239 240,239 179.81% 75,000 75,000 59,025 180,153 105,153 240.20% 152,000 152,000 108,223 406,479 254,479 267.42% 10,000 10,000 2,939 4,475 -5,525 44.75% 0 0 1,582 1,661 1,661 0.00% 101,000 101,000 46,307 167,005 66,005 165.35% 75,500 75,500 32,951 131,588 56,088 174.29% 153,000 153,000 18,963 145,711 -7,289 95.24% 2,200 2,200 70 2,756 556 125.29% 0 0 -1,017,147 0 0 0.00% 1,100 1,100 907 907 -193 82.47% 13,136,811 79,473,253 1,865,829 8,319,090 -71,154,163 10.47% 1,000 1,000 13 93 -907 9.25% 1,685,000 1,685,000 645,731 2,110,680 425,680 125.26% 2,256,708 2,256,708 598,338 2,334,654 77,946 103.45% 470,000 1,103,000 121,619 511,626 -591,374 46.38% 1,020,400 1,020,400 252,492 1,020,808 408 100.04% 4,865,453 4,865,453 209,591 5,380,284 514,831 110.58% 79,000 79,000 12,543 95,294 16,294 120.63% 5,500 5,500 336 6,327 827 115.04% 10,000 10,000 27,179 64,498 54,498 644.98% 100,000 100,000 82,850 227,803 127,803 227.80% 111,213,788 197,356,365 20,220,322 148,475,289 -48,881,076 75.23% Accounts are subject to adjusting entries and audit. The City's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, published annually, is the best resource for all final audited numbers. Page 1 of 3 79 For Fiscal: 2022/23 Period Ending: 06/30/2023 Expenditure Summary Accounts are subject to adjusting entries and audit. The City's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, published annually, is the best resource for all final audited numbers. Page 2 of 3 0 Variance Original Current Period Fiscal Favorable Percent Fund Total Budget Total Budget Activity Activity (Unfavorable) Used 101- GENERAL FUND 64,651,274 114,302,672 10,079,574 66,002,347 48,300,326 57.74% 201- GAS TAX FUND 2,687,351 3,715,416 260,426 1,556,838 2,158,578 41.90% 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 1,909,146 4,766,601 614,442 2,088,532 2,678,070 43.82% 203 - PUBLIC SAFETY FUND (MEAS 0 0 21,126 49,296 -49,296 0.00% 210 - FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND 152,600 387,726 0 181,574 206,152 46.83% 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND 100,000 100,000 -1,751 65,558 34,442 65.56% 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING F 2,465,376 2,710,631 630,120 2,576,738 133,892 95.06% 220 - QUIMBY FUND 0 466,967 21,791 21,791 445,176 4.67% 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 150,000 150,000 29,666 180,545 -30,545 120.36% 223 - MEASURE A FUND 3,882,000 5,843,145 333,969 2,728,438 3,114,707 46.69% 226 - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 12,000 12,000 0 25,055 -13,055 208.79% 227 - STATE HOMELAND SECURIT) 5,000 5,000 0 4,312 688 86.25% 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 5,500 5,500 1,923 1,923 3,577 34.97% 231- SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 RORF 0 0 -11,057,893 5,660,698 -5,660,698 0.00% 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUN 46,500 46,500 41,100 52,827 -6,327 113.61% 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADM 0 0 5,305 10,155 -10,155 0.00% 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY 1,712,670 2,112,295 204,894 1,905,441 206,854 90.21% 243 - RDA LOW -MOD HOUSING FL 250,000 305,000 0 255,000 50,000 83.61% 244 - HOUSING GRANTS (Multiple, 0 90,000 0 97,052 -7,052 107.84% 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 21,500 21,500 0 2,999 18,501 13.95% 249 - SA 2011 LOW/MOD BOND FI 20,000 3,644,192 2,955 65,245 3,578,947 1.79% 250 -TRANSPORTATION DIFFUNC 500,000 1,916,757 16,956 795,857 1,120,900 41.52% 251- PARKS & REC DIF FUND 500,000 500,000 8,272 28,715 471,285 5.74% 252 - CIVIC CENTER DIF FUND 250,000 250,000 0 75 249,925 0.03% 253 - LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT DIF 15,000 15,000 8,698 25,504 -10,504 170.03% 254 - COMMUNITY & CULTURAL C 0 125,000 0 0 125,000 0.00% 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUNC 177,000 426,165 992 108,047 318,118 25.35% 310 - LQ FINANCE AUTHORITY DEE 1,100 1,100 907 907 193 82.47% 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PR( 13,136,811 78,413,128 2,696,849 12,738,760 65,674,367 16.25% 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEM 1,608,750 2,236,714 -66,704 1,061,794 1,174,919 47.47% 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOG' 2,258,054 2,358,554 224,900 1,580,952 777,602 67.03% 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUN 545,000 1,618,000 1,041,063 1,276,419 341,581 78.89% 504 - INSURANCE FUND 984,100 984,100 3,057 961,886 22,214 97.74% 601- SILVERROCK RESORT 4,782,135 4,902,135 800,122 5,595,345 -693,210 114.14% 760 -SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PL 12,850 12,850 0 12,833 17 99.87% 761- CERBT OPEB TRUST 1,500 1,500 388 1,528 -28 101.86% 762 - PARS PENSION TRUST 55,000 5,055,000 2,424 5,048,204 6,796 99.87% Report Total: 102,898,217 237,501,148 5,925,572 112,769,190 124,731,958 47.48% Accounts are subject to adjusting entries and audit. The City's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, published annually, is the best resource for all final audited numbers. Page 2 of 3 0 81 Page 3 of 3 Fund Descriptions Fund # Name Notes 101 General Fund The primary fund of the City used to account for all revenue and expenditures of the City; a broad range of municipal activities are provided through this fund. 105 Disaster Recovery Fund Accounts for use of one-time federal funding designed to deliver relief to American workers and aid in the economic recovery iin the wake of COVID-19. The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) was passed by Congress in 2021 to provide fiscal recovery funds to state and local governments. 201 Gas Tax Fund Gasoline sales tax allocations received from the State which are restricted to street -related expenditures. 202 Library and Museum Fund Revenues from property taxes and related expenditures for library and museum services. 203 Public Safety Fund General Fund Measure G sales tax revenue set aside for public safety expenditures. 210 Federal Assistance Fund Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) received from the federal government and the expenditures of those resources. 212 SLESF (COPS) Fund Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Funds (SLESF) received from the State for law enforcement activities. Also known as Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS). 215 Lighting & Landscaping Fund Special assessments levied on real property for city-wide lighting and landscape maintenance/improvements and the expenditures of those resources. 220 Quimby Fund Developer fees received under the provisions of the Quimby Act for park development and improvements. 221 AB939 Fund/Cal Recycle Franchise fees collected from the city waste hauler that are used to reduce waste sent to landfills through recycling efforts. Assembly Bill (AB) 939. 223 Measure A Fund County sales tax allocations which are restricted to street -related expenditures. 224 TUMF Fund Developer -paid Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF) utilized for traffic projects in Riverside County. 225 Infrastructure Fund Developer fees for the acquisition, construction or improvement of the City's infrastructure as defined by Resolution 226 Emergency Mgmt. Performance Grant (EMPG) Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) grant for emergency preparedness. 227 State Homeland Security Programs (SHSP) Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) grant for emergency preparedness. 230 CASP Fund, ABI 379 / SBI 186 Certified Access Specialist (CASp) program fees for ADA Accessibility Improvements; derived from Business License renewals. Assembly Bill (AB) 1379 and Senate Bill (SB) 1186. 231 Successor Agency PA 1 RORF Fund Successor Agency (SA) Project Area (PA) 1 Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund (RORF) for Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) taxes received for debt service payments on recognized obligations of the former Redevelopment Agency (RDA). 235 SO Coast Air Quality Fund (AB2766, PM10) Contributions from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Uses are limited to the reduction and control of airborne pollutants. Assembly Bill (AB) 2766. 237 Successor Agency PA 1 Admin Fund Successor Agency (SA) Project Area (PA) 1 for administration of the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) associated with the former Redevelopment Agency (RDA). 241 Housing Authority Activities of the Housing Authority which is to promote and provide quality affordable housinq. 243 RDA Low -Moderate Housing Fund Activities of the Housing Authority which is to promote and provide quality affordable housing. Accounts for RDA loan repayments (20% for Housinq) and housinq proqrams,. 244 Housing Grants Activites related Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) and SB2 grants for housing planning and development. 247 Economic Development Fund Proceeds from sale of City -owned land and transfers from General Fund for future economic development. 249 SA 2011 Low/Mod Bond Fund Successor Agency (SA) low/moderate housing fund; 2011 bonds refinanced in 2016. 250 Transportation DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - transportation related. 251 Parks & Rec. DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - parks and recreation. 252 Civic Center DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - Civic Center. 253 Library Development DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - library. 254 Community Center DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - community center. 255 Street Facility DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - streets. 256 Park Facility DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - parks. 257 Fire Protection DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - fire protection. 259 Maintenance Facilities DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - maintenance facilities. 270 Art In Public Places Fund Developer fees collected in lieu of art placement; utilized for acquisition, installation and maintenance of public artworks. 275 LQ Public Safety Officer Fund Annual transfer in from General Fund; distributed to public safety officers disabled or killed in the line of duty. 299 Interest Allocation Fund Interest earned on investments. 310 LQ Finance Authority Debt Service Fund Accounted for the debt service the Financing Authority's outstanding debt and any related reporting requirements. This bond was fully paid in October 2018. 401 Capital Improvement Program Fund Planning, design, and construction of various capital projects throughout the City. 405 SA PA 1 Capital Improvement Fund Successor Agency (SA) Project Area (PA) 1 bond proceeds restricted by the bond indenture covenants. Used for SilverRock infrastructure improvements. 501 Equipment Replacement Fund Internal Service Fund for vehicles, heavy equipment, and related facilities. 502 Information Technology Fund Internal Service Fund for computer hardware and software and phone systems. 503 Park Equipment & Facility Fund Internal Service Fund for park equipment and facilities. 504 Insurance Fund Internal Service Fund for city-wide insurance coverages. 601 SilverRock Resort Fund Enterprise Fund for activities of the city -owned golf course. 602 SilverRock Golf Reserve Fund Enterprise Fund for golf course reserves for capital improvements. 760 Supplemental Pension Plan (PARS Account) Supplemental pension savings plan for excess retiree benefits to general employees of the City. 761 Other Post Benefit Obligation Trust (OPEB) For retiree medical benefits and unfunded liabilities. 762 Pension Trust Benefit (PARS Account) I For all pension -related benefits and unfunded liabilities. 81 Page 3 of 3 RVA CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 13 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 19, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE FIRST QUARTER FISCAL YEAR 2023/24 TREASURY REPORTS FOR JULY, AUGUST, AND SEPTEMBER 2023 RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the first quarter fiscal year 2023/24 Treasury Reports for July, August, and September 2023. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Commentary and Summary of Significant Activity The total book value of the portfolio decreased $15.2 million, from $246.6 million at the end of June to $231.4 million at the end of September. The decrease was due to the payment of Successor Agency debt service obligations that are paid in August. The portfolio is within policy limits for investment types and total allocation by type (see chart below) and is also within policy guidelines for investment ratings. Portfolio Allocations Max Investment Type July August September Allowed Bank Accounts 2.29% 4.95% 2.95% 100% Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) City 13.92% 7.75% 8.32% (1) Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Housing 0.84% 0.83% 0.89% (1)(2) Money Market Pool Accounts -CAMP 20.08% 19.96% 21.48% N/A Federal Agency Coupons & Discount Notes 20.11% 20.53% 22.33% 100% Treasury Coupons & Discount Notes 23.20% 20.63% 23.18% 100% Certificates of Deposit (CD's) 15.87% 15.83% 17.21% 30% Corporate Notes 0.75% 0.59% 0.64% 30% Money Market with Fiscal Agent 0.00% 6.04% 0.01% (2) CERBT- OPEB Trust 0.75% 0.75% 0.77% (3) PARS Pension Trust 2.18% 2.14% 2.22% (3) Total 100% 100% 100% (1) LAIF is subject to maximum dollar amount not a percentage of the portfolio (Z) Funds held by fiscal agent and the LAIF Housing funds are governed by bond indentures and not subject to City Investment Policy (3) OPEB and pension trusts are fiduciary accounts and not subject to City Investment Policy The fiscal year annual effective rate of return was 3.20% as of September, which was a 111 basis point (bps) increase since June. Total earnings for the quarter of $1.99 million 83 was $1.27 million above last year, when the annual effective rate was only 1.30%. City staff is continuing to evaluate liquidity needs and reinvesting money in short-term United States treasuries and the California Asset Management Program (CAMP) which are yielding more than the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). Throughout the quarter, three agency bonds, one corporate bond, nine treasuries, and five CDs matured; three agency bonds, six treasuries, and nine CDs were purchased. There were no sales or calls. Maturities and purchases are listed in detail in the attached reports. Other Notes Money market funds with the fiscal agent are bond proceeds subject to bond indentures, not the City's investment policy. Successor Agency (SA) funds cannot be invested long- term; therefore SA funds are only invested in LAIF. Looking Ahead The Treasurer follows a "buy and hold" Investment Policy unless it is fiscally advantageous to actively trade outside of maturity dates. In the short term, the Treasurer will invest in CAMP, LAIF, and U.S. Treasuries as needed. Longer term investments may include Government Sponsored Enterprise (agencies) securities, U.S. Treasuries, Corporate Notes, and Negotiable Certificates of Deposits. All investments recognize both immediate and long-term cash flow needs, and there is sufficient liquidity in the portfolio to meet expenditure requirements for the next six months. ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative. 84 Average Days Effective Rate Total Earnings to Maturity of Return YTD July $ 608,338 484 2.90% August $ 766,933 474 3.28% September $ 617,420 502 3.20% Quarter 2 $ 1,992,690 487 3.13% Throughout the quarter, three agency bonds, one corporate bond, nine treasuries, and five CDs matured; three agency bonds, six treasuries, and nine CDs were purchased. There were no sales or calls. Maturities and purchases are listed in detail in the attached reports. Other Notes Money market funds with the fiscal agent are bond proceeds subject to bond indentures, not the City's investment policy. Successor Agency (SA) funds cannot be invested long- term; therefore SA funds are only invested in LAIF. Looking Ahead The Treasurer follows a "buy and hold" Investment Policy unless it is fiscally advantageous to actively trade outside of maturity dates. In the short term, the Treasurer will invest in CAMP, LAIF, and U.S. Treasuries as needed. Longer term investments may include Government Sponsored Enterprise (agencies) securities, U.S. Treasuries, Corporate Notes, and Negotiable Certificates of Deposits. All investments recognize both immediate and long-term cash flow needs, and there is sufficient liquidity in the portfolio to meet expenditure requirements for the next six months. ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative. 84 Average Days Effective Rate Total Earnings to Maturity of Return YTD July $ 608,338 484 2.90% August $ 766,932 474 3.28% September $ 617,420 502 3.20% Quarter 1 $ 1,992,690 487 3.13% Throughout the quarter, three agency bonds, one corporate bond, nine treasuries, and five CDs matured; three agency bonds, six treasuries, and nine CDs were purchased. There were no sales or calls. Maturities and purchases are listed in detail in the attached reports. Other Notes Money market funds with the fiscal agent are bond proceeds subject to bond indentures, not the City's investment policy. Successor Agency (SA) funds cannot be invested long- term; therefore SA funds are only invested in LAIF. Looking Ahead The Treasurer follows a "buy and hold" Investment Policy unless it is fiscally advantageous to actively trade outside of maturity dates. In the short term, the Treasurer will invest in CAMP, LAIF, and U.S. Treasuries as needed. Longer term investments may include Government Sponsored Enterprise (agencies) securities, U.S. Treasuries, Corporate Notes, and Negotiable Certificates of Deposits. All investments recognize both immediate and long-term cash flow needs, and there is sufficient liquidity in the portfolio to meet expenditure requirements for the next six months. ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative. 84 Prepared by: Rosemary Hallick, Principal Management Analyst Approved by: Claudia Martinez, Finance Director/City Treasurer Attachment: 1. Treasurer's Report for July 1, 2023 to September 30, 2023 85 ta Qa Kra City of La Quinta Portfolio Management GEM oftbe DESERT Portfolio Summary July 31, 2023 ATTACHMENT 1 City of La Quinta 247,588,560.56 240,366,395.26 246,160,315.39 100.00% 817 484 3.299 Investments Total Earnings July 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 608,337.98 608,337.98 Average Daily Balance 247,288,381.77 247,288,381.77 Effective Rate of Return 2.90% 2.90% 1 certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code and the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months. The City of La Quinta used the monthly account statements issued by our financial institutions to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. Digitally signed by Claudia Martinez Date: 2023.12.04 10:51:07 -08,00 12/4/2023 Claudia Martinez, Finance Director/City Treasurer Reporting period 07/01/2023-07/31/2023 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:20 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 86 Par Market Book % of Days to YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 365 Equiv. Bank Accounts 5,626,335.00 5,626,335.00 5,626,335.00 2.29 1 1 0.000 CAMP TERM 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 8.12 263 255 5.645 Local Agency Investment Fund -City 34,256,152.68 33,739,335.31 34,256,152.68 13.92 1 1 3.305 Local Agency Invstmnt Fund -Housing 2,066,034.56 2,034,933.90 2,066,034.56 0.84 1 1 3.305 Money Market Accounts - CAMP 29,440,727.72 29,440,727.72 29,440,727.72 11.96 1 1 5.310 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 48,750,000.00 45,777,797.50 48,527,692.74 19.71 1,556 886 2.089 Federal Agency Discount 1,000,000.00 994,210.00 982,351.39 0.40 131 41 5.075 Treasury Coupon Securities 37,250,000.00 35,255,192.50 36,598,271.10 14.87 1,326 871 2.643 Treasury Discount Notes 21,000,000.00 20,791,420.00 20,515,292.10 8.33 168 68 5.205 Certificate of Deposits 39,068,000.00 37,657,324.73 39,067,377.50 15.87 1,662 908 2.745 Corporate Notes 1,900,000.00 1,817,808.00 1,848,770.00 0.75 1,813 1,197 3.089 Money Market with Fiscal Agent 1,554.40 1,554.40 1,554.40 0.00 1 1 0.000 CERBT- OPEBTrust 1,855,123.49 1,855,123.49 1,855,123.49 0.75 1 1 0.000 PARS Pension Trust 5,374,632.71 5,374,632.71 5,374,632.71 2.18 1 1 0.000 247,588,560.56 240,366,395.26 246,160,315.39 100.00% 817 484 3.299 Investments Total Earnings July 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 608,337.98 608,337.98 Average Daily Balance 247,288,381.77 247,288,381.77 Effective Rate of Return 2.90% 2.90% 1 certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code and the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months. The City of La Quinta used the monthly account statements issued by our financial institutions to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. Digitally signed by Claudia Martinez Date: 2023.12.04 10:51:07 -08,00 12/4/2023 Claudia Martinez, Finance Director/City Treasurer Reporting period 07/01/2023-07/31/2023 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:20 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 86 City of La Quinta CAMP TERM Portfolio Management Page 1 6067-001TERM 1521 California Asset Management Pr Portfolio Details - Investments 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 5.645 263 255 5.645 04/12/2024 July 31, 2023 Subtotal and Average 5,161,290.32 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 263 255 Average Purchase Fund -City Stated Days to YTM Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Term Maturity 365 Date Bank Accounts 34,256,152.68 3.305 1 1 3.305 Subtotal and Average 34,175,996.91 SYS1293 1293 Bank of New York 09/01/2020 506,572.95 506,572.95 506,572.95 1 1 0.000 059731851 1228 Bank of the West 08/20/2019 4,240,490.61 4,240,490.61 4,240,490.61 1 1 0.000 Local Agency Inv Fund SYS1059 1059 City Petty Cash 2,066,034.56 07/01/2016 3,300.00 3,300.00 3,300.00 1 1 0.000 SYS1318 1318 Dune Palms Mobile Estates 2,034,933.90 03/09/2021 784,424.96 784,424.96 784,424.96 1 1 0.000 Money Market Accounts - CAMP SYS1062 1062 La Quinta Palms Realty 07/01/2016 91,546.48 91,546.48 91,546.48 1 1 0.000 1153 California Asset Management Pr 09/26/2018 Subtotal and Average 8,396,480.13 5,626,335.00 5,626,335.00 5,626,335.00 1 1 0.000 CAMP TERM 6067-001TERM 1521 California Asset Management Pr 07/24/2023 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 5.645 263 255 5.645 04/12/2024 Subtotal and Average 5,161,290.32 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 263 255 5.645 Local Agency Investment Fund -City 98-33-434 1055 Local Agency Inv Fund 34,256,152.68 33,739,335.31 34,256,152.68 3.305 1 1 3.305 Subtotal and Average 34,175,996.91 34,256,152.68 33,739,335.31 34,256,152.68 1 1 3.305 Local Agency Invstmnt Fund -Housing 25-33-005 1113 Local Agency Inv Fund 2,066,034.56 2,034,933.90 2,066,034.56 3.305 1 1 3.305 Subtotal and Average 2,059,285.09 2,066,034.56 2,034,933.90 2,066,034.56 1 1 3.305 Money Market Accounts - CAMP SYS1153 1153 California Asset Management Pr 09/26/2018 29,440,727.72 29,440,727.72 29,440,727.72 5.310 1 1 5.310 Subtotal and Average 44,087,304.07 29,440,727.72 29,440,727.72 29,440,727.72 1 1 5.310 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 3133EKZK5 1223 Federal Farm Credit Bank 09/12/2019 500,000.00 499,305.00 499,400.00 1.600 1,432 13 1.632 08/14/2023 3133EJYL7 1158 Federal Farm Credit Bank 10/15/2018 250,000.00 249,432.50 247,275.00 2.800 1,786 35 3.041 09/05/2023 3133EK4X1 1234 Federal Farm Credit Bank 11/01/2019 1,000,000.00 990,740.00 996,900.00 1.600 1,461 92 1.680 11/01/2023 3130AFW94 1177 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/01/2019 500,000.00 491,940.00 498,550.00 2.500 1,810 196 2.563 02/13/2024 3133ELNEO 1246 Federal Farm Credit Bank 02/14/2020 1,000,000.00 978,560.00 999,000.00 1.430 1,461 197 1.456 02/14/2024 3135GAGK1 1482 Federal National Mtg Assn 04/12/2023 3,000,000.00 2,983,200.00 3,000,000.00 5.050 366 255 5.050 04/12/2024 3133ENYH7 1401 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/10/2022 500,000.00 487,725.00 499,080.00 2.625 731 314 2.720 06/10/2024 3135GOV75 1206 Federal National Mtg Assn 07/15/2019 500,000.00 483,405.00 495,950.00 1.750 1,814 336 1.922 07/02/2024 3133EKWV4 1212 Federal Farm Credit Bank 08/02/2019 500,000.00 482,310.00 499,500.00 1.850 1,820 360 1.871 07/26/2024 3135GAGA3 1480 Federal National Mtg Assn 04/03/2023 2,000,000.00 1,986,300.00 2,000,000.00 5.200 484 364 5.206 07/30/2024 3133EKP75 1224 Federal Farm Credit Bank 09/17/2019 500,000.00 479,285.00 498,750.00 1.600 1,827 413 1.652 09/17/2024 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:20 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 87 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments July 31, 2023 Page 2 CUSIP Investment # Average Issuer Balance Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate Days to Term Maturity YTM Maturity 365 Date Federal Agency Coupon Securities 3133ELEA8 1242 Federal Farm Credit Bank 12/17/2019 1,000,000.00 960,810.00 998,600.00 1.700 1,736 413 1.731 09/17/2024 3135GO6E8 1291 Federal National Mtg Assn 11/18/2020 500,000.00 467,825.00 499,250.00 0.420 1,461 475 0.458 11/18/2024 3133ENGN4 1355 Federal Farm Credit Bank 12/09/2021 1,000,000.00 940,250.00 1,000,000.00 0.970 1,096 496 0.970 12/09/2024 3135GAAW1 1300 Federal National Mtg Assn 12/30/2020 500,000.00 465,335.00 500,000.00 0.400 1,461 517 0.400 12/30/2024 3130AP21.18 1353 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/07/2021 1,000,000.00 931,700.00 987,100.00 0.550 1,127 525 0.976 01/07/2025 313OAQWY5 1374 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/25/2022 1,000,000.00 943,660.00 1,000,000.00 1.700 1,095 573 1.700 02/24/2025 3135GO3U5 1365 Federal National Mtg Assn 01/28/2022 500,000.00 463,590.00 487,790.00 0.625 1,180 630 1.400 04/22/2025 3134GVYG7 1279 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 05/27/2020 1,000,000.00 924,140.00 1,000,000.00 0.625 1,826 665 0.625 05/27/2025 3133ELH23 1280 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/09/2020 500,000.00 460,995.00 499,850.00 0.500 1,826 678 0.506 06/09/2025 3133ELH80 1282 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/10/2020 500,000.00 459,535.00 500,000.00 0.680 1,826 679 0.680 06/10/2025 3130AJKW8 1281 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/03/2020 500,000.00 458,670.00 499,850.00 0.500 1,836 682 0.506 06/13/2025 3130AJRP6 1283 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/30/2020 300,000.00 274,836.00 300,000.00 0.680 1,826 699 0.680 06/30/2025 3137EAEU9 1297 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 12/07/2020 1,000,000.00 915,270.00 997,300.00 0.375 1,687 720 0.434 07/21/2025 3137EAEU9 1361 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 01/05/2022 500,000.00 457,635.00 487,090.00 0.375 1,293 720 1.120 07/21/2025 3135GO5S8 1288 Federal National Mtg Assn 08/14/2020 500,000.00 456,910.00 500,000.00 0.500 1,826 744 0.500 08/14/2025 3136G4M75 1290 Federal National Mtg Assn 08/28/2020 500,000.00 457,980.00 499,750.00 0.520 1,816 748 0.530 08/18/2025 3136G4N74 1289 Federal National Mtg Assn 08/21/2020 1,000,000.00 914,300.00 1,000,000.00 0.560 1,826 751 0.560 08/21/2025 3137EAEX3 1307 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 02/23/2021 500,000.00 454,770.00 495,999.50 0.375 1,673 784 0.552 09/23/2025 3137EAEX3 1310 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 03/30/2021 1,000,000.00 909,540.00 983,940.00 0.375 1,638 784 0.740 09/23/2025 3130ARGJ4 1385 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/14/2022 500,000.00 474,615.00 500,000.00 2.500 1,279 805 2.500 10/14/2025 3134GW5R3 1362 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 01/05/2022 400,000.00 362,796.00 391,360.00 0.650 1,391 818 1.232 10/27/2025 3135GO6G3 1354 Federal National Mtg Assn 12/07/2021 1,000,000.00 907,450.00 976,300.00 0.500 1,431 829 1.120 11/07/2025 3135GA2Z3 1292 Federal National Mtg Assn 11/17/2020 500,000.00 452,030.00 499,250.00 0.560 1,826 839 0.590 11/17/2025 313OAKFA9 1298 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/07/2020 500,000.00 449,795.00 497,400.00 0.375 1,831 864 0.480 12/12/2025 3135GA7D7 1299 Federal National Mtg Assn 12/23/2020 500,000.00 452,275.00 500,000.00 0.600 1,826 875 0.600 12/23/2025 3134GXGZ1 1301 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 12/30/2020 500,000.00 452,575.00 500,000.00 0.550 1,826 882 0.550 12/30/2025 313OAKMZ6 1302 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/14/2021 500,000.00 450,005.00 500,000.00 0.510 1,826 897 0.510 01/14/2026 313OAKN28 1304 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/29/2021 500,000.00 449,825.00 500,000.00 0.550 1,826 912 0.550 01/29/2026 3130ALV92 1312 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/30/2021 500,000.00 452,885.00 500,000.00 1.050 1,826 972 0.938 03/30/2026 3130AMFS6 1324 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/17/2021 1,000,000.00 892,290.00 993,420.00 0.750 1,821 1,046 0.885 06/12/2026 3133EM2C5 1330 Federal Farm Credit Bank 08/10/2021 500,000.00 443,685.00 498,000.00 0.710 1,826 1,105 0.792 08/10/2026 3133EM4X7 1338 Federal Farm Credit Bank 09/28/2021 1,000,000.00 889,120.00 991,080.00 0.800 1,808 1,136 0.985 09/10/2026 3130APBM6 1337 Federal Home Loan Bank 09/30/2021 1,000,000.00 892,110.00 999,000.00 1.000 1,826 1,156 1.021 09/30/2026 3130APB46 1339 Federal Home Loan Bank 10/13/2021 1,000,000.00 891,400.00 998,250.00 0.950 1,826 1,169 0.986 10/13/2026 3134GW6C5 1359 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 01/05/2022 500,000.00 442,055.00 486,000.00 0.800 1,757 1,184 1.403 10/28/2026 3133ENCQ1 1344 Federal Farm Credit Bank 11/02/2021 1,000,000.00 899,530.00 1,000,000.00 1.270 1,826 1,189 1.270 11/02/2026 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:20 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 0 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments July 31, 2023 Page 3 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:20 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 NN Average Purchase Stated Days to YTM Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Term Maturity 365 Date Federal Agency Coupon Securities 3130APTV7 1347 Federal Home Loan Bank 11/24/2021 500,000.00 458,150.00 499,500.00 0.700 1,826 1,211 1.489 11/24/2026 313OAQF65 1358 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/22/2021 1,000,000.00 897,730.00 999,750.00 1.250 1,825 1,238 1.255 12/21/2026 3134GWUQ7 1366 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 02/10/2022 1,000,000.00 878,230.00 945,570.00 0.700 1,784 1,247 1.870 12/30/2026 3130AQJR5 1364 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/27/2022 1,000,000.00 899,690.00 1,000,000.00 1.500 1,826 1,275 1.500 01/27/2027 3130AQSA2 1367 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/10/2022 1,000,000.00 908,600.00 1,000,000.00 1.830 1,826 1,289 1.830 02/10/2027 3130ARGY1 1387 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/19/2022 1,000,000.00 930,630.00 1,000,000.00 2.700 1,826 1,357 2.700 04/19/2027 3130ASDV8 1409 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/28/2022 300,000.00 283,833.00 300,000.00 3.300 1,826 1,427 3.300 06/28/2027 3133ENL99 1426 Federal Farm Credit Bank 09/15/2022 1,000,000.00 957,790.00 997,492.55 3.375 1,826 1,506 3.430 09/15/2027 3133ENQ29 1433 Federal Farm Credit Bank 09/30/2022 1,000,000.00 984,700.00 996,400.00 4.000 1,825 1,520 4.080 09/29/2027 3133EN3H1 1441 Federal Farm Credit Bank 11/29/2022 1,000,000.00 980,790.00 998,650.00 4.000 1,826 1,581 4.030 11/29/2027 3133EN3S7 1446 Federal Farm Credit Bank 12/07/2022 1,000,000.00 971,000.00 998,000.00 3.750 1,826 1,589 3.794 12/07/2027 3133EPAV7 1464 Federal Farm Credit Bank 02/15/2023 1,000,000.00 981,940.00 995,400.00 3.875 1,825 1,658 3.977 02/14/2028 3134GYPJ5 1484 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 04/24/2023 1,000,000.00 979,330.00 999,100.00 5.200 1,820 1,721 5.220 04/17/2028 3133EPME2 1505 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/08/2023 1,000,000.00 982,290.00 998,190.00 3.875 1,827 1,773 3.915 06/08/2028 3133EPQDO 1527 Federal Farm Credit Bank 07/31/2023 1,000,000.00 998,700.00 998,655.69 4.250 1,813 1,812 4.280 07/17/2028 Subtotal and Average 47,561,251.75 48,750,000.00 45,777,797.50 48,527,692.74 1,556 886 2.089 Federal Agency Discount 313384LP2 1490 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/03/2023 1,000,000.00 994,210.00 982,351.39 4.850 131 41 5.075 09/11/2023 Subtotal and Average 982,351.39 1,000,000.00 994,210.00 982,351.39 131 41 5.075 Treasury Coupon Securities 9128284X5 1462 U.S. Treasury 02/07/2023 1,000,000.00 997,840.00 988,900.00 2.750 205 30 4.787 08/31/2023 912828T26 1217 U.S. Treasury 08/21/2019 500,000.00 496,740.00 499,300.00 1.375 1,501 60 1.410 09/30/2023 91282CBA8 1351 U.S. Treasury 12/07/2021 1,000,000.00 981,020.00 990,000.00 0.125 738 136 0.623 12/15/2023 91282CBEO 1342 U.S. Treasury 10/22/2021 1,000,000.00 976,880.00 991,000.00 0.125 815 167 0.531 01/15/2024 912828V80 1516 U.S. Treasury 06/30/2023 2,000,000.00 1,969,300.00 1,964,400.00 2.250 215 183 5.374 01/31/2024 91282CDVO 1519 U.S. Treasury 07/12/2023 1,000,000.00 977,890.00 975,600.00 0.875 203 183 5.416 01/31/2024 9128281366 1518 U.S. Treasury 07/12/2023 2,000,000.00 1,971,880.00 1,969,580.00 2.750 218 198 5.382 02/15/2024 91282CBR1 1352 U.S. Treasury 12/07/2021 1,000,000.00 968,980.00 989,800.00 0.250 829 227 0.704 03/15/2024 91282CBV2 1360 U.S. Treasury 01/05/2022 500,000.00 482,755.00 494,882.81 0.375 831 258 0.830 04/15/2024 912828XT2 1418 U.S. Treasury 05/04/2022 1,000,000.00 972,540.00 985,240.00 2.000 758 304 2.736 05/31/2024 91282821-13 1400 U.S. Treasury 06/09/2022 500,000.00 481,740.00 490,850.00 1.875 814 396 2.727 08/31/2024 91282CDB4 1343 U.S. Treasury 10/22/2021 1,000,000.00 945,660.00 996,320.00 0.625 1,089 441 0.750 10/15/2024 9128283DO 1390 U.S. Treasury 05/03/2022 1,000,000.00 963,480.00 985,190.00 2.250 912 457 2.870 10/31/2024 912828YV6 1241 U.S. Treasury 12/16/2019 1,000,000.00 951,990.00 989,687.50 1.500 1,811 487 1.718 11/30/2024 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:20 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 NN City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments July 31, 2023 Page 4 CUSIP Investment # Issuer Average Balance Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate Days to Term Maturity YTM 365 Maturity Date Treasury Coupon Securities 91282CAT8 1311 U.S. Treasury 03/30/2021 1,000,000.00 904,530.00 977,500.00 0.250 1,676 822 0.750 10/31/2025 91282CAZ4 1315 U.S. Treasury 04/22/2021 500,000.00 452,325.00 492,187.50 0.375 1,683 852 0.720 11/30/2025 91282CBC4 1303 U.S. Treasury 01/07/2021 500,000.00 451,545.00 498,632.81 0.375 1,819 883 0.431 12/31/2025 91282CBH3 1309 U.S. Treasury 02/23/2021 500,000.00 449,920.00 495,100.00 0.375 1,803 914 0.577 01/31/2026 91282CBQ3 1319 U.S. Treasury 05/28/2021 500,000.00 450,115.00 494,165.00 0.500 1,737 942 0.750 02/28/2026 91282CBQ3 1382 U.S. Treasury 03/23/2022 750,000.00 675,172.50 698,025.00 0.500 1,438 942 2.353 02/28/2026 91282CBT7 1320 U.S. Treasury 05/28/2021 500,000.00 452,580.00 499,525.00 0.750 1,768 973 0.770 03/31/2026 91282CBT7 1322 U.S. Treasury 06/17/2021 500,000.00 452,580.00 498,450.00 0.750 1,748 973 0.816 03/31/2026 9128286S4 1383 U.S. Treasury 03/23/2022 1,000,000.00 943,790.00 999,010.00 2.375 1,499 1,003 2.400 04/30/2026 91282CCF6 1321 U.S. Treasury 06/01/2021 1,000,000.00 899,770.00 997,060.00 0.750 1,825 1,034 0.810 05/31/2026 91282CCF6 1323 U.S. Treasury 06/17/2021 500,000.00 449,885.00 497,095.00 0.750 1,809 1,034 0.870 05/31/2026 91282CCP4 1335 U.S. Treasury 09/29/2021 1,000,000.00 892,380.00 983,750.00 0.625 1,766 1,095 0.970 07/31/2026 91282CCW9 1336 U.S. Treasury 09/29/2021 1,000,000.00 893,360.00 988,500.00 0.750 1,797 1,126 0.990 08/31/2026 91282CCW9 1380 U.S. Treasury 03/22/2022 500,000.00 446,680.00 466,454.17 0.750 1,623 1,126 2.350 08/31/2026 91282CDG3 1381 U.S. Treasury 03/22/2022 500,000.00 450,195.00 473,396.82 1.125 1,684 1,187 2.350 10/31/2026 912828Z78 1369 U.S. Treasury 02/10/2022 1,000,000.00 906,480.00 986,700.00 1.500 1,816 1,279 1.781 01/31/2027 91282CEF4 1391 U.S. Treasury 05/03/2022 1,000,000.00 937,230.00 976,860.00 2.500 1,793 1,338 3.010 03/31/2027 91282CEN7 1398 U.S. Treasury 06/08/2022 500,000.00 472,205.00 495,000.00 2.750 1,787 1,368 2.971 04/30/2027 912828X88 1397 U.S. Treasury 06/07/2022 1,000,000.00 930,820.00 969,687.50 2.375 1,803 1,383 3.041 05/15/2027 91282CET4 1399 U.S. Treasury 06/08/2022 500,000.00 469,610.00 491,842.18 2.625 1,818 1,399 2.980 05/31/2027 91282CEW7 1465 U.S. Treasury 02/15/2023 1,000,000.00 961,130.00 967,220.00 3.250 1,596 1,429 4.075 06/30/2027 91282CFB2 1417 U.S. Treasury 08/15/2022 1,000,000.00 942,380.00 989,460.00 2.750 1,811 1,460 2.980 07/31/2027 91282CFB2 1422 U.S. Treasury 08/29/2022 1,000,000.00 942,380.00 979,645.67 2.750 1,797 1,460 3.200 07/31/2027 9128282RO 1439 U.S. Treasury 11/18/2022 1,000,000.00 923,560.00 927,110.00 2.250 1,731 1,475 3.950 08/15/2027 91282CFH9 1456 U.S. Treasury 01/24/2023 500,000.00 477,815.00 489,175.00 3.125 1,680 1,491 3.640 08/31/2027 91282CGH8 1460 U.S. Treasury 02/02/2023 1,000,000.00 969,380.00 996,369.14 3.500 1,824 1,644 3.580 01/31/2028 91282CGT2 1508 U.S. Treasury 06/15/2023 1,000,000.00 974,690.00 984,600.00 3.625 1,751 1,704 3.980 03/31/2028 91282CGT2 1524 U.S. Treasury 05/31/2023 1,000,000.00 974,690.00 990,000.00 3.625 1,766 1,704 3.853 03/31/2028 91282CHA2 1525 U.S. Treasury 05/31/2023 1,000,000.00 969,300.00 985,000.00 3.500 1,796 1,734 3.837 04/30/2028 Subtotal and Average 36,034,942.36 37,250,000.00 35,255,192.50 36,598,271.10 1,326 871 2.643 Treasury Discount Notes 912796Y37 1463 U.S. Treasury 02/07/2023 2,000,000.00 1,999,420.00 1,954,412.92 4.636 177 2 4.877 08/03/2023 912797GF8 1481 U.S. Treasury 04/11/2023 2,000,000.00 1,997,960.00 1,968,951.36 4.696 119 7 4.904 08/08/2023 912797GJO 1489 U.S. Treasury 05/03/2023 1,000,000.00 995,900.00 984,010.00 4.878 118 28 5.096 08/29/2023 912796Z51 1471 U.S. Treasury 03/09/2023 3,000,000.00 2,986,860.00 2,927,220.00 4.991 175 30 5.258 08/31/2023 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:20 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 •E City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments July 31, 2023 Page 5 CUSIP Average Investment # Issuer Balance Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate Days to Term Maturity YTM Maturity 365 Date Treasury Discount Notes 912796YH6 1470 U.S. Treasury 03/09/2023 2,000,000.00 1,989,180.00 1,950,283.66 4.917 182 37 5.184 09/07/2023 912797FAO 1488 U.S. Treasury 05/03/2023 3,000,000.00 2,968,350.00 2,935,470.00 4.780 162 72 5.022 10/12/2023 912796YTO 1487 U.S. Treasury 05/03/2023 1,000,000.00 986,330.00 975,854.17 4.750 183 93 5.003 11/02/2023 912797FL6 1502 U.S. Treasury 05/31/2023 4,000,000.00 3,932,880.00 3,898,126.67 5.180 177 115 5.464 11/24/2023 912796ZN2 1517 U.S. Treasury 06/30/2023 3,000,000.00 2,934,540.00 2,920,963.32 5.240 181 149 5.532 12/28/2023 Subtotal and Average 20,896,168.23 21,000,000.00 20,791,420.00 20,515,292.10 168 68 5.205 Certificate of Deposits 75472RAD3 1218 Raymond James Bank 08/23/2019 244,000.00 243,126.58 244,000.00 1.950 1,461 22 1.951 08/23/2023 89579NCD3 1262 Triad Bank 03/30/2020 248,000.00 245,905.51 248,000.00 1.350 1,278 59 1.352 09/29/2023 57116ARV2 1155 Cache Valley BK F/K/A Marlin 10/17/2018 248,000.00 246,624.91 248,000.00 3.300 1,826 77 3.302 10/17/2023 625925AR3 1160 Municipal Trust and Savings 10/17/2018 245,000.00 243,579.51 245,000.00 3.200 1,826 77 3.202 10/17/2023 90348JEJ5 1161 UBS Bank USA 10/17/2018 245,000.00 243,672.56 245,000.00 3.350 1,826 77 3.352 10/17/2023 474067AQ8 1154 Jefferson Financial CU 10/19/2018 245,000.00 243,571.09 245,000.00 3.350 1,826 79 3.352 10/19/2023 20143PDV9 1162 Commercial Bank 11/15/2018 248,000.00 246,277.57 248,000.00 3.400 1,826 106 3.402 11/15/2023 67054NAN3 1164 Numerica Credit Union 11/28/2018 248,000.00 246,094.31 248,000.00 3.550 1,826 119 3.552 11/28/2023 48115LAD6 1396 Jovia Financial Credit Union 06/07/2022 248,000.00 245,015.01 248,000.00 2.500 548 128 2.502 12/07/2023 635573AL2 1170 National Cooperative Bank, N.A 12/21/2018 245,000.00 242,597.88 245,000.00 3.400 1,826 142 3.402 12/21/2023 066851 WJ1 1172 Bar Harbor Bank and Trust 12/31/2018 248,000.00 245,379.77 248,000.00 3.350 1,824 150 3.352 12/29/2023 89269FDP7 1415 Tradition Capital 07/20/2022 246,000.00 242,600.21 246,000.00 3.000 551 174 3.008 01/22/2024 51210SQU4 1208 Lakeside Bank 07/30/2019 248,000.00 243,082.54 248,000.00 2.000 1,644 181 2.003 01/29/2024 77579ADF0 1251 Rollstone B&T 02/12/2020 245,000.00 239,385.06 245,000.00 1.650 1,461 195 1.651 02/12/2024 66736ABP3 1181 Northwest Bank 02/13/2019 248,000.00 244,091.76 248,000.00 2.950 1,826 196 2.951 02/13/2024 949763XY7 1174 Wells Fargo 02/27/2019 248,000.00 243,862.90 248,000.00 3.000 1,826 210 3.001 02/27/2024 50625LAW3 1384 Lafayette FCU 03/30/2022 248,000.00 241,662.11 248,000.00 2.050 729 240 2.053 03/28/2024 882213AB7 1260 Texas Bank Financial 03/31/2020 245,000.00 237,190.96 245,000.00 1.100 1,458 240 1.101 03/28/2024 472382AQ3 1272 The Jefferson Bank 04/15/2020 248,000.00 239,787.00 248,000.00 1.250 1,461 258 1.251 04/15/2024 08016PDQ9 1270 Belmont Bank and Trust 04/16/2020 248,000.00 239,757.67 248,000.00 1.250 1,461 259 1.251 04/16/2024 69506YRH4 1269 Pacific Western Bk/Banc of CA 04/16/2020 245,000.00 237,011.84 245,000.00 1.300 1,461 259 1.301 04/16/2024 56065GAG3 1188 Main Street Bank 04/26/2019 248,000.00 241,819.00 248,000.00 2.600 1,827 269 2.603 04/26/2024 33640VDD7 1231 First Service Bank 11/15/2019 248,000.00 239,786.89 248,000.00 1.700 1,643 288 1.701 05/15/2024 48128HXU7 1185 JP Morgan Chase 05/16/2019 245,000.00 239,997.86 245,000.00 3.250 1,827 289 3.254 05/16/2024 46256YAZ2 1186 Iowa State Bank 05/23/2019 245,000.00 237,768.10 245,000.00 2.400 1,827 296 2.403 05/23/2024 538036GV0 1238 Live Oak Bank 11/27/2019 248,000.00 239,237.09 248,000.00 1.800 1,644 301 1.802 05/28/2024 156634AK3 1184 Century Next Bank 05/29/2019 248,000.00 240,695.66 248,000.00 2.500 1,827 302 2.503 05/29/2024 72651 LCL6 1195 Plains Commerce Bank 06/07/2019 245,000.00 237,965.97 245,000.00 2.550 1,827 311 2.553 06/07/2024 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:20 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 91 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments July 31, 2023 Page 6 CUSIP Investment # Average Issuer Balance Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate Days to Term Maturity YTM 365 Maturity Date Certificate of Deposits 299547AQ2 1196 Liberty FCU F/K/A Evansville T 06/12/2019 248,000.00 240,823.62 248,000.00 2.600 1,827 316 2.603 06/12/2024 524661CB9 1197 Legacy Bank 06/19/2019 248,000.00 239,778.28 248,000.00 2.400 1,827 323 2.403 06/19/2024 176688CP2 1199 Citizens State Bank 06/21/2019 248,000.00 239,730.77 248,000.00 2.400 1,827 325 2.403 06/21/2024 20416TAQ5 1202 Communitywide FCU 06/28/2019 248,000.00 239,217.48 248,000.00 2.250 1,827 332 2.253 06/28/2024 761402BY1 1203 Revere Bank 06/28/2019 247,000.00 238,460.12 247,000.00 2.300 1,827 332 2.303 06/28/2024 00257TBD7 1207 Abacus Federal Savings 07/26/2019 248,000.00 237,972.19 248,000.00 1.950 1,827 360 1.952 07/26/2024 33625CCP2 1209 First Security Bank of WA 07/30/2019 248,000.00 237,994.62 248,000.00 2.000 1,827 364 2.002 07/30/2024 710571DS6 1210 People's Bank 07/31/2019 248,000.00 237,969.00 248,000.00 2.000 1,827 365 2.002 07/31/2024 740367HP5 1213 Preferred Bank 08/16/2019 249,000.00 238,317.76 249,000.00 2.000 1,827 381 2.002 08/16/2024 33766LAJ7 1216 FirsTier Bank 08/23/2019 249,000.00 238,412.57 249,000.00 1.950 1,827 388 1.952 08/23/2024 93882861-12 1215 Washington Federal 08/23/2019 248,000.00 237,589.11 248,000.00 2.000 1,827 388 2.002 08/23/2024 336460CX6 1222 First State Bk DeQueen 08/30/2019 248,000.00 236,868.88 248,000.00 1.800 1,827 395 1.802 08/30/2024 334342CD2 1221 First Natl Bk of Syracuse 08/30/2019 249,000.00 237,960.80 249,000.00 1.850 1,827 395 1.852 08/30/2024 15118RRH2 1220 Celtic Bank 08/30/2019 248,000.00 237,005.14 248,000.00 1.850 1,827 395 1.852 08/30/2024 05580AD50 1333 BMW Bank 09/10/2021 245,000.00 230,482.86 245,000.00 0.650 1,096 406 0.651 09/10/2024 06652CHB0 1227 BankWest Inc 09/27/2019 248,000.00 236,068.69 248,000.00 1.700 1,827 423 1.702 09/27/2024 84223QAN7 1286 Southern Bancorp Bk 06/26/2020 248,000.00 231,867.19 248,000.00 0.500 1,582 451 0.500 10/25/2024 804375DL4 1235 Sauk Valley B&T Co 11/07/2019 248,000.00 234,994.29 248,000.00 1.700 1,827 464 1.702 11/07/2024 61690UNX4 1237 Morgan Stanley Bank 11/20/2019 245,000.00 233,220.67 245,000.00 1.950 1,827 477 1.952 11/20/2024 61760A3133 1236 Morgan Stanley Private Bk, NA 11/20/2019 245,000.00 233,061.95 245,000.00 1.900 1,827 477 1.902 11/20/2024 064520BG3 1287 Bank Princeton 06/30/2020 248,000.00 230,209.55 248,000.00 0.500 1,644 517 0.500 12/30/2024 80865MAB3 1454 Scient FCU 01/13/2023 248,000.00 244,413.68 248,000.00 4.650 731 531 4.656 01/13/2025 89388CEYO 1328 Transportation Alliance Bk TAB 07/23/2021 248,000.00 229,352.54 248,000.00 0.400 1,280 541 0.401 01/23/2025 06417NZQ9 1329 Bank OZK 07/29/2021 248,000.00 229,159.57 248,000.00 0.400 1,280 547 0.401 01/29/2025 90983WBT7 1249 United Community 02/07/2020 248,000.00 233,281.77 248,000.00 1.650 1,827 556 1.652 02/07/2025 32114VBT3 1250 First National Bank Michigan 02/14/2020 248,000.00 233,109.74 248,000.00 1.650 1,827 563 1.652 02/14/2025 35637RDC8 1248 Freedom Financial 02/14/2020 248,000.00 232,729.70 248,000.00 1.550 1,827 563 1.552 02/14/2025 029728BC5 1255 American State 02/21/2020 248,000.00 233,333.13 248,000.00 1.600 1,827 570 1.602 02/21/2025 17286TAGO 1252 Citadel FCU 02/27/2020 248,000.00 233,383.29 248,000.00 1.650 1,827 576 1.652 02/27/2025 00435JBH5 1256 Access Bank 03/13/2020 248,000.00 232,550.48 248,000.00 1.600 1,826 590 1.601 03/13/2025 49306SJ56 1475 Kay Bank, N.A. 03/15/2023 244,000.00 242,364.03 244,000.00 5.000 733 594 5.008 03/17/2025 909557KQ2 1477 United Bankers Bank 03/16/2023 248,000.00 246,359.86 248,000.00 5.000 732 594 4.823 03/17/2025 849430131`9 1257 Spring Bank 03/20/2020 248,000.00 232,591.68 248,000.00 1.500 1,826 597 1.501 03/20/2025 05465DAE8 1258 Axos Bank 03/26/2020 248,000.00 233,055.98 248,000.00 1.650 1,826 603 1.651 03/26/2025 020080BX4 1267 Alma Bank 03/30/2020 248,000.00 231,991.72 248,000.00 1.400 1,824 605 1.399 03/28/2025 2027506M2 1268 Commonwealth Business Bk 03/31/2020 248,000.00 231,304.08 248,000.00 1.250 1,826 608 1.251 03/31/2025 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:20 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 92 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments July 31, 2023 Page 7 CUSIP Investment # Average Issuer Balance Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate Days to Term Maturity YTM Maturity 365 Date Certificate of Deposits 654062JZ2 1266 Nicolet Natl Bank 03/31/2020 248,000.00 231,917.70 248,000.00 1.400 1,826 608 1.401 03/31/2025 14042TDD6 1271 Capital One USA FDIC33954 04/08/2020 245,000.00 229,563.49 245,000.00 1.600 1,826 616 1.601 04/08/2025 02007GPX5 1388 Ally Bank Midvale 04/21/2022 245,000.00 233,807.49 245,000.00 2.550 1,096 629 2.550 04/21/2025 52168UHY1 1389 Leader Bank 04/22/2022 245,000.00 233,791.00 245,000.00 2.550 1,096 630 2.552 04/22/2025 32112UDR9 1274 First Natl Bk McGregor 04/28/2020 248,000.00 231,340.75 248,000.00 1.350 1,826 636 1.351 04/28/2025 32027BALl 1273 First Freedom Bank 04/29/2020 249,000.00 231,605.16 249,000.00 1.200 1,826 637 1.201 04/29/2025 33847E3A3 1276 Flagstar 04/30/2020 248,000.00 231,017.56 248,000.00 1.250 1,826 638 1.251 04/30/2025 32056GDJ6 1278 1st Internet Bank 05/11/2020 248,000.00 229,144.89 248,000.00 1.000 1,827 650 0.985 05/12/2025 95960NKD8 1277 Western State Bank 05/13/2020 245,000.00 226,520.59 245,000.00 1.000 1,826 651 1.001 05/13/2025 254673E69 1392 Discover Bank Greenwood DE CF 05/24/2022 245,000.00 235,946.47 245,000.00 3.100 1,099 665 3.103 05/27/2025 169894AS1 1284 Chippewa Valley Bk 06/24/2020 248,000.00 227,185.68 248,000.00 0.600 1,826 693 0.600 06/24/2025 307811DF3 1363 Farmers & Merch 01/14/2022 249,000.00 228,613.25 249,000.00 0.900 1,277 713 0.900 07/14/2025 30960QAR8 1526 Farmers Insurance Group FCU 07/26/2023 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 5.400 733 727 5.408 07/28/2025 70962LAF9 1331 Pentagon FCU 09/01/2021 249,000.00 226,819.76 249,000.00 0.700 1,462 763 0.687 09/02/2025 914242AAO 1429 University Credit Union 09/26/2022 248,000.00 242,827.78 248,000.00 4.000 1,096 787 3.891 09/26/2025 51507LCC6 1305 Landmark Community Bank 01/22/2021 248,000.00 222,109.16 248,000.00 0.500 1,826 905 0.500 01/22/2026 84229LBA9 1434 Southern Bank Sardis GA 10/28/2022 244,000.00 240,480.77 244,000.00 4.250 1,188 911 4.254 01/28/2026 87270LDL4 1306 TIAA F/K/A EverBank 02/12/2021 245,000.00 218,919.27 245,000.00 0.500 1,826 926 0.500 02/12/2026 64034KAZ4 1376 Nelnet Bank 03/02/2022 245,000.00 226,508.23 245,000.00 1.800 1,461 944 1.801 03/02/2026 59524LAA4 1474 Mid Carolina Credit Union 03/13/2023 248,000.00 247,987.01 248,000.00 4.850 1,096 955 4.855 03/13/2026 39573LBC1 1313 Greenstate FCU 04/16/2021 249,000.00 223,919.58 249,000.00 0.950 1,826 989 0.951 04/16/2026 89235MKY6 1314 Toyota Financial Savings Bank 04/22/2021 245,000.00 220,491.98 245,000.00 0.900 1,826 995 0.900 04/22/2026 14622LAAO 1316 Carter FCU 04/27/2021 248,000.00 221,884.00 248,000.00 0.750 1,826 1,000 0.750 04/27/2026 62384RAT3 1485 Mountain America Federal CU 04/28/2023 248,000.00 247,685.27 248,000.00 4.700 1,096 1,001 4.705 04/28/2026 31617CAV5 1317 Fidelity Homestead 04/30/2021 248,000.00 221,484.25 248,000.00 0.700 1,826 1,003 0.711 04/30/2026 35089LAFO 1491 Four Points FCU 05/10/2023 248,000.00 246,458.54 248,000.00 4.550 1,097 1,014 4.443 05/11/2026 87868YAQ6 1501 Technology Credit Union 05/30/2023 248,000.00 249,929.89 248,000.00 5.000 1,095 1,032 5.005 05/29/2026 16141BAC5 1506 Chartway FCU 06/09/2023 248,000.00 249,031.29 248,000.00 4.900 1,096 1,043 4.905 06/09/2026 01025RAG4 1510 Alabama Credit Union 06/20/2023 248,000.00 250,213.18 248,000.00 5.000 1,098 1,056 5.005 06/22/2026 501798RP9 1356 LCA Bank Corp 12/27/2021 248,000.00 222,848.46 248,000.00 1.000 1,642 1,060 1.000 06/26/2026 92559TAJ7 1325 Vibrant Credit Union 07/02/2021 249,000.00 222,044.66 248,377.50 0.800 1,824 1,064 0.852 06/30/2026 300185LM5 1457 Evergreen Bank Group 01/27/2023 248,000.00 242,287.71 248,000.00 3.850 1,277 1,091 3.849 07/27/2026 38149MXK4 1326 Goldman Sachs 07/28/2021 248,000.00 222,300.22 248,000.00 1.000 1,826 1,092 1.001 07/28/2026 795451AFO 1327 Sallie Mae Bank Salt Lake City 07/28/2021 248,000.00 222,300.22 248,000.00 1.000 1,826 1,092 1.001 07/28/2026 87165ET98 1332 Synchrony Bank Retail 09/03/2021 245,000.00 218,097.30 245,000.00 0.900 1,826 1,129 0.900 09/03/2026 20786ADL6 1334 Connect One 09/24/2021 248,000.00 219,645.11 248,000.00 0.800 1,826 1,150 0.800 09/24/2026 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:20 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 93 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments July 31, 2023 Page 8 CUSIP Investment # Average Issuer Balance Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate Days to Term Maturity YTM Maturity 365 Date Certificate of Deposits 59013KPNO 1345 Merrick Bank 11/09/2021 249,000.00 221,814.76 249,000.00 1.100 1,826 1,196 1.101 11/09/2026 14042RQB0 1346 Capital One Natl Assn FDIC4297 11/17/2021 248,000.00 221,149.54 248,000.00 1.100 1,826 1,204 1.101 11/17/2026 20825WAR1 1357 Connexus CU 12/23/2021 249,000.00 222,625.60 249,000.00 1.250 1,826 1,240 1.250 12/23/2026 89786MAF1 1368 True Sky FCU 02/04/2022 245,000.00 221,279.29 245,000.00 1.600 1,826 1,283 1.601 02/04/2027 02357QAQO 1372 Amerant Bank 02/14/2022 245,000.00 221,073.60 245,000.00 1.600 1,828 1,295 1.601 02/16/2027 07371AYE7 1370 Beal Bank TX 02/23/2022 245,000.00 223,674.59 245,000.00 1.900 1,820 1,296 1.901 02/17/2027 073710E88 1371 Beal Bank USA 02/23/2022 245,000.00 223,674.59 245,000.00 1.900 1,820 1,296 1.901 02/17/2027 59161YAP1 1373 Metro Credit Union 02/18/2022 249,000.00 225,645.71 249,000.00 1.700 1,826 1,297 1.701 02/18/2027 24773RCR4 1377 Delta Natl B&T 03/09/2022 245,000.00 224,550.10 245,000.00 2.000 1,814 1,304 2.001 02/25/2027 27004PCM3 1375 Eaglemark Savings 03/02/2022 245,000.00 224,296.45 245,000.00 2.000 1,826 1,309 2.001 03/02/2027 91139LAB2 1378 United Roosevelt Savings 03/11/2022 248,000.00 225,900.89 248,000.00 1.900 1,826 1,318 1.901 03/11/2027 064860MC0 1476 Bank of the Sierra 03/15/2023 244,000.00 244,648.31 244,000.00 4.600 1,461 1,322 4.604 03/15/2027 565819AG4 1379 Marathon Bnak 03/16/2022 248,000.00 224,978.05 248,000.00 1.800 1,826 1,323 1.801 03/16/2027 1086221NJ6 1479 Bridgewater Bank 03/29/2023 248,000.00 251,232.17 248,000.00 4.850 1,461 1,336 4.767 03/29/2027 20033A3A2 1386 Comenity Capital Bank 04/14/2022 248,000.00 232,054.88 248,000.00 2.650 1,826 1,352 2.652 04/14/2027 60425SKB4 1486 Minnwest Bank 05/01/2023 248,000.00 246,055.26 248,000.00 4.250 1,463 1,371 4.254 05/03/2027 397417AQ9 1419 Greenwoods State Bank 05/17/2022 248,000.00 235,631.45 248,000.00 3.050 1,826 1,385 3.052 05/17/2027 85279AAC6 1509 St Vincent Med Center FCU 06/16/2023 248,000.00 249,361.03 248,000.00 4.600 1,461 1,415 4.604 06/16/2027 38120MCA2 1511 Golden State Business Bank 06/22/2023 249,000.00 249,426.93 249,000.00 4.450 1,461 1,421 4.453 06/22/2027 472312AA5 1514 Jeep Country FCU 06/29/2023 248,000.00 250,701.09 248,000.00 4.700 1,461 1,428 4.704 06/29/2027 02589ADH2 1421 American Express, NB 08/29/2022 245,000.00 236,484.14 245,000.00 3.450 1,793 1,456 3.067 07/27/2027 88413QDN5 1420 Third Federal Savings and Loan 08/19/2022 245,000.00 235,116.44 245,000.00 3.300 1,826 1,479 3.302 08/19/2027 89789AAG2 1473 Truliant FCU 03/10/2023 248,000.00 250,969.40 248,000.00 4.700 1,645 1,501 4.707 09/10/2027 732329BD8 1425 Ponce Bank 09/15/2022 248,000.00 239,521.25 248,000.00 3.500 1,826 1,506 3.502 09/15/2027 052392BT3 1427 Austin Telco FCU 09/21/2022 248,000.00 242,658.90 248,000.00 3.800 1,826 1,512 3.770 09/21/2027 22258JAB7 1430 County Schools FCU 09/30/2022 248,000.00 248,413.65 248,000.00 4.400 1,826 1,521 4.325 09/30/2027 34520LAT0 1435 Forbright Bank 11/02/2022 248,000.00 250,387.30 248,000.00 4.600 1,826 1,554 4.602 11/02/2027 25460FDW3 1438 Direct FCU 11/07/2022 248,000.00 252,368.14 248,000.00 4.800 1,827 1,560 4.735 11/08/2027 914098DJ4 1442 University Bank 11/30/2022 249,000.00 247,734.87 249,000.00 4.200 1,826 1,582 4.202 11/30/2027 25844MAK4 1447 Dort Financial CU 12/16/2022 247,000.00 248,584.29 247,000.00 4.500 1,826 1,598 4.503 12/16/2027 01664MAB2 1448 All In FCU 12/20/2022 248,000.00 248,909.67 248,000.00 4.400 1,826 1,602 4.402 12/20/2027 51828MAC8 1449 Latino Comm. CU 12/21/2022 248,000.00 249,921.74 248,000.00 4.500 1,826 1,603 4.503 12/21/2027 45157PAZ3 1450 Ideal CU 12/29/2022 248,000.00 249,929.94 248,000.00 4.500 1,826 1,611 4.502 12/29/2027 01882MAC6 1451 Alliant CU 12/30/2022 247,000.00 253,986.35 247,000.00 5.000 1,826 1,612 5.003 12/30/2027 78472EAB0 1455 SPCO Credit Union 01/20/2023 249,000.00 249,567.92 249,000.00 4.350 1,826 1,633 4.352 01/20/2028 82671DAB3 1458 Signature FCU 01/31/2023 248,000.00 249,086.08 248,000.00 4.400 1,826 1,644 4.402 01/31/2028 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:20 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 94 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments July 31, 2023 Page 9 Corporate Notes Average Purchase Stated Days to YTM Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Term Maturity 365 Date Certificate of Deposits 02/26/2021 500,000.00 447,410.00 497,300.00 0.500 1,826 940 0.610 02/26/2026 931142EE9 1512 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc 79772FAG1 1459 San Francisco FCU 973,110.00 3.700 02/03/2023 248,000.00 248,413.76 248,000.00 4.350 1,826 1,647 4.352 02/03/2028 530520AH8 1466 Liberty First CU 1,197 02/21/2023 248,000.00 250,315.53 248,000.00 4.500 1,827 1,666 4.504 02/22/2028 09582YAF9 1467 Blue Ridge Bank SYS1058 02/28/2023 244,000.00 243,169.62 244,000.00 4.200 1,826 1,672 4.202 02/28/2028 011852AE0 1469 Alaska USA/Global FCU Subtotal and Average 1,548.81 03/08/2023 248,000.00 251,220.09 248,000.00 4.600 1,827 1,681 4.606 03/08/2028 92891CCZ3 1472 VystarCU 03/10/2023 248,000.00 250,695.07 248,000.00 4.550 1,827 1,683 4.555 03/10/2028 00833JAQ4 1478 Affinity Bank 03/17/2023 248,000.00 254,591.63 248,000.00 4.900 1,827 1,690 4.906 03/17/2028 724468AC7 1483 Pitney Bowes Bank 04/14/2023 244,000.00 244,717.51 244,000.00 4.350 1,826 1,717 4.355 04/13/2028 062119BT8 1492 Bank Five Nine 05/12/2023 248,000.00 247,846.50 248,000.00 4.250 1,827 1,746 4.255 05/12/2028 152577BN1 1493 Central Bank 05/12/2023 248,000.00 245,113.52 248,000.00 4.000 1,827 1,746 4.005 05/12/2028 23248UA63 1494 Cy -Fair FCU 05/12/2023 248,000.00 250,579.48 248,000.00 4.500 1,827 1,746 4.505 05/12/2028 91527PBY2 1495 Univest Bank & Trust 05/12/2023 248,000.00 248,939.69 248,000.00 4.350 1,827 1,746 4.355 05/12/2028 92834ABT2 1496 Vision Bank 05/12/2023 248,000.00 245,660.12 248,000.00 4.050 1,827 1,746 4.055 05/12/2028 12547CBJ6 1497 CIBC Bank USA 05/16/2023 244,000.00 244,893.64 244,000.00 4.350 1,827 1,750 4.355 05/16/2028 843383CS7 1498 Southern Bank Poplar MO 05/17/2023 248,000.00 247,473.72 248,000.00 4.200 1,827 1,751 4.205 05/17/2028 06610RCA5 1499 Bankers Bank 05/24/2023 248,000.00 247,085.86 248,000.00 4.150 1,827 1,758 4.155 05/24/2028 90352RDB8 1500 US Alliance FCU 05/26/2023 248,000.00 251,492.14 248,000.00 4.550 1,827 1,760 4.555 05/26/2028 23204HPB8 1507 Customers Bank 06/14/2023 244,000.00 246,718.06 244,000.00 4.500 1,827 1,779 4.505 06/14/2028 910286GN7 1513 United Fidelity Bank 06/29/2023 248,000.00 251,161.00 248,000.00 4.500 1,827 1,794 4.505 06/29/2028 31911 KAK4 1515 First Bank Elk River 06/30/2023 248,000.00 250,040.75 248,000.00 4.400 1,827 1,795 4.405 06/30/2028 05765LBU0 1520 Balboa Thrift and Loan 07/19/2023 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.400 1,827 1,814 4.405 07/19/2028 560507AQB 1522 Maine Savings FCU 07/21/2023 248,000.00 243,654.33 248,000.00 4.800 1,827 1,816 4.806 07/21/2028 91739JAB1 1523 Utah First FCU 07/21/2023 245,000.00 242,866.56 245,000.00 5.000 1,827 1,816 5.006 07/21/2028 Subtotal and Average 38,908,538.79 39,068,000.00 37,657,324.73 39,067,377.50 1,662 908 2.745 Corporate Notes 594918BQ6 1157 Microsoft Corporation 10/15/2018 400,000.00 399,768.00 378,360.00 2.000 1,758 7 3.222 08/08/2023 45950VPS9 1308 International Finance Corp. 02/26/2021 500,000.00 447,410.00 497,300.00 0.500 1,826 940 0.610 02/26/2026 931142EE9 1512 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc 06/26/2023 1,000,000.00 970,630.00 973,110.00 3.700 1,827 1,791 4.303 06/26/2028 Subtotal and Average 1,848,770.00 1,900,000.00 1,817,808.00 1,848,770.00 1,813 1,197 3.089 Money Market with Fiscal Agent SYS1058 1058 US Bank 07/01/2016 1,554.40 1,554.40 1,554.40 1 1 0.000 Subtotal and Average 1,548.81 1,554.40 1,554.40 1,554.40 1 1 0.000 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:20 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 95 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments July 31, 2023 Page 10 Average Purchase Stated Days to YTM Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Term Maturity 365 Date CERBT - OPEB Trust SYS1114 1114 CalPERS CERBT Plan 07/01/2023 1,855,123.49 1,855,123.49 1,855,123.49 1 1 0.000 Subtotal and Average 1,855,123.49 1,855,123.49 1,855,123.49 1,855,123.49 1 1 0.000 PARS Pension Trust SYS1230 1230 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:20 Pblc Agncy Rtrmnt Sery Subtotal and Average Total and Average 5,319,330.43 247,288,381.77 5,374,632.71 5,374,632.71 247,588,560.56 5,374,632.71 5,374,632.71 240,366,395.26 5,374,632.71 5,374,632.71 246,160,315.39 1 1 0.000 1 1 0.000 817 484 3.299 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 96 t(vQ�� GEM of the DESERT - City of La Quinta Total Earnings Sorted by Fund - Fund July 1, 2023 - July 31, 2023 City of La Quinta CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 98-33-434 1055 101 LAIF 34,256,152.68 34,065,011.99 34,256,152.68 3.305 3.593 103,959.52 0.00 0.00 103,959.52 SYS1059 1059 101 CITYPC 3,300.00 3,300.00 3,300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SYS1114 1114 101 CALPRS 1,855,123.49 0.00 1,855,123.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32110YLK9 1147 101 1STNBA 0.00 245,000.00 0.00 3.150 3.150 422.88 0.00 0.00 422.88 06426KAN8 1151 101 NWENGL 0.00 249,000.00 0.00 3.250 3.250 687.31 0.00 0.00 687.31 SYS 1153 1153 101 CAMP 29,440,727.72 49,242,189.95 29,440,727.72 5.310 4.747 198,537.77 0.00 0.00 198,537.77 474067AQ8 1154 101 JEFF 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.350 3.350 697.07 0.00 0.00 697.07 57116ARV2 1155 101 MARBUS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.300 3.300 695.08 0.00 0.00 695.08 594918BQ6 1157 101 MCRSFT 400,000.00 378,360.00 378,360.00 2.000 2.075 666.66 0.00 0.00 666.66 3133EJYL7 1158 101 FFCB 250,000.00 247,275.00 247,275.00 2.800 2.778 583.33 0.00 0.00 583.33 625925AR3 1160 101 MUNTRS 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.200 3.200 665.86 0.00 0.00 665.86 90348JEJ5 1161 101 UBS 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.350 3.350 697.08 0.00 0.00 697.08 20143PDV9 1162 101 COMMBK 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.400 3.400 716.14 0.00 0.00 716.14 67054NAN3 1164 101 NMRCA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.550 3.550 747.74 0.00 0.00 747.74 635573AL2 1170 101 NLCOOP 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.400 3.400 707.48 0.00 0.00 707.48 066851WJ1 1172 101 BARHAR 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.350 3.350 705.61 0.00 0.00 705.61 949763XY7 1174 101 WELLS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.000 3.000 631.89 0.00 0.00 631.89 3130AFW94 1177 101 FHLB 500,000.00 498,550.00 498,550.00 2.500 2.460 1,041.66 0.00 0.00 1,041.66 66736ABP3 1181 101 NRTHWS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.950 2.950 621.36 0.00 0.00 621.36 156634AK3 1184 101 CENTNX 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.500 2.500 526.57 0.00 0.00 526.57 48128HXU7 1185 101 JPMORG 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.250 3.250 676.27 0.00 0.00 676.27 46256YAZ2 1186 101 IOWAST 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 2.400 2.400 499.40 0.00 0.00 499.40 56065GAG3 1188 101 MAINST 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.600 2.600 547.64 0.00 0.00 547.64 72651LCL6 1195 101 PLAINS 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 2.550 2.550 530.61 0.00 0.00 530.61 299547AQ2 1196 101 EVNSCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.600 2.600 547.64 0.00 0.00 547.64 524661CB9 1197 101 LEGCY 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.400 2.400 505.51 0.00 0.00 505.51 176688CP2 1199 101 CTZNST 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.400 2.400 505.52 0.00 0.00 505.52 20416TAQ5 1202 101 COMMW 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.250 2.250 473.92 0.00 0.00 473.92 761402BY1 1203 101 REVER 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 2.300 2.300 482.50 0.00 0.00 482.50 02772JBD1 1205 101 AMRNTL 0.00 248,000.00 0.00 2.000 2.000 258.19 0.00 0.00 258.19 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:11 Portfolio CITY CP TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 97 City of La Quinta Total Earnings Page 2 July 1, 2023 - July 31, 2023 CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 3135GOV75 1206 101 FNMA 500,000.00 495,950.00 495,950.00 1.750 1.731 729.17 0.00 0.00 729.17 00257TBD7 1207 101 ABACUS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.950 1.950 410.73 0.00 0.00 410.73 51210SQU4 1208 101 LKSIDE 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.000 2.000 421.26 0.00 0.00 421.26 33625CCP2 1209 101 1STSEC 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.000 2.000 421.26 0.00 0.00 421.26 710571 DS6 1210 101 PEOPLE 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.000 2.000 421.26 0.00 0.00 421.26 3133EKWV4 1212 101 FFCB 500,000.00 499,500.00 499,500.00 1.850 1.817 770.83 0.00 0.00 770.83 740367HP5 1213 101 PREFRD 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 2.000 2.000 422.96 0.00 0.00 422.96 938828131-12 1215 101 WSHFED 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.000 2.000 421.26 0.00 0.00 421.26 33766LAJ7 1216 101 1STIER 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 1.950 1.950 412.38 0.00 0.00 412.38 912828T26 1217 101 USTR 500,000.00 499,300.00 499,300.00 1.375 1.373 582.31 0.00 0.00 582.31 75472RAD3 1218 101 RAYJAM 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 1.950 1.950 404.11 0.00 0.00 404.11 15118RRH2 1220 101 CELTIC 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.850 1.850 389.67 0.00 0.00 389.67 334342CD2 1221 101 1STNBS 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 1.850 1.850 391.24 0.00 0.00 391.24 336460CX6 1222 101 1STDQN 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.800 1.800 379.13 0.00 0.00 379.13 3133EKZK5 1223 101 FFCB 500,000.00 499,400.00 499,400.00 1.600 1.572 666.67 0.00 0.00 666.67 3133EKP75 1224 101 FFCB 500,000.00 498,750.00 498,750.00 1.600 1.574 666.67 0.00 0.00 666.67 06652CHB0 1227 101 BNKWST 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.700 1.700 358.07 0.00 0.00 358.07 059731851 1228 101 BOTW 4,240,490.61 6,155,663.56 4,240,490.61 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 SYS1230 1230 101 PARS 5,374,632.71 5,317,487.02 5,374,632.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33640VDD7 1231 101 1STSER 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.700 1.700 358.07 0.00 0.00 358.07 3133EK4X1 1234 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 996,900.00 996,900.00 1.600 1.575 1,333.33 0.00 0.00 1,333.33 804375DL4 1235 101 SAUKVL 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.700 1.700 358.07 0.00 0.00 358.07 61760A3B3 1236 101 MSPRIV 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.900 1.900 395.36 0.00 0.00 395.36 61690UNX4 1237 101 MORGST 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.950 1.950 405.76 0.00 0.00 405.76 538036GV0 1238 101 LIVEOK 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.800 1.800 379.13 0.00 0.00 379.13 912828YV6 1241 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 989,687.50 989,687.50 1.500 1.511 1,270.49 0.00 0.00 1,270.49 3133ELEA8 1242 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 998,600.00 998,600.00 1.700 1.670 1,416.67 0.00 0.00 1,416.67 3133ELNE0 1246 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 999,000.00 999,000.00 1.430 1.404 1,191.67 0.00 0.00 1,191.67 35637RDC8 1248 101 FRDMFI 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.550 1.550 326.48 0.00 0.00 326.48 90983WBT7 1249 101 UNTDCM 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.650 1.650 347.54 0.00 0.00 347.54 32114VBT3 1250 101 1STNMI 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.650 1.650 347.54 0.00 0.00 347.54 77579ADF0 1251 101 RLLSTN 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.650 1.650 343.34 0.00 0.00 343.34 17286TAG0 1252 101 CITADL 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.650 1.650 347.54 0.00 0.00 347.54 029728BC5 1255 101 AMERST 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.600 1.600 337.01 0.00 0.00 337.01 00435J131-15 1256 101 ACCSS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.600 1.600 337.01 0.00 0.00 337.01 849430BF9 1257 101 SPRING 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.500 1.500 315.94 0.00 0.00 315.94 05465DAE8 1258 101 AXOS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.650 1.650 347.54 0.00 0.00 347.54 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:11 Portfolio CITY CP TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 98 City of La Quinta Total Earnings Page 3 July 1, 2023 - July 31, 2023 CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 882213AB7 1260 101 TEXAS 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.100 1.100 228.89 0.00 0.00 228.89 89579NCD3 1262 101 TRIAD 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.350 1.350 284.35 0.00 0.00 284.35 654062JZ2 1266 101 NCOLET 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.400 1.400 294.88 0.00 0.00 294.88 020080BX4 1267 101 ALMABK 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.400 1.400 294.88 0.00 0.00 294.88 2027506M2 1268 101 CMWBUS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.250 1.250 263.29 0.00 0.00 263.29 69506YRH4 1269 101 PACWST 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.300 1.300 270.50 0.00 0.00 270.50 08016PDQ9 1270 101 BELB&T 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.250 1.250 263.29 0.00 0.00 263.29 14042TDD6 1271 101 CAPONE 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.600 1.600 332.93 0.00 0.00 332.93 472382AQ3 1272 101 THEJEF 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.250 1.250 263.28 0.00 0.00 263.28 32027BALl 1273 101 1STFDM 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 1.200 1.200 253.77 0.00 0.00 253.77 32112UDR9 1274 101 1STMCG 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.350 1.350 284.35 0.00 0.00 284.35 33847E3A3 1276 101 FLGSTR 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.250 1.250 263.28 0.00 0.00 263.28 95960NKD8 1277 101 WSTRNS 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.000 1.000 208.09 0.00 0.00 208.09 32056GDJ6 1278 101 1STINT 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.000 1.000 210.63 0.00 0.00 210.63 3134GVYG7 1279 101 FHLMC 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.625 0.613 520.83 0.00 0.00 520.83 3133ELH23 1280 101 FFCB 500,000.00 499,850.00 499,850.00 0.500 0.491 208.33 0.00 0.00 208.33 3130AJKW8 1281 101 FHLB 500,000.00 499,850.00 499,850.00 0.500 0.491 208.33 0.00 0.00 208.33 3133ELH80 1282 101 FFCB 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.680 0.667 283.34 0.00 0.00 283.34 3130AJRP6 1283 101 FHLB 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 0.680 0.667 170.00 0.00 0.00 170.00 169894AS1 1284 101 CHIPVA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.600 0.600 126.38 0.00 0.00 126.38 84223QAN7 1286 101 STHRNB 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.500 0.500 105.32 0.00 0.00 105.32 064520BG3 1287 101 BKPRNC 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.500 0.500 105.32 0.00 0.00 105.32 3135G05S8 1288 101 FNMA 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.500 0.491 208.33 0.00 0.00 208.33 3136G4N74 1289 101 FNMA 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.560 0.549 466.67 0.00 0.00 466.67 3136G4M75 1290 101 FNMA 500,000.00 499,750.00 499,750.00 0.520 0.510 216.66 0.00 0.00 216.66 3135G06E8 1291 101 FNMA 500,000.00 499,250.00 499,250.00 0.420 0.413 175.00 0.00 0.00 175.00 3135GA2Z3 1292 101 FNMA 500,000.00 499,250.00 499,250.00 0.560 0.550 233.34 0.00 0.00 233.34 SYS1293 1293 101 BNY 506,572.95 273,521.42 506,572.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3137EAEU9 1297 101 FHLMC 1,000,000.00 997,300.00 997,300.00 0.375 0.369 312.50 0.00 0.00 312.50 3130AKFA9 1298 101 FHLB 500,000.00 497,400.00 497,400.00 0.375 0.370 156.25 0.00 0.00 156.25 3135GA7137 1299 101 FNMA 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.600 0.589 250.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 3135GAAW1 1300 101 FNMA 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.400 0.392 166.66 0.00 0.00 166.66 3134GXGZ1 1301 101 FHLMC 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.550 0.540 229.17 0.00 0.00 229.17 3130AKMZ6 1302 101 FHLB 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.510 0.500 212.50 0.00 0.00 212.50 91282CBC4 1303 101 USTR 500,000.00 498,632.81 498,632.81 0.375 0.373 157.94 0.00 0.00 157.94 3130AKN28 1304 101 FHLB 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.550 0.540 229.17 0.00 0.00 229.17 51507LCC6 1305 101 LNDMRK 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.500 0.500 105.32 0.00 0.00 105.32 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:11 Portfolio CITY CP TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 99 City of La Quinta Total Earnings Page 4 July 1, 2023 - July 31, 2023 CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 87270LDL4 1306 101 EVRBA 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 0.500 0.500 104.04 0.00 0.00 104.04 3137EAEX3 1307 101 FHLMC 500,000.00 495,999.50 495,999.50 0.375 0.371 156.25 0.00 0.00 156.25 45950VPS9 1308 101 IFC 500,000.00 497,300.00 497,300.00 0.500 0.507 214.09 0.00 0.00 214.09 91282CBH3 1309 101 USTR 500,000.00 495,100.00 495,100.00 0.375 0.382 160.49 0.00 0.00 160.49 3137EAEX3 1310 101 FHLMC 1,000,000.00 983,940.00 983,940.00 0.375 0.374 312.50 0.00 0.00 312.50 91282CAT8 1311 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 977,500.00 977,500.00 0.250 0.254 210.59 0.00 0.00 210.59 3130ALV92 1312 101 FHLB 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 1.050 1.030 437.50 0.00 0.00 437.50 39573LBC1 1313 101 GRNST 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 0.950 0.950 200.91 0.00 0.00 200.91 89235MKY6 1314 101 TOYFSB 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 0.900 0.900 187.27 0.00 0.00 187.27 91282CAZ4 1315 101 USTR 500,000.00 492,187.50 492,187.50 0.375 0.380 158.81 0.00 0.00 158.81 14622LAA0 1316 101 CARTER 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.750 0.750 157.97 0.00 0.00 157.97 31617CAV5 1317 101 FIDHMS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.700 0.700 147.44 0.00 0.00 147.44 SYS1318 1318 101 DPME 784,424.96 773,523.40 784,424.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 91282CBQ3 1319 101 USTR 500,000.00 494,165.00 494,165.00 0.500 0.502 210.60 0.00 0.00 210.60 91282CBT7 1320 101 USTR 500,000.00 499,525.00 499,525.00 0.750 0.749 317.63 0.00 0.00 317.63 91282CCF6 1321 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 997,060.00 997,060.00 0.750 0.750 635.24 0.00 0.00 635.24 91282CBT7 1322 101 USTR 500,000.00 498,450.00 498,450.00 0.750 0.750 317.63 0.00 0.00 317.63 91282CCF6 1323 101 USTR 500,000.00 497,095.00 497,095.00 0.750 0.752 317.63 0.00 0.00 317.63 3130AMFS6 1324 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 993,420.00 993,420.00 0.750 0.741 625.00 0.00 0.00 625.00 92559TAH 1325 101 VIBRNT 249,000.00 248,377.50 248,377.50 0.800 0.802 169.18 0.00 0.00 169.18 38149MXK4 1326 101 GLDMAN 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.000 1.000 210.63 0.00 0.00 210.63 795451AF0 1327 101 SALMAE 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.000 1.000 210.63 0.00 0.00 210.63 89388CEYO 1328 101 TABBK 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.400 0.400 84.25 0.00 0.00 84.25 06417NZQ9 1329 101 BKOZK 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.400 0.400 84.25 0.00 0.00 84.25 3133EM2C5 1330 101 FFCB 500,000.00 498,000.00 498,000.00 0.710 0.699 295.83 0.00 0.00 295.83 70962LAF9 1331 101 PENTGN 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 0.700 0.700 148.04 0.00 0.00 148.04 87165ET98 1332 101 SYNCHR 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 0.900 0.900 187.27 0.00 0.00 187.27 05580AD50 1333 101 BMW 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 0.650 0.650 135.25 0.00 0.00 135.25 20786ADL6 1334 101 CONNEC 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.800 0.800 168.51 0.00 0.00 168.51 91282CCP4 1335 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 983,750.00 983,750.00 0.625 0.640 534.94 0.00 0.00 534.94 91282CCW9 1336 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 988,500.00 988,500.00 0.750 0.753 631.80 0.00 0.00 631.80 3130APBM6 1337 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 999,000.00 999,000.00 1.000 0.982 833.33 0.00 0.00 833.33 3133EM4X7 1338 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 991,080.00 991,080.00 0.800 0.792 666.66 0.00 0.00 666.66 3130APB46 1339 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 998,250.00 998,250.00 0.950 0.934 791.67 0.00 0.00 791.67 91282CCN9 1341 101 USTR 0.00 497,792.97 0.00 0.125 5.521 51.80 0.00 2,207.03 2,258.83 91282CBEO 1342 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 991,000.00 991,000.00 0.125 0.126 106.08 0.00 0.00 106.08 91282CDB4 1343 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 996,320.00 996,320.00 0.625 0.626 529.37 0.00 0.00 529.37 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:11 Portfolio CITY CP TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 100 City of La Quinta Total Earnings Page 5 July 1, 2023 - July 31, 2023 CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 3133ENCQ1 1344 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1.270 1.246 1,058.33 0.00 0.00 1,058.33 59013KPNO 1345 101 MRRCK 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 1.100 1.100 232.63 0.00 0.00 232.63 14042RQBO 1346 101 CAP1NA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.100 1.100 231.69 0.00 0.00 231.69 3130APTV7 1347 101 FHLB 500,000.00 499,500.00 499,500.00 0.700 0.688 291.67 0.00 0.00 291.67 91282CBA8 1351 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 990,000.00 990,000.00 0.125 0.126 105.88 0.00 0.00 105.88 91282CBR1 1352 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 989,800.00 989,800.00 0.250 0.251 210.59 0.00 0.00 210.59 3130AP2U8 1353 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 987,100.00 987,100.00 0.550 0.547 458.34 0.00 0.00 458.34 3135G06G3 1354 101 FNMA 1,000,000.00 976,300.00 976,300.00 0.500 0.503 416.67 0.00 0.00 416.67 3133ENGN4 1355 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.970 0.952 808.33 0.00 0.00 808.33 501798RP9 1356 101 LCA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.000 1.000 210.63 0.00 0.00 210.63 20825WAR1 1357 101 CNNXS 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 1.250 1.250 264.35 0.00 0.00 264.35 313OAQF65 1358 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 999,750.00 999,750.00 1.250 1.227 1,041.67 0.00 0.00 1,041.67 3134GW6C5 1359 101 FHLMC 500,000.00 486,000.00 486,000.00 0.800 0.808 333.33 0.00 0.00 333.33 91282CBV2 1360 101 USTR 500,000.00 494,882.81 494,882.81 0.375 0.378 158.81 0.00 0.00 158.81 3137EAEU9 1361 101 FHLMC 500,000.00 487,090.00 487,090.00 0.375 0.378 156.25 0.00 0.00 156.25 3134GW5R3 1362 101 FHLMC 400,000.00 391,360.00 391,360.00 0.650 0.652 216.67 0.00 0.00 216.67 307811 DF3 1363 101 FARMER 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 0.900 0.900 190.33 0.00 0.00 190.33 3130AQJR5 1364 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1.500 1.472 1,250.00 0.00 0.00 1,250.00 3135G03U5 1365 101 FNMA 500,000.00 487,790.00 487,790.00 0.625 0.629 260.42 0.00 0.00 260.42 3134GWUQ7 1366 101 FHLMC 1,000,000.00 945,570.00 945,570.00 0.700 0.726 583.34 0.00 0.00 583.34 3130AQSA2 1367 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1.830 1.796 1,525.00 0.00 0.00 1,525.00 89786MAF1 1368 101 TRUSKY 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.600 1.600 332.93 0.00 0.00 332.93 912828Z78 1369 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 986,700.00 986,700.00 1.500 1.532 1,283.85 0.00 0.00 1,283.85 07371AYE7 1370 101 BEALTX 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.900 1.900 395.35 0.00 0.00 395.35 073710E88 1371 101 BEALUS 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.900 1.900 395.35 0.00 0.00 395.35 02357QAQO 1372 101 AMRNT 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.600 1.600 332.93 0.00 0.00 332.93 59161YAP1 1373 101 METRO 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 1.700 1.700 359.52 0.00 0.00 359.52 3130AQWY5 1374 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1.700 1.668 1,416.67 0.00 0.00 1,416.67 27004PCM3 1375 101 EGLMRK 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 2.000 2.000 416.16 0.00 0.00 416.16 64034KAZ4 1376 101 NELNET 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.800 1.800 374.55 0.00 0.00 374.55 24773RCR4 1377 101 DELTA 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 2.000 2.000 416.17 0.00 0.00 416.17 91139LAB2 1378 101 URSVLT 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.900 1.900 400.20 0.00 0.00 400.20 565819AG4 1379 101 MRTHON 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.800 1.800 379.13 0.00 0.00 379.13 91282CCW9 1380 101 USTR 500,000.00 466,454.17 466,454.17 0.750 0.797 315.89 0.00 0.00 315.89 91282CDG3 1381 101 USTR 500,000.00 473,396.82 473,396.82 1.125 1.179 473.85 0.00 0.00 473.85 91282CBQ3 1382 101 USTR 750,000.00 698,025.00 698,025.00 0.500 0.533 315.89 0.00 0.00 315.89 9128286S4 1383 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 999,010.00 999,010.00 2.375 2.358 2,000.68 0.00 0.00 2,000.68 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:11 Portfolio CITY CP TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 101 City of La Quinta Total Earnings Page 6 July 1, 2023 - July 31, 2023 CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 50625LAW3 1384 101 LFYTT 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.050 2.050 431.79 0.00 0.00 431.79 3130ARGJ4 1385 101 FHLB 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 2.500 2.453 1,041.67 0.00 0.00 1,041.67 20033A3A2 1386 101 CCBA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.650 2.650 558.16 0.00 0.00 558.16 3130ARGY1 1387 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2.700 2.649 2,250.00 0.00 0.00 2,250.00 02007GPX5 1388 101 ALLY 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 2.550 2.550 530.61 0.00 0.00 530.61 52168UHY1 1389 101 LEADR 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 2.550 2.550 530.61 0.00 0.00 530.61 9128283DO 1390 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 985,190.00 985,190.00 2.250 2.265 1,895.38 0.00 0.00 1,895.38 91282CEF4 1391 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 976,860.00 976,860.00 2.500 2.552 2,117.49 0.00 0.00 2,117.49 254673E69 1392 101 DISCOV 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.100 3.100 645.06 0.00 0.00 645.06 48115LAD6 1396 101 JOVIA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.500 2.500 526.57 0.00 0.00 526.57 912828X88 1397 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 969,687.50 969,687.50 2.375 2.429 2,000.68 0.00 0.00 2,000.68 91282CEN7 1398 101 USTR 500,000.00 495,000.00 495,000.00 2.750 2.755 1,158.28 0.00 0.00 1,158.28 91282CET4 1399 101 USTR 500,000.00 491,842.18 491,842.18 2.625 2.661 1,111.68 0.00 0.00 1,111.68 91282821J3 1400 101 USTR 500,000.00 490,850.00 490,850.00 1.875 1.894 789.74 0.00 0.00 789.74 3133ENYH7 1401 101 FFCB 500,000.00 499,080.00 499,080.00 2.625 2.580 1,093.75 0.00 0.00 1,093.75 3130ASDV8 1409 101 FHLB 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 3.300 3.238 825.00 0.00 0.00 825.00 89269FDP7 1415 101 TRADCP 246,000.00 246,000.00 246,000.00 3.000 3.000 626.79 0.00 0.00 626.79 91282CFB2 1417 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 989,460.00 989,460.00 2.750 2.801 2,353.74 0.00 0.00 2,353.74 912828XT2 1418 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 985,240.00 985,240.00 2.000 2.024 1,693.99 0.00 0.00 1,693.99 397417AQ9 1419 101 GRNWDS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.050 3.050 642.43 0.00 0.00 642.43 88413QDN5 1420 101 3RD 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.300 3.300 686.67 0.00 0.00 686.67 02589ADH2 1421 101 AMEXNB 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.450 3.450 717.89 0.00 0.00 717.89 91282CFB2 1422 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 979,645.67 979,645.67 2.750 2.829 2,353.74 0.00 0.00 2,353.74 732329BD8 1425 101 PONCE 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.500 3.500 737.21 0.00 0.00 737.21 3133ENL99 1426 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 997,492.55 997,492.55 3.375 3.320 2,812.50 0.00 0.00 2,812.50 052392BT3 1427 101 AUSTEL 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.800 3.800 800.39 0.00 0.00 800.39 914242AAO 1429 101 UNIVCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.000 4.000 842.52 0.00 0.00 842.52 22258JAB7 1430 101 CNTYSC 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.400 4.400 926.78 0.00 0.00 926.78 3133ENQ29 1433 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 996,400.00 996,400.00 4.000 3.939 3,333.34 0.00 0.00 3,333.34 84229LBA9 1434 101 STHBNK 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 4.250 4.250 880.74 0.00 0.00 880.74 34520LATO 1435 101 FORBRT 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.600 4.600 968.90 0.00 0.00 968.90 25460FDW3 1438 101 DIRFCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.800 4.800 1,011.03 0.00 0.00 1,011.03 9128282RO 1439 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 927,110.00 927,110.00 2.250 2.447 1,926.79 0.00 0.00 1,926.79 3133EN31-11 1441 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 998,650.00 998,650.00 4.000 3.930 3,333.33 0.00 0.00 3,333.33 914098DJ4 1442 101 UNIVBK 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 4.200 4.200 888.21 0.00 0.00 888.21 3133EN3S7 1446 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 998,000.00 998,000.00 3.750 3.687 3,125.00 0.00 0.00 3,125.00 25844MAK4 1447 101 DORTCU 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 4.500 4.500 944.01 0.00 0.00 944.01 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:11 Portfolio CITY CP TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 102 City of La Quinta Total Earnings Page 7 July 1, 2023 - July 31, 2023 CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 01664MAB2 1448 101 ALL IN 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.400 4.400 926.77 0.00 0.00 926.77 51828MAC8 1449 101 LATCOM 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.500 4.500 947.83 0.00 0.00 947.83 45157PAZ3 1450 101 IDEAL 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.500 4.500 947.84 0.00 0.00 947.84 01882MAC6 1451 101 ALIANT 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 5.000 5.000 1,048.91 0.00 0.00 1,048.91 80865MA133 1454 101 SCIENT 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.650 4.650 979.43 0.00 0.00 979.43 78472EABO 1455 101 SPCOCU 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 4.350 4.350 919.94 0.00 0.00 919.94 91282CFH9 1456 101 USTR 500,000.00 489,175.00 489,175.00 3.125 3.168 1,316.23 0.00 0.00 1,316.23 300185LM5 1457 101 EVRGRN 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.850 3.850 810.93 0.00 0.00 810.93 82671DAB3 1458 101 SIGFCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.400 4.400 926.77 0.00 0.00 926.77 79772FAG1 1459 101 SF FCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.350 4.350 916.24 0.00 0.00 916.24 91282CGH8 1460 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 996,369.14 996,369.14 3.500 3.540 2,995.66 0.00 0.00 2,995.66 9128284X5 1462 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 988,900.00 988,900.00 2.750 2.758 2,316.57 0.00 0.00 2,316.57 912796Y37 1463 101 USTR 2,000,000.00 1,954,412.92 1,954,412.92 4.636 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133EPAV7 1464 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 995,400.00 995,400.00 3.875 3.820 3,229.16 0.00 0.00 3,229.16 91282CEW7 1465 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 967,220.00 967,220.00 3.250 3.333 2,737.77 0.00 0.00 2,737.77 530520AH8 1466 101 LBRTY1 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.500 4.500 947.84 0.00 0.00 947.84 09582YAF9 1467 101 BLURDG 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 4.200 4.200 870.38 0.00 0.00 870.38 912797FR3 1468 101 USTR 0.00 2,951,790.00 0.00 4.821 149.034 0.00 0.00 48,210.00 48,210.00 011852AEO 1469 101 ALASKA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.600 4.600 968.90 0.00 0.00 968.90 912796YH6 1470 101 USTR 2,000,000.00 1,950,283.66 1,950,283.66 4.917 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 912796Z51 1471 101 USTR 3,000,000.00 2,927,220.00 2,927,220.00 4.991 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 92891CCZ3 1472 101 VYSTAR 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.550 4.550 958.37 0.00 0.00 958.37 89789AAG2 1473 101 TRUFCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.700 4.700 989.96 0.00 0.00 989.96 59524LAA4 1474 101 MIDCAR 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.850 4.850 1,021.55 0.00 0.00 1,021.55 49306SJ56 1475 101 KEYBNK 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 5.000 5.000 1,036.17 0.00 0.00 1,036.17 064860MCO 1476 101 BKSIER 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 4.600 4.600 953.27 0.00 0.00 953.27 909557KQ2 1477 101 UNBKRS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 5.000 5.000 1,053.15 0.00 0.00 1,053.15 00833JAQ4 1478 101 AFFNTY 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.900 4.900 1,032.09 0.00 0.00 1,032.09 108622NJ6 1479 101 BRIDWA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.850 4.850 1,021.56 0.00 0.00 1,021.56 3135GAGA3 1480 101 FNMA 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.200 5.102 8,666.67 0.00 0.00 8,666.67 912797GF8 1481 101 USTR 2,000,000.00 1,968,951.36 1,968,951.36 4.696 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3135GAGK1 1482 101 FNMA 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 5.050 4.955 12,625.00 0.00 0.00 12,625.00 724468AC7 1483 101 PITBOW 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 4.350 4.350 901.46 0.00 0.00 901.46 3134GYPJ5 1484 101 FHLMC 1,000,000.00 999,100.00 999,100.00 5.200 5.107 4,333.33 0.00 0.00 4,333.33 62384RAT3 1485 101 MTNAMR 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.700 4.700 989.96 0.00 0.00 989.96 60425SKB4 1486 101 MINWST 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.250 4.250 895.18 0.00 0.00 895.18 912796YTO 1487 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 975,854.17 975,854.17 4.750 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:11 Portfolio CITY CP TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 103 City of La Quinta Total Earnings Page 8 July 1, 2023 - July 31, 2023 CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 912797FAO 1488 101 USTR 3,000,000.00 2,935,470.00 2,935,470.00 4.780 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 912797GJO 1489 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 984,010.00 984,010.00 4.878 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 313384LP2 1490 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 982,351.39 982,351.39 4.850 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35089LAFO 1491 101 FRPNTS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.550 4.550 958.37 0.00 0.00 958.37 062119BT8 1492 101 BANK59 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.250 4.250 895.18 0.00 0.00 895.18 152577BN1 1493 101 CENTRL 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.000 4.000 842.52 0.00 0.00 842.52 23248UAB3 1494 101 CYFAIR 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.500 4.500 947.83 0.00 0.00 947.83 91527PBY2 1495 101 UNIVST 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.350 4.350 916.24 0.00 0.00 916.24 92834ABT2 1496 101 VISION 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.050 4.050 853.05 0.00 0.00 853.05 12547CBJ6 1497 101 CIBCBK 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 4.350 4.350 901.46 0.00 0.00 901.46 843383CS7 1498 101 SBPOPM 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.200 4.200 884.65 0.00 0.00 884.65 06610RCA5 1499 101 BANKRS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.150 4.150 874.12 0.00 0.00 874.12 90352RDB8 1500 101 USAFCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.550 4.550 958.37 0.00 0.00 958.37 87868YAQ6 1501 101 TECHCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 5.000 5.000 1,053.15 0.00 0.00 1,053.15 912797FL6 1502 101 USTR 4,000,000.00 3,898,126.67 3,898,126.67 5.180 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133EPME2 1505 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 998,190.00 998,190.00 3.875 3.809 3,229.17 0.00 0.00 3,229.17 16141BAC5 1506 101 CHRTWY 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.900 4.900 1,032.09 0.00 0.00 1,032.09 23204HPB8 1507 101 CUST 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 4.500 4.500 932.54 0.00 0.00 932.54 91282CGT2 1508 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 984,600.00 984,600.00 3.625 3.672 3,070.36 0.00 0.00 3,070.36 85279AAC6 1509 101 STVINC 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.600 4.600 968.89 0.00 0.00 968.89 01025RAG4 1510 101 ALABAM 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 5.000 5.000 1,053.15 0.00 0.00 1,053.15 38120MCA2 1511 101 GLDNST 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 4.450 4.450 941.09 0.00 0.00 941.09 931142EE9 1512 101 WALMRT 1,000,000.00 973,110.00 973,110.00 3.700 3.731 3,083.33 0.00 0.00 3,083.33 910286GN7 1513 101 UNTFDL 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.500 4.500 947.83 0.00 0.00 947.83 472312AA5 1514 101 JEEPCO 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.700 4.700 989.97 0.00 0.00 989.97 31911KAK4 1515 101 1STELK 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.400 4.400 926.78 0.00 0.00 926.78 912828V80 1516 101 USTR 2,000,000.00 1,964,400.00 1,964,400.00 2.250 2.309 3,851.56 0.00 0.00 3,851.56 912796ZN2 1517 101 USTR 3,000,000.00 2,920,963.32 2,920,963.32 5.240 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 912828666 1518 101 USTR 2,000,000.00 0.00 1,969,580.00 2.750 2.816 3,038.68 0.00 0.00 3,038.68 91282CDVO 1519 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 0.00 975,600.00 0.875 0.904 483.03 0.00 0.00 483.03 05765LBUO 1520 101 BALBOA 248,000.00 0.00 248,000.00 4.400 4.400 358.75 0.00 0.00 358.75 6067-001TERM 1521 101 CAMP 20,000,000.00 0.00 20,000,000.00 5.645 5.644 24,743.01 0.00 0.00 24,743.01 560507AQ8 1522 101 MAINE 248,000.00 0.00 248,000.00 4.800 4.800 326.14 0.00 0.00 326.14 91739JAB1 1523 101 UTH1ST 245,000.00 0.00 245,000.00 5.000 5.000 335.62 0.00 0.00 335.62 91282CGT2 1524 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 990,000.00 990,000.00 3.625 3.652 3,070.36 0.00 0.00 3,070.36 91282CHA2 1525 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 985,000.00 985,000.00 3.500 3.524 2,948.37 0.00 0.00 2,948.37 30960QAR8 1526 101 FARMIG 248,000.00 0.00 248,000.00 5.400 5.400 183.45 0.00 0.00 183.45 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:11 Portfolio CITY CP TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 104 City of La Quinta Total 247,588,560.56 244,727,903.32 246,160,315.39 2.851 557,920.95 0.00 50,417.03 608,337.98 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:11 TE (PRF TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 105 Total Earnings Page 9 July 1, 2023 - July 31, 2023 Adjusted Interest Earnings Ending Beginning Ending Current Annualized Interest Amortization/ Realized Adjusted Interest CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Par Value Book Value Book Value Rate Yield Earned Accretion Gainl/Loss Earnings Fund: General Fund 3133EPQDO 1527 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 0.00 998,655.69 4.250 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Subtotal 245,429,425.12 242,629,199.45 244,001,179.95 2.846 551,651.06 0.00 50,417.03 602,068.09 Fund: Fiscal Agent SYS1058 1058 231 USBANK 1,554.40 1,548.62 1,554.40 4.395 5.78 0.00 0.00 5.78 Subtotal 1,554.40 1,548.62 1,554.40 4.395 5.78 0.00 0.00 5.78 Fund: Housing Authority: WSA and LQ SYS1062 1062 241 LQPR 91,546.48 47,215.59 91,546.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Subtotal 91,546.48 47,215.59 91,546.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fund: SA Low/Mod Bond Fund 25-33-005 1113 249 LAIF 2,066,034.56 2,049,939.66 2,066,034.56 3.305 3.598 6,264.11 0.00 0.00 6,264.11 Subtotal 2,066,034.56 2,049,939.66 2,066,034.56 3.598 6,264.11 0.00 0.00 6,264.11 Total 247,588,560.56 244,727,903.32 246,160,315.39 2.851 557,920.95 0.00 50,417.03 608,337.98 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:11 TE (PRF TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 105 GEM of rhe DESERT City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary August 31, 2023 City of La Quinta 249,690,346.28 242,245,853.87 248,373,924.96 100.00% 812 474 3.033 Investments Total Earnings August 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 766,932.54 1,375,270.52 Average Daily Balance 245,791,126.67 246,539,754.22 Effective Rate of Return 3.67% 3.28% 1 certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code and the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months. The City of La Quinta used the monthly account statements issued by our financial institutions to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. Digitally signed by Claudia Martinez Date: 2023.12.0410:51:30 -0800, 12/4/2023 Claudia Martinez, Finance Director/City Treasurer Reporting period 08/01/2023-08/31/2023 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 17:55 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF—PMI) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 106 Par Market Book % of Days to YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 365 Equiv. Bank Accounts 12,306,569.93 12,306,569.93 12,306,569.93 4.95 1 1 0.000 CAMP TERM 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 8.05 263 224 5.645 Local Agency Investment Fund -City 19,256,152.68 18,739,335.32 19,256,152.68 7.75 1 1 3.434 Local Agency Invstmnt Fund -Housing 2,066,034.56 2,034,933.90 2,066,034.56 0.83 1 1 3.434 Money Market Accounts - CAMP 29,578,723.61 29,578,723.61 29,578,723.61 11.91 1 1 5.520 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 50,250,000.00 47,334,836.50 50,001,212.74 20.13 1,536 869 2.206 Federal Agency Discount 1,000,000.00 998,580.00 982,351.39 0.40 131 10 5.075 Treasury Coupon Securities 39,250,000.00 37,245,587.50 38,549,529.23 15.52 1,272 815 2.794 Treasury Discount Notes 13,000,000.00 12,869,500.00 12,680,697.82 5.11 176 68 5.299 Certificate of Deposits 39,320,000.00 37,562,836.61 39,319,377.50 15.83 1,666 894 2.777 Corporate Notes 1,500,000.00 1,412,085.00 1,470,410.00 0.59 1,827 1,472 3.054 Money Market with Fiscal Agent 15,000,443.22 15,000,443.22 15,000,443.22 6.04 1 1 0.000 CERBT - OPEB Trust 1,855,123.49 1,855,123.49 1,855,123.49 0.75 1 1 0.000 PARS Pension Trust 5,307,298.79 5,307,298.79 5,307,298.79 2.14 1 1 0.000 249,690,346.28 242,245,853.87 248,373,924.96 100.00% 812 474 3.033 Investments Total Earnings August 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 766,932.54 1,375,270.52 Average Daily Balance 245,791,126.67 246,539,754.22 Effective Rate of Return 3.67% 3.28% 1 certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code and the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months. The City of La Quinta used the monthly account statements issued by our financial institutions to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. Digitally signed by Claudia Martinez Date: 2023.12.0410:51:30 -0800, 12/4/2023 Claudia Martinez, Finance Director/City Treasurer Reporting period 08/01/2023-08/31/2023 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 17:55 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF—PMI) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 106 City of La Quinta CAMP TERM 6067-001TERM 1521 California Asset Management Pr 07/24/2023 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 5.645 263 224 5.645 04/12/2024 Subtotal and Average 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 263 224 5.645 Local Agency Investment Fund -City 98-33-434 1055 Local Agency Inv Fund 19,256,152.68 18,739,335.32 19,256,152.68 3.434 1 1 3.434 Subtotal and Average 29,901,313.97 19,256,152.68 18,739,335.32 19,256,152.68 1 1 3.434 Local Agency Invstmnt Fund -Housing 25-33-005 1113 Local Agency Inv Fund 2,066,034.56 2,034,933.90 2,066,034.56 3.434 1 1 3.434 Subtotal and Average 2,066,034.56 2,066,034.56 2,034,933.90 2,066,034.56 1 1 3.434 Money Market Accounts - CAMP SYS1153 1153 California Asset Management Pr 09/26/2018 29,578,723.61 29,578,723.61 29,578,723.61 5.520 1 1 5.520 Subtotal and Average 29,445,179.20 29,578,723.61 29,578,723.61 29,578,723.61 1 1 5.520 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 250,000.00 3133EJYL7 1158 Portfolio Management 3133EKWV4 1212 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3133EKP75 Page 1 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3133EK4X1 1234 Federal Farm Credit Bank Portfolio Details - Investments 1242 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3133ELNEO 1246 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3133ELH23 1280 Federal Farm Credit Bank August 31, 2023 1282 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3133EM2C5 1330 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3133EM4X7 1338 Federal Farm Credit Bank Average Purchase Federal Farm Credit Bank Stated Days to YTM Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Term Maturity 365 Date Bank Accounts 0.710 1,826 1,074 0.792 08/10/2026 991,080.00 0.800 1,808 1,105 SYS1293 1293 Bank of New York 1.270 09/01/2020 5,208,376.49 5,208,376.49 5,208,376.49 1 1 0.000 059731851 1228 Bank of the West 08/20/2019 6,165,882.61 6,165,882.61 6,165,882.61 1 1 0.000 SYS1059 1059 City Petty Cash PM (PRF_PM2) 07/01/2016 3,300.00 3,300.00 3,300.00 1 1 0.000 SYS1318 1318 Dune Palms Mobile Estates 03/09/2021 812,836.67 812,836.67 812,836.67 1 1 0.000 SYS1062 1062 La Quinta Palms Realty 07/01/2016 116,174.16 116,174.16 116,174.16 1 1 0.000 Subtotal and Average 6,679,873.65 12,306,569.93 12,306,569.93 12,306,569.93 1 1 0.000 CAMP TERM 6067-001TERM 1521 California Asset Management Pr 07/24/2023 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 5.645 263 224 5.645 04/12/2024 Subtotal and Average 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 263 224 5.645 Local Agency Investment Fund -City 98-33-434 1055 Local Agency Inv Fund 19,256,152.68 18,739,335.32 19,256,152.68 3.434 1 1 3.434 Subtotal and Average 29,901,313.97 19,256,152.68 18,739,335.32 19,256,152.68 1 1 3.434 Local Agency Invstmnt Fund -Housing 25-33-005 1113 Local Agency Inv Fund 2,066,034.56 2,034,933.90 2,066,034.56 3.434 1 1 3.434 Subtotal and Average 2,066,034.56 2,066,034.56 2,034,933.90 2,066,034.56 1 1 3.434 Money Market Accounts - CAMP SYS1153 1153 California Asset Management Pr 09/26/2018 29,578,723.61 29,578,723.61 29,578,723.61 5.520 1 1 5.520 Subtotal and Average 29,445,179.20 29,578,723.61 29,578,723.61 29,578,723.61 1 1 5.520 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 250,000.00 3133EJYL7 1158 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3133EKWV4 1212 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3133EKP75 1224 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3133EK4X1 1234 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3133ELEA8 1242 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3133ELNEO 1246 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3133ELH23 1280 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3133ELH80 1282 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3133EM2C5 1330 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3133EM4X7 1338 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3133ENCQ1 1344 Federal Farm Credit Bank Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 17:55 10/15/2018 250,000.00 1,786 249,932.50 08/02/2019 500,000.00 499,500.00 484,595.00 09/17/2019 500,000.00 1.871 480,825.00 11/01/2019 1,000,000.00 1,827 993,260.00 12/17/2019 1,000,000.00 996, 900.00 963,730.00 02/14/2020 1,000,000.00 1.680 982,400.00 06/09/2020 500,000.00 1,736 462,620.00 06/10/2020 500,000.00 999,000.00 461,665.00 08/10/2021 500,000.00 1.456 443,400.00 09/28/2021 1,000,000.00 1,826 891,720.00 11/02/2021 1,000,000.00 500,000.00 898,300.00 247,275.00 2.800 1,786 4 3.041 09/05/2023 499,500.00 1.850 1,820 329 1.871 07/26/2024 498,750.00 1.600 1,827 382 1.652 09/17/2024 996, 900.00 1.600 1,461 61 1.680 11/01/2023 998,600.00 1.700 1,736 382 1.731 09/17/2024 999,000.00 1.430 1,461 166 1.456 02/14/2024 499,850.00 0.500 1,826 647 0.506 06/09/2025 500,000.00 0.680 1,826 648 0.680 06/10/2025 498,000.00 0.710 1,826 1,074 0.792 08/10/2026 991,080.00 0.800 1,808 1,105 0.985 09/10/2026 1,000,000.00 1.270 1,826 1,158 1.270 11/02/2026 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 107 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments August 31, 2023 Page 2 CUSIP Investment # Average Issuer Balance Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate Days to Term Maturity YTM Maturity 365 Date Federal Agency Coupon Securities 3133ENGN4 1355 Federal Farm Credit Bank 12/09/2021 1,000,000.00 945,630.00 1,000,000.00 0.970 1,096 465 0.970 12/09/2024 3133ENYH7 1401 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/10/2022 500,000.00 489,050.00 499,080.00 2.625 731 283 2.720 06/10/2024 3133ENL99 1426 Federal Farm Credit Bank 09/15/2022 1,000,000.00 957,390.00 997,492.55 3.375 1,826 1,475 3.430 09/15/2027 3133ENQ29 1433 Federal Farm Credit Bank 09/30/2022 1,000,000.00 983,750.00 996,400.00 4.000 1,825 1,489 4.080 09/29/2027 3133EN3H1 1441 Federal Farm Credit Bank 11/29/2022 1,000,000.00 979,610.00 998,650.00 4.000 1,826 1,550 4.030 11/29/2027 3133EN3S7 1446 Federal Farm Credit Bank 12/07/2022 1,000,000.00 969,950.00 998,000.00 3.750 1,826 1,558 3.794 12/07/2027 3133EPAV7 1464 Federal Farm Credit Bank 02/15/2023 1,000,000.00 980,380.00 995,400.00 3.875 1,825 1,627 3.977 02/14/2028 3133EPME2 1505 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/08/2023 1,000,000.00 980,160.00 998,190.00 3.875 1,827 1,742 3.915 06/08/2028 3133EPQDO 1527 Federal Farm Credit Bank 07/31/2023 1,000,000.00 996,100.00 998,655.69 4.250 1,813 1,781 4.280 07/17/2028 3133EPSK2 1531 Federal Farm Credit Bank 08/18/2023 1,000,000.00 995,280.00 990,400.00 4.250 1,816 1,802 4.467 08/07/2028 3130AFW94 1177 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/01/2019 500,000.00 493,255.00 498,550.00 2.500 1,810 165 2.563 02/13/2024 3130AJKW8 1281 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/03/2020 500,000.00 461,625.00 499,850.00 0.500 1,836 651 0.506 06/13/2025 3130AJRP6 1283 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/30/2020 300,000.00 276,477.00 300,000.00 0.680 1,826 668 0.680 06/30/2025 3130AKFA9 1298 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/07/2020 500,000.00 451,500.00 497,400.00 0.375 1,831 833 0.480 12/12/2025 3130AKMZ6 1302 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/14/2021 500,000.00 450,110.00 500,000.00 0.510 1,826 866 0.510 01/14/2026 313OAKN28 1304 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/29/2021 500,000.00 449,855.00 500,000.00 0.550 1,826 881 0.550 01/29/2026 3130ALV92 1312 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/30/2021 500,000.00 455,975.00 500,000.00 1.050 1,826 941 0.938 03/30/2026 3130AMFS6 1324 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/17/2021 1,000,000.00 899,290.00 993,420.00 0.750 1,821 1,015 0.885 06/12/2026 3130APBM6 1337 Federal Home Loan Bank 09/30/2021 1,000,000.00 890,580.00 999,000.00 1.000 1,826 1,125 1.021 09/30/2026 3130APB46 1339 Federal Home Loan Bank 10/13/2021 1,000,000.00 889,470.00 998,250.00 0.950 1,826 1,138 0.986 10/13/2026 3130APTV7 1347 Federal Home Loan Bank 11/24/2021 500,000.00 457,735.00 499,500.00 0.700 1,826 1,180 1.489 11/24/2026 3130AP21.18 1353 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/07/2021 1,000,000.00 936,390.00 987,100.00 0.550 1,127 494 0.976 01/07/2025 313OAQF65 1358 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/22/2021 1,000,000.00 899,550.00 999,750.00 1.250 1,825 1,207 1.255 12/21/2026 3130AQJR5 1364 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/27/2022 1,000,000.00 896,540.00 1,000,000.00 1.500 1,826 1,244 1.500 01/27/2027 3130AQSA2 1367 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/10/2022 1,000,000.00 905,670.00 1,000,000.00 1.830 1,826 1,258 1.830 02/10/2027 3130AQWY5 1374 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/25/2022 1,000,000.00 947,310.00 1,000,000.00 1.700 1,095 542 1.700 02/24/2025 3130ARGJ4 1385 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/14/2022 500,000.00 475,610.00 500,000.00 2.500 1,279 774 2.500 10/14/2025 3130ARGY1 1387 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/19/2022 1,000,000.00 933,150.00 1,000,000.00 2.700 1,826 1,326 2.700 04/19/2027 3130ASDV8 1409 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/28/2022 300,000.00 284,637.00 300,000.00 3.300 1,826 1,396 3.300 06/28/2027 3130ARHG9 1529 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/10/2023 1,000,000.00 984,210.00 982,520.00 2.125 202 180 5.391 02/28/2024 3134GVYG7 1279 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 05/27/2020 1,000,000.00 926,820.00 1,000,000.00 0.625 1,826 634 0.625 05/27/2025 3137EAEU9 1297 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 12/07/2020 1,000,000.00 918,470.00 997,300.00 0.375 1,687 689 0.434 07/21/2025 3134GXGZ1 1301 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 12/30/2020 500,000.00 454,140.00 500,000.00 0.550 1,826 851 0.550 12/30/2025 3137EAEX3 1307 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 02/23/2021 500,000.00 456,025.00 495,999.50 0.375 1,673 753 0.552 09/23/2025 3137EAEX3 1310 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 03/30/2021 1,000,000.00 912,050.00 983,940.00 0.375 1,638 753 0.740 09/23/2025 3134GW6C5 1359 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 01/05/2022 500,000.00 441,955.00 486,000.00 0.800 1,757 1,153 1.403 10/28/2026 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 17:55 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 108 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments August 31, 2023 Page 3 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 17:55 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 109 Average Purchase Stated Days to YTM Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Term Maturity 365 Date Federal Agency Coupon Securities 3137EAEU9 1361 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 01/05/2022 500,000.00 459,235.00 487,090.00 0.375 1,293 689 1.120 07/21/2025 3134GW5R3 1362 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 01/05/2022 400,000.00 364,300.00 391,360.00 0.650 1,391 787 1.232 10/27/2025 3134GWUQ7 1366 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 02/10/2022 1,000,000.00 877,140.00 945,570.00 0.700 1,784 1,216 1.870 12/30/2026 3134GYPJ5 1484 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 04/24/2023 1,000,000.00 981,340.00 999,100.00 5.200 1,820 1,690 5.220 04/17/2028 3135GOV75 1206 Federal National Mtg Assn 07/15/2019 500,000.00 484,750.00 495,950.00 1.750 1,814 305 1.922 07/02/2024 3135GO5S8 1288 Federal National Mtg Assn 08/14/2020 500,000.00 457,205.00 500,000.00 0.500 1,826 713 0.500 08/14/2025 3136G4N74 1289 Federal National Mtg Assn 08/21/2020 1,000,000.00 914,900.00 1,000,000.00 0.560 1,826 720 0.560 08/21/2025 3136G4M75 1290 Federal National Mtg Assn 08/28/2020 500,000.00 458,530.00 499,750.00 0.520 1,816 717 0.530 08/18/2025 3135GO6E8 1291 Federal National Mtg Assn 11/18/2020 500,000.00 470,645.00 499,250.00 0.420 1,461 444 0.458 11/18/2024 3135GA2Z3 1292 Federal National Mtg Assn 11/17/2020 500,000.00 454,010.00 499,250.00 0.560 1,826 808 0.590 11/17/2025 3135GA7D7 1299 Federal National Mtg Assn 12/23/2020 500,000.00 451,890.00 500,000.00 0.600 1,826 844 0.600 12/23/2025 3135GAAW1 1300 Federal National Mtg Assn 12/30/2020 500,000.00 468,250.00 500,000.00 0.400 1,461 486 0.400 12/30/2024 3135GO6G3 1354 Federal National Mtg Assn 12/07/2021 1,000,000.00 910,840.00 976,300.00 0.500 1,431 798 1.120 11/07/2025 3135GO3U5 1365 Federal National Mtg Assn 01/28/2022 500,000.00 465,635.00 487,790.00 0.625 1,180 599 1.400 04/22/2025 3135GAGA3 1480 Federal National Mtg Assn 04/03/2023 2,000,000.00 1,990,320.00 2,000,000.00 5.200 484 333 5.206 07/30/2024 3135GAGK1 1482 Federal National Mtg Assn 04/12/2023 3,000,000.00 2,987,700.00 3,000,000.00 5.050 366 224 5.050 04/12/2024 Subtotal and Average 49,382,268.22 50,250,000.00 47,334,836.50 50,001,212.74 1,536 869 2.206 Federal Agency Discount 3133841P2 1490 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/03/2023 1,000,000.00 998,580.00 982,351.39 4.850 131 10 5.075 09/11/2023 Subtotal and Average 982,351.39 1,000,000.00 998,580.00 982,351.39 131 10 5.075 Treasury Coupon Securities 912828T26 1217 U.S. Treasury 08/21/2019 500,000.00 498,385.00 499,300.00 1.375 1,501 29 1.410 09/30/2023 912828YV6 1241 U.S. Treasury 12/16/2019 1,000,000.00 955,080.00 989,687.50 1.500 1,811 456 1.718 11/30/2024 91282CBC4 1303 U.S. Treasury 01/07/2021 500,000.00 452,970.00 498,632.81 0.375 1,819 852 0.431 12/31/2025 91282CBH3 1309 U.S. Treasury 02/23/2021 500,000.00 451,230.00 495,100.00 0.375 1,803 883 0.577 01/31/2026 91282CAT8 1311 U.S. Treasury 03/30/2021 1,000,000.00 907,620.00 977,500.00 0.250 1,676 791 0.750 10/31/2025 91282CAZ4 1315 U.S. Treasury 04/22/2021 500,000.00 453,730.00 492,187.50 0.375 1,683 821 0.720 11/30/2025 91282CBQ3 1319 U.S. Treasury 05/28/2021 500,000.00 451,405.00 494,165.00 0.500 1,737 911 0.750 02/28/2026 91282CBT7 1320 U.S. Treasury 05/28/2021 500,000.00 453,730.00 499,525.00 0.750 1,768 942 0.770 03/31/2026 91282CCF6 1321 U.S. Treasury 06/01/2021 1,000,000.00 901,800.00 997,060.00 0.750 1,825 1,003 0.810 05/31/2026 91282CBT7 1322 U.S. Treasury 06/17/2021 500,000.00 453,730.00 498,450.00 0.750 1,748 942 0.816 03/31/2026 91282CCF6 1323 U.S. Treasury 06/17/2021 500,000.00 450,900.00 497,095.00 0.750 1,809 1,003 0.870 05/31/2026 91282CCP4 1335 U.S. Treasury 09/29/2021 1,000,000.00 894,140.00 983,750.00 0.625 1,766 1,064 0.970 07/31/2026 91282CCW9 1336 U.S. Treasury 09/29/2021 1,000,000.00 895,160.00 988,500.00 0.750 1,797 1,095 0.990 08/31/2026 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 17:55 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 109 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments August 31, 2023 Page 4 CUSIP Investment # Issuer Average Purchase Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate Days to Term Maturity YTM 365 Maturity Date Treasury Coupon Securities 91282CBEO 1342 U.S. Treasury 10/22/2021 1,000,000.00 980,820.00 991,000.00 0.125 815 136 0.531 01/15/2024 91282CDB4 1343 U.S. Treasury 10/22/2021 1,000,000.00 949,490.00 996,320.00 0.625 1,089 410 0.750 10/15/2024 91282CBA8 1351 U.S. Treasury 12/07/2021 1,000,000.00 985,160.00 990,000.00 0.125 738 105 0.623 12/15/2023 91282CBR1 1352 U.S. Treasury 12/07/2021 1,000,000.00 972,850.00 989,800.00 0.250 829 196 0.704 03/15/2024 91282CBV2 1360 U.S. Treasury 01/05/2022 500,000.00 484,570.00 494,882.81 0.375 831 227 0.830 04/15/2024 912828Z78 1369 U.S. Treasury 02/10/2022 1,000,000.00 906,910.00 986,700.00 1.500 1,816 1,248 1.781 01/31/2027 91282CCW9 1380 U.S. Treasury 03/22/2022 500,000.00 447,580.00 466,454.17 0.750 1,623 1,095 2.350 08/31/2026 91282CDG3 1381 U.S. Treasury 03/22/2022 500,000.00 450,665.00 473,396.82 1.125 1,684 1,156 2.350 10/31/2026 91282CBQ3 1382 U.S. Treasury 03/23/2022 750,000.00 677,107.50 698,025.00 0.500 1,438 911 2.353 02/28/2026 9128286S4 1383 U.S. Treasury 03/23/2022 1,000,000.00 944,450.00 999,010.00 2.375 1,499 972 2.400 04/30/2026 9128283DO 1390 U.S. Treasury 05/03/2022 1,000,000.00 965,860.00 985,190.00 2.250 912 426 2.870 10/31/2024 91282CEF4 1391 U.S. Treasury 05/03/2022 1,000,000.00 936,910.00 976,860.00 2.500 1,793 1,307 3.010 03/31/2027 912828X88 1397 U.S. Treasury 06/07/2022 1,000,000.00 930,390.00 969,687.50 2.375 1,803 1,352 3.041 05/15/2027 91282CEN7 1398 U.S. Treasury 06/08/2022 500,000.00 471,835.00 495,000.00 2.750 1,787 1,337 2.971 04/30/2027 91282CET4 1399 U.S. Treasury 06/08/2022 500,000.00 469,240.00 491,842.18 2.625 1,818 1,368 2.980 05/31/2027 9128282U3 1400 U.S. Treasury 06/09/2022 500,000.00 483,010.00 490,850.00 1.875 814 365 2.727 08/31/2024 91282CFB2 1417 U.S. Treasury 08/15/2022 1,000,000.00 941,170.00 989,460.00 2.750 1,811 1,429 2.980 07/31/2027 912828XT2 1418 U.S. Treasury 05/04/2022 1,000,000.00 974,920.00 985,240.00 2.000 758 273 2.736 05/31/2024 91282CFB2 1422 U.S. Treasury 08/29/2022 1,000,000.00 941,170.00 979,645.67 2.750 1,797 1,429 3.200 07/31/2027 9128282RO 1439 U.S. Treasury 11/18/2022 1,000,000.00 923,090.00 927,110.00 2.250 1,731 1,444 3.950 08/15/2027 91282CFH9 1456 U.S. Treasury 01/24/2023 500,000.00 477,010.00 489,175.00 3.125 1,680 1,460 3.640 08/31/2027 91282CGH8 1460 U.S. Treasury 02/02/2023 1,000,000.00 966,840.00 996,369.14 3.500 1,824 1,613 3.580 01/31/2028 91282CEW7 1465 U.S. Treasury 02/15/2023 1,000,000.00 959,810.00 967,220.00 3.250 1,596 1,398 4.075 06/30/2027 91282CGT2 1508 U.S. Treasury 06/15/2023 1,000,000.00 971,910.00 984,600.00 3.625 1,751 1,673 3.980 03/31/2028 912828V80 1516 U.S. Treasury 06/30/2023 2,000,000.00 1,974,060.00 1,964,400.00 2.250 215 152 5.374 01/31/2024 91282BB66 1518 U.S. Treasury 07/12/2023 2,000,000.00 1,975,460.00 1,969,580.00 2.750 218 167 5.382 02/15/2024 91282CDVO 1519 U.S. Treasury 07/12/2023 1,000,000.00 981,560.00 975,600.00 0.875 203 152 5.416 01/31/2024 91282CGT2 1524 U.S. Treasury 05/31/2023 1,000,000.00 971,910.00 990,000.00 3.625 1,766 1,673 3.853 03/31/2028 91282CHA2 1525 U.S. Treasury 05/31/2023 1,000,000.00 966,600.00 985,000.00 3.500 1,796 1,703 3.837 04/30/2028 91282CEK3 1528 U.S. Treasury 08/10/2023 1,000,000.00 981,090.00 980,080.00 2.500 264 242 5.340 04/30/2024 912828W71 1530 U.S. Treasury 08/10/2023 2,000,000.00 1,962,260.00 1,960,078.13 2.125 234 212 5.338 03/31/2024 Subtotal and Average 38,652,934.93 39,250,000.00 37,245,587.50 38,549,529.23 1,272 815 2.794 Treasury Discount Notes 912796YH6 1470 U.S. Treasury 03/09/2023 2,000,000.00 1,998,240.00 1,950,283.66 4.917 182 6 5.184 09/07/2023 912796YTO 1487 U.S. Treasury 05/03/2023 1,000,000.00 990,910.00 975,854.17 4.750 183 62 5.003 11/02/2023 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 17:55 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 110 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments August 31, 2023 Page 5 CUSIP Average Investment # Issuer Balance Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate Days to Term Maturity YTM Maturity 365 Date Treasury Discount Notes 912797FAO 1488 U.S. Treasury 05/03/2023 3,000,000.00 2,981,910.00 2,935,470.00 4.780 162 41 5.022 10/12/2023 912797FL6 1502 U.S. Treasury 05/31/2023 4,000,000.00 3,950,400.00 3,898,126.67 5.180 177 84 5.464 11/24/2023 912796ZN2 1517 U.S. Treasury 06/30/2023 3,000,000.00 2,948,040.00 2,920,963.32 5.240 181 118 5.532 12/28/2023 Subtotal and Average 16,972,967.67 13,000,000.00 12,869,500.00 12,680,697.82 176 68 5.299 Certificate of Deposits 336460CX6 1222 First State Bk DeQueen 08/30/2019 248,000.00 238,859.03 248,000.00 1.800 1,827 364 1.802 08/30/2024 31911KAK4 1515 First Bank Elk River 06/30/2023 248,000.00 245,521.15 248,000.00 4.400 1,827 1,764 4.405 06/30/2028 32027BALl 1273 First Freedom Bank 04/29/2020 249,000.00 232,132.75 249,000.00 1.200 1,826 606 1.201 04/29/2025 33766LAJ7 1216 FirsTier Bank 08/23/2019 249,000.00 240,284.72 249,000.00 1.950 1,827 357 1.952 08/23/2024 32056GDJ6 1278 1st Internet Bank 05/11/2020 248,000.00 230,034.14 248,000.00 1.000 1,827 619 0.985 05/12/2025 32112UDR9 1274 First Natl Bk McGregor 04/28/2020 248,000.00 230,302.72 248,000.00 1.350 1,826 605 1.351 04/28/2025 334342CD2 1221 First Natl Bk of Syracuse 08/30/2019 249,000.00 239,855.36 249,000.00 1.850 1,827 364 1.852 08/30/2024 32114VBT3 1250 First National Bank Michigan 02/14/2020 248,000.00 234,602.97 248,000.00 1.650 1,827 532 1.652 02/14/2025 33625CCP2 1209 First Security Bank of WA 07/30/2019 248,000.00 240,087.97 248,000.00 2.000 1,827 333 2.002 07/30/2024 33640VDD7 1231 First Service Bank 11/15/2019 248,000.00 241,344.91 248,000.00 1.700 1,643 257 1.701 05/15/2024 88413QDN5 1420 Third Federal Savings and Loan 08/19/2022 245,000.00 235,116.44 245,000.00 3.300 1,826 1,448 3.302 08/19/2027 00257TBD7 1207 Abacus Federal Savings 07/26/2019 248,000.00 240,073.28 248,000.00 1.950 1,827 329 1.952 07/26/2024 00435JBH5 1256 Access Bank 03/13/2020 248,000.00 231,718.80 248,000.00 1.600 1,826 559 1.601 03/13/2025 00833JAQ4 1478 Affinity Bank 03/17/2023 248,000.00 245,249.33 248,000.00 4.900 1,827 1,659 4.906 03/17/2028 01025RAG4 1510 Alabama Credit Union 06/20/2023 248,000.00 246,255.75 248,000.00 5.000 1,098 1,025 5.005 06/22/2026 011852AEO 1469 Alaska USA/Global FCU 03/08/2023 248,000.00 242,288.55 248,000.00 4.600 1,827 1,650 4.606 03/08/2028 01882MAC6 1451 Alliant CU 12/30/2022 247,000.00 246,086.67 247,000.00 5.000 1,826 1,581 5.003 12/30/2027 01664MAB2 1448 All In FCU 12/20/2022 248,000.00 241,370.92 248,000.00 4.400 1,826 1,571 4.402 12/20/2027 02007GPX5 1388 Ally Bank Midvale 04/21/2022 245,000.00 230,856.15 245,000.00 2.550 1,096 598 2.550 04/21/2025 020080BX4 1267 Alma Bank 03/30/2020 248,000.00 228,284.00 248,000.00 1.400 1,824 574 1.399 03/28/2025 029728BC5 1255 American State 02/21/2020 248,000.00 234,318.63 248,000.00 1.600 1,827 539 1.602 02/21/2025 02589ADH2 1421 American Express, NB 08/29/2022 245,000.00 231,355.51 245,000.00 3.450 1,793 1,425 3.067 07/27/2027 02357QAQO 1372 Amerant Bank 02/14/2022 245,000.00 217,778.39 245,000.00 1.600 1,828 1,264 1.601 02/16/2027 052392BT3 1427 Austin Telco FCU 09/21/2022 248,000.00 236,696.51 248,000.00 3.800 1,826 1,481 3.770 09/21/2027 05465DAE8 1258 Axos Bank 03/26/2020 248,000.00 233,730.78 248,000.00 1.650 1,826 572 1.651 03/26/2025 05765LBUO 1520 Balboa Thrift and Loan 07/19/2023 248,000.00 247,811.74 248,000.00 4.400 1,827 1,783 4.405 07/19/2028 062119BT8 1492 Bank Five Nine 05/12/2023 248,000.00 238,228.88 248,000.00 4.250 1,827 1,715 4.255 05/12/2028 06610RCA5 1499 Bankers Bank 05/24/2023 248,000.00 237,082.61 248,000.00 4.150 1,827 1,727 4.155 05/24/2028 066851 WJ1 1172 Bar Harbor Bank and Trust 12/31/2018 248,000.00 246,281.65 248,000.00 3.350 1,824 119 3.352 12/29/2023 07371AYE7 1370 Beal Bank TX 02/23/2022 245,000.00 216,707.40 245,000.00 1.900 1,820 1,265 1.901 02/17/2027 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 17:55 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 111 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments August 31, 2023 Page 6 CUSIP Investment # Average Issuer Balance Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate Days to Term Maturity YTM Maturity 365 Date Certificate of Deposits 073710E88 1371 Beal Bank USA 02/23/2022 245,000.00 215,144.30 245,000.00 1.900 1,820 1,265 1.901 02/17/2027 08016PDQ9 1270 Belmont Bank and Trust 04/16/2020 248,000.00 238,975.28 248,000.00 1.250 1,461 228 1.251 04/16/2024 06417NZQ9 1329 Bank OZK 07/29/2021 248,000.00 231,358.10 248,000.00 0.400 1,280 516 0.401 01/29/2025 064520BG3 1287 Bank Princeton 06/30/2020 248,000.00 231,959.35 248,000.00 0.500 1,644 486 0.500 12/30/2024 064860MC0 1476 Bank of the Sierra 03/15/2023 244,000.00 239,616.19 244,000.00 4.600 1,461 1,291 4.604 03/15/2027 09582YAF9 1467 Blue Ridge Bank 02/28/2023 244,000.00 234,611.76 244,000.00 4.200 1,826 1,641 4.202 02/28/2028 05580AD50 1333 BMW Bank 09/10/2021 245,000.00 232,071.35 245,000.00 0.650 1,096 375 0.651 09/10/2024 06652CHB0 1227 BankWest Inc 09/27/2019 248,000.00 237,974.55 248,000.00 1.700 1,827 392 1.702 09/27/2024 108622NJ6 1479 Bridgewater Bank 03/29/2023 248,000.00 245,539.46 248,000.00 4.850 1,461 1,305 4.767 03/29/2027 14042RQB0 1346 Capital One Natl Assn FDIC4297 11/17/2021 248,000.00 208,900.32 248,000.00 1.100 1,826 1,173 1.101 11/17/2026 14042TDD6 1271 Capital One USA FDIC33954 04/08/2020 245,000.00 227,475.15 245,000.00 1.600 1,826 585 1.601 04/08/2025 14622LAAO 1316 Carter FCU 04/27/2021 248,000.00 222,384.58 248,000.00 0.750 1,826 969 0.750 04/27/2026 20033A3A2 1386 Comenity Capital Bank 04/14/2022 248,000.00 227,942.33 248,000.00 2.650 1,826 1,321 2.652 04/14/2027 15118RRH2 1220 Celtic Bank 08/30/2019 248,000.00 238,892.08 248,000.00 1.850 1,827 364 1.852 08/30/2024 156634AK3 1184 Century Next Bank 05/29/2019 248,000.00 242,501.34 248,000.00 2.500 1,827 271 2.503 05/29/2024 152577BN1 1493 Central Bank 05/12/2023 248,000.00 235,638.78 248,000.00 4.000 1,827 1,715 4.005 05/12/2028 169894AS1 1284 Chippewa Valley Bk 06/24/2020 248,000.00 227,861.63 248,000.00 0.600 1,826 662 0.600 06/24/2025 16141BAC5 1506 Chartway FCU 06/09/2023 248,000.00 245,582.75 248,000.00 4.900 1,096 1,012 4.905 06/09/2026 12547CBJ6 1497 CIBC Bank USA 05/16/2023 244,000.00 235,432.49 244,000.00 4.350 1,827 1,719 4.355 05/16/2028 17286TAGO 1252 Citadel FCU 02/27/2020 248,000.00 234,385.19 248,000.00 1.650 1,827 545 1.652 02/27/2025 2027506M2 1268 Commonwealth Business Bk 03/31/2020 248,000.00 232,065.51 248,000.00 1.250 1,826 577 1.251 03/31/2025 20825WAR1 1357 Connexus CU 12/23/2021 249,000.00 219,345.00 249,000.00 1.250 1,826 1,209 1.250 12/23/2026 22258JAB7 1430 County Schools FCU 09/30/2022 248,000.00 241,470.23 248,000.00 4.400 1,826 1,490 4.325 09/30/2027 20143PDV9 1162 Commercial Bank 11/15/2018 248,000.00 246,892.94 248,000.00 3.400 1,826 75 3.402 11/15/2023 20416TAQ5 1202 Communitywide FCU 06/28/2019 248,000.00 241,349.66 248,000.00 2.250 1,827 301 2.253 06/28/2024 20786ADL6 1334 Connect One 09/24/2021 248,000.00 213,103.92 248,000.00 0.800 1,826 1,119 0.800 09/24/2026 176688CP2 1199 Citizens State Bank 06/21/2019 248,000.00 241,754.71 248,000.00 2.400 1,827 294 2.403 06/21/2024 23204HPB8 1507 Customers Bank 06/14/2023 244,000.00 242,787.95 244,000.00 4.500 1,827 1,748 4.505 06/14/2028 23248UAB3 1494 Cy -Fair FCU 05/12/2023 248,000.00 240,818.98 248,000.00 4.500 1,827 1,715 4.505 05/12/2028 24773RCR4 1377 Delta Natl B&T 03/09/2022 245,000.00 220,753.26 245,000.00 2.000 1,814 1,273 2.001 02/25/2027 25460FDW3 1438 Direct FCU 11/07/2022 248,000.00 245,511.54 248,000.00 4.800 1,827 1,529 4.735 11/08/2027 254673E69 1392 Discover Bank Greenwood DE CF 05/24/2022 245,000.00 228,217.50 245,000.00 3.100 1,099 634 3.103 05/27/2025 25844MAK4 1447 Dort Financial CU 12/16/2022 247,000.00 233,807.73 247,000.00 4.500 1,826 1,567 4.503 12/16/2027 27004PCM3 1375 Eaglemark Savings 03/02/2022 245,000.00 218,069.60 245,000.00 2.000 1,826 1,278 2.001 03/02/2027 299547AQ2 1196 Liberty FCU F/K/A Evansville T 06/12/2019 248,000.00 242,412.87 248,000.00 2.600 1,827 285 2.603 06/12/2024 87270LDL4 1306 TIAA F/K/A EverBank 02/12/2021 245,000.00 218,696.85 245,000.00 0.500 1,826 895 0.500 02/12/2026 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 17:55 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 112 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments August 31, 2023 Page 7 CUSIP Investment # Average Issuer Balance Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate Days to Term Maturity YTM Maturity 365 Date Certificate of Deposits 300185LM5 1457 Evergreen Bank Group 01/27/2023 248,000.00 238,819.30 248,000.00 3.850 1,277 1,060 3.849 07/27/2026 307811DF3 1363 Farmers & Merch 01/14/2022 249,000.00 228,757.07 249,000.00 0.900 1,277 682 0.900 07/14/2025 30960QAR8 1526 Farmers Insurance Group FCU 07/26/2023 248,000.00 247,754.79 248,000.00 5.400 733 696 5.408 07/28/2025 31617CAV5 1317 Fidelity Homestead 04/30/2021 248,000.00 220,781.79 248,000.00 0.700 1,826 972 0.711 04/30/2026 33847E3A3 1276 Flagstar 04/30/2020 248,000.00 229,551.28 248,000.00 1.250 1,826 607 1.251 04/30/2025 34520LATO 1435 Forbright Bank 11/02/2022 248,000.00 243,680.52 248,000.00 4.600 1,826 1,523 4.602 11/02/2027 35637RDC8 1248 Freedom Financial 02/14/2020 248,000.00 230,897.92 248,000.00 1.550 1,827 532 1.552 02/14/2025 35089LAFO 1491 Four Points FCU 05/10/2023 248,000.00 243,344.64 248,000.00 4.550 1,097 983 4.443 05/11/2026 38149MXK4 1326 Goldman Sachs 07/28/2021 248,000.00 222,300.23 248,000.00 1.000 1,826 1,061 1.001 07/28/2026 38120MCA2 1511 Golden State Business Bank 06/22/2023 249,000.00 243,187.29 249,000.00 4.450 1,461 1,390 4.453 06/22/2027 39573LBC1 1313 Greenstate FCU 04/16/2021 249,000.00 223,919.57 249,000.00 0.950 1,826 958 0.951 04/16/2026 397417AQ9 1419 Greenwoods State Bank 05/17/2022 248,000.00 230,987.87 248,000.00 3.050 1,826 1,354 3.052 05/17/2027 45157PAZ3 1450 Ideal CU 12/29/2022 248,000.00 242,254.10 248,000.00 4.500 1,826 1,580 4.502 12/29/2027 46256YAZ2 1186 Iowa State Bank 05/23/2019 245,000.00 239,519.79 245,000.00 2.400 1,827 265 2.403 05/23/2024 472312AA5 1514 Jeep Country FCU 06/29/2023 248,000.00 244,369.88 248,000.00 4.700 1,461 1,397 4.704 06/29/2027 474067AQ8 1154 Jefferson Financial CU 10/19/2018 245,000.00 244,271.58 245,000.00 3.350 1,826 48 3.352 10/19/2023 48115LAD6 1396 Jovia Financial Credit Union 06/07/2022 248,000.00 245,986.07 248,000.00 2.500 548 97 2.502 12/07/2023 48128HXU7 1185 JP Morgan Chase 05/16/2019 245,000.00 239,997.86 245,000.00 3.250 1,827 258 3.254 05/16/2024 49306SJ56 1475 Kay Bank, N.A. 03/15/2023 244,000.00 242,239.63 244,000.00 5.000 733 563 5.008 03/17/2025 499724AP7 1532 Knoxville TVA Credit Union 08/25/2023 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.850 1,827 1,820 4.854 08/25/2028 51828MAC8 1449 Latino Comm. CU 12/21/2022 248,000.00 242,324.30 248,000.00 4.500 1,826 1,572 4.503 12/21/2027 530520AH8 1466 Liberty First CU 02/21/2023 248,000.00 241,395.85 248,000.00 4.500 1,827 1,635 4.504 02/22/2028 501798RP9 1356 LCA Bank Corp 12/27/2021 248,000.00 220,485.78 248,000.00 1.000 1,642 1,029 1.000 06/26/2026 52168UHY1 1389 Leader Bank 04/22/2022 245,000.00 233,791.01 245,000.00 2.550 1,096 599 2.552 04/22/2025 524661CB9 1197 Legacy Bank 06/19/2019 248,000.00 241,797.86 248,000.00 2.400 1,827 292 2.403 06/19/2024 50625LAW3 1384 Lafayette FCU 03/30/2022 248,000.00 243,120.38 248,000.00 2.050 729 209 2.053 03/28/2024 538036GV0 1238 Live Oak Bank 11/27/2019 248,000.00 241,192.88 248,000.00 1.800 1,644 270 1.802 05/28/2024 51210SQU4 1208 Lakeside Bank 07/30/2019 248,000.00 244,446.31 248,000.00 2.000 1,644 150 2.003 01/29/2024 51507LCC6 1305 Landmark Community Bank 01/22/2021 248,000.00 221,652.31 248,000.00 0.500 1,826 874 0.500 01/22/2026 560507AQ8 1522 Maine Savings FCU 07/21/2023 248,000.00 243,518.03 248,000.00 4.800 1,827 1,785 4.806 07/21/2028 56065GAG3 1188 Main Street Bank 04/26/2019 248,000.00 243,296.54 248,000.00 2.600 1,827 238 2.603 04/26/2024 57116ARV2 1155 Cache Valley BK F/K/A Marlin 10/17/2018 248,000.00 247,303.26 248,000.00 3.300 1,826 46 3.302 10/17/2023 59161YAP1 1373 Metro Credit Union 02/18/2022 249,000.00 225,645.72 249,000.00 1.700 1,826 1,266 1.701 02/18/2027 59524LAA4 1474 Mid Carolina Credit Union 03/13/2023 248,000.00 245,992.22 248,000.00 4.850 1,096 924 4.855 03/13/2026 60425SKB4 1486 Minnwest Bank 05/01/2023 248,000.00 240,585.17 248,000.00 4.250 1,463 1,340 4.254 05/03/2027 61690UNX4 1237 Morgan Stanley Bank 11/20/2019 245,000.00 233,220.67 245,000.00 1.950 1,827 446 1.952 11/20/2024 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 17:55 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 113 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments August 31, 2023 Page 8 CUSIP Investment # Average Issuer Balance Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate Days to Term Maturity YTM Maturity 365 Date Certificate of Deposits 59013KPNO 1345 Merrick Bank 11/09/2021 249,000.00 219,088.59 249,000.00 1.100 1,826 1,165 1.101 11/09/2026 565819AG4 1379 Marathon Bnak 03/16/2022 248,000.00 224,792.16 248,000.00 1.800 1,826 1,292 1.801 03/16/2027 61760A3B3 1236 Morgan Stanley Private Bk, NA 11/20/2019 245,000.00 234,550.06 245,000.00 1.900 1,827 446 1.902 11/20/2024 62384RAT3 1485 Mountain America Federal CU 04/28/2023 248,000.00 243,798.07 248,000.00 4.700 1,096 970 4.705 04/28/2026 625925AR3 1160 Municipal Trust and Savings 10/17/2018 245,000.00 244,260.04 245,000.00 3.200 1,826 46 3.202 10/17/2023 654062JZ2 1266 Nicolet Natl Bank 03/31/2020 248,000.00 231,917.70 248,000.00 1.400 1,826 577 1.401 03/31/2025 64034KAZ4 1376 Nelnet Bank 03/02/2022 245,000.00 224,943.38 245,000.00 1.800 1,461 913 1.801 03/02/2026 635573AL2 1170 National Cooperative Bank, N.A 12/21/2018 245,000.00 243,450.33 245,000.00 3.400 1,826 111 3.402 12/21/2023 67054NAN3 1164 Numerica Credit Union 11/28/2018 248,000.00 246,842.54 248,000.00 3.550 1,826 88 3.552 11/28/2023 66736ABP3 1181 Northwest Bank 02/13/2019 248,000.00 245,210.27 248,000.00 2.950 1,826 165 2.951 02/13/2024 69506YRH4 1269 Pacific Western Bk/Banc of CA 04/16/2020 245,000.00 238,617.55 245,000.00 1.300 1,461 228 1.301 04/16/2024 70962LAF9 1331 Pentagon FCU 09/01/2021 249,000.00 226,819.75 249,000.00 0.700 1,462 732 0.687 09/02/2025 710571DS6 1210 People's Bank 07/31/2019 248,000.00 240,063.57 248,000.00 2.000 1,827 334 2.002 07/31/2024 724468AC7 1483 Pitney Bowes Bank 04/14/2023 244,000.00 239,561.64 244,000.00 4.350 1,826 1,686 4.355 04/13/2028 72651 LCL6 1195 Plains Commerce Bank 06/07/2019 245,000.00 239,514.73 245,000.00 2.550 1,827 280 2.553 06/07/2024 732329BD8 1425 Ponce Bank 09/15/2022 248,000.00 239,521.25 248,000.00 3.500 1,826 1,475 3.502 09/15/2027 740367HP5 1213 Preferred Bank 08/16/2019 249,000.00 240,540.85 249,000.00 2.000 1,827 350 2.002 08/16/2024 761402BY1 1203 Revere Bank 06/28/2019 247,000.00 240,444.25 247,000.00 2.300 1,827 301 2.303 06/28/2024 77579ADF0 1251 Rollstone B&T 02/12/2020 245,000.00 239,385.07 245,000.00 1.650 1,461 164 1.651 02/12/2024 795451AFO 1327 Sallie Mae Bank Salt Lake City 07/28/2021 248,000.00 222,300.22 248,000.00 1.000 1,826 1,061 1.001 07/28/2026 804375/31-4 1235 Sauk Valley B&T Co 11/07/2019 248,000.00 234,994.29 248,000.00 1.700 1,827 433 1.702 11/07/2024 843383CS7 1498 Southern Bank Poplar MO 05/17/2023 248,000.00 237,666.23 248,000.00 4.200 1,827 1,720 4.205 05/17/2028 80865MAB3 1454 Scient FCU 01/13/2023 248,000.00 245,294.80 248,000.00 4.650 731 500 4.656 01/13/2025 79772FAG1 1459 San Francisco FCU 02/03/2023 248,000.00 240,463.81 248,000.00 4.350 1,826 1,616 4.352 02/03/2028 82671DAB3 1458 Signature FCU 01/31/2023 248,000.00 240,984.91 248,000.00 4.400 1,826 1,613 4.402 01/31/2028 78472EAB0 1455 SPCO Credit Union 01/20/2023 249,000.00 241,129.21 249,000.00 4.350 1,826 1,602 4.352 01/20/2028 849430BF9 1257 Spring Bank 03/20/2020 248,000.00 233,278.29 248,000.00 1.500 1,826 566 1.501 03/20/2025 84229LBA9 1434 Southern Bank Sardis GA 10/28/2022 244,000.00 238,104.50 244,000.00 4.250 1,188 880 4.254 01/28/2026 84223QAN7 1286 Southern Bancorp Bk 06/26/2020 248,000.00 233,956.31 248,000.00 0.500 1,582 420 0.500 10/25/2024 85279AAC6 1509 St Vincent Med Center FCU 06/16/2023 248,000.00 243,501.32 248,000.00 4.600 1,461 1,384 4.604 06/16/2027 87165ET98 1332 Synchrony Bank Retail 09/03/2021 245,000.00 214,817.27 245,000.00 0.900 1,826 1,098 0.900 09/03/2026 89388CEYO 1328 Transportation Alliance Bk TAB 07/23/2021 248,000.00 230,892.25 248,000.00 0.400 1,280 510 0.401 01/23/2025 87868YAQ6 1501 Technology Credit Union 05/30/2023 248,000.00 246,200.37 248,000.00 5.000 1,095 1,001 5.005 05/29/2026 882213AB7 1260 Texas Bank Financial 03/31/2020 245,000.00 238,783.65 245,000.00 1.100 1,458 209 1.101 03/28/2024 472382AQ3 1272 The Jefferson Bank 04/15/2020 248,000.00 239,787.01 248,000.00 1.250 1,461 227 1.251 04/15/2024 89235MKY6 1314 Toyota Financial Savings Bank 04/22/2021 245,000.00 220,491.98 245,000.00 0.900 1,826 964 0.900 04/22/2026 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 17:55 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 114 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments August 31, 2023 Page 9 Corporate Notes Average Purchase Stated 45950VPS9 1308 Days to YTM Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Term Maturity 365 Date Certificate of Deposits 973,110.00 3.700 1,827 1,760 4.303 06/26/2028 Subtotal and Average 1,555,846.13 1,500,000.00 1,412,085.00 1,470,410.00 89269FDP7 1415 Tradition Capital Money Market with Fiscal Agent 07/20/2022 246,000.00 243,618.79 246,000.00 3.000 551 143 3.008 01/22/2024 89579NCD3 1262 Triad Bank 15,000,443.22 03/30/2020 248,000.00 245,905.51 248,000.00 1.350 1,278 28 1.352 09/29/2023 89789AAG2 1473 Truliant FCU 1 03/10/2023 248,000.00 244,150.47 248,000.00 4.700 1,645 1,470 4.707 09/10/2027 89786MAF1 1368 True Sky FCU SYS1114 1114 02/04/2022 245,000.00 217,972.16 245,000.00 1.600 1,826 1,252 1.601 02/04/2027 90348JEJ5 1161 UBS Bank USA 1,855,123.49 10/17/2018 245,000.00 244,274.07 245,000.00 3.350 1,826 46 3.352 10/17/2023 909557KQ2 1477 United Bankers Bank 03/16/2023 248,000.00 246,236.46 248,000.00 5.000 732 563 4.823 03/17/2025 914098DJ4 1442 University Bank 11/30/2022 249,000.00 247,734.87 249,000.00 4.200 1,826 1,551 4.202 11/30/2027 914242AAO 1429 University Credit Union 09/26/2022 248,000.00 241,191.89 248,000.00 4.000 1,096 756 3.891 09/26/2025 91527PBY2 1495 Univest Bank & Trust 05/12/2023 248,000.00 239,070.05 248,000.00 4.350 1,827 1,715 4.355 05/12/2028 90983WBT7 1249 United Community 02/07/2020 248,000.00 234,815.01 248,000.00 1.650 1,827 525 1.652 02/07/2025 910286GN7 1513 United Fidelity Bank 06/29/2023 248,000.00 246,494.03 248,000.00 4.500 1,827 1,763 4.505 06/29/2028 91139LAB2 1378 United Roosevelt Savings 03/11/2022 248,000.00 222,236.57 248,000.00 1.900 1,826 1,287 1.901 03/11/2027 90352RDB8 1500 US Alliance FCU 05/26/2023 248,000.00 241,241.38 248,000.00 4.550 1,827 1,729 4.555 05/26/2028 91739JAB1 1523 Utah First FCU 07/21/2023 245,000.00 242,691.04 245,000.00 5.000 1,827 1,785 5.006 07/21/2028 92559TAJ7 1325 Vibrant Credit Union 07/02/2021 249,000.00 219,468.88 248,377.50 0.800 1,824 1,033 0.852 06/30/2026 92834ABT2 1496 VisionBank 05/12/2023 248,000.00 236,362.62 248,000.00 4.050 1,827 1,715 4.055 05/12/2028 92023CAG8 1557 ValleyStar Credit Union 08/30/2023 248,000.00 247,769.34 248,000.00 4.850 1,827 1,825 4.858 08/30/2028 92891CCZ3 1472 VystarCU 03/10/2023 248,000.00 241,774.28 248,000.00 4.550 1,827 1,652 4.555 03/10/2028 949763XY7 1174 Wells Fargo 02/27/2019 248,000.00 245,038.52 248,000.00 3.000 1,826 179 3.001 02/27/2024 938828BH2 1215 Washington Federal 08/23/2019 248,000.00 239,529.33 248,000.00 2.000 1,827 357 2.002 08/23/2024 95960NKD8 1277 Western State Bank 05/13/2020 245,000.00 227,280.71 245,000.00 1.000 1,826 620 1.001 05/13/2025 Subtotal and Average 39,052,538.79 39,320,000.00 37,562,836.61 39,319,377.50 1,666 894 2.777 Corporate Notes 45950VPS9 1308 International Finance Corp. 02/26/2021 500,000.00 448,605.00 497,300.00 0.500 1,826 909 0.610 02/26/2026 931142EE9 1512 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc 06/26/2023 1,000,000.00 963,480.00 973,110.00 3.700 1,827 1,760 4.303 06/26/2028 Subtotal and Average 1,555,846.13 1,500,000.00 1,412,085.00 1,470,410.00 1,827 1,472 3.054 Money Market with Fiscal Agent SYS1058 1058 US Bank 07/01/2016 15,000,443.22 15,000,443.22 15,000,443.22 1 1 0.000 Subtotal and Average 3,872,234.02 15,000,443.22 15,000,443.22 15,000,443.22 1 1 0.000 CERBT - OPEB Trust SYS1114 1114 CaIPERS CERBT Plan 07/01/2023 1,855,123.49 1,855,123.49 1,855,123.49 1 1 0.000 Subtotal and Average 1,855,123.49 1,855,123.49 1,855,123.49 1,855,123.49 1 1 0.000 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 17:55 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 115 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments August 31, 2023 Page 10 Average Purchase Stated Days to YTM Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Term Maturity 365 Date PARS Pension Trust SYS1230 1230 Pblc Agncy Rtrmnt Sery 5,307,298.79 5,307,298.79 5,307,298.79 1 1 0.000 Subtotal and Average 5,372,460.65 5,307,298.79 5,307,298.79 5,307,298.79 1 1 0.000 Total and Average 245,791,126.67 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 17:55 249,690,346.28 242,245,853.87 248,373,924.96 812 474 3.033 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 116 t(vQ�� GEM of the DESERT - City of La Quinta Total Earnings Sorted by Fund - Fund August 1, 2023 -August 31, 2023 City of La Quinta CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 98-33-434 1055 101 LAIF 19,256,152.68 34,256,152.68 19,256,152.68 3.434 3.126 90,956.42 0.00 0.00 90,956.42 SYS1059 1059 101 CITYPC 3,300.00 3,300.00 3,300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SYS1114 1114 101 CALPRS 1,855,123.49 1,855,123.49 1,855,123.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SYS 1153 1153 101 CAMP 29,578,723.61 29,440,727.72 29,578,723.61 5.520 5.519 137,995.89 0.00 0.00 137,995.89 474067AQ8 1154 101 JEFF 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.350 3.350 697.08 0.00 0.00 697.08 57116ARV2 1155 101 MARBUS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.300 3.300 695.08 0.00 0.00 695.08 594918BQ6 1157 101 MCRSFT 0.00 378,360.00 0.00 2.000 300.371 155.56 0.00 21,640.00 21,795.56 3133EJYL7 1158 101 FFCB 250,000.00 247,275.00 247,275.00 2.800 2.778 583.33 0.00 0.00 583.33 625925AR3 1160 101 MUNTRS 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.200 3.200 665.86 0.00 0.00 665.86 90348JEJ5 1161 101 UBS 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.350 3.350 697.08 0.00 0.00 697.08 20143PDV9 1162 101 COMMBK 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.400 3.400 716.14 0.00 0.00 716.14 67054NAN3 1164 101 NMRCA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.550 3.550 747.74 0.00 0.00 747.74 635573AL2 1170 101 NLCOOP 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.400 3.400 707.48 0.00 0.00 707.48 066851WJ1 1172 101 BARHAR 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.350 3.350 705.61 0.00 0.00 705.61 949763XY7 1174 101 WELLS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.000 3.000 631.89 0.00 0.00 631.89 3130AFW94 1177 101 FHLB 500,000.00 498,550.00 498,550.00 2.500 2.460 1,041.67 0.00 0.00 1,041.67 66736ABP3 1181 101 NRTHWS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.950 2.950 621.36 0.00 0.00 621.36 156634AK3 1184 101 CENTNX 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.500 2.500 526.58 0.00 0.00 526.58 48128HXU7 1185 101 JPMORG 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.250 3.250 676.27 0.00 0.00 676.27 46256YAZ2 1186 101 IOWAST 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 2.400 2.400 499.40 0.00 0.00 499.40 56065GAG3 1188 101 MAINST 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.600 2.600 547.64 0.00 0.00 547.64 72651LCL6 1195 101 PLAINS 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 2.550 2.550 530.61 0.00 0.00 530.61 299547AQ2 1196 101 EVNSCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.600 2.600 547.64 0.00 0.00 547.64 524661CB9 1197 101 LEGCY 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.400 2.400 505.51 0.00 0.00 505.51 176688CP2 1199 101 CTZNST 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.400 2.400 505.51 0.00 0.00 505.51 20416TAQ5 1202 101 COMMW 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.250 2.250 473.92 0.00 0.00 473.92 761402BY1 1203 101 REVER 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 2.300 2.300 482.49 0.00 0.00 482.49 3135GOV75 1206 101 FNMA 500,000.00 495,950.00 495,950.00 1.750 1.731 729.17 0.00 0.00 729.17 00257TBD7 1207 101 ABACUS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.950 1.950 410.73 0.00 0.00 410.73 51210SQU4 1208 101 LKSIDE 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.000 2.000 421.26 0.00 0.00 421.26 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:13 Portfolio CITY CP TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 117 City of La Quinta Total Earnings Page 2 August 1, 2023 - August 31, 2023 CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 33625CCP2 1209 101 1STSEC 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.000 2.000 421.26 0.00 0.00 421.26 710571 DS6 1210 101 PEOPLE 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.000 2.000 421.26 0.00 0.00 421.26 3133EKWV4 1212 101 FFCB 500,000.00 499,500.00 499,500.00 1.850 1.817 770.84 0.00 0.00 770.84 740367HP5 1213 101 PREFRD 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 2.000 2.000 422.96 0.00 0.00 422.96 938828131-12 1215 101 WSHFED 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.000 2.000 421.26 0.00 0.00 421.26 33766LAJ7 1216 101 1STIER 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 1.950 1.950 412.38 0.00 0.00 412.38 912828T26 1217 101 USTR 500,000.00 499,300.00 499,300.00 1.375 1.373 582.31 0.00 0.00 582.31 75472RAD3 1218 101 RAYJAM 0.00 244,000.00 0.00 1.950 1.950 286.78 0.00 0.00 286.78 15118RRH2 1220 101 CELTIC 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.850 1.850 389.67 0.00 0.00 389.67 334342CD2 1221 101 1STNBS 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 1.850 1.850 391.24 0.00 0.00 391.24 336460CX6 1222 101 1STDQN 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.800 1.800 379.13 0.00 0.00 379.13 3133EKZK5 1223 101 FFCB 0.00 499,400.00 0.00 1.600 4.997 288.89 0.00 600.00 888.89 3133EKP75 1224 101 FFCB 500,000.00 498,750.00 498,750.00 1.600 1.574 666.66 0.00 0.00 666.66 06652CHB0 1227 101 BNKWST 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.700 1.700 358.07 0.00 0.00 358.07 059731851 1228 101 BOTW 6,165,882.61 4,240,490.61 6,165,882.61 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 SYS1230 1230 101 PARS 5,307,298.79 5,374,632.71 5,307,298.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33640VDD7 1231 101 1STSER 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.700 1.700 358.07 0.00 0.00 358.07 3133EK4X1 1234 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 996,900.00 996,900.00 1.600 1.575 1,333.33 0.00 0.00 1,333.33 804375DL4 1235 101 SAUKVL 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.700 1.700 358.07 0.00 0.00 358.07 61760A363 1236 101 MSPRIV 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.900 1.900 395.36 0.00 0.00 395.36 61690UNX4 1237 101 MORGST 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.950 1.950 405.76 0.00 0.00 405.76 538036GV0 1238 101 LIVEOK 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.800 1.800 379.13 0.00 0.00 379.13 912828YV6 1241 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 989,687.50 989,687.50 1.500 1.511 1,270.50 0.00 0.00 1,270.50 3133ELEA8 1242 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 998,600.00 998,600.00 1.700 1.670 1,416.66 0.00 0.00 1,416.66 3133ELNEO 1246 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 999,000.00 999,000.00 1.430 1.404 1,191.67 0.00 0.00 1,191.67 35637RDC8 1248 101 FRDMFI 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.550 1.550 326.48 0.00 0.00 326.48 90983WBT7 1249 101 UNTDCM 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.650 1.650 347.54 0.00 0.00 347.54 32114VBT3 1250 101 1STNMI 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.650 1.650 347.54 0.00 0.00 347.54 77579ADF0 1251 101 RLLSTN 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.650 1.650 343.34 0.00 0.00 343.34 17286TAGO 1252 101 CITADL 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.650 1.650 347.54 0.00 0.00 347.54 029728BC5 1255 101 AMERST 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.600 1.600 337.01 0.00 0.00 337.01 00435J131-15 1256 101 ACCSS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.600 1.600 337.01 0.00 0.00 337.01 849430BF9 1257 101 SPRING 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.500 1.500 315.95 0.00 0.00 315.95 05465DAE8 1258 101 AXOS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.650 1.650 347.54 0.00 0.00 347.54 882213AB7 1260 101 TEXAS 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.100 1.100 228.89 0.00 0.00 228.89 89579NCD3 1262 101 TRIAD 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.350 1.350 284.35 0.00 0.00 284.35 654062JZ2 1266 101 NCOLET 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.400 1.400 294.88 0.00 0.00 294.88 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:13 Portfolio CITY CP TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 118 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 City of La Quinta Total Earnings Page 3 August 1, 2023 - August 31, 2023 CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 020080BX4 1267 101 ALMABK 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.400 1.400 294.88 0.00 0.00 294.88 2027506M2 1268 101 CMWBUS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.250 1.250 263.29 0.00 0.00 263.29 69506YRH4 1269 101 PACWST 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.300 1.300 270.51 0.00 0.00 270.51 08016PDQ9 1270 101 BELB&T 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.250 1.250 263.29 0.00 0.00 263.29 14042TDD6 1271 101 CAPONE 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.600 1.600 332.93 0.00 0.00 332.93 472382AQ3 1272 101 THEJEF 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.250 1.250 263.29 0.00 0.00 263.29 32027BALl 1273 101 1STFDM 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 1.200 1.200 253.78 0.00 0.00 253.78 32112UDR9 1274 101 1STMCG 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.350 1.350 284.35 0.00 0.00 284.35 33847E3A3 1276 101 FLGSTR 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.250 1.250 263.29 0.00 0.00 263.29 95960NKD8 1277 101 WSTRNS 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.000 1.000 208.08 0.00 0.00 208.08 32056GDJ6 1278 101 1STINT 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.000 1.000 210.63 0.00 0.00 210.63 3134GVYG7 1279 101 FHLMC 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.625 0.613 520.83 0.00 0.00 520.83 3133ELH23 1280 101 FFCB 500,000.00 499,850.00 499,850.00 0.500 0.491 208.33 0.00 0.00 208.33 3130AJKW8 1281 101 FHLB 500,000.00 499,850.00 499,850.00 0.500 0.491 208.34 0.00 0.00 208.34 3133ELH80 1282 101 FFCB 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.680 0.667 283.33 0.00 0.00 283.33 3130AJRP6 1283 101 FHLB 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 0.680 0.667 170.00 0.00 0.00 170.00 169894AS1 1284 101 CHIPVA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.600 0.600 126.38 0.00 0.00 126.38 84223QAN7 1286 101 STHRNB 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.500 0.500 105.32 0.00 0.00 105.32 064520BG3 1287 101 BKPRNC 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.500 0.500 105.32 0.00 0.00 105.32 3135G05S8 1288 101 FNMA 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.500 0.491 208.34 0.00 0.00 208.34 3136G4N74 1289 101 FNMA 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.560 0.549 466.67 0.00 0.00 466.67 3136G4M75 1290 101 FNMA 500,000.00 499,750.00 499,750.00 0.520 0.510 216.67 0.00 0.00 216.67 3135G06E8 1291 101 FNMA 500,000.00 499,250.00 499,250.00 0.420 0.413 175.00 0.00 0.00 175.00 3135GA2Z3 1292 101 FNMA 500,000.00 499,250.00 499,250.00 0.560 0.550 233.33 0.00 0.00 233.33 SYS1293 1293 101 BNY 5,208,376.49 506,572.95 5,208,376.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3137EAEU9 1297 101 FHLMC 1,000,000.00 997,300.00 997,300.00 0.375 0.369 312.50 0.00 0.00 312.50 3130AKFA9 1298 101 FHLB 500,000.00 497,400.00 497,400.00 0.375 0.370 156.25 0.00 0.00 156.25 3135GA7D7 1299 101 FNMA 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.600 0.589 250.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 3135GAAW1 1300 101 FNMA 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.400 0.392 166.67 0.00 0.00 166.67 3134GXGZ1 1301 101 FHLMC 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.550 0.540 229.16 0.00 0.00 229.16 3130AKMZ6 1302 101 FHLB 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.510 0.500 212.50 0.00 0.00 212.50 91282CBC4 1303 101 USTR 500,000.00 498,632.81 498,632.81 0.375 0.373 157.95 0.00 0.00 157.95 3130AKN28 1304 101 FHLB 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.550 0.540 229.16 0.00 0.00 229.16 51507LCC6 1305 101 LNDMRK 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.500 0.500 105.32 0.00 0.00 105.32 87270LDL4 1306 101 EVRBA 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 0.500 0.500 104.04 0.00 0.00 104.04 3137EAEX3 1307 101 FHLMC 500,000.00 495,999.50 495,999.50 0.375 0.371 156.25 0.00 0.00 156.25 45950VPS9 1308 101 IFC 500,000.00 497,300.00 497,300.00 0.500 0.505 213.41 0.00 0.00 213.41 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:13 Portfolio CITY CP TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 119 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 City of La Quinta Total Earnings Page 4 August 1, 2023 - August 31, 2023 CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 91282CBH3 1309 101 USTR 500,000.00 495,100.00 495,100.00 0.375 0.376 157.94 0.00 0.00 157.94 3137EAEX3 1310 101 FHLMC 1,000,000.00 983,940.00 983,940.00 0.375 0.374 312.50 0.00 0.00 312.50 91282CAT8 1311 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 977,500.00 977,500.00 0.250 0.254 210.60 0.00 0.00 210.60 3130ALV92 1312 101 FHLB 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 1.050 1.030 437.50 0.00 0.00 437.50 39573LBC1 1313 101 GRNST 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 0.950 0.950 200.91 0.00 0.00 200.91 89235MKY6 1314 101 TOYFSB 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 0.900 0.900 187.27 0.00 0.00 187.27 91282CAZ4 1315 101 USTR 500,000.00 492,187.50 492,187.50 0.375 0.380 158.81 0.00 0.00 158.81 14622LAAO 1316 101 CARTER 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.750 0.750 157.97 0.00 0.00 157.97 31617CAV5 1317 101 FIDHMS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.700 0.700 147.44 0.00 0.00 147.44 SYS1318 1318 101 DPME 812,836.67 784,424.96 812,836.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 91282CBQ3 1319 101 USTR 500,000.00 494,165.00 494,165.00 0.500 0.502 210.67 0.00 0.00 210.67 91282CBT7 1320 101 USTR 500,000.00 499,525.00 499,525.00 0.750 0.749 317.62 0.00 0.00 317.62 91282CCF6 1321 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 997,060.00 997,060.00 0.750 0.750 635.25 0.00 0.00 635.25 91282CBT7 1322 101 USTR 500,000.00 498,450.00 498,450.00 0.750 0.750 317.62 0.00 0.00 317.62 91282CCF6 1323 101 USTR 500,000.00 497,095.00 497,095.00 0.750 0.752 317.62 0.00 0.00 317.62 3130AMFS6 1324 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 993,420.00 993,420.00 0.750 0.741 625.00 0.00 0.00 625.00 92559TAJ7 1325 101 VIBRNT 249,000.00 248,377.50 248,377.50 0.800 0.802 169.18 0.00 0.00 169.18 38149MXK4 1326 101 GLDMAN 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.000 1.000 210.63 0.00 0.00 210.63 795451AFO 1327 101 SALMAE 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.000 1.000 210.63 0.00 0.00 210.63 89388CEYO 1328 101 TABBK 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.400 0.400 84.25 0.00 0.00 84.25 06417NZQ9 1329 101 BKOZK 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.400 0.400 84.25 0.00 0.00 84.25 3133EM2C5 1330 101 FFCB 500,000.00 498,000.00 498,000.00 0.710 0.699 295.83 0.00 0.00 295.83 70962LAF9 1331 101 PENTGN 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 0.700 0.700 148.04 0.00 0.00 148.04 87165ET98 1332 101 SYNCHR 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 0.900 0.900 187.28 0.00 0.00 187.28 05580AD50 1333 101 BMW 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 0.650 0.650 135.25 0.00 0.00 135.25 20786ADL6 1334 101 CONNEC 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.800 0.800 168.50 0.00 0.00 168.50 91282CCP4 1335 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 983,750.00 983,750.00 0.625 0.630 526.50 0.00 0.00 526.50 91282CCW9 1336 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 988,500.00 988,500.00 0.750 0.753 632.01 0.00 0.00 632.01 3130APBM6 1337 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 999,000.00 999,000.00 1.000 0.982 833.33 0.00 0.00 833.33 3133EM4X7 1338 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 991,080.00 991,080.00 0.800 0.792 666.67 0.00 0.00 666.67 3130APB46 1339 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 998,250.00 998,250.00 0.950 0.934 791.67 0.00 0.00 791.67 91282CBEO 1342 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 991,000.00 991,000.00 0.125 0.125 105.30 0.00 0.00 105.30 91282CDB4 1343 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 996,320.00 996,320.00 0.625 0.626 529.37 0.00 0.00 529.37 3133ENCQ1 1344 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1.270 1.246 1,058.34 0.00 0.00 1,058.34 59013KPNO 1345 101 MRRCK 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 1.100 1.100 232.63 0.00 0.00 232.63 14042RQBO 1346 101 CAP1NA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.100 1.100 231.69 0.00 0.00 231.69 3130APTV7 1347 101 FHLB 500,000.00 499,500.00 499,500.00 0.700 0.688 291.67 0.00 0.00 291.67 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:13 Portfolio CITY CP 120 TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 City of La Quinta Total Earnings Page 5 August 1, 2023 - August 31, 2023 CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 91282CBA8 1351 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 990,000.00 990,000.00 0.125 0.126 105.87 0.00 0.00 105.87 91282CBR1 1352 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 989,800.00 989,800.00 0.250 0.251 210.60 0.00 0.00 210.60 3130AP2U8 1353 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 987,100.00 987,100.00 0.550 0.547 458.33 0.00 0.00 458.33 3135G06G3 1354 101 FNMA 1,000,000.00 976,300.00 976,300.00 0.500 0.502 416.66 0.00 0.00 416.66 3133ENGN4 1355 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.970 0.952 808.33 0.00 0.00 808.33 501798RP9 1356 101 LCA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.000 1.000 210.63 0.00 0.00 210.63 20825WAR1 1357 101 CNNXS 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 1.250 1.250 264.35 0.00 0.00 264.35 3130AQF65 1358 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 999,750.00 999,750.00 1.250 1.227 1,041.67 0.00 0.00 1,041.67 3134GW6C5 1359 101 FHLMC 500,000.00 486,000.00 486,000.00 0.800 0.808 333.34 0.00 0.00 333.34 91282CBV2 1360 101 USTR 500,000.00 494,882.81 494,882.81 0.375 0.378 158.81 0.00 0.00 158.81 3137EAEU9 1361 101 FHLMC 500,000.00 487,090.00 487,090.00 0.375 0.378 156.25 0.00 0.00 156.25 3134GW5R3 1362 101 FHLMC 400,000.00 391,360.00 391,360.00 0.650 0.652 216.67 0.00 0.00 216.67 307811DF3 1363 101 FARMER 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 0.900 0.900 190.33 0.00 0.00 190.33 3130AQJR5 1364 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1.500 1.472 1,250.00 0.00 0.00 1,250.00 3135G03U5 1365 101 FNMA 500,000.00 487,790.00 487,790.00 0.625 0.629 260.41 0.00 0.00 260.41 3134GWUQ7 1366 101 FHLMC 1,000,000.00 945,570.00 945,570.00 0.700 0.726 583.33 0.00 0.00 583.33 3130AQSA2 1367 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1.830 1.796 1,525.00 0.00 0.00 1,525.00 89786MAF1 1368 101 TRUSKY 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.600 1.600 332.93 0.00 0.00 332.93 912828Z78 1369 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 986,700.00 986,700.00 1.500 1.508 1,263.59 0.00 0.00 1,263.59 07371AYE7 1370 101 BEALTX 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.900 1.900 395.36 0.00 0.00 395.36 073710E88 1371 101 BEALUS 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.900 1.900 395.36 0.00 0.00 395.36 02357QAQO 1372 101 AMRNT 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.600 1.600 332.94 0.00 0.00 332.94 59161YAP1 1373 101 METRO 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 1.700 1.700 359.52 0.00 0.00 359.52 3130AQWY5 1374 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1.700 1.668 1,416.67 0.00 0.00 1,416.67 27004PCM3 1375 101 EGLMRK 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 2.000 2.000 416.17 0.00 0.00 416.17 64034KAZ4 1376 101 NELNET 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.800 1.800 374.55 0.00 0.00 374.55 24773RCR4 1377 101 DELTA 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 2.000 2.000 416.16 0.00 0.00 416.16 91139LAB2 1378 101 URSVLT 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.900 1.900 400.20 0.00 0.00 400.20 565819AG4 1379 101 MRTHON 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.800 1.800 379.13 0.00 0.00 379.13 91282CCW9 1380 101 USTR 500,000.00 466,454.17 466,454.17 0.750 0.798 316.01 0.00 0.00 316.01 91282CDG3 1381 101 USTR 500,000.00 473,396.82 473,396.82 1.125 1.179 473.84 0.00 0.00 473.84 91282CBQ3 1382 101 USTR 750,000.00 698,025.00 698,025.00 0.500 0.533 316.01 0.00 0.00 316.01 912828654 1383 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 999,010.00 999,010.00 2.375 2.358 2,000.68 0.00 0.00 2,000.68 50625LAW3 1384 101 LFYTT 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.050 2.050 431.79 0.00 0.00 431.79 3130ARGJ4 1385 101 FHLB 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 2.500 2.453 1,041.66 0.00 0.00 1,041.66 20033A3A2 1386 101 CCBA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.650 2.650 558.17 0.00 0.00 558.17 3130ARGY1 1387 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2.700 2.649 2,250.00 0.00 0.00 2,250.00 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:13 Portfolio CITY CID TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 121 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 City of La Quinta Total Earnings Page 6 August 1, 2023 - August 31, 2023 CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 02007GPX5 1388 101 ALLY 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 2.550 2.550 530.61 0.00 0.00 530.61 52168UHY1 1389 101 LEADR 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 2.550 2.550 530.61 0.00 0.00 530.61 9128283D0 1390 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 985,190.00 985,190.00 2.250 2.265 1,895.38 0.00 0.00 1,895.38 91282CEF4 1391 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 976,860.00 976,860.00 2.500 2.552 2,117.49 0.00 0.00 2,117.49 254673E69 1392 101 DISCOV 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.100 3.100 645.05 0.00 0.00 645.05 48115LAD6 1396 101 JOVIA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.500 2.500 526.58 0.00 0.00 526.58 912828X88 1397 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 969,687.50 969,687.50 2.375 2.429 2,000.68 0.00 0.00 2,000.68 91282CEN7 1398 101 USTR 500,000.00 495,000.00 495,000.00 2.750 2.755 1,158.29 0.00 0.00 1,158.29 91282CET4 1399 101 USTR 500,000.00 491,842.18 491,842.18 2.625 2.661 1,111.68 0.00 0.00 1,111.68 9128282U3 1400 101 USTR 500,000.00 490,850.00 490,850.00 1.875 1.895 790.03 0.00 0.00 790.03 3133ENYH7 1401 101 FFCB 500,000.00 499,080.00 499,080.00 2.625 2.580 1,093.75 0.00 0.00 1,093.75 3130ASDV8 1409 101 FHLB 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 3.300 3.238 825.00 0.00 0.00 825.00 89269FDP7 1415 101 TRADCP 246,000.00 246,000.00 246,000.00 3.000 3.000 626.79 0.00 0.00 626.79 91282CFB2 1417 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 989,460.00 989,460.00 2.750 2.757 2,316.57 0.00 0.00 2,316.57 912828XT2 1418 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 985,240.00 985,240.00 2.000 2.024 1,693.99 0.00 0.00 1,693.99 397417AQ9 1419 101 GRNWDS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.050 3.050 642.42 0.00 0.00 642.42 88413QDN5 1420 101 3RD 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.300 3.300 686.67 0.00 0.00 686.67 02589ADH2 1421 101 AMEXNB 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.450 3.450 717.88 0.00 0.00 717.88 91282CFB2 1422 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 979,645.67 979,645.67 2.750 2.784 2,316.57 0.00 0.00 2,316.57 732329BD8 1425 101 PONCE 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.500 3.500 737.21 0.00 0.00 737.21 3133ENL99 1426 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 997,492.55 997,492.55 3.375 3.320 2,812.50 0.00 0.00 2,812.50 052392BT3 1427 101 AUSTEL 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.800 3.800 800.39 0.00 0.00 800.39 914242AA0 1429 101 UNIVCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.000 4.000 842.52 0.00 0.00 842.52 22258JAB7 1430 101 CNTYSC 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.400 4.400 926.77 0.00 0.00 926.77 3133ENQ29 1433 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 996,400.00 996,400.00 4.000 3.939 3,333.33 0.00 0.00 3,333.33 84229LBA9 1434 101 STHBNK 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 4.250 4.250 880.74 0.00 0.00 880.74 34520LAT0 1435 101 FORBRT 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.600 4.600 968.90 0.00 0.00 968.90 25460FDW3 1438 101 DIRFCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.800 4.800 1,011.02 0.00 0.00 1,011.02 9128282R0 1439 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 927,110.00 927,110.00 2.250 2.425 1,909.57 0.00 0.00 1,909.57 3133EN31-11 1441 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 998,650.00 998,650.00 4.000 3.930 3,333.33 0.00 0.00 3,333.33 914098DJ4 1442 101 UNIVBK 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 4.200 4.200 888.21 0.00 0.00 888.21 3133EN3S7 1446 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 998,000.00 998,000.00 3.750 3.687 3,125.00 0.00 0.00 3,125.00 25844MAK4 1447 101 DORTCU 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 4.500 4.500 944.02 0.00 0.00 944.02 01664MAB2 1448 101 ALL IN 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.400 4.400 926.77 0.00 0.00 926.77 51828MAC8 1449 101 LATCOM 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.500 4.500 947.84 0.00 0.00 947.84 45157PAZ3 1450 101 IDEAL 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.500 4.500 947.84 0.00 0.00 947.84 01882MAC6 1451 101 ALIANT 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 5.000 5.000 1,048.90 0.00 0.00 1,048.90 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:13 Portfolio CITY CP 122 TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 City of La Quinta Total Earnings Page 7 August 1, 2023 - August 31, 2023 CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 80865MAB3 1454 101 SCIENT 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.650 4.650 979.43 0.00 0.00 979.43 78472EAB0 1455 101 SPCOCU 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 4.350 4.350 919.94 0.00 0.00 919.94 91282CFH9 1456 101 USTR 500,000.00 489,175.00 489,175.00 3.125 3.169 1,316.71 0.00 0.00 1,316.71 300185LM5 1457 101 EVRGRN 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.850 3.850 810.93 0.00 0.00 810.93 82671DAB3 1458 101 SIGFCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.400 4.400 926.77 0.00 0.00 926.77 79772FAG1 1459 101 SF FCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.350 4.350 916.24 0.00 0.00 916.24 91282CGH8 1460 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 996,369.14 996,369.14 3.500 3.484 2,948.37 0.00 0.00 2,948.37 9128284X5 1462 101 USTR 0.00 988,900.00 0.00 2.750 16.415 2,241.85 0.00 11,100.00 13,341.85 912796Y37 1463 101 USTR 0.00 1,954,412.92 0.00 4.636 425.685 0.00 0.00 45,587.08 45,587.08 3133EPAV7 1464 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 995,400.00 995,400.00 3.875 3.820 3,229.17 0.00 0.00 3,229.17 91282CEW7 1465 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 967,220.00 967,220.00 3.250 3.333 2,737.77 0.00 0.00 2,737.77 530520AH8 1466 101 LBRTY1 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.500 4.500 947.84 0.00 0.00 947.84 09582YAF9 1467 101 BLURDG 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 4.200 4.200 870.38 0.00 0.00 870.38 011852AE0 1469 101 ALASKA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.600 4.600 968.90 0.00 0.00 968.90 912796YH6 1470 101 USTR 2,000,000.00 1,950,283.66 1,950,283.66 4.917 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 912796Z51 1471 101 USTR 0.00 2,927,220.00 0.00 4.991 30.250 0.00 0.00 72,780.00 72,780.00 92891CCZ3 1472 101 VYSTAR 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.550 4.550 958.37 0.00 0.00 958.37 89789AAG2 1473 101 TRUFCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.700 4.700 989.96 0.00 0.00 989.96 59524LAA4 1474 101 MIDCAR 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.850 4.850 1,021.56 0.00 0.00 1,021.56 49306SJ56 1475 101 KEYBNK 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 5.000 5.000 1,036.16 0.00 0.00 1,036.16 064860MC0 1476 101 BKSIER 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 4.600 4.600 953.27 0.00 0.00 953.27 909557KQ2 1477 101 UNBKRS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 5.000 5.000 1,053.15 0.00 0.00 1,053.15 00833JAQ4 1478 101 AFFNTY 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.900 4.900 1,032.09 0.00 0.00 1,032.09 108622NJ6 1479 101 BRIDWA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.850 4.850 1,021.56 0.00 0.00 1,021.56 3135GAGA3 1480 101 FNMA 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.200 5.102 8,666.67 0.00 0.00 8,666.67 912797GF8 1481 101 USTR 0.00 1,968,951.36 0.00 4.696 82.225 0.00 0.00 31,048.64 31,048.64 3135GAGK1 1482 101 FNMA 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 5.050 4.955 12,625.00 0.00 0.00 12,625.00 724468AC7 1483 101 PITBOW 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 4.350 4.350 901.46 0.00 0.00 901.46 3134GYPJ5 1484 101 FHLMC 1,000,000.00 999,100.00 999,100.00 5.200 5.107 4,333.34 0.00 0.00 4,333.34 62384RAT3 1485 101 MTNAMR 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.700 4.700 989.96 0.00 0.00 989.96 60425SKB4 1486 101 MINWST 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.250 4.250 895.18 0.00 0.00 895.18 912796YT0 1487 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 975,854.17 975,854.17 4.750 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 912797FA0 1488 101 USTR 3,000,000.00 2,935,470.00 2,935,470.00 4.780 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 912797GJ0 1489 101 USTR 0.00 984,010.00 0.00 4.878 21.183 0.00 0.00 15,990.00 15,990.00 313384LP2 1490 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 982,351.39 982,351.39 4.850 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35089LAF0 1491 101 FRPNTS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.550 4.550 958.37 0.00 0.00 958.37 062119BT8 1492 101 BANK59 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.250 4.250 895.18 0.00 0.00 895.18 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:13 Portfolio CITY CP TE (PRF_TE) 7.3.6 123 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 City of La Quinta Total Earnings Page 8 August 1, 2023 - August 31, 2023 CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 152577BN1 1493 101 CENTRL 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.000 4.000 842.52 0.00 0.00 842.52 23248UAB3 1494 101 CYFAIR 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.500 4.500 947.84 0.00 0.00 947.84 91527PBY2 1495 101 UNIVST 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.350 4.350 916.24 0.00 0.00 916.24 92834ABT2 1496 101 VISION 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.050 4.050 853.05 0.00 0.00 853.05 12547CBJ6 1497 101 CIBCBK 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 4.350 4.350 901.46 0.00 0.00 901.46 843383CS7 1498 101 SBPOPM 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.200 4.200 884.65 0.00 0.00 884.65 06610RCA5 1499 101 BANKRS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.150 4.150 874.12 0.00 0.00 874.12 90352RDB8 1500 101 USAFCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.550 4.550 958.37 0.00 0.00 958.37 87868YAQ6 1501 101 TECHCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 5.000 5.000 1,053.15 0.00 0.00 1,053.15 912797FL6 1502 101 USTR 4,000,000.00 3,898,126.67 3,898,126.67 5.180 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133EPME2 1505 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 998,190.00 998,190.00 3.875 3.809 3,229.17 0.00 0.00 3,229.17 16141BAC5 1506 101 CHRTWY 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.900 4.900 1,032.09 0.00 0.00 1,032.09 23204HP138 1507 101 CUST 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 4.500 4.500 932.55 0.00 0.00 932.55 91282CGT2 1508 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 984,600.00 984,600.00 3.625 3.672 3,070.35 0.00 0.00 3,070.35 85279AAC6 1509 101 STVINC 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.600 4.600 968.90 0.00 0.00 968.90 01025RAG4 1510 101 ALABAM 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 5.000 5.000 1,053.15 0.00 0.00 1,053.15 38120MCA2 1511 101 GLDNST 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 4.450 4.450 941.08 0.00 0.00 941.08 931142EE9 1512 101 WALMRT 1,000,000.00 973,110.00 973,110.00 3.700 3.731 3,083.34 0.00 0.00 3,083.34 910286GN7 1513 101 UNTFDL 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.500 4.500 947.84 0.00 0.00 947.84 472312AA5 1514 101 JEEPCO 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.700 4.700 989.96 0.00 0.00 989.96 31911KAK4 1515 101 1STELK 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.400 4.400 926.77 0.00 0.00 926.77 912828V80 1516 101 USTR 2,000,000.00 1,964,400.00 1,964,400.00 2.250 2.272 3,790.76 0.00 0.00 3,790.76 912796ZN2 1517 101 USTR 3,000,000.00 2,920,963.32 2,920,963.32 5.240 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 912828666 1518 101 USTR 2,000,000.00 1,969,580.00 1,969,580.00 2.750 2.790 4,667.83 0.00 0.00 4,667.83 91282CDV0 1519 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 975,600.00 975,600.00 0.875 0.890 737.09 0.00 0.00 737.09 05765LBU0 1520 101 BALBOA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.400 4.400 926.77 0.00 0.00 926.77 6067-001TERM 1521 101 CAMP 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 5.645 5.645 95,879.18 0.00 0.00 95,879.18 560507AQ8 1522 101 MAINE 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.800 4.800 1,011.02 0.00 0.00 1,011.02 91739JAB1 1523 101 UTH1ST 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 5.000 5.000 1,040.41 0.00 0.00 1,040.41 91282CGT2 1524 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 990,000.00 990,000.00 3.625 3.652 3,070.35 0.00 0.00 3,070.35 91282CHA2 1525 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 985,000.00 985,000.00 3.500 3.524 2,948.37 0.00 0.00 2,948.37 30960QAR8 1526 101 FARMIG 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 5.400 5.400 1,137.40 0.00 0.00 1,137.40 3133EPQD0 1527 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 998,655.69 998,655.69 4.250 4.176 3,541.66 0.00 0.00 3,541.66 91282CEK3 1528 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 0.00 980,080.00 2.500 2.530 1,494.56 0.00 0.00 1,494.56 3130ARHG9 1529 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 0.00 982,520.00 2.125 2.093 1,239.58 0.00 0.00 1,239.58 912828W71 1530 101 USTR 2,000,000.00 0.00 1,960,078.13 2.125 2.162 2,554.64 0.00 0.00 2,554.64 3133EPSK2 1531 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 0.00 990,400.00 4.250 4.040 1,534.72 0.00 0.00 1,534.72 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:13 Portfolio CITY CP TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 124 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 City of La Quinta Total 249,690,346.28 246,160,315.39 248,373,924.96 3.682 568,186.82 0.00 198,745.72 766,932.54 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:13 TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 125 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 Total Earnings Page 9 August 1, 2023 - August 31, 2023 Adjusted Interest Earnings Ending Beginning Ending Current Annualized Interest Amortization/ Realized Adjusted Interest CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Par Value Book Value Book Value Rate Yield Earned Accretion Gainl/Loss Earnings Fund: General Fund 499724AP7 1532 101 KNOX 248,000.00 0.00 248,000.00 4.850 4.850 197.72 0.00 0.00 197.72 92023CAG8 1557 101 VLLSTR 248,000.00 0.00 248,000.00 4.850 4.158 28.25 0.00 0.00 28.25 Subtotal 232,507,694.34 244,001,179.95 231,191,273.02 3.685 561,896.10 0.00 198,745.72 760,641.82 Fund: Fiscal Agent SYS1058 1058 231 USBANK 15,000,443.22 1,554.40 15,000,443.22 4.598 6.07 0.00 0.00 6.07 Subtotal 15,000,443.22 1,554.40 15,000,443.22 4.598 6.07 0.00 0.00 6.07 Fund: Housing Authority : WSA and LQ SYS1062 1062 241 LQPR 116,174.16 91,546.48 116,174.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Subtotal 116,174.16 91,546.48 116,174.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fund: SA Low/Mod Bond Fund 25-33-005 1113 249 LAIF 2,066,034.56 2,066,034.56 2,066,034.56 3.434 3.582 6,284.65 0.00 0.00 6,284.65 Subtotal 2,066,034.56 2,066,034.56 2,066,034.56 3.582 6,284.65 0.00 0.00 6,284.65 Total 249,690,346.28 246,160,315.39 248,373,924.96 3.682 568,186.82 0.00 198,745.72 766,932.54 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:13 TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 125 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 GEM of rhe DESERT City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary September 30, 2023 City of La Quinta 232,859,475.60 224,909,467.86 231,372,784.48 100.00% 879 502 3.373 Investments Total Earnings September 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 617,419.87 1,992,690.39 Average Daily Balance 247,824,460.81 246,958,680.28 Effective Rate of Return 3.03% 3.20% 1 certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code and the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months. The City of La Quinta used the monthly account statements issued by our financial institutions to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. Digitally signed by Claudia Martinez Date: 2023.12.04 10:51:59-08'00' 12/4/2023 Claudia Martinez, Finance Director/City Treasurer Reporting period 09/01/2023-09/30/2023 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 18:05 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF—PMI) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 126 Par Market Book % of Days to YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 365 Equiv. Bank Accounts 6,831,189.46 6,831,189.46 6,831,189.46 2.95 1 1 0.000 CAMP TERM 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 8.64 263 194 5.645 Local Agency Investment Fund -City 19,256,152.68 18,739,335.32 19,256,152.68 8.32 1 1 3.534 Local Agency Invstmnt Fund -Housing 2,066,034.56 2,034,933.90 2,066,034.56 0.89 1 1 3.534 Money Market Accounts - CAMP 29,713,603.41 29,713,603.41 29,713,603.41 12.84 1 1 5.550 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 50,000,000.00 46,918,014.00 49,753,937.74 21.50 1,535 843 2.202 Federal Agency Discount 2,000,000.00 1,928,340.00 1,916,929.44 0.83 287 263 5.533 Treasury Coupon Securities 43,750,000.00 41,480,222.50 42,892,240.04 18.54 1,165 742 3.108 Treasury Discount Notes 11,000,000.00 10,921,370.00 10,730,414.16 4.64 175 49 5.320 Certificate of Deposits 39,812,000.00 38,015,993.78 39,811,377.50 17.21 1,671 887 2.822 Corporate Notes 1,500,000.00 1,395,970.00 1,470,410.00 0.64 1,827 1,442 3.054 Money Market with Fiscal Agent 13,793.08 13,793.08 13,793.08 0.01 1 1 0.000 CERBT - OPEB Trust 1,773,353.25 1,773,353.25 1,773,353.25 0.77 1 1 0.000 PARS Pension Trust 5,143,349.16 5,143,349.16 5,143,349.16 2.22 1 1 0.000 232,859,475.60 224,909,467.86 231,372,784.48 100.00% 879 502 3.373 Investments Total Earnings September 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 617,419.87 1,992,690.39 Average Daily Balance 247,824,460.81 246,958,680.28 Effective Rate of Return 3.03% 3.20% 1 certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the California Government Code and the City Investment Policy. As Treasurer of the City of La Quinta, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the City's expenditure requirements for the next six months. The City of La Quinta used the monthly account statements issued by our financial institutions to determine the fair market value of investments at month end. Digitally signed by Claudia Martinez Date: 2023.12.04 10:51:59-08'00' 12/4/2023 Claudia Martinez, Finance Director/City Treasurer Reporting period 09/01/2023-09/30/2023 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 18:05 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF—PMI) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 126 City of La Quinta CAMP TERM Portfolio Management Page 1 6067-001TERM 1521 California Asset Management Pr Portfolio Details - Investments 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 5.645 263 194 5.645 04/12/2024 September 30, 2023 Subtotal and Average 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 263 194 Average Purchase Fund -City Stated Days to YTM Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Term Maturity 365 Date Bank Accounts 19,256,152.68 3.534 1 1 3.534 Subtotal and Average 19,256,152.68 SYS1293 1293 Bank of New York 09/01/2020 1,684,317.31 1,684,317.31 1,684,317.31 1 1 0.000 059731851 1228 Bank of the West 08/20/2019 4,176,100.00 4,176,100.00 4,176,100.00 1 1 0.000 Local Agency Inv Fund SYS1059 1059 City Petty Cash 2,066,034.56 07/01/2016 3,300.00 3,300.00 3,300.00 1 1 0.000 SYS1318 1318 Dune Palms Mobile Estates 2,034,933.90 03/09/2021 825,789.63 825,789.63 825,789.63 1 1 0.000 Money Market Accounts - CAMP SYS1062 1062 La Quinta Palms Realty 07/01/2016 141,682.52 141,682.52 141,682.52 1 1 0.000 1153 California Asset Management Pr 09/26/2018 Subtotal and Average 8,988,346.11 6,831,189.46 6,831,189.46 6,831,189.46 1 1 0.000 CAMP TERM 6067-001TERM 1521 California Asset Management Pr 07/24/2023 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 5.645 263 194 5.645 04/12/2024 Subtotal and Average 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 263 194 5.645 Local Agency Investment Fund -City 98-33-434 1055 Local Agency Inv Fund 19,256,152.68 18,739,335.32 19,256,152.68 3.534 1 1 3.534 Subtotal and Average 19,256,152.68 19,256,152.68 18,739,335.32 19,256,152.68 1 1 3.534 Local Agency Invstmnt Fund -Housing 25-33-005 1113 Local Agency Inv Fund 2,066,034.56 2,034,933.90 2,066,034.56 3.534 1 1 3.534 Subtotal and Average 2,066,034.56 2,066,034.56 2,034,933.90 2,066,034.56 1 1 3.534 Money Market Accounts - CAMP SYS1153 1153 California Asset Management Pr 09/26/2018 29,713,603.41 29,713,603.41 29,713,603.41 5.550 1 1 5.550 Subtotal and Average 29,583,219.60 29,713,603.41 29,713,603.41 29,713,603.41 1 1 5.550 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 3133EK4X1 1234 Federal Farm Credit Bank 11/01/2019 1,000,000.00 996,760.00 996,900.00 1.600 1,461 31 1.680 11/01/2023 3130AFW94 1177 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/01/2019 500,000.00 494,455.00 498,550.00 2.500 1,810 135 2.563 02/13/2024 3133ELNEO 1246 Federal Farm Credit Bank 02/14/2020 1,000,000.00 984,750.00 999,000.00 1.430 1,461 136 1.456 02/14/2024 3130ARHG9 1529 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/10/2023 1,000,000.00 986,340.00 982,520.00 2.125 202 150 5.391 02/28/2024 3135GAGK1 1482 Federal National Mtg Assn 04/12/2023 3,000,000.00 2,989,380.00 3,000,000.00 5.050 366 194 5.050 04/12/2024 3133ENYH7 1401 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/10/2022 500,000.00 490,380.00 499,080.00 2.625 731 253 2.720 06/10/2024 3135GOV75 1206 Federal National Mtg Assn 07/15/2019 500,000.00 486,200.00 495,950.00 1.750 1,814 275 1.922 07/02/2024 3133EKWV4 1212 Federal Farm Credit Bank 08/02/2019 500,000.00 485,635.00 499,500.00 1.850 1,820 299 1.871 07/26/2024 3135GAGA3 1480 Federal National Mtg Assn 04/03/2023 2,000,000.00 1,990,980.00 2,000,000.00 5.200 484 303 5.206 07/30/2024 3133EKP75 1224 Federal Farm Credit Bank 09/17/2019 500,000.00 482,020.00 498,750.00 1.600 1,827 352 1.652 09/17/2024 3133ELEA8 1242 Federal Farm Credit Bank 12/17/2019 1,000,000.00 964,960.00 998,600.00 1.700 1,736 352 1.731 09/17/2024 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:13 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 127 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments September 30, 2023 Page 2 CUSIP Investment # Average Issuer Balance Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate Days to Term Maturity YTM Maturity 365 Date Federal Agency Coupon Securities 3135G06E8 1291 Federal National Mtg Assn 11/18/2020 500,000.00 472,125.00 499,250.00 0.420 1,461 414 0.458 11/18/2024 3133ENGN4 1355 Federal Farm Credit Bank 12/09/2021 1,000,000.00 947,930.00 1,000,000.00 0.970 1,096 435 0.970 12/09/2024 3135GAAW1 1300 Federal National Mtg Assn 12/30/2020 500,000.00 469,475.00 500,000.00 0.400 1,461 456 0.400 12/30/2024 3130AP2U8 1353 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/07/2021 1,000,000.00 938,720.00 987,100.00 0.550 1,127 464 0.976 01/07/2025 3130AQWY5 1374 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/25/2022 1,000,000.00 948,760.00 1,000,000.00 1.700 1,095 512 1.700 02/24/2025 3135G031.15 1365 Federal National Mtg Assn 01/28/2022 500,000.00 465,790.00 487,790.00 0.625 1,180 569 1.400 04/22/2025 3134GVYG7 1279 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 05/27/2020 1,000,000.00 927,320.00 1,000,000.00 0.625 1,826 604 0.625 05/27/2025 3133ELH23 1280 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/09/2020 500,000.00 461,370.00 499,850.00 0.500 1,826 617 0.506 06/09/2025 3133ELH80 1282 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/10/2020 500,000.00 462,275.00 500,000.00 0.680 1,826 618 0.680 06/10/2025 3130AJKW8 1281 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/03/2020 500,000.00 462,060.00 499,850.00 0.500 1,836 621 0.506 06/13/2025 3130AJRP6 1283 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/30/2020 300,000.00 277,122.00 300,000.00 0.680 1,826 638 0.680 06/30/2025 3137EAEU9 1297 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 12/07/2020 1,000,000.00 919,170.00 997,300.00 0.375 1,687 659 0.434 07/21/2025 3137EAEU9 1361 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 01/05/2022 500,000.00 459,585.00 487,090.00 0.375 1,293 659 1.120 07/21/2025 3135G05S8 1288 Federal National Mtg Assn 08/14/2020 500,000.00 457,725.00 500,000.00 0.500 1,826 683 0.500 08/14/2025 3136G4M75 1290 Federal National Mtg Assn 08/28/2020 500,000.00 458,390.00 499,750.00 0.520 1,816 687 0.530 08/18/2025 3136G4N74 1289 Federal National Mtg Assn 08/21/2020 1,000,000.00 915,790.00 1,000,000.00 0.560 1,826 690 0.560 08/21/2025 3137EAEX3 1307 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 02/23/2021 500,000.00 455,900.00 495,999.50 0.375 1,673 723 0.552 09/23/2025 3137EAEX3 1310 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 03/30/2021 1,000,000.00 911,800.00 983,940.00 0.375 1,638 723 0.740 09/23/2025 3130ARGJ4 1385 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/14/2022 500,000.00 475,590.00 500,000.00 2.500 1,279 744 2.500 10/14/2025 3134GW5R3 1362 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 01/05/2022 400,000.00 364,280.00 391,360.00 0.650 1,391 757 1.232 10/27/2025 3135G06G3 1354 Federal National Mtg Assn 12/07/2021 1,000,000.00 909,460.00 976,300.00 0.500 1,431 768 1.120 11/07/2025 3135GA2Z3 1292 Federal National Mtg Assn 11/17/2020 500,000.00 452,865.00 499,250.00 0.560 1,826 778 0.590 11/17/2025 3130AKFA9 1298 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/07/2020 500,000.00 451,385.00 497,400.00 0.375 1,831 803 0.480 12/12/2025 3135GA7D7 1299 Federal National Mtg Assn 12/23/2020 500,000.00 451,430.00 500,000.00 0.600 1,826 814 0.600 12/23/2025 3134GXGZ1 1301 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 12/30/2020 500,000.00 452,730.00 500,000.00 0.550 1,826 821 0.550 12/30/2025 3130AKMZ6 1302 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/14/2021 500,000.00 449,330.00 500,000.00 0.510 1,826 836 0.510 01/14/2026 313OAKN28 1304 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/29/2021 500,000.00 449,000.00 500,000.00 0.550 1,826 851 0.550 01/29/2026 3130ALV92 1312 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/30/2021 500,000.00 454,625.00 500,000.00 1.050 1,826 911 0.938 03/30/2026 3130AMFS6 1324 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/17/2021 1,000,000.00 895,980.00 993,420.00 0.750 1,821 985 0.885 06/12/2026 3133EM2C5 1330 Federal Farm Credit Bank 08/10/2021 500,000.00 441,815.00 498,000.00 0.710 1,826 1,044 0.792 08/10/2026 3133EM4X7 1338 Federal Farm Credit Bank 09/28/2021 1,000,000.00 887,470.00 991,080.00 0.800 1,808 1,075 0.985 09/10/2026 3130APBM6 1337 Federal Home Loan Bank 09/30/2021 1,000,000.00 887,020.00 999,000.00 1.000 1,826 1,095 1.021 09/30/2026 3130APB46 1339 Federal Home Loan Bank 10/13/2021 1,000,000.00 884,450.00 998,250.00 0.950 1,826 1,108 0.986 10/13/2026 3134GW6C5 1359 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 01/05/2022 500,000.00 439,450.00 486,000.00 0.800 1,757 1,123 1.403 10/28/2026 3133ENCQ1 1344 Federal Farm Credit Bank 11/02/2021 1,000,000.00 891,350.00 1,000,000.00 1.270 1,826 1,128 1.270 11/02/2026 3130APTV7 1347 Federal Home Loan Bank 11/24/2021 500,000.00 454,265.00 499,500.00 0.700 1,826 1,150 1.489 11/24/2026 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:13 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 128 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments September 30, 2023 Page 3 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:13 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 129 Average Purchase Stated Days to YTM Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Term Maturity 365 Date Federal Agency Coupon Securities 313OAQF65 1358 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/22/2021 1,000,000.00 893,100.00 999,750.00 1.250 1,825 1,177 1.255 12/21/2026 3134GWUQ7 1366 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 02/10/2022 1,000,000.00 870,110.00 945,570.00 0.700 1,784 1,186 1.870 12/30/2026 3130AQJR5 1364 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/27/2022 1,000,000.00 890,300.00 1,000,000.00 1.500 1,826 1,214 1.500 01/27/2027 3130AQSA2 1367 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/10/2022 1,000,000.00 899,170.00 1,000,000.00 1.830 1,826 1,228 1.830 02/10/2027 3130ARGY1 1387 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/19/2022 1,000,000.00 922,900.00 1,000,000.00 2.700 1,826 1,296 2.700 04/19/2027 3130ASDV8 1409 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/28/2022 300,000.00 281,502.00 300,000.00 3.300 1,826 1,366 3.300 06/28/2027 3133ENL99 1426 Federal Farm Credit Bank 09/15/2022 1,000,000.00 948,540.00 997,492.55 3.375 1,826 1,445 3.430 09/15/2027 3133ENQ29 1433 Federal Farm Credit Bank 09/30/2022 1,000,000.00 970,760.00 996,400.00 4.000 1,825 1,459 4.080 09/29/2027 3133EN3H1 1441 Federal Farm Credit Bank 11/29/2022 1,000,000.00 970,140.00 998,650.00 4.000 1,826 1,520 4.030 11/29/2027 3133EN3S7 1446 Federal Farm Credit Bank 12/07/2022 1,000,000.00 960,690.00 998,000.00 3.750 1,826 1,528 3.794 12/07/2027 3133EPAV7 1464 Federal Farm Credit Bank 02/15/2023 1,000,000.00 964,480.00 995,400.00 3.875 1,825 1,597 3.977 02/14/2028 3134GYPJ5 1484 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 04/24/2023 1,000,000.00 975,070.00 999,100.00 5.200 1,820 1,660 5.220 04/17/2028 3133EPME2 1505 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/08/2023 1,000,000.00 961,930.00 998,190.00 3.875 1,827 1,712 3.915 06/08/2028 3133EPQDO 1527 Federal Farm Credit Bank 07/31/2023 1,000,000.00 976,970.00 998,655.69 4.250 1,813 1,751 4.280 07/17/2028 3133EPSK2 1531 Federal Farm Credit Bank 08/18/2023 1,000,000.00 976,690.00 990,400.00 4.250 1,816 1,772 4.467 08/07/2028 Subtotal and Average 49,786,907.74 50,000,000.00 46,918,014.00 49,753,937.74 1,535 843 2.202 Federal Agency Discount 313384YJ2 1534 Federal Home Loan Bank 09/07/2023 2,000,000.00 1,928,340.00 1,916,929.44 5.210 287 263 5.533 06/20/2024 Subtotal and Average 1,860,994.02 2,000,000.00 1,928,340.00 1,916,929.44 287 263 5.533 Treasury Coupon Securities 91282CBAB 1351 U.S. Treasury 12/07/2021 1,000,000.00 989,450.00 990,000.00 0.125 738 75 0.623 12/15/2023 91282CBEO 1342 U.S. Treasury 10/22/2021 1,000,000.00 985,000.00 991,000.00 0.125 815 106 0.531 01/15/2024 912828V80 1516 U.S. Treasury 06/30/2023 2,000,000.00 1,979,140.00 1,964,400.00 2.250 215 122 5.374 01/31/2024 91282CDVO 1519 U.S. Treasury 07/12/2023 1,000,000.00 985,120.00 975,600.00 0.875 203 122 5.416 01/31/2024 9128281366 1518 U.S. Treasury 07/12/2023 2,000,000.00 1,979,840.00 1,969,580.00 2.750 218 137 5.382 02/15/2024 91282CBR1 1352 U.S. Treasury 12/07/2021 1,000,000.00 977,110.00 989,800.00 0.250 829 166 0.704 03/15/2024 912828W71 1530 U.S. Treasury 08/10/2023 2,000,000.00 1,967,260.00 1,960,078.13 2.125 234 182 5.338 03/31/2024 91282CBV2 1360 U.S. Treasury 01/05/2022 500,000.00 486,720.00 494,882.81 0.375 831 197 0.830 04/15/2024 91282CEK3 1528 U.S. Treasury 08/10/2023 1,000,000.00 983,010.00 980,080.00 2.500 264 212 5.340 04/30/2024 912828XT2 1418 U.S. Treasury 05/04/2022 1,000,000.00 977,230.00 985,240.00 2.000 758 243 2.736 05/31/2024 9128282N9 1536 U.S. Treasury 09/07/2023 2,000,000.00 1,945,540.00 1,942,840.00 2.125 328 304 5.431 07/31/2024 9128282U3 1400 U.S. Treasury 06/09/2022 500,000.00 483,965.00 490,850.00 1.875 814 335 2.727 08/31/2024 9128282U3 1535 U.S. Treasury 09/07/2023 3,000,000.00 2,903,790.00 2,899,170.81 1.875 359 335 5.440 08/31/2024 91282CDB4 1343 U.S. Treasury 10/22/2021 1,000,000.00 951,840.00 996,320.00 0.625 1,089 380 0.750 10/15/2024 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:13 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 129 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments September 30, 2023 Page 4 CUSIP Investment # Issuer Average Purchase Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate Days to Term Maturity YTM 365 Maturity Date Treasury Coupon Securities 9128283DO 1390 U.S. Treasury 05/03/2022 1,000,000.00 966,720.00 985,190.00 2.250 912 396 2.870 10/31/2024 912828YV6 1241 U.S. Treasury 12/16/2019 1,000,000.00 956,760.00 989,687.50 1.500 1,811 426 1.718 11/30/2024 91282CAT8 1311 U.S. Treasury 03/30/2021 1,000,000.00 906,800.00 977,500.00 0.250 1,676 761 0.750 10/31/2025 91282CAZ4 1315 U.S. Treasury 04/22/2021 500,000.00 453,105.00 492,187.50 0.375 1,683 791 0.720 11/30/2025 91282CBC4 1303 U.S. Treasury 01/07/2021 500,000.00 452,050.00 498,632.81 0.375 1,819 822 0.431 12/31/2025 91282CBH3 1309 U.S. Treasury 02/23/2021 500,000.00 450,135.00 495,100.00 0.375 1,803 853 0.577 01/31/2026 91282CBQ3 1319 U.S. Treasury 05/28/2021 500,000.00 450,115.00 494,165.00 0.500 1,737 881 0.750 02/28/2026 91282CBQ3 1382 U.S. Treasury 03/23/2022 750,000.00 675,172.50 698,025.00 0.500 1,438 881 2.353 02/28/2026 91282CBT7 1320 U.S. Treasury 05/28/2021 500,000.00 452,150.00 499,525.00 0.750 1,768 912 0.770 03/31/2026 91282CBT7 1322 U.S. Treasury 06/17/2021 500,000.00 452,150.00 498,450.00 0.750 1,748 912 0.816 03/31/2026 912828654 1383 U.S. Treasury 03/23/2022 1,000,000.00 939,610.00 999,010.00 2.375 1,499 942 2.400 04/30/2026 91282CCF6 1321 U.S. Treasury 06/01/2021 1,000,000.00 898,130.00 997,060.00 0.750 1,825 973 0.810 05/31/2026 91282CCF6 1323 U.S. Treasury 06/17/2021 500,000.00 449,065.00 497,095.00 0.750 1,809 973 0.870 05/31/2026 91282CCP4 1335 U.S. Treasury 09/29/2021 1,000,000.00 890,040.00 983,750.00 0.625 1,766 1,034 0.970 07/31/2026 91282CCW9 1336 U.S. Treasury 09/29/2021 1,000,000.00 890,590.00 988,500.00 0.750 1,797 1,065 0.990 08/31/2026 91282CCW9 1380 U.S. Treasury 03/22/2022 500,000.00 445,295.00 466,454.17 0.750 1,623 1,065 2.350 08/31/2026 91282CDG3 1381 U.S. Treasury 03/22/2022 500,000.00 448,045.00 473,396.82 1.125 1,684 1,126 2.350 10/31/2026 912828Z78 1369 U.S. Treasury 02/10/2022 1,000,000.00 900,470.00 986,700.00 1.500 1,816 1,218 1.781 01/31/2027 91282CEF4 1391 U.S. Treasury 05/03/2022 1,000,000.00 928,980.00 976,860.00 2.500 1,793 1,277 3.010 03/31/2027 91282CEN7 1398 U.S. Treasury 06/08/2022 500,000.00 467,615.00 495,000.00 2.750 1,787 1,307 2.971 04/30/2027 912828X88 1397 U.S. Treasury 06/07/2022 1,000,000.00 922,270.00 969,687.50 2.375 1,803 1,322 3.041 05/15/2027 91282CET4 1399 U.S. Treasury 06/08/2022 500,000.00 464,845.00 491,842.18 2.625 1,818 1,338 2.980 05/31/2027 91282CEW7 1465 U.S. Treasury 02/15/2023 1,000,000.00 950,270.00 967,220.00 3.250 1,596 1,368 4.075 06/30/2027 91282CFB2 1417 U.S. Treasury 08/15/2022 1,000,000.00 931,640.00 989,460.00 2.750 1,811 1,399 2.980 07/31/2027 91282CFB2 1422 U.S. Treasury 08/29/2022 1,000,000.00 931,640.00 979,645.67 2.750 1,797 1,399 3.200 07/31/2027 9128282RO 1439 U.S. Treasury 11/18/2022 1,000,000.00 914,020.00 927,110.00 2.250 1,731 1,414 3.950 08/15/2027 91282CFH9 1456 U.S. Treasury 01/24/2023 500,000.00 471,975.00 489,175.00 3.125 1,680 1,430 3.640 08/31/2027 91282CGH8 1460 U.S. Treasury 02/02/2023 1,000,000.00 954,490.00 996,369.14 3.500 1,824 1,583 3.580 01/31/2028 91282CGT2 1508 U.S. Treasury 06/15/2023 1,000,000.00 958,870.00 984,600.00 3.625 1,751 1,643 3.980 03/31/2028 91282CGT2 1524 U.S. Treasury 05/31/2023 1,000,000.00 958,870.00 990,000.00 3.625 1,766 1,643 3.853 03/31/2028 91282CHA2 1525 U.S. Treasury 05/31/2023 1,000,000.00 953,320.00 985,000.00 3.500 1,796 1,673 3.837 04/30/2028 Subtotal and Average 42,406,494.54 43,750,000.00 41,480,222.50 42,892,240.04 1,165 742 3.108 Treasury Discount Notes 912797FAO 1488 U.S. Treasury 05/03/2023 3,000,000.00 2,995,620.00 2,935,470.00 4.780 162 11 5.022 10/12/2023 912796YTO 1487 U.S. Treasury 05/03/2023 1,000,000.00 995,440.00 975,854.17 4.750 183 32 5.003 11/02/2023 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:13 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 130 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments September 30, 2023 Page 5 CUSIP Average Investment # Issuer Balance Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate Days to Term Maturity YTM Maturity 365 Date Treasury Discount Notes 912797FL6 1502 U.S. Treasury 05/31/2023 4,000,000.00 3,968,800.00 3,898,126.67 5.180 177 54 5.464 11/24/2023 912796ZN2 1517 U.S. Treasury 06/30/2023 3,000,000.00 2,961,510.00 2,920,963.32 5.240 181 88 5.532 12/28/2023 Subtotal and Average 11,120,470.89 11,000,000.00 10,921,370.00 10,730,414.16 175 49 5.320 Certificate of Deposits 57116ARV2 1155 Cache Valley BK F/K/A Marlin 10/17/2018 248,000.00 247,743.40 248,000.00 3.300 1,826 16 3.302 10/17/2023 625925AR3 1160 Municipal Trust and Savings 10/17/2018 245,000.00 244,734.31 245,000.00 3.200 1,826 16 3.202 10/17/2023 90348JEJ5 1161 UBS Bank USA 10/17/2018 245,000.00 244,752.60 245,000.00 3.350 1,826 16 3.352 10/17/2023 474067AQ8 1154 Jefferson Financial CU 10/19/2018 245,000.00 244,714.96 245,000.00 3.350 1,826 18 3.352 10/19/2023 20143PDV9 1162 Commercial Bank 11/15/2018 248,000.00 247,368.30 248,000.00 3.400 1,826 45 3.402 11/15/2023 67054NAN3 1164 Numerica Credit Union 11/28/2018 248,000.00 247,240.93 248,000.00 3.550 1,826 58 3.552 11/28/2023 48115LAD6 1396 Jovia Financial Credit Union 06/07/2022 248,000.00 246,478.51 248,000.00 2.500 548 67 2.502 12/07/2023 635573AL2 1170 National Cooperative Bank, N.A 12/21/2018 245,000.00 243,830.31 245,000.00 3.400 1,826 81 3.402 12/21/2023 066851 WJ1 1172 Bar Harbor Bank and Trust 12/31/2018 248,000.00 246,709.74 248,000.00 3.350 1,824 89 3.352 12/29/2023 89269FDP7 1415 Tradition Capital 07/20/2022 246,000.00 243,968.75 246,000.00 3.000 551 113 3.008 01/22/2024 51210SQU4 1208 Lakeside Bank 07/30/2019 248,000.00 245,068.58 248,000.00 2.000 1,644 120 2.003 01/29/2024 77579ADF0 1251 Rollstone B&T 02/12/2020 245,000.00 241,423.23 245,000.00 1.650 1,461 134 1.651 02/12/2024 66736ABP3 1181 Northwest Bank 02/13/2019 248,000.00 245,720.25 248,000.00 2.950 1,826 135 2.951 02/13/2024 949763XY7 1174 Wells Fargo 02/27/2019 248,000.00 245,535.31 248,000.00 3.000 1,826 149 3.001 02/27/2024 50625LAW3 1384 Lafayette FCU 03/30/2022 248,000.00 243,651.97 248,000.00 2.050 729 179 2.053 03/28/2024 882213AB7 1260 Texas Bank Financial 03/31/2020 245,000.00 239,634.25 245,000.00 1.100 1,458 179 1.101 03/28/2024 472382AQ3 1272 The Jefferson Bank 04/15/2020 248,000.00 242,242.50 248,000.00 1.250 1,461 197 1.251 04/15/2024 08016PDQ9 1270 Belmont Bank and Trust 04/16/2020 248,000.00 242,132.95 248,000.00 1.250 1,461 198 1.251 04/16/2024 69506YRH4 1269 Pacific Western Bk/Banc of CA 04/16/2020 245,000.00 239,410.17 245,000.00 1.300 1,461 198 1.301 04/16/2024 56065GAG3 1188 Main Street Bank 04/26/2019 248,000.00 243,939.68 248,000.00 2.600 1,827 208 2.603 04/26/2024 33640VDD7 1231 First Service Bank 11/15/2019 248,000.00 241,975.61 248,000.00 1.700 1,643 227 1.701 05/15/2024 48128HXU7 1185 JP Morgan Chase 05/16/2019 245,000.00 239,997.86 245,000.00 3.250 1,827 228 3.254 05/16/2024 46256YAZ2 1186 Iowa State Bank 05/23/2019 245,000.00 240,118.73 245,000.00 2.400 1,827 235 2.403 05/23/2024 538036GV0 1238 Live Oak Bank 11/27/2019 248,000.00 241,842.78 248,000.00 1.800 1,644 240 1.802 05/28/2024 156634AK3 1184 Century Next Bank 05/29/2019 248,000.00 243,054.45 248,000.00 2.500 1,827 241 2.503 05/29/2024 72651 LCL6 1195 Plains Commerce Bank 06/07/2019 245,000.00 239,890.85 245,000.00 2.550 1,827 250 2.553 06/07/2024 299547AQ2 1196 Liberty FCU F/K/A Evansville T 06/12/2019 248,000.00 242,784.81 248,000.00 2.600 1,827 255 2.603 06/12/2024 524661CB9 1197 Legacy Bank 06/19/2019 248,000.00 242,292.84 248,000.00 2.400 1,827 262 2.403 06/19/2024 176688CP2 1199 Citizens State Bank 06/21/2019 248,000.00 242,249.39 248,000.00 2.400 1,827 264 2.403 06/21/2024 20416TAQ5 1202 Communitywide FCU 06/28/2019 248,000.00 241,817.86 248,000.00 2.250 1,827 271 2.253 06/28/2024 761402BY1 1203 Revere Bank 06/28/2019 247,000.00 240,970.76 247,000.00 2.300 1,827 271 2.303 06/28/2024 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:13 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 131 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments September 30, 2023 Page 6 CUSIP Investment # Average Issuer Balance Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate Days to Term Maturity YTM Maturity 365 Date Certificate of Deposits 00257TBD7 1207 Abacus Federal Savings 07/26/2019 248,000.00 240,587.00 248,000.00 1.950 1,827 299 1.952 07/26/2024 33625CCP2 1209 First Security Bank of WA 07/30/2019 248,000.00 240,588.84 248,000.00 2.000 1,827 303 2.002 07/30/2024 710571DS6 1210 People's Bank 07/31/2019 248,000.00 240,572.30 248,000.00 2.000 1,827 304 2.002 07/31/2024 740367HP5 1213 Preferred Bank 08/16/2019 249,000.00 241,142.42 249,000.00 2.000 1,827 320 2.002 08/16/2024 33766LAJ7 1216 FirsTier Bank 08/23/2019 249,000.00 240,857.96 249,000.00 1.950 1,827 327 1.952 08/23/2024 938828131-12 1215 Washington Federal 08/23/2019 248,000.00 239,972.65 248,000.00 2.000 1,827 327 2.002 08/23/2024 336460CX6 1222 First State Bk DeQueen 08/30/2019 248,000.00 239,394.27 248,000.00 1.800 1,827 334 1.802 08/30/2024 334342CD2 1221 First Natl Bk of Syracuse 08/30/2019 249,000.00 240,454.37 249,000.00 1.850 1,827 334 1.852 08/30/2024 15118RRH2 1220 Celtic Bank 08/30/2019 248,000.00 239,488.69 248,000.00 1.850 1,827 334 1.852 08/30/2024 05580AD50 1333 BMW Bank 09/10/2021 245,000.00 233,626.10 245,000.00 0.650 1,096 345 0.651 09/10/2024 06652CHB0 1227 BankWest Inc 09/27/2019 248,000.00 238,447.05 248,000.00 1.700 1,827 362 1.702 09/27/2024 84223QAN7 1286 Southern Bancorp Bk 06/26/2020 248,000.00 234,542.56 248,000.00 0.500 1,582 390 0.500 10/25/2024 804375/31-4 1235 Sauk Valley B&T Co 11/07/2019 248,000.00 237,356.96 248,000.00 1.700 1,827 403 1.702 11/07/2024 61690UNX4 1237 Morgan Stanley Bank 11/20/2019 245,000.00 234,931.62 245,000.00 1.950 1,827 416 1.952 11/20/2024 61760A3133 1236 Morgan Stanley Private Bk, NA 11/20/2019 245,000.00 234,796.97 245,000.00 1.900 1,827 416 1.902 11/20/2024 064520BG3 1287 Bank Princeton 06/30/2020 248,000.00 232,516.92 248,000.00 0.500 1,644 456 0.500 12/30/2024 80865MAB3 1454 Scient FCU 01/13/2023 248,000.00 245,071.21 248,000.00 4.650 731 470 4.656 01/13/2025 89388CEYO 1328 Transportation Alliance Bk TAB 07/23/2021 248,000.00 231,421.82 248,000.00 0.400 1,280 480 0.401 01/23/2025 06417NZQ9 1329 Bank OZK 07/29/2021 248,000.00 231,884.90 248,000.00 0.400 1,280 486 0.401 01/29/2025 90983WBT7 1249 United Community 02/07/2020 248,000.00 235,000.01 248,000.00 1.650 1,827 495 1.652 02/07/2025 32114VBT3 1250 First National Bank Michigan 02/14/2020 248,000.00 234,967.20 248,000.00 1.650 1,827 502 1.652 02/14/2025 35637RDC8 1248 Freedom Financial 02/14/2020 248,000.00 234,573.58 248,000.00 1.550 1,827 502 1.552 02/14/2025 029728BC5 1255 American State 02/21/2020 248,000.00 234,564.81 248,000.00 1.600 1,827 509 1.602 02/21/2025 17286TAGO 1252 Citadel FCU 02/27/2020 248,000.00 234,585.22 248,000.00 1.650 1,827 515 1.652 02/27/2025 00435JBH5 1256 Access Bank 03/13/2020 248,000.00 234,019.35 248,000.00 1.600 1,826 529 1.601 03/13/2025 49306SJ56 1475 Kay Bank, N.A. 03/15/2023 244,000.00 241,810.68 244,000.00 5.000 733 533 5.008 03/17/2025 909557KQ2 1477 United Bankers Bank 03/16/2023 248,000.00 245,762.59 248,000.00 5.000 732 533 4.823 03/17/2025 849430BF9 1257 Spring Bank 03/20/2020 248,000.00 233,430.62 248,000.00 1.500 1,826 536 1.501 03/20/2025 05465DAE8 1258 Axos Bank 03/26/2020 248,000.00 233,877.72 248,000.00 1.650 1,826 542 1.651 03/26/2025 020080BX4 1267 Alma Bank 03/30/2020 248,000.00 232,981.05 248,000.00 1.400 1,824 544 1.399 03/28/2025 2027506M2 1268 Commonwealth Business Bk 03/31/2020 248,000.00 232,317.32 248,000.00 1.250 1,826 547 1.251 03/31/2025 654062JZ2 1266 Nicolet Natl Bank 03/31/2020 248,000.00 232,824.40 248,000.00 1.400 1,826 547 1.401 03/31/2025 14042TDD6 1271 Capital One USA FDIC33954 04/08/2020 245,000.00 230,738.67 245,000.00 1.600 1,826 555 1.601 04/08/2025 02007GPX5 1388 Ally Bank Midvale 04/21/2022 245,000.00 233,905.49 245,000.00 2.550 1,096 568 2.550 04/21/2025 52168UHY1 1389 Leader Bank 04/22/2022 245,000.00 233,887.23 245,000.00 2.550 1,096 569 2.552 04/22/2025 32112UDR9 1274 First Natl Bk McGregor 04/28/2020 248,000.00 231,974.94 248,000.00 1.350 1,826 575 1.351 04/28/2025 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:13 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 132 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments September 30, 2023 Page 7 CUSIP Investment # Average Issuer Balance Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate Days to Term Maturity YTM Maturity 365 Date Certificate of Deposits 32027BALl 1273 First Freedom Bank 04/29/2020 249,000.00 232,315.83 249,000.00 1.200 1,826 576 1.201 04/29/2025 33847E3A3 1276 Flagstar 04/30/2020 248,000.00 231,721.77 248,000.00 1.250 1,826 577 1.251 04/30/2025 32056GDJ6 1278 list Internet Bank 05/11/2020 248,000.00 230,262.71 248,000.00 1.000 1,827 589 0.985 05/12/2025 95960NKD8 1277 Western State Bank 05/13/2020 245,000.00 227,613.93 245,000.00 1.000 1,826 590 1.001 05/13/2025 254673E69 1392 Discover Bank Greenwood DE CF 05/24/2022 245,000.00 235,376.45 245,000.00 3.100 1,099 604 3.103 05/27/2025 169894AS1 1284 Chippewa Valley Bk 06/24/2020 248,000.00 228,035.17 248,000.00 0.600 1,826 632 0.600 06/24/2025 307811DF3 1363 Farmers & Merch 01/14/2022 249,000.00 228,996.87 249,000.00 0.900 1,277 652 0.900 07/14/2025 30960QAR8 1526 Farmers Insurance Group FCU 07/26/2023 248,000.00 247,207.81 248,000.00 5.400 733 666 5.408 07/28/2025 70962LAF9 1331 Pentagon FCU 09/01/2021 249,000.00 226,718.26 249,000.00 0.700 1,462 702 0.687 09/02/2025 914242AAO 1429 University Credit Union 09/26/2022 248,000.00 240,695.34 248,000.00 4.000 1,096 726 3.891 09/26/2025 51507LCC6 1305 Landmark Community Bank 01/22/2021 248,000.00 220,899.22 248,000.00 0.500 1,826 844 0.500 01/22/2026 84229LBA9 1434 Southern Bank Sardis GA 10/28/2022 244,000.00 237,407.42 244,000.00 4.250 1,188 850 4.254 01/28/2026 87270LDL4 1306 TIAA F/K/A EverBank 02/12/2021 245,000.00 217,884.25 245,000.00 0.500 1,826 865 0.500 02/12/2026 64034KAZ4 1376 Nelnet Bank 03/02/2022 245,000.00 224,595.65 245,000.00 1.800 1,461 883 1.801 03/02/2026 59524LAA4 1474 Mid Carolina Credit Union 03/13/2023 248,000.00 245,164.39 248,000.00 4.850 1,096 894 4.855 03/13/2026 39573LBC1 1313 Greenstate FCU 04/16/2021 249,000.00 222,175.25 249,000.00 0.950 1,826 928 0.951 04/16/2026 89235MKY6 1314 Toyota Financial Savings Bank 04/22/2021 245,000.00 218,444.27 245,000.00 0.900 1,826 934 0.900 04/22/2026 14622LAAO 1316 Carter FCU 04/27/2021 248,000.00 220,981.34 248,000.00 0.750 1,826 939 0.750 04/27/2026 62384RAT3 1485 Mountain America Federal CU 04/28/2023 248,000.00 243,592.78 248,000.00 4.700 1,096 940 4.705 04/28/2026 31617CAV5 1317 Fidelity Homestead 04/30/2021 248,000.00 219,439.92 248,000.00 0.700 1,826 942 0.711 04/30/2026 35089LAFO 1491 Four Points FCU 05/10/2023 248,000.00 242,489.99 248,000.00 4.550 1,097 953 4.443 05/11/2026 87868YAQ6 1501 Technology Credit Union 05/30/2023 248,000.00 245,241.00 248,000.00 5.000 1,095 971 5.005 05/29/2026 16141BAC5 1506 Chartway FCU 06/09/2023 248,000.00 244,604.04 248,000.00 4.900 1,096 982 4.905 06/09/2026 01025RAG4 1510 Alabama Credit Union 06/20/2023 248,000.00 245,232.17 248,000.00 5.000 1,098 995 5.005 06/22/2026 501798RP9 1356 LCA Bank Corp 12/27/2021 248,000.00 220,142.90 248,000.00 1.000 1,642 999 1.000 06/26/2026 92559TAJ7 1325 Vibrant Credit Union 07/02/2021 249,000.00 219,489.89 248,377.50 0.800 1,824 1,003 0.852 06/30/2026 300185LM5 1457 Evergreen Bank Group 01/27/2023 248,000.00 237,870.55 248,000.00 3.850 1,277 1,030 3.849 07/27/2026 38149MXK4 1326 Goldman Sachs 07/28/2021 248,000.00 218,998.08 248,000.00 1.000 1,826 1,031 1.001 07/28/2026 795451AFO 1327 Sallie Mae Bank Salt Lake City 07/28/2021 248,000.00 219,438.28 248,000.00 1.000 1,826 1,031 1.001 07/28/2026 87165ET98 1332 Synchrony Bank Retail 09/03/2021 245,000.00 215,428.63 245,000.00 0.900 1,826 1,068 0.900 09/03/2026 20786ADL6 1334 Connect One 09/24/2021 248,000.00 216,556.29 248,000.00 0.800 1,826 1,089 0.800 09/24/2026 59013KPNO 1345 Merrick Bank 11/09/2021 249,000.00 218,479.50 249,000.00 1.100 1,826 1,135 1.101 11/09/2026 14042RQBO 1346 Capital One Natl Assn FDIC4297 11/17/2021 248,000.00 217,701.16 248,000.00 1.100 1,826 1,143 1.101 11/17/2026 20825WAR1 1357 Connexus CU 12/23/2021 249,000.00 218,606.22 249,000.00 1.250 1,826 1,179 1.250 12/23/2026 89786MAF1 1368 True Sky FCU 02/04/2022 245,000.00 217,093.58 245,000.00 1.600 1,826 1,222 1.601 02/04/2027 02357QAQO 1372 Amerant Bank 02/14/2022 245,000.00 216,871.39 245,000.00 1.600 1,828 1,234 1.601 02/16/2027 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:13 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 133 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments September 30, 2023 Page 8 CUSIP Investment # Average Issuer Balance Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate Days to Term Maturity YTM Maturity 365 Date Certificate of Deposits 07371AYE7 1370 Beal Bank TX 02/23/2022 245,000.00 219,034.84 245,000.00 1.900 1,820 1,235 1.901 02/17/2027 073710E88 1371 Beal Bank USA 02/23/2022 245,000.00 219,044.95 245,000.00 1.900 1,820 1,235 1.901 02/17/2027 59161YAP1 1373 Metro Credit Union 02/18/2022 249,000.00 220,931.22 249,000.00 1.700 1,826 1,236 1.701 02/18/2027 24773RCR4 1377 Delta Natl B&T 03/09/2022 245,000.00 219,714.42 245,000.00 2.000 1,814 1,243 2.001 02/25/2027 27004PCM3 1375 Eaglemark Savings 03/02/2022 245,000.00 219,640.66 245,000.00 2.000 1,826 1,248 2.001 03/02/2027 91139LAB2 1378 United Roosevelt Savings 03/11/2022 248,000.00 221,188.89 248,000.00 1.900 1,826 1,257 1.901 03/11/2027 064860MC0 1476 Bank of the Sierra 03/15/2023 244,000.00 238,438.58 244,000.00 4.600 1,461 1,261 4.604 03/15/2027 565819AG4 1379 Marathon Bnak 03/16/2022 248,000.00 220,315.51 248,000.00 1.800 1,826 1,262 1.801 03/16/2027 108622NJ6 1479 Bridgewater Bank 03/29/2023 248,000.00 244,270.08 248,000.00 4.850 1,461 1,275 4.767 03/29/2027 20033A3A2 1386 Comenity Capital Bank 04/14/2022 248,000.00 226,663.87 248,000.00 2.650 1,826 1,291 2.652 04/14/2027 60425SKB4 1486 Minnwest Bank 05/01/2023 248,000.00 239,435.16 248,000.00 4.250 1,463 1,310 4.254 05/03/2027 397417AQ9 1419 Greenwoods State Bank 05/17/2022 248,000.00 229,545.48 248,000.00 3.050 1,826 1,324 3.052 05/17/2027 85279AAC6 1509 St Vincent Med Center FCU 06/16/2023 248,000.00 242,241.30 248,000.00 4.600 1,461 1,354 4.604 06/16/2027 38120MCA2 1511 Golden State Business Bank 06/22/2023 249,000.00 241,936.81 249,000.00 4.450 1,461 1,360 4.453 06/22/2027 472312AA5 1514 Jeep Country FCU 06/29/2023 248,000.00 243,075.67 248,000.00 4.700 1,461 1,367 4.704 06/29/2027 02589ADH2 1421 American Express, NB 08/29/2022 245,000.00 229,652.10 245,000.00 3.450 1,793 1,395 3.067 07/27/2027 88413QDN5 1420 Third Federal Savings and Loan 08/19/2022 245,000.00 228,165.83 245,000.00 3.300 1,826 1,418 3.302 08/19/2027 89789AAG2 1473 Truliant FCU 03/10/2023 248,000.00 243,084.13 248,000.00 4.700 1,645 1,440 4.707 09/10/2027 732329BD8 1425 Ponce Bank 09/15/2022 248,000.00 232,406.66 248,000.00 3.500 1,826 1,445 3.502 09/15/2027 052392BT3 1427 Austin Telco FCU 09/21/2022 248,000.00 235,042.00 248,000.00 3.800 1,826 1,451 3.770 09/21/2027 22258JAB7 1430 County Schools FCU 09/30/2022 248,000.00 240,379.43 248,000.00 4.400 1,826 1,460 4.325 09/30/2027 34520LATO 1435 Forbright Bank 11/02/2022 248,000.00 241,989.96 248,000.00 4.600 1,826 1,493 4.602 11/02/2027 25460FDW3 1438 Direct FCU 11/07/2022 248,000.00 243,799.83 248,000.00 4.800 1,827 1,499 4.735 11/08/2027 914098DJ4 1442 University Bank 11/30/2022 249,000.00 239,086.87 249,000.00 4.200 1,826 1,521 4.202 11/30/2027 25844MAK4 1447 Dort Financial CU 12/16/2022 247,000.00 239,887.07 247,000.00 4.500 1,826 1,537 4.503 12/16/2027 01664MAB2 1448 All In FCU 12/20/2022 248,000.00 239,870.33 248,000.00 4.400 1,826 1,541 4.402 12/20/2027 51828MAC8 1449 Latino Comm. CU 12/21/2022 248,000.00 240,807.40 248,000.00 4.500 1,826 1,542 4.503 12/21/2027 45157PAZ3 1450 Ideal CU 12/29/2022 248,000.00 240,763.36 248,000.00 4.500 1,826 1,550 4.502 12/29/2027 01882MAC6 1451 Alliant CU 12/30/2022 247,000.00 244,508.22 247,000.00 5.000 1,826 1,551 5.003 12/30/2027 78472EAB0 1455 SPCO Credit Union 01/20/2023 249,000.00 240,211.10 249,000.00 4.350 1,826 1,572 4.352 01/20/2028 82671DAB3 1458 Signature FCU 01/31/2023 248,000.00 239,626.27 248,000.00 4.400 1,826 1,583 4.402 01/31/2028 79772FAG1 1459 San Francisco FCU 02/03/2023 248,000.00 239,125.07 248,000.00 4.350 1,826 1,586 4.352 02/03/2028 530520AH8 1466 Liberty First CU 02/21/2023 248,000.00 240,503.11 248,000.00 4.500 1,827 1,605 4.504 02/22/2028 09582YAF9 1467 Blue Ridge Bank 02/28/2023 244,000.00 233,774.01 244,000.00 4.200 1,826 1,611 4.202 02/28/2028 011852AEO 1469 Alaska USA/Global FCU 03/08/2023 248,000.00 241,392.97 248,000.00 4.600 1,827 1,620 4.606 03/08/2028 92891CCZ3 1472 VystarCU 03/10/2023 248,000.00 240,897.12 248,000.00 4.550 1,827 1,622 4.555 03/10/2028 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:13 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 134 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments September 30, 2023 Page 9 Corporate Notes Average Purchase Stated 500,000.00 Days to YTM Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Term Maturity 365 Date Certificate of Deposits Subtotal and Average 1,470,410.00 1,500,000.00 1,395,970.00 1,470,410.00 1,827 1,442 3.054 Money Market with Fiscal Agent 00833JAQ4 1478 Affinity Bank 03/17/2023 248,000.00 244,309.75 248,000.00 4.900 1,827 1,629 4.906 03/17/2028 724468AC7 1483 Pitney Bowes Bank 04/14/2023 244,000.00 234,935.90 244,000.00 4.350 1,826 1,656 4.355 04/13/2028 062119BT8 1492 Bank Five Nine 05/12/2023 248,000.00 237,512.44 248,000.00 4.250 1,827 1,685 4.255 05/12/2028 152577BN1 1493 Central Bank 05/12/2023 248,000.00 234,970.56 248,000.00 4.000 1,827 1,685 4.005 05/12/2028 23248UAB3 1494 Cy -Fair FCU 05/12/2023 248,000.00 240,054.32 248,000.00 4.500 1,827 1,685 4.505 05/12/2028 91527PBY2 1495 Univest Bank & Trust 05/12/2023 248,000.00 238,535.56 248,000.00 4.350 1,827 1,685 4.355 05/12/2028 92834ABT2 1496 VisionBank 05/12/2023 248,000.00 235,486.91 248,000.00 4.050 1,827 1,685 4.055 05/12/2028 12547CBJ6 1497 CIBC Bank USA 05/16/2023 244,000.00 234,726.54 244,000.00 4.350 1,827 1,689 4.355 05/16/2028 843383CS7 1498 Southern Bank Poplar MO 05/17/2023 248,000.00 236,975.41 248,000.00 4.200 1,827 1,690 4.205 05/17/2028 06610RCA5 1499 Bankers Bank 05/24/2023 248,000.00 236,406.69 248,000.00 4.150 1,827 1,697 4.155 05/24/2028 90352RDB8 1500 US Alliance FCU 05/26/2023 248,000.00 240,494.16 248,000.00 4.550 1,827 1,699 4.555 05/26/2028 23204HP138 1507 Customers Bank 06/14/2023 244,000.00 241,979.51 244,000.00 4.500 1,827 1,718 4.505 06/14/2028 910286GN7 1513 United Fidelity Bank 06/29/2023 248,000.00 245,701.29 248,000.00 4.500 1,827 1,733 4.505 06/29/2028 31911KAK4 1515 First Bank Elk River 06/30/2023 248,000.00 244,744.59 248,000.00 4.400 1,827 1,734 4.405 06/30/2028 05765LBUO 1520 Balboa Thrift and Loan 07/19/2023 248,000.00 247,026.97 248,000.00 4.400 1,827 1,753 4.405 07/19/2028 560507AQ8 1522 Maine Savings FCU 07/21/2023 248,000.00 242,831.23 248,000.00 4.800 1,827 1,755 4.806 07/21/2028 91739JAB1 1523 Utah First FCU 07/21/2023 245,000.00 241,974.21 245,000.00 5.000 1,827 1,755 5.006 07/21/2028 499724AP7 1532 Knoxville TVA Credit Union 08/25/2023 248,000.00 243,227.46 248,000.00 4.850 1,827 1,790 4.854 08/25/2028 05584CJJ6 1533 BNY Mellon 09/07/2023 244,000.00 235,628.77 244,000.00 4.500 1,827 1,803 4.505 09/07/2028 898812AC6 1537 Tucson FCU 09/08/2023 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 5.000 1,827 1,804 5.005 09/08/2028 60936TAL3 1538 Money One FCU 09/14/2023 248,000.00 244,774.44 248,000.00 5.000 1,827 1,810 5.005 09/14/2028 52470QEC4 1539 Legacy Bank & Trust 09/27/2023 248,000.00 239,302.36 248,000.00 4.500 1,827 1,823 4.505 09/27/2028 Subtotal and Average 39,588,977.50 39,812,000.00 38,015,993.78 39,811,377.50 1,671 887 2.822 Corporate Notes 45950VPS9 1308 International Finance Corp. 02/26/2021 500,000.00 447,190.00 497,300.00 0.500 1,826 879 0.610 02/26/2026 931142EE9 1512 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc 06/26/2023 1,000,000.00 948,780.00 973,110.00 3.700 1,827 1,730 4.303 06/26/2028 Subtotal and Average 1,470,410.00 1,500,000.00 1,395,970.00 1,470,410.00 1,827 1,442 3.054 Money Market with Fiscal Agent SYS1058 1058 US Bank 07/01/2016 13,793.08 13,793.08 13,793.08 1 1 0.000 Subtotal and Average 14,500,888.22 13,793.08 13,793.08 13,793.08 1 1 0.000 CERBT - OPEB Trust SYS1114 1114 CAPERS CERBT Plan 07/01/2023 1,773,353.25 1,773,353.25 1,773,353.25 1 1 0.000 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:13 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 135 City of La Quinta Portfolio Management Page 10 Portfolio Details - Investments September 30, 2023 Average Purchase Stated Days to YTM Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Term Maturity 365 Date Subtotal and Average 1,852,397.82 1,773,353.25 1,773,353.25 1,773,353.25 1 1 0.000 PARS Pension Trust SYS1230 1230 Pblc Agncy Rtrmnt Sery 5,143,349.16 5,143,349.16 5,143,349.16 1 1 0.000 Subtotal and Average 5,301,833.80 5,143,349.16 5,143,349.16 5,143,349.16 1 1 0.000 Total and Average 247,783,127.48 Run Date: 11/29/2023 - 15:13 232,859,475.60 224,909,467.86 231,372,784.48 879 502 3.373 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 136 t(vQ�� GEM of the DESERT - City of La Quinta Total Earnings Sorted by Fund - Fund September 1, 2023 - September 30, 2023 City of La Quinta CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 98-33-434 1055 101 LAIF 19,256,152.68 19,256,152.68 19,256,152.68 3.534 3.582 56,685.52 0.00 0.00 56,685.52 SYS1059 1059 101 CITYPC 3,300.00 3,300.00 3,300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SYS1114 1114 101 CALPRS 1,773,353.25 1,855,123.49 1,773,353.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SYS 1153 1153 101 CAMP 29,713,603.41 29,578,723.61 29,713,603.41 5.550 5.548 134,879.80 0.00 0.00 134,879.80 474067AQ8 1154 101 JEFF 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.350 3.350 674.59 0.00 0.00 674.59 57116ARV2 1155 101 MARBUS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.300 3.300 672.66 0.00 0.00 672.66 3133EJYL7 1158 101 FFCB 0.00 247,275.00 0.00 2.800 103.429 77.78 0.00 2,725.00 2,802.78 625925AR3 1160 101 MUNTRS 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.200 3.200 644.38 0.00 0.00 644.38 90348JEJ5 1161 101 UBS 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.350 3.350 674.59 0.00 0.00 674.59 20143PDV9 1162 101 COMMBK 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.400 3.400 693.04 0.00 0.00 693.04 67054NAN3 1164 101 NMRCA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.550 3.550 723.62 0.00 0.00 723.62 635573AL2 1170 101 NLCOOP 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.400 3.400 684.66 0.00 0.00 684.66 066851WJ1 1172 101 BARHAR 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.350 3.350 682.85 0.00 0.00 682.85 949763XY7 1174 101 WELLS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.000 3.000 611.51 0.00 0.00 611.51 3130AFW94 1177 101 FHLB 500,000.00 498,550.00 498,550.00 2.500 2.542 1,041.67 0.00 0.00 1,041.67 66736ABP3 1181 101 NRTHWS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.950 2.950 601.32 0.00 0.00 601.32 156634AK3 1184 101 CENTNX 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.500 2.500 509.60 0.00 0.00 509.60 48128HXU7 1185 101 JPMORG 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.250 3.250 654.45 0.00 0.00 654.45 46256YAZ2 1186 101 IOWAST 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 2.400 2.400 483.28 0.00 0.00 483.28 56065GAG3 1188 101 MAINST 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.600 2.600 529.97 0.00 0.00 529.97 72651LCL6 1195 101 PLAINS 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 2.550 2.550 513.50 0.00 0.00 513.50 299547AQ2 1196 101 EVNSCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.600 2.600 529.97 0.00 0.00 529.97 524661CB9 1197 101 LEGCY 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.400 2.400 489.21 0.00 0.00 489.21 176688CP2 1199 101 CTZNST 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.400 2.400 489.20 0.00 0.00 489.20 20416TAQ5 1202 101 COMMW 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.250 2.250 458.63 0.00 0.00 458.63 761402BY1 1203 101 REVER 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 2.300 2.300 466.94 0.00 0.00 466.94 3135GOV75 1206 101 FNMA 500,000.00 495,950.00 495,950.00 1.750 1.789 729.16 0.00 0.00 729.16 00257TBD7 1207 101 ABACUS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.950 1.950 397.48 0.00 0.00 397.48 51210SQU4 1208 101 LKSIDE 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.000 2.000 407.67 0.00 0.00 407.67 33625CCP2 1209 101 1STSEC 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.000 2.000 407.67 0.00 0.00 407.67 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:15 Portfolio CITY CP TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 137 City of La Quinta Total Earnings Page 2 September 1, 2023 - September 30, 2023 CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 710571 DS6 1210 101 PEOPLE 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.000 2.000 407.67 0.00 0.00 407.67 3133EKWV4 1212 101 FFCB 500,000.00 499,500.00 499,500.00 1.850 1.878 770.83 0.00 0.00 770.83 740367HP5 1213 101 PREFRD 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 2.000 2.000 409.32 0.00 0.00 409.32 938828131-12 1215 101 WSHFED 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.000 2.000 407.67 0.00 0.00 407.67 33766LAJ7 1216 101 1STIER 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 1.950 1.950 399.08 0.00 0.00 399.08 912828T26 1217 101 USTR 0.00 499,300.00 0.00 1.375 3.138 544.74 0.00 700.00 1,244.74 15118RRH2 1220 101 CELTIC 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.850 1.850 377.10 0.00 0.00 377.10 334342CD2 1221 101 1STNBS 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 1.850 1.850 378.62 0.00 0.00 378.62 336460CX6 1222 101 1STDQN 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.800 1.800 366.90 0.00 0.00 366.90 3133EKP75 1224 101 FFCB 500,000.00 498,750.00 498,750.00 1.600 1.626 666.67 0.00 0.00 666.67 06652CHB0 1227 101 BNKWST 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.700 1.700 346.52 0.00 0.00 346.52 059731851 1228 101 BOTW 4,176,100.00 6,165,882.61 4,176,100.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 SYS1230 1230 101 PARS 5,143,349.16 5,307,298.79 5,143,349.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33640VDD7 1231 101 1STSER 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.700 1.700 346.52 0.00 0.00 346.52 3133EK4X1 1234 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 996,900.00 996,900.00 1.600 1.627 1,333.34 0.00 0.00 1,333.34 804375DL4 1235 101 SAUKVL 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.700 1.700 346.52 0.00 0.00 346.52 61760A3133 1236 101 MSPRIV 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.900 1.900 382.60 0.00 0.00 382.60 61690UNX4 1237 101 MORGST 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.950 1.950 392.67 0.00 0.00 392.67 538036GV0 1238 101 LIVEOK 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.800 1.800 366.90 0.00 0.00 366.90 912828YV6 1241 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 989,687.50 989,687.50 1.500 1.511 1,229.50 0.00 0.00 1,229.50 3133ELEA8 1242 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 998,600.00 998,600.00 1.700 1.726 1,416.67 0.00 0.00 1,416.67 3133ELNE0 1246 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 999,000.00 999,000.00 1.430 1.451 1,191.66 0.00 0.00 1,191.66 35637RDC8 1248 101 FRDMFI 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.550 1.550 315.95 0.00 0.00 315.95 90983WBT7 1249 101 UNTDCM 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.650 1.650 336.33 0.00 0.00 336.33 32114VBT3 1250 101 1STNMI 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.650 1.650 336.33 0.00 0.00 336.33 77579ADF0 1251 101 RLLSTN 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.650 1.650 332.26 0.00 0.00 332.26 17286TAGO 1252 101 CITADL 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.650 1.650 336.33 0.00 0.00 336.33 029728BC5 1255 101 AMERST 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.600 1.600 326.14 0.00 0.00 326.14 00435J131-15 1256 101 ACCSS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.600 1.600 326.14 0.00 0.00 326.14 849430BF9 1257 101 SPRING 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.500 1.500 305.76 0.00 0.00 305.76 05465DAE8 1258 101 AXOS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.650 1.650 336.33 0.00 0.00 336.33 882213AB7 1260 101 TEXAS 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.100 1.100 221.50 0.00 0.00 221.50 89579NCD3 1262 101 TRIAD 0.00 248,000.00 0.00 1.350 1.350 266.01 0.00 0.00 266.01 654062JZ2 1266 101 NCOLET 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.400 1.400 285.37 0.00 0.00 285.37 020080BX4 1267 101 ALMABK 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.400 1.400 285.37 0.00 0.00 285.37 2027506M2 1268 101 CMWBUS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.250 1.250 254.79 0.00 0.00 254.79 69506YRH4 1269 101 PACWST 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.300 1.300 261.78 0.00 0.00 261.78 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:15 Portfolio CITY CP TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 138 City of La Quinta Total Earnings Page 3 September 1, 2023 - September 30, 2023 CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 08016PDQ9 1270 101 BELB&T 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.250 1.250 254.79 0.00 0.00 254.79 14042TDD6 1271 101 CAPONE 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.600 1.600 322.19 0.00 0.00 322.19 472382AQ3 1272 101 THEJEF 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.250 1.250 254.80 0.00 0.00 254.80 32027BALl 1273 101 1STFDM 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 1.200 1.200 245.60 0.00 0.00 245.60 32112UDR9 1274 101 1STMCG 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.350 1.350 275.18 0.00 0.00 275.18 33847E3A3 1276 101 FLGSTR 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.250 1.250 254.80 0.00 0.00 254.80 95960NKD8 1277 101 WSTRNS 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.000 1.000 201.37 0.00 0.00 201.37 32056GDJ6 1278 101 1STINT 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.000 1.000 203.84 0.00 0.00 203.84 3134GVYG7 1279 101 FHLMC 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.625 0.634 520.84 0.00 0.00 520.84 3133ELH23 1280 101 FFCB 500,000.00 499,850.00 499,850.00 0.500 0.507 208.34 0.00 0.00 208.34 3130AJKW8 1281 101 FHLB 500,000.00 499,850.00 499,850.00 0.500 0.507 208.33 0.00 0.00 208.33 3133ELH80 1282 101 FFCB 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.680 0.689 283.33 0.00 0.00 283.33 3130AJRP6 1283 101 FHLB 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 0.680 0.689 170.00 0.00 0.00 170.00 169894AS1 1284 101 CHIPVA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.600 0.600 122.30 0.00 0.00 122.30 84223QAN7 1286 101 STHRNB 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.500 0.500 101.92 0.00 0.00 101.92 064520BG3 1287 101 BKPRNC 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.500 0.500 101.92 0.00 0.00 101.92 3135G05S8 1288 101 FNMA 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.500 0.507 208.33 0.00 0.00 208.33 3136G4N74 1289 101 FNMA 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.560 0.568 466.66 0.00 0.00 466.66 3136G4M75 1290 101 FNMA 500,000.00 499,750.00 499,750.00 0.520 0.527 216.67 0.00 0.00 216.67 3135GO6E8 1291 101 FNMA 500,000.00 499,250.00 499,250.00 0.420 0.426 175.00 0.00 0.00 175.00 3135GA2Z3 1292 101 FNMA 500,000.00 499,250.00 499,250.00 0.560 0.569 233.33 0.00 0.00 233.33 SYS1293 1293 101 BNY 1,684,317.31 5,208,376.49 1,684,317.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3137EAEU9 1297 101 FHLMC 1,000,000.00 997,300.00 997,300.00 0.375 0.381 312.50 0.00 0.00 312.50 3130AKFA9 1298 101 FHLB 500,000.00 497,400.00 497,400.00 0.375 0.382 156.25 0.00 0.00 156.25 3135GA7D7 1299 101 FNMA 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.600 0.608 250.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 3135GAAW1 1300 101 FNMA 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.400 0.406 166.67 0.00 0.00 166.67 3134GXGZ1 1301 101 FHLMC 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.550 0.558 229.17 0.00 0.00 229.17 3130AKMZ6 1302 101 FHLB 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.510 0.517 212.50 0.00 0.00 212.50 91282CBC4 1303 101 USTR 500,000.00 498,632.81 498,632.81 0.375 0.373 152.86 0.00 0.00 152.86 3130AKN28 1304 101 FHLB 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 0.550 0.558 229.17 0.00 0.00 229.17 51507LCC6 1305 101 LNDMRK 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.500 0.500 101.92 0.00 0.00 101.92 87270LDL4 1306 101 EVRBA 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 0.500 0.500 100.69 0.00 0.00 100.69 3137EAEX3 1307 101 FHLMC 500,000.00 495,999.50 495,999.50 0.375 0.383 156.25 0.00 0.00 156.25 45950VPS9 1308 101 IFC 500,000.00 497,300.00 497,300.00 0.500 0.499 203.81 0.00 0.00 203.81 91282CBH3 1309 101 USTR 500,000.00 495,100.00 495,100.00 0.375 0.376 152.86 0.00 0.00 152.86 3137EAEX3 1310 101 FHLMC 1,000,000.00 983,940.00 983,940.00 0.375 0.386 312.50 0.00 0.00 312.50 91282CAT8 1311 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 977,500.00 977,500.00 0.250 0.254 203.81 0.00 0.00 203.81 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:15 Portfolio CITY CP TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 139 City of La Quinta Total Earnings Page 4 September 1, 2023 - September 30, 2023 CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 3130ALV92 1312 101 FHLB 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 1.050 1.065 437.50 0.00 0.00 437.50 39573LBC1 1313 101 GRNST 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 0.950 0.950 194.42 0.00 0.00 194.42 89235MKY6 1314 101 TOYFSB 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 0.900 0.900 181.24 0.00 0.00 181.24 91282CAZ4 1315 101 USTR 500,000.00 492,187.50 492,187.50 0.375 0.380 153.69 0.00 0.00 153.69 14622LAAO 1316 101 CARTER 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.750 0.750 152.88 0.00 0.00 152.88 31617CAV5 1317 101 FIDHMS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.700 0.700 142.68 0.00 0.00 142.68 SYS1318 1318 101 DPME 825,789.63 812,836.67 825,789.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 91282CBQ3 1319 101 USTR 500,000.00 494,165.00 494,165.00 0.500 0.507 206.04 0.00 0.00 206.04 91282CBT7 1320 101 USTR 500,000.00 499,525.00 499,525.00 0.750 0.749 307.38 0.00 0.00 307.38 91282CCF6 1321 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 997,060.00 997,060.00 0.750 0.750 614.75 0.00 0.00 614.75 91282CBT7 1322 101 USTR 500,000.00 498,450.00 498,450.00 0.750 0.750 307.38 0.00 0.00 307.38 91282CCF6 1323 101 USTR 500,000.00 497,095.00 497,095.00 0.750 0.752 307.38 0.00 0.00 307.38 3130AMFS6 1324 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 993,420.00 993,420.00 0.750 0.765 625.00 0.00 0.00 625.00 92559TAJ7 1325 101 VIBRNT 249,000.00 248,377.50 248,377.50 0.800 0.802 163.73 0.00 0.00 163.73 38149MXK4 1326 101 GLDMAN 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.000 1.000 203.83 0.00 0.00 203.83 795451AFO 1327 101 SALMAE 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.000 1.000 203.83 0.00 0.00 203.83 89388CEYO 1328 101 TABBK 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.400 0.400 81.53 0.00 0.00 81.53 06417NZQ9 1329 101 BKOZK 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.400 0.400 81.53 0.00 0.00 81.53 3133EM2C5 1330 101 FFCB 500,000.00 498,000.00 498,000.00 0.710 0.723 295.84 0.00 0.00 295.84 70962LAF9 1331 101 PENTGN 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 0.700 0.700 143.26 0.00 0.00 143.26 87165ET98 1332 101 SYNCHR 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 0.900 0.900 181.23 0.00 0.00 181.23 05580AD50 1333 101 BMW 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 0.650 0.650 130.89 0.00 0.00 130.89 20786ADL6 1334 101 CONNEC 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.800 0.800 163.06 0.00 0.00 163.06 91282CCP4 1335 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 983,750.00 983,750.00 0.625 0.630 509.51 0.00 0.00 509.51 91282CCW9 1336 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 988,500.00 988,500.00 0.750 0.761 618.14 0.00 0.00 618.14 3130APBM6 1337 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 999,000.00 999,000.00 1.000 1.015 833.34 0.00 0.00 833.34 3133EM4X7 1338 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 991,080.00 991,080.00 0.800 0.818 666.67 0.00 0.00 666.67 3130APB46 1339 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 998,250.00 998,250.00 0.950 0.965 791.66 0.00 0.00 791.66 91282CBEO 1342 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 991,000.00 991,000.00 0.125 0.125 101.91 0.00 0.00 101.91 91282CDB4 1343 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 996,320.00 996,320.00 0.625 0.626 512.30 0.00 0.00 512.30 3133ENCQ1 1344 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1.270 1.288 1,058.33 0.00 0.00 1,058.33 59013KPNO 1345 101 MRRCK 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 1.100 1.100 225.12 0.00 0.00 225.12 14042RQBO 1346 101 CAP1NA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.100 1.100 224.22 0.00 0.00 224.22 3130APTV7 1347 101 FHLB 500,000.00 499,500.00 499,500.00 0.700 0.710 291.66 0.00 0.00 291.66 91282CBA8 1351 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 990,000.00 990,000.00 0.125 0.126 102.46 0.00 0.00 102.46 91282CBR1 1352 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 989,800.00 989,800.00 0.250 0.252 205.00 0.00 0.00 205.00 3130AP21-18 1353 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 987,100.00 987,100.00 0.550 0.565 458.33 0.00 0.00 458.33 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:15 Portfolio CITY CP TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 140 City of La Quinta Total Earnings Page 5 September 1, 2023 - September 30, 2023 CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 3135G06G3 1354 101 FNMA 1,000,000.00 976,300.00 976,300.00 0.500 0.519 416.67 0.00 0.00 416.67 3133ENGN4 1355 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.970 0.983 808.34 0.00 0.00 808.34 501798RP9 1356 101 LCA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.000 1.000 203.84 0.00 0.00 203.84 20825WAR1 1357 101 CNNXS 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 1.250 1.250 255.82 0.00 0.00 255.82 3130AQF65 1358 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 999,750.00 999,750.00 1.250 1.268 1,041.66 0.00 0.00 1,041.66 3134GW6C5 1359 101 FHLMC 500,000.00 486,000.00 486,000.00 0.800 0.834 333.33 0.00 0.00 333.33 91282CBV2 1360 101 USTR 500,000.00 494,882.81 494,882.81 0.375 0.378 153.69 0.00 0.00 153.69 3137EAEU9 1361 101 FHLMC 500,000.00 487,090.00 487,090.00 0.375 0.390 156.25 0.00 0.00 156.25 3134GW5R3 1362 101 FHLMC 400,000.00 391,360.00 391,360.00 0.650 0.674 216.66 0.00 0.00 216.66 307811 DF3 1363 101 FARMER 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 0.900 0.900 184.19 0.00 0.00 184.19 3130AQJR5 1364 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1.500 1.521 1,250.00 0.00 0.00 1,250.00 3135G031-15 1365 101 FNMA 500,000.00 487,790.00 487,790.00 0.625 0.650 260.42 0.00 0.00 260.42 3134GWUQ7 1366 101 FHLMC 1,000,000.00 945,570.00 945,570.00 0.700 0.751 583.33 0.00 0.00 583.33 3130AQSA2 1367 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1.830 1.855 1,525.00 0.00 0.00 1,525.00 89786MAF1 1368 101 TRUSKY 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.600 1.600 322.19 0.00 0.00 322.19 912828Z78 1369 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 986,700.00 986,700.00 1.500 1.508 1,222.82 0.00 0.00 1,222.82 07371AYE7 1370 101 BEALTX 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.900 1.900 382.60 0.00 0.00 382.60 073710E88 1371 101 BEALUS 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.900 1.900 382.60 0.00 0.00 382.60 02357QAQO 1372 101 AMRNT 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.600 1.600 322.19 0.00 0.00 322.19 59161YAP1 1373 101 METRO 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 1.700 1.700 347.92 0.00 0.00 347.92 3130AQWY5 1374 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1.700 1.724 1,416.66 0.00 0.00 1,416.66 27004PCM3 1375 101 EGLMRK 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 2.000 2.000 402.74 0.00 0.00 402.74 64034KAZ4 1376 101 NELNET 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 1.800 1.800 362.46 0.00 0.00 362.46 24773RCR4 1377 101 DELTA 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 2.000 2.000 402.74 0.00 0.00 402.74 91139LAB2 1378 101 URSVLT 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.900 1.900 387.29 0.00 0.00 387.29 565819AG4 1379 101 MRTHON 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 1.800 1.800 366.90 0.00 0.00 366.90 91282CCW9 1380 101 USTR 500,000.00 466,454.17 466,454.17 0.750 0.806 309.07 0.00 0.00 309.07 91282CDG3 1381 101 USTR 500,000.00 473,396.82 473,396.82 1.125 1.179 458.56 0.00 0.00 458.56 91282CBQ3 1382 101 USTR 750,000.00 698,025.00 698,025.00 0.500 0.539 309.07 0.00 0.00 309.07 912828654 1383 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 999,010.00 999,010.00 2.375 2.358 1,936.14 0.00 0.00 1,936.14 50625LAW3 1384 101 LFYTT 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.050 2.050 417.86 0.00 0.00 417.86 3130ARGJ4 1385 101 FHLB 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 2.500 2.535 1,041.67 0.00 0.00 1,041.67 20033A3A2 1386 101 CCBA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.650 2.650 540.17 0.00 0.00 540.17 3130ARGY1 1387 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2.700 2.738 2,250.00 0.00 0.00 2,250.00 02007GPX5 1388 101 ALLY 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 2.550 2.550 513.49 0.00 0.00 513.49 52168UHY1 1389 101 LEADR 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 2.550 2.550 513.49 0.00 0.00 513.49 9128283D0 1390 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 985,190.00 985,190.00 2.250 2.265 1,834.24 0.00 0.00 1,834.24 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:15 Portfolio CITY CP TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 141 City of La Quinta Total Earnings Page 6 September 1, 2023 - September 30, 2023 CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 91282CEF4 1391 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 976,860.00 976,860.00 2.500 2.552 2,049.18 0.00 0.00 2,049.18 254673E69 1392 101 DISCOV 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.100 3.100 624.25 0.00 0.00 624.25 48115LAD6 1396 101 JOVIA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 2.500 2.500 509.60 0.00 0.00 509.60 912828X88 1397 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 969,687.50 969,687.50 2.375 2.429 1,936.14 0.00 0.00 1,936.14 91282CEN7 1398 101 USTR 500,000.00 495,000.00 495,000.00 2.750 2.755 1,120.93 0.00 0.00 1,120.93 91282CET4 1399 101 USTR 500,000.00 491,842.18 491,842.18 2.625 2.661 1,075.82 0.00 0.00 1,075.82 91282821.13 1400 101 USTR 500,000.00 490,850.00 490,850.00 1.875 1.915 772.66 0.00 0.00 772.66 3133ENYH7 1401 101 FFCB 500,000.00 499,080.00 499,080.00 2.625 2.666 1,093.75 0.00 0.00 1,093.75 3130ASDV8 1409 101 FHLB 300,000.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 3.300 3.346 825.00 0.00 0.00 825.00 89269FDP7 1415 101 TRADCP 246,000.00 246,000.00 246,000.00 3.000 3.000 606.58 0.00 0.00 606.58 91282CFB2 1417 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 989,460.00 989,460.00 2.750 2.757 2,241.85 0.00 0.00 2,241.85 912828XT2 1418 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 985,240.00 985,240.00 2.000 2.024 1,639.34 0.00 0.00 1,639.34 397417AQ9 1419 101 GRNWDS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.050 3.050 621.69 0.00 0.00 621.69 88413QDN5 1420 101 3RD 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.300 3.300 664.52 0.00 0.00 664.52 02589ADH2 1421 101 AMEXNB 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 3.450 3.450 694.73 0.00 0.00 694.73 91282CFB2 1422 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 979,645.67 979,645.67 2.750 2.784 2,241.85 0.00 0.00 2,241.85 732329BD8 1425 101 PONCE 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.500 3.500 713.42 0.00 0.00 713.42 3133ENL99 1426 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 997,492.55 997,492.55 3.375 3.430 2,812.50 0.00 0.00 2,812.50 052392BT3 1427 101 AUSTEL 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.800 3.800 774.58 0.00 0.00 774.58 914242AA0 1429 101 UNIVCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.000 4.000 815.34 0.00 0.00 815.34 22258JAB7 1430 101 CNTYSC 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.400 4.400 896.87 0.00 0.00 896.87 3133ENQ29 1433 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 996,400.00 996,400.00 4.000 4.070 3,333.33 0.00 0.00 3,333.33 84229LBA9 1434 101 STHBNK 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 4.250 4.250 852.33 0.00 0.00 852.33 34520LAT0 1435 101 FORBRT 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.600 4.600 937.64 0.00 0.00 937.64 25460FDW3 1438 101 DIRFCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.800 4.800 978.40 0.00 0.00 978.40 9128282R0 1439 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 927,110.00 927,110.00 2.250 2.407 1,834.24 0.00 0.00 1,834.24 3133EN31-11 1441 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 998,650.00 998,650.00 4.000 4.061 3,333.34 0.00 0.00 3,333.34 914098DJ4 1442 101 UNIVBK 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 4.200 4.200 859.56 0.00 0.00 859.56 3133EN3S7 1446 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 998,000.00 998,000.00 3.750 3.810 3,125.00 0.00 0.00 3,125.00 25844MAK4 1447 101 DORTCU 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 4.500 4.500 913.56 0.00 0.00 913.56 01664MAB2 1448 101 ALL IN 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.400 4.400 896.88 0.00 0.00 896.88 51828MAC8 1449 101 LATCOM 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.500 4.500 917.27 0.00 0.00 917.27 45157PAZ3 1450 101 IDEAL 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.500 4.500 917.26 0.00 0.00 917.26 01882MAC6 1451 101 ALIANT 247,000.00 247,000.00 247,000.00 5.000 5.000 1,015.06 0.00 0.00 1,015.06 80865MAB3 1454 101 SCIENT 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.650 4.650 947.84 0.00 0.00 947.84 78472EAB0 1455 101 SPCOCU 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 4.350 4.350 890.26 0.00 0.00 890.26 91282CFH9 1456 101 USTR 500,000.00 489,175.00 489,175.00 3.125 3.203 1,287.77 0.00 0.00 1,287.77 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:15 Portfolio CITY CP TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 142 City of La Quinta Total Earnings Page 7 September 1, 2023 - September 30, 2023 CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 300185LM5 1457 101 EVRGRN 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 3.850 3.850 784.77 0.00 0.00 784.77 82671DAB3 1458 101 SIGFCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.400 4.400 896.88 0.00 0.00 896.88 79772FAG1 1459 101 SF FCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.350 4.350 886.68 0.00 0.00 886.68 91282CGH8 1460 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 996,369.14 996,369.14 3.500 3.484 2,853.26 0.00 0.00 2,853.26 3133EPAV7 1464 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 995,400.00 995,400.00 3.875 3.947 3,229.17 0.00 0.00 3,229.17 91282CEW7 1465 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 967,220.00 967,220.00 3.250 3.333 2,649.46 0.00 0.00 2,649.46 530520AH8 1466 101 LBRTY1 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.500 4.500 917.26 0.00 0.00 917.26 09582YAF9 1467 101 BLURDG 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 4.200 4.200 842.30 0.00 0.00 842.30 011852AE0 1469 101 ALASKA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.600 4.600 937.64 0.00 0.00 937.64 912796YH6 1470 101 USTR 0.00 1,950,283.66 0.00 4.917 155.075 0.00 0.00 49,716.34 49,716.34 92891CCZ3 1472 101 VYSTAR 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.550 4.550 927.45 0.00 0.00 927.45 89789AAG2 1473 101 TRUFCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.700 4.700 958.03 0.00 0.00 958.03 59524LAA4 1474 101 MIDCAR 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.850 4.850 988.61 0.00 0.00 988.61 49306SJ56 1475 101 KEYBNK 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 5.000 5.000 1,002.74 0.00 0.00 1,002.74 064860MC0 1476 101 BKSIER 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 4.600 4.600 922.52 0.00 0.00 922.52 909557KQ2 1477 101 UNBKRS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 5.000 5.000 1,019.18 0.00 0.00 1,019.18 00833JAQ4 1478 101 AFFNTY 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.900 4.900 998.79 0.00 0.00 998.79 108622NJ6 1479 101 BRIDWA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.850 4.850 988.60 0.00 0.00 988.60 3135GAGA3 1480 101 FNMA 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.200 5.272 8,666.66 0.00 0.00 8,666.66 3135GAGK1 1482 101 FNMA 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 5.050 5.120 12,625.00 0.00 0.00 12,625.00 724468AC7 1483 101 PITBOW 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 4.350 4.350 872.39 0.00 0.00 872.39 3134GYPJ5 1484 101 FHLMC 1,000,000.00 999,100.00 999,100.00 5.200 5.277 4,333.33 0.00 0.00 4,333.33 62384RAT3 1485 101 MTNAMR 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.700 4.700 958.03 0.00 0.00 958.03 60425SKB4 1486 101 MINWST 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.250 4.250 866.30 0.00 0.00 866.30 912796YT0 1487 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 975,854.17 975,854.17 4.750 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 912797FA0 1488 101 USTR 3,000,000.00 2,935,470.00 2,935,470.00 4.780 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 313384LP2 1490 101 FHLB 0.00 982,351.39 0.00 4.850 65.575 0.00 0.00 17,648.61 17,648.61 35089LAF0 1491 101 FRPNTS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.550 4.550 927.45 0.00 0.00 927.45 062119BT8 1492 101 BANK59 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.250 4.250 866.30 0.00 0.00 866.30 152577BN1 1493 101 CENTRL 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.000 4.000 815.34 0.00 0.00 815.34 23248UAB3 1494 101 CYFAIR 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.500 4.500 917.27 0.00 0.00 917.27 91527PBY2 1495 101 UNIVST 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.350 4.350 886.68 0.00 0.00 886.68 92834ABT2 1496 101 VISION 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.050 4.050 825.53 0.00 0.00 825.53 12547CBJ6 1497 101 CIBCBK 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 4.350 4.350 872.39 0.00 0.00 872.39 843383CS7 1498 101 SBPOPM 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.200 4.200 856.11 0.00 0.00 856.11 06610RCA5 1499 101 BANKRS 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.150 4.150 845.92 0.00 0.00 845.92 90352RDB8 1500 101 USAFCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.550 4.550 927.45 0.00 0.00 927.45 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:15 Portfolio CITY CP TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 143 City of La Quinta Total Earnings Page 8 September 1, 2023 - September 30, 2023 CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Ending Par Value Beginning Book Value Ending Book Value Current Rate Annualized Yield Interest Earned Adjusted Interest Earnings Amortization/ Realized Accretion Gainl/Loss Adjusted Interest Earnings Fund: General Fund 87868YAQ6 1501 101 TECHCU 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 5.000 5.000 1,019.18 0.00 0.00 1,019.18 912797FL6 1502 101 USTR 4,000,000.00 3,898,126.67 3,898,126.67 5.180 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133EPME2 1505 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 998,190.00 998,190.00 3.875 3.936 3,229.16 0.00 0.00 3,229.16 16141BAC5 1506 101 CHRTWY 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.900 4.900 998.79 0.00 0.00 998.79 23204HP138 1507 101 CUST 244,000.00 244,000.00 244,000.00 4.500 4.500 902.47 0.00 0.00 902.47 91282CGT2 1508 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 984,600.00 984,600.00 3.625 3.672 2,971.31 0.00 0.00 2,971.31 85279AAC6 1509 101 STVINC 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.600 4.600 937.65 0.00 0.00 937.65 01025RAG4 1510 101 ALABAM 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 5.000 5.000 1,019.18 0.00 0.00 1,019.18 38120MCA2 1511 101 GLDNST 249,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 4.450 4.450 910.72 0.00 0.00 910.72 931142EE9 1512 101 WALMRT 1,000,000.00 973,110.00 973,110.00 3.700 3.855 3,083.33 0.00 0.00 3,083.33 910286GN7 1513 101 UNTFDL 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.500 4.500 917.27 0.00 0.00 917.27 472312AA5 1514 101 JEEPCO 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.700 4.700 958.02 0.00 0.00 958.02 31911KAK4 1515 101 1STELK 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.400 4.400 896.87 0.00 0.00 896.87 912828V80 1516 101 USTR 2,000,000.00 1,964,400.00 1,964,400.00 2.250 2.272 3,668.48 0.00 0.00 3,668.48 912796ZN2 1517 101 USTR 3,000,000.00 2,920,963.32 2,920,963.32 5.240 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 912828666 1518 101 USTR 2,000,000.00 1,969,580.00 1,969,580.00 2.750 2.770 4,483.70 0.00 0.00 4,483.70 91282CDV0 1519 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 975,600.00 975,600.00 0.875 0.890 713.31 0.00 0.00 713.31 05765LBU0 1520 101 BALBOA 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.400 4.400 896.88 0.00 0.00 896.88 6067-001TERM 1521 101 CAMP 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 5.645 5.644 92,786.30 0.00 0.00 92,786.30 560507AQ8 1522 101 MAINE 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.800 4.800 978.40 0.00 0.00 978.40 91739JAB1 1523 101 UTH1ST 245,000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 5.000 5.000 1,006.85 0.00 0.00 1,006.85 91282CGT2 1524 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 990,000.00 990,000.00 3.625 3.652 2,971.31 0.00 0.00 2,971.31 91282CHA2 1525 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 985,000.00 985,000.00 3.500 3.524 2,853.26 0.00 0.00 2,853.26 30960QAR8 1526 101 FARMIG 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 5.400 5.400 1,100.71 0.00 0.00 1,100.71 3133EPQD0 1527 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 998,655.69 998,655.69 4.250 4.315 3,541.67 0.00 0.00 3,541.67 91282CEK3 1528 101 USTR 1,000,000.00 980,080.00 980,080.00 2.500 2.530 2,038.05 0.00 0.00 2,038.05 3130ARHG9 1529 101 FHLB 1,000,000.00 982,520.00 982,520.00 2.125 2.193 1,770.84 0.00 0.00 1,770.84 912828W71 1530 101 USTR 2,000,000.00 1,960,078.13 1,960,078.13 2.125 2.162 3,483.61 0.00 0.00 3,483.61 3133EPSK2 1531 101 FFCB 1,000,000.00 990,400.00 990,400.00 4.250 4.351 3,541.67 0.00 0.00 3,541.67 499724AP7 1532 101 KNOX 248,000.00 248,000.00 248,000.00 4.850 4.850 988.61 0.00 0.00 988.61 05584CJJ6 1533 101 BNYMEL 244,000.00 0.00 244,000.00 4.500 4.500 721.97 0.00 0.00 721.97 313384YJ2 1534 101 FHLB 2,000,000.00 0.00 1,916,929.44 5.210 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9128282U3 1535 101 USTR 3,000,000.00 0.00 2,899,170.81 1.875 1.946 3,708.79 0.00 0.00 3,708.79 9128282N9 1536 101 USTR 2,000,000.00 0.00 1,942,840.00 2.125 2.170 2,771.74 0.00 0.00 2,771.74 898812AC6 1537 101 TUCSON 248,000.00 0.00 248,000.00 5.000 5.000 747.40 0.00 0.00 747.40 60936TAL3 1538 101 MONEY1 248,000.00 0.00 248,000.00 5.000 5.000 543.56 0.00 0.00 543.56 52470QEC4 1539 101 LEGBKT 248,000.00 0.00 248,000.00 4.500 4.500 91.73 0.00 0.00 91.73 Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:15 Portfolio CITY CP TE (PRF -TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 144 City of La Quinta Total 232,859,475.60 248,373,924.96 231,372,784.48 2.985 546,629.92 0.00 70,789.95 617,419.87 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:15 TE (PRF—TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 145 Total Earnings Page 9 September 1, 2023 - September 30, 2023 Adjusted Interest Earnings Ending Beginning Ending Current Annualized Interest Amortization/ Realized Adjusted Interest CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Par Value Book Value Book Value Rate Yield Earned Accretion Gainl/Loss Earnings Fund: General Fund 92023CAG8 1557 101 VLLSTR 0.00 248,000.00 0.00 4.850 4.157 169.47 0.00 0.00 169.47 Subtotal 230,637,965.44 231,191,273.02 229,151,274.32 3.101 526,761.00 0.00 70,789.95 597,550.95 Fund: Fiscal Agent SYS1058 1058 231 USBANK 13,793.08 15,000,443.22 13,793.08 1.118 13,787.01 0.00 0.00 13,787.01 Subtotal 13,793.08 15,000,443.22 13,793.08 1.118 13,787.01 0.00 0.00 13,787.01 Fund: Housing Authority : WSA and LQ SYS1062 1062 241 LQPR 141,682.52 116,174.16 141,682.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Subtotal 141,682.52 116,174.16 141,682.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fund: SA Low/Mod Bond Fund 25-33-005 1113 249 LAIF 2,066,034.56 2,066,034.56 2,066,034.56 3.534 3.582 6,081.91 0.00 0.00 6,081.91 Subtotal 2,066,034.56 2,066,034.56 2,066,034.56 3.582 6,081.91 0.00 0.00 6,081.91 Total 232,859,475.60 248,373,924.96 231,372,784.48 2.985 546,629.92 0.00 70,789.95 617,419.87 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 12/05/2023 - 16:15 TE (PRF—TE) 7.3.6 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 145 t(v ow fr(v CCity of La Quinta City of La Quinta Purchases Report CHEM ofthe DESERT - Sorted by Security Type - Fund July 1, 2023 - September 30, 2023 Sec. Original Purchase Principal Accrued Interest Rate at Maturity Ending CUSIP Investment # Fund Type Issuer Par Value Date Payment Periods Purchased at Purchase Purchase Date YTM Book Value CAMP TERM 6067-001TERM 1521 101 BCD CAMP 20,000,000.00 07/24/2023 04/12 - At Maturity 20,000,000.00 5.645 04/12/2024 5.645 20,000,000.00 Subtotal 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 0.00 20,000,000.00 Federal Agency Coupon Securities 3133EPQD0 1527 101 FAC FFCB 1,000,000.00 07/31/2023 01/17 - 07/17 998,655.69 Received 4.250 07/17/2028 4.280 998,655.69 3130ARHG9 1529 101 FAC FHLB 1,000,000.00 08/10/2023 08/28 - 02/28 982,520.00 Received 2.125 02/28/2024 5.391 982,520.00 3133EPSK2 1531 101 FAC FFCB 1,000,000.00 08/18/2023 02/07 - 08/07 990,400.00 Received 4.250 08/07/2028 4.467 990,400.00 Subtotal 3,000,000.00 2,971,575.69 0.00 2,971,575.69 Federal Agency Discount 313384YJ2 1534 101 AFD FHLB 2,000,000.00 09/07/2023 06/20 - At Maturity 1,916,929.44 5.210 06/20/2024 5.457 1,916,929.44 Subtotal 2,000,000.00 1,916,929.44 0.00 1,916,929.44 Treasury Coupon Securities 912828666 1518 101 TRC USTR 2,000,000.00 07/12/2023 08/15 - 02/15 1,969,580.00 Received 2.750 02/15/2024 5.382 1,969,580.00 91282CDV0 1519 101 TRC USTR 1,000,000.00 07/12/2023 07/31 - 01/31 975,600.00 Received 0.875 01/31/2024 5.416 975,600.00 91282CEK3 1528 101 TRC USTR 1,000,000.00 08/10/2023 10/31 - 04/30 980,080.00 Received 2.500 04/30/2024 5.340 980,080.00 912828W71 1530 101 TRC USTR 2,000,000.00 08/10/2023 09/30 - 03/31 1,960,078.13 Received 2.125 03/31/2024 5.338 1,960,078.13 9128282U3 1535 101 TRC USTR 3,000,000.00 09/07/2023 02/29 - 08/31 2,899,170.81 Received 1.875 08/31/2024 5.440 2,899,170.81 9128282N9 1536 101 TRC USTR 2,000,000.00 09/07/2023 01/31 -07/31 1,942,840.00 Received 2.125 07/31/2024 5.431 1,942,840.00 Subtotal 11,000,000.00 10,727,348.94 0.00 10,727,348.94 Certificate of Deposits 05765LBU0 1520 101 MC1 BALBOA 248,000.00 07/19/2023 08/19 - Monthly 248,000.00 4.400 07/19/2028 4.405 248,000.00 560507AQ8 1522 101 MC1 MAINE 248,000.00 07/21/2023 08/21 - Monthly 248,000.00 4.800 07/21/2028 4.806 248,000.00 91739JAB1 1523 101 MC1 UTH1ST 245,000.00 07/21/2023 08/21 - Monthly 245,000.00 5.000 07/21/2028 5.006 245,000.00 30960QAR8 1526 101 MC1 FARMIG 248,000.00 07/26/2023 08/28 - Monthly 248,000.00 5.400 07/28/2025 5.408 248,000.00 499724AP7 1532 101 MC1 KNOX 248,000.00 08/25/2023 10/01 - Monthly 248,000.00 4.850 08/25/2028 4.854 248,000.00 05584CJJ6 1533 101 MC1 BNYMEL 244,000.00 09/07/2023 03/07 - 09/07 244,000.00 4.500 09/07/2028 4.505 244,000.00 898812AC6 1537 101 MC1 TUCSON 248,000.00 09/08/2023 10/08 - Monthly 248,000.00 5.000 09/08/2028 5.005 248,000.00 60936TAL3 1538 101 MC1 MONEY1 248,000.00 09/14/2023 10/14 - Monthly 248,000.00 5.000 09/14/2028 5.005 248,000.00 52470QEC4 1539 101 MC1 LEGBKT 248,000.00 09/27/2023 10/27 - Monthly 248,000.00 4.500 09/27/2028 4.505 248,000.00 Received = Accrued Interest at Purchase was received by report ending date. Run Date: 11/16/2023 - 16:21 Portfolio CITY CP PU (PRF_PU) 7.1.1 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 146 City of La Quinta Purchases Report Page 2 July 1, 2023 - September 30, 2023 Sec. Original Purchase Principal Accrued Interest Rate at Maturity Ending CUSIP Investment # Fund Type Issuer Par Value Date Payment Periods Purchased at Purchase Purchase Date YTM Book Value Subtotal 2,225,000.00 2,225,000.00 0.00 2,225,000.00 CERBT - OPEB Trust SYS1114 1114 101 LA2 CALPRS 1,855,123.49 07/01/2023 12/31 -Monthly 1,855,123.49 1,773,353.25 Subtotal 1,855,123.49 1,855,123.49 0.00 1,773,353.25 Total Purchases 40,080,123.49 39,695,977.56 0.00 39,614,207.32 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 11/16/2023 - 16:21 PU (PRF_PU) 7.1.1 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 147 r City of La Quinta City of La Quinta Maturity Report GEM of the DESERT — Sorted by Maturity Date Amounts due during July 1, 2023 - September 30, 2023 Total Maturities 18,384,000.00 18,064,047.30 33,363.93 18,417,363.93 353,316.63 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 11/16/2023 - 16:22 MA (PRF_MA) 7.1.1 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 148 Sec. Maturity Purchase Rate Book Value Maturity Net CUSIP Investment # Fund Type Issuer Par Value Date Date at Maturity at Maturity Interest Proceeds Income 912797FR3 1468 101 ATD USTR 3,000,000.00 07/05/2023 03/07/2023 4.821 2,951,790.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 48,210.00 02772JBD1 1205 101 MC1 AMRNTL 248,000.00 07/19/2023 07/19/2019 2.000 248,000.00 407.67 248,407.67 407.67 32110YLK9 1147 101 MC1 1STNBA 245,000.00 07/20/2023 07/20/2018 3.150 245,000.00 634.32 245,634.32 634.32 06426KAN8 1151 101 MC1 NWENGL 249,000.00 07/31/2023 07/31/2018 3.250 249,000.00 687.31 249,687.31 687.31 91282CCN9 1341 101 TRC USTR 500,000.00 07/31/2023 10/22/2021 0.125 497,792.97 312.50 500,312.50 2,519.53 912796Y37 1463 101 ATD USTR 2,000,000.00 08/03/2023 02/07/2023 4.636 1,954,412.92 0.00 2,000,000.00 45,587.08 594918BQ6 1157 101 MC2 MCRSFT 400,000.00 08/08/2023 10/15/2018 2.000 378,360.00 4,000.00 404,000.00 25,640.00 912797GF8 1481 101 ATD USTR 2,000,000.00 08/08/2023 04/11/2023 4.696 1,968,951.36 0.00 2,000,000.00 31,048.64 3133EKZK5 1223 101 FAC FFCB 500,000.00 08/14/2023 09/12/2019 1.600 499,400.00 4,000.00 504,000.00 4,600.00 75472RAD3 1218 101 MC1 RAYJAM 244,000.00 08/23/2023 08/23/2019 1.950 244,000.00 2,359.45 246,359.45 2,359.45 912797GJO 1489 101 ATD USTR 1,000,000.00 08/29/2023 05/03/2023 4.878 984,010.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 15,990.00 9128284X5 1462 101 TRC USTR 1,000,000.00 08/31/2023 02/07/2023 2.750 988,900.00 13,750.00 1,013,750.00 24,850.00 912796Z51 1471 101 ATD USTR 3,000,000.00 08/31/2023 03/09/2023 4.991 2,927,220.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 72,780.00 3133EJYL7 1158 101 FAC FFCB 250,000.00 09/05/2023 10/15/2018 2.800 247,275.00 3,500.00 253,500.00 6,225.00 912796YH6 1470 101 ATD USTR 2,000,000.00 09/07/2023 03/09/2023 4.917 1,950,283.66 0.00 2,000,000.00 49,716.34 313384LP2 1490 101 AFD FHLB 1,000,000.00 09/11/2023 05/03/2023 4.850 982,351.39 0.00 1,000,000.00 17,648.61 89579NCD3 1262 101 MC1 TRIAD 248,000.00 09/29/2023 03/30/2020 1.350 248,000.00 275.18 248,275.18 275.18 912828T26 1217 101 TRC USTR 500,000.00 09/30/2023 08/21/2019 1.375 499,300.00 3,437.50 503,437.50 4,137.50 Total Maturities 18,384,000.00 18,064,047.30 33,363.93 18,417,363.93 353,316.63 Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 11/16/2023 - 16:22 MA (PRF_MA) 7.1.1 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 148 US Treasury Rates https://home.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/TextView?tvpe=daily treasury yield curve&field tdr date value=2023 s.6 5.35 5.7 4.85 4.6 4.35 4.1 3.85 3.6 3.35 3.1 2.85 2.6 2.35 2.1 1.85 1.6 1.35 1.1 0.S 5 0.6 0.35 0.1 -0.15° 3 'h OI" °1' 1 �1Q;"°� °S Ory °v °�' O^' Off' °^' °�' Ov ON Off' (3,1,D7' O^' °^' °� O� °� Oti 1ti 1ti 1ti 1ti 1ti 1ti \�' 1� lti 1�' 1ti 1� 1ti 1�' 1ti 1ti 1ti \ti \ti 1ti 1ti 1�' 1� 1ti TREASURY RATES AND PORTFOLIO RETURNS +1 -Yr Treasury f5 -Yr Treasury - Effective Rate ntReturn City Port€olic )YTD) -M- City PortFolioYTM 149 Effective Effective Date 1 mo 2 mo 3 mo 6 mo 1 yr 2 yr 3 yr 5 yr 7 yr 10 yr 20 yr 30 yr Rate of Rate of Return City Return City City Portfolio Portfolio Portfolio (month) (YTD) YTM 7/31/2023 5.48 5.54 5.55 5.53 5.37 4.88 4.51 4.18 4.08 3.97 4.22 4.02 2.90 2.9 3.299 8/31/2023 5.52 5.55 5.56 5.48 5.37 4.85 4.54 4.23 4.19 4.09 4.39 4.20 3.67 3.28 3.033 9/30/2023 5.55 5.60 5.55 5.61 5.53 5.46 5.03 4.80 4.60 4.61 4.59 4.92 3.03 3.2 3.373 s.6 5.35 5.7 4.85 4.6 4.35 4.1 3.85 3.6 3.35 3.1 2.85 2.6 2.35 2.1 1.85 1.6 1.35 1.1 0.S 5 0.6 0.35 0.1 -0.15° 3 'h OI" °1' 1 �1Q;"°� °S Ory °v °�' O^' Off' °^' °�' Ov ON Off' (3,1,D7' O^' °^' °� O� °� Oti 1ti 1ti 1ti 1ti 1ti 1ti \�' 1� lti 1�' 1ti 1� 1ti 1�' 1ti 1ti 1ti \ti \ti 1ti 1ti 1�' 1� 1ti TREASURY RATES AND PORTFOLIO RETURNS +1 -Yr Treasury f5 -Yr Treasury - Effective Rate ntReturn City Port€olic )YTD) -M- City PortFolioYTM 149 150 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 14 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 19, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE• APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED NOVEMBER 17, DECEMBER 1, AND DECEMBER 8, 2023 RECOMMENDATION Approve demand registers dated November 17, December 1, and December 8, 2023. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY — None FISCAL IMPACT Demand of Cash: City Successor Agency of RDA Housing Authority BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS $ 6,020,605.75 $ 41,969.09 $ 6,062,574.84 Routine bills and payroll must be paid between Council meetings. Attachment 1 details the weekly demand registers for November 17, December 1, and December 8, 2023. Warrants Issued: 212406-212487 EFT 131 212488-212556 EFT 132 212557-212609 Payroll Direct Deposit Payroll Check #37680 Payroll Tax Transfers Wire Transfers Voids $ 1,618,216.62 $ 200.00 $ 1,394,370.62 $ 127,664.51 $ 544,305.61 $ 473,992.29 $ 92.35 $ 101,460.74 $ 1,808,654.55 $ (6,382.45) $ 6,062,574.84 151 Eleven checks were voided, and seven were reissued. The voids were the result of the periodic review of stale -dated checks and corrections. Vendor Riverside County Sheriff Department American Asphalt South, Inc T.Y. Lin International() Desert Concepts Construction, Inc.(') Rutan & Tucker (1) Payments were made 11/17/23 & 12/8/23 Account Name Amount Purpose Various $ 1,119,687.10 8/24-9/20/23 Police Services Construction $ 1,033,528.60 PMP Slurry Seal Improvements Progress Payment Construction $ 297,057.28 Dune Palms Rd Bridge Management Services Various $145,450.00 Library Roof & X -Park Basin Repairs Various $127,664.51 Legal Services Wire Transfers: Twenty-seven transfers totaled $1,808,655. Of this amount, $1.19 million was to CalPERS and $497,856 was to Landmark. (See Attachment 2 for a complete listing). Investment Transactions: Full details of investment transactions, as well as total holdings, are reported quarterly in the Treasurer's Report. 152 Settle Coupon Transaction Issuer Type Par Value Date Rate YTM Purchase Federal Farm Credit Banks Agency $ 1,000,000 11/13/2027 4.625% 4.630% Maturity Commercial Bank CD $ 248,000 11/15/2023 3.400% 3.400% Purchase Empower Credit Union CD $ 247,000 11/15/2023 5.250% 5.250% Maturity United States Treasury T -Bill $ 4,000,000 11/24/2023 0.000% 5.403% Maturity Numerica CD $ 248,000 11/28/2023 3.550% 3.550% Purchase The Genoa Banking Company CD $ 248,000 11/28/2023 4.600% 4.600% Purchase United States Treasury T -Bill $ 2,000,000 12/4/2023 0.000% 5.330% Maturity Jovia Financial Credit Union CD $ 248,000 12/7/2023 2.500% 2.500% Prepared by: Jesse Batres, Finance Technician Approved by: Rosemary Hallick, Principal Management Analyst Attachments: 1. Demand Registers 2. Wire Transfers 152 ATTACHMENT 1 Demand Register 4Q"fa City of La Quinta Packet: APPKT03647 - 11/17/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 101 -GENERAL FUND FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 212433 GARNISHMENT Garnishments Payable 101-0000-20985 222.74 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 212478 CONTRIBUTION United Way Deductions 101-0000-20981 37.00 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING, LLC 212428 09/29/23 - PC PHN 2023 CODE UPDATES Advertising 101-6002-60450 434.28 DESERT SUN PUBLISHING, LLC 212428 09/29/23 - PC PHN LQ VILLAGE APTS Advertising 101-6002-60450 434.28 WILLDAN 212486 08/2023 - ONCALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERI... Contract Traffic Engineer 101-7006-60144 980.00 WILLDAN 212486 09/2023 - ONCALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERI... Contract Traffic Engineer 101-7006-60144 596.00 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212419 11/05-12/04/23 - FS #32 CABLE/INTERN... Telephone - Utilities 101-2002-61300 10.52 GALLS LLC 212435 UNIFORMS FOR G.DUCHENE Uniforms 101-6004-60690 130.48 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212419 10/24-11/23/23 - FS #93 CABLE (2415) Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 113.90 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212419 11/03-12/02/23 - FS #93 INTERNET (351... Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 99.99 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212419 10/29-11/28/23 - FS #32 INTERNET (649... Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 99.99 VINTAGE E & S INC 212484 SPORT COMPLEX CIRCUIT BREAKER REP... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 1,270.26 VINTAGE E & S INC 212484 11/9/23 - SSR PARK CAM LOCK PANEL E... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 3,972.00 VINTAGE E & S INC 212484 11/03/23 - SRR PARK ELECTRICAL ONCA... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 825.32 VINTAGE E & S INC 212484 10/25/23 - LQ PARK LIGHT POLES REPAI... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 506.49 MOJICA, OSCAR 212451 10/26-10/27/23 - CCAC NUTS & BOLTS ... Travel & Training 101-1005-60320 123.93 GARDAWORLD 212436 11/2023 - ARMORED SERVICES Professional Services 101-1006-60103 305.36 CASTANEDA, MONICA 212418 FY 23/24 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 200.00 RADEVA, MONIKA 131 FY 23/24 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 200.00 GRAHAM, MARCIE 212438 11/7-11/9/23 APPLE DEVELOPER CENTE... Travel & Training 101-3007-60320 1,154.57 GHERA, EDWARD R 212437 TRAINING DINNER REIMB E.GHERA Travel & Training 101-6003-60320 75.00 TUVELL, TAYLOR FLOYD 212476 10/22-10/23/23 PARKING REIMB FORT... Travel & Training 101-6003-60320 36.00 ULINE 212477 SANDBAGS FOR CH/EOC Disaster Prep Supplies 101-2002-60406 867.81 ULINE 212477 SANDBAGS FOR FS #70 Disaster Prep Supplies 101-2002-60406 1,069.00 ULINE 212477 SANDBAGS FOR FS #32 Disaster Prep Supplies 101-2002-60406 1,069.00 ULINE 212477 SANDBAGS FOR FS #93 Disaster Prep Supplies 101-2002-60406 1,069.00 ULINE 212477 OFFICE CHAIR Office Supplies 101-3008-60400 395.69 CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFIC... 212417 CALBO STATE PUBLICATION Subscriptions & Publications 101-6003-60352 176.13 FLAGS A FLYING 212432 USA COAST GUARD FLAG Sales Taxes Payable 101-0000-20304 -3.06 FLAGS A FLYING 212432 USA COAST GUARD FLAG Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 38.06 CACEO 212416 CACEO TRAINING C.WOODS Travel & Training 101-6004-60320 1,500.00 L.O. LYNCH QUALITY WELLS &.. 212447 RONDO CHANNEL PUMP RELAY SWITCH Professional Services 101-7003-60103 3,271.73 MADDEN MEDIA 212448 10/2023 - MEDIA SERVICES/WEBSITE D... Marketing & Tourism Promot.. 101-3007-60461 7,857.14 IRC CORPORATION 212444 10/2023 - PRE-EMPLOYMENT BACKGRO... Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 186.70 TKE ENGINEERING, INC. 212473 7/1-8/31/23 - ONCALL PW MAP CHECK... Map/Plan Checking 101-7002-60183 500.00 TKE ENGINEERING, INC. 212473 09/2023 - ONCALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERI... Contract Traffic Engineer 101-7006-60144 6,595.00 DUNN-EDWARDS CORPORAT... 212430 PAINT SUPPLIES Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 122.80 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 212483 9/11-9/15/23 -STORM HILARY CLEAN UP Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 4,480.00 NI GOVERNMENT SERVICES I... 212455 10/2023 -SATELLITE PHONES Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites 101-2002-61304 87.35 PARTY PALS 212461 SANTA CHAIR & TRACKLESS TRAIN Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 1,675.00 TOM MORGAN LA QUINTA R... 212475 FACILITY RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND Miscellaneous Deposits 101-0000-22830 100.00 JENSEN, SHARLA W 212445 1 DAY SESSION CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 48.00 JENSEN, SHARLA W 212445 PERSONAL TRAINING 3 SESSIONS CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 264.00 JENSEN, SHARLA W 212445 PERSONAL TRAINING 6 SESSIONS Instructors 101-3002-60107 1,320.00 WILLIAMS, BILLEE 212487 YOGA FLOW CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 54.60 WILLIAMS, BILLEE 212487 YOGA FLOW CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 12.60 VIELHARBER, KAREN 212482 GENTLE YOGA TUESDAY CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 273.00 SHIRY, TERESA 212467 BALLROOM BEGINNING DI CLASSES Instructors 101-3002-60107 147.00 SHIRY, TERESA 212467 BALLROOM BEGINNING CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 52.50 RUDY, LORI A 212466 ESSENTIAL FITNESS CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 210.00 WILLIAMS, BILLEE 212487 PILATES Instructors 101-3002-60107 273.00 HEWETT, ATSUKO YAMANE 212442 DEEP STRETCH CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 73.50 HEWETT, ATSUKO YAMANE 212442 DEEP STRETCH DI CLASSES Instructors 101-3002-60107 28.00 12/11/2023 6:40:38 PM Page 1 of 10 153 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03647 -11/17/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount WILLIAMS, BILLEE 212487 GENTLE YOGA FRIDAY DI CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 25.20 DESERT BUSINESS INTERIORS 212426 WELLNESS CENTER FURNITURE FINAL P... Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 2,915.36 D'ALESIO 212425 REPLACE IRON SLINGS AT FIRE STATIONS Fire Station 101-2002-60670 525.28 MOWERS PLUS INC 212452 CHAIN LOOP & OIL Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 85.61 MOWERS PLUS INC 212452 WOODCUTTERS APRON CHAPS Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 258.58 MOWERS PLUS INC 212452 TRIMMER LINE Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 22.90 FIELDMAN, ROLAPP & ASSOC... 212431 10/2023 LAND-BASED FINANCING POLI... Professional Services 101-1006-60103 6,984.00 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212457 BANKER BOXES Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 33.52 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212457 CITY-WIDE CUPS Citywide Supplies 101-1007-60403 65.04 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 212469 MOUSE PAD & DOCUMENT HOLDER Office Supplies 101-7001-60400 75.34 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 212469 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-3001-60400 183.61 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 212469 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-3001-60400 277.67 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 212469 RECEPTACLE TESTERS FOR PW INSPECT... Operating Supplies 101-7002-60420 57.39 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY CO 212468 IRRIGATION PARTS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 455.05 USA DRAIN AND PLUMBING... 212480 FS #93 WATER HEATER REPAIRS Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 350.00 USA DRAIN AND PLUMBING... 212480 CH BOILER REPAIRS Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 425.00 BURNS, ALICE QUIROZ 212415 12/1/23 - FINAL PAYMENT FOR 250 CUP... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 358.75 USA DRAIN AND PLUMBING... 212480 REPLACE CH BATHROOM & SINK SUPPLY.., Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 4,950.00 USA DRAIN AND PLUMBING... 212480 FS #70 GAS TO PROPANE DRYER CONVE... Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 1,075.00 USA DRAIN AND PLUMBING... 212480 FS #32 KITCHEN DRAIN REPAIRS Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 1,375.00 USA DRAIN AND PLUMBING... 212480 FB PARK URINAL REPAIRS Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 1,600.00 JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE P... 212446 CH FIRE SYSTEM SERVICE CALL Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 1,843.28 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 212450 HATS FOR INSPECTORS Uniforms 101-7006-60690 324.90 RASA/ERIC NELSON 212463 LLA 2023-1000 ON-CALL MAP CHECKING.., Map/Plan Checking 101-7002-60183 420.00 RASA/ERIC NELSON 212463 PMER 2023-1000 ONCALL MAP CHECKI... Map/Plan Checking 101-7002-60183 350.00 ROBERT HALF 212465 10/27/23 - TEMP AGENCY SERVICES A.... Temporary Agency Services 101-6006-60125 1,575.00 ROBERT HALF 212465 11/03/23 - TEMP AGENCY SERVICES A.... Temporary Agency Services 101-6006-60125 1,575.00 PALM DESERT AREA CHAMB... 212459 ADDITIONAL SEATS FOR POPS LUNCHE... LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 320.00 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAI... 212449 09/2023 -JANITORIAL SERVICES Janitorial 101-3008-60115 15,849.35 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAI... 212449 10/2023 -JANITORIAL SERVICES Janitorial 101-3008-60115 15,947.62 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAI... 212449 10/16/23 - LQ PARK RESTROOM CLEANI... Janitorial 101-3008-60115 245.00 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAI... 212449 10/25/23 - CH CARPET CLEANING Janitorial 101-3008-60115 210.00 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE... 212407 BLOOD ALCOHOL ANALYSIS Blood/Alcohol Testing 101-2001-60174 638.11 T -MOBILE 212474 09/18-09/27/23 - POLICE GPS LOCATE L... Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-60175 25.00 GRAINGER 212439 USA COAST GUARD FLAG Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 50.34 VERIZON WIRELESS 212481 09/26-10/25/23 - LQPD CELL (6852) Telephone - Utilities 101-2001-61300 889.42 OLD TOWN ARTISAN STUDIOS 212458 1/13/24 - COLOR THE WORLD GALA SIL... Sponsorships/Advertising 101-3007-60450 5,000.00 BELANICH, TOMM 212408 12/01/23 -TREE LIGHTING EVENT Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 200.00 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212443 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Monticello Park - Uti.. 101-3005-61102 13.60 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212443 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Colonel Paige - Utilit.. 101-3005-61108 1,087.28 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212443 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Adams Park - Utiliti... 101-3005-61110 36.88 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212423 WATER SERVICE Water -Pioneer Park - Utilities 101-3005-61207 492.15 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212423 WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-2002-61200 118.10 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212423 WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-3008-61200 25.41 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212423 WATER SERVICE Water -Monticello Park - Utili... 101-3005-61201 4,357.98 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212423 WATER SERVICE Water -Fritz Burns Park - Utili... 101-3005-61204 241.89 COACHELLA VALLEY CONSER... 212422 R/C 06/2023 MSHCP FEES TO FY23/23 MSHCP Mitigation Fee 101-0000-20310 -149,155.00 COACHELLA VALLEY CONSER... 212422 R/C 06/2023 MSHCP FEES TO FY23/23 CVMSHCP Admin Fee 101-0000-43631 1,491.55 COACHELLA VALLEY CONSER... 212422 R/C 06/2023 MSHCP FEES FROM FY 23/... MSHCP Mitigation Fee 101-0000-20310 149,155.00 COACHELLA VALLEY CONSER... 212422 R/C 06/2023 MSHCP FEES FROM FY 23/... CVMSHCP Admin Fee 101-0000-43631 -1,491.55 111 NOTARY SERVICES 212406 10/18/23 - VOLUNTEER FINGERPRINTING Travel & Training 101-1004-60320 90.00 OLD TOWN ARTISAN STUDIOS 212458 FY 23/24 OLD TOWN ARTISAN STUDIOS ... Contract Services 101-3001-60101 25,000.00 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212434 10/26-11/25/23 - POLICE INTERNETY Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2001-61400 548.78 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212434 10/28-11/27/23 - SPORT COMPLEX PH... Telephone - Utilities 101-3005-61300 53.19 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 212456 FB POOL ROLA-CHEM SQUEEZE TUBE RE... Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 222.31 COACHELLA VALLEY CONSER... 212422 10/2023 - MSHCP FEES MSHCP Mitigation Fee 101-0000-20310 1,625.00 COACHELLA VALLEY CONSER... 212422 10/2023 - MSHCP FEES CVMSHCP Admin Fee 101-0000-43631 -16.25 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/12/23 - APWA CV PUBLIC WORKS EX... Travel & Training 101-3005-60320 135.40 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/12/23 - APWA CV PUBLIC WORKS EX... Travel & Training 101-3005-60320 33.85 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/12/23 - APWA CV PUBLIC WORKS EX... Travel & Training 101-3008-60320 33.85 12/11/2023 6:40:38 PM Page 2 of 10 154 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03647 -11/17/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/12/23 - APWA CV PUBLIC WORKS EX... Travel & Training 101-3008-60320 67.70 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/12/23 - APWA CV PUBLIC WORKS EX... Travel & Training 101-7001-60320 135.40 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/12/23 - APWA CV PUBLIC WORKS EX... Travel & Training 101-7002-60320 67.70 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/12/23 - APWA CV PUBLIC WORKS EX... Travel & Training 101-7003-60320 101.55 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/12/23 - APWA CV PUBLIC WORKS EX... Travel & Training 101-7003-60320 135.40 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/12/23 - APWA CV PUBLIC WORKS EX... Travel & Training 101-7003-60320 33.85 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/12/23 - APWA CV PUBLIC WORKS EX... Travel & Training 101-7006-60320 33.85 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/12/23 - APWA CV PUBLIC WORKS EX... Travel & Training 101-7006-60320 101.55 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/19/23 - LUNCH FOR SUPERVISOR ME... Travel & Training 101-1004-60320 111.99 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/26/23 - BADGE RIBBONS FOR VETER... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 73.75 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/25/23 -COOKIES FOR TREE LIGHTING Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 845.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/25/23 - MUFFINS FOR VETERANS CE... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 71.55 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/12/23 - SNACKS FOR CONCERTS IN T... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 168.86 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/08/23 SANTA CHAIR RENTAL/DECOR... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 995.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/25/23 - CARTS FOR OFFICE/EVENT U... Operating Supplies 101-3003-60420 359.94 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/03/23 - COOLER BAG FOR CM OFFICE Office Supplies 101-1002-60400 16.96 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/18/23 - SEAT CUSHIONS (12) Office Supplies 101-1002-60400 448.92 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/1-10/4/23 CALPERS FORUM HOTEL/... Travel & Training 101-1004-60320 462.18 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/19/23 - SNACKS FOR SUPERVISOR M... Travel & Training 101-1004-60320 60.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/19/23 - LUNCH FOR SUPERVISOR ME... Travel & Training 101-1004-60320 55.92 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/10/23 - STICKY NOTES Office Supplies 101-1004-60400 20.85 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/26/23 - MONITOR MOUNT Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 119.61 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/23/23 - REFUND COMPUTER MONIT... Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 -108.74 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/23/23 - COMPUTER MONITOR MOU... Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 108.74 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/11/23 - SEAT CUSHIONS & OFFICE 5... Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 251.70 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/05/23 - FIRST AID KITS Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 68.26 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 1/31-2/1/24 - CSMFO CONFERENCE HO... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 308.88 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 1/31-2/1/24 - CSMFO CONFERENCE HO... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 308.88 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 1/31-2/1/24 - CSMFO CONFERENCE HO... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 308.88 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/1-10/4/23 CALPERS FORUM HOTEL/... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 462.18 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 1/31-2/1/24 - CSMFO CONFERENCE C.... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 665.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 1/31-2/1/24 - CSMFO CONFERENCE HO... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 308.88 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/6/23 - SPOONS/PLATES Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 12.09 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/06/23 - KEY TAGS Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 8.69 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/19/23 - PRESSURE WASHER & NOZZL... Fire Station 101-2002-60670 496.96 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/18/23 - 3 SETS OF BOCCI BALLS FOR ... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 133.35 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/02/23 - POTTERY Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 3,262.50 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/25/23 - CHRISTMAS LIGHTS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 413.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/2023 - MAI LCHIMP Membership Dues 101-3007-60351 205.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 11/2023 - APPLE MUSIC/STORAGE Membership Dues 101-3007-60351 22.95 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/7/23-10/6/24 - PIKTOCHART MEMB... Membership Dues 101-3007-60351 60.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/19/23 - CAMERA LENS ACCESSORY KI... Operating Supplies 101-3007-60420 205.54 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/09/23 - PARTICULATE FILTER TRAP &... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 98.14 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/2023 - DESERT SUN Subscriptions & Publications 101-6001-60352 11.98 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/10/23 -TONER CARTRIDGE Office Supplies 101-6001-60400 91.23 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/10/23 - MESH OFFICE CHAIR Office Supplies 101-6001-60400 173.99 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/10/23 - ERGONOMIC OFFICE CHAIR Office Supplies 101-6001-60400 173.99 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/10/23 - BUSINESS CARD HOLDERS Office Supplies 101-6001-60400 7.59 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/09/23 - MINTS Operating Supplies 101-6001-60420 3.82 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/09/23 -TRACING PAPER & WALL CAL... Operating Supplies 101-6001-60420 36.86 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/09/23 - WALL CALENDAR Operating Supplies 101-6001-60420 24.96 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/11/23 - IPAD CASES FOR BUILDING I... Supplies - Field 101-6003-60425 104.36 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/19/23 - BANKER BOXES Office Supplies 101-6004-60400 65.40 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 9/16-9/18/23 APA CONFERENCE HOTEL ... Travel & Training 101-6001-60320 -546.77 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/22-10/23/23 - CALBO CONFERENCE ... Travel & Training 101-6001-60320 369.91 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/22-10/23/23 - CALBO CONFERENCE ... Travel & Training 101-6001-60320 633.01 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/22-10/23/23 - CALBO CONFERENCE ... Travel & Training 101-6001-60320 369.91 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/16/23 - WORKING PLANNING LUNCH Travel & Training 101-6001-60320 69.95 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/22-10/23/23 - CALBO CONFERENCE ... Travel & Training 101-6001-60320 633.01 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/10/23 - STORAGE DRAWERS Office Supplies 101-6001-60400 49.37 12/11/2023 6:40:38 PM Page 3 of 10 155 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03647 - 11/17/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/23/23 - VB3 DRINKING FOUNTAIN V... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 1,556.46 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/05/23 - BOCCE BALLS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 212.01 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/04/23 - SOD CUTTER RENTAL Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 131.18 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/05/23 - PLANTS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 121.24 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/3/23 - M&O SUPERINTENDENT INTE... Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 77.18 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/11/23 - X -PARK ANNIVERSARY STICK... Promotional Items 101-3007-60134 263.18 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/26/23 -TEA FOR CCAC WORKSHOP J... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 2.43 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 1/31-2/2/24 - CSMFO CONFERENCE J. B... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 515.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/26/23 - GFOA TRAINING R.HALLICK Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 85.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 1/31-2/2/24 - CSMFO CONFERENCE K.B... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 515.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/25-10/26/23 - CCAC WORKSHOP HO... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 466.92 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 1/31-2/2/24 - CSMFO CONFERENCE S.L... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 515.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/17/23 - CSMFO MEMBERSHIP 1.BATR... Membership Dues 101-1006-60351 50.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/06/23 - MICR CHECK PRINTING INK Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 747.25 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/18/23 - SNACKS FOR NEIGHBORHOO... LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 72.18 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/23/23 - TV FOR FS #70 Fire Station 101-2002-60670 440.99 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/10/23 - LUNCHEON Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 317.29 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/09/23 - SUPPLIES FOR GOODIE BAGS Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 3,200.44 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/17/23 - DINNER FOR COUNCIL MEET... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 160.18 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/24/23 - INDIO STATE OF THE CITY J.P... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 79.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/10/23 - LEADERSHIP CV EVENT L.EV... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 20.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/02/23 - SNACKS FOR COUNCIL MEET... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 32.82 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 9/20-9/22/23 - CA CITIES CONF HOTEL C... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 -46.32 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/05/23 - USO GALA EVENT S.SANCHEZ Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 250.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 11/03/23 - GOGIRL LUNCHEON S.SANC... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 100.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/17/23 - INDIO STATE OF THE CITY 5.... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 79.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/30/23 - VGPS HOSPITALITY AWARD D.. Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 1,200.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/02/23 - DRINK FOR COUNCIL MEETI... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 4.29 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/02/23 - RETURN PROCLAMATION FIR Operating Supplies 101-1001-60420 -278.54 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/23/23 - PLANTS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 1,141.66 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/25/23 - PLANTS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 873.32 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/23/23 - CA LEAGUE 2023 NEW LAWS... Travel & Training 101-1005-60320 25.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/25-10/27/23 - CCAC TRAINING HOTE... Travel & Training 101-1005-60320 421.10 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/26/23 - CCAC TRAINING MEAL O.MOJ.. Travel & Training 101-1005-60320 13.46 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/17/23 - FILE FOLDER LABELS Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 99.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/24/23 - USPS POSTAGE SUBPOENA R... Operating Supplies 101-1005-60420 9.55 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212423 WATER SERVICE Water -Desert Pride - Utilities 101-3005-61206 257.22 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 09/01-09/30/23 - REVERSAL OF BANK F... Credit Card Fees 101-1006-60122 -1,180.17 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212464 08/24-09/20/23 - BP #3 POLICE SERVICES Sheriff Patrol 101-2001-60161 632,708.04 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212464 08/24-09/20/23 - BP #3 POLICE SERVICES Police Overtime 101-2001-60162 33,963.32 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212464 08/24-09/20/23 - BP #3 POLICE SERVICES Target Team 101-2001-60163 155,161.22 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212464 08/24-09/20/23 - BP #3 POLICE SERVICES Community Services Officer 101-2001-60164 59,204.00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212464 08/24-09/20/23 - BP #3 POLICE SERVICES Gang Task Force 101-2001-60166 17,150.40 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212464 08/24-09/20/23 - BP #3 POLICE SERVICES Narcotics Task Force 101-2001-60167 16,078.50 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212464 08/24-09/20/23 - BP #3 POLICE SERVICES Motor Officer 101-2001-60169 96,214.29 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212464 08/24-09/20/23 - BP #3 POLICE SERVICES Dedicated Sargeants 101-2001-60170 41,285.88 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212464 08/24-09/20/23 - BP #3 POLICE SERVICES Dedicated Lieutenant 101-2001-60171 25,496.00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212464 08/24-09/20/23 - BP #3 POLICE SERVICES Sheriff - Mileage 101-2001-60172 34,588.03 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212464 08/24-09/20/23 - BP #3 POLICE SERVICES Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-60175 1,101.88 Fund 101- GENERAL FUND Total: 1,287,164.26 Fund: 201- GAS TAX FUND SUPERIOR READY MIX CONC... 212470 CONCRETE MATERIALS Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 722.11 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/06/23 - ROTARY MIXER RENTAL & C... Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 722.31 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/06/23 - REFUND DEPOSIT FOR CONC... Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 -440.00 Fund 201- GAS TAX FUND Total: 1,004.42 Fund: 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTR... 212427 LIBRARY ROOF REPAIRS Maintenance/Services 202-3004-60691 49,000.00 USA DRAIN AND PLUMBING... 212480 LIBRARY TOILET REPAIRS Maintenance/Services 202-3004-60691 870.00 USA DRAIN AND PLUMBING... 212480 LIBRARY BATHROOM FAUCETS REPLAC... Maintenance/Services 202-3004-60691 1,855.00 USA DRAIN AND PLUMBING... 212480 LIBRARY RESTROOM REPAIRS Maintenance/Services 202-3004-60691 435.00 12/11/2023 6:40:38 PM Page 4 of 10 156 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03647 -11/17/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount MERCHANTS BUILDING MAI... 212449 09/2023 -JANITORIAL SERVICES Janitorial 202-3004-60115 3,264.32 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAI... 212449 09/2023 -JANITORIAL SERVICES Janitorial 202-3006-60115 989.54 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAI... 212449 10/2023 -JANITORIAL SERVICES Janitorial 202-3004-60115 3,264.32 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAI... 212449 10/2023 -JANITORIAL SERVICES Janitorial 202-3006-60115 989.54 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212423 WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 202-3006-61200 372.51 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/26/23 - PLANTS Maintenance/Services 202-3006-60691 338.08 Fund 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND Total: 61,378.31 Fund: 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 212464 08/24-09/20/23 - BP #3 POLICE SERVICES COPS Burglary/Theft Prevent... 212-0000-60179 6,735.54 Fund 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND Total: 6,735.54 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/25/23 - HAND SANITIZER WIPES Operating Supplies 215-7004-60420 254.34 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/25/23 -SUNSCREEN LOTION Safety Gear 215-7004-60427 207.20 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/23/23 - PLANTS Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 400.00 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212443 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 548.33 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212443 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61117 477.23 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212443 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 12.34 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212443 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 447.47 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212443 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61117 12.34 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212443 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 18.07 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212443 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61117 12.34 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212423 WATER SERVICE Water - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61211 184.11 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212423 WATER SERVICE Water - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61211 280.77 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212423 WATER SERVICE Water - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61211 1,696.07 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212423 WATER SERVICE Water - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61211 2,179.79 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212443 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 288.09 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total: 7,018.49 Fund: 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND THE PRINTING PLACE 212472 RECYCLING POSTCARDS WITH MAGNETS AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 11,229.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/03/23 - COMPOSTABLE BREAK ROOM., AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 80.12 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/25/23 -TRASH BAGS AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 9.68 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/20/23 - RECYCLE/TRASH OFFICE BINS AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 86.74 Fund 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND Total: 11,405.54 Fund: 224 - TUMF FUND COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOC 0... 212421 10/2023 -TUMF FEES TUMF Payable to CVAG 224-0000-20320 2,550.00 Fund 224 - TUMF FUND Total: 2,550.00 Fund: 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS DESERT SUN PUBLISHING, LLC 212428 9/20-9/27/23 COVE TRAILS PARKING LO... Construction 401-0000-60188 1,485.00 T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL 212471 07/2023 - DUNE PALMS RD BRIDGE MA... Construction 401-0000-60188 134,023.92 NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 - LA QUINTA X PARK Professional Services 401-0000-60103 1,925.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS LAKE I... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 962.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 - 2019-05 HIGHWAY 111 CORR... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 525.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 - SILVERROCK EVENT SPACE Professional Services 401-0000-60103 350.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 - CIVIC CENTER ACTIVITIES PR... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 1,025.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 - 2022-03 FRED WARING DRIVE... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 525.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 - 2019-01 VILLAGE ART/CULTU... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 4,025.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 - 2016-03 LQ LANDSCAPE IMP... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 2,312.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 - 2019-02 AVE 50 BRIDGE Professional Services 401-0000-60103 3,085.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 - 2023-15- PAVEMENT MANAG... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 18,620.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 - 2011-05 DUNE PALMS BRIDGE Professional Services 401-0000-60103 1,497.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 AVE 50 REHAB (WASHINGTON ... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 175.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 - EISENHOWER RETENTION BAS.. Professional Services 401-0000-60103 1,212.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 - 2022-08 CITYWIDE MISC. ADA.. Professional Services 401-0000-60103 150.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 - 2021-02 FRITZ BURN PARK IM... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 700.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 - 2022-06 VILLAGE UNDERGRO... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 175.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 - 2020-08 AVE 48 ART AND MU... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 1,575.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PL... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 175.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 - 2021-08 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT Professional Services 401-0000-60103 350.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 - 2022-14 AVE 52 PAVEMENT R... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 175.00 12/11/2023 6:40:38 PM Page 5 of 10 157 Demand Register Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Packet: APPKT03647 -11/17/2023 JB Account Name Account Number Amount NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 - 2022-05 AVE 50 WIDENING I... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 700.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 212454 10/2023 - AVE 52 MONROE STREET NEW.. Construction 401-0000-60188 1,160.00 DUDEK & ASSOCIATES INC 212429 7/1-8/25/23 - CIVIC CENTER LAKE IRRIG... Design 401-0000-60185 3,636.25 DUDEK & ASSOCIATES INC 212429 8/26-9/29/23 - CIVIC CENTER LAKE IRRI... Design 401-0000-60185 3,935.00 MSA CONSULTING INC 212453 CULTURAL CAMPUS SURVEY SERVICES Technical 401-0000-60108 6,655.00 UNIVERSAL CONSTRUCTION ... 212479 CIVIC CENTER ACTIVITIES PROMENADE ... Retention Payable 401-0000-20600 2,480.56 HAMMEL, GREEN, AND ABR... 212441 09/2023 - CULTURAL CAMPUS DESIGN Design 401-0000-60185 6,160.00 PLANIT REPROGRAPHICS SYS... 212462 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN BID SET Construction 401-0000-60188 72.03 PLANIT REPROGRAPHICS SYS... 212462 COVE TRAILS PARKING LOT IMPROV CO... Construction 401-0000-60188 84.00 PLANIT REPROGRAPHICS SYS... 212462 CACTUS FLOWER LANDSCAPE BID SET Construction 401-0000-60188 49.52 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/9/23 CONSULTANT SELECTION INTE... Design 401-0000-60185 90.73 Fund 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total: 200,072.01 Fund: 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT PARKHOUSE TIRE INC 212460 TIRE DISPOSAL Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 175.50 BMW MOTORCYCLES OF RIV... 212414 MOTORCYCLE REPAIRS A1047 Motorcycle Repair & Mainte... 501-0000-60679 569.42 BMW MOTORCYCLES OF RIV... 212414 MOTORCYCLE REPAIRS FOR A1249 Motorcycle Repair & Mainte... 501-0000-60679 301.43 WEX BANK 212485 09/26-10/25/23 - FUEL Fuel & Oil 501-0000-60674 12,445.69 CHEVROLET CADILLAC 212420 2018 CHEVY COLORADO VIN/1100222 ... Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 462.42 CHEVROLET CADILLAC 212420 2023 CHEVY BOLT VIN P4191664 NEW K... Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 418.73 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/16/23 - WATERLEAK REPAIR AT CH City Bldg Repl/Repair 501-0000-71103 1,665.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/24/23 WINDOW TINT FOR 2019 EQU... Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 460.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/10/23 - WATER TRUCK REPAIRS VIN ... Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 593.88 Fund 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total: 17,092.07 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212419 10/24-11/23/23 - WC CABLE (4601) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 280.75 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212434 10/25-11/24/23 - CH INTERNET Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 85.98 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212434 10/27-11/26/23 - BLACKHAWK/LQ PARK... Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 95.09 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/18/23 - POWER STATION Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 217.45 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/2023 - EMAIL PROTECTION SOFTWA... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 449.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/24/23-10/23/24 - GOLFTOUR DOMA... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 95.33 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/03/23 - LAPTOP STAND FOR L.REYES Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 86.99 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 9/27/23 - COMPUTER MOUSE FOR POLI... Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 48.90 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 11/2023 - HULU SUBSCRIPTION Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 81.99 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/18/23 - COMPUTER MONITOR FOR G... Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 719.51 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/16/23 - DOCKING STATION FOR G.VI... Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 157.68 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/17/23 - REFUND COMPUTER MONIT... Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 -865.22 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/09/23 - COMPUTER MONITOR FOR G... Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 865.22 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total: 2,318.67 Fund: 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND COOK AND SOLIS CONSTRUC... 212424 SRR LAKE PUMP & EQUIP REPLACEMENT.. Retention Payable 503-0000-20600 -2,288.55 COOK AND SOLIS CONSTRUC... 212424 IMPELLER REPLACEMENT Parks 503-0000-71060 7,230.00 COOK AND SOLIS CONSTRUC... 212424 SRR LAKE PUMP & EQUIPMENT REPLAC... Parks 503-0000-71060 10,681.30 Fund 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND Total: 15,622.75 Fund: 504 - INSURANCE FUND BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/16/23 - ERGONOMICS STANDING M... Operating Supplies 504-1010-60420 70.69 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212409 10/19/23 - STAND UP DESKTOP Operating Supplies 504-1010-60420 456.28 Fund 504 - INSURANCE FUND Total: 526.97 Fund: 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT GARDAWORLD 212436 11/2023 - SRR ARMORED SERVICES Bank Fees 601-0000-60455 747.59 H&G HOME IMPROVEMENTS- 212440 SRR HAND RAIL REPAIRS Repair & Maintenance 601-0000-60660 4,780.00 Fund 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT Total: 5,527.59 12/11/2023 6:40:38 PM Grand Total: 1,618,416.62 Page 6 of 10 158 Demand Register Fund Summary Fund 101 -GENERAL FUND 201- GAS TAX FUND 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 224-TUMFFUND 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND 504 - INSURANCE FUND 601- SILVERROCK RESORT Account Number 101-0000-20304 101-0000-20310 101-0000-20981 101-0000-20985 101-0000-22830 101-0000-43631 101-1001-60320 101-1001-60420 101-1002-60400 101-1004-50252 101-1004-60129 101-1004-60320 101-1004-60400 101-1005-60320 101-1005-60400 101-1005-60420 101-1006-60103 101-1006-60122 101-1006-60320 101-1006-60351 101-1006-60400 101-1007-60403 101-2001-60109 101-2001-60161 101-2001-60162 101-2001-60163 101-2001-60164 101-2001-60166 101-2001-60167 101-2001-60169 101-2001-60170 101-2001-60171 101-2001-60172 101-2001-60174 101-2001-60175 101-2001-61300 101-2001-61400 101-2002-60406 101-2002-60670 101-2002-60691 101-2002-61200 101-2002-61300 Grand Total: Account Summary Account Name Sales Taxes Payable MSHCP Mitigation Fee United Way Deductions Garnishments Payable Miscellaneous Deposits CVMSHCP Admin Fee Travel & Training Operating Supplies Office Supplies Annual Wellness Dollar ... Recruiting/Pre-Employm... Travel & Training Office Supplies Travel & Training Office Supplies Operating Supplies Professional Services Credit Card Fees Travel & Training Membership Dues Office Supplies Citywide Supplies LQ Police Volunteers Sheriff Patrol Police Overtime Target Team Community Services Offi... Gang Task Force Narcotics Task Force Motor Officer Dedicated Sargeants Dedicated Lieutenant Sheriff - Mileage Blood/Alcohol Testing Special Enforcement Fu... Telephone - Utilities Cable/Internet - Utilities Disaster Prep Supplies Fire Station Maintenance/Services Water - Utilities Telephone - Utilities Expense Amount 1,287,164.26 1,004.42 61,378.31 6,735.54 7,018.49 11,405.54 2,550.00 200,072.01 17,092.07 2,318.67 15,622.75 526.97 5,527.59 1,618,416.62 Expense Amount -3.06 1,625.00 37.00 222.74 100.00 -16.25 1,878.97 -278.54 465.88 400.00 263.88 780.09 20.85 583.49 538.57 9.55 7,289.36 -1,180.17 4,462.05 50.00 801.55 65.04 392.18 632,708.04 33,963.32 155,161.22 59,204.00 17,150.40 16,078.50 96,214.29 41,285.88 25,496.00 34,588.03 638.11 1,126.88 889.42 548.78 4,074.81 1,463.23 2,800.00 118.10 10.52 Packet: APPKT03647 - 11/17/2023 JB 12/11/2023 6:40:38 PM Page 7 of 10 159 Demand Register Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-2002-61304 Mobile/Cell Phones/Sate.., 87.35 101-2002-61400 Cable/Internet - Utilities 313.88 101-3001-60101 Contract Services 25,000.00 101-3001-60400 Office Supplies 461.28 101-3002-60107 Instructors 2,781.40 101-3002-60420 Operating Supplies 3,232.65 101-3003-60149 Community Experiences 7,759.76 101-3003-60420 Operating Supplies 359.94 101-3005-60184 Fritz Burns Pool Mainten... 222.31 101-3005-60320 Travel & Training 169.25 101-3005-60431 Materials/Supplies 8,166.42 101-3005-60691 Maintenance/Services 11,054.07 101-3005-61102 Electric - Monticello Park.. 13.60 101-3005-61108 Electric - Colonel Paige -... 1,087.28 101-3005-61110 Electric - Adams Park - Ut.. 36.88 101-3005-61201 Water -Monticello Park -... 4,357.98 101-3005-61204 Water -Fritz Burns Park-... 241.89 101-3005-61206 Water -Desert Pride - Util.. 257.22 101-3005-61207 Water -Pioneer Park - Uti.. 492.15 101-3005-61300 Telephone - Utilities 53.19 101-3007-60134 Promotional Items 263.18 101-3007-60320 Travel & Training 1,154.57 101-3007-60351 Membership Dues 287.95 101-3007-60420 Operating Supplies 205.54 101-3007-60450 Sponsorships/Advertising 5,000.00 101-3007-60461 Marketing & Tourism Pr... 7,857.14 101-3008-60115 Janitorial 32,251.97 101-3008-60320 Travel & Training 101.55 101-3008-60400 Office Supplies 395.69 101-3008-60431 Materials/Supplies 271.28 101-3008-60691 Maintenance/Services 8,818.28 101-3008-61200 Water - Utilities 25.41 101-6001-60320 Travel & Training 1,529.02 101-6001-60352 Subscriptions & Publicat... 11.98 101-6001-60400 Office Supplies 496.17 101-6001-60420 Operating Supplies 65.64 101-6002-60450 Advertising 868.56 101-6003-60320 Travel & Training 111.00 101-6003-60352 Subscriptions & Publicat... 176.13 101-6003-60425 Supplies - Field 104.36 101-6004-60320 Travel & Training 1,500.00 101-6004-60400 Office Supplies 65.40 101-6004-60690 Uniforms 130.48 101-6006-60125 Temporary Agency Servi... 3,150.00 101-7001-60320 Travel & Training 135.40 101-7001-60400 Office Supplies 75.34 101-7002-60183 Map/Plan Checking 1,270.00 101-7002-60320 Travel & Training 67.70 101-7002-60420 Operating Supplies 57.39 101-7003-60103 Professional Services 3,271.73 101-7003-60320 Travel & Training 270.80 101-7003-60432 Tools/Equipment 367.09 101-7006-60144 Contract Traffic Engineer 8,171.00 101-7006-60320 Travel & Training 135.40 101-7006-60690 Uniforms 324.90 201-7003-60431 Materials/Supplies 1,004.42 202-3004-60115 Janitorial 6,528.64 202-3004-60691 Maintenance/Services 52,160.00 Packet: APPKT03647 - 11/17/2023 JB 12/11/2023 6:40:38 PM Page 8 of 10 160 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03647 - 11/17/2023 JB Account Summary 12/11/2023 6:40:38 PM Page 9 of 10 161 Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 202-3006-60115 Janitorial 1,979.08 202-3006-60691 Maintenance/Services 338.08 202-3006-61200 Water - Utilities 372.51 212-0000-60179 COPS Burglary/Theft Pre... 6,735.54 215-7004-60420 Operating Supplies 254.34 215-7004-60427 Safety Gear 207.20 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 400.00 215-7004-61116 Electric - Utilities 1,314.30 215-7004-61117 Electric - Medians - Utilit... 501.91 215-7004-61211 Water - Medians - Utiliti... 4,340.74 221-0000-60127 AB 939 Recycling Solutio... 11,405.54 224-0000-20320 TUMF Payable to CVAG 2,550.00 401-0000-20600 Retention Payable 2,480.56 401-0000-60103 Professional Services 40,240.00 401-0000-60108 Technical 6,655.00 401-0000-60185 Design 13,821.98 401-0000-60188 Construction 136,874.47 501-0000-60674 Fuel & Oil 12,445.69 501-0000-60675 Parts, Accessories, and ... 460.00 501-0000-60676 Vehicle Repair & Maint... 1,650.53 501-0000-60679 Motorcycle Repair & Ma... 870.85 501-0000-71103 City Bldg Repl/Repair 1,665.00 502-0000-60301 Software Licenses 544.33 502-0000-60420 Operating Supplies 353.34 502-0000-61400 Cable/Internet - Utilities 543.81 502-0000-80100 Machinery & Equipment 877.19 503-0000-20600 Retention Payable -2,288.55 503-0000-71060 Parks 17,911.30 504-1010-60420 Operating Supplies 526.97 601-0000-60455 Bank Fees 747.59 601-0000-60660 Repair & Maintenance 4,780.00 Grand Total: 1,618,416.62 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Project Account Name Project Name Expense Amount **None** **None** **None** 1,386,439.38 111205CT Construction Expense Dune Palms Bridge Imp/BRLKS-52 134,023.92 111205P Professional Expense Dune Palms Bridge Imp/BRLKS-52 1,497.50 151609P Professional Expense La Quinta X Park 1,925.00 201603CT Construction Expense La Quinta Landscape Renovation 49.52 201603P Professional Expense La Quinta Landscape Renovation 2,312.50 201606D Design Expense Civic Center Campus Lake/Irrigati 7,571.25 201606P Professional Expense Civic Center Campus Lake/Irrigati 962.50 201608P Professional Expense SilverRock Event Space 350.00 201901D Design Expense Village Art Plaza Promenade & Ci 6,160.00 201901P Professional Expense Village Art Plaza Promenade & Ci 4,025.00 201901T Technical Expense Village Art Plaza Promenade & Ci 6,655.00 201902D Design Expense Avenue 50 Bridge Spanning the E 90.73 201902P Professional Expense Avenue 50 Bridge Spanning the E 3,085.00 201905P Professional Expense Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan 1 525.00 202008P Professional Expense Avenue 48 Art and Music Line Pr( 1,575.00 202102P Professional Expense Fritz Burns Park Improvements 700.00 202108P Professional Expense FY 21/22 PMP Slurry Seal Improv 350.00 202201P Professional Expense Avenue 50 Pavement Rehab (Wa 175.00 202203P Professional Expense Fred Waring Drive Pavement Reh 525.00 202205P Professional Expense Avenue 50 Widening Improveme 700.00 202206P Professional Expense Village Utilities Undergrounding 1 175.00 202208P Professional Expense Citywide Miscellaneous ADA Imp 150.00 12/11/2023 6:40:38 PM Page 9 of 10 161 Demand Register Project Account Key 202214P 202227P 202227RP 202230CT 202302P 202315CT 202315P 202320E 202320NR 202321E 202321RP 202322P 2324PMPP CONCERTE CSA152E TREEE VETSE XPARKE Project Account Summary Project Account Name Professional Expense Professional Expense Retention Payable Construction Expense Professional Expense Construction Expense Professional Expense Cyclone Hilary FEMA Reimbursable.. Cyclone Hilary Non -reimbursable c... SilverRock Event Park - Lake Pump... Retention Payable Eisenhower Retention Basin Slope... Professional Expense Concert Expense CSA 152 Expenses Tree Lighting Ceremony Expense Veterans Day Ceremony Expense X Park Expenses Grand Total: Project Name Avenue 52 Pavement Rehabilitate Civic Center Activities Promenadi Civic Center Activities Promenadi Cove Trails Parking Lot Improver Avenue 52 Monroe Street FY22/23 Pavement Management FY22/23 Pavement Management Tropical Cyclone Hilary Tropical Cyclone Hilary SilverRock Event Park - Lake Pum SilverRock Event Park - Lake Pum Eisenhower Retention Basin Slop FY23/24 Pavement Management Master Account for all SRR ConCE CSA 152 Project Tracking Tree Lighting Ceremony Veterans Day Ceremony V Dor, 1,618,416.62 Packet: APPKT03647 - 11/17/2023 JB Expense Amount 175.00 1,025.00 2,480.56 1,569.00 1,160.00 72.03 18,620.00 4,480.00 10,681.30 7,230.00 -2,288.55 1,212.50 175.00 168.86 3,865.61 7,274.19 230.64 263.18 *Project codes are generally used to track Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects, other large public works projects, developer deposits, or city-wide events. Normal operational expenditures are not project coded and, therefore, will report as "none" in this section. 12/11/2023 6:40:38 PM Page 10 of 10 162 City of La Quinta Demand Register Packet: APPKT03656 - 12/1/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 101 -GENERAL FUND CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212498 11/16-12/15/23 - FS #70 CABLE (1860) Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 41.76 SERVICEWEAR APPAREL 212542 UNIFORMS SALES TAX Sales Taxes Payable 101-0000-20304 -5.92 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212498 11/16-12/15/23 - FS #32 CABLE (8152) Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 94.55 MARTINEZ, CLAUDIA 212529 10/1-10/4/23 CALPERS EDUCATIONAL F... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 271.26 ROBERTSON, ANSCHUTZ, SC... 212540 BANKS RECORDS FOR WARRANT LA230... Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-60175 40.00 ESPINOZA, DAVID C. 212511 12/1/23 - CHAIRS FOR TREE LIGHTING E... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 282.50 SOUTHWEST AQUATICS INC 212544 11/2023 - LAKE MAINTENANCE SERVICES Civic Center Lake Maintenan... 101-3005-60117 1,350.00 SOUTHWEST AQUATICS INC 212544 11/2023 - LAKE MAINTENANCE SERVICES SilverRock Lake Maintenance 101-3005-60189 1,350.00 FOSTER, ROCIO 212514 POLICE VOLUNTEER DINNER DECOR RE... LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 95.60 COACHELLA VALLEY CATERI... 212501 12/5/23 - CATERING FOR COUNCIL OPEN.. Community Special Events 101-1001-60137 4,306.50 BLOWNAWAY BY WILLIAM 212493 CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS DECORATIVE PA... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 3,600.00 SIGNATURE TINT 212543 PICKLEBALL SIGNS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 193.95 DATA TICKET, INC. 212505 10/2023 - CODE CITATION PROCESSING Administrative Citation Servi... 101-6004-60111 446.16 DATA TICKET, INC. 212505 10/2023 - POLICE CITATION PROCESSING Administrative Citation Servi... 101-6004-60111 253.06 JOE A GONSALVES & SON 212523 12/2023 - LOBBYIST SERVICES Contract Services - Administr... 101-1002-60101 3,500.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 212554 11/2023 - PARK LANDSCAPE MAINTENA... Landscape Contract 101-3005-60112 67,311.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 212554 SOD SPOT TREATMENT AT LQ PARK Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 1,035.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 212554 LQAC LANDSCAPE PREPARATION Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 3,200.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 212554 STUMP REMOVAL & PLANT REPLACEM... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 3,200.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 212554 CIVIC CENTER PLANT REPLACEMENT Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 1,600.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 212554 IRRIGATION PARTS FOR THE LIBRARY Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 184.00 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFF... 212516 2024 GFOA DUES R.HALLICK, V.ORTEGA,... Membership Dues 101-1006-60351 305.00 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVIC... 212489 12/1/23 - INSURANCE FOR TREE LIGHTI... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 527.00 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVIC... 212489 12/16/23 - INSURANCE FOR PANCAKES... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 297.00 QUINN COMPANY 212535 11/14-11/15/23 - EQUIPMENT RENTAL Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 445.88 CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION F... 212495 CALED MEMBERSHIP G.VILLALPANDO Membership Dues 101-1002-60351 800.00 LH PRODUCTIONS 212525 VETERAN'S DAY EVENT AV SERVICES Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 3,543.63 DESERT RECREATION DISTRI... 212507 10/2023 - FB POOL OPERATIONS & PRO... Fritz Burns Pool Programming 101-3003-60184 12,733.46 THE CHAMBER 212546 10/2023 - GEM PUBLICATION Marketing & Tourism Promot.. 101-3007-60461 14,465.75 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 212492 BLOOD ALCOHOL ANALYSIS Blood/Alcohol Testing 101-2001-60174 1,979.70 THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. 212549 PAINT Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 342.24 THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. 212549 PAINT Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 342.24 THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. 212549 PAINT Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 71.00 THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. 212549 PAINT & PAINT SUPPLIES Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 432.03 THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. 212549 PAINT & PAINT SUPPLIES Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 125.04 WOOD, RUSSELL DAVID 212556 POLICE TOW LA232960003 Sheriff - Other 101-2001-60176 452.50 COURTMASTER SPORTS, INC. 212503 INSTALL BLUE RAIL COVER ON FB PARK ... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 3,000.00 COURTMASTER SPORTS, INC. 212503 INSTALL VOLLEYBALL NET AT ADAMS PA... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 315.00 ROBERT HALF 212539 11/10/23 - TEMP AGENCY SERVICES A.... Temporary Agency Services 101-6006-60125 1,575.00 ROBERT HALF 212539 11/17/23 - TEMP AGENCY SERVICES A.... Temporary Agency Services 101-6006-60125 1,575.00 FEDEX 212513 11/01/23 - OVERNIGHT MAIL Postage 101-1007-60470 13.85 FEDEX 212513 11/07/23 - OVERNIGHT MAIL Postage 101-1007-60470 50.86 PWLC II, INC 212534 11/2023 - L&L MONTHLY MAINTENANCE Landscape Contract 101-2002-60112 1,616.00 PWLC II, INC 212534 11/13-11/17/23 VILLAGE STREETS TREE ... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 2,808.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 212553 10/14-11/13/23 - EOC CELL (7813) Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites 101-2002-61304 247.74 THE LOCK SHOP, INC 212548 PAD LOCKS (6) Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 444.27 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212521 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electricity - Utilities 101-2002-61101 798.34 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212521 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electricity - Utilities 101-3008-61101 298.79 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212502 WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-2002-61200 560.34 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212502 WATER SERVICE Water -Seasons Park - Utilities 101-3005-61208 25.41 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212502 WATER SERVICE Water -Community Park - Util.. 101-3005-61209 494.25 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212502 WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-3008-61200 68.03 DISH NETWORK 212508 11/22-12/21/23 - EOC CABLE Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 105.71 12/11/2023 6:40:15 PM Page 1 of 6 163 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03656 -12/1/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount PETRA-1, LP 212533 WC GYM WIPES 4 CASES Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 671.91 LINCOLN AQUATICS 212526 FB POOL LANE LINES Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 2,681.57 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREA... 212497 2024 CPRS ANNUAL MEMEBERSHIP WC... Membership Dues 101-3002-60351 555.00 EMBASSY SUITES 212509 ANNUAL CITIZENS ON PATROL APPRECI... LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 3,144.40 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREA... 212497 2024 CPRS MEMBERSHIP D.HANSEN Membership Dues 101-3005-60351 150.00 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212515 11/2023 - LQ PARK PHONE Telephone - Utilities 101-3005-61300 48.64 BARBARA SINATRA CHILDREN.. 212491 PHYSICAL EXAM LA232620044 Sexual Assault Exam Fees 101-2001-60193 231.00 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/2/23 FS 32 POWER TOOL BATTERY P... Fire Station 101-2002-60670 158.39 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/17/23 - VACUUM FOR FS #32 Fire Station 101-2002-60670 366.11 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/23/23 SINK DRAIN EXTENSION TUBE... Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 39.54 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/09/23 - CLEANING SUPPLIES FOR FS ... Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 63.21 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212527 10/09/23 - O -RINGS & WASHERS Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 47.45 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/04/23 - SUPPLIES FOR GRAFFITI RE... Supplies -Graffiti and Vandali... 101-3005-60423 114.21 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/05/23 - POTTING SOIL BAGS (20) Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 195.10 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/11/23 - NAILSET & FLATBAR Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 29.30 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212527 09/28/23 - CONCRETE MIX Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 453.60 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212527 9/29/23 - POLYMERIC SAND & FENCE M... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 630.03 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212527 10/03/23 - LOOPED END CABLES (6) Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 91.02 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212527 10/19/23 - GRINDING WHEEL Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 40.23 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/05/23 - POTTING SOIL BAGS (15) Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 146.32 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212527 10/06/23 - PVC FITTINGS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 48.29 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/23/23 - FLAT CHIP BRUSHES Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 17.58 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212527 10/09/23 - PAINT & PAINT SUPPLIES Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 42.95 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/02/23 -TILE SPACERS & LIQUID NAILS.. Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 15.83 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 09/28/23 - BLACK STEEL POSTS & GLOV... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 871.33 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212527 10/10/23 - SANDPAPER Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 21.35 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212527 10/11/23 - SANDER Tools/Equipment 101-3005-60432 433.07 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212527 10/24/23 - WRENCH SET & HACKSAW Tools/Equipment 101-3005-60432 117.69 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/25/23 - CULTIVATOR Tools/Equipment 101-3005-60432 60.57 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212527 10/24/23 - CLEANING SUPPLIES Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 333.06 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/23/23 - MOTOR/WHEEL FAN & DRILL... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 136.08 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/26/23 - DEGREASER & PVC CEMENT ... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 42.15 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212527 09/27/23 - ELECTRICAL OUTLETS & TAPE Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 77.89 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/23/23 - SUPPLIES Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 17.00 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212527 10/05/23 - ANCHORS & DRILL BIT Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 85.67 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212527 10/10/23 -TOILET HARDWARE KIT FOR... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 110.21 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212527 10/03/23 - VINYL TILE FLOORING Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 229.61 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/16/23 - SPRAY PAINT Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 81.73 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212527 10/11/23 - ANCHORS & TOGGLE BOLTS Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 46.41 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/18/23 - FLOODLIGHTS Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 258.83 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/17/23 - STEEL SQUARE TUBES Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 49.72 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/02/23 - STEEL ANCHORS & SAW BLA... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 91.23 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/03/23 - LIGHT BULBS Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 7.46 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/05/23 - SAW BLADES Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 50.94 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/09/23 - WATER TRANSFER PUMP Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 216.41 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/10/23 -TOILET TANK FLAPPERS FOR... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 35.26 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/10/23 - COPPER FITTINGS & PLIERS Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 54.58 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/11/23 - BATTERIES Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 44.83 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/03/23 - ANCHORS & BATTERIES Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 116.50 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/03/23 - CABLE TIES & PAINTER'S TO... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 48.89 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/16/23 - DECKING BOARD Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 124.08 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/16/23 - GOOF OFF AEROSOL Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 52.00 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/17/23 - LIGHT BULBS & SUPPLIES Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 237.24 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/11/23 - ANCHORS & TOGGLE BOLT Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 31.12 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/03/23 - SHOVEL Tools/Equipment 101-3008-60432 43.48 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/26/23 - PORTABLE POWER STATION Tools/Equipment 101-3008-60432 182.68 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/04/23 - HAND TRUCK & VACUUM Tools/Equipment 101-3008-60432 1,175.11 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212527 09/27/23 - STARTER PUNCH Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 18.53 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212527 10/17/23 - PUSH BROOM Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 49.04 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREA... 212497 CPRS MEMBERSHIP R.SEVILLA Membership Dues 101-3005-60351 150.00 12/11/2023 6:40:15 PM Page 2 of 6 164 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03656 - 12/1/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212521 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - SilverRock Event Sit... 101-3005-61115 1,606.45 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212502 WATER SERVICE PM 10 - Dust Control 101-7006-60146 42.39 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212502 WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-2002-61200 161.28 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212502 WATER SERVICE Water -Eisenhower Park - Util.. 101-3005-61203 620.77 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212502 WATER SERVICE Water -Velasco Park - Utilities 101-3005-61205 326.43 RAYGADA, LILIANA 212536 PERMIT FEES REFUND BPOL2021-0351 Over Payments, AR Policy 101-0000-20330 338.79 VITELA, DAVID 212555 REFUND PERMIT FEES BSOL2022-0014 Over Payments, AR Policy 101-0000-20330 1,069.08 ESSENCE ARTS 212512 REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE LIC 770592 Business Licenses 101-0000-41600 76.00 THE HABIT RESTAURANTS, LLC 212547 REFUND HAZARDOUS WASTE FEE LIC 77... Over Payments, AR Policy 101-0000-20330 107.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 212554 PMD DEEP CYLINDERS (6) Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 1,939.50 ROADPOST USA INC. 212538 11/23-12/22/23 - EOC SATELLITE PHON... Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites 101-2002-61304 200.85 Fund 101- GENERAL FUND Total: 165,380.45 Fund: 201- GAS TAX FUND SERVICEWEAR APPAREL 212542 UNIFORMS Uniforms 201-7003-60690 73.60 TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 212550 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 156.60 TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 212550 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 78.08 SUPERIOR READY MIX CONC... 212545 CONCRETE Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 569.53 Fund 201- GAS TAX FUND Total: 877.81 Fund: 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 212554 11/2023 - PARK LANDSCAPE MAINTENA... Landscape Contract 202-3004-60112 930.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 212554 11/2023 - PARK LANDSCAPE MAINTENA... Landscape Contract 202-3006-60112 194.00 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212515 11/13-12/12/23 - MUSEUM PHONE Telephone - Utilities 202-3006-61300 125.88 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212527 10/11/23 - PLIERS & WRENCH Maintenance/Services 202-3004-60691 85.28 Fund 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND Total: 1,335.16 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND ROTO -LITE, INC 212541 PALM TREE LIGHT CHANGING COLOR SE... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 300.00 BLOWNAWAY BY WILLIAM 212493 VILLAGE STREETS DECORATIVE PAINTIN... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 3,500.00 BLOWNAWAY BY WILLIAM 212493 OLD TOWN LQ DECORATIVE PAINTING 5... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 3,500.00 BLOWNAWAY BY WILLIAM 212493 STUFT PIZZA PARKING LOT DECORATIVE... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 1,050.00 SIGNATURE TINT 212543 STREET SIGNS Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 75.43 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 212554 11/2023 - PARK LANDSCAPE MAINTENA... Landscape Contract 215-7004-60112 12,124.00 ROTO -LITE, INC 212541 LANDSCAPE LIGHT CHANGING COLOR 5... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 300.00 CREATIVE LIGHTING & ELECT... 212504 11/2023 - LIGHTING MAINTENANCE SER... Consultants 215-7004-60104 6,488.42 MACIAS NURSERY, INC. 212528 PLANTS (130) Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 1,413.75 PWLC II, INC 212534 11/2023 - L&L MONTHLY MAINTENANCE Landscape Contract 215-7004-60112 62,674.00 PWLC II, INC 212534 PW YARD WEED ABATEMENT & TREE IN... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 2,808.00 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212515 11/07-12/06/23 - PHONE SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 137.39 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212527 10/05/23 - PUTTY KNIFE & WOOD FILLER Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 80.48 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212521 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 437.32 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212521 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61117 627.34 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212502 WATER SERVICE Water - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61211 886.95 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 212502 WATER SERVICE Water - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61211 4,747.71 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 212506 LIGHT BULBS (24) Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 336.18 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 212506 TAX & FREIGHT CHARGE FOR LIGHT BUL... Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 32.63 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 212521 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 55.34 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total: 101,574.94 Fund: 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 ESSENCE ARTS 212512 REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE LIC 770592 SB 1186 Revenue 230-0000-42130 _4.00 Fund 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 Total: 4.00 Fund: 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND BLOWNAWAY BY WILLIAM 212493 MAINTENANCE OF MEMORIAL PEDESTA... APP Maintenance 270-0000-60683 2,100.00 Fund 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND Total: 2,100.00 Fund: 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS AMERICAN ASPHALT SOUTH ... 212490 10/2023 - PMP SLURRY SEAL PROGRESS ... Retention Payable 401-0000-20600 -54,396.24 AMERICAN ASPHALT SOUTH ... 212490 10/2023 - PMP SLURRY SEAL PROGRESS ... Construction 401-0000-60188 1,087,924.84 HERMANN DESIGN GROUP I... 212517 10/2023 - CACTUS FLOWER LANDSCAPE... Design 401-0000-60185 2,748.25 HERMANN DESIGN GROUP I... 212517 10/2023 - CACTUS FLOWER LANDSCAPE... Design 401-0000-60185 375.00 LANDMARK CONSULTANTS,... 212524 10/26-11/8/23 RED WARING DR PAVEM... Technical 401-0000-60108 1,060.80 12/11/2023 6:40:15 PM Page 3 of 6 165 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03656 - 12/1/20231B Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount CITY OF INDIO 212500 AVE 50 WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS RE... Contributions to Other Agenc.. 401-0000-60480 5,270.91 Fund 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total: 1,042,983.56 Fund: 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT MYFLEETCENTER 212531 22 CHEVY COLORADO OIL CHANGE VIN ... Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 96.63 HWY 111 LA QUINTA CAR W... 212520 12/2022 - CAR WASH SERVICES Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 24.00 MYFLEETCENTER 212531 19 CHEVY EQUINOX VIN 5541381 OIL C... Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 216.03 BMW MOTORCYCLES OF RIV... 212494 MOTORCYCLE REPAIRS A1154 Motorcycle Repair & Mainte... 501-0000-60679 2,003.65 P&M CUSTOM UPHOLSTERY ... 212532 COUNCIL CHAMBER CHAIRS UPHOLSTER... City Bldg Repl/Repair 501-0000-71103 15,068.35 TOWER ENERGY GROUP 212551 09/16-09/30/23 - FUEL Fuel & Oil 501-0000-60674 2,244.20 CHEVROLET CADILLAC 212499 22 CHEVY SILVERADO MAINTENANCE V... Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 106.49 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST 212510 11/2023 - FLEET LEASES Vehicles, Rentals & Leases 501-0000-71030 4,224.74 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 212527 10/12/23 -TOOLS FOR TRAILER LIGHTS Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 106.71 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 212518 10/02/23 - MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FO... Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 39.14 Fund 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total: 24,129.94 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACORN TECHNOLOGY SERVI... 212488 11/2023 - IT SERVICES Consultants 502-0000-60104 28,969.00 TRITON TECHNOLOGY SOLUT... 212552 CHAMBER AV EQUIPMENT Maintenance Agreements 502-0000-60300 506.73 RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC. 212537 10/2023 - GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION ... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 9,343.25 JCG TECHNOLOGIES 212522 2/1/24-1/31/25 LIBERTY AUDIO RECORD.. Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 1,350.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 212553 10/2-11/1/23 - BACKUP SERVER (2183) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 66.17 VERIZON WIRELESS 212553 10/02-11/01/23 - CITY IPADS (5587) Cell/Mobile Phones 502-0000-61301 1,273.95 VERIZON WIRELESS 212553 10/02-11/01/23 - CITY CELL SVC (5496) Cell/Mobile Phones 502-0000-61301 3,254.61 MICROSOFT CORPORATION 212530 10/10-11/09/23 - MS AZURE ONLINE SV... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 796.72 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212515 11/03-12/02/23 - 2ND CITY INTERNET LI... Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 2,580.00 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212515 11/04-12/03/23 - DSL SVC Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 436.95 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total: 48,577.38 Fund: 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL P... 212496 LQ PARK SPLASH PAD RENOVATION PR... Retention Payable 503-0000-20600 -343.15 CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL P... 212496 LQ PARK SPLASH PAD RENOVATION PR... Parks 503-0000-71060 6,863.00 Fund 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND Total: 6,519.85 Fund: 601- SILVERROCK RESORT THE LOCK SHOP, INC 212548 SRR KEY AND KNOB REPLACEMENT Repair & Maintenance 601-0000-60660 887.53 Fund 601- SILVERROCK RESORT Total: 887.53 Grand Total: 1,394,370.62 12/11/2023 6:40:15 PM Page 4 of 6 166 Demand Register Fund Summary Fund Expense Amount 101- GENERAL FUND 165,380.45 201- GAS TAX FUND 877.81 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 1,335.16 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 101,574.94 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 4.00 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 2,100.00 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 1,042,983.56 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 24,129.94 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 48,577.38 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND 6,519.85 601- SILVERROCK RESORT 887.53 Grand Total: 1,394,370.62 Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-0000-20304 Sales Taxes Payable -5.92 101-0000-20330 Over Payments, AR Policy 1,514.87 101-0000-41600 Business Licenses 76.00 101-1001-60137 Community Special Even... 4,306.50 101-1002-60101 Contract Services - Admi... 3,500.00 101-1002-60351 Membership Dues 800.00 101-1006-60320 Travel & Training 271.26 101-1006-60351 Membership Dues 305.00 101-1007-60470 Postage 64.71 101-2001-60109 LQ Police Volunteers 3,240.00 101-2001-60174 Blood/Alcohol Testing 1,979.70 101-2001-60175 Special Enforcement Fu... 40.00 101-2001-60176 Sheriff - Other 452.50 101-2001-60193 Sexual Assault Exam Fees 231.00 101-2002-60112 Landscape Contract 1,616.00 101-2002-60670 Fire Station 524.50 101-2002-60691 Maintenance/Services 150.20 101-2002-61101 Electricity - Utilities 798.34 101-2002-61200 Water - Utilities 721.62 101-2002-61304 Mobile/Cell Phones/Sate.., 448.59 101-2002-61400 Cable/Internet - Utilities 242.02 101-3002-60351 Membership Dues 555.00 101-3002-60420 Operating Supplies 671.91 101-3003-60149 Community Experiences 4,650.13 101-3003-60184 Fritz Burns Pool Progra... 12,733.46 101-3005-60112 Landscape Contract 67,311.00 101-3005-60117 Civic Center Lake Maint... 1,350.00 101-3005-60184 Fritz Burns Pool Mainten... 2,681.57 101-3005-60189 SilverRock Lake Mainten... 1,350.00 101-3005-60351 Membership Dues 300.00 101-3005-60423 Supplies -Graffiti and Va... 114.21 101-3005-60431 Materials/Supplies 10,386.89 101-3005-60432 Tools/Equipment 611.33 101-3005-60691 Maintenance/Services 14,408.00 101-3005-61115 Electric - SilverRock Even... 1,606.45 101-3005-61203 Water -Eisenhower Park ... 620.77 101-3005-61205 Water -Velasco Park - Uti.. 326.43 101-3005-61208 Water -Seasons Park - Ut.. 25.41 101-3005-61209 Water -Community Park... 494.25 101-3005-61300 Telephone - Utilities 48.64 101-3007-60461 Marketing & Tourism Pr... 14,465.75 101-3008-60431 Materials/Supplies 2,774.94 101-3008-60432 Tools/Equipment 1,401.27 101-3008-61101 Electricity - Utilities 298.79 Packet: APPKT03656 - 12/1/2023 JB 12/11/2023 6:40:15 PM Page 5 of 6 167 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03656 - 12/1/2023 JB Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-3008-61200 Water - Utilities 68.03 101-6004-60111 Administrative Citation ... 699.22 101-6006-60125 Temporary Agency Servi... 3,150.00 101-7003-60420 Operating Supplies 18.53 101-7003-60432 Tools/Equipment 939.19 101-7006-60146 PM 10 - Dust Control 42.39 201-7003-60429 Traffic Control Signs 234.68 201-7003-60431 Materials/Supplies 569.53 201-7003-60690 Uniforms 73.60 202-3004-60112 Landscape Contract 930.00 202-3004-60691 Maintenance/Services 85.28 202-3006-60112 Landscape Contract 194.00 202-3006-61300 Telephone - Utilities 125.88 215-7004-60104 Consultants 6,488.42 215-7004-60112 Landscape Contract 74,798.00 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 1,938.47 215-7004-60691 Maintenance/Services 11,458.00 215-7004-61116 Electric - Utilities 630.05 215-7004-61117 Electric - Medians - Utilit... 627.34 215-7004-61211 Water - Medians - Utiliti... 5,634.66 230-0000-42130 SB 1186 Revenue 4.00 270-0000-60683 APP Maintenance 2,100.00 401-0000-20600 Retention Payable -54,396.24 401-0000-60108 Technical 1,060.80 401-0000-60185 Design 3,123.25 401-0000-60188 Construction 1,087,924.84 401-0000-60480 Contributions to Other A... 5,270.91 501-0000-60674 Fuel & Oil 2,244.20 501-0000-60675 Parts, Accessories, and ... 145.85 501-0000-60676 Vehicle Repair & Maint... 443.15 501-0000-60679 Motorcycle Repair & Ma... 2,003.65 501-0000-71030 Vehicles, Rentals & Leas... 4,224.74 501-0000-71103 City Bldg Repl/Repair 15,068.35 502-0000-60104 Consultants 28,969.00 502-0000-60300 Maintenance Agreements 506.73 502-0000-60301 Software Licenses 11,489.97 502-0000-61301 Cell/Mobile Phones 4,528.56 502-0000-61400 Cable/Internet - Utilities 3,083.12 503-0000-20600 Retention Payable -343.15 503-0000-71060 Parks 6,863.00 601-0000-60660 Repair & Maintenance 887.53 Grand Total: 1,394,370.62 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Project Account Name Project Name Expense Amount **None** **None** **None** 340,514.08 201603D Design Expense La Quinta Landscape Renovation 3,123.25 202108CT Construction Expense FY 21/22 PMP Slurry Seal Improv 1,087,924.84 202108RP Retention Payable FY 21/22 PMP Slurry Seal Improv -54,396.24 202203T Technical Expense Fred Waring Drive Pavement Reh 1,060.80 202205CB Contribution Expense Avenue 50 Widening Improveme 5,270.91 202219E La Quinta Splash Pad Renovation La Quinta Splash Pad Renovation 6,863.00 202219RP Retention Payable La Quinta Splash Pad Renovation -343.15 TREEE Tree Lighting Ceremony Expense Tree Lighting Ceremony 809.50 VETSE Veterans Day Ceremony Expense Veterans Day Ceremony 3,543.63 Grand Total: 1,394,370.62 *Project codes are generally used to track Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects, other large public works projects, developer deposits, or city-wide events. Normal operational expenditures are not project coded and, therefore, will report as "none" in this section. 12/11/2023 6:40:15 PM Page 6 of 6 168 Demand Register City of La Quinta Packet: APPKT03665 - 12/08/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 101 -GENERAL FUND CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212569 11/24-12/23/23 - FS #93 CABLE (2415) Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 113.90 VINTAGE E & S INC 212608 CIVIC PARK PHOTO BOOTH POWER Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 2,004.95 SOUTH WEST CONCEPTS 212598 PERMIT REFUND BRES2022-0186 Building Permits 101-0000-42400 284.10 SOUTH WEST CONCEPTS 212598 PERMIT REFUND BRES2022-0186 Plumbing Permits 101-0000-42401 88.89 SOUTH WEST CONCEPTS 212598 PERMIT REFUND BRES2022-0186 Mechanical Permits 101-0000-42402 133.37 SOUTH WEST CONCEPTS 212598 PERMIT REFUND BRES2022-0186 Electrical Permits 101-0000-42403 144.72 REYES-ZUNIGA, JOSE 212594 FY 23/24 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 200.00 BURNS, ALICE QUIROZ 212565 12/13/23 - CUPCAKES FOR EMPLOYEE E... Employee Recognition Events 101-1004-60340 430.00 DECKARD TECHNOLOGIES, I... 212574 12/2023 - RENTALSCAPE Professional Services 101-1005-60103 3,750.00 SPARKLETTS 212599 11/1/23 & 11/17/23 - CITYWIDE DRINK]... Citywide Supplies 101-1007-60403 189.35 CAPITAL ONE 212568 10/20/23 - OPERATING SUPPLIES Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 53.76 VERITAS TECHNOLOGIES LLC 212605 10/2023 - LASERFICHE WORM BACKUP Professional Services 101-1005-60103 1,105.66 DUNN-EDWARDS CORPORAT... 212579 PAINT FOR CH LOBBY Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 39.19 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTR... 212576 X -PARK BASIN EROSION REPAIRS Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 96,450.00 ANSAFONE CONTACT CENTE... 212560 11/2023 - PM 10 ANSWERING SERIVCE PM 10 - Dust Control 101-7006-60146 160.39 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 212607 EXTRA LABOR FOR LQAC Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 2,240.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 212607 PLANTS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 2,079.00 EVAN TRUBEE BIG WHEEL T... 212580 RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND Miscellaneous Deposits 101-0000-22830 100.00 FIELDMAN, ROLAPP & ASSOC... 212581 11/2023 - LAND-BASED FINANCING POL... Professional Services 101-1006-60103 1,090.50 CMRTA 212570 2024 CMRTA MEMBERSHIP HALLICK/LO... Membership Dues 101-6006-60351 150.00 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212588 FILE FOLDERS, CALENDAR, KLEENEX Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 114.97 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 212588 CITY WIDE COFFEE SUPPLIES Citywide Supplies 101-1007-60403 112.99 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 212600 OFFICE SUPPLIES Operating Supplies 101-6006-60420 103.49 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 212600 CALENDARS Office Supplies 101-7001-60400 33.91 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 212600 CITYWIDE PRINTING PAPER Forms, Copier Paper 101-1007-60402 632.40 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 212600 CALENDAR, LEGAL PADS Office Supplies 101-7001-60400 46.19 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 212600 AWARD FRAME, POST -ITS Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 28.33 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 212600 CALENDAR Operating Supplies 101-6006-60420 33.81 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 212600 DRY -ERASE MARKERS Operating Supplies 101-6003-60420 14.13 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 212600 OFFICE SUPPLIES Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 258.88 SMART & FINAL 212596 11/07/23 - SNACKS FOR WC LUNCHEON... Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 80.59 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY CO 212597 IRRIGATION PARTS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 238.56 USA DRAIN AND PLUMBING... 212604 TOILET REPAIR AT PW YARD Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 740.00 USA DRAIN AND PLUMBING... 212604 11/17/23 - FS #93 RESTROOM TOILET &... Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 3,078.00 RASA/ERIC NELSON 212593 FPM 2023-1000 ONCALL MAP CHECKING.. Map/Plan Checking 101-7002-60183 650.00 RASA/ERIC NELSON 212593 FTM 2023-0001 ONCALL MAP CHECKING.. Map/Plan Checking 101-7002-60183 350.00 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 212575 10/2023 - BLOOD ALCOHOL ANALYSIS Blood/Alcohol Testing 101-2001-60174 210.00 ALPHA MEDIA LLC 212558 11/2023 - DIGITAL ADS FOR IRONMAN Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 3,200.00 ALPHA MEDIA LLC 212558 11/2023 - DIGITAL ADS FOR IRONMAN Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 275.00 ALPHA MEDIA LLC 212558 11/2023 - RADIO ADS FOR IRONMAN M... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 6,515.64 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAI... 212586 11/6/23 SRR INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR W.. Janitorial 101-3008-60115 275.00 INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 212584 10/2023 - ONCALL PLANNING SERVICES Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 3,371.25 VERIZON WIRELESS 212606 10/26-11/25/23 - LQPD CELL (6852) Telephone - Utilities 101-2001-61300 895.61 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 976929 - 2024 NPDES PERMIT Attorney 101-1003-60153 480.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978504 - 2024 NPDES PERMIT Attorney 101-1003-60153 72.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978495 - GENERAL Attorney 101-1003-60153 9,996.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978496 - PERSONNEL Attorney 101-1003-60153 1,416.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978498 - CODE ENFORCEMENT Attorney 101-1003-60153 3,704.75 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978500 - SRR Attorney 101-1003-60153 1,680.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978534 - RETAINER Attorney 101-1003-60153 11,000.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978497 - LITIGATION Attorney/Litigation 101-1003-60154 946.17 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978502 - COATS & KOHANFARSI STVR DI... Attorney/Litigation 101-1003-60154 24.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978503 - CAMILLE BARBER ADMIN APP... Attorney/Litigation 101-1003-60154 2,746.55 12/11/2023 6:39:43 PM Page 1 of 8 169 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03665 - 12/08/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978501- LEE REESE VS LQ Attorney/Litigation 101-1003-60154 5,034.47 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212582 11/26-12/25/23 - POLICE INTERNET Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2001-61400 533.84 DESERT RESORT MANAGEM... 212577 11/2023 - SECURITY PATROL SERVICES Professional Services 101-6004-60103 4,018.43 CMRTA 212570 FY22/23 R/C MEMBERSHIP DUES TO 101.. Membership Dues 101-1006-60351 -150.00 CMRTA 212570 FY 22/23 R/C MEMBERSHIP DUES FR 101.. Membership Dues 101-6006-60351 150.00 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITIO... 212590 08/23/23 & 09/12/23 - CH HVAC MAI NT... HVAC 101-3008-60667 1,352.00 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITIO... 212590 09/26/23 - CH HVAC MAINTENANCE HVAC 101-3008-60667 507.00 SILVA, KRIS 212595 BUSINESS LICENSE OVER PAYMENT REF... Over Payments, AR Policy 101-0000-20330 23.30 AMERICAN TRAFFIC SAFETY ... 212559 ATSSA MEMBERSHIP Membership Dues 101-7003-60351 450.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978304 - REIMBURSEMENT MATTERS Developer Deposits 101-0000-22810 1,060.50 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978309 - 2024 NPDES PERMIT Attorney 101-1003-60153 168.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 976927 - GENERAL IP Attorney 101-1003-60153 564.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978299 - CODE ENFORCEMENT Attorney 101-1003-60153 6,247.10 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978296 - GENERAL Attorney 101-1003-60153 4,782.41 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978303 - RESPONSES FOR PUBLIC RECO... Attorney 101-1003-60153 43.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 976926 -TELECOMMUNICATIONS Attorney 101-1003-60153 120.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978302 - SRR Attorney 101-1003-60153 1,704.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978301- RETAINER Attorney 101-1003-60153 11,000.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978297 - PERSONNEL Attorney 101-1003-60153 552.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978298 - LITIGATION Attorney/Litigation 101-1003-60154 5,400.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978308 - CAMILLE BARBER ADMIN APP... Attorney/Litigation 101-1003-60154 1,152.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978305 - DUCE ADMIN APPEAL Attorney/Litigation 101-1003-60154 1,296.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978307 - COATS & KOHANFARSI STVR DI... Attorney/Litigation 101-1003-60154 984.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978306 - LEE REESE VS LQ Attorney/Litigation 101-1003-60154 7,189.85 KILEY & ASSOCIATES 212585 11/2023 - FEDERAL LOBBYIST SERVICES Contract Services - Administr... 101-1002-60101 3,500.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978537 - RETAINER Attorney 101-1003-60153 13,200.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/13/23 - TV FOR FS #32 Fire Station 101-2002-60670 712.87 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/9/23 - FOOD FOR WC LUNCHEON Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 481.54 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 10/30/23 - CANDY CANES Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 144.99 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/22/23 - PW ASSESSMENT MEETING ... Travel & Training 101-7001-60320 75.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/20/23 - APWA AWARD LUNCHEON B... Travel & Training 101-7001-60320 90.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/20/23 - APWA AWARD LUNCHEON J... Travel & Training 101-7001-60320 90.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/06/23 - ADMIN TECH WC INTERVIEW... Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 98.58 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/08/23 - PERMIT TECH INTERVIEW P... Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 106.15 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/01/23 - CJPIA CPR TRAINING SNACKS Travel & Training 101-1004-60320 119.91 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/08/23 - SUPERVISORS MEETING LUN... Travel & Training 101-1004-60320 165.42 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/01/23 - CJPIA CPR TRAINING LUNCH Travel & Training 101-1004-60320 218.37 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/02/23 - CJPIA CPR TRAINING LUNCH Travel & Training 101-1004-60320 109.99 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 POWER STATION AND CABLE Office Supplies 101-3001-60400 27.13 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 12/01/23 - CHARACTERS FOR TREE LIGH... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 947.14 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 12/16/23 - FOOD FOR PANCAKES WITH ... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 550.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/09/23 - BALLOONS FOR VETERANS D... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 47.41 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 12/01/23 - CANDY CANES FOR TREE LIG... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 32.63 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 12/01/23 - WHIP CREAM FOR HOT CHO... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 107.90 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 12/01/23 - SANTA HATS FOR STAFF WO... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 28.65 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/10/23 - FLORAL ARRANGEMENTS FO... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 323.25 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/27/23 - DRINKS FOR CM OFFICE Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 88.05 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/7/23 - COUNCIL MEETING DINNER Travel & Training 101-1004-60320 118.34 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/7/23 - COUNCIL MEETING SNACKS Travel & Training 101-1004-60320 15.98 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/17/23 - BUSINESS CARD HOLDER WA... Citywide Supplies 101-1007-60403 35.66 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/21/23 - COFFEE MACHINE SUPPLIES Citywide Supplies 101-1007-60403 96.52 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/20/23 - ERGO MOUSE PADS LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 38.05 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/3/23 - NAME BADGE HOLDERS (100) Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 67.02 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/14/23 -TABLE CLOTHS Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 93.40 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/3/23 - COFFEE CARAFE Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 51.61 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/21/23 - HOLIDAY LIGHTS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 475.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 CANVA ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP Membership Dues 101-3007-60351 299.04 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 12/2023 - APPLE MUSIC/STORAGE Membership Dues 101-3007-60351 22.95 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/2023 - MAILCHIMP Membership Dues 101-3007-60351 205.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/29/23 -WINDOW SIGN HOLDER Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 75.99 12/11/2023 6:39:43 PM Page 2 of 8 170 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03665 -12/08/2023 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/2023 - DESERT SUN Subscriptions & Publications 101-6001-60352 14.98 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/06/23 - OFFICE CHAIR Office Supplies 101-6001-60400 402.36 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/6/23 - FOOTSTOOL, CORK BOARD,... Office Supplies 101-6001-60400 75.99 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/7/23 - HAND SANITIZER WIPES Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 141.30 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 PLATES/SILVERWARE FOR CM OFFICE Office Supplies 101-1002-60400 74.55 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 CITY HOLIDAY DECOR Community Engagement 101-3007-60137 766.66 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/27/23 - CH HOLIDAY DECOR Community Engagement 101-3007-60137 119.06 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 3/11/24 - MARKETING CONFENENCE L.R... Travel & Training 101-3007-60320 849.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 3/11/24 - MARKETING CONFENENCE M.... Travel & Training 101-3007-60320 849.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 4/1-4/5/24 - CONNECT CONF L.REYES &... Travel & Training 101-3007-60320 3,190.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/2/23-11/2/24 - FLOWCODE PRO ME... Membership Dues 101-3007-60351 108.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 X -PARK REGISTRATION Annual Permits/Inspections 101-3008-60196 218.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 X -PARK BUILDING REGISTRATION Annual Permits/Inspections 101-3008-60196 218.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/08/23 - WC LUNCHEON Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 34.45 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/15/23 - PEACE OFFICER/PUBLIC SAFE... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 1,250.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/21/23 - CITY COUNCIL DINNER Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 215.97 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/2/23 - SALVATION ARMY GALA S.SA... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 150.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/7/23 - CITY COUNCIL DINNER Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 277.63 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/16/23 - DHS STATE OF THE CITY LUN... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 69.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/13/23 - DVBA HOLIDAY LUNCH Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 49.70 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/21/23 - PROCLAMATION FRAMES Operating Supplies 101-1001-60420 148.75 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/14/23 - CITY SEAL PINS Promotional Items 101-3007-60134 331.69 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 4/22-4/25/24 - LASERFICHE CONF HOTEL.. Travel & Training 101-1005-60320 683.67 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 4/22-4/25/24 - LASERFICHE CONF HOTEL.. Travel & Training 101-1005-60320 683.67 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 212587 08/26/23 - FB POOL CAT MAINTENANCE Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 390.00 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 212587 10/2023 - FB POOL CAT 5000 COMPUTE... Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 240.00 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 212587 11/22/23 - FB POOL EQUIPMENT ROOM... Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 2,676.09 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978536 - RETAINER Attorney 101-1003-60153 13,200.00 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PUBIL 212572 10/2023 - RADIO MAINTENANCE Operating Supplies 101-2001-60420 136.83 CV PIPELINE CORP 212573 CVT VIDEO PIPE INSPECTION CALLE TA... Professional Services 101-7003-60103 960.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978535 - RETAINER Attorney 101-1003-60153 11,000.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 132 976928 - LQ GEM OF THE DESERT Attorney 101-1003-60153 76.00 TERRA NOVA PLANNING & R... 212602 07/1-10/31/23 - ONCALL PLANNING SE... Professional Services 101-6002-60103 20,852.15 Fund 101- GENERAL FUND Total: 301,625.94 Fund: 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 10/31/23 - PLANTS Materials/Supplies 202-3006-60431 517.65 Fund 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND Total: 517.65 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND VINTAGE E & S INC 212608 11/10-11/13/23 - FS#70 IRRIGATION ELE... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 1,060.08 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 212603 LANDSCAPE D.G Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 119.63 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 212603 LANDSCAPE D.G Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 149.53 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 212603 LANDSCAPE D.G Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 149.53 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 212603 LANDSCAPE D.G Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 149.53 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 212603 LANDSCAPE D.G Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 598.13 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 212603 LANDSCAPE D.G Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 299.06 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 212600 OFFICE SUPPLIES Operating Supplies 215-7004-60420 389.70 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY CO 212597 IRRIGATION PARTS Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 662.72 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY CO 212597 IRRIGATION PARTS Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 135.94 CALIFORNIA DESERT NURSER... 212567 PLANTS Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 999.75 PWLC II, INC 212592 08/19/23 - CITY STREETS STORM CLEAN... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 936.00 PWLC II, INC 212592 10/30-11/6/23 - WEED ABATEMENT Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 3,120.00 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212582 11/10-12/09/23 - PHONE SVC Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 42.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61117 321.35 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total: 9,132.95 Fund: 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 RECYCLING CONTEST SUPPLIES FOR STA... AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 6.80 Fund 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND Total: 6.80 Fund: 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978499 - HOUSING AUTHORITY Attorney 241-9101-60153 9,169.71 12/11/2023 6:39:43 PM Page 3 of 8 171 Demand Register Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 10/2023 - CH CABLE (4625) Packet: APPKT03665 - 12/08/20231B Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount RUTAN & TUCKER 132 978300 - HOUSING AUTHORITY Attorney 241-9101-60153 1,656.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/16-11/17/23 ADMIN ASSISTANT CO... Travel & Training 241-9101-60320 199.00 HAMMEL, GREEN, AND ABR... 212583 10/2023 - CULTURAL CAMPUS DESIGN Design Fund 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY Total: 11,024.71 Fund: 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND STREET LIGHT POLE Construction 401-0000-60188 1,076.63 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 3/11/24 - MARKETING CONFENENCE G.V.. Travel & Training 247-0000-60320 849.00 502-0000-60301 11/2023 - EMAIL PROTECTION SOFTWA... Software Licenses Fund 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND Total: 849.00 Fund: 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/16/23 - LQAC APP ACQUISITION 11/16/23 - LQAC APP ACQUISITION 11/16/23 - LQAC APP ACQUISITION Art Purchases 270-0000-74800 6,200.00 Art Purchases 270-0000-74800 3,695.00 Art Purchases 270-0000-74800 500.00 Fund 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND Total: 10,395.00 Fund: 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 10/2023 - CH CABLE (4625) Cable/Internet - Utilities T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL 212601 08/2023 - DUNE PALMS RD BRIDGE MA... Construction 401-0000-60188 163,033.36 DUDEK & ASSOCIATES INC 212578 9/30-10/27/23 - CIVIC CENTER LAKE & I... Design 401-0000-60185 10,277.50 BC DATA & POWER 212561 X PARK PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERA Construction 401-0000-60188 52,657.21 HAMMEL, GREEN, AND ABR... 212583 10/2023 - CULTURAL CAMPUS DESIGN Design 401-0000-60185 54,393.18 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECT... 212609 STREET LIGHT POLE Construction 401-0000-60188 1,076.63 502-0000-61400 11/12-12/11/23 - X -PARK INTERNET Cable/Internet - Utilities Fund 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total: 281,437.88 Fund: 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 502-0000-60301 11/2023 - EMAIL PROTECTION SOFTWA... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 CALI COLLISION CORP 212566 2022 CHEVY TRAVERSE REPAIR VIN J166... Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 6,689.76 PLAZA TOWING 212591 2021 GMC YUKON JUMP START SVCS Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 85.00 PACIFIC MOBILE STRUCTURES.. 212589 12/2023 - PW TRAILER RENTAL Building Leases 501-0000-71032 3,088.51 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/29/23 - CAFE DOOR FOR FLEET Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 38.05 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/8/23 - 2023 CHEVY BOLT WINDOW T... Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 460.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 11/3/23 - 2022 FORD DUMP WINCH RE... Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 1,442.26 Fund 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total: 11,803.58 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212569 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212569 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212569 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212569 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212569 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212569 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212569 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 212569 ACORN TECHNOLOGY SERVI... 212557 ACORN TECHNOLOGY SERVI... 212557 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212582 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212582 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 212582 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 Fund: 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND COOK AND SOLIS CONSTRUC... 212571 Fund: 504 - INSURANCE FUND BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 12/11/2023 6:39:43 PM 10/15-11/14/23 - WC CABLE (8105) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 10/2023 - CH CABLE (4625) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 11/2023 - CH CABLE (4625) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 12/2023 - CH CABLE (4625) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 11/20-12/19/23 - WC CABLE (1909) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 11/10-12/09/23 - CH INTERNET (2546) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 11/12-12/11/23 - CITY YARD CABLE (408... Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 11/24-12/23/23 - WC CABLE (4601) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 7/1/24-1/31/25 - SECUREWORKS SUBSC... Prepaid Expense 502-0000-13600 2/1-06/30/24 - SECUREWORKS SUBSCRI... Consultants 502-0000-60104 11/25-12/24/23 - CH INTERNET Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 11/27-12/26/23 - BLACKHAWK/LQ PARK... Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 11/12-12/11/23 - X -PARK INTERNET Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 11/1/23-10/31/24 - SNAGIT MAINTENA... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 11/2023 - EMAIL PROTECTION SOFTWA... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 11/15/23 - ROLLING TV STANDS FOR WC Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 12/2023 - HULU SUBSCRIPTION Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 2024 ARCGIS VIEWER LICENSES Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 DOCKING STATION FOR G.VILLALPANDO Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 reMARKABLE NOTE WRITING TABLETS (2) Operating Supplies 502-0000-60420 TVS FOR WC Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total RETENTION PAYMENT 10/31/23 - COVID-19 TESTS 11/07/23 - COVID-19 TESTS Retention Payable 503-0000-20600 Fund 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND Total Operating Supplies 504-1010-60420 Operating Supplies 504-1010-60420 154.66 175.81 175.81 175.81 11.59 2,079.00 81.77 280.75 16,275.00 16,275.00 100.09 95.09 904.11 12.50 449.00 566.56 81.99 1,100.00 108.74 1,146.23 2,186.98 42,436.49 2,288.55 2,288.55 86.67 104.01 Page 4 of 8 172 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03665 - 12/08/20231B Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 212562 COVID-19 TESTS Operating Supplies 504-1010-60420 260.89 Fund 504 - INSURANCE FUND Total: 451.57 Grand Total: 671,970.12 12/11/2023 6:39:43 PM Page 5 of 8 173 Demand Register Fund Summary Fund 101 -GENERAL FUND 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND 504 - INSURANCE FUND Account Number 101-0000-20330 101-0000-22810 101-0000-22830 101-0000-42400 101-0000-42401 101-0000-42402 101-0000-42403 101-1001-60320 101-1001-60420 101-1002-60101 101-1002-60400 101-1003-60153 101-1003-60154 101-1004-50252 101-1004-60129 101-1004-60320 101-1004-60340 101-1005-60103 101-1005-60320 101-1005-60400 101-1006-60103 101-1006-60351 101-1006-60400 101-1007-60402 101-1007-60403 101-2001-60109 101-2001-60174 101-2001-60420 101-2001-61300 101-2001-61400 101-2002-60670 101-2002-60691 101-2002-61400 101-3001-60400 101-3002-60420 101-3003-60149 101-3005-60184 101-3005-60431 101-3005-60691 101-3007-60134 101-3007-60137 101-3007-60320 101-3007-60351 Grand Total: Account Summary Account Name Over Payments, AR Policy Developer Deposits Miscellaneous Deposits Building Permits Plumbing Permits Mechanical Permits Electrical Permits Travel & Training Operating Supplies Contract Services - Admi... Office Supplies Attorney Attorney/Litigation Annual Wellness Dollar ... Recruiting/Pre-Employm... Travel & Training Employee Recognition E... Professional Services Travel & Training Office Supplies Professional Services Membership Dues Office Supplies Forms, Copier Paper Citywide Supplies LQ Police Volunteers Blood/Alcohol Testing Operating Supplies Telephone - Utilities Cable/Internet - Utilities Fire Station Maintenance/Services Cable/Internet - Utilities Office Supplies Operating Supplies Community Experiences Fritz Burns Pool Mainten... Materials/Supplies Maintenance/Services Promotional Items Community Engagement Travel & Training Membership Dues Expense Amount 301,625.94 517.65 9,132.95 6.80 11,024.71 849.00 10,395.00 281,437.88 11,803.58 42,436.49 2,288.55 451.57 671,970.12 Expense Amount 23.30 1,060.50 100.00 284.10 88.89 133.37 144.72 2,100.35 148.75 3,500.00 74.55 91,005.26 24,773.04 200.00 204.73 748.01 430.00 4,855.66 1,367.34 28.33 1,090.50 -150.00 114.97 632.40 434.52 38.05 210.00 136.83 895.61 533.84 712.87 3,078.00 113.90 27.13 650.34 12,384.64 3,306.09 2,792.56 100,694.95 331.69 885.72 4,888.00 634.99 Packet: APPKT03665 - 12/08/2023 JB 12/11/2023 6:39:43 PM Page 6 of 8 174 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03665 - 12/08/2023 JB Account Summary 12/11/2023 6:39:43 PM Page 7 of 8 175 Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-3008-60115 Janitorial 275.00 101-3008-60196 Annual Permits/Inspecti... 436.00 101-3008-60431 Materials/Supplies 75.99 101-3008-60667 HVAC 1,859.00 101-3008-60691 Maintenance/Services 779.19 101-6001-60352 Subscriptions & Publicat... 14.98 101-6001-60400 Office Supplies 478.35 101-6002-60103 Professional Services 20,852.15 101-6003-60118 Plan Checks 3,371.25 101-6003-60420 Operating Supplies 14.13 101-6004-60103 Professional Services 4,018.43 101-6006-60351 Membership Dues 300.00 101-6006-60420 Operating Supplies 137.30 101-7001-60320 Travel & Training 255.00 101-7001-60400 Office Supplies 80.10 101-7002-60183 Map/Plan Checking 1,000.00 101-7003-60103 Professional Services 960.00 101-7003-60351 Membership Dues 450.00 101-7003-60420 Operating Supplies 400.18 101-7006-60146 PM 10 - Dust Control 160.39 202-3006-60431 Materials/Supplies 517.65 215-7004-60420 Operating Supplies 389.70 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 3,263.82 215-7004-60691 Maintenance/Services 5,116.08 215-7004-61116 Electric - Utilities 42.00 215-7004-61117 Electric - Medians - Utilit... 321.35 221-0000-60127 AB 939 Recycling Solutio... 6.80 241-9101-60153 Attorney 10,825.71 241-9101-60320 Travel & Training 199.00 247-0000-60320 Travel & Training 849.00 270-0000-74800 Art Purchases 10,395.00 401-0000-60185 Design 64,670.68 401-0000-60188 Construction 216,767.20 501-0000-60675 Parts, Accessories, and ... 498.05 501-0000-60676 Vehicle Repair & Maint... 8,217.02 501-0000-71032 Building Leases 3,088.51 502-0000-13600 Prepaid Expense 16,275.00 502-0000-60104 Consultants 16,275.00 502-0000-60301 Software Licenses 1,561.50 502-0000-60420 Operating Supplies 1,821.53 502-0000-61400 Cable/Internet - Utilities 4,316.48 502-0000-80100 Machinery & Equipment 2,186.98 503-0000-20600 Retention Payable 2,288.55 504-1010-60420 Operating Supplies 451.57 Grand Total: 671,970.12 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Project Account Name Project Name Expense Amount **None** **None** **None** 266,114.12 111205CT Construction Expense Dune Palms Bridge Imp/BRLKS-5' 163,033.36 201606D Design Expense Civic Center Campus Lake/Irrigati 10,277.50 201901D Design Expense Village Art Plaza Promenade & Ci 54,393.18 202215E Landscape Maintenance Refurbis... Landscape Maint Refurbishment- 3,120.00 202223CT Construction Expense X Park Public Safety Cameras 52,657.21 202320E Cyclone Hilary FEMA Reimbursable.. Tropical Cyclone Hilary 97,386.00 202321RP Retention Payable SilverRock Event Park - Lake Pum 2,288.55 22006E GTGF LLC EXPENSE GTGF, LLC/Build to Stay 1,060.50 2324TMICT Construction Expense FY23/24 Traffic Maintenance ImF 1,076.63 12/11/2023 6:39:43 PM Page 7 of 8 175 Demand Register Project Account Key CSA152E IRONE STVRE TREEE VETSE Project Account Summary Project Account Name CSA 152 Expenses Ironman Expense Short Term Vacation Rental Expen... Tree Lighting Ceremony Expense Veterans Day Ceremony Expense Grand Total: Project Name CSA 152 Project Tracking Ironman Event Short Term Vacation Rental Tracl Tree Lighting Ceremony Veterans Day Ceremony 671,970.12 Packet: APPKT03665-12/08/202316 Expense Amount 960.00 9,990.64 7,768.43 1,354.71 489.29 *Project codes are generally used to track Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects, other large public works projects, developer deposits, or city-wide events. Normal operational expenditures are not project coded and, therefore, will report as "none" in this section. 12/11/2023 6:39:43 PM Page 8 of 8 176 City of La Quinta Bank Transactions 11/13/2023-12/8/2023 Wire Transaction Listed below are the wire transfers from 11/13/2023-12/8/2023. Wire Transfers: 11/14/2023 -WIRE TRANSFER -STERLING 11/15/2023 -WIRE TRANSFER - MISSION SQUARE 11/15/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - LQCEA 11/17/2023 -WIRE TRANSFER -LANDMARK 11/20/2023 -WIRE TRANSFER - J&H ASSET PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 11/24/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - LQCEA 11/24/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER- MISSION SQUARE 11/24/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - MISSION SQUARE 11/28/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - STERLING 11/30/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 11/30/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 11/30/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 11/30/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 11/30/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 11/30/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 11/30/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 12/05/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - LANDMARK 12/06/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP 12/07/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 12/08/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - STANDARD OF OREGON 12/08/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 12/08/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 12/08/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 12/08/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS 12/08/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - LQCEA 12/08/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - MISSION SQUARE 12/08/2023 - WIRE TRANSFER - MISSION SQUARE TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT ATTACHMENT 2 $1,460.39 $14,726.28 $477.00 $249,505.20 $49,926.59 $459.00 $3,925.00 $12,592.95 $1,460.39 $359.86 $6,154.94 $15,661.70 $28,522.53 $130,000.00 $350,000.00 $470,000.00 $248,350.45 $17,680.47 $128,648.64 $1,518.88 $5,928.98 $10,541.51 $15,567.57 $28,039.27 $459.00 $3,975.00 $12,712.95 $1,808,654.55 177 178 City of La Quints CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 15 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 19, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 MEASURE G SALES TAX COMPLIANCE REPORT RECOMMENDATION Receive and file fiscal year 2022/23 Measure G Sales Tax Compliance Report. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Measure G revenue for fiscal year 2022/23 was $16,088,087 and the Measure G reserve balance as of June 30, 2023, was $29,214,191. • The Financial Advisory Commission (FAC) provides oversight of Measure G revenue and prepares an annual Measure G Sales Tax Oversight Report (Report) to ensure Measure G revenue is used in compliance with the ballot initiative. • At the FAC's special meeting on December 20, 2023, the full Commission will formally receive, review, and file this Report. FISCAL IMPACT - None BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In accordance with the Measure G ballot measure, the FAC provides oversight of Measure G funds. This Measure G Report was prepared by the Finance Department with assistance from FAC members (Commissioners Batavick and Mast). This Report will be presented to the FAC on December 20, 2023; and subject to their review, will be received and filed on this date, with an update to the City's website. The Annual Measure G Sales Tax Oversight Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23 (Attachment 1) covers the period from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, and provides a summary of the Measure G revenue and expenditures for the fiscal year, as well as an inception - to -date summary. 41TERNATIVES Council may request additional information before filing this Report. 179 Prepared by: Claudia Martinez, Finance Director Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachment: 1. Annual Measure G Sales Tax Oversight Report for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023 180 ATTACHMENT 1 ANNUAL MEASURE G SALES TAX OVERSIGHT C. Qa�,ra REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 c� OVERVIEW The Financial Advisory Commission (FAC) provides oversight of Measure G tax revenue. This Annual Measure G Sales Tax Oversight Report covers the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023. Exhibit A includes a detailed summary of all Measure G activity. Measure G is a 1% transactions tax applied to sales of taxable goods and is part of the overall 8.75% sales tax rate in the City. It applies to goods transferred at the point of sale (businesses within La Quinta City limits), and to goods purchased in other jurisdictions that are delivered to addresses within the City. Measure G revenue continues to help La Quinta thrive and is integral to the financial health of the City. These funds assist in realizing the Sacred Values of La Quinta now and in the future: Health and Wellness, High Quality Aesthetics, a Vibrant and Safe Community, a Visually Beautiful City, and Cultural Diversity, to continue being recognized as the "The Gem of the Desert". REPORT HIGHLIGHTS • Since inception, about $27 million or 35% of Measure G funds have been allocated to improving citywide infrastructure and public recreational facilities. • Public safety services are a priority of La Quinta and have been supported with 27% of Measure G funds. • Fiscally responsible budgeting, prudent long-term financial projections, funds oversight, and financial transparency have strengthened the City's reserves with Measure G funds since the implementation of Measure G in April 2017. 181 FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 REVENUES Total Measure G sales tax revenue for fiscal year 2022/23 was $16.1 million, which was greater than the $15.5 million initially anticipated when budgeted. While most general consumer goods purchases experienced a slight decline due to higher prices, restaurants and hotels continued to see growth as consumers prioritized eating out, specifically takeout, delivery, drive-through, and curbside sales. In addition, increased labor costs and a spike in lumber prices resulted in an increase in revenue from building -construction supplies. Stronger than anticipated fiscal year-end Measure G sales tax revenues are a result of steady consumer spending and demonstrate that La Quinta residents and visitors continue to support our local economy. REVENUES SINCE INCEPTION The chart below summarizes Measure G revenue received from fiscal years 2016/17 through 2022/23. Steady household spending and tourism have shielded our economy from recession. Sales tax has grown, but is behind the spike in growth seen during the pandemic recovery. Looking ahead, challenges such as higher labor costs and lower consumer spending may impact sales taxes into fiscal year 2023/24. REVENUES SINCE INCEPTION $77 MILLION $18 $16 $14 $12 o $10 $8 $6 $4 $$2 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 Fiscal Year FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 USES Operational expenses and capital improvements for fiscal year 2022/23 were prioritized, while also including a prudent reserve allocation for operational flexibility in the budget. By allocating a portion of Measure G revenue to reserves, the City intends to continue to preserve and support public safety and capital projects in the future. USES SINCE INCEPTION Annually, the City hosts a community workshop to either affirm or determine the following year's budget priorities. Staff then evaluates funding options such as grants, interagency cost sharing, and use of reserves. Public safety services have been a 182 community priority since before Measure G, and with the support of this additional revenue, the City has been able to maintain the public safety service levels the community desires. The chart below summarizes the uses, since the inception, of Measure G funds. Approximately, $27 million, or 35% of these funds are for projects to improve citywide infrastructure and public recreational facilities. USES SINCE INCEPTION $77 MILLION Public Safety $21 M Reserves $29M Infrastructure Recreation Improvements $5M $22M • Public Safety use reflects the City's continuing commitment to provide all residents with a safe living environment. • Infrastructure improvement projects have included numerous road repairs, street striping projects, drainage improvements to avoid street flooding, an investment in Highway 111 (a crucial commercial corridor for our City where a majority of sales taxes are generated), an overhaul of landscape medians north of Highway 111, and the design of an updated corporate yard with administrative and crew quarters. The recent advanced funding of about $7.5 million for the Dune Palms Bridge Project allocated in fiscal year 2021/22 was subsequently approved for federal reimbursements. The advanced funding was returned to Reserves in fiscal year 2022/23. • Recreation projects have included funding for the new X -Park near La Quinta High School, the SilverRock event site, design of a new future Village Art Plaza Promenade connected to the La Quinta Museum, Fritz Burns Park improvements, and the Sports Complex lighting replacement. • Measure G reserves reflect fiscal responsibility and allow for operational flexibility by ensuring cash is available for public safety services and capital improvement projects when they are most efficient to complete. 183 The chart below summarizes citywide infrastructure improvements and recreational projects, totaling about $27 million funded with Measure G revenues. Infrastructure Improvements and Recreational City Facilities/Infrastructure � Projects $1.4M Public Safety $1.8M Highway 111 $3.2M Roads/Bridges $2 OM Drainage $3.4M Parks $5.4M Landscaping $9.8M $0 $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 Millions LOOKING AHEAD Due to the volatility of the economy, the past few years have presented challenges in some revenue streams. Fortunately, these have been offset by significant growth in sales tax. This revenue has allowed the City to look ahead to address critical needs such as road improvements, equipment replacement, and maintenance of City facilities. The City will also explore the use of Measure G reserve funds to prioritize additional funding intended to accelerate Capital Improvement Program projects, including for major street improvements. MEASURE G BACKGROUND AND COMPLIANCE SUMMARY Voters passed Ballot Measure G in November 2016. Measure G provides a permanent one percent transactions and use tax, effective April 1, 2017, which is fully allocated to the City of La Quinta and protected from State takeaways. All Measure G revenues shall be used in accordance with the ballot measure for costs including police protection, projects such as parks, streets, landscaping, and flood mitigation, programs attracting businesses, youth/senior services, sports recreation programs, and preserving property values and quality of life. This report confirms all Measure G tax revenues are properly recorded and are being used in accordance with the ballot measure. City Council, management, and staff thank all residents for their continuing support and investment in our community. Prior oversight reports and information on Measure G are located online at https://www.laguintaca.gov/business/tax-measure. Questions regarding this report or the use of Measure G funds may be directed to the Finance Department by calling 760- 777-7150 or by email at finance@laquintaca.gov. 184 CITY OF LA QUINTA Fiscal Year (FY) 16/17 Actual $ 1,462,650 17/18 Actual 9,967,657 18/19 Actual 10,958,118 19/20 Actual 10,310,526 20/21 Actual 12,594,389 21/22 Actual 15,615,802 22/23 Actual 16,088,087 Public Safety Fund 850,000 TOTAL $ 76,997,229 rla�al Year )16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 Project Description Operational Eisenhower Dr. Retention Basin MMI X -Park Funding 2,129,613 Public Safety Fund 300,000 North La Quinta Landscape Improvements Citywide Drainage Enhancements 411,013 La Quinta Village Road Diet Project 1,000,000 X -Park Funding 3,703,369 Alongi Building Improvements 310,000 SilverRock Event Site/ Alongi Building/ Retention Basin Measure G Reserves 2017/18 275,000 Public Safety Fund 850,000 Public Safety Contract Services 2,100,000 Citywide Drainage Enhancements 1,408,356 North La Quinta Landscape Improvements 1,000,000 SilverRock Event Site 350,000 Measure G Reserves 2018/19 7,468,061 Public Safety Contract Services 2,750,000 Corporate Yard Administration/Crew Quarters Highway 111 Corridor Improvements North La Quinta Landscape Improvements Village Art Plaza Promenade Measure G Reserves 2019/20 Public Safety Contract Services 4,545,000 X -Park Landscaping Highway 111 Corridor Improvements Measure G Reserves 2020/21 Public Safety Contract Services 5,163,000 Landscape Renovation Improvements Highway 111 Corridor Improvements Fritz Burns Park Improvements Allocate Advance Dune Palms Bridge Funding Measure G Reserves 2021/22 Public Safety Contract Services 5,100,000 Landscape Renovation Improvements Sports Complex Lighting Village Underground Utilities Feasibility ADA Transition Plan Update Village Parking Lot Phase II Public Safety Camera System Smart Infrastructure Feasibility Highway 111 Corridor Improvements Dune Palms Bridge Advance Funding Reimbursemen Measure G Reserves 2022/23 TOTAL $ 20,808,000 27% Capital Reserves 750,00 712,650 - 1,802,576 2,407,373 1,972,158 147,350 800,000 1,453,850 500,000 300,000 100,000 150,000 500,000 1,797,000 250,000 1,000,000 7,468,061) 26,975,038 $ 35% EXHIBIT A Total by Year T,462,650 9,967,657 10,958,118 10,310,526 12,594,389 15,615,802 13,859,148 16,088,087 29,214,191 $ 76,997,229 38% 185 1,084,350 194,730 2,129,613 1,300,000 4,383,775 411,013 1,000,000 3,703,369 310,000 2,136,144 275,000 250,000 7,524,389 1,408,356 1,000,000 350,000 7,468,061 226,385 500,000 300,000 100,000 150,000 500,000 1,797,000 250,000 1,000,000 7,468,061) 26,975,038 $ 35% EXHIBIT A Total by Year T,462,650 9,967,657 10,958,118 10,310,526 12,594,389 15,615,802 13,859,148 16,088,087 29,214,191 $ 76,997,229 38% 185 186 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 19, 2023 STAFF REPORT CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 16 AGENDA TITI : RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FEE REPORT RECOMMENDATIUN Receive and file the fiscal year 2022/23 Development Project Fee Report. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Development Impact Fees (DIF) are imposed on new construction to help offset impacts created by new development on City facilities and infrastructure. • The State Mitigation Fee Act requires the City to annually report on the receipts and expenditures of DIF Funds for the last five years within 180 days of the close of the fiscal year. • The City must use, or pledge to use, the developer fees on City facilities and infrastructure within five years of receipt; or present findings if that was not the case. • Staff has completed the required analysis (Attachments 1 and 2) and in all cases the City has complied with the time limit to expend or commit fees for future projects. FISCAL IMPACT - None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City has three development project category fees subject to State requirements: Infrastructure, Quimby, and DIF. Annually, the City reports on the following: • Brief description on the type of fee in the account or fund; • Amount of the fee; • Beginning and ending balance of the account or fund; • Amount of fees collected and interest earned; • Each public improvement on which fees were expended, the amount of expenditures, and total percentage of the project completed and costs funded with the fee; • Description of each interfund transfer, loan, and the public improvement funded. 187 The City must also report payments received pursuant to development agreements entered into after January 1, 2004. A schedule of development agreement payments received, and expenditures are noted in Attachment 2. All projects were reported in the prior fiscal year. Unspent balances will be evaluated for appropriation during the 2024/25 budget cycle. Civic Center UIF (Fund 2b2) Community Center DIF (Fund 254) Street Maintenance DIF (Fund 255) Park Maintenance DIF (Fund 256) Fire Protection DIF (Fund 257) Maintenance Facilities DIF (Fund 259) $ 1,417,770 $ 855,319 $ 80,260 $ 7,559 $ 576,308 $ 311,683 Each year these reports are also provided to the Desert Valley Builders Association (DVBA), the Building Industry Association (BIA), and the Gas Company. To date, no correspondence has been received regarding these reports. ALTERNATIVES This is a state required report, staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Virginia Ortega, Finance Manager Approved by: Claudia Martinez, Finance Director Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachments: 1. FY 2022/23 Development Project Fee Report 2. FY 2022/23 Developer Agreement Activity Report 188 2023 AB 1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Quimby Fees (Fund 220) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2023 /_Air_Ta:IJil=1LlksI The City's Quimby Special Revenue Fund is used to account for the accumulation of developer fees received under the provisions of the Quimby Act for park development and improvements. Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 22/23 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees Interest Income Contributions from Property Owners Transfers In Beginning Fund - 0 - - Expenditures Total Revenue Sources Unspent 0 Balance Expenditures & Other Uses Transfers out Capital Projects 96% - 21,791 Park Total Uses 4,595,916 21,791 1,296,611 4,714,876 (1,285,739 Revenues Collected from 2020 3,429,137 Total Available $ (713,669) $ (21,791) $ (735,460) Five Year Test FY 22/23 Using First In First Out Method % Completes Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Revenues Expenditures Committed Unspent 151609 North La Quinta Regional Skate and BMX Balance Collected 96% 73% Park Revenues Collected from 2019 4,595,916 129,832 1,296,611 4,714,876 (1,285,739 Revenues Collected from 2020 3,429,137 69,689 1,933,252 2,781,625 (1,216,051 Revenues Collected from 2021 1,565,574 35,415 1,600,989 1,180,635 (1,180,635 Revenues Collected from 2022 - - 713,669 466,967 (1,180,635 Revenues Collected from 2023 713,669 - 21,791 445,176 1,180,635 Total Revenue For Last Five Years $ 234,936 $ 5,566,312 Result: Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Percentage completed as of 6/30/2023 189 FY 22/23 Committed % Completes % funded with Capital Improvement Facilities fee 151609 North La Quinta Regional Skate and BMX 21,791 182,491 96% 73% Park 201903 Skate Park Conversion - 262,685 0% 100% Total $ 21,791 $ 445,176 Percentage completed as of 6/30/2023 189 2023 AB 1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Infrastructure Fee (Fund 225) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2023 The Infrastructure fee fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources, provided through developer fees for the acquisition, construction or improvement of the City's infrastructure as defined in Resolution 2013-006. Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 22/23 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees' Interest Income Reimbursements Unspent 294 - 23,914 Total Revenue Sources 4,543 $ 294 (3,924) Expenditures & Other Uses Capital Projects Project Administration/Internal Engineering 20,104 - - 1,410 Total Uses (3,210) - 19,408 (10) - 22,618 (3,220) Total Available $ 18,948 $ 294 1 $ 19,242 Five Year Test Usinq First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Balance Revenues Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent Revenues Collected from 2019 23,914 733 4,543 24,028 (3,924) Revenues Collected from 2020 20,104 715 1,410 22,618 (3,210) Revenues Collected from 2021 19,408 (10) - 22,618 (3,220) Revenues Collected from 2022 19,398 (450) 22,618 (3,670) Revenues Collected from 2023 18,948 294 22,618 3,376 Total Revenue For Last Five Years Result : Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 1,282 1 $ 5,953 Percentage completed as of 6/30/2023 '* The Infrastructure Fee is being phased out and not subject to collection of future revenue from developments. 190 FY 22/23 Committed % Complete" % funded with Capital Improvement Facilities fee 151603 La Quinta Village Complete Streets - Road 22,618 95% 0.18% Diet Total - $ 22,618 Percentage completed as of 6/30/2023 '* The Infrastructure Fee is being phased out and not subject to collection of future revenue from developments. 190 2023 AB 1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Transportation DIF (Fund 250) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2023 The Transportation Impact Fee developer fee fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources, provided through developer fees for street system improvements needed to handle traffic that will be generated by future development. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 4,009 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 3,076 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 2,281 Office/Medical Unit $ 6,542 General Commercial 1,000 sq ft $ 8,057 Tourist Commercial/Lodging 1,000 sq ft $ 1,859 Golf Course Acre $ 930 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 22/23 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Transfers In Beginning Fund 1,755,485 55,046 - - Expenditures Total Revenue Sources Unspent 1,810,531 Balance Expenditures & Other Uses Transfers out Capital Projects 53% 400,000 395,857 201709 Avenue 53 Jefferson Street Roundabout Total Uses 3,098,380 795,857 1,391,880 4,971,752 (2,509,028) Revenues Collected from 2020 2,462,724 Total Available $ 4,503,469 $ 1,014,674 $ 5,518,142 Five Year Test FY 22/23 Using First In First Out Method % Complete* Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Revenues Expenditures Committed Unspent 201702 Developer Reimbursements Balance Collected 53% 100% 201709 Avenue 53 Jefferson Street Roundabout Revenues Collected from 2019 3,098,380 756,223 1,391,880 4,971,752 (2,509,028) Revenues Collected from 2020 2,462,724 801,997 943,219 4,897,398 (2,575,896) Revenues Collected from 2021 2,321,502 688,043 745,418 4,356,480 (2,092,353) Revenues Collected from 2022 2,266,489 2,636,980 400,000 3,956,480 546,989 Revenues Collected from 2023 4,503,469 1,810,531 795,857 3,519,775 1,998,367 Total Revenue For Last Five Years $ 6,693,774 $ 4,276,374 Result: Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 22/23 Committed % Complete* % funded with fee 111205 Dune Palms Bridge Improvement 16,956 56,799 24% 1% 201702 Developer Reimbursements - 2,400,000 53% 100% 201709 Avenue 53 Jefferson Street Roundabout 375,121 - 92% 13% 201902 Avenue 50 Bridge Spanning the Evacuation Channel 2,380 965,501 0.13% 6% 202205 Avenue 50 Widening Improvements 1,400 97,475 2.53% 100% Total $ 395,857 $ 3,519,775 191 2023 AB 1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Parks & Rec DIF (Fund 251) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2023 The Parks & Recreation Impact Fee fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources, provided through developer fees for parks required to serve future development. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 2,106 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 1,794 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 1,716 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 22/23 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Transfers In Unspent 966,433 (2,777) - 887,905 Total Revenue Sources 4,542 963,656 (1,138,637) Expenditures & Other Uses Transfers Out Capital Projects 1,262,773 - 28,715 1,441,697 Total Uses (665,686) 28,715 294,027 322,133 962,469 2,844 (349,153) Total Available $ 674,268 $ 934,941 $ 1,609,209 Five Year Test Usinq First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Balance Revenues Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent Revenues Collected from 2019 887,905 379,411 4,542 2,401,410 (1,138,637) Revenues Collected from 2020 1,262,773 472,951 1,441,697 959,713 (665,686) Revenues Collected from 2021 294,027 322,133 962,469 2,844 (349,153) Revenues Collected from 2022 (346,309) 1,020,577 - - 674,268 Revenues Collected from 2023 674,268 963,656 28,715 474,129 1,135,080 Total Revenue For Last Five Years 1 $ 3,158,728 $ 2,437,423 Result : Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Percentage completed as of 6/30/2023 192 FY 22/23 Committed % Complete" % funded with Capital Improvement Facilities fee 201722 Fritz Burns Park Sidewalk & Parking Lot - 2,844 97% 6% 202102 Fritz Burns Park Improvements 28,715 471,285 10% 59% Total $ 28,715 $ 474,129 Percentage completed as of 6/30/2023 192 2023 AB 1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Civic Center DIF (Fund 252) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2023 The Civic Center Impact Fee fund was used to fund the expansion of the La Quinta Civic Center completed in 2008 to support the City's needs through build out. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 1,230 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 1,115 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 628 Office/Medical Unit $ 522 General Commercial 1,000 sq ft $ 522 Tourist Commercial/Lodging 1,000 sq ft $ 698 Golf Course Acre $ 251 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 22/23 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Transfers In Unspent 530,615 10,624 - - (7,103,053) Total Revenue Sources (7,004,993) 541,239 78,330 Expenditures & Other Uses 79,740 75 1,411 Total Uses 301,271 75 301,271 197,349 - - 498,620 Total Available $ 1,126,531 1 $ 541,164 1 $ 1,667,695 Five Year Test Usina First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Balance Revenues Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent Revenues Collected from 2019'" (7,103,053) 177,800 (7,004,993) 1,410 78,330 Revenues Collected from 2020 79,740 222,942 1,411 - 301,271 Revenues Collected from 2021 301,271 197,349 - - 498,620 Revenues Collected from 2022 498,620 627,911 - - 1,126,531 Revenues Collected from 2023 1,126,531 541,239 75 249,925 1,417,770 Total Revenue For Last Five Years $ 1,767,241 $ (7,003,507) Result : Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 * Percentage completed as of 6/30/2023 Loan repayment interest rate was based on the average quartery investment yield of the City's investment portfolio. During FY 2018/19, this loan was written -off. Projects are being evaluated for the unspent balance of $1,417,770 and will be included in the FY 2024/25 budget. 193 FY 22/23 Committed % Complete' % funded with Capital Improvement Facilities fee 202202 City Hall Capacity Improvements $ 75 249,925 0% 31% Total $ 75 $ 249,925 * Percentage completed as of 6/30/2023 Loan repayment interest rate was based on the average quartery investment yield of the City's investment portfolio. During FY 2018/19, this loan was written -off. Projects are being evaluated for the unspent balance of $1,417,770 and will be included in the FY 2024/25 budget. 193 2023 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Library DIF (Fund 253) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2023 The Library Impact Fee fund is used for library facilities required to serve future development in La Quinta. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 397 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 338 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 323 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 22/23 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Transfers In Beginning Fund 180,153 0 1,118,627 Total Revenue Sources 100% 180,153 Balance Expenditures & Other Uses Advance Interest Expense Expenditures - 25,504 Unspent Total Uses (1,572,557) 25,504 35,480 1,549,846 (3,100,091) Revenues Collected from 2020 (1,550,245) Total Available $ (1,273,276)1 $ 154,649 1 $ (1,118,627) Five Year Test FY 22/23 Using First In First Out Method % Complete ` Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Revenues 1,118,627 55% 100% public library facility) *' Balance Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent Revenues Collected from 2019 (1,572,557) 57,792 35,480 1,549,846 (3,100,091) Revenues Collected from 2020 (1,550,245) 75,336 30,278 1,505,187 (3,010,374) Revenues Collected from 2021 (1,505,187) 61,508 15,133 1,458,789 (2,917,601) Revenues Collected from 2022 (1,458,812) 196,648 11,112 1,273,276 (2,546,552) Revenues Collected from 2023 1,273,276 180,153 25,504 1,118,627 2,237,254 Total Revenue For Last Five Years $ 571,437 $ 117,507 Result : Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 22/23 Committed % Complete ` % funded with fee Successor Agency loan repayment (construction of 25,504 1,118,627 55% 100% public library facility) *' Total $ 25,504 $ 1,118,627 " Percentage completed as of 6/30/2023 ** Loan repayment interest rate is based on the average quarterly investment yield of the City's investment portfolio. As of 6/30/2023 the outstanding loan balance was: Principal 1,118,627 Interest - Total Due 1,118,627 194 2023 AB 1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Community Center DIF (Fund 254) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2023 The Community Center Fee fund is used for community center facilities required to serve future development in La Quinta. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 956 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 814 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 779 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 22/23 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Transfers In Beginning Fund 401,734 4,745 - - Expenditures Total Revenue Sources Unspent 406,479 Balance Expenditures & Other Uses Transfers Out Capital Projects 6% - Total Total Uses 136,956 - 4,542 103,049 55,842 Revenues Collected from 2020 158,891 Total Available $ 573,841 $ 406,479 $ 980,319 Five Year Test FY 22/23 Using First In First Out Method % Complete Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Revenues Expenditures Committed Unspent 201901 Village Art Plaza Promenade & Cultural Campus Balance Collected 6% 4% Total Revenues Collected from 2019 136,956 26,477 4,542 103,049 55,842 Revenues Collected from 2020 158,891 35,272 1,410 101,639 91,114 Revenues Collected from 2021 192,753 143,272 101,639 125,000 109,387 Revenues Collected from 2022 234,387 339,454 - 125,000 448,842 Revenues Collected from 2023 573,841 406,479 - 125,000 855,319 Total Revenue For Last Five Years $ 950,953 $ 107,591 Result : Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Percentage completed as of 6/30/2023 Projects are being evaluated for the unspent balance of $855,319 and will be included in the FY 2024/25 budget. 195 FY 22/23 Committed % Complete % funded with Capital Improvement Facilities fee 201901 Village Art Plaza Promenade & Cultural Campus - 125,000 6% 4% Total $ $ 125,000 Percentage completed as of 6/30/2023 Projects are being evaluated for the unspent balance of $855,319 and will be included in the FY 2024/25 budget. 195 2023 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Street Maintenance DIF (Fund 255) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2023 The Street Maintenance Fee fund is used for street maintenance required to serve future development in La Quinta. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 313 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 247 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 198 Office/Medical Unit $ 374 General Commercial 1000 sq ft $ 461 Tourist Commercial/Lodging 1000 sq ft $ 106 Golf Course Acre $ 53 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 22/23 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Transfers In Beginning Fund 3,360 1,115 - - Expenditures Total Revenue Sources Unspent 4,475 Balance Expenditures & Other Uses - Total Uses (1,891,594) 0 (1,871,689) 1,410 8,879 Revenues Collected from 2020 10,289 Total Available $ 75,785 $ 4,475 $ 80,260 Five Year Test FY 22/23 Committed Using First In First Out Method % funded with fee Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Revenues Expenditures Committed Unspent Balance Collected Revenues Collected from 2019" (1,891,594) 30,194 (1,871,689) 1,410 8,879 Revenues Collected from 2020 10,289 30,251 1,410 - 39,130 Revenues Collected from 2021 39,130 4,158 - 43,288 Revenues Collected from 2022 43,288 32,497 75,785 Revenues Collected from 2023 75,785 4,475 0 80,260 Total Revenue For Last Five Years $ 101,575 $ (1,870,279) Result: Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 22/23 Committed % Complete " % funded with fee Total $ - $ Percentage completed as of 6/30/2023 " Loan repayment interest rate was based on the average quartery investment yield of the City's investment portfolio. During FY 2018/19, this loan was written -off. Projects are being evaluated for the unspent balance of $80,260 and will be included in the FY 2024/25 budget. 196 2023 AB 1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Park Maintenance DIF (Fund 256) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2023 The Park Maintenance Fee fund is used for park maintenance required to serve future development in La Quinta. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 313 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 247 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 198 Office/Medical Unit $ 374 General Commercial 1000 sq ft $ 461 Tourist Commercial/Lodging 1000 sq ft $ 106 Golf Course Acre $ 53 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 22/23 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Transfers In Unspent 1,600 61 5 Total Revenue Sources 8,508 1,661 (3,192) Expenditures & Other Uses Transfers Out (1,782) - - 1,410 Total Uses 5,723 0 5,723 272 - 5,995 Total Available $ 5,898 $ 1,661 $ 79559 Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Balance Revenues Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent Revenues Collected from 2019 " 5 6,722 8,508 1,410 (3,192) Revenues Collected from 2020 (1,782) 8,915 1,410 - 5,723 Revenues Collected from 2021 5,723 272 - 5,995 Revenues Collected from 2022 5,995 (97) - 5,898 Revenues Collected from 2023 5,898 1,661 - 7,559 Total Revenue For Last Five Years $ 17,472 $ 9,918 Result : Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 22/23 Committed % Complete % funded with fee Total $ - $ - * Percentage completed as of 6/30/2023 Loan repayment interest rate was based on the average quartery investment yield of the City's investment portfolio. During FY 2018/19, this loan was written -off. 197 2023 AB 1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Fire Protection DIF (Fund 257) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2023 The Fire Protection Facilities Fee fund is used for fire protection facilities required to serve future development in La Quinta. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 369 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 335 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 188 Office/Hospital Unit $ 151 General Commercial 1000 sq ft $ 151 Tourist Commercial 1000 sq ft $ 201 Golf Course Acre $ 72 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 22/23 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Transfers In Beginning Fund 162,923 4,082 - - Expenditures Total Revenue Sources Unspent 167,005 Balance Expenditures & Other Uses - Total Uses (490,843) 0 (444,154) 1,410 33,663 Revenues Collected from 2020 35,073 Total Available $ 409,304 $ 167,005 $ 576,308 Five Year Test FY 22/23 Using First In First Out Method % Complete " Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Revenues Expenditures Committed Unspent Total Balance Collected Revenues Collected from 2019 (490,843) 81,761 (444,154) 1,410 33,663 Revenues Collected from 2020 35,073 102,373 1,410 - 136,036 Revenues Collected from 2021 136,036 61,224 - - 197,260 Revenues Collected from 2022 197,260 212,043 - 409,304 Revenues Collected from 2023 409,304 167,005 - 576,308 Total Revenue For Last Five Years 1 J$ 624,406 1 $ (442,744) Result : Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 22/23 Committed % Complete " % funded with fee Total $ - $ Percentage completed as of 6/30/2023 '* Loan repayment interest rate was based on the average quarterly investment yield of the City's investment portfolio. During FY 2018/19, this loan was written -off. Projects are being evaluated for the unspent balance of $576,308 and will be included in the FY 2024/25 budget. 198 2023 AB 1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Maintenance Facilities DIF (Fund 259) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2023 The Maintenance Facilities Fee fund is used for corporate yard maintenance facilities and equipment needed to serve future development in La Quinta. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 313 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 247 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 198 Office/Medical Unit $ 374 General Commercial 1000 sq ft $ 461 Tourist Commercial/Lodging 1000 sq ft $ 106 Golf Course Acre $ 53 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 22/23 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Transfers In Committed 130,311 1,277 - - Total Revenue Sources Balance 131,588 $ - Expenditures & Other Uses - Total Uses 47,015 - 47,015 Revenues Collected from 2022 47,015 Total Available $ 180,095 $ 131,588 $ 311,683 Five Year Test Usina First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending FY 22/23 Beginning Fund Revenues Expenditures Committed Unspent Balance Collected $ - $ - Revenues Collected from 2021 - 47,015 - 47,015 Revenues Collected from 2022 47,015 133,080 180,095 Revenues Collected from 2023 $ 180,095 131,588 311,683 Total Revenue For Last Five Years $ 311,683 $ - Result: Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 22/23 Committed % Complete. % funded with fee Total $ - $ - Percentage completed as of 6/30/2023 Projects are being evaluated for the unspent balance of $311,683 and will be included in the FY 2024/25 budget. 199 2023 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Developer Agreement Activity (Fund 401) FYE 6/30/2023 ATTACHMENT 2 The following development agreement payment was received for development agreements entered into after January 1, 2004 in accordance with Government Code Section 65865. Date Project/Purpose DeveloperTotal Balance Revenues Expenses Total 3/8/2010 Traffic Signals: Madison Street on Avenue 58 & Avenue 60 257,563.00 257,563.00 10/18/2010 Landscape Median: Monroe Avenue (Trilogy/Shea TM30023) 234,869.64 234,869.64 1/25/2016 Traffic Signal: Madison Street at Avenue 52 (Madison Club) 215,000.00 215,000.00 10/11/2016 Raised Median: Madison at Avenue 52 (TM33076-1) 59,642.00 59,642.00 6/14/2019 Turn Lane Extension: Highway 111 & Costco Drive 3,644.22 3,644.22 6/30/2020 Traffic Signal: Madison Street at Avenue 54 (CDA/Griffin Ranch) 107,500.00 107,500.00 6/30/2021 Turn Lane / Right Turn Only: Adams Street at Auto Centre 171,574.00 171,574.00 6/30/2023 Traffic Signal: Monroe at Avenue 52 20,755.35 20,755.35 Total Unearned Account No. 401-0000-228111 Revenue on Deposit 1 $ 1,070,548.21 11/30/2009 Lions Gate project 1821 sidewalk and landscaping 16,798.30 16,798.30 1/31/2011 Toll Brothers, Avenue 50 & Verano Drive, TM 30357, Mt. View Country Club Traffic Signal Improvements 215,000.00 215,000.00 6/30/2015 Avenue 53 at Jefferson Street Roundabout (580.85) (580.85) 6/30/2015 Traffic Signal Avenue 50 & Orchard, Project 1757 99,075.26 99,075.26 2/24/2016 ACM LQ/Highway 111 & Simon Drive 2,788.50 2,788.50 2/24/2016 ACM LQ/Washington & Miles 8,460.00 8,460.00 6/30/2019 Dune Palms Road Widening Eminent Domain 19,882.32 19,882.32 6/30/2023 Cove Trails Parking Lot Improvements 49,580.00 49,580.00 Account No. 401-0000-22210 $ 411,003.53 200 City of La Quinta BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 19, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPOINT A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO SERVE AS MAYOR PRO TEMPORE FOR ONE YEAR RECOMMENDATION Appoint a member of the City Council to serve as Mayor Pro Tempore for one year. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The Mayor Pro Tempore is the presiding officer at all Council meetings and related functions and activities when the Mayor is absent. • The selection of Mayor Pro Tempore is governed by State law (Gov. Code § 36801) and City's Rules of Procedure for Public Meetings (Resolution No. 2022-027). The laws require the Council to choose one of its members as Mayor Pro Tempore at the same meeting it declares the results of a general municipal election, or during odd -numbered years, at a regular meeting in the last calendar quarter. FISCAL IMPACT — None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Council's Rules of Procedure prescribes that the selection of a Mayor Pro Tempore shall be by three (3) or more affirmative votes, and a failure to achieve such total of affirmative votes, shall be deemed a selection of the incumbent to remain in office. The Resolution also stipulates that a successor or replacement Mayor Pro Tempore may be chosen at any time by three (3) or more affirmative votes. The office has been held by the following officials in recent years (calendar -year terms): • 2018 — Mayor Pro Tem Fitzpatrick • 2019 — Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez • 2020 — Mayor Pro Tem Pena • 2021 — Mayor Pro Tem Radi • 2022 — Mayor Pro Tem Fitzpatrick • 2023 — Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez ALTERNATIVES There are no alternatives to the recommended action. Prepared by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager 201 202 City of La Quints BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 19, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPOINT MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO SERVE ON VARIOUS OUTSIDE AGENCIES FOR 2024 RECOMMENDATION Appoint Councilmembers as City representatives to serve on various local, regional, and state committees for calendar year 2024. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Each year, the Council selects Councilmembers to serve on various local, regional, and state committees. Attachment 1 is the list of committees/commissions, their meeting schedules, and the 2023 representatives and alternates. Committees that offer stipends are identified with an asterisk (*). FISCAL IMPACT Attendance at some meetings requires Councilmembers to incur reimbursable travel costs that could include mileage, airfare, meals, and/or overnight hotel stays. Travel costs for the first half of 2024 are included in fiscal year 2023/24 budget (account no. 101-1001-60320). For meetings scheduled in the latter half of 2024, the costs will be included in fiscal year 2024/25 budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City is involved in various government committees and commissions relating to local, regional, and state affairs. Council may appoint one or more of its members to these committees/commissions or may appoint a citizen to represent the City. When appointing a Councilmember, the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) [FPPC Regulation 18702.5] allows an elected official to vote on his/her own appointment to another public agency's board, committee or commission if the appropriate form [Form 806 — Agency Report of: Public Official Appointments] is posted disclosing any compensation received. This form is posted on the City's website and will be immediately updated following this meeting. If Council opts to appoint a citizen representative, the City Clerk will seek applicants for that position. 203 Attachment 1 provides the list of committees, their meeting schedules, and the 2023 representatives and alternates. Committees/commissions that offer stipends are identified with an asterisk (*). ALTERNATIVES The Council may opt to make new appointments to some or all positions; discontinue membership in one or more committees/commissions; and/or change membership on one or more committees/commissions to a citizen representative. Prepared by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachment: 1. 2023 Committee Appointment List 204 2023 Assignments APPOINTED DECEMBER 6, 2022 ATTACHMENT 1 AGENCY 2023 MEETING SCHEDULE 2023 REPRESENTATIVES Animal Campus Commission 111 Thursday, quarterly at 9:30 am Member: Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez (2023: Feb 2, May 4, Aug 3, Nov 2) Alternate: Councilmember Fitzpatrick Member: Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez California Joint Powers Insurance Authority* Annual meeting in July Alternate: Monika Radeva and/or Claudia Martinez 1St quarter — Councilmember McGarrey 2nd quarter — Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez Greater CV Chamber of Commerce Councilmembers rotate — 31 Thursday every 3rd quarter — Mayor Evans Information Exchange Committee month at 8:30 am 4t" quarter — Councilmember Fitzpatrick Alternate — Councilmember Pena Art Purchase Committee — March 2023 Meet during Art Celebrations; Members: Com Servs. Com (2) Members; Art Purchase Committee — November 2023 (March 2-5, 2023; Nov. 9-12, 2023) —Sanchez & McGarrey; Mar. y' Nov. — Evans & Fitzpatrick Annual banquet — last Monday in June in Chair's Delegate: Mayor Evans CVAG General Assembly city Alternate: Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez June 26, 2023 at 6 m Members: All Councilmembers CVAG Conservation Commission* 2nd Thursday of each month at 10:30 am Member: Mayor Evans (2023: dark March, July, Aug, Oct, Dec) Alternate: Councilmember Fitzpatrick CVAG Energy & Environmental Resources Committee* 2n' Thursday of each month at 12 pm Member: Mayor Evans (2023: dark March, July, Aug, Oct, Dec) Alternate: Councilmember Fitzpatrick CVAG Executive Committee* Last Monday of each month at 4:30 pm Member: Mayor Evans (2023: dark March, July, Aug, Oct, Dec) Alternate: Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez (rotating) CVAG Public Safety Committee* 2nd Monday of each month at 9 am Member: Councilmember Pena (2023: dark Mar, Apr, Jul, Aug, Oct, Dec) Alternate: Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez CVAG Transportation Committee* 1St Monday of each month at 10 am Member: Councilmember Fitzpatrick (2023: dark March, July, Aug, Oct, Dec) Alternate: Councilmember McGarrey CVAG Homelessness Committee* 3rd Wednesday of each month at 10 am Member: Councilmember Pena (2023; dark Mar, July, Aug, Oct, Dec) Alternate: Councilmember Fitzpatrick Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District 2"d Tuesday of each month at 6 pm Member: Councilmember Pena (CVMVCD)* Appointed 10/19/2021 to serve thru 12/31/2025 2nd Monday, every other month at 3 pm Member: Councilmember McGarrey Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy (CVMC)* (2023: Jan 9, Mar 13, May 8, Jul 10, Sept 11, Nov Alternate: Councilmember Fitzpatrick 13) Coachella Valley Unified School District TBD Members: Councilmembers Fitzpatrick & Pena 2x2 Committee [established 11/03/2015] 205 * Note: receives stipend 2023 Assignments APPOINTED DECEMBER 6, 2022 206 * Note: receives stipend January Members: McGarrey & Fitzpatrick Community Service Grant Review Committee Three per year: January, May & September May Members: Evans & Sanchez September Members: McGarrey & Pena As needed — TBD Member: Mayor Evans Coachella Valley Water District Joint Policy Committee Alternate: Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez (rotating) Desert Sands Unified School District TBD Members: Mayor Evans & Mayor Pro Tem 2x2 Committee [established June 2013] Sanchez Desert Recreation District TBD Members: Councilmembers Fitzpatrick & 2x2 Committee [established Jan. 2017] McGarrey Economic Development Subcommittee Meet twice a month; TBD and 4th Wednesday at 4 Members: Mayor Evans & Councilmember [established May 20, 2014] p.m. Fitzpatrick Alternate Member: Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez Tuesday's at 8:30 am at rotating locations Members: Mayor Evans Visit Greater Palm Springs Convention & Visitors Bureau* (2023: Jan 31, April 4, June 27, Sept 26, Dec 15 18; Alternate Member: Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez dark in Feb, May, July, Aug, Oct 1St Monday of every month at 6 p.m. Member: Councilmember McGarrey IID Energy Consumers' Advisory Committee (ECAC) (2023: Jan 9, Feb 6, March 6, April 3, May 1, June 5, Appointment will end December 2026 Public Member: Lee Osborne July 10, Aug 7, Sept 11, Oct 2, Nov 6, Dec 11) Alternate: none IID does not recognize alternates 2nd Thursday of every month at 4 p.m. IID Coachella Valley Energy Commission (CVEC) (may be held at IID Headquarters in LQ or rotating from time to time at facilities in the cities of Coachella, Indio, La Quinta, Palm Desert, Indian Members: Mayor Evans Appointment will end December 2023 Wells, Rancho Mirage, tribal nations, or unincorporated areas of Imperial & Riverside counties League of California Cities - Delegate for annual Annual conference(s) & General Assembly Member: Mayor Evans conference September 20-22, 2023 in Sacramento, CA Alternate: Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez Three meetings per year Members: Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez -Presidential League of California Cities - Public Safety Committee (2023: Jan, Feb, April, & June) Appointment & Councilmember Pena — Division Appointment League of California Cities — Governance, Transparency, Three meetings per year Member: Councilmember McGarrey — and Labor Relations Policy Committee (2023: Jan, Feb, April, & June) Presidential Appointment Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC)* 2nd Wednesday of each month at 9:30 am Member: Councilmember Fitzpatrick [one rep appointed by every city] Alternate: Councilmember McGarrey Riverside Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) 41h Thursday of each month at 9:30 am Member: Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez (dark Nov 2023?) Annual Regional Conference & General Assembly Delegate: Mayor Evans So. Calif. Association of Governments (SCAG) — May 4-5, 2023 — Marriott Springs Resort — Palm Alternate Member: Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez Desert 41h Wednesday of each month at 10am-1 pm Member: Councilmember Pena Sunline Transit Agency* (includes Committees) Alternate: Councilmember Fitzpatrick dark Au & Nov 2023 206 * Note: receives stipend BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 3 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 19, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITL : APPROPRIATE $866,000 FROM GENERAL FUND RESERVES AND TRANSFER TO ENTERPRISE FUND, APPROVE PURCHASE OF GOLF CARTS FOR SILVERROCK GOLF COURSE, AND APPROVE ASSOCIATED BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS RECOMMENDATION Appropriate $866,000 from General Fund reserves and transfer to Enterprise Fund, approve purchase of golf carts for SilverRock golf course, and approve associated budget adjustments. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The lease for the golf carts currently in use at the City -owned and operated SilverRock golf course ends December 31, 2023, and does not have an end -of - lease purchase option. • The City would benefit from purchasing the carts instead of leasing them as they could be traded -in or sold once they reach end -of -life. • Landmark Golf Management (Landmark), SilverRock golf course operator, determined that Club Car manufactures a cart that best meets the City's design and performance expectations. FISCAL IMPACT The total cost to purchase 88 golf carts plus four (4) utility carts is $935,249. The SilverRock budget has $70,000 remaining in the lease account that can be applied to the purchase. Therefore, an appropriation of $866,000 from the General Fund Reserves, to be transferred to Fund 601, is requested, along with approval of the associated budget adjustments as shown below: 207 Account Expense Revenue 101-1007-99900 Transfer Out $ 866,000 601-0000-49500 Transfer In $ 866,000 601-0000-60211 Rental Expenses $ (70,000) 601-0000-71030 Vehicles $ 935,249 207 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In November 2019, Landmark, who is contracted by the City to operate the SilverRock golf course, entered into a four-year lease agreement with Club Car, LLC for 88 Tempo golf carts, two beverage carts, and three multi -passenger transport carts. The lease does not have an option -to -buy provision included, and carts have a pick-up date of December 31, 2023 (unless extended on a month-to-month basis). An analysis of options was conducted by Landmark, who determined that Club Car manufactures a cart that best meets the City's design and performance expectations, and that the City would benefit from purchasing the golf carts versus leasing them. Club Car manufactures golf carts that are known industry -wide for their reliability, quality, and warranty. Their lithium batteries have the biggest capacity of the major competitors, and the aluminum frame construction is better suited for our desert climate. Most importantly, Club Car has carts ready for production with delivery in 30 days, while other manufacturers have at least a six-month lead time. The cost to lease the same size fleet would be $810,000 over a four-year period, and similar to the current lease would not have a purchase option at the end. By purchasing carts, the City has the ability to trade-in or sell the fleet at its end -of -life, which is estimated to generate $320,000. Taking this into consideration, purchasing the fleet would yield a savings of approximately $194,000 over leasing. ALTERNATIVES Council may elect to continue to lease the golf carts instead of purchasing them, which would not require an appropriation of funds at this time but would cost the City more over the life of the carts. Prepared by: Rosemary Hallick, Principal Management Analyst Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager 208 STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. 1 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 19, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: DISCUSS FINANCIAL OPTIONS FOR THE VILLAGE UNDERGROUNDING FEASIBILITY STUDY PROJECT NO. 2022-06 RFCOMMFh Discuss financial options for the Village Undergrounding Feasibility Study Project No. 2022-06. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • In 2010 a feasibility study was prepared to assess the undergrounding of utilities citywide. • Undergrounding of utilities in the Village was identified as a priority at the 2021 and 2022 annual Community Workshops and funding was appropriated to update the feasibility study in fiscal year (FY) 2022/23 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). • On September 19, 2023, Council provided feedback on the draft of the Village Undergrounding Feasibility Study (Undergrounding Study). • The financial analysis and funding options for the Undergrounding Study have been prepared (Undergrounding Finance Options) and include both local funding mechanisms and federal/state grant opportunities. (Attachment 1) FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact to the City at this time. The Undergrounding Study provides estimated costs and financial options for undergrounding utilities in the various study areas. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In 2010 a citywide Undergrounding Feasibility Study was prepared, which included the assessment of costs to underground overhead utilities within six areas in the city. The costs prepared for this Study were out of date and needed to be reassessed. A phasing plan was also needed to prioritize the undergrounding of the Village's commercial area and Francis Hack Lane. 209 During the 2021 and 2022 annual Community Workshops, undergrounding utilities in the La Quinta Village was identified as a community priority. Subsequently, funding was included in FY 2022/23 CIP to update the Undergrounding Study, and Council approved an agreement with NV5, Inc. in December 2022 to provide these services. The draft Undergrounding Study was presented to Council for discussion on September 19, 2023. The study evaluated the technical and economic feasibility of undergrounding the existing overhead utilities in La Quinta. Specifically, the Undergrounding Study identified areas for the undergrounding of utilities, estimated the potential overall costs for undergrounding the utilities, and provided a planning -level cost estimate for each study area based on Imperial Irrigation District (IID) utility standards and recommendations in the following six areas: o Areal: The Cove o Area 2: Downtown Commercial Area o Area 3: Downtown Residential Area o Area 4: Sagebrush o Area 5: Highland Palms o Area 6: Westward Ho The financial analysis and funding options for undergrounding the existing overhead utilities within the Village have been developed. The Undergrounding Finance Options include both local funding approaches and federal and state grant opportunities detailed in Attachment 1. The potential funding mechanisms include: Local Funding: o Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Assessment District) o Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 o Funding share with utility partners - Equivalent Overhead Distribution System Federal Funding/Grants: o Grid Resilience and Partnership (GRIP) Program o Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program o Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant o Community Wildfire Defense Grant (CWDG) o Regional Catastrophic Preparedness Grant Program (RCPGP) FEMA Region 9 o Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) Direct Technical Assistance Grant State Funding/Grants o California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) programs o Community Resilience Investment (CERT) Program 210 Local projects have traditionally been funded through the 1913 Act Assessment Districts and occasionally by Mello -Roos Community Facilities Districts (CFD). There are two approaches to forming Undergrounding Utility Assessment Districts: 1) Form the Assessment District and then prepare the plans and specifications and then get construction bids; or 2) Prepare complete plans and specifications and have construction bids in hand before forming the Assessment District. The pros and cons of each option is identified in the draft Undergrounding Finance Options. An additional local funding mechanism includes a cost share with the utility partners, specifically Imperial Irrigation District (IID). The funding share could include the cost of an equivalent overhead distribution system. Prepared by: Julie Mignogna, Management Analyst Approved by: Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Draft Village Undergrounding Feasibility Study Financial Options 211 212 0 INNS q, jO �k.. • F.: g _. ire'* - - I Funding Options Local Funding Approaches Local projects have traditionally been funded through the 1913 Act Assessment Districts and occasionally by Mello -Roos CFDs. There are two basic approaches to forming Undergrounding Utility Assessment Districts. One is to form the Assessment District and then prepare the plans and specifications and then get construction bids; the other is to prepare complete plans and specifications and have construction bids in hand before forming the Assessment District. Included on the following slides are details on the different options available. Federal & State Grants There may be grants available, which are presented later in this presentation. A +1� 15 Funding Options Examples of Successful Assessment Districts NV5 has assisted with the successful formation of several utility undergrounding assessment districts throughout Southern California. The table below includes a sampling of recently formed districts that are comparable in size and scope to the City's areas. UUAD No. 124 City of Newport Beach 966 $32,815,700 $33,970 65.29% UUAD No. 117 City of Newport Beach 268 $4,640,550 $17,315 52.20% UUAD No. 113 City of Newport Beach 215 $6,249,500 $29,067 71.54% UUAD No. 19-4 City of Manhattan Beach 170 $7,255,000 $42,676 75.38% UUAD No. 19-12 City of Manhattan Beach 231 $6,735,000 $29,155 62.27% UUAD No. 19-14 City of Manhattan Beach 244 $6,810,000 $27,909 64.19% Paseo de la Playa UUAD City of Torrance 20 $1,784,400 $89,220 94.31% Greenwich Village North UUAD City of Hermosa Beach 101 $4,031,600 $39,916 65.28% a • Funding Options Option One — Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Assessment District) 1. The process is initiated by an interested property owner, who acts as a liaison between the City, utility companies, and neighbors 2. Based on the interest letter, the City Consultant prepares a boundary map and submits it to the appropriate utility companies who review the map to ensure that the boundaries are logical and feasible 3. The City Consultant then prepares a petition to be circulated by proponents to all affected property owners within the proposed district boundaries 4. Once the petition is certified by the Assessment Engineer, the City Engineer and the City Consultant will prepare a staff report requesting City Council approval to move forward. With Council approval, the Assessment Engineer will prepare an Engineer's Report 5. The Engineer's Report and Resolution of Intention are submitted to the City Council for approval and a public hearing is scheduled 6. The Ballots are prepared with the assessment amount and sent to each property owner within the proposed district boundaries 7. All votes must be submitted to the City prior to the end of the scheduled public hearing. The district passes if the district received greater than 50% approval and is subsequently approved by the City Council. Following approval by the property owners, the detailed design process begins. It usually involves the following steps: Base mapping, IID electrical design, and telephone and cable design 8. Once the project is fully designed, it will be bid with a contract awarded, and then constructed �`` 217 Funding Options Option One — Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Assessment District) Design: After District Formation (Fast-track) Pros • Once the petition is approved, the City can immediately order the Engineer's Report, go to ballot and form the Assessment District • Up front costs are significantly less and the time period to form the District is reduced to about 3-4 months. The agency can pay the up front costs or request that the proponents pay the up front costs by depositing funds with the agency • It is known whether you have an Assessment District before preparing plans and specifications and obtaining bids Cons • Disadvantage is the bids could come in higher than the estimated cost in the Engineer's Report causing a shortfall in assessment funds. This can be counter balanced by placing a larger contingency in the Cost Estimate .­-;rerrLs,i, T 218 lf. .. .t F 218 Funding Options Option Two 1. Steps 1-3 are the same as option 1 2. Once the petition is certified by the Assessment Engineer, the City Engineer and the City Consultant will prepare a staff report requesting City Council approval to begin the design process 3. The design process begins once the utility companies receive the design fee, which is the responsibility of the property owners. The process usually involves the following steps: Base mapping, IID electrical design, and telephone and cable design 4. Once the design is complete and accepted by the City and utility companies, the utility companies provide a "guaranteed cost of construction." 5. The completed design plans, Engineer's Report, and Resolution of Intention are submitted to the City Council for approval and a public hearing is scheduled 6. Ballots are prepared with the assessment amount and sent to each property owner within the proposed district's boundaries 7. All votes must be submitted to the City prior to the end of the scheduled public hearing. The district passes if the district received greater than 50% approval and is subsequently approved by City Council 219 Funding Options Option Two Design: Before District Formation Pros • Advantage is costs are known before balloting and forming the District Cons • Plans, specifications (PS&E) and bidding process must be paid for up front before forming the District • After paying the up front costs, the District could fail to be formed. The agency could lose the funds for the PS&E unless the proponents of the District pay up front the costs, rather than the agency, by placing a fund deposit with the agency • It can take two years to have the plans and specifications prepared and construction bids received and support for the District could change during this period EV" L'50 1W 4LT 220 Funding Options Paying the Assessment & Final Steps Regardless of which of the two options is selected, property owners will have two options to pay for the assessment: 1. 30 -Day Cash Payment Period: Within 30 days after the close of the public hearing, the property owner has the option to pay the full or a portion of the assessment amount. The property owner will save approximately 8% on the portion of the assessment paid in cash. This 8% savings results from not selling bonds for the amount owed. Bonds will be sold for any unpaid portion of the assessment and a lien will be placed on the property until the bond is paid in full. 2. Bond: If the property owner elects to not pay during the 30 -Day Cash Payment Period, bonds will be sold. Assessments will be placed on the property tax bill to be paid over a 20 to 25 -year financing period. During that time, a lien will be placed on the property until the bond amount is paid in full. Bonds will incur a finance charge. Once construction of the main line underground infrastructure has been completed, property owners will be responsible for hiring a licensed electrician to connect the property's existing overhead connection to the underground infrastructure — this cost is not covered in the assessment amount and will need to be completed within the designated time frame by the property owners. 221 Funding Options Cost Per Parcel Per Area (Paying in Cash) *** 1 The Cove 5,046 $117,279,875 2 Downtown Commercial 85 $4,564,999 3 Downtown Residential 294 $11,967,959 L4 Sagebrush M- 1116_ $2,692,109 5 Highland Palms 92 $4,482,771 $23,242.15 $53,705.87 $40,707.34 $23,207.83 $48,725.78 006 Westward Ho■ N N&L— $4,105,195& $33,927.23 -P * The cost estimate is based on IID maps and the count of services requiring conversion, which may differ from a simple parcel count. Occasionally, a single parcel may contain multiple homes or services, and conversely, a home or service may span multiple parcels. The most accurate option is to conduct an engineer's field study to obtain a true count of homes ** Includes 15% incidental costs (assessment engineer, CM and Inspection, city time, & bond counsel) *** It is estimated that private conversion costs will be in the $8,000-12,000 range per parcel. Property owners will be responsible for this amount, which is in addition to their assessment 222 Funding Options Cost Per Parcel Per Area (With Bonds)** 1 The Cove $23,242.15 $2,324.21 $25,566 $38,818 $1,940 2 Downtown Commercial $53,705.87 $5,370.59 $59,076 $89,699 $4,484 3 Downtown Residential $40,707.34 $4,070.73 $44,778 $67,989 $3,399 4 Sagebrush $23,207.83 $2,320.78 $25,528 $38,761 $1,938 5 Highland Palms $48,725.78 $4,872.58 $53,598 $81,381 $4,069 6 Westward Ho $33,927.23 $3,392.72 $37,319 $56,664 $2,833 * Rounded to the nearest dollar ** It is estimated that private conversion costs will be in the $8,000-12,000 range per parcel. Property owners will be responsible for this amount, which is in addition to their assessment 13 223 Funding Options Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 In 1982, the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Government Code §53311-53368.3) was created to provide an alternate method of financing for needed improvements and services. • The Act allows any county, city, special district, school district or joint powers authority to establish a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District (a "CFD") which allows for financing of public improvements and services. The services and improvements that Mello -Roos CFDs can finance include streets, sewer systems and other basic infrastructure, police protection, fire protection, ambulance services, schools, parks, libraries, museums and other cultural facilities. • A CFD is created to finance public improvements and services when no other source of money is available. • A CFD is created by a sponsoring local government agency. The proposed district will include all properties that will benefit from the improvements to be constructed or the services to be provided. A CFD cannot be formed without a two-thirds majority vote of residents living within the proposed boundaries. Or, if there are fewer than 12 residents, the vote is instead conducted of current landowners. In many cases, that may be a single owner or developer. • Once approved, a Special Tax Lien is placed against each property in the CFD. Property owners then pay a Special Tax each year. If the project cost is high, municipal bonds will be sold by the CFD to provide the large amount of money initially needed to build the improvements or fund the services. 224 Analysis of Equivalent Primary Overhead Distribution: Count and Cost Evaluation Equivalent Overhead Distribution System: A theoretical feeder and distribution extension designed as if the applicant were going to be served overhead by a new system. The line will follow the basic route of the existing overhead system. This evaluation involves estimating the costs associated with establishing a new equivalent overhead distribution system used for delivering electricity to the existing residents in the 6 study areas. It encompasses the costs linked to the new primary infrastructure elements, such as poles, arms, insulators, pins, anchors, stud poles, cable poles, guying and the associated labor, equipment and permitting related. The equivalent overhead distribution and feeder extension must originate from the same existing source. The equivalent study should follow the basic route of the existing overhead system but must also be based on sound engineering practices for overhead construction utilizing proper pole spacing, grade of pole construction, and loading engineering. The intent of this opinion of probable cost is to explore a credit option so Imperial Irrigation District can considerer an equivalent overhead credit for the length of the proposed conversions in the 6 different impacted areas in the City. 225 Analysis of Equivalent Primary Overhead Distribution: Count and Cost Evaluation This table provides an estimated count of feeder distribution poles, overhead conductors, and other essential components required to construct a comparable overhead primary distribution feeder system. EQUIVALENT PRIMARY OH DISTRIBUTION COUNT ESTIMATE Area #1 Area #2 Area #3 Area #4 Area #5 i. Area #6 Distribution Poles 765 37 77 37 38 Distribution Pin, Insulators 3550 172 357 172 176 Distribution Arms 887 43 89 -43 44 Primary Cable Poles 7 4 2 1 5� OH Feeder Conductor 4 wire 3 phase in Ft 24,868 1,719 ANNEEN M- OH Distribution Conductor 4 wire 3 phase in Ft 62,572 3,197 11,801 3,055 2A85 2,853 Anchors, Stub Pales and Other Guiding 77 4 8 4 4 4 + This table illustrates the estimated costs involved in constructing a comparable overhead primary distribution and feeder system. EQUIVALENT PRIMARY OH DISTRIBUTION COST ESTIMATE Area #1 Area #2 Area #3 Area #4 Area #5 Area #6 + Total Distribution Feeder Poles $ 19,125,000 $ 925,000 $ 1,925,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 925,000 $ 950,000 ++ + + *Total Distribution Primary Cable Poles $ 364,000 $ 208,000 $ 104,000 $ 52,000 $ 52,000 $ 260,000 + T ++ + + Total 397.5 AAC OH Feeder Conductor - 4 wire 3 phase $ 3,854,540 $ 761,980 + Total OH Distribution Conductor - 4 wire 3 phase $ 3,253,744 $ 166,244 $ 613,652 $ 153,860 $ 108,420 $ 148,668 TOTAL $ 26,597,284 $ 2,061,224 $ 2,642,652 $ 1,210,860 $ 1AS5,420 $ 1,358,668 + *Total Distribution Feeder Poles includes ( Distribution Pins, Insulators, Distribution Arms and Anchors). *Total Distribution Primary Cable Poles represent transitions from existing Underground system to Overhead system or vice versa. This cost estimate is based on whether a private or public entity, other than IID, was constructing a new infrastructure system. The calculations and costs associated with IID's utility may differ from those presented. Costs includes IID's Engineering, Materials, Labor and Permitting. 226 Funding Options Other Funding Opportunities Federal Funding/Grants The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, has been labeled as a once -in -a -generation investment in infrastructure to support the nation's growth. While nearly 400 funding opportunities exist within IIJA, many of them were focused on either finding the most cost-effective route, directed at clean energy, designed for the state of California to be the applicant, or were focused on rural populations, However, several opportunities presented themselves for the City which may qualify and are presented as follows: • GRIP (Grid Resilience & Partnership): Department of Energy (DOE) program that supports activities that will modernize the electric grid to reduce impacts due to extreme weather and natural disasters. This program will fund comprehensive transformational transmission and distribution technology solutions that will mitigate multiple hazards across a region or within a community, including wildfires, floods, hurricanes, extreme heat, extreme cold, storms, and any other event that can cause a disruption to the power system. This program provides grants to electric grid operators, electricity storage operators, electricity generators, transmission owners or operators, distribution providers, and fuel suppliers. This program will provide up to $2.513 over 5 years. r Grid Resilience and innovation Partnerships Program Ae. parrot d- Bipartisan irtbastrucwre law, "'Program-` Gripeployment Of IGDOI is adminicicring die $10.S billion Grid r ilienmand lnno�atanPartnvslaips IGPlPt t enl.an Wil g—ihiRyandip. the resiliia caofth. nauan's pews. grid agalna[ge ma ttr ftafextreme.scather and climate damp. n.c pr.,grams poiedsacros ffi­+i kvlelpertva.ethc —61hility or rare A.,,Rkn --nlr- have off -4611r. reliable, dean elecmclty anytime, anywhere. GRN iradudes three fundkq mxhar sins: GRID RESILIENCE UTILITY AND INDUSTRY GRANTS N2.S BILLION) Grid feesll:enre Inllity and hlddlby Grants m opus xhvIt sMas*Ml mademlae the dacVle grid to reduce gnpwla; I—e tb weather and natdral di—L— will h.ndmmprehensbaetramsfu ba I transmission and distribution techmIagy solutions that will prkpta weather hazards across a region or within a community imlud-rrg yr adflres, fleodr, hurricanes, ext— heat extremevents e wld, and ulkmme weather the k can cause a dlsruplim to the power system -TMs fundi ng oppm4wllN Is avj;l ble to elKft pld operates, electricity amble operatorspap, elecbzity gen—tots, Van—Iswon owners or operators, dls[r8etlon prwfders, and Fuel suppliers. • Concept er Deadllne: De.rnbrr JA 2022 • Anticlpatm Award Selection Det. Suourrer2023 • 2199 Concept Papers rereiyed • Nut Round of funding Opens: Winter 2023 • Full Application deadline: April 6, 2023 SMART GRID GRANTS ]$3 BILLION] Smart Grid Gra nG support aoivifi s that will hlmesse the flerahllktp, edgorerrcy, and reliahRlty of the elecvk power system.These granawiE fundtednnology tbcused on inoreasi%.pa,gofthe t—mi. system, Prepenting Faults that may ked to Akthres or other system disturbs-. intc"ng [[notable energy atthctranbmissiun and dl&Wbuson leoels, and facilitating the integatlm of increasing elecblFled vehndes. Elsildings, and other grid -edge duces. Smart grid technologies funol art depFuyed at orate under this program win demonstrate a partway to wider mute! adoption. Tho greatprogram jos brad eli8IIA y and Is awdabk to dorbcdtic entities including m wwpord ar hlgwr etlbatlon;for-Mt er><Itle%non-RroAt embtiim was stage and Iotal pmnnwtN eMibes, and 'lila] nations, • Coneps paper 0eadllne: J2ecemher lfi, x1322 • Anticlpn[ed Award Selectan Date: 9ummer20e3 • 326 Conscpl Paprrs rrceivrd • Pkat gvprq a}funding Opcns;Wmler2923 • Full ApplicaHorl deadline, March 3J, 2023 GRID INNOVATION PROGRAM {$S BILLION] Gr4d wr ation Program pr ldes Bnamlal amaPame Lovmeor mulbplestaws,Trabn, Iaosl gc re menu,and publlc utility wnrmrssiwrs tb ml4bbrate with electric mctvr ovmers al.d operators m deploy projects that case P.nmrative approaches to tr imm iw, stara3e, and d§Wfttion inf.asrnwtume to -Nnm grid—5,.ea..d Tt9iability, Brwd protect appllmt.om are mInleres[Incf.adinganberregla al tramrnlsslun Pmtxn, investments fuel atxelerae Inte—nnecboo mcleanma%ygenerarton, uullralion of dlatrlbubbn grid asseista provide backup power and reduce [rar.smisslon requlremems, and more. Innwabva approaches can rangy Twm use vfadvanced techlwlvgles w mnw*G parrnerahips ro the deplvymmrof projecn idenbtrei by Wnawilvc pLannbrg prxeuea m marry n iers. • Concept Paper Dcadllne-January 13, 2023 • -i'lpated Award Selecc.rn Dale: Pod 2023 • 135Conrept Papersrecewed a Near P—A F FuMing Opens: Whrrer 2023 • F0 AppII[atlon De ,Ane: May ", 2p23 wear. AwW]@.a. sugwe m r>*a� r. w.,npr.,,�a.�.Pa �,�a� �t,,nn �_>�rora•Pam�,,, '— fit' -arm mr .t w r 227 Funding Options o n s Economic Development Administratlan E D A p Economk Adjusbnent Assistance Program Other Funding Opportunities Federal Funding/Grants (Continued) • Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program: As a community development block grant recipient, the City may apply for a Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program grant. This program would help provide low-cost, flexible financing to support infrastructure that benefits low- and moderate- income citizens for site improvements. A match is not required and actual funds are unspecified. The funds are distributed on a rolling basis from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. • Public Works & Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant: This grant assist communities implementing long-term economic development efforts. Through this program, projects that demonstrate climate change resiliency for decades to come are encouraged to apply. A match from the applicant is required via cash/in-kind, although actual funds are not specified, and proportions vary based on unemployment rate and per capita income. The original solicitation date was 03/14/2023, but funds are distributed on a rolling basis from the US Department of Commerce. Economic Adjustment Assistance Program Whitdom ft Economic A4wnmarat Assimme PAA] program dol The VAprogmm p*mm a wdt range of Wks. plaonifq and pubk worts and Onagwoture aBelsiance In regiom experiencing adverse economic changes that may wwr auddeny %over fire These adverse economic isnpacta may raitA from a sheep dodina in a plant doeve. Gl angirgirade pattems, catastrophic naluraldisaster, a military base closure, or envionmentol changes and regdatiais. Who may bonefli From FAR and what will each finding do to promote economic dmicto rant? The EAAprogram can assist state and local entities it responding to a wide range of economc cheMnges tlarou � Suatagy Gramm to support ere devdmpreent updating or rafiament oFa Comprahative Economic Ckvelopmenl Strategy (CEDS). • Implerrre virion Grime to suppedthe execution d activlim identified in a CEM such as efraehudure improvement, including site acquisition, site preparation, consbuction, mhabilMion and equipping offaeililiao. Spacihc aetvitiea may befunded ma separate inveahnoa& ar as mrlliple skmerrt da single im%threert Why '• itadaanb9mus to apply For GAA Funding? The EAApwgram is EMs mostNe4le pmgram. Under the EAAprogram, E11Acan fund market and environmental studies, pknrang or construction grads, and capitalize arecaprbilize rmW lean funds (RLFs) to hey provide sinal busnenes wdh the capital they need to govt. Wheterleria are used in deternoWng which projeote receive EAA prints? • The ability of the proposed project to reapsticolly aeheve the deered resile and ealalyre additional reaorces; • The ability of a project to slag quickly and create jabs faster. • The erdeot to which the projsdwi enable the commusitpdegion to become more divemised and more economically prosperous: • The relative economic distress of the mpm • The app kaMs performance under previous Federal financial assistance awards, including whether the grantee submided requied performance reports and data. • The comparative feaoibily of the appkad to achieve IM outcomes idenlihed in the oppkation. What is as mmpis of a su ewssful GAA praW For exnmples of suoceseful EDA projects. vwR aro: yarrw eda.00v+arcual eoartsr Haw dD Iaed mare trhomm lien on howio apgaltlf The Federal Fun" Opportunity (FFO) is available at htmllwaw.eda. oovdundiaa•ouovrWnitesAntlec.hbn. To discuss any prWAproposals in further detail, contactyour EDARegional Olfre. MN{NAaION. PEGIGNALMMA&OFMON. dMCRLATIQri A"IMA.DW FelbWu fiR,u r0@Fl.Y EPA err +t r :1 228 Funding Options Other Funding Opportunities Federal Funding/Grants (Continued • CWDG (Community Wildfire Defense Grant): With the adoption of a community wildfire protection plan (CWPP), the City could benefit from this program which is designed to help implement projects within the CWPP that are less than 10 years old related to becoming a fire -adapted community. The due date for this grant is on 11/03/2024 and a cash/in-king match is required. The actual funds from the US Department of Agriculture are unspecified. • RCPGP (Regional Catastrophic Preparedness Grant Program) FEMA Region 9: This grant covers severe damage or disruption to the infrastructure related to a catastrophic incident impacting the area, focusing on projects that are focused on equity and climate resilience. This grant can be used to build on existing regional preparedness efforts for local governments. Although the original due date of 7/24/2023 has passed, there are multiple due dates for these funds from the US Department of Homeland Security. No match is required for the $12M funds available, with individual projects grants covering up to $3M. • BRIC (Building Resilient Infrastructure & Communities) Direct Technical Assistance Grant: If the City of La Quinta is able to demonstrate that they have pockets within the community with a social vulnerability index (SVI) score greater than or equal to 0.6, this grant can be applied for. There is no known due date for the next round of funding, but a match is not required for this program funded through the US Department of Homeland Security. This grant is to be used as an additional research resource as the purposed of this program is to provide non-financial direct technical assistance to applicants. 229 Funding Options Other Funding Opportunities State Funding/Grants • CPUC (California Public Utilities Commission) establishes funding mechanisms for undergrounding and upgrading the power grid through a variety of programs under Rules and Tariffs paid by users and the utility through work credits that accumulate annually in the municipality's account. The work credits are established by formula based on the equivalent overhead infrastructure improvement that would have been required if not for the construction of the underground facility. The challenge for agencies served by non -investor funded utilities, such as IID, is that the utility is not obligated to participate in these programs nor set aside work credits to fund future undergrounding as would be required for investor funded utilities, such as SCE. This is to the benefit to the rate payers in the short term but does not provide a funding source for future undergrounding our upgrades to the power grid. However, the CPUC does have requirements for undergrounding of secondary utilities, such as telecommunication lines, at the utility's expense along designated scenic highways and in areas where there is a public interest finding that justifies placing the lines underground. This would require these secondary services to participate, at their own cost, in any City sponsored undergrounding project to move the lines into the public right-of-way; however, the cost to reconnect service to individual properties may be borne by the property owner. • CERI (Community Resilience Investment) Program: This program will fund projects across California that increase community energy resilience and reliability, promote decarbonization of the electric system, improve energy justice and equity, and create good -paying jobs. Approximately $170 million in formula funds over the next five years will be distributed under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), section 40101(d) — Preventing Outages and Enhancing the Resilience of the Electric Grid. 230 Funding Options Summary & Conclusion Potential funding mechanisms include: • Local Funding State Funding/Grants • Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Assessment District) 0 CPUC (California Public Utilities Commission) programs • Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 0 CERI (Community Resilience Investment) Program • Federal Funding/Grants • GRIP (Grid Resilience & Partnership) Program • Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program • Public Works & Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant • CWDG (Community Wildfire Defense Grant) • RCPGP (Regional Catastrophic Preparedness Grant Program) FEMA Region 9 • BRIC (Building Resilient Infrastructure & Communities) Direct Technical Assistance Grant a 231 232 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 19, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 19, 2023: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO: 1) ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (EA2021-0006), AND 2) APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2021-0001, ZONE CHANGE 2021-0001, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2021-0002 (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) FOR AN 80 -UNIT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2021-0004 (TTM 37950); CEQA: DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PREPARED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CONSISTENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; PROJECT NAME: LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58; LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 58 BETWEEN MADISON STREET AND MONROE STREET RECOMMENDATION • Adopt a resolution to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2021-0006. • Adopt a resolution to approve General Plan Amendment 2021-0001, Zone Change 2021-0001, Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002 for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 (TTM 37950) for the La Villetta at Avenue 58 project. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The project site (Site) is located on two vacant parcels [Assessor Parcel Numbers 764-180-002 and 764-180-0031 south of Avenue 58 between Madison Street and Monroe Street (Attachment 1). • Applicant is proposing a Planning Unit Development (PUD) of an 80 -unit detached single-family residential project, which would require a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to increase density, a Conditional Use Permit for a PUD to establish design development standards, and a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the Site into individual lots. The project was heard by the Planning Commission on June 13, 2023, where the Commission recommended adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and approval of the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Conditional Use Permit, and Tentative Tract Map. 233 • Council heard the project on September 19, 2023, and continued the hearing to a date certain, December 19, 2023, to give the applicant additional time to address project concerns regarding the proposed density increase and electrical supply constraints. The applicant will provide an update on these items at the meeting. FISCAL IMPACT — None BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Applicant is proposing the La Villetta at Avenue 58 Project consisting of 80 single- family residential homes. The project would include site improvements such as landscaping, utility infrastructure, garage parking, clubhouse, pool, spa, tot lot, and passive park for the residents. The 8.94 -acre Site is comprised of two vacant parcels, bordered by an existing single-family home to the west, vacant residential parcels to the east and south, and an existing residential community, Piazza Serena, to the north (Attachment 3). A full description of the project applications is provided in the September 19, 2023 packet: httos://www.laauintaca.aov/home/showoublisheddocument/49183/638327220408530000 General Plan Amendment The project proposes a General Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Medium and High Density Residential (MHDR) to accommodate a higher density (Exhibit A, General Plan Amendment Resolution). The current LDR designation allows a density of up to four units to the acre. The MHDR designation allows for up to 16 units to the acre. The project proposes nine units to the acre. Zone Change The project proposes a Zone Change from Low Density Residential (RL) to Medium High Density Residential (RMH) to accommodate a higher density (Exhibit C to Zone Change Resolution). The current RL zone allows a density of two to four units to the acre. The RMH zone allows for eight to twelve units to the acre. The proposed Zone Change would be consistent with the proposed General Plan Amendment because the General Plan land use designation of MHDR allows for up to 16 units to the acre. Tentative Tract Map The Applicant is proposing TTM 37950 to subdivide 8.94 acres into 80 residential lots and five lettered lots that consists of streets, common area, and open space (Attachment 4). Planned Unit Development (PUD) The applicant prepared a PUD to allow for flexibility in design, and encourage the development of a creative, high-quality residential project that provides attractive living environments in a setting that is different from standard single-family home development. La Quinta's PUD standards allow for some flexibility from residential zoning development standards if project amenities are included. The PUD covers the use, site design, architectural, and landscaping design of the project. 234 AGENCY AND PUBLIC REVIEW Public Agency Review All written comments received are on file and available for review with the Design and Development Department. All applicable comments have been adequately addressed and/or incorporated in the recommended conditions of approval. Public Hearing Notice Project was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on August 28, 2023, and distributed to properties within 500 feet of the site. At the September 19, 2023, City Council meeting, Council continued the hearing to a date certain to December 19, 2023. No further notice was required. Tribal Consultation In accordance with SB18 and AB52, Tribal Consultation was conducted with the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI), who were the only tribe to request consultation. Mitigation was incorporated into the MND as requested by the ACBCI. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Design and Development department prepared a MND consistent with the CEQA (Exhibit A to EA 2021-0006 Resolution) and was circulated for public review from June 8, 2023, through June 28, 2023, as prescribed by the CEQA Guidelines. The department determined that the project would have less than significant effects on the environment, with mitigation measures incorporated. The City received two (2) public comments during the public review period regarding biological and energy concerns. None of the comment letters triggered modifications to the MND. The MND incorporated mitigation measures to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. ALTERNATIVES Council may elect to approve the project as recommended or reject the project proposal and deny the General Plan Amendment. Denial of the General Plan Amendment would render the other applications moot. Prepared by: Sijifredo Fernandez, Associate Planner Approved by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Findings for Approval 3. Project Information 4. Tentative Tract Map 37950 5. Development Plan Set 235 COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2023 — XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF 80 DWELLING UNITS LOCATED SOUTH OF AVENUE 58 BETWEEN MADISON STREET AND MONROE STREET CASE NUMBER: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2021-0006 APPLICANT: ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP LLC WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on December 19, 2023, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Royal Investors Group LLC, for an 80 -unit Planned Unit Development located at south of Avenue 58 between Madison Street and Monroe Street, more commonly described as: Assessor Parcel Numbers 764-180-002 and 764-180-003 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on September 19, 2023, previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approval of General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Conditional Use Permit, and Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, the City Council did continue the public hearing until a date uncertain, of December 19, 2023, to allow the applicant additional time to address the concerns regarding the proposed density increase and electrical supply constraints; and WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on August 28, 2023, as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on June 13, 2023, held a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider as requested and recommended adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2022-0001; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act to justify approval of said Environmental Assessment [Exhibit A]: 236 Council Resolution 2023 -XXX Environmental Assessment 2021-0006 Project: La Villeta at Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 2 of 3 1. The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Potential impacts can be mitigated to be less than significant levels. 2. The proposed project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity. Potential impacts can be mitigated to be less than significant. 3. The proposed project will not have environmental effects that adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly. Potential impacts can be mitigated to be less than significant. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case. SECTION 2. That the City Council hereby does approve adoption of Environmental Assessment 2021-0006 with mitigation measures incorporated [Exhibit A]. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on December 19, 2023, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 237 Council Resolution 2023 -XXX Environmental Assessment 2021-0006 Project: La Villeta at Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 3 of 3 ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 238 Council Resolution No. 2023 -XXX EXHIBIT A LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT LEAD AGENCY: PREPARED BY: City of La Quinta VCS Environmental 78495 Cal le Tampico 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 La Quinta, California 92253 San Juan Capistrano, California 92675 Contact: Siji Fernandez Contact: Dan Batt 760.777.7086 949.489.2700 �! W GEM of rhe DESER Y — IQW�&(v VCS Environmental EXPERTS IN STRATEGIC SUUTIQNS 239 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION La Villetta at Avenue 58 Environmental Assessment taQaXt(v GEM afthe DESERT LEAD AGENCY: City of la Quinta Planning Department 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Contact: Siji Fernandez 760.777.7086 PREPARED BY: VCS Environmental 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, California 92675 Contact: Dan Bott 949.489.2700 June 2023 240 This document has been setup for double -sided printing in order to conserve natural resources. 241 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Environmental Checklist................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Background......................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected.....................................................................1-2 1.3 Lead Agency Determination.............................................................................................1-3 1.4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts...............................................................................1-4 2.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Statutory Authority and Requirements............................................................................2-1 2.2 Purpose............................................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Incorporation by Reference.............................................................................................2-1 2.4 Consultations....................................................................................................................2-2 3.0 Project Description........................................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Proposed Project..............................................................................................................3-1 3.2 Site Location.....................................................................................................................3-1 3.3 Existing Site Physical Setting.............................................................................................3-1 3.4 Existing Land Use Setting..................................................................................................3-1 3.5 Project Characteristics...................................................................................................... 3-6 3.6 Construction Activities................................................................................................... 3-34 3.7 Requested Project Approvals/Permitting.......................................................................3-36 4.0 Environmental Analysis..............................................................................................................4.1-1 4.1 Aesthetics......................................................................................................................4.1-1 4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources..............................................................................4.2-1 4.3 Air Quality......................................................................................................................4.3-1 4.4 Biological Resources......................................................................................................4.4-1 4.5 Cultural Resources........................................................................................................4.5-1 4.6 Energy...........................................................................................................................4.6-1 4.7 Geology and Soils..........................................................................................................4.7-1 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions...........................................................................................4.8-1 4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials.................................................................................4.9-1 4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality......................................................................................4.10-1 4.11 Land Use and Planning................................................................................................4.11-1 4.12 Mineral Resources.......................................................................................................4.12-1 4.13 Noise...........................................................................................................................4.13-1 4.14 Population and Housing..............................................................................................4.14-1 4.15 Public Services.............................................................................................................4.15-1 4.16 Recreation...................................................................................................................4.16-1 4.17 Transportation.............................................................................................................4.17-1 4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources.............................................................................................4.18-1 4.19 Utilities and Service Systems.......................................................................................4.19-1 4.20 Wildfire........................................................................................................................4.20-1 Public Review Draft I June 2023 i Table of Contents 242 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance............................................................................4.21-1 4.22 References..................................................................................................................4.22-1 5.0 Inventory of Mitigation Measures.................................................................................................5-1 6.0 Report Preparation Personnel.......................................................................................................6-1 APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C1 Appendix C2 Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F1 Appendix F2 Appendix G Appendix H1 Appendix H2 Appendix I Appendix J Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis Biological Technical Report Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Historical Resource Analysis Report Geotechnical Engineering Report Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report Water Quality Management Plan Preliminary Hydrology Report Noise Impact Analysis Traffic Impact Analysis Report Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Assessment Public Services/Utilities Correspondence AB 52/SB 18 Correspondence Public Review Draft I June 2023 ii Table of Contents 243 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3-1 Regional Location........................................................................ Figure3-2 Vicinity Map................................................................................ Figure 3-3a Site Photograph Locations........................................................... Figure 3-3b Existing Site Photographs............................................................ Figure 3-4 Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations....... Figure 3-5 Existing and Proposed Zoning ..................................................... Figure 3-6 Typical Cluster............................................................................. Figure 3-7 Tentative Tract Map 37950......................................................... Figure 3-8 Building Design and Characteristics ............................................ Figure 3-9a Spanish Elevations....................................................................... Figure 3-9b Spanish Elevations....................................................................... Figure 3-9c Spanish Elevations....................................................................... Figure 3-10a Mediterranean Elevations........................................................... Figure 3-10b Mediterranean Elevations........................................................... Figure 3-10c Mediterranean Elevations........................................................... Figure 3-11a Santa Barbara Elevations............................................................. Figure 3-11b Santa Barbara Elevations............................................................. Figure 3-11c Santa Barbara Elevations............................................................. Figure 3-12a Color Schemes............................................................................. Figure 3-12b Color Boards—Spanish................................................................ Figure 3-12c Color Boards— Mediterranean.................................................... Figure 3-12d Color Boards—Santa Barbara ...................................................... Figure 3-13a Recreation Center Elevation........................................................ Figure 3-13b Recreation Center Floor Plan ...................................................... Figure 3-14 Conceptual Landscape Plan ......................................................... Figure 4.1-1 Image Corridor............................................................................ Figure4.1-2 Corridor View.............................................................................. Figure 4.4-1 Vegetation/Land Cover............................................................... Figure 4.4-2 California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) Occurrences...... ................................ 3-2 ................................ 3-3 ................................ 3-4 ................................ 3-5 ................................ 3-7 ........ 3-15 ........ 3-16 ........ 3-17 ........ 3-18 ........ 3-19 ........ 3-20 ........ 3-21 ........3-22 ........ 3-23 ........ 3-24 ........ 3-25 ........ 3-26 ........ 3-27 ........ 3-28 ........ 3-29 ........ 3-30 ........ 3-31 ....... 4.1-3 .......4.1-4 .4.4-3 .4.4-6 Public Review Draft I June 2023 iii Table of Contents 244 Figure 4.4-3 Tree Inventory Map............................................................ Figure 4.10-1 National Flood Hazard Map ................................................ Figure 4.13-1 Field Noise Monitoring Locations ....................................... Figure 4.17-1 Existing Roadway Conditions and Intersection Controls .... Figure 4.17-2 Project Trip Distribution Pattern ........................................ Figure 4.17-3 AM Peak Hour Project Traffic Volumes .............................. Figure 4.17-4 PM Peak Hour Project Traffic Volumes .............................. Figure 4.17-5 Proposed Site Plan.............................................................. Figure 4.20-1 Fire Hazard Severity Zones ................................................. Figure 4.21-1 Cumulative Project Location Map ...................................... Figure 4.21-2 AM Peak Hour Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes.......... Figure 4.21-3 PM Peak Hour Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes.......... LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.4-14 .4.10-11 ... 4.13-8 ...4.17-5 .... 4.17-7 .... 4.17-9 ..4.17-10 ..4.17-16 .... 4.20-2 .... 4.21-4 ..4.21-15 ..4.21-16 Public Review Draft I June 2023 iv Table of Contents 245 Public Review Draft I June 2023 Table of Contents 246 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1 Surrounding Land Uses.....................................................................................................3-6 Table 3-2 Project Open Space Areas................................................................................................ 3-9 Table 3-3 Land Use Statistical Summary........................................................................................3-11 Table 3-4 Proposed Landscaping....................................................................................................3-32 Table3-5 Parking Summary...........................................................................................................3-32 Table 3-6 Utility Providers..............................................................................................................3-33 Table 3-7 CVUSD School Locations and Generation Factors for Multiple -Family Attached Units..3-34 Table 3-8 Summary of Construction Activities............................................................................... 3-35 Table 4.1-1 General Plan Consistency Analysis................................................................................4.1-5 Table 4.3-1 State and Federal Criteria Pollutant Standards.............................................................4.3-4 Table 4.3-2 Coachella Valley Portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin Attainment Status .......................4.3-5 Table 4.3-3 SCAQMD Regional Criteria Pollutant Emission Thresholds of Significance .................. 4.3-10 Table 4.3-4 SCAQMD Local Air Quality Thresholds of Significance.................................................4.3-11 Table 4.3-5 Construction -Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions.......................................4.3-14 Table 4.3-6 Construction -Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions.............................................4.3-15 Table 4.3-7 Operational Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions......................................................4.3-16 Table 4.3-8 Operations -Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions...............................................4.3-17 Table 4.4-1 Vegetation Communities...............................................................................................4.4-2 Table 4.4-2 Special Status Species....................................................................................................4.4-4 Table 4.6-1 Proposed Project Compliance with Applicable General Plan Energy Policies................4.6-7 Table 4.8-1 Global Warming Potentials, Atmospheric Lifetimes and Abundances of GHGs ............4.8-3 Table 4.8-2 Project Related Greenhouse Gas Annual Emissions......................................................4.8-7 Table 4.8-3 Proposed Project Compliance with the La Quinta GHG Plan Policies............................4.8-8 Table 4.10-1 Beneficial Use Descriptions.........................................................................................4.10-3 Table 4.10-2 Study Area Water Body Beneficial Uses......................................................................4.10-4 Table 4.10-3 303(d) Impaired Water Bodies....................................................................................4.10-4 Table 4.10-4 Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan and Coachella Valley Water District Urban Water Management Plan Water Demand ........................................................4.10-7 Table 4.11-1 General Plan Land Use Consistency............................................................................4.11-2 Public Review Draft I June 2023 Table of Contents 246 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 4.11-2 Residential Planned Unit Development Standards ......................................................4.11-7 Table 4.13-1 Federal Transit Administration Construction Noise Criteria........................................4.13-3 Table 4.13-2 Federal Transit Administration Construction Noise Criteria........................................4.13-4 Table 4.13-3 City of La Quinta Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments .......... 4.13-5 Table 4.13-4 City of La Quinta Exterior Noise Standards..................................................................4.13-6 Table 4.13-5 Existing (Ambient) Noise Measurement Results.........................................................4.13-7 Table 4.13-6 Construction Equipment Noise Emissions and Usage Factors.....................................4.13-9 Table 4.13-7 Construction Noise Levels at the Nearest Sensitive Receptors .................................4.13-11 Table 4.13-8 Existing Project Traffic Noise Contributions.............................................................4.13-12 Table 4.13-9 Future Year 2035 Project Traffic Noise Contributions ..............................................4.13-12 Table 4.13-10 Proposed Homes Exterior Noise Levels from Avenue 58 ..........................................4.13-13 Table 4.15-1 CVUSD School Locations and Generation Factors for Multiple -Family Attached Units...................................................................................4.15-3 Table 4.17-1 Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections ...............................................4.17-3 Table 4.17-2 Project Trip Generation...............................................................................................4.17-6 Table 4.17-3 Existing Traffic with Ambient Growth with Project Traffic ..........................................4.17-8 Table 4.17-4 Year 2045 with Project Peak Hour Intersection Capacity..........................................4.17-11 Table 4.19-1 Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan and Coachella Valley Water District Urban Water Management Plan Water Demand ........................................................4.19-3 Table 4.21-1 Related Cumulative Projects.......................................................................................4.21-3 Table 4.21-2 Cumulative Project Traffic Generation......................................................................4.21-13 Table 4.21-3 Existing with Ambient Growth With Project With Cumulative Projects ....................4.21-14 Table 4.21-4 Year 2045 with Project Peak Hour Intersection Capacity..........................................4.21-14 Public Review Draft I June 2023 vi Table of Contents 247 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 1.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1.1 Background 1. Project Title: La Villetta at Avenue 58 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of La Quinta Planning Department 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Siji Fernandez, Associate Planner Telephone: 760.777.7086 4. Project Location: The project site is located at 81891 Avenue 58, generally near the intersection of Avenue 58 and Monroe Street. 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Kris Pinero Project Manager Rodeo Credit Enterprises, LLC 9595 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 708 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 6. General Plan Designation: The City of La Quinta General Plan designates the project site as Low Density Residential. 7. Zoning: The project site is zoned for Low Density Residential. Description of Project: The proposed project involves approval of a General Plan Amendment (from Low Density up to 4.0 dwelling units per acre to Medium/High Density), a Zone Change (from Low Density Residential to Medium/High Density), approval of a Conditional Use Permit (for a Planned Unit Development) and approval of a Tentative Tract Map to allow for the development of 80 single- family homes, a recreation area, open space lot and retention basin/open space on approximately 9.7 gross acres. Refer to Section 3.0, Project Description, for a comprehensive description of the proposed project. Public Review Draft I June 2023 1-1 Environmental Checklist 248 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is currently undeveloped and consists of a date palm orchard and heavily vegetated terrain. The project site is situated within an urbanized setting and is surrounded to the north by single-family residential across Avenue 58, single-family residential to the west and vacant land to the east and south, planned for low density residential uses. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required: Please refer to Section 3.6, Project Approvals and Permitting Agencies. 11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.? Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1 (Assembly Bill [AB] 52), the City of La Quinta has conducted the required outreach to the applicable Native American tribes. This process is further discussed in Section 4.18, Tribal Cultural Resources. 1.2 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture and Forestry ❑ Air Quality ® Biological Resources ® Cultural Resources ❑ Energy ® Geology and Soils ❑ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ® Hazards and Hazardous Materials ® Hydrology and Water Quality ❑ Land Use and Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population and Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ® Transportation ® Tribal Cultural Resources ❑ Utilities and Service Systems ❑ Wildfire ® Mandatory Findings of Significance Public Review Draft I June 2023 1-2 Environmental Checklist 249 J?TQKW ?R?TCL9C36 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 1.3 Lead Agency Determination Based on the analysis conducted in this Initial Study, the City of La Quinta, as the Lead Agency, has made the following determination: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, ❑ and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ❑ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) ❑ has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or ❑ mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. I find that the proposed project has previously been analyzed as part of an earlier CEQA document (which either mitigated the project or adopted impacts pursuant to findings) adopted/certified pursuant to the State CEQA Guidelines and the County's adopted Local ❑ CEQA Guidelines. The proposed project is a component of the whole action analyzed in the previously adopted/certified CEQA document. I find that the proposed project has previously been analyzed as part of an earlier CEQA document (which either mitigated the project or adopted impacts pursuant to findings) adopted/certified pursuant to State and County CEQA Guidelines. Minor additions and/or ❑ clarifications are needed to make the previous documentation adequate to cover the project which are documented in this addendum to the earlier CEQA document (CEQA Section 15164). I find that the proposed project has previously been analyzed as part of an earlier CEQA document (which either mitigated the project or adopted impacts pursuant to findings) adopted/certified pursuant to State and County CEQA Guidelines. However, there is important new information and/or substantial changes have occurred requiring the preparation of an additional CEQA document (ND or EIR) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 through 15163. Z' 4w � 05/31/2023 Signi(hk Date Sijifredo Fernandez Printed Name WjgiFtta,;u BpozfAl c0.01 /+1 G t 0 k d rJPfcdjcgf 250 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 1.4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts This Initial Study analyzes the potential construction related and long-term operation environmental impacts associated with implementation of the proposed project. The issue areas evaluated in this Initial Study include: • Aesthetics • Mineral Resources • Agriculture and Forestry Resources • Noise • Air Quality • Population and Housing • Biological Resources • Public Services • Cultural Resources • Recreation • Energy • Transportation • Geology and Soils • Tribal Cultural Resources • Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Utilities and Service Systems • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Wildfire • Hydrology and Water Quality • Mandatory Findings of Significance • Land Use and Planning Public Review Draft I June 2023 1-4 Environmental Checklist 251 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 2.0 INTRODUCTION The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that all state and local government agencies consider the environmental consequences of projects over which they have discretionary authority before taking action on those projects. Pursuant to Section 15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of La Quinta is the Lead Agency and has the principal responsibility of approving the proposed project. As the Lead Agency, the City of La Quinta is required to ensure that the proposed project complies with CEQA and that the appropriate level of CEQA documentation is prepared. Through preparation of an Initial Study as the Lead Agency, the City of La Quinta would determine whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration (ND) or Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). Based on the conclusions of this Draft Initial Study, the City of La Quinta has recommended that the appropriate level of environmental documentation forthe proposed project is an MND. This Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) analyzes the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative effects associated with implementation of the proposed project. 2.1 Statutory Authority and Requirements In accordance with CEQA (Public Resources Code Sections 21000-21177) and pursuant to Section 15063 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), the City of La Quinta as the Lead Agency, is required to undertake the preparation of an Initial Study to determine whether the proposed project would have a significant environmental impact. If the Lead Agency finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project, either as proposed or as modified to include the mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study, may cause a significant effect on the environment, the Lead Agency shall prepare a Negative Declaration (or Mitigated Negative Declaration) for that project. (Section 21080(c), Public Resources Code). This Mitigated Negative Declaration, which may ultimately be adopted by the City of La Quinta in accordance with CEQA, is intended as an informational document undertaken to describe the potential environmental impacts of the project. However, the resulting documentation is not a policy document, and its approval and/or certification neither presupposes nor mandates any actions on the part of those agencies from whom permits, and other discretionary approvals would be required. 2.2 Purpose Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines identifies global disclosure requirements for inclusion in an Initial Study. Pursuant to those requirements, an Initial Study must include: (1) a description of the project, including the location of the project; (2) an identification of the environmental setting; (3) an identification of environmental effects by use of a checklist, matrix or other method, provided that entries on a checklist or other form are briefly explained to indicate that there is some evidence to support the entries; (4) a discussion of ways to mitigate significant effects identified, if any; (5) an examination of whether the project is compatible with existing zoning, plans, and other applicable land use controls; and (6) the name of the person or persons who prepared or participated in the preparation of the IS. 2.3 Incorporation by Reference The planning documents listed below were utilized during the preparation of this Initial Study. These documents are incorporated by reference and were utilized throughout this IS/MND as the Public Review Draft I June 2023 2-1 Introduction 252 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration fundamental planning documents that may apply to work on the project site. Background information and policy information, as well as specific adopted rules and regulations pertaining to the City of La Quinta were also relied upon throughout this document. The documents are available for review at the City of La Quinta Planning Department, 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253. City of La Quinta 2035 General Plan (Amended November 2013). The City of La Quinta General Plan (General Plan) is a long-range guide for growth and development within the City. The General Plan also provides guidance to preserve the qualities that define the natural and built environment. The General Plan is divided into six chapters that contain goals, policies, and programs which are intended to guide land use and development decisions. The General Plan is also a tool to help City staff, City Commissions, and the City Council make land use and public investment decisions and provides the framework for the City's Zoning Ordinance. The General Plan Chapters include Chapter 1 -Administration, Chapter 2 - Community Development, which includes Land Use, Circulation, Livable Community, Economic Development, Park, Recreation and Trails, Housing, Chapter 3 - Natural Resources, Chapter 4 - Environmental Hazards, Chapter 5 - Public Infrastructure and Chapter 6 - Glossary and Terms. The Codified Ordinances of the City of La Quinta. The Codified Ordinances of the City of La Quinta (City Municipal Code), updated July 15, 2021, consists of codes and ordinances adopted by the City. These include General Provisions, Administration, Revenue and Finance, Business Regulations, Health and Sanitation, Historic Preservation, Building and Construction, Zoning, Animals, Peace, Morals and Safety, Vehicles and Traffic, Subdivision and Streets and Sidewalks. • City of La Quinta Zoning Code. The City Zoning Code is utilized to implement the General Plan and provide a guide for the growth and development of land within the City. The City Zoning Code contains development regulations for specified zoning districts within the City. 2.4 Consultations AB 52 NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION California Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) established a formal consultation process for California tribes within the CEQA process. AB 52 specifies that any project that may affect or cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource would require a lead agency to "begin consultation with a California Native American tribe that is traditional and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project." The City of La Quinta initiated tribal consultation for the purposes of AB 52 for the proposed project in February 2023. Those tribes that have requested to be listed on the City's notification list for the purposes of AB 52 were notified in writing via certified mail. As part of this process, the City has provided notification to each of the listed tribes for the opportunity to consult with the City regarding the proposed project. Public Review Draft I June 2023 2-2 Introduction 253 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 Proposed Project The proposed project involves a request for approval of a General Plan Amendment from Low Density up to 4 dwelling units per acre to Medium/High Density up to 12 dwelling units per acre, Zone Change from Low Density Residential to Medium/High Density, Tentative Tract Map and Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development to allow for the development of 80 single-family homes, a recreation area, an open space lot, and retention basin/open space on approximately 9.7 gross acres. 3.2 Site Location Regionally, the project site is located in the City of La Quinta, within Coachella Valley in northern - central Riverside County; refer to Figure 3-1, Regional Location. Assessor Parcel Numbers for the project site are APNs 764-180-002 and 764-180-003. Regional access to the site would be provided from Interstate 10 (1-10) via Monroe Street. Locally, the project site is located at 81891 Avenue 58, generally near the intersection of Avenue 58 and Monroe Street; refer to Figure 3-2, Vicinity Map. Local access to the site is provided from Avenue 58. 3.3 Existing Site Physical Setting The site is located in United States Geological Survey (USGS) Indio, California Quadrangle 7.5 -minute series topographic Range 7E and Township 6S, Section 27, Latitude 33-37-33, Longitude 116-14-03. The site topography is relatively flat and level with a general slope to the north with drainage by sheet flow at approximately one to two (1%-2%) percent across the site. The elevation of the site is approximately 60 feet above mean sea level. No settling ponds, lagoons, surface impoundments, wetlands, or natural catch basins were observed at the subject property during this assessment. Based on information obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey online database, the subject property is mapped as Indio fine sandy loam, wet. This series consists of very fine sandy loam and is considered to be moderately well -drained with a moderately high to high permeability rate, and a high available water storage capacity. According to Community Panel Number 06065C2263H, dated April 19, 2017, the subject property appears to be located in Zone X (unshaded), an area located outside of the 100 -year and 500 -year flood plains. 3.4 Existing Land Use Setting The subject property is currently vacant land with remnants of a former date palm orchard. No operations are currently performed onsite. According to available historical sources, the property was formerly undeveloped as early as 1904. A residence occupied the northeastern portion of the subject property from circa 1928 until it was demolished in 2015. The remainder of the subject property was developed with a date palm orchard from at least 1949 until circa 2002. Remnants of the date palm orchard remain on the subject property. Tenants on the subject property have included residential and farming occupants. The existing conditions on the project site are shown in Figure 3-3a, Site Photograph Locations, and Figure 3-3b, Existing Site Photographs. Public Review Draft I June 2023 3-1 Project Description 254 FUN VALLEY r.,br.�n Fn di an Reservation � 1.0,- 40 irr S �.rinRf •� -/ �T �s� 1. :ty`: �_� I' r Ai ens Cathedral % _ j,+►.•v� ian Cil- �+' •,yfr/'^ y� r -'�'i� .0 ration 1 i lJ' R4nd,n wf% � • � ieaRr �rrffJ� �i + r � Palm F, U' ✓ y�i 171Krl [ India - - C• O• Tl T r: Lam. M U 7 uwr,' Al T. •A 1�7 ,�'+ ��^• f e:n.�ri+.it,, roti • - , sj. - -.it1 OPW . r •'w�T�"t•a Ouinla Au gu-it rile f '. _ r +� r Itr acr vstinn S H M E G C A B I L L S V A 61 - Indi.,n L,[[78 PIr7jMR li crrry alinn - ` J y� •fj vandeven!er Flat Sena Rasa r•" IFIr .� I f .�. - �• '�� o-, fx ! Tneil rr• Marner a � ! 41, Indian J r ��Riti•crsfsir River - San Diego, r f ✓ ``y4'�Ixi S'A 11� i7{JY !I N S {• . r�' /' CoIYnY' f� ' s V `+ i 1}J If 1. .a' r � r � ` r• r .J :,� • • jam+. F�--+ ✓ _ � r_�� tylj ++#• ]yy p -�.s! ` A. ,nqs T.yw it "!•i' tt� _' 3 i �� .� 44v 4— ' On rnt•nlrs [ndf nn. �f � 0 1 � Rn rori'ali nr, -'"' t - E O R R E G O 1 S.XI Y.:.QlY1 AlarfRlOrn _. Fl�rrgrr Y i sP>inR, r H A O. L A. IV a S SAN VS)ORO MOUNTAIN 1� Source: ESRI and USGS; September 2021. - approximate Project Location G VCS Environmental LA VI LLETTA AT AVE N U E 58 P ROJ ECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Regional Location Figure 3-1 255 r* MakI.IWA 0 Source: Google Earth Pro; August 2021. approximate Project Site Boundary LAVILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Vicinity Map 13 VCS Environmental Figure 3-2 256 I IF ■ � � ® ' � _ . ■ ,� - � — � � . ' , .c ) -f ■ d- M . ._ ,..� �-r .j © 114 IN. 4w ' '■ - 4t z � , Ilk !04 ■ �,. �. . , �, . '\.. } �- ,#* 4 dF —, ■: �� '�� ���- � �� - � � ) �% ^r � , Source: Google Earth Pro; August 32. approximate Project Site Rca9 m 2 JET7 A AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Site Photograph Locations '1;VCS Environmental Figur 33 257 ;s14■�3+� kms* �y• 3+r e,tia View No. 1 View No. 2 View No. 3 VCS Environmental View No. 4 View No. 5 View No. 6 LA V I LLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Existing Site Photographs Figure 3-3b 258 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration The project site is situated within an urbanized setting and is surrounded by a residential golf course community to the west, undeveloped land to the east, and undeveloped land to the south. The City of La Quinta General Plan designates the project site Low Density Residential; refer to Figure 3-4, Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations. The Zoning Map designates the site as Residential Low Density; refer to Figure 3-5, Existing and Proposed Zoning. Table 3-1, Surrounding Land Uses, shows existing land uses, and existing General Plan and Zoning designations surrounding the project site. Table 3-1 Surrounding Land Uses Direction General Plan Designation Existing LandAMA North Low Density Residential Low Density Residential Single -Family Residential Across Avenue 58 East Low Density Residential Low Density Residential Date Palm Groves South Low Density Residential Low Density Residential Vacant Land West Low Density Residential Low Density Residential Single -Family Residential 3.5 Project Characteristics The proposed project involves a request for approval of a General Plan Amendment, a Zone Change, a Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development, and approval of a Tentative Tract Map to allow for the development of 80 single-family homes, a recreation area, open space lot and retention basin/open space on approximately 4.8 net acres. The project would have an overall density of 9.0 dwelling units per acre. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT As shown in Figure 3-4, the proposed project is requesting to redesignate the existing General Plan Land Use Designation on the 4.8 net acre project site from Low Density Residential up to 4 dwelling units per acre to Medium -High Density up to 16.0 dwelling units per acre. Under the Medium/High Density designation, a broad range of residential land uses are permitted, including small lot subdivisions, duplex, condominium, and apartment projects. ZONE CHANGE As shown in Figure 3-5, the proposed project is requesting to rezone the 4.8 net acre project site from Low Density to Medium -High Density. The Medium -High Density category provides for the development and preservation of medium density neighborhoods from 8.0 to 12.0 units per acre. The Medium -High Density allows a range of residential uses including single-family detached dwellings on medium and small size lots, projects with clustered smaller dwellings, such as one and two-story single-family attached, townhome or multi -family dwellings, with open space. Public Review Draft I June 2023 3-6 Project Description 259 Existing General Plan Land Use Now Project site '-__- ------ 4 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS Low Density Residential Source: City of La Quinta General Plan Preferred Land Use Map; May 7, 2012. El 1 VCS Environmental Proposed General Plan Land Use Iiii.IFEE FE 1 1. OEM, I oil a a Project t Site GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS = Medium/High Density Residential LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations Figure 3-4 260 P Existing Zoning RESIDENTIAL Low Density Residential Source: City of La Quinta Official Zoning Map; May 2021. El 1 VCS Environmental Proposed Zoning ■■■■ ■■�■ Project P, Site RMH ------- ---� RL RESIDENTIAL Medium High Density Residential LAVILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Existing and Proposed Zoning Figure 3-5 261 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT The purpose of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) is to allow flexibility in the design of residential projects, and encourage the development of creative, high-quality residential projects that provide attractive living environments in a setting that is different from standard single-family home development. Atypical plan view of the proposed cluster development is shown in Figure 3-6, Typical Cluster. The project consists of 30% common open space (recreation area, open space lot and retention basin/open space) and is proposing a recreation area with four open space amenities including a recreation building, bocce ball area, swimming pool and tot lot. PUDs require approval of a conditional use permit. The maximum density allowed in a PUD shall not exceed the general plan and zoning designation on the property. A PUD must provide thirty percent (30%) of the net project area (not including city street dedications, interior streets, or parking areas), as common area. The common area cannot include parking lot landscape areas, landscaped areas of less than five (5) feet in width, or any open space area provided for the exclusive use of a residential unit. Common areas can include passive and active areas and must provide amenities for the community as a whole. In order to encourage creative design development standards in PUDs, they can be proposed by the applicant. The applicant must demonstrate in the project's design guidelines that reduced setbacks are offset with project amenities. PUDs from 51 dwelling units to 100 units, such as the proposed project, would be required to provide four open space amenities. The project consists of 30% common open space and is proposing four open space amenities including a recreation building, bocce ball area, swimming pool and tot lot. Table 3-2, Project Open Space Areas, provides a breakdown of the open space areas for the project site. Table 3-2 Project Open Space Areas Project Area Size Recreation Area 29,210 square feet Open Space Lot 6,600 square feet Retention Basin/Open Space 26,200 square feet LMD along Avenue 58 4,540 square feet Project Total 66,550 square feet Required 30% based on Net 4.8 acres 62,655 square feet (1.44 acres) Public Review Draft I June 2023 3-9 Project Description 262 PLAN 3 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 3 5 BEDROOM, 3 BEDROOM, 3 BEDROOM, 5 BEDROOM, 3 BATH 2.5 BATH 2.5 BATH 3 BATH 2,140 SQ. FT. 1 ,815 SQ, FT. 1 ,81 5 SQ. FT. 2, 1 40 SQ. FT. 4 d •o a TF' I m I 29-0 F7 I o I 1 -I 1 I Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.; July 18, 2022. VCS Environmental LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Typical Cluster Figure 3-6 263 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration TENTATIVE TRACT MAP Tentative subdivision maps provide a means for obtaining review and approval of proposed land divisions. A tentative tract map shall be required for all subdivisions, reconfiguration, and consolidation of real property for which a final map, parcel map or waiver of parcel map is required. The project proposes the development of 80 single-family lot dwelling units on approximately 4.8 net acres. The project would have an overall density of 9.0 dwelling units per acre. The proposed lot sizes for the project would range from 2,310 square feet to 4,623 square feet with an average lot size of 2,623 square feet. As shown in Figure 3-7, Tentative Tract Map 37950, the residential units would be oriented around a series of courtyards. Table 3-3, Land Use Statistical Summary, shows the land use statistics of the project. Table 3-3 Land Use Statistical Summary Total Lots 80 Residential Lots on 4.4 Acres Minimum Lot Size 2,310 square feet Maximum Lot Size 4,623 square feet Average Lot Size 2,623 square feet Open Space/Water Quality Basin 1.65 acres Onsite Private Streets 2.7 acres Public Streets 0.8 acres Gross Area 9.7 acres Net Area 4.8 acres The minimum lot size would be 2,310 square feet. The lots would average approximately 2,623 square feet in size. The cluster layout of the homes would be designed to achieve visual diversity and interest on the street scene through varying setbacks, articulated building masses and enhanced elevations. The project would consist of mainly two-story homes, along with three one story plans along Avenue 58. Additionally, the community may consist of a mix of two-bedroom units and three-bedroom units ranging in size from approximately 1,250 square feet to 1,692 square feet. Each residential unit would be provided with a private outdoor patio as well as an attached garage. A total of 30% of the project would consist of open space, including a 29,210 square foot amenity center and tot lot located at the entrance to the community along with a landscaped area along the site frontage, with a 6,000 square foot open space active lot, as well as a 26,200 square foot multi -use basin/open space area which may be used as an active area for residents most of the year that might include sittings areas, picnic tables, movable soccer nets, etc. The open space amenities would be maintained by a Homeowner's Association. Public Review Draft I June 2023 3-11 Project Description 264 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ARCHITECTURE The proposed project has been designed to be visually compatible with similar architectural elements that are common in La Quinta. The overall project's architecture reflects a combination of Spanish Mediterranean and Santa Barbara design theme; refer to Figure 3-8, Building Design and Characteristics. Key design Spanish architectural design elements include use of courtyards, tile rooftops, and smooth stucco walls, arched doors, entryways, and windows, as well as heavy wooden doors with carving and metal work (Figures 3-9a to 3-9c, Spanish Elevations). Key design Mediterranean architectural design elements include emphasis on indoor/outdoor living, maximizing natural light and views of the outdoors, arched windows and doors and interior arched casings, and the use of natural materials in finishes and decor such as wood, rattan, tile, ceramics, terracotta, and wrought iron. (Figures 3-1Oa to 3-1Oc, Mediterranean Elevations). Key design Santa Barbara architectural design elements are an architectural design style derived from Mediterranean and Spanish -revival architecture often characterized by deep red tones and polished wood textures that contrast with stark white walls. Santa Barbara style architecture and interior design are characterized by white stucco walls, exposed beam ceilings, red -tile roofs and floors, arcades, and courtyards (Figures 3-11a to 3-11c, Santa Barbara Elevations). As shown in Figure 3-12a, Color Schemes, three different color design themes are proposed to add variety and visual interest. Samples of building elements for the project are shown in Figures 3-12b to 3-12d, Color Boards. The proposed recreation building would be a 2,772 square foot area with a maximum height of 14 feet 11 inches and would include a preparation kitchen, great room, restrooms and covered patio. The architecture would complement the design themes reflected in the residential architecture. Elevation and floor plan views of the proposed recreation building are shown in Figure 3-13a, Recreation Center Elevation, and Figure 3-13b, Recreation Center Floor Plan. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE The project proposes a comprehensive landscape plan within the project site and along the frontage of the property. A total of 66,550 square feet of area will consist of hard and softscape materials. An additional 26,200 square feet of area in the detention basin will consist of ground cover. The landscape treatment for the project is intended to complement the Coachella Valley desert environment; refer to Figures 3-14, Conceptual Landscape Plan. Consistent with the City of La Quinta General Plan, the project proposes image corridor enhancements along Avenue 58. A total of 4,540 square feet of landscaping is proposed on the Avenue 58 landscape corridor along the frontage of the project site. The landscape area includes a combination of trees, shrubs, and groundcover. A meandering multimodal trail is proposed within the landscape to enhance pedestrian circulation. The landscape along the frontage creates aesthetically pleasing views for motorists and pedestrians and creates an entry statement for the project. Public Review Draft I June 2023 3-12 Project Description 265 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37950 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ALL THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN APN 764-01-012 (TTM 30092) B ZONING/GENERAL PLAN: RL/LDR '/ •. �2.:� -- - -- EXISTING USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WATER POINT -- - � EX.18•WAPr OMNECTION .. (-1 AVrNUE 58- \ ' EX. 18'55 SEWER POINT �J� - IL OF CONNECTION 1 32. 26.07"W J EX. 18" SS J - EX. W SS b / - / .l ^ 700=-:7_ LOT A OFFER FOR DEDICATION F R -EX. 33"SS 3 S - \b I_ MZ PUBLIC STREET IMPROIMENTS _ 33,040 SF CROSS GUTTER AIRPORT BLVD ILOT ILOT CITIES AND SERVICES• EXISTING EASEMENTS• PROJECT SITEP,, PROPOSED FINISH SURFACE ELEVATION 0 58TH AVENUE 1 LOT VICINITY MAPo 50TH AVE 60TH AVENUE O AN EASEMENT FOR ROADS, PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED JUNE 6, 1957 AS BOOK 2099, PAGE 304 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: rc 0 61TH AVENUE 8.94 AC. 1389.500 IF 6 6 600 SF •,• ACCESS FOR Al FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS RUELLA S.SCHAFER N.T.S TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37950 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ALL THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN APN 764-01-012 (TTM 30092) B ZONING/GENERAL PLAN: RL/LDR '/ •. �2.:� -- - -- EXISTING USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WATER POINT -- - � EX.18•WAPr OMNECTION .. (-1 AVrNUE 58- \ ' EX. 18'55 SEWER POINT �J� - IL OF CONNECTION 1 32. 26.07"W J EX. 18" SS J - EX. W SS b / - / .l ^ 700=-:7_ LOT A OFFER FOR DEDICATION F R -EX. 33"SS 3 S - \b I_ MZ PUBLIC STREET IMPROIMENTS _ 33,040 SF BEGINNING ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, AT A POINT 641.8 FEET ( ®� LINE / WEST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF. THENCE AT A RIGHT ANGLE SOUTHERLY 6�LL a a 60.0• 60.0' IIII 60.0' FEET; THENCE AT A RIGHT ANGLE WESTERLY, 324 FEET; THENCE AT A RIGHT ANGLE ® L l NORTHERLY, 651 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, 324 FEET TO �61 *A-"045% wn PRIVAT STRsx D wp p " « awA O.45x w" R`2oo THE POINT OF BEGINNING. - 9Lor LOT = 9.........�. ... s 6=0 APN: ]64-180.002-2 PAD= -60.2 x '� _fit 5 S a' 30.0' -40.0' - -80.0'117,470 SF- -- B0.0'- - .0' PARCEL2: r 612 PRIVATE ALL THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF Rz] 0 75 7n oF- 26. STREETS SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP B SOUTH, RANGE T EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN a v 59 a PAD 59 3 THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY ••••• •••••••••••••••• m n o 75 nzs.0'-ss.0'J 25.0' ]3 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: OPEN SP. ACE'.' A 59 IF n Aa80 SF -4 - _ n og3 SF o t jj . PAO--60.4......... "'P •r.1.•.•......•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.PA-59.7- aeD sF 3 BEGINNING ONAPOINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTEREAS SAID \ -, �J2 PAD - 60.3 SECTION 517.60 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER\ 40.0' 40.0• m 23TSSF 2310 SF q a 9 4 J / •-84.0'_ 42.0 OF SECTION 27; THENCE ATARIGHT ANGLE SOUTHERLY 651.00 FEET; THENCE ATA RIGHT •420'•• to _ ' PAD=-fi0.0 I P/"D--59.5 0 ANGLE WESTERLY 324.00 FEET; THENCE AT A RIGHT ANGLE NORTHERLY 651.00 FEET TOA, 2 0--� - > " PD L_ W "n NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE EASTERLY 27722 5F 0�% ��' -55.0'/ 55.0'- f�� - O45R u b ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 324.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 0- s9\ (jM� 6L68 an n- `� APN: ]84-180.003-3 59. 25.0' I PA21 D 60 2 N �' SSS 40. 40.0 70 -qq 69 42.0' w 'u 24603 SF "' 2480 SF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER f D e 0.0 'I P 59.5 o 3 iPAD=-59.91 PAD= -59 T M 22478 IF o 64 85 " -55.0' ]64-180.002 m a L =-60.0 I �5 r, ` '"°PAD 604 OP 2480 IF 25.0' 25.0' 2604 SF 40.0 40.0' ]64180.003 4 59.0'- 0.958 X66 62 PAD= -59.J iO ss 0,4 ss n GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS o o'er b` 4 ,a" - L J L_ J n / 264D 9F �0 9F1_6m- M_ J a g w b II F ` �' = 40.0' I 40.0' � -PA 80.0'9.8 J � L PA .059.3- ,b 411 EXISTING: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL �� 42.a' < I , ---L -- - 420' 40 40.0' 70.0'Y•fi LPAPROPOSED: MEDIUMMIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL P-16 UNITS/AC) o sID F(-! 20' "20' 40 D IF ZONING: maLL 59.0'- 25.0' PA6 -60.2 0'0 u 2480 SF 805E 250' PAD =-592 I `55.00_59.9 25.0'4 59 7 6K o D- 2604 IF (e ; o A48055F 0 / 6 20 20 P D- 59.66 P. 6S I o PAO=-59.71 EXISTING: RL -J PROPOSED: RMH w z n 2p'2 59.a t2' t2' PAO 59.ai A -- o 56 A P q OWNER/DEVELOPER <�w L 84.D' - - ;2D' D.D' 40.0' 2306 I 40.0' RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES, LLC ' PAO 59.aI p= p 42' U 9595 WILSHIRE BLVD, SUITE 708 �� o 9 �'-55.05" < L550'F' - 045Rs � fi BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 �? PA-� 59.3I� ;6f' n ,�] 59.0'- 25.0' • /MPIF q f 6 I ATTN: KRIS PINERO 40.0' 40.0' \ o\ F 55 f 42.0' 241065E 3a (818)981-3000 w nPAD=-59.7.0 " PAD=859.4 I pnD=8fi01 ' ,PSF AD=- 0.4i PA080 60.24 CIVIL ENGINEER: D J L P 1 2478 SF 42.0' ,e '" 0 500 - SOt -55.0' 55.0 D & D ENGINEERING, INC PAD= -59.5 r - 54 0 2 40.0' 40.0' 119 W HYDE PARK BLVD °- 4 PAD--59.6OPAO=-59 6 . 25 0 25'0' 2604 5F e FS2o�� / eA 59.0'- OISX o F 5 PAD= -60.31 INGLEWOOD, CA90302 06/'-0 �w 9 ( �1 M 2640 5F n 3 0 ATTN: HENRIK NAZARIAN C e 4 " " �EI' '" �� y-' PAD= -59.2 26. 0 859.9 (424)351-6806 ^ 20.0' 20.0\20.0'_20.0' 20.0'- -40.0' 20.0' 22.0' -a0.0_- -I8.0' \22.0' e 71 LEGEND 24'8 Sr APN yJ _ �D--59.5 764-18 -002- I = s �. �Q _ / 59.0'- }} -- PROPERTY LINE 25.0• c 49 48 47 I 6 5 0 30 -60 PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR o •g 2320 SF °J 232a SF i 2320 5P 24 8F 20205 F m 11 2460 5F 2772 SF ; PAD --60.7 PA --i PAD= -60.31 PAD -60.1 9AI PA -59.9 i iPAD=-60.22 PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR RETAINIPRIONG n -63._' -593-21.0' r 00' 1 M 76 -180-OO�i EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR WALL �- 40.0' 40.0' PA 40.0• a0.0• - - - - EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 13 �0.95x a 015% 045Rn_ s F -'i_s, 045R s0o q 26]7 SF - - - - - - - CENTER LINE w b LPAD_-60.0 j`S w� �69'eb n --w w �w REST "E" y , ey o SS PROPOSED V.C.P SEWER MAIN 63.0'-'74-07o a0.0' a0.0' a00' a0.o'V a _ _ 4D. D' 4D.0' -I 4D.D' n .D' 40.0' T 40.0' -40.0' �� e PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLES o PROPOSED WATER MAIN 4 t5 I. 16 0. t' o. 1s o' 2 00 24 21 22 a 23 24 25 26 WA v, 4623 SF ^ 25.0• 0 0 I n SD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN h PAD --59.8 - 2400 IF o 2400 SF 2400 SF ,0 2400 SF ,0 4 SF o 00 SF 2400 SF o 2400 SF o 2400 SF o 2400 SF o 2400 SF o 2400 SF - o PAO- 60.2" PAO- 60.4 PAp- 60.7 PAD= -60.7 PAD=-60.5iO PAD= -60.3 P -60.1 PAD= -59.9b PAD --6'I PAD--60.J� EXISTING SEWER MAIN TO BE BA`DONED 3 -mI I J J J J J o - - EXISTING WATER MAIN - 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0'548.00 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 161 EASEMENT LINE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: PROP APN 764-190-002 41 403 J 0' PAD - 55.07 0 0S PAD= -59.5 � - I 55.0' ' 39 PA310 SF D--59.5 8 \ 2640 SF PAD= -59_3 J 640 5 PAD= -59.8 J 0' 0' 102 ' PA== -60.0 55.0' 28 500 IF - J 27 LIF e --J RIGHT OF WAVEXISTING: VACANT LAND RETAWLL / ZONING/GENERAL PLAN: RL/LDR APN 764-190-003 PROPOSED: 80 RESIDENTIAL LOTS D fib" EXISTING USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING/GENERAL PLAN: RL/LDR - - BUILDING SETBACK AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 2,623 SF / EXISTING USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BACK OF WALK MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 2,310 SF / `b CROSS GUTTER RECREATIONAREA: OPEN SPACE: ILOT ILOT CITIES AND SERVICES• EXISTING EASEMENTS• 2528 w PROPOSED FINISH SURFACE ELEVATION RETENTION BASIN/OPEN SPACE: 1 LOT VICINITY MAPo IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT SOCAL GAS O AN EASEMENT FOR ROADS, PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED JUNE 6, 1957 AS BOOK 2099, PAGE 304 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: GROSS AREA: 8.94 AC. 1389.500 IF 6 6 600 SF •,• ACCESS FOR Al FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS RUELLA S.SCHAFER N.T.S PROPOSED SURFACE SLOPE NET AREA: R�EATION BUILDING CABLE TV: CALL BOP L,c11 `^ DEPARTMENT ONLY••, ..•. .•.•.QPEJN. SpPGE.'.'.. ••• LOT E 4 AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED IN BOOK PROPOSED A.C. PAVEMENT ONSITE STREETS: 2.]0 AC. WATER: COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT - C PROPOSED CONCRETE PUBLIC STREETS: 0.'6 AC. D ] COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT (THE LOCATION OF THE EASEMENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM THE RECORD LEGAL DESCRIPTION , LOT C INFORMATION.) 6 - PROPOSED LANDSCAPE RECREATION AREA: ; 6,. SCHOOL DISTRICT: - -6- 966x 27 370 SF OPEN SPACE LOT: 0.15 AC. 6,600 SF RETENTION BASIN/OPEN SPACE: 0.63AC./27,370 SF WASTE DISPOSAL: PARCEL 1: , 29,210 SF ~V- TOTAL OPEN SPACE AREA = 1.45 AC. / 63,180 SF (30.2%) P J)/ IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT (AFFECTS THE SOUTH 60.0 FEET OF THE NORTH RETENTION BASIN /OPEN SPACE THE ALL THAT PORTIONHI THE SOUTH, NORTHEASTQUARTEREAST, SAN BERNARDINO RINOBAE ADMERID SECTION 2], TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE ]EAST, BAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, AS SHOWN BY UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 611 90.0 FEET AS SHOWN) / COMMON AREA PAD= -60.0 i l tJ -' ❑ �a o 79 (p'�y� o ]e 3 4p04 60 o 4883 5F PAD$ -60.1 \� A=-,5 Iln PAD= -60.5 P EXISTING LOT ACCESS RAMP, 20% MAX SLOPE MAX. WATER LEVEL 1OD-YR STORM BEGINNING ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, AT A POINT 641.8 FEET ( ®� LINE / WEST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF. THENCE AT A RIGHT ANGLE SOUTHERLY 6�LL a a 60.0• 60.0' IIII 60.0' FEET; THENCE AT A RIGHT ANGLE WESTERLY, 324 FEET; THENCE AT A RIGHT ANGLE ® L l NORTHERLY, 651 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, 324 FEET TO �61 *A-"045% wn PRIVAT STRsx D wp p " « awA O.45x w" R`2oo THE POINT OF BEGINNING. - 9Lor LOT = 9.........�. ... s 6=0 APN: ]64-180.002-2 PAD= -60.2 x '� _fit 5 S a' 30.0' -40.0' - -80.0'117,470 SF- -- B0.0'- - .0' PARCEL2: r 612 PRIVATE ALL THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF Rz] 0 75 7n oF- 26. STREETS SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP B SOUTH, RANGE T EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN a v 59 a PAD 59 3 THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY ••••• •••••••••••••••• m n o 75 nzs.0'-ss.0'J 25.0' ]3 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: OPEN SP. ACE'.' A 59 IF n Aa80 SF -4 - _ n og3 SF o t jj . PAO--60.4......... "'P •r.1.•.•......•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.PA-59.7- aeD sF 3 BEGINNING ONAPOINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTEREAS SAID \ -, �J2 PAD - 60.3 SECTION 517.60 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER\ 40.0' 40.0• m 23TSSF 2310 SF q a 9 4 J / •-84.0'_ 42.0 OF SECTION 27; THENCE ATARIGHT ANGLE SOUTHERLY 651.00 FEET; THENCE ATA RIGHT •420'•• to _ ' PAD=-fi0.0 I P/"D--59.5 0 ANGLE WESTERLY 324.00 FEET; THENCE AT A RIGHT ANGLE NORTHERLY 651.00 FEET TOA, 2 0--� - > " PD L_ W "n NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE EASTERLY 27722 5F 0�% ��' -55.0'/ 55.0'- f�� - O45R u b ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 324.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 0- s9\ (jM� 6L68 an n- `� APN: ]84-180.003-3 59. 25.0' I PA21 D 60 2 N �' SSS 40. 40.0 70 -qq 69 42.0' w 'u 24603 SF "' 2480 SF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER f D e 0.0 'I P 59.5 o 3 iPAD=-59.91 PAD= -59 T M 22478 IF o 64 85 " -55.0' ]64-180.002 m a L =-60.0 I �5 r, ` '"°PAD 604 OP 2480 IF 25.0' 25.0' 2604 SF 40.0 40.0' ]64180.003 4 59.0'- 0.958 X66 62 PAD= -59.J iO ss 0,4 ss n GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS o o'er b` 4 ,a" - L J L_ J n / 264D 9F �0 9F1_6m- M_ J a g w b II F ` �' = 40.0' I 40.0' � -PA 80.0'9.8 J � L PA .059.3- ,b 411 EXISTING: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL �� 42.a' < I , ---L -- - 420' 40 40.0' 70.0'Y•fi LPAPROPOSED: MEDIUMMIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL P-16 UNITS/AC) o sID F(-! 20' "20' 40 D IF ZONING: maLL 59.0'- 25.0' PA6 -60.2 0'0 u 2480 SF 805E 250' PAD =-592 I `55.00_59.9 25.0'4 59 7 6K o D- 2604 IF (e ; o A48055F 0 / 6 20 20 P D- 59.66 P. 6S I o PAO=-59.71 EXISTING: RL -J PROPOSED: RMH w z n 2p'2 59.a t2' t2' PAO 59.ai A -- o 56 A P q OWNER/DEVELOPER <�w L 84.D' - - ;2D' D.D' 40.0' 2306 I 40.0' RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES, LLC ' PAO 59.aI p= p 42' U 9595 WILSHIRE BLVD, SUITE 708 �� o 9 �'-55.05" < L550'F' - 045Rs � fi BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 �? PA-� 59.3I� ;6f' n ,�] 59.0'- 25.0' • /MPIF q f 6 I ATTN: KRIS PINERO 40.0' 40.0' \ o\ F 55 f 42.0' 241065E 3a (818)981-3000 w nPAD=-59.7.0 " PAD=859.4 I pnD=8fi01 ' ,PSF AD=- 0.4i PA080 60.24 CIVIL ENGINEER: D J L P 1 2478 SF 42.0' ,e '" 0 500 - SOt -55.0' 55.0 D & D ENGINEERING, INC PAD= -59.5 r - 54 0 2 40.0' 40.0' 119 W HYDE PARK BLVD °- 4 PAD--59.6OPAO=-59 6 . 25 0 25'0' 2604 5F e FS2o�� / eA 59.0'- OISX o F 5 PAD= -60.31 INGLEWOOD, CA90302 06/'-0 �w 9 ( �1 M 2640 5F n 3 0 ATTN: HENRIK NAZARIAN C e 4 " " �EI' '" �� y-' PAD= -59.2 26. 0 859.9 (424)351-6806 ^ 20.0' 20.0\20.0'_20.0' 20.0'- -40.0' 20.0' 22.0' -a0.0_- -I8.0' \22.0' e 71 LEGEND 24'8 Sr APN yJ _ �D--59.5 764-18 -002- I = s �. �Q _ / 59.0'- }} -- PROPERTY LINE 25.0• c 49 48 47 I 6 5 0 30 -60 PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR o •g 2320 SF °J 232a SF i 2320 5P 24 8F 20205 F m 11 2460 5F 2772 SF ; PAD --60.7 PA --i PAD= -60.31 PAD -60.1 9AI PA -59.9 i iPAD=-60.22 PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR RETAINIPRIONG n -63._' -593-21.0' r 00' 1 M 76 -180-OO�i EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR WALL �- 40.0' 40.0' PA 40.0• a0.0• - - - - EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 13 �0.95x a 015% 045Rn_ s F -'i_s, 045R s0o q 26]7 SF - - - - - - - CENTER LINE w b LPAD_-60.0 j`S w� �69'eb n --w w �w REST "E" y , ey o SS PROPOSED V.C.P SEWER MAIN 63.0'-'74-07o a0.0' a0.0' a00' a0.o'V a _ _ 4D. D' 4D.0' -I 4D.D' n .D' 40.0' T 40.0' -40.0' �� e PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLES o PROPOSED WATER MAIN 4 t5 I. 16 0. t' o. 1s o' 2 00 24 21 22 a 23 24 25 26 WA v, 4623 SF ^ 25.0• 0 0 I n SD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN h PAD --59.8 - 2400 IF o 2400 SF 2400 SF ,0 2400 SF ,0 4 SF o 00 SF 2400 SF o 2400 SF o 2400 SF o 2400 SF o 2400 SF o 2400 SF - o PAO- 60.2" PAO- 60.4 PAp- 60.7 PAD= -60.7 PAD=-60.5iO PAD= -60.3 P -60.1 PAD= -59.9b PAD --6'I PAD--60.J� EXISTING SEWER MAIN TO BE BA`DONED 3 -mI I J J J J J o - - EXISTING WATER MAIN - 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0'548.00 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 161 EASEMENT LINE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: PROP APN 764-190-002 41 403 J 0' PAD - 55.07 0 0S PAD= -59.5 � - I 55.0' ' 39 PA310 SF D--59.5 8 \ 2640 SF PAD= -59_3 J 640 5 PAD= -59.8 J 0' 0' 102 ' PA== -60.0 55.0' 28 500 IF - J 27 LIF e --J RIGHT OF WAVEXISTING: VACANT LAND RETAWLL / ZONING/GENERAL PLAN: RL/LDR APN 764-190-003 PROPOSED: 80 RESIDENTIAL LOTS D fib" EXISTING USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING/GENERAL PLAN: RL/LDR - - BUILDING SETBACK AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 2,623 SF / EXISTING USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BACK OF WALK MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 2,310 SF / `b Source: D&D Engineering, Inc.; February 28, 2023. VCS Environmental CROSS GUTTER RECREATIONAREA: OPEN SPACE: ILOT ILOT CITIES AND SERVICES• EXISTING EASEMENTS• 2528 w PROPOSED FINISH SURFACE ELEVATION RETENTION BASIN/OPEN SPACE: 1 LOT ELECTRIC: GAS: IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT SOCAL GAS O AN EASEMENT FOR ROADS, PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED JUNE 6, 1957 AS BOOK 2099, PAGE 304 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: GROSS AREA: 8.94 AC. 1389.500 IF TELEPHONE: FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS RUELLA S.SCHAFER 0.4E PROPOSED SURFACE SLOPE NET AREA: 4]9 AC. 1208,850 SF CABLE TV: FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS REQUIRED OPEN SPACE (30%): 1A4 AC. /62,655 SF 4 AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED IN BOOK PROPOSED A.C. PAVEMENT ONSITE STREETS: 2.]0 AC. WATER: COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2454, PAGE 85 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE C PROPOSED CONCRETE PUBLIC STREETS: 0.'6 AC. SEWER: COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT (THE LOCATION OF THE EASEMENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM THE RECORD COMMON AREA PLAN INFORMATION.) D PROPOSED LANDSCAPE RECREATION AREA: 0.67 AC./ 29,210 SF SCHOOL DISTRICT: COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT -6- PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION OPEN SPACE LOT: 0.15 AC. 6,600 SF RETENTION BASIN/OPEN SPACE: 0.63AC./27,370 SF WASTE DISPOSAL: WASTE MANAGEMENT OF THE DESERT O ANEASEMENTFOR POWER LINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED MARCH 28,1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO.89HO4143 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: TOTAL OPEN SPACE AREA = 1.45 AC. / 63,180 SF (30.2%) X1.44 AC. IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT (AFFECTS THE SOUTH 60.0 FEET OF THE NORTH PROPOSED 6' PERIMETER WALL 90.0 FEET AS SHOWN) Source: D&D Engineering, Inc.; February 28, 2023. VCS Environmental IN N RESIDENCE q,5' PROPOSED PRIVATE DRIVE q 5• RESIDENCE IOEW K AND FIRE LANE SIDEWALK, 3.5' GE 3.5' I,AIAPE LANDSCAPE GARAGE L GARAGE STREET SECTION A -A PROPOSED PRIVATE DRIVE AND FIRE LANE NO SCALE NORTH SOUTH STREET SECTION B -B AVENUE 58 NO SCALE LOT LINE / /W W RETAINING WALL 1' RESIDENCE LOT 11 BACKYARD PAD EL = -59.9 ADJACENT PARCEL APN:]64-16I I FG EL SECTION C -C WEST BOUNDARY NO SCALE LOT PROPOSED INE RETAINING WALL I' RESIDENCE LOT 1] BACKY RD ADJACENT PARCEL APN: 764-190-002 ii PAD El 6071 FGEL=-625 'GRADES & ELEVATION NOTE GRADES AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON MAP ARE NOT _- } E APPROVED UNTIL FINAL MAP PROP 'FIRE HYDRANT NOTE RETAINING KEEP 2' CLEARANCE FROM OBSTRUCTIONS AROUND HYDRANTS EARTHWORK QUANTITY: 2,215 C.Y. CUT 24,906 C.V. FILL 23,000 C.V. IMPORT SECTION D -D SOUTH BOUNDARY NO SCALE LOT LINE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL V LOT 31 BACKYARD PAD EL = -60.0 ADJACENT PARCEL - APN:"' 180-004 - - FG EL = -63.3 SECTION E -E EAST BOUNDARY NO SCALE 40 0 40 80 scale T"= 40• feet CITY OF LA QUINTA 1" = 40' TTM 379507m 2/28/2023 SHT NO: 01 OF 01 LA VI LLETTA AT AVEN U E 58 P ROJ ECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Tentative Tract Map 37950 Fi�663-7 ure 0� 0 0 0� 0 IIIIIi�IIII' �� 0 IN N RESIDENCE q,5' PROPOSED PRIVATE DRIVE q 5• RESIDENCE IOEW K AND FIRE LANE SIDEWALK, 3.5' GE 3.5' I,AIAPE LANDSCAPE GARAGE L GARAGE STREET SECTION A -A PROPOSED PRIVATE DRIVE AND FIRE LANE NO SCALE NORTH SOUTH STREET SECTION B -B AVENUE 58 NO SCALE LOT LINE / /W W RETAINING WALL 1' RESIDENCE LOT 11 BACKYARD PAD EL = -59.9 ADJACENT PARCEL APN:]64-16I I FG EL SECTION C -C WEST BOUNDARY NO SCALE LOT PROPOSED INE RETAINING WALL I' RESIDENCE LOT 1] BACKY RD ADJACENT PARCEL APN: 764-190-002 ii PAD El 6071 FGEL=-625 'GRADES & ELEVATION NOTE GRADES AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON MAP ARE NOT _- } E APPROVED UNTIL FINAL MAP PROP 'FIRE HYDRANT NOTE RETAINING KEEP 2' CLEARANCE FROM OBSTRUCTIONS AROUND HYDRANTS EARTHWORK QUANTITY: 2,215 C.Y. CUT 24,906 C.V. FILL 23,000 C.V. IMPORT SECTION D -D SOUTH BOUNDARY NO SCALE LOT LINE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL V LOT 31 BACKYARD PAD EL = -60.0 ADJACENT PARCEL - APN:"' 180-004 - - FG EL = -63.3 SECTION E -E EAST BOUNDARY NO SCALE 40 0 40 80 scale T"= 40• feet CITY OF LA QUINTA 1" = 40' TTM 379507m 2/28/2023 SHT NO: 01 OF 01 LA VI LLETTA AT AVEN U E 58 P ROJ ECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Tentative Tract Map 37950 Fi�663-7 ure LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Back of11x17 This page intentionally left blank. Public Review Draft I June 2023 3-14 Project Description 267 Typical Characteristics: Rectangular or asymmetrical massing with some recessed second floor elements Breaks in massing Concrete tile roof materials Distinctive trim over entry Wrought iron window treatment Shutters Pot shelves Decorative gable end tiles ZA 7 Ll =iil� Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.; July 18, 2022. Building Architecture and Form: 1. Articulate building facades by including 1) Provide one story elements (porch, living variation in massing, roof form, and wall area, garages where applicable) on some planes- of the floor plans to allow more variations. 2) Homes with same facades shall be separated by a minimum of one lot when occurring along the same side of the street, and offset homes. of same facades when occurring on the opposite side of the street by at least one lot - 3) Articulate all elevations within public view especially on corner homes and the rear elevations of street adjacent homes. 4) Vary roof lines through the use of gables and other roof elements consistent with the architectural style. Change the height and direction of roof ridges to provide variations. 5) Corner lot houses shall address the corner. These shall be designed to be more open and landscaped. 2. Use multiple colors, materials, textures, and The community includes 4 floor plans and 3 applied finishes to help break up wall elevation styles (Yverall. Each plan includes a massing_ minimum of 2 elevation styles, and 3 color schemes for each of the 3 styles. Between the variety of floor plans in conjunction with elevation styles each and varying color choices, the community will include a total of 27 unique homes. 3. Provide distinctive entries, porches, balconies 1) All houses shall have an entry feature and window treatment, oriented toward the which can be achieved through an street. architectural element, stepping up the entry way, wrought iron or stucco columns, or a distinctive porch over entry. 2) Provide window treatment on all side windows for corner homes and at the rear windows of street adjacent homes consistent with the architectural style. Examples include: • Window trim and shutters. • Shaped frames and sllls to enhance openings and add additional relief. 4- Residential buildings shall use high- Meet or exceed City Standard - quality, tile roofing (concrete, ceramic, etc.), appropriate for withstanding the City's varied climate conditions. 5. Garage doors shall provide aesthetic Meet or exceed the City Standard. value to the home. LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Buillding Design and Characteristics 1 VCS Environmental Figure 3-8 268 C xMK—L C.0 Al M.&.. V.. Refer teeMleape F. .L Yee. MW fln.F]nta4nnf FRONTr�eiaEs LEGENDRIGHT Fe OOQC Apple -.w GAkM Doc*- m+u sECROwk ROOF: CONCIM-r RE FASCl4 �eYlOOO WEslxc R&]CUFR�E wuL YMW CO SK"W.: YRlrlwl WO potmft ILW RST w000 POt ]HE1F MUARsttti �' Sn]OCO p1'ER RKiU FORA ■Rc �+ 00 4 REAR COL8R5GHEMEI LEFT PLAN 1 A SPANI5H ELEVATIONS E�is Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.; July 18, 2022. LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Spanish Elevations 1 VCS Environmental Figure 3-9a 269 FRONT (MOTOR COURT VIEW) MATERIALS LEGEND RIGHT FRw Dace APPOL n ROOD: CC++COM-V RE Mew: WOOD GA&E 90 S&LATM Cu +ik WALL Vxco MO : Yw9nwM SAMM 3rOAAFM w0OG N)t3"aF 7lW"RsiEE FR"' Fi]CCO ��'YR RI[rq falA.1 a. REAR COLOR SCHEME 2 LEFT PLAN 2A �� SPANISH ELEVATIONS 4 7 Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.; July 18, 2022. LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Spanish Elevations 13 VCS Environmental Figure 3-9b 270 Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.; July 18, 2022. LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Spanish Elevations VCS Environmental Figure 3-9C 271 I LJ FRONT (MOTOR COURT VIEW) rERia�u �craro RIGHT (SIDE YARD) FRdR'OQ GArtA DO0 - A AL SCOIOML RCpf: CC.iCVM S RE BARGE 36 wOO� YMOD E'4 Ep Cur7!E GALL. 4TKC WALL. vmnw 5 w VMRS:: vrtirl rrn wom POT5 RI: L.0 ZSTEEL POT5W& IRr.. TiyCCOOVER RI[.O FO/iA JTVCC00 hie Ri h IL REAR (SIDE YARD) COLOkSCHEME 3 L. I`f (REAR YARD) PLAN 3A SPANISH ELEVATIONS a 2 + ^e — a Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.; July 18, 2022. LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Spanish Elevations VCS Environmental Figure 3-9C 271 FRONT (MOTOR COURT VIEW) MATERIALSLEGEND RIGHT 'so.+. Door A$Mh5L ss GAkA6EUoc*t mysp=h ROOF: CONORM-V RE FASCW' kaw000 wsu stucco w.CO4: v"% W OEcs swmEEs: �uuc�hnvr000 'orS f For M" sruccoovRRpGCF01w REAR COLOR SCHEME 8 PLAN 2C MEDITERRANEAN ELEVATIONS Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.; July 18, 2022. 1 VCS Environmental LEFT LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mediterranean Elevations Figure 3-10a 272 — CP --° i ✓Z . , { All I FRONT (MOTOR COURT VIEW) MATERiauLEGrNo F&W Dc*r A0RGtA3$ CAAA.CAb[X - MY5904NAL ROOF: CONCRM-V RE FASCW' as W000 BGE: 24WOOD WALL sTUcco wN00 L v -1L WI C -M SWITHS: AVARATED WOOL1 POTmFF ?oN tRNA: AUCCO OYER MM FOAM REAR (SIDE YARD) COLakSCHEME 9 PLAN 3C MEDITERRANEAN ELEVATIONS Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.; July 18, 2022. RIGHT (SIDE YARD) LEFT (REAR YARD) LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mediterranean Elevations 13 VCS Environmental Figure 3-1 Ob 273 FRONT MATERIALS LEGrNn RIGHT � .—M PRWDC*W- F40*tAW OAkACA bbok +0&sRChona ROOF: CONCSM-rT E FMCW 2&woo0 Rte.! -r woof wuk stucco M -DOM; Y.% W om PUTrFRS: 'AWAhO WOW PoTWv Fo— IRNA: 3tXC00VER6HC.W0AM REAR COLOR SCHEME 8 LEFT PLAN 4C MEDITERRANEAN ELEVATIONS u 2 "i a Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.; July 18, 2022. LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mediterranean Elevations 13 VCS Environmental Figure 3-10C 274 Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.; July 18, 2022. VCS Environmental LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Santa Barbara Elevations Figure 3-11a 275 FRONT (MOTOR COURT VIEWS RIGHT MATERIALSLEGEND Odctit k W CDNC" RODE: N& C OD T RSE Rmu Sic WOOD SA@A CAM 3A w000 OWE a6 LTLICCO EO,VA sTucco MODM; vrm w .6 wNTERS x Rs: auuRttnwuod VA& MOM POT 7MRF FOAM FOT3 fllw YTUCCO OYHf RIGOfOM1 ` 1 • REAR C01oR XHEME 5 LEFT PLAN 28 SANTA BARBARA ELEVATIONS o 47 Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.; July 18, 2022. VCS Environmental LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Santa Barbara Elevations Figure 3-11a 275 I .. 70?] LG'M i =ldk uen}ee1. 1'1[ RelM ie �[epe tt'dYf�1 FY Ntl�, I1!!, EYA yry,p CCEMN FRONT itiGHT MATERIALS LEGEND ROOT: R! B -S A 3 N&wo D wow MSG!' acmAiE WA4LMWE ETR STLCCOIE EQUA ww Hutto vn+oow4 um wl[ vffiobbw&FUMPS kfx WAAAf 8 WOM PW SK 4: FOAM p waoo n $TxaoomwAwFow Fme � ■ 4 r 00 REAR COLOkSCHEME 4 LEFT PLAN 18 SANTA BARBARA ELEVATION5 o s i ii Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.; July 18, 2022. LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Santa Barbara Elevations 13 VCS Environmental Figure 3-11 b 276 � 1 f FRONT MATERIALSLEGEND R;GiT FFdR OOb! OOD W N& ROOF; n:184 c -r c2mruE ROOF: KE FASCIA 2F worn GME RID- CF6(IQAIFFO,V.1 ww; w.00wF~L Wr GIM W.Jb6W ltlx W6 O rrrth UWAAIM WOOO Pors-F WOCr mM YiUCC00+'ER 41= 00+VA REAR COLOR SCHEME 5 LEFT PLAN 46 SANTA BARBARA ELEVATION5 u L .{. e Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.; July 18, 2022. VCS Environmental LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Santa Barbara Elevations Figure 3-11c 277 AVENUE 58 LA QUINTA, CA "A" ELEVATIONS SPANISH SCHEME 1 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 3 STUCCO 1503 1585 1502 STUCCO PAINT MATCH— SW7028 INCREDIBLE WHITE SW6386 NAPERY SW7571 CASA BLANCA FASCIA / SW6047 SW6102 SW6089 GARAGE DOOR HOT COCOA PORTABELLO GROUNDED SW9173 SW9102 SW9101 TRIM SW7634 SW6665 SW7512 TRIM SHIITAKE QUINOA TRES NATURALE FRONT DOOR / SW6034 SW7604 SW7745 SHUTTERS ARRESTING AUBURN SMOKY BLUE MUDDLED BASIL FRONT DOOR SW6061 SW6061 SW6061 GABLE DETAIL SW9125 SW6214 SW2846 SHUTTERS TANBARK TANBARK TANBARK SW6990 SW6990 SW6990 WROUGHT IRON 3773 3773 3773 CAPISTRANO CAVIAR CAVIAR CAVIAR ROOF: "S" TILE SMC 8403 SMC 8403 SMC 8403 CAPISTRANO SANTA BARBARA BLD SANTA BARBARA BLD SANTA BARBARA BLD "B" ELEVATIONS SANTA BARBARA SCHEME 4 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 6 STUCCO 1572 1626 1627 STUCCO PAINT MATCH'" RGB 2551255;255 SW7001 MARSHMALLOW SW7038 TONY TAUPE SW6074 SW2806 SW7040 FASCIA SPALDING GRAY RKWD BROWN SMOKEHOUSE GARAGE DOOR / SW7634 SW6665 SW7512 TRIM SW7032 SW6075 SW9091 FRONT DOOR / PEDIMENT GARDENIA PAVILION BEIGE GARAGE DOOR / SW6075 SW2808 SW7041 FRONT DOOR GARRET GRAY RKWD DARK BROWN VAN DYKE BROWN ROOF: "S" TILE SW9125 SW6214 SW2846 SHUTTERS TUCSON BLEND TUCSON BLEND TUCSON BLEND OLIVIA OSCURO UNDERSEAS RYCRT BRNZ GREEN ROOF: "S" TILE 3773 3773 3773 CAPISTRANO WALNUT CREEK WALNUT CREEK WALNUT CREEK "C" ELEVATIONS MEDITERRANEAN SCHEME7 SCHEME8 SCHEME9 STUCCO 27 1553 1551 STUCCO PAINT MATCH— SW6120 BELIEVABLE BUFF SW7506 LOGGIA SW7521 DORMER BROWN SW7033 SW7514 SW9090 FASCIA/TRIM BRAINSTORM BRONZE FOOTHILLS CARAIBE GARAGE DOOR / SW7032 SW6075 SW9091 FRONT DOOR / WARM STONE GARRET GRAY HALF CAFF SHUTTERS ROOF: "S" TILE SCC8806 SCC8806 SCC8806 CAPISTRANO TUCSON BLEND TUCSON BLEND TUCSON BLEND STUCCO: OMEGA PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS ROOF: EAGLE ALL FLASHING, GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. ALL PAINT BREAKS TO BE CUT AT INSIDE CORNERS. " FOR PHOTOSHOP & RENDERING PURPOSES ONLY, DO NOT USE IN THE FIELD TODAS LAS TAPAJUNTAS, CAMALERAS, CAMALONES, ETC.SERAN PINTADOS PARA IGUALAR A LA SUPERFICIE DE JUNTO TODAS LAS RESTAURAS DE PINTURA BE CORTARAN EN LAS ESQUINAS INTERIORES "SOLO PARA FINES DE PHOTOSHOP Y REPRESENTACIONES, NO USAR EN EL CAMPO Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.; July 18, 2022. VCS Environmental LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Color Schemes Figure 3-12a 278 Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.; July 18, 2022. SPANISH SCHEME #1 F,0 LLw G Owk o- o' o �a LLw £ k Ow G o a �"0 'o a p a ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP AVENUE 58 Keri"LCM..kI ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP LA OUINTA, CA wnvzxox: ........... LA OUINTA, CA Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.; July 18, 2022. LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Color Boards — Spanish 13 VCS Environmental Figure 3-12b 279 SPANISH SCHEME #2 F,0 LLw G Owk o- a ." " .0 'o aQ LLw a AVENUE 58 ROYAL INVEsrorzs crzouP tiglru LA OUINTA, CA rwv s.mv ......�...,... .. LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Color Boards — Spanish 13 VCS Environmental Figure 3-12b 279 SPANISH SCHEME #3 0 aQ LLw zo ow ok - z" " 'o a o a ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP AVENUE 58 Kron L. Q-1,ArelIpoq LA OUINTA, CA wnvzxox: ........... LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Color Boards — Spanish 13 VCS Environmental Figure 3-12b 279 MEDITERRANEAN SCHEME#7 o, 110-11 0 °o f °°Gk G a U ao� LL aLL ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP AVENUE 58"�yeF�e[I LA OUINTA, CA nnvaxmx ............ Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.; July 18, 2022. MEDITERRANEAN SCHEME #8 x 000 G a u Qow LL a� u ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP AVENUE 58 K— L. c—kAryh-1 LA OUINTA, CA rwv s.mv MEDITERRANEAN SCHEME#9 i 0 Go E 10101- °°G GG a u 1. 1z LL aLL L. Q-1, ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP AVENUE 58 rc— �npeq LA OUINTA, CA wnvzxox: I� LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Color Boards — Mediterranean 13 VCS Environmental Figure 3-12C 280 SANTA BARBARA SCHEME #4 0 a . L. crack I ROYAL iNVEsroas caouP AVENUE 58 K.. LA OUINTA, CA nnvuxmx ... ....... Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.; July 18, 2022. SANTA BARBARA SCHEME #5 � V 0 0 E LL °o°o G 00 as Kcx;� L. c�aok ROYAL INVEsrorzs crzouP AVENUE 58 LA QUINTA, CA SANTA BARBARA SCHEME#6 a f .0 N - LL $°° G 00 are ° L. Q-1,Rr ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP AVENUE 58 �npeq LA OUINTA, CA wnv zxox: I� LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Color Boards —Santa Barbara 13 VCS Environmental Figure 3-12d 281 �s pll I�.,hUG�ek.rtlN.a.lx. F.r..lo br�cop. avn..p �a �1 rtw. mn,l,.d bcoFan FRONT I I LEFT RIGHT Ilk&Yb61d. R § V <, l` . , f r; b nr REAR RECREATION CENTER; d 12 Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.; July 18, 2022. 1 VCS Environmental LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Recreation Center Elevation Figure 3-13a 282 L4 i I ----- I i L L__L----t Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.; July 18, 2022. 13 1 VCS Environmental AREATABULARON PUP, NUONUN UNCONDRIONEO SPACE !SIB 5p. n. Pros PauPuaxr Ru. izs m: n: MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA ALLOWANCES PER OCCUPANT ANC TS CPANIC GROUPz ROOM TOTAL TOTAL REQUIRED PROVIDED HARDWARE I/Is I/Is LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Recreation Center Floor Plan Figure 3-13b 283 PLUMBING FIXTURES REQUIRED DCGUPANGr ROOM ARE4 RATIO OCCUPANTS WATER CLOSER GROUP TOTAL � TOTAL MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE _ 1/yap I luso= lazs= LAVATORIESa ",o1/w Iaaa3 On- ]IRINA J�.� 1llR 1 112 TOTAL REQUIRED0.SWIMING 11, POOL -PLUMBING FIXTURES REQUIRED WATER TOTAL BATHERS WATER CLOSER URINALS LAVATORIES SHO SURFACEAR SQ.FT. ' "M16'"°"°'" 1/50 I� NN WATER CLOSER IAVAi0RlE5 URINALS MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE TOTAL REQUIRED PLUMBING FIXTURES PROVIDED WATER CLOSETS1 LAVATORIES URINALS MEN'S RESTROOM WOMEN'S RESTROOM Source: Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc.; July 18, 2022. 13 1 VCS Environmental AREATABULARON PUP, NUONUN UNCONDRIONEO SPACE !SIB 5p. n. Pros PauPuaxr Ru. izs m: n: MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA ALLOWANCES PER OCCUPANT ANC TS CPANIC GROUPz ROOM TOTAL TOTAL REQUIRED PROVIDED HARDWARE I/Is I/Is LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Recreation Center Floor Plan Figure 3-13b 283 r T = Source: VLA Group; November 18, 2022. . " 0' ;M - 3&�� � LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Conceptual Landscape Plan 13 VCS Environmental Figure 3-14 284 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Within the community, the project proposes a combination of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. Landscape and/or hardscape treatment is proposed along drive isles, parkways, residential courtyards, recreation building, pool and deck area and play area. Table 3-4, Proposed Landscaping, identifies the amount and locations of landscaping and hardscape proposed within the project. Table 3-4 Proposed Landscaping oc;tiorA& Landscaping Amounts Recreation Area, Pool, Building Recreation Building 2,733 square feet Pool and Hardscape Area 8,310 square feet Shrub Areas 6,000 square feet Turf Area 2,860 square feet Subtotal 19,903 square feet Play Area Shrub Areas 1,068 square feet Turf Areas 1,432 square feet Concrete Area 535 square feet Subtotal 4,307 square feet Common Areas Shrub Areas 5,000 square feet Subtotal 5,000 square feet Total Project Landscaping Total Community Landscaping 29,210 square feet Total Open Space Lot 6,600 square feet Total Avenue 58 Corridor Landscaping 4,540 square feet Total Detention Basin Landscaping 26,200 square feet Total 66,550 square feet Source: VLA Group, Preliminary Landscape Plan, October 20, 2021. CIRCULATION/PARKING Access to the project would be from two entrances from Avenue 58. A 40 -foot wide private loop road with a 3.5 -foot wide landscaped parkway and a 4.5 -foot wide sidewalk would provide internal vehicle and pedestrian access for the project. The pedestrian connection to Avenue 58 would be provided by sidewalks along the driveway entrance to the project. As shown in Table 3-5, Parking Summary, a combination of covered garage parking and surface parking would be provided. Table 3-5 Parking Summary IF Parking Type Parking Spaces Required Parking Total Residential Units 80 Total Required Parking 205 Proposed Resident Parking 164 Guest Parking 41 Total Parking 205 Source: D&D Engineering, Inc., Tentative Tract Map No. 37950, June 17, 2001. Public Review Draft I June 2023 3-32 Project Description 285 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration DRAINAGE PLAN The project is required to prepare and have an approved Water Quality Management Plan that would demonstrate that there would not be any offsite surface water generated by the project. The drainage plan, in conjunction with the project Water Quality Management Plan, would retain and infiltrate all onsite stormwater runoff. The stormwater runoff from the site would be conveyed along private drives that would flow into a catch basin located on the site that would drain into a 26,200 square foot drainage basin where it would infiltrate into the ground. PUBLIC UTILITIES Onsite utility infrastructure would be required to be constructed to serve the project. The municipal and private utility services necessary to serve the project site are currently available along Avenue 58, including water, sanitary sewer, and dry utilities (e.g., electricity, natural gas, cable). The utilities would be provided to the project via underground connections from Avenue 58. No new or expanded utility lines or facilities are required for serving the project, except as needed for the utility connections. The final sizing and design of onsite facilities would occur during final design. Water Water service to the project site would be provided by the Coachella Valley Water District through an existing 18 -inch main water line along the northside of Avenue 58. An 8 -inch water line would connect to the main water pipeline along Avenue 58, and 4 -inch or smaller laterals would extend through the looped private road and drive areas to service all units. Sewer Sewer service to the project site would be provided by the Coachella Valley Water District through an existing 33 -inch sewer main line along Avenue 58. An 8 -inch sewer pipeline would connect to the main sewer pipeline along Avenue 58 and 4 -inch to 6 -inch laterals would extend through the looped private road and drive areas to service all units. Solid Waste Disposal Solid waste disposal would be provided by Waste Management of the Desert. Solid waste would be transported to Edom Hill Transfer Station and then taken to one of three landfills, Lamb Canyon, Badlands or EI Sobrante. All three landfills have long-term available capacity. Electric, Natural Gas and Telecommunications Electrical, natural and telecommunications providers for the proposed project are shown in Table 3-6, Utility Providers. Table 3-6 Utility Providers Provider Utilit Imperial Irrigation District Electric Souther California Gas Natural Gas Telephone Frontier Communications I Verizon Charter Cable I Frontier Cable I Spectrum Cable and Internet Public Review Draft I June 2023 3-33 Project Description 286 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration PUBLIC SERVICES Fire Protection Service The Riverside County Fire Department would provide fire protection service for the project. The Department provides staffing from three paramedic and engine companies. The closest fire station would be Fire Station 70 located at 54001 Madison Street, approximately 1.4 miles from the project site. The fire station includes primary and reserve fire engines and a volunteer squad vehicle. Police Protection Service The Riverside Sheriff's Department would provide law enforcement protection service for the project. The Sheriff's Department provides 24-7 law enforcement protection for the City and surrounding sphere of influence. There are two Sheriff Department offices in the City of La Quinta, located at 51- 351 Avenida Bermudas and the Business District office located at 79440 Corporate Center Drive. School Services The project site is within the Coachella Valley Unified School District (CVUSD). Schools that would serve the proposed project are shown in Table 3-7, CVUSD School Locations and Generation Factors for Multiple -Family Attached Units. Table 3-8 also shows the District Generation Rate and projected students generated by the project. The School District requires a Development Impact Fee of $4.08 per square foot of new residential construction for the construction of new facilities and the maintenance of existing school facilities. Table 3-7 CVUSD School Locations and Generation Factors for Multiple -Family Attached Units School Level Name School Location Student Generation/ Number Students Elementary 82225 Airport Boulevard Westside Elementary School 0.4357/35.7 Thermal, CA Intermediate Toro Canyon 86150 Avenue 66 0.1107/9.0 Thermal, CA High School Coachella Valley High School 83800 Airport Boulevard 0.2019/16.5 Thermal, CA Total 61.2 Students 3.6 Construction Activities The entirety of the proposed developed area within the project site would be disturbed during construction of the project. The Grading Plan shows there is an estimated 2,070 cubic yards of cut and 32,159 cubic yards of fill. To balance the site and support the proposed residential development area, an estimated 30,089 cubic yards of select material is expected to be imported to the project site. STAGING AREAS The construction staging and laydown areas would occur within the project site. The project site would be fenced during construction and access would be for construction vehicles only. Public Review Draft I June 2023 Project Description 287 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE AND MIX OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT The project is anticipated to be under construction in 2024, with an estimated total construction period of 290 days. The number and types of equipment to be used would vary on a daily basis, based on the stage of construction; however, typical construction equipment would be used (e.g., concrete/industrial saws, dozers, tractors/loaders/ backhoes, graders, excavators, cranes, forklifts, welders, cement and mortar mixers, pavers and paving equipment, rollers, and air compressors). The duration for each stage of construction is estimated in Table 3-8, Summory of Construction Activities. Table 3-8 Summary of Construction Activities Equipment Description Number of Equipment Daily Hours Operation Total Construction Days Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 10 6 10 Tractor, Loader, or Backhoes 4 10 84 10 Construction Truck Trips 10 8 10 Total Days 10 Grading Excavators 1 60 6 60 Grader 1 60 6 60 Rubber Tired Dozer 1 60 6 60 Tractor, Loader, or Backhoes 3 60 6 60 Construction Truck Trips 100 60 Total Days 60 Building Construction Crane 1 160 6 160 Forklift (Gradall) 3 80 6 80 Generator 1 80 6 80 Tractor, Loader or Backhoes 3 160 6 160 Welder 1 80 6 80 Truck Deliveries 20 60 Total Days 160 Paving/Landscape Paver 2 20 8 20 Paving Equipment 2 20 8 20 Roller 2 5 8 5 Landscape Installation 30 8 30 Truck Deliveries 20 20 Total Days 30 Architectural Coating Air Compressor 1 60 6 30 Total Construction 290 Public Review Draft I June 2023 3-35 Project Description 288 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 3.7 Requested Project Approvals/Permitting The IS/MND is intended to provide environmental review for full implementation of the project, including all discretionary actions and ministerial permits associated with it. The City of La Quinta is the Lead Agency with approval authority over the project. Below is the listing of permits and approvals required for the project: • General Plan Amendment • Zone Change • Conditional Use Permit to Allow Planned Unit Development • Development Plan Approval Public Review Draft I June 2023 3-36 Project Description 289 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared forth proposed project because the Initial Study concluded that the proposed project would not result in significant unavoidable environmental impacts once mitigation measures are implemented. The following Sections 4.1 through 4.21, provide a discussion of the potential project impacts associated with the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change and the 80 -unit residential project as identified in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). Explanations are provided within each corresponding impact category in this analysis. Aesthetics ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment/Zone Change Implementation of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not adversely impact any scenic resources or obstruct or modify any existing vistas. Potential impacts to aesthetics have been evaluated as part of the evaluation of the proposed project and have been evaluated for compliance with the City of La Quinta General Plan polices and Zoning Code requirements which would be confirmed through the City's review process for Planned Unit Developments. Compliance with the City's review process would be reduced to less than significant for the potential of significant aesthetic impacts associated with the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No Impact: The project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista. For purposes of determining significance under CEQA, a scenic vista is defined as a viewpoint that provides expansive Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.1-1 Aesthetics 290 Less Than Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section Potentially Significant Less Than No 21099, would the project: Significant Impact With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ ❑ b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic ❑ ❑ ❑ buildings within a state scenic highway? c. In non -urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage ❑ ❑ ® ❑ point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ area? ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment/Zone Change Implementation of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not adversely impact any scenic resources or obstruct or modify any existing vistas. Potential impacts to aesthetics have been evaluated as part of the evaluation of the proposed project and have been evaluated for compliance with the City of La Quinta General Plan polices and Zoning Code requirements which would be confirmed through the City's review process for Planned Unit Developments. Compliance with the City's review process would be reduced to less than significant for the potential of significant aesthetic impacts associated with the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No Impact: The project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista. For purposes of determining significance under CEQA, a scenic vista is defined as a viewpoint that provides expansive Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.1-1 Aesthetics 290 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration views of a highly valued landscape for the benefit of the general public and is generally designated by public agencies to provide for their preservation. According to the City of La Quinta General Plan, the project site is not designated as a scenic vista. The frontage of the project site on Avenue 58 is identified as an Image Corridor; refer to Figure 4.1-1, Imoge Corridor. The intent of the Image Corridor is to provide for the protection of scenic resource views from a public right-of-way. The scenic resource views range from the intimate coves nestled in the foothills, to the expansive views of the Santa Rosa Mountains. Presently along the project frontage on Avenue 58 is overgrown vegetation that obstructs distant views of the foothills. Consistent with the City of La Quinta General Plan, the project proposes Image Corridor enhancements along Avenue 58. A landscape setback area of 15 feet (14,312 square feet of landscape area) is proposed along the frontage of the project site. A total of 29,210 square feet of landscaping is proposed. The landscape area includes a combination of trees, shrubs, and groundcover. A meandering multimodal trail is proposed within the landscape to enhance pedestrian circulation. The landscape along the frontage creates aesthetically pleasing views for motorists and pedestrians as well as an entry statement for the project. In accordance with the Zoning Code, residential structures proposed within 150 feet of an Image Corridor shall not exceed a height of 22 feet. The project proposes three single -story structures that would be within 150 feet of the Avenue 58 Image Corridor; refer to Figure 4.1-2, Corridor View. The maximum height of the structures would be approximately 18 feet. The three single -story homes would be located 145 feet from the closest residential uses, that are located north of Avenue 58. The next closest two-story home to Avenue 58 would be 150 feet and to the closest existing residential uses it would be 195 feet. Additionally, the project proposes landscaping, 6,600 square foot open space lot, 26,200 square feet open space detention basin. Both of these areas would not have any multi- story structures on them which allow distant views to the south. The proposed project would comply with Image Corridor requirements to maintain views along Avenue 58 and potential impacts to scenic vistas would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact: The project would not substantially damage scenic resources within a state scenic highway. The State Scenic Highway Program was established by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to preserve and protect scenic highway corridors from change that would diminish the aesthetic value of lands adjacent to State Highways. Highways may be designated as scenic depending upon how much of the natural landscape can be seen by travelers, the scenic quality of the landscape, and the extent to which development intrudes upon the traveler's enjoyment of the view. According to Caltrans, there are no designated or eligible state scenic highways within the viewshed of the proposed project. Therefore, no impacts to scenic resources along a state scenic highway would occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.1-2 Aesthetics 291 r— Ho Legend Reads ■ ■ ■ City Boundary m Sphere of Influence Image Corridors Source: City of La Quinta August 2011 N N sn a C o N R 7 Annus 64 Source: City of La Quinta, General Plan Circulation Element 2035; Adopted February 19, 2013, Amended November 19, 2013. a_- approximate Project Location LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Image Corridors VCS Environmental Figure 4.1-1 292 1 ' 1 ■ • 1 — — 0.i i 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 � 1 1 � � 1 w ! 1 1 r 1 i 1 ! 1 r 1 1 1 r— Ho Legend Reads ■ ■ ■ City Boundary m Sphere of Influence Image Corridors Source: City of La Quinta August 2011 N N sn a C o N R 7 Annus 64 Source: City of La Quinta, General Plan Circulation Element 2035; Adopted February 19, 2013, Amended November 19, 2013. a_- approximate Project Location LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Image Corridors VCS Environmental Figure 4.1-1 292 APN 784-01-012 (TTM 30092) ZONING/GENERAL PLAN: RL/1-DR EXISTING USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AVENUE 58 LOT A 33,040 SF 8 'LV I U 8,800 SF LOT C .' ..PEH SeACE OPEN SPACE EXISTING LiT LINE J.1II JII' TOT LOT I IL zoos III 1010700 B �II�I�IIIIII 100 0 100 200 scale 11f= 100' feet 153' R AVENUE 58 RPRIIVATE STREET D 10 102' R w 33' ki0', �_ 40' _�1Q' , 1, � - 8' 2 4' 8' NEW R/ �C6 ® EX R/W 0�j C6 I6'—'l EX. PAD ELEV 5 5' 5.5 PAD ELEV: —60.10 PAD ELEV: —59.80 SECTION A -A 40 0 40 80 scale 1 "= 40' feet Source: D&D Engineering, Inc.; August 11, 2022. El ZWL 1 VCS Environmental LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Corridor View Figure 4.1-2 293 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration c) In non -urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? Less Than Significant Impact: The project would not conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations that govern scenic quality. The proposed project is an undeveloped parcel that is situated within an urbanized setting. The site is disturbed and in a declining aesthetic condition. The site is adjacent to existing and planned single-family land uses. The proposed project would be compatible with the type and pattern of existing land uses in the area. The project is located in an urbanized area. For projects in an urbanized area, CEQA requires the project be evaluated for potential conflicts with regulations that govern scenic quality. The relevant planning programs that would provide for the protection of scenic quality on the project site and surrounding area would be the City of La Quinta General Plan and Zoning Code. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT The General Plan Land Use Element provides goals to maintain community identity and development quality for the City and its neighborhoods and identifies a series of policies to implement the goals. Table 4.1-1, General Plan Consistency Analysis, is an evaluation of the consistency of the proposed project with relevant goals provided in the Land Use Element that would govern scenic quality on the project site. Table 4.1-1 General Plan Consistency Analysis Goal qmw Consistency Evaluation GOAL LU -1: Land use compatibility throughout City. In accordance with Section 9.60.330 of the City of La Quinta Zoning Code, the project was required to prepare and submit a massing plan. The massing plan depicts the relationship of the structures within the project site to each other and to development adjacent to the project and its compatibility with surrounding development. With preparation and approval of the massing study, the project would demonstrate the project design of one- and two-story units would be consistent with the surrounding single - story units and would be consistent with Goal LU -1. The project proposes residential land uses that would be adjacent to existing residential land uses, as well as planned residential land uses and would not introduce incompatible land uses. The project would comply with Image Corridor requirements by including a 15 -foot landscape setback along Avenue 58 and limiting the height of structures within 150 feet of Avenue 58 to under 22 feet, which would be compatible with height and setback requirements provided for the existing residential uses located north of Avenue 58. The project would be setback at an adequate distance to existing Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.1-5 Aesthetics 294 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Goa Consistency Evaluation residential areas, where there would be no adverse operation effects to existing residential areas. The project would not redirect through existing neighborhoods or involve any long-term activities that would affect the quality and integrity of existing residential neighborhoods. As you enter the proposed community through its main entrance along Avenue 58, you will see a one-story recreation building to the west, along with a large landscaped open space area along the northern edge of the property which backs up to three one-story homes, which has been carefully designed to comply and promote the City's view corridor program. The lower architectural elements and open space along the property's northern edge create a viewshed that is seamless with the northern existing neighborhoods, thereby illustrating a land use compatibility with well-established homes. As shown on the attached Preliminary Site and Landscape Plan, the Corridor View Figure and Recreation Building Architectural Plans, this proposed community has been integrated with open space, as well as amenities to soften and enhance the views to create a well thought- out and designed neighborhood. The structures have been tapered from one-story homes (approximately 18 feet in height) along the northern edge to two-story homes (approximately 25 feet in height) as the community transitions to the south. Adjacent land uses to the south, east and west are planned for single- family residential homes which again are compatible with the proposed community. GOAL LU -2: High quality design that compliments and The proposed project has been designed to promote enhances the City. residential amenities and flexibility in design. The cluster layout of the homes has been designed to achieve visual diversity and interest in the street scene through varying setbacks, articulated building masses or enhanced elevations on residences plotted on corner lots. The proposed project has been designed to be visually compatible with similar architectural elements of Spanish, Mediterranean and Santa Barbara influences that are common in La Quinta. The project proposes a minimum of four floor plans, with three elevations and three -color schemes per elevation to provide aesthetic variety and interest. No identical single-family detached plan and elevation would be permitted side-by-side and two houses on either side of a specific lot would be required to use different color schemes. The homes would be designed so that living activities are oriented towards the street with emphasis on porches, courtyards, entries, and windows. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.1-6 Aesthetics 295 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ZONING CODE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT The project site is currently zoned as Low Density residential. To allow for deviation of the zoning code site development standards, Planned Unit Development has been proposed as part of the approval of a conditional use permit. The purpose of the Planned Unit Development is to allow flexibility in the design of residential projects and encourage the development of creative high-quality residential projects that provide attractive living environments in a setting that is different from a single-family development. In accordance with the City of La Quinta Zoning Code, the following findings are required prior to the approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) project: Consistency with General Plan. As shown in Table 4.1-1 and Table 4.11-11 the project would be consistent with relevant policies provided in the City of La Quinta General Plan. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.1-7 Aesthetics 296 Consistency Evaluation The proposed project includes a landscape treatment program consisting of plants, shrubs, trees and groundcover, including 15 feet of landscape setback along Avenue 58 in accordance with the Image Corridor requirements, which would enhance the streetscape over its existing condition. GOAL LU -3: Safe and identifiable neighborhoods that The project has been designed as a planned unit provide a sense of place. development that would provide open space and recreation amenities and landscape treatments to create an identifiable community. The project would comply with Fire Protection and Police Protection requirements to ensure safety for its residents. GOAL LU -4: Maintenance and protection of existing Similar to the existing residential uses located north of neighborhoods. the project, the proposed project would limit the height of structures along Highway 58 to less than 22 feet which would maintain privacy for the existing and proposed residential uses. The closest two-story homes to Avenue 58 would be 150 feet and the closest existing residential uses would be 195 feet. Additionally, the project proposes a perimeter block wall around the project which would minimize operational impacts. The project lighting would be similar to the type and level of existing lighting provided in the project area and it would comply with the Municipal Code lighting requirements which would ensure that all exterior lighting would be confined to the property to avoid spillover lighting impacts to adjoining properties. The project would take access off of Avenue 58 and would not access through or redirect traffic to existing residential neighborhoods. GOAL LU -5: A broad range of housing types and choices The proposed medium density project would provide for all residents of the City. an additional range of housing types in the City. ZONING CODE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT The project site is currently zoned as Low Density residential. To allow for deviation of the zoning code site development standards, Planned Unit Development has been proposed as part of the approval of a conditional use permit. The purpose of the Planned Unit Development is to allow flexibility in the design of residential projects and encourage the development of creative high-quality residential projects that provide attractive living environments in a setting that is different from a single-family development. In accordance with the City of La Quinta Zoning Code, the following findings are required prior to the approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) project: Consistency with General Plan. As shown in Table 4.1-1 and Table 4.11-11 the project would be consistent with relevant policies provided in the City of La Quinta General Plan. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.1-7 Aesthetics 296 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 2. Consistency with the Provisions of the Zoning Code. The project would be consistent with the provisions of zoning code findings relevant to the PUD requirements, including design guideline requirements, development standard requirements, common area requirements, and parking requirements. 3. Compliance with CEQA. The City of La Quinta has recommended that the appropriate level of environmental documentation forthe proposed project is an MND. This Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared in accordance with CEQA and analyzes the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative effects associated with implementation of the proposed project. The IS/MND determined that with incorporation of mitigation measures, potential impacts to the environment would be less than significant. The proposed project would be consistent with PUD CEQA finding. 4. Site Design. The proposed project has been designed to promote residential amenities and flexibility in design. The cluster layout of the homes has been designed to achieve visual diversity and interest in the street scene through varying setbacks, articulated building masses or enhanced elevations on residences plotted on corner lots. A 15 -foot landscape setback is proposed along the frontage of the project site to enhance the streetscape and to help conserve distance views along Avenue 58. In compliance with Image Corridor requirements, the maximum height of residential uses within 150 feet of the Avenue 58 Image Corridor has been limited to approximately 18 feet. The closest two-story homes to Avenue 58 would be 150 feet. 5. Architecture. The project proposes three architecture styles and a minimum of four floor plans, with three elevations and three -color schemes per elevation to provide aesthetic variety and interest. No identical single-family detached plan and elevation would be permitted side-by-side and two houses on either side of a specific lot would be required to use different color schemes. The homes would be designed so that living activities are oriented towards the street with emphasis on porches, courtyards, entries and windows. The project's proposed architectural and site design would be consistent with the intent PUD architectural and site design finding. 6. Landscape Design. As shown previously in Figures 3-14a and 3-14b, Conceptual Landscape Plan, the project proposes landscaping that includes a mix of drought tolerant groundcover, shrubs and trees that would provide a unifying influence to enhance the visual continuity of the project. A total of 66,550 square feet of landscaping would be provided, including 29,210 square feet of community landscaping, 6,600 square foot open space lot, 4,540 square feet of Avenue 58 Image Corridor landscaping and 26,200 square feet of detention basin landscaping. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Site Development Review for the project would be conducted as part of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) request. The purpose of a site development review is to ensure that the development and design standards of this zoning code, including, but not limited to, permitted uses, development standards and supplemental regulations are satisfied. In accordance with Section 9.210.010 of the Zoning Code, the following findings shall be made by the decision-making authority prior to the approval of any site development permit review: Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.1-8 297 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration • Consistency with General Plan. With approval of the General Plan Amendment, the project would be consistent with the General Plan. As shown in Table 4.1-1 and Table 4.11-1, the project would be consistent with relevant policies provided in the City of La Quinta General Plan. • Consistency with Zoning Code. The project is proposing a PUD in accordance with the Zoning Code. As discussed above, the project would meet the required findings for a PUD, and therefore, would be consistent with the Zoning Code. • Compliance with CEQA. Processing and approval of the permit application in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared in accordance with CEQA and analyzes the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative effects associated with implementation of the proposed project. The IS/MND determined that with incorporation of mitigation measures, potential impacts to the environment would be less than significant. The proposed project would be consistent with PUD CEQA finding. • Architectural Design. The proposed project has been designed to be visually compatible with similar architectural elements that are common in La Quinta. The overall project's architecture reflects a combination of Spanish, Mediterranean, and Santa Barbara design themes. In each architecture design theme key, architectural elements are reflected including building mass, materials, colors, architectural element detail and roof style. • Site Design. The cluster layout of the homes would be designed to achieve visual diversity and interest in the street scene through varying setbacks, articulated building masses or enhanced elevations on residences plotted on corner lots. Landscape courtyards have been incorporated into the project design. In accordance with PUD requirements, the project would provide four open space amenities for residents. • Landscape Design. The project proposes a comprehensive landscape plan within the project site and along the frontage of the property. The landscape treatment for the project is intended to complement the Coachella Valley desert environment. A total of 66,550 square feet of landscaping would be provided, including 29,210 square feet of community landscaping, 6,600 square foot open space lot, 4,540 square feet of Avenue 58 Image Corridor landscaping and 26,200 square feet of detention basin landscaping. • The project proposes Image Corridor enhancements along Avenue 58. A total of 4,540 square feet of landscaping is proposed on the Avenue 58 landscape corridor along the frontage of the project site. The landscape area includes a combination of trees, shrubs, and groundcover. A meandering multimodal trail is proposed within the landscape to enhance pedestrian circulation. The landscape along the frontage creates aesthetically pleasing views for motorists and pedestrians as well as an entry statement for the project. DETERMINATION OF CONFLICTS WITH REGULATIONS GOVERNING SCENIC QUALITY The relevant polices governing the scenic quality of the project would be the City of La Quinta General Plan and Zoning Code Planned Unit Development (PUD) requirements. As discussed above, the project would be consistent with relevant policies provided in the City of La Quinta General Plan and would be consistent with the required design findings for a PUD. Through the City's design Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.1-9 Aesthetics 298 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration review process, the City of La Quinta would reaffirm that the design of the project would be consistent with the General Plan, Zoning Code Planned Unit Development requirements and would not conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality that could substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings. Therefore, potential aesthetic impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less Than Significant Impact: The project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. The area surrounding the project is currently developed with urbanized land uses that provide various levels of nighttime lighting. The operation of the proposed project would introduce new sources of lighting into the project area. The construction activities for the proposed project would occur during the day. Therefore, no temporary nighttime construction lighting impacts would occur. Section 9.100.150 of the Municipal Code, Outdoor Lighting, provide standards for outdoor lighting which allow adequate energy efficient lighting for public safety while minimizing adverse effects of lighting such as lighting which has a detrimental effect on astronomical observations; Inefficiently utilizes scarce electrical energy; or creates a public nuisance or safety hazard. The proposed project would be required to comply with the following Municipal Code General Lighting requirements: • Shielding. All exterior illuminating devices, except that exempt from this section and those regulated by shall be fully or partially shielded as required in the table contained in this subsection. — "Fully shielded" means the fixture shall be shielded in such a manner that light rays emitted by the fixture, either directly from the lamp or indirectly from the fixture, are projected below a horizontal plane running through the lowest point on the fixture where light is emitted, thus preventing the emission of above the horizontal. — "Partially shielded" means the fixture shall be shielded in such a manner that the bottom edge of the shield is below the plane centerline of the light source (lamp), minimizing the emission of light rays above the horizontal. • Filtration. Those outdoor light fixtures requiring a filter per the table following shall be equipped with a filter consisting of a glass, acrylic or translucent enclosure. Quartz glass does not meet this requirement. • Height. Building -mounted light shall be installed below the eave line. Lights shall be located no more than eight (8) feet above grade. • Exterior Lighting. All exterior lighting shall be located and directed so as not to shine directly on adjacent properties. • Requirements for Shielding and Filtering. The requirements for shielding and filtering light emissions from outdoor light fixtures shall be as set forth in Table 9-7. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.1-10 Aesthetics 299 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration The project would be required to submit an application to the City providing evidence that the proposed work would comply with Section 9.100.150 of the Municipal Code, which would include plans indicating the location on the premises and the type of illuminating devices, fixtures, lamps, height, supports, and other devices as well as the description of the illuminating devices, fixtures, lamps, supports, shielding, filtering and other devices. This description may include but is not limited to, wattage, lighting output, manufacturers catalog cuts, and drawings. With compliance with Section 9.100.150 of the Municipal Code, potential light and glare impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.1-11 Aesthetics 300 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page was intentionally left blank. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.1-12 Aesthetics 301 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may referto the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, Less Than including timberland, are significant environmental Potentially Significant Less Than No effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled Significant Impact With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Incorporated Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the ❑ ❑ ❑ Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ❑ ❑ ❑ Williamson Act contract? c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(8)), timberland (as defined by Public ❑ ❑ ❑ Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(8))? d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest ❑ ❑ ❑ land to non -forest use? e. Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in ❑ ❑ ❑ conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment/Zone Change The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not convert existing or planned agriculture land uses to non -agriculture land uses or convert existing or planned timberland or forest land uses to non -timberland or forest land uses. No adverse impacts to agriculture, timberland or forest land uses would occur. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.2-1 Agricultural and Forestry Resources 302 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? No Impact: The project would not Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural use. According to the California Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, there are no Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance on the project site or the surrounding area. The Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program identifies the project site Other Lands. Therefore, no impacts to Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance would occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact: The project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract. The project site is currently zoned Low Density Residential. The surrounding properties to the north, south, east, and west are also zoned Low Density. According to the property title, the project site is not under a Williamson Act contract. The development of the site would not conflict with any lands zoned for agriculture uses on the project site or with surrounding properties. Implementation of the proposed project would have no impact regarding potential conflicts with existing agriculture zoning or Williamson Act contracts on the property. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? No Impact: The project would not conflict with the existing zoning for or cause rezoning of forest land or timberland. The City of La Quinta General Plan Natural Resources Element does not identify any forest lands or timberland in the City. Additionally, the project site is currently zoned Low Density Residential and would not cause a rezone of lands that are zoned for forest land or timberland. Therefore, no impacts to forest land, timberland or lands zoned for timberland would occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? No Impact: The project would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non - forest use. There are no existing forest lands or timberland resources on the property and the project site is not zoned for timberland production. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in the loss of forest land. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.2-2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources 303 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? No Impact: The project would not involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. The project site and surrounding properties do not contain farmland or timberland resources. The construction and operation of the proposed project would be confined to the project site and would not cause any onsite or offsite conversion of farmland or forest land to non -agriculture uses or non -forest uses. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.2-3 Agricultural and Forestry Resources 304 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.2-4 Agricultural and Forestry Resources 305 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.3 Air Quality Where available, the significance criteria established by Less Than the applicable air quality management district or air Potentially Significant Less Than o pollution control district may be relied upon to make the Significant Impact With Significant pa Impact Mitigation Impact following determinations. Would the project: JIL Incorporated a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ applicable air quality plan? b. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is ❑ ❑ ® ❑ non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? c. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ❑ ❑ ® ❑ concentrations? d. Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of ❑ ❑ ® ❑ people? ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The following analysis is based on the Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis prepared by Vista Environmental on October 28, 2021. The report is presented in its entirety in Appendix A. Background Air pollutants are generally classified as either criteria pollutants or non -criteria pollutants. Federal ambient air quality standards have been established for criteria pollutants, whereas no ambient standards have been established for non -criteria pollutants. For some criteria pollutants, separate standards have been set for different periods. Most standards have been set to protect public health. For some pollutants, standards have been based on other values (such as protection of crops, protection of materials, or avoidance of nuisance conditions). CRITERIA POLLUTANTS AND OZONE PRECURSORS The criteria pollutants consist of ozone, NOx, CO, SOx, lead (Pb), and particulate matter (PM). The ozone precursors consist of NOx and VOC. These pollutants can harm your health and the environment, and cause property damage. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) calls these pollutants "criteria" air pollutants because it regulates them by developing human health based and/or environmentally based criteria for setting permissible levels. The following provides descriptions of each of the criteria pollutants and ozone precursors. Nitrogen Oxides: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) is the generic term for a group of highly reactive gases which contain nitrogen and oxygen. While most NOx are colorless and odorless, concentrations of NO2 can often be seen as a reddish -brown layer over many urban areas. NOx forms when fuel is burned at high temperatures, as in a combustion process. The primary man-made sources of NOx are motor vehicles, electric utilities, and other industrial, commercial, and residential sources that burn fuel. NOx reacts with other pollutants to form, ground -level ozone, nitrate particles, acid aerosols, as well as NO2, which Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-1 Air Quality 306 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration causes respiratory problems. NOx and the pollutants formed from NOx can be transported over long distances, following the patterns of prevailing winds. Ozone: Ozone (03) is not usually emitted directly into the air but in the vicinity of ground -level and is created by a chemical reaction between NOx and volatile organic compounds (VOC) in the presence of sunlight. Motor vehicle exhaust, industrial emissions, gasoline vapors, chemical solvents as well as natural sources emit NOx and VOC that help form ozone. Ground -level ozone is the primary constituent of smog. Sunlight and hot weather cause ground -level ozone to form with the greatest concentrations usually occurring downwind from urban areas. Ozone is subsequently considered a regional pollutant. Ground -level ozone is a respiratory irritant and an oxidant that increases susceptibility to respiratory infections and can cause substantial damage to vegetation and other materials. Because NOx and VOC are ozone precursors, the health effects associated with ozone are also indirect health effects associated with significant levels of NOx and VOC emissions. Carbon Monoxide: Carbon monoxide (CO) is a colorless, odorless gas that is formed when carbon in fuel is not burned completely. It is a component of motor vehicle exhaust, which contributes approximately 56% of all CO emissions nationwide. In cities, 85% to 95% of all CO emissions may come from motor vehicle exhaust. Other sources of CO emissions include industrial processes (such as metals processing and chemical manufacturing), residential wood burning, and natural sources such as forest fires. Woodstoves, gas stoves, cigarette smoke, and unvented gas and kerosene space heaters are indoor sources of CO. Since CO concentrations are strongly associated with motor vehicle emissions, high CO concentrations generally occur in the immediate vicinity of roadways with high traffic volumes and traffic congestion, active parking lots, and in automobile tunnels. Areas adjacent to heavily traveled and congested intersections are particularly susceptible to high CO concentrations. High levels of CO can affect even healthy people. People who breathe high levels of CO can develop vision problems, reduced ability to work or learn, reduced manual dexterity, and difficulty performing complex tasks. At extremely high levels, CO is poisonous and can cause death. Sulfur Oxides: Sulfur Oxide (SOx) gases are formed when fuel containing sulfur, such as coal and oil is burned, as well as from the refining of gasoline. SOx dissolves easily in water vapor to form acid and interacts with other gases and particles in the air to form sulfates and other products that can be harmful to people and the environment. Lead: Lead (Pb) is a metal found naturally in the environment as well as manufactured products. The major sources of lead emissions have historically been vehicles and industrial sources. Due to the phase out of leaded gasoline, metal processing is now the primary source of lead emissions into the air. High levels of lead in the air are typically only found near lead smelters, waste incinerators, utilities, and lead -acid battery manufacturers. Exposure of fetuses, infants and children to low levels of Pb can adversely affect the development and function of the central nervous system, leading to learning disorders, distractibility, inability to follow simple commands, and lower intelligence quotient. In adults, increased lead levels are associated with increased blood pressure. Particulate Matter: Particle matter (PM) is the term for a mixture of solid particles and liquid droplets found in the air. PM is made up of a number of components including acids (such as nitrates and sulfates), organic chemicals, metals, and soil or dust particles. The size of particles is directly linked to their potential for causing health problems. Particles that are less than 10 micrometers in diameter (PM1o) that are also known as Respirable Particulate Matter are the particles that generally pass through the throat and nose and enter the lungs. Once inhaled, these particles can affect the heart Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-2 Air Quality 307 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and lungs and cause serious health effects. Particles that are less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter (PMZ.$) that are also known as Fine Particulate Matter have been designated as a subset of PM10 due to their increased negative health impacts and its ability to remain suspended in the air longer and travel further. Volatile Organic Compounds: Hydrocarbons are organic gases that are formed from hydrogen and carbon and sometimes other elements. Hydrocarbons that contribute to the formation of 03 are referred to and regulated as VOCs (also referred to as reactive organic gases). Combustion engine exhaust, oil refineries, and fossil -fueled power plants are the sources of hydrocarbons. Other sources of hydrocarbons include evaporation from petroleum fuels, solvents, dry cleaning solutions, and paint. VOC is not classified as a criteria pollutant since VOCs by themselves are not a known source of adverse health effects. The primary health effects of VOCs result from the formation of 03 and its related health effects. High levels of VOCs in the atmosphere can interfere with oxygen intake by reducing the amount of available oxygen through displacement. Carcinogenic forms of hydrocarbons, such as benzene, are considered toxic air contaminants (TACs). There are no separate health standards for VOCs as a group. OTHER POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN Toxic Air Contaminants: In addition to the above -listed criteria pollutants, toxic air contaminants (TACs) are another group of pollutants of concern. TAC is a term that is defined under the California Clean Air Act and consists of the same substances that are defined as Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPS) in the Federal Clean Air Act. There are over seven hundred different types of TACs with varying degrees of toxicity. Sources of TACs include industrial processes such as petroleum refining and chrome plating operations, commercial operations such as gasoline stations and dry cleaners, and motor vehicle exhaust. Cars and trucks release at least forty different toxic air contaminants. The most important of these TACs, in terms of health risk, are diesel particulates, benzene, formaldehyde, 1,3 -butadiene, and acetaldehyde. Public exposure to TACs can result from emissions from normal operations as well as from accidental releases. Health effects of TACs include cancer. Asbestos: Asbestos is listed as a TAC by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and as a HAP by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Asbestos occurs naturally in mineral formations and crushing or breaking these rocks, through construction or other means, can release asbestiform fibers into the air. Asbestos emissions can result from the sale or use of asbestos -containing materials, road surfacing with such materials, grading activities, and surface mining. The risk of disease is dependent upon the intensity and duration of exposure. When inhaled, asbestos fibers may remain in the lungs and with time may be linked to such diseases as asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma. Regulatory Setting The project site is located within the Coachella Valley portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB). The air quality at the project site is addressed through the efforts of various international, federal, state, regional, and local government agencies. These agencies work jointly, as well as individually, to improve air quality through legislation, regulations, planning, policy-making, education, and a variety of programs. The agencies responsible for improving the air quality are discussed below. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-3 Air Quality 308 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration FEDERAL The EPA handles global, international, national and interstate air pollution issues and policies. The EPA sets national vehicle and stationary source emission standards, oversees approval of all State Implementation Plans, conducts research, and provides guidance in air pollution programs and sets National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), also known as federal standards. There are six common air pollutants, called criteria air pollutants, which were identified resulting from provisions of the Clean Air Act of 1970. The six criteria pollutants are Ozone, Particulate Matter (PM10 and PM2.5), Nitrogen Dioxide, Carbon Monoxide, Lead and Sulfur Dioxide. The NAAQS were set up to protect public health, including that of sensitive individuals. NAAQS pollutants were identified using medical evidence and are shown in Table 4.3-1, State and Federal Criteria Pollutant Standards. Table 4.3-1 State and Federal Criteria Pollutant Standards Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-4 Air Quality 309 Concentration/Averaging Time Air Pollutant Most Relevant Effects Federal Primary California Standards Standards (a) Pulmonary function decrements and localized lung edema in humans and animals; (b) Risk to public health implied by 0.09 ppm / 1 -hour alterations in pulmonary morphology and host defense in animals; Ozone (Os) 0.070 ppm, / 8 hour (c) Increased mortality risk; (d) Risk to public health implied by altered connective tissue metabolism and altered pulmonary 0.07 ppm / 8 hour morphology in animals after long-term exposures and pulmonary function decrements in chronically exposed humans; (e) Vegetation damage; and (f) Property damage. (a) Aggravation of angina pectoris and other aspects of coronary Carbon 20.0 ppm / 1 -hour 35.0 ppm / 1 -hour heart disease; (b) Decreased exercise tolerance in persons with Monoxide peripheral vascular disease and lung disease; (c) Impairment of (Co) 9.0 ppm / 8 -hour 9.0 ppm / 8 -hour central nervous system functions; and (d) Possible increased risk to fetuses. (a) Potential to aggravate chronic respiratory disease and Nitrogen 0.18 ppm 1 -hour / 100 ppb 1 -hour / respiratory symptoms in sensitive groups; (b) Risk to public health Dioxide 0.030 ppm /annual 0.053 ppm /annual implied by pulmonary and extra -pulmonary biochemical and (NO2) cellular changes and pulmonary structural changes; and (c) Contribution to atmospheric discoloration. Sulfur 0.25 ppm / 1 -hour (a) Bronchoconstriction accompanied by symptoms which may Dioxide 75 ppb / 1 -hour include wheezing, shortness of breath and chest tightness, during (SOz) 0.04 ppm / 24-hour 0.14 ppm/annual exercise or physical activity in persons with asthma. Suspended (a) Exacerbation of symptoms in sensitive patients with Particulate 50 µg/m3 / 24-hour 150 µg/m3 / 24-hour respiratory or cardiovascular disease; (b) Declines in pulmonary Matter 20 µg/m3 /annual function growth in children; and (c) Increased risk of premature (PM1o) death from heart or lung diseases in elderly. Suspended Particulate 12 µg/m3 /annual 35 4g/m3 / 24-hour Matter 12 µg/m3/annual (PMz.5) (a) Decrease in ventilatory function; (b) Aggravation of asthmatic symptoms; (c) Aggravation of cardio -pulmonary disease; (d) Sulfates 25 µg/m3 / 24-hour No Federal Standards Vegetation damage; (e) Degradation of visibility; and (f) Property damage. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-4 Air Quality 309 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration As part of its enforcement responsibilities, the EPA requires each state with federal nonattainment areas to prepare and submit a State Implementation Plan (SIP) that demonstrates the means to attain the national standards. The SIP must integrate federal, state, and local components and regulations to identify specific measures to reduce pollution, using a combination of performance standards and market-based programs within the timeframe identified in the SIP. The CARIB defines attainment as the category given to an area with no violations in the past three years. As indicated in Table 4.3-2, Coachella Valley Portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin Attainment Status, the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB) has been designated by EPA for the national standards as a non -attainment area for ozone and PM 1o. Currently, the SSAB is in attainment with the national ambient air quality standards for CO, NO2, S02, PM2.5, and lead. Table 4.3-2 Coachella Valley Portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin Attainment Status Criteria PollutanStandard Concentration/Averaging Time Air Pollutant Most Relevant Effects Attainment Datebi Federal Primary NAAQS 7CAAQS California Standards Standards 12/31/2013 Lead 1.5 / 30 -day 0.15 µgW/3-month (a) Learning disabilities; and (b) Impairment of blood formation µg/m3 rolling and nerve conduction. Nonattainment Extinction coefficient Visibility impairment on days when relative humidity is less than (0.09 ppm) of 0.23 per kilometer - 70%. Visibility visibility of ten miles Nonattainment (Severe -15) 6/15/2019 Reducing or more due to No Federal Standards Particles particles when NAAQS 2008 8 -Hour Nonattainment (Severe -15) relative humidity is 8 -Hour Ozonede (0.075 ppm) less than 70%. Source: Vista Environmental, Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis; October 28, 2021. As part of its enforcement responsibilities, the EPA requires each state with federal nonattainment areas to prepare and submit a State Implementation Plan (SIP) that demonstrates the means to attain the national standards. The SIP must integrate federal, state, and local components and regulations to identify specific measures to reduce pollution, using a combination of performance standards and market-based programs within the timeframe identified in the SIP. The CARIB defines attainment as the category given to an area with no violations in the past three years. As indicated in Table 4.3-2, Coachella Valley Portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin Attainment Status, the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB) has been designated by EPA for the national standards as a non -attainment area for ozone and PM 1o. Currently, the SSAB is in attainment with the national ambient air quality standards for CO, NO2, S02, PM2.5, and lead. Table 4.3-2 Coachella Valley Portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin Attainment Status Criteria PollutanStandard Averaging Time Designate Attainment Datebi NAAQS 7CAAQS 19791 -Hour Attainment 12/31/2013 (0.12 ppm) 1 -Hour Ozonece 1 -Hour Nonattainment N/A (0.09 ppm) NAAQS 1997 8 -Hour Nonattainment (Severe -15) 6/15/2019 (0.08 ppm) NAAQS 2008 8 -Hour Nonattainment (Severe -15) 7/20/2027 8 -Hour Ozonede (0.075 ppm) NAAQS 2015 8 -Hour Pending— Expect Nonattainment Pending (0.070 ppm) (Severe) CAAQS 8 -Hour (0.070 ppm) Nonattainment Beyond 2032 NAAQS 1 -Hour (35 ppm) Unclassifiable/Attainment N/A (attained) 8 -Hour (9 ppm) CO 1 -Hour (20 ppm) 6/11/2007 CAAQS 8 -Hour (9 ppm) Attainment (attained) NAAQS 2010 1 -Hour (0.10 ppm) Unclassifiable/Attainment N/A (attained) NO2ee NAAQS 1971 Annual (0.053 ppm) Unclassifiable/Attainment N/A (attained) 1 -Hour (0.18 ppm) CAAQS Annual (0.030 ppm) Attainment --- Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-5 Air Quality 310 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration STATE CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD The California Air Resources Board (CARB), which is a part of the California Environmental Protection Agency, is responsible for the coordination and administration of both federal and state air pollution control programs within California. In this capacity, the CARB conducts research, sets the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), compiles emission inventories, develops suggested control measures, provides oversight of local programs, and prepares the SIP. The CAAQS for criteria pollutants are shown above in Table 4.3-2. In addition, the CARB establishes emission standards for motor vehicles sold in California, consumer products (e.g., hairspray, aerosol paints, and barbeque lighter fluid), and various types of commercial equipment. It also sets fuel specifications to further reduce vehicular emissions. The Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB) has been designated by the CARB as a non -attainment area for ozone and PM1o. Currently, the SSAB is in attainment with the ambient air quality standards for CO, NO2, S02, PM2.5, lead, and sulfates and is unclassified for visibility reducing particles and Hydrogen Sulfide. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-6 Air Quality 311 Criteria Pollutant Standard Averaging Time Designationai Attainment Dateb) NAAQS 2010 1 -Hour (75 ppb) Designations Pending (expect N/A (attained) Unclassifiable/Attainment) S02') NAAQS 1971 24 -Hour (0.14 ppm) Unclassifiable/Attainment N/A (attained) 1971 Annual (0.03 ppm) NAAQS 1987 24-hour Nonattainment (Serious) 12/31/2006 (150 µg/m3) PM10gi 24-hour (50 µg/m3) CAAQS Annual (20 µg/m3) Nonattainment N/A NAAQS 2006 24 -Hour Unclassifiable/Attainment N/A (attained) (35 µg/m3) NAAQS 1997 Annual Unclassifiable/Attainment N/A (attained) PM2.5h) (15.0 µg/m3) NAAQS 2012 Annual Unclassifiable/Attainment N/A (attained) (12.0 µg/m3) CAAQS Annual (12.0 µg/m3) Attainment N/A Lead NAAQS 2008 3 -Months Rolling Attainment N/A (attained) (0.15 µg/m3) Notes: a) U.S. EPA often only declares Nonattainment areas; everywhere else is listed as Unclassifiable/Attainment or Unclassifiable. b) A design value below the NAAQS for data through the full year or smog season prior to the attainment date is typically required for attainment demonstration. c) The 1979 1 -hour ozone NAAQS (0.12 ppm) was revoked, effective June 15, 2005; the Coachella Valley had not timely attained this standard by 11/15/07 "severe -17" deadline. d) The 2008 8 -hour ozone NAAQS (0.075 ppm) was revised to 0.070 ppm. Effective 12/28/15 with classifications and implementation goals to be finalized by 10/1/17; the 1997 8 -hour ozone NAAQS (0.08 ppm) was revoked in the 2008 ozone implementation rule, effective 4/6/15;there are continuing obligations under the revoked 1997 and revised 2008 ozone until they are attained. e) New NO2 1 -hour standard, effective August 2, 2010; attainment designations January 20, 2012; annual NO2 standard retained. f) The 1971 annual and 24-hour SO2 standards were revoked, effective August 23, 2010; however, these 1971 standards will remain in effect until one year after U.S. EPA promulgates area designations for the 2010 S02 1 -hour standard. Final area designations expected 12/31/2020 expected to be designated Unclassifiable /Attainment. g) Annual PM10 standard was revoked, effective December 18, 2006; 24-hour PM10 NAAQS deadline was 12/31/2006; SCAQMD request for attainment redesignation was postponed pending additional monitoring. h) The annual PM2.5 standard was revised on 1/15/15, effective 3/18/13, from 15.0 µg/m3 to 12.0 1g/m3. Source: Vista Environmental, Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions ImpactAnolysis; October 28, 2021. STATE CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD The California Air Resources Board (CARB), which is a part of the California Environmental Protection Agency, is responsible for the coordination and administration of both federal and state air pollution control programs within California. In this capacity, the CARB conducts research, sets the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), compiles emission inventories, develops suggested control measures, provides oversight of local programs, and prepares the SIP. The CAAQS for criteria pollutants are shown above in Table 4.3-2. In addition, the CARB establishes emission standards for motor vehicles sold in California, consumer products (e.g., hairspray, aerosol paints, and barbeque lighter fluid), and various types of commercial equipment. It also sets fuel specifications to further reduce vehicular emissions. The Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB) has been designated by the CARB as a non -attainment area for ozone and PM1o. Currently, the SSAB is in attainment with the ambient air quality standards for CO, NO2, S02, PM2.5, lead, and sulfates and is unclassified for visibility reducing particles and Hydrogen Sulfide. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-6 Air Quality 311 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration REGIONAL South Coast Air Quality Management District South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) develops rules and regulations, establishes permitting requirements for stationary sources, inspects emission sources, and enforces such measures through educational programs or fines, when necessary. SCAQMD is directly responsible for reducing emissions from stationary, mobile, and indirect sources. It has responded to this requirement by preparing a sequence of AQMPs. The Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (2016 AQMP) was adopted by the SCAQMD Board on March 3, 2016, and was adopted by CARIB on March 23, 2017, for inclusion into the SIP. The 2016 AQMP was prepared in order to meet the following standards: • 8 -hour Ozone (75 ppb) by 2032 • Annual PM2.5 (12 µg/m3) by 2021-2025 • 8 -hour Ozone (80 ppb) by 2024 (updated from the 2007 and 2012 AQMPs) • 1 -hour Ozone (120 ppb) by 2023 (updated from the 2012 AQMP) • 24-hour PM2.5 (35 µg/m3) by 2019 (updated from the 2012 AQMP) In addition to meeting the above standards, the 2016 AQMP also includes revisions to the attainment demonstrations for the 1997 8 -hour ozone NAAQS and the 1979 1 -hour ozone NAAQS. The prior 2012 AQMP was prepared in order to demonstrate attainment with the 24-hour PM2.s standard by 2014 through adoption of all feasible measures. The prior 2007 AQMP demonstrated attainment with the 1997 8 -hour ozone (80 ppb) standard by 2023, through implementation of future improvements in control techniques and technologies. These "black box" emissions reductions represent 65% of the remaining NOx emission reductions by 2023 in order to show attainment with the 1997 8 -hour ozone NAAQS. Given the magnitude of these needed emissions reductions, additional NOx control measures have been provided in the 2016 AQMP. The 2016 AQMP provides a new approach that focuses on available, proven and cost effective alternatives to traditional strategies, while seeking to achieve multiple goals in partnership with other entities to promote reductions in GHG emissions and TAC emissions as well as efficiencies in energy use, transportation, and goods movement. The 2016 AQMP recognizes the critical importance of working with other agencies to develop funding and other incentives that encourage the accelerated transition of vehicles, buildings and industrial facilities to cleaner technologies in a manner that benefits not only air quality, but also local businesses and the regional economy. Although SCAQMD is responsible for regional air quality planning efforts, it does not have the authority to directly regulate air quality issues associated with plans and new development projects throughout the SSAB. Instead, this is controlled through local jurisdictions in accordance with CEQA. In order to assist local jurisdictions with air quality compliance issues the CEQA Air Quality Handbook (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook), prepared by SCAQMD, 1993, with the most current updates found at http:// www.aqmd.gov/ceqa/hdbk.html, was developed in accordance with the projections and programs detailed in the AQMPs. The purpose of the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook is to assist Lead Agencies, as well as consultants, project proponents, and other interested parties in evaluating a proposed project's potential air quality impacts. Specifically, the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook explains the procedures that SCAQMD recommends be followed for the environmental review process required by CEQA. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook provides direction on how to evaluate potential air quality impacts, how to determine whether these impacts are significant, and how to mitigate these impacts. The SCAQMD intends that by providing this guidance, the air quality impacts of plans and development proposals Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-7 Air Quality 312 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration will be analyzed accurately and consistently throughout the SSAB, and adverse impacts will be minimized. The following lists the SCAQMD rules that are applicable but not limited to all land development projects in the SSAB. • Rule 402— Nuisance. Rule 402 prohibits a person from discharging from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which causes injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. Compliance with Rule 402 will reduce local air quality and odor impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. • Rule 403 — Fugitive Dust. Rule 403 governs emissions of fugitive dust during construction activities and requires that no person shall cause or allow the emissions of fugitive dust such that dust remains visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line or the dust emission exceeds 20% opacity if the dust is from the operation of a motorized vehicle. Compliance with this rule is achieved through application of standard Best Available Control Measures Compliance with these rules would reduce local air quality impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. • Rules 1108 and 1108.1— Cutback and Emulsified Asphalt. Rules 1108 and 1108.1 govern the sale, use, and manufacturing of asphalt and limits the VOC content in asphalt. This rule regulates the VOC contents of asphalt used during construction as well as any on-going maintenance during operations. Therefore, all asphalt used during construction and operation of the proposed project must comply with SCAQMD Rules 1108 and 1108.1. • Rule 1113 — Architectural Coatings. Rule 1113 governs the sale, use, and manufacturing of architectural coatings and limits the VOC content in sealers, coatings, paints and solvents. This rule regulates the VOC contents of paints available during construction. Therefore, all paints and solvents used during construction and operation of the proposed project must comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113. • Rule 1143 — Paint Thinners. Rule 1143 governs the sale, use, and manufacturing of paint thinners and multi-purpose solvents that are used in thinning of coating materials, cleaning of coating application equipment, and other solvent cleaning operations. This rule regulates the VOC content of solvents used during construction. Solvents used during construction and operation of the proposed project must comply with SCAQMD Rule 1143. Southern California Association of Governments The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is the regional planning agency for Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Imperial Counties and addresses regional issues relating to transportation, the economy, community development and the environment. SCAG is the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the majority of the southern California region and is the largest MPO in the nation. With respect to air quality planning, SCAG has prepared the 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (Connect SoCal), adopted September 3, 2020, and the 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (2019 FTIP), adopted September 2018, which addresses regional development and growth forecasts. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-8 Air Quality 313 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Although the Connect SoCaland 2019 FTIP are primarily planning documents for future transportation projects, a key component of these plans is to integrate land use planning with transportation planning that promotes higher density infill development in close proximity to existing transit service. These plans form the basis for the land use and transportation components of the AQMP, which are utilized in the preparation of air quality forecasts and in the consistency, analysis included in the AQMP. The Connect SoCal, 2019 FTIP, and AQMP are based on projections originating within the City and County General Plans. LOCAL City of La Quinta Local jurisdictions, such as the City of La Quinta, have the authority and responsibility to reduce air pollution through its police power and decision-making authority. Specifically, the City is responsible for the assessment and mitigation of air emissions resulting from its land use decisions. The City is also responsible for the implementation of transportation control measures as outlined in the AQMPs. Examples of such measures include bus turnouts, energy-efficient streetlights, and synchronized traffic signals. In accordance with CEQA requirements and the CEQA review process, the City assesses the air quality impacts of new development projects, requires mitigation of potentially significant air quality impacts by conditioning discretionary permits, and monitors and enforces implementation of such mitigation. In accordance with the CEQA requirements, the City does not, however, have the expertise to develop plans, programs, procedures, and methodologies to ensure that air quality within the City and region will meet federal and state standards. Instead, the City relies on the expertise of the SCAQMD and utilizes the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook as the guidance document for the environmental review of plans and development proposals within its jurisdiction. The City of La Quinta General Plan (La Quinta General Plan), adopted February 19, 2013, provides the following air quality -related goals and policies that are applicable to the proposed project. GOAL AQ -1: A reduction in all air emissions generated within the City. Policy AQ -1.1: Coordinate with the South Coast Air Quality Management District to assure compliance with air quality standards. Policy AQ -1.2: Work to reduce emissions from residential and commercial energy use by encouraging decreased consumption and increased efficiency. Policy AQ -1.3: Work to reduce emissions from mobile sources by encouraging a decrease in the number of vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled. Policy AQ -1.4: Protect people and sites that are especially sensitive to airborne pollutants (sensitive receptors) from polluting point sources. Policy AQ -1.5: Ensure all construction activities minimize emissions of all air pollutants. Policy AQ -1.6: Proposed development air quality emissions of criteria pollutants shall be analyzed under CEQA. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-9 Air Quality 314 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Air Quality Impact Threshold of Significance Regional Air Quality Impacts. SCAQMD has developed significance thresholds based on the volume of pollution emitted rather than on actual ambient air quality because the direct air quality impact of a project is not quantifiable on a regional scale. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that any project in the Coachella Valley portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin with daily emissions that exceed any of the identified significance thresholds should be considered as having an individually and cumulatively significant air quality impact. For the purposes to this air quality impact analysis, a regional air quality impact would be considered significant if emissions exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds identified in Table 4.3-3, SCAQMD Regional Criteria Pollutant Emission Thresholds of Significance. Table 4.3-3 SCAQMD Regional Criteria Pollutant Emission Thresholds of Significance IF Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)' Activity VOC NOx CO Sox PM10 PM2.5 Lead AL Construction 75 100 550 150 150 55 3 Operation 75 100 550 150 150 55 3 Notes: 1 The SCAQMD operational thresholds for the Coachella Valley are the same as the construction thresholds. Source: Vista Environmental, Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis; October 28, 2021. Local Air Quality Impacts. In order to assess local air quality impacts the SCAQMD has developed Localized Significant Thresholds (LSTs) to assess the project -related air emissions in the project vicinity. SCAQMD has also provided Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology), July 2008, which details the methodology to analyze local air emission impacts. The LST Methodology found that the primary emissions of concern are NO2, CO, PM1o, and PM2.5. The LST Methodology provides Look -Up Tables with different thresholds based on the location and size of the project site and distance to the nearest sensitive receptors. As detailed above, the project site is located in Monitoring Area 30, which covers the Coachella Valley. The Look -Up Tables provided in the LST Methodology include project site acreage sizes of 1 -acre, 2 -acres and 5 -acres. The 5 -acre project site values in the Look -Up Tables have been utilized in this analysis since that is the nearest size available for the 9.7 -acre project site. The nearest sensitive receptor to the project site is a home at 58300 Almonte Drive that is located as near as 12 feet (3.7 meters) west of the project site. According to LST Methodology, any receptor located closer than 25 meters (82 feet) shall be based on the 25 -meter thresholds. Table 4.3-4, SCAQMD Local Air Quality Thresholds of Significance, shows the LSTs for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 for both construction and operational activities. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-10 Air Quality 315 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 4.3-4 SCAQMD Local Air Quality Thresholds of Significance General Plan Amendment/Zone Change The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would increase the population on the project site above what is currently projected for the project site, which would increase long-term operational air emissions above what was estimated in the City's General Plan. The air quality analysis prepared for the proposed project considered and evaluated the incremental increase of operational air quality emissions associated with increased population on the project site and determined that air quality impacts would be less than significant. Potential air quality impacts associated with the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be less than significant. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less Than Significant Impact: The project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of an applicable air quality plan. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a discussion of any inconsistencies between a proposed project and applicable General Plans and regional plans (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125). The regional plan that applies to the proposed project includes the SCAQMD AQMP. Therefore, this section discusses any potential inconsistencies of the proposed project with the AQMP. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that "New or amended GP Elements (including land use zoning and density amendments), Specific Plans, and significant projects must be analyzed for consistency with the AQMP." Strict consistency with all aspects of the plan is usually not required. A proposed project should be considered consistent with the AQMP if it furthers one or more policies and does not obstruct other policies. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency and both are evaluated below. (1) Whether the project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. (2) Whether the project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP or increments based on the year of project buildout and phase. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-11 Air Quality 316 Allowable Emissions (pounds/day)' Activity NOx c0 PMio 118 Construction 304 2,292 14 Operation 304 2,292 4 2 Notes: 1 The nearest sensitive receptor to the project site is a single-family home located as near as 12 feet (3.7 meters) west of the project site. According to SCAQMD methodology, all receptors closer than 25 meters are based on the 25 -meter threshold. Source: Vista Environmental, Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis October 7, 2021. General Plan Amendment/Zone Change The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would increase the population on the project site above what is currently projected for the project site, which would increase long-term operational air emissions above what was estimated in the City's General Plan. The air quality analysis prepared for the proposed project considered and evaluated the incremental increase of operational air quality emissions associated with increased population on the project site and determined that air quality impacts would be less than significant. Potential air quality impacts associated with the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be less than significant. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less Than Significant Impact: The project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of an applicable air quality plan. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a discussion of any inconsistencies between a proposed project and applicable General Plans and regional plans (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125). The regional plan that applies to the proposed project includes the SCAQMD AQMP. Therefore, this section discusses any potential inconsistencies of the proposed project with the AQMP. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that "New or amended GP Elements (including land use zoning and density amendments), Specific Plans, and significant projects must be analyzed for consistency with the AQMP." Strict consistency with all aspects of the plan is usually not required. A proposed project should be considered consistent with the AQMP if it furthers one or more policies and does not obstruct other policies. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency and both are evaluated below. (1) Whether the project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. (2) Whether the project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP or increments based on the year of project buildout and phase. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-11 Air Quality 316 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration CRITERIA 1: INCREASE FREQUENCY OR SEVERITY OF VIOLATIONS Based on the air quality modeling analysis contained in this report, short-term regional construction air emissions would not result in significant impacts based on SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance or local thresholds of significance. The ongoing operation of the proposed project would generate air pollutant emissions that are inconsequential on a regional basis and would not result in significant impacts based on SCAQMD thresholds of significance. The analysis for long-term local air quality impacts showed that local pollutant concentrations would not exceed the air quality standards. Therefore, a less than significant long-term impact would occur, and no mitigation would be required. Therefore, based on the information provided above, the proposed project would be consistent with the first criterion. CRITERIA 2: EXCEED ASSUMPTIONS GENERAL PLAN Consistency with the AQMP assumptions is determined by performing an analysis of the proposed project with the assumptions in the AQMP. The emphasis of this criterion is to ensure that the analyses conducted for the proposed project are based on the same forecasts as the AQMP. The AQMP is developed through use of the planning forecasts provided in the Connect SoCal and 2019 FTIP. Connect SoCal is a major planning document for the regional transportation and land use network within southern California. The Connect SoCal is a long-range plan that is required by federal and state requirements placed on SCAG and is updated every four years. The 2019 FTIP provides long-range planning for future transportation improvement projects that are constructed with state and/or federal funds within southern California. Local governments are required to use these plans as the basis of their plans for the purpose of consistency with applicable regional plans under CEQA. For this project, the City of La Quinta General Plan's Land Use Plan defines the assumptions that are represented in AQMP. The project site is currently designated Low Density Residential (LDR) in the General Plan and is zoned Low Density Residential (RL). The proposed project involves a request of approval for a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to Medium Density Residential, approval of a Planned Unit Development and approval of a Tentative Tract Map to allow for the development of 80 single-family dwelling units on a 9.7 gross acre project site. Although the proposed project is currently inconsistent with the General Plan land use designation and zoning for the project site, the proposed project would be in close proximity to the proposed commercial land uses located on the east side of Monroe Street (as near as 550 feet east of the project site) which will promote a walkable community and would be in substantial compliance with the City's Land Use Element goals and policies. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in an inconsistency with the current land use designations with respect to the regional forecasts utilized by the AQMPs. As such, the proposed project is not anticipated to exceed the AQMP assumptions for the project site and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the second criterion. Based on the above, the proposed project would not result in an inconsistency with the SCAQMD AQMP. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur in relation to implementation of the AQMP. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-12 Air Quality 317 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. The SCAQMD has published a report on how to address cumulative impacts from air pollution: White Paper on Potential Control Strategies to Address Cumulative Impacts from Air Pollution (http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/Agendas/ Environmenta l-Justice/cumulative-impacts-working-group/cumulative-impacts-white-paper. pdf). In this report, the AQMD clearly states (Page D-3): "...the AQMD uses the same significance thresholds for project specific and cumulative impacts for all environmental topics analyzed in an Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Projects that exceed the project -specific significance thresholds are considered by the SCAQMD to be cumulatively considerable. This is the reason project -specific and cumulative significance thresholds are the some. Conversely, projects that do not exceed the project - specific thresholds are generally not considered to be cumulatively significant." Therefore, this analysis assumes that individual projects that do not generate operational or construction emissions that exceed the SCAQMD's recommended daily thresholds for project -specific impacts would also not cause a cumulatively considerable increase in emissions for those pollutants for which the Basin is in nonattainment and, therefore, would not be considered to have a significant, adverse air quality impact. Alternatively, individual project -related construction and operational emissions that exceed SCAQMD thresholds for project -specific impacts would be considered cumulatively considerable. The following section calculates the potential air emissions associated with the construction and operations of the proposed project and compares the emissions to the SCAQMD standards. CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS The construction activities for the proposed project are anticipated to include site preparation and grading of the 9.7 -acre project site, building construction of the 80 single-family homes, paving of the onsite roads and road improvements to Avenue 58 and application of architectural coatings. The construction emissions have been analyzed for both regional and local air quality impacts. Regional Air Quality Construction Impacts The CaIEEMod model has been utilized to calculate the construction -related regional emissions from the proposed project. The worst-case summer or winter daily construction -related criteria pollutant emissions from the proposed project for each phase of construction activities are shown in Table 4.3- 5, Construction -Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions. Since it is possible that building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities may occur concurrently towards the end of the building construction phase, Table 4.3-5 also shows the combined regional criteria pollutant emissions from building construction (year 2023), paving and architectural coating phases of construction. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-13 AirQuality 318 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 4.3-5 Construction -Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions Activity Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) VOC NO, CO SO, PMlo PM2.5 Site Preparation (Year 2022)1 Onsite2 3.17 33.08 19.70 0.04 10.46 6.03 Offsite3 0.07 0.260.64 <0.00 0.18 0.05 Total 3.24 33.34 20.34 0.04 10.64 6.08 Grading (Year 2022)1 Onsite2 1.95 20.86 15.27 0.03 4.21 2.42 Offsite3 0.66 25.65 5.97 0.11 3.74 1.22 Total 2.61 46.51 21.24 0.14 7.95 3.64 Building Construction (Year 2022) Onsite 1.71 15.62 16.36 0.03 0.81 0.76 Offsite 0.41 1.663.78 0.01 1.09 0.31 Total 2.12 17.28 20.14 0.04 1.90 1.07 Combined Year 2023 Building Construction, Paving, and Architectural Coatings Onsite 68.54 25.88 32.64 0.05 1.28 1.20 Offsite 0.48 1.40 4.52 0.02 1.38 0.38 Total 69.02 27.28 37.16 0.07 2.66 1.58 Maximum Daily Construction Emissions 69.02 46.51 37.16 0.14 10.64 6.08 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Notes: 1 Site Preparation and Grading based on adherence to fugitive dust suppression requirements from SCAQMD Rule 403. z Onsite emissions from equipment not operated on public roads. 3 Offsite emissions from vehicles operating on public roads. Source: Vista Environmental, Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis; October 28, 2021. Table 4.3-5 shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the regional emissions thresholds during either site preparation, grading, or the combined building construction, paving and architectural coatings phases. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from construction of the proposed project. Local Air Quality Construction Impacts Construction -related air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the Air Basin. The local air quality emissions from construction were analyzed through utilizing the methodology described in Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology), prepared by SCAQMD, revised October 2009. The LST Methodology found the primary criteria pollutant emissions of concern are NOx, CO, PM1o, and PM2.5. To determine if any of these pollutants require a detailed analysis of the local air quality impacts, each phase of construction was screened using the SCAQMD's Mass Rate LST Look -up Tables. The Look -up Tables were developed Public Review Draft I lune 2023 4.3-14 AirQuality 319 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration by the SCAQMD to readily determine if the daily onsite emissions of CO, NOx, PM,o, and PM2.5 from the proposed project could result in a significant impact to the local air quality. Table 4.3-6, Construction -Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions, shows the onsite emissions from the CaIEEMod model for the different construction phases and the calculated localized emissions thresholds. Since it is possible that building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities could occur concurrently towards the end of the building construction phase, Table 4.3-6 also shows the combined local criteria pollutant emissions from year 2023 building construction, paving and architectural coating phases of construction. Table 4.3-6 Construction -Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions The data provided in Table 4.3-6 shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the local emissions thresholds during either site preparation, grading, or the combined building construction, paving, and architectural coatings phases. Therefore, a less than significant local air quality impact would occur from construction of the proposed project. OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS The on-going operation of the proposed project would result in a long-term increase in air quality emissions. This increase would be due to emissions from the project -generated vehicle trips, emissions from energy usage, onsite area source emissions, and off-road equipment created from the on-going use of the proposed project. The following section provides an analysis of potential long-term air quality impacts due to regional air quality and local air quality impacts with the on-going operations of the proposed project. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-15 Air Quality 320 Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)' Construction Phase IN NOx CO PMio PM2. Site Preparation 33.12 19.78 10.48 6.04 Grading2 24.06 16.02 4.68 2.57 Building Construction (Year 2022) 15.82 16.83 0.95 0.80 Combined Building Construction (Year 2023), Paving and Architectural Coatings 27.32 33.36 1.56 1.35 Maximum Daily Construction Emissions 33.12 33.36 10.48 6.04 SCAQMD Local Construction Thresholds' 304 2,292 14 8 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No Notes: 1 The Pollutant Emissions include 100% of the onsite emissions (off-road equipment and fugitive dust) and 1/8 of the offsite emissions (on road trucks and worker vehicles), in order to account for the on -road emissions that occur within a 1/4 mile of the project site. z Site Preparation and Grading phases based on adherence to fugitive dust suppression requirements from SCAQMD Rule 403. 3 The nearest offsite sensitive receptor to the project site is a single-family home located as near as 12 feet (3.7 meters) west of the project site. According to SCAQMD methodology, all receptors closer than 25 meters are based on the 25 -meter threshold. Calculated from SCAQMD's Mass Rate Look -up Tables for five acres in Air Monitoring Area 30, Coachella Valley. Source: Vista Environmental, Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis; October 28, 2021. The data provided in Table 4.3-6 shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the local emissions thresholds during either site preparation, grading, or the combined building construction, paving, and architectural coatings phases. Therefore, a less than significant local air quality impact would occur from construction of the proposed project. OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS The on-going operation of the proposed project would result in a long-term increase in air quality emissions. This increase would be due to emissions from the project -generated vehicle trips, emissions from energy usage, onsite area source emissions, and off-road equipment created from the on-going use of the proposed project. The following section provides an analysis of potential long-term air quality impacts due to regional air quality and local air quality impacts with the on-going operations of the proposed project. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-15 Air Quality 320 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Operations -Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Analysis The operations -related regional criteria air quality impacts created by the proposed project have been analyzed through use of the CaIEEMod model. The worst-case summer or winter VOC, NOx, CO, SO2, PM1o, and PM2.5 daily emissions created from the proposed project's long-term operations have been calculated and are summarized in Table 4.3-7, Operational Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions. Table 4.3-7 Operational Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions The data provided in Table 4.3-6 shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the regional emissions thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from the operation of the proposed project. This analysis also evaluates the proposed project's localized impact to air quality for emissions of CO, NOx, PM1o, and PM2.5 by comparing the proposed project's onsite emissions to the SCAQMD's applicable LST thresholds. As evaluated in this analysis, the proposed project would not result in emissions that exceeded the SCAQMD's LSTs. Therefore, the proposed project would not be expected to exceed the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standards for emissions of CO, NOx, PM1o, and PM2.5. Operations -Related Local Air Quality Impacts Project -related air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the Air Basin. The proposed project has been analyzed for the potential local CO emission impacts from the project -generated vehicular trips and from the potential local air quality impacts from onsite operations. The following analyzes the vehicular CO emissions and local impacts from onsite operations. Local CO Hotspot Impacts from Project -Generated Vehicular Trips CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential local air quality impacts. Local air quality Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-16 Air Quality 321 Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) C ivi 13P VOC Co SO2 PM10 Area Sources1 5.46 0.08 6.77 <0.00 0.04 0.04 Energy Usage' 0.06 0.55 0.24 <0.00 0.04 0.04 Mobile Sources3 2.18 2.58 17.63 0.04 3.69 1.00 Total Emissions 7.70 1 3.21 1 24.64 0.04 3.77 1 1.08 SCAQMD Operational Threshold S4 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Notes: 1 Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. 2 Energy usage consists of emissions from natural gas usage. 3 Mobile sources consist of emissions from vehicles and road dust. 4 The SCAQMD operational thresholds for the Coachella Valley are the same as the construction thresholds. Source: Vista Environmental, Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis; October 28, 2021. The data provided in Table 4.3-6 shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the regional emissions thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from the operation of the proposed project. This analysis also evaluates the proposed project's localized impact to air quality for emissions of CO, NOx, PM1o, and PM2.5 by comparing the proposed project's onsite emissions to the SCAQMD's applicable LST thresholds. As evaluated in this analysis, the proposed project would not result in emissions that exceeded the SCAQMD's LSTs. Therefore, the proposed project would not be expected to exceed the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standards for emissions of CO, NOx, PM1o, and PM2.5. Operations -Related Local Air Quality Impacts Project -related air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the Air Basin. The proposed project has been analyzed for the potential local CO emission impacts from the project -generated vehicular trips and from the potential local air quality impacts from onsite operations. The following analyzes the vehicular CO emissions and local impacts from onsite operations. Local CO Hotspot Impacts from Project -Generated Vehicular Trips CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential local air quality impacts. Local air quality Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-16 Air Quality 321 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration impacts can be assessed by comparing future without and with project CO levels to the State and Federal CO standards of 20 ppm over one hour or 9 ppm over eight hours. At the time of the 1993 Handbook, the Air Basin was designated nonattainment under the CAAQS and NAAQS for CO. With the turnover of older vehicles, introduction of cleaner fuels, and implementation of control technology on industrial facilities, CO concentrations in the Air Basin and in the state have steadily declined. In 2007, the Air Basin was designated in attainment for CO under both the CAAQS and NAAQS. SCAQMD conducted a CO Hotspot analysis for attainment at the busiest intersections in Los Angeles during the peak morning and afternoon periods and did not predict a violation of CO standards.' Since the nearby intersections to the proposed project are much smaller with less traffic than what was analyzed by the SCAQMD, no local CO Hotspots are anticipated to be created from the proposed project and no CO Hotspot modeling was performed. Therefore, a less than significant long- term air quality impact is anticipated to local air quality with the on-going use of the proposed project. Local Criteria Pollutant Impacts from Onsite Operations Project -related air emissions from onsite sources such as architectural coatings, landscaping equipment, and onsite usage of natural gas appliances may have the potential to create emissions areas that exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the SSAB. The local air quality emissions from onsite operations were analyzed using the SCAQMD's Mass Rate LST Look -up Tables and the methodology described in LST Methodology. The Look -up Tables were developed by the SCAQMD to readily determine if the daily emissions of CO, NOx, PM1o, and PMZ.s from the proposed project could result in a significant impact to the local air quality. Table 4.3-8, Operations -Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions, shows the onsite emissions from the CalEEMod model that includes area sources, energy usage, onsite off-road equipment, and vehicles operating in the immediate vicinity of the project site and the calculated emissions thresholds. Table 4.3-8 Operations -Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions or Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) Onsite Emission Source NOx CO PM10 PMz.s Area Sources 0.08 6.77 0.04 0.04 Energy Usage 0.55 0.24 0.04 0.04 Mobile Sources' 0.06 0.44 0.09 0.03 Total Emissions 0.69 7.45 0.17 0.11 SCAQMD Local Operational Thresholds 304 2,292 4 2 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No Notes: 1 Mobile sources based on 1/8 of the gross vehicular emissions, which is the estimated portion of vehicle emissions occurring within a quarter mile of the project site. z The nearest sensitive receptor to the project site is a single-family home located as near as 12 feet (3.7 meters) west of the project site. According to SCAQMD methodology, all receptors closer than 25 meters are based on the 25 -meter threshold. Source: Vista Environmental, Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis; October 28, 2021. 1 The four intersections analyzed by the SCAQMD were: Long Beach Boulevard and Imperial Highway; Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue; Sunset Boulevard and Highland Avenue; and La Cienega Boulevard and Century Boulevard. The busiest intersection evaluated (Wilshire and Veteran) had a daily traffic volume of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day with LOS E in the morning and LOS F in the evening peak hour. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-17 Air Quality 322 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration The data provided in Table 4.3-8 shows that the on-going operations of the proposed project would not exceed the local NOx, CO, PM1o, and PM2.s thresholds of significance. Therefore, the on-going operations of the proposed project would create a less than significant operations -related impact to local air quality due to onsite emissions and no mitigation would be required. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. The local concentrations of criteria pollutant emissions produced in the nearby vicinity of the proposed project, which could expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations have been calculated for both construction and operations, which are discussed separately below. The discussion below also includes an analysis of the potential impacts from local criteria pollutant and toxic air contaminant emissions. The nearest sensitive receptor is a home at 58300 Almonte Drive that is located as near as 12 feet west of the project site. CONSTRUCTION -RELATED SENSITIVE RECEPTOR IMPACTS Construction activities could expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations of localized criteria pollutant concentrations and from toxic air contaminant emissions created from onsite construction equipment, which are described below. Local Criteria Pollutant Impacts from Construction The local air quality impacts from construction of the proposed project have been analyzed and found that the construction of the proposed project would not exceed the local NOx, CO, PM1o, and PM2.5 thresholds of significance. Therefore, construction of the proposed project would create a less than significant construction -related impact to local air quality and no mitigation would be required. Toxic Air Contaminants Impacts from Construction According to the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook, any project that has the potential to expose the public to toxic air contaminants in excess of the following thresholds would be considered to have a significant air quality impact: • If the Maximum Incremental Cancer Risk is 10 in one million or greater; or • Toxic air contaminants from the proposed project would result in a Hazard Index increase of 1 or greater. In order to determine if the proposed project may have a significant impact related to toxic air contaminants (TACs), the Health Risk Assessment Guidance for analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis, (Diesel Analysis) prepared by SCAQMD, August 2003, recommends that if the proposed project is anticipated to create TACs through stationary sources or regular operations of diesel trucks on the project site, then the proximity of the nearest receptors to the source of the TAC and the toxicity of the hazardous air pollutant (HAP) should be analyzed through a comprehensive facility -wide health risk assessment (HRA). Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-18 Air Quality 323 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration The greatest potential for toxic air contaminante missions would be related to diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions associated with heavy equipment operations during construction of the proposed project. According to SCAQMD methodology, health effects from carcinogenic air toxics are usually described in terms of "individual cancer risk." "Individual Cancer Risk" is the likelihood that a person exposed to concentrations of toxic air contaminants over a 70 -year lifetime will contract cancer, based on the use of standard risk -assessment methodology. It should be noted that the most current cancer risk assessment methodology recommends analyzing a 30 -year exposure period for the nearby sensitive receptors (OEHHA, 2015). Given the relatively limited number of heavy-duty construction equipment, the varying distances that construction equipment would operate to the nearby sensitive receptors, and the short-term construction schedule, the proposed project would not result in a long-term (i.e., 30 or 70 years) substantial source of toxic air contaminant emissions and corresponding individual cancer risk. In addition, California Code of Regulations Title 13, Article 4.8, Chapter 9, Section 2449 regulates emissions from off-road diesel equipment in California. This regulation limits the idling of equipment to no more than five minutes, requires equipment operators to label each piece of equipment and provide annual reports to CARB of their fleet's usage and emissions. This regulation also requires systematic upgrading of the emission Tier level of each fleet, and currently no commercial operator is allowed to purchase Tier 0 or Tier 1 equipment. By January 2023, no commercial operator is allowed to purchase Tier 2 equipment. In addition to the purchase restrictions, equipment operators need to meet fleet average emissions targets that become more stringent each year between years 2014 and 2023. Therefore, due to the limitations in off-road construction equipment DPM emissions from implementation of Section 2448, a less than significant short-term toxic air contaminant impact would occur during construction of the proposed project. As such, construction of the proposed project would result in a less than significant exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. OPERATIONS -RELATED SENSITIVE RECEPTOR IMPACTS The on-going operations of the proposed project could expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations of local CO emission impacts from the project -generated vehicular trips and from the potential local air quality impacts from onsite operations. The following analyzes the vehicular CO emissions, local criteria pollutant impacts from onsite operations, and toxic air contaminant impacts. Local CO Hotspot Impacts from Project -Generated Vehicle Trips CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential impacts to sensitive receptors. The analysis provided above shows that no local CO Hotspots are anticipated to be created at any nearby intersections from the vehicle traffic generated by the proposed project. Therefore, operation of the proposed project would result in a less than significant exposure of offsite sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations and no mitigation would be required. Local Criteria Pollutant Impacts from Onsite Operations The local air quality impacts from the operation of the proposed project would occur from onsite sources such as architectural coatings, landscaping equipment, and onsite usage of natural gas Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-19 AirQuality 324 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration appliances. The analysis provided above found that the operation of the proposed project would not exceed the local NOx, CO, PM1o, and PM2.s thresholds of significance. Therefore, the on-going operations of the proposed project would create a less than significant operations -related impact to local air quality due to onsite emissions and no mitigation would be required. Operations -Related Toxic Air Contaminant Impacts Particulate matter (PM) from diesel exhaust is the predominant TAC in most areas and according to The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality 2013 Edition, prepared by CARB, about 80% of the outdoor TAC cancer risk is from diesel exhaust. Some chemicals in diesel exhaust, such as benzene and formaldehyde have been listed as carcinogens by State Proposition 65 and the Federal Hazardous Air Pollutants program. Due to the nominal number of diesel truck trips that are anticipated to be generated by the on-going operation of the proposed residential project, a less than significant TAC impact would occur during the on-going operations of the proposed project and no mitigation would be required. Therefore, operation of the proposed project would result in a less than significant exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people. Individual responses to odors are highly variable and can result in a variety of effects. Generally, the impact of an odor results from a variety of factors such as frequency, duration, offensiveness, location, and sensory perception. The frequency is a measure of how often an individual is exposed to an odor in the ambient environment. The intensity refers to an individual's or group's perception of the odor strength or concentration. The duration of an odor refers to the elapsed time over which an odor is experienced. The offensiveness of the odor is the subjective rating of the pleasantness or unpleasantness of an odor. The location accounts for the type of area in which a potentially affected person lives, works, or visits; the type of activity in which he or she is engaged; and the sensitivity of the impacted receptor. Sensory perception has four major components: detectability, intensity, character, and hedonic tone. The detection (or threshold) of an odor is based on a panel of responses to the odor. There are two types of thresholds: the odor detection threshold and the recognition threshold. The detection threshold is the lowest concentration of an odorthat will elicit a response in a percentage of the people that live and work in the immediate vicinity of the project site and is typically presented as the mean (or 50% of the population). The recognition threshold is the minimum concentration that is recognized as having a characteristic odor quality and this is typically represented by recognition by 50% of the population. The intensity refers to the perceived strength of the odor. The odor character is what the substance smells like. The hedonic tone is a judgment of the pleasantness or unpleasantness of the odor. The hedonic tone varies in subjective experience, frequency, odor character, odor intensity, and duration. Potential odor impacts have been analyzed separately for construction and operations below. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-20 Air Quality 325 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration CONSTRUCTION -RELATED ODOR IMPACTS Potential sources that may emit odors during construction activities include the application of coatings such as asphalt pavement, paints, and solvents and from emissions from diesel equipment. Standard construction requirements that limit the time of day when construction may occur as well as SCAQMD Rule 1108 that limits VOC content in asphalt and Rule 1113 that limits the VOC content in paints and solvents would minimize odor impacts from construction. As such, the objectionable odors that may be produced during the construction process would be temporary and would not likely be noticeable for extended periods of time beyond the project site's boundaries. Through compliance with the applicable regulations that reduce odors and due to the transitory nature of construction odors, a less than significant odor impact would occur, and no mitigation would be required. OPERATIONS -RELATED ODOR IMPACTS The proposed project would consist of a residential development. Potential sources that may emit odors during the on-going operations of the proposed project would primarily occur from the trash storage areas. Pursuant to City regulations, permanent trash enclosures that protect trash bins from rain as well as limit air circulation would be required for the trash storage areas. Due to the distance of the nearest receptors from the project site and through compliance with SCAQMD's Rule 402 and City trash storage regulations, no significant impact related to odors would occur during the on-going operations of the proposed project. Therefore, a less than significant odor impact would occur, and no mitigation would be required. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-21 Air Quality 326 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.3-22 Air Quality 327 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.4 Biological Resources The following analysis is based on a Biological Technical Report prepared by VCS Environmental in October 2021. The report is presented in its entirety in Appendix B. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Existing Setting The project site is currently vacant land with remnants of a former date palm (Phoenix doctylifero) orchard. No operations are currently performed onsite. According to available historical sources, the property was formerly undeveloped as early as 1904. A residence occupied the northeastern portion of the subject property from circa 1928 until it was demolished in 2015. The remainder of the subject property was developed with a date palm orchard from at least 1949 until circa 2002. Remnants of the date palm orchard remain on the subject property. Tenants on the subject property have included residential and farming occupants. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.4-1 Biological Resources 328 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Would the project: Significant Impact With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status ❑ ® ❑ ❑ species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, ❑ ❑ ❑ regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct ❑ ❑ ❑ removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife ❑ ® ❑ ❑ corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree ❑ ❑ ❑ preservation policy or ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? The following analysis is based on a Biological Technical Report prepared by VCS Environmental in October 2021. The report is presented in its entirety in Appendix B. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Existing Setting The project site is currently vacant land with remnants of a former date palm (Phoenix doctylifero) orchard. No operations are currently performed onsite. According to available historical sources, the property was formerly undeveloped as early as 1904. A residence occupied the northeastern portion of the subject property from circa 1928 until it was demolished in 2015. The remainder of the subject property was developed with a date palm orchard from at least 1949 until circa 2002. Remnants of the date palm orchard remain on the subject property. Tenants on the subject property have included residential and farming occupants. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.4-1 Biological Resources 328 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration The project site supports one vegetation community/land cover type, Fallow Agricultural Field; refer to Figure 4.4-1, Vegetation/Land Cover. The site is highly disturbed and is dominated primarily by date palm trees, non-native herbaceous forbs and grasses and remnants of the former date palm orchard. VEGETATION COMMUNITIES Overall, the project site is highly disturbed with remnants of date palm trees scattered throughout the site. Herbaceous non-native grasses and forbs are present at a moderate cover and some patches of native saltbush and arrow weed occur intermixed with other non-native species within the project site. Table 4.4-1, Vegetation Communities, shows the vegetation/land cover mapping and acreages of the fallow agricultural field. Table 4.4-1 Vegetation Communities Vegetation Community/Land Cover Type Project Site (acres) Fallow Agricultural Field 9.7 Total 9.7 Source: VCS Environmental, Biological Technical Report, October 2021. Approximately 9.7 acres of fallow agricultural field was mapped within the project site. This is not a natural or seminatural vegetation community, therefore, the vegetation type identified within the project site did not meet alliance membership requirements of the Manual of California Vegetation. This vegetation community/land cover is highly disturbed and presents non-native date palm trees scattered throughout the site. Some non-native species observed include tamarisk (Tamarix ramosissima), bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon), pigweed amaranth (Amaranthus albus), nutgrass (Cyperus rotundus), Lamb's quarter (Chenopodium album), cheese weed (malva palviflora), Russian thistle (Salsola tragus), fountain grass (Cenchrus setaceus), oleander (Nerium oleander) and common purslane (Portulaca oleracea). Native species observed onsite include patches of fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens), arrow weed (Pluchea sericea), burrow weed (Ambrosia dumosa), with scattered gray desert sunflower (Helianthus petiolaris ssp. canescens) and other herbaceous species. Special Status Vegetation Communities The project site does not support any sensitive vegetation communities. Additionally, no sensitive communities were reported in the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) within two miles of the project. JURISDICTIONAL WATERS No surface water or wetlands are mapped on the project site through the online National Wetlands Inventory (NWI). According to topographic map interpretation, groundwater flow in the vicinity of the project is inferred to be toward the southeast. No settling ponds, lagoons, surface impoundments, wetlands, or natural catch basins were observed on the project site (Partner 2019). The topography of the project site and perimeters do not support jurisdictional waters or wetlands. Public Review Draft I June 2023 Biological Resources 329 Project Site Vegetation/Land Cover Of Fallow Agricultural Field - t�R Lis: M � ■ i � ML • _ .* tit rr k It /t uu _y� "• �,� � "ri��, �f f 0 og' :e{. ~� •� Ab Source: VCS Environmental; October 2021. LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Vegetation/Land Cover VCS Environmental Figure 4.4-1 330 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration SENSITIVE PLANT AND WILDLIFE SPECIES A database search of special status plant species and wildlife species listed in the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Online Survey of rare Plants and the CNDDB was conducted to determine the potential for special status plant and wildlife species to be present on the project site. A listing of special status plant and wildlife species that have a moderate or higher potential to occur on the project site is shown in Table 4.4-2, Special Status Species. A complete listing of all special status species that have some potential to occur on the project site is presented in Appendix B, Biological Technical Report, and graphically shown in Figure 4.4-2, California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) Occurrences. Table 4.4-2 Special Status Species Scientific Name Common StatM General Habitat Description Potential for Occurrence Name AL within the Project Site Plants Abronia villosa Chaparral CRPR: 113.1 This species is found on the coastal Low -Moderate. Project var. aurito sand- side of the southern California provides suitable sandy verbena mountains in chaparral and coastal soils and somewhat bare (also foothill sage scrub plant communities. Sand- areas for the species; sand- verbena likes sun and sandy soil. however, the site is verbena) Sand -verbena has gray foliage with highly degraded and has pinkish purple flowers, and the weeds; additionally, no flowers are fragrant. It does not washes, alluvial scrub or tolerate weeds and needs bare chaparral occur on the ground. Exposed sites with sandy project site. soils, especially washes and dunes, The species was not in chaparral, sage scrub, and alluvial observed during the scrub. biological surveys. Elevation: <1600 meters Blooming period: (Jan)March — September Reptiles Uma inornata Coachella FT, SE Highly specialized endemic lizard Low. Project site lacks Valley CVMSHCP that is restricted to windblown sand suitable windblown sand fringe -toed - Covered deposits (dunes) on the floor of the dune habitat. lizard Species Coachella Valley in Riverside County, California. Birds Athene burrowing SSC Open, dry annual or perennial Low -Moderate. Project cunicularia owl CVMSHCP grasslands, deserts and scrublands site lacks suitable - Covered characterized by low -growing burrows; however, the Species vegetation. Subterranean nester, area is in the vicinity that dependent upon burrowing could provide suitable mammals, most notably, the habitat. California ground squirrel. Public Review Draft I June 2023 Biological Resources 331 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.4-5 Biological Resources 332 Common Potential for Occurrence Scientific Name Status General Habitat Description Name within the Project Site Falco mexiconus prairie WL Open hills, plains, prairies, deserts. Moderate foraging falcon Typically found in fairly dry open habitat. Suitable open country, including grassland and desert habitat is found desert. Also, in open country above on the project site. The tree line in high mountains. In species was not winter, often found in farmland and observed during the around lakes and reservoirs, and biological surveys. may regularly winter in some western cities. Avoids forested country, and usually scarce on the immediate coast. Mammals Nyctinomops Pocketed SC Variety of arid habitats Desert Scrub, Moderate. Project site femorosaccus Free tailed Palm Oasis, Desert Wash, roosts in contains suitable Bat rocky cliffs. foraging habitat. Lasiurus Western SC Primarily roosts in the dead fronds Moderate. Project site xonthinus/ega Yellow Bat CVMSHCP of palms, including landscape contains palm trees - Covered specimens. suitable for foraging and Species roosting. Legend: Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA): FE = federally listed as endangered: FT = federally listed as threatened California Endangered Species Act (CESA): SE = state listed as endangered ST = state listed as threatened California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW): SSC = species of special concern CE= Candidate Endangered FP = fully protected WL=watch list California Rare Plant Ranks (formerly known as CNPS Lists): CRPR 1A - California Rare Plant Rank 1A (formerly List 1A): Plants presumed extirpated in California and either rare or extinct elsewhere. CRPR: 1B - California Rare Plant Rank 1B (formerly List 16): Plants Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California and Elsewhere. CRPR: 2 - California Rare Plant Rank 2 (formerly List 2): Plants Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California, But More Common Elsewhere. CRPR: 4 - California Rare Plant Rank 4 (formerly List 4): Plants of Limited Distribution. California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Threat Ranks: The CNPS Threat Rank is an extension added onto the California Rare Plant Rank (CRPR) and designates the level of endangerment by a 1 to 3 ranking with 1 being the most endangered and 3 being the least endangered. Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP): CVMSHCP = Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Covered Species Source: VCS Environmental, Biological Technical Report, October 2021. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.4-5 Biological Resources 332 Project Site Buffer (2 miles) �r r a.rr CNDDB Occurrences _ - '' •�= Coachella Valley fringe -toed lizard Lancaster milk -vetch Q desert slender salamander glandular ditaxis prairie falcon a 16 MIA 'sk i ! s++ _ • HUME 5ft IIS . . • a • e • r • r � i � ` ,moi: ' ~ • - �� �. �r-. ��= � . • . • • `� 1. !9k - � � • • • _ _ t i ....., 4� �:1pddMIFJAWF _;�'' 1gi:. r ■ Source: VCS Environmental; October 2021. LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) Occurrences VCS Environmental Figure 4.4-2 333 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration WILDLIFE MOVEMENT Wildlife corridors link together areas of suitable habitat that are otherwise separated by rugged terrain, changes in vegetation, or human disturbance. The fragmentation of open space areas by urbanization creates isolated "islands" of wildlife habitat. Corridors effectively act as links between different populations of a species. An increase in a population's genetic variability is generally associated with an increase in a population's health. Corridors mitigate the effects of habitat fragmentation by: • Allowing wildlife to move between remaining habitats, which allows depleted populations to be replenished and promotes genetic diversity; • Providing escape routes from fire, predators, and human disturbances, thus reducing the risk that catastrophic events (such as fires or disease) will result in population or local species extinction; and • Serving as travel routes for individual wildlife species as they move within their home ranges in search of food, water, mates, and other needs (Fahrig and Merriam 1985, Simberloff and Cox 1987, Harris and Gallagher 1989). Wildlife movement activities usually fall into one of three movement categories: • Dispersal (e.g., juvenile animals from natal areas, individuals extending range distributions); Seasonal migration; and • Movements related to home range activities (foraging for food or water, defending territories, searching for mates, breeding areas, or cover). The project site is bordered by residential development, open space, and agriculture areas. Because the site is vacant land and is near open fields, it is possible the project site may play a minor role in local wildlife dispersal and foraging. Common wildlife species including coyotes, skunks, and raccoons may travel through the site and neighboring developed areas, but the site does not provide connectivity between large areas of open space on a local or regional scale. The site is not within a significant regional wildlife movement corridor and is not considered to play a role in regional wildlife movement. General Plan Amendment/Zone Change The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not increase impacts to biological resources above the level of impacts identified in the existing General Plan. Potential impacts to biological resources have been evaluated as part of the evaluation of the proposed project and would be required to comply with regional, state, and federal laws and regulations providing for the protection of biological resources and, where needed, would include avoidance or mitigation measures to minimize impacts to biological resources. With compliance with local, state, and federal laws, potential impacts to biological resources associated with the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be less than significant. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.4-7 Biological Resources 334 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: The project would not have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The following evaluates potential impacts to special status plants, wildlife and critical habitat areas. SPECIAL STATUS PLANT SPECIES Development of the project site would result in the direct removal of non-native trees, herbaceous forbs, and common ruderal plant species. Common plant species present within the project site occur in large numbers throughout the region and their removal does not meet the significance threshold. Based on the high levels of disturbance, low habitat quality and the lack of detection of any special status plants during the biological and focus plant surveys, the project is not expected to impact any special status plant species. Based on the habitat found onsite, no direct impacts are expected to occur as a result of project implementation and no mitigation measures are recommended. SPECIAL STATUS WILDLIFE Development of the project site would result in the disruption and removal of non-native habitat. Due to the lack of native habitat and the level of existing disturbance from agricultural activity onsite and within the vicinity (e.g., nearby date palm tree orchard), these impacts would not be expected to reduce the general wildlife populations below self-sustaining levels within the region and impacts to non -sensitive wildlife species do not meet the significance thresholds. Due to the disturbed nature of the site, surrounding development, and through compliance with the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP), impacts resulting from the project are anticipated to have a less than significant effect on these wildlife species. Although no sensitive wildlife species were observed within the project site during the field survey, five wildlife species have at least moderate (or low to moderate) potential to occur including the Coachella Valley fringe -toed lizard, Prairie falcon, burrowing owl, pocketed free -tailed bat and Western yellow bat. To avoid potential impacts to special status species, Mitigation Measures 13I0-1 through BIO -4 are recommended to reduce impacts to less than significant. Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard The CVMSHCP identifies that there is no potential for fringe -toed lizard to occur on the project site. The site is highly disturbed because of the agricultural activities, and the potential for the project site to support a viable population of this species is considered low. Burrowing Owl Burrowing owl has low to moderate potential to occur within the project site. Although no suitable size burrows were observed within the project site, the areas in the vicinity could provide suitable Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.4-8 Biological Resources 335 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration habitat and due to the proximity, a pre -construction survey to determine presence/absence of the species is recommended. This species was not detected within the project site during the general biological survey. The burrowing owl is covered by special survey requirements of the CVMSHCP. To avoid potential impacts to this species, mitigation measures are proposed which include conducting a burrowing owl survey and implementation of avoidance measures, if present. It should be noted that the burrowing owl, although a "covered" species under the CVMSHCP, also receives protection under CDFW Fish and Game Code (FGC) and Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), therefore, surveys and mitigation would be required regardless of the species location within the Plan Area. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO -2 would ensure that potential impacts to burrowing owls would be less than significant. Prairie Falcon There is a low to moderate potential for prairie falcon to occur within the project site while foraging. This species typically nests in bluffs and cliffs which are not present within the project site. Since removal of vegetation could result in impacts to this raptor species, Mitigation Measure BIO -3 shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less than significant. Nesting Birds and Other Raptor Species The project site has the potential to support various avian species and raptor nests due to the presence of a few shrubs, ground cover, date palm trees and other ornamental trees onsite. Since removal of vegetation could result in impacts to raptor species and nesting birds, Mitigation Measure BIO -3 shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less than significant. Pocketed Free -Tailed Bat, Western Yellow Bat, and Other Bat Species The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has provided bats with more protection recently and have commented on past CEQA documents about the inadequate analysis pertaining to bat impacts. For example, Title 14, Section 251.1 of the California Code of Regulations prohibits harassment of nongame mammals (i.e., bats). Harassment could mean removing the habitat occupied by the species. Additionally, the California Fish and Game Code Section 4150 and Section 86 prohibit "take" or possession of all nongame mammals. The removal of an occupied bat roost that results in the death of bats could be considered "take". Impacts to bat maternity colonies (i.e., native wildlife nursery sites), could be considered potentially significant under the CEQA. There is a moderate potential for bat species including the pocketed free -tailed and Western yellow bat to occur within the project site. The Western yellow bat may roost in untrimmed date palm trees. Bat surveys should be conducted prior to vegetation removal/site disturbance to confirm presence/absence of bat species within the project site. To reduce any potential indirect and direct impacts to bats to less than significant, avoidance and Mitigation Measures BIO -4a — 4d shall be implemented. CRITICAL HABITAT The project site is not located within designated federal critical habitat. No impact to critical habitat would occur. Public Review Draft I June 2023 Biological Resources 336 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Measures: 13I0-1: CVMSCHP Mitigation Fee. The project proponent shall be required to pay the City of La Quinta a local development mitigation fee prior to obtaining a building permit. 1310-2: A pre-construction/clearance burrowing owl survey shall be performed not more than 30 days prior to initial ground disturbance activity to map the location of suitable burrows, if any, and to formally determine presence/absence of the species. A qualified biologist will survey the project site and a buffer zone, 500 -feet outside the project limits for burrows that could be used by burrowing owls. If the burrow is determined to be occupied, the burrow will be flagged, and a 160 -foot diameter buffer will be established during non - breeding season or a 250 -foot diameter buffer during the breeding season. If burrows onsite are unoccupied, construction may proceed. If the site survey determines the presence of burrowing owl, mitigation in accordance with the CDFW shall be implemented as follows: • If burrowing owls are identified as being resident onsite outside the breeding season (September 1 to February 14) they may be relocated to other sites by a permitted biologist (permitted by CDFW), as allowed in the CDFW Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (March 2012). If an active burrow is found during the breeding season, the burrow shall be treated as a nest site and temporary fencing shall be installed at a distance from the active burrow, to be determined by the biologist, to prevent disturbance during grading or construction. Installation and removal of the fencing shall be done with a biological monitor present. • Active relocation and eviction/passive relocation require the preservation and maintenance of suitable burrowing owl habitat determined through coordination with the Wildlife Agencies. 1310-3: Vegetation removal activities shall be conducted outside the nesting season (September 1 to February 14 for songbirds; September 1 to January 14 for raptors) to avoid potential impacts to nesting birds. Any construction activities that occur during the nesting season (February 15 to August 31 for songbirds; January 15 to August 31 for raptors) will require that all suitable habitats be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist within three days before commencement of vegetation clearing/ground disturbance activities. If any active nests are detected, a buffer of 500 feet of an active listed species or raptor nest, 300 feet of other sensitive bird nests (non -listed), and 100 feet of most common songbird nests will be delineated, flagged, and avoided until the nesting cycle is complete. The buffer may be modified and/or other recommendations proposed as determined appropriate by the biological monitor to minimize impacts. BIO -4a: Prior to construction, all suitable areas within the project site shall be surveyed for the presence of bat roosts by a qualified bat biologist. Initial surveys are recommended to be conducted between one year to six months prior to the initiation of vegetation removal and ground disturbing activities, ideally during the maternity season (typically March 1 to Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.4-10 Biological Resources 337 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration August 31), to allow time to prepare mitigation and/or exclusion plans if needed. Surveys may entail direct inspection of the trees or nighttime surveys. If active bat roosts are present, a qualified bat biologist shall determine the species of bats present and the type of roost (i.e., day roost, night roost, maternity roost). If the biologist determines that the roosting bats are not a special -status species and the roost is not being used as a maternity roost, then the bats may be evicted from the roost by a qualified bat biologist experienced in developing and implementing bat mitigation and exclusion plans. • If special -status bat species or a maternity roost of any bat species is present, but no direct removal of active roosts will occur, a qualified bat biologist shall determine appropriate avoidance measures, which may include implementation of a construction -free buffer around the active roost. • If special -status bat species or a maternity roost of any bat species is present and direct removal of habitat (roost location) will occur, then a qualified bat biologist experienced in developing bat mitigation and exclusion plans shall develop a mitigation plan to compensate for the lost roost site. Removal of the roost shall only occur when the mitigation plan has been approved by the City and only when bats are not present in the roost. The mitigation plan shall detail the methods of excluding bats from the roost and the plans for a replacement roost in the vicinity of the project site. The mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for approval prior to implementation. The plan shall include: (1) a description of the species targeted for mitigation; (2) a description of the existing roost or roost sites; (3) methods to be used to exclude the bats if necessary; (4) methods to be used to secure the existing roost site to prevent its reuse prior to removal; (5) the location for a replacement roost structure; (6) design details for the construction of the replacement roost; (7) monitoring protocols for assessing replacement roost use; (8) a schedule for excluding bats, demolishing of the existing roost, and construction of the replacement roost; and (9) contingency measures to be implemented if the replacement roosts do not function as designed. 13I0 -4b: Pre -construction surveys shall be conducted by a qualified bat biologist no more than two weeks prior to the initiation of vegetation removal and ground disturbing activities. If no active roosts are present, then trees shall be removed within two weeks following the survey. 13I0 -4c: All potential roost trees (including palm trees) shall be removed in a manner approved by a qualified bat biologist outside the maternity season (March 15 — August 31 in the Coachella Valley which coincides with the bird nesting season) to avoid the potential for "take" of nonvolant (flightless) young. Trees and snags that have been identified as confirmed or potential roost sites require a two-step removal process and the involvement of a bat biologist to ensure that no roosting bats are killed during this activity. Consistent with CDFW protocols this two-step removal shall occur over two consecutive days as follows: on Day 1, branches and limbs not containing cavities, as identified by a qualified bat biologist, will be removed. On Day 2, the remainder of the tree may be removed without supervision by a bat biologist. The Public Review Draft I June 2023 Biological Resources 338 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration disturbance caused by limb removal, followed by an interval of one evening, will allow bats to safely abandon the roost. BIO -4d: All construction activity in the vicinity of an active roost shall be limited to daylight hours. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact: The project would not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The project site consists of 9.7 acres of a fallow agricultural field which is not considered a sensitive habitat by local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by CDFW or USFWS. The proposed project will not impact any native habitats or any special status habitats. No riparian habitats exist on the project site. Therefore, no impacts are expected to occur to any riparian habitats or other sensitive natural communities as a result of project activities. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact: The project would not have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. No jurisdictional waters or wetlands regulated under the CWA occur on the project site; therefore, no impacts are expected. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: The project would not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. The project site may serve a function in local wildlife dispersal and foraging; however, due to the disturbed nature of the site and the degraded habitats, the loss of foraging habitat and/or effect on local wildlife movement would be less than significant. No long-term or significant effects to wildlife movement are anticipated due to project implementation. Because the project site does not lie within a CVMSHCP-designated wildlife corridor and is adjacent to residential development, the proposed project is not anticipated to have significant impacts related to habitat fragmentation and regional wildlife movement. As such, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures would be required. Public Review Draft I lune 2023 4.4-12 Biological Resources 339 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Neqative Declaration NESTING BIRDS Due to the potential for onsite bird nesting, project construction could result in impacts to nesting birds that would be in violation of the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBIA) and the California Fish and Game Code. Therefore, recommended avoidance measures, including a pre -construction nesting bird survey to avoid impacts prior to the start of work, would be implemented. With the implementation of 13I0-3, potential impacts to migratory birds would be less than significant. ROOSTING BATS Due to the potential for bat species, including the pocketed free -tailed and Western yellow bat to occur within the project site and with the potential for these species to roost in untrimmed date palms, project construction could result in impacts to roosting bats. Therefore, recommended avoidance measures including pre -construction bat surveys shall be implemented. With the implementation of Mitigation Measures 13I0 -4a, 13I0 -4b, BIO -4c and 13I0 -4d, potential impacts to roosting bats would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measures 1310-3, 310-4a, 1310-4b, 1310-4c and 1310-4d are required. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? No Impact: The project would not conflict with any local policy or ordinances protecting biological resources. The City has no existing ordinance specifically protecting any tree or biological resources. VCS conducted a Tree Inventory Survey and prepared a Tree Inventory Memorandum as part of the biological analysis to document the trees located on the project site, which is included as Appendix D of Appendix B, Biological Technical Report. The Tree Inventory Survey was conducted by VCS biologists Carla Marriner and Chris Eljenholm on September 22, 2021, and identified a total of 207 trees within the project site. Specifically, the survey found that 188 date palms (Phoenix dactylifera), 17 Mexican fan palms (Washingtonia robusta), one crimson bottlebrush (Callistemon citrinus), and one Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis) and are located within the project site. The location and sizes of the trees to be removed are included in Figure 4.4-3, Tree Inventory Map. All the tree species identified within the project site are non-native ornamental species and are not species that would be considered rare or threatened. The City has no local policies or ordinances that would conflict with the removal of the trees inventoried on the project site. Additionally, the Riverside County Agriculture Commissioner does not have any ordinances regarding the removal of trees that would be applicable to the project site. Therefore, the project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.4-13 Biological Resources 340 Q Project Site Trees Height Date palm, 0-5 ft A Date palm, 5-15 ft A Date palm, 15-30 ft A Date palm, 30-45 ft A Date palm, 45-60 ft O Mexican palm, 5-15 ft O Mexican palm, 15-30 ft • Mexican palm, 30-45 ft * Crimson bottlebrush, 15-30 ft * Aleppo pine, 30-45 ft Tree Height (ft) Date Palm Mexican Palm Crimson Bottlebrush Aleppo I Pine 0-5 3 0 0 0 5-15 32 7 0 C 15-30 61 8 1 0 30-451 91 21 0 1 45-601 1 0 0 0 Total 1881 171 1 .. IF1% MR = i saris serenata Dr f F 7 sisra� Source: VCS Environmental: October 2021. VCS Environmental .P Ap' 7 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Tree Inventory Map Figure 4.4-3 341 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: The project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. The project falls within the CVMSHCP planning area. The CVMSHCP designates 21 Conservation areas within its Planning area which have increased protections for covered species. The project does not fall within any areas designated as conservation areas in the CVMSHCP. Additionally, the project site consists of vacant/disturbed land which is unlikely to support suitable habitat for species protected under the CVMSHCP. Because the proposed project falls within the CVMSHCP planning area, it will be required to pay a mitigation fee which will be used to ensure that future funds are available to meet the conservation goals of the CVMSHCP. Payment of mitigation fees would ensure compliance with the CVMSHCP and therefore impacts to covered species would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measures BIO -1 is required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.4-15 Biological Resources 342 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.4-16 Biological Resources 343 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.5 Cultural Resources The following analysis is based on a Phase / Cultural Resources Assessment prepared by VCS Environmental in August 2021 and a Historic Resource Analysis Report prepared by Urbana Preservation & Planning in May 2022. The Reports are presented in Appendix C. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Background Cultural resources include prehistoric archaeological sites, historic archaeological sites, historic structures, and artifacts made by people in the past. Prehistoric archaeological sites are places that contain the material remains of activities carried out by the native population of the area (Native Americans) prior to the arrival of Europeans in southern California. Artifacts found in prehistoric sites include flaked stone tools such as projectile points, knives, scrapers, and drills; ground stone tools such as manos, metates, mortars, and pestles for grinding seeds and nuts; and bone tools. Historic archaeological sites are places that contain the material remains of activities carried out by people during the period when written records were produced after the arrival of Europeans. Historic archaeological material usually consists of refuse, such as bottles, cans and food waste, deposited near structure foundations. Historic structures include houses, commercial structures, industrial facilities, and other structures and facilities more than 50 years old. Regulatory Setting CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) CEQA requires a lead agency to determine whether a project would have a significant impact on one or more historical resources. According to Section 15064.5(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines, a "historical resource" is defined as a resource listed in or determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) (PRC §21084.1); a resource included in a local register of historical resources (14 CCR §15064.5[a][2]); or any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript that a lead agency determines to be historically significant (14 CCR §15064.5[a][3]). Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.5-1 Cultural Resources 344 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Would the project:J11k Significant Impact With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to in Section ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 15064.5? b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section ❑ ® ❑ ❑ 15064.5? c. Disturb any human remains, including those interred ❑ ® ❑ ❑ outside of dedicated cemeteries? The following analysis is based on a Phase / Cultural Resources Assessment prepared by VCS Environmental in August 2021 and a Historic Resource Analysis Report prepared by Urbana Preservation & Planning in May 2022. The Reports are presented in Appendix C. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Background Cultural resources include prehistoric archaeological sites, historic archaeological sites, historic structures, and artifacts made by people in the past. Prehistoric archaeological sites are places that contain the material remains of activities carried out by the native population of the area (Native Americans) prior to the arrival of Europeans in southern California. Artifacts found in prehistoric sites include flaked stone tools such as projectile points, knives, scrapers, and drills; ground stone tools such as manos, metates, mortars, and pestles for grinding seeds and nuts; and bone tools. Historic archaeological sites are places that contain the material remains of activities carried out by people during the period when written records were produced after the arrival of Europeans. Historic archaeological material usually consists of refuse, such as bottles, cans and food waste, deposited near structure foundations. Historic structures include houses, commercial structures, industrial facilities, and other structures and facilities more than 50 years old. Regulatory Setting CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) CEQA requires a lead agency to determine whether a project would have a significant impact on one or more historical resources. According to Section 15064.5(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines, a "historical resource" is defined as a resource listed in or determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) (PRC §21084.1); a resource included in a local register of historical resources (14 CCR §15064.5[a][2]); or any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript that a lead agency determines to be historically significant (14 CCR §15064.5[a][3]). Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.5-1 Cultural Resources 344 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Section 5024.1 of the PRC, Section 15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR), and Sections 21083.2 and 21084.1 of the CEQA Statutes were used as the basic guidelines for the cultural resources study. PRC 5024.1 requires evaluation of historical resources to determine their eligibility for listing in the CRHR. The purposes of the CRHR are to maintain listings of the State's historical resources and to indicate which properties are to be protected from substantial adverse change. The criteria for listing resources in the CRHR, which were expressly developed to be in accordance with previously established criteria developed for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRNP) (per the criteria listed at 36 CFR §60.4), are stated below (PRC §5024.1). Any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California may be considered a historical resource ... Generally, a resource shall be considered by a lead agency to be "historically significant" if the resource meets the criteria for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources including the following: (a) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage; or (b) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; or (c) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or (d) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Impacts that would materially impair the significance of a resource listed in or eligible for listing in the CRHR are considered to have a significant effect on the environment. Impacts to historical resources from the proposed project are considered significant if the project (A) demolishes or materially impairs in an adverse manner those physical characteristics that convey its historical significance and that justify its inclusion in, or eligibility for, the California Register; (B) demolishes or materially impairs in an adverse manner those physical characteristics that account for its inclusion in a local register, or (C) demolishes or materially impairs in an adverse manner those physical characteristics that convey its historical significance and thatjustify its eligibilityfor inclusion in the California Register as determined by a lead agency (§15064.5[b][2]). Integrity and the CRHR Integrity is the authenticity of a historical resource's physical identity evidenced by the survival of characteristics that existed during the resource's period of significance. Historical resources eligible for listing in the California Register must meet one of the criteria of significance described above and retain enough of their historic character or appearance to be recognizable as historical resources and to convey the reasons for their significance. Historical resources that have been rehabilitated or restored may be evaluated for listing. Integrity is evaluated with regard to the retention of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. It must also be judged with reference to the particular criteria under which a resource is proposed for eligibility. Alterations over time to a resource or historic changes in its use may themselves have historical, cultural, or architectural significance. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.5-2 Cultural Resources 345 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration It is possible that historical resources may not retain sufficient integrity to meet the criteria for listing in the National Register, but they may still be eligible for listing in the California Register. A resource that has lost its historic character or appearance may still have sufficient integrity for the California Register if it maintains the potential to yield significant scientific or historical information or specific data. CITY OF LA QUINTA HISTORIC PRESERVATION CRITERIA City of La Quinta Municipal Code Title 7 (Ord. 536 § 2, 2016; Ord. 238 § 2, 1993; Ord. 207 § 1, 1992) states that a historic resource may be considered and approved by City Council for inclusion in the City's historic resources inventory based on one or more of the following: A. It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the City's cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering or architectural history. B. It is identified with persons or events significant in local, state or national history. C. It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period or method of construction, is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship or is representative of a notable work of an acclaimed builder, designer or architect. D. It is an archaeological, paleontological, botanical, geological, topographical, ecological or geographical site which has the potential of yielding information of scientific value. E. It is a geographically definable area with a concentration of buildings, structures, improvements, or objects linked historically through location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and/or association, in which the collective value of the improvements may be greater than the value of each individual improvement. EXISTING SETTING Cultural Pre -History The earliest period of human occupation in North America that is widely accepted is called Period I by Wallace (1978). It dates from approximately 12,000 to 6,000 Before Present (B.P.) This period has been called San Dieguito, Playa, or Lake Mojave in southern California and Western Pluvial Lakes Tradition in the Great Basin. The Western Pluvial Lakes Tradition (Bedwell 1970) corresponds to post -Pleistocene conditions that were cooler and wetter than the present. It represents the post -Pleistocene adaptation to big game hunting of large mammals and possibly even members of the late Pleistocene megafauna, such as the mammoth. If gathering was also part of this early subsistence strategy, plants were apparently not being processed with ground stone technology. It is characterized by (a) site locations near major water sources, (b) an absence of ground stone, (c) a flaked stone industry with long stemmed points, and (d) a stone tool kit which included large core and flake scrapers, scraper -planes, choppers, and hammerstones (see Altschul et al. 1985:24). This early hunting tradition ended around 6,000 B.P., probably due to the advent of much warmer and drier times associated with the Altithermal which led to a shift in subsistence strategies focused on plants and small game. The Millingstone Horizon (Wallace 1955), or Encinitas Tradition (Warren 1968), dates from approximately 8,000 B.P. to 1,000 B.P. This horizon marks the technological advancements of seed grinding for flour and the beginning of the use of marine resources. Diagnostic artifacts for this tradition include manos, metates, scraper planes, choppers, core tools, doughnut stones, discoidals, Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.5-3 Cultural Resources 346 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and cogstones. This period includes archaeological cultures/complexes such as Pauma, La Jolla, Topanga, Oak Grove, and Sayles (cf. Moratto 1983). Brock (2002) reports a buried late period Millingstone site (pottery absent) in lacustrine sediments in the City of Coachella. The site is characterized by the presence of fired clay, purportedly evidence of waddle and daub construction, chipped stone implements (no projectile points), and fragments of milling stone. Brock (2002a) also reports an isolated discoidal found on another property in the City of Coachella. No other finds from this period are recorded for the Coachella Valley (Moratto 1983:149). The Late Prehistoric Period began around 1000 B.P. and continued until historic contact in the late 1700s. On the coast, the period is characterized by three basic shifts in the economy: (a) a more land- based collecting economy in coastal environs, (b) collection of specifically targeted shellfish resource areas, and (c) the development of a quasi -maritime economy (True 1966). In the Salton Basin, the cyclical filling and desiccation of Lake Cahuilla largely dictated settlement patterns. Archaeologically, the introduction of the mortar and pestle, finer projectile points, cremations, and the introduction of pottery around 1000 CE characterize this period throughout southern California. Archaeologically the San Luis Rey Complex represents a termination of most of the millingstone practices in favor of greater reliance on acorn exploitation and establishment of semi-permanent villages in centralized resource locations (True 1966). San Luis Rey I assemblages are characterized by millingstones, bedrock mortars, cremations and small triangular points. San Luis Rey II contains all those plus pottery, cremation urns and, after contact, glass beads and metal knives (True et al 1974) and is also seen as an intrusive period of "desert" traits/people from the northeast, possibly related to the desiccation of Lake Cahuilla. Researchers believe that this cultural pattern can be linked to Shoshonean expansion into the region and that it is probably the direct ancestor of the Luiseno culture (True 1966; True et al 1974; White 1963; Bean and Shipek 1978). The Late Prehistoric period can be said to have ended with the Spanish colonization and establishment of the missions. Disease and forced relocation, which reduced the populations considerably among the coastal settlements, did much to destroy the cultural pattern established in that period (Bean and Shipek 1978). The retreat of Lake Cahuilla began at approximately 500 B.P. Within just a few decades the salinity of the lake water was such that it was no longer able to be used for human consumption. The eventual desiccation of Lake Cahuilla resulted in the emigration of human populations (proto-historic Cahuilla) to the south and west through San Gorgonio Pass into the San Jacinto Plains (Wilke 1971; O'Connell et al. 1974). Post lacustrine settlement patterns seem to consist of campsites or villages (located near perennial water sources such as Morongo) and sporadic temporary activity locations. At European contact times, the study area was within areas occupied by groups known as the Cahuilla. The Cahuilla culture area incorporated east -central Riverside County, consisting of desert, pass (San Gorgonio Pass) and mountain groups each affiliation describing the exploitation areas of each group. Desert Cahuilla ranged throughout the Coachella Valley from almost EI Centro to Cabezon; the Pass Cahuilla occupied San Gorgonio Pass and the Mountain Cahuilla dominated the Santa Rosa Mountains. The Cahuilla are linguistically comprised of a language belonging to the Cupan subgroup of the Takic family of the Shoshonean (Uto-Aztecan) (Kroeber 1925: Plate 57; Bean 1972). The Contact period ethnicity of the study area is clear as the modern Cahuilla reservation of Agua Caliente is nearby. Ethnographic literature pertinent to the Cahuilla and surrounding ethnographic groups is fairly Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.5-4 Cultural Resources 347 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration extensive and has been collected since the 1800's (see Barrows 1900; Sparkman 1908; Kroeber 1925; White 1963 and Bean 1972). ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS SEARCH A review of the records search completed by Hudlow (2019) at the Eastern Information Center (EIC) at the University of California, Riverside was completed by the author (Appendix Q. The EIC is the designated branch of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) and houses records concerning archaeological and historic resources in Riverside, Inyo, and Mono Counties. The records search provided data on known archaeological and built environment resources as well as previous studies within one-half mile of the project site. Data sources consulted at the EIC included archaeological records, Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility (DOE), and the Historic Property Data File (HPDF) maintained by the California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP). The HPDF contains listings for the CRHR and/or NRHP, California Historical Landmarks (CHL), and California Points of Historical Interest (CPHI). The records search revealed ten surveys had been conducted within one half -mile of the survey area, including three surveys that included the current project area (Tang, et a/ 2003, Mason 2005, Tang and Encarnacion 2010). The EIC lists three prehistoric archaeological sites recorded within one-half mile of the survey area to the south. No cultural resources have been recorded within the project area. FIELD SURVEY During the field survey, no cultural resources were identified; however, the property was covered in trash and thick weeds, limiting examination of the ground. A desktop study revealed that the project site still supports the remnants of a date palm operation. HISTORY OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA European exploration of the Coachella Valley began in the late 18th century. The earliest reported exploration of the Coachella Valley occurred during the Spanish occupation of California. In 1776, Spanish explorer Juan Bautista de Anza traversed the region on one of his two expeditions during the early colonization of California. Spanish exploration of the region continued through the 1800s, in an effort to find a passable supply route from Mexico to the colonies in California. For the first half of the 19th century, the Coachella Valley was intermittently utilized as an overland route between Mexico and Alta California. Between 1821 and 1846, Mexican land grants were established and bestowed by the Mexican government along former indigenous lands. They were issued to people who showed the government that they could put the land to good use. Throughout the Mexican occupation of California, over 500 land grants were made. In 1876, the Southern Pacific Railroad was constructed through the Coachella Valley, opening the region for settlement, as well as providing new economic opportunities and stimulating the development of towns and communities. Railroad stations were placed along the railway, becoming the center of new towns and the fabric of the settlement system in the area. The present-day City of Indio, at the time known as Indian Wells, and later the towns of Thermal, Coachella, and Mecca, developed as a result of the railroad. By the 1880s, as homesteading in the Coachella Valley increased, the area that would become La Quinta would not see its first homestead claims until the turn of the century. Early homesteading Public Review Draft I June 2023 Cultural Resources 348 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration occurred mostly around the Palm Springs area under the Desert Land Law of 1877. During the late 1890s, the first applications for government land in the La Quinta area consisted of Desert Land Entries, Homestead Entries, and State Grants, and properties acquired through the Indemnity List. During the 1920s, tourism became the new major industry in the Coachella Valley, transforming the region into a winter retreat. Mirroring the development of Palm Springs, resorts, camps, hotels, and later country clubs were constructed in La Quinta in order to cater to tourists. In the 1930s, developers began to subdivide large parcels of land located within proximity to the La Quinta Hotel for suburban development. In 1935, developer E. S. "Harry' Kiener purchased and subdivided an area south of the hotel known as the La Quinta Cove. Kiener previously developed the Peter Pan Woodland Club in Big Bear and brought his experience to the Cove project. He advertised his new community as "one to rival Palm Springs." Residential lots were sold for $500 with fully furnished "weekend homes" and promoted in newspaper publications as part of the winter resort club community. Modest adobe bungalows were constructed on lots averaging approximately 50 feet by 100 feet. Streets were constructed in a north -to -south grid pattern, and graded and oiled to control dust conditions. By 1941, the Cove residential subdivision began to take its present-day appearance. During the 1940s, Coachella Valley served as a military training site for almost one million soldiers. A 162,000 -acre military camp known as Camp Young was established east of present-day Indio. The area became a military testing area for lethal weapons utilized during the war. In 1942, the La Quinta Hotel closed its doors and was requisitioned by the United States Army who used it as their headquarters. While the hotel was not an official duty station, signs were placed forbidding all unauthorized entry. In the early 1980s, as the development and population of the area continued to increase, so did the need for incorporation. With a population of approximately 3,500 in 1980, residents needed additional dedicated services to accommodate the growing population. On May 1, 1982, following two attempts at incorporation, the City of La Quinta was incorporated as a municipality. The city was named after the hotel that stimulated the early development of the area as a resort town. In 2002, additional sections of land formerly belonging to the unincorporated town of Thermal were annexed to the City of La Quinta. Today, the City is home again to a destination for therapeutic and recreational resort opportunities with more than 20 golf courses, numerous parks, and biking and hiking trails. The City continues to embrace its history while facilitating new development strategies. Date Farming Agricultural development of present-day La Quinta commenced at the turn of the twentieth century. Despite the harsh desert environment, the area was home to numerous farming establishments. La Quinta's climate and soil fostered the growth of exotic dates, sweet corn, Bermuda onions, and Thompson seedless grapes, therein becoming one of the several agricultural communities in the Coachella Valley. In the beginning of the 1900s, the region was one of many selected by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for experimental research purposes. Established in 1862, the USDA's primary goals were to promote the interests of farmers and rural communities in the United States, which at the time represented over half of the nation's population. In the late 1880s, the USDA created a special department to locate exotic crops for farmers to grow in the United States. These included mangos, avocados, and new varieties of citrus. As part of their task, the department studied different environments and established experimental stations throughout the country in areas they felt were best suited for the cultivation of a subject crop. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.5-6 Cultural Resources 349 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration In 1904, the USDA established the first of several experimental stations in the Coachella Valley. The federal agency discovered the region's high temperatures and soil conditions were ideal for the cultivation of dates. Between the 1910s and 1940s, date farms dotted the area and defined the cultural landscape of the Coachella Valley. Dates were grown commercially by both farmers and ranchers and generated the largest single source of income of crop cultivated in the region. With the Southern Pacific Railroad located in close proximity, farmers had easy access to exporting their crops to outside markets. Three varieties of dates were grown in the La Quinta area, the Deglet Noor, Saidy, and Thoory. During the 1950s, date farmers faced tough competition from foreign markets. While lower in quality, foreign sources were generally preferred due to lower prices. Iraqi dates represented the vast majority of dates consumed by Americans. In an effort to boost the date industry, valley farmers hosted an annual International Festival of the Dates. Business and civic leaders encouraged townspeople to participate in the event. The Middle Eastern themed event offered camel races, a pageant, and exhibits with a variety of dates. Over the years, as date farmers continued to struggle, farms were gradually replaced by citrus trees and increased residential development. Today, many residential sections have recently been built over former date farms. Although the date industry has since declined in the area of La Quinta, it continues to make a small presence in the Coachella Valley. Adobe Construction During the early settlement of the Coachella Valley, the region was once dotted with hundreds of adobe structures. Adobe construction was popular in the region due to its simplicity, low-cost, ease of construction, and readily available materials. Adobe has a long history as one of the earliest preferred building materials that is utilized to this day. Adobe structures are often identified by their thick load- bearing walls with a rounded wavy -like appearance, deeply set fenestration, flat or gently sloping roofs, and massive wood roof and ceiling beams. Since adobe construction was load bearing with low structural strength, walls tend to be massive and are seldom two -stories in height. By the early 20th century, cement stucco was applied to the exterior of buildings as an adobe surface coating. Adobe structures are typically found in California, Arizona, and to a greater extent, in Texas and New Mexico. It was applied to several historic architectural styles, including the Spanish Revival, Mission Revival, Pueblo Revival, Mexican Hacienda, and Monterey. Today, many of the adobe structures visible in La Quinta date from the 1920s to 1950s. Adobe construction is often visible in residential -use properties but is also noticeable in commercial -use properties. Adobe buildings were mostly constructed in the Spanish Colonial Revival style, but also include the Mission Revival and Monterrey architectural style. The buildings feature red tile roofs, adobe or stucco exteriors, walled gardens, courtyards, decorative iron work, and arcaded porches. The most recognized adobe commercial use building constructed in the Spanish Colonial Revival style is the La Quinta Resort and Club. Constructed in 1926, the hotel exhibited many of the character defining features previously listed. The hotel was designed around three courtyards with twenty Spanish Eclectic guest bungalows sited near the hotel lobby. It took more than 100,000 hand -formed adobe bricks and 60,000 locally fired roof tiles to construct the small casitas. Within the hotel grounds, a two- story Spanish Revival style adobe residence with characteristics in the Monterrey style was constructed for the hotel's developer Walter H. Morgan. By the 1930s, the construction of the La Quinta Hotel would spur the development of the area's first residential community known as the Cove. Located south of the La Quinta Resort and Club, the Cove subdivision featured several Spanish Colonial Revival adobe bungalows. Between 1936 and 1941, approximately 61 small adobe houses were constructed in a similar fashion and scale to the casitas at the La Quinta Hotel. The dwellings featured a white Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.5-7 Cultural Resources 350 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration adobe exterior, low red tiled -roofs, paned windows, and wooden lintels. The same company who had made the tiles and bricks for the La Quinta Hotel also made the roof tiles for the casitas in the Cove. Over the years, several of these properties have been modified through repairs, alterations, and additions, however most of the dwellings that remain retain sufficient integrity. Project Site History The construction history occurring on the project site was established through previous documentation, building permits, historic maps, and historic and current aerial photography. Based on the historic aerials, the project site was initially improved between 1939 and 1941 with the construction of a modest one-story vernacular adobe dwelling with characteristics in the Spanish Colonial architectural style by an unidentified builder. The residence had an asymmetrical fagade and an L-shaped floorplan sited on a concrete foundation. The dwelling featured thick adobe walls, a low- pitched side gable roof topped with gravel, an interior cobblestone chimney, deeply recessed wood - framed casement windows and aluminum double -hung windows, and a wide veranda supported by wooden posts. The property was first delineated on a 1941 Coachella USGS Quadrangle map (1:62,500) and was captured on a 1947 aerial photograph of the area (Earth Explorer ID# B000384630002). The building was surrounded by several acres of date palms. Between 1953 and 1972, a small office addition was constructed east of the existing dwelling. The addition featured a rectangular floorplan, a stucco fagade, a low-pitched shed roof topped with gravel, and aluminum fenestration throughout. The addition is first visible on a 1972 aerial photograph (HistoricAerials.com). In 1976, a swimming pool was constructed north of the office addition. Between 1996 and 2002, many of the date palms located south of the existing dwelling were removed to allow for the addition of a horse paddock and several pole structures. The paddock is visible on a 2002 aerial photograph (HistoricAerials.com). In 2014, a permit was filed by La Quinta del Sol, LLC for the demolition of the single-family residence and the office space addition (Permit No. BDEM2014- 0001). The permit was approved by the City of La Quinta Building and Safety Department on October 1, 2014. Today, the subject property is a vacant lot with some remnants of the former date farm. General Plan Amendment/Zone Change The Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment prepared for the project did not identify recorded cultural resources or paleontological resources on the project site. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not increase impacts to cultural or paleontological resources above the level of impacts identified in the existing General Plan. Potential impacts to cultural resources have been evaluated as part of the evaluation of the proposed project and would be required to comply with laws and regulations providing for the protection of cultural and paleontological resources, including implementing measures to minimize impacts to cultural and paleontological resources. With compliance with laws and regulations providing for the protection of cultural and paleontological resources and implementing measures to minimize impacts to cultural and paleontological resources, potential impacts to cultural and paleontological resources associated with the proposed General Plan Amendment would be less than significant. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.5-8 Cultural Resources 351 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to in Section 15064.5? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to in Section 15064.5. Based on the historic aerial photograph reviewed, included as part of the Historical Resource Analysis Report prepared by Urbana Preservation and Planning for the property, the property was initially improved between 1939 and 1941 with the construction of a modest one-story vernacular adobe dwelling with characteristics in the Spanish Colonial architectural style by an unidentified builder. Between 1996 and 2002, many of the date palms located south of the existing dwelling were removed to allow for the addition of a horse paddock and several pole structures. In 2014, a permit was filed by La Quinta del Sol, LLC for the demolition of the single-family residence and the office space addition (Permit No. BDEM2014-0001). The permit was approved by the City of La Quinta Building and Safety Department on October 1, 2014. The property was analyzed for historical and architectural significance under the eligibility criteria of the Local Register and California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). These eligibility criteria establish a threshold under which a property may be determined to meet the definition of a historical resource for the purposes of CEQA and the local planning and development discretionary review process and inform the local designation request. The following is an analysis of the project eligibility. CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES (CRHR)/LOCAL REGISTER ELIGIBILITY CRHR/Local Criterion 1/A: It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the City's cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, or architectural history. • The property is not eligible under CRHR/Local Register Criterion 1/A as it does not exemplify or reflect special elements of the City's history. Constructed between 1939 and 1941, the property is one of many associated with the date industry that defined the area of La Quinta during the first half of the twentieth century. The subject property was not the first nor was it the most significant date farm in the area. As such, the property was determined not eligible under CRHR/Local Register Criterion 1/A. CRHR/Local Criterion 2/13: It is identified with persons or events significant in local, state or national history. • Research does not indicate that the 81891 Avenue 58 property is associated with individuals significant in local, state, or national history. For this reason, the subject property was determined not eligible under CRHR/Local Register 2/13. CRHR/Local Criterion 3/C: It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period or method of construction, is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship or is representative of a notable work of an acclaimed builder, designer or architect. • In order to designate the property under Criterion 3/C, the subject dwelling must possess the distinctive characteristics of an architectural style and it must not have been substantially altered from its historic condition. Based on historical research and imagery, the subject property was initially improved between 1939 and 1941 with the construction of a vernacular adobe style dwelling with characteristics of the Spanish Colonial architectural style. The Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.5-9 Cultural Resources 352 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration dwelling had an asymmetrical fapade and an L-shaped floorplan sited on a concrete foundation. The dwelling featured thick adobe walls, a low-pitched side gable roof topped with gravel, an interior cobblestone chimney, and deeply recessed wood -framed casement windows and aluminum double hung windows, and a wide veranda supported by wooden posts. The dwelling featured several Spanish Colonial style design elements. These include a rectangular floorplan, thick stucco walls, deeply recessed fenestration, and a wide veranda supported by wood beams. However, none of these elements would be considered distinctive. Rather, they are typical and common. Although the dwelling (demolished in 2014) was one of few constructed in adobe, it was constructed towards the latter end of the popularity of adobe as a building material. For this reason, it was determined that the dwelling — had it survived — would not have been eligible under CRHR/Local Register 3/C. CRHR/Local Criterion 4/D: It is an archaeological, paleontological, botanical, geological, topographical, ecological or geographical site which has the potential of yielding information of scientific value. • Research and analysis of the subject property has not yielded information important in local, regional, state, or national history. Further study of the property is not likely to yield important information. The property is not eligible under CRHR/Local Register Criterion 4/D. Local Register Criterion E: It is a geographically definable area with a concentration of buildings, structures, improvements, or objects linked historically through location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and/or association, in which the collective value of the improvements may be greater than the value of each individual improvement. • The subject property is not in and of itself a geographically definable concentration of buildings, structures, improvements, or objects linked historically through location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and/or association. The property is not eligible under Local Register Criterion E. Integrity: Evaluation of integrity must always be grounded in an understanding of a resource's physical features and how they relate to historic significance. To retain historic integrity, a resource will possess several, and usually most, of the following seven aspects of integrity: location, materials, design, setting, workmanship, feeling, and association. If it is determined that a resource is eligible for designation because it meets one or more of the adopted designation criteria, the integrity of the resource must be evaluated. Integrity is the ability of a resource to convey its significance. Only after the historic significance of a resource is fully established can the issue of integrity be addressed. • The property has not been found to be individually eligible for designation under any of the criteria. In its former state, the residence would not have been considered significant as a distinctive example of a vernacular Spanish Colonial Revival style dwelling. Additionally, the dwelling had lost integrity due to substantial and recent modifications to the property. Today, the dwelling has since been demolished and the property remains a vacant lot with some remnants of the date farm. Further integrity analysis is not merited. REGULATORY CONCLUSIONS The property has been identified as not eligible for designation to or listing on the CRHR and Local Register under all criteria. Constructed between 1939 and 1941, the property was one of many Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.5-10 Cultural Resources 353 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration constructed during the agricultural development of the City of La Quinta. The demolished dwelling was a vernacular adobe structure with characteristics of the Spanish Colonial style that was not found to have historical or architectural merit. Today, the property remains a vacant lot with no standing structures. Consequently, the subject property does not meet the definition of a historic resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, nor does it meet the definition of a historic resource pursuant to the City of La Quinta's Municipal Code Title 7 (Ord. 536 § 2, 2016; Ord. 238 § 2, 1993; Ord. 207 § 1, 1992). As a result, it was determined that the proposed project at the subject property would not cause an adverse significant effect to a historic resource. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: Implementation of the proposed project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5. As previously indicated, a record search and pedestrian survey conducted on the project site did not identify any known archaeological resources. Three prehistoric isolates have been recorded within one-half mile. Although the project site is not located within a general area of sensitivity for prehistorical archaeology, the grading activities associated with construction of the proposed project could encounter native soils and could have the potential to encounter unknown archaeological resources. To avoid adverse impacts to archaeological resources that could be encountered during construction, Mitigation Measure CR -1 is recommended, which requires archaeological monitoring and Native American monitoring to occur during project excavations into alluvial soils, and estimated to occur within near surface soils to a depth of 5 to 10 feet. With implementation of Mitigation Measure CR -1, potential impacts to unknown archaeological resources would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: CR -1: Based on the data presented, it is recommended that archaeological monitoring and Native American monitoring (if applicable) occur during project excavations into alluvial soils, estimated to occur within near surface soils to a depth of 5 to 10 feet. These Mitigation Measures for the project outline the monitoring protocols. A MMRP to mitigate potential impacts to undiscovered buried cultural resources within the project shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the Lead Agency. This program shall include, but not be limited to, the following actions: 1) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall provide written verification that a certified archaeologist has been retained to implement the monitoring program. This verification shall be presented in a letter from the project archaeologist to the Lead Agency. 2) The project applicant shall provide Native American monitoring during grading if the Lead Agency determines it is necessary pending results of the AB 52 Consultation process. If applicable, the Native American monitor shall work in concert with the archaeological monitor to observe ground disturbances and search for cultural materials. The Lead Agency shall coordinate with the consulting Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.5-11 Cultural Resources 354 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Tribe(s) to facilitate communications with the project developer/applicant so that all parties can develop a mutually acceptable Tribal Monitoring and Treatment Agreement which includes the scope of monitoring, scheduling of monitors from individual consulting Tribe(s), and the course of action for inadvertent discoveries. 3) The project archaeologist, in consultation with the consulting Tribe(s), the contractor, and the City, shall implement a Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) to address the details, timing and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site. Details in the plan shall include: a. Project grading and development scheduling. b. The project archaeologist and the Consulting Tribes(s) shall attend the pre - grading meeting with the City, the construction manager and all contractors and will conduct a mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance. The training will include a brief review of the cultural sensitivity of the project and the surrounding area; what resources could potentially be identified during earthmoving activities; the requirements of the monitoring program; the protocols that apply in the event inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources are identified, including who to contact and appropriate avoidance measures until the find(s) can be properly evaluated; and any other appropriate protocols. c. The protocols and stipulations that the contractor, City, Consulting Tribe(s) and project archaeologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a cultural resource evaluation. 4) During the original cutting of previously undisturbed deposits, the archaeological and Tribal monitors (if applicable) shall be onsite, as determined by the consulting archaeologist, to perform periodic inspections of the excavations. Monitoring is recommended in younger Holocene alluvial soils, estimated to occur within near surface soils to a depth of 5 to 10 feet. The frequency of inspections will depend upon the rate of excavation, the materials excavated, and the presence and abundance of artifacts and features. The consulting archaeologist shall have the authority to modify the monitoring program if the potential for cultural resources appears to be less than anticipated. 5) Isolates and clearly non-significant deposits will be minimally documented in the field so the monitored grading can proceed. 6) In the event that previously unidentified cultural resources are discovered, the archaeologist shall have the authority to divert or temporarily halt ground disturbance operations in the area of the discovery to allow for the evaluation of potentially significant cultural resources. The archaeologist shall contact the Lead Agency at the time of the discovery. The archaeologist, in consultation with the lead agency, shall determine the significance of the discovered resources. The Lead Agency must concur with the evaluation before construction activities will be Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.5-12 Cultural Resources 355 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration allowed to resume in the affected area. For significant cultural resources, a Research Design and Data Recovery Program to mitigate impacts shall be implemented by the consulting archaeologist and approved by the Lead Agency before being carried out, using professional archaeological methods. If any human bones are discovered, the county coroner and lead agency shall be contacted. In the event that the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Most Likely Descendant (as identified by the NAHC) shall be contacted in order to determine proper treatment and disposition of the remains. a. Before construction activities are allowed to resume in the affected area, the artifacts shall be recovered, and features recorded using professional archaeological methods. The project archaeologist, in consultation with the consulting Tribe(s), shall determine the amount of material to be recovered for an adequate artifact sample for analysis. b. One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be used in the event of a discovery: Preservation -in -Place. Avoidance, or preservation -in-place, involves leaving a resource where it was found with no development affecting its integrity. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological and cultural resources. ii. Reburial on the project site in an area not subject to future disturbance. Reburial of a resource shall include provisions to protect the selected reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all required cataloging and basic recording have been completed, with the exception of sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. The listing of contents and the location of the reburial shall be included in a confidential Phase IV Monitoring Report. c. If Preservation -in -Place or reburial is not feasible, all cultural material collected during the grading monitoring program shall be processed and curated according to the current professional repository standards in a Riverside County curation facility that meets State Resources Department Office of Historic Preservation Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Resources (OHP 1993). The collections and associated records shall be transferred, including title and accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation. 7) A Phase IV Monitoring Report, documenting the field and analysis results and interpreting the artifact and research data within the research context, shall be completed and submitted to the satisfaction of the Lead Agency prior to the issuance of any building permits. The report will include DPR Primary and Archaeological Site Forms. The Phase IV report shall be filed with the City under a Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.5-13 Cultural Resources 356 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration confidential cover and not subject to a Public Records Request and a copy of the report shall be submitted to the consulting Tribe(s). c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: Implementation of the project would not disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries. No human remains or cemeteries are known to exist within or near the project site. However, there is always the potential that subsurface construction activities associated with the proposed project could encounter and potentially damage or destroy previously undiscovered human remains. Accordingly, this is considered a potentially significant impact. In the event of the accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5; Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5; Public Resources Code Section 5097.94 and Section 5097.98 must be followed. With the implementation of Mitigation Measure CR -2, potential impacts to human remains would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: CR -2: Project related earth disturbance has the potential to unearth previously undiscovered human remains, resulting in a potentially significant impact. Pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California Heolth and Safety Code, if human remains are encountered during excavation activities, all work shall halt, and the County Coroner shall be notified. The Coroner would determine within two working days whether a cause of death investigation is necessary. If the Coroner determines that the remains are Native American, he/she would contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours. The NAHC would then, pursuant to Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code, immediately identify the most likely descendant (MLD), who may inspect the remains and site of discovery and make recommendations for the treatment and/or disposition of the remains. The MLD shall make his/her recommendation within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The MLD's recommendation shall be followed, if feasible, and may include scientific removal and non-destructive analysis of the human remains, preservation in place, and deeding the remains to the MLD for treatment. If no MLD is identified, the MLD fails to make a recommendation, or the landowner rejects the recommendation, the landowner shall rebury the remains with appropriate dignity on the property in a location that would not be subject to further subsurface disturbance. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.5-14 Cultural Resources 357 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.6 Energy The following analysis is based on an Energy Analysis prepared by Vista Environmental in October 2021. The report is presented in its entirety in Appendix A, Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Regulatory Framework The regulatory setting related to energy conservation is primarily addressed through State and County regulations, which are discussed below. State CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (CCR) TITLE 20 On November 3, 1976, the CEC adopted the Regulations for Appliance Efficiency Standards Relating to Refrigerators, Refrigerator -Freezers and Freezers and Air Conditioners, which were the first energy - efficiency standards for appliances. The appliance efficiency regulations have been updated several times by the Commission and the most current version is the 2016 Appliance Efficiency Regulations, adopted January 2017 and now includes almost all types of appliances and lamps that use electricity, natural gas as well as plumbing fixtures. The authority for the CEC to control the energy -efficiency of appliances is detailed in California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 20, Division 2, Chapter 4, Article 4, Sections 1601-1609. California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 6 The CEC is also responsible for implementing the CCR Title 24, Part 6: California's Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (Title 24 Part 6) that were first established in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California's energy consumption. In 2008, California set an energy -use reduction goal of zero -net -energy use of all new homes by 2020 and the CEC was mandated to meet this goal through revisions to the Title 24, Part 6 regulations. The Title 24 standards are updated on a three-year schedule and since 2008, the standards have been incrementally moving to the 2020 goal of the zero -net -energy use. On January 1, 2020, the 2019 standards went into effect that have been designed so the average new home built in California would now use zero -net -energy and that non-residential buildings would use about 30% less energy than the Public Review Draft I lune 2023 4.6-1 Energy 358 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Would the project:d1k Significant Impact With Significant Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated a. Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary ❑ ® I--] consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? b. nflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for r ewable energy or energy efficiency? The following analysis is based on an Energy Analysis prepared by Vista Environmental in October 2021. The report is presented in its entirety in Appendix A, Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Regulatory Framework The regulatory setting related to energy conservation is primarily addressed through State and County regulations, which are discussed below. State CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (CCR) TITLE 20 On November 3, 1976, the CEC adopted the Regulations for Appliance Efficiency Standards Relating to Refrigerators, Refrigerator -Freezers and Freezers and Air Conditioners, which were the first energy - efficiency standards for appliances. The appliance efficiency regulations have been updated several times by the Commission and the most current version is the 2016 Appliance Efficiency Regulations, adopted January 2017 and now includes almost all types of appliances and lamps that use electricity, natural gas as well as plumbing fixtures. The authority for the CEC to control the energy -efficiency of appliances is detailed in California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 20, Division 2, Chapter 4, Article 4, Sections 1601-1609. California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 6 The CEC is also responsible for implementing the CCR Title 24, Part 6: California's Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (Title 24 Part 6) that were first established in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California's energy consumption. In 2008, California set an energy -use reduction goal of zero -net -energy use of all new homes by 2020 and the CEC was mandated to meet this goal through revisions to the Title 24, Part 6 regulations. The Title 24 standards are updated on a three-year schedule and since 2008, the standards have been incrementally moving to the 2020 goal of the zero -net -energy use. On January 1, 2020, the 2019 standards went into effect that have been designed so the average new home built in California would now use zero -net -energy and that non-residential buildings would use about 30% less energy than the Public Review Draft I lune 2023 4.6-1 Energy 358 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 2016 standards due mainly to lighting upgrades. The 2019 standards also encourage the use of battery storage and heat pump water heaters, require the more widespread use of LED lighting as well as improve the building's thermal envelope through high performance attics, walls and windows. The 2019 standards also require improvements to ventilation systems by requiring highly efficient air filters to trap hazardous air particulates as well as improvements to kitchen ventilation systems. California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 11 CCR Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards (CALGreen) was developed in response to continued efforts to reduce GHG emissions associated with energy consumption. The CalGreen Building Standards are also updated every three years and the current version is the 2019 California Green Building Standard Code that became effective on January 1, 2020. The CALGreen Code contains requirements for construction site selection; storm water control during construction; construction waste reduction; indoor water use reduction; material selection; natural resource conservation; site irrigation conservation; and more. The code provides for design options allowing the designer to determine how best to achieve compliance for a given site or building condition. The code also requires building commissioning, which is a process for verifying that all building systems (e.g., heating and cooling equipment and lighting systems) are functioning at their maximum efficiency. The CALGreen Code provides standards for bicycle parking, carpool/vanpool/electric vehicle spaces, light and glare reduction, grading and paving, energy efficient appliances, renewable energy, graywater systems, water efficient plumbing fixtures, recycling and recycled materials, pollutant controls (including moisture control and indoor air quality), acoustical controls, storm water management, building design, insulation, flooring, and framing, among others. Implementation of the CALGreen Code measures reduces energy consumption and vehicle trips and encourages the use of alternative -fuel vehicles, which reduces pollutant emissions. Some of the notable changes in the 2019 CALGreen Code over the prior 2016 CALGreen Code include: an alignment of building code engineering requirements with the national standards that include anchorage requirements for solar panels, provides design requirements for buildings in tsunami zones, increases Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV) for air filters from 8 to 13, increases electric vehicle charging requirements in parking areas, and sets minimum requirements for use of shade trees. Local CITY OF LA QUINTA The La Quinta General Plan (City of La Quinta, 2013) provides the following energy-related goals and policies that are applicable to the proposed project. Goal EM -1: The sustainable use of management of energy and mineral resources. Policy EM -1.1: Strongly encourage conservation of energy resources. Policy EM -1.2: Support the use of alternative energy and the conversion of traditional energy sources to alternative energy. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.6-2 Energy 359 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Threshold of Significance The CEQA Checklist includes an Energy Section that analyzes the proposed project's energy consumption to avoid or reduce inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of energy. Since the Energy Section was just added, no state or local agencies have adopted specific criteria or thresholds to be utilized in an energy impact analysis. However, the 2018 Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, provide the following direction on how to analyze a project's energy consumption: "If analysis of the project's energy use reveals that the project may result in significant environmental effects due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary use of energy, or wasteful use of energy resources, the EIR shall mitigate that energy use. This analysis should include the project's energy use for all project phases and components, including transportation -related energy, during construction and operation. In addition to building code compliance, other relevant considerations may include, among others, the project's size, location, orientation, equipment use and any renewable energy features that could be incorporated into the project. This analysis is subject to the rule of reason and shall focus on energy use that is caused by the project. This analysis may be included in related analyses of air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, transportation or utilities in the discretion of the lead agency." If the proposed project creates inefficient, wasteful or unnecessary consumption of energy during construction or operation activities or conflicts with a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency, then the proposed project would create a significant energy impact. General Plan Amendment/Zone Change The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would increase the population on the project site above the level identified in the existing General Plan which would increase long-term energy consumption for electricity and natural gas above what is currently estimated in the existing General Plan. The energy analysis prepared for the proposed project considered and evaluated the incremental increase of energy demands associated with increased population on the project site and determined that energy impacts for the project and associated with the proposed General Plan and Zone Change would be less than significant. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation. The proposed project would impact energy resources during construction and operation. Energy resources that would be potentially impacted include electricity, natural gas, and petroleum-based fuel supplies and distribution systems. This analysis includes a discussion of the potential energy impacts of the proposed project, with emphasis on avoiding or reducing inefficient, wasteful, and unnecessary consumption of energy. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.6-3 Energy 360 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration CONSTRUCTION ENERGY CONSUMPTION The construction activities forth e proposed project are anticipated to include demolition and grading of the project site, building construction and application of architectural coatings and paving of the proposed parking lot and onsite roads. The proposed project would also consume energy resources during construction in three (3) general forms: 1) Petroleum-based fuels used to power off-road construction vehicles and equipment on the project site, construction worker travel to and from the project site, as well as delivery and haul truck trips (e.g., hauling of demolition material to offsite reuse and disposal facilities). 2) Electricity associated with the conveyance of water that would be used during project construction for dust control (supply and conveyance) and electricity to power any necessary lighting during construction, electronic equipment, or other construction activities necessitating electrical power. 3) Energy used in the production of construction materials, such as asphalt, steel, concrete, pipes, and manufactured or processed materials such as lumber and glass. CONSTRUCTION -RELATED ELECTRICITY During construction, the proposed project would consume electricity to construct the new structures and infrastructure. Electricity would be supplied to the project site by Imperial Irrigation District and would be obtained from the existing electrical lines in the vicinity of the project site. The use of electricity from existing power lines rather than temporary diesel or gasoline powered generators would minimize impacts on fuel consumption. Electricity consumed during project construction would vary throughout the construction period based on the construction activities being performed. Various construction activities include electricity associated with the conveyance of water that would be used during project construction for dust control (supply and conveyance) and electricity to power any necessary lighting during construction, electronic equipment, or other construction activities necessitating electrical power. Such electricity demand would be temporary, nominal, and would cease upon the completion of construction. Overall, construction activities associated with the proposed project would require limited electricity consumption that would not be expected to have an adverse impact on available electricity supplies and infrastructure. Therefore, the use of electricity during project construction would not be wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary. Since there are currently power lines in the vicinity of the project site, it is anticipated that only a few improvements would be required to Imperial Irrigation District distribution lines and equipment with development of the proposed project. Compliance with the City's guidelines and requirements would ensure that the proposed project fulfills its responsibilities relative to infrastructure installation, coordinate any electrical infrastructure removals or relocations, and limit any impacts associated with construction of the project. Construction of the project's electrical infrastructure would not be anticipated to adversely affect the electrical infrastructure serving the surrounding uses or utility system capacity. Construction -Related Natural Gas Construction of the proposed project typically would not involve the consumption of natural gas. Natural gas would not be supplied to support construction activities, thus there would be no demand generated by construction. Since there is currently natural gas service in the vicinity of the project site, Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.6-4 Energy 361 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration construction of the proposed project would be limited to installation of new natural gas connections within the project site. Development of the proposed project would likely not require extensive infrastructure improvements to serve the project site. Construction -related energy usage impacts associated with the installation of natural gas connections are expected to be confined to trenching to place the lines below the surface. In addition, prior to ground disturbance, the proposed project would notify and coordinate with SoCalGas to identify the locations and depth of all existing gas lines and avoid disruption of gas service. Therefore, construction -related impacts to natural gas supply and infrastructure would be less than significant. Construction -Related Petroleum Fuel Use Petroleum-based fuel usage represents the highest amount of transportation energy potentially consumed during construction, which would be utilized by both off-road equipment operating on the project site, on -road vehicles transporting workers to and from the project site, and on -road trucks transporting equipment and supplies to the project site. The off-road construction equipment fuel usage was calculated through use of the off-road equipment assumptions and fuel use assumptions, which found that the off-road equipment utilized during construction of the proposed project would consume 45,237 gallons of fuel. The on -road construction trips fuel usage was calculated through use of the construction vehicle trip assumptions and fuel use assumptions, which found that the on -road trips generated from construction of the proposed project would consume 27,905 gallons of fuel. As such, the combined fuel used from off-road construction equipment and on -road construction trips for the proposed project would result in the consumption of 73,142 gallons of petroleum fuel. This equates to 0.006% of the gasoline and diesel consumed annually in Riverside County. As such, the construction -related petroleum use would be nominal, when compared to current county -wide petroleum usage rates. Construction activities associated with the proposed project would be required to adhere to all State and SCAQMD regulations for off-road equipment and on -road trucks, which provide minimum fuel efficiency standards. As such, construction activities for the proposed project would not result in the wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy resources. Impacts regarding transportation energy would be less than significant. Development of the project would not result in the need to manufacture construction materials or create new building material facilities specifically to supply the proposed project. It is difficult to measure the energy used in the production of construction materials such as asphalt, steel, and concrete. It is reasonable to assume that the production of building materials such as concrete, steel, etc., would employ all reasonable energy conservation practices in the interest of minimizing the cost of doing business. OPERATIONAL ENERGY The on-going operation of the proposed project would require the use of energy resources for multiple purposes including, but not limited to, heating/ventilating/air conditioning (HVAC), refrigeration, lighting, appliances, and electronics. Energy would also be consumed during operations related to water usage, solid waste disposal, landscape equipment and vehicle trips. Operations -Related Electricity Operation of the proposed project would result in consumption of electricity at the project site. The proposed project would consume 158,109 kilowatt-hours per year of electricity. This equates to Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.6-5 Energy 362 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 0.0047% of the electricity consumed annually by Imperial Irrigation District. As such, the operations - related electricity use would be nominal, when compared to current electricity usage rates in the Imperial Irrigation District service area. It should be noted that the proposed project would be required to meet the 2019 Title 24, Part 6 building energy efficiency standards that have been developed to meet the State's goal of zero -net - energy use for new homes. The zero net energy use would be achieved through a variety of measures to make new homes more energy efficient and also requiring installation of photovoltaic systems of adequate size to generate enough electricity to meet the zero -net energy use standard. The size of the PV system required for the project pursuant to the 2019 Title 24, requires the proposed project to install at least 203 Kilowatts of photovoltaic panels within the proposed project. Although, the CaIEEMod model found that with implementation of the 2019 Title 24 Part 6 standards, the proposed project would continue to utilize a nominal amount of power. It should be noted that the electricity usage and emission rates utilized by the CaIEEMod model are based on regional average usage rates for existing homes, which were not all built to the most current Title 24 Part 6, standards. The CaIEEMod model provides a conservative or worst-case analysis of electricity use from the proposed project. Therefore, it is anticipated the proposed project would be designed and built to minimize electricity use and that existing and planned electricity capacity and electricity supplies would be sufficient to support the proposed project's electricity demand. Thus, impacts to electrical supply and infrastructure capacity would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures would be required. Operations -Related Natural Gas Operation of the proposed project would result in increased consumption of natural gas at the project site. The proposed project would consume 2,192 MBTU per year of natural gas. This equates to 0.0048% of the natural gas consumed annually in Riverside County. As such, the operations -related natural gas use would be nominal, when compared to current natural gas usage rates in the County. It should be noted that, the proposed project would comply with all Federal, State, and City requirements related to the consumption of natural gas, that includes CCR Title 24, Part 6 Building Energy Efficiency Standards and CCR Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards. The CCR Title 24, Part 6 and Part 11 standards require numerous energy efficiency measures to be incorporated into the proposed structures, including enhanced insulation as well as use of efficient natural gas appliances and HVAC units. Therefore, it is anticipated the proposed project would be designed and built to minimize natural gas use and that existing and planned natural gas capacity and natural gas supplies would be sufficient to support the proposed project's natural gas demand. Thus, impacts to natural gas supply and infrastructure capacity would be less than significant and no mitigation measures would be required. Operations -Related Vehicular Petroleum Fuel Usage Operation of the proposed project would result in increased consumption of petroleum-based fuels related to vehicular travel to and from the project site. The proposed project would consume 67,006 gallons of petroleum fuel per year from vehicle travel. This equates to 0.0055% of the gasoline and diesel consumed annually in Riverside County. As such, the operations -related petroleum use would be nominal, when compared to current county -wide petroleum usage rates. Therefore, it is anticipated the proposed project would be designed and built to minimize transportation energy and it is anticipated that existing and planned capacity and supplies of transportation fuels would be sufficient to support the proposed project's demand. Thus, impacts with regard to transportation energy supply Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.6-6 Energy 363 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and infrastructure capacity would be less than significant and no mitigation measures would be required. In conclusion, the proposed project would comply with regulatory compliance measures outlined by the State and City related to Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG), Transportation/Circulation, and Water Supply. Additionally, the proposed project would be constructed in accordance with all applicable City Building and Fire Codes. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation. Impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. The La Quinta General Plan (City of La Quinta, 2013) contains goals and policies related to energy and energy efficiency. The proposed project's consistency with the applicable energy-related policies in the General Plan are shown in Table 4.6-1, Proposed Proiect Compliance with Applicable General Plan Energy Policies. Table 4.6-1 Proposed Project Compliance with Applicable General Plan Energy Policies General Plan Policy Proposed Project Implementation Actions JM Policy EM -1.1: Strongly encourage conservation of Consistent. The proposed structures will be designed to energy resources. meet the 2019 Title 24 Part 6 building standards that require enhanced insulation and installation of energy- efficient appliances to reduce energy usage and encourage conservation of energy resources. Policy EM -1.2: Support the use of alternative energy Consistent. The proposed project will be designed to and conversion of traditional energy sources to meet the 2019 or newer Title 24 Part 6 requirements alternative energy. that require all single-family homes built in California to have rooftop solar PV systems. Source: Source: City of La Quinta, 2013. As shown in Table 4.6-1, the proposed project would be consistent with all applicable energy-related policies from the General Plan. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.6-7 Energy 364 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.6-8 Energy 365 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.7 Geology and Soils The following analysis is based on the Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared for the project site by Bruin Geotechnical Services, Inc., in September 2021 and is presented in Appendix D. The purpose of the geotechnical investigation was to evaluate the onsite subsurface soil conditions relative to geotechnical engineering characteristics of the project site and to provide geotechnical recommendations relative to the proposed project. The preliminary geotechnical investigation included performing a site reconnaissance, conducting field subsurface exploration through soil borings and sampling, a laboratory testing program of selected soil samples and performing an engineering analyses of the data. Public Review Draft I June 2023 Geology and Soils 366 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Would the project:Ak Significant Impact With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a. Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other ❑ ❑ ❑ substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. 2) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 3) Seismic -related ground failure, including ❑ ❑ ® ❑ liquefaction? 4) Landslides? ❑ ❑ ❑ b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ❑ ® ❑ ❑ c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or offsite ❑ ® ❑ ❑ landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1- 6 of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating ❑ ❑ ® ❑ substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal ❑ ❑ ❑ systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ❑ ® ❑ ❑ resource or site or unique geologic feature? The following analysis is based on the Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared for the project site by Bruin Geotechnical Services, Inc., in September 2021 and is presented in Appendix D. The purpose of the geotechnical investigation was to evaluate the onsite subsurface soil conditions relative to geotechnical engineering characteristics of the project site and to provide geotechnical recommendations relative to the proposed project. The preliminary geotechnical investigation included performing a site reconnaissance, conducting field subsurface exploration through soil borings and sampling, a laboratory testing program of selected soil samples and performing an engineering analyses of the data. Public Review Draft I June 2023 Geology and Soils 366 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment/Zone Change Geotechnical studies prepared for the project site did not identify any onsite geologic hazards. Similar to other areas in the City, the project site could be subject to seismic shaking impacts. Implementation of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not increase geologic risks above the level identified in the existing General Plan. Potential geologic and soil impacts have been evaluated as part of the evaluation of the proposed project and would be required to incorporate construction design recommendations to ensure geologic stability and reduce potential impacts to less than significant. Potential geologic and soil impacts associated with the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be less than significant. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. No Impact: Implementation of the project would not be subject to rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault. The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act (Act) regulates development near active faults in order to mitigate the hazards of surface fault rupture. An active fault is one that has experienced earthquake activity in the past 11,000 years. Under the Act, the State Geologist is required to delineate special study zones along known active faults, known as Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones. The Act also requires that prior to approval of a project, a geologic study be prepared to define and delineate any hazards from surface rupture and that a 50 -foot building setback be established from any known trace hazard. According to the project geotechnical report and the California Geologic Survey Indio USGS Quadrangle, there are no Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones on the project site or in the nearby area. Therefore, the proposed project would not directly or indirectly be exposed to ground rupture impacts. Therefore, no ground rupture impacts would occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. 2) Strong seismic ground shaking? Less Than Significant Impact: The project site would be subject to strong seismic ground shaking. The project site is situated within a seismically active region that could be subject to ground shaking impacts from several active faults in the region. Active faults in the regional vicinity with the potential to cause ground shaking in the City of La Quinta include the San Andreas Fault, the San Jacinto Fault, the Burnt Mountain Fault, and the Elsinore Fault. These faults would have the potential to produce an earthquake ranging up to 6.9 on the Richter Scale. In the event an earthquake of this magnitude occurs, the project site could experience Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.7-2 Geology and Soils 367 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration periodic shaking, possibly of considerable intensity. The potential seismic shaking risks at the project site would be like other areas in southern California. The proposed structures on the project site would be required to be designed to meet the City's construction development standards and the seismic design parameters of the California Uniform Building Code to withstand potential seismic shaking impacts caused by an earthquake within an acceptable level of risk. Compliance with the California Uniform Building Code Seismic Safety Standards would minimize risks related to seismic shaking impacts. Therefore, the proposed project would not expose people or structures to potential adverse effects of ground shaking. Potential impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. 3) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less Than Significant Impact: The project site would not be subject to seismic -related ground failure. Liquefaction is the phenomenon in which loosely deposited soils located below the water table undergo rapid loss of shear strength due to excess pore pressure generated when subject to strong earthquake induced ground shaking. Liquefaction is known generally to occur in saturated or near -saturated cohesionless soils at depths shallower than 50 -feet below the ground surface. According to the City's Environmental Hazard Chapter Seismic Hazard Map, the project site is located within a Seismic Hazard Zone that has a High Potential for Liquefaction. However, boring investigations conducted on the site showed relatively firm sandy silt, and relative densities indicating that the potential for onsite liquefaction or seismically induced dynamic settlement should be negligible and the site would not require a liquefaction analysis. The proposed structures on the project site would be required to be designed to meet the City's construction development standards and the seismic design parameters of the California Uniform Building Code to withstand potential seismic shaking impacts and liquefaction hazards within an acceptable level of risk. Compliance with the City construction development standards and California Uniform Building Code Seismic Safety Standards would reduce potential liquefaction hazard impacts to less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. 4) Landslides? No Impact: The project site would not be subject to landslides. According to the California Geologic Survey Landslide Hazard Map for the Indio Quadrangle, the project site is identified as not being susceptible to earthquake induced landslides. Due to the relatively low topographic relief on the site, the potential for landslides on the site is considered low. Also, the Specific Plan does not propose to create slopes or features that would increase the landslide potential beyond existing conditions. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: The Grading Plan shows there is an estimated 2,070 cubic yards of cut material needed for the project in addition to an estimated 32,229 cubic yards of fill to construct the project. The land clearing and grading activities associated with the Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.7-3 Geology and Soils 368 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration proposed project would uncover soil, which could be subject to erosion impacts caused by water and wind. Additionally, construction equipment and vehicles could indirectly transport sediment to offsite locations. The proposed project would disturb more than one acre of soil. Construction projects which disturb one or more acres of soil are required to obtain coverage under a general construction permit issued from the State Water Resources Control Board. The General Construction Permit would require the filing of a Notice of Intent with the State Water Resources Control Board and the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP would provide a list of Best Management Practices to minimize potential adverse erosion impacts. Compliance with Mitigation Measures HYDRO -1 and GEO-1 requires obtaining a General Construction Permit and implementation of erosion control measures. Potential impacts related to substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil to a less than significant level. In the Coachella Valley, there is a natural sand migration process, called "blowsand," that has direct and indirect effects on regional air quality. Blowsand produces particulate matter (PM1o) in two ways: (1) by direct particle erosion and fragmentation as natural PM1o, and (2) by secondary effects, as sand deposits on road surfaces. SCAQMD has defined a Coachella Valley Blowsand Zone as the corridor of land extending two miles on either side of the Interstate 10 (1-10) Freeway, beginning at the SR -111/1- 10 junction and continuing southeast to the 1-10/Jefferson Street interchange in Indio. Being located approximately seven miles south of the 1-10 Freeway, the project site is found outside of this designated blowsand area but is still exposed to seasonal wind conditions capable of producing fugitive dust from undeveloped ground conditions. In order to reduce the effect of windborne erosion at the project site, the project shall be required to implement the Coachella Valley PM10State Implementation Plan (PM10 Plan) requirement for a Fugitive Dust Control Plan. The purpose of this plan is to reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in the ambient air as a result of anthropogenic fugitive dust sources by requiring actions to prevent, reduce or mitigate fugitive dust emissions. The Fugitive Dust Control Plan requires the implementation of best management practices (BMPs) such as the use of perimeter fencing, applying adhesive dust suppressant, or watering the project site. The Fugitive Dust Control Requirements for the Coachella Valley are detailed in SCAQMD Rule 403.1. Other than the "Blowsand Zone" that covers the area within two miles of both sides of 1-10 west of Jefferson Street (does not include project site), the rules are basically identical to the SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements that are applicable for the rest of the SCAQMD area. With implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1 which requires implementation of the Coachella Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan, potential windborne erosion impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: HYDRO -1: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant will obtain coverage under a General Construction Permit issued from the State Water Resources Control Board. The General Construction Permit would require the filing of a Notice of Intent with the State Water Resources Control Board and the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). GEO-1: During construction, Grading Plans for the project shall implement fugitive dust control measures and windborne erosion control measures from the Coachella Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.7-4 Geology and Soils 369 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on -or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: The project would not be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on -or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. The geotechnical report prepared for the proposed project identified the following geologic conditions on the project site. GEOLOGIC CONSTRAINTS Landslides: As previously identified, the project site is identified as not being susceptible to earthquake induced landslides. Liquefaction: As previously identified from the project geotechnical report, the potential for ground failure and liquefaction would be low. Lateral Spreading: Potential hazards associated with liquefaction include lateral spreading and slow slides, foundation bearing failure, and ground surface settlement. Because the upper 50 feet of the native soils are not likely to liquefy, the potential for lateral spreading would also be low. Ground Lurching: Ground lurching is generally associated with fault rupture and liquefaction. As these hazards are considered unlikely, the potential for ground lurching would be low. SOIL CONSTRAINTS The upper four to five feet of soil were found to be non-uniform with some areas of the site soils subject to hydro -consolidation. Based on the laboratory testing and subsurface data obtained, it is the opinion of the Bruin Geotechnical Engineering Report that the upper site soils would not provide a uniform soil support system without remediation through recompaction. To provide a more uniform soil support system and minimize the potential for differential settlement, the proposed structures should be supported by a recompacted fill mat and ensure that the recommendations in the Bruin Geotechnical Engineering Report are incorporated into the design and construction of the project. With implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-2, potential soil constraints and associated impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: GEO-2: Prior to issuance of grading permits, the City of La Quinta shall confirm that grading and construction plans for the project incorporate design recommendations provided in the Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by Bruin Geotechnical Services, Inc., September 2021. The design recommendations shall address site earthwork; remedial grading for building pads; asphalt, pavement, and concrete; fill placement and compaction; soil shrinkage; fill slope stability; imported soils; post grading pad drainage foundation design recommendations; retaining walls and structures; corrosion and chemical attack; excavations; utility trenches and backfill; interior concrete; exterior concrete rigid pavement; pavement design; and construction considerations. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.7-5 Geology and Soils 370 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? Less Than Significant Impact: The project would not be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property. Expansive soils are defined as fine grained silts and clays which are subject to swelling and contracting. The amount of swelling and contracting would be subject to the amount of fine-grained clay materials present in the soils and the amount of moisture either introduced or extracted from the soils. The expansion index tests conducted on the onsite soils indicate that the surficial soils are within the "very low" expansion category. Potential impacts associated with expansive soils would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Impact: The proposed project would not involve the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. Therefore, no impacts would occur regarding septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: Implementation of the project would not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. The project site is identified in the General Plan (La Quinta 2013) as being in an area of high paleontological sensitivity. A paleontological record search of the project area and the environs was conducted at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (NHMLAC) by Samuel A. McLeod, Ph.D. on August 9, 2019. A second search was completed by Darla Radford from the Western Science Center (WSC) in Hemet on July 29, 2021 (Appendix C). The NHMLAC record search revealed that no paleontological finds have occurred within the project area; however, nearby fossil localities have occurred within the sedimentary deposits that underlie the project area (McLeod 2019). The entire proposed project area has surface deposits composed of Pleistocene and Holocene lacustrine and fluvial deposits, known as Lake Cahuilla beds. These deposits have contained significant vertebrate and invertebrate fossils in the uppermost layers, such as diatoms, land plants, clams, snails, crustaceans, and a bighorn sheep jawbone. Significant excavations below the uppermost soils and younger Quaternary Alluvium that extend into older sedimentary deposits may well encounter significant vertebrate fossils. Therefore, the NHMLAC recommended that any substantial excavations in the proposed project area should be closely monitored to quickly and professionally recover any fossil remains while not impeding development. The WSC record search also revealed that no fossil localities have been recorded within one mile of the project site (Radford 2021). The WSC maps the project site as alluvial sand and clay deposits dating to the Holocene epoch. Older Holocene or Late Pleistocene sediments would lie at depth. Excavations Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.7-6 Geology and Soils 371 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration that would disturb these deeper sediments could encounter scientifically significant fossil material; therefore, the WSC recommends that caution during development should be observed. Based upon this information and the results of the paleontological resources records search, paleontologically sensitive sediments consisting of undisturbed older Pleistocene alluvium lie below the surficial Younger Holocene alluvium on the project site. Monitoring of excavation in these sensitive sediments under the direct guidance of a qualified paleontologist is recommended once earthmoving reaches 3-5 feet below the original ground surface. Monitors should be equipped to salvage fossils, as they are unearthed, to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of sediments that are likely to contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates. Monitors must be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens. Monitoring may be reduced if the potentially fossiliferous units described are not present, or, if present, are determined upon exposure and examination by qualified paleontological personnel to have low potential to contain fossil resources. With implementation of Mitigation Measures PALEO-1, PALEO-2, and PALEO-3, potential impacts to paleontological resources would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: PALEO-1: Once earthmoving reaches 3-5 feet below the original ground surface, excavation shall be monitored under the direct guidance of a qualified paleontologist. PALEO-2: The project paleontologist retained shall review the approved development plan and shall conduct any pre -construction work necessary to render appropriate monitoring and mitigation requirements as appropriate. These requirements shall be documented by the project paleontologist in a Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP). This PRIMP shall be submitted to the City's Design and Development Department for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. Information to be contained in the PRIMP shall meet the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards. PALEO-3: If paleontological resources are detected and recovered during monitoring, a report must be prepared. The following items must be presented in the report: recovered specimens must be prepared to a point of identification and permanent preservation, including washing of sediments to recover small invertebrates and vertebrates. The recovered fossils must be identified and curated into a professional, fully accredited museum repository with permanent retrievable storage (e.g., WSC). The paleontologist must have a written repository agreement in hand prior to the initiation of mitigation activities. The report and inventory, when submitted to the Lead Agency, will signify completion of the program to mitigate impacts to paleontological resources. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.7-7 Geology and Soils 372 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.7-8 Geology and Soils 373 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions The following analysis is based on an Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis prepared by Vista Environmental in October 2021. The report is presented in its entirety in Appendix A. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Existing Setting Constituent gases of the earth's atmosphere, called atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHGs), play a critical role in the earth's radiation amount by trapping infrared radiation from the earth's surface, which otherwise would have escaped to space. Prominent greenhouse gases contributing to this process include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), ozone (03), water vapor, nitrous oxide (N20), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). This phenomenon, known as the Greenhouse Effect, is responsible for maintaining a habitable climate. Anthropogenic (caused or produced by humans) emissions of these greenhouse gases in excess of natural ambient concentrations are responsible for the enhancement of the Greenhouse Effect and have led to a trend of unnatural warming of the earth's natural climate, known as global warming or climate change. Emissions of gases that induce global warming are attributable to human activities associated with industrial/manufacturing, agriculture, utilities, transportation, and residential land uses. Emissions of CO2 and N20 are byproducts of fossil fuel combustion. Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, results from off gassing associated with agricultural practices and landfills. Sinks of CO2, where CO2 is stored outside of the atmosphere, include uptake by vegetation and dissolution into the ocean. The following provides a description of each of the greenhouse gases and their global warming potential. • Water Vapor: Water vapor is the most abundant, important, and variable GHG in the atmosphere. Water vapor is not considered a pollutant; in the atmosphere it maintains a climate necessary for life. Changes in its concentration are primarily considered a result of climate feedbacks related to the warming of the atmosphere rather than a direct result of industrialization. The feedback loop in which water is involved is critically important to projecting future climate change. • Carbon Dioxide: The natural production and absorption of CO2 is achieved through the terrestrial biosphere and the ocean. However, humankind has altered the natural carbon cycle by burning coal, oil, natural gas, and wood. The concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is projected to increase to a minimum of 540 ppm by 2100 as a direct result of Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.8-1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 374 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Would the project: Significant Impact With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ environment? b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of ❑ ❑ ® ❑ greenhouse gases? The following analysis is based on an Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis prepared by Vista Environmental in October 2021. The report is presented in its entirety in Appendix A. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Existing Setting Constituent gases of the earth's atmosphere, called atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHGs), play a critical role in the earth's radiation amount by trapping infrared radiation from the earth's surface, which otherwise would have escaped to space. Prominent greenhouse gases contributing to this process include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), ozone (03), water vapor, nitrous oxide (N20), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). This phenomenon, known as the Greenhouse Effect, is responsible for maintaining a habitable climate. Anthropogenic (caused or produced by humans) emissions of these greenhouse gases in excess of natural ambient concentrations are responsible for the enhancement of the Greenhouse Effect and have led to a trend of unnatural warming of the earth's natural climate, known as global warming or climate change. Emissions of gases that induce global warming are attributable to human activities associated with industrial/manufacturing, agriculture, utilities, transportation, and residential land uses. Emissions of CO2 and N20 are byproducts of fossil fuel combustion. Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, results from off gassing associated with agricultural practices and landfills. Sinks of CO2, where CO2 is stored outside of the atmosphere, include uptake by vegetation and dissolution into the ocean. The following provides a description of each of the greenhouse gases and their global warming potential. • Water Vapor: Water vapor is the most abundant, important, and variable GHG in the atmosphere. Water vapor is not considered a pollutant; in the atmosphere it maintains a climate necessary for life. Changes in its concentration are primarily considered a result of climate feedbacks related to the warming of the atmosphere rather than a direct result of industrialization. The feedback loop in which water is involved is critically important to projecting future climate change. • Carbon Dioxide: The natural production and absorption of CO2 is achieved through the terrestrial biosphere and the ocean. However, humankind has altered the natural carbon cycle by burning coal, oil, natural gas, and wood. The concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is projected to increase to a minimum of 540 ppm by 2100 as a direct result of Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.8-1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 374 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration anthropogenic sources. This could result in an average global temperature rise of at least two degrees Celsius or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit. • Methane: CH4 is an extremely effective absorber of radiation, although its atmospheric concentration is less than that of CO2. Its lifetime in the atmosphere is brief (10 to 12 years), compared to some other GHGs (such as CO2, N20, and Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)). • Nitrous Oxide: Concentrations of N20 also began to rise at the beginning of the industrial revolution. In 1998, the global concentration of this GHG was documented at 314 parts per billion (ppb). N20 is produced by microbial processes in soil and water, including those reactions which occur in fertilizer containing nitrogen. • Chlorofluorocarbons: CFCs are gases formed synthetically by replacing all hydrogen atoms in methane or ethane (C2H6) with chlorine and/or fluorine atoms. CFCs are nontoxic, nonflammable, insoluble, and chemically unreactive in the troposphere (the level of air at the earth's surface). • Hydrofluorocarbons: HFCs are synthetic man-made chemicals that are used as a substitute for CFCs. Out of all the GHGs, they are one of three groups with the highest global warming potential. • Perfluorocarbons: Two common PFCs are tetrafluoromethane (CF4) and hexafluoroethane (C2F6). Concentrations of CF4 in the atmosphere are over 70 ppt. The two main sources of PFCs are primary aluminum production and semiconductor manufacturing. • Sulfur Hexafluoride: Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) is an inorganic, odorless, colorless, nontoxic, nonflammable gas. SF6 has the highest global warming potential of any gas evaluated; 23,900 times that of CO2. • Aerosols: Aerosols are particles emitted into the air through burning biomass (plant material) and fossil fuels. Aerosols can warm the atmosphere by absorbing and emitting heat and can cool the atmosphere by reflecting light. GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIAL GHGs have varying global warming potential (GWP). The GWP is the potential of a gas or aerosol to trap heat in the atmosphere; it is the cumulative radiative forcing effects of a gas over a specified time horizon resulting from the emission of a unit mass of gas relative to the reference gas, CO2. The GHGs listed by the IPCC and the CEQA Guidelines are discussed in this section in order of abundance in the atmosphere. Water vapor, the most abundant GHG, is not included in this list because its natural concentrations and fluctuations far outweigh its anthropogenic (human -made) sources. To simplify reporting and analysis, GHGs are commonly defined in terms of their GWP. The IPCC defines the GWP of various GHG emissions on a normalized scale that recasts all GHG emissions in terms of CO2 equivalent (CO2e). As such, the GWP of CO2 is equal to 1. The GWP values used in this analysis are based on the 2007 IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, which are used in CARB's 2014 Scoping Plan Update and the CaIEEMod Model Version 2020.4.0 and are detailed in Table 4.8-1, Global Warming Potentials, Atmospheric Lifetimes and Abundances of GHGs. The IPCC has updated the Global Warming Potentials of some gases in their Fifth Assessment Report; however, the new values have not yet been incorporated into the CaIEEMod model that has been utilized in this analysis. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.8-2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 375 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 4.8-1 Global Warming Potentials, Atmospheric Lifetimes and Abundances of GHGs Gas Atmospheric Lifetime (years)' Global Warming Potential Atmospheric (100 Year Horizon)' Abundance Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 50-200 1 379 ppm Methane 04) 9-15 25 1,774 ppb Nitrous Oxide (N20) 114 298 319 ppb HFC -23 270 14,800 18 ppt HFC -134a 14 1,430 35 ppt HFC -152a 1.4 124 3.9 ppt PFC: Tetrafluoromethane (CF4) 50,000 7,390 74 ppt PFC: Hexafluoroethane (C2F6) 10,000 12,200 2.9 ppt Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) 3,200 22,800 5.6 ppt Definitions: ppm = parts per million; ppb = parts per billion; ppt = parts per trillion Notes: 1 Defined as the half-life of the gas. 2 Compared to the same quantity of CO2 emissions and is based on the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) 2007 standard, which is utilized in CalEEMod (Version 2016.3.2),that is used in this report (CalEEMod user guide: Appendix A). Source: Vista Environmental, Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis; October 28, 2021. Regulatory Setting The regulatory setting related to global climate change is addressed through the efforts of various international, federal, state, regional, and local government agencies. These agencies work jointly, as well as individually, to reduce GHG emissions through legislation, regulations, planning, policy making, education, and a variety of programs. The agencies responsible for global climate change regulations are discussed below. INTERNATIONAL In 1988, the United Nations established the IPCC to evaluate the impacts of global climate change and to develop strategies that nations could implement to curtail global climate change. In 1992, the United States joined other countries around the world in signing the United Nations' Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) agreement with the goal of controlling GHG emissions. The parties of the UNFCCC adopted the Kyoto Protocol, which set binding GHG reduction targets for 37 industrialized countries, with the objective of reducing their collective GHG emissions by five percent (5%) below 1990 levels by 2012. The Kyoto Protocol has been ratified by 182 countries, but has not been ratified by the United States. It should be noted that Japan and Canada opted out of the Kyoto Protocol and the remaining developed countries that ratified the Kyoto Protocol have not met their Kyoto targets. The Kyoto Protocol expired in 2012 and the amendment for the second commitment period from 2013 to 2020 has not yet entered into legal force. The parties to the Kyoto Protocol negotiated the Paris Agreement in December 2015, agreeing to set a goal of limiting global warming to less than 2 degrees Celsius compared with pre -industrial levels. The Paris Agreement has been adopted by 195 nations with 147 ratifying it, including the United States by President Obama, who ratified it by Executive Order on September 3, 2016. On June 1, 2017, President Trump announced Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.8-3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 376 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration that the United States is withdrawing from the Paris Agreement and on January 21, 2021, President Biden signed an executive order rejoining the Paris Agreement. FEDERAL The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for implementing federal policy to address global climate change. The federal government administers a wide array of public- private partnerships to reduce U.S. GHG intensity. These programs focus on energy efficiency, renewable energy, methane, and other non -0O2 gases, agricultural practices and implementation of technologies to achieve GHG reductions. EPA implements several voluntary programs that substantially contribute to the reduction of GHG emissions. STATE California Air Resources Board (CARB) has proposed interim statewide CEQA thresholds for GHG emissions and released Recommended Approaches for Setting Interim Significance Thresholds for Greenhouse Gases under the California Environmental Quality Act, on October 24, 2008, that has been utilized by the SCAQMD's GHG Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group in their framework for developing SCAQMD's draft GHG emissions thresholds. California currently has no regulations that establish ambient air quality standards for GHGs. However, California has passed laws directing CARB to develop actions to reduce GHG emissions. The following is a listing of relevant state laws to reduce GHG emissions. Detail discussion of each State is presented in Appendix A. • Executive Order B-30-15, Senate Bill 32 and Assembly Bill 197 • Assembly Bill 1493 • Executive Order S-3-05 • Assembly Bill 32 • Executive Order S-1-07 • Senate Bill 97 • Senate Bill 375 • Assembly Bill 341 and Senate Bills 939 and 1374 • California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 11 REGIONAL South Coast Air Quality Management District The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) develops rules and regulations, establishes permitting requirements for stationary sources, inspects emission sources, and enforces such measures through educational programs or fines, when necessary. SCAQMD is directly responsible for reducing emissions from stationary, mobile, and indirect sources. The SCAQMD is also responsible for GHG emissions for projects where it is the lead agency. However, for other projects in the SSAB where it is not the lead agency, it is limited to providing resources to other lead agencies in order to assist them in determining GHG emission thresholds and GHG reduction measures. In order to assist local agencies with direction on GHG emissions, the SCAQMD organized a Working Group, which is described below. SCAQMD Working Group. Since neither CARB nor the OPR has developed a GHG emissions threshold, the SCAQMD formed a Working Group to develop significance thresholds related to GHG emissions. At the September 28, 2010, Working Group meeting, the SCAQMD released its most current version Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.8-4 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 377 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration of the draft GHG emissions thresholds, which recommends a tiered approach that either provides a quantitative annual threshold of 3,500 MTCO2e for residential uses, 1,400 MTCO2e for commercial uses, 3,000 MTCO2e for mixed uses, and 10,000 MTCO2e for industrial uses. Southern California Association of Governments The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is the regional planning agency for Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Imperial Counties and addresses regional issues relating to transportation, the economy, community development and the environment. SCAG is the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the majority of the southern California region and is the largest MPO in the nation. With respect to air quality planning, SCAG has prepared the Connect SoCal and 2019 FTIP which addresses regional development and growth forecasts. Although the Connect SoCal and 2019 FTIP are primarily planning documents for future transportation projects and a key component of these plans is to integrate land use planning with transportation planning that promotes higher density infill development in close proximity to existing transit service. These plans form the basis for the land use and transportation components of the AQMP, which are utilized in the preparation of air quality forecasts and in consistency analysis included in the AQMP. The Connect SoCal, 2019FTIP, and AQMP are based on projections originating within the City and County General Plans. LOCAL City of La Quinta Local jurisdictions, such as the City of La Quinta, have the authority and responsibility to reduce GHG emissions through their police power and decision-making authority. Specifically, the City of La Quinta is responsible for the assessment and mitigation of GHG emissions resulting from its land use decisions. In accordance with CEQA requirements and the CEQA review process, the City assesses the global climate change potential of new development projects, requires mitigation of potentially significant global climate change impacts by conditioning discretionary permits, and monitors and enforces implementation of such mitigation. Lo Quinta General Plan The La Quinta General Plan (City of La Quinta, 2013), provides the following GHG emissions -related policy that is applicable to the proposed project. Policy AQ -1.7: Greenhouse gas emissions associated with a development project shall demonstrate adherence to the City's GHG Reduction Plan. City of Lo Quinta Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan The La Quinta Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (La Quinta GHG Plan), was adopted by the City on February 19, 2013. The La Quinta GHG Plan has set forth reduction targets consistent with AB 32 and aims to reduce CO2e emissions to 10% below 2005 levels by 2020 and 28% below 2005 levels by 2035. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.8-5 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 378 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Greenhouse Gas Emissions Threshold of Significance Since the La Quinta GHG Plan does not provide any quantitative GHG emissions thresholds for new development projects nor does it provide any direction on how to analyze new development projects within the City, the SCAQMD GHG emissions reduction thresholds have been utilized in this analysis. To identify significance criteria under CEQA for development projects, SCAQMD initiated a Working Group, which provided detailed methodology for evaluating significance under CEQA. At the September 28, 2010, Working Group meeting, the SCAQMD released its most current version of the draft GHG emissions thresholds, which recommends a tiered approach that provides a quantitative annual threshold of 3,000 MTCOze for all land use projects. Although the SCAQMD provided substantial evidence supporting the use of the above threshold, the SCAQMD Board has not yet considered or approved the Working Group's thresholds. However, it should be noted that the SCAQMD threshold was utilized in DSEIR No. 330. It should be noted that SCAQMD's Working Group's thresholds were prepared prior to the issuance of Executive Order B-30-15 on April 29, 2015, that provided a reduction goal of 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. This target was codified into a statute through passage of AB 197 and SB 32 in September 2016. However, to date no air district or local agency within California has provided guidance on how to address AB 197 and SB 32 with relation to land use projects. In addition, the California Supreme Court's ruling on Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Association of Governments (Cleveland v. SANDAG), Filed July 13, 2017, stated: SANDAG did not abuse its discretion in declining to adopt the 2050 goal as a measure of significance in light of the fact that the Executive Order does not specify any plan or implementation measures to achieve its goal. In its response to comments, the EIR said: "It is uncertain what role regional land use and transportation strategies can or should play in achieving the EO's 2050 emissions reduction target. A recent California Energy Commission report concludes, however, that the primary strategies to achieve this target should be major 'decarbonization' of electricity supplies and fuels, and major improvements in energy efficiency [citation]. Although, the above court case was referencing California's GHG emission targets for the year 2050, at this time, it is also unclear what role land use strategies can or should play in achieving the AB 197 and SB 32 reduction goal of 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. As such this analysis has relied on the SCAQMD Working Group's recommended thresholds. Therefore, the proposed project would be considered to create a significant cumulative GHG impact if the proposed project would exceed the annual threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e. General Plan Amendment/Zone Change The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would increase the population on the project site above what is currently projected for the project, which would increase greenhouse gas emissions above what was evaluated in the General Plan. The greenhouse gas emission analysis prepared for the proposed project considered and evaluated the incremental increase of greenhouse gas emissions associated with increased population on the project site and determined that greenhouse emission impacts would be less than significant. Potential greenhouse gas emission impacts associated with the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be less than significant. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.8-6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 379 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would not generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. The proposed project consists of a residential development that would include 80 detached single-family homes. The proposed project is anticipated to generate GHG emissions from area sources, energy usage, mobile sources, waste disposal, water usage, and construction equipment and include energy efficiencies from Title 24 standards. The project's GHG emissions have been calculated with the CalEEMod model based on the construction and operational parameters. A summary of the results is shown below in Table 4.8-2, Project Related Greenhouse Gas Annual Emissions. Table 4.8-2 Project Related Greenhouse Gas Annual Emissions The data provided in Table 4.8-2 shows that the proposed project would create 792.08 MTCO2e per year. According to the SCAQMD draft threshold of significance, a cumulative global climate change impact would occur if the GHG emissions created from the on-going operations would exceed 3,000 MTCO2e per year. It should be noted that the most current 2019 Title 24 Part 6 building energy efficiency standards now require that all new homes built in the State to be designed to be net zero energy usage that is achieved through requirements for enhanced insulation, use of energy efficient appliances and lighting, and solar rooftop PV systems to adequately meet net zero energy usage. Therefore, a less than significant generation of greenhouse gas emissions would occur from development of the proposed project. Impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.8-7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 380 Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons per Year) Category pAreaSourcesi CH4 N20 CO2e 0.99 <0.00 <0.00 1.02 Energy Usage 130.59 <0.00 <0.00 131.43 Mobile Sources' 588.93 0.04 0.03 599.29 Solid Waste 9.78 0.58 <0.00 24.23 Water and Wastewaters 9.18 0.14 <0.00 13.72 Construction' 22.02 <0.00 <0.00 22.39 Total Emissions 761.49 0.76 0.03 792.08 SCAQMD Draft Threshold of Significance 3,000 Notes: 1 Area sources consist of GHG emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, hearths, and landscaping equipment. 2 Energy usage consists of GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage. 3 Mobile sources consist of GHG emissions from vehicles. 4 Waste includes the CO2 and CH4 emissions created from the solid waste placed in landfills. 5 Water includes GHG emissions from electricity used for transport of water and processing of wastewater. 6 Construction emissions amortized over 30 years as recommended in the SCAQMD GHG Working Group on November 19, 2009. Source: Vista Environmental, Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis October 28, 2021. The data provided in Table 4.8-2 shows that the proposed project would create 792.08 MTCO2e per year. According to the SCAQMD draft threshold of significance, a cumulative global climate change impact would occur if the GHG emissions created from the on-going operations would exceed 3,000 MTCO2e per year. It should be noted that the most current 2019 Title 24 Part 6 building energy efficiency standards now require that all new homes built in the State to be designed to be net zero energy usage that is achieved through requirements for enhanced insulation, use of energy efficient appliances and lighting, and solar rooftop PV systems to adequately meet net zero energy usage. Therefore, a less than significant generation of greenhouse gas emissions would occur from development of the proposed project. Impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.8-7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 380 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. The applicable plan for the proposed project is the La Quinta GHG Plan (City of La Quinta, 2013). The La Quinta GHG Plan has set forth reduction targets consistent with AB 32 and aims to reduce CO2e emissions to 10% below 2005 levels by 2020, and 28% below 2005 levels by 2035. The proposed project's consistency with the applicable measures in the La Quinta GHG Plan are shown in Table 4.8-3, Proposed Project Compliance with the La Quinta GHG Plan Policies. Table 4.8-3 Proposed Project Compliance with the La Quinta GHG Plan Policies Measure GHG Plan Policy Proposed Project Consistency ND -1 Encourage and promote all new commercial and Consistent. The proposed homes will be designed residential development achieve energy efficiency to meet the 2019 Title 24 Part 11 Green Building and incorporate sustainable design principles that Code standards that exceed the 2013 Title 24 Part exceed Green Building Code requirements. 11 Green Building Code standards. ND -2 Work towards carbon neutrality for all new Consistent. The proposed homes will be designed buildings to achieve a net zero emission of GHGs to meet the 2019 Title 24 Part 6 building standards through design measures, onsite renewables, and that require all new homes to be designed to be offsets. net zero energy usage through enhanced insulation and installation of energy-efficient appliances as well as installation of rooftop solar PV systems. ND -3 Encourage all new development to meet 50% of Consistent. The proposed homes will be designed energy demand through onsite solar or other non- to meet the 2019 Title 24 Part 6 building standards polluting source. that require all new homes to be designed to be net zero energy usage through installation of rooftop solar PV systems. ND -4 Encourage all new development to minimize Consistent. The proposed project will include vehicle trips. onsite recreational activities at the proposed open space lot as well as include onsite sidewalks that will encourage alternative modes of transportation that will minimize vehicle trips. ND -6 Require that new development accommodate Consistent. The proposed project will include pedestrians and bicyclists. onsite sidewalks that will accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists. ND -7 Encourage all new development to utilize materials Consistent. The proposed homes will be designed that consist of recycled materials and are to meet the 2019 Title 24 Part 11 Green Building recyclable. Code standards that require that a minimum of 65% of construction waste to be diverted from landfills through re -use and recycling programs. Source: City of La Quinta, 2013. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.8-8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 381 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration As shown in Table 4.8-3, the proposed project would be consistent with all applicable La Quinta GHG Plan policies for new residential development. Therefore, the proposed project would be consistent with the La Quinta GHG plan and the proposed project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.8-9 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 382 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.8-10 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 383 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment/Zone Change The Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment did not identify hazardous waste on the project site or any listed hazardous waste sites near the project site (refer to Appendix E, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report). Implementation of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not increase the risk for hazardous material impacts and would be required to comply with local, state, and federal laws regarding the handling, storage and transporting of hazardous substances. With compliance with local, state, and federal laws, potential hazardous materials impacts associated with the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be less than significant. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.9-1 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 384 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Would the project: Significant Impact With Significant Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ disposal of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset ❑ ❑ ® ❑ and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste ❑ ❑ ❑ within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, ❑ ® ❑ ❑ would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, ❑ ❑ ❑ would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? f. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency ❑ ❑ ® ❑ evacuation plan? g. Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death ❑ ❑ ® ❑ involving wildland fires? ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment/Zone Change The Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment did not identify hazardous waste on the project site or any listed hazardous waste sites near the project site (refer to Appendix E, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report). Implementation of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not increase the risk for hazardous material impacts and would be required to comply with local, state, and federal laws regarding the handling, storage and transporting of hazardous substances. With compliance with local, state, and federal laws, potential hazardous materials impacts associated with the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be less than significant. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.9-1 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 384 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Hazardous materials have been and are commonly used in commercial, agricultural, and industrial applications as well as in residential areas. Hazardous wastes are hazardous materials that no longer have practical use, such as substances that have been discarded, discharged, spilled, contaminated, or are being stored prior to proper disposal. The health impacts of hazardous materials exposure are based on the frequency of exposure, the exposure pathway, and individual susceptibility. LONG-TERM OPERATIONAL The long-term operation of the proposed project would not be expected to involve the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials in quantities or conditions that would pose a hazard to public health and safety or the environment. The operation of the proposed project could involve the use of cleaning products and occasional use of pesticide activities and herbicides for landscape maintenance. The materials would be common for general maintenance and would not be stored in enormous quantities that pose a health hazard to the public. Potential impacts would be less than significant. The construction operations associated with the proposed project would involve the handling of incidental amounts of hazardous substances, such as solvents, fuels, and oil. To avoid public exposure to hazardous materials, the proposed project would be required to comply with local, state, and federal laws and regulations regarding the handling and storage of hazardous materials. With compliance with local, state, and federal hazardous material laws and regulations and implementation of BMPs, potential hazardous impacts to the public would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public orthe environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. The construction operations associated with the proposed project would involve the handling of incidental amounts of hazardous substances, such as solvents, fuels, and oil. The level of risk associated with the accidental release of hazardous substances would not be considered significant due to the small volume and low concentration of hazardous materials that would be utilized during construction. The construction contractor would be required to use standard construction controls and safety procedures that would avoid or minimize the potential for accidental release of hazardous substances into the environment. The most relevant measures would pertain to material delivery and storage; material use; and spill prevention and control. These measures would outline the required improvements and procedures Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.9-2 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 385 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for preventing impacts of hazardous materials to workers and the environment during construction. With compliance with local, state, and federal hazardous material laws and regulations and implementation of material delivery and storage, material use, and spill prevention and control BMPs, potential hazardous impacts involving the accidental release of hazardous materials into the environment would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. The project site is not located within 0.25 miles of a school. The nearest school to the project site would be Westside Elementary (82225 Airport Boulevard, Thermal, CA) located approximately one mile to the north of the project site. No impact would occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: The project would not be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. A Phase / Environmental Site Assessment Report was prepared by Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. in July 2019 (Appendix E) for the project site to identify any Recognized Environmental Conditions, Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions, and Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions. A recognized environmental condition refers to the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property due to release to the environment, under conditions indicative of a release to the environment, or under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. No evidence of a recognized environmental condition was identified on the project site. A controlled recognized environmental condition refers to a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls. No evidence of a recognized environmental condition was identified on the project site. A historical recognized environmental condition refers to a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls. No evidence of a historical recognized environmental condition was identified on the project site. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.9-3 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 386 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration While the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment did not identify any recognized environmental conditions, it did identify one environmental issue on the site. The project site was utilized for agricultural purposes as early as 1949 until about 2002. It is unknown if environmentally persistent pesticides and/or herbicides were historically applied to the crops grown on the subject property. According to the Phase I Site Assessment and experience with similar agricultural properties, there would be low potential for soil contamination at concentrations in excess of regulatory thresholds as a result of the past use of persistent pesticides/herbicides from normal crop application. The accumulation of persistent pesticides/herbicides in soils at concentrations in excess of regulatory thresholds is more commonly associated with the cultivation of orchards over prolonged periods of time; or in areas where repeated mixing and rinsing of chemical application equipment may have occurred. No specific areas of concern related to onsite agricultural chemical storage and usage (spills, releases, etc.) were identified and the potential for elevated concentrations of environmentally persistent pesticides/herbicides to exist in the near -surface soils of the subject property, which would require regulatory action, would appear to be low. Even though no recognized environmental conditions were identified, however, because of the historical agriculture use of the property, it is recommended that a Phase II investigation could be conducted to assess the presence or absence of environmentally persistent agricultural chemicals within near surface soils. With implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, the potential for the project to create a significant hazard to the public or the environment would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: HAZ-1: Prior to issuance of grading permit, a Phase II investigation will be conducted to assess the presence or absence of environmentally persistent agricultural chemicals within near surface soils. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact: The project would not be within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, which would result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area. The project site is not located within an airport land use plan and there are no public airports within two miles of the project site. The nearest airport is Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport that is located as near as 3.6 miles east of the project site. In addition, the Crown Aero (Bermuda Dunes) Airport is approximately 8 miles away from the project site and the Palm Springs International (PSP) Airport which is 20 miles from the site. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in safety hazards or excessive noise impacts within the project area. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The City's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP), identifies hazards and vulnerabilities, provides mitigation strategies, and coordinates all institutions for disaster mitigation planning and Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.9-4 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 387 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration action within the City. The LMHP was last updated in 2022, and identified specific hazards including earthquake, flood, extreme weather, and drought. The City also establishes procedures and responsibilities for City personnel in its adopted Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), including planning and designation of evacuation routes under different scenarios. The City's primary tool in preparing for emergencies is its adopted EOP. The Emergency Services Division is responsible for emergency preparedness in the City. The Division is responsible for both planning and implementation of emergency response efforts, and coordinates with other local jurisdictions and the County of Riverside in emergency response planning, training, and disaster exercises. The City also participates in the County of Riverside Multi -Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, which was updated in 2017. Like local, the County LHMP consists of the Riverside County Operational Area Plan including the City of La Quinta. Close coordination with both the police and fire departments is included in all disaster planning efforts. In addition, the City participates in the California Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) program, and Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) National Incident Management System (NIMS), to assure coordinated response at the state and federal levels. In the event evacuation is required, the Riverside County Sheriff's Department would identify and direct traffic to designated emergency evacuation routes to ensure that residents can leave their neighborhoods safely, which would avoid any potential conflicts with emergency response plans. Residents of the project would comply with the City's emergency response plans. Potential impacts associated with conflicts to emergency response plans would be less than significant. The construction activities for the proposed project would not involve any activities that would physically impair or interfere with emergency response plans for the project area. During construction, there could be the potential for temporary lane closures to allow for utility connections. However, the temporary lane closures would be for a brief period and would be implemented in accordance with recommendations provided in the California Temporary Traffic Control Handbook to ensure that emergency access would always be maintained. Potential impacts associated with conflicts to emergency response plans would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, the project site is not within a Very High Fire Hazard Zone and not subject to wildland fire impacts. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.9-5 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 388 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.9-6 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 389 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality The following analysis is based on a Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) (February 28, 2023) and a Preliminary Hydrology Study (February 28, 2023) prepared by D&D Engineering, Inc. and presented in Appendix F. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Existing Setting The project site is located in the Whitewater Watershed. The Whitewater Watershed is home to the cities of Cathedral City, Palm Springs, Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert, Indian Wells, Indio, La Quinta, and Coachella. The watershed drains into the Whitewater River. The Whitewater River is a small permanent stream and begins its free-flowing journey from the 11,499 -foot -high summit of Mount San Gorgonio in the San Bernardino mountains. It is joined by three significant tributaries before reaching the Salton Sea. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.10-1 Hydrology and Water Quality 390 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Would the project: Significant Impact With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially ❑ ❑ ® ❑ degrade surface or ground water quality? b. Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge ❑ ❑ ❑ such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: 1) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or ❑ ® ❑ ❑ offsite? 2) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in ❑ ❑ ® ❑ flooding on- or offsite? 3) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned ❑ ® ❑ ❑ stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? 4) Impede or redirect flood flows? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release ❑ ❑ ® ❑ of pollutants due to project inundation? e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater ❑ ❑ ❑ management plan? The following analysis is based on a Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) (February 28, 2023) and a Preliminary Hydrology Study (February 28, 2023) prepared by D&D Engineering, Inc. and presented in Appendix F. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Existing Setting The project site is located in the Whitewater Watershed. The Whitewater Watershed is home to the cities of Cathedral City, Palm Springs, Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert, Indian Wells, Indio, La Quinta, and Coachella. The watershed drains into the Whitewater River. The Whitewater River is a small permanent stream and begins its free-flowing journey from the 11,499 -foot -high summit of Mount San Gorgonio in the San Bernardino mountains. It is joined by three significant tributaries before reaching the Salton Sea. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.10-1 Hydrology and Water Quality 390 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration The project site is located within the jurisdiction of the Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Plan (Basin Plan). For planning purposes, the site is within the Coachella Valley Planning Area. This planning area contains the Whitewater Hydrologic Unit and the East Salton Sea Hydrologic Unit. It lies almost entirely in Riverside County and covers 1,920 square miles in the west central portion of the region. The San Bernardino Mountains and the Little San Bernardino Mountains form the northern boundary. The Whitewater River is the major drainage course in the Planning Area. There is perennial flow in the mountains, but because of diversions and percolation into the basin, the Whitewater River becomes dry further downstream. The constructed downstream extension of the river channel known as the Coachella Valley Storm Water Channel, serves as a drainage way for irrigation return flows, treated community wastewater, and storm runoff. GROUND WATER Ground water is stored principally in the unconsolidated Pleistocene sediments. Wells yield up to 4,000 gpm. The maximum thickness of the water -bearing sediments is not known; however, it exceeds 1,000 feet in Coachella Valley. Ground water is generally unconfined except in the lower areas of the Coachella Valley. A clay aquitard, a result of past sedimentation in the old lakebed, extends from the Salton Sea to some distance west of Indio, overlying the domestic -use aquifers. The clay layer underlies lenses of permeable sediments and perched ground waters which are replenished by percolating irrigation water. Efforts to recharge the ground water basin in the Coachella Valley began in 1919 when the Coachella Valley County Water District constructed facilities to capture natural flows from the Whitewater River channel to recharge the upper portion of the Whitewater River Subbasin. In 1973, the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) and Desert Water Agency (DWA) began importing Colorado River water to the Whitewater recharge facility. The imported water was obtained from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California via the Colorado River Aqueduct in exchange for State Water Project water, for the purpose of increasing ground water recharge in the upper portion of the Whitewater River Subbasin. Regulatory Framework The project site is currently undeveloped and 100% pervious with no onsite drainage facilities. The natural drainage is from the southwest to the northeast. The project would be improved with onsite drainage facilities that would drain into the Coachella Valley Storm Water Channel and ultimately into the Salton Sea. The Basin Plan designates beneficial uses for surface waters and groundwater basins. Additionally, the Basin Plan identifies impaired water bodies and environmental sensitive areas within the region that afford additional protection. BENEFICIAL USES The Basin Plan designates beneficial uses for surface waters in the Coachella Valley. The beneficial uses include quantitative and narrative criteria for a range of water quality constituents that are applicable to certain receiving water bodies in order to protect the beneficial uses. The beneficial uses in the Basin Plan are described in Table 4.10-1, Beneficial Use Descriptions. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.10-2 Hydrology and Water Quality 391 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 4.10-1 Beneficial Use Descriptions Abbreviation Beneficial Use GWR Groundwater Recharge waters are used for natural or artificial recharge of groundwater for purposes that may include, but are not limited to, future extraction, maintaining water quality or halting saltwater intrusion into freshwater aquifers. REC 1 Water Contact Recreation waters are used for recreational activities involving body contact with water where ingestion of water is reasonably possible. These uses may include, but are not limited to, swimming, wading, water skiing, skin and scuba diving, surfing, whitewater activities, fishing and use of natural hot springs. REC 2 Non -Contact Water Recreation waters are used for recreational activities involving proximity to water, but not normally body contact with water where ingestion of water would be reasonably possible. These uses may include, but are not limited to, picnicking, sunbathing, hiking, beachcombing, camping, boating, tide pool and marine life study, hunting, sightseeing and aesthetic enjoyment in -conjunction with the above activities. WARM Warm waters support warm water ecosystems that may include, but are not limited to, preservation and enhancement of aquatic habitats, vegetation, fish, and wildlife, including invertebrates. AQUA Uses of water for agriculture or mariculture operations including, but not limited to propagation, cultivation, maintenance, or harvesting of aquatic plants and animals for human consumption or bait purposes. COLD Cold Freshwater habitat waters support cold water ecosystems. FRSH Uses of water for natural or artificial maintenance of surface water quantity or quality. WILD Wildlife Habitat waters support wildlife habitats that may include, but are not limited to, the preservation and enhancement of vegetation and prey species used by waterfowl and other wildlife. RARE Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species (RARE) waters support habitats necessary for the survival and successful maintenance of plant or animal species designated under state or federal law as rare, threatened or endangered. MUN Municipal and Domestic Supply waters are used for community, military, municipal or individual water supply systems. These uses may include, but are not limited to, drinking water supply. AGR Agricultural Supply waters are used for farming, horticulture or ranching. These uses may include, but are not limited to, irrigation, stock watering, and support of vegetation for range grazing. IND Industrial Service Supply waters are used for industrial activities that do not depend primarily on water quality. These uses may include, but are not limited to, mining, cooling water supply, hydraulic conveyance, gravel washing, fire protection and oil well depressurization. PROC Industrial Process Supply waters are used for industrial activities that depend primarily on water quality. These uses may include, but are not limited to, process water supply and all uses of water related to product manufacture or food preparation. POW Hydropower Generation waters are used for hydroelectric power generation. Source: California Water Boards, Colorado River Basin Plan , updated June 2019. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.10-3 Hydrology and Water Quality 392 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration As shown in Table 4.10-2, Study Area Water Body Beneficial Uses, the Basin Plan identifies beneficial uses for the Coachella Valley Storm Water Channel and the Salton Sea. Table 4.10-2 Study Area Water Body Beneficial Uses Beneficial Use Coachella Valley Storm Water Channel Salton Sea FRSH E NL IND NL P REC 1 E P REC 2 EE E WARM E E WILD E E RARE NL E Notes: E=Existing, P= Pending, NL -Not Listed SECTION 303(D) WATER BODIES Under Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act, the SWRCB is required to develop a list of impaired water bodies. Each of the individual RWQCBs are responsible for establishing priority rankings and developing action plans, referred to as total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) to improve water quality of water bodies included in the 303(d) list. The Clean Water Act 303(d) listed pollutants in the Coachella Valley Storm Water Channel and the Salton Sea are shown in Table 4.10-3, 303(d) Impaired Water Bodies. Table 4.10-3 303(d) Listed Impaired Water Bodies Water Bod P Distance to Receiving Water Coachella Valley Storm Water Channel Ammonia, DDT, Dieldrin, PCBs, Toxaphene, 7 Miles Toxicity, Disulfoton, Dissolved Oxygen Salton Sea Ammonia, Arsenic, Chloride, Chlorpyrifos, 17 Miles DDT, Low Dissolved Oxygen, Toxicity STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Section 402 of the Clean Water Act established the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to control water pollution by regulating point sources that discharge pollutants into Waters of the United States. In the State of California, the EPA has authorized the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to be the permitting authority to implement the NPDES program. The SWRCB issues two baseline general permits, one for industrial discharges and one for construction activities (General Construction Permit). Additionally, the NPDES Program includes the long-term regulation of storm water discharges from medium and large cities through the MS4 Permit Program. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.10-4 Hydrology and Water Quality 393 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Short -Term Storm Water Management Storm water discharges from construction sites with a disturbed area of one or more acres are required to either obtain individual NPDES permits for storm water discharges or be covered by a General Construction Permit. Coverage under the General Construction Permit requires filing a Notice of Intent with the State Water Resources Control Board and preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Each applicant underthe Construction General Permit must ensure that a SWPPP would be prepared prior to grading and implemented during construction. The primary objective of the SWPPP is to identify, construct, implement, and maintain Best Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce or eliminate pollutants in storm water discharges and authorized non -storm water discharges from the construction site during construction. BMPs include programs, technologies, processes, practices, and devices that control, prevent, remove, or reduce pollution. Long -Term Storm Water Management The stormwater management regulatory requirements for the site include water quality requirements per the Colorado River Basin Plan and the City of La Quinta Water Quality Ordinance Municipal Code Section 8.70. The project is considered a redevelopment project that requires Long -Term Post Construction Stormwater Requirements to reduce the amounts of impervious areas and capture and treat or infiltrate stormwater runoff. General Plan Amendment/Zone Change Implementation of the General Plan and Zone Change would not increase the risk for adverse hydrology and water quality impacts above what is identified in the existing General Plan. Potential hydrology and water quality impacts have been evaluated as part of the evaluation of the proposed project and would be required to comply with local, state, and federal regulations that provide for the protection of water quality and flood hazards. With compliance with local, state, and federal regulations that provide for the protection of water quality and flood hazards, potential hydrology and water quality impacts associated with the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be less than significant. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality. The following analysis evaluates if the proposed project would conflict with beneficial uses or further impair any listed 303(d) Impaired Water Bodies established in the Regional Water Quality Control Board Basin Plan. BENEFICIAL USES The project site is expected to generate pollutants associated with roads, parking areas and landscaping. Expected pollutants of concern would include bacteria, viruses, nutrients, pesticides, sediments, trash and debris, oil and grease. During construction, there would be the potential that degraded surface water runoff generated from the construction site could be conveyed into local drainage facilities. Depending on the constituents in the surface water, the water quality of the project Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.10-5 Hydrology and Water Quality 394 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration area surface water bodies could be reduced, which could conflict with beneficial uses established for the project area surface water bodies. The proposed project would disturb more than one acre of area and would, therefore, be required to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) State General Construction Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. In accordance with the State General Construction Permit, the project applicant would be required to file a Notice of Intent (N01) to the Storm Water Report Tracking System and obtain a waste discharger identification number from the State Water Resources Control Board. Additionally, the General Construction Permit requires the development and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP would identify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize degraded surface water runoff impacts. Such measures would include a site map that shows the construction site perimeter, existing and proposed buildings, parking areas, roadways, storm drain collection and discharge points before and after construction. Additionally, structural BMPs placement of such sandbags or waddles near drainages, use of rumble racks or wheel washers or other measures would be implemented to avoid sediment transport. Compliance with the NPDES short-term regulatory requirements would reduce short-term construction related impacts to water quality to a less than significant level. The long-term operation of the proposed project would generate surface water runoff that could contain pollutants that could conflict with project area surface water beneficial uses. The proposed project would be regulated under NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permits issued by the Colorado River Regional Water Quality Control Board. The proposed project would be required to comply with City of La Quinta Stormwater Program requirements to reduce the amounts of impervious areas and capture and treat or infiltrate stormwater runoff. The proposed project would be required to prepare a WQMP in accordance with the requirements of the non -point source NPDES Permit for Waste Discharge Requirements. The WQMP prepared for the proposed project would treat onsite low flows with an onsite bioretention basin. Additionally, non-structural and structural BMP's would be implemented to maintain water quality. Non-structural BMP's could include education of residents, common area landscape management, litter control, catch basin inspection, and street and parking lot sweeping. Structural BMP's could include storm drain system stenciling, design outdoor hazardous material storage areas to reduce pollutant introduction, and design trash enclosures to reduce pollutant introduction. Compliance with WQMP non-structural and structural and treatment control measures would reduce long-term operation impacts to water quality to a less than significant level. SECTION 303(d) IMPAIRED WATER BODIES It is unlikely that the construction and operation of the proposed project would generate elevated levels of pollution constituents shown previously in Table 4.10-3 that would be discharged or conveyed into the Coachella Valley Storm Water Channel or the Salton Sea. During construction, the proposed project would be required to implement SWPPP in accordance with State Water Resources Control Board General Construction Permit to maintain water quality. Additionally, non-structural, structural and treatment control measures would be implemented in accordance with the project Water Quality Management Plan requirements. Compliance with General Construction Permit requirements in conjunction with the implementation of the project WQMP would avoid further impairment to downstream impaired water bodies. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.10-6 Hydrology and Water Quality 395 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? No Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin. Water supplies forth e project would be provided by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) from a combination of groundwater and imported water. The project site underlies the Indio Subbasin. The Coachella Valley Water District has prepared the Coachella Valley Urban Water Management Plan and the Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan Sustainable Groundwater Management Act Plan (SGMA) to manage the supply and demand of surface water and groundwater in the service area. The groundwater water supplies identified in the Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan, are included in the groundwater supplies provided in the Coachella Valley Water District Urban Water Management Plan. Under the existing General Plan and Zoning Code, a total of 39 single-family units with a minimum lot size of 72,000 square feet could be developed on the project site. The proposed General Plan Amendment would increase the density on the project site from Low Density up to 4.0 dwelling units per acre to Medium/High Density up to 16 dwelling units per acre. The project proposes a density of 9.0 units per acre and the number of residential proposed on the project site would increase from 39 units to 80 units. Table 4.10-4, Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan and Coachella Valley Water District Urban Water Management Plan Water Demand, identifies the SGMA Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan and the Coachella Valley Water District Urban Water Management Plan water demand rates for 39 units allowed under the Low -Density Single -Family designation and 80 units proposed under the Medium/High Density designation. Table 4.10-4 Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan and Coachella Valley Water District Urban Water Management Plan Water Demand Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.10-7 Hydrology and Water Quality 396 Existing General Plan Proposed Water Demand Rate 39 Units Allowed Project 80 Units Gallons Per Land Use IL Household Unit Gallons Per Gallons Per Household Unit Household Unit Per Day Per Day Per Day Low Density Single -Family 1 494 19,266 Medium/High Density Multiple -Family 1170 13,600 Source: 2022 Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.10-7 Hydrology and Water Quality 396 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 4.10-4 shows that the water demands for the proposed 80 residential proposed under the Medium/High Density Multiple -Family designation would have a lower daily water demand compared to the 39 units that could be developed under the Low -Density Single -Family designation. The reduction in water demand would be a result of the cluster residential development common area landscaping, use of energy efficient water fixtures, minimal turf grass for park/playground area, and use of decomposed granite for landscaping. The proposed Medium/High Density Multiple -Family land uses would have approximately 29% less demand compared to the existing General Plan Low Density land uses planned for the site. The existing General Plan land use water demand is supplied for in the SGMA Indio Subbasin Groundwater Water Management Plan and the Coachella Valley Water District Urban Water Management Plan. The reduced water demand generated bythe proposed project would also be supplied for in the SGMA Indio Subbasin Groundwater Water Management Plan and the Coachella Valley Water District Urban Water Management Plan. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies nor interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin and potential impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: 1) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: Implementation of the proposed project would result in substantial erosion or siltation onsite or offsite. The project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area. During earthwork activities, there would be the potential that uncovered soils on the project site could be exposed to water erosion and/or wind erosion impacts. Additionally, there would be the potential that construction vehicles and construction equipment could transport sediment onto local streets and into local drainage systems. The proposed project would disturb more than one acre of area and would be required to obtain a General Construction Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. The General Construction Permit would require preparation and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to avoid erosion and sediment transfer impacts. With the implementation of Mitigation Measure HYDRO -1, potential erosion and sediment transfer impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: HYDRO -1: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant will obtain coverage under a General Construction Permit issued from the State Water Resources Control Board. The General Construction Permit would require the filing of a Notice of Intent with the State Water Resources Control Board and the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.10-8 Hydrology and Water Quality 397 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 2) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding onsite or offsite. The project site is currently vacant and 100% pervious. Implementation of the project would result in an increase in impervious area over the current condition, which would increase the rate of surface water generated from the site. As part of the improvements for the proposed project, a new storm drain would be constructed to route flows around and through the project site to an onsite detention basin. The detention basin is located at the northeast corner of the project site and consists of 26,200 square feet of area. The maximum depth of the detention basin is 6 feet with the capacity to hold 101,725 cubic feet of surface water runoff. According to the WQMP prepared for the proposed project, the proposed drainage system would be able to accommodate increased surface water flows generated from the project site. With implementation of the project WQMP, the proposed project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding onsite or offsite. Potential impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. 3) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: Implementation of the proposed project would not exceed the capacity of planned stormwater drainage facilities or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. The project is considered a priority project and would be subject to the surface water management regulations provided in Chapter 8.70 (Surface Water Management and Discharge Controls) of the City of La Quinta Municipal Code. The project has prepared a Drainage Plan that would retain and infiltrate all onsite stormwater runoff. The stormwater runoff from the site would be conveyed along private drives that would flow into a catch basin located on the site that would drain into a 26,200 square foot drainage basin where it would infiltrate into the ground. The project has also prepared a Water Quality Management Plan to minimize pollutant discharges, and/or accelerated erosion and sediment runoff during construction and/or post -construction use of the property. This project incorporates LID/Site Design BMPs to fully address the Municipal Code Treatment Control BMP requirement. Additionally, the project incorporates the following Site Design BMPs: • Preserve natural drainage features and natural depressional storage areas on the site. • Use natural drainage systems. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.10-9 Hydrology and Water Quality 398 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration • Construct streets, sidewalks, and parking lot aisles to minimum widths necessary, provided that public safety and a walkable environment for pedestrians are not compromised. • Reduce widths of streets where off-street parking is available. • Minimize the use of impervious surfaces, such as decorative concrete, in the landscape. Design residential and commercial sites to contain and infiltrate roof runoff, or direct roof runoff to landscaped swales or buffer areas. • Incorporate landscaped buffer areas between sidewalks and streets. With implementation of the proposed project, surface water infiltration basin and Site Design BMPs, rates of surface water runoff would be reduced and would not create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems. Additionally, during construction, the proposed project would be required to comply with NPDES General Construction Permit requirements and Municipal Code regulations to minimize the conveyance of degraded surface water runoff to offsite drainage systems. With compliance with the project Drainage Plan, WQMP, Municipal Code regulations and NPDES General Construction Permit requirements, potential water quality impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measure HYDRO -1 is required. 4) Impede or redirect flood flows? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not impede or redirect flood flows. As shown on FEMA FIRM 06065C2263H effective December 3, 2009, the project site is located in the Zone X area of minimal flood hazard; refer to Figure 4.10-1, National Flood Hazard Map. As part of the improvements for the proposed project, a new storm drain would be constructed to route flows around and through the project site to a bioretention basin. According to the WQMP prepared for the proposed project, the proposed drainage system would be able to accommodate increased surface waterflows generated from the project site. With implementation of the project drainage plan, potential flood flow impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? Less Than Significant Impact: The project would not be in a flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation. According to the City of La Quinta General Plan, the project site is not susceptible to flooding associated with dam failure, potential inundation from any stored water body or within a tsunami run up area that would increase the risk for the release of pollutants. Potential impacts associated with release of pollutants from a flood hazard would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.10-10 Hydrology and Water Quality 399 ational Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette Z FFMA legend 0 250 50D 11000 1Ism 2,000 Basemap: OSGS Natldnal Map: Orthdlmageryt Data refrdshed October, 2020 Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA); August 9, 2021. Ems- approximate Project Site Boundary El 1 VCS Environmental SEE FISREi IDR pELIREO IECEap ANDiNp rata FORRRN iMNILIUA YF Wlthbut Base Flood Dwatlon{BFE) ;am A Y. A4e SPECIAL FLOOD Wth BFE or Depth law AE. Ao. Air. WEAR HAZARDARfAS Regulatory Floodway 0.2% Annual ChanCo Flood HaYard. Argas or t% annual Chance flood with average depthless than one toot of with drainage areas of less than one square mile + Future Conditions 1%Annual �� Chance Flood Hazard :,M.i Afea with Reduped Flood Rrek due to OTHER AREAS OF Lerae. See Nates. zo.s FLOOD HAZWO �%� Area with Fkod Frisk due td Lereer :...; M SoMir it Area or Minimal Florid Hazard Ef f MIIb LOMA5 OTHER AREAS Area of Ondetermined Flood Hazard r. GENERAL ---- Chani el. Culvert. of Storm Sewer STRUCTURES r i i i i h e Levee. axe. ar rraodwan Th Is map Cam piles with FEMA's Stan dards lar the use Of dlgltal flow maps h It is not void as described below. Th a basemap shown Complies with FEMArs besemap accutadyslandarde The Hood hazard mtonnalkw i derived directly from the a udwritative HFHL web services provided by FEMA, ThiS map was exported on R: Ss/2O?S nt 6:3$ Ph1 and does not rellert changes or amendments subsequent to th is date and Ime. The NFHL and affective Information may change or become superseded by new data ower time. This map image is veld it the one or more al the following map elements do not appear. basamap Imagery, flood m @ labels, legend Kate bar. map sreatlon dale. community ideatiflers. FIRM panel n limper, and F I RM enecthva d ate -Atop Immges for unmapped and kin modemzed areas Cannot be died IQ regulatory pwpades, LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration National Flood Hazard Map Figure 4.10-1 400 . Cross Sections Math 1,% An nual Chanoa �I+L water Surface Elevalbn r- - - Coastal Transect •-+In— NaSe Flood Fleraton tine 19FE) limit o Study luFISdrttinn Boundary -- Coastal Transem Msdllna DTyIER Profile eauhrie FEATURE& Hydrographic Feature plgltal Data Available IU No D19,01' Dala Availatlle "PVrINKS unmapped The pin displayed on the map Is an apprarlmate point Wetted by the ages and does net mpresent an authoritative p4bFtrty 1o[atldd. Th Is map Cam piles with FEMA's Stan dards lar the use Of dlgltal flow maps h It is not void as described below. Th a basemap shown Complies with FEMArs besemap accutadyslandarde The Hood hazard mtonnalkw i derived directly from the a udwritative HFHL web services provided by FEMA, ThiS map was exported on R: Ss/2O?S nt 6:3$ Ph1 and does not rellert changes or amendments subsequent to th is date and Ime. The NFHL and affective Information may change or become superseded by new data ower time. This map image is veld it the one or more al the following map elements do not appear. basamap Imagery, flood m @ labels, legend Kate bar. map sreatlon dale. community ideatiflers. FIRM panel n limper, and F I RM enecthva d ate -Atop Immges for unmapped and kin modemzed areas Cannot be died IQ regulatory pwpades, LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration National Flood Hazard Map Figure 4.10-1 400 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? No Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with beneficial uses established for receiving water bodies for the project and would not conflict with water quality objectives nor further impair existing impaired water bodies. The proposed project would implement SWPPP, WQMP BMPs and would treat onsite low flows to protect beneficial uses for surface waters identified in the Colorado River Basin Plan. In 2014, the California Legislature enacted the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), that empowers local agencies to sustainably manage groundwater resources. SGMA requires local agencies to form groundwater sustainability agencies (GSAs) for the high and medium priority basins. GSAs develop and implement groundwater sustainability plans (GSPs) to avoid undesirable results and mitigate overdraft within 20 years. The project would receive water supplies from the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin. The project site specifically underlies the Indio Subbasin. The subbasins have been designated as medium priority. In 1964, DWR estimated that the Indio Subbasin contained approximately 29.8 million acres feet of water in the first 1,000 feet below the ground surface, or approximately 76% of the total groundwater in the Coachella Valley Groundwater Basin. The Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) has been designated an "exclusive" General Services Administration (GSA) over its service area for the Indio Subbasins. The final 2022 Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan Update was adopted by the GSA in December 2021. The Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan Update demonstrates that despite anticipated climate changes, the Indio Subbasin GSAs are able to meet forecasted demands under a variety of conditions and maintain the Indio Subbasin in balance, even increasing groundwater storage over time. Subsidence and saltwater intrusion have been stopped and are not anticipated to occur during Plan implementation. As documented in the Management Plan Update, the water supply of the Indio Subbasin is managed sustainably by the Indio Subbasin GSAs, with ongoing and adaptive management into the foreseeable future. The Management Plan Update has been developed in collaboration with groundwater management plans basins and will continue to be coordinated. The GSAs have succeeded in reversing historical groundwater trends and are currently planning to continue managing the Indio Subbasin sustainably. This Management Plan demonstrates that the GSAs have the necessary tools to support effective water management in the region. The proposed project with its cluster development and common landscaping would have approximately 29% less demand for water compared to the existing General Plan Low Density land uses planned for the site. The existing General Plan land use water demand is accounted for in SGMA Indio Subbasin Groundwater Water Management Plan. Therefore, the reduced water demand generated by the proposed project would also be accounted for in the SGMA Indio Subbasin Groundwater Water Management Plan. Implementation of the proposed project would not be expected to conflict with regional groundwater management strategies nor conflict with the Indio Subbasin Sustainable Groundwater Management Plan and potential impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.10-12 Hydrology and Water Quality 401 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.11 Land Use and Planning ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment/Zone Change The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not divide or create a barrier to existing communities or result in the development of incompatible land uses. Potential land use impacts have been evaluated as part of the proposed project and have been evaluated for land use consistency with adopted General Plan goals, policies, and objectives, as well as with the Zoning Code standards and requirements to ensure no adverse land use impacts would occur. Potential land use impacts associated with the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be less than significant. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Physically divide an established community? No Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not physically divide an established community. The project site is currently undeveloped and situated within a suburban setting that is in transition from undeveloped land to suburban land uses. The project site is adjacent to residential land uses to the north and west. The proposed project would develop 80 dwelling units that would be consistent with surrounding residential land uses and would not result in any adverse land use compatibility impacts. The project would not divide an established community, would not redirect traffic through existing residential neighborhoods or would not introduce any physical barriers between the project site and surrounding area. Additionally, the project would not require acquisition of private or public lands that would divide existing land uses. Therefore, no impacts would occur in regard to physically dividing an established community. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The relevant planning documents for the project would be the City of La Quinta General Plan and Zoning Code. The City of La Quinta General Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.11-1 Land Use and Planning 402 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Would the project: Significant Impact With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a. Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ b. Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation ❑ ❑ ® ❑ adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment/Zone Change The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not divide or create a barrier to existing communities or result in the development of incompatible land uses. Potential land use impacts have been evaluated as part of the proposed project and have been evaluated for land use consistency with adopted General Plan goals, policies, and objectives, as well as with the Zoning Code standards and requirements to ensure no adverse land use impacts would occur. Potential land use impacts associated with the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be less than significant. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Physically divide an established community? No Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not physically divide an established community. The project site is currently undeveloped and situated within a suburban setting that is in transition from undeveloped land to suburban land uses. The project site is adjacent to residential land uses to the north and west. The proposed project would develop 80 dwelling units that would be consistent with surrounding residential land uses and would not result in any adverse land use compatibility impacts. The project would not divide an established community, would not redirect traffic through existing residential neighborhoods or would not introduce any physical barriers between the project site and surrounding area. Additionally, the project would not require acquisition of private or public lands that would divide existing land uses. Therefore, no impacts would occur in regard to physically dividing an established community. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The relevant planning documents for the project would be the City of La Quinta General Plan and Zoning Code. The City of La Quinta General Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.11-1 Land Use and Planning 402 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Plan and Zoning Map currently designate the project site as Low Density Residential, allowing up to four dwelling units per acre to be developed. The proposed project involves a General Plan Amendment that would redesignate the project site from Low Density Residential to Medium/High Density Residential at 16.0 dwelling units per acre and a Zone Change from Low Density Residential to Medium/High at 12.0 dwelling units per acre. The maximum amount of dwelling units that could be developed on the site would be 58 units. The surrounding residential land uses are designated low density. The project is proposing a residential density of 9.0 dwelling units per acre which would allow an additional 41 dwelling units to be developed on the project site. The increase in dwelling units on the project site would not be considered substantial compared to the maximum number of number of dwelling units that could be developed on the site under the Medium/High designation. Even though the project is proposing a General Plan Land Use Amendment, the project would still be required to demonstrate consistency with the General Plan. Table 4.11-1, General Plan Land Use Consistency, evaluates the consistency with the proposed project with relevant goals and policies from the City's General Plan. Table 4.11-1 General Plan Land Use Consistency General Plan Goal/Policy Consistency Evaluation Land Use Element GOAL LU -1: Land use compatibility throughout City. In accordance with Section 9.60.330 of the City of La Quinta Zoning Code, the project was required to prepare and submit a massing plan. The massing plan depicts the relationship of the structures within the project site to each other and to development adjacent to the project and its compatibility with surrounding development. With preparation and approval of the massing study, the project would demonstrate the project design of one- and two-story units would be consistent with the surrounding single - story units and would be consistent with Goal LU -1. The project proposes residential land uses that would be adjacent to existing residential land uses, as well as planned residential land uses and would not introduce incompatible land uses. The project would comply with Image Corridor requirements by including a 15 -foot landscape setback along Avenue 58 and limiting the height of structures within 150 feet of Avenue 58 to under 22 feet, which would be compatible with height and setback requirements provided for the existing residential uses located north of Avenue 58. The project would be setback at an adequate distance to existing residential areas, where there would be no adverse operation effects to existing residential areas. The project would not redirect through existing neighborhoods or involve any long-term activities that would affect the quality and integrity of existing residential neighborhoods. As you enter the proposed community through its main entrance along Avenue 58, Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.11-2 Land Use and Planning 403 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration General Plan Goal/Policy Consistency Evaluation you will see a one-story recreation building to the west, along with a large landscaped open space area along the northern edge of the property which backs up to three one-story homes, which has been carefully designed to comply and promote the City's view corridor program. The lower architectural elements and open space along the property's northern edge create a viewshed that is seamless with the northern existing neighborhoods, thereby illustrating a land use compatibility with well- established homes. As shown on the attached Preliminary Site and Landscape Plan, the Corridor View Figure and Recreation Building Architectural Plans, this proposed community has been integrated with open space, as well as amenities to soften and enhance the views to create a well thought-out and designed neighborhood. The structures have been tapered from one-story homes (approximately 18 feet in height) along the northern edge to two-story homes (approximately 25 feet in height) as the community transitions to the south. Adjacent land uses to the south, east and west are planned for single-family residential homes which again are compatible with the proposed community. GOAL LU -2: High quality design that compliments and The proposed project has been designed to promote enhances the City. residential amenities and flexibility in design. The cluster layout of the homes has been designed to achieve visual diversity and interest in the street scene through varying setbacks, articulated building masses or enhanced elevations on residences plotted on corner lots. The proposed project has been designed to be visually compatible with similar architectural elements of Spanish, Mediterranean and Santa Barbara influences that are common in La Quinta. The project proposes a minimum of four floor plans, with three elevations and three color schemes per elevation to provide aesthetic variety and interest. No identical single-family detached plan and elevation would be permitted side-by-side and two houses on either side of a specific lot would be required to use different color schemes. The homes would be designed so that living activities are oriented towards the street with emphasis on porches, courtyards, entries, and windows. The proposed project includes a landscape treatment program consisting of plants, shrubs, trees and groundcover, including 15 feet of landscape setback along Avenue 58 in accordance with the Image Corridor requirements, which would enhance the streetscape over its existing condition. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.11-3 Land Use and Planning 404 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration General Plan Goal/Policy I Consistency Evaluation Policy LU -2.7: Continue to include park facilities planning in neighborhood planning efforts. GOAL LU -3: Safe and identifiable neighborhoods that provide a sense of place. GOAL LU -4: Maintenance and protection of existing neighborhoods. GOAL LU -5: A broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City. Policy LU -5.2: Consider changes in market demand in residential product type to meet the needs of current and future residents. Circulation Element Policy CIR-1.6: Maintain LOS -D operating conditions for all corridors and intersections unless maintaining this LOS would, in the City's judgment, be infeasible and/or conflict with the achievement of other goals. Program CIR-1.12.c: New development shall provide pedestrian and bicycle connections to adjacent streets, and assure that infrastructure and amenities accommodate pedestrian and bicycle use. The project includes recreation facilities for its residents including pool, spa, outdoor seating areas, clubhouse, and gardens. The project has been designed as a planned unit development that would provide open space and recreation amenities and landscape treatments to create an identifiable community. The project would comply with Fire Protection and Police Protection requirements to ensure safety for its residents. Similar to the existing residential uses located north of the project, the proposed project would limit the height of structures along Highway 58 to less than 22 feet which would maintain privacy for the existing and proposed residential uses. The closest two-story homes to Avenue 58 would be 150 feet and the closest existing residential uses would be 195 feet. Additionally, the project proposes a perimeter block wall around the project which would minimize operational impacts. The project lighting would be similar to the type and level of existing lighting provided in the project area and it would comply with the Municipal Code lighting requirements which would ensure that all exterior lighting would be confined to the property to avoid spillover lighting impacts to adjoining properties. The project would take access off of Avenue 58 and would not access through or redirect traffic to existing residential neighborhoods. The proposed medium density project would provide an additional range of housing types in the City. The project proposes an alternative clustered residential housing product in lieu of a single-family dwelling development to help meet the housing needs of a wide range of household income levels and range of housing sizes for current and future demands for housing in the City. The proposed project would not generate operation conditions that would not reduce project area roadway segments or intersections to below LOS D. The proposed project includes a pedestrian sidewalk along the private driveway which would provide access to pedestrian sidewalks and a Class II Bikeway proposed along Avenue 58. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.11-4 Land Use and Planning 405 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration General Plan Goal/Policy Consistency Evaluation mom Policy CIR-1.14: Private streets shall be developed in accordance with development standards set forth in the Municipal Code, relevant Public Works Bulletins and other applicable standards and guidelines. Policy CIR-1.17: In orderto preserve the aesthetic values on the City's streets, optimum landscape setbacks shall be maintained along all designated General Plan Image Corridors and shall be identified in the City's Municipal Code. Livable Community Element Policy SC -1.3: Encourage the use of more environmentally friendly storm water management techniques such as bioswales, permeable surfaces and other methods as they are developed, in all new development. Program SC -1.4.a: Require all new development proposals to demonstrate consistency with the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan. Program SC -1.5.a: All new development shall be constructed to meet or exceed CalGreen Building Codes. Program SC -1.5.c: New development projects shall include vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle connections to the greatest extent possible, both through the project and connecting to adjacent projects. Housing Element GOAL H-1: Provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population. Policy H-1.4: Support the construction of new affordable housing by rezoning, where appropriate and desirable, to permit higher density residential development. Policy H-6.1: Promote higher density and compact developments that increase energy efficiency and reduce land consumption. Air Quality Element Policy AQ -1.5: Ensure all construction activities minimize emissions of all air quality pollutants. Policy AQ -1.6: Proposed development air quality emissions of criteria pollutants shall be analyzed under CEQA. The project will coordinate with the City to ensure that private streets are designed and constructed to meet City standards. The project includes a 15 -foot landscape setback behind the right-of-way along Avenue 58, which is identified as a General Plan Image Corridor. The project proposes Light Impact Development/Site Design Drainage Concepts and Treatment Controls as part of the project WQMP. The project evaluated Greenhouse Gas emissions and determined that the project contributions would be less than significant. The project will coordinate with the City to ensure the project complies with CALGreen Building Code requirements. The proposed project includes a pedestrian sidewalk along the private driveway which would provide access to pedestrian sidewalks and a Class II Bikeway proposed along Avenue 58. The project proposes an alternative clustered residential housing product in lieu of a single-family dwelling development to help meet the housing needs of a wide range of household income levels and range of housing sizes for the current and future demands for housing in the City. The proposed project includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Density to Medium Density which would allow for 4 ladditional residential units to be developed on the site. The proposed project includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Density to Medium Density, which would result in more units on less land. The project IS/MND evaluates short-term construction related air quality impacts and determined that construction air quality impacts would be less than significant. The project IS/MND Air Quality Assessment evaluates the generation of criteria pollutants and has determined Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.11-5 Land Use and Planning 406 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration General Plan Goal/Policy I Consistency Evaluation Policy AQ -1.7: Greenhouse gas emissions associated with a development project shall demonstrate adherence to the City's GHG Reduction Plan. Biological Resources Element Policy BIO -1.4: Comply with the requirements of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (M BTA). Cultural Resources Element Program CUL -1.1.a: Any development application for a vacant site, or a site previously or currently used for agricultural purposes, shall be accompanied by a Phase I archaeological and/or historic analysis conducted by a qualified archaeologist. Such analysis shall be paid for by the project proponent. Water Resources Element Program WR -1.4.c: Require onsite retention for new development projects to the greatest extent possible, to provide added recharge of the aquifer. Environmental Hazards (Safety Element) Policy N-1.2: New residential development located adjacent to any roadway identified in Table IV -4 as having a build out noise level more than 65 dBA shall continue to be required to submit a noise impact analysis in conjunction with the first Planning Department application, which demonstrates compliance with the City's noise standards. Policy N-1.5: All noise impact analysis will include, at a minimum, short-term construction noise and noise generated by the daily operation of the project at build out. Policy GEO-1.2: The City shall continue to require that development in areas subject to rockfall, landslide, liquefaction and/or other geotechnical hazards described in this Element, prepare detailed geotechnical analyses that include mitigation measures intended to reduce potential hazards to less than significant levels. Program FH -1.3.a: New development shall continue to be required to construct onsite retention/detention basins and other necessary stormwater management facilities that are capable of managing 100 -year stormwater flows. that construction and operational air quality impacts would be less than significant. The project IS/MND Greenhouse Gas Study evaluated the consistency of the project with the City's GHG Reduction Plan and determined it adheres to the GHG Reduction Plan. The project IS/MND Biological Study evaluated potential conflicts with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and identified measures to avoid impacts to migratory birds. The project site was a former date palm orchard. The project IS/MND includes a Phase 1 Archeological/ Historic Assessment. The project Drainage Plan proposes a bioretention basin to capture stormwater runoff and infiltrate it into the ground water basin. The IS/MND includes a Noise Study which evaluates traffic noise impacts and has determined that traffic noise impacts would be less than significant. The project IS/MND includes a Noise Study which evaluates short-term construction and long-term operational noise impacts and determined that noise impacts would be less than significant. The project IS/MND includes a Geotechnical Study that evaluates landslide, liquefaction and other geotechnical constraints and has determined that potential geologic and soil impacts would be less than significant. The project Drainage Plan proposes a bioretention basin to capture stormwater runoff and infiltrate it into the ground water basin. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.11-6 Land Use and Planning 407 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration General Plan Goal/Policy Consistency Evaluation Policy ES -1.2: New development proposals shall The IS/MND evaluates potential impacts to fire continue to be routed to the Fire Department to assure protection and determined potential impacts would be that project access and design provide for maximum fire less than significant. Additionally, through site plan and life safety. review, the City would ensure the project complies with all required fire standards and requirements. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY With approval of the General Plan Amendment, the proposed project would not conflict with the General Plan land use density. As demonstrated above, the proposed project would be consistent with relevant policies from the City of La Quinta and would contribute to meeting the City's RHNA requirements. The approval of the proposed project would not substantially conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect within the City. Potential land use impacts would be less than significant. CITY OF LA QUINTA ZONING CODE Table 4.11-2, Residential Planned Unit Development Standards, is a comparison of the site development standards for the proposed Medium Density Residential Zone Change and the site development standards proposed by the project with the proposed PUD. Through the PUD process, the project is proposing to reduce minimum lot area, front yard setback, rear yard setback, side yard setback and increase the maximum lot coverage. Table 4.11-2 Residential Planned Unit Development Standards Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.11-7 Land Use and Planning 408 Development Criteria IF I R A. Lot Size Minimum lot size (square feet) 7,200 3,600 2,310 Minimum Lot Frontage (feet) 60 40 33 B. Building Placement Front Yard Setback (feet) 20 20 0 Rear Yard (feet) 20 15 7.5 Interior/Exterior Side Yard Rear Yard (feet) 5/10 5/10 3/5 C. Building Size and Massing Maximum Lot Coverage 50% 60 66% Maximum Building Height (feet) 28 28 28 D. Landscaping Required Landscaping (%) 10/20 (first number equals minimum at any point; second number equals minimum average over entire frontage) 10/20 (first number equals minimum at any point; second number equals minimum average over entire frontage) 30% Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.11-7 Land Use and Planning 408 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Presently, the zoning on the project site is Low Density Residential. To ensure consistency between the proposed project and the City of La Quinta Zoning Map, the Zoning Map would be amended to Medium High Density Residential for the project site. In accordance with Section 9.220.020 of the Zoning Code, the following findings shall be made by the City Council prior to the approval of the Zone change request: 1. Consistency with General Plan goals, policies, and objectives. As shown in Table 4.11-1, the proposed project would be consistent with relevant policies from the General Plan. 2. Approval will not create conditions materially detrimental to public health, safety, and general welfare. The IS/MND prepared for the proposed project evaluated potential environmental effects that could potentially cause adverse impacts on the environment and human beings and determined that with the incorporation of mitigation measures all potential impacts would be less than significant. 3. Compatible with zoning on adjacent land uses. The surrounding residential land uses adjacent to the site are Low Density Residential and Neighborhood Commercial. Across from Avenue 58, the area is also zoned Low Density Residential. Under the Low -Density Residential zoning, projects with clustered smaller dwellings, such as one-story and two-story single-family attached, townhome or condominium dwellings are permitted. The proposed Zone Change would rezone the project site to Medium Density Residential at a density of 12.0 dwelling units per acre that would develop a small lot cluster development. The project would be compatible with and could be served by Neighborhood Commercial land uses planned for the area. The proposed project would have a higher density, but the housing type that would be developed on the project site would be consistent with the types of housing allowed under the Low Density Residential Zoning. To enhance compatibility with adjacent land uses, the project would comply with Image Corridor requirements by including a 15 -foot landscape setback along Avenue 58 and limiting the height of structures within 150 feet of Avenue 58, to a 22 - foot height requirement which would be compatible with the height and setback requirements provided for the existing residential uses located north of Avenue 58. The project would be setback at an adequate distance to existing residential areas, where there would be no adverse operation effects to existing residential areas. 4. Proposed zoning is suitable and appropriate for the property. The project site is currently zoned Low Density Residential. No change of use is proposed, only an increase in residential density from 2.0 to 4.0 units per acre to 8.0 to 12.0 units per acre. The project infrastructure plan and studies identify that the project could support the increased residential density without any significant adverse effects. Public Review Draft I lune 2023 4.11-8 Land Use and Planning 409 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 5. Approval of the zone change is warranted because general conditions of the property have changed since the existing zoning was imposed. The property is currently zoned Low Density Residential. Over the last few years, California has experienced an unprecedented, severe, and well-documented housing shortage. California Senate Bill 330 (SB 330), "The Housing Crisis Act of 2019," was signed into law by Governor Newsom on October 9, 2019 and became effective January 1, 2020. SB 330 establishes a statewide housing emergency to be in effect until January 1, 2030 and acknowledges California is experiencing a housing supply crisis, with housing demand far outstripping supply. California needs an estimated 180,000 additional homes annually to keep up with population growth, and the Governor has called for 3.5 million new homes to be built over the next 7 years. The proposed zone change would increase the amounts of units currently allowed under the current zoning and would be warranted in response to the State of California's current need for additional housing. Zoning Code Consistency Determination As shown above, the project would support the required Zone Change findings provided in Section 9.220.020 of the Zoning Code. Upon adoption of the proposed Zone Change, the project would be consistent with the La Quinta Municipal Code and Zoning Map. Impacts would be less than significant in this regard. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.11-9 Land Use and Planning 410 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.11-10 Land Use and Planning 411 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.12 Mineral Resources ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment/Zone Change The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state or result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state. The City of La Quinta General Plan identifies that the project is located in an area that is designated MRZ-1, areas where geologic information indicates that little likelihood exists for the presence of significant mineral resources. The project site is not planned for mineral resource extraction and has not historically been associated with mineral resources. Therefore, there would be no impacts to mineral resources. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan. As discussed above, no known valuable mineral resources exist within or near the project site, and no mineral resource extraction activities occur on the site. According to the City of La Quinta General Plan, the project site is not identified as a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general, specific plan, or other land use plan. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.12-1 Mineral Resources 412 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Would the project: Significant Impact With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the ❑ ❑ ❑ residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local ❑ ❑ ❑ general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment/Zone Change The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state or result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state. The City of La Quinta General Plan identifies that the project is located in an area that is designated MRZ-1, areas where geologic information indicates that little likelihood exists for the presence of significant mineral resources. The project site is not planned for mineral resource extraction and has not historically been associated with mineral resources. Therefore, there would be no impacts to mineral resources. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan. As discussed above, no known valuable mineral resources exist within or near the project site, and no mineral resource extraction activities occur on the site. According to the City of La Quinta General Plan, the project site is not identified as a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general, specific plan, or other land use plan. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.12-1 Mineral Resources 412 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.12-2 Mineral Resources 413 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.13 Noise The following analysis is based on a Noise Impact Analysis prepared by Vista Environmental in October 2021. The report is presented in its entirety in Appendix G. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Background NOISE LEVELS Noise level (or volume) is generally measured in decibels (dB) using the A -weighted sound pressure level (dBA). The A -weighting scale is an adjustment to the actual sound pressure levels to be consistent with that of human hearing response, which is most sensitive to frequencies around 4,000 Hertz (about the highest note on a piano) and less sensitive to low frequencies (below 100 Hertz). Sound pressure level is measured on a logarithmic scale with the 0 B level based on the lowest detectable sound pressure level that people can perceive (an audible sound that is not zero sound pressure level). Based on the logarithmic scale, a doubling of sound energy is equivalent to an increase of three dBA, and a sound that is 10 dBA less than the ambient sound level has no effect on ambient noise. Because of the nature of the human ear, a sound must be about 10 dBA greaterthan the reference sound to bejudged as twice as loud. In general, a three dBA change in community noise levels is noticeable, while a one to two dB change is generally not perceived. Quiet suburban areas typically have noise levels in the range of 40-50 dBA, while arterial streets are in the 50-60+ dBA range. SOUND ATTENUATION Noise levels typically attenuate (or drop off) at a rate of six dBA per doubling of distance from point sources (i.e., industrial machinery). Additionally, noise levels may also be reduced by intervening structures. Generally, a single row of buildings between the receptor and the noise source reduces the noise level by about five dBA, while a solid wall or berm reduces noise levels by approximately seven dBA. The manner in which older homes in California were constructed (approximately 30 years old or Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.13-1 Noise 414 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Would the project result in: ilkIncorporated Significant Impact With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact - a. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local ❑ ❑ ® ❑ general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ groundborne noise levels? c. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a ❑ ❑ ❑ public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? The following analysis is based on a Noise Impact Analysis prepared by Vista Environmental in October 2021. The report is presented in its entirety in Appendix G. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Background NOISE LEVELS Noise level (or volume) is generally measured in decibels (dB) using the A -weighted sound pressure level (dBA). The A -weighting scale is an adjustment to the actual sound pressure levels to be consistent with that of human hearing response, which is most sensitive to frequencies around 4,000 Hertz (about the highest note on a piano) and less sensitive to low frequencies (below 100 Hertz). Sound pressure level is measured on a logarithmic scale with the 0 B level based on the lowest detectable sound pressure level that people can perceive (an audible sound that is not zero sound pressure level). Based on the logarithmic scale, a doubling of sound energy is equivalent to an increase of three dBA, and a sound that is 10 dBA less than the ambient sound level has no effect on ambient noise. Because of the nature of the human ear, a sound must be about 10 dBA greaterthan the reference sound to bejudged as twice as loud. In general, a three dBA change in community noise levels is noticeable, while a one to two dB change is generally not perceived. Quiet suburban areas typically have noise levels in the range of 40-50 dBA, while arterial streets are in the 50-60+ dBA range. SOUND ATTENUATION Noise levels typically attenuate (or drop off) at a rate of six dBA per doubling of distance from point sources (i.e., industrial machinery). Additionally, noise levels may also be reduced by intervening structures. Generally, a single row of buildings between the receptor and the noise source reduces the noise level by about five dBA, while a solid wall or berm reduces noise levels by approximately seven dBA. The manner in which older homes in California were constructed (approximately 30 years old or Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.13-1 Noise 414 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration older) generally provides a reduction of exterior -to -interior noise levels of about 20 to 25 dBA with closed windows. The exterior -to -interior sound reduction of newer residential units and office buildings constructed to California Energy Code standards is generally 30 dBA or more (Harris, Miller, Miller and Hanson, 2006). NOISE METRICS One of the most frequently used noise metrics that considers both duration and sound power level is the equivalent noise level (Leq). The Leq is defined as the single steady A -weighted level that is equivalent to the same amount of energy as that contained in the actual fluctuating levels over a period of time (essentially, the average noise level). Typically, Leq is summed over a one-hour period. Lmax is the highest RMS (root mean squared) sound pressure level within the measuring period, and Lmin is the lowest RMS sound pressure level within the measuring period. The time period in which noise occurs is also important since noise that occurs at night tends to be more disturbing than that which occurs during the day. Community noise is usually measured using Day -Night Average Level (Ldn), which is the 24-hour average noise level with a 10 dBA penalty for noise occurring during nighttime (10:00 PM to 7:00 AM) hours, or Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL), which is the 24-hour average noise level with a five dBA penaltyfor noise occurring from 7:00 PM to 10:00 PM and a 10 dBA penalty for noise occurring from 10:00 PM to 7:00 AM. Noise levels described by Ldn and CNEL usually do not differ by more than one dB. Daytime Leq levels are louder than Ldn or CNEL levels; thus, if the Leq meets noise standards, the Ldn and CNEL are also met. Regulatory Framework FEDERAL NOISE CONTROL ACT The Federal Noise Control Act (1972) addressed the issue of noise as a threat to human health and welfare. To implement the Federal Noise Control Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) undertook a number of studies related to community noise in the 1970s. The EPA found that 24-hour averaged noise levels less than 70 dBA would avoid measurable hearing loss. Levels of less than 55 dBA outdoors and 45 dBA indoors would prevent activity interference and annoyance (EPA 1972). The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) published a Noise Guidebook for use in implementing the Department's noise policy. In general, HUD's goal is exterior noise levels that are less than or equal to 55 dBA Ldn. The goal for interior noise levels is 45 dBA Ldn. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulates noise of aircraft and airports. Surface transportation system noise is regulated by a host of agencies, including the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), which regulates transit noise, while freeways that are part of the interstate highway system are regulated by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Although the proposed project is not under the jurisdiction of the FTA, the Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (FTA Manual), prepared by the FTA, September 2018, is the only guidance document from a government agency that provides guidance on construction noise and recommends developing construction noise criteria on a project -specific basis that utilizes local noise ordinances if possible. However, local noise ordinances will usually relate to nuisance and hours of allowed activity and sometimes specify limits in terms of maximum levels, but are generally not practical for assessing the noise impacts of a construction project. Project construction noise criteria should take into account the existing noise environment, the absolute noise levels during construction activities, the duration of the construction, and the adjacent land uses. The FTA standards are based on extensive studies by the FTA and other governmental agencies on the human effects and reaction to noise and a summary Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.13-2 Noise 415 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration of the FTA findings for a detailed construction noise assessment are provided below in Table 4.13-1, Federal Transit Administration Construction Noise Criteria. Table 4.13-1 Federal Transit Administration Construction Noise Criteria Land Use Day (dBA Leg(s-ho.,)) T Night (dBA Leq(8-ho.r)) 30 -day Average (dBA Ldn) Residential 80 70 75 Commercial 85 85 80(1) Industrial 90 90 85(1) Notes: (1) Use a 24-hour Leq (24 hour) instead of Ldn (30 day). Source: Vista Environmental, Noise Impact Analysis; October 19, 2021. STATE Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) establishes standards governing interior noise levels that apply to all new single-family and multiple -family residential units in California. These standards require that acoustical studies be performed before construction at building locations where the existing Ldn exceeds 60 dBA. Such acoustical studies are required to establish mitigation measures that will limit maximum Ldn levels to 45 dBA in any habitable room. Although there are no generally applicable interior noise standards pertinent to all uses, many communities in California have adopted a Ldn of 45 as an upper limit on interior noise in all residential units. In addition, the State of California General Plan Guidelines (OPR 2003), provides guidance for noise compatibility. The guidelines also present adjustment factors that may be used to arrive at noise acceptability standards that reflect the noise control goals of the community, the particular community's sensitivity to noise, and the community's assessment of the relative importance of noise pollution. LOCAL The City of La Quinta General Plan 2035 (General Plan), adopted February 19, 2013, and Municipal Code establishes the following applicable policies related to noise and vibration. La Quinta General Plan The following applicable goals and policies to the proposed project are from Chapter IV Environmental Hazards Element of the General Plan: Policy N-1.1: Noise standards in the City shall be consistent with the Community Noise and Land Use Compatibility scale described in this Element. Policy N-1.2: New residential development located adjacent to any roadway identified in Table IV -4 as having a build out noise level in excess of 65 dBA shall continue to be required to submit a noise impact analysis in conjunction with the first Planning Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.13-3 416 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Department application, which demonstrates compliance with the City's noise standards. Policy N-1.5: All noise impact analysis will include, at a minimum, short-term construction noise and noise generated by the daily operation of the project at build out. Policy N-1.6: The City may require remedial noise control plans and/or improvements for areas experiencing noise in excess of adopted City standards. Policy N-1.7: Noise impact analysis shall be included in all City Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and developer -required roadway widening projects to demonstrate compliance with City noise standards. City of La Quinta Municipal Code The City of La Quinta Municipal Code establishes the following applicable standards related to noise and vibration. 6.08.050 — Disturbance by Construction Noises A. It is a nuisance, and it is unlawful, for any person to be engaged or employed, or for any person to cause any other person to be engaged or employed, in any work of construction, erection, alteration, repair, addition to, or improvement to realty, except between the hours set forth as follows: Table 4.13-2 Federal Transit Administration Construction Noise Criteria Days of Week October 15t through April 30th Monday -Friday I 7:00 AM to 5:30 PM May 15t through September 30th Saturday 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Sunday None Holidays* None Monday -Friday 6:00 AM to 7:00 PM Saturday 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM. Sunday None Holidays* None Notes: * For purposes of this section, the following shall be considered Holidays: New Year's Day (January 15t) Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day (third Monday in January) President's Day (third Monday in February formerly Washington's birthday) Memorial Day (last Monday in May) Independence Day (July 41h) Labor Day (first Monday in September) Veteran's Day (November 111h) Thanksgiving (fourth Thursday in November) Christmas (December 25th) Source: 6.08.050 of the Municipal Code. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.13-4 Noise 417 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration B. No person doing or causing work prohibited by subsection A of this section, after being informed orally or in writing that the work is in violation of subsection A, shall fail, refuse or neglect to cease said work. Exceptions: 1. Emergency repair of existing installations or equipment or appliances; 2. Construction work complying with the terms of a written early work permit which may be issued by the city manager or designee, upon a showing of sufficient need due to hot or inclement weather, or the use of an unusually long process material, or other circumstances of unusual and compelling nature. 9.60.220 — Noise Control Residential land uses shall comply with the noise control standards set forth in Section 9.100.210. 9.100.210 — Noise Control A. Purpose. The noise control standards for nonresidential land use districts set forth in this section are established to prevent excessive sound levels which are detrimental to the public health, welfare and safety or which are contrary to the public interest. B. Noise Standards. Exterior noise standards are set forth below. Residential property, schools, hospitals and churches are considered noise sensitive land uses, regardless of the land use district in which they are located. All other uses shall comply with the "other nonresidential" standard. All noise measurements shall be taken using standard noise measuring instruments. Measurements shall be taken within the receiving property locations determined by the director to be most appropriate to the individual situation. Table 4.13-3 City of La Quinta Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) Land Uses 50 1 55 1 60 1 65 1 70 1 75 1 80 C Residential Single -Family Dwellings, Duplex, Mobile Homes A C Chart Legend: A- Normally Acceptable: With no special noise reduction requirements assuming standard construction. B - Conditionally Acceptable: New construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirement is made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. C - Normally Unacceptable: New construction is discouraged. If new construction does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirement is made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. D - Clearly Unacceptable: New construction or development should generally not be undertaken. Source: Section 9.100.210(8) of the Municipal Code. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.13-5 Noise 418 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 4.13-4 City of La Quinta Exterior Noise Standards Receiving Land Use Noise Standard Time Period 7NiseSensitive 65 dB(A) 77:00 AM —10:00 PM 50 dB(A) 10:00 PM — 7:00 AM Other Nonresidential 75 dB(A) 7:00 AM —10:00 PM 65 dB(A) 10:00 PM — 7:00 AM Source: Section 9.100.210(B) of the Municipal Code. If the noise consists entirely of impact noise, simple tone noise, speech or music, or any combination thereof, each of the noise levels specified in the table in this section shall be reduced by five (5) dB(A). C. Noise Limits. It is unlawful for any person at any location within the city to create any noise, or to allow the creation of any noise on property owned, leased, occupied or otherwise controlled by such person, when such noise causes the noise level, when measured on any adjacent property to exceed: 1. The noise standard for a cumulative period of more than thirty (30) minutes in any hour; 2. The noise standard plus five (5) dB(A) for a cumulative period of more than fifteen (15) minutes in any hour; 3. The noise standard plus ten (10) dB(A) for a cumulative period of more than five (5) minutes in any hour; 4. The noise standard plus fifteen (15) dB(A) for a cumulative period of more than one (1) minute in any hour; or 5. The noise standard plus twenty (20) dB(A) for any period of time. For purposes of this section, the term "cumulative period" means the number of minutes that a noise occurs within any hour, whether such minutes are consecutive or not. D. Ambient Noise Level. If the ambient or background noise level exceeds any of the preceding noise categories, no increase above such ambient noise level shall be permitted. E. Exemptions. The following are exempt from the noise restrictions of this section: 1. Emergency vehicles or other emergency operations. 2. City maintenance, construction or similar activities. 3. Construction activities regulated by Section 6.08.050 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. 4. Golf course maintenance activities between 5:30 a.m. and ending no later than 8:00 p.m. on any given day. 9.100.220 — Operational Standards All uses and developed properties within any nonresidential district shall comply with the following standards for development, operation and maintenance. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.13-6 419 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration F. Vibration. No use except a temporary construction operation shall be permitted which generates inherent and recurrent ground vibration perceptible, without instruments, at the boundary of the lot on which the use is located. Existing Noise Setting The nearest sensitive receptor to the project site would be a home at 58300 Almonte Drive that is located as near as 12 feet west of the project site. There are also single-family homes located on the north side of Avenue 58 that are as near as 100 feet north of the project site. The nearest school is Westside Elementary School, which is located as near as 0.9 miles northeast of the project site. To determine the existing noise levels, noise measurements were taken in the vicinity of the project site. The noise monitoring locations were selected to obtain noise levels in the vicinity of the project site. Descriptions of the noise monitoring sites are provided in Table 4.13-5, Existing (Ambient) Noise Measurement Results, and are shown in Figure 4.13-1, Field Noise Monitoring Locations. Table 4.13-5 Existing (Ambient) Noise Measurement Results Site Average Maximum (d BA Leg1-hour/Time) Average Site Description Minimum Maximum No (d BA Leg (d BA Lmax ) (d BA CNEL) Located on the northern portion of the project site on a power pole, 64.9 A approximately 60 feet south of the 58.2 85.1 63.2 Avenue 58 centerline and 110 feet west AM 2:01 AM 7:09 AM of Via Pasatiempo. Located west of the project site on a palm tree, approximately 40 feet south of the 44.2 70.6 B Avenue 58 centerline and 150 feet east of 65.7 93.5 3:28 AM 1:25 PM 69.4 the Almonte Drive centerline. Note: Noise measurements were taken with two Extech Model 407780 Type 2 sound level meters from Monday, September 6, 2021, to Tuesday, September 7, 2021. Source: Vista Environmental, Noise Impact Analysis; October 19, 2021. General Plan Amendment/Zone Change The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would increase population and associated traffic generated from the project site above the level identified in the existing General Plan which could increase operational noise levels and long-term traffic noise levels above levels currently estimated in the existing General Plan. The Noise Impact Analysis prepared for the project evaluated potential increased operational noise and increased noise impacts associated with increased traffic trips and determined that potential noise impacts would be less than significant. Potential noise impacts associated with the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be less than significant. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.13-7 Noise 420 mom 44 Ilk 0 . #, , - ti 4W it i k � B Noise Measurement Location Source: Vista Environmental; October 2021. approximate Project Site Boundary LAVILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Field Noise Monitoring Locations 13 VCS Environmental Figurgib-1 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would generate construction noise impacts and long-term operation noise impacts. Construction noise estimates are based upon noise levels reported by the FTA, Office of Planning and Environment, and the distance to nearby sensitive receptors. Reference noise levels from that document were used to estimate noise levels at nearby sensitive receptors based on a standard noise attenuation rate of 6 dB per doubling of distance. The long-term operation noise associated with the proposed project would be traffic related. A noticeable increase would be 3 dBA Leq which would require a doubling of peak hour traffic volumes. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION NOISE IMPACTS The noise impacts from construction of the proposed project have been analyzed through use of the FHWA's Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM). Table 4.13-6, Construction Equipment Noise Emissions and Usage Factors, provides a list of the construction equipment anticipated to be used for each phase of construction that was obtained from the Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis Tentative Tract Map No. 37950 Project (Air Quality Analysis), prepared by Vista Environmental, October 28, 2021, for the proposed project. Table 4.13-6 Construction Equipment Noise Emissions and Usage Factors Equipment Description Number of Equipment Acoustical Use Factor' o (/o) Spec 721.560 Lmax at 50 feetz (dBA, slows) Actual Measured Lmax at 50 feet4 (dBA, slowa ) AL Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 40 85 82 Tractor, Loader, or Backhoes 4 40 84 N/A Grading Excavators 1 40 85 81 Grader 1 40 85 83 Rubber Tired Dozer 1 40 85 82 Tractor, Loader, or Backhoes 3 40 85 82 Building Construction Crane 1 16 85 81 Forklift (Gradall) 3 40 85 83 Generator 1 50 82 81 Tractor, Loader or Backhoes 3 40 84 N/A Welder 1 40 73 74 Paving Paver 2 50 85 77 Paving Equipment 2 50 85 77 Roller 2 20 85 80 Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.13-9 Noise 422 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration CONSTRUCTION -RELATED NOISE The construction activities for the proposed project are anticipated to include site preparation and grading of the 9.7 -acre project site, building construction of the 80 single-family homes, paving of the onsite roads and road improvements to Avenue 58 and application of the architectural coatings. Noise impacts from construction activities associated with the proposed project would be a function of the noise generated by construction equipment, equipment location, sensitivity of nearby land uses, and the timing and duration of the construction activities. The nearest sensitive receptor is a home at 58300 Almonte Drive that is located as near as 12 feet west of the project site. There are also single- family homes located on the north side of Avenue 58 that are as near as 100 feet north of the project site. Section 9.100.210(E)(3) of the City's Municipal Code exempts construction noise from the City noise standards provided construction activities adhere to the construction noise disturbance limits provided in Section 6.08.050 of the Municipal Code, that limits the allowable times construction may occur. However, the City construction noise standards do not provide any limits to the noise levels that may be created from construction activities and even with adherence to the City standards, the resultant construction noise levels could result in a significant substantial temporary noise increase to the nearby residents. To determine if the proposed construction activities would create a significant substantial temporary noise increase, the FTA construction noise criteria thresholds have been utilized, which shows that a significant construction noise impact would occur if construction noise exceeded 80 dBA during the daytime at any of the nearby homes. Table 4.13-6 shows the anticipated construction equipment for each construction phase. The results are shown below in Table 4.13-7, Construction Noise Levels at the Nearest Sensitive Receptors, and the RCNM printouts are provided in Appendix C of Appendix G, Noise Impact Analysis, prepared for the project. Table 4.13-7 shows that the greatest noise impacts would occur during the building construction phase, with a noise level as high as 69 dBA Leq at the nearest home to the west. Table 4.13-7 also shows that none of the construction phases would exceed the FTA noise standard of 80 dB at the nearby homes. Therefore, through adherence to the limitation of allowable construction times provided in Section 6.08.050 of the Municipal Code, construction -related noise levels would not exceed any standards established in the General Plan or Noise Ordinance nor would construction Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.13-10 423 Number of er of Acoustical Use Spec 721.560 Lmax Actual Measured Equipment Description Equipment Factor' % ( ) at 50 feet2 Lmax at 50 feet4 OL (dBA, slow') (dBA, slow') Architectural Coating Air Compressor 1 40 80 78 Notes: 1 Acoustical use factor is the percentage of time each piece of equipment is operational during a typical workday. 2 Spec 721.560 is the equipment noise level utilized by the RCNM program. 3 The "slow" response averages sound levels over 1 -second increments. A "fast" response averages sound levels over 0.125 - second increments. 4 Actual Measured is the average noise level measured of each piece of equipment during the Central Artery/Tunnel project in Boston, Massachusetts primarily during the 1990s. Reference: Federal Highway Administration, 2006 and CaIEEMod default equipment mix. Source: Vista Environmental, Noise Impact Analysis; October 19, 2021. CONSTRUCTION -RELATED NOISE The construction activities for the proposed project are anticipated to include site preparation and grading of the 9.7 -acre project site, building construction of the 80 single-family homes, paving of the onsite roads and road improvements to Avenue 58 and application of the architectural coatings. Noise impacts from construction activities associated with the proposed project would be a function of the noise generated by construction equipment, equipment location, sensitivity of nearby land uses, and the timing and duration of the construction activities. The nearest sensitive receptor is a home at 58300 Almonte Drive that is located as near as 12 feet west of the project site. There are also single- family homes located on the north side of Avenue 58 that are as near as 100 feet north of the project site. Section 9.100.210(E)(3) of the City's Municipal Code exempts construction noise from the City noise standards provided construction activities adhere to the construction noise disturbance limits provided in Section 6.08.050 of the Municipal Code, that limits the allowable times construction may occur. However, the City construction noise standards do not provide any limits to the noise levels that may be created from construction activities and even with adherence to the City standards, the resultant construction noise levels could result in a significant substantial temporary noise increase to the nearby residents. To determine if the proposed construction activities would create a significant substantial temporary noise increase, the FTA construction noise criteria thresholds have been utilized, which shows that a significant construction noise impact would occur if construction noise exceeded 80 dBA during the daytime at any of the nearby homes. Table 4.13-6 shows the anticipated construction equipment for each construction phase. The results are shown below in Table 4.13-7, Construction Noise Levels at the Nearest Sensitive Receptors, and the RCNM printouts are provided in Appendix C of Appendix G, Noise Impact Analysis, prepared for the project. Table 4.13-7 shows that the greatest noise impacts would occur during the building construction phase, with a noise level as high as 69 dBA Leq at the nearest home to the west. Table 4.13-7 also shows that none of the construction phases would exceed the FTA noise standard of 80 dB at the nearby homes. Therefore, through adherence to the limitation of allowable construction times provided in Section 6.08.050 of the Municipal Code, construction -related noise levels would not exceed any standards established in the General Plan or Noise Ordinance nor would construction Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.13-10 423 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration activities create a substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels from construction of the proposed project. Impacts would be less than significant. Table 4.13-7 Construction Noise Levels at the Nearest Sensitive Receptors LONG-TERM OPERATIONAL NOISE IMPACTS The proposed project would consist of the development of 80 detached single-family homes. Potential noise impacts associated with the operations of the proposed project would be from project - generated vehicular traffic on the nearby roadways. In addition, the proposed development would be adjacent to Avenue 58, which may create exterior and interior noise levels in excess of City standards at the proposed homes. The noise impacts to the nearby existing homes and proposed homes have been analyzed separately below. ROADWAY VEHICULAR NOISE IMPACTTO NEARBY HOMES Vehicle noise is a combination of the noise produced by the engine, exhaust, and tires. The level of traffic noise depends on three primary factors: (1) the volume of traffic, (2) the speed of traffic, and (3) the number of trucks in the flow of traffic. The proposed project does not propose any uses that would require a substantial number of truck trips and the proposed project would not alter the speed limit on any existing roadway so the proposed project's potential offsite noise impacts have been focused on the noise impacts associated with the change of volume of traffic that would occur with development of the proposed project. Since the General Plan does not quantify what is a significant roadway noise increase, the roadway noise threshold utilized in the General Plan Draft EIR has been utilized, which details that a significant noise increase would occur when the traffic noise increases by 3 dBA CNEL. The potential offsite traffic noise impacts created by the on-going operations of the proposed project have been analyzed through utilization of the FHWA model. The noise calculation spreadsheets are provided in Appendix D of the Noise Impact Analysis. The proposed project's potential offsite traffic Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.13-11 Noise 424 Construction Noise Level (dBA Leq) at: Construction Phase Nearest Home Nearest Homes to the West' to the North' Site Preparation 68 67 Grading 68 67 Building Construction 69 68 Paving 63 62 Painting 55 54 FTA Construction Noise Threshold 80 80 Exceed Thresholds? No No Notes: 1 The nearest home to the west is located as near as 410 feet from the center of the project site. z The nearest homes to the north are located as near as 460 feet from the center of the project site. 3 The FTA Construction noise thresholds are detailed above in Table 4.13-1. Reference: RCNM, Federal Highway Administration, 2006. Source: Vista Environmental, Noise Impact Analysis; October 19, 2021. LONG-TERM OPERATIONAL NOISE IMPACTS The proposed project would consist of the development of 80 detached single-family homes. Potential noise impacts associated with the operations of the proposed project would be from project - generated vehicular traffic on the nearby roadways. In addition, the proposed development would be adjacent to Avenue 58, which may create exterior and interior noise levels in excess of City standards at the proposed homes. The noise impacts to the nearby existing homes and proposed homes have been analyzed separately below. ROADWAY VEHICULAR NOISE IMPACTTO NEARBY HOMES Vehicle noise is a combination of the noise produced by the engine, exhaust, and tires. The level of traffic noise depends on three primary factors: (1) the volume of traffic, (2) the speed of traffic, and (3) the number of trucks in the flow of traffic. The proposed project does not propose any uses that would require a substantial number of truck trips and the proposed project would not alter the speed limit on any existing roadway so the proposed project's potential offsite noise impacts have been focused on the noise impacts associated with the change of volume of traffic that would occur with development of the proposed project. Since the General Plan does not quantify what is a significant roadway noise increase, the roadway noise threshold utilized in the General Plan Draft EIR has been utilized, which details that a significant noise increase would occur when the traffic noise increases by 3 dBA CNEL. The potential offsite traffic noise impacts created by the on-going operations of the proposed project have been analyzed through utilization of the FHWA model. The noise calculation spreadsheets are provided in Appendix D of the Noise Impact Analysis. The proposed project's potential offsite traffic Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.13-11 Noise 424 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration noise impacts have been analyzed forth e existing year (year 2021) and future year 2035 scenarios that are discussed separately below. Existing Year Conditions The proposed project's potential offsite traffic noise impacts have been calculated through a comparison of the Existing scenario to the Existing with Project scenario. The results of this comparison are shown in Table 4.13-8, Existing Project Traffic Noise Contributions. Table 4.13-8 shows that the proposed project's permanent noise increases to the nearby homes from the generation of additional vehicular traffic would not exceed the 3 dBA traffic noise increase threshold. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels for the existing conditions. Impacts would be less than significant. Table 4.13-8 Existing Project Traffic Noise Contributions Future Year 2035 Conditions The proposed project's potential offsite traffic noise impacts have been calculated through a comparison of the future year 2035 scenario to the future year 2035 with project scenario. The results of this comparison are shown in Table 4.13-9, Future Year 2035 Project Traffic Noise Contributions. Table 4.13-9 Future Year 2035 Project Traffic Noise Contributions dBA CNEL at Nearest Receptor' dBA CNEL at Nearest Receptor' Exceed +3 Roadway Segment Year 2035 Project Existing Plus Project dBA CNEL Year 2035 Plus Project Contribution Existing2 Project Contribution Threshold Avenue 58 Madison Street to Monroe Street No 56.5 57.2 0.7 No Notes: z +3 dBA Increase Threshold obtained from General Plan DEIR, 2013. 1 Distance to nearest sensitive receptors shown in Table G of the Noise Impact Analysis, does not take into account existing noise barriers. z +3 dBA Increase Threshold obtained from General Plan DEIR, 2013. Reference: FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model FHWA-RD-77-108. Source: Vista Environmental, Noise Impact Analysis; October 19, 2021. Future Year 2035 Conditions The proposed project's potential offsite traffic noise impacts have been calculated through a comparison of the future year 2035 scenario to the future year 2035 with project scenario. The results of this comparison are shown in Table 4.13-9, Future Year 2035 Project Traffic Noise Contributions. Table 4.13-9 Future Year 2035 Project Traffic Noise Contributions Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.13-12 Noise 425 dBA CNEL at Nearest Receptor' Exceed +3 Roadway Segment Year 2035 Project dBA CNEL -16 Year 2035 Plus Project Contribution Threshold Avenue 58 Madison Street to Monroe Street 63.2 63.3 0.1 No Notes: i Distance to nearest sensitive receptors shown in Table G of the Noise Impact Analysis, does not take into account existing noise barriers. z +3 dBA Increase Threshold obtained from General Plan DEIR, 2013. Reference: FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model FHWA-RD-77-108. Source: Vista Environmental, Noise Impact Analysis; October 19, 2021. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.13-12 Noise 425 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 4.13-9 shows that the proposed project's permanent noise increases to the nearby homes from the generation of additional vehicular traffic would not exceed the traffic noise increase thresholds detailed above. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels for the future year 2035 conditions. Impacts would be less than significant. ROADWAY VEHICULAR NOISE IMPACTS TO PROPOSED HOMES The proposed project would consist of the development of a residential community with 80 detached single-family homes. General Plan Policy N-1.2 requires that the noise level at new residential developments that are adjacent to a roadway to not exceed 65 dBA CNEL. It is anticipated that the primary source of noise impacts to the project site would be traffic noise from Avenue 58 that is adjacent to the north side of the project site. The anticipated noise levels have been calculated for backyards that are adjacent to Avenue 58 for representative lots and the results are shown below in Table 4.13-10, Proposed Homes Exterior Noise Levels from Avenue 58. Table 4.13-10 Proposed Homes Exterior Noise Levels from Avenue 58 Building Exterior Noise Levels (dBA CNEL) Sound Wall Height' Roadway Number Without Sound Wall With Sound Wall (feet) ( 1 Avenue 58 59 52 6.0 76 Avenue 58 59 53 6.0 78 Avenue 58 65 57 1 6.0 80 Avenue 58 65 57 6.0 Notes: i Although not shown on Site Plan, the City typically requires construction of a 6 -foot high CMU wall adjacent to secondary roadways. Exceedance of City's 65 dBA CNEL residential exterior noise standard shown in bold. Reference: FHWA RD -77-108 Model. Source: Vista Environmental, Noise Impact Analysis; October 19, 2021. Table 4.13-10 shows that the noise levels at all proposed homes backyards near Avenue 58 would be within the City's 65 dBA CNEL residential exterior noise standard forthe without and with the proposed sound wall conditions. Impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not result in the generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. Vibration is a unique form of noise as the energy is transmitted through buildings, structures and the ground whereas audible noise energy is transmitted through the air. Thus, vibration is generally felt rather than heard. The ground motion caused by vibration is measured as peak particle velocity (PPV) in inches per second and is referenced as vibration decibels (VdB) for the purpose of evaluating the potential for adverse construction -related impacts. The vibration velocity level threshold of perception for humans is a PPV of approximately 0.01 inches/second which equates to 65 VdB. A vibration velocity of 75 VdB is the approximate dividing line between barely perceptible and distinctly perceptible levels. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.13-13 Noise 426 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration The construction activities for the proposed project are anticipated to include site preparation and grading of the 9.7 -acre project site, building construction of the 80 single-family homes, paving of the onsite roads and road improvements to Avenue 58 and application of the architectural coatings. Vibration impacts from construction activities associated with the proposed project would typically be created from the operation of heavy off-road equipment. The nearest sensitive receptor to the project site is a home at 58300 Almonte Drive that is located as near as 12 feet west of the project site. Section 9.100.220(F) of the City's Municipal Code restricts the creation of vibration that is perceptible without instruments at the boundary of a lot on which it is created. However, Section 9.100.220(F) provides an exemption for temporary construction activities from this standard. Since neither the Municipal nor the General Plan provide a quantifiable vibration threshold for temporary construction activities, guidance from the Transportation and Construction -Induced Vibration Guidance Manual, prepared by Caltrans, April 2020, has been utilized, which defines the threshold of perception from transient sources such as off-road construction equipment at 0.25 inch per second peak particle velocity (PPV). CONSTRUCTION -RELATED VIBRATION IMPACTS The primary source of vibration during construction would be from the operation of a bulldozer. A large bulldozer would create a vibration level of 0.089 inch per second PPV at 25 feet. Based on typical propagation rates, the vibration level at the nearest offsite home (12 feet to the west) would be 0.20 inch per second PPV. The vibration level at the nearest offsite home would be below the 0.25 inch per second PPV threshold detailed above. Impacts would be less than significant. OPERATIONS -RELATED VIBRATION IMPACTS The proposed project would consist of the development of 80 single-family homes. The on-going operation of the proposed project would not include the operation of any known vibration sources other than typical onsite vehicle operations for a residential development. Therefore, a less than significant vibration impact is anticipated from the operation of the proposed project. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact: The proposed project would not expose people residing in the project area to excessive noise levels from aircraft. The nearest airport is Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport that is located as near as 3.6 miles east of the project site. The project site is located outside of the 60 dBA CNEL noise contours of this airport. Therefore, the proposed homes would not be exposed to excessive aircraft noise and there would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 Noise 427 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.14 Population and Housing ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment/Zone Change Implementation of the General Plan would increase the estimated housing in the City by 41 dwelling units and increase the estimated population by 102 persons. The population increase generated from the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would represent an increase of approximately 0.0027% over the population estimated in the City in the existing General Plan. The increased population growth would be negligible and would not generate substantial new employment growth or require the expansion of public services or construction of new public service facilities. Additionally, the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not cause construction of new infrastructure that would facilitate unplanned growth. Potential impacts would be less than significant. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure). The proposed project would construct 80 single-family units. Based on the City of La Quinta average household size of 2.62 persons per household, the project is estimated to have 209 residents. Under the current zoning, a total of 39 units could be developed with an estimated resident population of 102 people. The proposed project would develop an additional 41 units on the project site and increase the population on the project site by an additional 107 persons over the estimated population based on the existing General Plan. The City of La Quinta Housing Element identifies the population in the City in 2018 was 40,704 persons. The additional population generated by the project would be an approximate 0.0026 increase over estimated population in the existing General Plan, which would be considered a negligible increase. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.14-1 Population and Housing 428 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Would the project: & Significant Impact With Significant Impact A Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated —domm,L--- a. Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new ❑ ❑ ® ❑ homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of ❑ ❑ ❑ replacement housing elsewhere? ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment/Zone Change Implementation of the General Plan would increase the estimated housing in the City by 41 dwelling units and increase the estimated population by 102 persons. The population increase generated from the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would represent an increase of approximately 0.0027% over the population estimated in the City in the existing General Plan. The increased population growth would be negligible and would not generate substantial new employment growth or require the expansion of public services or construction of new public service facilities. Additionally, the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not cause construction of new infrastructure that would facilitate unplanned growth. Potential impacts would be less than significant. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure). The proposed project would construct 80 single-family units. Based on the City of La Quinta average household size of 2.62 persons per household, the project is estimated to have 209 residents. Under the current zoning, a total of 39 units could be developed with an estimated resident population of 102 people. The proposed project would develop an additional 41 units on the project site and increase the population on the project site by an additional 107 persons over the estimated population based on the existing General Plan. The City of La Quinta Housing Element identifies the population in the City in 2018 was 40,704 persons. The additional population generated by the project would be an approximate 0.0026 increase over estimated population in the existing General Plan, which would be considered a negligible increase. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.14-1 Population and Housing 428 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Southern California Association of Governments Connect SoCal, 2020 — 2045 RTP/SCS forecasts that the population of La Quinta will grow to 47,700 in 2045, an increase of approximately 0.15% over the 2018 population. The additional population increase generated from the proposed project would account for 0.017% of the estimated population growth. The estimated population increase would be in the range of estimated future growth projections and would not be considered a substantial unplanned housing growth. The proposed project would create a residential product type that would meet housing needs for a wide range of households and would be consistent with several General Plan goals and policies. These would include: GOAL LU -5: A broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City. • Policy LU -5.2: Consider changes in market demand in residential product type to meet the needs of current and future residents. • GOAL H-1: Provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population. • Policy H-6.1: Promote higher density and compact developments that increase energy efficiency and reduce land consumption. The project would not construct any new roads or major infrastructure in locations that are not planned for growth, and therefore would not induce substantial unplanned population growth in the area, either directly or indirectly. Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact: Implementation of the project would not displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. The existing project site is vacant. Therefore, it would not displace any existing housing or require replacement housing. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.14-2 Population and Housing 429 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.15 Public Services ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment/Zone Change Implementation of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would increase the population on the project site above the population level estimated for the project by the existing General Plan which would increase the demand for public services above the level estimated in the existing General Plan. As part of the evaluation of the project, public service providers were coordinated with in regard to the increased demand for public services that would be generated by the project. Public service providers indicated that the increased demand for public services would have a less than significant impact. Potential impacts to public services associated with the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be less than significant. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 1) Fire protection? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.15-1 Public Services 430 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Would the project:ilk Significant Impact With Significant Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated a. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 1) Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 2) Police protection? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 3) Schools? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 4) Parks? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 5) Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment/Zone Change Implementation of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would increase the population on the project site above the population level estimated for the project by the existing General Plan which would increase the demand for public services above the level estimated in the existing General Plan. As part of the evaluation of the project, public service providers were coordinated with in regard to the increased demand for public services that would be generated by the project. Public service providers indicated that the increased demand for public services would have a less than significant impact. Potential impacts to public services associated with the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be less than significant. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 1) Fire protection? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.15-1 Public Services 430 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for fire protection services. The Riverside County Fire Department would provide fire protection service for the project. As part of the evaluation for the project, Deputy Fire Marshal Adria Reinertson from the Riverside County Fire Department was consulted on current facility and staffing levels and potential impacts to fire protection services that could be associated with the project. The La Quinta Fire Department serves as the City's liaison with Riverside County in the areas of fire protection and medical response. The Department provides staffing from three paramedic and engine companies. The closest fire station would be Fire Station 70, located at 54001 Madison Street, approximately 1.4 miles from the project site. The Fire Station 70 includes 1 engine with 3 personnel. Fire Station 70 would have a response time of 8 minutes. According to the Fire Department, the project would increase the response time. The project site is currently planned for low density residential land uses. The proposed project would increase the density on the project site and increase the planned population on the site by 107 persons. Implementation of the project would incrementally increase the demand for fire services. However, according to Deputy Fire Marshal Adria Reinertson, current staffing levels and facilities are adequate to serve the project and she identified that the project would not result in the need for new or expanded facilities such as construction of a new fire station. The project would be responsible for the payment of development impact fees to offset future fire protection needs. Additionally, the project would be required to comply with applicable Riverside County Fire Department codes, ordinances, and regulations regarding fire prevention and suppression measures, fire hydrants and sprinkler systems, emergency access, and other similar requirements. Compliance with these codes and standards would reduce potential impacts to fire protection impacts to less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. 2) Police protection? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for law enforcement protection services. The Riverside Sheriff's Department would provide police protection service for the project. As part of the evaluation for the project, Sergeant Chris Olsen from the Riverside County Sheriff's Department was consulted with on current facility and staffing levels and potential impacts to police protection services that could be associated with the project. The Sheriff's Department provides 24-7 police protection for the City and the surrounding sphere of influence. The closest police station is 5.8 miles from the project site, located at 86-625 Airport Boulevard, Thermal, CA. The project site is currently planned for low density residential land uses. The proposed project would increase the density on the project site and increase the planned population on the site by 107 persons. Implementation of the project would incrementally increase the demand for Sheriff services. The Sheriff's Department has indicated their current facilities and staffing are adequate. The project would be responsible for development impact fees and would generate Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.15-2 Public Services 431 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration taxes to fund existing and future Sheriff Department facilities. Additionally, the project would be required to comply with the Sheriff's Department Code requirements. With payment of development impact fees and compliance with the Sheriff's Department Code requirements, potential impacts to the Sheriff's Department services would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. 3) Schools? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for school services. The project site is within the Coachella Valley Unified School District (CVUSD). Schools that would serve the proposed project are shown in Table 4.15-1, CVUSD School Locations and Generation Factors for Multiple -Family Attached Units. Table 4.15-1 also shows the District Generation Rate and projected students generated by the project. The proposed project would incrementally increase the enrollment of students and the use of CVUSD facilities. The proposed project would be required to pay development fees prior to issuance of a building permit to offset the cost of providing school services and facilities. With payment of development impact fees, there would be a less than significant impact to local school district facilities. Table 4.15-1 CVUSD School Locations and Generation Factors for Multiple -Family Attached Units Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. 4) Parks? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for parks. The City of La Quinta currently operates 11 city parks, the Civic Center Campus, and three nature preserve areas. All city parks, with the exception of the Civic Center Campus, provide a Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.15-3 Public Services 432 Student Generation/ School Level Name School Location Number Students Elementary Westside Elementary School 82225 Airport Boulevard 0.4357/35.7 Thermal, CA Intermediate Toro Canyon 86150 Avenue 66 0.1107/9.0 Thermal, CA High School Coachella Valley High School 83800 Airport Boulevard 0.2019/16.5 Thermal, CA Total 61.2 Students Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. 4) Parks? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for parks. The City of La Quinta currently operates 11 city parks, the Civic Center Campus, and three nature preserve areas. All city parks, with the exception of the Civic Center Campus, provide a Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.15-3 Public Services 432 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration children's playground facility. La Quinta's three nature preserves are also available for public recreation, as they all contain trails for hiking and bicycling. There are also several public pocket parks located within existing subdivisions. The City of La Quinta works in conjunction with the Desert Sands Unified School District to share the use of recreational facilities on school properties. La Quinta is also home to one public and 22 privately owned and operated golf courses, seven of which are open and available for public use. The City's SilverRock Golf Course consists of 18 holes over 525 acres of land. Both public and private golf courses are included within the land use calculation for Recreational Open Space. La Quinta's designated recreational open space totals approximately 5,259 acres. The Quimby Act allows local governments to exact from developers of residential subdivisions, through the dedication of parkland or in -lieu fees, or both. The Quimby Act sets a minimum threshold of 3.0 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. The City of La Quinta has a policy of providing a minimum of 5.0 acres per 1,000 residents. The City of La Quinta requires either the payment of a park development fee, the dedication of land, or both when a residential subdivision is proposed to meet the Quimby Act requirements. The proposed 80 -unit residential project would provide housing for approximately 209 persons, which would be a 107 persons population increase over the population estimated for the site under the current General Plan and Zoning designations. The project site would be within the vicinity of the Lake Cahuilla Regional Park and several local parks and recreation facilities. Additionally, project residents would be provided with onsite recreation facilities and open space, which reduces the demand and use of public parkland. The proposed project would not contribute to a substantial increase in the overall population, necessitating either construction or expansion of a park facility. The existing parkland within the City of La Quinta should meet the recreational needs of the residents of the proposed project. The project would also be subject to Quimby Act parkland fees to fund existing facilities and/or provide future park facilities. With compliance with the City of La Quinta's Quimby Act requirements, potential parkland impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. 5) Other public facilities? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for other public facilities. The proposed project would not contribute to a substantial increase in the overall population, necessitating either construction or expansion of a hospital, community-based clinic, or other health services facility or program. Impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.15-4 Public Services 433 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.16 Recreation ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment/Zone Change Implementation of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would increase the population on the project site above the level currently estimated in the General Plan and would increase the demand for recreation facilities anticipated in the existing General Plan. Potential recreation impacts have been evaluated as part of the evaluation of the proposed project and with onsite recreation amenities proposed by the project and payment of park fees, the increased demand for recreation facilities were determined to be less than significant. Potential impacts to recreation facilities associated with the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be less than significant. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the project would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated. The proposed project includes onsite recreation amenities for residents. The amenities would be in close proximity to residential uses which would make them easily accessible and would discourage residents from seeking recreation facilities located outside of the community. These onsite recreation facilities would reduce the proposed project's demand for existing recreation facilities in the area and would not accelerate substantial deterioration of existing recreation facilities. Potential impacts associated with increasing use of existing and recreation facilities would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.16-1 Recreation 434 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Would the project: Significant Impact With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that ❑ ❑ ® ❑ substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities ❑ ❑ ® ❑ which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment/Zone Change Implementation of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would increase the population on the project site above the level currently estimated in the General Plan and would increase the demand for recreation facilities anticipated in the existing General Plan. Potential recreation impacts have been evaluated as part of the evaluation of the proposed project and with onsite recreation amenities proposed by the project and payment of park fees, the increased demand for recreation facilities were determined to be less than significant. Potential impacts to recreation facilities associated with the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be less than significant. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the project would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated. The proposed project includes onsite recreation amenities for residents. The amenities would be in close proximity to residential uses which would make them easily accessible and would discourage residents from seeking recreation facilities located outside of the community. These onsite recreation facilities would reduce the proposed project's demand for existing recreation facilities in the area and would not accelerate substantial deterioration of existing recreation facilities. Potential impacts associated with increasing use of existing and recreation facilities would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.16-1 Recreation 434 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would not include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. The proposed project proposes the construction of outdoor recreation facilities for future residents. Potential impacts associated with the construction of the proposed recreation facilities have been evaluated as part of the proposed project. With the incorporation of City codes and regulations and project mitigation measures, potential impacts associated with the project, including the proposed recreation facilities, would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.16-2 Recreation 435 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.17 Transportation The following analysis is based on a Traffic ImpactAnalysis Report and Vehicle Miles Travel Assessment prepared by Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) in August 2022. Both reports are presented in Appendix H. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment/Zone Change The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would increase the population and associated traffic generated from the project site above the level projected for in the existing General Plan. The traffic analysis prepared for the project identified that increased traffic trips generated by the proposed project would result in less than significant traffic impacts and would result in less than significant vehicle miles traveled impacts. Potential traffic impacts associated with the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be less than significant. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities? Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would not conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ANALYSIS The following analysis is based on a traffic analysis prepared for the project by LLG Engineers in August 2022. Included in this Traffic Impact Analysis are: • Existing traffic counts. • Estimated project traffic generation/distribution/assignment. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.17-1 Transportation 436 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than No Would the project: Significant Impact With Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a. Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, ❑ ❑ ® ❑ roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? b. Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? c. Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous ❑ ® ❑ ❑ intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d. Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ The following analysis is based on a Traffic ImpactAnalysis Report and Vehicle Miles Travel Assessment prepared by Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) in August 2022. Both reports are presented in Appendix H. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment/Zone Change The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would increase the population and associated traffic generated from the project site above the level projected for in the existing General Plan. The traffic analysis prepared for the project identified that increased traffic trips generated by the proposed project would result in less than significant traffic impacts and would result in less than significant vehicle miles traveled impacts. Potential traffic impacts associated with the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be less than significant. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities? Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would not conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ANALYSIS The following analysis is based on a traffic analysis prepared for the project by LLG Engineers in August 2022. Included in this Traffic Impact Analysis are: • Existing traffic counts. • Estimated project traffic generation/distribution/assignment. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.17-1 Transportation 436 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration • Estimated cumulative projects traffic generation/distribution/assignment. • AM and PM peak hour capacity analyses for existing conditions. • AM and PM peak hour capacity analyses for existing with ambient growth to the Year 2025 with project traffic conditions. • AM and PM peak hour capacity analyses for existing with ambient growth to the Year 2025 with project with cumulative projects traffic conditions (i.e., cumulative traffic conditions). • AM and PM peak hour capacity analyses for Year 2045 with and without project traffic conditions. • Area -Wide Traffic Improvements. Site Access and Internal Circulation Evaluation. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS METHODS The following methods were utilized to assess existing traffic conditions and project traffic impacts: Level of Service (LOS) Analysis Methodologies In conformance with County of Riverside requirements, existing AM and PM peak hour operating conditions for the unsignalized intersections and unsignalized driveways were evaluated using the Highway Capacity Manual 6 (HCM 6) methodology. Per the La Quinta Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, the existing peak hour factor has been utilized for the Existing and Existing With Ambient Growth With Project analysis scenarios. A peak hour factor of 0.95 was utilized for the Existing With Ambient Growth With Cumulative Projects analysis scenario, and a peak hour factor of 1.00 was utilized for Year 2045 Without Project and Year 2045 With Project analysis scenarios. Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Method of Analysis (Unsignalized Intersections) The HCM unsignalized methodology for stop -controlled intersections was utilized for the analysis of the unsignalized intersections. LOS criteria for unsignalized intersections differ from LOS criteria for signalized intersections as signalized intersections are designed for heavier traffic and therefore a greater delay. Unsignalized intersections are also associated with more uncertainty for users, as delays are less predictable, which can reduce users' delay tolerance. Two-way stop -controlled intersections are comprised of a major street, which is uncontrolled, and a minor street, which is controlled by stop signs. Level of service for a two-way stop -controlled intersection is determined by the computed or measured control delay. The control delay by movement, by approach, and for the intersection as a whole is estimated by the computed capacity for each movement. LOS is determined for each minor -street movement (or shared movement) as well as major -street left turns. The worst side street approach delay is reported. LOS is not defined for the intersection as a whole or for major - street approaches, as it is assumed that major -street through vehicles experience zero delay. The HCM control delay value range for two-way stop -controlled intersections is shown in Table 4.17-1, Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.17-2 Transportation 437 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 4.17-1 Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections (HCM Methodology) LOS7nHCM Delay Per Vehicle (Seconds/Vehicle) Level of Service Description A <_10.0 Little or no delay B >10.0 and <_15.0 Short traffic delays C >15.0 and <_ 25.0 Average traffic delays D >25.0 and <_ 35.0 Long traffic delays E >35.0 and <_50.0 Very long traffic delays F >50.0 Severe congestion Source: LLG, Traffic Impact Analysis Report; August 17, 2022. All -way stop -controlled intersections require every vehicle to stop at the intersection before proceeding. Because each driver must stop, the decision to proceed into the intersection is a function of traffic conditions on the other approaches. The time between subsequent vehicle departures depends on the degree of conflict that results between the vehicles and vehicles on the other approaches. This methodology determines the control delay for each lane on the approach, computes a weighted average for the whole approach, and computes a weighted average for the intersection as a whole. Level of service (LOS) at the approach and intersection levels is based solely on control delay. The HCM control delay value range for all -way stop -controlled intersections is shown in Table 4.17-1, Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections. EXISTING TRAFFIC SETTING Local access to the project site would be provided by Madison Street, Monroe Street, and Avenue 58. The following discussion provides a brief synopsis of these key streets. The descriptions are based on an inventory of existing roadway conditions. Madison Street is a four -lane, divided roadway, oriented in the north -south direction. On -street parking is not permitted on either side of the roadway within the vicinity of the project. The posted speed limit on Madison Street is 50 miles per hour (mph). The key study intersection at Avenue 58 is stop -controlled. Monroe Street is a three -lane, divided roadway north of Avenue 58 and a two-lane, undivided roadway south of Avenue 58. Monroe Street is oriented in a north -south direction. On -street parking is not permitted on either side of the roadway within the vicinity of the project. The posted speed limit on Monroe Street is 50 mph. The key study intersection at Avenue 58 is stop -controlled. Avenue 58 is a four -lane, divided roadway west of Almonte Drive and a three -lane divided roadway east of Almonte Drive. Avenue 58 is oriented in an east -west direction, located north of the project site. On -street parking is not permitted on either side of the roadway within the vicinity of the project. The posted speed limit on Avenue 58 is 50 mph. The key study intersection at Via Pasatiempo is stop - controlled. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.17-3 Transportation 438 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration The three (3) key study intersections within the project area are: • Madison Street at Avenue 58 • Via Pasatiempo at Avenue 58 • Monroe Street at Avenue 58 The key study area intersections have been identified as the locations at which to evaluate existing and future traffic operating conditions. Some portion of potential project -related traffic will pass through these intersections and their analysis will reveal the expected relative impacts of the project. These key study intersections were selected for evaluation based on discussions with City of La Quinta staff. In compliance with the City of La Quinta guidelines, existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes for the three study intersections evaluated have been increased by 20% to compensate for variations in seasonal population. Figure 4.17-1, Existing Rodway Conditions and Intersection Controls, illustrates an inventory of existing roadway conditions for the key study intersections. The number of travel lanes and intersection controls for the project area intersections are identified. All three key study intersections currently operate at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. All critical movements for the all -way stop -controlled intersection also operate acceptable levels of service per City requirements. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS To assess future traffic conditions, project traffic was combined with existing traffic and areawide growth. Consistent with prior traffic studies conducted in La Quinta, the future growth in traffic volumes has been calculated at two percent (2%) per year. Applied to existing Year 2022, traffic volumes result in a six percent (6%) increase growth in existing volumes to horizon Year 2025. Long-term (Year 2045) traffic volume forecasts for this traffic analysis were determined through utilization of the RIVCOM model developed by WRCOG. The future Year 2045 traffic volumes were post -processed based on the relationship of Year 2018 base year validation model run output to the base year ground traffic counts. The projected volume was reviewed carefully, and adjustments were applied as warranted based on local conditions and professional judgment. Project Traffic Generation The project traffic generation is forecasted by applying the appropriate vehicle trip generation equations and/or rates to proposed project land uses. Traffic generation is expressed in vehicle trip ends, defined as one-way vehicular movements, either entering or exiting the generating land use. Generation equations and/or rates used in the traffic forecasting procedure are found in the 11th Edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE.) [Washington D.C., 2021]. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.17-4 Transportation 439 Source: Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers; August 17, 2022. VCS Environmental \� ALL/WAY STOP MADISON ST 58TH AVE 5 i -4- ALL WAY STOP MONROE ST 58TH AVE _� i ONE 2WAY STOP VIA PASATIEMPO 58TH AVE KEY # = STUDY INTERSECTION = APPROACH LANE ASSIGNMENT = STOP SIGN P = PARKING, NP = NO PARKING U = UNDIVIDED, D = DIVIDED 2 = NUMBER OF TRAVEL LANES (XX)= POSTED SPEED LIMIT (MPH) C 7 = PROJECT SITE LAVILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Existing Roadway Conditions and Intersection Controls Figure 4.17-1 440 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Implementation of the proposed project would generate additional vehicle trips within the project. Trip generation is expressed in vehicle trip ends, defined as one-way vehicular movements, either entering or exiting the generating land use. Generation rates used in the traffic forecasting procedure are found in the 11th Edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) [Washington D.C., 2021]. A summary of the trip generation rates used in forecasting the vehicular trips generated by the proposed project is shown in Table 4.17-2, Project Traffic Generation. The table presents the forecasted daily and peak hour project traffic volumes for a "typical" weekday. The trip generation potential for the proposed project was forecast using ITE Land Use Code 210: Multiple Family Housing Low Rise Dwellings Housing trip rates. As shown in Table 4.17- 2, the proposed project would be expected to generate 754 daily trips (one half arriving and one-half departing), with 56 AM Peak Hour Traffic Trips (15 inbound, 41 outbound) and 75 PM Peak Hour Traffic Trips (47 inbound, 28 outbound) generated on a "typical" weekday. Table 4.17-2 Project Traffic Generation Project Traffic Distribution The second step of the forecasting process is traffic distribution, which identifies the origins and destinations of inbound and outbound project traffic. These origins and destinations are typically based on demographics and existing/expected future travel patterns in the study area. The third step is traffic assignment, which involves the allocation of project traffic to study area streets and intersections. Traffic assignment is typically based on minimization of travel time, which may or may not involve the shortest route, depending on prevailing operating conditions and travel speeds. Traffic distribution patterns are indicated by general percentage orientation, while traffic assignment allocates specific volume forecasts to individual roadway segments and intersection turning movements throughout the study area. The traffic distribution pattern for the proposed project and project traffic volumes are shown in Figure 4.17-2, Project Trip Distribution Pattern. Project traffic both entering and exiting the project site have been distributed and assigned to the adjacent street system based on the following considerations: • Expected localized traffic flow patterns based on adjacent street channelization and presence of traffic signals. • Existing intersection traffic volumes. • Ingress/egress availability at the project site. Public Review Draft I lune 2023 4.17-6 Transportation 441 Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use In 0 Total In 16 Out Total 2 -way Ges: Generation Rat 9.43 26% 74% 0.70 63% 37% 0.94 210: Multiple family Housing Low -Rise Generation Trips: 754 15 41 56 47 28 75 Multiple -Family Dwellings Project Trip Generation 754 1 15 1 41 56 47 1 28 1 75 Project Traffic Distribution The second step of the forecasting process is traffic distribution, which identifies the origins and destinations of inbound and outbound project traffic. These origins and destinations are typically based on demographics and existing/expected future travel patterns in the study area. The third step is traffic assignment, which involves the allocation of project traffic to study area streets and intersections. Traffic assignment is typically based on minimization of travel time, which may or may not involve the shortest route, depending on prevailing operating conditions and travel speeds. Traffic distribution patterns are indicated by general percentage orientation, while traffic assignment allocates specific volume forecasts to individual roadway segments and intersection turning movements throughout the study area. The traffic distribution pattern for the proposed project and project traffic volumes are shown in Figure 4.17-2, Project Trip Distribution Pattern. Project traffic both entering and exiting the project site have been distributed and assigned to the adjacent street system based on the following considerations: • Expected localized traffic flow patterns based on adjacent street channelization and presence of traffic signals. • Existing intersection traffic volumes. • Ingress/egress availability at the project site. Public Review Draft I lune 2023 4.17-6 Transportation 441 n V Source: Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers; August 17, 2022. ' VCS Environmental I0I �-40% b ~5% 5%-0 MADISON ST 58TH AVE D / L \ �5% \ 45%J 5%— b� MONROE ST 58TH AVE —55% \ 55%— VIA PASATIEMPO @ 58TH AVE KEY ® = STUDY INTERSECTION C = PROJECT SITE = INBOUND PERCENTAGE 45%--� PROJECT DRIVEWAY 58TH AVE KEY ® = STUDY INTERSECTION C = PROJECT SITE = INBOUND PERCENTAGE = OUTBOUND PERCENTAGE LAVILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Project Trip Distribution Pattern Figure 4.17-2 442 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration The anticipated AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes associated with the proposed project are shown in Figure 4.17-3, AM Peak Hour Project Traffic Volumes, and Figure 4.17-4, PM Peak Hour Proiect Traffic Volumes. The traffic volume assignments shown in Figures 4.17-3 and 4.17-4 reflect the traffic distribution characteristics shown previously in Figure 4.17-2, Project Trip Distribution Pattern, and the traffic generation forecast shown previously in Table 4.17-2, Project Traffic rpnprntinn TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS The relative impact of the proposed project during the AM peak hour and PM peak hour was evaluated based on analysis of future operating conditions at the key study intersections, without, then with, the proposed project. The previously discussed capacity analysis procedures were utilized to investigate the future volume -to -capacity relationships and service level characteristics at each study intersection. The significance of the potential impacts of the project at each key intersection was then evaluated using the following traffic impact criteria. The City of La Quinta has established LOS "D" as the minimum level of service for its intersections. Unsignalized intersections shall have a LOS "D" or better for all critical movements at an all -way stop - controlled intersection and a LOS "E" for a side street on a two-way stop -controlled intersection. A potentially significant impact at an unsignalized study intersection is defined to occur when, with project traffic included, an intersection has a projected LOS "F" on a side street for two-way stop controlled intersections or LOS "E" or worse for the intersection at an all -way stop -controlled intersection and the addition of project traffic results in an addition of 3 seconds or more of delay for any movement. EXISTING WITH AMBIENT GROWTH WITH PROJECTTRAFFIC CONDITIONS All three key study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours; refer to Table 4.17-3, Existing Traffic with Ambient Growth with Project Traffic. All critical movements for the all -way stop -controlled intersections are also expected to operate at acceptable levels of service per City requirements. Therefore, no deficiencies and no traffic improvements are required. Table 4.17-3 Existing Traffic with Ambient Growth with Project Traffic Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.17-8 Transportation 443 Existing with Ambient Growth Existing Traffic Minimum(Year Conditions 2025) with Deficiency Key Intersection Time Acceptable project Traffic period LOS Conditions Delay Delay LOS LOSIncrease Yes/No Madison Street AM LOS D 8.4 A 8.6 A 0.2 No at Avenue 58 PM 9.4 A 9.7 A 0.3 No Via Pasatiempo AM LOS D 8.7 A 8.7 A 0.0 No at Avenue 58 PM 9.5 A 9.7 A 0.2 No Monroe Street at AM LOS D 8.1 A 8.2 A 0.1 No Avenue 58 PM 10.8 B 11.7 B 0.9 No Source: LLG, Traffic Impact Analysis Report; August 17, 2022. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.17-8 Transportation 443 Source: Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers; August 17, 2022. ' VCS Environmental /C) o c01` 17\ o � oJ'1fC)'I MADISON ST 58TH AVE D / 0\ / moo f 1 o �\ 2— moo/ MONROE ST 58TH AVE o 0 1� 0 Jl-8 \ 23— / VIA PASATIEMPO 58TH AVE / 0 8 7; rn N PROJECT DRIVEWAY 58TH AVE KEY ® = STUDY INTERSECTION [ ] = PROJECT SITE LAVILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration AM Peak Hour Project Traffic Volumes Figure 4.17-3 444 Source: Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers; August 17, 2022. ' VCS Environmental /000N 11\ o \ � 2J'1fc)'I MADISON ST 58TH AVE D /N 0\ / NOO 2 \ o � 11-1 C) CD � MONROE ST 58TH AVE CD CD 1— 0 \ J � — 27 \ 15— VIA PASATIEMPO 58TH AVE / D \ 27 \ 22;� � \_ _� PROJECT DRIVEWAY 58TH AVE KEY ® = STUDY INTERSECTION C 7 = PROJECT SITE LAVILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration PM Peak Hour Project Traffic Volumes Figure 4.17-4 445 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Year 2045 With Project Traffic Conditions Table 4.17-4, Year2045 with Project Peak Hour Intersection Capacity, summarizes the peak hour level of service results at the three (3) key study intersections for "Year 2045 With Project" traffic conditions. With project traffic conditions, all three (3) key study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. It should be noted that all critical movements for the all -way stop -controlled intersections are forecast to also operate at acceptable levels of service per City requirements. Table 4.17-4 Year 2045 with Project Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Recommended Improvements As shown previously in Figure 4.17-1, Existing Roadway Conditions and Intersection Controls, roadway improvements to be installed in conjunction with the project includes roadway widening and restriping to provide and exclusive eastbound right -turn lane and an exclusive westbound left -turn lane at the project driveway. Striping modifications are also proposed to provide an exclusive eastbound right -turn lane at the emergency vehicle access driveway. The results of the intersection and roadway segment analyses for Existing With Ambient Growth With Project traffic conditions indicate that the three (3) key study intersections are forecast to continue to operate at acceptable service levels. As there are no deficiencies, no traffic improvements are required under this traffic scenario. The results of the intersection and roadway segment analyses for Year 2045 With Project traffic conditions indicate that the three (3) key study intersections are forecast to continue to operate at acceptable service levels. As there are no deficiencies, no traffic improvements are required under this traffic scenario. BIKEWAYS PLAN The City of La Quinta Circulation Element Exhibit II -6 identifies that a Class 2 On -Street Bikeway is designated on Avenue 58, including along the project frontage. The project incorporates a multi- purpose trail along Avenue 58 and has been designed to ensure that the implementation of the project would not cause any long-term conflicts that would affect the safety of a cyclist. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.17-11 Transportation 446 Existing Year 2045 Minimum Traffic Without Year 2045 Deficiency Key Intersection Time Acceptable Period LOS Delay Delay Delay LOS LOS LOS Increase Yes/No (s/v) (s/v) (s/v) Madison Street AM 8.4 A 9.6 A 9.7 A 0.1 No LOS D at Avenue 58 PM 9.4 A 10.6 B 10.7 B 0.1 No Via Pasatiempo AM 8.7 A 9.2 A 9.3 A 0.1 No LOS D at Avenue 58 PM 9.5 A 9.3 A 9.4 A 0.1 No Monroe Street AM 8.1 A 12.0 B 12.0 B 0.3 No LOS D at Avenue 58 PM 10.8 B 20.0 C 20.0 c 0.7 No Source: LLG, Traffic Impact Analysis Report; August 17, 2022. Recommended Improvements As shown previously in Figure 4.17-1, Existing Roadway Conditions and Intersection Controls, roadway improvements to be installed in conjunction with the project includes roadway widening and restriping to provide and exclusive eastbound right -turn lane and an exclusive westbound left -turn lane at the project driveway. Striping modifications are also proposed to provide an exclusive eastbound right -turn lane at the emergency vehicle access driveway. The results of the intersection and roadway segment analyses for Existing With Ambient Growth With Project traffic conditions indicate that the three (3) key study intersections are forecast to continue to operate at acceptable service levels. As there are no deficiencies, no traffic improvements are required under this traffic scenario. The results of the intersection and roadway segment analyses for Year 2045 With Project traffic conditions indicate that the three (3) key study intersections are forecast to continue to operate at acceptable service levels. As there are no deficiencies, no traffic improvements are required under this traffic scenario. BIKEWAYS PLAN The City of La Quinta Circulation Element Exhibit II -6 identifies that a Class 2 On -Street Bikeway is designated on Avenue 58, including along the project frontage. The project incorporates a multi- purpose trail along Avenue 58 and has been designed to ensure that the implementation of the project would not cause any long-term conflicts that would affect the safety of a cyclist. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.17-11 Transportation 446 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration GOLF CART/NEV ROUTE SYSTEM The City of La Quinta's planned circulation system includes Golf Cart/NEV pathways along existing and future roadways connecting residential, recreational, commercial, and other community amenities. The City of La Quinta Circulation Element Exhibit II -7 shows Class II On -Street Golf Cart/NEV Paths on Avenue 58 including along the project frontage. The design of the project would provide 51 feet of right of way and provide improvements to Avenue 58, per the City's General Plan criteria for Secondary Arteria to accommodate the Golf Cart/NE Route System. Implementation of the project would not cause any long-term conflicts that would affect the safety of Golf Cart/NEV users. PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION The project has been designed to provide pedestrian circulation within the project as well as connections to offsite pedestrian circulation systems. The project's private loop road provides a 3.5 - foot landscaped parkway and a 4.5 -foot sidewalk that would provide internal vehicle and pedestrian access for the project. Pedestrian connection to Avenue 58 would be provided by sidewalks along the driveway entrance to the project. Additionally, the City of La Quinta Circulation Element Exhibit II -7 identifies a multi -modal trail on Avenue 58 including along the project frontage. The intent of the Circulation Element is that multi -use paths provide pedestrian, bicycle and NEV travel ways that are separated from automobile traffic. As part of the City of La Quinta's Project Image Corridor improvement requirements, the project would provide a 14,312 square feet landscape setback area and multi -modal trail along the frontage of the project site consistent with the Circulation Element. PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE The provider of public transit service within the City of La Quinta and the Coachella Valley is the SunLine Transit Agency, which was created in 1977 and has since evolved to provide a wide range of public transit services. The City of La Quinta Circulation Element does not identify mass transit routes or facilities near the project site. Therefore, implementation of the project would not conflict with any mass transit program. CIRCULATION SYSTEM CONFLICT SUMMARY As shown above, implementation of the proposed project would not result in conflicts with the project area Traffic Circulation System, Bikeways Plan, Golf Cart/NEV Route System, Pedestrian Circulation Plans or mass transit projects. Potential impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would not conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b). On December 28, 2018, the California Natural Resources Agency adopted revised CEQA Guidelines. Among the changes to the guidelines was the removal of vehicle delay and LOS from consideration for transportation impacts under CEQA. With the adopted guidelines, transportation impacts are to be evaluated based on a project's effect on vehicle miles traveled using VMT per capita as the metric. The intent of this change is to balance the needs of congestion management with statewide goals for infill development, promotion of public health through active transportation, and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Under the VMT Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.17-12 Transportation 447 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration methodology, screening is used to determine if a project will be required to conduct a detailed VMT analysis. The City of La Quinta has developed VMT Impact Screening Criteria to serve as a screening tool for potential VMT impacts associated with select land use projects in the city. As such, the following guidance summarizes the potential project screening and would not have a significant transportation related CEQA impact, as shown in Step 1: Project Type Screening: • Small Projects. This applies to projects with low trip generation per CEQA exemptions or results in a 3,000 Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (MTCO2e) per year screening level threshold, based on the County of Riverside Climate Action plan and South Coast Air Quality Management District's draft interim guidance for assessing project -level greenhouse gas impacts. Small projects include: Single -Family Housing projects less than or equal to 140 dwelling units. Multiple -Family (low-rise) Housing projects less than or equal to 200 DU. Multiple -Family (mid -rise) Housing projects less than or equal to 245 DU. General Office Building with are less than or equal to 160,000 square feet. Retail buildings with are less than or equal to 70,000 square feet. Warehouse (unrefrigerated) buildings with are less than or equal to 410,000 square feet. — General Light Industrial buildings with less than or equal to 170,000 square feet. Small Infill Projects. Transportation Projects that reduce or do not increase VMT. Project GHG emissions less than 3,000 Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide. • Local Serving Projects. A project that induces local service land uses is determined to shorten nondiscretionary trips by putting goods and services closer to residents, resulting in an overall reduction in VMT. These land uses can be presumed to have a less than significant impact, absent substantial evidence to the contrary. Local serving land uses are listed below: — Local -serving retail projects less than 50,000 square feet — Local -serving K-12 schools — Local parks — Day care centers — Local -serving gas stations — Local -serving banks — Local -serving hotels (e.g., non -destination hotels) — Student housing projects — Local serving community colleges that are consistent with the assumptions noted in the RTP/SCS — Affordable housing The proposed project consists of 80 single-family swelling units, which is less than the "Small Projects" threshold of 140 DU. Additionally, as identified in Section 4.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, the project would generate less than 3,000 Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide. Based on the criteria, the project could be screened from a VMT analysis and would have a less than significant transportation related CEQA impact, per the City of La Quinta Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis Policy. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.17-13 Transportation 448 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: Implementation of the proposed project would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment). The design of the project would provide 51 feet of right of way and provide improvements to Avenue 58, per the City's General Plan criteria for Secondary Arterial. As shown in Figure 4.17-5, Proposed Site Plon, access for the proposed project would be provided from one (1) full -access stop controlled main gated driveway and one (1) gated emergency vehicle access (EVA) driveway along Avenue 58, which are both located an adequate distance from Monroe Street to provide safe and efficient access. Based on the existing striping along Avenue 58, which includes a center striped median, the striping is recommended to be modified to create a 60 -foot westbound left turn pocket at the main project driveway while providing a ±90 -foot eastbound left turn pocket at Pasatiempo Court. As shown in Figure 4.17-1, roadway improvements to be installed in conjunction with the project, which includes roadway widening and restriping to provide an exclusive eastbound right -turn lane and an exclusive westbound left -turn lane at the project driveway. Striping modifications are also proposed to provide an exclusive eastbound right -turn lane at the emergency vehicle access driveway. In addition, pedestrian and bicycle access will be provided via a pedestrian connection to the existing sidewalk system along Avenue 58 at the main project driveway. The proposed roadway improvement plans would be coordinated with the City to ensure required standards are met. With the recommended striping improvements, the onsite circulation layout of the proposed project would be adequate. The driveway widths have been confirmed and would be adequate for emergency vehicles, service/delivery (FedEx, UPS, Amazon, etc.) trucks, trash trucks, and moving vans. In addition, adequate storage and a turnaround area is provided for visitors at the call box. With implementation of Mitigation Measure T-1, potential hazards associated with access to the project would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: T-1: The existing striping along Avenue 58, which includes a center striped median, is recommended to be modified to create a 60 -foot westbound left turn pocket at the main project driveway while providing a ±90 -foot eastbound left turn pocket at Pasatiempo Court. d) Result in inadequate emergency access? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not result in inadequate emergency access. The proposed project would involve the construction of new structures and access ways. The project would be required to design, construct, and maintain structures and access ways in compliance with local, regional, and state requirements related to emergency access. The Riverside County Fire Department would review and ensure that adequate emergency access and adequate emergency response times are maintained. Compliance with local, regional, and state requirements related to emergency access and implementation of the project would ensure that the proposed project would have adequate emergency access. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.17-14 Transportation 449 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Temporary activities associated with construction of project driveways and with the extension of infrastructure into the project site could result in temporary partial lane closures along Avenue 58 which could hinder emergency access. The project would coordinate with the City of La Quinta on the need for traffic controls during construction, which would determine if and what type of traffic controls are needed to maintain emergency access. With compliance with the City of La Quinta's traffic control requirements, potential impacts associated with conflicts to the emergency response plans would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.17-15 Transportation 450 r�� a - a��M��r ..rte' :rte• ■ ! s — � e�--sue— j- _ W I - - - - - eex sE -- �y- 4 Lz > it I LOT E il� i5•'1: __ _ - r ° _ � w r .'. � � 3 1i 1Wl lYnl uln AFF'• '��- �� E�.��o' I _y �F•�.s�._ bra � �:" '� �f` � v ,�' c• � :1,--- � -• I ' — f �' –J L — . LOT B WorE J L --- I— --I r-- j # Iljj I I `I r+a--xal I_ rW•01.� I I �M.RTI .. -- r qrn IwG--w> ia.+en{ i.o--p.fl I•Ae.a,l I4O�M.# :+� +1 j wi L :re's— . ' I � I ' I o,�4. 1 —� • i +I Ik II II 11 II 11 II li II IjI Source: Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers; August 17, 2022. I LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Proposed Site Plan 13 VCS Environmental Figure 4.17-5 451 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Because this project is a CEQA action, it requires an offer of tribal consultation under Assembly Bill [AB] 52 (Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1). In addition, it also requires a General Plan Amendment and is therefore subject to the statutory requirements of Senate Bill 18 Tribal Consultation Guidelines (Government Code Section 65352.3) that are initiated with this notification. Regulatory Framework AB 52 TRIBAL CONSULTATIONS This project is subject to the requirements of Assembly Bill (AB) 52. AB 52 is applicable to projects that have filed a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or notice of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) or Negative Declaration (ND) on or after July 1, 2015. The law requires lead agencies to initiate consultation with California Native American Tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the project and have requested such consultation, prior to determining the type of CEQA documentation that is applicable to the project (i.e., EIR, MND, ND). Significant impacts to "tribal cultural resources" are considered significant impacts to the environment. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.18-1 Tribal Cultural Resources 452 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Would the project:Lia Significant Impact With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: 1) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local ❑ ® ❑ ❑ register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k), or 2) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth ❑ ® ❑ ❑ in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Because this project is a CEQA action, it requires an offer of tribal consultation under Assembly Bill [AB] 52 (Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1). In addition, it also requires a General Plan Amendment and is therefore subject to the statutory requirements of Senate Bill 18 Tribal Consultation Guidelines (Government Code Section 65352.3) that are initiated with this notification. Regulatory Framework AB 52 TRIBAL CONSULTATIONS This project is subject to the requirements of Assembly Bill (AB) 52. AB 52 is applicable to projects that have filed a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or notice of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) or Negative Declaration (ND) on or after July 1, 2015. The law requires lead agencies to initiate consultation with California Native American Tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the project and have requested such consultation, prior to determining the type of CEQA documentation that is applicable to the project (i.e., EIR, MND, ND). Significant impacts to "tribal cultural resources" are considered significant impacts to the environment. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.18-1 Tribal Cultural Resources 452 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration "Tribal cultural resources" are either of the following: Sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either of the following: A. Included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources. B. Included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision (k) of Section 5020.1. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1 for the purposes of this paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. To determine if such resources exist, under AB 52 (PRC §21080.3.1) lead agencies must consult with tribes that request consultation and must make a reasonable and good faith effort to mitigate the impacts of a development on such resources to a less than significant level. AB 52 allows tribes 30 days after receiving notification to request consultation and the lead agency must then initiate consultation within 30 days of the request by tribes. SB 18 CONSULTATION The intent of SB 18 is to provide California Native American tribes an opportunity to participate in local land use decisions at an early planning stage, for the purpose of protecting, or mitigating impacts to, cultural places. Prior to the adoption or any amendment of a general plan or specific plan, a local government must notify the appropriate tribes (on the contact list maintained by the NAHC) of the opportunity to conduct consultations for the purpose of preserving, or mitigating impacts to, cultural places located on land within the local government's jurisdiction that is affected by the proposed plan adoption or amendment. Tribes have 90 days from the date on which they receive notification to request consultation unless a shorter timeframe has been agreed to by the tribe. SACRED LANDS RECORD SEARCH An NAHC Sacred Lands File Search and Tribal contacts list was requested via email on July 21, 2021 (Appendix C). A negative Sacred Lands File Search was received from the NAHC on August 18, 2021. The NAHC also provided a Tribal contacts list of local tribes that may wish to consult on the project. They include the following (refer to Attachment C): • Patricia Garcia -Plotkin, Director, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians • Jeff Grubbe, Chairperson, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians • Amanda Vance, Chairperson, Augustine Band of Mission Indians • Doug Welmas, Chairperson, Cabazon Band of Mission Indians • Daniel Salgado, Chairperson, Cahuilla Band of Indians • Ray Chapparosa, Chairperson, Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla and Cupeno Indians • Robert Martin, Chairperson, Morongo Band of Mission Indians • Ann Brierty, THPO, Morongo Band of Mission Indians • Jill McCormick, THPO, Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.18-2 Tribal Cultural Resources 453 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration • Joseph Hamilton, Chairperson, Ramona Band of Mission Indians • Lovina Redner, Tribal Chair, Santa Rosa Band of Mission Indians • Isaiah Vivanco, Chairperson, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians • Thomas Tortez, Chairperson, Torres -Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indian The NAHC also submitted the SLF search results and Tribal contact list to Carlos Flores, Planner at the City of La Quinta. The City will use its AB 52 contact list to conduct its consultation with interested tribes independently of this study. A listing of 13 tribal individuals representing 11 tribes were consulted as part of AB 52/SB 18 consultation. One tribe provided responses to the consultation request via email; refer to Appendix J. The tribe that requested to consult was the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians which requested the following: • Formal government to government consultation under California Assembly Bill No. 52 (AB 52). • A cultural resources inventory of the project area by a qualified archaeologist prior to any development activities in this area. • A copy of the records search with associated survey reports and site records from the information center. • Copies of any cultural resource documentation (report and site records) generated in connection with this project. • The presence of an approved Cultural Resource Monitor(s) during any ground disturbing activities (including archaeological testing and surveys). Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer. • Mitigation Measures for the project. MITIGATION MEASURES In response to the information received through AB 52/SB 18 consultation along with a record search conducted for the project, the proposed project includes Mitigation Measures CR -1 and CR -2 that would require archaeological and Native American monitoring to ensure proper protocol is followed if resources are unearthed during ground disturbing activities. General Plan Amendment/Zone Change The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not increase impacts to tribal resources above the level of impacts identified in the existing General Plan. Potential impacts to tribal resources have been evaluated as part of the evaluation of the proposed project and mitigation measures have been recommended to minimize impacts to tribal resources. With compliance with mitigation measures, potential impacts to tribal resources associated with the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be less than significant. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.18-3 Tribal Cultural Resources 454 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: 1) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: Implementation of the proposed project would not cause a substantial adverse change to a listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k). The proposed project is not listed nor eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k). Because historical resources have been known to occur within the region, there is the potential that historical resources could be encountered during excavation activities. To avoid adverse impacts to historical resources, if cultural resources are discovered during grading, work must be halted in the vicinity of the find and a qualified archaeologist be retained to identify and evaluate the cultural material. With implementation of Mitigation Measure CR -1, potential impacts to unknown historical resources would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measure CR -1 is required. 2) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: Implementation of the proposed project would not cause a substantial adverse change to a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. As previously indicated, a record search and pedestrian survey conducted on the project site did not identify any known archaeological resources on the project site. Three prehistoric isolates are recorded within one-half mile. Although the project site is not located within a general area of sensitivity for prehistorical archaeology, the grading activities associated with construction of the proposed project could encounter native soils and could have the potential to encounter unknown archaeological resources. To avoid adverse impacts to archaeological resources that could be encountered during construction, it is recommended if cultural resources are discovered during grading, work must be halted in the vicinity of the find and a Public Review Draft I lune 2023 4.18-4 Tribal Cultural Resources 455 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration qualified archaeologist be retained to identify and evaluate the cultural material. With implementation of Mitigation Measures CR -1 and CR -2, potential impacts to unknown archaeological resources would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measures CR -1 and CR -2 are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.18-5 Tribal Cultural Resources 456 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.18-6 Tribal Cultural Resources 457 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.19 Utilities and Service Systems ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment/Zone Change Implementation of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would increase the population on the project site above the population level estimated in the existing General Plan. The increased population would increase the demand for utility services above the estimates anticipated in the existing General Plan. The existing General Plan identifies low density residential land uses for the project site. Compared to the existing General Plan the proposed project would have less overall water demand. Additionally, a substantial amount of wastewater treatment capacity would be available for the project. Potential impacts to utility systems associated with the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be less than significant. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, or wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.19-1 Utilities and Service Systems 458 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Would the project: Significant Impact With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated a. Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, or wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future ❑ ❑ ® ❑ development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? c. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local ❑ ❑ ® ❑ infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e. Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to ❑ ❑ ® ❑ solid waste? ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment/Zone Change Implementation of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would increase the population on the project site above the population level estimated in the existing General Plan. The increased population would increase the demand for utility services above the estimates anticipated in the existing General Plan. The existing General Plan identifies low density residential land uses for the project site. Compared to the existing General Plan the proposed project would have less overall water demand. Additionally, a substantial amount of wastewater treatment capacity would be available for the project. Potential impacts to utility systems associated with the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would be less than significant. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, or wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.19-1 Utilities and Service Systems 458 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, or wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects. Implementation of the proposed project would require adding onsite utilities since the project site is currently undeveloped. As part of the construction activities for the proposed project, new onsite utility service systems would be constructed, and they would connect to existing utility systems currently provided in the project area. Construction connections to offsite utility systems would involve some minor trenching. Potential impacts would be short-term and construction BMPs would be in place to minimize construction related impacts. Each utility service provider would coordinate on the design/installation and would ensure that utility service would comply with construction standards and that adverse impacts to the environment are avoided. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years. The Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) would provide water service to the project. All domestic water provided by CVWD is extracted from the groundwater basin through a system of wells, which CVWD operates throughout its District. In addition, CVWD imports water from the Colorado River, which is used to recharge the groundwater basin. There are three recharge facilities in the Valley: one located northwest of Palm Springs, one located southeast of La Quinta, in Martinez Canyon, and one located in La Quinta, south of Avenue 58, and west of Madison Street. CVWD also owns and operates the water distribution system, which is generally located under existing streets in the public right-of- way. The CVWD also maintains water storage tanks throughout its service area, including ten existing or planned tanks in the City and its Sphere of Influence, with capacities ranging from 250,000 to 10 million gallons. Water Agencies, such as the CVWD, are required to prepare and update their Urban Water Management Plans (UWMP) every five years. The UWMP identifies long-term resource planning to ensure that adequate water supplies are available to meet existing and future water needs. The water demands are based on the City of La Quinta's existing General Plan planned land uses within the CVWD water service area. The UWMP includes a water supply and demand assessment that compares the total water supply sources available to the water supplier with the long-term total projected water use over the next 20 years, in five-year increments, for a normal water year, a single dry water year, and a drought lasting multiple consecutive water years. The most recent UWMP for CVWD was prepared in 2020. The UWMP identifies that within the water service area, the existing General Plan Low Density designation of up to 4.0 single-family dwelling units per acre planned for the project site would have adequate water supplies during a normal, single dry, and multiple dry years. The proposed project proposes a General Plan Amendment to increase the density on the project site from Low Density 4.0 dwelling units per acre to Medium/High Density up to 16.0 dwelling units per acre and proposes to increase the number of residential units that could be developed on the site from 39 units to 80 units. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.19-2 Utilities and Service Systems 459 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 4.19-1, Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan and Coachella Valley Water District Urban Water Management Plan Water Demand, identifies the Coachella Valley Water District Urban and SGMA Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan water demand rates for Low Density Single -Family and Medium/High Density Multiple -Family land uses. Table 4.19-1 Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan and Coachella Valley Water District Urban Water Management Plan Water Demand Table 4.19-1 shows that the water demands for the proposed 80 Medium/High Density multiple -family dwellings would have a lower daily water demand compared to the 39 Low -Density single-family dwellings that could be developed under the current General Plan. The overall water demand for the project site would be less. The reduction in water demand would be a result of cluster residential development common area landscaping, use of energy efficient water fixtures, minimal turf grass for park/playground area, and use of decomposed granite for landscaping. The proposed multiple -family cluster development would have approximately 29% less demand for water compared to the water demands for single-family homes that could be developed under the existing General Plan Low Density land use designation. The proposed project would reduce overall water demands in the City and enhance the reliability of future water supplies. The project would also attain General Plan Policy WR -1.4.c, which requires onsite retention for new development projects to the greatest extent possible, to provide added recharge of the aquifer. The project Drainage Plan proposes a bioretention basin to capture stormwater runoff and infiltrate it into the ground water basin. The final water plan design for the project would be required to comply with the CVWD Development Design Manual which provides comprehensive procedural and technical requirements for the planning, design, and construction of CVWD service infrastructure required for new development to ensure water efficient facilities and water conservation measures are incorporated into the project, which would further reduce water demands. Additionally, the proposed project would be required to coordinate with CVWD and secure a Will Serve Letter which would indicate that CVWD would have the ability to provide adequate water service to the proposed project. The design of the water distribution system would be required to coordinate with CVWD to ensure that they are adequately sized to meet the long-term operation needs for the project. The proposed General Plan Amendment would reduce water demands on the project site compared to the current General Plan land uses planned for the project site and would reduce overall water demands in the City and create surplus water supplies through a net reduction. The project would also contribute to recharging the groundwater basin by providing an onsite retention basin that would Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.19-3 Utilities and Service Systems 460 Existing General Plan Proposed Water Demand Rate 39 Units Allowed Project 80 Units IL Land Use Gallons Per Gallons Per Gallons Per Household Unit Household Unit Household Unit Per Day Per Day Per Day Low Density Single -Family 494 19,266 Medium/High Density Multiple -Family 170 - 13,600 Source: 2022 Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan. Table 4.19-1 shows that the water demands for the proposed 80 Medium/High Density multiple -family dwellings would have a lower daily water demand compared to the 39 Low -Density single-family dwellings that could be developed under the current General Plan. The overall water demand for the project site would be less. The reduction in water demand would be a result of cluster residential development common area landscaping, use of energy efficient water fixtures, minimal turf grass for park/playground area, and use of decomposed granite for landscaping. The proposed multiple -family cluster development would have approximately 29% less demand for water compared to the water demands for single-family homes that could be developed under the existing General Plan Low Density land use designation. The proposed project would reduce overall water demands in the City and enhance the reliability of future water supplies. The project would also attain General Plan Policy WR -1.4.c, which requires onsite retention for new development projects to the greatest extent possible, to provide added recharge of the aquifer. The project Drainage Plan proposes a bioretention basin to capture stormwater runoff and infiltrate it into the ground water basin. The final water plan design for the project would be required to comply with the CVWD Development Design Manual which provides comprehensive procedural and technical requirements for the planning, design, and construction of CVWD service infrastructure required for new development to ensure water efficient facilities and water conservation measures are incorporated into the project, which would further reduce water demands. Additionally, the proposed project would be required to coordinate with CVWD and secure a Will Serve Letter which would indicate that CVWD would have the ability to provide adequate water service to the proposed project. The design of the water distribution system would be required to coordinate with CVWD to ensure that they are adequately sized to meet the long-term operation needs for the project. The proposed General Plan Amendment would reduce water demands on the project site compared to the current General Plan land uses planned for the project site and would reduce overall water demands in the City and create surplus water supplies through a net reduction. The project would also contribute to recharging the groundwater basin by providing an onsite retention basin that would Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.19-3 Utilities and Service Systems 460 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration collect storm water and rainfall and infiltrate it into the groundwater. With water demand reductions associated with the project and the project contribution to help maintain the groundwater basin, the proposed project water demands would not conflict with UWMP and there would be adequate water supplies for normal, single dry, and multiple dry years and long-term operational impacts associated with providing water services to the project. Impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would not result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments. Sanitary sewer collection and treatment facilities are provided by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) within most of the City of La Quinta. The Mid -Valley Water Reclamation Plant (WRP-4), located in Thermal, serves the area in the City of La Quinta located south of Miles Avenue including the proposed project site. WRP 4 is the District's second largest wastewater reclamation plant in terms of treatment capacity and provides collection service to approximately 63,000 people in the cities of La Quinta, Mecca, Palm Desert, and Thousand Palms. The WRP-4 has a current capacity of just under 10 mgd and processes approximately 5 mgd per day. According to City's General Plan EIR, WRP-4 currently has excess capacity. There are currently no plans for expansion at the Mid -Valley Plant. The U.S. Environmental Policy Act (EPA) estimates that the typical average daily wastewater flows are 40 to 60 gallons per person per day (USEPA, 2002). Therefore, using the City's current household number of 2.6 persons per household, the project could generate approximately 8,320 to 16,640 gallons of wastewater per day. Under the existing General Plan, 39 single-family residential units could be developed with a wastewater demand of 4,056 to 8,080 gallons per day. Based on the current treatment capacity of 10 mgd and current processes of approximately 5 mgd per day, the incremental increase in wastewater treatment demand associated with the proposed project would be a nominal increase and sufficient capacity would be available to serve the project. Additionally, project plans will be reviewed by CVWD and City staff to ensure wastewater capacity and compliance. Sewer installation and connection fees in place at the time of development or connection would be collected by CVWD. Therefore, less than significant impacts relative to wastewater capacity are expected. The proposed project would connect to an existing 18 -inch diameter force main along Avenues 58. Based on the available capacity at the Mid -Valley Water Reclamation Plant, the increase in wastewater treatment generated by the proposed project would have a less than significant impact. Additionally, as part of the final design, the proposed project would be required to coordinate with CVWD and secure a Will Serve Letter which would ensure that the CVWD would have the ability to provide adequate wastewater service to the proposed project. The design of the wastewater distribution system would be required to coordinate with CVWD to ensure that they are adequately sized to meet the long-term operation needs for the project. With coordination with CVWD, long-term operational impacts associated with providing wastewater services to the project would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.19-4 Utilities and Service Systems 461 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration d) Generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would not generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. Solid waste disposal for the proposed project would be Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, LLC (Burrtec) under a franchise agreement with the City. Burrtec collects solid waste and transports it to the Edom Hill Transfer Station, located west of the City in the City of Cathedral City. From the Transfer Station, waste is taken to one of three regional landfills: Lamb Canyon, Badlands or EI Sobrante. According to City's General Plan EIR, all three landfills have capacity remaining for the long-term. The proposed project will generate 96 tons of solid waste per year. The analysis was based on the default CalEEMod waste generation rate. The amount generated is almost twice as much than would be generated from the site under the existing low density residential land use designation. Solid waste generated from the project would consist mostly of typical household trash from residents and visitors, and workers. The EI Sobrante and Lamb Canyon Landfills are permitted to receive 5,000 tons of solid waste per day and the Badlands Landfill is permitted to receive up to 4,000 tons of solid waste per day. The 96 tons of solid waste per year equates to about 545 pounds per day which would represent 0.054% of the daily amount of solid waste disposal permitted by the EI Sobrante and Lamb Canyon Landfills and a 0.068% of the daily amount of solid waste disposal permitted at the Badlands Landfill. The project would use one of the three landfill sites. Based on availability and remaining capacity of all landfills, it is unlikely that the volume of solid waste generated from the proposed project would exceed landfill capacity. The amount of solid waste generated from the construction of the project would not exceed the capacity of local facilities or exceed state and local standards. The project does not involve demolition of any structures. The site preparation phase for the project would involve the removal of vegetation, tree stumps, and stones. It is estimated that approximately 100 trucks of site preparation debris would be disposed at one of the three surrounding landfills, which equates to approximately 55 tons of solid waste. This amount would be disposed over several days and would be well under the daily amount of solid waste disposal permitted at any of the three landfills. Potential impacts associated with providing solid waste disposal service to the proposed project would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Less Than Significant Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste. The proposed project would produce solid waste associated with the construction stages as well as during operation. The proposed project would be required to comply with state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Applicable regulations include California's Integrated Waste Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.19-5 Utilities and Service Systems 462 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) which requires cities and counties throughout the state to divert 50% of all solid waste from landfills through source reduction, recycling, and composting; 2008 modifications of AB 939 to reflect a per -capita requirement rather than tonnage; AB 341 which increased the statewide goal for waste diversion to 75% by 2020; and the California Solid Waste Reuse and Recycling Access Act (AB 1327) which requires local agencies to adopt an ordinance to set aside areas for collecting and loading recyclable materials in development projects. In accordance with the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery disposal requirements, Best Management Practices would be employed to reduce solid waste disposal such as the recycling of all plastic bags, containers, and green waste composting, chipping, and shredding. Additionally, Best Management Practices would be implemented to reduce the solid waste generated from construction activities and, where feasible, would recycle construction debris. With implementation of the Best Management Practices and compliance with the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery disposal requirements, potential solid waste disposal impacts would be less than significant. Implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with the ability to comply with these regulations. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.19-6 Utilities and Service Systems 463 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.20 Wildfire ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Background A wildland fire is a non-structural fire that occurs in vegetative fuels. Wildland fires can occur in undeveloped areas and spread to urban areas where the landscape and structures are not designed and maintained to be fire resistant. The potential for wildland fires represents a hazard where development is adjacent to open space or within proximity to wildland fuels or designated Fire Hazard Safety Zones. The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection identifies the project site is not within an area that has not been designated as a High Fire Hazard Area or State Responsibility Area; refer to Figure 4.20-11 Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Additionally, the City of La Quinta General Plan Safety Element identifies that the project site is located in an area that has less than moderate potential for high fire zones. General Plan Amendment/Zone Change The project site is not within a High Fire Hazard Area or a State Responsibility Area. Implementation of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not increase the risk for wildfire impacts. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.20-1 IAI;IA*;re 464 Less Than If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands Potentially Significant Less Than classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the Significant Impact With Significant o project: Impact Mitigation Impact pact Incorporated a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency response ❑ ❑ ❑ plan or emergency evacuation plan? b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project ❑ ❑ ❑ occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c. Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may ❑ ❑ ❑ exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d. Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or ❑ ❑ ❑ 11 landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes? ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Background A wildland fire is a non-structural fire that occurs in vegetative fuels. Wildland fires can occur in undeveloped areas and spread to urban areas where the landscape and structures are not designed and maintained to be fire resistant. The potential for wildland fires represents a hazard where development is adjacent to open space or within proximity to wildland fuels or designated Fire Hazard Safety Zones. The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection identifies the project site is not within an area that has not been designated as a High Fire Hazard Area or State Responsibility Area; refer to Figure 4.20-11 Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Additionally, the City of La Quinta General Plan Safety Element identifies that the project site is located in an area that has less than moderate potential for high fire zones. General Plan Amendment/Zone Change The project site is not within a High Fire Hazard Area or a State Responsibility Area. Implementation of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not increase the risk for wildfire impacts. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.20-1 IAI;IA*;re 464 Source: California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CALFIRE); September 2021. - approximate Project Location N LA VI LLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Fire Hazard Severity Zones VCS Environmental Figure 4.20-1 465 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration The Riverside County Sheriff's Department would oversee evacuating neighborhoods in the event of a fire that threatens homes. These evacuations would be decided within the Incident Command structure in consultation with the fire department, law enforcement, public works, and local government liaisons. In the event of emergency, residents would be directed to specific evacuation routes to avoid conflicts with emergency response plans. Therefore, the proposed project would not significantly impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? No Impact: The proposed project would not exacerbate wildfire risks due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire. Topography influences the movement of air and the direction of a fire course. Additionally, wind events magnify the risks of wildfire and would have the potential to expose inhabitants to elevated pollutant concentrations. According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, the project site is not identified as a High Fire Hazard Area or near a State Responsibility Area. Additionally, the project site is not contiguous to wildland slope areas that could function as a conduit for wildland fire. Additionally, the proposed project would have surrounding roadways and driveways which would also function as fire breaks. The City's Fire Hazard Element informs that from 2013 to March 2021, no wildfires occurred within the City and Sphere of Influence. Additionally, there is no unusual fire risk, fire spread risk or death and injury risk according to the Fire -Community Assessment Response Evaluation System (Fire CARES). A "big data" analytical system provides information on the capacity and capability of local fire departments regarding the risk environment they are called to respond. Therefore, the proposed project would not exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire in or near State Responsibility Areas or lands classified as extremely high fire hazard severity zones. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? No Impact: The proposed project would not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment. According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, the project site is not identified as a High Fire Hazard Area or near a State Responsibility Area. The project includes the construction of water infrastructure and other utility improvements that would aid in fire suppression. The proposed project does not include any changes to existing roadways that would exacerbate fire risk. The proposed project would not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure that would exacerbate fire risk or result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment. The California Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.20-3 Wildfire 466 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Fire Code Section B105 imposes fire -flow requirements for buildings based on their size and construction type. CalFire updated the 2010 Strategic Fire Plan in 2018, to coordinate Unit Fire Plans that address risks, fire protection needs, and strategies with other levels of fire plans and community wildfire protection plans to provide one consistent approach. Therefore, the proposed project would not exacerbate fire risk or result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes? No Impact: Implementation of the proposed project would not expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post - fire slope instability, or drainage changes. Landslides, including mud flows and debris flows can be triggered by erosion and downslope runoff caused by rain following a fire. According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, the project site is not identified as a High Fire Hazard Area or near a State Responsibility Area. The proposed project would not increase the risk for wildland fire impacts that expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes in or near State Responsibility Areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.20-4 Wildfire 467 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: The General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and the proposed residential project would not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Development of the project site would result in the direct removal of non-native trees, herbaceous fortis, and common ruderal plant species. Based on the high levels of disturbance, low habitat quality Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.21-1 Mandatory Findings of Significance 468 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Would the project: Significant Impact With Significant Mpa Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporated a. Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal ❑ ® ❑ ❑ community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection ❑ ® ❑ ❑ with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c. Have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either ❑ ® ❑ ❑ directly or indirectly? d. Have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term ❑ ❑ ® ❑ environmental goals? RESIDENTIAL PROJECT a) Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: The General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and the proposed residential project would not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Development of the project site would result in the direct removal of non-native trees, herbaceous fortis, and common ruderal plant species. Based on the high levels of disturbance, low habitat quality Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.21-1 Mandatory Findings of Significance 468 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and the lack of detection of any special status plants during the biological and focus plant surveys, the project is not expected to impact any special status plant species. Development of the project site would result in the disruption and removal of non-native habitat. Due to the disturbed nature of the site, surrounding development, and through compliance with the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP), impacts resulting from the project are anticipated to have a less than significant effect on wildlife species. Although no sensitive wildlife species were observed within the project site during the field survey, five wildlife species have at least moderate (or low to moderate) potential to occur including the Coachella Valley fringe -toed lizard, prairie falcon, burrowing owl, pocketed free -tailed bat and Western yellow bat. To avoid potential impacts to special status species, Mitigation Measures BIO -1 through BIO -4 are recommended to reduce impacts to less than significant. The project would not reduce the general wildlife populations below self-sustaining levels. The property has been identified as not eligible for designation to or listing on the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) and Local Register under all criteria and would not cause an adverse significant effect to a historic resource. A cultural resources record search and pedestrian survey conducted on the project site did not identify any known archaeological resources. Three prehistoric isolates have been recorded within one-half mile. Although the project site is not located within a general area of sensitivity for prehistorical archaeology, the grading activities associated with construction of the proposed project could encounter native soils and could have the potential to encounter unknown archaeological resources. To avoid adverse impacts to archaeological resources that could be encountered during construction, Mitigation Measure CR -1 is recommended, which requires archaeological monitoring and Native American monitoring to occur during project excavations into alluvial soils, estimated to occur within near surface soils to a depth of 5 to 10 feet. With implementation of Mitigation Measure CR -1, potential impacts to unknown archaeological resources would be less than significant and the project would not eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: Implementation of the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and the proposed residential project would not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. Section 15355 of the Guidelines defines cumulative impacts as "... two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts." Cumulative impacts represent the change caused by the incremental impact of a project when added to other proposed or committed projects in the vicinity. Section 15130 of the Guidelines states that an EIR may determine that a project's contribution to a significant cumulative impact will be rendered less than cumulatively considerable and thus is not significant. A project's contribution is less than cumulatively considerable if the project is required to implement or fund its fair share of a mitigation measure or measures designed to alleviate the cumulative impact. The discussion of any cumulative impacts shall reflect the level and severity of the Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.21-2 Mandatory Findings of Significance 469 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration impact and the likelihood of occurrence, but not in as great a level of detail as that necessary for the project alone. CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(b)(1) states that the information utilized in an analysis of cumulative impacts should come from one of two sources: • A list of past, present, and probable future projects, producing related cumulative impacts, including, if necessary, those projects outside the control of the agency. • A summary of projections contained in an adopted General Plan or related planning document designed to evaluate regional or area -wide conditions. The cumulative analysis for the proposed project is based on a list of past, present, and probable future projects, producing related cumulative impacts. In coordination with the City of La Quinta, ten cumulative projects have been identified in the City of La Quinta and four cumulative projects in Riverside County that have either been built, but not yet fully occupied, or are being processed for approval. These 14 cumulative projects have been included as part of the cumulative background setting. A summary of related projects in the vicinity of the project site used in the cumulative analysis is presented in Table 4.21-1, Related Cumulative Projects, and Figure 4.21-1, Cumulative Project Location Map. Table 4.21-1 Related Cumulative Projects No. Cumulative Project J`_—W Description City of La Quinta 1. Capistrano Monroe Street at Camino San Juan 139 DU Single -Family Detached 2. Piazza Serena Pasatiempo Court at Avenue 58 51 DU Single -Family Detached 3. Stone Creek Stone Creek way at Avenue 58 66 DU Single -Family Detached 4. Signature at PGA West PGA Boulevard at Signature Way 100 DU Multi -Family Housing 5. Cantera Sidonia Way at Avenue 58 85 DU Single -Family Detached 6. Andalusia Country Club Marbella at Andalusia 63 DU Single -Family Detached 7. Andalusia TTM North of Seville 54 DU Single -Family Detached 8. Malaga TTM 33597 SEC of Monroe Street at Avenue 60 57 DU Single -Family Detached 9. Monroe Dates Monroe Street at 61st Avenue 94 DU Single -Family Detached 10. TTM No. 34642 SWC of Monroe Street at Avenue 54 90 DU Single -Family Detached County of Riverside 11. TR37192 SWC of Orchid Court at Avenue 60 198 DU Single -Family Detached 12. TTM38136 NWC of Orchid Court at 61st Avenue 231 DU Single -Family Detached 13. Vista Santa Rosa Gateway Village SWC of Monroe Street at Airport Boulevard 7,550 SF Retail, 16 VFP Gas Station with 5,800 SF Convenience Store, 15,800 SF Pharmacy, 2,400 SF Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Through, 128 DU Assisted Living 14. TR36902 East of Monroe Street, south of 55th Avenue 80 DU Single -Family Detached Abbreviations: DU = Dwelling Units; SF = Square -Feet; VFP = Vehicle Fueling Positions Source: LLG, Traffic Impact Analysis Report; August 17, 2022. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.21-3 Mandatory Findings of Significance 470 1. CAPISTRANO 2. PIAZZA SERENA 3. STONE CREEK 4. SIGNATURE AT PGA WEST 5. CANTERA 6. ANDALUSIA COUNTRY CLUB 7. ANDALUSIA TTM 8. MALAGA TTM 33597 9. MONROE DATES 10. TTM NO. 34642 11. TR37192 12. TTM38136 13. VISTA SANTA ROSA GATEWAY VILLAGE 14. TR36902 a] ro s= KEY ® = CUMULATIVE PROJECTS LOCATION [ = PROJECT SITE m g � C 9 AWP" LIE 50 Avenue 50 Avenue 50 v AVr- a � w y h w Avenue 54 10 � 14 0 O4 AirWrt ai,•r, � orf acv -.1 13 _ N OO Wis1a O❑ San1a Rasa g m nue 60.11 Are 0 12 9 &V Avenu4 50 0 - Coachella Coachella 52nd Ave LP6 21 I Jacqueline Cochran Sender Kmrner Regional Airgart Thermal aves:ua E{1 FT Source: Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers; August 17, 2022. LAVILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Cumulative Project Location Map VCS Environmental Figure 4.21-1 471 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration AESTHETICS Land uses developed under the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change, including the proposed residential project, have been evaluated for potential aesthetic impacts. The proposed project would involve the construction of 80 single-family homes as part of a cluster Planned Unit Development. Potential aesthetics impacts for the project site have been minimized or avoided through compliance with the City of La Quinta General Plan polices and Zoning Code Planned Unit site development requirements which would be confirmed through the City's development review process. Therefore, the proposed project would not be contributing to cumulative aesthetic impacts. Related development projects shown previously in Table 4.21-1, Related Cumulative Projects, would be evaluated on a project -by -project basis for potential aesthetic impacts and would be required to comply with applicable site development and design standards to minimize potential aesthetic impacts. Compliance with applicable site development and design standards would reduce the potential for significant aesthetic impacts. Therefore, the proposed General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and the proposed residential project would not contribute considerably to significant cumulative impacts. AIR QUALITY Operational Impacts The proposed General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and proposed residential project would increase the population on the project site above what is currently projected for the project site, which would increase long-term operational air emissions above what was evaluated in the in the City's General Plan EIR. For operational air quality emissions, any project that does not exceed or can be mitigated to less than the daily regional threshold values would not be considered by SCAQMD to be a substantial source of air pollution and would not add significantly to a cumulative impact. Operation of the project would not result in emissions in excess of the SCAQMD regional emissions thresholds. Therefore, the proposed General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and operation of the proposed residential project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant. The project's operational emissions would not exceed SCAQMD regional thresholds and would be consistent with the 2016 AQMP. Therefore, the project would not be significantly cumulatively considerable, and a less than significant impact would occur. Construction Impacts The proposed General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and proposed residential project would allow an increased number of residential structures to be constructed on the project site, which would increase the level of construction emissions that could be generated based on the existing General Plan. The context for assessing cumulative air impacts from short-term construction activities includes quantifying emissions and comparing the emissions to the applicable SCAQMD screening thresholds. As discussed in Section 4.3, Air Quality, the proposed project's construction emissions would be below SCAQMD thresholds. Further, the proposed project would be required to comply with SCAQMD Fugitive Dust Rule 403, which would require dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance offsite. With compliance with Fugitive Dust Rule 403, short-term construction air emissions would be less than significant. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant. Cumulative development projects would be required to reduce their emissions per SCAQMD rules and mandates, cumulative construction emissions would not contribute to an exceedance of air quality standards, and therefore Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.21-5 Mandatory Findings of Significance 472 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration would comply with the goals of the 2016 AQMP. Thus, it can be reasonably inferred that the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and proposed residential project -related construction activities, in combination with the cumulative development projects shown previously in Table 4.21-1, Related Cumulative Projects, would not deteriorate the local air quality and would not result in cumulatively considerable construction -related impacts. Construction source emissions for the project would not exceed the applicable LSTs with implementation. Thus, the project's construction localized emissions impacts would not be cumulatively considerable toward exposing sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Air Quality Management Plan The proposed General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and proposed residential project would be subject to the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The proposed residential project's construction and operational air emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds, and localized NOx emissions during construction would be below SCAQMD LST thresholds. The proposed residential project would also be required to comply with the applicable SCAQMD emission reduction measures to further reduce fugitive dust emissions. As such, the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and the proposed residential project would not have a cumulatively considerable contribution to impacts in this regard, and a less than significant impact would occur. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not increase impacts to biological resources above the level of impacts identified in the existing General Plan and would not contribute considerably to potential cumulative significant impacts to biological resources. Development of the project site would result in the direct removal of non-native trees, herbaceous forbs, and common ruderal plant species. Common plant species present within the project site occur in large numbers throughout the region and their removal does not meet the significance threshold. Based on the high levels of disturbance, low habitat quality and the lack of detection of any special status plants during the biological and focus plant surveys, the project is not expected to impact any special status plant species. Development of the project site would result in the disruption and removal of non-native habitat. Due to the lack of native habitat and the level of existing disturbance from agricultural activity onsite and within the vicinity (e.g., nearby date palm tree orchard), these impacts would not be expected to reduce the general wildlife populations below self-sustaining levels. Although no sensitive wildlife species were observed within the project site during the field survey, five wildlife species have at least moderate (or low to moderate) potential to occur including the Coachella Valley fringe -toed lizard, prairie falcon, burrowing owl, pocketed free -tailed bat and Western yellow bat. To avoid potential impacts to Special Status species, Mitigation Measures BIO -1 through 13I0-4 are recommended to reduce impacts to less than significant. With implementation of Mitigation Measures 13I0-1 through BIO -4, the proposed project would not contribute considerably to significant cumulative impacts to sensitive plant or wildlife species. The proposed project will not impact any native habitats or sensitive vegetation of any special status habitats. No riparian habitats, sensitive vegetation communities or jurisdictional waters occur on the project site. Therefore, the proposed project would not contribute to the cumulative loss of native habitats, sensitive vegetation communities or jurisdictional waters. The project site may serve as a function in the local wildlife dispersal and foraging. However, due to the disturbed nature of the site and the degraded habitats, the loss of foraging habitat and/or effect Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.21-6 Mandatory Findings of Significance 473 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration on local wildlife movement would be less than significant. Due to the potential for onsite bird nesting, project construction could result in impacts to nesting birds that would be in violation of the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the California Fish and Game Code. Therefore, recommended avoidance measures, including a pre -construction nesting bird survey to avoid impacts prior to the start of work, would be implemented. With the implementation of Mitigation Measure 13I0-3, potential impacts to migratory birds would be less than significant and the proposed project would not contribute considerably to significant cumulative impacts to migratory birds. Cumulative development projects identified previously in Table 4.21-1, Related Cumulative Projects, would be required to comply with state and federal laws that provide for the protection of biological resources and where needed, would implement measures to minimize impacts to biological resources. Compliance with local, state, and federal laws would reduce potential impacts to less than significant. Therefore, the proposed General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and proposed residential project, considered with cumulative development projects in the vicinity of the project site, would not result in significant cumulative impacts to biological resources. CULTURAL/PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not increase impacts to cultural or paleontological resources above the level of impacts identified in the existing General Plan and would not contribute considerably to potential cumulative significant impacts to cultural or paleontological resources. The context for assessing cumulative impacts to local archaeological and paleontological resources is to determine whether the project would result in a loss of these resources that could diminish or eliminate important information relevant to the history of the project area. The proposed project would be required to comply with Mitigation Measures CR -1, CR -2, , PALEO-1, PALEO-2 and PALEO-3, which would require an archaeologist/paleontologist to evaluate any discovered potential archaeological/paleontological resources, and appropriate steps to preserve or curate the artifact and halt or redirect work. This would eliminate any potential loss of important archaeological or paleontological information that may be buried under the project site. With regard to potential discovery of human remains during construction, the project would be required to comply with State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to the origin and disposition pursuant to Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code. Therefore, the General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and the proposed residential project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to impacts related to a cumulative loss of important archaeological or paleontological resources, and/or disturbed human remains. Related cumulative projects in the project area would be evaluated for potential impacts to cultural resources and would be required to implement measures to reduce impacts to cultural resources. Therefore, the General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and the proposed residential project, considered with the related cumulative projects, would not result in significant cumulative impacts to cultural resources. ENERGY The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would increase the population on the project site above the level identified in the existing General Plan which would increase long-term energy consumption above that currently estimated in the existing General Plan for electricity and natural gas. The areas considered for cumulative impacts to electricity and natural gas supplies are the service areas of the Imperial Irrigation District and Southern California Gas Company. Implementation of the proposed project would increase the demand for electricity and natural gas. All projects within the Imperial Irrigation District and Southern California Gas Company service areas would be required Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.21-7 Mandatory Findings of Significance 474 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration to comply with the Building Energy Efficiency Standards and CALGreen, which would contribute to minimizing wasteful energy consumption. With compliance of Building Energy Efficiency Standards and CALGreen, cumulative impacts associated with the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and proposed residential project would be less than significant and would not contribute considerably to cumulative significant impacts to energy resources. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Implementation of the General Plan Amendment and the Zone Change would not increase geologic risks above the level identified in the existing General Plan and would not contribute considerably to potential cumulative significant impacts. Like other areas in southern California, land uses developed under the General Plan, including the proposed project, could be subject to seismic shaking impacts and would be required to meet the City's construction development standards and the seismic design parameters of the California Uniform Building Code. The proposed project would be required to implement geotechnical design measures recommended in the project geotechnical report to ensure the stability of the project and implement erosion control measures to reduce erosion impacts. With compliance of the California Uniform Building Code, geotechnical design measures and erosion control measures, potential geologic impacts would be less than significant. Therefore, implementation of the General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and the proposed residential project would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact with regard to geologic impacts. The land clearing and grading activities that could occur from construction activities resulting from implementation the General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and the proposed residential project would uncover soil, which could be subject to erosion impacts caused by water and wind. Additionally, construction equipment and vehicles could indirectly transport sediment to offsite locations. Compliance with applicable NPDES erosion control requirements would reduce impacts related to substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil to a less than significant level. With the implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-1, GEO-2 and HYDRO -1, potential erosion impacts associated with the General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and the proposed residential project would be less than significant and would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact in regard to erosion impacts. Related cumulative projects identified previously in Table 4.21-1, Related Cumulative Projects, would be required to comply with California Building Code requirements to minimize potential geologic and seismic impacts and would be required to implement erosion control plans to minimize potential erosion and sedimentation impacts. Therefore, the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and proposed residential project, considered with the cumulative development projects shown previously in Table 4.21-1, Related Cumulative Projects, would not contribute considerably to significant cumulative geologic impacts. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would increase the population on the project site above the level identified in the existing General Plan which would increase long-term Greenhouse Gas emissions above the level currently estimated in the General Plan. GHG emissions are not confined to a particular air basin but are dispersed worldwide. Therefore, the proposed project greenhouse emission impacts are not project -specific impacts, but the proposed project's contribution to cumulative GHG impacts. Implementation of the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and the proposed residential project would not exceed the GHG emissions significance threshold of 3,000 Public Review Draft I June 2023 Mandatory Findings of Significance 475 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration MTCO2e/yr. Therefore, the General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and the proposed residential project GHG emissions and their contribution to global climate change would not be cumulatively considerable, and GHG emissions impacts would be less than significant. Related cumulative projects identified previously in Table 4.21-1, Related Cumulative Projects, would be evaluated for greenhouse gas emission impacts. As stated above, GHG impacts are recognized as exclusively cumulative impacts, and there are no non -cumulative GHG emission impacts from a climate change perspective. The analysis above concludes that the project would not exceed the GHG emissions significance threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e/yr and would not interfere with the goals of SB 32. When considered together, potential GHG impacts associated with the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, proposed residential project and cumulative development projects in the vicinity of the project site would be less than significant. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS The Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment did not identify hazardous waste on the project site or any listed hazardous waste sites near the project site. Implementation of the proposed General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and proposed residential project would not increase the risk for hazardous material impacts. The proposed residential project would involve the use of incidental amounts of hazardous substances, such as fuel, oil, and solvents. To ensure hazardous substances are not inadvertently released into the environment, the proposed residential project would be required to comply with local, state, and federal laws regarding the handling, storage and transporting of hazardous substances and would be required to comply with spill prevention and clean-up BMPs during construction. With compliance with local, state, and federal laws and implementation of BMPs, the potential handling of hazardous materials would be less than significant. Therefore, the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and proposed residential project would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact with regard to the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Because of the historic agricultural use that occurred on the project site, it is recommended that a Phase II investigation be conducted to assess the presence or absence of environmentally persistent agricultural chemicals within near surface soils. With implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, the potential for the project to create a significant hazard to the public or the environment would be less than significant. Related cumulative projects identified previously in Table 4.21-1, Related Cumulative Projects, would be evaluated for potential hazards and potential release of hazardous substances into the environment. The related cumulative projects would be required to comply with local, state and federal laws and regulations regarding the handling, storage and transporting of hazardous materials. Compliance with local, state and federal laws would reduce the potential impacts to less than significant. Therefore, the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and the proposed residential project, considered with related cumulative projects, would not result in significant cumulative hazards or hazardous material impacts. The proposed residential project was determined to have a less than significant impact to interfering with an emergency evacuation plan. Cumulative projects in the area would be analyzed for impairment of emergency access on a project -by -project basis and would be required to comply with all roadway design standards to ensure adequate emergency access is not impacted. Therefore, the General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change, the proposed residential project, and related cumulative projects within the vicinity of the project site would have a less than significant cumulative impact to interfering with emergency plans. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.21-9 Mandatory Findings of Significance 476 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Construction activities associated with the proposed residential project implemented under the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change could have the potential to generate degraded surface water impacts which could adversely affect downstream receiving water bodies. The proposed residential project would be required to adhere to the City of La Quinta NPDES MS4 Storm Water Permit requirement, which would be to obtain a State General Construction Permit, filing a Notice of Intent (NCI) to the Storm Water Report Tracking System and obtain a waste discharger identification number from the State Water Resources Control Board. Additionally, the General Construction Permit would require the development and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP would identify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize degraded surface water runoff impacts. With compliance of the General Construction Permit requirements and preparation and implementation of the SWPPP, potential erosion impacts would be less than significant. Therefore, the General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and the proposed residential project would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact to hydrology and water quality. Cumulative development projects identified previously in Table 4.21-1, Related Cumulative Projects, would have the potential to affect water quality during the construction phase. Related cumulative development that disturbs one or more acres of soil would be required to obtain coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit and would avoid and/or reduce construction -related impacts to water quality through preparation of a site-specific SWPPP, which identifies applicable BMPs. Each project would be required to comply with existing water quality standards at the time of development review and implement BMPs, as necessary. Thus, related cumulative development projects would not contribute considerably to cumulatively significant hydrology and water quality impacts. LAND USE Implementation of the General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and the proposed residential project would not construct any structures or barriers that would divide existing communities. The General Plan Amendment would redesignate the project site from Low Density Residential up to 4.0 dwelling units per acre to Medium -High Density up to 16 dwelling units per acre. The proposed residential project would increase the density on the site to 9.0 dwelling units per acre and would allow an additional 41 dwelling units to be developed on the project site, which would be well below the maximum residential units that could be developed. The increased density would not result in significant impacts to the environment and would not contribute considerably to cumulative significant impacts to the environment. The proposed residential project is consistent with relevant goals and policies of the City of La Quinta General Plan and would not contribute cumulative land use policy conflicts. The proposed General Plan Amendment would not result in the development of incompatible land uses that would not contribute considerably to cumulative significant land use impacts to the environment. Related development projects would be subject to site-specific planning reviews that would address consistency with adopted General Plan goals, policies, and objectives, as well as with the local development code standards. Each cumulative development project would be analyzed independent of other projects, within the context of their respective land use and regulatory setting. As part of the review process, each project would be required to demonstrate compliance with the provisions of the applicable land use designation(s). Additionally, as part of the planning reviews, related projects would be subject to CEQA environmental review, where needed projects would be Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.21-10 Mandatory Findings of Significance 477 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration required to provide mitigation to reduce potential adverse impacts to the environment. Thus, implementation of the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, development of the proposed residential project, and cumulative development projects would not contribute considerably to significant cumulative land use impacts. NOISE The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would increase population and associated traffic generated from the project site above the level identified in the existing General Plan which would increase long-term traffic noise levels above levels currently estimated in the existing General Plan for the project site. The proposed project's long-term operational mobile and stationary noise impacts were determined to be less than significant. Therefore, the General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and the proposed residential project would not contribute considerably to significant cumulative noise impacts. Related cumulative projects would be required to comply with applicable noise and vibration standards, and regulations to minimize noise and vibration impacts. Therefore, the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and the proposed residential project, considered with the related cumulative projects, would not result in significant cumulative noise impacts. Cumulatively significant construction vibration would occur when construction activities at a site occur in close vicinity of one another in a way that concentrates the vibration. The further construction activities occur from one another on each respective project site, the quicker the vibration dissipates by the time it reaches a sensitive receptor. Because heavy construction equipment moves around a project site and would only occur for limited durations, the average vibration levels at nearby structures would diminish rapidly with increasing distance between structures. There are no ongoing or planned construction activities near the project site that would contribute to cumulative vibration impacts. In addition, groundborne vibration generated at the site during construction would not be in exceedance of the Caltrans threshold of 0.25 inch per second peak particle velocity (PPV) and long- term vibration impacts from operations at the site would be less than significant. Therefore, the project's contribution to cumulative vibration impacts would not be cumulatively considerable. POPULATION AND HOUSING The Southern California Association of Governments Connect SoCal, 2020 — 2045 RTP/SCS, forecasts that the population of La Quinta will grow to 47,700 in 2045, an increase of approximately 0.15% over the 2018 population. The additional population increase generated from the proposed project would account for 0.017% of the estimated population growth. The estimated population increase would be in the range of estimated future growth projections and would not be considered substantial unplanned housing growth. As such, the General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and the proposed residential project would not contribute to cumulatively adverse growth impacts. Related projects identified previously in Table 4.21-1, Reloted Cumulative Projects, would be reviewed by the City, and development would be required to be consistent with adopted state and City development standards, regulations, plans, and policies to minimize the effect of the increase in population on physical impacts to the environment. Therefore, the General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and the proposed residential project, combined with related projects, would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts to population and housing as no substantial new unplanned growth would occur. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.21-11 Mandatory Findings of Significance 478 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration PUBLIC SERVICES Fire Protection The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would increase demands for fire protection services above the level identified in the existing General Plan. The proposed residential project and related cumulative development projects would receive fire protection services from the Riverside County Fire Department. According to the Riverside County Fire Department, the proposed residential project would not require the expansion of fire protection facilities or services. Additionally, the project would be required to comply with the California Building Code, California Fire Code and related codes and would be reviewed by the Riverside County Fire Department to ensure it has been designed in compliance with fire protection safety requirements. The Riverside County Fire Department would review all cumulative development projects identified previously in Table 4.21-1, Related Cumulative Proiects, and, if needed, would identify if additional fire protection facilities would be necessary. Additionally, cumulative development projects would be subject to all applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations in place for fire protection and emergency services, which would help to reduce potential cumulative impacts for fire protection services. The overall cumulative impacts to fire protection services would be less than significant. Police Protection The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would increase demands for police protection services above the level identified in the existing General Plan. The proposed residential project and related cumulative development projects would receive police protection services from the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. The project would be required to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations in place for police protection services. The General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and proposed project's cumulative impacts to police protection services would be less than significant and would not contribute to cumulatively significant impacts. Cumulative development projects identified previously in Table 4.21-1, Related Cumulative Projects, would also be evaluated for potential impacts to police services and would be required to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations in place for police protection services. Compliance with protection ordinances and regulations would reduce cumulative development project impacts to police services to less than significant. Overall, cumulative impacts to police protection services would be less than significant. School Services The proposed General Plan Amendment would increase the population on the project site above the level identified in the existing General Plan and would incrementally increase the enrollment of students and the use of CVUSD facilities. As identified in Section 4.15, Public Services, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact on school services. The proposed residential project would be required to pay development fees prior to issuance of a building permit to offset the cost of providing school services and facilities. Related development projects identified previously in Table 4.21-1, Related Cumulative Projects, would be evaluated for potential impacts to schools and would be required to pay development fees to fund existing and future school facilities. With coordination with CVUSD and the payment of development fees, potential cumulative impacts to school services would be less than significant. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.21-12 Mandatory Findings of Significance 479 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration In order to make a realistic estimate of future on -street conditions prior to implementation of the project, the status of other known development projects (cumulative projects) has been researched at La Quinta and Riverside County. With this information, the potential impact of the proposed project can be evaluated within the context of the cumulative impact of all ongoing development. As shown previously in Table 4.21-1, Related Cumulative Projects, there are ten cumulative projects in La Quinta and four cumulative projects in Riverside County that have either been built, but not yet fully occupied, or are being processed for approval. These 14 cumulative projects have been included as part of the cumulative background setting. Table 4.21-2, Cumulative Proiect Traffic Generation, presents the development totals and resultant trip generation for the 14 cumulative projects. As shown in Table 4.21-2, the 14 cumulative projects are forecast to generate a combined total of 19,039 weekday daily trips, with 1,136 trips forecast during the AM peak hour and 1,457 trips forecast during the PM peak hour. It should be noted that the trip generation in Table 4.21-2 reflects the remaining dwelling units to be constructed and/or occupied in the tracts under construction based on LLG research/reconnaissance. The anticipated AM peak hour and PM peak hour cumulative projects traffic volumes at the key study intersections are presented in Figure 4.21-2, AM Peak Hour Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes, and Figure 4.21-3, PM Peak Hour Cumulative Proiects Traffic Volumes. Table 4.21-2 Cumulative Project Traffic Generation Cumulative Project Daily 2- Way AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total Out Total City of La Quinta Capistrano (139 DU) 1,311 25 72 97 83 48 131 Piazza Serena (51 DU) 481 9 27 36 30 18 48 Stone Creek (66 DU) 622 12 34 46 39 23 62 Signature at PGQ West (100 DU) 674 10 30 40 32 19 51 Cantera 802 16 44 60 50 30 80 Andalusia Country Club 594 11 33 44 37 22 59 Andalusia TTM 509 10 28 38 32 19 51 Malaga TTM 33597 538 10 30 40 34 20 54 Monroe Dates 886 17 49 66 55 33 88 TTM No.34642 849 16 47 63 54 31 85 County of Riverside TR 37192 1,867 36 103 139 117 69 186 TTM 38136 2,178 42 120 162 137 80 217 Vista Santa Rosa Gateway Village 6,974 137 112 249 132 138 270 TR 36902 754 15 41 56 47 28 75 Total 19,039 366 770 1,136 879 578 1,457 Source: LLG, Traffic Impact Analysis Report; August 17, 2022. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.21-13 Mandatory Findings of Significance 480 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 4.21-3, Existing with Ambient Growth With Project With Cumulative Projects, summarizes the peak hour level of service results at the three (3) key study intersections for "Existing With Ambient Growth With Project With Cumulative Projects" traffic conditions. Table 4.21-3 shows that for existing with ambient growth with project with cumulative projects traffic conditions, all three key intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. All critical movements for the all -way stop -controlled intersections are also expected to operate at acceptable levels of service per City requirements. Table 4.21-3 Existing with Ambient Growth With Project With Cumulative Projects Year 2045 With Project Traffic Conditions The project has been evaluated for future impacts in 2045 with cumulative development occurring. Table 4.21-4, Year 2045 with Project Peak Hour Intersection Capacity, shows the peak hour level of service results at the three key study intersections for "Year 2045 With Project" traffic conditions. With project traffic conditions, all three key study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. It should be noted that all critical movements for the all - way stop -controlled intersections are forecast to also operate at acceptable levels of service per City requirements. Table 4.21-4 Year 2045 with Project Peak Hour Intersection Capacity ir ME Existing with Ambient Year 2045 Existing Traffic Growth with Project with without with Project Deficiency Minimum Conditions Cumulative Traffic Deficiency Ke Intersection y Time Period Acce table p Conditions LOS LOS Delay Dela) LOS Dela) LOS Increase Yes/N Madison Street at AM LOS 8.4 A 9.8 A 1.4 No Madison Street at AM LOS D 8.4 A 9.6 A 9.7 A Avenue 58 PM 9.4 A 10.8 B 1.4 No Via Pasatiempo at AM 8.7 A 9.3 A 0.6 No 10.6 B LOS D B 0.1 No Via Pasatiempo at AM Avenue 58 PM 9.2 9.5 A 9.4 A 0.09 No Monroe Street at AM 8.1 A 11.9 B 3.8 No Avenue 58 LOS D 9.5 A 9.3 A 9.4 Avenue 58 PM No 10.8 B 19.3 C 8.5 No Source: LLG, Traffic Impact Analysis Report; August 17, 2022. Year 2045 With Project Traffic Conditions The project has been evaluated for future impacts in 2045 with cumulative development occurring. Table 4.21-4, Year 2045 with Project Peak Hour Intersection Capacity, shows the peak hour level of service results at the three key study intersections for "Year 2045 With Project" traffic conditions. With project traffic conditions, all three key study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. It should be noted that all critical movements for the all - way stop -controlled intersections are forecast to also operate at acceptable levels of service per City requirements. Table 4.21-4 Year 2045 with Project Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.21-14 Mandatory Findings of Significance 481 Existing Traffic Year 2045 Year 2045 Minimum Conditions without with Project Deficiency Key Intersection Time Acceptable Project Period LOS Delay Delay ALIDelay (s0_ /v) LOS (s/v) LOS (s/v) LOS Increase _JL_ Yes/No Madison Street at AM 8.4 A 9.6 A 9.7 A 0.1 No LOS D Avenue 58 PM 9.4 A 10.6 B 10.7 B 0.1 No Via Pasatiempo at AM 8.7 A 9.2 A 9.3 A 0.1 No LOS D Avenue 58 PM 9.5 A 9.3 A 9.4 A 0.1 No Monroe Street at AM 8.1 A 12.0 B 12.0 B 0.3 No LOS D Avenue 58 PM 10.8 B 20.0 C 20.0 C 0.7 No Source: LLG, Traffic Impact Analysis Report; August 17, 2022. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.21-14 Mandatory Findings of Significance 481 Source: Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers; August 17, 2022. ' VCS Environmental /N r7 '-- 11 \ 18 62: ' \ 3oy / o rn o MADISON ST 58TH AVE D /--� �r— 0 �\ 35� � f r / 00 / MONROE ST 58TH AVE / 04 1 \ J � — 17 30— VIA PASATIEMPO 58TH AVE KEY ® = STUDY INTERSECTION = PROJECT SITE LAVILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration AM Peak Hour Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes Figure 4.21-2 482 Source: Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers; August 17, 2022. ' VCS Environmental 7 03 42-4 \ i 26— / MADISON ST @ 58TH AVE 0 / SMO f 6 .�i�' 0 29'/ - c- \ f �/ MONROE ST Q 58TH AVE / oo 17 ) 32 14- \ 24— / \ / VIA PASATIEMPO 58TH AVE KEY ® = STUDY INTERSECTION = PROJECT SITE LAVILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration PM Peak Hour Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes Figure 4.21-3 483 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Therefore, the proposed project would not contribute considerably to significant cumulative traffic impacts. Striping improvements are recommended along the project frontage on Avenue 58 in conjunction with the widening of the project frontage to the ultimate width. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES The proposed General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and proposed residential project would not increase impacts to tribal resources above the level of impacts identified in the existing General Plan and would not contribute considerably to potential cumulative significant impacts of tribal resources. Cumulative development projects would be evaluated for impacts to tribal resources. To avoid significant impacts to unknown tribal cultural resources that could be present on the project site, the proposed project would be required to comply with Mitigation Measure CR -1, which requires project monitoring by a Native American and proper consultation with Native American Tribes and the Native American Heritage Commission if subsurface tribal cultural resources are found during construction, excavation, and/or other construction activities in the area. This would eliminate any potential loss of important tribal cultural resources that may be discovered at the project site. Compliance with Mitigation Measure CR -1 would ensure that a cumulative loss of tribal cultural resources from the project construction activities would not occur. Additionally, the project would comply with Mitigation Measure CR -2, which requires if human remains are encountered during excavation activities, all work shall halt, and the County Coroner shall be notified. Therefore, the General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and the proposed residential project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to impacts related to tribal cultural resources, and impacts would be less than significant. Related cumulative development projects identified previously in Table 4.21-1, Related Cumulative Projects, would be required to comply with the provisions of AB 52, which would reduce cumulative impacts to tribal cultural resources. Therefore, the General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and the proposed residential project, considered with the related cumulative projects, would not result in significant cumulative impacts to cultural tribal resources. UTI LITI ES Water The proposed General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and proposed residential project would increase water demands above the level identified in the existing General Plan and in the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) Urban Water Management Plan. However, the overall water demand for the project would be less. The reduction in water demand would be a result of the cluster residential development common area landscaping, use of energy efficient water fixtures, minimal turf grass for park/playground area, and use of decomposed granite for landscaping. The proposed project would have approximately 46% less demand for water compared to water demands under the existing General Plan Low Density land use designation. Therefore, the project would not contribute considerably to significant cumulative water supply impacts. Related development projects identified previously in Table 4.21-1, Related Cumulative Projects, would also be evaluated for water demands and consistency with the CVWD Urban Water Management Plan to determine if adequate water supplies would be available. Related development projects would be required to incorporate water conserving features and would be required to coordinate with CVWD to ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations to reduce cumulative water demand impacts. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.21-17 Mandatory Findings of Significance 484 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Wastewater The proposed General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and proposed residential project would increase population and would increase wastewater treatment demands above the level identified for in the existing General Plan. Wastewater treatment service for the project area would be provided from the Mid -Valley Water Reclamation Plant (WRP-4) which has available treatment capacity for the proposed residential project, including the incremental increase demand from the General Plan Amendment. Therefore, the General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and the proposed residential project would not considerably contribute to significant cumulative wastewater treatment capacity impacts. Additionally, as part of the final design, the proposed project would be required to coordinate with CVWD and secure a Will Serve Letter which would ensure that the CVWD would have the ability to provide adequate wastewater service to the proposed project. The design of the wastewater distribution system would be required to coordinate with CVWD to ensure that they are adequately sized to meet the long-term operational needs for the project. Related development projects identified previously in Table 4.21-1, Related Cumulative Projects, would also be required to coordinate with CVWD to determine if adequate wastewater treatment capacity would be available and would be required to comply with the relevant regulations. Coordination with CVWD and compliance with relevant laws and regulations would ensure the General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and the proposed residential project impacts related to the construction of wastewater facilities are not significantly cumulatively considerable. Solid Waste Disposal The proposed General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and proposed residential project would increase population and would increase solid waste disposal demands above the level identified for in the existing General Plan. The proposed project and related development projects would increase demand for solid waste disposal services within the project area. Solid waste disposal for the proposed project would be from Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, LLC (Burrtec) under a franchise agreement with the City. Burrtec collects solid waste and transports it to the Edom Hill Transfer Station, located west of the City in the City of Cathedral City. From the Transfer Station, waste is taken to one of three regional landfills: Lamb Canyon, Badlands or EI Sobrante. All three landfills have capacity remaining for the long-term. Therefore, the General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and the proposed residential project would not considerably contribute to significant cumulative solid waste disposal impacts. Cumulative related development projects identified previously in Table 4.21- 1, Related Cumulative Projects, would be required to coordinate if adequate solid waste disposal service is available and would be subject to conformance with all relevant laws, ordinances, and regulations in place for solid waste disposal. This includes compliance with AB 939, which requires a 50% diversion of all solid waste from disposal in local landfills, and the 2016 (or most recent) California Green Building Code Standards, which includes design and construction measures that act to reduce construction -related waste though material conservation measures and other construction -related efficiency measures. With compliance with relevant laws, ordinances, and regulations in place for solid waste disposal, cumulative impacts to solid waste would be less than significant. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.21-18 Mandatory Findings of Significance 485 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration c) Have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: Implementation of the General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and the proposed project would not have environmental effects which would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Potential impacts that could cause substantial adverse effects on human beings were analyzed in this Initial Study include, but are not limited to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, geology hazards, hazardous materials, seismic hazards, hydrology/water quality, noise and wildfire. Each issue area found that there would be either no impacts, impacts would be less than significant, or impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. The proposed residential project and cumulative development projects would comply with local and regional planning programs, applicable codes, and ordinances, state and federal laws and regulations, and mitigation measures to ensure that long-term operation activities and short-term construction activities associated with the proposed project would not result in direct, or indirect adverse impacts to human beings. d) Have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? Less Than Significant Impact: The General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and the proposed residential project would not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. If the proposed project is approved and constructed, a variety of short- and long-term impacts would occur. During construction, surrounding land uses could be temporarily impacted by dust and noise. There could also be an increase in vehicle pollutant emissions caused by grading and construction activities and potential generation of degraded surface water. However, these short-term effects would be temporary and would be avoided or lessened to a large degree through implementation of mitigation measures and compliance with regulatory requirements. Implementation of the General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and the proposed project would result in long-term environmental consequences associated with increasing population above the existing General Plan and the transition of land use from vacant land to residential land uses. Long-term operation of the General Plan Amendment, the Zone Change and the proposed residential project would change the physical appearance of the project site and would contribute increased traffic volumes, increased noise from the operation of the project, increased amounts of impervious surfaces and increased energy and natural resource consumption. However, these long-term operational effects would be reduced to a less than significant level through implementation of mitigation measures and compliance with regulatory requirements. Construction and operation of the project would not result in significant adverse effects to the environment. Therefore, the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and proposed residential project would not achieve short-term environmental goals that would result in the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.21-19 Mandatory Findings of Significance 486 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.21-20 Mandatory Findings of Significance 487 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4.22 References The following references were utilized during preparation of this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. These documents are available for review at the City of La Quinta Planning Department, 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253. Bruin Geotechnical Services, Inc., Geotechnical Engineering Report. September 9, 2021. Coachella Valley Water District, Urban Water Management Plan; Adopted 2020. D&D Engineering, Inc., Preliminary Hydrology Study. February 28, 2023. D&D Engineering, Inc., TTM 37950 Water Quality Management Plan. February 28, 2023. Kevin L. Crook Architect Inc., Avenue 58 Architectural Package. July 18, 2022. Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers, Traffic Impact Analysis Report. August 17, 2022. Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers, Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Assessmentfor the Proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 37950 Project. October 12, 2021. Partner Engineering and Science, Inc., Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report. July 23, 2019. Todd Groundwater and Woodard & Curran, 2022 Indio Subbasin Water Management Plan Update; December 2021. Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC, Historical Resource Analysis Report 81891 Avenue 58, La Quinta, CA. May 2022. VCS Environmental, Biological Technical Report for Tentative Tract Map 37950 Project. October 2021. VCS Environmental, Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Lo Quinta Cluster Development Project — Tentative Tract Map 37950. August 2021. Vista Environmental, Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis Tentative Tract Map No. 37950 Residential Project. October 28, 2021. Vista Environmental, Noise Impact Analysis Tentative Tract Map No. 37950 Residential Project. October 19, 2021. VLA Group, Preliminary Landscape Plan. November 18, 2022. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.22-1 References 488 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. Public Review Draft I June 2023 4.22-2 References 489 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 5.0 INVENTORY OF MITIGATION MEASURES BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 1310-1: CVMSCHP Mitigation Fee. The project proponent shall be required to pay the City of La Quinta a local development mitigation fee prior to obtaining a building permit. The most current rates are as follows (future developments may be subject to updated fees). 1310-2: A pre-construction/clearance burrowing owl survey shall be performed not more than 30 days prior to initial ground disturbance activity to map the location of suitable burrows, if any, and to formally determine presence/absence of the species. A qualified biologist will survey the project site and a buffer zone, 500 -feet outside the project limits for burrows that could be used by burrowing owls. If the burrow is determined to be occupied, the burrow will be flagged, and a 160 -foot diameter buffer will be established during non - breeding season or a 250 -foot diameter buffer during the breeding season. If burrows onsite are unoccupied, construction may proceed. If the site survey determines the presence of burrowing owl, mitigation in accordance with the CDFW shall be implemented as follows: • If burrowing owls are identified as being resident onsite outside the breeding season (September 1 to February 14) they may be relocated to other sites by a permitted biologist (permitted by CDFW), as allowed in the CDFW Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (March 2012). If an active burrow is found during the breeding season, the burrow shall be treated as a nest site and temporary fencing shall be installed at a distance from the active burrow, to be determined by the biologist, to prevent disturbance during grading or construction. Installation and removal of the fencing shall be done with a biological monitor present. • Active relocation and eviction/passive relocation require the preservation and maintenance of suitable burrowing owl habitat determined through coordination with the Wildlife Agencies. 13I0-3: Vegetation removal activities shall be conducted outside the nesting season (September 1 to February 14 for songbirds; September 1 to January 14 for raptors) to avoid potential impacts to nesting birds. Any construction activities that occur during the nesting season (February 15 to August 31 for songbirds; January 15 to August 31 for raptors) will require that all suitable habitats be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist within three days before commencement of vegetation clearing/ground disturbance activities. If any active nests are detected, a buffer of 500 feet of an active listed species or raptor nest, 300 feet of other sensitive bird nests (non -listed), and 100 feet of most common songbird nests will be delineated, flagged, and avoided until the nesting cycle is complete. The buffer may be modified and/or other recommendations proposed as determined appropriate by the biological monitor to minimize impacts. Public Review Draft I June 2023 5-1 Inventory of Mitigation Measures 490 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration BIO -4a: Prior to construction, all suitable areas within the project site shall be surveyed for the presence of bat roosts by a qualified bat biologist. Initial surveys are recommended to be conducted between one year to six months prior to the initiation of vegetation removal and ground disturbing activities, ideally during the maternity season (typically March 1 to August 31), to allow time to prepare mitigation and/or exclusion plans if needed. Surveys may entail direct inspection of the trees or nighttime surveys. If active bat roosts are present, a qualified bat biologist shall determine the species of bats present and the type of roost (i.e., day roost, night roost, maternity roost). If the biologist determines that the roosting bats are not a special -status species and the roost is not being used as a maternity roost, then the bats may be evicted from the roost by a qualified bat biologist experienced in developing and implementing bat mitigation and exclusion plans. • If special -status bat species or a maternity roost of any bat species is present, but no direct removal of active roosts will occur, a qualified bat biologist shall determine appropriate avoidance measures, which may include implementation of a construction -free buffer around the active roost. • If special -status bat species or a maternity roost of any bat species is present and direct removal of habitat (roost location) will occur, then a qualified bat biologist experienced in developing bat mitigation and exclusion plans shall develop a mitigation plan to compensate for the lost roost site. Removal of the roost shall only occur when the mitigation plan has been approved by the City and only when bats are not present in the roost. The mitigation plan shall detail the methods of excluding bats from the roost and the plans for a replacement roost in the vicinity of the project site. The mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for approval prior to implementation. The plan shall include: (1) a description of the species targeted for mitigation; (2) a description of the existing roost or roost sites; (3) methods to be used to exclude the bats if necessary; (4) methods to be used to secure the existing roost site to prevent its reuse prior to removal; (5) the location for a replacement roost structure; (6) design details for the construction of the replacement roost; (7) monitoring protocols for assessing replacement roost use; (8) a schedule for excluding bats, demolishing of the existing roost, and construction of the replacement roost; and (9) contingency measures to be implemented if the replacement roosts do not function as designed. BIO -4b: Pre -construction surveys shall be conducted by a qualified bat biologist no more than two weeks prior to the initiation of vegetation removal and ground disturbing activities. If no active roosts are present, then trees shall be removed within two weeks following the survey. BIO -4c: All potential roost trees (including palm trees) shall be removed in a manner approved by a qualified bat biologist outside the maternity season (March 15 — August 31 in the Coachella Valley which coincides with the bird nesting season) to avoid the potential for "take" of nonvolant (flightless) young. Trees and snags that have been identified as confirmed or potential roost sites require a two-step removal process and the involvement of a bat biologist to ensure that no roosting bats are killed during this activity. Consistent with CDFW protocols this two-step removal Public Review Draft I June 2023 5-2 Inventory of Mitigation Measures 491 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration shall occur over two consecutive days as follows: on Day 1, branches and limbs not containing cavities, as identified by a qualified bat biologist, will be removed. On Day 2, the remainder of the tree may be removed without supervision by a bat biologist. The disturbance caused by limb removal, followed by an interval of one evening, will allow bats to safely abandon the roost. BIO -4d: All construction activity in the vicinity of an active roost shall be limited to daylight hours. CULTURAL RESOURCES CR -1: Based on the data presented, it is recommended that archaeological monitoring and Native American monitoring (if applicable) occur during project excavations into alluvial soils, estimated to occur within near surface soils to a depth of 5 to 10 feet. These Mitigation Measures for the project outline the monitoring protocols. A MMRP to mitigate potential impacts to undiscovered buried cultural resources within the project shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the Lead Agency. This program shall include, but not be limited to, the following actions: 1) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall provide written verification that a certified archaeologist has been retained to implement the monitoring program. This verification shall be presented in a letter from the project archaeologist to the Lead Agency. 2) The project applicant shall provide Native American monitoring during grading if the Lead Agency determines it is necessary pending results of the AB 52 Consultation process. If applicable, the Native American monitor shall work in concert with the archaeological monitor to observe ground disturbances and search for cultural materials. The Lead Agency shall coordinate with the consulting Tribe(s) to facilitate communications with the project developer/applicant so that all parties can develop a mutually acceptable Tribal Monitoring and Treatment Agreement which includes the scope of monitoring, scheduling of monitors from individual consulting Tribe(s), and the course of action for inadvertent discoveries. 3) The project archaeologist, in consultation with the consulting Tribe(s), the contractor, and the City, shall implement a Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) to address the details, timing and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site. Details in the plan shall include: Public Review Draft I June 2023 a. Project grading and development scheduling. b. The project archaeologist and the Consulting Tribes(s) shall attend the pre - grading meeting with the City, the construction manager and all contractors and will conduct a mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance. The training will include a brief review of the cultural sensitivity of the project and the surrounding area; what resources could potentially be identified during earthmoving activities; the requirements of the monitoring program; the protocols that apply in the event inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources are identified, including who to contact and appropriate avoidance measures 5-3 Inventory of Mitigation Measures 492 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration until the find(s) can be properly evaluated; and any other appropriate protocols. c. The protocols and stipulations that the contractor, City, Consulting Tribe(s) and project archaeologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a cultural resource evaluation. 4) During the original cutting of previously undisturbed deposits, the archaeological and Tribal monitors (if applicable) shall be onsite, as determined by the consulting archaeologist, to perform periodic inspections of the excavations. Monitoring is recommended in younger Holocene alluvial soils, estimated to occur within near surface soils to a depth of 5 to 10 feet. The frequency of inspections will depend upon the rate of excavation, the materials excavated, and the presence and abundance of artifacts and features. The consulting archaeologist shall have the authority to modify the monitoring program if the potential for cultural resources appears to be less than anticipated. 5) Isolates and clearly non-significant deposits will be minimally documented in the field so the monitored grading can proceed. 6) In the event that previously unidentified cultural resources are discovered, the archaeologist shall have the authority to divert or temporarily halt ground disturbance operations in the area of the discovery to allow for the evaluation of potentially significant cultural resources. The archaeologist shall contact the Lead Agency at the time of the discovery. The archaeologist, in consultation with the lead agency, shall determine the significance of the discovered resources. The Lead Agency must concur with the evaluation before construction activities will be allowed to resume in the affected area. For significant cultural resources, a Research Design and Data Recovery Program to mitigate impacts shall be implemented by the consulting archaeologist and approved by the Lead Agency before being carried out, using professional archaeological methods. If any human bones are discovered, the county coroner and lead agency shall be contacted. In the event that the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Most Likely Descendant (as identified by the NAHC) shall be contacted in order to determine proper treatment and disposition of the remains. Public Review Draft I June 2023 a. Before construction activities are allowed to resume in the affected area, the artifacts shall be recovered, and features recorded using professional archaeological methods. The project archaeologist, in consultation with the consulting Tribe(s), shall determine the amount of material to be recovered for an adequate artifact sample for analysis. b. One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be used in the event of a discovery: Preservation -in -Place. Avoidance, or preservation -in-place, involves leaving a resource where it was found with no development affecting its integrity. Pursuant to Public Resources Inventory of Mitigation Measures 493 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Code Section 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological and cultural resources. ii. Reburial on the project site in an area not subject to future disturbance. Reburial of a resource shall include provisions to protect the selected reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all required cataloging and basic recording have been completed, with the exception of sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. The listing of contents and the location of the reburial shall be included in a confidential Phase IV Monitoring Report. c. If Preservation -in -Place or reburial is not feasible, all cultural material collected during the grading monitoring program shall be processed and curated according to the current professional repository standards in a Riverside County curation facility that meets State Resources Department Office of Historic Preservation Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Resources (OHP 1993). The collections and associated records shall be transferred, including title and accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation. 7) A Phase IV Monitoring Report, documenting the field and analysis results and interpreting the artifact and research data within the research context, shall be completed and submitted to the satisfaction of the Lead Agency prior to the issuance of any building permits. The report will include DPR Primary and Archaeological Site Forms. The Phase IV report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to a Public Records Request and a copy of the report shall be submitted to the consulting Tribe(s). CR -2: Project related earth disturbance has the potential to unearth previously undiscovered human remains, resulting in a potentially significant impact. Pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, if human remains are encountered during excavation activities, all work shall halt, and the County Coroner shall be notified. The Coroner would determine within two working days whether a cause of death investigation is necessary. If the Coroner determines that the remains are Native American, he/she would contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours. The NAHC would then, pursuant to Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code, immediately identify the most likely descendant (MLD), who may inspect the remains and site of discovery and make recommendations for the treatment and/or disposition of the remains. The MLD shall make his/her recommendation within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The MLD's recommendation shall be followed, if feasible, and may include scientific removal and non-destructive analysis of the human remains, preservation in place, and deeding the remains to the MLD for treatment. If no MLD is identified, the MLD fails to make a recommendation, or the landowner rejects the recommendation, the landowner shall rebury the remains with appropriate dignity on the property in a location that would not be subject to further subsurface disturbance. Public Review Draft I June 2023 5-5 Inventory of Mitigation Measures 494 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration GEOLOGY AND SOILS HYDRO -1: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant will obtain coverage under a General Construction Permit issued from the State Water Resources Control Board. The General Construction Permit would require the filing of a Notice of Intent with the State Water Resources Control Board and the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). GEO-1: During construction, Grading Plans for the project shall implement fugitive dust control measures and windborne erosion control measures from the Coachella Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan. GEO-2: Prior to issuance of grading permits, the City of La Quinta shall confirm that grading and construction plans for the project incorporate design recommendations provided in the Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by Bruin Geotechnical Services, Inc., September 2021. The design recommendations shall address site earthwork; remedial grading for building pads; asphalt, pavement, and concrete; fill placement and compaction; soil shrinkage; fill slope stability; imported soils; post grading pad drainage foundation design recommendations; retaining walls and structures; corrosion and chemical attack, excavations; utility trenches and backfill; interior concrete; exterior concrete rigid pavement; pavement design; and construction considerations. PALEO-1: Once earthmoving reaches 3-5 feet below the original ground surface, excavation shall be monitored under the direct guidance of a qualified paleontologist. PALEO-2: The project paleontologist retained shall review the approved development plan and shall conduct any pre -construction work necessary to render appropriate monitoring and mitigation requirements as appropriate. These requirements shall be documented by the project paleontologist in a Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP). This PRIMP shall be submitted to the City's Design and Development Department for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. Information to be contained in the PRIMP shall meet the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards. PALEO-3: If paleontological resources are detected and recovered during monitoring, a report must be prepared. The following items must be presented in the report: recovered specimens must be prepared to a point of identification and permanent preservation, including washing of sediments to recover small invertebrates and vertebrates. The recovered fossils must be identified and curated into a professional, fully accredited museum repository with permanent retrievable storage (e.g., WSC). The paleontologist must have a written repository agreement in hand prior to the initiation of mitigation activities. The report and inventory, when submitted to the Lead Agency, will signify completion of the program to mitigate impacts to paleontological resources. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HAZ-1: Prior to grading, a Phase II investigation will be conducted to assess the presence or absence of environmentally persistent agricultural chemicals within near surface soils. Public Review Draft I June 2023 5-6 Inventory of Mitigation Measures 495 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY HYDRO -1: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant will obtain coverage under a General Construction Permit issued from the State Water Resources Control Board. The General Construction Permit would require the filing of a Notice of Intent with the State Water Resources Control Board and the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). TRANSPORTATION T-1: The existing striping along Avenue 58, which includes a center striped median, is recommended to be modified to create a 60 -foot westbound left turn pocket at the main project driveway while providing a ±90 -foot eastbound left turn pocket at Pasatiempo Court. Public Review Draft I June 2023 5-7 Inventory of Mitigation Measures 496 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. Public Review Draft I June 2023 5-8 Inventory of Mitigation Measures 497 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 6.0 REPORT PREPARATION PERSONNEL CITY OF LA QUINTA (LEAD AGENCY) Planning Department 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Cheri Flores, Planning Manager Siji Fernandez, Associate Planner VCS ENVIRONMENTAL (ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS) 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, California 92675 Julie Beeman, President Dan Bott, Project Manager Valerie Flores, Environmental Planner Patrick Maxon, RPA, Archaeologist Wade Caffrey, Biologist Carla Marriner, Senior Biologist Chris Eljenholm, Biologist CJ Fotheringham, Ph.D., Botanist Max Ketabi, GIS Specialist Linda Bo, Production Coordinator Public Review Draft I June 2023 6-1 Report Preparation Personnel 498 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. Public Review Draft I June 2023 6-2 Report Preparation Personnel 499 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS/ MITIGATION MONITORING REPORTING PROGRAM SCH Number 2023060069 La Villetta at Avenue 58 Environmental Assessment GEM of the DESERT — LEAD AGENCY: City of La Quinta Planning Department 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Contact: Siji Fernandez 760.777.7086 PREPARED BY: VCS Environmental 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, California 92675 Contact: Dan Bott 949.489.2700 August 2023 500 This document has been setup for double -sided printing in order to conserve natural resources 501 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Purpose 2.0 Responsible/Reviewing Agencies 3.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program....................................................................... 35 Draft Final I August 2023 i Table of Contents 502 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. Draft Final I August 2023 ii Table of Contents 503 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 1.0 PURPOSE In compliance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. and the CEQA Guidelines, the City of La Quinta has prepared a Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft IS/MND) for the La Villetta at Avenue 58 Residential Project (State Clearinghouse No. SCH Number 2023060069). In accordance with Section 15088 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City of La Quinta as the Lead Agency has evaluated the comments received on the La Villetta at Avenue 58 Residential Project Draft IS/MND. The Lead Agency is required to respond to comments that raise significant environmental issues. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines, the City of La Quinta has prepared responses for each comment received. Section 2.0 contains comments from responsible agencies, reviewing agencies and responses from the Lead Agency. Section 3.0 provides Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program for the Final Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration. Draft Final I August 2023 1 Purpose 504 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. Draft Final I August 2023 2 Purpose 505 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 2.0 RESPONSIBLE AND REVIEWING AGENCIES The following is a list of Responsible and Reviewing Agencies that submitted comments on the IS/MND during the public review period. The number designations in the responses are correlated to the bracketed and identified portions of each comment letter. Draft Final I August 2023 3 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 506 Responsible and Reviewing Agency Letter Dated IrJune20, Commentil Letter No. A California Department Fish and Wildlife 2023 B Imperial Irrigation District June 28, 2023 Draft Final I August 2023 3 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 506 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration COMMENT LETTER NO. A State of California — Natural Resources Agency GAVIN NEW30M. Governor ' DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director a Inland Desert Region 3602 Inland Empire Boulevard, Suite C-220 , �� of PLAAli x Gntario, CA 91754 WWVV*ldlife.sa.9ou 444 11r,� q� June 20, 2023 Sent via email Sijifredo Fernandez Associate Planner City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 La Villetta at Avenue 58 Project (PROJECT) Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) SCH# 2023060069 Dear Sijifredo Fernandez: The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) received a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) from the City of La Quinta (City) for the Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA guidelines. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments and recommendations regarding those activities involved in the Project that may affect California fish and wildlife. Likewise, we appreciate the opportunity to provide comments regarding those aspects of the Project that CDFW, by law; may be required to carry out or approve through the exercise of its own regulatory authority under the Fish and Game Code. CDFW ROLE CDFW is Califomia's Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources and holds those resources in trust by statute for all the people of the State_ (Fish & G. Code, §§ 711.7, subd. (a) & 1802; Pub. Resources Code, § 21070; CEQA Guidelines § 15386, subd. (a).) CDFW, in its trustee capacity, has jurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and habitat necessary for biologically sustainable populations of those species. (1d., § 1802.) Similarly, for purposes of CEQA, CDFW is charged by law to provide, as available, biological expertise during public agency environmental review efforts, focusing specifically on Projects and related activities that have the potential to adversely affect fish and wildlife resources. 'CEQA is codified in the California Public Resources Code in section 21400 et seq. The "CEPA Guidelines' are found in Title 14 ofthe California Code or Regulations, commencing with section 15040. ConserWng California's Uhfdrife Since 1870 Draft Final I August 2023 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 507 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Sijifredo Fernandez, Associate Planner City of La Quinta June 20, 2023 Page 2 CDFW is also submitting comments as a Responsible Agency under CEQA. {Pub. Resources Code, § 21069; CEQA Guidelines, § 15381) CDFW expects that it may need to exercise regulatory authority as provided by the Fish and Game Code_ As proposed, for example, the Project may be subject to GDFW s lake and streambed alteration regulatory authority. {Fish & G. Code, § 1600 et seq.} Likewise, to the extent implementation of the Project as proposed may result in "take" as defined by State law of any species protected under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) (Fish & G. Code, § 2050 et seq.), the Project proponent may seek related take authorization as provided by the Fish and Game Code. PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY Proponent: Rodeo Credit Enterprises, LLC Objective: The proposed Project involves a request for approval of a General Plan Amendment from Low Density up to 4 dwelling units per acre to Medium/High Density up to 12 dwelling units per acre, Zone Change from Low Density Residential to Medium/High Density, Tentative Tract Map, and Conditional Use Permit For Planned Unit Development to allow for the development of 80 single-family homes, a recreation area, an open space lot, and retention basinlopen space on approximately 9.7 acres. The Project would consist of mainly two-story homes, along with three one-story plans along Avenue 58. The Project proposes a landscape plan within the Project site and along the Frontage of the property. A total of 66,550 square feet of area will consist of hard and saftscape materials. An additional 26,200 square Feet of area in the detention basin will consist of ground cover. A total of 4,540 square feet of landscaping is proposed on the Avenue 58 landscape corridor along the frontage of the Project site. The landscape area includes a combination of trees, shrubs, and groundcover. A meandering multimodal trail is proposed within the landscape. Landscape and/or hardscape treatment is proposed along drive isles, parkways, residential courtyards, recreation building, pool and deck area, and play area. Access to the Project would be through two entrances from Avenue 58. The Project is required to prepare and have an approved Water Quality Management Pian that would demonstrate that there would not be any offsite surface water generated by the Project. The drainage plan, in conjunction with the Project Water Quality Management Plan, would retain and infiltrate all onsite stormwater runoff. The stormwater runoff from the site would be conveyed along private drives that would flow into a catch basin located on the site that would drain into a 26,200 square foot drainage basin where it would infiltrate into the ground. The utilities would be provided to the Project via underground connections from Avenue 58. Water service to the Project site would be provided by the Coachella Valley Water District through an existing 18 -inch main water line along the northside of Avenue 56. An 8 -inch water line would connect to the main water pipeline along Avenue 58, and 4 -inch or smaller laterals would extend through the looped private road and drive areas to service all units. Sewer service to the Project site would be provided by the Coachella Valley Water District through an existing 33 -inch sewer main line along Avenue 58. An 8 -inch Draft Final I August 2023 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 508 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 5ijifredo Fernandez, Associate Planner City of La Quinta June 20, 2023 Page 3 sewer pipeline would connect to the main sewer pipeline along Avenue 58, and 4 -inch to 5 -inch laterals would extend through the looped private road and drive areas to service all units. The entirety of the proposed developed area within the Project site would be disturbed during construction of the Project. The Grading Plan shows there is an estimated 2,078 cubic yards of cut and 32,159 cubic yards of fill. To balance the site and support the proposed residential development area, an estimated 30,089 cubic yards of select material is expected to be imported to the Project site. The construction staging and laydown areas would occur within the Project site. The Project site would be fenced during construction, and access would be for construction vehicles only. The number and types of equipment to be used would vary based on the stage of construction; however, typical construction equipment would be used (e.g., concretefindustdal saws, dozers, tractors/loaders/ backhoes, graders, excavators, cranes, forklifts, welders, cement and mortar mixers, pavers and paving equipment, rollers, and air compressors). The construction activities for the proposed Project would occur during the day. Therefore, no artificial nighttime construction lighting would be used. Location: The proposed Project is located south of Avenue 58 between Madison Street and Monroe Street in the City of La Quinta, within Coachella Valley in north -central Riverside County. Assessor Parcel Numbers for the Project site are APNs 754-180-002 and 784-180-083. Timeframe: The proposed Project is anticipated to start construction in 2024, with an estimated total construction period of 290 days. COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CDFW hasjurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and habitat necessary for biologically sustainable populations of those species (i -e., biological resources). CDFW offers the comments and recommendations below to assist City of La Quinta in adequately identifying and/or mitigating the Project's significant, or potentially significant, direct and indirect impacts on fish and wildlife (biological) resources. The MND has not adequately identified and disclosed the ProjecVs impacts (i.e., direct, indirect, and cumulative) on biological resources and whether those impacts are reduced to lessthan significant. CDFW's comments and recommendations on the MND are explained in greater detail below and summarized here. CDFW is concerned that the MND does not adequately identify or mitigate the Project's significant, or potentially significant, impacts to biological resources. CDFW also concludes that the MND lacks sufficient information to facilitate a meaningful review by CDFW, including both a complete and accurate assessment of biological resources on the Project site. CDFW requests that additional information and analyses be added to a revised MND, along with avoidance, Draft Final I August 2023 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 509 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 5ijifredo Fernandez, Associate Planner City of La Quinta ,lune 20, 2023 Page 4 minimization, and mitigation measures that avoid or reduce impacts to less than significant. Prosect Description Compliance with CEQA is predicated on a complete and accurate description of the proposed Project. Without a complete and accurate Project description, the MND likely provides an incomplete assessment of Project -related impacts to biological resources. CDFW has identified gaps in information related to the Project description. The MND lacks a discussion of plans for artificial nighttime lighting. CDFW requests that the MND is revised to include plans for artificial nighttime lightning and lightning specifications. Artificial nighttime lighting can negatively impact biological resources in a variety of ways as discussed in the Artificial Nighttime Lightning section below. To conduct a meaningful review and provide biological expertise an how to protect fish and wildlife resources, CDFW requires a complete and accurate Project description. Existing Environmental Setting Compliance with CEQA is predicated on a complete and accurate description of the environmental setting that may be affected by the proposed Project. CDFW is concerned that the assessment of the existing environmental setting has not been adequately analyzed in the MND. CDFW is concerned that without a complete and accurate description of the existing environmental setting, the MND may provide an incomplete analysis of Project -related environmental impacts. The MND lacks a recent assessment of biological resources within the Project site and surrounding area_ A recent and accurate assessment of the environmental setting and Project -related impacts to biological resources is needed to both identify appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures and demonstrate that these measures reduce Project impacts to less than significant. Mitigation Measures CEQA requires that a MND include mitigation measures to avoid or reduce significant impacts. CDFW is concerned that the mitigation measures proposed in the MND are not adequate to avoid or reduce impacts to biological resources to below a level of significance. To support City of La Quinta in ensuring that Project impacts to biological resources are reduced to less than significant, CDFW recommends adding mitigation measures for an assessment of biological resources and artificial nighttime lightning, as well as revising the mitigation measures for burrowing owl (Afhene cunicularia), nesting birds, and bats. zJ Assessment of Biological Resources Draft Final I August 2023 A-1 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 510 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Sijifredo Fernandez, Associate Planner City of La Quints ,lune 20, 2023 Page 5 Page 1 of the Project's Biological Technical Report, dated October 2021, indicates that biological surveys were conducted on September 22 and 27, 2021. CDFW generally considers biological field assessments for wildlife to be valid for a one-year period. Section 15125(c) of the CEQA Guidelines states that knowledge of the regional setting of a Project is critical to the assessment of environmental impacts, that special emphasis should be placed on environmental resources that are rare or unique to the region, and that significant environmental impacts of the proposed Project are adequately investigated and discussed. CDFW recommends that the MIND is revised to include the findings of a complete, recent inventory of rare, threatened, endangered, and other sensitive species located within the Project area and within offsite areas with the potential to be affected, including California Species of Special Concern (CSSC) and California Fully Protected Species (Fish and Game Code § 3511). Based on findings from a recent biological inventory, CDFVV recommends that the MIND is revised to include an analysis of direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts to biological resources and identification of appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures. CDFW recommends that City of La Quinta add in a revised MND the following mitigation measure: Mitigation Measure 610-[A]: Assessment of Biological Resources Prior to Project construction activities, a complete and recent inventory of rare, threatened, endangered, and other sensitive species located within the Project footprint and within offsite areas with the potential to be affected, including California Species of Special Concern (CSSC) and California Fully Protected Species (Fish and Game Code § 3511), will be completed. Species to be addressed should include all those which meet the CEQA definition (CEQA Guidelines § 15380). The inventory should address seasonal variations in use of the Project area and should not be limited to resident species. Focused species-specific surveys, completed by a qualified biologist and conducted at the appropriate time of year and time of day when the sensitive species are active or otherwise identifiable are required. Acceptable species-specific survey procedures should be developed in consultation with CDFW and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, where necessary- Note that CDFW generally considers biological field assessments for wildlife to be valid for a one-year period, and assessments for rare plants may be considered valid for a period of up to three years. Some aspects of the proposed Project may warrant periodic updated surveys for certain sensitive taxa, particularly if the Project is proposed to occur over a protracted time frame, or in phases, or if surveys are completed during periods of drought. 2) Burrowing Owl A-1 A-2 Draft Final I August 2023 8 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 511 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 5ijifredo Fernandez, Associate Planner City of La Quints ,lune 20, 2023 Page 6 Burrowing owl (Achene cunicularia) is a California Species of Special Concern. Take of individual burrowing owls and their nests is defined by Fish and Game Code section 86, and prohibited by sections 3503, 3543.5, and 3513. Fish and Game Code section 3513 makes it unlawful to take or possess any migratory nongame bird except as provided by rules and regulations adopted by the Secretary of the Interior under provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, as amended (16 U.S.C. § 703 et seq.). Take is defined in Fish and Game Code section 86 as "hunt, pursue, catch, capture or kill, or attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture or kill." Page 4.4-8 of the MND indicates that "burrowing owl has low to moderate potential to occur with the Project site. Although no suitable size burrows were observed within the Project site, the areas in the vicinity could provide suitable habitat." Although the MND includes Mitigation Measure BIO -2 for burrowing owl, CDFW considers the measure to be inadequate in scope and timing to reduce impacts to less than significant. CDFVV recommends that City of La Quirita revise Mitigation Measure 1310-2, with additions in bold and removals in stFikethrsagh: Mitigation Measure BID -2: Burrowing Owl Avoidance A-2 Suitable burrowing owl habitat has been confirmed on the Project site and surrounding area; therefore, focused burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (20 12 or most recent version) prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities. If burrowing owls are detected during the focused surveys, the qualified biologist and Project Applicant shall prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. The Burrowing awl Plan shall describe proposed avoidance, minimization, mitigation, and monitoring actions. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall include the number and location of occupied burrow sites, acres of burrowing owl habitat that will be impacted, details of site monitoring, and details on proposed buffers and other avoidance measures if avoidance is proposed. If impacts to occupied burrowing owl habitat or burrow cannot be avoided, the Burrowing Owl Plan shall also describe minimization and relocation actions that will be implemented. Proposed implementation of burrow exclusion and closure should only be considered as a last resort, after all other options have been evaluated as exclusion is not in itself an avoidance, minimization, or mitigation method and has the possibility to result in take. If impacts to occupied burrows cannot be avoided, information shall be provided regarding adjacent or nearby suitable habitat available to owls along with proposed relocation actions. The Project proponent shall implement the Burrowing Owl Plan following CDFW and USFWS review and approval. Draft Final I August 2023 9 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 512 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 5ijifredo Fernandez, Associate Planner City of La Quints ,lune 20, 2023 Page 7 Pre -construction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days pfior to the start of Project -related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl ANtigation (2012 or most recent version). Preconstruction surveys should be performed by a qualified biologist following the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report an Burrowing OwiJwtigation. If the preconstruction surveys confirm occupied burrowing owl habitat, Project activities shall be irr nediatety halted. The qualified biologist shall coordinate with CDFW and prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW and USFWS for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities.. n n nc+r, rtinr�lnlearar ne b .rG'.V1 'A" 664R'QY Shall he PQ'4,rme.l n,,ts-We the projog limits for- bui reure that A- ,, d be u ear! by h, irrawiAg eels if the h„rroy" :c rletnrminod to he n :e,J the hwrg; ,mill he Aa 996 rl a A d a 160 fent owl Mi#inn►inn in aGGOrda nee vuith the C --Q W-4 A-hallhe im pie reented Q follawr' If hurrowmRn owls ore :rlentif:erl as hei c:rtent n cite Q-ts, de the hreerlinn 66a.60n_t6 a Pte FS he 'S W Fe brW_PV 11 ) the.Y Fn aL_ha. relnna to d 10 Other ritnc." POrmi_#@d hinale,gist Iherrr it+ed by GIDPAi) a alin,a,er! ir, +he f`nRnf �'ta fF oe_o;# d ict, rha era ri,irir;r, r.rarl:nr. n Petr, 4ntinr. Ine.tallatinr. anrt r al Qf the 2,;th the Wild4e e„er,r.iec 3) Nesting Birds It is the Project proponent's responsibility to comply with all applicable laws related to nesting birds and birds of prey. Fish and Game Code sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513 afford protective measures as follows: section 3503 states that it is unlawful to take, possess, or needlessly destroy the nest or eggs of any bird, except as otherwise provided by Fish and Game Code or any regulation made pursuant thereto. Fish and Game Code section 3503.5 makes it unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the orders Falconiformes or 5trigiformes (birds -of -prey) or to take, possess, or destroy the nest or eggs of any such bird except as otherwise provided by Fish and Game Code or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto. fish and Game Code section 3513 makes it Draft Final I August 2023 A-2 A•3 10 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 513 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Sijifredo Fernandez, Associate Planner City of La Quints June 20, 2023 Page 8 unlawful to take or possess any migratory nongame bird except as provided by rules and regulations adopted by the Secretary of the Interior under provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, as amended (16 UJ S.C. § 703 et seq.). Page 4.4-9 indicates that the Project site `has the potential to support various avian species and raptor nests due to the presence of a few shrubs, ground cover, date palm trees and other ornamental trees onsite." The Project site contains, and is located adjacent to, areas with non-native palm trees. Birds like hooded oriole (icterus cucullafus) primarily nest in palm trees and build hanging nests on the undersidesof palm fronds? Mourning doves (Zenaida macroura), owls, greater roadrunner (Geococcyx califomianus), and house finch (Haemorhous me)acanus) frequently nest in the thick skirts of palms.' The MND includes Mitigation Measure BIO -3, indicating that "any construction activities that occur during the nesting season (February 15 to August 31 for songbirds; January 15 to August 31 for raptors) will require that all suitable habitats be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds." CDFW recommends that disturbance of occupied nests of migratory birds and raptors within the Project site and surrounding area be avoided any time birds are nesting on-site. CDFW oonsiders the Mitigation Measure 13I0-3 to be insufficient in scope and timing to reduce impacts to nesting birds to less than significant. CDFW recommends the City of La Quints revise Mitigation Measure BI0-3, with additfcns in bold and removals in Vie; Mitigation Measure BIO -3: Nesting Birds Regardless of the time of year, nesting bird surveys shalt be performed by a qualified avian biologist no more than 3 days prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities. Pre -construction surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior. The qualified avian biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the pre -construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A smaller or larger buffer may he 2 Garrett, K., and J. Dunn. 1981. Birds of southern California. Los Angeles Audubon Sac., Los Angeles. a Comett, J. W., How did palm oases getto the California desert? A behind -the -scenes look at these 'tropical islands'. Desert Magazine. Sept. 13, 241 8. A-3 Draft Final I August 2023 11 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 514 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 5ijifredo Fernandez, Associate Planner City of La Quints ,lune 20, 21723 Page 9 determined by the qualified biologist familiar with the nesting phenology of the nesting species and based on nest and buffer monitoring results. Established buffers shall remain on site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. �OwAwa4 a04vi�&S&wl; be to snar.en rrehruaFy 15 to August 31 for sn nhipds; Ian6iapy 15 tB August 31 Wr of ReGt! R„ hir.is by „@I1f:e.b11919906t W4h;R thFae d@YS_be GOA�FReIPIGBFRORt Of . @tHti.. r.lo qlq AGI diE4 rhA afi.rifia If aAy ..+i. osis a a digio .ted a b iffar of WO feef of an agtiyi; listed maniac r. anter past songbird IeStS Will bO dehROated, flagged, and aWid9d Until the nest 19 GyGle m6 rlaterrninnrl ruts her the 10inln94211 rn niter in MR; as}c 4J Bats Page 4.4-13 of the MND indicates that "due to the potential for bat species, including the pocketed free -tailed and Western yellow bat [(Lasiurus xanthinus; Species of Special Concern, Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) Covered Species)] to occur within the Project site and with the potential for these species to roost in untrimmed date palms, project construction could result in impacts to roosting bats." In California, western yellow bats appear to roost exclusively in the skirt of dead fronds of both native and non-native palm trees and appear to be limited in their distribution by availability of palm habitat .4 Western yellow bats may form small maternity groups in palm trees.5 Some individuals or populations may be migratory, although some individuals appearto be present year-round, even in the northernmost portion of the range including southern California_ As indicated in the Project's Tree Inventory Map 4 Bolster, B.C.. Bolster, B.C_, (ed.). 1998. Terrestrial Mammal Species of Special Concem in California. Draft Final Report. May. Sacramento, CA. Prepared by Paul VV. Collins. Prepared for California Department of Fish and Game, Nongame Bird and Mammal Conservation Program, Sacramento, CA. Life History Acoount for Western Yellow Bat California Department of Fish and Wildlife, February 2045. A-3 A,4 Draft Final I August 2023 12 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 515 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 5ijifredo Fernandez, Associate Planner City of La Quints ,lune 20, 2023 Page 10 (Figure 1 of the Biological Technical Report), the Project site includes more than 15 Mexican fan palms (Washingfonia robusta), many of which have partially untrimmed frond skirts that may support roosting habitat and maternity groups for western yellow !oats. Date palms (Phoenix dacfylitera) may also provide roosting habitat for western yellow bats and other bat species. Removal of palm trees on-site that contain roosting habitat for bats can subject bats to impacts ranging from permanent loss of day roosts, including maternity roosts, to direct mortality if avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures are not implemented. Artificial nighttime lightning may also negatively impact bats within open -space areas surrounding the Project site, and additional details on the Project's lighting plans and lightning specifications and appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures are needed (see section below on Artificial !Nighttime Lighting). Although the MIND contains Mitigation Measure BI04a regarding surveys for bats, CDFW considers Mitigation Measure 13I04a to be insufficient in scope and timing to reduce impacts to bats to less than significant. CDFW recommends that City of La Quinta revise Mitigation Measure 1310-4a, with additions in bold and removals in s+.ili gh: Mitigation Measure BIO -4a: Surveys for daytime, Nighttime, Wintering (Hibernacula), and Maternity Roosting Sites for Bats Prior to the initiation of Project activities within suitable bat roosting habital, City of La Quinta shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct focused surveys to determine presence of daytime, nighttime, wintering (hibernacula), and maternity roost sites. Two spring surveys (April through June) and two winter surveys (November through January) shall be performed by qualified biologists. Surveys shall be conducted during favorable weather conditions only. Each survey shall consist of one dusk emergence survey (start one hour before sunset and last for three hours), followed by one pre -dawn re-entry survey (start one hour before sunrise and last for two hours), and one daytime visual inspection of all potential roosting habitat on the Project site- Surveys shall be conducted within one 24-hour period. Visual inspections shall focus on the identification of bat sign (i.e., individuals, guano, urine staining, corpses, feeding remains, scratch marks and bats squeaking and chattering). Bat detectors, bat call analysis, and visual observation shall be used during all dusk emergence and predawn re-entry surveys. If active hibernacula or maternity roosts are identified in the work area or 500 feet extending from the work area during preconstruction surveys, for maternity roosts, Project activities will be initiated between October 1 and Draft Final I August 2023 A-4 13 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 516 5ipfredo Fernandez City of La Quinta June -20, 2023 Page 11 Associate Planner LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration February 28. outside of the maternity roosting season when young bats are present but are not yet ready to fly out of the roost. Maternity roosts shall not be evicted, excluded, removed, or disturbed. A minimum 540 -foot no -work buffer shall be provided around hibernacula. The buffer shall not be reduced. Project -related construction and activities shall not occur within 500 feet of or directly under or adjacent to hibernacula. Buffers shall be left in place until a qualified bat biologist determines that the hibernacula are no longer active. Within this buffer, Project -related activities shall not occur between 30 minutes before sunset and 30 minutes after sunrise. Hibernacula roosts shall not be evicted, excluded, removed, or disturbed. If avoidance of a hibernacula is not feasible, the Project Biologist will prepare a relocation plan to remove the hibernacula and provide for construction of an alternative bat roost outside of the work area. A bat roost relocation plan shall be submitted for CIDFW review prior to initiation of Project -related activities. The qualified biologist will implement the relocation plan and new roost sites shall be in place before the commencement of any ground -disturbing activities that will occur within 504 feet of the hibernacula. New roost sites shall be in place prior to the initiation of Project -related activities to allow enough time for bats to relocate. Removal of roosts will be guided by accepted exclusion and deterrent techniques. The City of La Quinta shall compensate no less than 2:1 for permanent impacts to roosting habitat. aterp:ty r e (typi Gaily March 1 to Au art 31), to all. -w time to prepare biaiogi6t shall deteFFfline the speeies of bats PFeSeRt a Rd the type of FeaSt (i.e-, day ,.{ •} 4 6W616SPEGIeS ad the e_t rat belAy 619ed as a aFc nil., but no dy_-rt r al of ActWLa r nAfiq .mill n r a qualified hat h:aiegist ch�Jl detapmwe appwpr lata a omdanr.a m • in rh inlw PRay nnlirin r.lornonW%inn of a a r.rl the anti ire r nc+ If SpeGlal_SWUS hatSP@Gi9_F_Matn4ty r OFA„f ar.,, hatSpeGler'r nrocant ' and dire_ _ royal of habitat (Foest lOGatiQR) Will O GOr then a qua!'Ced hat r eVelnp a mit:pati OR plan to r sate fpr tha IoiJ r not oitn ❑ArnAyAl of thq r.ct ch all.GWY n WIRep the Rq tigWIr. rtilan hoc. leer. a red by than:c.. A,4 Draft Final I August 2023 14 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 517 5ipfredo Fernandez City of La Quinta June -20, 2023 Page 12 Associate Planner LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Additionally, although the MND contains Mitigation Measure BIO -4b and 310-4c regarding the removal of trees that may provide roosting habitat for bats. CDFW considers these measures to be insufficient in scope and timing to reduce impacts to bats to less than significant. CDFW recommends that City of La Quinta revise Mitigation Measures 1310-4b and 1310- 4c, with additions in bold and removals in 64ik@tl;;G6i91;: Mitigation Measure BIO -4b: Avoidance of Bats during Tree Removal Tree removal work with the potential to house roosting bats shall be performed between September 15 and October 31 to minimize direct impacts to roosting bats. This time period is after young are volant (flying) but before expected onset of torpor (wintering inactivity). Tree removal work may also be conducted between February 15 and March 31, following winter torpor and prior to the start of the maternity season. No tree removals shall occur during the hibernation season, which typically begins in November or December (depending on weather conditions) and continues through mid-February, due to the high potential for mortality of hibernating bats. Depending on weather conditions and the best professional judgement of a qualified bat biologist approved by CDFW, tree removal work may be performed in November if the forecasted nighttime low temperatures on the evening of removal and the subsequentfour evenings do not drop below 45'F. In November, if weather is cold (i.e., forecasted nighttime low temperatures reach 45'F or less for that evening and the next four eveningsf, then no tree removals shall be performed. All tree removals shall require a two-step removal process and the involvement of a CDFW-approved qualified bat biologist to ensure that no roosting bats are killed during this activity. The following two-step tree removal process shall be implemented over two consecutive days: on Day 1, live palm fronds located above the Frond skirt, and as identified by a qualified Draft Final I August 2023 A-4 A•5 C Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 518 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 5ijifredo Fernandez, Associate Planner City of La Quints ,lune 20, 2023 Page 13 bat biologist, will be removed. On Day 2, the remainder of the tree may be removed without supervision by a qualified bat biologist. BIG -^gib 6ra@GtiYlt!e6r if ,tr,, are pFeSent , then trees shall be removed within two - _� ■ rrranr:nr.�s�� . }War,- - - - 5) Artificial fVighnime Lighting Goal LU -4 (page 4.1-7) indicates that the "Project lighting would be similar to the type and level of existing lighting provided in the Project area and it would comply with the Municipal code lighting requirements should ensure that all exterior lighting would be confined to the property to avoid spillover lighting impacts to adjoining properties.' The MND lacks details on the Project's actual lighting plans and lighting specifications. CDFW requests that the MND is revised to include a discussion of the Project's lightning plans and lightning specifications to be used over long-term operations of the Project to allow CDFVIIto conduct a meaningful review and provide expertise on activities that have the potential to adversely affect fish and wildlife resources. Additionally, because the Project is located adjacent to open -space areas that may support western yellow bat, nesting birds, migratory birds that fly at night, and other nocturnal and crepuscular wildlife, CDFVV recommends the MND is revised to include an analysis of the direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of artificial nighttime lighting expected to adversely affect biological resources surrounding the Project site. In general, available research indicates that artificial nighttime lighting alters ecological processes including, but not limited to, the temporal niches of species; the repair and recovery of physiological function; the measurement of time through interference with the detection of circadian and lunar and seasonal cycles; the detection of resources and Draft Final I August 2023 A-5 A-6 16 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 519 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 5ijifredo Fernandez, Associate Planner City of La Quints ,lune 20, 2023 Page 14 natural predators; and navigation.6 Further, many of the effects of artificial nighttime lighting on population- or ecosystem -level processes are still poorly understood suggesting that a precautionary approach should be taken when identifying and implementing appropriate avoidance and minimization measures concerning artificial nighttime lighting. To support the City of La Quinta in reducing impacts of artificial nighttime lighting on biological resources to less than significant, CDFW recommends that the City of La Quinta add to a revised MND the following mitigation measure: Mitigation Measure 8113-]B]: Artificial Nighttime Lighting Throughout the lifetime operations of the Project, the City of La Quinta shall eliminate all nonessential lighting throughout the Project area and avoid or limit the use of artificial light at night during the hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are most active. The City of La Quinta shall ensure that all lighting for the Project is fully shielded, cast downward, reduced in intensity to the greatest extent, and does not result in lighting trespass including glare into surrounding areas or upward into the night sky (see the International Dark -Sky Association standards at http://darksky.or_gl). The City of La Quinta shall ensure use of LED lighting with a correlated color temperature of 3,000 Kelvins or less, proper disposal of hazardous waste, and recycling of lighting that contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycler. 6) Landscaping Page 4.1-8 of the MND indicates that the Project proposes landscaping that includes "a mix of drought tolerant groundcover, shrubs and trees." The MND lades additional details on the plant species proposed for landscaping. To ameliorate the water demands of this Project, CDFW recommends incorporation of water -wise concepts in any Project landscape design pians. In particular, CDFW recommends xeriscaping with locally native California species and installing water -efficient and targeted irrigation systems (such as drip irrigation). Native plants support butterflies, birds, reptiles, amphibians, small mammals, bees, and other pollinators that evolved with those plants, more information on native plants suitable for the Project location and nearby nurseries is available at CALSCAPE: httos://ceiscai)e.ora/. Local water agencies/districts and resource conservation districts in your area may be able to provide information on plant nursenesthat carry locally native species, and some facilities display drought -tolerant locally native species demonstration gardens. Information on drought -tolerant 6 Gatson, K. J., Bennie, J., Davies, T_, Hopkins, J_ The eccbgical impacts of nighttime tight poiiuhon' a mechanistic appraisal. Biological Reviews, 88.4 (2M): 912-927. A-6 A-7 Draft Final I August 2023 17 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 520 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Sijifredo Fernandez, Associate Planner City of La Quinta June 20, 2023 Page 15 landscaping and water-efficierrt irrigation systems is available on Califomia's Save our Water website: https:llsaveourvvater.com/. CDFW also recommends that the DEIS include recommendations regarding landscaping from Section 4.0 of the CVMSHCP A-7 "Table 4-112: Coachella Valley Native Plants Recommended for Landscaping" (pp. 4- 180 to 4-182: https://ovmshcn.ora/plan-documentso. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA CEQA requires that information developed in environmental impact reports and negative declarations be incorporated into a database which may be used to make subsequent or supplemental environmental determinations. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21003, subd. (e).) Accordingly, please report any special status species and natural communities detected during Project surveys to the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). The CNNDB field survey form can be filled out and submitted online at the following link: httos://wildlife.ca.- ov/Data1CNDDB/Submitting-Data. The types of information reported to CNDDB can be found at the following link: httVs://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Plants-and-Animals. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT FILING FEES The Project, as proposed, would have an impact on fish and/or wildlife, and assessment of environmental document filing fees is necessary. Fees are payable upon filing of the Notice of Determination by the Lead Agency and serve to help defray the cost of environmental review by CDFW. Payment of the environmental document filing fee is required in order for the underlying Project approval to be operative, vested, and final. {Cal. Code Regs, tit. 14, § 753.5; Fish & G. Code, § 711.4; Pub. Resources Code, § 21089.} CONCLUSIONS CDFW appreciates the opportunity to comment on the MND to assist City of La Quinta in identifying and mitigating Project impacts to biological resources. CDFW concludes that the MND does not adequately identify or mitigate the Project's significant, or potentially significant, impacts to biological resources. CDFW also concludes that the MND lacks sufficient information for a meaningful review of impacts to biological resources, including a complete project description and recent assessment of biological resources on the Project site. The CEQA Guidelines indicate that recirculation is required when insufficient information in the MND precludes a meaningful review j§ 15088.5) or when a new significant effect is identified and additional mitigation measures are necessary (§ 15073.5). CDFW recommends that a revised MND, including a complete Project description including lighting plans and specifications and a recent assessment of impacts to biological resources be recirculated for public comment. CDVVF also recommends that revised and additional mitigation measures as described in this letter be added to a revised MND. Draft Final I August 2023 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 521 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Sijifredo Fernandez, Associate Planner City of La Quinta June 20, 2023 Page 16 CDFW personnel are available for consultation regarding biological resources and strategies to minimize impacts. Questions regarding this letter or further coordination should be directed to Jacob Skaggs, Environmental Scientist, at jacob.skagasQwildIife.ca. gov. Sincerely, �F) ow sg��d "br �14i 1rY[.u9l,4YlA. a4FVZFFEEFa24C8... Kirn Freeburn Environmental Program Manager Attachment 1: MMRP for CDFW-Proposed Mitigation Measures e c: Heather Brashear, Senior Environmental Scientist (Supervisor), CDFW Heather. Brashearp_Wild life. ca.ciov Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse, Sacramento State.clearinLthouseO,oi?r.ca.gov Rollie White, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service rollie white@tws.gov Vincent James, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service vincent james6bfvus.gov ATTACHMENT 1: MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (MMRP) Mitigation Measures Timing and Responsible Methods Parties Draft Final I August 2023 19 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 522 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 5ijifredo Femandez, Associate Planner City of La Quinta June 20, 2023 Page 17 Mitigation Measure SIO -[A]: Assessment of Timing: Prior to Implementation: Biological Resources Project City of La 0 uiNa construction Prior to Project construction activities, a complete activities Monitoring and and recent inventory of rare, threatened, endangered, Reporting: City of La and other sensitive species located within the Project Methods: See Quirita footprint and within offsite areas with the potential to M itigation be affected, including California Species of Special Measure Concern (GSSG) and California Fully Protected Species (Fish and Garne Code § 3511), will be completed. Spec#es to be addressed should include all those which meet the CEQA definition (CEQA Guidelines § 15380). The inventory should address seasonal variations In use of the Project area and should not be limited to resident species. Focused species-specific surveys, completed by a qualified biologist and conducted at the appropriate time of year and time of day when the sensitive species are active or otherwise identifiable are required. Acceptable species-specific survey procedures should be developed in consultation with CDFW and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, where necessary. Note that CDFW generally considers biological field assessments for wildlife to be valid for a one-year period, and assessments for rare plants may be considered vat id for a period of up to three years. Some aspects of the proposed Project maywarrant periodic updated surveys for certain sensitive taxa, particularly if the Project is proposed to occur over a protracted Hme frame, or in phases, or If surveys are completed during periods of drought. Mitigation Measure 610-2: Burrowing Owl Avoidance Timing Priorto Implementation: the start of Project Appl icard Suitable burrowing owl habitat has been confirmed Project -related on the Projects" and surrounding area, therefore, activities for Monitoring and focused burrowing owi surveys shall be conducted in focused surveys. Reporting: City of La accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl No less than 14 Quina Mitigation (2D12 or most recent version) prior to days prior to the vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities. If start of Project - burrowing ovals are detected during the focused related activities surveys, the qualified biologist and Project Applicant and within 24 shall prepare a Burrowing Owl flan that shalt be hours prior to submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to ground commencing Project activities. The Burrowing Owl disturbance for Plan shall describe proposed avoidance, preconstruction minimization, mitigation, and monitoring actions. The surveys. Burrowing Owl Plan shal I include the number and location of occupied burrow sites, acres of burrowing owl habitat that will be impacted, details of site Draft Final I August 2023 7n Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 523 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 5ijifredo Femandez, Associate Planner City of La Quinta June 20, 2023 Page 18 monitoring, and details on proposed buffers and Methods: See other avoidance measures if avoidance is proposed. Mitigation N impacts to occupied burrowing owl habitat or Measure burrow cannot be avoided, the Burrowing owl Plan shall also describe minimization and relocation actions that will be implemented. Proposed implementation of burrow exclusion and closure should only be considered as a last resort, after all other options have been evaluated as exclusion is not in itself an avoidance, "nimization, or mitigation method and has the possibility to result In take. If impacts to occupied burrows cannot be avoided, information shall be provided regarding adjacent or nearby suitable habitat available to owls along with proposed relocation actions. The Project proponent shall implement the Burrowing Owl Plan following CDFW and USFWS review and approval. Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Project -related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing awl Alitigation (2012 or most recent version). Preconstruction surveys should be performed by a qualified biologist following the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl M ugrafiar►. If the preconstruction surveys confirm occupied burrowing owl habitat, Project activities shall be immediately halted. Thequaliffed biologist shall coordinate with GDFW and prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to COFW and USFWS for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. Mitigation Measure 810-3: Nesting Birds Timing- No more Implementation: than 3 days prior City of La Quetta Regardless of the time of year, nesting bird surveys to vegetation shall be performed by a qualified avian hiologist no removal or Monitoring and more than 3 days prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing Reporting. City of La ground -disturbing activities. Pre construction activities. Quinta surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and Methods: See nesting behavior. The qualified avian biologist will Mitigation make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as Measure a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the pre -construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 300 feet for passerines and SOD feet for raptors. A smaller or larger busier may be determined by the Draft Final I August 2023 21 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 524 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 5ijifredo Femandez, Associate Planner City of La Quinta June 20, 2023 Page 19 qualified hloIogist fami ITar with the nesting phenol ogyof the nesting species and based on nest and buffer monitoring results. Established buffers shall remain on site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualifled biologist untlI thequalitled biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work If nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. Mitigation Measure 8104a: Surveys for Daytime, Timing: Prior to Implementation Nighttime, Wintering (Hibernacuta), and Maternity initiation of Project City of La Quirita Roosting S9tes for Bats activities Monitoring and Prior to the initiation of Project activities within Methods: See Reporting: City of La suitable bat roosting habitat, City of La Quinta shall Mitigation Quinta retain a qualified biologist to conduct focused Measure surveys to determine presence of daytime, nighttime, wintering (hibernacula), and maternity roost sites. Two spring surveys (April through June) and two winter surveys (November through January) shall be performed by qualified biologists. Surveys shall be conducted during favorable weather conditions only. Each survey shall consist of one dusk emergence survey (start one hour before sunsiat and last for three hours), followed by one predawn re-entry survey (start one hour before sunrise and last for two hours), and one daytime visual inspection of all potential roosting habitat on the Project site. Surveys shall be conducted within one 24-hour period. Visual inspections shall focus on the identification of bat sign (i.e., individuals, guano, urine staining, corpses, feeding remains, scratch marks and bats squeaking and chattering). Bat detectors, bat call analysis, and visual observation shall be used during all dusk emergence and pre -dawn re-entry surveys. if active hibernacula or maternity roosts are Identified in the work area or SW feet extending from the work area during preconstruction surveys, for maternity roosts, Project activities will be initiated between October f and February 2% outside of the maternity roosting season when young bats are present but are not yet ready to fly nut of the roost. Ntaternity roosts shall not be evicted, excluded, removed, or disturbed. A minimum SOQ-foot no -work buffer shall be provided around hibernacula. The buffer shall not be reduced. Draft Final I August 2023 22 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 525 5ijifredo Fernandez, Associate Planner City of La Quinta June 20, 2023 Page 20 occur within 500 feet of or directly under or adjacent to hibernacula. Buffers shall be left in place uTdil a qualified bat biologist determines that the hibernacula are no longer active. Within this buffer, Project -related activities shall not occur between 30 minutes before sunset and 30 minutes after sunrise. Hibernacula roosts shall not be evicted, excluded, removed, or disturbed. If avoidance of a hibernacula is not feasible, the Project Biologist will prepare a relocation plan to remove the hibernacula and provide for construction of an alternative bat roost outs Ida of the work area. A bat roost relocation plan shall be submitted for CDFW review prior to initiation of Project -related activities. The qualified biologist will implement the relocation plan and new roost sites shall be in place before the commencement of any ground -disturbing activities that will occur within 600 feet of the hibernacula. New roost sites shall be in place prior to the initiation of Project -related activities to allow enough time for bats to relocate. Removal of roosts will be guided by accepted exclusion and deterrent techniques. The City of La Quinta shall compensate no less than 2:1 for permanent impacts to roosting habitat. Mitigation Measure BI0-4b: Avoidance of Bats during Timing: During Tree Removal Project activities Tree removal work with the potential to house Methods: See roosting bats shall be performed between September M itigation 15 and October 31 to minimize direct impacts to Measure roosting bats. Thus time period Is after young are volant (flying) but before expected onset of torpor (wintering inactivity). Tree removal work may also be conducted between February 15 and March 31, fol lovvfng winter torpor and prior to the start of the maternity season. No tree removals shall occur during the hibernation season, which typically begins in November or December (depending on weather conditions) and continues through mid-February, due to the high potential for mortality of hibernating bats. Depending on weather conditions and the best professional judgement of a qualified bat biologist approved by CDFW, tree removal work may be performed in November if the forecasted nighttime low temperatures on the Evening of removal and the subsequent four evenings do not drop below 45'F. In November, if weather is cold (i.e., forecasted nighttime low temperatures reach 45'F or less for that evening and the next four evenings), then no tree Draft Final I August 2023 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Implementation: Project Appl icant Monitoring and Reporting: City of La Quinta 73 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 526 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 5ijifredo Fernandez, Associate Planner City of La Quinta June 20, 2023 Page 21 removals shall be performed. All tree removals shall require a two-step removal process and the involvement of a CDFW-approved qualified bat biologist to ensure that no roosting bats are killed during this activity. The following two-step tree removal process shall be inWlemented over two consecutive days: on Day 1, live palm fronds located above the frond skirt, and as identified by a quahfled bat biologist, will be removed. 0n Day 2, the remainder of the tree may be removed without supervision by a qualified hat biologist. Mitigation Measure BIO -[B]: Artificial Nighttime Timing: Implementation: Lighting Throughout the City of La Qkuinta lifetime operations Throughout the lifetime operations of the Project, the oft hL, Project Monitoring and City of La Quinta shall eliminate all nonessential Reporting; City of La lighting throughout the Project area and avoid or limit Methods: See Qui nta the use of artificial light at night during the hours of M itigation dawn and duskwin en mmnywiIdlife species are most Measure active. The City of La Quinta shall ensure that all lighting for the Project is fully shielded, cast downward, reduced in intensity to the greatest extent, and does not result in lighting trespass including glare into surrounding areas or upward into the night sky [see the International Dark -Sky Association standards at http:ffdarksky.org!}_ The City of La Qulnta shall ensure use of LED lighting with a correlated color temperature of 3,000 Kelvins or less, proper disposal of hazardous waste, and recycling of lighting that contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycier. Draft Final I August 2023 24 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 527 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Response No. A Kim Freeburn, Environmental Program Manager I Inland Desert Region State of California — Natural Resources Agency I Department of Fish and Wildlife June 20, 2023 Comment A-1: The comment identifies that the biological surveys for the project were completed in September of 2021 and that the CDFW generally considers biological assessments valid for a one-year period and has recommended that that the IS/MND be revised to include the findings of a recent inventory of rare, threatened, endangered and other sensitive species conducted on the project site and on offsite areas that have the potential to be affected by the project. Response: The Lead Agency disagrees with the comment and believes that the biological resources on the project site and on offsite areas were adequately evaluated in the IS/MND, and that the existing biological surveys are still adequate to describe and evaluate impacts on the project site and on offsite areas and the recommended mitigation measure to conduct additional biological surveys is not needed. Comment A-2: The comment identifies that the IS/MND indicates that burrowing owl as low to moderate potential to occur on the project site and that the existing mitigation measure is adequate to reduce impacts to less than significant and that existing Mitigation BIO -2 in the IS/MND be replaced with CDFW recommended mitigation measure. Response: The following is a revised mitigation measure to replace Mitigation Measure BIO -2 in the Final IS/MND: Mitigation Measure BIO -2: Suitable burrowing owl habitat has been confirmed on the Project site and surrounding area; therefore, focused burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012 or most recent version) prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities. If burrowing owls are detected during the focused surveys, the qualified biologist and Project Applicant shall prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall describe proposed avoidance, minimization, mitigation, and monitoring actions. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall include the number and location of occupied burrow sites, acres of burrowing owl habitat that will be impacted, details of site monitoring, and details on proposed buffers and other avoidance measures if avoidance is proposed. If impacts to occupied burrowing owl habitat or burrow cannot be avoided, the Burrowing Owl Plan shall also describe minimization and relocation actions that will be implemented. Proposed implementation of burrow exclusion and closure should only be considered as a last resort, after all other options have been evaluated as exclusion is not in itself an avoidance, minimization, or mitigation method and has the possibility to result in take. If impacts to occupied burrows cannot be avoided, information shall be provided regarding adjacent or nearby suitable habitat available to owls along with proposed relocation actions. Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Project -related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012 or most recent version). Preconstruction surveys should be Draft Final I August 2023 25 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 528 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration performed by aqua I ified biologist following the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. Comment A-3: The comment identifies that Mitigation Measure BIO -3 in the IS/MND requires that suitable habitats be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds if construction activities occur during the nesting, from February 15 to August 31 for songbirds and from January 15 to August 31 for raptors. The comment recommends that disturbances of occupied nests of migratory birds and raptors within the project site and surrounding area be avoided at all times and that Mitigation Measure BIO -3 in the IS/MND be replaced with CDFW recommended mitigation measure. Response: The following is a revised mitigation measure to replace Mitigation Measure BIO -3 in the Final IS/MND. Mitigation Measure BIO -3: Regardless of the time of year, nesting bird surveys shall be performed by a qualified avian biologist no more than 3 days prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities. Pre -construction surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior. The qualified avian biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the pre -construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A smaller or larger buffer may be determined by a qualified biologist familiar with the nesting phenology of the nesting species and based on nest and buffer monitoring results. Established buffers shall remain on site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. A qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. Comment A-4: The comment identifies that the IS/MND indicates that "due to the potential for bat species, including the pocketed free -tailed and Western yellow bat [(Lasiurus xanthinus; Species of Special Concern, Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) Covered Species)] to occur within the Project site and with the potential for these species to roost in untrimmed date palms, project construction could result in impacts to roosting bats and that CDFW considers Mitigation Measure 1310-4a in the IS/MND to be insufficient to reduce impacts to bats to less than significant and that the existing Mitigation Measure 1310-4a be replaced with CDFW recommended mitigation measure. Response: The following is a revised mitigation measure to replace Mitigation Measure BIO -4 in the Final IS/MND. Mitigation Measure BIO -4a: Prior to the initiation of Project activities within suitable bat roosting habitat, the Applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct focused surveys to determine presence of daytime, nighttime, wintering (hibernacula), and maternity roost sites. Two spring surveys (April through June) and two winter surveys (November through January) shall be performed by qualified biologists. Surveys shall be conducted during favorable weather conditions only. Each survey shall consist of one dusk emergence survey (start one hour before sunset and last for three hours), followed by one pre -dawn re-entry survey (start one hour before sunrise and last for two hours), and Draft Final I August 2023 21 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 529 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration one daytime visual inspection of all potential roosting habitat on the Project site. Surveys shall be conducted within one 24-hour period. Visual inspections shall focus on the identification of bat sign (i.e., individuals, guano, urine staining, corpses, feeding remains, scratch marks and bats squeaking and chattering). Bat detectors, bat call analysis, and visual observation shall be used during all dusk emergence and pre -dawn re-entry surveys. If active hibernacula or maternity roosts are identified in the work area or 500 feet extending from the work area during preconstruction surveys, for maternity roosts, Project activities will be initiated between October 1 and February 28, outside of the maternity roosting season when young bats are present but are not yet ready to fly out of the roost. Maternity roosts shall not be evicted, excluded, removed, or disturbed. A minimum 500 -foot no -work buffer shall be provided around hibernacula. The buffer shall not be reduced. Project -related construction and activities shall not occur within 500 feet of or directly under or adjacent to hibernacula. Buffers shall be left in place until a qualified bat biologist determines that the hibernacula are no longer active. Within this buffer, Project -related activities shall not occur between 30 minutes before sunset and 30 minutes after sunrise. Hibernacula roosts shall not be evicted, excluded, removed, or disturbed. If avoidance of hibernacula is not feasible, the Project Biologist will prepare a relocation plan to remove the hibernacula and provide for construction of an alternative bat roost outside of the work area. The qualified biologist will implement the relocation plan and new roost sites shall be in place before the commencement of any ground -disturbing activities that will occur within 500 feet of the hibernacula. New roost sites shall be in place prior to the initiation of Project -related activities to allow enough time for bats to relocate. Removal of roosts will be guided by accepted exclusion and deterrent techniques. The Applicant shall compensate no less than 2:1 for permanent impacts to roosting habitat. Comment A-5: The comment identifies that the IS/MND contains Mitigation Measure BIO -4b and BIO - 4c regarding the removal of trees that may provide roosting habitat for bats and that CDFW considers these measures to be insufficient to reduce impacts to bats to less than significant and recommends the existing Mitigation Measures BIO -4b and BIO -4c be replaced with CDFW recommended mitigation measure. Response: The Lead Agency disagrees with the comment and believes that existing Mitigation Measures BIO -4b and BIO -4c adequately address CDFW concerns regarding potential impacts to bats and that no revisions to the existing Mitigation Measures BIO -4b and BIO -4c are needed. Comment A-6: CDFW requests that the IS/MND be revised to include a discussion of the Project's lightning plans and lightning specifications to be used over long-term operations of the Project and that the revised analysis in the IS/MND evaluate direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts on biological resources from artificial nighttime lighting and that the existing Mitigation Measure BIO -4d be replaced with CDFW recommended Mitigation Measure. Response: The Lead Agency disagrees with the comment and believes that existing analysis adequately evaluates direct, indirect, and cumulative impact on biological resources from artificial nighttime lighting. To ensure that lighting impacts are minimized during the operation of the project, the existing Mitigation BIO -4 has been replaced with the following Mitigation Measure and is incorporated into the Final IS/MND. Draft Final I August 2023 27 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 530 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Measure 13I0 -4d: Throughout the lifetime operations of the Project, the Applicant shall eliminate all nonessential lighting throughout the Project area and avoid or limit the use of artificial light at night during the hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are most active. The City of La Quinta shall ensure that all lighting for the Project is fully shielded, cast downward, reduced in intensity to the greatest extent, and does not result in lighting trespass including glare into surrounding areas or upward into the night sky (see the International Dark -Sky Association standards at http://darksky.org/). The City of La Quinta shall ensure use of LED lighting with a correlated color temperature of 3,000 Kelvins or less, proper disposal of hazardous waste, and recycling of lighting that contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycler. Comment A-7: The comment suggests that the IS/MND lacks additional details on the plant species proposed for landscaping and that the IS/MND include recommendations regarding landscaping from Section 4.0 of the CVMSHCP. Response: The project description in the IS/MND in Conceptual Landscape Plan includes landscape intended to complement the Coachella Valley desert environment. Additionally, the proposed project would be required to comply with Section 8.13 of the City of La Quinta Municipal Code Water Efficient Landscape requirements which is intended to promote water conservation through climate appropriate plant material and efficient irrigation as well as to create a city landscape theme through enhancing and improving the physical and natural environment. Draft Final I August 2023 28 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 531 IID A coIttIfy {] f e?'I4ce. .funis 28, 2023 5ijifredo Fernandez Associate Planner Development & Design Department City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration COMMENT LETTER NO. B www lid.com Share 1911 SUBJECT: NOI to Adopt an MND La Villetta at Avenue 58 Project in La Quinta, CA; EA 2021-0006, GPA 2021-0001, ZC 2021-0001, TTM 2021-0004, CUP 2021- 0002 Dear Mr. Fernandez: On June 19, 2023, the Imperial Irrigation District received from the City of La Quinta Design & Development Deptartment, the Notice of Intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the La Wletta at Avenue 58 project; Environmental Assessment, 2021- 0006, General Plan Amendment 2021-0001, Zone Change 2021-0041, Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004, Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002. The applicant proposes the development of 80 single-family homes on approximately 9.7 gross acres and associated site improvements, including landscaping, utility infrastructure, a clubhouse, pool, and community spaces. The project site is located south of Avenue 58 between Madison Street and Monroe Street in the City of La Quinta, Califomia (APNs 754-180-002 and - 003). The IID has reviewed the project information and has the following comments: 1. Based on the preliminary information provided to IID, the power load requirements to serve the project will require the installation of a new 92/13.2 kV 1-50 MVA transformer bank at the existing Avenue 58 substation, the reconfiguration of 92 W transmission lines and all additional infrastructure related to the new transformer bank. Applicant will be required to install a double conduit/vault system from the Avenue 58 substatlon's new bank to the project for a minimum of six distribution backbone feeders. The proposed route for this system is planned to come out of Avenue 58 substation, cross Avenue 58 and continue on the south side of Avenue 58 going west all the way to your project. The whole conduit system will be required to be in place prior to extending the new feeders/backbone line extensions (conduit, cable) from the Avenue 58 substation's new 50 MVA transformer circuit breakers to the project. IMPMAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT - P,0, SOX 937 • INIPERIAL, CA92251 B-1 Draft Final I August 2023 29 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 532 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Sijilredo Fernandez June 28, 2023 Page 2 3. Applicant will be required to extend distribution backbone feeders as part of the new substation transformer implementation, which includes the associated backbone cable/terminations from Avenue 58 substation's new 50 MVA transformer circuit breakers to the project load centers. IID will not begin any studies, engineering or estimate costs to provide electrical service to the development project until the applicant submits a customer project application (available at http://www.iid.cam/home/showdocument?id=12923 and detailed loading information, panel sizes, project schedule and estimated in- service date. Applicant shall bear all costs associated with providing electrical service to the development project, including but not limited to the construction andlor addition of a 1-50 MVA transformer, new substation facilities and Infrastructure, transmission line extensions/reconfigurations, conduit and vault systems, distribution feeder breakers, feeder backbones and distribution overhead and/or underground line extensions and the re -configuration of distribution lines and related upgrades as well as applicable permits, zoning changes, landscaping (if required by the City) and rights-of-way and easements. The applicant shall bear the cost of the substation infrastructure to serve the project but would be reimbursed for any oversizing required, subject to approval by the IID Board of Directors_ The district's ability to provide service from existing infrastructure is based on current avaiiable capacity, which may be impacted by future development in the area. The projects must progress toward completion as Ilia is unable to hold system capacity to the detriment of other customers. It is important to note that a detailed and final study will be developed once a customer project application and loading calculations are received. This detailed information will allow IID to perform an accurate assessment and provide a full report of any potential impacts and mitigation measures. The conditions of service could change as a result of the additional studies. 7. Underground infrastructure that includes trenching, aandults, pull boxes, switch boxes and pads should be installed by the applicant following IID approved plans. Physical field installation of underground infrastructures should be verified and approved by an HD inspector prior to cable installation as per IID Developer's Guide (available at https://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=14229). B. IID Regulations goveming line extensions can be found at: No.2 (http://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=2540), No. 13 (htti):Ifwww.i d_.comfhome/showdocument?id=2553), No. 15 (http://www.iid.conVhorne/showdocument?id=2555), No. 20 (http://www.iid.com/horne/showdocurnent?id=2560) and No. 23 (https://www.iid.com/homelshowdocument?id=17897]. B -i Draft Final I August 2023 30 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 533 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 5iji#redo Fernandez June 23, 2023 Page 3 9. For additional information regarding electrical service for the projects, the applicant should be advised to contact the IID Energy - La Quinta Division Customer Operations, 81-600 Avenue 58 La Quinta, CA 92253, at (760) 398-5841 and speak with the project development planner assigned to the area. 10. It is important to note that IID's policy is to extend its electrical facilities only to those projects that have obtained the approval of a city or county planning commission and such other governmental authority or decision-making body having jurisdiction over said projects. 11.The applicant will be required to provide and bear all costs associated with acquisition of rights of way, easements, and infrastructure relocations deemed necessary to accommodate street or road improvements imposed by the municipality. 12,Any construction or operation on HD property or within its existing and proposed right of way or easements Including but not limited to: surface improvements such as proposed new streets, driveways, parking lots, landscape; and all water, sewer, storm water, or any other above ground or underground utilities; will require an encroachment permit, or encroachment agreement (depending on the circumstances). A copy of the HD encroachment permit application and instructions for its completion are available at https:l/www.ild.corn/about-ild/doi)artment directory/Feal-estate. The IIID Real Estate Section should be contacted at (760) 339-9239 for additional information regarding encroachment permits or agreements. 13. Any new, relocated, modified or reconstructed IID facilities required for and by the projects (which can include but is not limited to electrical utility substations, electrical transmission and distribution lines; the acquisition and dedication of real property, rights of way and/or easements for the siting and construction of electrical utility substations, electrical transmission and/or distribution lines and ancillary facilities associated with the conveyance of energy service, etc.) need to be included as part of the project's California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) andlor National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation, environmental impact analysis and mitigation. Failure to do so will result in postponement of any construction and/or modification of IID facilities until such time as the environmental documentation is amended and environmental impacts are fully mitigated. Any mitigation necessary as a result of the construction, relocation and/or upgrade of IID facilities is the responsibility of the project proponent. 14. Dividing a project into two or more pieces and evaluating each piece in a separate environmental document (Piecemealing or Segmenting), rather than evaluating the whole of the project in one environmental document, is explicitly forbidden by CEQA, because dividing a project into a number of pieces would allow a Lead B•1 Draft Final I August 2023 31 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 534 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Sijifredo Fernandez June 28, 2023 Page 4 Agency to minimize the apparent environmental impacts of a project by evaluating individual pieces separately, each of which may have a less -than -significant impact on the environment, but which together may result in a significant impact. Segmenting a project may also hinder developing comprehensive mitigation strategies. In general, if an activity or facility is necessary for the operation of a project, or necessary to achieve the project objectives, or a reasonably foreseeable consequence of approving the project, then it should be considered an integral project component that should be analyzed within the environmental analysis. The project description should include all project components, including those that will have to be approved by responsible agencies. The State CEQA Guidelines define a project under CEQA as "the whole of the action" that may result either directly or indirectly in physical changes to the environment. This broad definition is intended to provide the maximum protection of the environment. CEQA case law has established general principles on project segmentation for different project types. For a project requiring construction of offsite infrastructure, the offsite infrastructure must be included in the prefect description. San Joaquin RaptorlWildJife Rescue Center v. County of Stanislaus (1994) 27 Cal.App. 4th 713. 15.Applicant should be advised that landscaping can be dangerous if items are planted too close to IID's electrical equipment. In the event of an outage, or equipment failure, it is vital that IID personnel have immediate and safe access to its equipment to make the needed repairs. For public safety, and that of the electrical workers, it is important to adhere to standards that limit landscaping around electrical facilities. 111D landscaping guidelines are available at https:llwww.iid.com/enemytyegetation-managemen . Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (760) 482-3609 or at dvargas@iid.com. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this matter, 71aald lly, rg' -1 Compliance Administrator II Sergio auira - Interim General Manager Mlke Pacheco - Manager, water Dept Jarnle Asbury-Mamger, Energy❑ept. Matthew H Smelse+_ Deputy Mgr- Energy Dept- Daryl9UGWey - Mgr, of DistHWWn Sacs. 6 lealnL 4prfn5., Energy Dept Geoff Holbrook - General Counsel M Ichael P. Kerr. -p - Superintandent General, Fleet Sentces and Reg. & Environ. Compliance Lawa Cervantes. -Supervisor, Real Estate B-1 Draft Final I August 2023 32 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 535 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Response No. B Donald Vargas, Compliance Administrator II Imperial Irrigation District June 28, 2023 Comment B-1: The comment identifies electrical service infrastructure improvements required for the proposed project. Response: The comment does not provide any comments on the IS/MND prepared for the project or identifies new significant impact or introduces new information that would change a less than significant impact determination to a significant impact. No response is required. Draft Final I August 2023 33 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 536 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration This page intentionally left blank. Draft Final I August 2023 34 Responsible and Reviewing Agencies 537 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 3.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that when a public agency completes an environmental document which includes measures to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects, the public agency must adopt a reporting or monitoring plan. This requirement ensures that environmental impacts found to be significant will be mitigated. The reporting or monitoring plan must be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6),In compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, Table 7-1, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist, has been prepared for the La Villetta at Avenue 58 (the "project"). This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist is intended to provide verification that all applicable Conditions of Approval relative to significant environmental impacts are monitored and reported. Monitoring will include: 1) verification that each mitigation measure has been implemented; 2) recordation of the actions taken to implement each mitigation; and 3) retention of records in the City of La Quinta Project file. This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) delineates responsibilities for monitoring the project, but also allows the City flexibility and discretion in determining how best to monitor implementation. Monitoring procedures will vary according to the type of mitigation measure. Adequate monitoring consists of demonstrating that monitoring procedures took place and that mitigation measures were implemented. This includes the review of all monitoring reports, enforcement actions, and document disposition, unless otherwise noted in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist (Table 1). If an adopted mitigation measure is not being properly implemented, the designated monitoring personnel shall require corrective actions to ensure adequate implementation. Reporting consists of establishing a record that a mitigation measure is being implemented, and generally involves the following steps: • The City distributes reporting forms to the appropriate entities for verification of compliance. • Departments/agencies with reporting responsibilities will review the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, which provides general background information on the reasons for including specified mitigation measures. • Problems or exceptions to compliance will be addressed to the City as appropriate. • Periodic meetings may be held during project implementation to report on compliance of mitigation measures. • Responsible parties provide the City with verification that monitoring has been conducted and ensure, as applicable, that mitigation measures have been implemented. Monitoring compliance may be documented through existing review and approval programs such as field inspection reports and plan review. • The City prepares a reporting form periodically during the construction phase and an annual report summarizing all project mitigation monitoring efforts. • Appropriate mitigation measures will be included in construction documents and/or conditions of permits/approvals. Draft Final I August 2023 35 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 538 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Minor changes to the MMRP, if required, would be made in accordance with CEQA and would be permitted after further review and approval by the City. Such changes could include reassignment of monitoring and reporting responsibilities, plan redesign to make any appropriate improvements, and/or modification, substitution or deletion of mitigation measures subject to conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. No change will be permitted unless the MMRP continues to satisfy the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. Draft Final I August 2023 36 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 539 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Method of Monitoring Verification of Compliance Number Mitigation Measure Verification Timing Responsibility Initials Date Remarks BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES BIO -1 CVMSCHP Mitigation Fee. The project Impact Fees Prior to City of La proponent shall be required to pay the City of La Receipt ground Quinta Planning Quinta a local development mitigation fee prior disturbance Department to obtaining a building permit. (demolition, grading and/or construction) BIO -2 Suitable burrowing owl habitat has been Submittal of Pre- Prior to City of La confirmed on the Project site and surrounding Construction ground Quinta Planning area; therefore, focused burrowing owl surveys Survey to Planning disturbance Department shall be conducted in accordance with the Staff Staff (demolition, Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012 or grading most recent version) prior to vegetation and/or removal or ground -disturbing activities. If construction) burrowing owls are detected during the focused surveys, the qualified biologist and Project Applicant shall prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall describe proposed avoidance, minimization, mitigation, and monitoring actions. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall include the number and location of occupied burrow sites, acres of burrowing owl habitat that will be impacted, details of site monitoring, and details on proposed buffers and other avoidance measures if avoidance is proposed. If impacts to occupied burrowing owl habitat or burrow cannot be avoided, the Burrowing Owl Plan shall also describe minimization and relocation actions that will be implemented. Proposed implementation of burrow exclusion and closure should only be considered as a last resort, after all other Draft Final I August 2023 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 540 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Method of Monitoring Verification of Compliance Number Mitigation Measur Verification Timing Responsibility Initials Date Remarks options ave een eva uate as exc usion is not in itself an avoidance, minimization, or mitigation method and has the possibility to result in take. If impacts to occupied burrows cannot be avoided, information shall be provided regarding adjacent or nearby suitable habitat available to owls along with proposed relocation actions. Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Project -related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012 or most recent version). Preconstruction surveys should be performed by a qualified biologist following the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. BIO -3 Regardless of the time of year, nesting bird Submittal of Prior to City of La surveys shall be performed by a qualified avian monitoring ground Quinta Planning biologist no more than 3 days prior to contracts, fully disturbance Department vegetation removal or ground -disturbing executed (demolition, activities. Pre -construction surveys shall focus grading on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, and/or including nest locations and nesting behavior. construction) The qualified avian biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the pre -construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 300 feet for Draft Final I August 2023 �o Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 541 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Method of Monitoring Verification of Compliance Number Mitigation Measur Verification Timing Responsibility Initials Date Remarks passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A smaller or larger buffer may be determined by a qualified biologist familiar with the nesting phenology of the nesting species and based on nest and buffer monitoring results. Established buffers shall remain on site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. A qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. 1310-4a Prior to the initiation of Project activities within Submittal of Prior to City of La suitable bat roosting habitat, the Applicant shall monitoring ground Quinta Planning retain a qualified biologist to conduct focused contracts, fully disturbance Department surveys to determine presence of daytime, executed (demolition, nighttime, wintering (hibernacula), and grading maternity roost sites. Two spring surveys (April and/or through June) and two winter surveys construction) (November through January) shall be performed by qualified biologists. Surveys shall be conducted during favorable weather conditions only. Each survey shall consist of one dusk emergence survey (start one hour before sunset and last for three hours), followed by one pre -dawn re-entry survey (start one hour before sunrise and last for two hours), and one daytime visual inspection of all potential roosting habitat on the Project site. Surveys shall be conducted within one 24-hour period. Visual inspections shall focus on the identification of bat sign (i.e., Draft Final I August 2023 I9 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 542 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Number Mitigation Measure A& Method of Verification Timing Monitoring Responsibility Verification of Compliance Initials Date Remar — individuals, guano, urine staining, corpses, feeding remains, scratch marks and bats squeaking and chattering). Bat detectors, bat call analysis, and visual observation shall be used during all dusk emergence and pre -dawn re-entry surveys. If active hibernacula or maternity roosts are identified in the work area or 500 feet extending from the work area during preconstruction surveys, for maternity roosts, Project activities will be initiated between October 1 and February 28, outside of the maternity roosting season when young bats are present but are not yet ready to fly out of the roost. Maternity roosts shall not be evicted, excluded, removed, or disturbed. A minimum 500 -foot no -work buffer shall be provided around hibernacula. The buffer shall not be reduced. Project -related construction and activities shall not occur within 500 feet of or directly under or adjacent to hibernacula. Buffers shall be left in place until a qualified bat biologist determines that the hibernacula are no longer active. Within this buffer, Project -related activities shall not occur between 30 minutes before sunset and 30 minutes after sunrise. Hibernacula roosts shall not be evicted, excluded, removed, or disturbed. If avoidance of hibernacula is not feasible, the Project Biologist will prepare a relocation plan to remove the hibernacula and provide for construction of an alternative bat roost outside of the work area. Draft Final I August 2023 AA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 543 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Method of Monitoring Verification of Compliance Number Mitigation Measure A& Verification Timing Responsibility Initials Date Remar The qualified biologist will implement the relocation plan and new roost sites shall be in place before the commencement of any ground -disturbing activities that will occur within 500 feet of the hibernacula. New roost sites shall be in place prior to the initiation of Project -related activities to allow enough time for bats to relocate. Removal of roosts will be guided by accepted exclusion and deterrent techniques. The Applicant shall compensate no less than 2:1 for permanent impacts to roosting habitat. BIO -4b Pre -construction surveys shall be conducted by Submittal of Prior to City of La a qualified bat biologist no more than two weeks monitoring ground Quinta Planning prior to the initiation of vegetation removal and contracts, fully disturbance Department ground disturbing activities. If no active roosts executed (demolition, are present, then trees shall be removed within grading two weeks following the survey. and/or construction) BIO -4c All potential roost trees (including palm trees) Acknowledgement Prior to City of La shall be removed in a manner approved by a by the Applicant ground Quinta Planning qualified bat biologist outside the maternity disturbance Department season (March 15 — August 31 in the Coachella (demolition, Valley which coincides with the bird nesting grading season) to avoid the potential for "take" of and/or nonvolant (flightless) young. construction) Trees and snags that have been identified as confirmed or potential roost sites require a two-step removal process and the involvement of a bat biologist to ensure that no roosting bats are killed during this activity. Consistent with CDFW protocols this two-step removal shall occur over two consecutive days as Draft Final I August 2023 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 544 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation JL Method of Monitoring Verification of Compliance Number Mitigation Measure A& Verification Timing Responsibility Initials Date Remark follows: on Day 1, branches and limbs not containing cavities, as identified by a qualified bat biologist, will be removed. On Day 2, the remainder of the tree may be removed without supervision by a bat biologist. The disturbance caused by limb removal, followed by an interval of one evening, will allow bats to safely abandon the roost. BIO -4d Throughout the lifetime operations of the Submittal of Operation of City of La Project, the Applicant shall eliminate all Building Permit Project Quinta Planning nonessential lighting throughout the Project Plans/Code Department area and avoid or limit the use of artificial light Enforcement at night during the hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are most active. The City of La Quinta shall ensure that all lighting for the Project is fully shielded, cast downward, reduced in intensity to the greatest extent, and does not result in lighting trespass including glare into surrounding areas or upward into the night sky (see the International Dark -Sky Association standards at http://darksky.org/). The City of La Quinta shall ensure use of LED lighting with a correlated color temperature of 3,000 Kelvins or less, proper disposal of hazardous waste, and recycling of lighting that contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycler. CULTURAL/TRIBAL RESOURCES CUL -1 Based on the data presented, it is Submittal of Prior to City of La recommended that archaeological monitoring monitoring issuance of a Quinta Planning and Native American monitoring (if applicable) contracts, fully grading Department occur during project excavations into alluvial executed permit soils, estimated to occur within near surface soils to a depth of 5 to 10 feet. These Mitigation Draft Final I August 2023 42 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 545 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Number AMitigation Measure & Method of Verification Timing Monitoring Responsibility Verification of Compliance Initials Date Remar - Measures for the project outline the monitoring protocols. A MMRP to mitigate potential impacts to undiscovered buried cultural resources within the project shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the Lead Agency. This program shall include, but not be limited to, the following actions: 1) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall provide written verification that a certified archaeologist has been retained to implement the monitoring program. This verification shall be presented in a letter from the project archaeologist to the Lead Agency. 2) The project applicant shall provide Native American monitoring during grading if the Lead Agency determines it is necessary pending results of the AB 52 Consultation process. If applicable, the Native American monitor shall work in concert with the archaeological monitor to observe ground disturbances and search for cultural materials. The Lead Agency shall coordinate with the consulting Tribe(s) to facilitate communications with the project developer/applicant so that all parties can develop a mutually acceptable Tribal Monitoring and Treatment Agreement which includes the scope of monitoring, scheduling of monitors from individual Draft Final I August 2023 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 546 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Number Mitigation Measure JL A Method of Verification Timing Monitoring Responsibility Verification of Compliance Initials Date Remar consulting Tribe(s), and the course of action for inadvertent discoveries. 3) The project archaeologist, in consultation with the consulting Tribe(s), the contractor, and the City, shall implement a Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) to address the details, timing and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site. Details in the plan shall include: a. Project grading and development scheduling. b. The project archaeologist and the Consulting Tribes(s) shall attend the pre - grading meeting with the City, the construction manager and all contractors and will conduct a mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance. The training will include a brief review of the cultural sensitivity of the project and the surrounding area; what resources could potentially be identified during earthmoving activities; the requirements of the monitoring program; the protocols that apply in the event inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources are identified, including who to contact and appropriate avoidance measures until the find(s) can be Draft Final I August 2023 na Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 547 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Number Mitigation Measure Method of Verification Timing Monitoring Responsibility Verification of Compliance Initials Date Remar properly evaluated; and any other appropriate protocols. c. The protocols and stipulations that the contractor, City, Consulting Tribe(s) and project archaeologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a cultural resource evaluation. 4) During the original cutting of previously undisturbed deposits, the archaeological and Tribal monitors (if applicable) shall be onsite, as determined by the consulting archaeologist, to perform periodic inspections of the excavations. Monitoring is recommended in younger Holocene alluvial soils, estimated to occur within near surface soils to a depth of 5 to 10 feet. The frequency of inspections will depend upon the rate of excavation, the materials excavated, and the presence and abundance of artifacts and features. The consulting archaeologist shall have the authority to modify the monitoring program if the potential for cultural resources appears to be less than anticipated. 5) Isolates and clearly non-significant deposits will be minimally documented in the field so the monitored grading can proceed. Draft Final I August 2023 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 548 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Number Mitigation Measur Method of Verification Timing Monitoring Responsibility Verification of Compliance Initials Date Remarks 6) In the event that previously unidentified cultural resources are discovered, the archaeologist shall have the authority to divert or temporarily halt ground disturbance operations in the area of the discovery to allow for the evaluation of potentially significant cultural resources. The archaeologist shall contact the Lead Agency at the time of the discovery. The archaeologist, in consultation with the lead agency, shall determine the significance of the discovered resources. The Lead Agency must concur with the evaluation before construction activities will be allowed to resume in the affected area. For significant cultural resources, a Research Design and Data Recovery Program to mitigate impacts shall be implemented by the consulting archaeologist and approved by the Lead Agency before being carried out, using professional archaeological methods. If any human bones are discovered, the county coroner and lead agency shall be contacted. In the event that the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Most Likely Descendant (as identified by the NAHC) shall be contacted in order to determine proper treatment and disposition of the remains. a. Before construction activities are allowed to resume in the affected area, the artifacts shall be recovered, and features recorded using professional Draft Final I August 2023 AL Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 549 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Number Mitigation Measure �0& Method of Verification Timing Monitoring Responsibility Verification of Compliance Initials Date Remar archaeological methods. The project archaeologist, in consultation with the consulting Tribe(s), shall determine the amount of material to be recovered for an adequate artifact sample for analysis. b. One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be used in the event of a discovery: i. Preservation -in -Place. Avoidance, or preservation -in-place, involves leaving a resource where it was found with no development affecting its integrity. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological and cultural resources. ii. Reburial on the project site in an area not subject to future disturbance. Reburial of a resource shall include provisions to protect the selected reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all required cataloging and basic recording have been completed, with the exception of sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. The listing of contents and the location of the reburial shall Draft Final I August 2023 A7 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 550 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Number Mitigation Measure Method of Verification Timing Monitoring Responsibility Verification of Compliance Initials Date Remar be included in a confidential Phase IV Monitoring Report. c. If Preservation -in -Place or reburial is not feasible, all cultural material collected during the grading monitoring program shall be processed and curated according to the current professional repository standards in a Riverside County curation facility that meets State Resources Department Office of Historic Preservation Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Resources (OHP 1993). The collections and associated records shall be transferred, including title and accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation. 7) A Phase IV Monitoring Report, documenting the field and analysis results and interpreting the artifact and research data within the research context, shall be completed and submitted to the satisfaction of the Lead Agency prior to the issuance of any building permits. The report will include DPR Primary and Archaeological Site Forms. The Phase IV report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to a Public Records Request and a copy of the report shall be submitted to the consulting Tribe(s). Draft Final I August 2023 48 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 551 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Number Mitigation Measur Method of Verification Timing Monitoring Responsibility Verification of Compliance Initials Date Remarks CUL -2 Project related earth disturbance has the Submittal of During ground City of La potential to unearth previously undiscovered monitoring disturbance Quinta Planning human remains, resulting in a potentially contracts, fully (demolition, Department significant impact. Pursuant to Section 7050.5 of executed grading the California Health and Safety Code, if human and/or remains are encountered during excavation construction) activities, all work shall halt, and the County Coroner shall be notified. The Coroner would determine within two working days whether a cause of death investigation is necessary. If the Coroner determines that the remains are Native American, he/she would contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours. The NAHC would then, pursuant to Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code, immediately identify the most likely descendant (MLD), who may inspect the remains and site of discovery and make recommendations for the treatment and/or disposition of the remains. The MLD shall make his/her recommendation within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The MLD's recommendation shall be followed, if feasible, and may include scientific removal and non-destructive analysis of the human remains, preservation in place, and deeding the remains to the MLD for treatment. If no MLD is identified, the MLD fails to make a recommendation, or the landowner rejects the recommendation, the landowner shall rebury the remains with appropriate dignity on the property in a location that would not be subject to further subsurface disturbance. Draft Final I August 2023 49 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 552 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Method of Monitoring Verification of Compliance Number Mitigation Measure Verification Timing Responsibility Initials Date Remark GEOLOGY AND SOILS GEO-1 During construction, Grading Plans for the Submittal of the During ground City of La project shall implement fugitive dust control Dust Control Plan disturbance Quinta Public measures and windborne erosion control to Public Works (demolition, Works measures from the Coachella Valley PMZo State Staff grading Department Implementation Plan. and/or construction) GEO-2 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the City of Acknowledgment Prior to City of La La Quinta shall confirm that grading and by the Applicant Grading Quinta Planning construction plans for the project incorporate Permits Department design recommendations provided in the Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by Bruin Geotechnical Services, Inc., September 2021. The design recommendations shall address site earthwork; remedial grading for building pads; asphalt, pavement, and concrete; fill placement and compaction; soil shrinkage; fill slope stability; imported soils; post grading pad drainage foundation design recommendations; retaining walls and structures; corrosion and chemical attack; excavations; utility trenches and backfill; interior concrete; exterior concrete rigid pavement; pavement design; and construction considerations. PALEO-1 Once earthmoving reaches 3-5 feet below the Acknowledgment During ground City of La original ground surface, excavation shall be by the Applicant disturbance Quinta Planning monitored under the direct guidance of a (demolition, Department qualified paleontologist. grading and/or construction) Draft Final I August 2023 50 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 553 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation JL Method of Monitoring Verification of Compliance Number Mitigation Measure Verification Timing Responsibility Initials Date Remar PALEO-2 The project paleontologist retained shall review Submittal of During ground City of La the approved development plan and shall monitoring disturbance Quinta Planning conduct any pre -construction work necessary to contracts, fully (demolition, Department render appropriate monitoring and mitigation executed grading requirements as appropriate. These and/or requirements shall be documented by the construction) project paleontologist in a Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP). This PRIMP shall be submitted to the City's Design and Development Department for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. Information to be contained in the PRIMP shall meet the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards. PALEO-3 If paleontological resources are detected and Provide Planning During ground City of La recovered during monitoring, a report must be Staff a copy of the disturbance Quinta Planning prepared. The following items must be report and finding (demolition, Department presented in the report: recovered specimens grading must be prepared to a point of identification and/or and permanent preservation, including washing construction) of sediments to recover small invertebrates and vertebrates. The recovered fossils must be identified and curated into a professional, fully accredited museum repository with permanent retrievable storage (e.g., WSC). The paleontologist must have a written repository agreement in hand prior to the initiation of mitigation activities. The report and inventory, when submitted to the Lead Agency, will signify completion of the program to mitigate impacts to paleontological resources. Draft Final I August 2023 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 554 LA VILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Method of Monitoring Verification of Compliance Number Mitigation Measure Verification Timing Responsibility Initials Date Remark HAZARDS HAZ-1 Prior to issuance of grading permit, a Phase II Provide Planning Prior to City of La investigation will be conducted to assess the Staff a copy of the issuance of Quinta Planning presence or absence of environmentally Phase II Report grading Department persistent agricultural chemicals within near permit surface soils. HYDROLOGY/WATER QUALITY HYDRO -1 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Submittal of the Prior to City of La applicant will obtain coverage under a General approval letter to issuance of Quinta Public Construction Permit issued from the State Planning Staff grading Works Water Resources Control Board. The General permit Department Construction Permit would require the filing of a Notice of Intent with the State Water Resources Control Board and the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). TRANSPORTATION T-1 The existing striping along Avenue 58, which Submittal of the Prior Issuance City of La includes a center striped median, is Public Building Quinta Public recommended to be modified to create a 60- Improvement Plans Permit Works foot westbound left turn pocket at the main Department project driveway while providing a ±90 -foot eastbound left turn pocket at Pasatiempo Court. Draft Final I August 2023 52 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 555 COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2023 — XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, ZONE CHANGE, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO ALLOW A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF 80 DWELLING UNITS LOCATED SOUTH OF AVENUE 58 BETWEEN MADISON STREET AND MONROE STREET CASE NUMBERS: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2021-0001, ZONE CHANGE 2021-0001, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2021-0002, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2021-0004 APPLICANT: ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on December 19, 2023, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Royal Investors Group for approval of a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Conditional Use Permit, and Tentative Tract Map for an 80 -unit Planned Unit Development located south of Avenue 58 between Madison Street and Monroe Street, more particularly described as: ` ' � •'��]E:�Ia1Ily_�tL• � I�:IIa1IlIC? WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on September 19, 2023, previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approval of General Plan Amendment, Zone change, Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, the City Council did continue the public hearing until a date uncertain to give the applicant additional time to address the concerns regarding the proposed density increase and electrical supply constraints; and WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on August 28, 2023, as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and General Plan Amendment 2021-0001 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, Council did make 556 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX General Plan Amendment 2021-0001, Zone Change 2021-0001, Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002, Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villeta at Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 2 of 7 the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said General Plan Amendment, as conditioned [Exhibits A and B]: 1. Internal General Plan Consistency. The amendment is internally consistent with those goals, objectives and policies of the general plan which are not being amended. The General Plan Amendment would lead to a Medium High Density land use designation which supports up to 16 units to the acre. 2. Public Welfare. Approval of the amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. As part of the project, a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be adopted to mitigate any potential impacts. 3. General Plan Compatibility. In the case of amendments to the general plan policy diagram, the new designation is compatible with the designations on adjacent properties. The increase in density is being used to create a residential project that will connect with surrounding residential properties to provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population. 4. Property Suitability. In the case of amendments to the general plan policy diagram, the new designation is suitable and appropriate for the subject property, insofar as it will allow the development of single-family homes on a site that is generally flat and rectangular. 5. Change in Circumstances. In the case of amendments to the general plan policy diagram, approval of the amendment is warranted because the situation and the general conditions of the property have substantially changed since the existing designation was imposed. Higher density is required to achieve a single-family home project that meets the market demand. Market conditions have led to needing more units to match increases in costs in building units meanwhile meeting increase in demand for single family residential units for the public. Zone Change 2021-0001 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said Zone Change, as conditioned [Exhibits C and D]: The zone map change is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, as described above and contained in Exhibit C. The Zone Change would lead to a High -Density Residential zoning designation, consistent with the Medium and High Density Residential General Plan land use designation, which 557 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX General Plan Amendment 2021-0001, Zone Change 2021-0001, Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002, Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villeta at Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 3 of 7 supports 8-12 units per acre residential density and is designed to accommodate a broad range of residential land uses, including single family development. 2. Approval of the zone map change will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. As part of the project, a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be adopted to mitigate any potential impacts. 3. The new zoning is compatible with the zoning on adjacent properties as it continues residentially zoned properties adjacent to the property and surrounding it. 4. The new zoning is suitable and appropriate for the subject property because it is currently zoned for residential and the change is to increase density, consistent with the General Plan Amendment designation. 5. Change in Circumstances. Approval of the zone change is warranted because the situation and the general conditions of the property have substantially changed since the existing zoning was imposed. Higher density is required to achieve a single-family home project that meets the market demand. Market conditions have led to needing more units to match increases in costs in building units meanwhile meeting increase in demand for single family residential units for the public. The zone change is warranted to meet the density allowed under the General Plan land use map. Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said Conditional Use Permit, as conditioned [Exhibits E and F]: The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Medium/High Density Residential. The City's General Plan Medium/High Density Residential designation is designed to accommodate a broad range of residential land uses, including single family residential projects. The City's General Plan policies relating to Medium/High Density Residential encourage a broad range of residential uses within the City, and the proposed use maintains those policies. The proposed project is consistent with the following Goals, Programs, and Policies: • Goal LU -2 as the project consists of high-quality design that complements and enhances the City. The project design uses high-quality Spanish, Mediterranean, and Santa Barbara styles, and utilizes varying roof lines and architectural accent, along with a complementary color palette. 558 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX General Plan Amendment 2021-0001, Zone Change 2021-0001, Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002, Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villeta at Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 4 of 7 • Goal LU -5 as the project provides a broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City. The project provides for a small lot single family home residential project, which creates a different housing type and choice for residents within the City. • Policy LU -5.2 in considering changes in market demand in residential product type to meet the needs of current and future residents. The project is changing from a low-density residential project to a planned unit development project to respond to market demand in residential product type to provide residents with smaller lot single family subdivisions. • Goal SC -1 in that it provides a community that provides the best possible quality of life for all its residents by providing alternative housing types within La Quinta meanwhile providing a project that incorporates open space and common area with a pool for its residents, bocce ball court, tot lot, and passive open space. • Goal H-1 in providing housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population. The single-family home project of this type provides a diverse type of residential product. • Policy H-1.3 to direct new housing development to viable areas where essential public facilities can be provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are available. The housing development is located in viable area where essential public facilities can be provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are all available. 2. The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Medium High Density Residential zone as well as the development standards of the City's Zoning Code and in terms of architectural style and landscaping. The project satisfies the zone's intent to provide for the development of high-density neighborhoods with one and two-story single-family dwellings. The project is generally consistent with the residential development standards and permitted use table, except deviations as established within the Planned Unit Development. 3. The Design and Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2021-0006 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Department has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect because mitigation measures have been incorporated. 559 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX General Plan Amendment 2021-0001, Zone Change 2021-0001, Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002, Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villeta at Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 5 of 7 4. The architectural design of the project, including, but not limited to, the architectural style, scale, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details, roof style and other architectural elements are compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. The Spanish, Mediterranean, and Santa Barbara styles utilizes a high-quality design that is compatible with other approved and constructed residential projects within the City. 5. The site design of the project including, but not limited to, project entries, interior circulation, pedestrian and bicycle access, pedestrian amenities, screening of equipment and trash enclosures, exterior lighting, and other site design elements are compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. 6. Project landscaping, including, but not limited to, the location, type, size, color, texture, and coverage of plant materials, has been designed so as to provide visual relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements and vistas, screen undesirable views, provide a harmonious transition between adjacent land uses and between development and open space, and provide an overall unifying influence to enhance the visual continuity of the project. The proposed project is consistent with the landscaping standards and plant palette and implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan and Zoning Code. The permanent overall site landscaping utilizes various tree and shrub species to enhance the building architecture and provide adequate relief and screening from Avenue 58. Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said Tentative Tract Map, as conditioned [Exhibit G]: 1. The proposed Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the land use policies and programs of the General Plan, as it allows for development of a Medium High Density Residential project in the Medium/High Density land use designation, which supports up to 16 units per acre residential density and is designed to accommodate a broad range of residential land uses, including single family projects. 2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, and Planned Unit Development standards with the implementation of recommended conditions of approval to ensure consistency for the homes proposed on the lots created herein. 560 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX General Plan Amendment 2021-0001, Zone Change 2021-0001, Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002, Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villeta at Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 6 of 7 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The Design and Development Department prepared Environmental Assessment (EA) 2021-0006, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This approval includes adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration. 4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, insofar as the project will be required to comply with all laws, standards and requirements associated with sanitary sewer collection, water quality and other public health issues. 5. The site of the proposed subdivision is physically suitable for the type of development and proposed density of development. The Planned Unit Development allows for creative development with smaller lot subdivision while still providing a quality residential development. 6. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable provisions of Title 13 of the City's Subdivision Regulations Code and the Planned Unit Development, including, but not limited to, minimum lot area requirements, any other applicable provisions of Title 9 of the City's Zoning Code, and the Subdivision Map Act. 7. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case. SECTION 2. That the above project is determined to be consistent with the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project (EA 2021-0006). SECTION 3. That City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment 2021- 0001 [Exhibit A], Zone Change 2021-0001 [Exhibit C], Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002, and, Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval [Exhibits B, D, F, and G]. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on December 19, 2023, by the following vote: 561 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX General Plan Amendment 2021-0001, Zone Change 2021-0001, Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002, Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villeta at Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 7 of 7 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 562 Existing General Plan Land Use GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS Low Density Residential Source: City of La Quinta General Plan Preferred Land Use Map; May 7, 2012. 1 VCS Environmental COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX EXHIBIT A Proposed General Plan Land Use � [-4 . - - or r -LI I ,,!LEL[V a i Project t site GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS Medium/High Density Residential LAVILLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations Figure 3-4 563 Council Resolution 2023 - XXX Conditions Of Approval — Recommended General Plan Amendment 2021-0001 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 1 of 1 GENERAL EXHIBIT B The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this General Plan Amendment. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. GPA2021-0001 shall comply with all applicable conditions and mitigation measures for the following related approvals: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2021-0001 ZONE CHANGE 2021-0001 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2021-0002 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2021-0004 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 564 Existing zoning RESIDENTIAL Law Density Residential Source: City of La Quinta Official Zoning Map; May 2021. N VCS Environmental COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX Proposed Zoning 1179FINMOMME NEON Project Site RMH RESIDENTIAL _ Medium High Density Residential I W1:11 U0I i LA VI LLETTA AT AVENUE 58 PROJECT Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Existing and Proposed Zoning Figure3-5 565 Council Resolution 2023 - XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Zone Change 2021-0001 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 1 of 1 GENERAL EXHIBIT D The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Zone Change. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. ZC2021-0001 shall comply with all applicable conditions and mitigation measures for the following related approvals: 2100511:z•01.I►VAI21.111raW-AWA2 "I&12101111 Pz1yAQ11I8111 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2021-0001 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2021-0002 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2021-0004 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 566 Council Resolution No. 2023 -XXX EXHIBIT E PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT La Villetta at Avenue 58 Tentative Tract Map 37950 40ca 02"inra GEM of the DESERT May 31, 2023 PREPARED BY: RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES, LLC — Applicant Contact: Kris Pinero, Project Manager 9595 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 708 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 818-981-3000 Page 1of10 567 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Applicant, Rodeo Credit Enterprises, LLC (previously Royal Investors Group, LLC) proposes a Planned Unit Development ("PUD") with a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a new Tentative Tract Map Number 37950 consisting of 80 single-family lots, one community recreation center, one open space lot and a retention basin/open space area. The Assessor Parcel Numbers are: 764-180- 002 and 003. The subject location is designated Low Density Residential (4 units/ac) by the General Plan and is zoned (RL) — Low Density Residential; the proposed land use is Medium/High Density Residential (up to 16 per units/ac) and the proposed zoning is (RMH) — Medium High Density Residential. This modification includes a change to the site layout allowing for smaller, cluster or courtyard lots on a conventional site plan with 9.0 dwelling units per acre. The site is relatively flat and square in shape. There will be a total of two entrances into the community from Avenue 58 and the interior streets are depicted as private wherein the project may become gated as determined by the future homebuilder. Page 2 of 10 568 The community is designed to promote residential amenities and promote flexibility in design as further described below. A higher level of architectural standards will be proposed than what is currently required. The project requires a PUD because it does not meet all of the required regulations of the zoning ordinance as outlined below: Regulation RL RMH PUD Proposal Compliance —Minimum lot Minimum 7,200 sf Minimum Minimum 2,310 sf No area (sf) 3,600 Lot Frontage (ft) Minimum 80 Minimum 40 33 No Maximum Maximum 2-4 Maximum 8-12 9.0 du/ac Yes, with dwelling du/ac du/ac proposed units per acre Zone Change Front yard setback Minimum 20 Minimum 20 3 No to house (ft) Front yard setback Minimum 20 Minimum 20 3 No to garage (ft) Rear Yard (ft) Minimum 20 Minimum 15 7.5 No Interior Side Yard 5 5 3 No Min ft.) Exterior Side 10 10 5 No Yard Lot Coverage Maximum 50% Minimum 60% 66% No Private streets Minimum 28 Minimum 28 24 No Width (No on- streetparking) The minimum lot size proposed is 2,310 square feet. The lots would average approximately 2,623 square feet in size. The courtyard layout of the homes will be designed to achieve visual diversity and interest in the street scene through varying setbacks, articulated building massing or enhanced elevations on residences plotted on corner lots. With the importance in promoting sustainable communities, the interior street widths were reduced from 28' in size to 24' to effectively manage speeds without decreasing safety and thereby reducing the amount of pavement required, which in turn lessens environmental impacts. The plan includes 44 parking spaces within the community. The street widths were approved by the Riverside County Fire Department during the entitlement process. Page 3 of 10 569 LAND USE COMPATABILITY: As you enter the proposed community through its main entrance along Avenue 58, you will see a one-story recreation building to the west, along with a large landscaped open space area along the northern edge of the property that backs up to three one-story homes, which has been carefully designed to comply and promote the City's View Corridor Program. Special consideration was taken during the site planning process to ensure that the important, as well as cherished views would be maintained along Avenue 58 for all residents of La Quinta. Consistent with the City's General Plan, the community proposes Image Corridor enhancements along Avenue 58 such as a 15 -foot landscaped setback consisting of a meandering multi -modal trail, trees, shrubs and groundcover to enhance the treasured mountain views. In addition, there is a 10 -foot setback along Avenue 58 which restricts construction of any structures or walls as required by the City's Municipal Code Section 13.24.130. The lower architectural elements and open space along the property's northern edge creates a viewshed that is seamless with the northern existing neighborhoods, thereby illustrating a land use compatibility with well-established homes. As shown on the attached Preliminary Site and Landscape Plan, the Corridor View Exhibit (see above) and Recreation Building Architectural Plans, this proposed community has been integrated with open space and well thought out amenities to soften and enhance the views resulting in a beautifully designed new La Quinta neighborhood. The structures have been tapered from one story homes (approximately 18' in height) along the northern edge, to two story homes (approximately 25' in height) as the community transitions to the south. Adjacent land uses to the south, east and west are planned for single family residential homes that are compatible with the proposed community. Page 4 of 10 570 L -a Villetta at Avenue 58 .dingle Family Detached Homes � L��M 1 � �F�rp�w Y.!rxrd FILL M j x i{QrOGM a 1.00 1.6?2 10. XT. tLAH PIA" fkhm 2 PIA" $ 4 :: --. '2 i ILEP4: a HCIu: 3!AI+ r•frr 2.5 LAIn 7='= 3:JMH. L;S .lid . Fr 1,415 5Q F- 7,B1 IMM 7.14-D VO. F1 F[R S 1 FLOOR f'LA N TYFICAL CLUSTER m■ KLAN 1 PLAN k # IEOt��+ti - 3 b72 313. fr Architectural elements such as windows, gables, arcades, swing awnings and other similar features will be recommended to be used to break up the massing of the homes. The community proposes a minimum of four floor plans, with three elevations and three -color schemes per elevation. No identical single-family detached elevation is permitted side by side and the two houses on either side of a specific lot must use different color schemes than that specific lot. The homes shall be designed so that living activities are oriented towards the street with emphasis on porches, entries and windows. Page 5 of 10 571 Building Design: JF J .l• - .3 r. M • i i _1qr JZ 2M cOd L 0Xk* � N -PCI bg �ee ,O xOk 70) Oro sr• 10:0"+ As designed by award winning firm Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc, the overall community's architecture reflects a Mediterranean/Spanish/Santa Barbara abode design with one and two-story elevations; characteristic elements include windows with pot shelves, shutters, and trim above doors and windows and wrought iron or gable end accents. Combined one- and two-story massing with single story elements and gabled roofs with window accents are classic variations of this style. A total of nine different color schemes are proposed in which the proposed stucco colors are predominately brown, beige, and terracotta. The trim colors could be various shades of taupe, brown, and beige and the proposed shutter colors are brown, blue, green and beige. The fascia, trim and garage doors range could range in colors from beige, to browns and tans. The roof materials will be in shades of brown and shall be varied to create visual interest. Lastly, the proposed homes were designed to be visually compatible with similar architectural elements of Spanish, Mediterranean and Santa Barbara influences that are commonly found in existing La Quinta neighborhoods. Page 6 of 10 572 Typical Characteristics: rry krr.. s.s,,.+.7.}-iry •Cd.r}� • Rectangular or asymmetrical massing with some recessed second floor elements • Breaks in massing • Concrete tile roof materials • Distinctive trim over entry • Wrought iron window treatment • Shutters • Pot shelves • Decorative gable end tiles Thirty percent of the acreage will be set aside as open space which is proposed to consist of a 24,200 square foot amenity center and tot lot located at the entrance to the community and a 6,600 square foot open space area for passive park enjoyment, which may contain sitting areas, picnic benches with trellis and grass play area that will be maintained by a homeowners association. Conceptual Recreation Center Site i�JIyF D n L L LOLL LL O Plan: 7 r Features may E: RECREATION BUILDING or include: recreation E " _ I-' building, pool E and spa area, tot lot and bocce ball 5p" I V V 1 L Page 7 of 10 573 Recreation Building: W, gv?f hL�CbA Mddw. F¢. RdbUd p.d—ruS i—M. imr.mdskk R.A. FRONT The following table summarizes how the project would comply with the proposed Planned Unit Development requirements: Page 8 of 10 574 DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA RL RMH PROPOSED PUD STANDARDS A. LOT SIZE 1. Minimum lot size (sq ft) 7,200 3,600 2,310 2. Minimum width (ft) 60 40 33 B. BUILDING PLACEMENT 1. Front Yard Setback(ft) 20 20 3 2. Rear Yard (ft) 20 15 7.5 3. Interior Side Yard (ft) 5 5 3 4. Exterior Side Yard (ft) 10 10 5 C. BUILDING SIZE & MASSING 1. Maximum Lot Coverage (%) 50 60 66 2. Maximum Building Height (ft) 28 28 28 D. INTERIOR PRIVATE STREET IDTH City of La Quinta standard (ft) 28 128 24 E. LANDSCAPING 1. Required landscaping (%) 0 130 30 Page 8 of 10 574 :•=i.•- •-_--•--+a•7ti%CGI� �-:-�•;. it -7:.. {.--r.-; ,.• .--rr.:�-...,r. •. . Page 9 of 10 575 DEVELOPMENT RL RMH PROPOSED PUD CRITERIA STANDARDS F. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT 1. Minimum setback (ft) from 5 5 3 property line G. BUILDING ARCHITECTURE AND FORM 1. Articulate building facades by including 1) Provide one story elements (porch, living area, variation in massing, roof form, and wall garages where applicable) on some of the floor plans planes. to allow more variations. 2) Homes with same facades shall be separated by a minimum of one lot when occurring along the same side of the street, and offset homes of same facades when occurring on the opposite side of the street by at least one lot. 3) Articulate all elevations within public view especially on corner homes and the rear elevations of street adjacent homes. 4) Vary roof lines through the use of gables and other roof elements consistent with the architectural style. Change the height and direction of roof ridges to provide variations. 5) Corner lot houses shall address the corner. These shall be designed to be more open and landscaped. :•=i.•- •-_--•--+a•7ti%CGI� �-:-�•;. it -7:.. {.--r.-; ,.• .--rr.:�-...,r. •. . Page 9 of 10 575 2. Use multiple colors, materials, textures, The community includes 4 floor plans and 3 and applied finishes to help break up elevation styles overall. Each plan includes wall massing. a minimum of 2 elevation styles, and 3 color City's varied climate conditions. schemes for each of the 3 styles. Between 5. Garage doors shall provide aesthetic the variety of floor plans in conjunction value to the home. with elevation styles each and varying color choices, the community will include a total of 27 unique homes. 3. Provide distinctive entries, porches, 1) All houses shall have an entry feature balconies and window treatment, which can be achieved through an oriented toward the street. architectural element, stepping up the entry way, wrought iron or stucco columns, or a distinctive porch over entry. 2) Provide window treatment on all side windows for corner homes and at the rear windows of street adjacent homes consistent with the architectural style. Examples include: • Window trim and shutters • Shaped frames and sills to enhance openings and add additional relief 4. Residential buildings shall use high- Meet or exceed City Standard quality, tile roofing (concrete, ceramic, etc.), appropriate for withstanding the City's varied climate conditions. 5. Garage doors shall provide aesthetic Meet or exceed the City Standard value to the home. Page 10 of 10 576 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 1 of 17 GFNFRAI EXHIBIT F The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Conditional Use Permit recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. The Conditional Use Permit shall expire twenty-four (24) months after City Council approval and shall become null and void in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.200.080 unless a building permit has been issued. A time extension may be requested per LQMC Section 9.200.080. 3. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Development Division (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Exemption Form — Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) • La Quinta Design and Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) • State Water Resources Control Board • SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) • South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 4. Coverage under the State of California General Construction Permit must be obtained by the applicant, who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's ("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent ("NOI") and Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 5. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin 577 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 2 of 17 Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permittee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP") to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. D. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. E. The inclusion in the Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs as required. 6. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 7. CUP2021-0002 shall comply with all applicable conditions and mitigation measures for the following related approvals: • Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 • Environmental Assessment 2021-0006 • General Plan Amendment 2021-0001 • Zone Change 2021-0001 578 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 3 of 17 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 8. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to affect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 9. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 10. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 11. Pursuant to the aforementioned condition, conferred rights shall include approvals from the master developer over easements and other property rights necessary for construction and proper functioning of the proposed development not limited to access rights over proposed and/or existing private streets that access public streets and open space/drainage facilities of the master development. 12. The applicant shall offer for dedication all public street rights-of-way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 13. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Avenue 58 (Secondary Arterial) — The standard 51 feet from the centerline of Avenue 58 to the ultimate developed right of way. 14. The applicant shall retain for private use on the Final Map all private street rights-of-way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 579 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 4 of 17 15. The private street rights-of-way to be retained for private use required for this development include: A. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Private Residential Streets measured at lot line to lot line shall have a 40 - foot travel width. The travel width may be reduced to 24 with prohibited on -street parking with approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors, and the applicant establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&R's. 16. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. Pursuant to this requirement, the Applicant shall include in the submittal packet containing the draft final map submitted for map checking, an offsite street geometric layout, drawn at 1" equals 40 feet, detailing the following design aspects: median curb line, outside curb line, lane line alignment including lane widths, left turn lanes, deceleration lane(s) and bus stop turnout(s). The geometric layout shall be accompanied with sufficient professional engineering studies to confirm the appropriate length of all proposed turn pockets and auxiliary lanes that may impact the right of way dedication required of the project and the associated landscape setback requirement. 17. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights-of-way shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such rights-of-way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights-of-way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 18. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map a ten -foot -wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all private streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet in width with the express written approval of IID. 19. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public rights-of-way as follows: A. Avenue 58 (Secondary Arterial) - 10 -foot from the R/W-P/L. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 20. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map. 580 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 5 of 17 21. Direct vehicular access to Avenue 58 is restricted, except for those access points identified on the tentative tract map, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final tract map. 22. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 23. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 24. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties and Development) for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 25. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be near vertical with a 1/8" batter and a minimum height of 0.1'. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 26. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses.) A. OFF-SITE STREETS 1) Avenue 58 (Secondary Arterial) a. Widen the south side of the street along all frontage adjacent to the Tentative Map boundary to its ultimate width on the south side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions. Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing roadway pavement as necessary to augment and convert it from a rural county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design standard. The south curb face shall be located thirty-six feet (36') south of the centerline or as approved by the City Engineer. b. Restripe to provide an eastbound right -turn lane and a westbound left - turn lane at the main project driveway and an eastbound right -turn lane at the emergency access driveway as shown in the Traffic Impact Analysis Report and/or as approved by the City Engineer. Other required improvements in the right-of-way and/or adjacent landscape 581 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 6 of 17 setback area include: C. All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. d. Multi -Use Path - The applicant shall construct a multi -use path per La Quinta Standard 260 feet along the south side of Avenue 58 frontage within the landscaped setback. The location and design of the path shall be approved by the City. A split rail fence shall be constructed along the roadway side of the multi -use path in accordance with Section 9.140.060 (Item E, 3a) of the Zoning Ordinance. Bonding for the fence to be installed shall be posted prior to final map approval. The multi -use path and fence shall be maintained by the Developer or project's Homeowner's Association as applicable. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the project boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). To connect to the west improvements and minimum 20' to the east. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Construct internal streets per the approved lay -out shown on the Tentative Tract map and/or as approved by the City Engineer. Minimum street width measured at lot line to lot line shall have a 40 -foot travel width. The travel width may be reduced to 24 feet with prohibited on -street parking with approved Planned Unit Development (PUD). The applicant shall make provisions for perpetual enforcement of the "No Parking" restrictions in the CC&Rs. 2) The location of driveways shall not be located within the curb return and away from intersections, when possible. 27. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20 -year life pavement, and the site-specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) Residential Secondary Arterial 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. 4.5" a.c /5.5" c.a.b. 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. 4.0" a.c./6.0" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials per the City Engineer. 28. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of 582 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 7 of 17 construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 29. All gated entries shall provide for a three -car minimum stacking capacity for inbound traffic to be a minimum length of 62 feet from call box to the street; and shall provide for a full turn -around outlet for non -accepted vehicles or as approved by the City Engineer. Where a gated entry is proposed, the applicant shall submit a detailed exhibit at a scale of 1" = 10', demonstrating that those passenger vehicles that do not gain entry into the development can safely make a full turn -around (minimum radius to be 24 feet) out onto the main street from the gated entry. Pursuant to said condition, there shall be a minimum of twenty five feet width provided at the turn -around opening provided. Two lanes of traffic shall be provided on the entry side of each gated entry, one lane shall be dedicated for residents and one lane for visitors. The two travel lanes shall be a minimum of 20 feet of total paved roadway surface or as approved by the Fire Department. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, standard knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 30. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: Avenue 58 (Primary Entry): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. Avenue 58 (Emergency Access): Emergency access only. No public access allowed. Left turns are restricted. 31. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 32. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. FINAL MAPS 33. Prior to the City's approval of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate mylars of the Final Map that were approved by the City's map checker on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The Final Map shall be 1" = 40' scale. PARKING 583 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 8 of 17 34. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and in particular the following: A. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking stall design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is required including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans to evaluate ADA accessibility issues. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking stall lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2 -foot overhang for standard parking stalls and 18 feet with a 2 -foot overhang for handicapped parking stall or as approved by the City Engineer. One van accessible handicapped parking stall is required per 8 handicapped parking stalls. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, ADA accessibility route to public streets and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 35. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 36. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Development Services Division. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On -Site Rough Grading Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal B. PM10 Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal 584 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 9 of 17 C. Erosion Control Plan E F 1" = 40' Horizontal Final WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through D to be submitted concurrently. Off -Site Street Improvement/Storm Drain Plan Off -Site Signing & Striping Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1" = 4' Vertical 1" = 40' Horizontal The Off -Site street improvement plans shall have separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. G. On -Site Precise Grading Plan 1" = 30' Horizontal H. On -Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1"= 4' Vertical NOTE: E through H to be submitted concurrently. (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200 -feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On -Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1 -foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. "On -Site Precise Grading" plans shall normally include all on-site surface improvements including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements and accessibility requirements. 37. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the "Plans, Notes and Design Guidance" 585 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 10 of 17 section of the Public Works Department at the City website (laquintaca.gov). Please navigate to the Public Works Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 38. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. 39. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer Of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the EOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer Of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 40. Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on and off-site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 41. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Tract Map, shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security). 42. Prior to constructing any off-site improvements, the applicant shall deposit securities equivalent to both a Performance and Labor & Material Bonds each valued at 100% of the cost of the off-site improvements, or as approved by the City Engineer. 43. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 44. When improvements are phased through a "Phasing Plan," or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off-site improvements and common on-site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 586 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 11 of 17 Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured, prior to the completion of homes or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 45. Depending on the timing of the development of this Tentative Tract Map, and the status of the off-site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off-site improvements. B. Construct additional off-site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this Tentative Tract Map. D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. Off -Site Improvements should be completed on a first priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off -Site Improvements in the first phase of construction or by the issuance of the 20 % Building Permit. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 46. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on-site and off-site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule as approved by the City Engineer. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. 47. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 587 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 12 of 17 GRADING 48. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 49. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 50. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. Final WQMP prepared by an appropriate professional registered in the State of California. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 51. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 52. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e., the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6) of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the 588 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 13 of 17 right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 53. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval, or as approved by the City Engineer. 54. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. 55. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (0.5') from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance review. 56. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation, and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 57. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for the La Villetta at Avenue project (TTM 37950), or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. Nuisance water shall be retained onsite and disposed of via an underground percolation improvement approved by the City Engineer. 58. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 -year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be the 1 hour, 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. 59. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 60. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. 589 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 14 of 17 The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 61. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on-site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 62. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Planning Manager and the City Engineer. 63. For on-site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 64. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 65. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 66. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 67. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 68. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. A. For post -construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. B. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City 590 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 15 of 17 Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. C. The developer shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. UTILITIES 69. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 70. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 71. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. 72. The 92 KV transmission power poles and all existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 73. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. 74. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 75. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on-site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 76. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 77. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. 591 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 16 of 17 78. All new and modified landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 79. Lighting plans shall be submitted with the final landscaping plans for a recommendation to the Planning Manager for his approval. Exterior lighting shall be consistent with LQMC Section 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting). All freestanding lighting shall not exceed 18 feet in height and shall be fitted with a visor if deemed necessary by staff to minimize trespass of light off the property. The illuminated carports shall be included in the photometric study as part of the final lighting plan submittal. 80. All water features shall be designed to minimize "splash" and use high efficiency pumps and lighting to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. They shall be included in the landscape plan water efficiency calculations per Municipal Code Chapter 8.13. 81. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view. Utility transformers or other ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be fully screened with a screening wall or landscaping and painted to match the adjacent buildings. 82. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing, and approval to the Community Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Manager approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit unless the Planning Manager determines extenuating circumstances exist which justifies an alternative processing schedule. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Manager and/or City Engineer. 83. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition" or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 84. The final design of the perimeter landscaping, particularly the perimeter wall, shall be included with the Final Landscape Plan submittal. PI ANNING 85. Architectural styles shall vary throughout the site. Similar architectural styles shall not be plotted on adjacent lots or across the street from one another to the extent possible. 86. Enhanced elevations shall be used for all outside perimeter lots. PUBLIC SERVICES 87. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements if required by SunLine Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer. 592 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 17 of 17 MAINTENANCE 88. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 89. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, common areas, access drives, sidewalks, multi -use trail, and stormwater BMPs. FEES AND DEPOSITS 90. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 593 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 1 of 17 GFNFRAI EXHIBIT G The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative Tract Map, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Tentative Tract Map, and any Final Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code §§ 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"). 3. This Tentative Tract Map shall expire 36 months from the approval date and shall become null and void in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code Section 13.12.150. A time extension may be requested per LQMC Section 13.12.160 4. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Development Division (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Exemption Form — Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) • La Quinta Design and Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID)California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) • State Water Resources Control Board • SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) • South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 5. Coverage under the State of California General Construction Permit must be obtained by the applicant, who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's ("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent ("NOI") and Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 594 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 2 of 17 6. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permittee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP") to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. D. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. E. The inclusion in the Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs as required. 7. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 8. CUP2021-0002 shall comply with all applicable conditions and mitigation measures for the following related approvals: • Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 • Environmental Assessment 2021-0006 • General Plan Amendment 2021-0001 • Zone Change 2021-0001 595 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 3 of 17 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 9. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to affect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 10. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 11. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 12. Pursuant to the aforementioned condition, conferred rights shall include approvals from the master developer over easements and other property rights necessary for construction and proper functioning of the proposed development not limited to access rights over proposed and/or existing private streets that access public streets and open space/drainage facilities of the master development. 13. The applicant shall offer for dedication all public street rights-of-way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 14. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Avenue 58 (Secondary Arterial) — The standard 51 feet from the centerline of Avenue 58 to the ultimate developed right of way. 15. The applicant shall retain for private use on the Final Map all private street rights-of-way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 596 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 4 of 17 16. The private street rights-of-way to be retained for private use required for this development include: A. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Private Residential Streets measured at lot line to lot line shall have a 40 - foot travel width. The travel width may be reduced to 24 with prohibited on - street parking with approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors, and the applicant establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&R's. 17. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. Pursuant to this requirement, the Applicant shall include in the submittal packet containing the draft final map submitted for map checking, an offsite street geometric layout, drawn at 1" equals 40 feet, detailing the following design aspects: median curb line, outside curb line, lane line alignment including lane widths, left turn lanes, deceleration lane(s) and bus stop turnout(s). The geometric layout shall be accompanied with sufficient professional engineering studies to confirm the appropriate length of all proposed turn pockets and auxiliary lanes that may impact the right of way dedication required of the project and the associated landscape setback requirement. 18. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights-of-way shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such rights-of-way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights-of-way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 19. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map a ten -foot -wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all private streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet in width with the express written approval of IID. 20. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public rights-of-way as follows: A. Avenue 58 (Secondary Arterial) - 10 -foot from the R/W-P/L. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 21. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map. 597 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 5 of 17 22. Direct vehicular access to Avenue 58 is restricted, except for those access points identified on the tentative tract map, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final tract map. 23. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 24. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 25. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties and Development) for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 26. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be near vertical with a 1/8" batter and a minimum height of 0.1'. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 27. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses.) A. OFF-SITE STREETS 1) Avenue 58 (Secondary Arterial) a. Widen the south side of the street along all frontage adjacent to the Tentative Map boundary to its ultimate width on the south side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions. Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing roadway pavement as necessary to augment and convert it from a rural county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design standard. The south curb face shall be located thirty-six feet (36') south of the centerline or as approved by the City Engineer. b. Restripe to provide an eastbound right -turn lane and a westbound left - turn lane at the main project driveway and an eastbound right -turn lane at the emergency access driveway as shown in the Traffic Impact Analysis Report and/or as approved by the City Engineer. Other required improvements in the right-of-way and/or adjacent landscape 598 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 6 of 17 setback area include: C. All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. d. Multi -Use Path - The applicant shall construct a multi -use path per La Quinta Standard 260 feet along the south side of Avenue 58 frontage within the landscaped setback. The location and design of the path shall be approved by the City. A split rail fence shall be constructed along the roadway side of the multi -use path in accordance with Section 9.140.060 (Item E, 3a) of the Zoning Ordinance. Bonding for the fence to be installed shall be posted prior to final map approval. The multi -use path and fence shall be maintained by the Developer or project's Homeowner's Association as applicable. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the project boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). To connect to the west improvements and minimum 20' to the east. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Construct internal streets per the approved lay -out shown on the Tentative Tract map and/or as approved by the City Engineer. Minimum street width measured at lot line to lot line shall have a 40 -foot travel width. The travel width may be reduced to 24 feet with prohibited on -street parking with approved Planned Unit Development (PUD). The applicant shall make provisions for perpetual enforcement of the "No Parking" restrictions in the CC&Rs. 2) The location of driveways shall not be located within the curb return and away from intersections, when possible. 28. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20 -year life pavement, and the site-specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) Residential Secondary Arterial 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. 4.5" a.c /5.5" c.a.b. 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. 4.0" a.c./6.0" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials per the City Engineer. 29. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of 599 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 7 of 17 construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 30. All gated entries shall provide for a three -car minimum stacking capacity for inbound traffic to be a minimum length of 62 feet from call box to the street; and shall provide for a full turn -around outlet for non -accepted vehicles or as approved by the City Engineer. Where a gated entry is proposed, the applicant shall submit a detailed exhibit at a scale of 1" = 10', demonstrating that those passenger vehicles that do not gain entry into the development can safely make a full turn -around (minimum radius to be 24 feet) out onto the main street from the gated entry. Pursuant to said condition, there shall be a minimum of twenty five feet width provided at the turn -around opening provided. Two lanes of traffic shall be provided on the entry side of each gated entry, one lane shall be dedicated for residents and one lane for visitors. The two travel lanes shall be a minimum of 20 feet of total paved roadway surface or as approved by the Fire Department. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, standard knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 31. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: Avenue 58 (Primary Entry): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. Avenue 58 (Emergency Access): Emergency access only. No public access allowed. Left turns are restricted. 32. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 33. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. FINAL MAPS 34. Prior to the City's approval of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate mylars of the Final Map that were approved by the City's map checker on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. The Final Map shall be 1" = 40' scale. PARKING T -f Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 8 of 17 35. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and in particular the following: A. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking stall design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is required including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans to evaluate ADA accessibility issues. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking stall lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2 -foot overhang for standard parking stalls and 18 feet with a 2 -foot overhang for handicapped parking stall or as approved by the City Engineer. One van accessible handicapped parking stall is required per 8 handicapped parking stalls. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, ADA accessibility route to public streets and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 36. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 37. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Development Services Division. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On -Site Rough Grading Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal B. PM10 Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal 601 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 9 of 17 C. Erosion Control Plan E F 1" = 40' Horizontal Final WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through D to be submitted concurrently. Off -Site Street Improvement/Storm Drain Plan Off -Site Signing & Striping Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1" = 4' Vertical 1" = 40' Horizontal The Off -Site street improvement plans shall have separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. G. On -Site Precise Grading Plan 1" = 30' Horizontal H. On -Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1"= 4' Vertical NOTE: E through H to be submitted concurrently. (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200 -feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On -Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1 -foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. "On -Site Precise Grading" plans shall normally include all on-site surface improvements including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements and accessibility requirements. 38. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the "Plans, Notes and Design Guidance" 602 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 10 of 17 section of the Public Works Department at the City website (laquintaca.gov). Please navigate to the Public Works Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 39. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. 40. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer Of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the EOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer Of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 41. Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on and off-site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 42. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Tract Map, shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security). 43. Prior to constructing any off-site improvements, the applicant shall deposit securities equivalent to both a Performance and Labor & Material Bonds each valued at 100% of the cost of the off-site improvements, or as approved by the City Engineer. 44. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 45. When improvements are phased through a "Phasing Plan," or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off-site improvements and common on-site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 603 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 11 of 17 Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed, or secured, prior to the completion of homes or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 46. Depending on the timing of the development of this Tentative Tract Map, and the status of the off-site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off-site improvements. B. Construct additional off-site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this Tentative Tract Map. D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. Off -Site Improvements should be completed on a first priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off -Site Improvements in the first phase of construction or by the issuance of the 20 % Building Permit. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 47. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on-site and off-site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule as approved by the City Engineer. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. 48. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 604 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 12 of 17 GRADING 49. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 50. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 51. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. Final WQMP prepared by an appropriate professional registered in the State of California. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 52. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 53. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e., the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6) of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the 605 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 13 of 17 right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 54. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval, or as approved by the City Engineer. 55. The applicant shall minimize the differences in elevation between the adjoining properties and the lots within this development. 56. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (0.5') from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance review. 57. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation, and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 58. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for the La Villetta at Avenue project (TTM 37950), or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. Nuisance water shall be retained onsite and disposed of via an underground percolation improvement approved by the City Engineer. 59. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 -year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be the 1 hour, 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. 60. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 61. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. .1. Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 14 of 17 The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 62. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on-site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 63. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Planning Manager and the City Engineer. 64. For on-site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 65. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 66. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 67. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 68. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 69. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. A. For post -construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. B. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City 607 Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 15 of 17 Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. C. The developer shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. UTILITIES 70. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 71. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 72. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. 73. The 92 KV transmission power poles and all existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 74. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. 75. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 76. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on-site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 77. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 78. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots and setbacks, medians, retention basins, and parks shall be signed and stamped by a licensed landscape architect. .1: Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 16 of 17 79. All new and modified landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 80. Lighting plans shall be submitted with the final landscaping plans for a recommendation to the Planning Manager for his approval. Exterior lighting shall be consistent with LQMC Section 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting). All freestanding lighting shall not exceed 18 feet in height and shall be fitted with a visor if deemed necessary by staff to minimize trespass of light off the property. The illuminated carports shall be included in the photometric study as part of the final lighting plan submittal. 81. All water features shall be designed to minimize "splash" and use high efficiency pumps and lighting to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. They shall be included in the landscape plan water efficiency calculations per Municipal Code Chapter 8.13. 82. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view. Utility transformers or other ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be fully screened with a screening wall or landscaping and painted to match the adjacent buildings. 83. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing, and approval to the Community Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Manager approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit unless the Planning Manager determines extenuating circumstances exist which justifies an alternative processing schedule. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Manager and/or City Engineer. 84. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition" or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 85. The final design of the perimeter landscaping, particularly the perimeter wall, shall be included with the Final Landscape Plan submittal. PI ANNING 86. Architectural styles shall vary throughout the site. Similar architectural styles shall not be plotted on adjacent lots or across the street from one another to the extent possible. 87. Enhanced elevations shall be used for all outside perimeter lots. PUBLIC SERVICES 88. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements if required by SunLine Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer. .I• Council Resolution 2023 — XXX Conditions of Approval — Recommended Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 Project: La Villetta At Avenue 58 Adopted: December 19, 2023 Page 17 of 17 MAINTENANCE 89. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 90. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, common areas, access drives, sidewalks, multi -use trail, and stormwater BMPs. FEES AND DEPOSITS 91. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 610 Vicinity Map 611 ATTACHMENT 2 FINDINGS Environmental Assessment 2021-0006 1. The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number, or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Potential impacts can be mitigated to be less than significant levels. 2. The proposed project will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity. Potential impacts can be mitigated to be less than significant. 3. The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly. Potential impacts can be mitigated to be less than significant. General Plan Amendment 2021-0001 1. Internal General Plan Consistency. The amendment is internally consistent with those goals, objectives and policies of the general plan which are not being amended. The General Plan Amendment would lead to a Medium High Density land use designation which supports up to 16 units to the acre. 2. Public Welfare. Approval of the amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. As part of the project, a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be adopted to mitigate any potential impacts. 3. General Plan Compatibility. In the case of amendments to the general plan policy diagram, the new designation is compatible with the designations on adjacent properties. The increase in density is being used to create a residential project that is creative and will connect with surrounding residential properties to provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population. 4. Property Suitability. In the case of amendments to the general plan policy diagram, the new designation is suitable and appropriate for the subject property, insofar as it will allow the development of single family homes on a site that is generally flat and rectangular. 612 5. Change in Circumstances. In the case of amendments to the general plan policy diagram, approval of the amendment is warranted because the situation and the general conditions of the property have substantially changed since the existing designation was imposed. Higher density is required to achieve a single-family home project that meets the market demand. Market conditions have led to needing more units to match increases in costs in building units meanwhile meeting increase in demand for single family residential units for the public. The General Plan Amendment is warranted to meet the density allowed under the General Plan land use map. Zone Change 2021-0001 1. The zone map change is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, as described above and contained in Exhibit C. The Zone Change would lead to a High Density Residential zoning designation, consistent with the Medium and High Density Residential General Plan land use designation, which supports 8-12 units per acre residential density and is designed to accommodate a broad range of residential land uses, including single family development. 2. Approval of the zone map change will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. As part of the project, a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be adopted to mitigate any potential impacts. 3. The new zoning is compatible with the zoning on adjacent properties as it continues residentially zoned properties adjacent to the property and surrounding it. 4. The new zoning is suitable and appropriate for the subject property because it is currently zoned for residential and the change is to increase density, consistent with the General Plan Amendment designation. 5. Change in Circumstances. Approval of the zone change is warranted because the situation and the general conditions of the property have substantially changed since the existing zoning was imposed. Higher density is required to achieve a single-family home project that meets the market demand. Market conditions have led to needing more units to match increases in costs in building units meanwhile meeting increase in demand for single family residential units for the public. The zone change is warranted to meet the density allowed under the General Plan land use map. 613 Conditional Use Permit 2021-0002 1. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Medium/High Density Residential. The City's General Plan Medium/High Density Residential designation is designed to accommodate a broad range of residential land uses, including single family residential projects. The City's General Plan policies relating to Medium/High Density Residential encourage a broad range of residential uses within the City, and the proposed use maintains those policies. The proposed project is consistent with the following Goals, Programs, and Policies: • Goal LU -2 as the project consists of high-quality design that complements and enhances the City. The project design uses high- quality Spanish, Mediterranean, and Santa Barbra styles, and utilizes varying roof lines and architectural accent, along with a complementary color palette. • Goal LU -5 as the project provides a broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City. The project provides for a single family home residential project, which creates a different housing type and choice for residents within the City. • Policy LU -5.2 in considering changes in market demand in residential product type to meet the needs of current and future residents. The project is changing from a low density residential project to a planned unit development project to respond to market demand in residential product type to provide residents with smaller lot single family subdivisions. • Goal SC -1 in that it provides a community that provides the best possible quality of life for all its residents by providing alternative housing types within La Quinta meanwhile providing a project that incorporates open space and common area with a pool for its residents, bocce ball court, tot lot, and passive open space. • Goal H-1 in providing housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population. The single-family home project of this type provides a diverse type of residential product. • Policy H-1.3 to direct new housing development to viable areas where essential public facilities can be provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are available. The housing development is located in viable area where essential public facilities can be provided and employment opportunities, educational facilities, and commercial support are all available. 2. The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Medium High Density Residential zone as well as the development standards of the City's Zoning Code and in terms of architectural style and 614 landscaping. The project satisfies the zone's intent to provide for the development of high density neighborhoods with one and two-story single family dwellings. The project is generally consistent with the residential development standards and permitted use table, except deviations as established within the Planned Unit Development. 3. The Design and Development Department has prepared Environmental Assessment 2021-0006 for this project, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Department has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect because mitigation measures have been incorporated. 4. The architectural design of the project, including, but not limited to, the architectural style, scale, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details, roof style and other architectural elements are compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. The Spanish, Mediterranean, and Santa Barbara styles utilizes a high-quality design that is compatible with other approved and constructed residential projects within the City. 5. The site design of the project including, but not limited to, project entries, interior circulation, pedestrian and bicycle access, pedestrian amenities, screening of equipment and trash enclosures, exterior lighting, and other site design elements are compatible with surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. 6. Project landscaping, including, but not limited to, the location, type, size, color, texture, and coverage of plant materials, has been designed so as to provide visual relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements and vistas, screen undesirable views, provide a harmonious transition between adjacent land uses and between development and open space, and provide an overall unifying influence to enhance the visual continuity of the project. The proposed project is consistent with the landscaping standards and plant palette and implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan and Zoning Code. The permanent overall site landscaping utilizes various tree and shrub species to enhance the building architecture and provide adequate relief and screening from Avenue 58. Tentative Tract Map 2021-0004 1. The proposed Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the land use, policies and programs of the General Plan, as it allows for development of a Medium High Density Residential project in the Medium/High Density land use designation, which supports up to 16 units per acre residential density and is designed to accommodate a broad range of residential land uses, including single family projects. 615 2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, and Planned Unit Development standards with the implementation of recommended conditions of approval to ensure consistency for the homes proposed on the lots created herein. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The Design and Development Department prepared Environmental Assessment (EA) 2021-0006, in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This approval includes adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration. 4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, insofar as the project will be required to comply with all laws, standards and requirements associated with sanitary sewer collection, water quality and other public health issues. 5. The site of the proposed subdivision is physically suitable for the type of development and proposed density of development. The Planned Unit Development allows for creative development with smaller lot subdivision while still providing a quality residential development. 6. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable provisions of Title 13 of the City's Subdivision Regulations Code and the Planned Unit Development, including, but not limited to, minimum lot area requirements, any other applicable provisions of Title 9 of the City's Zoning Code, and the Subdivision Map Act. 7. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. 616 ATTACHMENT 3 PROJECT INFORMATION CASE NUMBERS: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2021-0001, ZONE CHANGE 2021-0001, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2021-0002 (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT), AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2021-0004 APPLICANT: ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP REQUEST: CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, ZONE CHANGE, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN 80 UNIT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 37950 LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 58 BETWEEN MADISON STREET AND MONROE STREET CEQA: THE LA QUINTA DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSED PROJECT, HAS DETERMINED THAT ANY POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS CAN BE MITIGATED TO A LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVEL, AND HAS PREPARED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. GENERALPLAN DESIGNATION: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (EXISTING) ZONING DESIGNATION: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (EXISTING) SURROUNDING ZONING/LAND USES: NORTH: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, EXISTING RESIDENTIAL SOUTH: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, VACANT SITE EAST: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, VACANT SITE WEST: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, EXISTING RESIDENTIAL 617 VICINITY MAP N.T.S LEGAL DESCRIPTION TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37950 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ALL THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN APN 764-01-012 (TTM 30092) o w B ZONING/GENERAL PLAN: RL/LDR 12 EXISTING USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WATER POINT Q EX. 18 WA OF CONNECTION AVENUE 58 < � - - .., Lo - 60' 90' 0 ;3S 18" SEX. 18" SSoN89` 32 26.07 W J-0 3EX. S M 3 � SEWER POINT L O T A EX. 33" SS OF CONNECTION' 51' x 648' N 5 3'QJ 10' LANDSCAPE OFFER FOR DEDICATION FOR �6,�I � ��s SETBACK _ PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS �J 1 -sem B LOT D•: -61 '�. • - ACCESS •FOR FIRE ` -`---`---`--- 6'6 -------------- CALL BOX l62' ..........'............'' ACE ----------------------------- _ • OPE,N SP DEPARTMENT ONLY r I PARCEL 1: - -FrR L�-162 • -60 - 0. - - 7 - L O T E ALL THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, OF SECTION L 0 T C ,601 27, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, AS SHOWN BY ` w Q 3 20.00% 27,370 SF UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 29,210 SF �,_ < l- - > I 1 COMMON AREA �- '�,�\6� � w N f I. I RETENTION BASIN / OPEN SPACE �_ o' 78 �� 79 1 80 I ACCESS RAMP 20% MAX SLOPE 1 BEGINNING ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, AT A POINT 841.8 FEET WEST PAD= -60.0 8J Ba J8 ��62J w � 83 SIF �� 4204 SF 1� 488 SF OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF. THENCE AT A RIGHT ANGLE SOUTHERLY 651 FEET; 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ 3Al 64'=-59.8 PAD= -60.0 PAD= -60.2 i MAX. WATER LEVEL THENCE AT A RIGHT ANGLE WESTERLY, 324 FEET; THENCE AT A RIGHT ANGLE NORTHERLY, 651 ° I EXISTING LOT ; 100 -YR STORM FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE EASTERLY 1.31 FL LINE -61.75 FIL V 0.81 TC - - -61.25 TC i ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, 324 FEET TO THE POINT OF I \ '� I PAD= -66.0 a 60.0' 60.0' 60.0' 15• - I � 3 I BEGINNING. Two• N � APN: 764-180-002-2 -6t wq w. - q q �p wq PRIVAT STREET "D" wg N N A- 0 f .45% O� 0.45% ITD / I -ss ss goo Q o ss ss , y ss cc p \� PARCEL 2: a I 0 .� -V,-Ss ss - L 0 T B ALL THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION �QT 3 //`b' • o - • ��'- R,8 U i 27, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF PAD= -60.2 - • • - • �•� -61 - 117,470 SF i Lc� 30.0' 40.0' 80.0'80.0' X2.0' N w CO LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY UNITED STATES I r -60 w PRIVATE GOVERNMENT SURVEY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: R� IDI 75 0 �DI 0 `D \'� 3 1 +� "' Z 2640 SF 74 z / STREETS %. �.'. - - - • - - - - ,� 2640 SF . ; m PAD= -59.8 PAD= -59.3 M /� 62.0' D BEGINNING ON A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION •� •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• I 0 77 _ 0 76 25.0' 55.0' 25.0 73 N I `'�cli . QPEN SPA -CE--`-`-`-`-` %% I- ' 2459 SF 2480 SF o < 1 517.60 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 27; *.PAD= -60.4'. un w - "'PAD --60.3 PAD= -60.2 - -55.0' 2583 SF ] 0 1 w �n - PAD= -59.7 N THENCE AT A RIGHT ANGLE SOUTHERLY 651.00 FEET; THENCE AT A RIGHT ANGLE WESTERLY .`•`•`•••`•`�-• • o �� e 0 I N ,",,,,,,,,r,� I� k E 2480 SF `D I 324.00 FEET; THENCE AT A RIGHT ANGLE NORTHERLY 651.00 FEET TO A NORTHERLY LINE OF ,-,----•••-•----------••--------------•--- _ T 0) o w PAD= -60.3 0 L-------------------� s �� 61.86 FL �1 r '" � I � 3 1 SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY •••'••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• N 61.36 TC N o 71 oI 72 o N o 'w 40.0' 40.0' 2310 SF 2310 SF N ^�0 _ _ 10.0' 80.0' 84.0' 42.0' 42.0' LINE 324.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PAD= -60.0 I PAD= -59.5 // 32.0' 30.0' APN: 764-180-003-3 0 2772 SF- Lw'�U 1 -61 FS 41 M - 0.50% -- �� 55.0' �® 01 55.0' �60 0.45% ss �I oTrv' I oa�vn -61 �. 0 N -� ray rri V 26401 SF I� 0 PAD= -59.8 I . ,o F �, 00 F� -wn ;� w -w ` r7 r7 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER' 59.0' 25.0' 3 ,�O��S m, - ' � 43 0 42 I 25 0 PAD= -59.3 2604 SF o 40.0' 40.0' 4N N 764-180-002 764-180-003 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: EXISTING: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED: MEDIUM/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (4-16 UNITS/AC) ZONING: EXISTING: RL PROPOSED: RMH OWNER/DEVELOPER RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES, LLC 9595 WILSHIRE BLVD, SUITE 708 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 ATTN: KRIS PINERO (818)981-3000 CIVIL ENGINEER: D & D ENGINEERING, INC 119 W HYDE PARK BLVD INGLEWOOD, CA 90302 ATTN: HENRIK NAZARIAN (424) 351-6800 LEGEND: - F o 70 0 69 0 2.0 2460 SF 2480 SF PAD= -60.2 a N N �' c� ° 55.0' sp 3 -61.94 FL o 'q-2310 SF 2310 SF 0 00' ZQ PAD= -59.7 PAD= -59.7 w 4 nl o -61.78 FIL -61.44 TC _ �i N _60 PAD= -60.0 PAD= -59.5 -61.28 FL o I`� 2478 SF N -61.28 TC v N v -60.78 TC N o 40 W 0 0 64 0 65 55.0' 55.0' N N PAD= -60.0 25.0' 68 N 40.0' 40.0' PAD= -59.5 1SF < o a (D 2480 SF � 2480 SF 25 2604 SF � s PAD= -60.4 PAD= -60.2 _ _ Ki cD z N 59.0' -61--,o0.45% o ID 66 0 67 PAD= -59.7_ S- -ss-0.45% ss o M O Q D o N �I ' ,l " ,`°�`�5 N i`���IF�' °, z 2640 SF 2640 SF 53 D M I ���'�� wn `� a `'05 � 55.0' I�04 PAD= -59.8 PAD 59.3 ,`� F ``� oo. F N ' III I _ II z 40.0' 1 40.0' 80.0' w . . 40'w 0 42.0 � O 5 gi 40.0' 40.0' 0 Z 2478 SF N 1 1 6zi o 39 0 0 O O >- o -61.68 FL 12' , 12' I 20' "20' -61.39 FL 0 N 2310 SF Z N \w O Z J PAD= -60.0 N -61.18 TC �Ilr ° o z� 61 0 60 I� 0 12' 12' -60.89 TC o; PAD= -59.5 O J Q 59.0' M w X640 SF � 2640 SF I I M N o 00 w 7 o PAD= -59.2 PAD= -59.9 I I I 0 0 O Z J LL- 25.0' 2604 SF co 0 63 0 62 1 0 I 36 37 J Ii1 / PAD= -60.1 140' CN 2480 SF 2480 SF 25.0' 55.0' 55.0' 25.0' 2604 SF N (� I I 2480 SF � 2480 SF 25.0' 55`0' OI Q Q < J 0 i 0 PAD= -59.8 PAD= -59.6 cD Co+ I PAD= -59.8 PAD= -59.7 00 w w Lu w z� 2772 SF z 20' 20' 0 PAD= -60.3 I 0 ° 38 0 = J Z PAD= -59.8 w I -61.37 FL A M Z w ' I -60.87 TC N 0 57 0 0 40' ' 2640 9 '`� I< a 58 o N A PAD= -59.3 0- O -'` - -- - - 40.0' 40.0' J � 2310 SF � 2310 SF _ � N 3 40.0' 1 40.0' 1 r w z < \w 84.0' 42.0' I N 42.0' I - - Ln '�` PAD= -59.4 PAD= -60.1 - `� I I 1 1 80.0' s Z w rCD Z C� 2772 SF"" �z' it ,moi -i O� L� X0.51% sJ\ O 55.0' I 55.0' ,� -61 0.45% I 0 ZII 33 0 < N PAD= -59.3 O ,0`��c`' c M WA OJNA�oO�c�S -��vI ® �� ,O`�F w ih ~ i6 iF� 3 I r7 � I `� 5 -C14wn �`? ' 'r1i Iw 2640 SF Z Z PAD= -59.8 z 59.0' 25.0' 8 35 34 2604 SF 40.0' 40.0' 0 56 0I cD _ 42.0' N I 2480 SF 2480 SF 25.0' - O z X PAD= -59.7 55 0 w gmaannnr ' -61.26 FL i �70Z V o � 2310 SF � I 2310 SF _ 0 >- I PAD= -60.4 PAD= -60.2 X61.19 FL V v 55.0' 0 -60.76 TC N PAD= -59.4 PAD= -60.1 N z-61.95 FIL y o10 N -60.69 TC -u ,� N N N o 32 p 2478 SF 42.0' Off' Q ' 0 50 / 0 51 55.0' 55.0' ,c3; 6� j -61.45 TC _z N SF N w PAD = -59.5 O 2604 SF o 40.0' 40.0' PAD= -60.0 60.0 ��,'54 2480 SF � 2480 SF 25.0' 25.0' N' !A 'L- 59.0'pr �- s"? 0.45% PAD= -59.7 PAD= -59.6 1 PAD= -60.3 CO ss ss '� s 01 N oo �� J� ,� I 52 o 53 �, 0 _ 0.45% w C C 6o F� - ih wq-O�• F`' �, - n 2640 SF 2640 SIF I I �6`O� 3 w N �- ��`o� 55.0' PAD= -59.2 PAD= -59.9 V ,`o vF n ,�o F PROPERTY LINE 0 11 0/ / II 20.0' 20.0'_20.0' 20.0' 40.0' - - 20.0_ 22.0' 40.0_ 18.0' \,22.0' 20.0' CD co - Parcel Table AIRPORT BLVD 1 LOT Parcel # Area Parcel # Area 1 C- SF 44 C/) SF 2 n SF 45 2320 SF 3 2604 SF 46 0 SF 4 0 SF 47 cn SF 5 z SF 48 2320 PROJECT 6 2772 SF 49 2320 SF 7 2604 SF 50 2480 SITE 8 58TH AVENUE SF 51 2480 SF 9 2772 D 52 2640 SF 10 2478 Z 53 2640 50TH AVE 11 2478 Co 54 2604 SF 12 D r m 55 2310 SF 13 0 0 z 56 c~n 60TH AVENUE 14 z Cn 57 w o SF 15 cn SF 58 2310 SF 16 2400 SF 59 2604 SF 17 2400 SF 60 O 61 TH AVENUE 18 2400 SF 61 2640 SF 19 2400 SF VICINITY MAP N.T.S LEGAL DESCRIPTION TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37950 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ALL THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN APN 764-01-012 (TTM 30092) o w B ZONING/GENERAL PLAN: RL/LDR 12 EXISTING USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WATER POINT Q EX. 18 WA OF CONNECTION AVENUE 58 < � - - .., Lo - 60' 90' 0 ;3S 18" SEX. 18" SSoN89` 32 26.07 W J-0 3EX. S M 3 � SEWER POINT L O T A EX. 33" SS OF CONNECTION' 51' x 648' N 5 3'QJ 10' LANDSCAPE OFFER FOR DEDICATION FOR �6,�I � ��s SETBACK _ PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS �J 1 -sem B LOT D•: -61 '�. • - ACCESS •FOR FIRE ` -`---`---`--- 6'6 -------------- CALL BOX l62' ..........'............'' ACE ----------------------------- _ • OPE,N SP DEPARTMENT ONLY r I PARCEL 1: - -FrR L�-162 • -60 - 0. - - 7 - L O T E ALL THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, OF SECTION L 0 T C ,601 27, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, AS SHOWN BY ` w Q 3 20.00% 27,370 SF UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 29,210 SF �,_ < l- - > I 1 COMMON AREA �- '�,�\6� � w N f I. I RETENTION BASIN / OPEN SPACE �_ o' 78 �� 79 1 80 I ACCESS RAMP 20% MAX SLOPE 1 BEGINNING ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, AT A POINT 841.8 FEET WEST PAD= -60.0 8J Ba J8 ��62J w � 83 SIF �� 4204 SF 1� 488 SF OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF. THENCE AT A RIGHT ANGLE SOUTHERLY 651 FEET; 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ 3Al 64'=-59.8 PAD= -60.0 PAD= -60.2 i MAX. WATER LEVEL THENCE AT A RIGHT ANGLE WESTERLY, 324 FEET; THENCE AT A RIGHT ANGLE NORTHERLY, 651 ° I EXISTING LOT ; 100 -YR STORM FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE EASTERLY 1.31 FL LINE -61.75 FIL V 0.81 TC - - -61.25 TC i ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, 324 FEET TO THE POINT OF I \ '� I PAD= -66.0 a 60.0' 60.0' 60.0' 15• - I � 3 I BEGINNING. Two• N � APN: 764-180-002-2 -6t wq w. - q q �p wq PRIVAT STREET "D" wg N N A- 0 f .45% O� 0.45% ITD / I -ss ss goo Q o ss ss , y ss cc p \� PARCEL 2: a I 0 .� -V,-Ss ss - L 0 T B ALL THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION �QT 3 //`b' • o - • ��'- R,8 U i 27, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF PAD= -60.2 - • • - • �•� -61 - 117,470 SF i Lc� 30.0' 40.0' 80.0'80.0' X2.0' N w CO LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY UNITED STATES I r -60 w PRIVATE GOVERNMENT SURVEY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: R� IDI 75 0 �DI 0 `D \'� 3 1 +� "' Z 2640 SF 74 z / STREETS %. �.'. - - - • - - - - ,� 2640 SF . ; m PAD= -59.8 PAD= -59.3 M /� 62.0' D BEGINNING ON A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION •� •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• I 0 77 _ 0 76 25.0' 55.0' 25.0 73 N I `'�cli . QPEN SPA -CE--`-`-`-`-` %% I- ' 2459 SF 2480 SF o < 1 517.60 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 27; *.PAD= -60.4'. un w - "'PAD --60.3 PAD= -60.2 - -55.0' 2583 SF ] 0 1 w �n - PAD= -59.7 N THENCE AT A RIGHT ANGLE SOUTHERLY 651.00 FEET; THENCE AT A RIGHT ANGLE WESTERLY .`•`•`•••`•`�-• • o �� e 0 I N ,",,,,,,,,r,� I� k E 2480 SF `D I 324.00 FEET; THENCE AT A RIGHT ANGLE NORTHERLY 651.00 FEET TO A NORTHERLY LINE OF ,-,----•••-•----------••--------------•--- _ T 0) o w PAD= -60.3 0 L-------------------� s �� 61.86 FL �1 r '" � I � 3 1 SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY •••'••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• N 61.36 TC N o 71 oI 72 o N o 'w 40.0' 40.0' 2310 SF 2310 SF N ^�0 _ _ 10.0' 80.0' 84.0' 42.0' 42.0' LINE 324.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PAD= -60.0 I PAD= -59.5 // 32.0' 30.0' APN: 764-180-003-3 0 2772 SF- Lw'�U 1 -61 FS 41 M - 0.50% -- �� 55.0' �® 01 55.0' �60 0.45% ss �I oTrv' I oa�vn -61 �. 0 N -� ray rri V 26401 SF I� 0 PAD= -59.8 I . ,o F �, 00 F� -wn ;� w -w ` r7 r7 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER' 59.0' 25.0' 3 ,�O��S m, - ' � 43 0 42 I 25 0 PAD= -59.3 2604 SF o 40.0' 40.0' 4N N 764-180-002 764-180-003 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: EXISTING: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED: MEDIUM/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (4-16 UNITS/AC) ZONING: EXISTING: RL PROPOSED: RMH OWNER/DEVELOPER RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES, LLC 9595 WILSHIRE BLVD, SUITE 708 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 ATTN: KRIS PINERO (818)981-3000 CIVIL ENGINEER: D & D ENGINEERING, INC 119 W HYDE PARK BLVD INGLEWOOD, CA 90302 ATTN: HENRIK NAZARIAN (424) 351-6800 LEGEND: - F o 70 0 69 0 2.0 2460 SF 2480 SF PAD= -60.2 a N N �' c� ° 55.0' sp 3 -61.94 FL o 'q-2310 SF 2310 SF 0 00' ZQ PAD= -59.7 PAD= -59.7 w 4 nl o -61.78 FIL -61.44 TC _ �i N _60 PAD= -60.0 PAD= -59.5 -61.28 FL o I`� 2478 SF N -61.28 TC v N v -60.78 TC N o 40 W 0 0 64 0 65 55.0' 55.0' N N PAD= -60.0 25.0' 68 N 40.0' 40.0' PAD= -59.5 1SF < o a (D 2480 SF � 2480 SF 25 2604 SF � s PAD= -60.4 PAD= -60.2 _ _ Ki cD z N 59.0' -61--,o0.45% o ID 66 0 67 PAD= -59.7_ S- -ss-0.45% ss o M O Q D o N �I ' ,l " ,`°�`�5 N i`���IF�' °, z 2640 SF 2640 SF 53 D M I ���'�� wn `� a `'05 � 55.0' I�04 PAD= -59.8 PAD 59.3 ,`� F ``� oo. F N ' III I _ II z 40.0' 1 40.0' 80.0' w . . 40'w 0 42.0 � O 5 gi 40.0' 40.0' 0 Z 2478 SF N 1 1 6zi o 39 0 0 O O >- o -61.68 FL 12' , 12' I 20' "20' -61.39 FL 0 N 2310 SF Z N \w O Z J PAD= -60.0 N -61.18 TC �Ilr ° o z� 61 0 60 I� 0 12' 12' -60.89 TC o; PAD= -59.5 O J Q 59.0' M w X640 SF � 2640 SF I I M N o 00 w 7 o PAD= -59.2 PAD= -59.9 I I I 0 0 O Z J LL- 25.0' 2604 SF co 0 63 0 62 1 0 I 36 37 J Ii1 / PAD= -60.1 140' CN 2480 SF 2480 SF 25.0' 55.0' 55.0' 25.0' 2604 SF N (� I I 2480 SF � 2480 SF 25.0' 55`0' OI Q Q < J 0 i 0 PAD= -59.8 PAD= -59.6 cD Co+ I PAD= -59.8 PAD= -59.7 00 w w Lu w z� 2772 SF z 20' 20' 0 PAD= -60.3 I 0 ° 38 0 = J Z PAD= -59.8 w I -61.37 FL A M Z w ' I -60.87 TC N 0 57 0 0 40' ' 2640 9 '`� I< a 58 o N A PAD= -59.3 0- O -'` - -- - - 40.0' 40.0' J � 2310 SF � 2310 SF _ � N 3 40.0' 1 40.0' 1 r w z < \w 84.0' 42.0' I N 42.0' I - - Ln '�` PAD= -59.4 PAD= -60.1 - `� I I 1 1 80.0' s Z w rCD Z C� 2772 SF"" �z' it ,moi -i O� L� X0.51% sJ\ O 55.0' I 55.0' ,� -61 0.45% I 0 ZII 33 0 < N PAD= -59.3 O ,0`��c`' c M WA OJNA�oO�c�S -��vI ® �� ,O`�F w ih ~ i6 iF� 3 I r7 � I `� 5 -C14wn �`? ' 'r1i Iw 2640 SF Z Z PAD= -59.8 z 59.0' 25.0' 8 35 34 2604 SF 40.0' 40.0' 0 56 0I cD _ 42.0' N I 2480 SF 2480 SF 25.0' - O z X PAD= -59.7 55 0 w gmaannnr ' -61.26 FL i �70Z V o � 2310 SF � I 2310 SF _ 0 >- I PAD= -60.4 PAD= -60.2 X61.19 FL V v 55.0' 0 -60.76 TC N PAD= -59.4 PAD= -60.1 N z-61.95 FIL y o10 N -60.69 TC -u ,� N N N o 32 p 2478 SF 42.0' Off' Q ' 0 50 / 0 51 55.0' 55.0' ,c3; 6� j -61.45 TC _z N SF N w PAD = -59.5 O 2604 SF o 40.0' 40.0' PAD= -60.0 60.0 ��,'54 2480 SF � 2480 SF 25.0' 25.0' N' !A 'L- 59.0'pr �- s"? 0.45% PAD= -59.7 PAD= -59.6 1 PAD= -60.3 CO ss ss '� s 01 N oo �� J� ,� I 52 o 53 �, 0 _ 0.45% w C C 6o F� - ih wq-O�• F`' �, - n 2640 SF 2640 SIF I I �6`O� 3 w N �- ��`o� 55.0' PAD= -59.2 PAD= -59.9 V ,`o vF n ,�o F PROPERTY LINE 0 11 0/ / II 20.0' 20.0'_20.0' 20.0' 40.0' - - 20.0_ 22.0' 40.0_ 18.0' \,22.0' 20.0' CD co - Parcel Table Parcel Table 1 LOT Parcel # Area Parcel # Area 1 2480 SF 44 2320 SF 2 2772 SF 45 2320 SF 3 2604 SF 46 2436 SF 4 2478 SF 47 2320 SF 5 2478 SF 48 2320 SF 6 2772 SF 49 2320 SF 7 2604 SF 50 2480 SF 8 2604 SF 51 2480 SF 9 2772 SF 52 2640 SF 10 2478 SF 53 2640 SF 11 2478 SF 54 2604 SF 12 2772 SF 55 2310 SF 13 2677 SF 56 2310 SF 14 4623 SF 57 2310 SF 15 2400 SF 58 2310 SF 16 2400 SF 59 2604 SF 17 2400 SF 60 2640 SF 18 2400 SF 61 2640 SF 19 2400 SF 62 2480 SF 20 2400 SF 63 2480 SF 21 2400 SF 64 2480 SF 22 2400 SF 65 2480 SF 23 2400 SF 66 2640 SF 24 2400 SF 67 2640 SF 25 2400 SF 68 2604 SF 26 2400 SF 69 2310 SF 27 3200 SF 70 2310 SF 28 3300 SF 71 2310 SF 29 2640 SF 72 2310 SF 30 2480 SF 73 2583 SF 31 2310 SF 74 2640 SF 32 2310 SF 75 2640 SF 33 2640 SF 76 2480 SF 34 2480 SF 77 2459 SF 35 2480 SF 78 4883 SF 36 2480 SF 79 4204 SF 37 2480 SF 80 4883 SF 38 2640 SF 39 2310 SF 40 2310 SF 41 2640 SF 42 2480 SF 43 2460 SF RESIDENCE GARAGE LOT ATTACHMENT LINE 10' PUE 8' 4.5' 40' 4 LOT LINE 10' PUE 24' 8' PROPOSED PRIVATE DRIVE 4.5' RESIDENCE K AND FIRE LANE SIDEWALK 3.5' 3.5' 1 INDSCAPE LANDSCAPE 1 TC=FS+0.1' GARAGE 7J ­ k .. STREET SECTION A -A PROPOSED PRIVATE DRIVE AND FIRE LANE NO SCALE NEW NORTH EX SOUTH R/W ' R/W R/W 102 81' 51' 30' 15' 7 8' EXISTING (MEANDERING 2' 1 SIDEWALK 18' 15'f EX.LANE EX.LANE EX.LANE RESIDENCE *FIRE HYDRANT NOTE KEEP 2' CLEARANCE FROM OBSTRUCTIONS AROUND E HYDRANTS N 2478 SF N I 20.0' �_ I 40.0 31 -60 PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR APN i 0 0 PAD= -59.5 � X60 � �I'zl I o � 2310 SF � 764-18Q 002 I N N 3 N PAD= -60.0 PROP NOTE: PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR 59.0' 1 RETAINING PERIMETER WALLS TO BE EITHER 25.0' L 0 49 o W 48 0 47 0 46 6 45 0 44 0 o 130 WALL DECORATIVE COLORED BLOCK OR STUCCO (-60) EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR 2 co o ° 2320 SF � 2320 SF ,°n° 2320 SF 00 2436 SF 0,0 2320 SF 00 2320 SF w o � 2480 SF 25.0' 55.0' 0FINISHED, PER CITY CODE. - �� 0 Q PAD= -60.7 PAD= -60.5 PAD= -60.3 PAD= -60.1 PAD= -59.9 PAD= -59.9 PAD= -60.2- EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR 2772 SF I I�� 3 N y D D I I v, 13 o u ,, 29 0 I II I '� -61.29 FL M PAINTED WROUGHT IRON FENCES AROUND PROP PAD= -59.3 I LIz Z ? `� APN '�� 2640 SF ' \ _ -60.79 TC 764-180-003 40.0' 25.0' THE BASIN ALONG THE STREET FACING SIDE - - CENTER LINE RETAINING 63.0' 21.0' r4/.��>�00' -40.0' 40.0' + � 42.0' 40.0' 40.0' PAD= -59.8 WALL AND INTERIOR SIDE OF THE PROJECT. SS PROPOSED V.C.P SEWER MAIN 3 0 ` - '-61 ' 3 -/-60 55.0' MATERIAL, TYPE, AND FINISH OF ALL � ss o 0.45% ss- `� `4 ss ss- - ss _., o � 13 0.45% o _ 0.45% _ 0.44% - ss 0.45% -� e� FUTURE INTERNAL WALLS AND FENCES ^ PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE 2677 SF o���5 - w-~ w� o.° �5 -waw -o���Q - w N w w� wa w�60 �Q � W:: � �5 wg -61 w o w N o. �, _ r PAD= -60.0 , , _ _ 5 0 PRIVATE STREET E o - 28 o MUST BE PER CITY CODE AND OBTAIN CITY RESIDENCE WA PROPOSED WATER MAIN 63.0' �' �� N �`� - oN 3300 SF � APPROVAL. - - PAD= -59.7 -6,0 6 0 40.0 40.0' 40.0' -40.0' 4 .0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' SD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN � - �n ^ oN IhII ZII I�I1 z � I D Z I D o Z o D z Ed D y -60 Lo EXISTING SEWER MAIN 14 �a I z `� � z -Ir z o 4623 SF 25.0 15 0 0 0 - - - � � - 1 25.0" EXISTING WATER MAIN 70 Co 70 PAD= -59.8 _ 0 16 0 17 0 18 00 19 00 20 0 21 0 22 0 23 0 24 0 25 0 26 0 55.0' 2400 SF 0 2400 SF 0, 2400 SF 0, 2400 SF C) 2400 SF 0, 2400 SF 0 2400 SF CD 2400 SF 0, 2400 SF ( 2400 SF 0, 2400 SF o 2400 SF 0 TO BE BANDONED 3 PAD=-60.2 PAD= -60.4 PAD= -60.7 PAD= -60.7 PAD= -60.5 PAD= -60.3 PAD= -60.1 PAD= -59.9 PAD= -60.1 PAD= -60.3 PAD= -60.1 co PAD= -59.90 ZII 27 �o - - - - - - - - - - EASEMENT LINE o D �i L7 � w 3200 SF PAD= -59.5 RIGHT OF WAY N89° 32' 29.00"W 88.0 DEVELOP ' T PROP 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' / 40.0' 648.00 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' �� 80.0' BUILDING SETBACK PROPOSED BACK OF WALKAPN 764-190-002 EXISTING: VACANT LAND RETAIANL ���� ZONING/GENERAL PLAN: RL/LDR APN 764-190-003 _(_64) _ - CROSS GUTTER PROPOSED: 80 RESIDENTIAL LOTS D EXISTING USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING/GENERAL PLAN: RL/LDR 25282 AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 2,623 SF / EXISTING USE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL F� PROPOSED FINISH SURFACE ELEVATION MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 2,310 SIF ,�01 0.4% PROPOSED SURFACE SLOPE RECREATION AREA: 1 LOT UTILITIES AND SERVICES: EXISTING EASEMENTS: _ IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT SOCAL GAS FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT WASTE MANAGEMENT OF THE DESERT 0 3 AN EASEMENT FOR ROADS, PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED JUNE 6, 1957 AS BOOK 2099, PAGE 304 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: RUELLA S. SCHAFER 4 AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED IN BOOK 2454, PAGE 85 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (THE LOCATION OF THE EASEMENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM THE RECORD INFORMATION.) OAN EASEMENT FOR POWER LINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED MARCH 28, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 89-094143 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT (AFFECTS THE SOUTH 60.0 FEET OF THE NORTH 90.0 FEET AS SHOWN) EARTHWORK QUANTITY 2,215 C.Y. CUT 24,906 C.Y. FILL 23,000 C.Y. IMPORT 21' 10' DEDICATION LANDSCAPE SETBACK 8' 7' PROPOSED MULTIPURPOSE TRAIL _ I I PROPOSED EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS STREET SECTION B -B AVENUE 58 NO SCALE LOT LINE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL MASONRY BLOCK WALL PER CITY CODE LOT 11 BACKYARD PAD EL = -59.9 ADJACENT PARCEL APN: 764-180-001 FG EL = (-62.1) SECTION C -C WEST BOUNDARY NO SCALE LOT LINE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL MASONRY BLOCK WALL PER CITY CODE LOT 17 BACKYARD PAD EL = -60.7 ADJACENT PARCEL APN: 764-190-002 FG EL = -62.5 SECTION D -D SOUTH BOUNDARY NO SCALE LOT LINE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL MASONRY BLOCK WALL PER CITY CODE LOT 31 BACKYARD PAD EL = -60.0 ADJACENT PARCEL APN: 764-180-004 FG EL = -63.3 RESIDENCE I SECTION E -E EAST BOUNDARY NO SCALE 40 0 40 80 scale 1 "= 40' feet OPEN SPACE: 1 LOT D PROPOSED A.C. PAVEMENT RETENTION BASIN/OPEN SPACE: 1 LOT ELECTRIC: GAS: PROPOSED CONCRETE GROSS AREA: 8.94 AC. / 389,500 SF TELEPHONE: NET AREA: 4.79 AC. / 208,850 SF CABLE TV: ---- PROPOSED LANDSCAPE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE (30%): 1.44 AC. / 62,655 SF ON-SITE STREETS: 2.70 AC. WATER: PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION PUBLIC STREETS: 0.76 AC. SEWER: PROPOSED 6' PERIMETER WALL RECREATION AREA: 0.67 AC. / 29,210 SF SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSED WROUGHT IRON FENCE OPEN SPACE LOT: 0.15 AC. / 6,600 SF WASTE DISPOSAL: RETENTION BASIN / OPEN SPACE: 0.63 AC. / 27,370 SF TOTAL OPEN SPACE AREA = 1.45 AC. / 63,180 SF (30.2%) >1.44 AC. IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT SOCAL GAS FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT WASTE MANAGEMENT OF THE DESERT 0 3 AN EASEMENT FOR ROADS, PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED JUNE 6, 1957 AS BOOK 2099, PAGE 304 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: RUELLA S. SCHAFER 4 AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED IN BOOK 2454, PAGE 85 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (THE LOCATION OF THE EASEMENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED FROM THE RECORD INFORMATION.) OAN EASEMENT FOR POWER LINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED MARCH 28, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 89-094143 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. IN FAVOR OF: IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT (AFFECTS THE SOUTH 60.0 FEET OF THE NORTH 90.0 FEET AS SHOWN) EARTHWORK QUANTITY 2,215 C.Y. CUT 24,906 C.Y. FILL 23,000 C.Y. IMPORT 21' 10' DEDICATION LANDSCAPE SETBACK 8' 7' PROPOSED MULTIPURPOSE TRAIL _ I I PROPOSED EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS STREET SECTION B -B AVENUE 58 NO SCALE LOT LINE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL MASONRY BLOCK WALL PER CITY CODE LOT 11 BACKYARD PAD EL = -59.9 ADJACENT PARCEL APN: 764-180-001 FG EL = (-62.1) SECTION C -C WEST BOUNDARY NO SCALE LOT LINE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL MASONRY BLOCK WALL PER CITY CODE LOT 17 BACKYARD PAD EL = -60.7 ADJACENT PARCEL APN: 764-190-002 FG EL = -62.5 SECTION D -D SOUTH BOUNDARY NO SCALE LOT LINE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL MASONRY BLOCK WALL PER CITY CODE LOT 31 BACKYARD PAD EL = -60.0 ADJACENT PARCEL APN: 764-180-004 FG EL = -63.3 RESIDENCE I SECTION E -E EAST BOUNDARY NO SCALE 40 0 40 80 scale 1 "= 40' feet LA QUINTA, RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES, LLC. 06/20/2023 ATTACHMENT 5 Kevin L. Crook Architect Inc PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE 619 A-1 TYPICAL CLUSTER A-28 A-2 PLAN PLAN 2A 1 - FLOOR PLAN A-36 RECREATION CENTER - FLOOR PLAN A-10 A-30 A-3 2A PLAN ENHANCED ELEVATIONS A-37 RECREATION CENTER - ELEVATIONS 1A - SPANISH ELEVATIONS A-31 SANTA A-4 PLAN A-12 PLAN 1A - SPANISH ENHANCED 2B - ELEVATIONS BARBARA ENHANCED ELEVATIONS A-5 PLAN 1B - SANTA BARBARA ELEVATIONS A-32 A-6 PLAN 1B - SANTA BARBARA ENHANCED ELEVATIONS A-33 A-7 PLAN 1 - ROOF PLANS A-34 A-35 A-8 PLAN 2 - FLOOR PLAN A AT Ar" LA QUINTA, CA -m PLAN 4 - FLOOR PLAN PLAN 4B - SANTA BARBARA ELEVATIONS PLAN 4C - MEDITERRANEAN ELEVATIONS PLAN 4 - ROOF PLANS WRITTEN COLOR SCHEMES COLOR BOARDS - "A" SPANISH COLOR BOARDS - "B" SANTA BARBARA COLOR BOARDS - "C" MEDITERRANEAN A-9 PLAN PINERO 2A - SPANISH ELEVATIONS A-36 RECREATION CENTER - FLOOR PLAN A-10 PLAN 2A - SPANISH ENHANCED ELEVATIONS A-37 RECREATION CENTER - ELEVATIONS A-11 PLAN 2B - SANTA BARBARA ELEVATIONS A-38 RECREATION CENTER - ROOF PLAN A-12 PLAN 2B - SANTA BARBARA ENHANCED ELEVATIONS A-13 PLAN 2C - MEDITERRANEAN ELEVATIONS A-14 PLAN 2C - MEDITERRANEAN ENHANCED ELEVATIONS A-15 PLAN 2 - ROOF PLANS A-16 PLAN 3 - FLOOR PLAN A-17 PLAN 3A - SPANISH ELEVATIONS A-18 PLAN 3A - SPANISH ENHANCED ELEVATIONS A-19 PLAN 3C - MEDITERRANEAN ELEVATIONS A-20 PLAN 3C - MEDITERRANEAN ENHANCED ELEVATIONS A-21 PLAN 3 - ROOF PLANS A-22 PLAN 3X - FLOOR PLAN A-23 PLAN 3XA - SPANISH ELEVATIONS A-24 PLAN 3XA - SPANISH ENHANCED ELEVATIONS A-25 PLAN 3XC - MEDITERRANEAN ELEVATIONS A-26 PLAN 3XC - MEDITERRANEAN ENHANCED ELEVATIONS A-27 PLAN 3X - ROOF PLANS A-39 RECREATION CENTER - EXTERIOR COLOR SCHEME A-40 RECREATION CENTER - EXTERIOR COLOR BOARD DEVELOPER: RCE, LLC (RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES, LLC) 9595 WILSHIRE BLVD, SUITE 708 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 CONTACT: KRIS PINERO BUSINESS: (661) 621-8912 Kevin L. Crook Architect Inc PLANNING + ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECT: KEVIN L. CROOK ARCHITECT, INC. 1360 REYNOLDS AVE. SUITE 110 IRVINE, CA 92614 CONTACT: JEFF ADDISON BUSINESS: (949) 660-1587 WWW.KLCARCH.COM 620 PLAN 3 4 BEDROOM, 3 BATH, DEN 2, 1 40 SQ. FT. PLAN 2 3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATH 1 815 SQ. FT. SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1 3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATH 1 ,672 SQ. FT, PLAN 1 3 BEDROOM, 2,5 BATH 1 ,672 SQ. FT. RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. PLAN 3 4 BEDROOM, 3 BATH, DEN 2, 140 SQ. FT. PLAN 2 3 BEDROOM, 2,5 BATH 1 815 SQ. FT. 150'-0" PLAN 2 3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATH 1,815 SQ. FT. PLAN 3 4 BEDROOM, 3 BATH, DEN 2,140 SQ. FT. TYPICAL CLUSTER Av4v u FLA QUINTA, CA PLAN 2 3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATH 1 ,81 5 SQ. FT. PLAN 1 3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATH 1 ,b72 SQ. FT, PLAN 1 3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATH 1 ,672 SQ. FT. PLAN 3 4 BEDROOM, 3 BATH, DEN 2, 140 SQ. FT. SECOND FLOOR 621 SECOND FLOOR PLAN RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. GARAGE 20'-1 "x20'-9" PLAN 1 3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATH r-r-T-�--r-r-r-� ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ILLS VNU LA QUINTA, CA o e I I I , J L—� I I I I I 0/W J Ii al DINING II I V RANGE O 11'-8"x11'-3" 00 KITCHEN 9-2x13-1' I I I I I I F� ----- _ O L — 36" I 39 REF. PANTRY ----- �y N I LIVING RM. I CO QTS 14'-4"x13'-6" I II PWDR. II � II I L --- I I I ENTRY I I UP --- i A/C r FIRST FLOOR PLAN AREA TABULATION CONDITIONED SPACE FIRST FLOOR AREA 606 SQ. FT. SECOND FLOOR AREA 1,066 SQ. FT. TOTAL DWELLING 1,672 SQ. FT. UNCONDITIONED SPACE GARAGE 497 SQ. FT. TOTAL CONDITIONED + UNCONDITIONED SPACE = 2,129 SQ FT ABBREVIATIONS U.N.O - UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 622 2022 Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc. I:f1.Ii�:Lsl� T.C.P. 07 u7 uQi CV S +I O F.F. CV -' T.O.P. FENCE LINE o• F.F. RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. 0 0 Refer to landscape drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations FRONT I I I I I I MATERIALS LEGEND (WHERE OCCURS) FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: SIMULATED CLAY TILE WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF TUBULAR STEEL TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM COLOR SCHEME I PLAN I A SPANISH ELEVATIONS VILLA A V NU LA QUINTA, CA 0 4 RIGHT e A v r LEFT FENCE LINE 623 I:f1.Ii�:Csl� T.O.P. FENCE LINE U------- F.F. RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. Ell L I Ir --J-. MATERIALS LEGEND (WHERE OCCURS) I FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: SIMULATED CLAY TILE WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF TUBULAR STEEL TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM COLOR SCHEME 1 PLAN I A SPANISH ENHANCED ELEVATIONS ILLS 'AT AV LA QUINTA, CA NU r E D 0 4 RIGHT FENCE LINE TIA-1 I is • JY tel.° • � .. :.. '.. � j �..' - -- .._ •:4�• ..... r � ��` • ^9 -� k ..� < ;iii..'.. ..... I� y.. .- .. �:'d .- 5'fisi-i�. �. P✓. 1�'�r� ���i� 2022 Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc. I:f1.Ii�:Lsll T.O.P. FENCE LINE - --------------- --------- F.F. RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. Refer to landscape drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations FRONT MATM WAlk h§ MATERIALS LEGEND (WHERE OCCURS) FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: DECORATE FOAM WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF FOAM TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM COLOR SCHEME 4 PLAN 1 B SANTA BARBARA ELEVATIONS NEILLTTA AT AV NU LA QUINTA, CA M RIGHT K I I ' 000 000 00� LEFT mv FENCE LINEWIX 625 I:11piem:Cell T.O.P. 1 F.F. RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC.LT I � I � I f )fie MATERIALS LEGEND (WHERE OCCURS) FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: DECORATE FOAM WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF FOAM TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM COLOR SCHEME 4 PLAN 1 B SANTA BARBARA ENHANCED ELEVATIONS v4v L qw4VW A i Aip LA QUINTA, CA I I I 1 I 1 Ld1 RIGHT FENCE LINE 626 A - SPANISH RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES9 LLC. III B - SANTA BARBARA PLAN 1 ROOF PLANS AT AV NUE LA QUINTA, CA SECOND FLOOR PLAN RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. A/C 29'-6" DINING O 14'-2^ x, 1'-11" III PLAN 2 3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATH RA 1 "x20 O LIVING RM. 15'-2"x 15'-1 " ENTRY UP. 17R FIRST FLOOR PLAN XPAV NU LA QUINTA, CA !!! 41 AREA TABULATION CONDITIONED SPACE FIRST FLOOR AREA 753 SQ. FT. SECOND FLOOR AREA I� I SQ. FT. I /( I I1 1,815 SQ. i39'"' R J 1 --------------FAD = iT l i � 1, I UNCONDITIONED SPACE GARAGE KITCHEN SQ. FT. 36' PAIM 14'-2"x9'-6° I L------- n n �O •30'RWE ------ U U N PLAN 2 3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATH RA 1 "x20 O LIVING RM. 15'-2"x 15'-1 " ENTRY UP. 17R FIRST FLOOR PLAN XPAV NU LA QUINTA, CA !!! 41 AREA TABULATION CONDITIONED SPACE FIRST FLOOR AREA 753 SQ. FT. SECOND FLOOR AREA 1,062 SQ. FT. TOTAL DWELLING 1,815 SQ. FT. UNCONDITIONED SPACE GARAGE 420 SQ. FT. 628 CD 2022 Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc. BLDG. HGT. Refer to landscape drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations FRONT (MOTOR COURT VIEW) n RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. MATERIALS LEGEND (WHERE OCCURS) 2A FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: SIMULATED CLAY TILE WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF TUBULAR STEEL TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM COLOR SCHEME 2 PLAN 2A SPANISH ELEVATIONS AL A`. VQUINTA, CA FENCE LINE L - - _ -------------------------- I I f I I I RIGHT LEFT FENCE LINE 629 BLDG. HGT. n RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. V -JI MATERIALS LEGEND (WHERE OCCURS) 2A FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: SIMULATED CLAY TILE WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF TUBULAR STEEL TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM I I f I I I RIGHT FENCE LINE FENCE LINE COLOR SCHEME 2 PLAN 2A SPANISH ENHANCED ELEVATIONS ILLS AT A V NU LA QUINTA, CA LEFT 630 © 2022 Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc. BLDG. HGT. T.O.P. F.F. T.O.P. FENCE LINE I- RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. F • T1 rl � - fi� Refer to landscape drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations FRONT (MOTOR COURT VIEW) u 0 - MATERIALS LEGEND (WHERE OCCURS) FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: DECORATE FOAM WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF FOAM TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM FENCE' INE COLOR SCHEME 5 PLAN 2B SANTA BARBARA ELEVATIONS I LLqz I -i A AV NU LA QUINTA, CA r ----------- I I I I I I RIGHT LEFT FENCE LINE 631 BLDG. HGT. T.O.P. F.F. Cil -' T.O.P. a FENCE LINE I- RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. MATERIALS LEGEND (WHERE OCCURS) 2B FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: DECORATE FOAM WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF FOAM TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM FENCE' INE COLOR SCHEME 5 PLAN 2B SANTA BARBARA ENHANCED ELEVATIONS prA -AAv4v � V---. w if QUINTA, CA RIGHT LEFT 0 632 © 2022 Kevin L. Crook Architect. Inc. ia:■zea:�N •T1 Refer to landscape drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations FRONT (MOTOR COURT VIEW) RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. MATERIALS LEGEND (WHERE OCCURS) FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF FOAM TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM COLOR SCHEME 8 PLAN 2C MEDITERRANEAN ELEVATIONS I L Lqzoil A A AV LA QUINTA, CAr I !III LINE FENCE LINE NU RIGHT LEFT 633 1a111ea:p"N } .L',,P. F.F. Cil -' T.O.P. a FENCE LINE I_ RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. Lei RIGHT MATERIALS LEGEND (WHERE OCCURS) 2C FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF FOAM TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM COLOR SCHEME 8 PLAN 2C MEDITERRANEAN ENHANCED ELEVATIONS 4L "A LJLIIKrA Av4v u QUINTA, CA LEFT 634 A - SPANISH RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES9 LLC. III B - SANTA BARBARA PLAN 2 ROOF PLANS R I AI VI L Lffil FAT AV NUE LA QUINTA, CA C - MEDITERRANEAN LAVL . BEDRM. 15-1'x14'-1" 0 0 M. BATH RDROP•IN6TUB SHS RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. R.A.G. - LINEN - WNW" LAU. z I AA F- F -=J I II WASHER/ - - L - DRYER I II L ----- iL---- W.I.C. 27'_2'' L.L. [:D � DN. 17R =E60'x32' HALL u., I I I BEDRM. 2 11,_7„ I x10,_1„ 0 I----------- I 0Era I I I BATH 2 0 BEDRM. 4 I 10'-4"x 10'-0'' I I I L � SECOND FLOOR PLAN I I I I I I I I I I I I I BEDRM. 3 11'-2"x10'-1” I I I I I I I I I I O N 61 '-0" FIRST FLOOR PLAN PLAN 3 4 BEDROOM, 3 BATH, DEN/ OPT. OFFICE ILL AVE NU LA QUINTA, CA AREA TABULATION CONDITIONED SPACE FIRST FLOOR AREA 920 SQ. FT. SECOND FLOOR AREA 1,220 SQ. FT. TOTAL DWELLING 2,140 SQ. FT. UNCONDITIONED SPACE GARAGE 428 SQ. FT. PORCH 42 SQ. FT. TOTAL CONDITIONED + UNCONDITIONED SPACE= 2,610 SQ FT ABBREVIATIONS U.N.O - UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 636 )CE © 2022 Kevin L. Croak Architect, Inc. Refer to landscape drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations }6_CG.,_Hc T T.O.P. F�F. T.O.P. RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. FRONT (MOTOR COURT VIEW) REAR (SIDE YARD) MATERIALS LEGEND (WHERE OCCURS) 3A FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: SIMULATED CLAY TILE WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF TUBULAR STEEL TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM ■ FENCE LINE COLOR SCHEME 3 PLAN 3A SPANISH ELEVATIONS NEILLTTA AVt'NU LA QUINTA, CA FENCE LINE 0 vo m FENCE LINE --------- — O I ❑ I � I I RIGHT (SIDE YARD) a r � LEFT (REAR YARD) 637 T.O.P. to ;o f a F.F. -' T.O.P. RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. MATERIALS LEGEND (WHERE OCCURS) 3A FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: SIMULATED CLAY TILE WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF TUBULAR STEEL TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM JE1 Ll I L-11 I REAR (SIDE YARD) COLOR SCHEME 3 PLAN 3A SPANISH ENHANCED ELEVATIONS Vl L A\/ QUINTA, CA NUE FENCE LINE_ 5.00 Lol LEFT (REAR YARD) 638 1 2020 Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc. BLDG. HGT. T.O.P. RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. FRONT (MOTOR COURT VIEW) Refer to landscape drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations MATERIALS LEGEND (WHERE OCCURS) FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF FOAM TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM FENCE LINE REAR (SIDE YARD) COLOR SCHEME 9 PLAN 3C MEDITERRANEAN ELEVATIONS ILLqzl _1A Ai AV LA QUINTA, CAI !III NU RIGHT (SIDE YARD) JFH LEFT (REAR YARD) 639 BLDG. HGT. T.O.P. RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. MATERIALS LEGEND (WHERE OCCURS) FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF FOAM TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM Lim E+ El ILLL 7L--� REAR (SIDE YARD) COLOR SCHEME 9 PLAN 3C MEDITERRANEAN ENHANCED ELEVATIONS Vt L Lqsoil -I A A I AV NU LA QUINTA, CA FENCE LINE_ L LEFT (REAR YARD) 640 A - SPANISH RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES9 LLC. III PLAN 3 ROOF PLANS I LLTTA AT AV NUE LA QUINTA, CA C - MEDITERRANEAN R.A.G. i 0 ON. BATH 2 17R CK) O—LINEN—m f M. BEDRM. 15'-1,x14,-1„ V. - AA. - w --- HALL z j 30"x30"CAU . z I --- I i i WASHER/ ❑ — L — DRYER — ---- --- --- --���� IL I I I I -----JL-----' --- BEDRM. 2 0 0M/P9W- 11'-7'x10'-11, M. BATH A — 27'-2'' L.F. F1 W.I.C. 0 60'x36" Im DROP—IN lU0 I I I 1 IIL ----------------------- SECOND FLOOR PLAN RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. BEDRM. 4 10'-4"x10'-0" ❑ I I I I I I I BEDRM. 3 11'-2"x10'-1" I I I I ❑ I I I I I I I I O CV A/- 0 I n/c � I I I I I I I L — LIVING RM. 12'-8"x 14'-2" DINING 10'-9"x 12'-2" PANTRY STORAGE DEN/ OPT. OFFICE ------1> 9'-8"x12'-5" LW/HJ 0 I I I I I II O o -------- I IFS i ii 30" RANGE ------- I d �D/W ---- 11, KITCHEN QO ' I I 1 T -0"x9'-6" — — II ❑ I I 36"x36° ElI BATH 3 SHOWER I I I G�nT I I I I MICRO/ /OVEN`\ I I UP.17R I I I II II I I II II I I I I --- -- ---- ----------------- I I ENTRY PORCH I d- - - - - O FIRST FLOOR PLAN PLAN 3X 4 BEDROOM, 3 BATH, DEN/ OPT. OFFICE Av4v u PLA QUINTA, CA GARAGE 20'-5"x20'-1" I - Di _ i i i i I 0 2 4 8 12 642 © 2022 Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc. Refer to landscape drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations —.,%G,_Hc=T T.O.P. F.F. Cil —' T.O.P. a I � k � I o �I (D Pi{�-g_� RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. FRONT (SIDE YARD) REAR (SIDE YARD) MATERIALS LEGEND (WHERE OCCURS) FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: SIMULATED CLAY TILE WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF TUBULAR STEEL TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM FENCE LINE COLOR SCHEME 1 PLAN 3XA SPANISH ELEVATIONS RIGHT (MOTOR COURT VIEW) FENCE LINE I ILLqzl -1A Ai V UP!111 LA QUINTA, CA LEFT (REAR YARD) 643 T.O.P. a ----------------- � k � I (D Pi RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. MATERIALS LEGEND (WHERE OCCURS) FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: SIMULATED CLAY TILE WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF TUBULAR STEEL TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM JE -11 JE1 Ll REAR (SIDE YARD) COLOR SCHEME 1 PLAN 3XA SPANISH ENHANCED ELEVATIONS I 1I LLS AV LA QUINTA, CA NUE FENCE LINE W. Ell' Ell� Ll LEFT (REAR YARD) 644 © 2022 Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc. Refer to landscape drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations FRONT (SIDE YARD) BLDG. HGT. T.O.P. 0 to 0, `O u�] 04 = +I o 0 _ F.F. Cil ------------------------ ------ i � I � � E I © I REAR (SIDE YARD) RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. MATERIALS LEGEND (WHERE OCCURS) FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF FOAM TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM ■ FENCE LINE COLOR SCHEME 7 PLAN 3XC MEDITERRANEAN ELEVATIONS jj.V1L'L4i-iVA R1 AV LA QUINTA, CA RIGHT (MOTOR COURT VIEW) FENCE LINE- LEFT (REAR YARD) 645 BLDG. HGT. T.O.P. a MATERIALS LEGEND (WHERE OCCURS) 3XC FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF FOAM TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM FENCE LINE � I o I RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. REAR (SIDE YARD) COLOR SCHEME 7 PLAN 3XC MEDITERRANEAN ENHANCED ELEVATIONS LLS 'OwAAV LA QUINTA, CA FENCE LINE - - LEFT (REAR YARD) 646 A - SPANISH RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES9 LLC. III V AT AV NUE LA QUINTA, CA C - MEDITERRANEAN PLAN 3X ROOF PLANS V AT AV NUE LA QUINTA, CA C - MEDITERRANEAN RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. DINING 13'-1"x 11'-0" I I I I� �I BL IEN � I KITCHEN PANTRY F1 --- i 1 22"00"1 I A.A. I RAGE " x 20'-2" I 50'-0" 01 1 LIVING RM. 13'-6" x 14'-3" 0 r------------------ i 'F.A.u.- 39" I ------ REF. i --------------------I ENTRY PORCH A/C jp�i ��qll E9W.I.C. M. BEDRM. 15'-2" x 13'-8" RAG. COATS II M. BATH F -1-7-1111, c\ --- i1 I � i I 1 30"x30" LAU.1; aA �\ -----'1 F= F=--- _9 I I I I 1 OVER 1 L - DRYER - I T-1 I LINEN L ----- J L ----- J 0 0 60"0g�2' B SHOYfER ATH 2 I I I RAG. HALL I 0 �h� BEDRM. 10'-2" x 10'-6" 11 FLOOR PLAN 1� F1 42'x102 ' HOSWOO Oil � 0 DE 10'-1"x.1N2'-8" PLAN 4 3 BEDROOM, 2 BATH, DEN u BEDRM 2 l 10'-1" x 10'-1" A AT AV NU LA QUINTA, CA Ll AREA TABULATION CONDITIONED SPACE FIRST FLOOR AREA 1,769 SQ. FT. TOTAL DWELLING 1,769 SQ. FT. UNCONDITIONED SPACE GARAGE PORCH "A" PORCH "B" PORCH "C" 420 SQ. FT. 41 SQ. FT. 41 SQ. FT. 41 SQ. FT. 648 2022 Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc. FRONT BLDG. HGT. T.O.P. FENCE LINE - ---- ----- --------------------- i a L qh" CA MATS" RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. Refer to landscape drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations MATERIALS LEGEND (WHERE OCCURS) 4B FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: DECORATE FOAM WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF FOAM TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM COLOR SCHEME 5 --------- I I I I I I RIGHT C110�IIfq PLAN 4B SANTA BARBARA ELEVATIONS L LTTA AT AV NU LA QUINTA, CA LEFT 649 2022 Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc. FRONT BLDG. HGT. T.C.P. FENCE LINE a 1L RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. Refer to landscape drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations MATERIALS SII. IIIY Ill Ill � IIII [] (WHERE OCCURS) f FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: VIII, Illi ��� 0 IIS I�1 VIII Illl„ VINYL W/ GRIDS SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD 2022 Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc. FRONT BLDG. HGT. T.C.P. FENCE LINE a 1L RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. Refer to landscape drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations MATERIALS LEGEND (WHERE OCCURS) FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF FOAM TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM COLOR SCHEME 8 RIGHT PLAN 4C MEDITERRANEAN ELEVATIONS LLqzl-IAAI AV LA QUINTA, CAI !III NU LEFT 650 EAVE B - SANTA BARBARA RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES9 LLC. III L Q Y PLAN 4 ROOF PLANS ILLS AVtNUE LA QUINTA, CA C - MEDITERRANEAN RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. III AVENUE 58 LA QU I NTA, CA "A" ELEVATIONS SPANISH SCHEME 1 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 3 STUCCO 1503 1585 1502 STUCCO PAINT MATCH' SW7028 INCREDIBLE WHITE SW6386 NAPERY SW7571 CASA BLANCA FASCIA / SW6047 SW6102 SW6089 GARAGE DOOR HOT COCOA PORTABELLO GROUNDED SW9173 SW9102 SW9101 TRIM SW7634 SW6665 SW7512 TRIM SHIITAKE QUINOA TRES NATURALE FRONT DOOR / SW6034 SW7604 SW7745 SHUTTERS ARRESTING AUBURN SMOKY BLUE MUDDLED BASIL FRONT DOOR SW6061 SW6061 SW6061 GABLE DETAIL SW9125 SW6214 SW2846 SHUTTERS TANBARK TANBARK TANBARK SW6990 SW6990 SW6990 WROUGHT IRON 3773 3773 3773 CAPISTRANO CAVIAR CAVIAR CAVIAR ROOF: "S" TILE SMC 8403 SMC 8403 SMC 8403 CAPISTRANO SANTA BARBARA BLD SANTA BARBARA BLD SANTA BARBARA BLD "B" ELEVATIONS SANTA BARBARA SCHEME 4 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 6 STUCCO 1572 1626 1627 STUCCO PAINT MATCH**'k RGB 255/255/255 SW7001 MARSHMALLOW SW7038 TONY TAl1PF SW6074 SW2806 SW7040 FASCIA SPALDING GRAY RKWD BROWN SMOKEHOUSE GARAGE DOOR / SW7634 SW6665 SW7512 TRIM SW7032 SW6075 SW9091 FRONT DOOR / PEDIMENT GARDENIA PAVILION BEIGE GARAGE DOOR / SW6075 SW2808 SW7041 FRONT DOOR GARRET GRAY RKWD DARK BROWN VAN DYKE BROWN ROOF: "S" TILE SW9125 SW6214 SW2846 SHUTTERS TUCSON BLEND TUCSON BLEND TUCSON BLEND OLIVIA OSCURO UNDERSEAS RYCRT BRNZ GREEN ROOF: "S" TILE 3773 3773 3773 CAPISTRANO WALNUT CREEK WALNUT CREEK WALNUT CREEK "C" ELEVATIONS MEDITERRANEAN SCHEME 7 SCHEME 8 SCHEME 9 STUCCO 27 1553 1551 STUCCO PAINT MATCH*** SW6120 BELIEVABLE BUFF SW7506 LOGGIA SW7521 DORMER BROWN SW7033 SW7514 SW9090 FASCIA /TRIM BRAINSTORM BRONZE FOOTHILLS CARAIBE GARAGE DOOR / SW7032 SW6075 SW9091 FRONT DOOR / WARM STONE GARRET GRAY HALF CAFF SHUTTERS ROOF: "S" TILE SCC8806 SCC8806 SCC8806 CAPISTRANO TUCSON BLEND TUCSON BLEND TUCSON BLEND Ire :. -RA CREATED 22014 5/5/2022 STUCCO: OMEGA PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS ROOF: EAGLE ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP Kevin L. Crook Architect Inc ALL FLASHING, GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. ALL PAINT BREAKS TO BE CUT AT INSIDE CORNERS. ** FOR PHOTOSHOP & RENDERING PURPOSES ONLY, DO NOT USE IN THE FIELE TODAS LAS TAPAJUNTAS, CAnALERAS, CAnALONES, ETC.SERAN PINTADOS PARA IGUALAR A LA SUPERFICIE DE JUNTO TODAS LAS RESTAURAS DE PINTURA SE CORTARAN EN LAS ESQUINAS INTERIORES **SOLO PARA FINES DE PHOTOSHOP Y REPRESENTACIONES, NO USAR EN EL CAMPO L AA WRITTEN COLOR SCHEMES VILLIPF A F Av4VUi: QUINTA, CA .:�_�. _- . ,issi•-�--.�- � �fa�. �-.•��-sem \ 0, Q O U-) 0 LLL W Q ry U ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP SPANISH SCHEME #1 \ J) J z D' - OI W �_ O 0 0� _ Z Z �W W r> LL m > Q AVENUE 58 LA QUINTA, CA RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. III Kevin L. Crook Architect #22014 Inc MAY 5, 2022 PLANWNQ # ARCHITECT LIRE SPANISH SCHEME #2 1 ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP \ J) J z D' - O� W �_ O� 0 Z Z W � W �> LL m > Q AVENUE 58 LA QUINTA, CA Kevin L. Crook Architect #22014 Inc MAY 5, 2022 PLANItINa # ARCHITECTURE COLOR BOARDS - SPANISH ILL''RIAIAVUEE LA QUINTA, CA SPANISH SCHEME #3 ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP \ (n J z D' - OLLJ W �_ O� 0 Z Lf) Z W � W �> LL m > Q AVENUE 58 LA QUINTA, CA Kevin L. Crook Architect #22014 Inc MAY 5, 2022 PLANNING } AItCHITECTURE SANTA BARBARA SCHEME #4 L 8 m o- U LL U O O Q cn ry O ry Q O0 w ILL Q~ wz z (7 O Lf) Qry Q Kevn L. Crook U ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP AVENUE 58 iAchitst #220,4 Inc LAQUINTA, CA MAY 5, 2022 PLANNINr ♦ ARC HITECTII RE RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. SANTA BARBARA y O'.� O. U 1 SCHEME #5 Q � a/ cn �O 0� w Q O0 ILL 0~ L wz = (7 O Lf) Q� �ILL D Q 5 i} U ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP AVENUE 58 LA QUINTA, CA COLOR BOARDS L Kevin L. Crook Architect #220,4 Inc MAY 5, 2022 PLANNING ♦ ARCHITECTURE SANTA BARBARA §VA AT V4V QUINTA, CA 654 SANTA BARBARA SCHEME #6 L i L D 5 i} m O U s ILL a6millillill (0 Q cn �O 0� Q O0 w ILL Q~ Lu z = (7 O QQ� �ILL Q U AVENUE 58 Kevi n L. Crook ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP Architect LAQUINTA, CA #220,4 Inc MAY 5, 2022 PLANNING ♦ ABC HITECTII RE 654 RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. MEDITERRANEAN Ls '#fitp, SCHEME #8 y O•!} lift I�• .Y T+'. Fr µi �'. '• 40 (n ,� -�•st �,,- a-� `'�'� �, •A91 *.- MEDITERRANEAN SCHEME #7 W Q Q Q W 1F 'h V / 0 O ILL O.— Q LL m U O U U ILL O 0,— ry (N) ry LL W Q Q Q W U) LaLry Q O Q H U AVENUE 58 Kevi n L. Crook ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP Architect LAQUINTA, CA #22014 Inc MAY 5, 2022 PLANNINr ♦ ARCHITECTLIRi' RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. MEDITERRANEAN Ls '#fitp, SCHEME #8 y O•!} lift I�• .Y T+'. Fr µi �'. '• 40 (n ,� -�•st �,,- a-� `'�'� �, •A91 *.- ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP AVENUE 58 LA QUINTA, CA LL (0 0L Kevin L. Crook Architect #22014 Inc MAY 5, 2022 PLANNING ♦ ARCHITECTURE COLOR BOARDS - MEDITERRANEAN AVi ��.. Ut QUINTA, CA 41 MEDITERRANEAN SCHEME #9 ZI - r TTT Y ^" • v i .� Y { r �• M ty } 4vk ap 4.+0 IN `F ILL O (j) W Q Q Q W u Z Lf)QOM ILL Q LL U n L. Crook ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP AVENUE 58 Kevi Architect #22014 I n c LA QUINTA, CA MAY 5, 2022 PLANNING ♦ ABCHIII IIItJi� , � 655 W Q Q Q W V / � O ILL Q LL U ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP AVENUE 58 LA QUINTA, CA LL (0 0L Kevin L. Crook Architect #22014 Inc MAY 5, 2022 PLANNING ♦ ARCHITECTURE COLOR BOARDS - MEDITERRANEAN AVi ��.. Ut QUINTA, CA 41 MEDITERRANEAN SCHEME #9 ZI - r TTT Y ^" • v i .� Y { r �• M ty } 4vk ap 4.+0 IN `F ILL O (j) W Q Q Q W u Z Lf)QOM ILL Q LL U n L. Crook ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP AVENUE 58 Kevi Architect #22014 I n c LA QUINTA, CA MAY 5, 2022 PLANNING ♦ ABCHIII IIItJi� , � 655 RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. FLOOR PLAN RECREATION PLUMBING FIXTURES REQUIRED C.P.C. TABLE 422.1 OCCUPANCY GROUP ROOM AREA RATIO OCCUPANTS WATER CLOSETS LAVATORIES URINALS 252 TOTAL °C� TOTAL MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE A-2 PREP KITCHEN 230 230 1/200 1.15 .575 .575 1/50 = 0.08 1/25 = 0.16 1/150= 0.02 1/150= 0.02 1/200= 0.02 A-3 GREAT RM. 754 754 1/30 26 13 13 1/100 = 0.13 1/25 = 0.52 1/200= 0.07 1/100= 0.13 1/100= 0.02 A-2 PATIO 230 230 1/30 8 4 4 1/50 = 0.08 1/25 = 0.16 1/150= 0.02 1/150= 0.02 1/200= 0.02 TOTAL REQUIRED 0.29 0.84 0.11 0.17 0.06 SWIMING POOL -PLUMBING FIXTURES REQUIRED C.B.C. 3115B WATER SURFACE AREA TOTAL SQ, FT BATHERS WATER CLOSETS URINALS LAVATORIES SHOWERS I PER 15 TOTAL SO FT. OF WATER MALE SURFACE FEMALE MALE 1/75 FEMALE 1/60 MALE 1/75 TOTAL 1/80 MALE FEMALE 1 /50 SWIMMING POOL 1,350 1,494 100 50 50 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 SPA 144 WATER CLOSETS LAVATORIES URINALS MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE TOTAL REQUIRED 1 1 1 1 1 PLUMBING FIXTURES PROVIDED WATER CLOSETS LAVATORIES URINALS MEN'S RESTROOM 2 2 1 WOMEN'S RESTROOM 3 2 CENTER VE NUE PLtAQUINTA, CA 41 0 N AREA TABULATION CONDITIONED SPACE PREP KITCHEN 230 SQ. FT. GREAT ROOM 754 SQ. FT. RESTROOMS 423 SQ. FT. STORAGE 252 SQ. FT. JANITOR 57 SQ. FT. TOTAL: 1,716 SQ. FT. UNCONDITIONED SPACE PREP KITCHEN 230 COVERED PATIO 230 SQ. FT. POOL EQUIPMENT RM. 329 SQ. FT. TOTAL BUILDING: 2,275 SQ. FT. MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA ALLOWANCES PER OCCUPANT C.B.C. TABLE 1004.1.2 OCCUPANCY GROUP ROOM AREA TOTAL RATIO OCCUPANTS TOTAL EXITS REQUIRED EXITS PROVIDED PANIC HARDWARE Occ,"', A-2 GREAT ROOM 754 1/15 51 1 1 YES A-2 PREP KITCHEN 230 1/15 16 1 1 YES PATIO 230 1 1 /1 5 16 1 1 1 NO 0 2 4 8 12 656 RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES, LLC.*. A 7m, gym, m PROM RECRI 1 "- i RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES9 LLC. III ROOF PLAN RECREATION CENTER FAV NUE LA QUINTA, CA RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES9 LLC9 AVENUE 58 PROJECT #22014 RECREATION CENTER LA Q U I N TA, CA EXTERIOR COLOR SCHEME STUCO 1502 STUCCO PAINT MATCH*** SW7571 CASA BLANCA SW6089 FASCIA GROUNDED SW9101 TRIM TRES NATURALE SW7745 ALL DOORS MUDDLED BASIL ROOF: "S" TILE SMC 8403 CAPISTRANO SANTA BARBARA BLEND KEYSTONES ARCTIC WHITE TILE AT SHOWERS D617 2" x 1" BRICK JOINT ALL FLASHING, GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. ALL PAINT BREAKS TO BE CUT AT INSIDE CORNERS. ** FOR PHOTOSHOP & RENDERING PURPOSES ONLY. DO NOT USE IN THE FIELD TODAS LAS TAPAJUNTAS, CAnALERAS, CAnALONES, ETC.SERAN PINTADOS PARA IGUALAR A LA SUPERFICIE DE JUNTO TODAS LAS RESTAURAS DE PINTURA SE CORTARAN EN LAS ESQUINAS INTERIORES **SOLO PARA FINES DE PHOTOSHOP Y REPRESENTACIONES, NO USAR EN EL CAMPO CREATED 5/16/2022 STUCCO: OMEGA PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS ROOF: TILE AT SHOWERS: EXTERIOR COLOR SCHEME /I , L II�IIir A AV �.. ,. QUINTA, CA EAGLE DALTI LE ROYAL INVESTORS GROUP Kevin L. Crook Architect I n C P L A N N I N G 4 A R C H I T E G T U R E RODEO CREDIT ENTERPRISES LLC. EXTERIOR COLOR BOARD 4 _ 4 mil►�''l' -�` • jrMir kr •� 4 �`?� . PpAi- o lit 1,..' U ILL M U a TILE AT SHOWERS O ILL J J Q AVENUE 58 RECREATION CENTER Kevin L. Crook Architect JOB # 22014 Inc MAY 16, 2022 LA QUINTA, CA PLANNING f ARCHIN EXTERIOR COLOR BOARD uk: QUINTA, CA .., WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 19, 2023 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 19, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT BY DESERT VALLEY BUILDERS ASSOCIATION; CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO.16 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FEE REPORT - LETTER OF SATISFACTION 2023 BOARD OF DIRECTORS PRESIDENT Todd Hooks Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Immediate Past President Deborah McGarrey Southern California Gas Company .15' J/I CE PRESIDENT Tom Dubose Dubose Design Group, Inc. SECRETAR 17TREASURER Pedro Rincon Osborne Rincon CPAs VICE PRESIDENT OF ASSOCIATES Allan Levin Allan Levin & Associates CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER Gretchen Gutierrez DIRECTORS Fred Bell/2023 PAC Chairman Nobel[ Energy Solutions Brian Benedetti Brian Benedetti Construction Mark Benedetti Dede Callanan CalBesl Title Mario Gonzales GHA Companies Joe Hayes First Bank Jeremy Roos FreeVolt Dave Lippert Lippert Construction, Inc Paul Mahoney PMA Advertising Bruce Maize Orr Builders Russ Martin Mission Springs Water District Dan Olivier Nethery Mueller Olivier Alan Pace Petra GeoSciences Kevin Pillow AC Houston Lumber John Powell, Jr. Coachella Valley Water District Mike Rowe MSA Consulting Phil Smith Sunrise Company Alissa Vatter Fidelity National Title Jeff Wattenbarger Wattenbarger Construction VbIA desert valleys builders association December 19, 2023 City of La Quinta Claudia Martinez, Finance Director 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Ms. Martinez, Thank you for providing the Desert Valleys Builders Association with the opportunity to review and comment on the City of La Quinta's 2022/2023 Development Project Fee AB1600 Report. After some initial comments and concerns the DVBA is satisfied that the City has met its annual reporting obligations pursuant to the City Municipal Code and the Mitigation Fee Act. 34360 Gateway Drive • Palm Desert • CA 92211 (760) 776-7001 office • (760) 776-7002 fax www.TheDVBA.org CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 19, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT BY DESERT VALLEY BUILDERS ASSOCIATION PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO.1 LA VILETTA - LETTER OF SUPPORT 'V A �3bva desert valleys builders association December 14, 2023 City of La Quinta 78494 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: La Villetta Project To City of La Quinta: On behalf of the Desert Valleys Builders Association (DVBA), we are supportive of the entitlement process related to the La Villetta Project. The DVBA represents over 150 companies within the construction and development industries and is encouraging developer/builder entities to create attractive communities; as well as hire local trades & construction workers as part of the construction process as we continue to move forward post-Covid with our construction companies. It is our understanding this community will provide unique housing model for those buyers that may wish to downsize; be a starter home or simply wish a simpler lifestyle without the maintenance of exterior yardwork. This new community will be creating job opportunities, both for those currently in the workforce, as well as those we are working to place into the construction industries. Additional benefits to the greater La Quinta community — such as through discretionary local shopping/spending — with sales tax revenues to the City is just one area of the financial economies that will also be positive to the City. Thank you, Gret`chenDerierrez ..._ �� �- _._.........CEO Desert Valleys Builders Association 34360 Gateway Drive • Palm Desert • CA 92211 (760) 776-7001 office • (760) 776-7002 fax www.TheDVBA.org From: Gretchen Gutierrez <gg@thedvba.org> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2023 8:20 AM To: Monika Radeva Subject: DVBA Letter for Council Meeting Dec 19 Public Hearing Item No 1 Attachments: doc02910220231215161347.pdf You don't often get email from gg@thedvba.org. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Good Morning Monika Attached please find our comment letter for tomorrow night's Council Meeting . thanks and Happy Holidays, Gretchen Gretchen Gutierrez CEO DVBA 34360 Gateway Drive Palm Desert, CA 92211 760-776-7001 office 661-478-3762 cell email: gg@thedvba.org website: www.TheDVBA.org A desert valleys builders association NAHB11, National Association of Home Builders From: gretchen.gutierrez66@gmail.com<gretchen.gutierrez66@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2023 4:13 PM To: Gretchen Gutierrez <gg@thedvba.org> Subject: do not reply 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: A2069992-2C57-4F39-9A57-FC8BF2CC9159 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 19, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT BY PALARI, INC PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO.1 LA VILETTA - LETTER OF SUPPORT December 18, 2023 La Quinta City Council 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Members of the La Quinta City Council, I am writing on behalf of Palari to express our enthusiastic support for the proposed "La Villetta" housing development, consisting of 80 units, within the beautiful community of La Quinta. As a reputable homebuilder with a vested interest in creating vibrant and sustainable communities, we believe that the La Villetta project aligns seamlessly with the vision for the area. Palari acknowledges the pressing need for diverse housing options within the La Quinta community. The proposed development presents an opportunity to cater to this demand by offering a distinct and desirable housing option that complements the local landscape. We firmly believe that the introduction of La Villetta will contribute positively to the fabric of the area, fostering growth while preserving the unique character that defines La Quinta. Moreover, our market analysis indicates a substantial demand for precisely this type of housing in the area. La Villetta's design and concept are in sync with the preferences and needs of prospective residents, aligning with the evolving dynamics of the local real estate market. Beyond addressing the demand for housing, the La Villetta project exemplifies our commitment to crafting communities that foster connectivity, sustainability, and a high quality of life. We are confident that this development will not only meet but exceed the expectations of both future residents and the greater La Quinta community. In closing, Palari is excited about the potential of the La Villetta development and its positive impact on La Quinta. We wholeheartedly support this project and urge the City Council to consider its immense benefits for the community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, —DocuSigned by: -f($zy�01,12/18/2023 ic illeil !'iriQerson Managing Director Palari, Inc mitch@palari.com GREATER COACHELLA VALLEY CHAMBER CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 19, 2023 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT BY GREATER COACHELLA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE; PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO.1 LA VILETTA - LETTER OF SUPPORT The Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce is writing to express our support for the proposed La Villetta project in La Quinta. As representatives of local businesses and active members of the business community, we believe that the approval of this project will bring about numerous positive impacts on our local economy and enhance the overall quality of life for our residents. We understand that there are challenges associated with ensuring a reliable power supply for projects of this nature. However, we have confidence that the comprehensive plan in place will address these concerns effectively. Once power is established, we are confident that the La Villetta project will proceed seamlessly within the parameters set forth by the city council and the planning commission. We believe the La Villetta project aligns with the city's goals for sustainable growth, economic development, and community well-being. We firmly believe that a diverse housing market is essential for the long-term success of Riverside County. The Coachella Valley residents require a wide range of housing options, and La Villetta, with its mix of home offerings is a step in the right direction. This diversity is crucial for meeting current and future housing needs and is equally beneficial for the local business community, as a healthy housing market plays a pivotal role in attracting and retaining employees. We sincerely appreciate your consideration of the La Villetta project. Your approval will not only contribute to the prosperity of our local economy but will also play a vital role in fostering a vibrant and inclusive community in La Quinta. If you require any additional information or if there are ways in which the Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce can further support this project, please do not hesitate to contact us at 760-347-0676. Thank you for your time and consideration. Brandon Marley President/CEO Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce. 760-347-0676 1 WWW.GCVCC.ORG I INFO@GCVCC.ORG HAND OUTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 19, 2023 RIVERSIDE CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 19, 2023 - HAND-OUT BY RIVERSIDE COUNTY COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AARON HAKE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Jt - TRAFFIC RELIEF PLAN 2024 GRAFT UPDATE A local strategy to improve traffic flow, safety, and economic opportunity in Riverside County MWAMNMI NMI I` M1-1M1-1�M Table of Contents Overview of the Traffic Relief Plan...................................................................................................2 Accountability to Taxpayers.............................................................................................................3 Equity Among Regions and Residents............................................................................................4 Traffic Relief Plan: Your Guide to Projects and Services..................................................................5 PaloVerde Valley (Blythe)................................................................................................................6 CoachellaValley.............................................................................................................................. 7 Western Riverside County.............................................................................................................12 21 Your Voice. Your Plan. The Traffic Relief Plan is a local strategy to reduce traffic bottlenecks, improve safety, and help create a stronger, more sustainable economy for our communities. Residents across Riverside County have expressed thoughts about how to improve transportation in Riverside County. From freeways that move faster, to safer roads with fewer potholes, to more available public transportation, and protecting our infrastructure from natural hazards like floods and earthquakes, you told us that these improvements will make a difference to your life. We've listened. Highlights of the Traffic Relief Plan include: • Improving freeway traffic flow on 1-10, 1-15, 1-215, State Route 60, and State Route 91. • Improving traffic flow and safety on major roads including but not limited to Temescal Canyon Road, Cajalco Road, Ramona Expressway, Gilman Springs Road, Grand Avenue, Bob Hope Drive, Fred Waring Drive, Highway 111, and Indian Canyon Drive. • Improving the condition of existing roads by providing funds for basic pothole repairs, paving dirt roads, and synchronizing signals throughout Riverside County. • Adding sidewalks and safety improvements for pedestrians, equestrians, and bicyclists. • Increasing frequency of and access to bus and rail public transportation by adding new tracks, new stations, more trains, more bus service, bus shelters, safety and security measures, and technology to make public transit safer and more reliable. • Bringing daily rail service to the Coachella Valley and San Gorgonio Pass from Los Angeles, Orange County, and Riverside. Connecting Riverside County by accelerating completion of a new east -west corridor between Perris and San Jacinto called the Mid County Parkway, building the long-awaited realignment of State Route 79 from the Temecula Valley through Hemet and San Jacinto, widening and improving safety on Cajalco Road, roadway improvements between Lake Elsinore and Perris to shorten commutes on 1-15 and 1-215, and a bypass to 1-10 east of Banning toward the Coachella Valley. Providing more independence and opportunity for residents who rely on public transportation services, such as seniors, veterans, individuals with disabilities, students, residents of rural communities, and those who choose to use public transportation. • Using new technologies that can improve the efficiency and safety of the current roadway and public transit systems, paving the way for the future. Independent Audits Required Upon voter approval of a revenue source for the Plan, no less than annually, RCTC will obtain an independent financial audit. The audit will be published on the internet. Efficiency and Local Control Local Voice. Local Control. Riverside County voters will enact the Plan, which will then be implemented through their locally elected representatives and local public works professionals. By law, the Plan is implemented by RCTC, which is governed by local city council members or mayors of every city and all five members of the County Board of Supervisors. No Money Diverted to Sacramento or Washington D.C. State and federal governments cannot legally divert, take, or direct funds raised through this local Plan and its governing ordinance. Fiscal Accountability and Efficiency. Administrative salaries and benefits to administer the Plan are limited to no more than 1 % of net revenues generated under the Plan's governing ordinance. Implementation of this Plan will not require the creation of any new government entity. To achieve efficiency and local control, RCTC may delegate appropriate responsibilities for administering components of the Plan to existing local governments at its discretion. Transparency and Openness Implementation of the Plan will occur in compliance with all transparency, disclosure, and open meetings laws. Mandatory Plan Review and Updates Through a public process, RCTC must formally review this Plan at least every 10 years after it takes effect to ensure the Plan reflects the current and anticipated future needs of Riverside County's residents. If RCTC wishes to amend the Plan after its review or at any other point in time, RCTC must follow current state law and this Plan's voter -approved governing ordinance to do so. Flexibility to Expedite Projects RCTC may issue bonds or other debt against future revenue to achieve any objectives of the Plan and to expedite completion of projects. RCTC will issue bonds or other debt in accordance with applicable laws. The issuances of bonds or other debt will undergo a feasibility analysis to ensure the lowest borrowing costs are incurred while repayment terms are advantageous. To expedite priority projects and services, reduce costs to taxpayers, or avoid loss of other funding, RCTC may make maximum use of funds by temporarily loaning funds between transportation purposes set forth in the Plan. In borrowing and making loans, the proportionate shares for areas and purposes over the duration of the Plan may not be changed without an amendment of the Plan as required by law. Maintenance of Effort Funds received by cities and the County shall supplement existing local revenues and required developer improvements used for transportation purposes. As a condition of receiving funds, cities and the County shall maintain their existing commitment of local funds for transportation purposes. Environmental mitigation funds provided for land conservation shall supplement and shall not supplant existing mitigation fees paid by developers. Equity Among Regions and Residents Many residents of Riverside County live in areas that lack infrastructure and public transportation services. A growing number of residents face increasing traffic congestion. Therefore, the Traffic Relief Plan commits to providing equity for Riverside County residents in the following ways: Geography The Traffic Relief Plan recognizes the three distinct subregions of Riverside County and ensures that revenues raised by the Plan in each subregion remain there and cannot be moved to other parts of the county: • Palo Verde Valley (Blythe area) • Coachella Valley • Western Riverside County (Riverside and Corona areas, Moreno Valley and Perris areas, Hemet -San Jacinto Valley, San Gorgonio Pass, and Temecula -Murrieta -Lake Elsinore areas) Small, Rural, Disadvantaged Communities Prioritization of investments shall take into account the needs of residents in small, rural, and disadvantaged communities in Riverside County. Mitigation Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) The Traffic Relief Plan mitigates VMT with VMT-reducing projects and services funded by multiple aspects of this Plan. Decisions Based On Needs Priority for investments in areas requiring significant infrastructure repairs and upgrades and public transportation will be determined based on objective needs. New Funding for All Communities in Riverside County All communities will have access to new funding to keep local streets and roads in good condition. Increased Transportation Options for Residents The Traffic Relief Plan places significant focus on seniors, students, veterans, individuals with disabilities, and residents of rural and underserved communities who use public transportation regularly. Balanced Transportation System The Traffic Relief Plan recognizes all types of transportation needs for Riverside County. Proactively addressing the transportation issues in Riverside County requires a flexible and a comprehensive approach. Investment Types The Plan includes eight investment types. In the Coachella Valley, all investment types are funded through the valleywide Transportation Project Prioritization Study (TPPS). In Western Riverside County, a specific percentage of funding is reserved for each investment type, with several sub -types. In the Palo Verde Valley (Blythe), funds can be used on any investment type below. Safe Streets and Roads — Pothole repair and road maintenance; sidewalks and pedestrian safety infrastructure; protected bicycle lanes; roadway improvements in high -accident areas; bus shelters; bridge repairs; improvements to railroad crossings, including bridges to separate roads from railroad tracks; traffic calming measures; bypass roads; median barriers; protecting roads, sidewalks, and bicycle facilities from flooding and other natural hazards; traffic signals, including technology to synchronize and interconnect signals; improvements to provide accessibility for persons with disabilities. Highways — Improving traffic flow on State Routes 60, 91, 111 and Interstates 10, 15, and 215 by constructing new lanes, improving highway interchanges (on- and off -ramps and bridges) and public transportation facilities, and utilizing innovative technologies. Public Transportation — Increasing frequency and safety of trains and buses; building new tracks, parking, and stations; extending rail service from Perris to Hemet and San Jacinto; extending rail service to the Coachella Valley and San Gorgonio Pass (Banning/Beaumont/Calimesa/Cabazon area); sustaining operation of rail service throughout the county; expanding bus service options including rapid/express buses; on -demand transit options known as "micro -transit;" modernizing and adding zero -emission buses; providing targeted transit services and keeping bus fares low for seniors, veterans, students, and individuals with disabilities; upgrading bus stops and amenities; and improving connections between home, school, and employment centers. Regional Connections — Constructing multi -modal transportation corridors that connect parts of Riverside County, relieving congestion on existing highways and local roads, improving safety such as realigning State Route 79, creating a bypass to 1-10 east of Banning toward Coachella Valley, improving Cajalco Road, completing Mid County Parkway (Ramona Expressway), and providing a new Elsinore-Ethanac Expressway. Commuter Assistance — Expanding Freeway Service Patrol roadside assistance, maintaining and expanding carpool/vanpool service and Park & Ride lots, and partnering with employers to create incentives for alternative commute methods. Active Transportation — Improving safety and expanding access to pedestrian and bicycle facilities such as sidewalks and bicycle lanes, in addition to improving and expanding recreational trails and access to open spaces and natural areas. Flood and Blowsand Control — Reinforcing roadways and infrastructure against natural hazards in the Coachella Valley. Environmental Mitigation — To construct the traffic relief improvements in this Plan, mitigation will be required, while other community mitigation will be provided to preserve and improve quality of living, particularly in disadvantaged communities. Additionally, public infrastructure is increasingly under threat from natural disasters. Further, population growth and development puts pressure on natural areas that make Riverside County a desirable place to live. To achieve balanced growth of the region, ensure transportation projects can move forward, withstand natural hazards, and provide for a high quality of living for current and future generations of Riverside County residents, the Traffic Relief Plan makes meaningful commitments to environmental stewardship. The Palo Verde Valley component of the Traffic Relief Plan calls for improvements to all aspects of local transportation. All revenues generated in the Palo Verde Valley will remain in the Palo Verde Valley, with all revenue returned directly to the City of Blythe and County of Riverside. The Blythe City Council will have authority to set priorities and expend funds within the city limits and the County Board of Supervisors will have authority to expend funds in unincorporated areas of the Palo Verde Valley. Investments made by the City of Blythe and County must be for transportation purposes for the benefit of Palo Verde Valley residents and must be approved in an open and transparent manner pursuant to open meetings laws. All revenues generated through the Traffic Relief Plan in the Palo Verde Valley shall remain in the Palo Verde Valley and cannot be diverted to other areas of Riverside County. To address transportation needs in rural areas, such as the Palo Verde Valley, and to strengthen the agricultural economy and tourism, new investments will focus on: • Safety and maintenance of local streets and roads • Ensuring public infrastructure complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act • Closing sidewalk gaps and enhancing bike lanes for improved pedestrian access to and from schools • Improving the condition of interchanges at Interstate 10, including landscaping and gateway enhancements • Establishing a new vanpool program for residents commuting to major employment areas, such as Ironwood and Chuckawalla Valley prisons, Coachella Valley, and Arizona • Providing reduced- or free -fare public transit to increase access to education, healthcare, employment, and services • Replacing and expanding the bus fleet to improve air quality with low- and zero - emission vehicles • Upgrading transit operating and maintenance facilities to maintain transit vehicles and infrastructure in good condition • Increasing frequency and expanding public transit options for education, healthcare, employment, and services in underserved neighborhoods Transportation investments through the Plan will also serve as a driver for economic development in the community. Improving the transportation network will leverage other public and private investments and encourage new businesses to invest. Safe St—fa HighwaysPublic Regional Active Flaod& Environmental &Roads Transportation Connections Transportation M.—d Mitigation Control Palm Springs • Aerial Tramway1111 TRAFFIC RELIEF= COACHELLA VALLEY I� '7"- Palm Sprngs Intemational Airport Joshua 6 O Agua Caliente Resort Casino Spa CSUSB Palm Desert d Cam us UC Riversi Palm Dese Campus -- Indio FII l R I I I - EI Paseo Shopping District O -O • The Living Desert Zoo & Gardens �O +0fo Indian Wells Tennis Garden Polo Grounds 6 29 Casino 7 tOR 00 f ///a Highways Regional Connections Active Public Transportation Transportation _.s & Roads Flood & Blowsand Commuter Assistance Environmental Mitigation Control 2024 Draft Traffic Relief Plan 7 The Coachella Valley component of the Traffic Relief Plan calls for improvements to all aspects of local and regional transportation systems in the Coachella Valley. The Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) will administer the Plan in the Coachella Valley. CVAG is a public agency governed by an Executive Committee consisting of the mayor or an elected official representing every city council in the Coachella Valley and the City of Blythe, all five County Supervisors, and the Tribal Chairs from the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Cabazon Band of Cahuilla Indians, Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, and Twenty -Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians. Funds Generated in the Coachella Valley Stay in the Coachella Valley All revenues generated under the Plan in the Coachella Valley will remain in the Coachella Valley for expenditure. Funding will provide investments for projects in communities that fully participate in, and are compliant with, the Coachella Valley's Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) and the procedures approved by the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission for the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP). While this section uses the same library of icons seen throughout the Plan, most Coachella Valley projects, improvements, and programs may fall within multiple subject areas as they have multiple benefits. Regional Active Public Safe Streets Flood & Commuter Environmental Connections Transportation Transportation & Roads Blowsand Assistance Mitigation Control Establishing and Updating Regional Priorities Since 1989, CVAG has been entrusted to manage the regional transportation network. CVAG establishes its priorities according to the Transportation Project Prioritization Study (TPPS), which is a merit -based method of prioritizing all regional projects in the Coachella Valley. Project priorities are based on criteria adopted by the CVAG Executive Committee, as recommended by civil engineers and public works professionals, and publicly reviewed by elected officials representing every CVAG member jurisdiction. The TPPS is updated every few years as the Coachella Valley's population grows and becomes more diverse in order to address different mobility needs, new technologies, state and federal policy as well as worldwide climate and economic trends. Funding for TPPS projects follow CVAG's cost - splitting policy that requires a local match to unlock regional funding. Local funding is an element of the Maintenance of Effort requirements employed by RCTC and CVAG. CVAG will continue to work with RCTC to ensure new regional funding resources do not supplant current funding and commitments; rather the funding pie grows larger for all. In addition to overall mobility related goals described under this Plan, the TPPS process shall include the following objectives: • Achieve balance and equity • Achieve climate resiliency • Provide economic opportunities • Address statewide and regional housing needs by supporting transit -oriented development and affordable housing • Address safety by continually reducing serious accidents and fatalities on the roadways • Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) • Promote public health and safety, including improving air quality The TPPS includes upgraded, safer, and more accessible regional roadways and bridges. These regional multi -modal facilities connect the Coachella Valley and ensure the transportation network helps support a stronger, more sustainable economy for the community. Some of the arterials and other roads that will continue to be improved are depicted on the map and listed at the end of this section. The TPPS has included projects to substantially improve connections to federal and state freeways and highways, particularly Interstate 10, Highway 111 and State Route 86. Upgrades to existing interchanges as well as new interchanges are planned and are awaiting funding to be constructed. This Plan will also allow for improvements such as managed lanes or toll lanes on 1-10. Such facilities will make it easier and safer to travel along Interstate 10. Additionally, the plan will include grade separations for State Route 86, including a new bridge at Avenue 50, and improving other areas where high numbers of accidents and fatalities occur. The TPPS process is flexible enough to incorporate improvements to connecting regions, including Highway 62 and Highway 74. Additionally, the Plan includes funding to substantially improve the overall condition of these roads as CVAG works in partnership with Caltrans. To catch up with and prepare for continued population growth, the TPPS identifies regional corridors in every community of the Coachella Valley. It also will expand to address new needs, such as an 1-10 bypass and extending Avenue 50 between 1-10 and State Route 86 to reduce traffic gridlock on existing highways, improve safety, open economic opportunities to disadvantaged communities, and reduce the miles traveled by drivers who must drive inefficient routes to get from one end of the region to another. This Plan and the TPPS include active transportation projects that make it easier and more accessible for people to walk or bike safely. In the Coachella Valley, eligible improvements often accommodate electric vehicles such as golf carts and low -speed electric vehicles, which are part of a multifaceted approach to meet varying degrees of mobility and independence among seniors, individuals with disabilities and underserved communities. Such projects may be stand-alone projects, such as CV Link extensions to North Shore and Desert Hot Springs, and others may expand on the existing active transportation network, such as the Palm Desert Link and bike improvements to the La Quinta village. It also may include incorporating active transportation into the design of complete streets and creating multi -modal connections, such as improvements along Dillon Road. Linking such projects to public transportation and facilitating first mile, last mile connectivity shall be a priority. Public transportation investments, such as CV Rail, is an utmost priority in this Plan. Many of the improvements needed to create consistent service between the Coachella Valley and Los Angeles have already been identified and are awaiting funding to be constructed. With Plan funding, the TPPS will be updated to include CV Rail and a fair share "local commitment" from the Coachella Valley for rail investments and operational costs of CV Rail and train stations. Those investments will be paired with investments from the Western Riverside component of this plan to match federal and state funding. It also will facilitate the movement of goods along the rail lines, which is critical to economic opportunities. Under the TPPS update process, additional benefits to public transportation can be considered, such as transit priority lanes for buses, zero -emission buses and transit facilities, and bus shelters that are sustainable and enhance the passenger experience. The Plan will also support public transportation options for veterans, individuals with disabilities, seniors, students, and disadvantaged communities, including improving access and keeping these transit options affordable. The Coachella Valley portion of the Plan will also fund operations and maintenance (O&M) of regional transportation corridors as identified in the TPPS. The CVAG regional O&M program will support operations, repairs, and replacement of traffic management systems, pavement surfaces (e.g., pothole repair), and traffic control devices. Identical to other projects in the TPPS, the O&M plan would follow a formula and approach to ensure the regional investment enhances, not replaces, investments being made by local cities and Riverside County. This plan includes funding to improve the aesthetic appeal of major corridors and gateways in the Coachella Valley, particularly Interstate 10 and Highway 86. The Coachella Valley corridors and gateways should better reflect the desert's unique characteristics and appeal to visitors and residents alike. Additionally, the O&M program will enhance existing efforts to promote uniform standards, keep transportation infrastructure in good condition, and extend the life cycle of Coachella Valley's transportation infrastructure. Regional corridors and gateways span cities and unincorporated communities and include, but are not limited to: • Interstate 10 • Gene Autry Trail/Palm Drive • Bob Hope Drive • Highway 111 • Indio Boulevard • Dinah Shore Drive • Ramon Road • Highway 86 • Date Palm Drive • Cook Street • Washington Street • Little Morongo Road • Fred Waring Drive • Monterey Avenue • Avenue 50 CVAG regularly reviews and amends the TPPS to incorporate new and innovative strategies that help reduce traffic congestion and increase economic productivity. The TPPS embraces regional mobility concepts and technologies such as signal synchronization and Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) technologies, which better connect the Coachella Valley's workforce to the workplace and reduce seasonal and traffic bottlenecks related to major events. Such concepts are also employed during emergencies to ensure access to hospitals and the best mobility possible for first responders and emergency vehicles. ITS technologies will allow for bus priority or transit signal priority to improve service and reduce delay for mass transit vehicles at intersections on regional corridors. Technologies that eliminate or reduce vehicle miles travelled, vehicle trips, and lay the groundwork for high-speed broadband access, will also be a priority. Building bridges and other resilient infrastructure is a very high priority in the Coachella Valley. Critical roads, such as Indian Canyon, Gene Autry Trail, and Dillon Road are regularly closed due to blowsand and rainstorms. With increasing frequency, there are prolonged closures and roads are destroyed during major rain events in the communities of Palm Springs, Desert Hot Springs, and Cathedral City. Such flood impacts can occur anywhere in the Coachella Valley but are often associated with areas that have not had similar flood control and road investments in the past, such as the eastern Coachella Valley. Projects to address the persistent flooding along Box Canyon Drive and other areas will be included in this Plan and future TPPS updates. 101 Freeway Service Patrol will be expanded to 1-10 in the Coachella Valley to quickly clear incidents from the freeway. Investments will be made in partnering with employers in the Coachella Valley to encourage alternative forms of commuting as a means to reduce congestion and improve air quality and safety. Population growth and development puts pressure on open spaces and natural areas, such as the sand dunes and mountains, that make the Coachella Valley a desirable place to live. Consistent with the approach in Western Riverside County, a minimum of 12.5% of annual revenues shall be allocated, at the discretion of CVAG, to preserve the Coachella Valley's natural areas, including fulfillment of the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP). CVAG shall allocate sufficient revenues set-aside for the above purposes to the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission (CVCC) for habitat acquisition and/or endowment purposes until the CVMSHCP reserve assembly and endowment obligations are met to fill any funding gaps for the long-term administration, land management, and monitoring of the CVMSHCP. Funding related to this Plan shall not relieve any Permittees under the MSHCPs of their pre-existing obligations to the fulfillment of the CVMSHCP. Funding for these programs has an inherent benefit to the environment but also helps expedite permitting and completion of transportation projects. TRAFFIC BELIE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY 91 I oro a 1 I 1 1 0 ~H Canyon L Cary Laky Wildomar iv, urrieta i Lake Perris 1. A&dai Diamond Valley Lake �. 44 A. Vail Zo�/ L ake ----- 377----------------------- O O to Safe Streets & Roads Highways Regional Public Connections Transportation Commuter Assistance Active Transportation Environmental Mitigation 1 2X 2024 Draft Traffic Relief Plan Western Riverside County Traffic Relief Investments Safe Streets and Roads, 8% Active Transportation, 3% Commuter Assistance, 2% Environmental Mitigation, 25% Safe Streets Highways & Roads Highways, 25% Regional Connections, 12% Public Transportation, 25% Regional Public Commuter Active Environmental Connections Transportation Assistance Transportation Mitigation Every city and the unincorporated communities of western Riverside County is guaranteed to receive its fair share of funds for safety improvements to local streets and roads and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Additionally, major roadways that connect the region will receive funds to implement safety improvements that will reduce accidents, injuries, and fatalities, as well as provide emergency relief to regional corridors with few or no alternative routes. Half of the funds for Safe Streets and Roads will be distributed by formula (based on population) to each city and the County of Riverside for unincorporated communities. Half of the funds will be distributed by RCTC to major regional safety projects. Improvements funded from this program include: • Pothole repair and road maintenance • Sidewalks and pedestrian safety infrastructure • Protected bicycle lanes • Roadway improvements in high -accident areas • Bus shelters • Bridge repairs • Improvements to railroad crossings, including bridges to separate roads from railroad tracks • Traffic calming measures • Bypass roads • Median barriers • Protecting roads, sidewalks, and bicycle facilities from flooding and other natural hazards • Traffic signals, including technology to synchronize and interconnect signals • Improvements to provide accessibility for persons with disabilities Specific regional corridors that could receive funding for safety improvements include: • Cajalco Road • Gilman Springs Road • Grand Avenue • Ramona Expressway / Mid County Parkway • 1-10 Bypass between Banning and Cabazon Improving the flow of traffic saves time, reduces stress, and improves safety, air quality, and economic productivity. Population is growing in Riverside County. Without action, traffic congestion will also continue to grow. The highways in Riverside County were built decades ago, in some cases severing communities and impacting local traffic circulation. Additionally, Riverside County has an incomplete highway network that does not adequately serve our residents or economy. The Traffic Relief Plan will improve traffic flow by building new infrastructure and using technology to improve efficiency of how the transportation system operates. Investments will include: 1-15 Corridor/Corona, Temescal Valley, Lake Elsinore, Wildomar, Murrieta, Temecula • Add Express Lanes in each direction on 1-15 between Cajalco Road in Corona and State Route 74 • Add at least one lane in each direction on 1-15 between State Route 74 to the San Diego County Line • Construct auxiliary lanes on 1-15 in Corona • Construct the final phase of the French Valley Parkway interchange at 1-15 in Temecula, which includes: o Widening ramps at Winchester Road o Constructing on and off ramps to 1-15 from French Valley Parkway and a bridge over 1-15 o Constructing the French Valley Parkway from Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road o Adding of collector/distributor lanes for southbound 1-15 from 1-215 to Winchester Road • Reconstruct interchanges at: o Nichols Road in Lake Elsinore o Central Avenue (State Route 74) in Lake Elsinore o Wildomar Trail (formerly Baxter Road) in Wildomar o Bundy Canyon Road in Wildomar • Construct a new interchange on 1-15 at: o Campbell Ranch Road and Temescal Canyon Road in Temescal Valley o Franklin Street in Lake Elsinore 1-215 Corridor/Riverside, Moreno Valley, Perris • Add at least one lane in each direction between State Route 60 and Van Buren Boulevard • Construct new interchanges (on and off ramps) on 1-215 at: o Keller Road in Murrieta o Garbani Road in Menifee • Reconstruct interchange at Harley Knox Boulevard in Moreno Valley 91 Corridor/Corona, Riverside • Add at least one new lane on State Route 91 between: o State Route 241 and State Route 71 in the eastbound direction o 1-15 in Corona and Pierce Street in Riverside in both directions • Reconstruct interchanges on State Route 91 at: o Adams Street in Riverside o Tyler Street in Riverside • Construct a rapid transit connection from the 91 Express Lanes to the North Main Corona Transit Center/Metrolink station 60 Corridor/Jurupa Valley, Moreno Valley • Add at least one lane in each direction on State Route 60 in Moreno Valley Reconstruct interchanges on State Route 60 at: o Etiwanda Avenue in Jurupa Valley o Rubidoux Boulevard in Jurupa Valley o Redlands Boulevard in Moreno Valley 1-10 Corridor/Calimesa, Beaumont, Banning, Cabazon • Reconstruct interchanges on 1-10 at: o State Route 79 (Beaumont Avenue) in Beaumont o Highland Springs Avenue in Beaumont and Banning o Pennsylvania Avenue in Beaumont o Morongo Parkway and Main Street in Cabazon o County Line Road in Calimesa o Cherry Valley Boulevard in Calimesa Add express lanes on 1-10 between State Route 60 in Beaumont and Highway 111 in Palm Springs Countywide Interconnected Highways Using technologies that have been proven effective around the world, as well as emerging innovative technologies, investments will be made to interconnect highways, street and ramp signals, and automobiles to create more efficiency in the entire transportation network. With roadways and vehicles that can talk to each other, traffic flow can be increased and safety improved by reducing the potential for human error on the road. To catch up with and prepare for continued population growth, new regional corridors are necessary to reduce traffic gridlock on existing highways, improve safety, open economic opportunities to disadvantaged communities, and reduce the miles traveled by drivers who must drive inefficient routes to get from one end of the region to another. Five new regional corridors are in various stages of preparation and need additional funding to become a reality for Riverside County residents. These transportation facilities will include features that accommodate public transit and bicyclists, and will be consistent with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan for the protection of the environment. Investments will be prioritized based on readiness to be constructed and available funding: • Cajalco Road • Mid County Parkway • State Route 79 Realignment • Elsinore-Ethanac Expressway • 1-10 Bypass Bringing reliable public transportation to more areas of Riverside County is a priority of the Traffic Relief Plan. Increased investment in bus, rail, and new modes of public transportation will offer Riverside County residents choices for how they travel, and ensure public transportation is available for those who need it most. Passenger Rail Riverside County is home to several railroad rights-of-way that connect our growing communities. These rail lines serve as a public transportation backbone for our region. Funds for the Traffic Relief Plan will: Increase train service frequency on existing commuter rail (Metrolink) lines such as the 91/Perris Valley Line and Inland -Empire Orange County Line, with trains eventually as frequent as every 30 minutes during peak periods • Expand rail service into new areas of Riverside County such as the Beaumont/ Ban ning/Cabazon/Calimesa area, the Coachella Valley, and Hemet and San Jacinto • Construct new railroad tracks and supporting infrastructure within existing rail rights-of- way to allow more trains to operate and to increase efficiency and on-time performance of trains • Construct new rail stations, such as at the Ramona Expressway, in Winchester, and in Beaumont/Banning/Calimesa/Cabazon area • Maintain and enhance security and safety at rail stations • Maintain and enhance management of publicly owned railroad rights-of-way to ensure proper maintenance and safety • Enhance existing rail stations (there are currently nine stations in Corona, Riverside, Jurupa Valley, Perris, and near Moreno Valley), including: o Construct improvements to provide better accessibility for persons with disabilities o Construct new parking capacity at stations in Corona, Riverside, and Perris o Construct train boarding platforms, pedestrian bridges, and crossings • Maintain and operate existing and future rail stations • Invest in zero -emission trains • Maintain and enhance all aspects of operating rail service in Riverside County Bus The Public Transportation section of the Traffic Relief Plan will invest in bus transit to reduce traffic congestion, increase sustainability, and provide more options to residents who rely on public transit to access medical care, employment, education, and other services. Funding will go toward: • Sustaining and expanding where feasible local fixed -route bus services Sustaining and expanding rapid/commuter bus services along major corridors in Riverside County to destinations such as San Diego, Orange, and San Bernardino Counties, downtown Riverside, Temecula, Moreno Valley, Coachella Valley, Hemet/San Jacinto, and Beaumont/Banning/Calimesa, Corona, and Perris. These routes can connect to commercial airports in the region, major educational, business, and retail/ entertainment destinations • Improving safety and security on bus transit • Zero -emission buses and related capital, maintenance, and operation costs • Maintenance and operation of transit centers/hubs and bus stops/shelters • Roadway technologies that improve bus travel times • Micro -transit (on -demand) public transit technologies Additionally, funding will be set aside for specialized transportation providers that serve seniors, veterans, students, individuals with disabilities, and rural and underserved communities. The Citizens and Specialized Transit Advisory Committee, with representatives from these populations, will assist RCTC in administering and providing oversight to the program. Funding will go toward: • Ensuring infrastructure compliance with expansion of destinations and hours of operation for paratransit services such as Dial -A -Ride • Keeping transit fares low for seniors, veterans, students, and individuals with disabilities • Improved access to and from schools, colleges and universities, and employment centers for low-income families and rural communities • Free or reduced bus fares for those who require access to medical appointments, job interviews, or other needed services • Bringing infrastructure into compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act • Continued operation of vital community transportation resources such as the 2-1-1 network, which provides individualized assessments with transportation and social service specialists To construct the traffic relief improvements in this Plan, mitigation will be required, while other community mitigation will be provided to preserve and improve quality of living, particularly in disadvantaged communities. Additionally, public infrastructure is increasingly under threat from natural disasters. Further, population growth and development puts pressure on natural areas that make Riverside County a desirable place to live. To achieve balanced growth of the region, ensure transportation projects can move forward, withstand natural hazards, and provide for a high quality of living for current and future generations of Riverside County residents, the Traffic Relief Plan makes meaningful commitments to environmental stewardship. Revenues shall be allocated, at the discretion of RCTC, for one or more of the following purposes: • To benefit the environment and to expedite permitting and completion of transportation projects • To promote public health and safety by improving air quality or safeguarding local transportation infrastructure from natural hazards, including, but not limited to, floods, fires, earthquakes, or blowsand • To preserve Riverside County's natural areas, including fulfillment of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) obligations • To mitigate Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) • To support transit -oriented development and housing • To establish and maintain recreational use of public open spaces by non -motorized means RCTC shall allocate at least half of the revenues set-aside for the above purposes to the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority for habitat acquisition and/or endowment purposes until the MSHCP reserve assembly and endowment obligations are met to ensure the long-term administration, land management, and monitoring of the habitat. Funding allocated from this Plan shall not relieve any Permittees under the MSHCPs of their pre-existing obligations to the fulfillment of the MSHCP. To help commuters with a safer trip, and to provide alternatives to driving alone, the Traffic Relief Plan invests in the following Commuter Assistance programs: Freeway Service Patrol When accidents occur on highways or when vehicles break down, traffic can build quickly, creating delays and additional safety hazards to motorists. Freeway Service Patrol provides roving tow trucks to quickly assist motorists so that traffic can flow again. This public service is operated with strict performance and accountability measures by the California Highway Patrol, Caltrans, and RCTC ensuring that Freeway Service Patrols reduce congestion, increase safety, and decrease air pollution. The Plan will sustain and increase Freeway Service Patrol levels on Interstates 15 and 215 and State Routes 60 and 91, including weekend service. The Plan will also enable new service to begin on Interstate 10 and possibly other routes as determined by benefit -cost analysis. Park & Ride Lots Creating more convenient locations for commuters to meet and travel together reduces the burdens of solo commuting and decreases the number of cars on the road during peak hours. Employer Partnerships to Reduce Commutes The Traffic Relief Plan recognizes that improving commutes is not just about the commuter, but also about employers stepping up to help. The Plan calls for enhancing current Commuter Assistance Programs with employers in Riverside County to provide better options and incentives to encourage ridesharing, vanpooling, telecommuting, and public transit use. Transportation options that do not require a motorized vehicle are an important element of healthy, connected communities in Riverside County. Therefore, the Traffic Relief Plan invests in pedestrian and bicycle facilities, trails and access to open space, and planning. Funding from this category can go toward: • Sidewalks and bicycle lanes • Infrastructure that provides safer routes to school for children to walk or bike to school and decreases injuries and fatalities • Recreational trails so that Riverside County residents can enjoy better access to our world-renowned natural open spaces o Amenities that support these facilities such as trailheads, parking lots, restrooms, and signs are eligible for these funds; however, maintenance and operations shall be the responsibility of the local government agency, not RCTC o Major regional trails identified in the master plan for the Riverside County Parks & Open Space District are eligible for funding, which include but are not limited to: • Butterfield Overland Trail/Southern Emigrant Trail • Santa Ana River Trail • Juan Bautista de Anza Historical Trail • Salt Creek Trail I RIVERSIDE CFTC TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TRAFFIC RELIEF PLAN Riverside County Transportation Commission (951) 787-7141 • www.rctc.org 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 12008 • Riverside, CA 92502-2208 POWER POINTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 19, 2023 City Council Regular Meeting Housing Authority Special Meeting December 19, 2023 +ca'Ilia I City Council Regular Meeting December 19, 2023 CLOSED SESSION IN PROGRESS Pledge of Allegiance 12/20/2023 12/20/023 CALIFORNIA December 19, 2023 1 r 1 h" 61 11 3 W� TRAFFIC RELIEF PLAN RCTC - Providing Transportation Solutions To Connect Our Communities • County -wide transportation improvements • Measure A • Support Metrolink, RTA, SunLine & other transit operators • Toll operations,, 1WTRAFFIC RELIEF PLAN 2023 Public Survey - Coachella Valley 74% Coachella Valley voter support for transportation measure 72% 72% 70% 69% 68% December 19, 2023 68% More than two 7 thirds of voters in 66 % 64% Coachella Valley 64% support a transportation 62% measure 604E Indio, Coachella, La Desert hotSprings,Palm Rancho Mirage, Indian 4uinta; Springs, Cathedral City;ZIP Wells, ZIPCodes: 92274, 92254 Codes: 92241, 92276, Palm Desert 92240,92258 ■ Public Support g M. M M W� TRAFFIC RELIEF PLAN 2023 Public Survey 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 December 19, 2023 1WTRAFFIC RELIEF PLAN Traffic Relief Plan: Looking Forward TRAFFIC RELIIFF PLAN 10 Draft 2024 Traffic Relief Plan... • Identifies County -wide transportation projects and services • Developed from public input • Over $25 billion in transportation investment • Updates the 2020 Commission -adopted TRP Draft 2024 Traffic Relief Plan: NOT funded • Unless voters approve funding M 10 5 Ranking transportation priorities by residents (Coachella Valley) 93% 91% 89% 87% 84% 80% — 72% of La — - Quinta, Indio, Coachella, and - ZIP Codes: 92274, 92254 support a sales Great or some Keeping Pothole repair Reinforcing Improving Keeping tax measure need for roads in good highways, safety senior, transportation condition roads and student, funding bridges from disabled and flooding and veteran bus earquake fares low 1WTRAFFIC RELIEF PLAN Traffic Relief Plan: Looking Forward TRAFFIC RELIIFF PLAN 10 Draft 2024 Traffic Relief Plan... • Identifies County -wide transportation projects and services • Developed from public input • Over $25 billion in transportation investment • Updates the 2020 Commission -adopted TRP Draft 2024 Traffic Relief Plan: NOT funded • Unless voters approve funding M 10 5 W� TRAFFIC RELIEF PLAN RCTC is Your Team kv� _ Coachella Valley Rail Project Dillon Rd./Indian Canyon Dr. Monroe Interchange Project 11 1WTRAFFIC RELIEF PLAN 12 Sunline Transit Operations CV Link 30 -year funding limit 30+ year funding Estimates $1.2 billion for Coachella Estimates $5 billion for Coachella Valley Valley Annual investment $50 million (2019- Annual investment $166 million estimate 2023) 3 Investment types: • Highways and Regional Arterials • Local Streets and Roads • Specialized and Public Transit No CV Rail 8 Investment types • Highway improvements • Public Transportation • Safe Streets and Roads • New Regional Connections • Commuter Assistance • Active Transportation • Environmental Mitigation • Flood and Blowsand Control CV Rail December 19, 2023 12 go 11 111 Cathedr■1 Oty CVAG 13 TRP Distribution TRAFFIC RELIEF PLAN ptV{pi16E Measure A Distribution :aunty `IvMI1{ ClIlVh coulrtr R IWA.— COMMISSION CONIN1 SK)III COMNIS$ION 11 111 Cathedr■1 Oty CVAG 13 TRP Distribution 4. Qala A Ctlhedlsl Dty 9WR? TRAFFIC RELIEF PLAN a.! aEA..Rot.o moo_ RIr IRSiOl CO. Coachella Valley • CVAG administers funding13 distribution • Transportation Project Prioritization Study (TPPS) • VMT mitigation, support TOD/housing, CVMSHCP�� • Projects funding for multiple categories a 0 •• 00 Ill�hwq� Rcgional acrvo Ssf.S—. ![�e Commvtar Emlrovn�rxsC ConneCtlons Iransporta[ior �ROvls I Alsallnd NiSlOallan 14 la December 19, 2023 13 7 ptV{pi16E :aunty ClIlVh COMMISSION I CVAGY:sr9 4. Qala A Ctlhedlsl Dty 9WR? TRAFFIC RELIEF PLAN a.! aEA..Rot.o moo_ RIr IRSiOl CO. Coachella Valley • CVAG administers funding13 distribution • Transportation Project Prioritization Study (TPPS) • VMT mitigation, support TOD/housing, CVMSHCP�� • Projects funding for multiple categories a 0 •• 00 Ill�hwq� Rcgional acrvo Ssf.S—. ![�e Commvtar Emlrovn�rxsC ConneCtlons Iransporta[ior �ROvls I Alsallnd NiSlOallan 14 la December 19, 2023 13 7 W� TRAFFIC RELIEF PLAN TRP Example Projects 1 3. Improve connections to 1-10, Highway Highw•yF 111 and SR -86 • Local road repairs, safety improvements, and traffic management systems �°•"• Avenue 50, Highway 111 0 • SR -86, Highway 62, Highway 74, and flegional I-10 bypass W• Bridges, resilient infrastructure and FloodE flood control investments on: Bc— .1d Indian Canyon, Gene Autry Trail , [enlr•I Dillon Road, and Box Canyon Drive 15 ff� TRAFFIC RELIEF PLAN 16 December 19, 2023 • Coachella Valley Rail public • Transit priority lanes, zero -emission buses, V.-M.natl " bus shelters and improving access and affordability ®CV Link extensions and Palm Desert Link • Complete streets and multi -modal Tr p• t•tlan connections • Preserve Coachella Valley's natural areas • Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat EnriranmenHl Mltiq•mm Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) • Freeway Service Patrol on I-10 �..•r Employer partnerships Economic Impact & Regional Investment Over 30 years: One -Cent $25 billion 168,000* $10.9 billion" $30.9 billion" Ensure revenues raised in each region stay F . .1 -lla (Blythe Area) Valley t. , _$20 million billion billion Note: Totals may not add due to rounding *Jobs Supported = An Industry -specific mix of full-time, part-time, and seasonal employment that are supported by project expenditures this includes Direct, Induced, and Indirect Jobs supported ** Direct, Induced, and Indirect Impact total 15 16 OwTRAFFIC RELIEF PLAN Accountability to Taxpayers • Independent audits and mandatory reviews • Local Voice. Local Control — No funds to be diverted to Sacramento or Washington D.C. • No more than 1% can be used for administrative salaries • Cities and County working together with RCTC December 19, 2023 17 18 a - wn CALIFORNIA - } w4A, 12/20/2023 City Council Meeting December 19, 2023 131 - Appoint a Member of the City Council to Serve as Mayor Pro Tem for One Year - CALIFORNIA - 12/20/2023 City Council Meeting December 19, 2023 B2 —Appoint Members of the City Council to Serve on Various Outside Organizations s - o CALo CALI 12/20/2023 City Council Meeting December 19, 2023 B3 - Appropriate $866,000 and Approve Purchase of Golf Carts for SilverRock CALIP.M. NI.. Golf Cart Lease vs Purchase • Leases do not have a purchase option. • Current fleet is at end -of -life. • New lease cost is $810,000 over 4 years. • Purchasing cost is $936,000 with re -sale value in the fleet retained by City. Why Club Car? • Known in the industry for quality and reliability • Longer battery life • Aluminum frame construction suited for desert climate • Ability to deliver quickly Budget Appropriation • Current SilverRock budget has $70,000 for leases that can be transferred to the vehicles account • $866,000 is needed from unassigned general fund reserves, to be transferred to the SilverRock Fund 101-1007-99900 601-0000-49500 601-0000-60211 601-0000-71030 Budget Adjustments Account Transfer Out Transfer In Rental Expense Vehicles Expense $ 866,000 $ (70,000) $ 935,249 Revenue $ 866,00 12/20/2023 - CALIFORNIA - City Council Meeting December 19, 2023 S1 - Village Undergrounding Feasibility Study Financial Options Background • 2010: Initial Village Undergrounding Study prepared • 2021 and 2022 Community Workshops: Village Undergrounding identified as community priority • December 2022: City Council approved agreement with NV5 to prepare Undergrounding Study Update Background • September 19, 2023: Study Session Discussion for Draft Undergrounding Study Update — Project Overview — Description of Study Areas — Construction phasing and community impacts Study Area Reviews & Detailed Cost Estimates — Review of Rules, Regulations, & Franchises Agreements December 19, 2023 City of taowkra Undergrounding Feasibility Study Funding Options MT. Presented by Jeffrey M. Cooper, PE 33 Funding Options zr� i 6 Areas 1. The Cove 2. Downtown Commercial j 3. Downtown Residential 4. Sagebrush 5. Highland Palms �. - r 6. Westward Ho � ! } s• ;� .. s. s• 34 17 December 19, 2023 Funding Options Local Funding Approaches Local projects have traditionally been funded through the 1913 Act Assessment Districts and occasionally by Mello -Roos CFDs. There are two basic approaches to forming Undergrounding Utility Assessment Districts. One is to form the Assessment District and then prepare the plans and specifications and then get construction bids; the other is to prepare complete plans and specifications and have construction bids in hand before forming the Assessment District. Included on the following slides are details on the different options available. Federal & State Grants There may be grants available, which are presented later in this presentation. 0161 Funding Options Examples of Successful Assessment Districts NV5 has assisted with the successful formation of several utility undergrounding assessment districts throughout Southern California. The table below includes a sampling of recently formed districts that are comparable in size and scope to the City's areas. District Parcel (Weighted) UUAD No. 124 City of Newport Beach 966 $32,815,700 $33,970 65.29% UUAD No. ity of Newport Beach _J&` $4,640,550 L $17,315 52.20% UUAD No. 113 City of Newport Beach 215 $6,249,500 $29,067 71.54% [UUAD No. 19-4 ■=f Manhattan Beac,_�5,000 = $42,676 UUAD No. 19-12 City of Manhattan Beach 231 $6,735,000 $29,155 62.27% FAD No. 19-14 �fftry of Manhattan Beach 21 $6,810,000 $27,909 Paseo de la Playa UUAD City of Torrance 20 $1,784,400 $89,220 94.31% reenwich Village North � ity of Hermosa Beach $4,031,600 $39,916 65.28% UAD s• 36 ON December 19, 2023 Funding Options Option One — Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Assessment District) 1. The process is initiated by an interested property owner, who acts as a liaison between the City, utility companies, and neighbors 2. Based on the interest letter, the City Consultant prepares a boundary map and submits it to the appropriate utility companies who review the map to ensure that the boundaries are logical and feasible 3. The City Consultant then prepares a petition to be circulated by proponents to all affected property owners within the proposed district boundaries 4. Once the petition is certified by the Assessment Engineer, the City Engineer and the City Consultant will prepare a staff report requesting City Council approval to move forward. With Council approval, the Assessment Engineer will prepare an Engineer's Report 5. The Engineer's Report and Resolution of Intention are submitted to the City Council for approval and a public hearing is scheduled 6. The Ballots are prepared with the assessment amount and sent to each property owner within the proposed district boundaries 7. All votes must be submitted to the City prior to the end of the scheduled public hearing. The district passes if the district received greater than 50% approval and is subsequently approved by the City Council. Following approval by the property owners, the detailed design process begins. It usually involves the following steps: Base mapping, IID electrical design, and telephone and cable design 8. Once the project is fully designed, it will be bid with a contract awarded, and then constructed 37 Funding Options Option One — Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Assessment District) Design: After District Formation (Fast-track) Pros • Once the petition is approved, the City can immediately order the Engineer's Report, go to ballot and form the Assessment District • Up front costs are significantly less and the time period to form the District is reduced to about 3-4 months. The agency can pay the up -front costs or request that the proponents pay the up -front costs by depositing funds with the agency • It is known whether you have an Assessment District before preparing plans and specifications and obtaining bids Cons • Disadvantage is the bids could come in higher than the estimated cost in the Engineer's Report causing a shortfall in assessment funds. This can be counter balanced by placing a larger contingency in the Cost Estimate 38 19 Funding Options Option Two December 19, 2023 1. Steps 1-3 are the same as option 1 2. Once the petition is certified by the Assessment Engineer, the City Engineer and the City Consultant will prepare a staff report requesting City Council approval to begin the design process 3. The design process begins once the utility companies receive the design fee, which is the responsibility of the property owners. The process usually involves the following steps: Base mapping, IID electrical design, and telephone and cable design 4. Once the design is complete and accepted by the City and utility companies, the utility companies provide a "guaranteed cost of construction." 5. The completed design plans, Engineer's Report, and Resolution of Intention are submitted to the City Council for approval and a public hearing is scheduled 6. Ballots are prepared with the assessment amount and sent to each property owner within the proposed district's boundaries 7. All votes must be submitted to the City prior to the end of the scheduled public hearing. The district passes if the district received greater than 50% approval and is subsequently approved by City Council OR Funding Options Option Two Design: Before District Formation Pros • Advantage is costs are known before balloting and forming the District Cons • Plans, specifications (PS&E) and bidding process must be paid for up front before forming the District • After paying the up front costs, the District could fail to be formed. The agency could lose the funds for the PS&E unless the proponents of the District pay up front the costs, rather than the agency, by placing a fund deposit with the agency It can take two years to have the plans and specifications prepared and construction bids received and support for the District could change during this period ,:14,&, M 20 December 19, 2023 Funding Options Paying the Assessment & Final Steps Regardless of which of the two options is selected, property owners will have two options to pay for the assessment: 1. 30 -Day Cash Payment Period: Within 30 days after the close of the public hearing, the property owner has the option to pay the full or a portion of the assessment amount. The property owner will save approximately 8% on the portion of the assessment paid in cash. This 8% savings results from not selling bonds for the amount owed. Bonds will be sold for any unpaid portion of the assessment and a lien will be placed on the property until the bond is paid in full. 2. Bond: If the property owner elects to not pay during the 30 -Day Cash Payment Period, bonds will be sold. Assessments will be placed on the property tax bill to be paid over a 20 to 25 -year financing period. During that time, a lien will be placed on the property until the bond amount is paid in full. Bonds will incur a finance charge. Once construction of the main line underground infrastructure has been completed, property owners will be responsible for hiring a licensed electrician to connect the property's existing overhead connection to the underground infrastructure — this cost is not covered in the assessment amount and will need to be completed within the designated time frame by the property owners. 41 Funding Options Cost Per Parcel Per Area (Paying in Cash) *** ® Parcels in the Area * Cost ,O 1 The Cove 5,046 $117,279,875 $23,242.15 2 Downtown Commercial 85 $4,564,999 $53,705.87 3 Downtown Residential 294 $11,967,959 $40,707.34 ` 4 Sagebrush $2,692, AL $23,207.83 5 Highland Palms MM 9� &_ $4,482,771 $48,725.78 M$4,105,195 _MM33,927,2= * The cost estimate is based on IID maps and the count of services requiring conversion, which may differ from a simple parcel count. Occasionally, a single parcel may contain multiple homes or services, and conversely, a home or service may span multiple parcels. The most accurate option is to conduct an engineer's field study to obtain a true count of homes ** Includes 15% incidental costs (assessment engineer, CM and Inspection, city time, & bond counsel) *** It is estimated that private conversion costs will be in the $8,000-12,000 range per parcel. Property owners will be responsible for this amount, which is in addition to their assessment r ' nI- 42 21 December 19, 2023 Funding Options Cost Per Parcel Per Area (With Bonds)** 1 The Cove $23,242.15 $2,324.21 $25,566 $38,818 $1,940 Downtown$53,705.87 r�r 2 Commercial $5,370.59 $59,076 $89,699 3 Downtown Residential $40,707.34 $4,070.73 $44,778 $67,989 $3,399 -�agebrush $23,207.8 I[2,320.78 $25,528 $38,761 * Anded tb'iOPPA r 495 $48,725.78 $4,872.58 $53,598 $81,381 $4,069 ** It is estimated that private conversion costs 6 Westward Ho w1 11 be in the $8,000-12,000 ran a er parcel. >33,927.23 $3,392.2 Property owners will be responsible $37,319 for this amount which is $56,664 in addition to their assggssment >2,833 43 IFunding Options Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 In 1982, the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Government Code §53311-53368.3) was created to provide an alternate method of financing for needed improvements and services. • The Act allows any county, city, special district, school district orjoint powers authority to establish a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District (a "CFD") which allows for financing of public improvements and services. The services and improvements that Mello -Roos CFDs can finance include streets, sewer systems and other basic infrastructure, police protection, fire protection, ambulance services, schools, parks, libraries, museums and other cultural facilities. • A CFD is created to finance public improvements and services when no other source of money is available. • A CFD is created by a sponsoring local government agency. The proposed district will include all properties that will benefit from the improvements to be constructed or the services to be provided. A CFD cannot be formed without a two-thirds majority vote of residents living within the proposed boundaries. Or, if there are fewer than 12 residents, the vote is instead conducted of current landowners. In many cases, that may be a single owner or developer. • Once approved, a Special Tax Lien is placed against each property in the CFD. Property owners then pay a Special Tax each year. If the project cost is high, municipal bonds will be sold by the CFD to provide the large amount of money initially needed to build the improvements or fund the services. x 44 22 December 19, 2023 Analysis of Equivalent Primary Overhead Distribution: Count and Cost Evaluation Equivalent Overhead Distribution System: A theoretical feeder and distribution extension designed as if the applicant were going to be served overhead by a new system. The line will follow the basic route of the existing overhead system. This evaluation involves estimating the costs associated with establishing a new equivalent overhead distribution system used for delivering electricity to the existing residents in the 6 study areas. It encompasses the costs linked to the new primary infrastructure elements, such as poles, arms, insulators, pins, anchors, stud poles, cable poles, guying and the associated labor, equipment and permitting related. The equivalent overhead distribution and feeder extension must originate from the same existing source. The equivalent study should follow the basic route of the existing overhead system but must also be based on sound engineering practices for overhead construction utilizing proper pole spacing, grade of pole construction, and loading engineering. The intent of this opinion of probable cost is to explore a credit option so Imperial Irrigation District can consider an equivalent overhead credit for the length of the proposed conversions in the 6 different impacted areas in the City. 45 Analysis of Equivalent Primary Overhead Distribution: Count and Cost Evaluation Y q Y This table provides an estimated count of feeder distribution poles, overhead conductors, and other essential components required to construct a comparable overhead primary distribution feeder system. EQUIVALENT PRIMARY OH DISTRIBUTION COUNT ESTIMATES--_ Distribution Distribution Pin, Pin, Insulato.jillip"i 3550---� �� Distribution Arnn_ 887 `Total Distribution Feeder Poles $ 19,125,000 $ Primary Cable Polak 7 4 1 *Total Distribution Primary Cable Poles $ OH Feeder Conductor4 wire 3 phase in Ft 24,868 1,719 _-- 260,000 ®IT OH Distribution 00nductor4 wire 3 phase in Ft 62,572 3,197 Anchors, Stub Poles and Other Guiding 77 4 _-- 4 166,244 $ This table illustrates the estimated costs involved in constructing a comparable overhead primary distribution and feeder system. EQUIVALENT PRIMARY OH DISTRIBUTION COST ESTIMATE Area 41 Area N2 Area--� Area - A�� `Total Distribution Feeder Poles $ 19,125,000 $ 925,000 $ 1,925,000 $ 1,0DD,0D0 $ 925,ODD $ 950,000 *Total Distribution Primary Cable Poles $ 364,000 $ 208,000 $ 104000 $ 52,000 $ 52,000 $ 260,000 ®IT Total 397.5 AAC OH Feeder Conductor -4 wire 3 phase $ 3,854,540 $ 761,980 oral OH Distribution Conductor-4wire 3 phase $ 3,253,744 $ 166,244 $ 613,652 $ 158,860 $ 10BA20 $ 148,666 AL $ 26,597,284 $ 2,061,224 $ 2,642,652 $ ---® *Total Distribution Feeder Poles includes( Distribution Pins, Insulators, Distribution Arms and Anchors). *Total Distribution Primary Cable Poles represent transitions from existing Underground system to Overhead system or vice versa. This cost estimate is based on whether a private or public entity, other than IID, was constructing a new infrastructure system. ThQ,caI ulations and costs associated with IID's utility may differ from those presented. Costs includes IID's Engineering, Materials, Labor and Permitting. 46 23 Funding Options Other Funding Opportunities Federal Funding/Grants The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, has been labeled as a once -in -a -generation investment in infrastructure to support the nation's growth. While nearly 400 funding opportunities exist within IIIA, many of them were focused on either finding the most cost-effective route, directed at clean energy, designed for the state of California to be the applicant, or were focused on rural populations, However, several opportunities presented themselves for the City which may qualify and are presented as follows: • GRIP (Grid Resilience & Partnership): Department of Energy (DOE) program that supports activities that will modernize the electric grid to reduce impacts due to extreme weather and natural disasters. This program will fund comprehensive transformational transmission and distribution technology solutions that will mitigate multiple hazards across a region or within a community, including wildfires, floods, hurricanes, extreme heat, extreme cold, storms, and any other event that can cause a disruption to the power system. This program provides grants to electric grid operators, electricity storage operators, electricity generators, transmission owners or operators, distribution providers, and fuel suppliers. This program will provide up to $2.56 over 5 years. 47 IFunding Options Other Funding Opportunities Federal Funding/Grants (Continued) • Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program: As a community development block grant recipient, the City may apply for a Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program grant. This program would help provide low-cost, flexible financing to support infrastructure that benefits low- and moderate- income citizens for site improvements. A match is not required and actual funds are unspecified. The funds are distributed on a rolling basis from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. • Public Works & Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant: This grant assist communities implementing long-term economic development efforts. Through this program, projects that demonstrate climate change resiliency for decades to come are encouraged to apply. A match from the applicant is required via cash/in-kind, although actual funds are not specified, and proportions vary based on unemployment rate and per capita income. The original solicitation date was 03/14/2023, but funds are distributed on a rolling basis from the US Department of Commerce. ,:14,&, M. December 19, 2023 Grd RESiEEnLE ane Inneratedn Parinarships t+rd�am wnk. n EDA pmni..ye�e n p ..ragmen nwpkr.ImaO pane. nwmi.pad.....da�M.em emnxp�q•n.n+»eu •.mA .tl�dm »nnnk..nnmry=..eAan.�,..n.nn ntlfrede uRry Na<nae pOki'i.xme en e entlk me .omnnrynNion m enol» mon awn,M vna ime mx.go Nerouim�' nAd.. NDk.rotpMpmxn<e'uNemipndn.F.Amiknmkl.n'Mn..nr<..�z46nA.ndnntlw in.»m»�tl»meuury oiAn.ppk.nroenwv �k oukom..'dentl.e'innn epdY•kn. WM k ....nrok or..».wki un nd.n'A rn..wNk. d»n.eem� E�,pmx.m,,m. Id— 24 December 19, 2023 IFunding Options Other Funding Opportunities Federal Funding/Grants (Continued) • CWDG (Community Wildfire Defense Grant): With the adoption of a community wildfire protection plan (CWPP), the City could benefit from this program which is designed to help implement projects within the CWPP that are less than 10 years old related to becoming a fire -adapted community. The due date for this grant is on 10/31/2023 and a cash/in-king match is required. The actual funds from the US Department of Agriculture are unspecified. • RCPGP (Regional Catastrophic Preparedness Grant Program) FEMA Region 9: This grant covers severe damage or disruption to the infrastructure related to a catastrophic incident impacting the area, focusing on projects that are focused on equity and climate resilience. This grant can be used to build on existing regional preparedness efforts for local governments. Although the original due date of 7/24/2023 has passed, there are multiple due dates for these funds from the US Department of Homeland Security. No match is required for the $12M funds available, with individual projects grants covering up to $3M. • BRIC (Building Resilient Infrastructure & Communities) Direct Technical Assistance Grant: If the City of La Quinta is able to demonstrate that they have pockets within the community with a social vulnerability index (SVI) score greater than or equal to 0.6, this grant can be applied for. There is no known due date for the next round of funding, but a match is not required for this program funded through the US Department of Homeland Security. This grant is to be used as an additional research resource as the purpose of this program is to provide non-financial direct technical assistance to applicants. f M Funding Options Other Funding Opportunities State Funding/Grants • CPUC (California Public Utilities Commission) establishes funding mechanisms for undergrounding and upgrading the power grid through a variety of programs under Rules and Tariffs paid by users and the utility through work credits that accumulate annually in the municipality's account. The work credits are established by formula based on the equivalent overhead infrastructure improvement that would have been required if not for the construction of the underground facility. The challenge for agencies served by non -investor funded utilities, such as IID, is that the utility is not obligated to participate in these programs nor set aside work credits to fund future undergrounding as would be required for investor funded utilities, such as SCE. This is to the benefit of the rate payers in the short term but does not provide a funding source for future undergrounding our upgrades to the power grid. However, the CPUC does have requirements for undergrounding of secondary utilities, such as telecommunication lines, at the utility's expense along designated scenic highways and in areas where there is a public interest finding that justifies placing the lines underground. This would require these secondary services to participate, at their own cost, in any City sponsored undergrounding project to move the lines into the public right-of-way; however, the cost to reconnect service to individual properties may be borne by the property owner. • CERI (Community Resilience Investment) Program: This program will fund projects across California that increase community energy resilience and reliability, promote decarbonization of the electric system, improve energy justice and equity, and create good -paying jobs. Approximately $170 million in formula funds over the next five years will be distributed under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), section 40101(d) — Preventing Outages and Enhancing the Resilience of the Electric Grid. 50 25 Funding Options Summary & Conclusion Potential funding mechanisms include: • Local Funding • Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (Assessment District) • Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 • Federal Funding/Grants • GRIP (Grid Resilience & Partnership) Program • Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program December 19, 2023 • State Funding/Grants • CPUC (California Public Utilities Commission) programs • CERI (Community Resilience Investment) Program • Public Works & Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant • CWDG (Community Wildfire Defense Grant) • RCPGP (Regional Catastrophic Preparedness Grant Program) FEMA Region 9 • BRIC (Building Resilient Infrastructure & Communities) Direct Technical Assistance Grant 51 52 26 12/20/2023 - CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting December 19, 2023 PH1 — La Villetta at Avenue 58 Project EA2021-0006, G PA2021-0001, ZC2021-00017 C U P2021-0002, & TTM 2021-0004 "C Background • Project Location: — South of Avenue 58 between Madison Street and Monroe Street — The project site is located on two vacant parcels (764-180-002 and 764-180-003) Vicinity L. Map , Andalusia ! ti Proposal • 80 detached single-family units • Landscaping, bocce ball, clubhouse, pool, tot lot, a passive park, and utility infrastructure Proposal • Applications include: — Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) to find proposed project does not have a significant effect on environment — General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, and Planned Unit Development (Conditional Use Permit) m a.rs Gm � J�ix; 9.reaas PLAN S PLAN P 5 D ORM& $ SE DRG4M, 3 BATH 2,S SATIF 2.140 SO. FT. 1 111 SQ. FT. PLAN 1 _ yHEDRR4M, 2-5 WH 1.672 5A• FT PLAN 8 PLA1 N 3 3lLO iY 2.5 SRiH 1 SE DROOM1I. 1.672 54. FI, SECOND FLOOR 2.5 IATH PLAN 8 PLAN 2PLAN 3 PLAN 9 S 9E DROOM. .] SEBROp., 1 SE DROOM1I. S 9EDROOM, I 1a 2.5 IATH 2,6 IATB Sd+1H 2.140 SO. Ft. �a 1.115 So F1. 1,6[S SQ, FT, wo- eQ 2.110 SQ. FT, i TYPICAL CLUSTER FRONT REAR 62 ���IF60b nm..000� rtaue •w� we Q.ao CbLCA 5tnFME a PLAN 1 B SANTA BARBARA ELEVATIONS December 19, 2023 PLAN 2 PLAN 3 31RO100>+, S INOR00M. 2.5 BATH 3 BA1K LaI6 SQ. I1, 2.110 IQ. FE, s PLAN 1 :!EEL N, 672 5G FT PLAN i }IEOROO M. 2.5 SATP 1.672 SQ FT -- - SECOND FLOOR INEM LEFT 31 Enhanced Elevations Landscape Plan r �'_ J u - - FM •i i�� �' a!� 6 Findings • City Council must make findings to: — Approve adoption of MND — Approve the GPA and ZC and apply Conditions of Approval (COA) — Find the PUD consistent with General Plan and apply COA — Approve the architecture, landscaping, and site design of PUD and apply COA CALIFORNIA December 19, 2023 PYA MM 34 Project Comparison General Plan Amendment • Low Density Residential (LDR) to Medium/High Density Residential (M H DR) • At the current LDR designation, the Site would be allowed up to 36 units. • If changed to a MHDR designation, the Site would be allowed up to 143 units. Planned Unit Development • 80 Unit breakdown: — Plan 1 units: 3 bedrooms, 2.5 bathrooms 1,672 sf two stories — Plan 2 units: 3 bedrooms, 2.5 bathrooms 1,815 sf two stories — Plan 3 units: 5 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, 2,140 sf two stories — Plan 4 units: 3 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, den, 1,769 sf single story Planned Unit Development • Architectural styles include Spanish, Mediterranean, and Santa Barbara • Architectural features incorporate varying roof lines, gables, arcades, and swing awnings to break up the massing of the homes Existing General Plan Land Use GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS JAA Low Density Residential 73 December 19, 2023 Proposed General Plan Land Use GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS !W MedivaMigh Density Residential 74 37 I ' Project j ' site t ---------------- GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS JAA Low Density Residential 73 December 19, 2023 Proposed General Plan Land Use GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS !W MedivaMigh Density Residential 74 37 Planned Unit Development • 4 project amenities are required: community pool/spa, clubhouse, bocce ball, a tot lot, and a passive park retention basin Zone Change • Low Density (RL) to Medium High Density (RMH) • Under the current RL zone, the Site would be allowed up to 36 units. • If changed to a RMH zone, the Site would be allowed up to 108 units. FRONT (MOTOR COURT'ALWI m�ivcn R�e�i_ Rw'*an['°'000 I— December 19, 2023 RIGHT k=AR COLORSCHEMEe LEFT PLAN 2C VAN MFIT ard W- tee. LEFT PLAN 2C 78 39 79 c+ i FRONT (MOTOR COURT VIEW) AuTmauairIa RIGHT {SIVE YARD) v ==j w��: ur'Pu wm REAR {SIDE YARD) COLOR SCF`_ME3 LEFT (REAR YARD) PLAN 3A M b:9G� 1uWAi9R December 19, 2023 REAR (SIDE YARD) COL9E 5CREME a LEFT (REAR YARD) PLAN 3A SPANISH ENHANCED ELEVATIONS 20 M.- PROW z—, :v— =-- December 19, 2023 RVIFFT REAR Mien sCjqk* 5 LEFT PLAN 48 SANTA BARBARA ELEVATIONS 41 EW F=- difth - W: RICHT Existing Zoning NFA. RECREATION CENTER RESIDENTIAL Low Density Residential 84 December 19, 2023 Proposed Zoning Project Site RMH EK*. RESIDENTIAL = Medium High Density Residential 1 1 1 42 December 19, 2023 1:1.7 R.P. 43 A t x y — S • JI u vC �w Ilk r 100 100 20 SCQIe ^_ • 00' feat AVEN E 58 RIw PRtyATE_5TPiXr —x]w_J q R/w t 1 40• —AQi I 1571 7? 51 X L$• g• �55 Ek -,... -...,_ 5• AAp ELEy: -6.39 AU E V. - 5.8� SECTION A•A 40 0 40 8 stele ' feet R.P. 43 Traffic • Access from Avenue 58 • Secondary access is for emergency Fire access only • Avenue 58 to be improved to full General Plan width ImageCorridM.- -h-o ro Conditions of Approval • There are some minor modifications to help clarify the intent of a few COAs • Condition No. 34 TTM COA and Condition No. 33 CUP COA were removed • These changes were reviewed by staff and the proposed conditions still meet the original intent of the conditions reviewed by Planning Commission CEQA • Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared • Public review period was June 8 to June 28 • The City received two comment letters • Mitigation measures have been incorporated to reduce impacts to a less than significant level Landscape Plan • The landscape area includes a combination of trees, shrubs, and groundcover • A meandering sidewalk is proposed along Avenue 58 to enhance pedestrian connection Landscape Plan La Villetta at AveKue ss La Quinta, California f PAM A December 79, 2023 Presented Sy: Rodeo Credit Enterprises, LLC 93 La Villetta at Avenue ss e o©oo 02FTC ��R . OmOG r o©no I U-0— HE om pp - saca 94 December 19, 2023 47 95 La Villetta at Avenue ss COMMUNITY BENEFITS The proposed project: • Has broad-based community support with little to no opposition. • Supports and will contribute to the IID cost sharing agreement for installation of a new substation benefiting the larger community. • Will provide much needed housing diversity. • Fulfills the City's General Plan Goals & Policies. • Provides as abundant on-site parking to alleviate off-site parking concerns. Broad -Based Community Support for La Villetta • Desert Valley Builders Association • Greater Coachella Valley Chamber (La Quinta Chamber of Commerce) • Local and Regional Home Builders • Local Residents • Adjacent Neighbors December 19, 2023 Elm LA VILLETTA, DEVELOPERS, IID & CITY COORDINATION - IID Cost Sharing Agreement to Alleviate Electrical Supply Constraints - Conference calls with IID Staff and City in September and discussion of project participation in cost sharing; - Attend IID Zoom Meeting/Power Point Presentation with Developers on 1 1-20-23; IID topics: Conceptual solution to meet power needs, cost sharing agreement with developers to fund the construction of Avenue 58 Substation - 50 MVA Bank Addition, and discussion of timeline for construction. City Zoom meeting hosted by the City Manager on 12/13/23 to discuss participation in a cost sharing agreement for funding IID upgrades. The estimated cost is $3,000-$6,000 per home which is similar to capacity charges in other cities. La Villetta affirmed its intention on 12/18/23 to participate in the cost sharing agreement, as well as pay our fair share for the IID upgrades required for the community. 7 LARGE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY IDENTIFIED AS PARTICIPANTS IN FUNDING IID UPGRADES, ALONG WITH POWER USAGE FOR EACH DEVELOPER Avenue 58 Substation — 50 MVA Bank Addition Developments in the Area Est Project Description Project Location KVA The Club at Coral Mountain 750 dwelling units, a neighborhood. Southwestcomerof Madison Street G 8,200 commercial and otheramom ias Avenue 66 Estate Collection at Coral Mountaing1 Res ldentldl U rifts i400 A Panels S°uthwest corner of Madison Street & 2.430 (MaEaga) Avenue 60 3d Residential U nits with We at of Monroe Street between Avenue 54 Saddle Ranch Sol&OSattery and 28 kW Power 340 & Avenue 55 Generator per Lot EEellasera 320 Residential Units Southeast corner of Monroe & Avenue 80 3,200 (422WA)240Y=176 Amps per Lot) AVenu a 68 Town homes Project 62 Low Mosity Rosidoniial lin its South of Avenue 50 between Madison 620 Street and Monroe Street Andalusia 150 Residential Units South of Avenue 56 between Madison 1.500 Sureet and Monroe Street Estates at Griffin -Tract map 86744 78 Residential U nits. 400 amp Panels South of Ave nuo 54 Lotwaon Madison 2,370 Street and Monroe Street 7ravartina 1.200 Residential Units and Avanua 60 and Madison Street 14,600 SW Room Hate, City of La Ruinta 6,540 40,DD0 09 December 19, 2023 Housing Diversity 4�% ONE OF THE EIGHT GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA IS TO STRIVE TO ENSURE THAT EXISTING AND FUTURE HOUSING FOR ALL RESIDENTS CONTINUES TO BE DIVERSE IN TYPE AND OF HIGH QUALITY. Buyer Profile YOUNG PROFESSIONALS: Cost is especially concerning for millennials who are burdened with student loar debt and tighter credit conditions, along with higl' interest rates. Today's young Americans are startii families later and having few children. GEN Xers and BABY BOOMERS are also seeking someth simpler by moving to neighborhoods that fit their needs better - for example, a community with recreational amenities and less upkeep. ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSCIOUS buyers are motivated to live in a more modest home to conserve resources. Millennials and Gen Xers are focused on smaller homes as they are easier to maintain, less expensive to heat and cool and have a smaller environmental impact, as well as more mindful consumption. December 19, 2023 101 Proposed La Villetta Community Fulfills the City's General Plan Goals & Policies The City's General Plan is the foundation upon which land use decisions are based. It is an information and planning GUIDE that provides a framework for making informed decisions. The planning process provides the opportunity to amend the General Plan and may be needed from time to time due to changed conditions, such as the need for increased housing units. When considering a General Plan Amendment, review of a project's contributions is needed to determine if the proposed amendment addresses key issues and guiding principles included in the General Plan and if it furthers implementation of specific General Plan goals and policies. In other words, the findings must be based on the project furthering the City's goals and being in the City's interest. 102 51 La Villetta at Avenue 58 The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not result in the development of incompatible land uses, as there is existing residential development to the north and west. Potential land use impacts have been evaluated for land use consistency with adopted General Plan goals, policies and objectives, as well as with the zone change standards and requirements in order to ensure no adverse land use impacts would occur. The following outlines how La Villetta proposes to meet the City's General Plan Goals and Policies: 103 LU -1 Land Use CompatibiIitvThroughoutthe City and Policy CIR-1.17: In order to preserve the aesthetic values on the City's streets, optimum landscape setbacks shall be maintained along all designated General Plan Image Corridors and shall be identified in the City's Municipal Code and GOAL LU -4: Maintenance and Protection of Existing Neighborhoods: As depicted on the Line of Sight Plan, the project's design of one and two story homes would be harmonious with the surrounding single -story homes and would be consistent. Similar to the existing residential uses located to the north and west, the proposed project would limit the height of structures along Highway 58 to less than 22 feet which would maintain privacy for the existing and proposed residential uses. The closest two-story homes to Avenue 58 would be 150 feet and the closest existing residential uses would be 195 feet. ■cde 1'= 100' The project also is in compliance with the General Plan Image Corridor requirements by including a 15 foot landscape setback along Avenue 58 and limiting the height of structures within 150 feet of Avenue 58 to under 22 feet. The lower architectural elements and open space along the property's northern edge create a viewshed that is seamless with the northern existing neighborhoods, thereby illustrating a land use compatibility with well-established homes. 104 December 19, 2023 52 2. LU -2 High Quality Design That Compliments and Enhances the City and Policy LU 2.7: Continue to Include Park Facilities Planning in Neighborhood Planning Efforts: The proposed project has been designed to be visually compatible with similar architectural elements of Spanish, Mediterranean and Santa Barbara influences that are common in La Quinta. With the required 20% open space, the project has been designed to promote onsite amenities for its residents. The amenities include a clubhouse, pool and spa, tot lot, seating areas with picnic tables and benches - all which promote a high quality of living withinth — T • 0 L� 105 3. GOAL LU -3: Safe and Identifiable Neighborhoods that Provide a Sense of Place: As a Planed Unit Development, the community provides open space and recreational amenities, as well as landscape treatments to create an identifiable community. The charm of the neighborhood is reflected in its name, La Villetta. - -Ntz— �..... diiarsfl 106 ': I a- - .o ^a PRELIMINARY SITE AND LAND$GAPF PLAN TTM 3195R December 19, 2023 53 4. GOAL LU -5: Broad Range of Housing Types and Choices for All Residents of the City. Policy LU -5.2: Consider Changes in Market Demand in Residential Product Type to Meet the Needs of Current and Future Residents and GOAL H-1: Provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population: The proposed project's 9 units to the acre would provide an additional housing supply and a smaller housing choice that promotes a reduced carbon footprint. In addition, this alternative clustered residential housing product in lieu of a single-family dwelling development would help meet the housing needs of a wide range of household income levels and range of housing sizes for current and future housing demands in the Citv. GEN X 107 5. Program CIR-1.12c: New Development Shall Provide Pedestrian and Bicycle Connections to Adjacent Streets and Assure that Infrastructure and Amenities Accommodate Pedestrian and Bicycle Use, Policy CIR-1.14: Private streets shall be developed in accordance with development standards set forth in the Municipal Code, relevant Public Works Bulletins and other applicable standards and guidelines and Program SC -1.5.c: New development projects shall include vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle connections to the greatest extent possible, both through the project and connecting to adjacent projects: The proposed project includes a pedestrian sidewalk along the private driveway which would provide access to pedestrian sidewalks and a Class II Bikeway proposed along Avenue 58. The project will coordinate with the City to ensure that private streets are designed and constructed to meet City standards. Nuri In EX R/W 102' R/W R/W 81' 21' 10' 51'D' DEDICATION LAND APE SETBACK 15' B' 15' 7 EXIS NG PROPOSED (MEANDERING 2 MULTIPDRPO SIDE ALIS 1$• 15'f 2' AL _ 7LLAN EX -LANE ]-LANE PROPOSED Ex1 ST1N G I M PRO V.FM EN TS STREET SECTION B -B AVENUE 58 108 December 19, 2023 54 6. Policy SC -1.3: Encourage the use of more environmentally friend IV storm water management techniques such as bioswales, permeable surfaces and other methods as they are developed, in all new development, Program WR -1.4.c: Require onsite retention for new development projects to the greatest extent possible, to provide added recharge of the aquifer and Program FH -1.3.a: New development shall continue to be required to construct onsite retention/detention basins and other necessary stormwater management facilities that are capable of managing 100 -year stormwater flows The project proposes Light Impact Development/Site Design Drainage Concepts and Treatment Controls as part of the project WQMP and proposes a bioretention basin to capture stormwater runoff and infiltrate it into the ground water b 7. Program SC -1.4.a: Require all new development proposals to demonstrate consistency with the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan and Policy AQ -1.7: Greenhouse gas emissions associated with a development project shall demonstrate adherence to the City's GHG Reduction Plan:: The project evaluated Greenhouse Gas emissions and determined that the project contributions would be less than significant and the IS/MND Greenhouse Gas Study evaluated the consistency of the project with the City's GHG Reduction Plan and determined it adheres to the GHG Reduction Plan. Program SC -1.5.a: All new development shall be constructed to meet or exceed CalGreen Building Codes: The project will coordinate with the City to ensure the project complies with CalGreen Building Code requirements. iIQ 9. Policy H-1.4: Support the construction of new affordable housing by rezoning, where appropriate and desirable, to permit higher density residential development: The proposed project includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Density to Medium Density which would allow for 44 additional residential units to be developed on the site. The proposed project with nearby single family detached homes would be developed similarly to the existing area of La Quinta wherein the community of Codorniz is located, which has a mix of low, medium and high density homes. 110 December 19, 2023 55 Future Construction of La Villetta at Avenue 58 • With your approval of this project, we will continue working with a local homebuilder (who has entered into a Letter of Intent) or alternatively, proceed with our in-house construction partner, Delsa Homes for constructing the homes. Regardless, the construction of these homes will proceed expeditiously. • Since the homes range in size from 1,600 sf to 2,400 sf, the future sales prices for these homes will be based on current market rates in 2025 or thereafter. • Current housing market comparable: the Richmond American homes at Piazza Serena, located across the street from the proposed project are selling for over $600,000 and are traditional single family detached homes starting at 2,440 sf. • Similar cluster style communities recently built: Sycamore Hills in Upland, Collett Crossings in Riverside, and Sol Terra in La Quinta. 111 Rodeo Credit Enterprises' Construction Partner • Deer Creek I & II / 29 Quartz Hill (Palmdale) Homes • Built in 2022-2023 • Starting at 3,043 — 3,469 sf • Prices: starting at $800,000 J3ifa' 112 December 19, 2023 56 Rio Bravo Country Club, Bakersfield 22 Luxury Golf Course Homes by Delsa Homes (construction starting in 2024) 113 The Proposed La Villetta Community has an Abundance of On -Site Parking • 204 total parking spaces • Each unit has a 2 -car garage • 44 guest parking spaces to be supervised by a Homeowners Association Management Company • Total of 2.55 parking spaces per unit exceeding the City's Municipal Code requirements TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 379$0 114 December 19, 2023 57 La Villetta at Avenue 58 In summary, the proposed project: 1. Is supported by the community;' 2. Will contribute to the cost sharing agreement to fund the future IID power upgrades, which benefits the larger community; 3. Will provide much need housing diversity; 4. Will fulfill the City's General Plan Goals & Policies; and 5. Will provide on-site parking to meet the needs of its residents and guests. 115 La Villetta at Avenue 58 Project Team Kris Pinero, Project Manager Rodeo Credit Enterprises, LLC - Applicant 661-621-8912 (cell) kris@rcellc.us Henrik Nazarian, Civil Engineer D and D Engineering HNazarian@DandDEnaineerinainc.com Julie Beeman, President VCS Environmental ibeeman@vcsenvironmental.com Jeff Addison, Principal/Director of Design Kevin L Crook Architect, Inc. jaddison@klcarch.com Tim Piasky, Project Consultant Piasky Solutions tim@piaskysolutions.com 116 Mike Salazar, Landscape Architect Koriander Design Architecture msalazar@kdlainc.com Angela Besa LLG Engineers - Traffic Engineer maberry@Ilgenaineers.com December 19, 2023 ME December 19, 2023 'moo CALIFORNIA:_r y '• C X -y" 117 59