The URL can be used to link to this page

CC Resolution 2026-006 Highway 111 Corridor SP & Development Code Project MND EA 2024-0002RESOLUTION NO. 2026 — 006 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (EA2024-0002, SCH# 2025050964) FOR A SPECIFIC PLAN TO REPEAL AND REPLACE EXISTING SPECIFIC PLANS, ZONE CHANGE TO THE HIGHWAY 111 MIXED USE ZONE, AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO ADD CHAPTER 9.105 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE FOR THE HIGHWAY 111 CORRIDOR AREA TO FACILITATE THE HIGHWAY 111 SPECIFIC PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE CASE NUMBER: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2024-0002 PROJECT: HIGHWAY 111 SPECIFIC PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on April 7, 2026, hold a continued Public Hearing to consider approval of the Highway 111 Specific Plan and Development Code for properties within the Highway 111 Corridor Area, generally located north of Avenue 48, south of the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel, east of Washington Street, and west of Jefferson Street; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on February 24, 2026, consider the revised Development Code at City Council's direction and suggested additional revisions to the Development Code and Specific Plan for City Council consideration; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on January 20, 2026, previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the Highway 111 Specific Plan and Development Code and continued the Public Hearing to allow additional time for staff to prepare the revised Development Code and present to Planning Commission for their review of the proposed revisions; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on November 18, 2025, previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider the Highway 111 Specific Plan and Development Code and continued the Public Hearing to a date certain to allow additional time for staff to further review the proposed Development Code with stakeholders and provide suggested revisions to the Specific Plan and Development Code if needed; and RESOLUTION NO. 2026 — 006 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2024-0002 PROJECT: HIGHWAY 111 SPECIFIC PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE LOCATION: HIGHWAY 111 AREA BETWEEN WASHINGTON AND JEFFERSON STREETS APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA ADOPTED: APRIL 7, 2026 PAGE: 2 of 4 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on October 29, 2025, as prescribed by the Municipal Code and California Government Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within the project area and within a 500-ft radius of the project area and emailed or mailed to other interested parties who have requested notification relating to the project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on October 14, 2025, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing and recommended City Council approval of the Environmental Assessment (Planning Commission Resolution 2025-010), Specific Plan, Zone Change, and Zoning Ordinance Amendment (Planning Commission Resolution 2025-011); and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act to justify adoption of Environmental Assessment 2024-0002 (SCH# 2025050964) [Exhibit A]: The proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number, or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Potential impacts can be mitigated to be less than significant levels with the implementation of mitigation measures. 2. The proposed project will not result in impacts that are individually limited or cumulatively considerable when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate vicinity. Potential impacts can be mitigated to be less than significant levels. 3. The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect the human population, either directly or indirectly. Potential impacts can be mitigated to be less than significant levels. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case. RESOLUTION NO. 2026 — 006 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2024-0002 PROJECT: HIGHWAY 111 SPECIFIC PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE LOCATION: HIGHWAY 111 AREA BETWEEN WASHINGTON AND JEFFERSON STREETS APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA ADOPTED: APRIL 7, 2026 PAGE: 3 of 4 SECTION 2. That the City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration (Environmental Assessment 2024-0002, SCH# 2025050964) and finds that Specific Plan 2022-0002, Zone Change 2024-0002, and Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2024-0002 are consistent with the analysis therein and all environmental impacts can be mitigated to less than significant levels [Exhibit A]. SECTION 3. That it does hereby adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration (Environmental Assessment 2024-0002, SCH# 2025050964) for the reasons set forth in this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on April 7, 2026, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Fitzpatrick, McGarrey, Pena, Sanchez, and Mayor Evans NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: MONIKA RAD VA, dty Clerk City of La Quinta, California RESOLUTION NO. 2026 — 006 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2024-0002 PROJECT: HIGHWAY 111 SPECIFIC PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE LOCATION: HIGHWAY 111 AREA BETWEEN WASHINGTON AND JEFFERSON STREETS APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA ADOPTED: APRIL 7, 2026 PAGE: 4 of 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney - - - City of La Quinta, California RESOLUTION NO. 2026-006 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2024-0002 EXHIBIT A PROJECT: HIGHWAY 111 SPECIFIC PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan Final IS/MND City of La Quinta 1 October 2025 Final IS/MND Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan EA2024-0002 SP2022-0002 ZC2024-0002 ZOA2024-0002 CIP #2019-05 This document has been prepared by: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92247-1504 In collaboration with: 320 Goddard, #200 Irvine, CA 92618, United States T 949-648-5200 1 E info-northamerica@ghd.com I ghd.com October 2025 City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan Table of Contents 1 Project Information.......................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 CEQA Requirements........................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Project Background..........................................................................................................1-2 1.3 Project Location and Existing Setting...............................................................................1-3 1.4 Project Description............................................................................................................1-3 1.5 Required Agency Approvals.............................................................................................1-7 1.6 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program ................................................................1-8 1.7 Tribal Consultation............................................................................................................1-8 1.8 Project Figures..................................................................................................................1-9 2 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected..............................................................................2-1 3 Environmental Analysis...............................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Aesthetics.........................................................................................................................3-1 3.2 Agriculture and Forest Resources....................................................................................3-5 3.3 Air Quality.........................................................................................................................3-7 3.4 Biological Resources......................................................................................................3-12 3.5 Cultural Resources.........................................................................................................3-51 3.6 Energy Resources..........................................................................................................3-57 3.7 Geology and Soils...........................................................................................................3-59 3.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions...........................................................................................3-65 3.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials.................................................................................3-68 3.10 Hydrology and Water Quality..........................................................................................3-74 3.11 Land Use and Planning..................................................................................................3-80 3.12 Mineral Resources..........................................................................................................3-83 3.13 Noise...............................................................................................................................3-84 3.14 Population and Housing..................................................................................................3-88 3.15 Public Services...............................................................................................................3-90 3.16 Recreation......................................................................................................................3-94 3.17 Transportation.................................................................................................................3-96 3.18 Tribal Cultural Resources.............................................................................................3-101 3.19 Utilities and Service Systems.......................................................................................3-106 3.20 Wildfire..........................................................................................................................3-112 3.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance..............................................................................3-115 4 References....................................................................................................................................4-1 5 Report Preparers..........................................................................................................................5-1 5.1 City of La Quinta...............................................................................................................5-1 5.2 GHD..................................................................................................................................5-1 City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan i Table index Table1.1. Development Areas..................................................................................................................................1-4 Table 1.2. Draft Development Scenarios: Development Yield..................................................................................1-5 Table 1.3. Draft Development Scenarios: Land Use.................................................................................................1-6 Table 1.4. Draft Development Scenarios: Development Intensity.............................................................................1-6 Table 1.5. Draft Development Scenarios: Housing Details.......................................................................................1-6 Table 3.1. Potential for Special Status Plants to Occur in the Project Area............................................................3-22 Table 3.2. Potential for Special Status Animals to Occur in the Project Area.........................................................3-29 Table 3.3. Consistency analysis between Specific Plan and City GHG Plan.........................................................3-66 Table 3.4. Loudness Impact on Subjective Perception...........................................................................................3-85 Table 3.5. Current and Future City Projects..........................................................................................................3-116 Figure index Figure1-1. Project Vicinity.........................................................................................................................................1-9 Figure 1-2. Current and Potential Development Areas...........................................................................................1-10 Figure 1-3. Development Moderate Scenario.........................................................................................................1-11 Figure 1-4. Development Max Scenario..................................................................................................................1-12 Appendices Appendix A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) Appendix B Biological Resources Appendix C Cultural Resources Appendix D Public and Agency Comments City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan ii Acronyms and Abbreviations Acronyms and Abbreviations Term Definition AAQS Ambient Air Quality Standards AB 32 Assembly Bill 32 AB 52 Assembly Bill 52 ADN Adams & Dune Palms North ADS Adams & Dune Palms South AQMP Air Quality Management Plan ARD Archaeological Resources Directory BERD Built Environment Resource Directory BMP best management practice Burrtec Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, LLC CAC California Energy Commission Cal/OSHA California Division of Occupational Safety and Health Caltrans California Department of Transportation CARB California Air Resources Board CC Community Commercial CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife CDFW FP CDFW Fully Protected (Animal) CDFW SSC CDFW Species of Special Concern CDFW WL CDFW Watch List CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CESA California Endangered Species Act CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CERT Community Emergency Response Team CGP General Construction Permit CHRIS California Historical Resources Inventory System CIP Capital Improvement Plan City City of La Quinta CN Neighborhood Commercial CNDDB California Natural Diversity Database Corridor Highway 111 Corridor CID Commercial Park CR Regional Commercial CRHR California Register of Historic Resources CUPA Certified Unified Program Agency CV Coachella Valley City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan iii Acronyms and Abbreviations Term Definition CVCC Coachella Valley Conservation Commission CVMSHCP Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan CVSC Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel CVWD Coachella Valley Water District dB decibels dBA A -weighted decibels DGS (California) Department of General Services DIF Development Impact Fee DJN Dune Palms & Jefferson North DJS Dune Palms & Jefferson South DOC (California) Department of Conservation DPS Distinct population segment DSA Development Strategy Area DTSC (California) Department of Toxic Substances Control DU Dwelling Unit EIC Eastern Information Center EIR Environmental Impact Report EOP (City of La Quinta) Emergency Operations Plan FAR floor area ratio FEMA Federal Emergency Management Act FGC (California) Fish and Game Code FHWA Federal Highway Administration GC General Commercial General Plan City of La Quinta 2035 General Plan GHG Plan Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan GSF gross square feet HCP Habitat Conservation Plan HMBEP Hazardous Materials Business Emergency Plan HMU Highway 111 Mixed Use HWMP Hazardous Waste Management Plan IID Imperial Irrigation District IS Initial Study IS/MND Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration LDMF Local Development Mitigation Fee LHMP Local Hazard Mitigation Plan LST Localized Significance Threshold LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan iv Acronyms and Abbreviations Term Definition MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act mgd million gallons per day MMRP Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program MND Mitigated Negative Declaration MU mixed use NAC noise abatement criterion NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NCCP Natural Community Conservation Plan ND Negative Declaration NFHL National Flood Hazard Layer NFPA National Fire Protection Association NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPS National Park Service NRHP National Register of Historic Places NWI National Wetlands Inventory OHP (California) Office of Historic Preservation OPR (Governor's) Office of Planning & Research OS Open Space PMP Pavement Management Plan PRC Public Resources Code PRMMP Paleontological Resources Monitoring and Mitigation Plan Project Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan (see also, Specific Plan) RCFC Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District RCFD Riverside County Fire Department RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RCSD Riverside County Sheriffs Department RM Medium Density Residential RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SB 100 Senate Bill 100 SB 18 Senate Bill 18 SB 375 Senate Bill 375 SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SCTCA Southern California Tribal Chairman Association sf square feet SLF Sacred Lands File SNC Sensitive Natural Community City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan v Acronyms and Abbreviations Term Definition SoCalGas Southern California Gas Company SPCC Spill Prevention Countermeasure Contingency Specific Plan Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan (see also, Project) SRA Sensitive Receptor Area SSAB Salton Sea Air Basin SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board TAZ Traffic Analysis Zone USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service USGS U.S. Geological Survey UWMP Urban Water Management Plan VMT vehicle miles travelled WAN Washington & Adams North WAS Washington & Adams South WDID Waste Discharge ID Number WEAP Workers Environmental Awareness Program WG West Gateway WQMP Water Quality Management Plan WUI Wildland-Urban Interface City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan vi Project Information 1 Project Information Project Title Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan EA2024-0002 CIP 2019-05 Lead Agency Name & Address City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92247-1504 Contact Person & Phone Number Danny Castro Design and Development Director City of La Quinta (760) 777-7000 Project Location Located along the Highway 111 Corridor within the City of La Quinta, Riverside County General Plan Land Use Designation General Commercial Zoning CR (Regional Commercial), CC (Community Commercial), CP (Commercial Park), RM (Medium Density Residential) 1.1 CEQA Requirements This project is subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The lead agency is City of La Quinta (City). The purpose of this Initial Study (IS) is to provide a basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), or a Negative Declaration (ND). This IS is intended to satisfy the requirements of the CEQA (Public Resources Code, Div 13, Sec 21000-21177) and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Sec 15000-15387). CEQA encourages lead agencies and applicants to modify their projects to avoid significant adverse impacts. Section 15063(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines states the content requirements of an IS as follows: 1. A description of the project including the location of the project; 2. An identification of the environmental setting; 3. An identification of environmental effects by use of a checklist, matrix, or other method, provided that entries on a checklist or other form are briefly explained to indicate that there is some evidence to support the entries; 4. A discussion of the ways to mitigate the significant effects identified, if any; 5. An examination of whether the project would be consistent with existing zoning, plans, and other applicable land use controls; and 6. The name of the person or persons who prepared or participated in the IS. Environmental Analysis Methodology The State CEQA Guidelines present several "Special Situations" that include unique requirements for environmental evaluation. Section 15183 discusses "Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning." Subsection (a) states, "CEQA mandates that projects which are consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified shall not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project -specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 1-1 Project Information This streamlines the review of such projects and reduces the need to prepare repetitive environmental studies." This project is consistent with the City's current 2035 General Plan, which is included in Section 4, References. The proposed Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan would enable proposed future projects to consider this impact analysis when evaluating their potential environmental impacts. Where sufficiently addressed herein, future development may be considered "within the scope" of this environmental analysis. As a programmatic -level document, however, this CEQA analysis is not anticipated to provide sufficient detail to fully address the project -specific impacts of all future development. Indeed, it is anticipated that additional environmental technical studies or CEQA documentation may be needed for future projects once sufficient details are known. In such cases, the necessary environmental studies and documentation may be conducted at the time of proposal. It is anticipated that CEQA compliance for future projects would be tiered from this document. 1.2 Project Background The City is preparing a Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan (hereinafter "Specific Plan" or "Project") and Highway 111 Development Code to facilitate the establishment of Highway 111 as a vibrant mixed -use corridor. The Highway 111 Corridor (Corridor) consists of a roughly two-mile stretch of businesses, mostly retail, located along the La Quinta portion of Highway 111, between Washington and Jefferson Streets. Approximately 75% of the City's sales tax is generated in the Corridor. The Specific Plan is intended to guide the orderly development and redevelopment of local infrastructure, businesses, and housing within the Corridor. The City intends that these improvements would provide a unifying blueprint for one interconnected space to shop, live, work, and play, accessible via Highway 111, the Coachella Valley (CV) Link, and other multi -use paths. The Highway 111 Development Code is a land use policy that establishes development standards for the Corridor's expansion, incorporating location -specific guidelines like active frontage, and offering detailed information on qualifying uses, as well as additional requirements and permissions for future growth. The CV Link is a 40-mile pathway providing access to pedestrians, bicyclists, and low -speed electric vehicles on a dual pathway that runs mostly parallel to Highway 111 along the Whitewater Wash just north of the Project area. This regional pathway connects Palm Springs to Thermal and is expected to draw 13,500-16,000 users annually (City of La Quinta, 2019). Population growth anticipated by the Specific Plan is assumed to be captured within the City's current General Plan; however, the new Specific Plan would supersede and effectively replace existing Specific Plans that were previously adopted within the Project vicinity. Previously adopted Specific Plans are as follows: • SP 1987-011 Washington Park • SP 1989-014 111 La Quinta Center • SP 1996-027 Jefferson Plaza • SP 1996-028 Dune Palms Center • SP 1997-029 Centre at La Quinta • SP 1999-036 La Quinta Corporate Center • SP 2000-043 Point Happy • SP 2000-047 La Quinta Court • SP 2003-066 The Pavilion • SP 2005-075 Komar Desert Center • SP 2008-085 Coral Mountain Apartments City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 1-2 Project Information Additional details regarding population growth are provided in Section 1.4 below. This Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared in accordance with CEQA to provide a programmatic -level review of potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan. 1.3 Project Location and Existing Setting The Specific Plan project area is located along Highway 111 within the City of La Quinta, which is in the County of Riverside. The City is located in the foothills of the Santa Rosa Mountains in the Coachella Valley. The Valley extends about 45 miles southeast from the San Gorgonio Pass to the northern shore of the Salton Sea and the neighboring Imperial Valley. Cities in the vicinity of La Quinta include the cities of Palm Springs, Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage, and Indio, among others. The Project area encompasses just over approximately 410 acres (-0.64 square miles) of the Highway 111 Corridor spanning from approximately Washington Street on the west end to Jefferson Street on the east; and from the Whitewater flood control channel on the north to Avenue 47, and Vista Coralina Lane on the south. Development along Highway 111 in the Project area comprises a mix of uses, principally commercial (e.g., big box retail, strip center, grocery, restaurants, auto dealers) and large surface parking lots. Some residential uses are located to the south. There are a few vacant parcels scattered throughout the Project area. Landscaping consists of street trees and other ornamental xeriscape. Transportation facilities are largely improved with a full street network, curbs and sidewalks, and crosswalks at major intersections. Figure 1-1, Project Vicinity, presents the Project area within the context of the City. Figure 1-2, Current and Potential Development Areas, presents the Highway 111 Corridor within the City and outlines the seven development areas along the corridor. 1.4 Project Description Purpose The proposed Specific Plan provides guidance for implementing development within the Project area. The draft Specific Plan is available for public review by contacting the City of La Quinta Design and Development Department. As noted above, the Specific Plan is consistent with the City's current 2035 General Plan (hereinafter "General Plan") and furthers the objectives of the General Plan by providing a more detailed planning document for development of specific sites and streetscape improvements. This Specific Plan is intended to provide a comprehensive development approach for Highway 111 focused on public connectivity, mixed - use development, and enhanced transportation options. Introduction of mixed -use development is essential for the future of the Highway 111 Corridor. By combining commercial, residential, and recreational spaces, the Highway 111 Corridor is intended to become a vibrant urban environment that encourages economic growth and enhances the quality of life. Integration of pedestrian -friendly pathways and dedicated bike lanes, for example, would ensure seamless connectivity between residential areas, commerce, and cultural hubs, fostering a more engaged and active community. The Highway 111 Corridor is currently heavily vehicle -centric, and this Specific Plan aims to promote public accessibility through residential and retail densification and introduction of more compatible land uses to improve the Corridor's urban landscape. This holistic development approach is anticipated to revitalize the region and serve as a catalyst for urban renewal and community well-being. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 1-3 Project Information The City of La Quinta Municipal Code sets forth site -specific standards and regulations that govern the size, shape, and type of use that would occur in accordance with the proposed Project. The proposed Specific Plan is intended to be built out over the course of 20 to 25 years. Economically feasible buildout under the Specific Plan could result in the following additional square footages (sf): • Residential: 1,464,000 to 1,837,000 sf • Retail: 107,000 to 194,000 sf • Office: 82,000 sf • Hotel: 150,000 to 250,000 sf Population In 2020, La Quinta's permanent population was estimated to be 40,660 individuals. However, during the winter months, the seasonal population swells with an estimated additional 10,000 individuals, marking a 25% increase in the City's total population during that period (City of La Quinta, 2022). Population growth is expected to rise along the Highway 111 Corridor over the next two decades and beyond. This Specific Plan aligns with the objectives of the City's General Plan, which prioritizes mixed -use development while promoting seamless public connectivity and optimal land use to accommodate future generations. Embracing this growth is advantageous as it enables a more efficient and sustainable utilization of space, enhancing the accessibility of amenities and services for residents while promoting economic vitality and community engagement. Furthermore, this Specific Plan aligns with the City's General Plan Housing Element Goal H1: Provide opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population (City of La Quinta, 2022). The proposed densification along the Highway 111 Corridor aims to offer enhanced and abundant housing options, including urban housing options, to accommodate an expanding population. This Specific Plan would repurpose areas that were formerly underutilized, such as parking lots and large-scale retail establishments, transforming them into vibrant residential spaces with pedestrian -friendly uses. By maximizing the potential of these previously inefficiently utilized areas, the Project not only addresses the pressing need for housing but also revitalizes the urban landscape, fostering a more dynamic and sustainable community environment. Development Strategy Areas The proposed Specific Plan establishes seven Development Strategy Areas (DSAs), which provide a vision for future land uses, development standards, and design guidelines as envisioned by the City. The seven DSAs, and their development focus, are provided in Table 1.1. Table 1.1. Development Areas Development.. West Gateway No changes proposed Washington & Adams North (WAN) Lifestyle Center + Retail Retrofit Live, Work, Play Walkable Neighborhood Washington & Adams South (WAS) Market Rate Urban Housing Urban Housing Adams & Dune Palms North (ADN) Urban Housing + Community Use City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 1-4 Project Information Development.. Adams & Dune Palms South (ADS) Centre at La Quinta Business Hotel Cluster Urban Housing Dune Palms & Jefferson North (DJN) Urban Housing + Auto -Oriented Retail Dune Palms & Jefferson South (DJS) Creative Retail + Senior Living Project Development Scenarios Two development scenarios are proposed within each of the seven DSAs: Moderate "Residential" Scenario Max "Mixed Use" Scenario Table 1.2, Draft Development Scenarios: Development Yield, presents the Moderate and Max scenarios as a side -by -side comparison of development yield, land use, development intensity, and housing details that could occur within each DSA with implementation of the proposed Specific Plan. Numbers represent additional uses compared to existing conditions. A detailed breakdown of Moderate and Max development scenarios in each of the seven DSAs is shown in Figures 1-3 and 1-4. Table 1.2. Draft Development Scenarios: Development Yield Building.. Residential (Total) 1,464,000 1,837,000 999,600 Single Use Residential 1,464,000 540,000 Mixed Use Residential 1,297,000 Retail (Total) 107,000 194,000 190,262 Single Use Retail 107,000 68,000 Mixed Use Retail 126,000 Mixed Use (Total) 1,423,000 Office 82,000 82,000 81,025 Hotel 150,000 250,000 180,000 Total Development 1,803,000 2,363,000 Note: Residential and Hotel GSF Demand is estimated here using 1,200 GSF/DU and 400 GSF/Key City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 1-5 Project Information Table 1.3. Draft Development Scenarios: Land Use Acres Residential (Single Use) ModeratePortion Scenario 67.75 Scenario 26.13 61.0% 23.5% Retail (Single Use) 22.31 18.70 20.1 % 16.8% Mixed Use 45.23 0.0% 40.7% Office 7.99 7.99 7.2% 7.2% Hotel 9.49 9.49 8.5% 8.5% New Public Right -of -Way 3.55 3.55 3.2% 3.2% Total Land 111.08 111.08 100.0% 100.0% Table 1.4. Draft Development Scenarios: Development Intensity FAR by Land Use Residential (Single Use) ModerateAverage 0.50 0.47 0.88 Retail (Single Use) 0.11 0.08 0.29 Mixed Use 0.72 0.96 Office 0.24 0.24 0.40 Hotel 0.36 0.60 1.11 Total Land 0.38 0.50 Table 1.5. Draft Development Scenarios: Housing Details Dwelling Units / Keys Units (Total) Moderate Scenario 1,000 Max Scenario 1,600 Highest FAR 833 Single Use Units 1,000 383 Mixed Use Units 1,217 Affordable Units (Total) 703 783 - Low Income / Very Low Inc 520 520 515 Moderate Income 183 263 140 Hntpl Wave 1W300 550 450 Average DU/Ac Moderate Scenario Max Scenario Housing Intensity (District Ave) 14.76 22.42 Single Use Units 14.76 14.66 Mixed Use Units None 26.91 Housing Max Intensity 34.00 34.00 Housing Min Intensity 7.53 7.53 Housing Min Intensity (New) 9.00 11.08 Average Unit Size (GSF/DU) Moderate Scenario Max Scenario 75% Efficiency Housing Units (Total) 1,464 1,148 1,098 861 Single Use Units 1,464 1,410 1,098 1,057 Mixed Use Units 1,066 799 City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 1-6 Project Information Highway 111 Development Code The Highway 111 Development Code will govern land development along the Corridor and is designed to achieve consistent and aesthetically pleasing urban environments by prioritizing physical structure over the strict exclusion of land uses. Unlike traditional zoning codes, which focus mainly on dictating permitted land uses and activity levels, the Highway 111 Development Code concentrates on ensuring that buildings harmonize with their surroundings, allowing for a more diverse mix of activities within them. The Highway 111 Development Code seeks to integrate key land use and urban form objectives into adaptive development policies under the Highway 111 Mixed Use (HMU) Zone. These policies promote active frontages, where building facades engage with the street to create a vibrant pedestrian environment with visible goods, services, and activities. At the same time, the code emphasizes designing future development — whether new, infill, or replacement — to coexist harmoniously with existing auto -oriented uses along the Corridor, ensuring the continued presence of commercial activities like drive- thru establishments. Additionally, the code proposes a pedestrian -friendly block street network that supports mixed -use, townhomes, and retail developments, encouraging off-street paths and using roadways from signalized or roundabout intersections as access points and anchors for the block network. This approach ensures that new developments align with the desired character and vision of a neighborhood or community. Implementing the Highway 111 Development Code in the Highway 111 HMU Zone would enhance the community by offering clear guidelines that govern the visual aspects of development, ensuring a cohesive aesthetic and harmonious atmosphere while simplifying and expediting the development process. By focusing on the physical form and design of development, rather than simply regulating land use, the Highway 111 Development Code will support the creation of walkable, diverse neighborhoods that reflect the unique character and identity of each community. 1.5 Required Agency Approvals The City's approval of the proposed Specific Plan would not require any permits or approvals by other public agencies. Actions subsequent to the Specific Plan that support implementation of the General Plan may require permits or approvals by other public agencies. The following permits and/or approvals will be conducted concurrently with the proposed Specific Plan: City of La Quinta —Zone Change and Development Code Update (Zoning Ordinance Amendment). Future implementation of development proposed by the Specific Plan may require the following approvals: • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) — Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (applicable to fill within jurisdictional waterways and wetlands). • State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) — Construction General Permit and Storm Water Pollution and Prevention Plan (SWPPP, applicable to certain construction activities greater than one acre in disturbance). • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) — Biological Opinion or Letter of Concurrence, for Endangered Species Act consultation (applicable to activities that adversely affect federally listed species). • California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) — Encroachment Permit (applicable to activities that encroach within state highway facilities). • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) — Development Services permits and approvals for domestic water connections and Encroachment Permits for work within CVWD Right -of -Way. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 1-7 Project Information 1.6 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program The Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program (MMRP) for this IS/MND is included in Appendix A. The MMRP includes a summary of all mitigation measures and description(s) of how each mitigation measure would be implemented to ensure all potential impacts associated with the Project or future development projects would result in a less than significant environmental impact. 1.7 Tribal Consultation CEQA requires that lead agencies determine whether a proposed Project would have a significant effect on tribal cultural resources. The CEQA Guidelines define tribal cultural resources as: (1) a site, feature, place, cultural landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe that is listed or eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), or on a local register of historical resources as defined in PRC Section 5020.1(k); or (2) a resource determined by the Lead Agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant according to the historical register criteria in PRC Section 5024.1(c), and considering the significance of the resource to a California Native American Tribe. Pursuant to Senate Bill 18 (SB 18), prior to the adoption or any amendment of a city or county's general plan, proposed on or after March 1, 2005, the city or county shall conduct consultations with California Native American Tribes that are on the contact list maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for the purpose of preserving or mitigating impacts to places, features, and objects described in Sections 5097.9 and 5097.995 of the Public Resources Code (PRC) that are located within the city or county's jurisdiction. Similarly, pursuant to Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), the CEQA Lead Agency for any project for which a Notice of Preparation, Notice of Mitigated Negative Declaration, or Notice of Negative Declaration is filed on or after July 1, 2015, must provide notification to tribes that may be traditionally and culturally affiliated to the geographic area where the project is located. The City conducted concurrent SB 18 and AB 52 consultation. Seventeen Native American Tribes were contacted, pursuant to the list acquired from the NAHC, and PRC § 21080.3.1 and Chapter 532 Statutes of 2014 (i.e., AB 52), as part of preparing this environmental review document. Refer to Section 3.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, for additional information. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 1-8 Project Information 1.8 Project Figures City of Indio � C�jd1L�t� O Project Site C 05 1 2 3 Mlles. Map projection. Mercator Auxiliary Sphere Horizontal Datum: WIGS 1984 G d: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere .�ghtlner+ghdlUSGK;armft-2200 pate sorter World Imagery Ea fttar Geographies Created byzurabe 21OProjedsl5at11121937VOSWep3lWorkirgl11219378-CEOA411219378 CEOA.epm-tAcnhy Figure 1-1. Project Vicinity City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 1-9 Project Information Cl Project Site ii•.., Ja �. .r Washington & r Adarns North AI S7WARD HD DR West Gateway 01 Adams & Dune ^s. Palms North a a.. `Dune Palms & wAN-oz _ Jefferson North - AD"I r- yA WAS-02 - - WAS-01 Washington & South ADS-3Adams (Adams & Dune Dune Palms & 17 Palms South Jefferson South } 0 500 1,OD0 2A00 3,000 N US Feet Horizontal Datum WGS 1964 Gnd: GCS WGS 1984 .ghdnet,ghd-llS'.Saaamerdt - 2207 Data eared'. Wald Imapvy Wor Crv*W ty zirabo 21s5Proede'S61tfl219379�GI5,MeoelWuWnot11219378 CEQA11121M78 CEGA.am-Laahm Figure 1-2. Current and Potential Development Areas City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 1-10 Project Information WEST GATEWAY Iw IAt11 Fanrr M tow wrArtrl t.w> IA67,W tw]Q t111Itw 1N.M0 0'.o a_ilius oli f717e� N.7a iv" ae .mumcm.Ar tw,IMa oia Masao N rlow ie%A.I spa 1Aw v.0 tX ctr• sas rrw L..vw f + .I..o 81% .+x wo tau m ant. w�. _fit w0 Sa tx ao ilti cmrd. tso.Mn nw sx AlMM.111. W.M9 A%."I ' AR,,O-Il. H.I—Wg -ft' I t- -_ _ _ I uw.nnry Ltv. h— 695 LON>^My Law Income S2a i,7a under) Lk4N 1 — 140 WO—W tlr _ eA (flj ugtY! r w� a M1lwll .II Itw YwY Aw> MI►U• Wi }(1 RSaU 9V Wl tl� YNY { _ 1 t. as Ilan �.IS Or6@ tl1 ,- DUNE PALMS & JEFFERSON NORTH f vrrt Plopwad Rou.ln� •. I RO DU;CowV11>r Lu. l•Iwmo) � RIMA Alta4wnt'. .w^J.ry Law Inoprnl� _ �dn PropasW N.WIt� - " i:l_I I Qy,y�ir� LON IMAIIC) ih NA 0.11.MT : iw7tgry Lw ltccm.l Plan Pro pot.d Hooting � 50 DV � 11obr.w Ircw- ,•, .. .. ... RHMA Allv4trwlt .. .. 178 DU (LINLI Inrrrrt NHMA AII.fwrtl: 'tYDAMS - DUNE PALMS SOUTHJNM Ulm Figure 1-3. Development Moderate Scenario ' P11n Prtlpw..d Hou.ir>p: tY0 OU (t vwVety I nN ttmm.) RNNA AtIaYttent. t16 Du (Lw.Wy Law h.atel r .. I..w M.%,Is - tl\ .n q 71 sew I �� I• \mt m Ile AIw _ __ - O a too »a ado soda 2M ......., a V. N 00. . City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 1-11 Project Information iYT�ina -rY Nt� Iu IV .c- Jp %y -. WEST GATEWAY ' WASHINGTON & ADAMS NORTH - Ile 1! I\ �r WASHINGTON - ADAMS SOUTH, w,.:c�loPo,.d Hau.lnp. 13- . ,A.Mr.alr Inccmr RHNA Alelonnt, i o; 12e DU WNLI Inoome. I ® n en —ern Figure 1-4. Development Max Scenario �Yl Wo.Wwo 0I7 I./i1,9M :a 11 .g1�ieY`_0.L100 _ NdUO�.fr 1M IOMnOwil 0.itlY G 71 ) 9f lleeae 4eo „ fp 101Y JAT» I AI00a 1 1 t11 I t71900 1 fl0.JN ILII IN rniL.R ialaen.r 1,Hi xi _ IN.Ic� _ AI7ordMW H0 G A110-1- L-'Iv, Lv."LL—. 53. Wdetec i Ml/e7tleble HOUeing Albin-1: LanNey Law lrr., :20(175WCWII 100001ndsr) t Ir � w GYA.Yr M Plm Proposed HOW.F , .m •• •• .• •• .3J OULavNay Lvs R'INA Allobnenl. .whey Lew Y¢enYj , _ -=DUNE Pt an PnapO.ed H"Vinp: i _' :DNA A11011Mn!• _:whey Lor ebomel RMNAAIbbrlt -- 110 W (Ebowep lnwmsl 1111n ProPe1441 H..110' !2C CIJ L— I. —I RHNA AI.--l: 110 DU lL,. _ , L.. 1,—) - I _Duri PALMS -JEFFERSON SOUTH) o. r, 7W esr r rtts s nrl I.N •M City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 1-12 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected 2 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages: ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ❑ Agricultural & Forestry Resources ❑ Hazards & Hazardous Materials ❑ Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Energy ❑ Geology & Soils ❑ Hydrology & Water Quality ❑ Land Use & Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population & Housing DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation ❑ Tribal Cultural Resources ❑ Utilities & Service Systems ❑ Wildfire ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION would be prepared. ® I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there would not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION would be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact' or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect: (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact' or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect: (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Cheri Flores, City of La Quinta Date City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 2-1 Environmental Analysis — Aesthetics 3 Environmental Analysis 3.1 Aesthetics Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic ✓ vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock ✓ outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) In non -urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public view of the site and its surroundings? (Public Views are those that are experienced from ✓ publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or ✓ nighttime views in the area? Existing Aesthetic There are no adopted scenic vistas within the Project area. La Quinta is a desert resort city situated in Riverside County, California. Positioned between Indian Wells and Indio, California, it is one of the nine cities comprising the scenic Coachella Valley (CV), with vistas of the Little San Bernardino, Santa Rosa, and San Jacinto Mountains. Views of the Indio Hills and other scenic hilly regions are present from various locations within the City. The La Quinta General Plan land use designation for the Highway 111 Corridor is General Commercial (GC), and consists of a mix of retail stores, office spaces, restaurants, and service - oriented establishments (City of La Quinta, 2022). The Highway 111 Corridor contains a mix of zoning including Regional Commercial (CR), Community Commercial (CC), Commercial Park (CP) and Medium Density Residential (RM). While the construction of new buildings and structures within the City may potentially obstruct views of the surrounding natural landscape, the policies outlined in the Community Development, Land Use, Circulation, and Natural Resources sections of the City of La Quinta 2035 General Plan are designed to mitigate such impacts (City of La Quinta, 2022). These policies mandate that any future development carefully consider the preservation of scenic vistas and resources. By integrating these considerations, the City ensures that both growth and environmental stewardship are balanced, maintaining the aesthetic appeal and natural beauty of the area for future generations. This approach not only supports sustainable urban planning but also enhances the quality of life for all residents by preserving the visual access to nature amidst urban expansion. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-1 Environmental Analysis — Aesthetics Furthermore, the implementation of the Highway 111 Development Code along the Highway 111 Corridor would prioritize the physical form of buildings and public spaces over strict land use categories. As previously described in Section 1.4, the Highway 111 Development Code is an aesthetic -focused approach to development and land use planning. By emphasizing the design, scale, and appearance of buildings within a specific area, the Highway 111 Development Code seeks to create cohesive and visually appealing communities that reflect the character and identity of the region. This approach will ensure that new construction along the Highway 111 Corridor aligns with the area's vision for growth and preserves its unique character. a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Less than Significant Impact: A scenic vista can be described as a picturesque scene of open space with little or no intrusions. The Project encompasses various enhancements to the public infrastructure in order to provide a more suitable environment for commercial enterprises to operate and serve the community, residential, and hotel space, as well as streetscape beautification and other improvements to public rights - of -way, sidewalks, and public open spaces. The Specific Plan outlines proposed urban design concepts that showcase the planned streetscape and community improvements within the Project area. The Project aims to improve the accessibility, function, and aesthetic of the Highway 111 Corridor, providing a lasting community benefit. A guiding principle of the City of La Quinta's General Plan is that it remains a resort -oriented community, which ensures maintenance and improvements of opportunities for La Quinta to be recognized as a top resort and recreation destination (City of La Quinta, 2022). As a resort destination, aesthetics are key and would be ideally improved upon with this proposed Project. Should the Project utilize the Moderate scenario, impacts on public scenic views would be less than significant as the existing aesthetic and scenery along the Highway 111 Corridor contains solely mixed commercial use parcels. The corridor has limited land uses other than commercial (i.e., residential, office, and hotel) as well as improved pedestrian and bicycle accessibility. The Moderate Scenario would also utilize lower density development, thus reducing potential impacts on scenic resources. Should the Project utilize the Max Scenario, impacts on scenic vistas may be slightly more than the Moderate Scenario as it would consist of greater density development and increased pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Nonetheless, impacts to public views and the surrounding environment would be less than significant. Depending on the parcel/region of the Project area, the views of the Little San Bernardino, Santa Rosa, and San Jacinto mountains may differ. Views of these mountain ranges may be partially blocked/impeded by the new development along the corridor. The Municipal Code of the City includes standards for development to protect the aesthetic quality of the City, while providing reasonable opportunities for businesses and commercial development (City of La Quinta, 2022). The Project would comply with the City of La Quinta General Plan and Municipal Code as it relates to the surrounding aesthetic and sense of community. The Specific Plan aims to improve the look and feel of the Highway 111 Corridor by redeveloping big -box retail stores with a more livable and walkable multi -use community, as appropriate. In doing so, future development along the Highway 111 Corridor would better align with the principles of the City's General Plan Open Space (OS) Goal OS-3: Preservation of scenic resources as vital contributors to the City's economic health and overall quality of life (City of La Quinta, 2022). Although the redevelopment of the Highway 111 Corridor may result in changes to the current aesthetic of the region (e.g., big -box retail, large asphalt parking lots), impacts are anticipated to improve the function of the corridor and overall community quality of life. Impacts are anticipated to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-2 Environmental Analysis — Aesthetics b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact: The proposed Project area is the Highway 111 Corridor, which spans from approximately the intersection of Highway 111 and Washington Street on the west end to Jefferson Street on the east. This section of Highway 111 is not designated or eligible as a scenic resource by the California State Scenic Highway System. According to Caltrans, the nearest eligible State Scenic Highway is 7.4 miles west of the Project area, along Highway 111 at the intersection of Monterey Avenue, Route 74, and Highway 111. From this point up until Interstate 10, Highway 111 is designated "Eligible" as a State Scenic Highway. Route 74 is an Officially Designated Scenic Highway in California. However, the proposed Project would not affect these Highways, or enter a State Scenic Highway, nor would it interfere with or substantially damage scenic resources or historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. As such, no impacts to scenic resources are anticipated. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. c) In non -urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public view of the site and its surroundings? (Public Views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? No Impact: The area surrounding Highway 111 relevant to the Specific Plan is already an urbanized environment. Proposed development scenarios do not conflict with the applicable zoning designation and regulations. In the Land Use Element of the General Plan, the Highway 111 Corridor is encouraged to become a mixed -use overlay district as defined in the City's Municipal Code (City of La Quinta, 2024a). The purpose of a mixed -use (MU) area is to provide opportunities for multifamily residential development in combination with commercial and/or office development in a cohesive and integrated manner (City of La Quinta, 2024a). The Specific Plan would encourage and implement this and there is no conflict with applicable zoning and regulations governing scenic quality, therefore no impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less than Significant Impact: The proposed Specific Plan area development is intended to transform the current landscape, dominated by big -box retail and expansive asphalt parking lots, into a vibrant, well- connected urban space. This is designed to optimize land use by incorporating a diverse mix of upgraded retail options and dining, moving away from the one-dimensional shopping experience currently offered. The proposed Specific Plan area development, while introducing new sources of daytime glare and nighttime illumination, is carefully designed to enhance views, rather than expand the amount of light pollution. This development strategy focuses on utilizing lighting technologies that are energy -efficient and/or designed to minimize unnecessary glare. Future development facilitated by the Specific Plan may include low -impact lighting fixtures and reflective surfaces that are designed to reduce brightness, which would enhance visual comfort and safety without contributing to light pollution. This approach ensures that lighting serves both functional and decorative purposes, enriching the City's character at night and improving navigability and security for the community. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-3 Environmental Analysis — Aesthetics Furthermore, future development would adhere to the policies and regulations outlined in the General Plan as well as the City Municipal Code. Policy LU-2.3 in the Land Use Element of the General Plan states that the City's outdoor lighting ordinance would be maintained. Section 9.100.150, Outdoor Lighting of the City's Municipal Code, states that its purpose is to set the standards for allowing adequate energy efficient lighting for public safety while minimizing adverse effects (City of La Quinta, 2022). Complying with the designated policies would require that new light sources introduced along the Highway 111 Corridor be appropriately shielded and directed away from open viewing spaces. This ensures that day and nighttime views are not negatively impacted by the presence of these lights. By complying with these guidelines, the potential impacts associated with light and glare can be minimized to a level that is deemed insignificant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-4 Environmental Analysis — Agriculture and Forest Resources 3.2 Agriculture and Forest Resources Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? J J The project area is situated within a highly urbanized section of the City, devoid of agricultural or forest activities. Given its urban character, the area was not included in the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program's surveys (California DOC, 2022). This section of the City comprises several zoning districts, all of which exclude agricultural or forestry operations. The area is largely categorized as Urban and Built -Up Land. Agricultural activities are not proposed as part of the Specific Plan development. a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? No Impact: The area covered by the proposed Specific Plan is considered Urban and Built-up Land according to the California Department of Conservation (DOC), Important Farmland Finder (California DOC, 2024b). Urban and Built -Up land refers to areas that are covered by structures and buildings with a relatively high concentration. This is typically defined as having a building density of at least one (1) unit per one and a half (1.5) acres of land, or approximately six (6) structures for every ten (10) acre parcel (California DOC, 2024b). Prime Farmland is located adjacent to the Project area in two locations: northwest of the West Gateway area; and southeast of the Dune Palms and Jefferson South area (California DOC, 2022). Proposed development under this Specific Plan would not enter these Prime Farmland areas and both the West Gateway and the Dune Palms and Jefferson South areas are separated from Prime Farmland by Washington Street at the northwest portion of the Project area and by Jefferson Street at the City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-5 Environmental Analysis — Agriculture and Forest Resources southeast, respectfully. Furthermore, designated land uses within the Project area do not include agricultural uses and the Project implementation would not result in conversion of existing farmland to non- agricultural uses. Therefore, the Project does not affect an agricultural resource area and thus does not impact designated Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact: As per the City of La Quinta Municipal Zoning Code, the Project area outlined in this Specific Plan is not zoned for agricultural uses (City of La Quinta, 2024a). Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with any lands zoned for agriculture uses. Additionally, the Project area is not under a Williamson Act Contract; therefore, no impacts to Williamson Act contract lands are anticipated. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? No Impact: There are no anticipated changes to zoning of forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production under the proposed Specific Plan. No Impact would occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? No Impact: The area covered under the Specific Plan does not contain forest land resources. Therefore, development under the proposed Specific Plan would not result in the loss of forest land. No impact would occu r. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? No Impact: The proposed developments outlined in the Specific Plan are designated to occur within the specified area along Highway 111, stretching from approximately Jefferson Street to Washington Street in La Quinta. These developments would not result in the conversion of any onsite or offsite farmland or forest land to non-agricultural or non -forest uses. As such, there would be no impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-6 Environmental Analysis — Air Quality 3.3 Air Quality Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase in any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? I J The Project area is located within the Coachella Valley planning area of the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB) and under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SSAB portion of Riverside County is currently designated as nonattainment for the federal and state ambient air quality standards for ozone and PM1o. The Project area is designated as attainment or unclassified for all other federal and state ambient air quality standards. As described in Section 1, Project Information, the Project is consistent with the City's current 2035 General Plan. Therefore, growth parameters, such as population and vehicle activity, are consistent with the General Plan and have been previously analyzed in the certified General Plan EIR. The following General Plan Air Quality policies and programs are applicable to and would be implemented by project: Policy AQ-1.3: Work to reduce emissions from mobile sources by encouraging a decrease in the number of vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled. — Program AQ-1.3.b: Encourage public and private schools to establish alternative transportation programs for students. — Program AQ-1.3.c: Adopt and implement a Transportation Demand Management Ordinance for businesses with 50 or more employees. — Program AQ-1.3.d: Expand routes for golf carts and other neighborhood electric vehicles and plan for access and recharging facilities at retail, recreational, and community centers. — Program AQ-1.3.e: Expand pedestrian and bicycle routes and provide safe and convenient access to retail, recreational, and community centers. — Program AQ-1.3.f.- Facilitate mixed use development concepts in specific identified areas of the community to allow the combination of residential and non ---residential uses, such as live--- work---shop designs, as described in the Land Use Element. — Program AQ-1.3.g: Where permitted by the Land Use plan, and where appropriate, encourage high density residential development within walking distance to commercial, educational and recreational opportunities. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-7 Environmental Analysis — Air Quality Policy AQ-1.4: Protect people and sites that are especially sensitive to airborne pollutants (sensitive receptors) from polluting point sources. — Program AQ-1.4.a: Uses such as manufacturing, auto body shops, and other point source polluters should be reasonably separated from sensitive receptors. Policy AQ-1.5: Ensure all construction activities minimize emissions of all air quality pollutants. — Program AQ-1.5.a: All grading and ground disturbance activities shall adhere to established fugitive dust criteria. — Program AQ-1.5.b: Fugitive Dust Control Plans shall be reviewed and approved for development projects. Policy AQ-1.6: Proposed development air quality emissions of criteria pollutants shall be analyzed under CEQA. The impact analysis in this section is based on understanding that the population and jobs growth anticipated under the Project is consistent with, and would not be in excess of, that anticipated by the City's General Plan and as analyzed within the General Plan's certified EIR. a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? No Impact: The SCAQMD has adopted multiple Air Quality Management Plans (AQMPs) to address state and federal ambient air quality standards. Current AQMPs include: 2016 AQMP. The 2016 AQMP addresses the multiple ozone and PM2.5 standards. 2022 AQMP. The 2022 AQMP is focused on attaining the 2015 8-hour ozone standard. 2023 Coachella Valley PM,o State Implementation Plan. According to the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook, the purpose of the consistency finding is to determine if a project is inconsistent with the assumptions and objectives of the regional air quality plans, and if it would interfere with the region's ability to comply with federal and state Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS). Growth assumptions within the AQMP are based on growth assumptions and land use designations included within local general plans. The SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook contains the following two key indicators of consistency with the AQMP: 1. Whether the project will not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. 2. If a project is consistent with the growth assumptions in the AQMP. The first criterion is assessed in Impact c) below. As demonstrated in the analysis for Impact c), the Project's potential to expose sensitive receptors to substantial air pollutant concentrations (i.e., generate pollutant concentrations that would exceed an air quality standard) would be reduced to less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure AIR-1. Therefore, the project is consistent with the first criterion. Under the second criterion, the SCAQMD recommends that lead agencies demonstrate that a project would not directly obstruct implementation of an applicable air quality plan and that a project be consistent with the assumptions (typically land -use related, such as resultant employment or residential units) upon which the air quality plan is based. The project is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan, which was adopted in 2013, prior to the development of all the applicable AQMPs. The growth supported by development of the Project would be consistent with the applicable General Plan, and the current General Plan was adopted City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-8 Environmental Analysis — Air Quality prior to the current AQMP. Therefore, growth supported by the Project is accounted for in the AQMP. The project is less than significant under this criterion. As demonstrated above, the project would be consistent with both analysis criteria and, therefore, would not conflict with the applicable AQMPs. The project would result in no impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase in any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? No Impact: As described above, the SSAB portion of Riverside County is currently designated as nonattainment for the federal and state ambient air quality standards for ozone and PM1o. The SCAQMD had adopted recommended air quality significance thresholds for project construction and operation; however, these thresholds are applicable to the project level. Plan -level documents, such as the proposed La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan, where no specific development is identified or proposed and for which a construction schedule is not proposed, are not directly applicable to a plan -level action. The Project is consistent with the General Plan and the General Plan's certified EIR. As described in Impact a) above, the growth assumptions in the General Plan are accounted for in the applicable AQMPs. The AQMPs demonstrate the path to attainment of the relevant air quality attainment standards. As the Project is consistent with the General Plan, and the General Plan growth assumptions are incorporated in and accounted for in the AQMPs, the growth that would occur within the Specific Plan area would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase in any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is nonattainment. This Specific Plan would provide a comprehensive development approach for Highway 111 focused on public connectivity, mixed -use development, and enhanced transportation options. This Specific Plan includes introduction of mixed -use development, integration of pedestrian -friendly pathways and dedicated bike lanes, and other improvements to connectivity and accessibility. The project impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: Sensitive receptors are defined as facilities or land uses that include members of the population that are particularly sensitive to the effects of air pollutants, such as children, the elderly, and people with illnesses. Examples of these sensitive receptors are residences, schools, hospitals, and daycare centers. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has identified the following groups of individuals as the most likely to be affected by air pollution: the elderly over 65, children under 14, athletes, and persons with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases such as asthma, emphysema, and bronchitis. Sensitive receptors near the area include the residences north, east, south, and west of the Project. Amelia Earhart Elementary and John Glenn Middle School are adjacent to each other, about 1.5 miles north of the proposed Project area, while La Quinta High School is located north of the Project area along the Whitewater River. Additionally, James Madison Elementary School is located about 1.6 miles northeast of the Specific Plan area. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-9 Environmental Analysis — Air Quality Localized Significance Thresholds Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) were developed in response to SCAQMD Governing Boards' Environmental Justice Enhancement Initiative (1-4). The SCAQMD provided the Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (dated June 2003 [revised 2008]) for guidance (SCAQMD, 2008). The LST methodology assists lead agencies in analyzing localized air quality impacts. The SCAQMD provides the LST screening lookup tables for one, two, and 5-acre sites for the following pollutants: CO, NOX, PM2.5, and PM1o. The LST methodology and associated mass rates are not designed to evaluate localized impacts from mobile sources traveling over the roadways. The SCAQMD recommends that any project over 5 acres should perform air quality dispersion modeling to assess impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. The Project is located within Sensitive Receptor Area (SRA) 30, CV. The SCAQMD LST methodology provides two approaches for performing the LST analysis. For projects of 5 acres or less where emissions would occur, the SCAQMD has developed a series of look up tables that provide estimates of daily construction or operational emissions above which a project's emissions are determined to have a significant air quality impact. These emission LSTs are provided for each combination of pollutants (CO, NO2, PM1o, and PM2.5), SRA, size of the project emission area, and distance to the nearest sensitive receptor. For projects where emissions occur over an area larger than 5 acres, the localized significance impacts for construction and operation emissions can be derived by either applying the LSTs for a 5-acre area, or by performing air dispersion modeling. Thus, the primary determinants for the LST assessment, therefore, are the SRA where the project is located, the size of the emission area, and distance to the nearest sensitive receptor. The Specific Plan is a guidance -level document and does not include site -specific development plans. Mitigation Measure AIR-1 is proposed to reduce the potential impact of future development to less than significant. With implementation of Mitigation Measure AIR-1, future development supported by the Specific Plan would not generate a significant localized impact. Mitigation Measures: AIR-1 d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? No Impact: The SCAQMD recommends that odor impacts be addressed in a qualitative manner. Such an analysis shall determine whether the project would result in excessive nuisance odors, as defined under the California Code of Regulations and Section 41700 of the California Health and Safety Code and thus would constitute a public nuisance related to air quality. Land uses typically considered associated with odors include wastewater treatment facilities, waste - disposal facilities, or agricultural operations. The Specific Plan area would not contain land uses typically associated with emitting objectionable odors. Future development supported by the Project would involve the use of diesel construction equipment and diesel trucks during construction. However, the Project area has a predominance of commercial land uses and emissions from trucks are common throughout the project vicinity. In addition, project -generated emissions would rapidly disperse in the atmosphere and would not be noticeable to the nearby public. Therefore, the project would not generate a significant odor impact during construction or operation. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-10 Environmental Analysis — Air Quality Air Quality Mitigation Measures • Mitigation Measure AIR-1: Localized Significance Assessment Prior to the issuance required discretionary permits, new development projects in the Specific Plan area, if subject to CEQA compliance, must demonstrate that the proposed development would either not exceed applicable the SCAQMD's LST lookup tables or not exceed the respective ambient air quality thresholds for CO, NOx, and PM10 and PM2.5. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-11 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources 3.4 Biological Resources Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special - status species in local or regional plans, policies, ✓ or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, ✓ policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community ✓ Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? t! The potential for sensitive biological resources to occur (federally or state listed or state special status plants and wildlife, Sensitive Natural Communities (SNCs), and wetlands) were evaluated within the areas planned for development within the Project area, as well as a 100-foot buffer around the Project area for potential wildlife impacts. The Project area comprises seven DSAs, as outlined in Table 1.1 and Figure 1-2, which are planned to be developed with various focuses in mind and differ among each distinct area. The following information is based on the Biological Reconnaissance Technical Memorandum (Appendix B) that was prepared in support of the proposed La Quinta Highway 111 Specific Plan. The technical memorandum documents the results of a site visit conducted on February 4, 2023 that covered the Project area and the 100-foot buffer. The following information is also based on the results of two protocol -level floristic surveys that were conducted separately on April 26 through April 27, 2023, and October 24, 2023 in one area of the Project, encompassing a 15-acre parcel embedded within the ADN DSA (Figure 1-2), and documented in a separate Botanical Technical Memorandum (Appendix B). City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-12 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources The Project area with 100-foot wildlife buffer is located entirely within the City of La Quinta. Land cover is primarily classified as developed, interspersed with shrub/scrub (USGS, 2016). The 100-foot wildlife buffer extends into the Whitewater River Watershed. The Project area is bordered by the Whitewater River to the north and is bisected by Highway 111. The landscape surrounding the Project area is highly urbanized and developed, with high amounts of vehicular traffic. There are seven areas planned for development with various focuses ( Table 1.1; Figure 1-2). Depending on the parcel/region proposed for development within the Project area, there are two scenarios that are being assessed: a Moderate Scenario, which would utilize lower density development, and a Max Scenario, which would utilize higher density development. In all cases of potential impact, the "high" scenario would consist of increased pedestrian and bicycle traffic, which may result in slightly higher impacts to potential sensitive resources in those areas. The areas planned for development are surrounded by commercial businesses, residential areas, and roadways. A few areas planned for development within ADN, DJN, and DJS contain variable extents of natural habitat (Figure 1-2 through Figure 1-4). The DJS area contains only marginally suitable habitat features due to the limited extent of land and closer proximity to commercial buildings and roads. The other areas planned for development within WAN, ADS, and WAS have been graded or altered from their natural state and generally have less potential to support sensitive biological resources. Although the Project area is within a developed landscape, there are shrubs and dune habitat within select areas (WG, ADN, DJN, and DJS) that may support special status species and do support common species. Within the more natural areas, small mammal burrows were observed within the Project area, which can be used by other taxa such as birds and reptiles. The Project area and 100-foot wildlife buffer also supports common avian species protected by the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code (FGC). A brief summary of each area planned for development is included below, oriented from west to east, and north to south. 3.4.1 West Gateway The WG Development Area has minimal trees and shrubs, with limited vegetation overall. It includes Point Happy, an undeveloped elevated area (183 feet) bordered by Highway 111 to the south, Whitewater River to the north, and businesses and restaurants to the east and west. While special status species are not expected, nesting birds may be present. 3.4.2 Washington and Adams North The areas proposed for development within the WAN Development Area have no trees or shrubs present. They have limited vegetation within them and are surrounded by commercial businesses and concrete parking lots. Special status species are not expected to occur here. 3.4.3 Washington and Adams South The areas proposed for development within the WAS Development Area are clustered at the southern edge bordering Avenue 47. These areas consist of a movie theatre and paved parking lot bordered by a small margin of open space that has already been graded and has fences around it. There are trees along the edges of the areas proposed for development, and roads. Special status species are not expected to occur here, but nesting birds may occur. 3.4.4 Adams and Dune Palms North The area proposed for development within the ADN Development Area is a 15-acre parcel that contains natural habitat features that may support sensitive species and does support common species as well as City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-13 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources nesting birds. Trees and shrubs are present. A separate report for this area has been prepared by GHD (Appendix B). The parcel is bordered by commercial development and concrete parking lots. 3.4.5 Adams and Dune Palms South The areas proposed for development within the ADS Development Area are clustered at the southwest corner and bordered by two major roads, with a discrete and disjointed area at the east edge within an already paved parking lot and also bordered by a major road. The areas proposed for development are already graded, and there are trees and shrubs present along the edges and roads, some or all planted. Special status species are not expected to occur here, but nesting birds may occur. 3.4.6 Dune Palms and Jefferson North The area proposed for development within the DJN Development Area is at the westernmost edge, and contains natural habitat features that may support sensitive species and does support common species as well as nesting birds. 3.4.7 Dune Palms and Jefferson South The area proposed for development within the DJS Development Area is at the northern edge and bordered by Highway 111. This area is already paved on the east side. It contains marginal amounts of natural habitat features that may support sensitive species and does support common species as well as nesting birds. Based on occurrence records, habitat availability, and the protocol -level site visit of the ADN Development Area (Figure 1-2), and the reconnaissance -level site visit of the entire Project area, special status plants do not have potential to occur in areas of the Project that are proposed for development. No special status plants or SNCs were observed during surveys of the ADN Development Area or within the greater Project area. Based on occurrence records, habitat availability, and the reconnaissance -level site visit of the entire Project area, special status wildlife species have a potential to occur. The Project area is bordered to the north by the channelized Whitewater River. No flowing water and minimal moisture within the riverbed was observed. In addition, there is the Deep Canyon Stormwater Channel that bisects a small portion of the northwest corner of the Project area. No impacts to jurisdictional wetlands or waters, or SNCs, are expected. a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Special -status Plant Species Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated: The database scoping detailed in the botanical technical memorandum (Appendix B) produced a total of 66 plant species known to occur in the nine USGS quads within and surrounding the Project area. Based on species -specific habitat requirements and habitat availability within the Project area, three species were determined to have a low potential to occur, and seven to have a moderate potential to occur (Table 3.1) based on the results of database scoping. The majority of areas planned for development in the Project area are already developed and do not have potential for any special status plant species to occur. Three parcels in the Project area are undeveloped, retain natural habitat, and have potential for special status plants to occur: ADN, DJN, and DJS; however, City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-14 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources no special status plant species were observed during protocol -level surveys of the ADN Development Area in May and October of 2023, or in the reconnaissance survey of the entire Project area. Desert plant communities can be ephemeral in nature given the variable precipitation of any given year and species adaptations to this variability is resource availability. While the potential for sensitive plant species to be present in the undeveloped spaces of the Project area is generally low, the suitability of these sites to host sensitive species in subsequent years may change. With incorporation of Measure BIO-1 and 13I0-2, the Project would have a less than significant impact on special status plant species. Special -status Wildlife Species Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: The database scoping detailed in the biological resources technical memorandum (Appendix B) returned a total of 87 species (Table 3.2). The potential for sensitive wildlife species to occur was determined based on existing data and the reconnaissance level site visit (Appendix B). Special status species are federally and/or state listed, a California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Species of Special Concern, CDFW Fully Protected, on the CDFW Special Animals List, or any combination of these. The majority of areas planned for development within the Project area (within WAN, WAS, and ADS Development Areas) are developed and do not have potential for any special status wildlife species to occur. However, common and urban adapted bird species protected by the FGC and MBTA may occur if structures are present, or nesting features (such as shrubs and trees) are present within or adjacent to the areas. Based on the reconnaissance -level site visit on February 4, 2023 and review of existing data, the ADN, DJN, and DJS areas within the Project area may provide suitable habitat for special status wildlife species and do support common species protected by the MBTA and FGC. However, habitat within DJS is less suitable than the other two areas. The areas within the WAN, WAS, and ADS may also support common and urban adapted bird species protected by the MBTA and FGC. Three areas planned for development within the Project area contain discrete areas that are undeveloped, retain natural habitat, and have potential for special status wildlife to occur, in addition to common bird species protected by the FGC and MBTA: ADN, DJN, and DJS, for which the following species may occur: • The Palm Springs Round -tailed Ground Squirrel (Xerospermophilus tereticaudus chlorusa; CDFW Species of Special Concern) has a moderate potential to occur at all three Development Areas (ADN, DJN, and DJS). • The Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia; CDFW Species of Special Concern) has a moderate potential to occur within ADN. • The Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard (Uma inornata; federally threatened and state endangered) is a reptile species with a moderate potential to occur within ADN Development Area. • Flat -tailed Horned Lizard (Phrynosoma mcallii; CDFW Species of Special Concern) is a reptile species with a moderate potential to occur within ADN and DJN. • Coachella Giant Sand Treader Cricket (Macrobaenetes valgum; CDFW Special Animals List) is an insect with a moderate potential to occur at ADN and DJN. • The Costa's Hummingbird (Calypte costae; CDFW Special Animals List), Abert's Towee (Pipilo aberti; CDFW Special Animals List), Cooper's Hawk (Accipiter cooperii; CDWF Watch List), and Vermillion Flycatcher (Pyrocephalus obscurus; CDFW Species of Special Concern) have a moderate potential to occur at all three Development Areas (ADN, DJN, and DJS). • The Black -tailed Gnatcatcher (Polioptila melanura; CDFW Watch List) has a moderate potential to occur at ADN and DJN. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-15 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources The Palm Springs Round -tailed Ground Squirrel, Burrowing Owl, Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard, Flat -tailed Horned Lizard, and Coachella Giant Sand Treader Cricket are species covered by the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP). The Burrowing Owl is a covered species under the CVMSHCP but is afforded additional protections under FGC and the MBTA and would require additional minimization measures. According to the CVMSHCP, authorization of take for all species with a moderate potential to occur, except the six bird species, can be obtained through compliance with the CVMSHCP and the Local Development Mitigation Fee (LDMF) paid to the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission (CVCC, 2023). All Conservation Measures that are applicable within Section 4.4 (Required Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Measures) and Section 9 (Species Accounts and Conservation Measures) of the CVMSHCP should be implemented by the Project to minimize impacts to plant and wildlife species within the Habitat Conservation Plan's (HCP's) jurisdiction (CVMSHCP, 2016). Assuming there would be compliance with the CVMSHCP and with incorporation of Mitigation Measure 113I0-1 through 13I0-5, potential impact to the five species covered by the CVMSHCP would be less than significant. Based on existing habitat and available data, certain areas (ADN, DJN, and DJS) may support special status species and do support common species. Though, the area in DJS contains less suitable habitat and extent than the other two areas. The entire Project area may support migratory and nesting birds. With inclusion of Mitigation Measures 1131O-1, 113I0-2, 113I0-3, 1131O-4, and 1131O-5 impacts to special status wildlife species, including native, migratory, and nesting birds not covered by the CVMSHCP, would be less than significant. The Project area does not overlap any federally designated critical habitat (USFWS, 2023a). No impact would result. With implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1, 113I0-2, 113I0-3, 131O-4, and 1131O-5 impacts to protected wildlife species would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: BIO-1, BIO-2, BIO-3, BIO-4, and BIO-5. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated: A query of the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) (CDFW, 2023a) returned multiple locations of Desert Fan Palm Oasis Woodland (Washingtonia filifera) SNC (G3, S3.2) in the nine quads surrounding the Project area; however, the nearest Desert Fan Palm Oasis to the Project area is over five miles to the northeast. No native fan palms are present in the Project area. The undeveloped portions of the Project area are vegetated by Creosote Bush Scrub (Larrea tridentata), a natural community that is not considered sensitive by CDFW (G5, S5). The Project would not impact any SNCs, as none are present. A small portion of DPJ Development Area is mapped as "stabilized shielded desert sand fields" per the CVMSHCP's natural community characterization and mapping (CVCC, 2024); however, this area is not within a designated conservation area and, therefore, is not an identified priority area for conservation per Section 10.2.6 of the CVMSHCP (CVMSHCP, 2016). The Project would not impact natural communities identified for conservation as described in the CVMSHCP. The Whitewater River borders the northern edge of the Project area; however, the river has been channelized, and the banks are cemented at the upslope edge. There was no riparian vegetation observed along the length of the corridor within the Project area. This Specific Plan is not expected to affect riparian City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-16 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources habitat or other sensitive natural communities, as it is a planning -level document. However, future development in the Highway 111 corridor could potentially impact the flow or banks of the nearby Whitewater River. Consequently, future projects should incorporate Mitigation Measure 1131O-6 to minimize potential impacts on the natural flow of streams or rivers. Mitigation Measures: 131O-6. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact: No wetlands are documented in the Project area based on database searches (National Wetlands Inventory [NWI]) (USFWS, 2023b), and none were observed in the Project area at the time of surveys. The Whitewater River is along northern border of the Project area. The section of river adjacent to a majority of the Project area is classified as either a riverine intermittent streambed that is intermittently flooded or a riverine unknown perennial with unconsolidated bottom that is semi -permanently flooded (USFWS, 2023b). There is a small section of the Whitewater River that is within the Project area within the DJN Development Area, but the river is also channelized in this section, with steep, bare slopes and intermittently ponded water (not flowing). The Project is not expected to have an impact on state or federally protected wetlands. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? No Impact: Wildlife corridors refer to established migration routes commonly used by resident and migratory species for passage from one geographic location to another. Maintaining the continuity of established wildlife corridors is important to: a) sustain species with specific foraging requirements, b) preserve a species' distribution potential, and c) retain diversity among many wildlife populations. The Project is approximately seven miles from the nearest "essential connectivity area" and one mile from a "natural landscape block" and "small natural landscape area" identified by the California Habitat Connectivity Project (CDFW, 2023c). The Project area is surrounded by existing development, Highway 111, and the highly modified Whitewater River. Habitat in the Project area is highly fragmented. No new barriers to terrestrial wildlife movement would result from the Project, and the Project would not substantially interfere with migratory birds, bats, or other species. Due to the level of development existing surrounding the Project area, there would be no impact to the habitat access, connectivity, or migratory corridors of wildlife species. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Less than Significant Impact: The proposed Highway 111 Specific Plan does not include any site -specific designs or proposals, nor does it grant any entitlements for development that would have the potential to conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. The City of La Quinta 2035 General City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-17 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Plan (City of La Quinta, 2022) addresses natural resources within the City limits through its Biological Resources Element. The goals, policies, and programs within this Element address the preservation of valuable habitat and species which occur in the City and align with federal, state, and regional efforts toward preservation. The City does not have an adopted tree ordinance. Future development proposed to implement the Specific Plan would be required to comply with all applicable policies included in the General Plan. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated: Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) and Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs) are site -specific plans to address effects on sensitive species of plants and animals. The Project area is within the CVMSHCP (CVMSHCP, 2016), which is an HCP and NCCP implemented by the CVCC (CDFW, 2023b; CVCC, 2023). The City of La Quinta has been a participant in the CVMSHCP since 1996. If the project qualifies, the signatories to the CVMSHCP are able to obtain coverage for incidental take for the 21 wildlife and plant species that the CVMSHCP covers (CVCC, 2023). The proposed Project area is urbanized and highly developed and is not located within any CVMSHCP identified Conservation Areas; however, the westernmost extent of the Project area is less than one mile east of a portion of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area boundary (CVCC, 2024). The plant species covered by the CVMSHP include the Coachella Valley milkvetch (Astragalus lentiginosus var. coachellae), triple -ribbed milkvetch (Astragalus tricarinatus), Little San Bernardino Mountains linanthus (Linanthus maculatus), Mecca aster (Xylorhiza cognata), and Orocopia sage (Salvia greatae). None of these species have potential to occur in the Project area due to a lack of suitable habitat or a suitable elevational range. Wildlife species covered by the CVMSHCP that have a moderate potential to occur include Palm Springs Round -tailed Ground Squirrel, Burrowing Owl, Flat -tailed Horned Lizard, Coachella Valley Fringe -tailed Lizard, and the Coachella Giant Sand Treader Cricket (CDFW, 2023b). With implementation of Mitigation Measure 13I0-7, the Project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted HCP/NCCP and, therefore, would have a less than significant impact. Mitigation Measures: BIO-7 Biological Resources Mitigation Measures • 13I0-1: Assessment of Biological Resources and Worker Environmental Awareness Training Prior to Project construction activities for all projects covered in this IS/MND, a complete and recent inventory of rare, threatened, endangered, and other sensitive species located within the Project footprint and within offsite areas with the potential to be affected, including California Species of Special Concern and California Fully Protected Species (Fish and Game Code § 3511), will be completed. Species to be addressed should include all those which meet the CEQA definition (CEQA Guidelines § 15380). The inventory should address seasonal variations in use of the Project area and should not be limited to resident species. Focused species -specific surveys, completed by a qualified biologist and conducted at the appropriate time of year and time of day when the City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-18 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources sensitive species are active or otherwise identifiable are required. Acceptable species -specific survey procedures should be developed in consultation with CDFW and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, where necessary. Note that CDFW generally considers biological field assessments for wildlife to be valid for a one-year period, and assessments for rare plants may be considered valid for a period of up to three years. Some aspects of the proposed Project may warrant periodic updated surveys for certain sensitive taxa, particularly if the Project is proposed to occur over a protracted time frame, or in phases, or if surveys are completed during periods of drought. An environmental training program should be developed and presented by a qualified biologist to all crew members prior to the beginning of all Project construction in natural areas planned for development. The training should describe special -status plant and wildlife species and sensitive habitats that could occur within the Project area, protection afforded to these species and habitats, and avoidance and minimization measures required to avoid and/or minimize impacts from the project. All new construction personnel should receive this training before beginning work on this Project. A copy of the training and training materials should be provided to construction crews for review and approval at least 30 days prior to the start of construction. As needed, in -field training should be provided to new on -site construction personnel by the qualified biologist or a qualified individual who should be identified by the qualified biologist, or initial training should be recorded and replayed for new personnel. • 131O-2: General Measures for Plants and Wildlife When working in the natural habitat areas, the number of access routes, number and size of staging areas, and the total area of the activity should be limited to the minimum necessary to achieve the project goal. Routes and boundaries outside of normal access roads should be clearly delineated through fencing or flagging. Food, trash, and other solid wastes should be disposed of in Common Raven proof/wildlife proof, covered refuse containers and regularly removed from the various structures and facilities on a daily basis to avoid offsite dispersal of waste and to avoid attracting wildlife onto the Project site. Following covered activity work, all trash and debris should be removed from the work area. Construction work should avoid direct destruction of burrows through chaining (dragging a heavy chain over an area to remove shrubs), disking, cultivation, and urban, industrial, or agricultural development. Project -related excavations greater than 6 inches deep should be secured to prevent wildlife entry and entrapment. Holes and trenches should be back -filled, securely covered, or fenced. Excavations that cannot be fully secured should incorporate appropriate wildlife ramp(s) at a slope of no more than a 3:1 ratio (horizontal: vertical, equivalent to a 33.3 percent or 18.4-degree slope), or other means to allow trapped animals to escape. Personnel on site should be required to check under their vehicles for sensitive species prior to moving them and should exercise caution while driving on the Project site. Before moving, burying, or capping, inspect for wildlife in any construction pipes, culverts, or similar structures that are stored on the site for one or more nights. Alternatively, cap structures before storing on the work site. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-19 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources • BIO-3: Special Status and Migratory Birds Construction should be conducted, if possible, during the fall and/or winter months and outside of the avian nesting season (generally February 1 — August 31) to avoid any direct and or indirect effects to protected nesting birds. Pre -construction surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior. The qualified avian biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the pre -construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 100 feet for passerines and 300 feet for raptors. A smaller or larger buffer may be determined by the qualified biologist familiar with the nesting phenology of the nesting species and based on nest and buffer monitoring results. Construction activities may not occur inside the established buffers, which shall remain on -site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored at least once a week or as needed by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. • BIO-4: Burrowing Owl Habitat Assessment and Focused and Pre -Construction Surveys No less than 60 days prior to the start of Project -related activities for all projects covered in the MND, a burrowing owl habitat assessment shall be conducted by a qualified biologist according to the specifications of the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (Department of Fish and Game, March 2012 or most recent version) for all projects covered under the MND. If the habitat assessment demonstrates suitable burrowing owl habitat, then focused burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012 or most recent version) prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities. If burrowing owls are detected during the focused surveys, the qualified biologist and Project proponent shall begin coordination with CDFW and USFWS immediately, and shall prepare a Burrowing Owl Avoidance and Monitoring Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall describe proposed avoidance and monitoring actions, including measures necessary to avoid take of burrowing owl individuals, nests, and eggs. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall include the number and location of occupied burrow sites (occupied site means at least one burrowing owl or its sign has been observed within the last three years; may be indicated by owl sign including feathers, pellets, prey remains, eggshell fragments, or excrement at or near a burrow entrance or perch site), acres of burrowing owl habitat that will be impacted, details of site monitoring, and details on proposed buffers and other avoidance measures. If impacts to occupied burrowing owl habitat or burrow(s) or burrowing owl individuals, nests, or eggs cannot be avoided, appropriate California Endangered Species Act (CESA) authorization (i.e., Incidental Take Permit under Fish and Game Code section 2081) should be obtained from CDFW prior to commencement of Project activities. Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Project -related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012 or most recent version). Preconstruction surveys should be repeated when there is a pause in construction of more than 30 days. Preconstruction surveys should be performed by a qualified biologist following the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If the preconstruction surveys confirm occupied burrowing owl habitat, Project activities shall be immediately halted. The qualified biologist City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-20 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources shall coordinate with CDFW and prepare a Burrowing Owl Avoidance and Monitoring Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW and USFWS for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. • 113I0-5: Artificial Light Impacts Throughout construction and the lifetime operation of all projects covered in the IS/MND the City and Project proponents shall eliminate all nonessential lighting throughout the Project area and avoid or limit the use of artificial light at night during the hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are most active. The City and Project proponent shall ensure that all lighting for the Project is fully shielded, cast downward and directed away from surrounding open -space and agricultural areas, reduced in intensity to the greatest extent possible, and does not result in lighting trespass including glare into surrounding areas or upward into the night sky (see the International Dark -Sky Association standards at http://darksky.org/). The City and Project proponent shall ensure use of LED lighting, proper disposal of hazardous waste, and recycling of lighting that contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycler. • 113I0-6: CDFW Lake and Streambed Alteration (LSA) Program Prior to construction and issuance of any grading permit, the Project Sponsor shall obtain written correspondence from CDFW stating that notification under Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code is not required for the Project, or the Project Sponsor should obtain a CDFW-executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement, authorizing impacts to Fish and Game Code Section 1602 resources associated with the Project. • 113I0-7: Project Adherence to the CVMSHCP All Conservation Measures that are applicable within Section 4.4 (Required Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Measures) and Section 9 (Species Accounts and Conservation Measures) of the CVMSHCP should be implemented by the Project to minimize impacts to plant and wildlife species within the HCP's jurisdiction (CVMSHCP, 2016). The Project is outside of a designated Conservation Area, and a Joint Review Project is not required. However, the LDMF to the CVCC is required for development projects. Submission of the LDMF to the CVCC is recommended before building or grading permits are submitted. Prior to construction and issuance of any grading permit for all projects covered in the IS/MND, the City shall ensure compliance with the CVMSHCP and its associated Implementing Agreement and shall ensure the collection of payment of the CVMSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee and transfer of fees, at least quarterly and prior to impacts to Covered Species and their Habitats, to the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission. Prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities, for all project areas covered in the IS/MND that contain suitable habitat for sand -dependent Covered Species, the City will collaborate with the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission to plan and implement a salvage of sand - dependent Covered Species within the Project site. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-21 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Table 3.1. Potential for Special Status Plants to Occur in the Project Area Abronia villosa var. chaparral sand- 1 B.1 aurita verbena Acmispon haydonii pygmy lotus 1 B.3 Astragalus crested milk -vetch 4.3 bicristatus Chaparral, Coastal scrub, Desert dunes, Sandy Pinyon and juniper woodland, Sonoran desert scrub, Rocky No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range for this species (245 - 5250 feet). No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range for this species (1705 - 3935 feet). Lower montane coniferous forest, Upper No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range montane coniferous forest, Carbonate for this species (5580 - 9005 feet). (usually), Rocky (sometimes), Sandy (sometimes) Astragalus hornii Horn's milk -vetch 1 B.1 Meadows and seeps, Playas, Alkaline, Lake No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range var. hornii Margins 1 for this species (195 - 2790 feet). Astragalus Borrego milk- 4.3 Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range lentiginosus var. vetch scrub, Sandy for this species (100 - 2935 feet). borreganus Astragalus Coachella Valley FE, 1 B.2 Desert dunes, Sonoran desert scrub No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range lentiginosus var. milk -vetch (sandy) for this species (130 - 2150 feet). coachellae Astragalus Big Bear Valley 113.2 Lower montane coniferous forest, Pebble No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range leucolobus woollypod (Pavement) plain, Pinyon and juniper for this species (3610 - 9465 feet). woodland, Upper montane coniferous forest, Rocky Astragalus preussii Lancaster milk- 1 B.1 Chenopod scrub No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range var. laxiflorus vetch for this species (2295 - 2295 feet). Astragalus gravel milk -vetch 2B.2 Desert dunes, Mojavean desert scrub, Moderate potential. Suitable habitat is present in the Project sabulonum Sonoran desert scrub, Flats, Gravelly area in areas ADN, DJN, and DJS. Occurrence data is not (sometimes), Roadsides, Sandy (usually), available. Washes This species was not observed in the ADN Development Area during the May and October 2023 protocol level surveys, or the reconnaissance level surveys of the entire Project area. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-22 Environmental Analysis - Biological Resources Astragalus triple -ribbed milk- FE, 1 B.2 Joshua tree "woodland", Sonoran desert No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range tricarinatus vetch scrub, Gravelly (sometimes), Sandy for this species (1475 - 3905 feet). (sometimes) 213.3 Ayenia compacta California ayenia Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range scrub, Rocky Sonoran desert scrub (rocky) for this species (490 - 3595 feet). No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range Bursera microphylla little -leaf elephant 213.3 tree for this species (655 - 2295 feet). Calochortus palmeri San Jacinto 1 B.2 Chaparral, Lower montane coniferous No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range var. munzii mariposa -lily forest, Meadows and seeps for this species (2805 - 7220 feet). Calochortus palmeri Palmer's 1 B.2 Chaparral, Lower montane coniferous No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range var. palmeri mariposa -lily forest, Meadows and seeps, Mesic for this species (2330 - 7840 feet). Caulanthus Payson's 4.2 Chaparral, Coastal scrub, Granitic, Sandy No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range simulans jewelflower for this species (295 - 7220 feet). Chaenactis parishii Parish's 1 B.3 Chaparral (rocky) No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range chaenactis for this species (4265 - 8205 feet). Chorizanthe Peninsular 4.2 Chaparral, Coastal scrub, Lower montane No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range leptotheca spineflower coniferous forest, alluvial fan, Granitic for this species (985 - 6235 feet). Chorizanthe xanti white-bracted 1 B.2 Coastal scrub (alluvial fans), Mojavean No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range var. leucotheca spineflower desert scrub, Pinyon and juniper woodland, for this species (985 - 3935 feet). Gravelly (sometimes), Sandy (sometimes) Cuscuta californica pointed dodder 3 Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert Moderate potential. Suitable habitat is present in the Project var. apiculata scrub, Sandy area in areas ADN, DJN, and DJS. Occurrence data is not available. This species was not observed in the ADN Development Area during the May and October 2023 protocol level surveys, or the reconnaissance level surveys of the entire Project area. Delphinium parishii Colorado Desert 4.3 Chaparral, Cismontane woodland, Pinyon No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range ssp. subglobosum larkspur and juniper woodland, Sonoran desert scrub for this species (1970 - 5905 feet). Dieteria canescens Ziegler's aster 1 B.2 Lower montane coniferous forest, Upper No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range var. ziegleri montane coniferous forest for this species (4500 - 8200 feet). City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-23 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Ditaxis claryana glandular ditaxis 2B.2 Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert Moderate potential. Suitable habitat is present in the Project scrub, Sandy area in areas ADN, DJN, and DJS. A California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) occurrence from an unknown date is mapped to an uncertain location in the Project area. This species was not observed in the ADN Development Area during the May and October 2023 protocol level surveys, or the reconnaissance level surveys of the entire Project area. Ditaxis serrata var. California ditaxis 3.2 Sonoran desert scrub No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range californica for this species (100 - 3280 feet). Draba saxosa Southern 1 B.3 Alpine boulder and rock field, Subalpine No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range California rock coniferous forest, Upper montane for this species (8005 - 11810 feet). draba coniferous forest, Rocky Eremothera boothii Booth's evening- 2B.3 Joshua tree "woodland", Pinyon and juniper No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range ssp. boothii primrose Harwood's 1 B.2 woodland Desert dunes for this species (2675 - 7875 feet). No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range Eriastrum harwoodii eriastrum Palomar 4.3 Chaparral, Lower montane coniferous for this species (410 - 3000 feet). No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range Erythranthe diffusa monkeyflower forest, Gravelly (sometimes), Sandy for this species (4005 - 6005 feet). (sometimes) Eschscholzia Joshua Tree 4.3 Joshua tree "woodland", Mojavean desert No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range androuxii poppy scrub, Desert washes, Flats, Gravelly, for this species (1920 - 5530 feet). Rocky, Sandy, Slopes, Washes Euphorbia Abrams' spurge abramsiana Euphorbia arizonica Arizona spurge Euphorbia flat -seeded spurge platysperma 2B.2 Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert Low potential. Suitable habitat is present in the Project area in scrub, Sandy areas ADN, DJN, and DJS; however, this species was last seen in 1968 approximately 3.5 miles northwest of the Project area. This species was not observed in the ADN Development Area during the May and October 2023 protocol level surveys, or the reconnaissance level surveys of the entire Project area. 2B.3 Sonoran desert scrub (sandy) No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range for this species (165 - 985 feet). 1 B.2 Desert dunes, Sonoran desert scrub I No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range (sandy) for this species (215 - 330 feet). City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-24 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Euphorbia revoluta revolute spurge 4.3 Mojavean desert scrub (rocky) No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range for this species (3595 - 10170 feet). Funastrum crispum wavyleaf twinvine 213.2 Chaparral, Pinyon and juniper woodland No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range for this species (3820 - 6035 feet). Galium slender bedstraw 4.2 Joshua tree "woodland", Sonoran desert No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range angustifolium ssp. scrub, Granitic, Rocky for this species (425 - 5085 feet). gracillimum Galium San Jacinto 113.3 Lower montane coniferous forest No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range angustifolium ssp. Mountains for this species (4430 - 6890 feet). jacinticum bedstraw Heuchera shaggy -haired 113.3 Subalpine coniferous forest, Upper montane No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range hirsutissima alumroot coniferous forest, Granitic, Rocky for this species (4985 - 11485 feet). Horsfordia alata pink velvet -mallow 4.3 Sonoran desert scrub (rocky) No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range for this species (330 - 1640 feet). Horsfordia Newberry's velvet- 4.3 Sonoran desert scrub (rocky) Moderate potential. Suitable habitat is present in the Project newberryi mallow area in areas ADN, DJN, and DJS. Occurrence data is not available. This species was not observed in the ADN Development Area during the May and October 2023 protocol level surveys, or the reconnaissance level surveys of the entire Project area. Hulsea vestita ssp. beautiful hulsea 4.2 Chaparral, Lower montane coniferous No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range callicarpha forest, Granitic, Gravelly (sometimes), for this species (3000 - 10005 feet). Rocky (sometimes) Jaffueliobryum raui Rau's 213.3 Alpine dwarf scrub, Chaparral, Mojavean No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range jaffueliobryum desert scrub, Sonoran desert scrub, for this species (1610 - 6890 feet). moss Carbonate, Dry, Openings, Rock crevices Johnstonella costata ribbed cryptantha 4.3 Desert dunes, Mojavean desert scrub, Moderate potential. Suitable habitat is present in the Project Sonoran desert scrub, Sandy area in areas ADN, DJN, and DJS. Occurrence data is not available. This species was not observed in the ADN Development Area during the May and October 2023 protocol level surveys, or the reconnaissance level surveys of the entire Project area. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-25 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Johnstonella winged cryptantha 4.3 Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert holoptera scrub Juncus acutus ssp. southwestern 4.2 Coastal dunes (mesic), Coastal scrub, leopoldii spiny rush Marshes and swamps (coastal salt), Meadows and seeps (alkaline seeps) Juncus cooperi I Cooper's rush 14.3 Leptosiphon Santa Rosa 1 B.3 floribundus ssp. Mountains hallii 4eptosiphon Lilium parryi mon lily 1 B.2 Lycium torreyi I Torrey's box -thorn 4.2 Marina orcuttii var. California marina 1 B.3 orcuttii Matelea parvifolia spear -leaf matelea 2B.3 Mirabilis tenuiloba Nemacaulis denudata var gracilis slender -lobed four o'clock slender cottonheads 4.3 213.2 Meadows and seeps (mesic, alkaline or saline) Pinyon and juniper woodland, Sonoran desert scrub No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range for this species (330 - 5545 feet). No potential. No marshes, swamps or seeps are present in the Project area. No potential. No marshes, swamps or seeps are present in the Project area. No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range for this species (3280 - 6560 feet). Lower montane coniferous forest, Meadows No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range and seeps, Riparian forest, Upper montane for this species (4005 - 9005 feet). coniferous forest, Mesic Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert scrub, desert valleys, Rocky, Sandy, Streambanks, Washes Chaparral, Pinyon and juniper woodland, Sonoran desert scrub, Rocky Moderate potential. Suitable habitat is present in the Project area in areas ADN, DJN, and DJS. Occurrence data is not available. This species was not observed in the ADN Development Area during the May and October 2023 protocol level surveys, or the reconnaissance level surveys of the entire Project area. No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range for this species (3445 - 3805 feet). Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range scrub, Rocky for this species (1445 - 3595 feet). Sonoran desert scrub No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range for this species (755 - 3595 feet). Coastal dunes, Desert dunes, Sonoran Moderate potential. Suitable habitat is present in the Project desert scrub area in areas ADN, DJN, and DJS. This species was observed approximately 0.5 mile west of the Project area in 1978. This species was not observed in the ADN Development Area during the May and October 2023 protocol level surveys, or the reconnaissance level surveys of the entire Project area. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-26 Environmental Analysis - Biological Resources Penstemon California 1 B.2 Chaparral, Lower montane coniferous No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range californicus beardtongue forest, Pinyon and juniper woodland, Sandy for this species (3840 - 7545 feet). Penstemon San Jacinto 4.3 Chaparral, Pinyon and juniper woodland, No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range clevelandii var. beardtongue Sonoran desert scrub, Rocky for this species (1310 - 4920 feet). connatus Petalonyx linearis narrow -leaf 2B.3 Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert Low potential. Suitable habitat is present in the Project area in sandpaper -plant scrub, canyons, Rocky (sometimes), Sandy areas ADN, DJN, and DJS; however, the nearest occurrence is (sometimes) mapped to an uncertain location over five miles to the southwest. This species was not observed in the ADN Development Area during the May and October 2023 protocol level surveys, or the reconnaissance level surveys of the entire Project area. Phaseolus filiformis slender -stem bean 213.1 Sonoran desert scrub No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range for this species (410 - 410 feet). Pseudorontium Deep Canyon 2B.3 Sonoran desert scrub (rocky) Low potential. Suitable habitat is present in the Project area in cyathiferum snapdragon areas ADN, DJN, and DJS; however, the nearest occurrences are over five miles to the southwest. This species was not observed in the ADN Development Area during the May and October 2023 protocol level surveys, or the reconnaissance level surveys of the entire Project area. Saltugilia latimed Latimer's 1 B.2 'Chaparral, Mojavean desert scrub, Pinyon 'No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range woodland-gilia and juniper woodland, Granitic (often), for this species (1310 - 6235 feet). Rocky (sometimes), Sandy (sometimes), Washes (sometimes) Sedum niveum Davidson's 4.2 Lower montane coniferous forest, Subalpine No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range stonecrop coniferous forest, Upper montane for this species (6810 - 9845 feet). coniferous forest, Rocky Selaginella desert spike -moss 2B.2 Chaparral, Sonoran desert scrub (gravelly, No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range eremophila rocky) for this species (655 - 4250 feet). Senna covesii Cove's cassia 2B.2 Sonoran desert scrub, Dry, sandy desert No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range washes and slopes, Dry, Sandy, Slopes, for this species (740 - 4250 feet). Washes City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-27 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Sidotheca white -margined 1 B.3 Chaparral, Lower montane coniferous No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range emarginata oxytheca forest, Pinyon and juniper woodland for this species (3935 - 8205 feet). Stemodia purple stemodia 2B.1 Sonoran desert scrub (often mesic, sandy) No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range durantifolia for this species (590 - 985 feet). Streptanthus southern 1 B.3 Chaparral, Lower montane coniferous No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range campestris jewelflower forest, Pinyon and juniper woodland, Rocky for this species (2955 - 7545 feet). Thysanocarpus rigid fringepod 1 B.2 Pinyon and juniper woodland, Dry, Rocky, No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range rigidus Slopes for this species (1970 - 7220 feet). Tragia ramosa desert tragia 4.3 Chenopod scrub, Pinyon and juniper No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range woodland, Rocky for this species (2955 - 6105 feet). Xylorhiza cognata Mecca -aster 1 B.2 Sonoran desert scrub No potential. The Project area is outside of the elevational range for this species (65 - 1310 feet). Footnotes: Rankings from CNDDB (January 2023). 2 General habitat, and microhabitat column information, reprinted from CNDDB (January 2023). Status Abbreviations: CRPR: CNPS rankings for rare plants (CNPS, 2023) - 1A = Plants presumed extinct in California; 1 B = Plants rare, threatened or endangered in California and elsewhere; 2 = Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California, but more common elsewhere; 3 = Plants about which more information is needed (a review list); 4 = Plants of limited distribution (a watch list); n/a = not applicable; Threat Code extensions and their meanings: ".1 - Seriously threatened in California (over 80% of occurrences threatened / high degree and immediacy of threat); .2 — Moderately threatened in California (20-80% of occurrences threatened / moderate degree and immediacy of threat); .3 — Not very threatened in California (<20% of occurrences threatened / low degree and immediacy of threat or no current threats known)" (CDFW, 2023a). Potential to Occur: No potential: Habitat in and adjacent to the Project area is clearly unsuitable for the species requirements (cover, substrate, elevation, hydrology, plant community, site history, disturbance regime). Low potential: Few of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present, and/or the majority of habitat on and adjacent to the site is unsuitable or of very poor quality. The species is not likely to be found in the Project area. Moderate potential: Some of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present, and/or only some of the habitat on or adjacent to the site is unsuitable. The species has a moderate probability of being found in the Project area. High potential: All of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present and/or most of the habitat on or adjacent to the site is highly suitable. The species has a high probability of being found in the Project area. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-28 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Table 3.2. Potential for Special Status Animals to Occur in the Project Area Antrozous pallidus Pallid Bat None None SSC Deserts, grasslands, shrublands, Low potential. There are no woodlands and forests. Most suitable rocky areas for roosting. common in open, dry habitats with Additionally, the Project area is rocky areas for roosting. Roosts must highly disturbed. protect bats from high temperatures. Very sensitive to disturbance of roosting sites. Bassariscus Southern None None FP Exploit a variety of habitats such as Low potential. There is not astutus octavus California dry, rocky, brush -covered hillsides or suitable habitat available for this Ringtail riparian areas, typically not far from species in the Project area. an open water source. Dens most often in rock crevices, boulder piles, or talus, but also tree hollows, root cavities, and rural buildings. Rarely use same den for more than a few days. Chaetodipus Dulzura Pocket None None SSC Chaparral, coastal scrub, and valley Low potential. The preferred californicus Mouse & foothill grassland. Variety of habitat types are not present within femoralis habitats including coastal scrub, the Project area. Also, the Project chaparral, and grassland in San area is not within San Diego Diego County. Attracted to grass- County. chaparral edges. Chaetodipus fallax Northwestern None None SSC Coastal scrub, chaparral, grasslands, Low potential. There is no fallax San Diego sagebrush, etc. in western San Diego suitable habitat within the Project Pocket Mouse County. Sandy, herbaceous areas, area for this species. Also, the usually in association with rocks or Project area is not within San coarse gravel. Diego County. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-29 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Scientific name Common Name FESA CESA Other Habitat'Potential to Occur CDFW Chaetodipus fallax Pallid San Diego None None SSC Desert wash, pinon & juniper Low potential. There is not pallidus Pocket Mouse woodlands, Sonoran desert scrub. suitable habitat within the Project Desert border areas in eastern San area for this species. Also, the Diego County in desert wash, desert Project area is not within San scrub, desert succulent scrub, Diego County. pinyon -juniper, etc. Sandy, herbaceous areas, usually in association with rocks or coarse gravel. Dipodomys Earthquake None None - Chaparral, coastal scrub. Known only Low potential. No chaparral or merriami collinus Merriams from San Diego and Riverside coastal scrub habitat available for Kangaroo Rat counties. Associated with riversidean this species. sage scrub, chaparral, and non- native grassland. Need sandy loam substrates for digging of burrows. Eumops perotis Western Mastiff None None SSC Chaparral, cismontane woodland, Low potential. The Project area californicus Bat coastal scrub, and valley & foothill does not contain suitable roosting grassland. Many open, semi -arid to habitat. arid habitats, including conifer and deciduous woodlands, coastal scrub, grasslands, chaparral, etc. Roosts in crevices in cliff faces, high buildings, trees, and tunnels. Lasiurus xanthinus Western Yellow None None SSC Found in valley foothill riparian, Low potential. Although the Bat desert riparian, desert wash, and Project area is in proximity to palm oasis habitats. Roosts in trees, limited riparian habitat within the particularly palms. Forages over Whitewater River, there are no water and among trees. palm trees available for roosting. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-30 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Scientific name Common Name FESA CESA Other Habitat'Potential to Occur CDFW Neotoma albigula Colorado Valley None None - Sonoran desert scrub. Low-lying Low potential. The Project area venusta Woodrat desert areas in southeastern does not contain succulent plants California. Closely associated with or beaver -tail cactus for foraging. beaver -tail cactus and mesquite. Intolerant of cold temps. Eats mainly succulent plants. Distribution influenced by abundance of nest building material. Neotoma lepida San Diego None None SSC Coastal scrub of southern California Low potential. No moderate to intermedia Desert Woodrat from San Diego County to San Luis dense canopy, or coastal scrub Obispo County. Moderate to dense present in the Project area. canopies preferred. They are particularly abundant in rock outcrops, rocky cliffs, and slopes. Nyctinomops Pocketed Free- None None SSC Joshua tree woodland, pinon & Low potential. There is no femorosaccus tailed Bat juniper woodlands, riparian scrub, woodland, scrub, or rocky areas and Sonoran desert scrub. Variety of with high cliffs habitat types arid areas in southern California; available in the Project area for pine -juniper woodlands, desert scrub, this species. palm oasis, desert wash, desert riparian, etc. Rocky areas with high cliffs. Ovis canadensis Desert Bighorn None None FP Alpine, alpine dwarf scrub, chaparral, No potential. There is no suitable nelsoni Sheep chenopod scrub, Great Basin scrub, habitat available within the Project Mojavean desert scrub, Montane area. The proximity to roads and dwarf scrub, pinon & juniper human development is not woodlands, riparian woodland, and suitable. Sonoran desert scrub. Widely distributed from the White Mountains in Mono County to the Chocolate Mountains in Imperial County. Open, rocky, steep areas with available water and herbaceous forage. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-31 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Scientific name Common Name FESA CESA Other Habitat'Potential to Occur CDFW Ovis canadensis Peninsular FE ST FP Eastern slopes of the Peninsular No potential. There is no suitable nelsoni pop. 2 Bighorn Sheep Ranges below 4,600-foot elevation. habitat available within the Project DPS This distinct population segment area. The proximity to roads and (DPS) of the subspecies inhabits the human development is not Peninsular Ranges in southern suitable. California from the San Jacinto Mountains south to the U.S.-Mexico International Border. Optimal habitat includes steep walled canyons and ridges bisected by rocky or sandy washes, with available water. Perognathus Palm Springs None None SSC Desert wash, Sonoran desert scrub. Low potential. There is suitable longimembris Pocket Mouse Desert riparian, desert scrub, desert creosote habitat for this species; bangsi wash, and sagebrush habitats. Most however, no observations nearby common in creosote -dominated (CDFW, 2023a; iNaturalist, 2023). desert scrub. Rarely found on rocky sites. Occurs in all canopy coverage classes. Perognathus Los Angeles None None SSC Coastal scrub. Lower elevation Low potential. Coastal scrub is longimembris Pocket Mouse grasslands and coastal sage not present within the Project area. brevinasus communities in and around the Los The Project area is outside of the Angeles Basin. Open ground with Los Angeles Basin. fine, sandy soils. May not dig extensive burrows, hiding under weeds and dead leaves instead. Taxidea taxus American None None SSC Most abundant in drier open stages Low potential. The Project area Badger of most shrub, forest, and does not contain suitable habitat herbaceous habitats, with friable for this species, and the soils. Needs sufficient food, friable fragmentation is not suitable. soils and open, uncultivated ground. Preys on burrowing rodents. Digs burrows. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-32 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Scientific name Common Name FESA CESA Other Habitat'Potential to Occur CDFW Xerospermophilus Palm Springs None None SSC Chenopod scrub, Sonoran desert Moderate potential. The areas tereticaudus Round -tailed scrub. Restricted to the CV. Prefers ADN, DJN, and DJS contain chlorus Ground Squirrel desert succulent scrub, desert wash, suitable habitat for this species. desert scrub, alkali scrub, and levees. There is an observation on the Prefers open, flat, grassy areas in CNDDB within the Project area fine -textured, sandy soil. Density from 2002 (CDFW, 2023a). The correlated with winter rainfall. Project area is within areas predicted to have occupancy from a habitat suitability model (CVCC, 2023). Birds Accipiter cooperii Coopers Hawk None None WL Cismontane woodland, riparian Moderate potential. There are forest, riparian woodland, upper observations from three separate montane coniferous forest. locations within the Project area Woodland, chiefly of open, (eBird, 2023). However, there is no interrupted or marginal type. Nest nesting habitat available within any sites mainly in riparian growths of areas in the Project area for this deciduous trees, as in canyon species. The species may occur in bottoms on river flood -plains, also live riparian habitat areas in and oaks. around the Whitewater River. Accipiterstriatus Sharp -shinned None None WL Cismontane woodland, lower Low potential. There is no Hawk montane coniferous forest, riparian suitable forested or riparian habitat forest, riparian woodland. Ponderosa available within the Project area. pine, black oak, riparian deciduous, mixed conifer, and Jeffrey pine habitats. Prefers riparian areas. North -facing slopes with plucking perches are critical requirements. Nests usually within 275 feet of water. Aquila chrysaetos Golden Eagle None None FP I WL Rolling foothills, mountain areas, Low potential. No canyons or sage -juniper flats, and desert. Cliff- large trees available for nesting walled canyons provide nesting within the Project area. habitat in most parts of range, also large trees in open areas. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-33 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Scientific name Common Name FESA CESA Other Habitat'Potential to Occur CDFW Ardea alba Great Egret None None - Brackish marsh, estuary, freshwater Low potential. There is not marsh, marsh & swamp, riparian suitable habitat within the Project forest, and wetland. Colonial nester in area for this species. large trees. Rookery sites located near marshes, tide -flats, irrigated pastures, and margins of rivers and lakes. Ardea herodias Great Blue None None - Brackish marsh, estuary, freshwater Low potential. There is not Heron marsh, marsh & swamp, riparian suitable habitat within the Project forest, and wetland. Colonial nester in area for this species. tall trees, cliffsides, and sequestered spots on marshes. Rookery sites in close proximity to foraging areas: marshes, lake margins, tide -flats, rivers and streams, and wet meadows. Asio otus Long-eared Owl None None SSC Cismontane woodland, Great Basin Low potential. There is not scrub, riparian forest, riparian suitable habitat within the Project woodland, upper montane coniferous area for this species. forest. Riparian bottomlands grown to tall willows and cottonwoods, also belts of live oak paralleling stream courses. Require adjacent open land, productive of mice and the presence of old nests of crows, hawks, or magpies for breeding. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-34 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Scientific name Common Name FESA CESA Other Habitat'Potential to Occur CDFW Athene cunicularia Burrowing Owl None None SSC Coastal prairie, coastal scrub, Great Moderate potential. This species Basin grassland, Great Basin scrub, has a moderate potential to occur Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran within ADN. There are recorded desert scrub, and valley & foothill observations from two separate grassland. Open, dry annual or locations within the Project area perennial grasslands, deserts, and (eBird, 2023). A majority of the scrublands characterized by low- Project area is considered to have growing vegetation. Subterranean highly suitable habitat (CDFW, nester, dependent upon burrowing 2016). mammals, most notably, the California ground squirrel. Botaurus American Bittern None None - Brackish marsh, freshwater marsh, No potential. No suitable marsh lentiginosus and salt marsh. Freshwater and habitat available. slightly brackish marshes. Also in coastal salt marshes. Dense reed beds. Buteo regalis Ferruginous None None WL Great Basin grassland, Great Basin Low potential. Marginally suitable Hawk scrub, Pinon & juniper woodlands, habitat available for this species and valley & foothill grassland. Open within the Project area. grasslands, sagebrush flats, desert Observations are approximately 5 scrub, low foothills, and fringes of miles away (eBird, 2023). pinyon & juniper habitats. Eats mostly lagomorphs, ground squirrels, and mice. Population trends may follow lagomorph population cycles. Calypte costae Costas None None - Desert riparian, desert and and scrub Moderate potential. There are Hummingbird foothill habitats. multiple recent observations within the Project area (eBird, 2023). The species may occur throughout the Project area, but the ADN, DJN, and DJS areas contain natural elements more suitable for nesting and foraging. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-35 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Scientific name Common Name FESA CESA Other Habitat'Potential to Occur CDFW Chaetura vauxi Vauxs Swift None None SSC Redwood, Douglas -fir, and other Low potential. There is no coniferous forests. Nests in large suitable forested habitat within the hollow trees and snags. Often nests Project area for this species. in flocks. Forages over most terrains and habitats but shows a preference for foraging over rivers and lakes. Charadrius Mountain Plover None None SSC Chenopod scrub, Valley & foothill Low potential. There are no montanus grassland, Short grasslands, freshly grazed areas within the Project plowed fields, newly sprouting grain area. No observations nearby fields, and sometimes sod farms. (eBird, 2023). Short vegetation, bare ground, and flat topography. Prefers grazed areas and areas with burrowing rodents. Chlidonias niger Black Tern None None SSC Freshwater marsh, Great Basin Low potential. There is no standing waters, wetland. Freshwater suitable aquatic habitat present lakes, ponds, marshes, and flooded within the Project area. ag fields. At coastal lagoons and estuaries during migration. Breeding range reduced. Breeds primarily in Modoc Plateau region, with some breeding in Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys. Circus hudsonius Northern Harrier None None SSC Coastal scrub, Great Basin Low potential. There is not grassland, marsh & swamp, riparian suitable foraging or nesting habitat scrub, valley & foothill grassland, and within the Project area for this wetland. Coastal salt and freshwater species. marsh. Nest and forage in grasslands, from salt grass in desert sink to mountain cienagas. Nests on ground in shrubby vegetation, usually at marsh edge; nest built of a large mound of sticks in wet areas. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-36 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Scientific name Common Name FESA CESA Other Habitat'Potential to Occur CDFW Contopus cooperi Olive -sided None None SSC Lower montane coniferous forest, Low potential. There is no Flycatcher redwood, upper montane coniferous suitable nesting habitat within the forest. Nesting habitats are mixed Project area. conifer, montane hardwood -conifer, Douglas -fir, redwood, red fir and lodgepole pine. Most numerous in montane conifer forests where tall trees overlook canyons, meadows, lakes or other open terrain. Egretta thula Snowy Egret None None - Marsh & swamp, meadow & seep, Low potential. There is not highly riparian forest, riparian woodland, suitable habitat available within the and wetland. Colonial nester, with Project area for this species. nest sites situated in protected beds of dense tules. Rookery sites situated close to foraging areas: marshes, tidal -flats, streams, wet meadows, and borders of lakes. Empidonax traillii Little Wouldow None SE - Meadow & seep, riparian woodland. Low potential. There is not highly brewsteri Flycatcher Mountain meadows and riparian suitable habitat available within the habitats in the Sierra Nevada and Project area for this species. Cascades. Nests near the edges of vegetation clumps and near streams. Empidonax traillii Southwestern FE SE - Riparian woodlands in Southern Low potential. No suitable habitat extimus Wouldow California. available within the Project area for Flycatcher this species. No observations nearby (eBird, 2023). Eremophila California None None WL Marine intertidal & splash zone Low potential. The Project area alpestris actia Horned Lark communities, and meadow & seep. does not contain suitable habitat Coastal regions, chiefly from Sonoma for this species. County to San Diego County. Also main part of San Joaquin Valley and east to foothills. Short -grass prairie, "bald" hills, mountain meadows, open coastal plains, fallow grain fields, alkali flats. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-37 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Scientific name Common Name FIESA CESA Other Habitat'Potential to Occur CDFW Falco mexicanus Prairie Falcon None None WL Great Basin grassland, Great Basin Low potential. There is no cliff scrub, Mojavean desert scrub, habitat for breeding, or preferred Sonoran desert scrub, and valley & foraging habitats within the Project foothill grassland. Inhabits dry, open area. terrain, either level or hilly. Breeding sites located on cliffs. Forages far afield, even to marshlands and ocean shores. Falco peregrinus American Delisted Delisted FP Near wetlands, lakes, rivers, or other Low potential. No suitable aquatic anatum Peregrine water; on cliffs, banks, dunes, and habitat within or nearby the Project Falcon mounds, also human -made area. structures. Nest consists of a scrape or a depression or ledge in an open site. Hydroprogne Caspian Tern None None - Nests on sandy or gravelly beaches Low potential. No suitable aquatic caspia and shell banks in small colonies habitat within or nearby the Project inland and along the coast. Inland area. freshwater lakes and marshes, also brackish or salt waters of estuaries and bays. Icteria virens Yellow -breasted None None SSC Riparian forest, riparian scrub, Low potential. The Project area Chat riparian woodland. Summer resident; does not contain suitable riparian inhabits riparian thickets of willow and habitat for this species. other brushy tangles near watercourses. Nests in low, dense riparian, consisting of willow, blackberry, wild grape; forages and nests within 10 feet of ground. Lanius Loggerhead None None SSC Broken woodlands, savannah, Low potential. The Project area ludovicianus Shrike pinyon -juniper, Joshua tree, and does not provide highly suitable riparian woodlands, desert oases, habitat for this species. Recent scrub, and washes. Prefers open observations nearby are sparse country for hunting, with perches for (eBird, 2023). scanning, and fairly dense shrubs and brush for nesting. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-38 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Scientific name Common Name FIESA CESA Other Habitat'Potential to Occur CDFW Larus californicus California Gull None None WL Littoral waters, sandy beaches, Low potential. No suitable aquatic waters and shorelines of bays, tidal habitat within or nearby the Project mud -flats, marshes, lakes, etc. area. Colonial nester on islets in large interior lakes, either fresh or strongly alkaline. Leiothlypis luciae Lucys Warbler None None SSC Riparian woodland. Primarily along Low potential. The Project area lower Colorado River Valley and the does not contain suitable riparian washes and arroyos emptying into it, habitat for this species. with occasional occurrences throughout the Sonoran and Mojave Deserts. Partial to thickets of mesquite, riparian scrub, and even stands of tamarisk. Melozone aberti Alberts Towhee None None - Desert wash, riparian woodland. Moderate potential. There are Desert riparian and desert wash recorded public observations habitats in the lower Colorado River within the Project area (eBird, Valley, also the Imperial and 2023). The species may occur Coachella valleys. Frequents dense throughout the Project area, but vegetation, thickets of willow, the ADN, DJN, and DJS areas cottonwood, mesquite, and salt contain natural elements more cedar. suitable for nesting and foraging. Numenius Long -billed None None WL Great Basin grassland, meadow & Low potential. The Project area americanus Curlew seep. Breeds in upland shortgrass does not provide suitable habitat prairies and wet meadows in for this species. northeastern California. Habitats on gravelly soils and gently rolling terrain are favored over others. Pandion haliaetus Osprey None None WL Riparian forest, Ocean shore, bays, No potential. There is no suitable freshwater lakes, and larger streams. aquatic habitat needed for foraging Large nests built in tree -tops within within or nearby the Project area. 15 miles of a good fish -producing body of water. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-39 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Scientific name Common Name FESA CESA Other Habitat'Potential to Occur CDFW Passerculus Bryants None None SSC Open fields, meadows, salt marshes, Low potential. No suitable habitat sandwichensis Savannah prairies, dunes, and shores. Over types are present. alaudinus Sparrow most of range, found in open meadows, pastures, edges of marshes, alfalfa fields, pastures; also tundra in summer, shores and weedy vacant lots in winter. Passerculus Large -billed None None SSC Wetland. Breeds along the Colorado Low potential. No wetland habitat sandwichensis Savannah River delta in Mexico; winters at the available for this species within the rostratus Sparrow Salton Sea. Saline emergent Project area. wetlands at the Salton Sea and southern coast. Piranga rubra Summer None None SSC Riparian forest. Summer resident of Low potential. The Project area Tanager desert riparian along lower Colorado does not contain cottonwood - River, and locally elsewhere in willow riparian habitat. California deserts. Requires cottonwood -willow riparian for nesting and foraging; prefers older, dense stands along streams. Polioptila Coastal FT None SSC Coastal bluff scrub, coastal scrub. Low potential. There is no coastal californica California Obligate, permanent resident of habitat available within the Project californica Gnatcatcher coastal sage scrub below 2500 feet in area for this species. southern California. Low, coastal sage scrub in arid washes, on mesas and slopes. Not all areas classified as coastal sage scrub are occupied. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-40 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Scientific name Common Name FESA CESA Other Habitat'Potential to Occur CDFW Polioptila melanura Black -tailed None None WL Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran Moderate potential. The Project Gnatcatcher desert scrub. Primarily inhabits area contains desert scrub habitat wooded desert wash habitats; also in the natural areas. There are occurs in desert scrub habitat, public observations recorded especially in winter. Nests in desert within 0.75 miles of the Project washes containing mesquite, palo area (eBird 2023). The species verde, ironwood, acacia; absent from may occur throughout the Project areas where salt cedar introduced. area, but the ADN and DJN areas contain natural elements more suitable for nesting and foraging. Pyrocephalus Vermilion None None SSC Marsh & swamp, riparian forest, Moderate potential. There are rubinus Flycatcher riparian scrub, riparian woodland, recorded observations within the wetland. During nesting, inhabits Project area, with the most recent desert riparian adjacent to irrigated being in January 2023 (eBird fields, irrigation ditches, pastures, 2023). The species may occur and other open, mesic areas. Nest in throughout the Project area, but cottonwood, willow, mesquite, and the ADN, DJN, and DJS areas other large desert riparian trees. contain natural elements more suitable for nesting and foraging. Rallus obsoletus Yuma Ridgways FE ST FP Freshwater marsh, Marsh & swamp, No potential. No marsh habitat yumanensis Rail Wetland. Nests in freshwater available within the Project area. marshes along the Colorado River and along the south and east ends of the Salton Sea. Prefers stands of cattails and tules dissected by narrow channels of flowing water; principal food is crayfish. Selasphorus rufus Rufous None None - North coast coniferous forest, old Low potential. There is not Hummingbird growth. Breeds in Transition life zone suitable habitat for this species of northwest coastal area from within the Project area. Oregon border to southern Sonoma County. Nests in berry tangles, shrubs, and conifers. Favors habitats rich in nectar -producing flowers. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-41 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Scientific name Common Name FESA CESA Other Habitat'Potential to Occur CDFW Setophaga petechia Yellow Warbler None None SSC Riparian plant associations in close Low potential. There is not proximity to water. Also nests in suitable riparian habitat available montane shrubbery in open conifer for this species within the Project forests in Cascades and Sierra area. Nevada. Frequently found nesting and foraging in willow shrubs and thickets, and in other riparian plants including cottonwoods, sycamores, ash, and alders. Spinus lawrencei Lawrences None None - Broadleaved upland forest, chaparral, Low potential. The preferred Goldfinch pinon & juniper woodlands, riparian habitat types are not available for woodland. Nests in open oak or other this species within the Project arid woodland and chaparral, near area. water. Nearby herbaceous habitats used for feeding. Closely associated with oaks. Spizella breweri Brewers None None - East of Cascade -Sierra Nevada Low potential. The Project area Sparrow crest, mountains, and high valleys of does not contain suitable Mojave Desert, and mountains at mountainous or valley habitat for southern end of San Joaquin Valley. this species. For nesting they prefer high sagebrush plains, slopes and valley with Great Basin sagebrush and antelope brush. Toxostoma crissa/e Crissal Thrasher None None SSC Riparian woodland. Resident of Low potential. The Project area southeastern deserts in desert does not contain suitable riparian riparian and desert wash habitats. habitat for this species. Nests in dense vegetation along streams/washes; mesquite, screwbean mesquite, ironwood, catclaw, acacia, arrowweed, and willow. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-42 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Scientific name Common Name FESA CESA Other Habitat'Potential to Occur CDFW Toxostoma lecontei Le Contes None None SSC Desert wash, Mojavean desert scrub, Low potential. The Project area Thrasher and Sonoran desert scrub. Desert may contain suitable shrub habitat resident; primarily of open desert for this species. There are no wash, desert scrub, alkali desert recent or nearby recorded scrub, and desert succulent scrub observations (eBird, 2023). habitats. Commonly nests in a dense, spiny shrub or densely branched cactus in desert wash habitat, usually 2-8 feet above ground. Vireo bellii pusillus Least Bells FE SE - Riparian forest, riparian scrub, Low potential. There are Vireo riparian woodland. Summer resident observations from 2022 over 3 of Southern California in low riparian miles west of the Project area in vicinity of water or in dry river (eBird, 2022). The Project area bottoms; below 2000 feet. Nests does not contain riparian habitat. placed along margins of bushes or on twigs projecting into pathways, usually willow, Baccharis, mesquite. Vireo vicinior Gray Vireo None None SSC Dry chaparral; west of desert, in Low potential. The Project area chamise-dominated habitat; does not contain suitable habitat or mountains of Mojave Desert, features for this species. associated with juniper and Artemisia. Forage, nest, and sing in areas formed by a continuous growth of twigs, 1-5 feet above ground. Xanthocephalus Yellow -headed None None SSC Marsh & swamp, wetland. Nests in No potential. The Project area xanthocephalus Blackbird freshwater emergent wetlands with does not contain wetland habitat dense vegetation and deep water. for this species. Often along borders of lakes or ponds. Nests only where large insects such as Odonata are abundant, nesting timed with maximum emergence of aquatic insects. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-43 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Anniella stebbinsi Southern None None SSC Broadleaved upland forest, chaparral, Low potential. The Project area California coastal dunes, and coastal scrub. does not contain the suitable Legless Lizard Generally south of the Transverse habitat types for this species. Range, extending to northwestern Baja California. Occurs in sandy or loose loamy soils under sparse vegetation. Disjunct populations in the Tehachapi and Piute Mountains in Kern County. Variety of habitats; generally in moist, loose soil. They prefer soils with a high moisture content. Aspidoscelis tigris Coastal Whiptail None None SSC Found in deserts and semi -arid areas Low potential. This subspecies' stejnegeri with sparse vegetation and open range is closer to the coast, which areas. Also found in woodland and is outside of the Project area riparian areas. Ground may be firm (California Herps, 2023). soil, sandy, or rocky. Coleonyx San Diego None None SSC Chaparral, coastal scrub. Coastal and Low potential. No rocky outcrops variegatus abbotti Banded Gecko cismontane southern California. in coastal scrub or chaparral Found in granite or rocky outcrops in habitats available within the coastal scrub and chaparral habitats. Project area. Crotalus ruber Red -diamond None None SSC Chaparral, woodland, grassland, and Low potential. The Project area Rattlesnake desert areas from coastal San Diego contains only marginally suitable County to the eastern slopes of the habitat for this species. There are mountains. Occurs in rocky areas no rocky areas present. and dense vegetation. Needs rodent burrows, cracks in rocks or surface cover objects. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-44 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Scientific name Common Name FIESA CESA Other Habitat'Potential to Occur CDFW Gopherus agassizii Desert Tortoise FT ST - Joshua tree woodland, Mojavean Low potential. There was a desert scrub, and Sonoran desert juvenile shell found in 2017 within scrub. Most common in desert scrub, the Project area (iNaturalist, 2023). desert wash, and Joshua tree There are many other recent habitats; occurs in almost every observations surrounding the desert habitat. Require friable soil for vicinity of the Project area burrow and nest construction. (iNaturalist, 2023). Records on the Creosote bush habitat with large CNDDB are generally more annual wildflower blooms preferred. northwest to southeast, though the nearest are seven to 11 miles in either direction (CDFW, 2023a). Creosote brush habitat with friable soil is present for this species. No sign of Desert Tortoise was observed during the site visit. The level of human disturbance and Common Raven presence is not suitable for this species, and it is unlikely for them to occur. Phrynosoma Coast Horned None None SSC Frequents a wide variety of habitats, Low potential. The Project area blainvillii Lizard most common in lowlands along does not contain highly suitable sandy washes with scattered low habitat. No observations nearby bushes. Open areas for sunning, (iNaturalist, 2023). bushes for cover, patches of loose soil for burial, and abundant supply of ants and other insects. Phrynosoma mcallii Flat -tailed None None SSC Desert dunes, Mojavean desert Moderate potential. There are Horned Lizard scrub, and Sonoran desert scrub. many observations within the Restricted to desert washes and vicinity of the Project, the nearest desert flats in central Riverside, one is approximately 0.5 miles eastern San Diego, and Imperial from the Project area (iNaturalist, Counties. Critical habitat element is 2023). Suitable habitat is present fine sand, into which lizards burrow to within the ADN and WIN areas avoid temperature extremes; requires within the Project area for this vegetative cover and ants. species. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-45 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Scientific name Salvadora hexalepis virgultea Common Name Coast Patch- nosed Snake FESA None CESA None Other CDFW SSC Habitat'Potential Coastal scrub. Brushy or shrubby vegetation in coastal southern California. Require small mammal burrows for refuge and overwintering sites. to Occur Low potential. There is no coastal scrub habitat within the Project area. Uma inornata Coachella Valley FT - Desert dunes, desert wash. Limited Moderate potential. Suitable Fringe -toed to sandy areas in the CV Riverside habitat is present within the ADN Lizard County. Requires fine, loose, area within the Project area for this windblown sand (for burrowing), species. ADN contains loose, interspersed with hardpan and windblown sand, with widely widely -spaced desert shrubs. The spaced desert shrubs. The Project species' habitat is characterized by area is outside of critical habitat, active dunes, surrounded by and population centers are known stabilized dunes and desert scrub to be more north of the Project (Vandergast et al., 2016). area and closer to the 1-10 SE (Vandergast et al., 2016). However, there are many recent observations surrounding the Project area within urban developed areas (iNaturalist, 2023). The most recent observation is from February 2023 (iNaturalist, 2023). Additionally, there are records on the CNDDB from the late 1960s to 1970s (CDFW, 2023a). City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-46 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Scientific name Common Name FESA CESA Other Habitat'Potential to Occur CDFW Amphibians Batrachoseps Desert Slender FE SE - Desert wash, limestone, and talus Low potential. The Project area major aridus Salamander slope. Known only from Hidden Palm does not provide suitable Canyon and Guadalupe Creek, dampened habitat for this species. Riverside County, in barren, palm oasis, desert wash, and desert scrub. Occurs under limestone sheets, rocks, and talus, usually at the base of damp, shaded, north and west - facing walls. Lithobates Lowland None None SSC Were found along the Colorado River No potential. No suitable aquatic yavapaiensis Leopard Frog and in streams near the Salton Sea. habitat available for this species. Fish Cyprinodon Desert Pupfish FE SE - Aquatic, artificial flowing waters, No potential. No aquatic habitat macularius artificial standing waters, Colorado within the Project area. River basin flowing waters, and Colorado River basin standing waters. Desert ponds, springs, marshes and streams in southern California. Can live in salinities from freshwater to 68 ppt; can withstand temps from 9 - 45 C and dissolved oxygen levels down to 0.1 ppm. Insects Bombus crotchii Crotch Bumble None CE - Coastal California east to the Sierra- Low potential. The Project area Bee Cascade crest and south into Mexico. does not provide suitable habitat Food plant genera include for this species. Antirrhinum, Phacelia, Clarkia, Dendromecon, Eschscholzia, and Eriogonum. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-47 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Scientific name Common Name FIESA CESA Other Habitat'Potential to Occur CDFW Danaus plexippus Monarch FC None Fields, roadside areas, open areas, No potential. There are no suitable Butterfly — wet areas, or urban gardens. This overwintering trees within the California species only lays eggs on milkweed. Project area. Overwintering, Overwintering tree habitat includes Pop. 1 eucalyptus, Monterey pine, Monterey cypress, western sycamore, coast redwood, and coast live oak trees. Dinacoma caseyi Caseys June FE None - Desert wash, Mojavean desert scrub. Low potential. There is an Beetle Found only in two populations in a observation approximately 1.5 small area of southern Palm Springs. miles north of the Project area Found in sandy soils; the females live (iNaturalist, 2023). The Project underground and only come to the area is outside of the range ground surface to mate. (USFWS, 2023a). Euparagia Algodones None None - Desert dunes. Endemic to the Low potential. Only marginally unidentata Euparagia Wasp Algodones Dunes in Imperial County. suitable dune habitat present. Euphydryas editha Quino FE None - Chaparral, coastal scrub. Sunny Low potential. The Project area is quino Checkerspot openings within chaparral and coastal not near the coast. Butterfly sage shrublands in parts of Riverside and San Diego counties. Hills and mesas near the coast. Need high densities of food plants Plantago erecta, P. insularis, and Orthocarpus purpurescens. Habropoda pallida White Faced None None - Desert dunes. Endemic to the Low potential. The Project area is Bee Algodones Dunes in Imperial County. not within Imperial County. Hesperopsis Macneills None None - Found in well -watered lowland areas Low potential. There are Atriplex gracielae Sootywing along the Colorado River and lentiformis observations on the extending west into the CV. Atriplex edges of the Project area from lentiformis is the only known host 2019 (iNaturalist, 2023). However, plant. the Project area is not well - watered. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-48 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Scientific name Common Name FIESA CESA Other Habitat'Potential to Occur CDFW Juniperella Juniper Metallic None None - Larvae develop in juniper in Santa No potential. The Project area is mirabilis Wood -boring Rosa Mountains in southern not within the Santa Rosa Beetle California. Mountains, and there's no juniper in the Project area. Macrobaenetes Coachella Giant None None - Desert dunes. Known from the sand Moderate potential. There is an valgum Sand Treader dune ridges in the vicinity of CV. observation within the Project area Cricket Population size regulated by amount (iNaturalist, 2023). Suitable habitat of annual rainfall; some spots favor is present within the ADN and DJN permanent habitation where springs areas within the Project area for dampen sand. this species. Oliarces clara Cheeseweed None None - Sonoran desert scrub. Inhabits the Low potential. The larval host Owlfly lower Colorado River drainage. species (Larrea tridentata) is (Cheeseweed Found under rocks or in flight over documented within the Project Moth Lacewing) streams. Larrea tridentata is the area (iNaturalist, 2023). There is suspected larval host. an observation approximately 6 miles from the Project area (iNaturalist, 2023). Habitat within the Project area is marginally suitable. Stenopelmatus Coachella Valley None None - Desert dunes. Inhabits a small Low potential. The Project area cahuilaensis Jerusalem segment of the sand and dune areas contains marginally suitable habitat Cricket of the CV, in the vicinity of Palm but is not in close proximity to Mt Springs. Found in the large, San Jacinto. undulating dunes piled up at the north base of Mt San Jacinto. Mollusks Anodonta California None None - Aquatic. Freshwater lakes and slow- No potential. No aquatic habitat californiensis Floater moving streams and rivers. within the Project footprint. Taxonomy under review by specialists. Generally in shallow water. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-49 Environmental Analysis — Biological Resources Footnotes: Rankings from CNDDB (January 2023). 2 General habitat, and microhabitat column information, reprinted from CNDDB (January 2023). Status Abbreviations: Other Statuses (other federal or state listings may include): CDFW FP (CDFW Fully Protected Animal): "This classification was the State of California's initial effort to identify and provide additional protection to those animals that were rare or faced possible extinction. Lists were created for fish, amphibians and reptiles, birds and mammals. Most of the species on these lists have subsequently been listed under the state and/or federal endangered species acts." (CDFW, 2023a); CDFW SSC (CDFW Species of Special Concern): "It is the goal and responsibility of the Department of Fish and Wildlife to maintain viable populations of all native species. To this end, the Department has designated certain vertebrate species as `Species of Special Concern' because declining population levels, limited ranges, and/or continuing threats have made them vulnerable to extinction. The goal of designating species as 'Species of Special Concern' is to halt or reverse their decline by calling attention to their plight and addressing the issues of concern early enough to secure their long-term viability" (CDFW, 2023a); CDFW WL (CDFW Watch List): "The CDFW maintains a list consisting of taxa that were previously designated as "Species of Special Concern" but no longer merit that status, or which do not yet meet SSC criteria, but for which there is concern and a need for additional information to clarify status" (CDFW, 2023a). Potential to Occur: No potential: Habitat in and adjacent to the Project area is clearly unsuitable for the species requirements (cover, substrate, elevation, hydrology, plant community, site history, disturbance regime). Low potential: Few of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present, and/or the majority of habitat on and adjacent to the site is unsuitable or of very poor quality. The species is not likely to be found in the Project area. Moderate potential: Some of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present, and/or only some of the habitat on or adjacent to the site is unsuitable. The species has a moderate probability of being found in the Project area. High potential: All of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present and/or most of the habitat on or adjacent to the site is highly suitable. The species has a high probability of being found on in the Project area. Present: Detected or documented on -site. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-50 Environmental Analysis — Cultural Resources 3.5 Cultural Resources Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Historic Overview La Quinta is nestled amidst the Santa Rosa Mountains and is situated on the base of the CV. Achieving City status on May 1, 1982, La Quinta has witnessed continuous development, particularly along the Highway 111 Corridor, fueled by a steadily increasing population that peaks during the winter season (City of La Quinta, 2024b). La Quinta is within the ancestral lands of the Desert Cahuilla Indians, who have resided in the Coachella Valley since immemorial, including areas such as the Martinez Canyon area of the CV and what is known today as Point Happy. The Desert Cahuilla Indians were hunter and gatherers and one of the few Native American Tribes to dig wells. The area held significant importance for the Cahuilla people due to its role as a vital access point to water sources, including the Whitewater River. Notably, within a distance of less than 300 yards from Point Happy, a well was excavated. This well later lent its name to the present-day City of Indian Wells (City of La Quinta, 2024b; SCTCA, 2024). For centuries, the Cahuilla people were the sole inhabitants of the CV, maintaining a permanent presence. It wasn't until the early 19th century that Europeans started journeying through the valley. Spanish, and later Mexican explorers, soldiers, and missionaries arrived with the sole aim of swiftly crossing the challenging desert terrain (La Quinta Historical Society, 2017). Record Search This analysis is based on a cultural records investigation conducted at the California Historical Resources Inventory System (CHRIS) Eastern Information Center (EIC) located at the University of California, Riverside. The examination of records took place on January 22, 2024, encompassing a review of maps, records, and reports from the EIC pertaining to the Project area. The assessment involved a review of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 1959 La Quinta 7.5 minute series quadrangle map, 1941 Toro Peak 15 minutes series, and 1959 Palm Desert 15 minute series topographic map to assess the Project site. In addition, the California Points of Historical Interest, California Historical Landmarks, California Register of Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), the California State Historic Resources Inventory, and historic topographic maps were reviewed. The findings revealed that there have been 92 studies on cultural resources conducted within the approximately 410 acres of the proposed Project area. A total of 56 cultural resource properties are documented within the Project area boundaries. According to the NRHP, there are no listed properties located within the bounds of the Project area. Per results from the California Office of Historic City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-51 Environmental Analysis — Cultural Resources Preservation's (OHP's) Archaeological Resources Directory (ARD), there is one property that is listed as considered eligible for listing on the NRHP (P-33-001178 [CA-RIV-001178] La Quinta Evac. CH. AD). According to the CHRIS records search, California OHP Built Environment Resource Directory (BERD) indicates that two properties are listed as historically significant by local government (P-33-007263, PT. Happy Ranch and P-33-023955, PT. Happy Ranch) located at the intersection of Highway 111 and Washington Street. The term "Happy Ranch" is in reference to Point Happy, which is described above. The West Gateway area includes Point Happy, which is an undeveloped elevated area (183 feet in elevation) bordered by Highway 111 to the south, Whitewater River to the north, and restaurants and businesses to the east and west. Point Happy is linked to nearby culturally and historically significant resources. Any forthcoming development within the West Gateway area should consider Point Happy. It is advisable to consult a cultural resources expert before engaging in any ground -disturbing activities near this site. A previous study identified two prehistoric resources (P-33-008692/CA-RIV-006190, P-33-002936/CA-RIV- 002936) within the Project area, near the intersection of Dune Palms Road and Highway 111. P-33- 008692/CA-RIV-006190 consists of a 230 meter (east/west) by 170 meter (north/south) prehistoric -era resource with the three large and three small loci comprised of ceramics, burned bone, Iithic debitage, burned clay, and fire -affected rock. P-33-002936/CA-RIV-002936 consists of a 150 meter (north/south) by 60 meter (east/west) prehistoric -era resource comprised of ceramics, fire -affected rock, semi -fired clay, animal bone, and shell fragments (Hallock et al., 2023). Given the extensive amount of documented cultural resources within the Project area, it is conceivable that yet -to -be -discovered cultural resources exist. However, it is important to note that the densely developed environment and established infrastructure of the Project area may mitigate the probability of encountering such unrecorded cultural resources. Since this Specific Plan serves as a guide for future development along the corridor, forthcoming development endeavors within the Project area should undergo thorough assessment by a cultural resource expert to evaluate any historical, archaeological, or cultural heritage resources that have not been recorded and to offer suggestions regarding their importance and appropriate management before any ground -disturbing activities commence. Individuals engaged in future development along the Highway 111 Corridor are urged to recognize and respect the significance and irreplaceable value of cultural resources. For assistance, a comprehensive list of cultural resource consultants statewide can be accessed online at http://chrisinfo.org. Refer to Appendix C: Cultural Resources for the non -confidential cultural records search report. Sacred Lands File Search The following analysis is based on a Sacred Lands File (SLF) record search by the NAHC received on March 8, 2024. The results of the search were negative, meaning that no specific site information was found in the SLF search. However, it is important to note that the absence of such information in the SLF does not necessarily indicate the absence of cultural resources within the Project area. The letter from NAHC along with a list of Native American Tribes who may have knowledge of cultural resources in the Project area is provided in Appendix C: Cultural Resources. a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: A non -confidential CHRIS records request was conducted by EIC to determine the presence of culturally and historically significant resources within and near the Project area. According to the report (Appendix C: Cultural Resources), there have been 92 studies on cultural resources and there are 56 cultural resource properties documented in the Highway 111 City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-52 Environmental Analysis — Cultural Resources Corridor. Two historically significant properties were identified in the CHRIS records search, both being Point Happy Ranch, which is located at the intersection of Highway 111 and Washington Street. Although this is within the Project limits, potential impacts to historic resources would be mitigated through the implementation of Cultural Resource mitigation measures CRA through CR-9. The designated Project site was not identified as Sacred Land based on the examination conducted by NAHC. However, as acknowledged previously, the absence of specific information about cultural resources in the SLF does not necessarily imply the absence of such resources in the Project area. Before development activities commence, it is necessary for a cultural resource expert to conduct a survey to ascertain the existence or non-existence of culturally significant resources. Additionally, it is important to coordinate with local Native American Tribes in the vicinity. Employing cultural resource mitigation measures (CR-1 through CR-9) would aid in minimizing potential impacts on significant cultural and historical resources that might be found within or close to the Project boundaries. Furthermore, the Highway 111 Corridor is not designated on the NRHP, and it is advisable to conduct a cultural resource study before initiating any development activities within the Project area. In the event that archaeological resources are encountered during ground -disturbing activities, the construction contractor would implement mitigation measures CR-1 through CR-9. The use of appropriate mitigation efforts would help reduce potential impacts on historic and cultural resources to a less then significant level. Mitigation Measures: CR-1 through CR-9. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: Results from the non -confidential CHRIS records request demonstrate that there are no recorded archaeological resources within the Project area. This Specific Plan is a regulatory and policy document with the intention to guide development along the Highway 111 Corridor. No development is proposed as part of this Specific Plan and, therefore, the Project would not impact any unknown archaeological resources. This Specific Plan enables future projects to use this impact analysis for environmental assessments. Although this programmatic CEQA analysis offers a general overview, it may not cover all specific project impacts. Future developments may require site - specific archaeological surveys and reports to assess and mitigate impacts on significant archaeological resources, as outlined in mitigation measures CRA through CR-9. Mitigation Measures: CR-1 through CR-9. c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: The Project area consists of previously developed land; thus it is unlikely for human remains to be exposed during any future construction activities. Nonetheless, future development and ground excavations would be closely monitored to ensure the identification of any previously undiscovered remains. Given that the proposed Specific Plan serves as a regulatory and policy document with no current development plans, there is no immediate impact on any unidentified human remains within the Project area. However, if such remains are encountered during future development, implementation of mitigation measures CR-1 through CR-9 would provide appropriate instruction on the treatment of any human remains discovered during construction to reduce potential impacts to cultural and historic resources. Mitigation Measures: CR-1 through CR-9. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-53 Environmental Analysis — Cultural Resources Cultural Resources Mitigation Measures Implementation of mitigation measures CR-1 through CR-9 would reduce potential impacts to a less -than - significant level during future construction activities. Appropriate pre -construction training and a data recovery plan (if needed) would be implemented to address potential discovery of unanticipated archaeological resources and to preserve and/or record those resources consistent with appropriate laws and requirements. Proposed mitigation measures for future development are outlined below. • CR-1: Workers Environmental Awareness Program A Qualified Archaeologist who meets or exceeds the Secretary of Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology (NPS, 1983) shall conduct Workers Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) training on archaeological sensitivity for all construction personnel prior to the commencement of any ground -disturbing activities. Archaeological sensitivity training shall include a description of the types of cultural material that may be encountered, cultural sensitivity issues, the regulatory environment, and the proper protocol for treatment of the materials in the event of a find. The WEAP training document shall include materials that convey the information noted above, which shall be maintained in an area accessible to all construction personnel so that it may be reviewed regularly by construction staff. • CR-2: Pre -Excavation Agreement Prior to the issuance of Grading Permits, the Applicant/Owner shall enter into a pre -excavation agreement, otherwise known as a Tribal Cultural Resources Treatment and Tribal Monitoring Agreement with consulting Tribal Monitor associated within the area. A copy of the agreement shall be included in building and development plans and permit applications with the City. The purpose of this agreement shall be to formalize protocols and procedures between the Applicant/Owner and the consulting Tribal Monitor associated with the area for the protection and treatment of, including but not limited to, Native American human remains, funerary objects, cultural and religious landscapes, ceremonial items, and traditional gathering areas and tribal cultural resources located and/or discovered through a monitoring program in conjunction with the construction of the proposed project, including additional archaeological surveys and/or studies, excavations, geotechnical investigations, grading, and all other ground disturbing activities. At the discretion of the consulting Tribal Monitor, artifacts may be made available for 3D scanning/printing, with scanned/printed materials to be curated at a local repository meeting the federal standards of 36CFR79. • CR-3: Retention of Qualified Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permits, the Applicant/Owner or Grading Contractor shall provide executed contracts or agreements with a Qualified Archaeologist and consulting Tribal Monitor, at the Applicant/Owner or Grading Contractor's expense, to implement the monitoring program, as described in the pre -excavation agreement. • CR-4: Tribal Cultural Monitor Coordination During Ground Disturbing Activities The Qualified Archaeologist and consulting Tribal Monitor shall attend all applicable pre -construction meetings with the General Contractor and/or associated subcontractors to present the archaeological monitoring program. The Qualified Archaeologist and consulting Tribal Monitor shall be present on -site full-time during grubbing, grading, and/or other ground altering activities, including the placement of imported fill materials or fill used from other areas of the Project site, to identify any evidence of potential archaeological or tribal cultural resources. All fill materials shall be absent of any and all tribal cultural resources. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-54 Environmental Analysis — Cultural Resources • CR-5: Controlled Grade Procedure To detect important archaeological artifacts and cultural resources during monitoring, a "Controlled Grade Procedure" must be created by a Qualified Archaeologist. This will be done in consultation with the consulting Tribal Monitor, relevant consulting Tribes, and the Applicant/Owner, and needs approval from City representatives. The procedure will set guidelines for machinery work in sensitive areas identified during cultural resource monitoring. It will cover aspects like operating speed, removal increments, weight, and equipment features. A copy of this procedure must be included in the Grading Plan submissions for Grading Permits. • CR-6: Discovery of Tribal Cultural Resources The Qualified Archaeologist and consulting Tribal Monitor can stop ground -disturbing activities if undiscovered tribal cultural resources or artifacts are found. All work must cease in the vicinity of any archaeological discovery until the Qualified Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor can assess the context of the find, including its significance, potential eligibility for the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), and whether the project would have a direct impact on the resource. If buried cultural deposits are encountered, the Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor may request that construction halt nearby and must notify a Qualified Archaeologist within 24 hours for investigation. Work will be redirected away from these areas for assessment. Minor finds will be documented and secured for later repatriation; if items cannot be securely stored on -site, they may be stored off -site. Minor finds include archaeological materials that are isolated, lack context, and are unlikely to indicate a larger or significant site. If the discovered resources are deemed potentially significant, the involved Tribes will be notified for consultation on their respectful treatment. Avoidance of significant resources is preferred, but if not feasible, a data recovery plan may be required. The consulting Tribes will be consulted on this plan as well. For resources under a data recovery plan, a proper sample will be collected using professional methods, reflecting tribal values. The Tribal Monitor must be present during any resource collection or cataloging. If the Qualified Archaeologist does not collect the resources, the Tribal Monitor may do so. Ground -disturbing work will not resume until the resources are documented and/or protected. • CR-7: Treatment of Tribal Cultural Resources The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources unearthed during all ground disturbing activities, and from any previous archaeological studies or excavations on the Project site to the affiliated consulting Tribe, as determined through the appropriate process, for respectful and dignified treatment and disposition, including reburial at a protected location on -site, in accordance with the Tribe's cultural and spiritual traditions. All cultural materials that are associated with burial and/or funerary goods would be repatriated to the Most Likely Descendant as determined by the NAHC per California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. No tribal cultural resources shall be subject to curation. • CR-8: Tribal Cultural Monitoring Report A monitoring report and/or evaluation report, if appropriate, which describes the results, analysis, and conclusions of the archaeological monitoring program (e.g., data recovery plan) shall be submitted by the Qualified Archaeologist, along with the consulting Tribal Monitor's notes and comments, to the City of La Quinta Planning Division for approval. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-55 Environmental Analysis — Cultural Resources • CR-9: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains As specified by California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, if human remains are found on the Project site during construction or during archaeological work, the person responsible for the excavation, or his or her authorized representative, shall immediately notify the Riverside County Coroner's Office by telephone. No further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the Coroner Medical Examiner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code 5097.98. If such a discovery occurs, a temporary construction exclusion zone shall be established surrounding the area of the discovery so that the area would be protected, and consultation and treatment could occur as prescribed by law. If suspected Native American remains are discovered, the remains shall be kept in -situ, or in a secure location in close proximity to where they were found, and the analysis of the remains shall only occur on -site in the presence of a Tribal Monitor. By law, the Coroner Medical Examiner shall determine within two working days of being notified if the remains are subject to his or her authority. If the Coroner Medical Examiner identifies the remains to be of Native American ancestry, he or she shall contact the NAHC within 24 hours. The NAHC shall make a determination as to the Most Likely Descendent. If human remains are discovered, notify the consulting Tribe's Tribal Historic Preservation Officer. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-56 Environmental Analysis — Energy Resources 3.6 Energy Resources Would the project: a) Result in potentially significant environmental impacts due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? Electricity in the City is provided by the Imperial Irrigation District (IID), which provides power to eastern CV and Imperial County. IID derives over 60% of its power from various facilities, notably the Coachella Gas Turbine facility in Coachella. Its transmission network encompasses the innovative Green Path system, transmitting geothermal energy harnessed in Imperial County. Diversifying its portfolio, IID is committed to achieving a minimum of 45% of its electricity from alternative sources like geothermal, solar, and wind energy by 2027 (City of La Quinta, 2022; IID, 2024). a) Result in potentially significant environmental impacts due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? Less Than Significant: Future enhancements along the Highway 111 Corridor would prioritize efficient energy use and resource consumption. The proposed improvements under the Specific Plan would necessitate collaboration with IID to assess their capacity to support and sustain future developments in the corridor. Potential future developments along Highway 111 have the potential to increase the electrical demands on IID's systems. Developers planning future projects would need to apply for electrical service with IID, which would conduct evaluations of project design engineering and estimate costs associated with potential increases in energy demand. Information required by IID includes detailed loading and panel size specifications to assist in determining the requirements for supplying permanent power to improvements within the Specific Plan area. Additionally, all development activities within the Specific Plan area must undergo review and approval by the City, adhering to applicable local, state, and federal laws as well as aligning with the City's General Plan and this Specific Plan. Given that this Specific Plan serves as a high- level guide for the redevelopment of the Highway 111 Corridor, no site -specific electrical development plans or proposals are included or granted within it. Consequently, impacts on critical energy resources are expected to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? No Impact: Senate Bill 100 (SB 100), passed in September 2018, aims to speed up the State's Renewable Portfolio Standards Program. This involves directing electricity providers to increase their sourcing from eligible renewable energy sources to 100 percent of their total retail sales by 2045. The proposed project intends to use the current IID electricity grid. All construction facilitated by the proposed Project must adhere to Title 24 standards and current building codes. Importantly, the Project aligns with the state plan for renewable energy and does not pose any new impacts beyond what was anticipated and evaluated City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-57 Environmental Analysis — Energy Resources under the Specific Plan. The Energy Element and Mineral Resource Element of the General Plan highlight two policies along with their corresponding programs related to sustainable energy use, as detailed below (City of La Quinta, 2022): Policy EM 1.1: Strongly encourages conservation of energy resources. — Program EM 1.1 a: Review and amend, as appropriate, Zoning Ordinance procedures and standards to include site orientation, solar control and use of passive heating and cooling techniques. Policy EM 1.2: Supports the use of alternative energy and the conversion of traditional energy sources to alternative energy. — Program EM1.2a: Encourage installation of alternative energy devices on new and existing development. Programs may include City -funded incentive programs; matching fund programs with IID, The Gas Company and alternative energy providers, as well as other programs as they become available. — Program EM1.2b: As funding and applicability allows, incorporate Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), hybrid or electric vehicles into the City fleet as vehicles are replaced, with a target to complete the conversion by 2035. — Program EM1.2c: Continue participation in the Sunline Transit Agency, and promote the use of alternative fuel technologies for its buses. — Program EM1.2d: As appropriate, incorporate LED or other energy -efficient lighting in signals and lights throughout the City. — Program EM1.2e: Explore opportunities to provide a CNG and other alternate fueling station in the City. — Program EM1.2f.- Implement, as appropriate, energy efficient improvements in City buildings and facilities using Energy Efficiency Conservation Block Grant or similar funds. The proposed Specific Plan would align with the energy policies outlined in the City's General Plan by promoting sustainable and energy -efficient development along the Highway 111 Corridor. This approach would facilitate better planning and adaptability for the corridor as development advances and the population expands. As such, no impacts are anticipated. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-58 Environmental Analysis - Geology and Soils 3.7 Geology and Soils Would the project: a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42? ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? iii. Seismic related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv. Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on, or off, site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater ✓ disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic ✓ feature? Geologic Setting The natural landscape of the City exhibits significant variation, with elevations ranging from 130 feet below sea level to over 1,700 feet above sea level in the foothills of the Santa Rosa Mountains. Predominantly situated in a valley, the City experiences hot, arid summers and relatively mild winters. This climate influences the composition of soils. La Quinta contains predominantly sandy, well -drained soils, with rocky terrain prevalent in the Santa Rosa foothills. Soil composition in the Project area is mainly characterized by fine sandy loam with alluvial sand and gravel of the Whitewater River at the northeastern portions of the project area and a mix of alluvial sand and clay and wind -laid dune sand throughout the rest of the Project area (City of La Quinta, 2022; USDA, 2024). City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-59 Environmental Analysis — Geology and Soils The Project site is not within any of the State of California designated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Rupture Zones (California DOC, 2024a). Nevertheless, the region is susceptible to seismic activity due to the presence of active faults nearby. Notably, the historically active San Andreas Fault lies approximately 5 miles northwest of the City, while the San Jacinto Fault is situated about 17 miles southwest (City of La Quinta, 2002). In 1972, California implemented the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act to reduce the risk of fault rupture. This law prohibits building structures intended for human use over the trace of an active fault. The Project area is subject to strong seismic activities and is situated within Zone 4, the most intense seismic shaking zone (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations). Strong ground shaking has the potential to cause hazards including landslides, liquefaction, and structural damage, although liquefaction is not considered a hazard to development at the Project site, mainly due to the significant depth of groundwater. Zone 4 jurisdictions are responsible for diligently identifying any structures that could potentially pose hazards or fall below standard safety requirements. Subsequently, they are obligated to develop and execute thorough mitigation programs aimed at reducing the risks associated with such structures, and ensuring the safety and well-being of residents and infrastructure within their jurisdiction (City of La Quinta, 2002; 2022). The following policies outlined in the City's General Plan would ensure that the impacts of seismic hazards are carefully considered and mitigated alongside future development efforts: Policy GEO-1.1: The City shall maintain and periodically update an information database and maps that identify local and regional geologic and seismic conditions. — Program GEO-1.1a: The City shall periodically confer with the California Division of Mines and Geology, Riverside County, neighboring communities, and other appropriate agencies to improve and routinely update the database. Policy GEO-1.2: The City shall continue to require that development in areas subject to rockfall, landslide, liquefaction and/or other geotechnical hazards described in this Element, prepare detailed geotechnical analyses that include mitigation measures intended to reduce potential hazards to less than significant levels. Policy GEO-1.3: The City shall require that development in areas subject to collapsible or expansive soils conduct soil sampling and laboratory testing and implement mitigation measures that minimize such hazards. — Program GEO-1.3a: The Building and Safety Department shall review and determine the adequacy of soils and/or other geotechnical studies conducted for proposed projects and enforce the implementation of mitigation measures. Policy GEO-1.4: The City shall require that all new structures be built in accordance with the latest adopted version of the Building Code. Policy GEO-1.5: The City shall continue to require that structures that pose a safety threat due to inadequate seismic design are retrofitted or removed from use, according to law. Policy GEO-1.6: The City shall coordinate and cooperate with public and quasi -public agencies to ensure that major utilities continue to be functional in the event of a major earthquake. — Program GEO-1.6.a: The City shall maintain working relationships and strategies between the Public Works Department, utility providers, and other appropriate agencies to strengthen or relocate utility facilities and take other appropriate measures to safeguard major utility distribution systems. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-60 Environmental Analysis — Geology and Soils a.i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. No Impact: There are no Alquist-Priolo zoned faults in the City (City of La Quinta, 2022). The prospect of future development in the proposed Project area carries a seismic risk given its proximity to the San Andreas Fault, a well-known and active fault line, as outlined in the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map (State of California, 2022). The San Andreas Fault, positioned approximately 5 miles north of the City, represents a significant geological feature considered the "master fault" in southern California. Additionally, the region is influenced by the San Jacinto Fault Zone approximately 17 miles to the southwest of the Project area, the Burnt Mountain Fault roughly 15 miles north of the City, and the Indio Hills Fault situated approximately 2 miles east of the San Andreas Fault. These faults collectively shape the seismic characteristics of the area. As seismic events can lead to ground shaking, displacement, and other hazards, thorough consideration of these geological factors is crucial for informed decision -making in land - use planning and construction practices. Adherence to the City's General Plan and seismic building codes are imperative to enhance the resilience and safety of any future infrastructure projects. As such, rupture of known earthquake faults in the area are not expected to generate substantial adverse effects to future development along the Highway 111 Corridor. No impacts are anticipated. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. a.ii) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking? Less Than Significant Impact: The Project is situated within a seismically active area close to several seismic sources capable of generating moderate to strong ground shaking. Given the proximity of the San Andreas Fault and other significant active faults (San Jacinto Fault Zone, Burnt Mountain Fault, and Indio Hills fault), as well as other active faults within California, the Project area could experience strong ground shaking during future development along the Highway 111 Corridor. Shaking intensity could range from moderate to strong and would be expected to result in moderate to extensive damage, especially to buildings that are older or poorly constructed. The Project area is anticipated to encounter moderate to intense earthquakes throughout its design lifespan. Nevertheless, the Project would be engineered to meet the highest mandated standards, ensuring resilience against potential seismic activity as per the most recent specifications from the State of California Building Code and Department of Transportation. Furthermore, the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) outlines the specific risks linked to earthquakes and outlines measures for mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery in case of seismic activity within the City. By addressing both natural and man-made hazards, the LHMP aims to reduce La Quinta's susceptibility and underscores the City's dedication to safeguarding residents, property, and critical infrastructure (City of La Quinta, 2023). Moreover, the City's Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) details the coordinated responses to various emergencies, encompassing natural disasters, technological incidents, and national security threats that could impact the City. The EOP establishes protocols aligned with the California Standardized Emergency Management System and designates evacuation routes for different scenarios (City of La Quinta, 2010). Following and executing these plans would safeguard and direct development along the Highway 111 Corridor, averting negative consequences for the community and City infrastructure in future development initiatives. Project -related impacts associated with seismic ground shaking would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-61 Environmental Analysis — Geology and Soils a.iii) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving seismic related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less Than Significant Impact: Liquefaction occurs when ground shaking of relatively long duration and intensity over 0.2 g occurs in areas of loose, unconsolidated soils with relatively shallow groundwater depths (50 feet or less). The sudden increase in water pressure in pores between soil grains may substantially decrease soil shear strength. This creates a condition where soil takes on the qualities of a liquid or a semi -viscous substance. Liquefaction can result in ground settlement, ground undulation, lateral spreading or displacement, and flow failures. Structures may sink or tilt as bearing capacity decreases, causing substantial damage (City of La Quinta, 2022). The City's General Seismic Hazard Map shows that the Project area is not considered to be in a moderate or high Liquefaction Susceptibility area. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. a.iv) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving landslides? Less Than Significant Impact: Landslides and rockfall can occur when unstable slope conditions are worsened by strong ground motion caused by seismic events. Conditions that lead to landslide vulnerability include high seismic potential; rapid uplift and erosion that creates steep slopes and deeply incised canyons; folded and highly fractured rock; and rock with silt or clay layers that are inherently weak. Rockfall and rockslides are also common on very steep slopes. Landslides have been recorded after periods of heavy rainfall, and rockfall has been associated with slope failure during drier periods (City of La Quinta, 2022). The City's General Seismic Hazard Map shows that the Project Area is not an Earthquake Induced Instability Area of Concern. Although the Project area is primarily flat, northwest of the Project area is susceptible to rock falls. Nonetheless, by adhering to the City's General Plan and standards of the LHMP, impacts involving the risk of landslides are anticipated to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less Than Significant Impact: The Specific Plan does not encompass existing development proposals, nor does it provide entitlements for development. While the Specific Plan itself would not cause soil erosion, activities such as land clearing, grading or excavations, and future development could potentially lead to soil erosion. Future construction activities, including cut, fill, removal of vegetation, and operation of heavy machinery would disturb soil and, therefore, have the potential to cause erosion. State law mandates that new development projects must comply with the statewide General Construction Permit (CGP) under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). This program oversees discharges from construction activities and monitors stormwater quality in municipal systems. Projects must submit a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as part of their permit application. Additionally, according to the City's General Plan, the Project area has a very high wind erodibility rating caused by strong winds in the CV. As such, any future development activities within the Highway 111 Corridor should be performed in compliance with the BMPs prescribed in the City's Municipal Code and General Plan, including Policies GEO-1.1 through GEO-1.6a, as referenced above (City of La Quinta, 2021; 2022). Therefore, impacts are expected to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-62 Environmental Analysis — Geology and Soils c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on, or off, site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less Than Significant Impact: According to the City's General Plan, the proposed Project Area consists of three different geological units. Directly to the north of Highway 111 in the Project area, the soil consists of alluvial sand and clay and just north that is alluvial sand and gravel of Whitewater River. The southern section of the Project area south of Highway 111 consists of a combination of alluvial sand and gravel as well as wind -laid dune sand (City of La Quinta, 2022). Future development along the Highway 111 Corridor should be consistent with the City's General Plan and must adhere to established state and local regulations to mitigate risks related to unstable and expansive soils. As such, impacts are expected to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? Less Than Significant Impact: Expansive soils are soils containing fine-grained materials such as silts and clays in varying amounts. With changes in moisture content, clay minerals can shrink or swell, creating pressure that may affect structures or other surface improvements. Prior to any future ground -disturbing activities within the Highway 111 Corridor, it is recommended that soil properties and type be identified to ensure compliance with the Uniform Building Code. Furthermore, by adhering to the City's General Plan Policy GEO-1.3, potential impacts to property development due to expansive soils would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Less Than Significant: Development under the proposed Specific Plan would continue to be connected to the CVWD's wastewater treatment system. Future wastewater treatment proposed for development must comply with Regional Water Control Board regulations to prevent any potential discharge into local water sources. The installation, use, sizing, and location of wastewater treatment systems to support future development would undergo review and approval by both the Riverside County Environmental Health Department and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Additionally, it is likely that geotechnical engineering analysis may be required to secure future building permits to ensure the safe and proper installation of wastewater treatment systems. Subsequent development may necessitate additional CEQA assessment of project -specific impacts before proceeding, alongside adherence to local laws and regulations. The potential wastewater impacts stemming from the adoption of the Specific Plan are expected to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-63 Environmental Analysis — Geology and Soils f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: Paleontological resources encompass not only fossil remains but also fossil sites and geological formations that have yielded fossil material. The proposed Specific Plan does not entail specific development projects or confer entitlements for development. Moreover, the proposed land use blueprint would align with the current land use designations outlined in the City's General Plan. As the Specific Plan functions as a policy and regulatory framework, it would not directly cause the disturbance of paleontological resources. However, potential future enhancements to execute the Specific Plan could potentially impact these resources. Though there are no known unique paleontological resources, site, or unique geologic feature present within the Project area, that does not mean undiscovered paleontological resources do not exist. To address this, mitigation measure GEO-1 has been proposed to mitigate potential impacts on undiscovered paleontological resources. As such, impacts are expected to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: GEO-1. Geology and Soils Mitigation Measures • GEO-1: Protect Paleontological Resources during Construction Activities Prior to ground disturbing activities, all field personnel will receive training on paleontological resources, including potential fossils that may be discovered and response steps, while a qualified paleontologist will prepare a Paleontological Resources Monitoring and Mitigation Plan (PRMMP). If fossils (like bones, teeth, or well-preserved plants) are found during construction, the City will stop work within 50 feet and notify a paleontologist to document and assess the find. The paleontologist may allow work to continue or recommend salvaging the fossils if necessary and will suggest appropriate treatment methods. Collected fossils will be sent to an accredited institution for curation and preservation. All earth -moving operations deeper than two feet must have a qualified paleontological monitor. Continuous monitoring is needed if fossil -rich lakebed sediments are found. The monitor can stop work to identify and salvage fossils and may halt equipment for large specimens. A monitoring plan must be submitted to the City before any permits are issued or soil is disturbed. Grading and excavation must comply with La Quinta Code and regulations. After ground disturbing activities and any necessary fossil curation, the project paleontologist will prepare a final report detailing the results of the PRMMP. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-64 Environmental Analysis — Greenhouse Gas Emissions 3.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant ✓ impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the ✓ emissions of greenhouse gases? As described in Section 1, Project Information, the Project is consistent with the City's current 2035 General Plan. Therefore, growth parameters such as population and vehicle activity are consistent with the General Plan and have been previously analyzed in the certified General Plan EIR. The following General Plan policies and programs are applicable to and would be implemented by project: Policy AQ-1.7: Greenhouse gas emissions associated with a development project shall demonstrate adherence to the City's GHG Reduction Plan. The City adopted the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (GHG Plan) in 2013. The City's GHG Plan includes emission reduction targets for year 2020 and year 2035 that are consistent with the State's Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32) reduction targets. Specifically, the City's reduction targets are: 10 percent below 2005 levels by 2020, and 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2035 a,b) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment, conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Less Than Significant Impact: The applicable greenhouse gas reduction plan is the City's GHG Plan, which demonstrates a community -wide emissions reduction strategy consistent with the AB 32 reduction goals. Therefore, if a project is consistent with the City's GHG Plan, the project would not generate greenhouse gas emissions that may have a significant impact on the environment. The Specific Plan's consistency with the City's GHG Plan is assessed in Table 3.3, below. As demonstrated in the table, the Specific Plan is consistent with the City's GHG Plan. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with an applicable GHG plan; the Specific Plan's greenhouse gas emissions generation impact would be less than significant. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-65 Environmental Analysis — Greenhouse Gas Emissions Table 3.3. Consistency analysis between Specific Plan and City GHG Plan ND-1. Encourage and promote that all new commercial and residential development achieve energy efficiency and incorporate sustainable design principles that exceed Green Building Code requirements. a. Require projects that implement green building principles to report GHG reductions achieved. i. Record number of building permit applications constructed that exceed Title 24. Include tabulation on estimated energy saved and associated GHG reduction achieved. b. Encourage the use of energy efficient appliances and fixtures that are Energy Star rated or equivalent for all new buildings. c. Require high efficiency water fixtures (toilets, water heaters and faucets) in all new buildings and remodels. d. Limit turf to 10% of all landscaped areas, exception for active use areas. ND-2. Work towards carbon neutrality for all new buildings. Carbon neutral buildings achieve a net zero emission of GHGs through design measures, onsite renewable, and offsets. a. Strive to achieve carbon neutrality for a minimum of 525,000 square feet of new commercial development by 2020, and an additional 230,000 square feet for new development between 2020 and 2035. b. Strive to achieve carbon neutrality for a minimum of 1,000 residential homes by 2020 and an additional 1,000 homes by 2035. ND-3. Encourage all new development to meet 50% of energy demand through onsite solar or other non-polluting source. a. Dedicate accessible rooftop space for solar and wire for photovoltaic energy. i. Rooftop solar or above parking solar shall be preferred to the development of solar offsite. b. Require solar water heaters. ND-4. Encourage all new development to minimize vehicle trips. a. Implement the Transportation Demand Management Ordinance. b. Encourage business with >50 employees to offer bus passes or establish carpool programs for employees. c. Consider proximity to services when permitting new residential development. i. When considering mandated affordable housing projects, consider partnering with commercial developer to create a Mixed Use project. Consistent. The State's Title 24 Energy Code and Green Building Code have been updated since the adoption of the City's GHG Plan. Future development would be subject to the Title 24 Energy Code and Green Building Codes in effect at the time of development. Additionally, future development would be subject to City review and implementation of the standards and conditions of approval that implement this measure. Consistent. This is a City-wide measure that cannot be implemented by the Specific Plan or future development individually. However, the future development would be subject to City review and implementation of the standards and conditions of approval that implement this measure. Consistent. The State's Title 24 Energy Code and Green Building Code have been updated since the adoption of the City's GHG Plan. Future development is subject to the 2022 Energy Codes, or the codes in effect at the time of development. The State's Energy Codes have solar photovoltaic (PV) system and solar ready requirements that apply to newly constructed low-rise residential buildings. The solar -ready requirements are mandatory measures and applicable to buildings which do not have a solar PV system installed. Consistent. The Specific Plan would minimize vehicle trips through guiding growth towards higher density mixed -use development supported by enhanced active transportation infrastructure. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-66 Environmental Analysis — Greenhouse Gas Emissions ND-5. Require that new commercial development include provisions for bus stops and scheduled transit services from SunLine transit where available. Consistent. See analysis in Section 3.17, Transportation, Impact a). ND-6. Require that new development accommodate Consistent. See analysis in Section 3.17, pedestrians and bicyclists. Transportation, Impact a). a. Include facilities for safe and convenient bicycle parking for non-residential and multi -family development. b. Consider access routes for pedestrians and bicycles. ND-7. Encourage all new development to utilize materials that consist of recycled materials and are recyclable. ND-8. Consider the provision for the requirement of onsite composting facilities. Consistent. The Project would reduce waste with implementation of state mandated recycling and reuse mandates. Consistent. The Project would reduce waste with implementation of state mandated recycling and reuse mandates. ND-9. Encourage new commercial development to prepare Consistent. The Project would reduce waste with an operational plan to minimize waste. implementation of state mandated recycling and reuse mandates. ND-10. Work with the County in developing a fee program for Not Applicable. This measure pertains to methane capture to fund the development of methane coordination between the City and County. capture facilities at landfills utilized by the City. ND-11. Encourage convenient, accessible, and easy disposal opportunities. a. Require the proper labeling of bins to enhance participation. b. Increase sorting before and after collection to minimize the waste stream. c. Work with Burrtec to expand accepted recycled products. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. Not Applicable. This measure pertains to coordination between the City and waste stream companies, as well as waste stream sorting. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-67 Environmental Analysis — Hazards and Hazardous Materials 3.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? * A material is considered hazardous by the state of California Health and Safety Code as any material that, because of quantity, concentration, or physical or chemical characteristics, poses a significant present or potential hazard to human health and safety or to the environment (CA HSC, 2022.). California categorizes hazardous materials into four categories. These include if the material or waste is poisonous (toxicity), can be ignited by open flame (ignitability), can corrode other materials (corrosivity), or can react violently, explode, or generate vapors when mixed with water (reactivity) (CCR, 2023b). Future development along the Highway 111 Corridor would facilitate expansion of commercial activities that may manufacture, transport, store, use, or dispose of hazardous materials and waste. Prior to any related ground disturbing activities, developers may need to conduct site -specific research and technical studies to assess the presence of hazardous materials and potential hazards within the Specific Plan area. This information would ensure that future developers are well-informed about the necessary protocols for safely handling, storing, and disposing of hazardous substances, as well as understanding any environmental risks that could impact development projects in the area. The following policies within the City's General Plan aim to address and mitigate health hazards associated with hazardous materials in future development: City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-68 Environmental Analysis — Hazards and Hazardous Materials Policy HAZ-1.1: The storage, transport, use and disposal of hazardous materials shall comply with all City, County, State, and federal standards. — Program HAZ-1.1. a: Continue to coordinate with all appropriate agencies to assure that local, State and federal regulations are enforced. — Program HAZ-1.1.b: Development plans for projects which may store, use or transport hazardous materials shall continue to be routed to the Fire Department and the Department of Environmental Health for review. — Program HAZ-1.1.c: The City's Emergency Services Division shall maintain a comprehensive inventory of all hazardous waste sites within the City, including underground fuel storage tanks. Policy HAZ-1.2: To the extent empowered, the City shall regulate the generation, delivery, use and storage of hazardous materials. — Program HAZ-1.2.a: All facilities which produce, utilize, store or transport hazardous materials shall be constructed in strict conformance with all applicable Building and Fire Codes. Policy HAZ-1.3: Support Household Hazardous Waste — Program HAZ-1.3.a: Continue to work with the County to assure regular household hazardous waste disposal events are held in and around the City. — Program HAZ-1.3.b: Educate the City's residents on the proper disposal of household hazardous waste through the City's newsletter and by providing educational materials at City Hall. The analysis described in this section includes data on hazardous sites sourced from the San Diego RWQCB GeoTracker Database and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control EnviroStor Database, accessed as of June 2024. a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated: Construction activities associated with the Specific Plan may involve the handling of incidental amounts of hazardous materials such as fuels, hydraulic liquids, oils, and solvents. Handling, storage, and transportation of hazardous materials would be conducted in accordance with applicable federal and state laws and any hazardous waste materials would be disposed of offsite. Given the proposed densification of the corridor and new commercial activities, there would be greater potential for the transport of hazardous materials in Specific Plan area streets, increasing the likelihood of potential spills or leaks from mobile sources. Changes in land use, such as modification, increased activity, and reorganization, can potentially expose the public to environmental hazards associated with the transportation, disposal, or use of hazardous materials. Furthermore, future development or construction activities may also present risks to public health and the environment by disturbing contaminated groundwater, soils, or hazardous building materials already present. Future development within the Highway 111 Corridor would be required to adhere to the Specific Plan's policies, the City's General Plan, and applicable federal and state laws and local regulations. As such, environmental impacts associated with the handling and disposal of hazardous material would be mitigated through the implementation of HAZ-1 and impacts are anticipated to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: HAZ-1. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-69 Environmental Analysis — Hazards and Hazardous Materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated: The Specific Plan would adhere to the County's Hazardous Waste Management Plan (HWMP), which addresses the proper disposal, processing, handling, storage, and treatment of hazardous materials. The City also has adopted this HWMP and implements it at a local level. In future redevelopment projects involving demolition of structures built more than 30 years ago, there is a possibility of encountering asbestos materials. Therefore, an Asbestos Survey shall be conducted prior to the commencement of any demolition activities, in compliance with Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations. Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, overseen by the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA), encompasses safety standards in the workplace, including regulations related to hazardous materials such as asbestos. Title 8 addresses the handling, removal, and disposal of asbestos during demolition activities. (CCR, 2023a). Furthermore, future development within the Highway 111 Corridor shall comply with the City's General Plan policies HAZ-1.1 through HAZ-1.3 to ensure impacts related to health hazards from hazardous materials are taken into consideration and reduced or minimized in conjunction with future development. All future development under the proposed Specific Plan would be required to comply with applicable federal and state laws and local regulations pertaining to the transport, use, disposal, and accidental release of hazardous materials, including but not limited to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), California Hazardous Waste Control Law, California Health and Safety Code, California Fire Code, California Department of Public Health, South Coast AQMD, RCRA regulations, the City's Municipal Code along with the General Plan policies listed above. Compliance with these laws, regulations, and policies aims to mitigate potential environmental impacts associated with hazardous materials and hazards. Through the inclusion of mitigation measure HAZA, future improvements within the Highway 111 Corridor would be minimized to levels deemed insignificant. Mitigation Measures: HAZ-1 c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated: La Quinta High School is about 0.18 miles north of the Specific Plan area, while James Madison Elementary School is roughly 1.6 miles northeast. Additionally, Amelia Earhart Elementary School and John Glenn Middle School are situated adjacent to each other, approximately 1.5 miles north of the proposed Project development area. The Specific Plan is a guidance -level document and does not include site -specific development plans, however, future developments within the Specific Plan area may involve the release or handling of hazardous materials, substances, or waste within a quarter -mile radius of any existing or proposed school. Therefore, future development in the Highway 111 Corridor should adopt mitigation measure HAZA to reduce potential impacts from hazardous materials, substances, or waste on nearby schools. Mitigation Measures: HAZ-1. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-70 Environmental Analysis — Hazards and Hazardous Materials d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated: The provisions in Government Code Section 65962.5 are commonly referred to as the "Cortese List." A search of the Cortese List was completed for the Project to determine if any known hazardous waste sites have been recorded on or adjacent to the Specific Plan area. These include: • Department of Toxic Substances Control EnviroStor database; • List of Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites from the Water Board GeoTracker database; • List of solid waste disposal sites identified by the Water Board with waste constituents above hazardous waste levels; • List of "active" Cease and Desist Orders and Cleanup and Abatement Orders from the Water Board; and • List of hazardous waste facilities subject to corrective action pursuant to Section 25187.5 of the Health and Safety Code. Database searches conducted within a one -mile radius of the Specific Plan area returned two LUST (Leaking Underground Storage Tank) Cleanup Sites within the Specific Plan area (Regional Water Board Cases # 7T2253006; and 7T2253014 [DTSC, 2024; SWRCB, 2024]). LUST site 7T2253006 is located at 78611 Highway 111, La Quinta, CA 92253 and LUST site 7T2253014 is located at 46150 Washington Street, La Quinta, CA 92253. The LUST sites, 7T2253006 and 7T2253014, are located where future development may occur within the Highway 111 Corridor; however, the cases were closed in 2001 and 2003, respectively. The known contaminant for both LUST sites was gasoline, which was found in soil at both LUST sites. Excavation cleanup activities were conducted shortly after the leaks were detected and the cases were closed with no further regulatory action required. As such, it is likely that the closed sites have little to no potential to present a lasting impact or adverse consequences that would impede the feasibility of the proposed Specific Plan development. As there are no other known hazardous sites or ongoing clean-up activities within the Project area that would pose a hazardous risk, the implementation of the Specific Plan would not create significant hazards to the public or environment. To prevent potential hazards to the public or environment from future development under the Specific Plan, any construction or site disturbance in areas with recorded Cortese List sites would require additional environmental assessment, such as Phase I or Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, before excavation or major construction begins, as outlined in Mitigation Measure HAZ-2. Mitigation Measures: HAZ-2. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact: The development area outlined in the Specific Plan is situated outside of an airport land use plan and beyond a two-mile radius from any public use airport. The closest airport, Bermuda Dunes Airport, is approximately four miles north of the Specific Plan area and is a public airport that is privately owned. Additionally, the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport is a public county -owned airport located approximately eight miles southeast of the Specific Plan area. Despite this proximity, it is expected that the proposed development would not negatively affect airport operations or safety. Since the Highway 111 City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-71 Environmental Analysis — Hazards and Hazardous Materials Corridor is located outside any Airport Influence Area, it is not subject to an Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan requirements (Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission, 2004). Therefore, no impacts related to airport land use plans or safety hazards are expected to occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Less Than Significant: Highway 111 serves as an arterial route through the City and can be utilized as an evacuation path. Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would not hinder access along Highway 111 and to nearby neighborhoods. The City's Emergency Management Division has established an EOP detailing mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery efforts in emergencies (City of La Quinta, 2010). Additionally, the City operates a Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) Program, educating residents on disaster preparedness and basic response skills such as fire safety and rescue operations. The City's LHMP further reduces risks from natural and man-made hazards, emphasizing protection for residents, property, and critical infrastructure (City of La Quinta, 2023). The proposed Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan includes transportation and street enhancements aimed at improving multi -modal connectivity and pedestrian -friendliness without disrupting traffic flow or emergency access. All future development would undergo review and approval by the City of La Quinta Fire Department to ensure compliance with fire safety standards and non-interference with emergency access. Adherence to the General Plan policies ensures that local emergency plans are regularly updated with the latest disaster preparedness information and evacuation procedures. By aligning with the goals of the EOP, CERT Program, LHMP, and General Plan, development along Highway 111 would proceed responsibly, minimizing impacts on emergency response and evacuation protocols and promoting community safety. Therefore, the Project is expected to have a less than significant impact on established emergency plans and evacuation procedures. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? No Impact: The Project area is situated outside of wildland fire hazard zones and is not prone to wildfires (CAL FIRE, 2023). Development along the Highway 111 Corridor would adhere to the City's LHMP and comply with Building and Fire codes established to ensure adequate fire safety standards. These standards consider factors such as building type, design, intended occupancy, and usage. Additionally, the City has partnered with the Riverside County Fire Department to enhance fire safety measures under a comprehensive fire services agreement. By following the guidelines set forth in the City of La Quinta's LHMP, the Project is expected to have no impact on fire safety, ensuring compliance and safety standards are met. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Mitigation Measures • HAZ-1: Hazardous Materials Handling and Planning New development projects in the Specific Plan area must comply with local, state, and federal regulations by submitting development plans and permits to the City for review. Projects intending to City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-72 Environmental Analysis — Hazards and Hazardous Materials use or store hazardous materials must prepare a Spill Prevention Countermeasure Contingency (SPCC) Plan outlining spill containment protocols, along with maintaining an onsite SPCC spill kit. Additionally, developments proposing storage and use of hazardous materials above reporting thresholds must create a Hazardous Materials Business Emergency Plan (HMBEP) as per Chapter 6.95 of the California Health & Safety Code and Title 19, Division 2 of the California Code of Regulations. The HMBEP requires approval from the County of Riverside Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) and the Department of Environmental Health prior to business operation commencement. • HAZ-2: Phase I and/or Phase II Site Assessment Projects within the Specific Plan area that involve excavation at locations with recorded Cortese List sites must undergo a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, and where necessary, Phase II sampling. If the Phase I assessment identifies the need for remediation, the project sponsor must adhere to all remediation and abatement directives specified by the DTSC, RWQCB, or relevant regulatory agencies. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-73 Environmental Analysis — Hydrology and Water Quality 3.10 Hydrology and Water Quality Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially ✓ degrade surface or ground water quality? b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge ✓ such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i. Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or ✓ off -site? ii. Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in ✓ flooding on- or off -site? iii. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned ✓ stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? iv. Impede or redirect flood flows? ✓ d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk ✓ release of pollutants due to project inundation? e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater ✓ management plan? Hydrology of the Region The City is situated in the CV and exhibits a distinct hydrological profile shaped by its desert environment and unique geological characteristics. The City experiences a hot desert climate, characterized by low annual precipitation and high temperatures, which significantly influence its hydrology. La Quinta receives minimal precipitation, averaging 3-5 inches annually, mostly during winter months (City of La Quinta, 2022). High evaporation rates from intense solar radiation limit surface water resources and, as such, the City heavily depends on groundwater from CV aquifers. The City's hydrology is shaped by the San Andreas Fault system and nearby mountain ranges, influencing groundwater recharge and aquifer sustainability. Given its arid climate and groundwater reliance, the City prioritizes sustainable water management through conservation, monitoring groundwater levels, and exploring alternative water sources to address potential challenges from droughts and growing water demands (City of La Quinta, 2022). Sustainable water management practices are essential to support the City's growth and development while safeguarding its water resources. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-74 Environmental Analysis — Hydrology and Water Quality Water Management and Flood Controls The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC) oversees the design of flood control structures across the region. These structures manage runoff from areas beyond the City, such as the surrounding mountains. The CVWD holds extensive responsibilities for flood control management, encompassing planning, maintenance, and construction of enhancements for regional facilities. This includes managing facilities such as the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel (CVSC, Whitewater River), the La Quinta Evacuation Channel, the Bear Creek System, the East La Quinta Channel, and Lake Cahuilla. CVWD is an independent special district that is responsible for protecting and conserving local water resources in the CV. CVWD provides water to its customers via groundwater, recycled water, and imported water from either the Colorado River (via Coachella Canal) or through the State Water Project (CVWD, 2024). As groundwater is an important resource in the region, the CVWD has adopted several strategies, including groundwater recharge, imported water utilization, and water conservation initiatives, aimed at reducing groundwater extraction. The Whitewater River/CVSC, which is managed by CVWD, serves as the primary drainage route within the City and while usually dry, it can flood during storms. Spanning approximately 50 miles, the CVSC averages 260 feet in width and is channelized in some portions and contains levees (City of La Quinta, 2022). The channel mostly aligns with its historical natural course, except for a deviation within the City's boundaries. The City maintains and manages stormwater-related facilities that gather and transport runoff from streets and properties to regional channels and basins. The City's Master Drainage Plan serves as a tool for managing and documenting the status and locations of existing stormwater management facilities (City of La Quinta, 2009). The Project area includes regions identified by the Federal Emergency Management Act's (FEMA's) National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) as Zone X and Zone A. Zone X denotes areas with a reduced flood risk due to the presence of levees, while Zone A represents areas situated within the 100- year floodplain (FEMA, 2024). Compliance with the following policies outlined in the City's General Plan would promote efficient use and conservation of the City's valuable water resources: Policy WR-1.1: Support the Coachella Valley Water District in its efforts to supply adequate domestic water to residents and businesses. — Program WR-1.1.a: The City shall continue to implement its Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance and Building Codes, and update them as needed to meet or exceed State standards for water efficiency and conservation. — Program WR-1.1.b: Continue to work with CVWD to implement independent and joint programs, rebates, and discounts that promote water conservation, subject to available funding. Policy WR-1.2: Support the Coachella Valley Water District in its efforts to recharge the aquifer. — Program WR-1.2.a: Support CVWD's efforts to increase recharge at its La Quinta facility and elsewhere in its district. — Program WR-1.2.b: Work with CVWD to implement new or improved recharging techniques in golf course and lake design, turf and agricultural irrigation methods, and the use of tertiary treated water for irrigation and other uses. Policy WR-1.3: Support the Coachella Valley Water District in its efforts to expand tertiary treated (i.e. reclaimed) water distribution. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-75 Environmental Analysis — Hydrology and Water Quality — Program WR-1.3.a: Work with CVWD to provide tertiary treated water for future recreational facilities and landscaping irrigation to the greatest extent possible. Policy WR-1.4: Protect stormwater from pollution and encourage its use to recharge the aquifer. — Program WR-1.4.a: Implement federal, regional and local standards pertaining to the discharge and treatment of pollutants in surface water for all development projects. — Program WR-1.4.b: Coordinate with CVWD in its review of projects which impact drainage channels. — Program WR-1.4.c: Require on -site retention for new development projects to the greatest extent possible, to provide added recharge of the aquifer. Policy WR-1.5: Development within drainage areas and stormwater facilities shall be limited to recreational uses such as golf courses, lakes, sports or play fields and similar uses. Policy WR-1.6: Encourage the use of permeable pavements in residential and commercial development projects. a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: Future development along the Highway 111 Corridor would lead to the construction of new structures. This expansion of mixed -use development and densification of the Highway 111 Corridor would introduce more impermeable surfaces, as well as an increase in population and vehicles. Consequently, there would be a rise in urban pollutants like oils, heavy metals, pesticides, and fertilizers entering the storm drain systems. The SWRCB regulates water quality through the NPDES program, established under the Clean Water Act. This program aims to control and reduce pollutants entering water bodies from both point and non -point sources, covering long-term and construction -related activities. NPDES permits for discharges to water bodies are issued and enforced by the Colorado River RWQCB. Projects that disturb more than one acre of land during construction must submit a notice of intent to be covered under the NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity. Project applicants must propose control measures consistent with this permit, as well as with local agency recommendations and RWQCB standards. Development that exceeds one acre in disturbance requires a notice of intent submission to the RWQCB. The State NPDES General Construction Permit mandates the development and execution of a SWPPP. This plan utilizes BMPs for controlling runoff, erosion, and sedimentation from project sites, both during and after construction. Adhering to the NPDES General Permit requirements would significantly mitigate potential impacts on water quality to below a significant level. Additionally, any future development of wastewater treatment systems could affect groundwater quality, however, treatment of wastewater must be in accordance with RWQCB as well as state regulations. As such, impacts to surface waters or ground water quality can be reduced to a less than significant level through the implementation of mitigation measure HWQ-1. Mitigation Measures: HWQ-1. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-76 Environmental Analysis — Hydrology and Water Quality b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? Less Than Significant: CVWD manages and protects groundwater resources in the CV and implements groundwater recharge to conserve water for the region. However, despite CVWD's consistent increase in groundwater basin recharge (from 1,813 acre-feet in 2000 to 21,735 acre-feet in 2009), persistent drought conditions and rising demand have prevented CVWD from sustaining positive recharge levels. CVWD intends to intensify recharge endeavors as the City expands (City of La Quinta, 2022; CVWD, 2024). Future development across the CV and the Highway 111 Corridor would necessitate domestic water for indoor use and landscaping irrigation, which would likely result in an increased demand on constrained water resources. The City has initiated water conservation measures and must sustain and broaden those efforts to safeguard its water reserves in the future. The City is also working with property owners along the corridor to remove non-functional turf and replace with desertscape to conserve water resources. The proposed Specific Plan will enable future projects to use this impact analysis for environmental assessments, providing a programmatic overview that will likely be tiered from this document. Future growth and development along Highway 111 should align with the goals, policies, and programs outlined in the City's General Plan, particularly water resource policies WR-1.1 through WR-1.6. Projects in the area will need to adhere to water efficiency standards, including Building Code mandates, and should incorporate drought -tolerant landscaping with minimal irrigation. These measures, along with other applicable requirements, are expected to effectively mitigate water -related impacts to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. c.i) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? Less Than Significant: Development facilitated by this Specific Plan would likely involve grading and construction in areas already developed, and undeveloped areas, potentially altering drainage patterns and increasing impervious surfaces. This could lead to increased stormwater runoff, potentially causing erosion, siltation, or exceeding the capacity of storm drain systems, thereby posing flood hazards to surrounding lands. However, these impacts related to altered drainage patterns and stormwater runoff would remain insignificant if future development adheres to the policies of the City's General Plan and complies with existing federal, state, and local regulations. As such, impacts are anticipated to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. c.ii, c.iii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: The Specific Plan does not include specific site designs, nor does it include development plans that may increase surface runoff rates and flooding. The document is intended to guide future land use and propose development scenarios and aesthetic improvements (Highway 111 Development Code) to the Highway 111 Corridor. However, potential future improvements in the area covered by the Specific Plan may alter runoff rates, possibly causing flooding or City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-77 Environmental Analysis — Hydrology and Water Quality exceeding the capacity of the drainage system. The Highway 111 Corridor is largely developed, and any new buildings or facilities must be designed to manage stormwater by directing it into the City's drainage system or retaining it onsite. Adhering to City's development standards would help mitigate impacts related to surface runoff and drainage system overload. Furthermore, future improvements that disturb over one acre of land would be required to develop and implement a SWPPP under NPDES (as mentioned above), which would mitigate impacts associated with stormwater runoff on the environment. Moreover, developments that generate more than 5,000 square feet of new impervious surface are generally required to adhere to Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) regulations, which call for post -construction controls to manage stormwater runoff and safeguard water quality (RCFCWCD, 2015b). Finally, integrating General Plan policy WR-1.6 into future construction and design along the Highway 111 Corridor would promote the adoption of permeable pavements, thereby reducing stormwater impacts caused by runoff. Therefore, impacts are expected to be less than significant with incorporation of Mitigation Measure HWQ-1. Mitigation Measures: HWQ-1. c.iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? Less Than Significant: The Project area includes regions identified by FEMA's NFHL as Zone X and Zone A. Zone X denotes areas with a reduced flood risk due to the presence of levees, while Zone A represents areas situated within the 100-year floodplain. There are no FEMA-regulated floodways in the Project area (FEMA, 2024). Future improvements in flood hazard areas would undergo City Engineer review to ensure compliance with all development requirements. Future improvements would be required to prepare project - specific hydrology studies and water quality management plans. Thus, adherence to City development standards would mitigate impacts related to impeding or redirecting flood flows, and as such, impacts are anticipated to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? Less Than Significant: According to FEMA, the Whitewater River, located along the northern boundary of the Project area, is classified as Zone A. Only a relatively small and select portion of the Project area (approximately one acre area) is located within a flood hazard area (Zone A). This Zone A area is situated along the Whitewater River channelized wash, which lies in the northwest portion of the Project area, where Highway 111 crosses over the wash. However, the Project area outlined in this Specific Plan is an inland area that is not near a large body of water that could release or carry pollutants from a tsunami or seiche. As described above, any future development improvements along the Highway 111 Corridor would be reviewed by City staff for compliance with flood hazard development standards. Additionally, future development may be required to prepare project -specific hydrology and water quality management plans, as needed, to align with City development standards. As such, impacts related to the potential release of pollutants due to project inundation would be reduced and impacts are anticipated to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: As mentioned above, the City's Master Drainage Plan documents the status and locations of all stormwater management facilities (City of La Quinta, 2009). The Whitewater River Region Stormwater Management Plan outlines the activities and programs City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-78 Environmental Analysis — Hydrology and Water Quality undertaken by permittees to effectively manage urban runoff in accordance with the NPDES municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) permit, specifically tailored for the Whitewater River Region (RCFCWCD, 2015a). Additionally, the Whitewater River Region Water Quality Management Plan Guidance Document was created to aid projects in meeting the obligations for addressing post -construction urban runoff from new development and redevelopment projects within the region (RCFCWCD, 2015b). Development planned within the Specific Plan area shall adhere to mitigation measure HWQ-2, which includes water efficiency standards, compliance with development codes, and the use of drought -tolerant landscaping and restricted irrigation methods. Compliance with these requirements would ensure that future enhancements along the Highway 111 Corridor do not hinder the implementation of water quality control or sustainable groundwater management plans. Therefore, impacts are anticipated to be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. Mitigation Measures: HWQ-2. Hydrology and Water Quality Mitigation Measures • HWQ-1: Stormwater Management Practices Prior to the issuance of City building permits, all projects within the Specific Plan area that disturb one acre or more of land must prepare a SWPPP. This plan shall outline suitable BMPs for managing and treating runoff from future development site(s). The applicant is accountable for both preparing and executing the SWPPP in accordance with NPDES requirements. Additionally, the applicant must submit a Notice of Intent to the SWRCB, obtain a Waste Discharge ID Number (WDID), and ensure a copy of the SWPPP is present at the development site throughout the construction phase. • HWQ-2: Water Conservation Measures Future development in the Highway 111 Corridor must integrate water -saving appliances and fixtures, such as low -flush toilets, low -flow showerheads, and faucets, in compliance with Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code, Title 20 of the California Administrative Code Section 1601(b), and relevant sections of Title 24 of the California State Code. Additionally, the City would enforce its Water Efficient Landscape ordinance, requiring development projects within the Specific Plan area to adopt water -efficient landscaping plans that meet or exceed current criteria. These measures are aimed at conserving water resources while addressing the needs of residents and businesses. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-79 Environmental Analysis — Land Use and Planning 3.11 Land Use and Planning Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ✓ b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation ✓ adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Highway 111, traversing the Project area, is recognized as a primary arterial route, featuring a width of six lanes. The City's General Plan Land Use Designation for the Project area is GC. The Specific Plan would continue to implement the mixed -use overlay district, as outlined in the General Plan. The overlay strategically considers the area's ideal location, in close proximity to public facilities, commerce, and major roads. By integrating mixed use development, the Specific Plan aims to create a dynamic blend of commercial, residential, and recreational spaces that can serve the diverse needs of the community. The Project encompasses enhancements to transportation infrastructure, featuring the integration of dedicated bike lanes, enhancements to pedestrian pathways and potentially roundabouts at strategic points of the corridor area. These upgrades aim to facilitate seamless connectivity along the corridor, fostering smoother traffic flow and ensuring safer and more accessible travel options for all users. The proximity to key transportation routes and essential services makes the Project area an ideal location for such development, enhancing accessibility and convenience for residents and visitors alike. The implementation of the Specific Plan is designed to create a more dynamic, interconnected, and sustainable urban setting, aligning with the vision of a vibrant, pedestrian -friendly downtown center. a) Physically divide an established community? No Impact: The Specific Plan outlines seven DSAs that serve as a blueprint for future land use, development standards, and design guidelines in accordance with the City's vision. Development would occur within the existing boundaries of the City without physically dividing any existing neighborhoods in La Quinta. The Specific Plan aims to transform the downtown area into a vibrant and pedestrian -friendly center that serves as the focal point for the community. It envisions a walkable environment that encourages foot traffic and creates a lively atmosphere. The proposed mix of land uses within the Specific Plan is designed to be compatible with the existing uses in the surrounding downtown area and its main thoroughfares. This compatibility ensures a harmonious integration of new developments with the established character and activities of the immediate vicinity. The proposed Project would not physically divide any established community and would result in a negligible impact on the surrounding area. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? No Impact: The proposed Project would be consistent with the land use plans, policy and regulations set forth by the City including the Land Use Element of the General Plan as well as the City's Municipal Code. Consistency with the General Plan Goals and Policies: City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-80 Environmental Analysis — Land Use and Planning The City's General Plan largely consists of a set of guidelines and policies that are in support of improved land use. As per the General Plan, Highway 111 presents the City with a prime opportunity for targeted diverse -purpose development, emphasizing increased housing choices and the creation of pedestrian - friendly spaces that prioritize public accessibility. Highway 111's convenient access to transit options and its proximity to employment centers, schools, and various services make it an ideal location for mixed -use projects. This combination of factors creates a favorable environment for the integration of residential, commercial, and possibly other uses, fostering a vibrant and interconnected community along Highway 111. Within this framework, the vision of the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan aligns with the policies established for La Quinta, particularly those related to land use. Therefore, any future project would need to adhere to the goals, policies, and actions outlined in the General Plan to ensure consistency and compliance with the established framework. The Specific Plan would be consistent with the following relevant goals and implementation policies from the General Plan Land Use Element: Goal Land Use (LU)-5: A broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City. — Implementation Policy LU-5.2 Consider changes in market demand in residential product type to meet the needs of current and future residents. ■ Program LU-5.2a: Periodically review and update, as needed, the standards of the Zoning Ordinance to allow for changes in residential product types without the need for a Specific Plan. Program LU-5.2b: Include detailed residential development standards in the Mixed Use Overlay zoning district. Goal LU-7: Innovative land uses in the Village and on Highway 111. — Implementation Policy LU-7.1: Encourage the use of mixed use development in appropriate locations. ■ Program LU-7.la: Establish a Mixed Use Overlay for all the commercial zoning designations. — Implementation Policy LU-7.2: Mixed Use developments within 300 feet of Highway 111 must include retail commercial development for at least 75% of the ground floor leasable area. — Implementation Policy LU-7.3: Encourage the use of vacant pads in existing commercial development on Highway 111 for residential use. Program LU-7.3a: Amend the Zoning Ordinance to include standards for high density residential development within commercial zones. — Implementation Policy LU-7.4: Develop incentives for Mixed Use projects. Program LU-7.4a: Consider density bonuses, modified parking requirements, expedited entitlement and building permit processing and fee waivers for Mixed Use projects. — Implementation Policy LU-7.8: Encourage the expansion of transit service to meet commuter needs. ■ Program LU-7.8a: Expand transit opportunities on Highway 111 and to the Village to allow a broad range of services (including special event shuttle services). Consistency with the Municipal Code: Title 9 of the City's Municipal Code addresses the zoning regulations. These regulations are established with the aim of advancing public health, safety, and overall well-being in accordance with Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution, the State Planning and Zoning Law (Government Code Section City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-81 Environmental Analysis — Land Use and Planning 65000 et seq.), the CEQA (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), and relevant state statutes. The Highway 111 Specific Plan would adhere to its policies including: Mixed Use Overlay District (9-110.120) Purpose and intent: — To provide opportunities for multifamily residential development in combination with commercial and/or office development in a cohesive and integrated manner. — To facilitate mixed use nodes that minimize vehicle trips and enhance proximity to services and mass transit, consistent with implementation measures CI-13 and ND-4 of the City's GHG Plan, as well as Transportation Demand Management principles. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-82 Environmental Analysis — Mineral Resources 3.12 Mineral Resources Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally - important mineral resource recovery site ✓ delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact: According to the City's General Plan, the only mineral resources in the region are composed of primarily sand and gravel for construction. However, these resources have not been mined in the City for many years. The California DOC, Division of Mines and Geology, has conducted mapping of the City's resources and recognized the presence of three mineral resource zones within the region: MRZ-1 consists of land where no significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood for their presence exists. MRZ-2 consists of land where significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that a high likelihood for their presence exists. MRZ-3 consists of land containing mineral deposits, but the significance cannot be evaluated from available data. The designated region outlined in the Specific Plan is labeled as MRZ-1, suggesting a low probability of substantial mineral resources being present (City of La Quinta, 2022). Therefore, the loss of known mineral resources is not expected and as such, impacts to mineral resources are not anticipated. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact: No locally important mineral resource recovery site is located in the designated Project area covered by the Specific Plan (City of La Quinta, 2022). Therefore, no impacts related to mineral resources are anticipated. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-83 Environmental Analysis — Noise 3.13 Noise Would the project: a) Result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or noise levels? c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Noise, considered an unwanted sound, can have severe physiological and psychological effects, including sleep disturbances and hearing loss. Sound is typically measured in decibels (dB), which quantify changes in air pressure. Traffic noise, however, is usually measured in A -weighted decibels (dBA) since this scale aligns closely with human hearing. It emphasizes mid -range frequencies while giving less importance to very low and very high frequencies, reflecting our natural experience of sounds like traffic. As most noise is measured in dB, people notice a 3 dB increase in noisy areas, a 5 dB rise is clearly noticeable, and a 10 dB increase feels like doubling the loudness. Traffic noise impacts are deemed significant if predicted levels exceed existing noise by 12 dBA or approach within 1 dBA of the noise abatement criterion (NAC) for sensitive areas, with evaluations considering the setting, receptor sensitivity, noise increase magnitude, number of affected residences, and absolute noise level. In California, under Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) protocol, the NAC is 67 dBA for residences, places of worship, and schools. Construction activities and associated equipment can register up to 110 dBA (FHWA, 2024; City of La Quinta, 2022). Table 3.4 below illustrates the impact of loudness on people's subjective perception. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-84 Environmental Analysis — Noise Table 3.4. Loudness Impact on Subjective Perception Threshold of pain 140 Near jet engine 130 Intolerable 120 Deafening Jet fly -over at 300m (1,000 feet) Rock band 110 Loud auto horn 100 Gas lawn mower at 1 m (3 feet) 90 Very Noisy Diesel truck at 15m (50 feet), at Food blender at 1 m (3 feet) 80 80 km/hr 50 mph) Noisy urban area, daytime Vacuum cleaner at 3m (10 feet) 70 Loud Heavy traffic at 90m (300 feet) Normal speech at 1 m (3 feet) 60 Quiet urban daytime Large business office 50 Moderate Theater, large conference room Quiet urban nighttime 40 (background) Quiet suburban nighttime Library 30 Bedroom at night, concert hall Faint Quiet rural nighttime background) 20 Broadcast/recording studio 10 Lowest threshold of human Lowest threshold of human Very Faint 0 ,hearing hearing Hearin Speech Interference Sleep Disturbance No Effect The ambient noise level in a community is the total background sound at any given time, including noise from sources such as traffic, birdsong, conversations, and other environmental sounds. A linear source of noise, such as a roadway, affects a broader area along its length, while a point source, like a factory exhaust, impacts a more localized area around its specific location (USEPA, 1978). In the City, traffic noise is the primary noise source, with levels rising when heavy trucks are more prevalent compared to passenger cars. Other contributors include commercial activities such as air compressors, compactors, landscaping equipment, and daily business operations. Additionally, aircraft noise from Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport, though infrequent, can impact nearby residential areas. The City's General Plan includes the following policies to manage and reduce noise impacts from future development: • Policy N-1.1: Noise standards in the City shall be consistent with the Community Noise and Land Use Compatibility scale described in this Element. • Policy N-1.2: New residential development located adjacent to any roadway identified in Table IV-4 as having a build out noise level in excess of 65 d8A shall continue to be required to submit a noise impact analysis in conjunction with the first Planning Department application, which demonstrates compliance with the City's noise standards. • Policy N-1.3: New non-residential development located adjacent to existing residential development, sensitive receptors or residentially designated land, shall be required to submit a noise impact analysis in conjunction with the first Planning Department application, which City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-85 Environmental Analysis — Noise demonstrates that it will not significantly impact the adjacent residential development or residential land. • Policy N-1.4: All Mixed Use projects shall be required to submit a noise impact analysis in conjunction with the first Planning Department application, which demonstrates compliance with the City's noise standards. • Policy N-1.5: All noise impact analysis will include, at a minimum, short-term construction noise and noise generated by the daily operation of the project at build out. • Policy N-1.6: The City may require remedial noise control plans and/or improvements for areas experiencing noise in excess of adopted City standards. • Policy N-1.7: Noise impact analysis shall be included in all City Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and developer -required roadway widening projects to demonstrate compliance with City noise standards. • Policy N-1.8: Maintain a truck route plan restricting truck travel to arterial roadways. a) Result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated: In the City, traffic noise - especially from heavy trucks - is the most prevalent source of noise, with additional noise coming from commercial activities and daily operations. Section 9.100.210 of the La Quinta Municipal Code sets noise standards, allowing 60 dBA from 7 AM to 10 PM and 50 dBA from 10 PM to 7 AM for sensitive uses, and 75 dBA and 65 dBA, respectively, for nonresidential areas. Construction projects often use heavy equipment that generates noise between 68 dBA and over 100 dBA at 50 feet, with levels decreasing by about 6 dBA for each doubling of distance. However, heavy equipment near sensitive areas can still cause brief periods of excessive noise. To address this, the City's noise ordinance limits construction activities during evenings, weekends, and holidays. To mitigate construction -related noise impacts associated with the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan, projects within the Specific Plan area shall implement NOI-1. Additionally, developments near sensitive receptors would include a construction noise analysis. The addition of mixed use and residential areas along Highway 111 is intended to create a vibrant, interconnected, and pedestrian -friendly downtown. Future development, as outlined by the Specific Plan may temporarily generate construction noise as well as increase longer -term operational noise along the corridor Noise levels are anticipated to be compatible with the urban environment. For future developments along the Highway 111 Corridor, the City may require a noise impact study. Based on this study, projects may need to include noise mitigation measures as per General Plan policies NS-1.1 through NS-1.8, ensuring that noise levels remain acceptable and impacts are minimal. Future development would follow the City's Municipal Code and General Plan policies to ensure traffic noise remains within acceptable levels, preventing exposure beyond these standards. As such, impacts are expected to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: NOI-1. b) Result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or noise levels? Less Than Significant Impact: None of the permitted uses in the proposed Specific Plan area involve excessive vibration or groundborne noise. However, construction of future developments in the area may temporarily cause short-term noise or vibration impacts. The City's General Plan notes that groundborne vibration primarily comes from construction equipment, train activity, and heavy truck traffic. However, City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-86 Environmental Analysis — Noise unlike noise, there is no standardized method for measuring vibration. In the City, most vibration is caused by construction and heavy trucks, as there are no train tracks within the City or its surrounding areas. Over time, the introduction of new vibration sources is not anticipated. While construction equipment and heavy trucks may cause brief, localized vibrations, these are not expected to have a significant impact on the City. The implementation of the Specific Plan would not directly increase groundborne vibration or noise levels. Future development under the Plan would require additional CEQA review and noise/vibration analysis. As such, impacts related to excessive groundborne vibration or noise levels are anticipated to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact: The Bermuda Dunes Airport is approximately 2.7 miles north of the study area and the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport is situated in the community of Thermal approximately 8 miles southeast of the Project area. The Bermuda Dunes Airport is a public use airport that is privately owned. The Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport is also a public use airport and primarily handle business and private air traffic. As airport activity is expected to grow in the future, noise impacts would vary depending on the runway used. One runway, aligned north -south, primarily generates noise to the north and south. The other runway, oriented northwest -southeast, produces noise mainly around the immediate area. Consequently, noise from the airport is not expected to impact areas west of Harrison Street, about 7 miles southeast of the Specific Plan limits. Any future development along the Highway 111 Corridor would not be affected by this airport as the Specific Plan area is northwest of this airport. Due to the distance from the airport, the Specific Plan area is unlikely to experience excessive noise from airport operations. No impacts would occur. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. Noise Mitigation Measures • N0I-1: Noise Reduction All construction activities shall adhere to the City Construction Hours/Quality Assurance Program for designated construction hours, and equipment with internal combustion engines must be equipped with manufacturer -recommended mufflers. Future development projects shall use noise -reducing paving materials during temporary construction activities, such as open -grade asphalt, for all road surfacing, as feasible. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-87 Environmental Analysis — Population and Housing 3.14 Population and Housing Would the project: a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for ✓ example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of ✓ replacement housing elsewhere? Currently, the City of La Quinta has a vibrant population (estimated at 40,000 residents), with expectations of growth in the years ahead. As the City continues to attract new residents and businesses, there is a pressing need to develop its areas thoughtfully, particularly focusing on sustainable practices. The Highway 111 Corridor, a central hub for commercial activities, is slated for development that integrates mixed -use spaces and fosters walkability and connectivity. This approach aims to streamline City functions, ensuring that as the City expands, it does so in a sustainable and community -oriented manner that enhances the overall quality of life for its residents. Through the implementation of the Specific Plan, the Highway 111 Corridor would integrate residential development and mixed -uses alongside its current commercial development, promoting a community design that prioritizes pedestrians and cyclists to enhance overall quality of life and mobility throughout the City. The City must participate in regional efforts mandated by Senate Bill 375 (SB 375), a California state law focused on curbing urban sprawl, promoting sustainable community planning, and cutting down on vehicle trips and air emissions to reduce greenhouse gases. This law mandates "Sustainable Community Strategies" crafted by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), aiming to promote concentrated development, mixed -use areas near job centers, bus routes, and commercial services (City of La Quinta, 2022). The proposed Project's Development Moderate Scenario is projected to introduce around 1,000 residential units (equivalent to 1,464,000 GSF) and approximately 339,000 GSF of additional retail, commercial, hotel, restaurant, and civic spaces within the Specific Plan area. In contrast, the Specific Plan's Development Max Scenario aims to incorporate roughly 1,600 residential units (totaling 1,837,000 GSF) and about 526,000 GSF of new retail, commercial, hotel, restaurant, and civic spaces into the area. The Development Moderate Scenario estimates a total development of approximately 1,803,000 GSF, while the Development Max Scenario estimates approximately 2,363,000 GSF — a 31.08% increase in developed area along the Highway 111 Corridor. See Figure 1-3 and Figure 1-4 for more information on development area scenarios and land use build out. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-88 Environmental Analysis — Population and Housing a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Less than Significant Impact: The Specific Plan is intended to provide guidance for the organized development and redevelopment of local infrastructure, businesses, and housing along the Highway 111 Corridor. The City aims to create a cohesive blueprint that integrates shopping, living, working, and recreational spaces in one interconnected area. This space would be accessible through Highway 111, the CV Link, and other multi -use paths. The implementation of the Specific Plan is expected to take place gradually over a period of 20 to 25 years. If economically feasible, the completion of Specific Plan build out could result in an additional residential area from 1,464,000 GSF (Development Moderate Scenario) to 1,837,000 GSF (Development Max Scenario) for the Highway 111 Corridor. Moreover, including residential units along the Highway 111 Corridor would create housing opportunities in an area traditionally focused on commercial activities, thereby introducing a more diverse and beneficial mix of uses in the region in a sustainable manner. As a guidance document, the proposed Specific Plan does not contain detailed designs or specific proposals for particular sites, nor does it provide authorization for any development activities. Nevertheless, potential enhancements within the Specific Plan area could involve the construction of new residential or commercial properties, which may result in a direct or indirect population increase within the designated area. Even if all the residential, commercial, and hotel developments envisioned by the Specific Plan were built, the population growth associated with these developments would occur gradually over an extended period. Furthermore, any future improvements would likely reference and tier off of this CEQA document to evaluate potential impacts related to population growth and development. Therefore, the overall impact on population growth would be deemed less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Less than Significant Impact: The proposed Project area along the Highway 111 Corridor is currently zoned primarily for commercial purposes, featuring shopping centers, restaurants, and office spaces. This area has traditionally focused on big box retail with limited residential options. However, the proposed Project aims to increase residential opportunities in alignment with the La Quinta General Plan and Municipal Code. This approach ensures that the Specific Plan would not displace individuals or housing but rather diversify land use to accommodate additional residential development. Given its inefficient use of space and sprawling commercial developments, the Highway 111 Corridor presents an opportunity to improve its walkability and accessibility. The proposed development outlined in the Specific Plan seeks to revitalize the area by drawing more people and optimizing land use in the region, thereby encouraging a more dynamic and accessible environment. By promoting land use types that support residential growth, the Specific Plan mitigates potential significant impacts on population resulting from the proposed development scenarios and improvements along the Highway 111 Corridor. As such, impacts are anticipated to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-89 Environmental Analysis — Public Services 3.15 Public Services Would the project: a) Result in substantial adverse physical it associated with the provision of new or altered governmental facilities, need for physically altered governmental facilities construction of which could cause signif environmental impacts, in order to main acceptable service ratios, response tim( performance objectives for any of the pL services: Fire Protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? Highway 111 serves as a crucial arterial corridor in the City of La Quinta, facilitating essential routes for emergency services and access to public facilities. It not only connects the northern residential neighborhoods with the bustling southern commercial core but also links other residences, schools, and public facilities along its path. Highway 111 intersects with Washington Street, a prominent north -south thoroughfare within the City that links Highway 111 to the Civic Center Campus located to the south. Public facilities encompass City -owned buildings such as City Hall, the Library, and the Senior Center, which collectively form the Civic Center Campus. Additionally, facilities include schools operated by either the Desert Sands Unified School District or the Coachella Valley Unified School District. The City is supported by the Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD), offering fire protection and emergency medical services not only to the City itself but also to neighboring areas within Riverside County. Law enforcement services and the protection of public safety are overseen by the Riverside County Sheriffs Department (RCSD). The City features 12 parks that offer a variety of recreational activities and amenities, ensuring both residents and visitors have numerous opportunities for outdoor enjoyment and community gatherings (City of La Quinta, 2022). However, there are no parks located within the Specific Plan area. Most of the City's parks and greenspaces are located outside the Highway 111 Corridor; this route acts as a vital connection, allowing residents to seamlessly access these recreational areas beyond the urban commercial core. Residents of the City currently enjoy access to 72 acres of parks, 146.75 acres of nature preserves with recreational parkland, and 845 acres of regional parks. The City also has joint use agreements with Desert Sands, neighboring cities, and the Desert Recreation District for the use of additional recreation facilities (City of La Quinta, 2022). The proposed development under this Specific Plan seeks to enhance connectivity throughout the City, transforming Highway 111 from a principally vehicular thoroughfare into a unified, integrated corridor for active transportation. The emphasis would be on fostering mixed -use developments that cater to pedestrian and multimodal transportation needs, thereby creating a cohesive urban environment. This approach aims City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-90 Environmental Analysis — Public Services to blend residential, commercial, and recreational spaces seamlessly, promoting a more vibrant and accessible cityscape. As development progresses along the Highway 111 Corridor, there may be heightened demand for fire protection, emergency services, and public facilities, including parks. This growth could necessitate the hiring of additional staff and the construction of new facilities to adequately support the expanding corridor. The General Plan's Emergency Services Element, Public Facilities Element, and Parks and Recreation Element specifically address future requirements for fire, emergency response, and public amenities. a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for public services? Less Than Significant Impact: Possible improvements within the designated Specific Plan area might entail the development of new or expanded residential or commercial properties, potentially leading to a population increase, either directly or indirectly. This may increase the demand for the following public services: 1. Fire Protection and Emergency Services: The proposed Project is aimed at promoting development, which could lead to a rise in demand for fire protection services. As a result, there would likely be a need for both additional personnel and new facilities to accommodate the anticipated growth in the Specific Plan area. The City's General Plan acknowledges the need for expanded fire protection services to meet demands associated with future population growth. Although strategic placement of fire stations is present, additional fire stations would likely be needed in areas where growth occurs (City of La Quinta, 2022). Future development under the Specific Plan could increase the need for additional fire protection and emergency services. Impacts are anticipated to be less than significant as future development would be required to pay Development Impact Fees (DIF) to help offset impacts to fire and emergency services and would be required to be consistent with the following policies from the City's General Plan: Policy ES-1.1: The City shall continue to work with the Riverside County Fire Department to accurately forecast future needs and provide adequate and timely expansion of services and facilities based on service capabilities and response times. - Program ES-1.1a: Maintain the Fire Facilities component of the City's Development Impact Fee to assure that new development pays its fair share of future fire stations. Policy ES-1.2: New Development proposals shall continue to be routed to the Fire Department to assure that project access and design provide for maximum fire and life safety. Program ES- 1.8a: Periodically review and update the Emergency Operations Plan to address the City's growth in population and built environment, as well as new emergency response techniques. 2. Police Protection: The development proposed in the Specific Plan could act as a catalyst for growth, potentially increasing the demand for police protection services. Therefore, there may be a necessity for additional personnel and the construction of new police facilities to adequately accommodate the growth along the Highway 111 Corridor. The City's General Plan acknowledges the potential need for increased police protection services to accommodate population growth. The City follows the standard of one police officer per 1,000 residents (City of La Quinta, 2022). Should City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-91 Environmental Analysis — Public Services future development prompted by this Specific Plan result in a rise in residential units and population, additional officers may be necessary. Impacts on police protection services are expected to be less than significant as future development would be required to pay DIF fees to help offset impacts to police services and development would be required to be consistent with the following policies from the City's General Plan: Policy ES- 1.5: The City shall continue to work with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department to accurately forecast future needs and provide adequate and timely expansion of services and facilities. Policy ES- 1.6: New development proposals shall continue to be routed to the Police Department to assure that project access and design provide for defensible space and maximum crime prevention while maintaining City design standards and codes. 3. Schools: Local schools are managed by two public school districts that offer education from kindergarten through Grade 12: the Desert Sands Unified School District and the Coachella Valley Unified School District (City of La Quinta, 2022). The Desert Sands Unified School District currently serves the corridor area. Although there are no public schools from these districts in the Specific Plan area, population growth, including an increase in school age children, is possible with development facilitated by the Specific Plan. The anticipated population growth could increase the demand for school services and potentially create the need for new or physically altered school facilities. Schools could be built on properties near the Highway 111 Corridor or on sites within the corridor that are served by existing infrastructure. Future development within the corridor area would be required to pay school fees, in the amount set at the time of building permit issuance, to offset any impacts created by additional residential units. As such, impacts on schools are anticipated to be less than significant. The Specific Plan would be consistent with the following policies from the City's General Plan: Policy PF-1.6: The City shall coordinate with the Desert Sands and Coachella Valley Unified School Districts and encourage the Districts to plan for and construct new schools to meet demand. 4. Parks: No parks are located within the Specific Plan area; however, the CV Link is a multi -modal trail system that runs along the Whitewater River at the north boundary of the corridor area and would be available for new residents and patrons in the corridor. It is assumed that population growth would result in an increase in demand for neighborhood and regional parks and other recreational facilities. This Specific Plan supports the creation of additional recreational spaces and pocket parks along the Highway 111 Corridor and a trail connector along the northern side of Highway 111 to connect with the CV Link. The proposed development outlined by this Specific Plan would enhance and potentially expand recreational facilities within the City without causing impacts beyond those anticipated by the City's General Plan. The City's General Plan includes goals and policies to maintain current parks and facilities and to acquire additional parkland for future population growth, as listed below. Section 3.16, Recreation, provides a more detailed overview of the City's recreational assets. The Specific Plan would be consistent with the following policies from the City's General Plan: Goal PR-1: A comprehensive system of parks and recreation facilities and services that meet the active and passive needs of all residents and visitors. Policy PR-1.1 Expand or modify community services to meet the health, well-being, and recreational needs of the community. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-92 Environmental Analysis — Public Services • Policy PR-1.2: Continue to provide a minimum standard of 5 acres of parkland for every 1,000 residents. • Policy PR- 1.3: Identify all viable financing mechanisms for the funding of construction, maintenance, and operation of parks and recreational facilities. • Policy PR- 1.4: The design and construction of parks and recreational facilities shall comply with all the development standards that apply to privately constructed facilities. • Policy PR- 1.5: Coordinate with partner agencies and neighboring communities to expand recreational opportunities and access to recreational facilities. • Policy PR- 1.6: Encourage patterns of development that promote safe pedestrian and bicycle access to schools, public parks, and recreational areas. • Policy PR-1.7: Identify opportunities to integrate public health concerns into parks and trails planning. • Policy PR- 1.8: Promote a healthy and active lifestyle for all residents. 5. Other Public Facilities: Public facilities include City -owned buildings, such as City Hall, the Wellness Center, and the Library, also known as the Civic Center Campus. The General Plan acknowledges that an increase in population would likely require the expansion of public facilities to serve the City's anticipated future growth. The City's CIP is updated annually and would play a key role in the planning and construction of future facilities (City of La Quinta, 2022). Future development would be subject to DIF fees which would offset impacts to public facilities Additionally the Specific Plan would be consistent with the following policies from the City's General Plan: • Policy PF-1.1: The City shall expand or modify municipal services to meet the needs of the community. • Policy PF-1.2: Periodically evaluate the demand for municipal services and facilities, and include construction and expansion of these facilities to assure timely completion. • Policy PF-1.3: The City shall identify all viable financing mechanisms for the funding of construction, maintenance and operation of municipal facilities. • Policy PF-1.4: The design and construction of municipal facilities shall comply with all the processes and development standards that apply to privately constructed facilities. • Policy PF-1.5: The City shall coordinate with the County of Riverside to assure that library facilities and services are expanded as demand warrants. • Policy PF-1.6: The City shall coordinate with the Desert Sands and Coachella Valley Unified School Districts and encourage the Districts to plan for and construct new schools to meet demand. • Policy PF-1.7: The City shall continue to explore the potential for the joint purchase or use of recreational facilities with the Desert Sands and Coachella Valley Unified School Districts, as well as the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-93 Environmental Analysis — Recreation 3.16 Recreation Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? The City currently operates 12 City parks, the Civic Center Campus, and three nature preserve areas. La Quinta Park is the closest park to the Project area outlined in this Specific Plan. Most City parks have children's playground facilities, and the nature preserves offer hiking and bicycling trails for public recreation. The CV Link is currently under construction which would provide a multi -modal trail for La Quinta and CV residents. In addition, many existing subdivisions include public pocket parks. Two regional parks — La Quinta Community Park (6.5 acres) and Lake Cahuilla Regional Park (845 acres) — are managed by the Desert Recreation District and Riverside County Parks Department, respectively. Lake Cahuilla Regional Park charges user fees for day visitors, fishing, and camping. The City collaborates with the Desert Sands Unified School District to share recreational facilities on school grounds, such as the Sports Complex at La Quinta Middle School and soccer fields at Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School. The City is also home to one public and 22 privately owned and operated golf courses, with seven courses available for public use. In total, La Quinta has approximately 5,259 acres designated as recreational open space (City of La Quinta, 2022). a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Less Than Significant Impact: The objective of the proposed Specific Plan is to offer a clear direction for the systematic development and redevelopment of local infrastructure, businesses, and housing. This may lead to a population increase, which may increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks and other recreational facilities. However, by adhering to the City's General Plan, which recognizes that a population increase would necessitate the expansion of public facilities to accommodate growth, no substantial physical deterioration of such facilities would occur (City of La Quinta, 2022). The Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan identifies current and projected demand for parks as the City grows. Adherence to the City's General Plan would ensure that existing park and recreational facilities are expanded in parallel with population increases. Therefore, impacts on neighborhood and recreational facilities are anticipated to be less than significant. Relevant Policies from the General Plan: Policy PR- 1.1 through PR- 1.8 Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-94 Environmental Analysis — Recreation b) Include or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Less Than Significant Impact: Population growth resulting directly or indirectly from the implementation of development scenarios in the Specific Plan may necessitate the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. The Quimby Act, also known as the Quimby Act of 1975 (California Government Code Sections 66477-66484), mandates that local governments require developers to either dedicate land or pay fees for park and recreational purposes when subdividing land or securing a residential development permit. The Act's aim is to guarantee sufficient park and recreational facilities and accompany new residential developments, thereby balancing urban expansion with the demand for public open spaces. The Quimby Act empowers local governments to manage the impact of new residential projects on community parks and recreational amenities. The Quimby Act sets a minimum threshold of 3.0 acres of parklands per 1,000 residents; however, the City has a policy of providing a minimum of 5.0 acres of open space per 1,000 residents. The General Plan acknowledges that expansion of recreational facilities would be needed as the City grows and would be regularly updating the City's Community Service Master Plan to consider a growing demand for services well in advance of need. By adhering to the Land Use, Natural Resources and Parks and Recreational Elements of the City's General Plan, as well as the Community Service Master Plan, impacts to recreational facilities are expected to be less than significant. Relevant Policies from the General Plan: Policy PR- 1.1 through PR- 1.8 Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-95 Environmental Analysis — Transportation 3.17 Transportation Would the project: a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, ✓ roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines ✓ section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous ✓ intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access? ✓ Roadways Highway 111 The Highway 111 Corridor is a six -lane roadway that accommodates upwards of 28,700 vehicles daily (Replica: Hwy 111 WB W/O Washington St, 2023). Within the study area, Highway 111 has a six -lane divided cross-section with 50-mph posted speed limits. There are eight signalized intersections, located at Highway 111 and Washington Street, Simon Drive, La Quinta Center Drive, Adams Street, La Quinta Drive, Dune Palms Road, Costco Drive, and Jefferson Street. Dedicated left turn lanes are provided at all signalized intersections, with nearly all providing dedicated right turn lanes as well. Highway 111 serves as a primary east -west connection through the CV between the City of La Quinta and communities to the northwest, including Palm Springs, Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert, and Indian Wells, and communities to the southeast, including Indio, Coachella, and communities surrounding the Salton Sea and the Imperial Valley. Washington Street Within the study area, Washington Street is a divided six -lane major arterial with a landscaped median, with three left turn lanes and right turn pockets in both directions respectively at the intersection with Highway 111. This portion of Washington Street has a 50-mph posted speed limit and accommodates upwards of 17,900 vehicles daily (Replica: Washington St NB S/O Hwy 111, 2023). Washington Street does not accommodate on -street parking, as the surrounding land use is inward -facing residential and surface lot - facing retail. Signage instructs bicyclists to share the sidewalk on the east side of Washington Street with pedestrians. Ad;;mG Strppt Within the study area, Adams Street is a divided four -lane secondary arterial with a landscaped median between Highway 111 and Avenue 48, with two left turn lanes and right turn pockets in both directions respectively at the intersection with Highway 111. This portion of Adams Street has a 45-mph posted speed limit and accommodates upwards of 3,540 vehicles daily (Replica: Adams St NB N/O Hwy 111, 2023). Adams Street does not accommodate on -street parking due to lane configuration and widths north of City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-96 Environmental Analysis — Transportation Highway 111 and the presence of Class II bike lanes, both buffered and non -buffered, south of Highway 111. Dune Palms Road Within the study area north of Highway 111, Dune Palms Road is an undivided four -lane secondary arterial with two left turn lanes and a right turn pocket at the intersection with Highway 111. South of Highway 111, Dune Palms Road is a divided four -lane arterial with two left turn lanes and a right turn pocket at the intersection with Highway 111. This portion of Dune Palms Road has a 45-mph posted speed limit and accommodates upwards of 2,890 vehicles daily (Replica: Dune Palms Rd NB N/O Hwy 111, 2023). Dune Palms Road does not accommodate on -street parking between Highway 111 and Avenue 48 as there are Class II bike lanes on either side. Partial Class II bike lanes and adjacent land use preclude on -street parking north of Highway 111. Jefferson Street Within the study area, Jefferson Street is a divided six -lane major arterial with a landscaped median, with three left turn lanes and right turn pockets in both directions respectively at the intersection with Highway 111. This portion of Jefferson Street has a 55-mph posted speed limit and accommodates upwards of 18,300 vehicles daily (Replica: Jefferson St SB N/O Hwy 111, 2023). Jefferson Street does not accommodate on -street parking due to the presence of Class II bike lanes. Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities With the suburban nature of the City of La Quinta, multimodal infrastructure is available, including sidewalk and bicycle lanes along and adjoining Highway 111, however, it is often disconnected and distances between destinations are spread out due to the auto -oriented land use patterns along the corridor. Within the study area, pedestrian infrastructure is located along both sides of Highway 111, apart from segments with sidewalk gaps along undeveloped parcels, including east of La Quinta Drive (north side) and east of Dune Palms Road (north side). Sidewalks are most often 8 feet wide, exhibit serpentine alignment, and are separated from motor vehicle traffic by landscape buffers. Crosswalks are provided at signalized intersections of Highway 111/Washington Street (east side only), Highway 111/Simon Drive, Highway 111/La Quinta Center Drive, Highway 111/Adams Street, Highway 111/La Quinta Drive, Highway 111/Dune Palms Road, Highway 111/Costco Drive (east side crossing only), and Highway 111/Jefferson Street. Existing bicycle facilities are sporadic and disconnected, with most portions of Highway 111 containing some form of bicycle facilities in at least one direction, but few, if any, connected to form a complete segment. Class II bicycle lanes are provided along portions of Highway 111 west and east of Washington Street (eastbound only), east of Simon Drive (eastbound only), east of La Quinta Center Drive (eastbound only), west of Adams Street (westbound only), between Adams Street and Dune Palms Road (both directions), and between Dune Palms Road and Jefferson Street (westbound only). Due to the number of vehicle lanes, high speeds, and bike infrastructure lacking physical separation between active modes and motor vehicles, the segment level of traffic stress on nearly all study area roadways is LTS 4 or LTS 3. Segment LTS 1 is found on Simon Drive and La Quinta Center Drive due to fewer lanes and slower speeds. Construction is ongoing for the planned CV Link project, an alternative transportation project connecting eight cities and two tribes in the CV, providing a regional multi -use path for bicycles and pedestrians that parallels the Highway 111 Corridor to the north throughout the Specific Plan area. The CV Link would provide an alternative to automobile travel for residents and visitors, reducing vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and providing alternative mobility options for people of all ages and abilities. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-97 Environmental Analysis Public Transit Existing regional transit routes in the study area include Route 1 EV, Route 7, Route 700, and Route 701, all operated by SunLine Transit Agency. Route 1 EV runs on Highway 111, connecting Town Center Way in Palm Desert (and connecting transit routes, like Route 1 WV) with the City of Coachella. Route 7 provides transit service between the communities of Bermuda Dunes and La Quinta, connecting with the Highway 111 Corridor along Adams Street. Routes 700 and 701 are school "tripper buses" providing supplemental transit service to and from La Quinta High School on school days. Airports The Bermuda Dunes Airport is a public use airport located along Avenue 42 adjacent to the Jefferson Street/1-10 interchange approximately 2.7 miles north of the study area. Additionally, the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport is approximately 8 miles southeast of the study area in Thermal, California. a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? No Impact: The Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan includes urban design concepts that outline the proposed streetscape enhancements envisioned for the Highway 111 Corridor area. The Specific Plan would potentially increase traffic in the area along Highway 111. The CV Link's proximity to Highway 111 brings several advantages. First and foremost, it allows for enhanced accessibility, with multiple access points and entryways along the route, making it convenient for users to connect to various neighborhoods, businesses, parks, and other points of interest throughout the region. Additionally, being closely aligned with the highway can increase visibility and awareness, promoting the usage of the pathway among the public. The Project proposes several complete street improvements in the study area to create a multimodal corridor that is safe and comfortable for all users. Transportation improvements include reduced vehicular travel lane widths, signs, and pavement markings, enhanced bicycle and pedestrian facilities like Class II bike lanes, green conflict striping, widened sidewalks, curb extensions (bulb -outs), high visibility crossing treatments, and reduced vehicular conflict zones. Additionally, the Specific Plan would be consistent with the City's General Plan Circulation Goal, CIR-1, as outlined below: CIR-1: A transportation and circulation network that efficiently, safely and economically moves people, vehicles, and goods using facilities that meet the current demands and projected needs of the City. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? No Impact: The Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan is not anticipated to conflict with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 criteria for analyzing transportation impacts effective July 1, 2020 concerning VMT. The VMT screening described below meets the requirements stipulated by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 (b) and incorporates relevant advice contained in the Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA published by the Governor's Office of Planning & Research (OPR) in December 2018. Section 15064.3 of the State CEQA Guidelines describes the requirements for assessing transportation impacts based on VMT that applied statewide beginning July 1, 2020. As described in Section 15064.3: City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-98 Environmental Analysis "Vehicle miles traveled" refers to the amount and distance of automobile travel "attributable to a project." Other relevant considerations may include the effects of the project on transit or nonmotorized travel. As described separately in the Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (OPR, December 2018), VMT re-routed from other origins or destinations as the result of a project would not be attributable to a project except to the extent that the re-routing results in a net increase in VMT. For example, OPR guidelines note that retail projects typically re-route travel from other retail destinations, and therefore a retail project may lead to increases or decreases in VMT, depending on previously existing travel patterns. Similarly, a large share of retail trips are "pass -by trips" that would not be considered attributable to a retail project. Lead agencies have discretion to choose the most appropriate methodology to evaluate a project's vehicle miles traveled, including whether to express the change in absolute terms, per capita, per household, or any other measure. If existing models or methods are not available to estimate the vehicle miles traveled for the particular project being considered, a lead agency may evaluate the project's vehicle miles traveled qualitatively. A lead agency may use models to estimate a project's vehicle miles traveled and may revise those estimates to reflect professional judgment based on substantial evidence. VMT Screening The City's Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis Policy indicates that residential and office projects located within a low VMT-generating area may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. In addition, other employment -related and mixed -use land use projects may qualify for the use of screening if the project can reasonably be expected to generate VMT per resident, per worker, or per service population that is similar to the existing land uses in the low VMT area. The Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan covers multiple Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) of the Riverside County Transportation Model (RIVTAM/RIVCOM), including TAZ 913, 920, 926, 929, 930, and 937. Based on the model, the citywide VMT per Capita is 14.98 while the VMT for the Specific Plan area TAZs are as follows: • TAZ 913: 12.92 • TAZ 920: 12.50 • TAZ 926: 12.74 • TAZ 929: 0.00 • TAZ 930: 11.45 • TAZ 937: 0.00 The VMT for each TAZ is lower than the City threshold for the base year (2018). Based on these findings, the Specific Plan does not require a VMT analysis as there is no impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-99 Environmental Analysis c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? No Impact: The Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan is not anticipated to substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment). The Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan recommends the implementation of protected intersections, curb extensions, lane width reductions, turn lane reductions, Class II bike lanes with green conflict markings, high -visibility crosswalks, and Class I shared -use paths along the Highway 111 Corridor. Transportation improvements along other key corridors in the study area include roundabouts, curb extensions, reduced lane widths, Class II bike lanes with green conflict markings, and high -visibility crosswalks. With these recommended infrastructure improvements, the Specific Plan aims to reduce hazards by reducing pedestrian crossing distances, providing high visibility crossing treatments, and reducing vehicular conflict zones. The General Plan includes policies that would ensure efficient circulation and adequate access are provided in the City. Future development under the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan, as part of the City's project approval process, would be required to comply with existing regulations, including General Plan policies and zoning regulations that have been prepared to minimize impacts related to design features. Adherence to state and City requirements, combined with compliance with the City's General Plan and zoning regulations, would ensure that the adoption of the proposed Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan would result in no impact with respect to an increase in hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible uses. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. d) Result in inadequate emergency access? No Impact: The Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan is not anticipated to result in inadequate emergency access. The Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan proposes mixed -use development along the corridor, enhancing pedestrian and bicycle access, implementing parking solutions, and increasing the density of residential and commercial spaces. This aims to foster a more connected and community -centered downtown area. Roadway improvements proposed under the Specific Plan would enhance the connectivity and mobility of the downtown area and would not impede emergency vehicle access. As previously stated, transportation improvements along the Highway 111 Corridor focus on enhancing safety for pedestrians and vehicles through improved visibility at crosswalks and minimizing areas of vehicular conflict. Furthermore, the City's General Plan includes policies that would ensure adequate emergency access. Future development within the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan, as part of the City's project approval process, must adhere to current regulations. These include General Plan policies and zoning regulations specifically designed to mitigate impacts concerning emergency access. The City, throughout the multi -year buildout period of the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan, would ensure relevant coordination with local emergency response providers. Adherence to state and City requirements, combined with compliance with the City's General Plan and zoning regulations, would ensure that the adoption of the proposed Specific Plan would result in no impact with respect to inadequate emergency access. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-100 Environmental Analysis 3.18 Tribal Cultural Resources Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of ✓ Historic Resources, or in a local register of historic resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of the Public Resources Code ✓ section 5024.1? In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of the Public Resources Code section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American Tribe. The La Quinta area is home to the Desert Cahuilla Indians, who were the first ancestors of the La Quinta area, settling into the Martinez Canyon in the early 1800s (SCTCA, 2024). The CEQA Guidelines define a tribal cultural resource as: (1) a site, feature, place, cultural landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe that is listed or eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources, or on a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k); or (2) a resource determined by the Lead Agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant according to the historical register criteria in Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(c), and considering the significance of the resource to a California Native American Tribe. AB 52 established a formal consultation process for California tribes within the CEQA process. AB 52 must be completed before a CEQA document can be certified. AB 52 specifies that any project may affect or cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource that would require a lead agency to "begin consultation with a California Native American Tribe that is traditional and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed Project." Section 21074 of AB 52 also defines a new category of resources under CEQA called "tribal cultural resources." Tribal cultural resources are defined as "sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe" and is either listed on or eligible for the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR) or a local historic register, or if the lead agency chooses to treat the resource as a tribal cultural resource. California Native American Tribes to be included in the process are those that have requested notice of projects proposed within the jurisdiction of the Lead Agency. Native American Consultation On March 14, 2024, the City initiated the tribal consultation process for the purposes of AB 52, in conjunction with SIB 18 consultation for the Specific Plan, for the proposed Project. Initial consultation letters were sent to all of the Native American tribal governments listed on the NAHC contact list, per the City's AB City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-101 Environmental Analysis 52 protocol (Appendix C: Cultural Resources). The letters provided a summary of the Project and requested information regarding comments or concerns the tribal governments might have regarding the proposed Project. Letters were sent to the following tribal governments: • Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians • Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians • Cabazon Band of Mission Indians • Cahuilla Band of Indians • Campo Band of Diegueno Mission Indians • Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians • La Posta Band of Diegueno Mission Indians • Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla and Cupeno Indians • Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay Nation • Mesa Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians • Morongo Band of Mission Indians • Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation • Ramona Band of Cahuilla • Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians • Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians • Torres -Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians • Twenty -Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians The City received responses from two tribes: the Morongo Band of Mission Indians and the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (Appendix C: Cultural Resources). The Morongo Band stated that the project site is not within their ancestral territory or traditional use area. The Agua Caliente Band indicated that, although the project area is outside their reservation boundaries, it lies within their Traditional Use Area, and a records search identified nearby surveys that confirmed the presence of cultural resources. For a summary of the investigation and mitigation measures related to cultural and tribal resources, see Section 3.5 Cultural Resources and Appendix C: Cultural Resources. a,b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historic Resources, or in a local register of historic resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)? Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of the Public Resources Code section 5024.1? In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of the Public Resources Code section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American Tribe? Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: As discussed in Section 3.5, Cultural Resources, the analysis relies on a search of the SLF conducted by the NAHC on March 8, 2024. The search included a review of the CRHR as well as local registers yielding no specific site information, indicating a negative result. However, it is essential to understand that the absence of such information in the SLF search does not necessarily imply the absence of cultural resources within the Project area. Due to the negative result, the tribes (referenced above) were contacted to satisfy the AB 52 consultation requirement under CEQA. This analysis is also based on a review of cultural records accessed through the CHRIS EIC at the University of California, Riverside. The examination of records occurred on January 22, 2024 involving a comprehensive review of maps, documents, and reports relevant to the Project area. The findings revealed that there have been 92 studies on cultural resources conducted within the approximately 410 acres of the proposed Project area, with 56 documented cultural resource properties identified within its boundaries. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-102 Environmental Analysis Refer to Appendix C: Cultural Resources for the SLF search results and the Non -Confidential Cultural Records Search report. Potential future development may be required to prepare cultural resources reports to assess site -specific impacts. As mentioned previously, a prior study identified two prehistoric resources (P-33-008692/CA-RIV- 006190, P-33-002936/CA-RIV-002936) in the Project area near Dune Palms Road and Highway 111 (Hallock et al., 2023). As such, if tribal cultural resources are disturbed or discovered during future development, it could result in a significant impact. Therefore, implementing Mitigation Measures CR-1 through CR-9 during subsequent development phases would mandate further documentation of any tribal cultural resources within the Project area, thereby minimizing impacts to a level deemed less than significant. Mitigation Measures • CR-1: Workers Environmental Awareness Program A Qualified Archaeologist who meets or exceeds the Secretary of Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology (NPS, 1983) shall conduct Workers Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) training on archaeological sensitivity for all construction personnel prior to the commencement of any ground -disturbing activities. Archaeological sensitivity training shall include a description of the types of cultural material that may be encountered, cultural sensitivity issues, the regulatory environment, and the proper protocol for treatment of the materials in the event of a find. The WEAP training document shall include materials that convey the information noted above, which shall be maintained in an area accessible to all construction personnel so that it may be reviewed regularly by construction staff. • CR-2: Pre -Excavation Agreement Prior to the issuance of Grading Permits, the Applicant/Owner shall enter into a pre -excavation agreement, otherwise known as a Tribal Cultural Resources Treatment and Tribal Monitoring Agreement with consulting Tribal Monitor associated within the area. A copy of the agreement shall be included in building and development plans and permit applications with the City. The purpose of this agreement shall be to formalize protocols and procedures between the Applicant/Owner and the consulting Tribal Monitor associated with the area for the protection and treatment of, including but not limited to, Native American human remains, funerary objects, cultural and religious landscapes, ceremonial items, and traditional gathering areas and tribal cultural resources located and/or discovered through a monitoring program in conjunction with the construction of the proposed project, including additional archaeological surveys and/or studies, excavations, geotechnical investigations, grading, and all other ground disturbing activities. At the discretion of the consulting Tribal Monitor, artifacts may be made available for 3D scanning/printing, with scanned/printed materials to be curated at a local repository meeting the federal standards of 36CFR79. • CR-3: Retention of Qualified Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permits, the Applicant/Owner or Grading Contractor shall provide executed contracts or agreements with a Qualified Archaeologist and consulting Tribal Monitor, at the Applicant/Owner or Grading Contractor's expense, to implement the monitoring program, as described in the pre -excavation agreement. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-103 Environmental Analysis • CR-4: Tribal Cultural Monitor Coordination During Ground Disturbing Activities The Qualified Archaeologist and consulting Tribal Monitor shall attend all applicable pre -construction meetings with the General Contractor and/or associated subcontractors to present the archaeological monitoring program. The Qualified Archaeologist and consulting Tribal Monitor shall be present on -site full-time during grubbing, grading, and/or other ground altering activities, including the placement of imported fill materials or fill used from other areas of the Project site, to identify any evidence of potential archaeological or tribal cultural resources. All fill materials shall be absent of any and all tribal cultural resources. • CR-5: Controlled Grade Procedure The Qualified Archaeologist and consulting Native American Monitor shall attend all applicable pre - construction meetings with the General Contractor and/or associated subcontractors to present the archaeological monitoring program. The Qualified Archaeologist and consulting Tribal Monitor shall be present on -site full-time during grubbing, grading, and/or other ground altering activities, including the placement of imported fill materials or fill used from other areas of the Project site, to identify any evidence of potential archaeological or tribal cultural resources. All fill materials shall be absent of any and all tribal cultural resources. • CR-6: Discovery of Tribal Cultural Resources The Qualified Archaeologist and consulting Tribal Monitor can stop ground -disturbing activities if undiscovered tribal cultural resources or artifacts are found. All work must cease in the vicinity of any archaeological discovery until the Qualified Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor can assess the context of the find, including its significance, potential eligibility for the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), and whether the project would have a direct impact on the resource. If buried cultural deposits are encountered, the Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor may request that construction halt nearby and must notify a Qualified Archaeologist within 24 hours for investigation. Work will be redirected away from these areas for assessment. Minor finds will be documented and secured for later repatriation; if items cannot be securely stored on -site, they may be stored off -site. Minor finds include archaeological materials that are isolated, lack context, and are unlikely to indicate a larger or significant site. If the discovered resources are deemed potentially significant, the involved Tribes will be notified for consultation on their respectful treatment. Avoidance of significant resources is preferred, but if not feasible, a data recovery plan may be required. The consulting Tribes will be consulted on this plan as well. For resources under a data recovery plan, a proper sample will be collected using professional methods, reflecting tribal values. The Tribal Monitor must be present during any resource collection or cataloging. If the Qualified Archaeologist does not collect the resources, the Tribal Monitor may do so. Ground -disturbing work will not resume until the resources are documented and/or protected. • CR-7: Treatment of Tribal Cultural Resources The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources unearthed during all ground disturbing activities, and from any previous archaeological studies or excavations on the Project site to the affiliated consulting Tribe, as determined through the appropriate process, for respectful and dignified treatment and disposition, including reburial at a protected location on -site, in accordance with the Tribe's cultural and spiritual traditions. All cultural materials that are associated with burial City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-104 Environmental Analysis and/or funerary goods would be repatriated to the Most Likely Descendant as determined by the NAHC per California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. No tribal cultural resources shall be subject to curation. • CR-8: Tribal Cultural Monitoring Report A monitoring report and/or evaluation report, if appropriate, which describes the results, analysis, and conclusions of the archaeological monitoring program (e.g., data recovery plan) shall be submitted by the Qualified Archaeologist, along with the consulting Tribal Monitor's notes and comments, to the City of La Quinta Planning Division for approval. • CR-9: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains As specified by California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, if human remains are found on the Project site during construction or during archaeological work, the person responsible for the excavation, or his or her authorized representative, shall immediately notify the Riverside County Coroner's Office by telephone. No further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the Coroner Medical Examiner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code 5097.98. If such a discovery occurs, a temporary construction exclusion zone shall be established surrounding the area of the discovery so that the area would be protected, and consultation and treatment could occur as prescribed by law. If suspected Native American remains are discovered, the remains shall be kept in -situ, or in a secure location in close proximity to where they were found, and the analysis of the remains shall only occur on -site in the presence of a Tribal Monitor. By law, the Coroner Medical Examiner shall determine within two working days of being notified if the remains are subject to his or her authority. If the Coroner Medical Examiner identifies the remains to be of Native American ancestry, he or she shall contact the NAHC within 24 hours. The NAHC shall make a determination as to the Most Likely Descendent. If human remains are discovered, notify the consulting Tribe's Tribal Historic Preservation Officer. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-105 Environmental Analysis 3.19 Utilities and Service Systems Would the project: a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electrical power, natural ✓ gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future ✓ development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the ✓ project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local ✓ infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to ✓ solid waste? As the City continues to grow, the provision of essential public and quasi -public services becomes increasingly critical. This is especially true for areas like the Highway 111 Corridor, where utilities play a pivotal role in supporting future development. Adequate utilities — such as water, sewer, electricity, natural gas, and telecommunications — are fundamental for implementing the Specific Plan. Without these services, the planned development and expansion could be significantly hindered or even unachievable. Ensuring robust and reliable utility infrastructure is, therefore, essential for accommodating growth and achieving the City's long-term vision for development. The Specific Plan would create a mix of land uses guided by site -specific development standards (i.e., Highway 111 Development Code) to ensure alignment with the City's General Plan. It would also encourage water conservation features, such as low -flow plumbing fixtures, drought -tolerant native landscaping, and efficient irrigation systems. The City's General Plan recognizes the need for sufficient water, sewer, and other utilities to support planned growth and anticipated population increases in the coming years. The Water, Sewer and other Utilities Element as well as the Natural Resources: Water Resources Element of the General Plan establishes goals, policies, and programs to ensure these services are provided as the City grows (City of La Quinta, 2022). Relevant General Plan policies are outlined in detail below in response to question b). City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-106 Environmental Analysis Domestic Water The City of La Quinta relies primarily on groundwater from the CV Groundwater Basin for its domestic water supply. This groundwater is extracted through a network of wells managed by the CVWD, which also oversees the City's irrigation and water distribution services. In addition to groundwater, CVWD supplements the City's water needs with imported water, delivered via regional canals. This imported water is stored or recharged into the aquifer through basins located in the west end of the Valley, such as the Whitewater River northwest of Palm Springs, as well as through facilities in Martinez Canyon and a dike in the southeastern section of the City. CVWD operates and maintains an extensive water distribution system, primarily located beneath existing streets in the public right-of-way. CVWD also manages water storage tanks throughout the area with capacities ranging from 250,000 to 10 million gallons (City of La Quinta, 2022). Under the California Water Code, CVWD is responsible for assessing both current and future water supplies to ensure that adequate resources are available for the City's land uses. This includes the preparation of an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) to address and plan for the City's ongoing and future water needs. Sanitary Sewer CVWD also manages sanitary sewer collection and treatment for the City, with most areas served by sewer systems, though some parts of the City still use septic systems. The City is served by two wastewater treatment plants. Wastewater from the northern part of the City, north of Miles Avenue, is directed to Water Reclamation Plant 7 on Madison Street and Avenue 38, which has a capacity of 5 million gallons per day (mgd). Wastewater from areas south of Miles Avenue is treated at the Mid -Valley Water Reclamation Plant, located southeast of the City, with a capacity of 9.5 mgd. Water Reclamation Plant 7 currently produces 2.5 mgd of tertiary treated water for irrigation, with the potential to expand to 7.5 mgd. The Mid -Valley plant does not yet provide tertiary treated water, but there are plans to extend this system to other areas (City of La Quinta, 2022). Electricity Power in the City is supplied by the IID, a public utility serving various parts of Southern California. IID delivers power through its own generation and contractual agreements, with electricity transmitted at 92 or 161 kilovolts to its substations and then reduced to 12 kilovolts for distribution (City of La Quinta, 2022). Natural Gas Natural gas is the main energy source in the City of La Quinta, supplied by Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas), the largest natural gas utility in the U.S. with extensive coverage across southern California. Major gas supply lines run along Washington Street and Highway 111. However, natural gas service is less extensive in the southern part of the City, especially south of Airport Boulevard and east of Monroe Street (City of La Quinta, 2022; City of La Quinta, 2024c). Solid Waste Management Burrtec Waste and Recycling Services, LLC (Burrtec) manages solid waste disposal in La Quinta. Burrtec collects waste and transport it to the Edom Hill Transfer Station in Cathedral City, where it is then sent to regional landfills with sufficient long-term capacity: Lamb Canyon, Badlands, or El Sobrante. Burrtec also oversees recycling for residential and commercial sectors, covering paper, plastic, glass, aluminum, and City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-107 Environmental Analysis green waste. The City meets its requirement to recycle at least 50% of its waste. Additionally, Burrtec handles special programs for household hazardous waste, construction and demolition materials, medical sharps, and commercial recycling (City of La Quinta, 2022; City of La Quinta, 2024c). Telecommunications In the City, Verizon serves as the primary landline telephone provider, while Time Warner is the main cable TV provider. The City has seen a range of communication options evolve due to advancements in technology and changes in regulations. Residents and businesses now have access to various services, including cellular, internet-based communication, fiber optic networks, and cable -based solutions. Several telecommunications companies such as Spectrum, which offers cable TV, internet, and phone services, AT&T, which provides internet, phone, and TV services, and Frontier Communications, which delivers internet and phone services with varying availability, cater to these needs (City of La Quinta, 2022). As the City continues to grow, it is anticipated that new technologies would further enhance communication and data transfer capabilities for both its residents and businesses. a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electrical power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant Impact: Under the Specific Plan, if the proposed buildout is economically feasible, it is expected to lead to a substantial increase in the construction of new buildings and utilities as well as the expansion of existing ones. This growth would entail the addition of significant square footage dedicated to various purposes, including residential, retail, office spaces, and hotels. Consequently, there would be a heightened demand for essential utilities and infrastructure to support these developments effectively. To accommodate the increased requirements of such development, various utility facilities would need to be constructed or expanded. These utilities may encompass water supply and distribution systems, wastewater treatment plants, stormwater drainage systems, electrical power infrastructure, natural gas distribution networks, and telecommunications facilities. Each of these systems plays a crucial role in providing the necessary resources for the functioning of residential and commercial properties, ensuring that businesses can thrive and residents have access to essential services. To address the potential environmental impacts associated with this buildout, the Specific Plan emphasizes the importance of adhering to the Water, Sewer, and Other Utilities Element within the City's General Plan. This element outlines comprehensive guidelines and regulations regarding the development and management of utility facilities based on current and future projected population growth within the City. Additionally, the Natural Resources: Water Resources Element of the City's General Plan is another crucial aspect considered in this context, which focuses on water resource management and conservation to meet the needs of current and future development within the City. By adhering to these General Plan guidelines and the goals outlined by this Specific Plan, developers and authorities can ensure that future construction and expansion of utility facilities are conducted in sustainable manner. Additionally, future development in the Specific Plan area will utilize this impact analysis for environmental assessments, offering a programmatic overview that will likely be tiered from this document to evaluate impacts on new or expanded utilities within the area. As such, impacts on utility systems as a result of this Specific Plan implementation are anticipated to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-108 Environmental Analysis b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated: As the new developments under the Specific Plan commence, they would require a reliable and adequate water supply to meet the needs of their occupants and operations. This includes not only the water required for residential purposes but also for commercial activities, hotel services, landscaping, and other essential functions within these structures. To accommodate the heightened demand, proper planning and management of water resources become crucial. This may involve assessing the existing water infrastructure and identifying potential upgrades or expansions to ensure sufficient supply to meet the new demand. It might also require exploring sustainable water management practices, such as rainwater harvesting, water recycling, or implementing water -efficient technologies and fixtures, to minimize excessive water consumption. CVWD is responsible under the California Water Code for evaluating current and future water supplies to meet district needs. The UWMP is regularly updated to ensure it remains current. Due to ongoing growth and increased demand, CVWD has overdrafted from the Lower Thermal subarea since the 1980s. To address this, CVWD is expanding recharge facilities and emphasizing water conservation, crucial for managing overdraft as the city continues to grow. Additionally, all new residential and nonresidential buildings in California must follow the CalGreen Codes. These codes mandate a 20% reduction in indoor water use through efficient fixtures and require irrigation systems that prevent waste by monitoring soil and weather conditions. Please refer to California Department of General Services for the most recent CalGreen Codes (DGS, 2024). Over the next 25 years, the codes would become progressively stricter to further conserve water (City of La Quinta, 2022). All new development projects would necessitate domestic water for indoor use and landscaping irrigation, which would put additional strain on the already limited water resources. To address this, the City has already taken steps to implement water conservation initiatives and would need to persistently and further expand these efforts to safeguard its water resources (City of La Quinta, 2022). By adhering to the goals and objectives outlined in the City's General Plan as well as this Specific Plan, future development can reduce potential impacts on water resources to a less than significant level with the incorporation of proposed mitigation measure HWQ-2. Relevant Policies from the General Plan: • Policy WR-1.1: Support the Coachella Valley Water District in its efforts to supply adequate domestic water to residents and businesses. • Policy WR-1.2: Support the Coachella Valley Water District in its efforts to recharge the aquifer. • Policy UTL-1.1: The City should coordinate with the Coachella Valley Water District to assure that sufficient water supplies are available to sustain current and future development. • Policy UTL-1.2: The City should encourage the conservation of water. — Program UTL-1.2a: Develop programs, both in conjunction with the Coachella Valley Water District and independently, to allow and encourage the retrofitting of existing water -intensive appliances and irrigation systems in existing development — Program UTL-1.2b: City and private sector development projects shall implement water efficient landscaping plans which meet or exceed current water efficiency standards. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-109 Environmental Analysis Policy UTL-1.3: New development shall reduce its projected water consumption rates over "business -as -usual" consumption rates. Policy UTL-1.4: Review and amend Development Standards to require that all new development demonstrate a reduction of domestic water consumption equivalent to, or exceeding, the CalGreen Tier One standards in effect at the time of development. Mitigation Measures: HWQ-2. c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Less Than Significant Impact: Future development scenarios outlined in the Specific Plan would likely increase the need and demand for wastewater treatment. Future development would need to adhere to Building Code requirements that mandate the incorporation of water -efficient fixtures in new homes or businesses and in those undergoing major remodeling. These regulations also apply to water features, and fountains, as they can be a significant source of water loss, especially considering the evaporation that occurs in the City's desert environment. The City also mandates that all development projects must manage and regulate rainwater runoff that flows through a developed site, typically achieved by constructing retention basins. These basins are often landscaped and designed to enable stormwater to soak into the ground, promoting natural percolation (City of La Quinta, 2022). Therefore, future development under the Specific Plan would be required to adhere to these requirements. The Specific Plan offers conceptual guidance for future development. Developers can reference this Specific Plan and if needed, create a tiered CEQA document to further assess the need for expanding existing wastewater treatment facilities or adding individual septic systems to accommodate growth in the area. As such, impacts are expected to be less than significant. Relevant Policies from the General Plan: Policy WR-1.3: Support the Coachella Valley Water District in its efforts to expand tertiary treated (i.e. reclaimed) water distribution. Policy WR-1.4: Protect stormwater from pollution and encourage its use to recharge the aquifer. Policy WR-1.6: Encourage the use of permeable pavements in residential and commercial development projects. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. d, e) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Less than Significant Impact: As development continues to grow under the Specific Plan, there would be a corresponding rise in the volume of solid waste generated. Burrtec provides waste disposal services under a franchise agreement with the City, collecting solid waste and transporting it to the Edom Hill Transfer Station in Cathedral City. From there, waste is taken to one of three regional landfills — Lamb City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-110 Environmental Analysis Canyon, Badlands, or El Sobrante — which have sufficient capacity for long-term needs (City of La Quinta, 2022). Thus, impacts are expected to be less than significant. All future developments would be required to comply with the diversion requirements, Municipal Code requirements and the City's General Plan policies. These requirements would maximize waste stream diversions and help reduce solid waste disposal impacts related to compliance with federal, state, and local regulations related to the solid waste generated from future development in accordance with the Specific Plan. The City is committed to recycling at least 50% of its solid waste, a target it currently meets. Burrtec manages specialized programs for household hazardous waste, construction materials, medical "sharps," and commercial recycling (City of La Quinta, 2022). Future site -specific development would be required to abide by relevant laws and regulations governing solid waste disposal treatment. As such, impacts associated with solid waste are expected to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. Utilities and Service Systems Mitigation Measures • HWQ-2: Water Conservation Measures Future development in the Highway 111 Corridor must integrate water -saving appliances and fixtures, such as low -flush toilets, low -flow showerheads, and faucets, in compliance with Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code, Title 20 of the California Administrative Code Section 1601(b), and relevant sections of Title 24 of the California State Code. Additionally, the City would enforce its Water Efficient Landscape ordinance, requiring development projects within the Specific Plan area to adopt water -efficient landscaping plans that meet or exceed current criteria. These measures are aimed at conserving water resources while addressing the needs of residents and businesses. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-111 Environmental Analysis 3.20 Wildfire Would the project: a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides as a result of runoff, post -fire slop instability, or drainage changes? The Project area is located in the City's urban core and is not in proximity to a Fire Hazard Severity Zone (CAL FIRE, 2023). The nearest moderate Fire Hazard Severity Zone is approximately 5 miles southwest of the Project area. a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Less Than Significant Impact: The LHMP for the City underscores a commitment to construction regulations that prioritize safety. This involves adopting and rigorously enforcing existing building codes, with provisions for promptly amending them when local deficiencies are identified, all aimed at ensuring the community's safety. All new construction projects are required to adhere to the City's Building or Fire Codes to ensure all future development meets the prescribed minimum standards for fire safety. These standards are determined by factors such as the building type, design, intended occupancy, and usage. To further enhance fire safety measures, the City has entered into an agreement with the RCFD for comprehensive fire services. These services encompass not only firefighting capabilities but also extend to community outreach initiatives aimed at promoting fire safety awareness and prevention strategies (City of La Quinta, 2022). Future developments would be required to implement the LHMP and General Plan policies regarding emergency response and evacuation; therefore, impacts are anticipated to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-112 Environmental Analysis b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed area under the Specific Plan is not considered a Fire Hazard Severity Zone (CAL FIRE, 2023). While the City itself may not be situated within a wilderness expanse, the potential for wildland fires within its vicinity remains substantial due to the juxtaposition of wildland and urban zones. The extensive development in the City and surrounding environment has resulted in what is known as the Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI), a terrain that presents a heightened susceptibility to wildland fires. This vulnerability is exacerbated by the prevalence of extended drought periods and the prevalent aridity in these locales, rendering them particularly prone to wildfires (City of La Quinta, 2022). Furthermore, the influence of Santa Ana winds provides an additional fire safety concern. These winds possess the capability to swiftly propagate wildfires across the community. The threat of wildland fire occurrences extends far beyond isolated areas; it blankets approximately 90% of Riverside County, reaching into the City. This includes open spaces, parklands, and agricultural regions. Therefore, the issue of wildland fire hazards is a complex concern with wide -reaching implications for the entire region. This underscores the need for comprehensive attention and strategic actions to effectively manage and mitigate the associated risks. (City of La Quinta, 2022). Development under the Specific Plan would include the development of Medium -Hazard Occupancies as defined by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), however, by adhering to and enforcing established mandates, such as the California Building Code, California Fire Code, La Quinta Municipal Codes, CEQA Statutes and Guidelines, and other pertinent fire safety regulations, the mitigation of fire - related risks can be effectively managed (La Quinta, 2022). Therefore, less than significant impacts are anticipated. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? Less Than Significant Impact: The Specific Plan serves as a policy -level document designed to guide future development along the Highway 111 Corridor. Consequently, any future projects within the Specific Plan area will likely reference and tier off of this CEQA document to further assess infrastructure constraints related to fire risks. Additional discussion of water sources and utilities can be found in Section 3.19 of this IS/MND. Future projects may necessitate additional infrastructure to adequately support new development. Any future development would require further CEQA review to ensure that proposed improvements do not entail infrastructure that could worsen wildfire risks. The adoption and implementation of developments under the Specific Plan would not significantly exacerbate wildfire risks above existing conditions. As such, impacts are considered to be less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-113 Environmental Analysis d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes? Less than Significant Impact: As described previously, the Specific Plan does not include any site - specific designs for development and is only intended to serve as a guidance document for the City in implementing future development along the Highway 111 Corridor. The Specific Plan area occupies a predominantly flat terrain and is generally not susceptible to downslope flooding or landslides due to its topographic features. As such, future development along the Project area is not anticipated to expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes. Portions of the Project area that are adjacent to the Whitewater River Wash are located within Special Flood Hazard Areas; however, these areas have between 0.2% and 1 % annual chance of flooding with average depths of less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mile. There are no FEMA-regulated floodways identified within the Project area (FEMA, 2024). Impacts are deemed less than significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-114 Environmental Analysis 3.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance Does the project: a) Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal ✓ community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in ✓ connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Have environmental effects which would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, ✓ either directly or indirectly? a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated: As outlined in Section 3.4, Biological Resources, the proposed Specific Plan is expected to have no direct impact on biological resources. Future improvements under the Specific Plan would comply with relevant federal, state, and local regulations. The implementation of Mitigation Measure 131O-1 would ensure construction personnel receive environmental awareness training to mitigate potential impacts on special -status species and their habitats. Similarly, 1310- 2 would establish best practices to minimize impacts on natural habitats and wildlife. Furthermore, implementation of 131O-3 would guide the protection of special -status and migratory birds during construction, and 131O4 would provide specific guidance on focused burrowing owl surveys. Mitigation Measures 131O-5 and 131O-6 offer strategies for reducing nonessential lighting to safeguard wildlife at the Project site, as well as guidance on securing approval from CDFW under Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code for any impacts to a stream or riverbed. Lastly, 131O-7 would emphasize adherence to conservation measures specified in the CVMSHCP. Together, these measures would effectively reduce impacts to species and their habitats to less than significant levels. Similarly, as detailed in Section 3.5, Cultural Resources, the proposed Specific Plan is not expected to impact significant periods of California history or cultural and historic resources. Future developments City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-115 Environmental Analysis outlined in the Specific Plan would be subject to mitigation measures CR-1 through CR-9, ensuring that any unearthed resources are properly managed. With the implementation of these cultural mitigation measures, impacts to cultural and historic resources are anticipated to be reduced to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures: BIO-1 through BIO-7, and CR-1 through CR-9. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated: Cumulative impacts are defined as "two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts" (CEQA Guidelines Section 15355). Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor, but collectively significant actions taking place over a period of time. This Specific Plan aligns with the City's General Plan policies and goals as well as City Codes. Evidence in this Finding of Consistency shows no new significant environmental effects beyond those identified in the City's General Plan. The General Plan envisions the Highway 111 Corridor evolving into a prime mixed -use area, reflecting its goals for innovative development. This Specific Plan would guide the transformation of Highway 111 to improve quality of life for residents, employees, and visitors, envisioning it as a standout destination offering a variety of memorable experiences. Future development guided by this Specific Plan may have cumulative impacts on air quality, natural resources, hazards, cultural/tribal resources, public services, and population and housing. While future development along the Highway 111 Corridor would lead to some environmental changes, potential impacts associated with these environmental disciplines are expected to be minor or mitigated to a less significant level through recommended measures in the Specific Plan. This approach would also ensure that any contribution to cumulative impacts remains minimal. Table 3.5 below provides a brief list of present and reasonably foreseeable future projects near or within the Project area, including a description of the projects and their anticipated construction schedules (if known). Identified projects are summarized below. Table 3.5. Current and Future City Projects Project Project Type Project Status Summary Washington Street CIP Underway The proposed improvements along Washington Sidewalk Improvements (2024 — 2025) Street include construction of a 6-foot sidewalk from Avenue 50 to Calle Tampico. Avenue 50 Widening CIP Underway The proposed improvements on Avenue 50 include Improvements (from (2024 — 2025) widening Avenue 50 from Jefferson Street to Jefferson Street to Madison Street to the general plan roadway Madison Street) conditions, including construction of a multi -use trail along the north side. Pavement Management CIP Underway As part of the 5-year PMP, slurry seal Plan (PMP) Slurry Seal (2023) improvements would take place Citywide, Improvements specifically at the Cove, the village area, Washington Street, and Monroe Street. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-116 Environmental Analysis Project Project Type Project Status Summary Highway 111 Pavement CIP Awaiting Planned Summer 2024 - Rehabilitation of Highway Rehabilitation federal 111 between Washington Street and Jefferson funding (2024) Street. Point Happy Homes Project Under New plan types to complete existing residential Developments construction subdivision. St. Francis Parish Hall Project Approved Expansion of existing church for new 27, 334 Expansion Developments square foot parish hall with additional landscaping and parking. Hampton Inn Project Approved New 125 room Hampton Inn Hotel with associated Developments amenities. SolTerra Project Completed 133 condominium rental units. Developments Dune Palms Mixed Use Project Under Two new drive -through commercial buildings for Project Developments construction future Chick-fil-A and Quick Quack Car Wash. Longhorn Steakhouse Project Completed Modification to former Soup Plantation for a new Developments Longhorn Steakhouse restaurant. Jefferson St Apartments Project Under Two story, 42-unit apartment complex. Developments construction Source: City of La Quinta, 2024d; City of La Quinta, 2024e. The impacts associated with the proposed Specific Plan would not add appreciably to any existing or foreseeable future significant cumulative environmental impact. Incremental impacts, if any, would be negligible. All potential direct and indirect impacts of the Project can be avoided or minimized to a level that is considered insignificant, as summarized in Appendix A: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). Consequently, the proposed Project's cumulative impacts are not considered significant, as any applicable impacts it may contribute to would be mitigated to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measures: BIO-1 through BIO-7, CR-1 through CR-9, AIR-1, GEO-1, HAZ-1, HAZ-2, HWQ-1, HWQ-2, and NOI-1. c) Does the project have environmental effects which would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated: Future development contemplated by the proposed Specific Plan could potentially lead to environmental impacts related to air quality, geology and soils, hazardous materials, water quality, noise, and utilities. While the Specific Plan itself does not involve construction, it serves as a guide for future development. The IS/MND for the Specific Plan ensures compliance with regulations to mitigate these potential impacts. Mitigation Measures AIR-1, GEO-1, HAZA, HAZ-2, HWQ-1, HWQ-2, and NOI-1 would help lessen environmental impacts by minimizing pollutants and conserving natural resources, thereby reducing direct health risks and indirect effects on important ecosystems that support human well-being. With these measures in place, the Specific Plan is expected to avoid significant adverse effects on human health and the environment. Mitigation Measures: AIR-1, GEO-1, HAZ-1, HAZ-2, HWQ-1, HWQ-2, and NOI-1. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-117 Environmental Analysis Mandatory Findings of Significance Mitigation Measures: • BIO-1: Assessment of Biological Resources and Worker Environmental Awareness Training Prior to Project construction activities for all projects covered in this IS/MND, a complete and recent inventory of rare, threatened, endangered, and other sensitive species located within the Project footprint and within offsite areas with the potential to be affected, including California Species of Special Concern and California Fully Protected Species (Fish and Game Code § 3511), will be completed. Species to be addressed should include all those which meet the CEQA definition (CEQA Guidelines § 15380). The inventory should address seasonal variations in use of the Project area and should not be limited to resident species. Focused species -specific surveys, completed by a qualified biologist and conducted at the appropriate time of year and time of day when the sensitive species are active or otherwise identifiable are required. Acceptable species -specific survey procedures should be developed in consultation with CDFW and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, where necessary. Note that CDFW generally considers biological field assessments for wildlife to be valid for a one-year period, and assessments for rare plants may be considered valid for a period of up to three years. Some aspects of the proposed Project may warrant periodic updated surveys for certain sensitive taxa, particularly if the Project is proposed to occur over a protracted time frame, or in phases, or if surveys are completed during periods of drought. An environmental training program should be developed and presented by a qualified biologist to all crew members prior to the beginning of all Project construction in natural areas planned for development. The training should describe special -status plant and wildlife species and sensitive habitats that could occur within the Project area, protection afforded to these species and habitats, and avoidance and minimization measures required to avoid and/or minimize impacts from the project. All new construction personnel should receive this training before beginning work on this Project. A copy of the training and training materials should be provided to construction crews for review and approval at least 30 days prior to the start of construction. As needed, in -field training should be provided to new on -site construction personnel by the qualified biologist or a qualified individual who should be identified by the qualified biologist, or initial training should be recorded and replayed for new personnel. • BIO-2: General Measures for Plants and Wildlife When working in the natural habitat areas, the number of access routes, number and size of staging areas, and the total area of the activity should be limited to the minimum necessary to achieve the project goal. Routes and boundaries outside of normal access roads should be clearly delineated through fencing or flagging. Food, trash, and other solid wastes should be disposed of in Common Raven proof/wildlife proof, covered refuse containers and regularly removed from the various structures and facilities on a daily basis to avoid offsite dispersal of waste and to avoid attracting wildlife onto the Project site. Following covered activity work, all trash and debris should be removed from the work area. Construction work should avoid direct destruction of burrows through chaining (dragging a heavy chain over an area to remove shrubs), disking, cultivation, and urban, industrial, or agricultural development. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-118 Environmental Analysis Project -related excavations greater than 6 inches deep should be secured to prevent wildlife entry and entrapment. Holes and trenches should be back -filled, securely covered, or fenced. Excavations that cannot be fully secured should incorporate appropriate wildlife ramp(s) at a slope of no more than a 3:1 ratio (horizontal: vertical, equivalent to a 33.3 percent or 18.4-degree slope), or other means to allow trapped animals to escape. Personnel on site should be required to check under their vehicles for sensitive species prior to moving them and should exercise caution while driving on the Project site. Before moving, burying, or capping, inspect for wildlife in any construction pipes, culverts, or similar structures that are stored on the site for one or more nights. Alternatively, cap structures before storing on the work site. • BI0-3: Special Status and Migratory Birds Construction should be conducted, if possible, during the fall and/or winter months and outside of the avian nesting season (generally February 1 — August 31) to avoid any direct and or indirect effects to protected nesting birds. Pre -construction surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior. The qualified avian biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the pre -construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 100 feet for passerines and 300 feet for raptors. A smaller or larger buffer may be determined by the qualified biologist familiar with the nesting phenology of the nesting species and based on nest and buffer monitoring results. Construction activities may not occur inside the established buffers, which shall remain on -site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored at least once a week or as needed by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. • BIO-4: Burrowing Owl Habitat Assessment and Focused Pre -Construction Surveys No less than 60 days prior to the start of Project -related activities for all projects covered in the MND, a burrowing owl habitat assessment shall be conducted by a qualified biologist according to the specifications of the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (Department of Fish and Game, March 2012 or most recent version) for all projects covered under the MND. If the habitat assessment demonstrates suitable burrowing owl habitat, then focused burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012 or most recent version) prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities. If burrowing owls are detected during the focused surveys, the qualified biologist and Project proponent shall begin coordination with CDFW and USFWS immediately, and shall prepare a Burrowing Owl Avoidance and Monitoring Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall describe proposed avoidance and monitoring actions, including measures necessary to avoid take of burrowing owl individuals, nests, and eggs. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall include the number and location of occupied burrow sites (occupied site means at least one burrowing owl or its sign has been observed within the last three years; may be indicated by owl sign including feathers, pellets, prey remains, eggshell fragments, or excrement at or near a burrow entrance or perch site), acres of burrowing owl habitat that will be impacted, details of site monitoring, and details on proposed City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-119 Environmental Analysis buffers and other avoidance measures. If impacts to occupied burrowing owl habitat or burrow(s) or burrowing owl individuals, nests, or eggs cannot be avoided, appropriate California Endangered Species Act (CESA) authorization (i.e., Incidental Take Permit under Fish and Game Code section 2081) should be obtained from CDFW prior to commencement of Project activities. Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Project -related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012 or most recent version). Preconstruction surveys should be repeated when there is a pause in construction of more than 30 days. Preconstruction surveys should be performed by a qualified biologist following the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If the preconstruction surveys confirm occupied burrowing owl habitat, Project activities shall be immediately halted. The qualified biologist shall coordinate with CDFW and prepare a Burrowing Owl Avoidance and Monitoring Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW and USFWS for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. • 113I0-5: Artificial Light Impacts Throughout construction and the lifetime operation of all projects covered in the IS/MND the City and Project proponents shall eliminate all nonessential lighting throughout the Project area and avoid or limit the use of artificial light at night during the hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are most active. The City and Project proponent shall ensure that all lighting for the Project is fully shielded, cast downward and directed away from surrounding open -space and agricultural areas, reduced in intensity to the greatest extent possible, and does not result in lighting trespass including glare into surrounding areas or upward into the night sky (see the International Dark -Sky Association standards at http://darksky.org/). The City and Project proponent shall ensure use of LED lighting, proper disposal of hazardous waste, and recycling of lighting that contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycler. • 113I0-6: CDFW Lake and Streambed Alteration (LSA) Program Prior to construction and issuance of any grading permit, the Project Sponsor shall obtain written correspondence from CDFW stating that notification under Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code is not required for the Project, or the Project Sponsor should obtain a CDFW-executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement, authorizing impacts to Fish and Game Code Section 1602 resources associated with the Project. • BI0-7: Project Adherence to the CVMSHCP All Conservation Measures that are applicable within Section 4.4 (Required Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Measures) and Section 9 (Species Accounts and Conservation Measures) of the CVMSHCP should be implemented by the Project to minimize impacts to plant and wildlife species within the HCP's jurisdiction (CVMSHCP, 2016). The Project is outside of a designated Conservation Area, and a Joint Review Project is not required. However, the LDMF to the CVCC is required for development projects. Submission of the LDMF to the CVCC is recommended before building or grading permits are submitted. Prior to construction and issuance of any grading permit for all projects covered in the IS/MND, the City shall ensure compliance with the CVMSHCP and its associated Implementing Agreement and shall ensure the collection of payment of the CVMSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee and transfer of fees, at least quarterly and prior to impacts to Covered Species and their Habitats, to the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-120 Environmental Analysis Prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities, for all project areas covered in the IS/MND that contain suitable habitat for sand -dependent Covered Species, the City will collaborate with the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission to plan and implement a salvage of sand - dependent Covered Species within the Project site. • CR-1: Workers Environmental Awareness Program A Qualified Archaeologist who meets or exceeds the Secretary of Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology (NPS, 1983) shall conduct Workers Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) training on archaeological sensitivity for all construction personnel prior to the commencement of any ground -disturbing activities. Archaeological sensitivity training shall include a description of the types of cultural material that may be encountered, cultural sensitivity issues, the regulatory environment, and the proper protocol for treatment of the materials in the event of a find. The WEAP training document shall include materials that convey the information noted above, which shall be maintained in an area accessible to all construction personnel so that it may be reviewed regularly by construction staff. • CR-2: Pre -Excavation Agreement Prior to the issuance of Grading Permits, the Applicant/Owner shall enter into a pre -excavation agreement, otherwise known as a Tribal Cultural Resources Treatment and Tribal Monitoring Agreement with the consulting Tribal Monitor associated within the area. A copy of the agreement shall be included in building and development plans and permit applications with the City. The purpose of this agreement shall be to formalize protocols and procedures between the Applicant/Owner and the consulting Tribal Monitor associated with the area for the protection and treatment of, including but not limited to, Native American human remains, funerary objects, cultural and religious landscapes, ceremonial items, and traditional gathering areas and tribal cultural resources located and/or discovered through a monitoring program in conjunction with the construction of the proposed project, including additional archaeological surveys and/or studies, excavations, geotechnical investigations, grading, and all other ground disturbing activities. At the discretion of the consulting Tribal Monitor, artifacts may be made available for 3D scanning/printing, with scanned/printed materials to be curated at a local repository meeting the federal standards of 36CFR79. • CR-3: Retention of Qualified Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permits, the Applicant/Owner or Grading Contractor shall provide a written and signed letter to the City of La Quinta Planning Division stating that a Qualified Archaeologist and consulting Tribal Monitor have been retained at the Applicant/Owner or Grading Contractor's expense to implement the monitoring program, as described in the pre -excavation agreement. • CR-4: Tribal Cultural Monitor Coordination During Ground Disturbing Activities The Qualified Archaeologist and consulting Tribal Monitor shall attend all applicable pre -construction meetings with the General Contractor and/or associated subcontractors to present the archaeological monitoring program. The Qualified Archaeologist and consulting Tribal Monitor shall be present on -site full-time during grubbing, grading, and/or other ground altering activities, including the placement of imported fill materials or fill used from other areas of the Project site, to City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-121 Environmental Analysis identify any evidence of potential archaeological or tribal cultural resources. All fill materials shall be absent of any and all tribal cultural resources. • CR-5: Controlled Grade Procedure To detect important archaeological artifacts and cultural resources during monitoring, a "Controlled Grade Procedure" must be created by a Qualified Archaeologist. This will be done in consultation with the consulting Tribal Monitor, relevant consulting Tribes, and the Applicant/Owner, and needs approval from City representatives. The procedure will set guidelines for machinery work in sensitive areas identified during cultural resource monitoring. It will cover aspects like operating speed, removal increments, weight, and equipment features. A copy of this procedure must be included in the Grading Plan submissions for Grading Permits. • CR-6: Discovery of Tribal Cultural Resources The Qualified Archaeologist and consulting Tribal Monitor can stop ground -disturbing activities undiscovered tribal cultural resources or artifacts are found. All work must cease in the vicinity of any archaeological discovery until the Qualified Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor can assess the context of the find, including its significance, potential eligibility for the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), and whether the project would have a direct impact on the resource. If buried cultural deposits are encountered, the Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor may request that construction halt nearby and must notify a Qualified Archaeologist within 24 hours for investigation. Work will be redirected away from these areas for assessment. Minor finds will be documented and secured for later repatriation; if items cannot be securely stored on -site, they may be stored off -site. Minor finds include archaeological materials that are isolated, lack context, and are unlikely to indicate a larger or significant site. If the discovered resources are deemed potentially significant, the involved consulting Tribes will be notified for consultation on their respectful treatment. Avoidance of significant resources is preferred, but if not feasible, a data recovery plan may be required. The consulting Tribes will be consulted on this plan as well. For resources under a data recovery plan, a proper sample will be collected using professional methods, reflecting tribal values. The Tribal Monitor must be present during any resource collection or cataloging. If the Qualified Archaeologist does not collect the resources, the Tribal Monitor may do so. Ground -disturbing work will not resume until the resources are documented and/or protected. • CR-7: Treatment of Tribal Cultural Resources The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources unearthed during all ground disturbing activities, and from any previous archaeological studies or excavations on the Project site to the affiliated consulting Tribe, as determined through the appropriate process, for respectful and dignified treatment and disposition, including reburial at a protected location on -site, in accordance with the Tribe's cultural and spiritual traditions. All cultural materials that are associated with burial and/or funerary goods would be repatriated to the Most Likely Descendant as determined by the NAHC per California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. No tribal cultural resources shall be subject to curation. • CR-8: Tribal Cultural Monitoring Report A monitoring report and/or evaluation report, if appropriate, which describes the results, analysis, and conclusions of the archaeological monitoring program (e.g., data recovery plan) shall be City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-122 Environmental Analysis submitted by the Qualified Archaeologist, along with the consulting Tribal Monitor's notes and comments, to the City of La Quinta Planning Division for approval. • CR-9: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains As specified by California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, if human remains are found on the Project site during construction or during archaeological work, the person responsible for the excavation, or his or her authorized representative, shall immediately notify the Riverside County Coroner's Office by telephone. No further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the Coroner Medical Examiner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code 5097.98. If such a discovery occurs, a temporary construction exclusion zone shall be established surrounding the area of the discovery so that the area would be protected, and consultation and treatment could occur as prescribed by law. If suspected Native American remains are discovered, the remains shall be kept in -situ, or in a secure location in close proximity to where they were found, and the analysis of the remains shall only occur on -site in the presence of a consulting Tribal Monitor. By law, the Coroner Medical Examiner shall determine within two working days of being notified if the remains are subject to his or her authority. If the Coroner Medical Examiner identifies the remains to be of Native American ancestry, he or she shall contact the NAHC within 24 hours. The NAHC shall make a determination as to the Most Likely Descendent. If human remains are discovered, notify the consulting Tribe's Tribal Historic Preservation Officer. • AIR-1: Localized Significance Assessment Prior to the issuance required discretionary permits, new development projects in the Specific Plan area, if subject to CEQA compliance, must demonstrate that the proposed development would either not exceed applicable the SCAQMD's LST lookup tables or not exceed the respective ambient air quality thresholds for CO, NOx, and PM10 and PM2.5. • GEO-1: Protect Paleontological Resources during Construction Activities Prior to ground disturbing activities, all field personnel will receive training on paleontological resources, including potential fossils that may be discovered and response steps, while a qualified paleontologist will prepare a Paleontological Resources Monitoring and Mitigation Plan (PRMMP). If fossils (like bones, teeth, or well-preserved plants) are found during construction, the City will stop work within 50 feet and notify a paleontologist to document and assess the find. The paleontologist may allow work to continue or recommend salvaging the fossils if necessary and will suggest appropriate treatment methods. Collected fossils will be sent to an accredited institution for curation and preservation. All earth -moving operations deeper than two feet must have a qualified paleontological monitor. Continuous monitoring is needed if fossil -rich lakebed sediments are found. The monitor can stop work to identify and salvage fossils and may halt equipment for large specimens. A monitoring plan must be submitted to the City before any permits are issued or soil is disturbed. Grading and excavation must comply with La Quinta Code and regulations. After ground disturbing activities and any necessary fossil curation, the project paleontologist will prepare a final report detailing the results of the PRMMP. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-123 Environmental Analysis • HAZ-1: Hazardous Materials Handling and Planning New development projects in the Specific Plan area must comply with local, state, and federal regulations by submitting development plans and permits to the City for review. Projects intending to use or store hazardous materials must prepare a Spill Prevention Countermeasure Contingency Plan (SPCC) outlining spill containment protocols, along with maintaining an onsite SPCC spill kit. Additionally, developments proposing storage and use of hazardous materials above reporting thresholds must create a Hazardous Materials Business Emergency Plan (HMBEP) as per Chapter 6.95 of the California Health & Safety Code and Title 19, Division 2 of the California Code of Regulations. The HMBEP requires approval from the County of Riverside CUPA and the Department of Environmental Health prior to business operation commencement. • HAZ-2: Phase I and/or Phase II Site Assessment Projects within the Specific Plan area that involve excavation at locations with recorded Cortese List sites must undergo a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, and where necessary, Phase II sampling. If the Phase I assessment identifies the need for remediation, the project sponsor must adhere to all remediation and abatement directives specified by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), or relevant regulatory agencies. • HWQ-1: Stormwater Management Practices Prior to the issuance of City building permits, all projects within the Specific Plan area that disturb one acre or more of land must prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). This plan shall outline suitable Best Management Practices (BMPs) for managing and treating runoff from future development site(s). The applicant is accountable for both preparing and executing the SWPPP in accordance with NPDES requirements. Additionally, the applicant must submit a Notice of Intent to the State Water Resource Control Board, obtain a Waste Discharge ID Number (WDID), and ensure a copy of the SWPPP is present at the development site throughout the construction phase. • HWQ-2: Water Conservation Measures Future development in the Highway 111 corridor must integrate water -saving appliances and fixtures, such as low -flush toilets, low -flow showerheads, and faucets, in compliance with Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code, Title 20 of the California Administrative Code Section 1601(b), and relevant sections of Title 24 of the California State Code. Additionally, the City will enforce its Water Efficient Landscape ordinance, requiring development projects within the Specific Plan area to adopt water -efficient landscaping plans that meet or exceed current criteria. These measures are aimed at conserving water resources while addressing the needs of residents and businesses. • N0I-1: Noise Reduction All construction activities shall adhere to the City Construction Hours/Quality Assurance Program for designated construction hours, and equipment with internal combustion engines must be equipped with manufacturer -recommended mufflers. Future development projects shall use noise -reducing paving materials, such as open -grade asphalt, for all road surfacing. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-124 References 4 References CAL FIRE. June 15, 2023. Fire Hazard Severity Zone in State Responsibility Area Map. Available online at: https://calfire-forestry.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=988d43l a42b242b29d89597ab693d008 California Code of Regulations (CCR). 2022. Title 24; Part 2, CH. 2-23. Administrative Code. Available online at: https://www.dgs.ca.gov/BSC/Codes 2023a. Title 8; Div. 1, CHA, Sub. Ch4, Article 4. Dusts, Fumes, Mists, Vapors, and Gas. Available online at https://www.dir.ca.gov/Title8/sb4a4.html 2023b. Title 22; Section 66260.200. Classification of a Waste as Hazardous or Nonhazardous. Available online at: https://dtsc.ca.gov/title22/ California Health and Safety Code (CA HSC). 2022. Sections: 25501, 7050.5. Available online at: https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/health-and-safety-code/hsc-sect-25501 / California Department of Conservation (DOC). 2022. California Important Farmland Finder. Available at: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF 2023. Important Farmland Finder Map. Available online at: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/ 2024a. Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation Mapper. Available online at: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/ 2024b. Important Farmland Categories. Available online at: https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/fmmp/Pages/Important-Farmland- Categories.aspx#:--:text=Urban%20and%20Built%2Dup%20Land,to%20a%2010%2Dacre%20parcel. California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2012. Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. Available online at: https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentlD=83843 2016. California Wildlife Habitat Relationships Predicted Habitat Models. State of California, Natural Resources Agency, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, California Interagency Wildlife Task Group, Sacramento, California, USA. https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CWHR (2/28/2023) 2023a. California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) QuickView Tool. State of California, Natural Resources Agency, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Biogeographic Data Branch, Sacramento, California, USA. https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Maps-and-Data#43018410-cnddb-quickview-tool (1/24/2023) 2023b. NCCP Plan Summary — Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. State of California, Natural Resources Agency, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Habitat Conservation Planning Branch, Sacramento, California, USA. https://wildIife.ca.gov/Conservation/Planning/NCCP/Plans/Coachella-Valley (2/27/2023) 2023c. California Essential Habitat Connectivity Project. State of California, Natural Resources Agency, Habitat Conservation Planning Branch, Sacramento, California, USA. https://wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Planning/Connectivity/CEHC (1/24/2023) California Department of General Services (DGS). 2024. CalGreen: California's green building standards code. Available online at: https://www.dgs.ca.gov/bsc/calgreen City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 4-1 References California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 2024. EnviroStor. Available online at: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ California Department of Transportation. 2023. State Scenic Highway Map. Available online at: https:Hcaltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index. html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc8e8057116fl aacaa California Energy Commission (CAC). 2023. SB 100 Joint Agency Report. Available online at: https://www.energy.ca.gov/sb1 00 California Herps. 2023. A Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of California. http://www.californiaherps.com (2/28/2023) California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2023. CNPS Inventory of Rare Plants. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, California, USA. https://www.cnps.org/rare-plants/cnps-inventory-of-rare-plants (1/24/2023) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). 2023. See table 3-1. City of La Quinta: 2002. Washington Park Specific Plan, SP1987-011, Amendment No. 4. 2009. Master Drainage Plan. Available online at: https://www.laquintaca.gov/business/design-and- development/master-drainage-plan 2010. City of La Quinta Emergency Operations Plan, Part 1: Basic Plan. Available online at: http://www.la- quinta.org/home/showdocument?id=l 2446 2019. Highway 111 Corridor Plan. Available online at: https://www.laquintaca.gov/business/design-and- development/planning-division/links-documents 2021. La Quinta Municipal Code. Available online at: https://library.municode.com/ca/la_quinta/codes/municipal_code?nodeld=M UCOLAQUCA 2022. 2035 La Quinta General Plan. Available online at: https://www.laquintaca.gov/business/design-and- development/planning-division/2035-1a-quinta-general-plan 2023. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Available online at: https://www.laquintaca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/47943/638101721348208554 2024a. Municipal Code. Available online at: https://Iibrary.municode.com/ca/la_quinta/codes/municipal—code 2024b. History of La Quinta. Available online at: https://www.laquintaca.gov/about-us/history-of-la-quinta 2024c. Local Utilities. City of La Quinta. Available online at: https://www.laquintaca.gov/residents/public-safety- se rvices/local-uti I iti es 2024d. Capital Improvement Program. City of La Quinta. Available online at: https://www.laquintaca.gov/our- city/city-departments/design-and-development/capital-improvement-program-cip 2024e. City of La Quinta Project Developments Map. Available online at: https:Hexperience.arcgis.com/experience/55e7afl cb6684670bcbffe51 fa2646da/#data_s=id%3AdataSource_1- 1888d6cffe 1-layer-1 %3A34 Coachella Valley Conservation Commission (CVCC). 2023. Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan - Plan Documents. https:Hcvmshcp.org/plan-documents/ (2/28/2023). Coachella Valley Conservation Commission (CVCC). 2024. Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan - Open Data Portal, Conservation Areas. https://mshcp-cvag.hub.arcgis.com/ (02/20/2024) Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP). 2016. Species Accounts and Conservation Measures. Final Major Amendment to the CVMSHCP, Section 9.0. August 2016. https://cvmshcp.org/plan-documents/ City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 4-2 References Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). 2024. Where Does My Water Come From? Available online at: https://web.archive.org/web/20130701050832/http://www.cvwd.org/about/wherewater.php eBird. 2023. eBird: an online database of bird distribution and abundance. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York, USA. http://www.ebird.org (2/28//2023) Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA). 2024. FEMA Flood Map Service Center. Available online at: https:Hmsc.fema.gov/portal/home Federal Highway Administration. 2024. Reviewing Noise Analysis. U.S. Department of Transportation. Available online at: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/Environment/noise/resources/reviewing_noise_analysis/ Hallock, Espinoza, and Arias. 2023. Cultural Resources Report for City of La Quinta — Highway 111 15-Acre Project Site, Riverside County, California. Prepared for GHD, Irvine, California. July 2023. Herriges, Daniel. 2020. Strong Towns: 6 Reasons Your City Needs a Form -Based Code. Available online at: https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2020/6/8/6-reasons-your-city-needs-a- form-based-code Imperial Irrigation District (IID). 2024. Renewable Energy. Imperial Irrigation District. Available online at: https://www.iid.com/power/renewable-energy iNaturalist. 2023. Observations. iNaturalist Department, California Academy of Sciences and National Geographic Society, San Francisco, California, USA. https://www.inaturalist.org (2/03/2023) La Quinta Historical Society. 2017. Point Happy: The Gateway to La Quinta. Article in the Desert Sun. Available Online at: https://www.desertsun.com/story/life/2017/08/11/point-happy-gateway-la-quinta/560876001/ National Park Service (NPS): 1983. Archaeology and Historic Preservation: Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines. Available online at: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/historicpreservation/upload/standards-guidelines-archeology-historic- preservation.pdf 2020. National Register of Historic Places. Available online at: https://www. nps.gov/maps/full.html?mapld=7ad l 7cc9-b808-4ff8-a2f9-a99909164466 Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission. 2004. Land Use Compatibility Policy Document. Available online at: https://rcaluc.org/sites/g/files/aldnop421 /files/2023-06/Bermuda%20Dunes.pdf Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFCWCD). 2015a. Whitewater River Region Stormwater Management Plan. Available online at: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/rwgcb7/water issues/programs/stormwater/docs/wwr swmp_0l1515.pdf 2015b. Whitewater River Region Water Quality Management Pan Guidance Document. Available online at: https://content.rcflood.org/downloads/N PDES/Documents/WW_SWM P_WQMP/WWR_WQMP_Guidance_Jan 15_2015. pdf State of California. 2022. CGS Seismic Hazards Program: Alquist-Priolo Fault Hazard Zones. Available online at: https:Hgis.data.ca.gov/maps/ee92a5f9f4ee4ec5aa731 d3245ed9f53/explore South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2008. Final LST Methodology Document. Available online at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/final-ist-methodology- document.pdf Southern California Tribal Chairman Association (SCTCA). 2024. Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians. Available online at: https://sctca.net/torres-martinez-desert-cahuilla-indians/ State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). 2024. GeoTracker. Available online at: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 4-3 References United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2024. Natural Resource Conservation Service Web Soil Survey. Available online at: https://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1978. Information on levels of environmental noise requisite to protect public health and welfare with an adequate margin of safety. Available online at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-08/documents/1978-noise-manual.pdf United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023a. IPaC - Information for Planning and Consultation. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office, Arcata, CA, USA. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/ (1/24/2023) 2023b. National Wetlands Inventory. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. https://data.nal.usda.gov/dataset/national- wetlands-inventory (1/24/2023) United States Geological Survey (USGS). 2016. National Land Cover Database Land Cover (California). https://map.dfg.ca.gov/metadata/NLCD_2016_Land_Cover CA_20190424_WM.html (1/30/2023) Vandergast, A. G., D. A. Wood, A. R. Thompson, M. Fisher, C. W. Barrows, and T. J. Grant. 2016. Drifting to oblivion? Rapid genetic differentiation in an endangered lizard following habitat fragmentation and drought. Diversity and Distributions 22:344-257. https://onIinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.12398 City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 4-4 Report Preparers 5 Report Preparers 5.1 City of La Quinta Danny Castro, Design and Development Director Cheri Flores, Design and Development Planning Manager 5.2 G H D Nicole Greenberg, Senior Environmental Planning Lead Charles Smith, Senior Environmental Manager Jonathan Linkus, Project Director Todd Tregenza, Senior Project Manager Chryss Meier, Senior Environmental Planner, Air Quality Specialist Ryder Burliss, Environmental Scientist Kolby Lundgren, Biologist Patrick Lewis, Transportation Planner Veronica Chocholek, Technical Editor City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 5-1 Appendices Appendix A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the adoption of feasible mitigation measures to reduce the severity and magnitude of potentially significant environmental impacts associated with project development. CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(d) states: When making the findings required in subdivision (a)(1), the CEQA Lead Agency shall also adopt a program for reporting on or monitoring the changes which it has either required in the project or made a condition of approval to avoid or substantially lessen significant environmental effects. These measures must be enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. CEQA Guidelines Section 15097(a) states: This section applies when a public agency has made the findings required under paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of section 15091 to adopt a mitigated negative declaration in conjunction with approving a project. In order to assure that the mitigation measures and project revisions identified in the negative declaration are implemented, the public agency shall adopt a program for monitoring or reporting on the revisions which it has required in the project and the measures it has imposed to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects. Mitigation Measures Air Quality AIR-1: Localized Significance Assessment Prior to the issuance required discretionary permits, new development projects in the Specific Plan area, if subject to CEQA compliance, must demonstrate that the proposed development would either not exceed applicable the SCAQMD's Localized Significance Thresholds (LST) lookup tables or not exceed the respective ambient air quality thresholds for CO, NOx, and PM,o and PM2.s. Biological Resources BIO-1: Assessment of Biological Resources and Worker Environmental Awareness Training Prior to Project construction activities for all projects covered in this IS/MND, a complete and recent inventory of rare, threatened, endangered, and other sensitive species located within the Project footprint and within offsite areas with the potential to be affected, including California Species of Special Concern and California Fully Protected Species (Fish and Game Code § 3511), will be completed. Species to be addressed should include all those which meet the CEQA definition (CEQA Guidelines § 15380). The inventory should address seasonal variations in use of the Project area and should not be limited to resident species. Focused species -specific surveys, completed by a qualified biologist and conducted at the appropriate time of year and time of day when the sensitive species are active or otherwise identifiable are required. Acceptable species -specific survey procedures should be developed in consultation with CDFW and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, where necessary. Note that CDFW generally considers biological field assessments for wildlife to be valid for a one-year period, and assessments for rare plants may be considered valid for a period of up to three years. Some aspects of the proposed Project may warrant periodic updated surveys for certain sensitive taxa, particularly if the Project is proposed to occur over a protracted time frame, or in phases, or if surveys are completed during periods of drought. An environmental training program should be developed and presented by a qualified biologist to all crew members prior to the beginning of all Project construction in natural areas planned for development. The training should describe special -status plant and wildlife species and sensitive habitats that could occur within the Project area, protection afforded to these species and habitats, and avoidance and minimization measures required to avoid and/or minimize impacts from the project. All new construction personnel should receive this training before beginning work on this Project. A copy of the training and training materials should be provided to construction crews for review and approval at least 30 days prior to the start of construction. As needed, in -field training should be provided to new on -site construction personnel by the qualified biologist or a qualified individual who should be identified by the qualified biologist, or initial training should be recorded and replayed for new personnel.. Future development in the Highway 111 Prior to Corridor must demonstrate compliance Construction with SCAQMD's LSTs look up tables and or ambient air quality thresholds. Brief construction workers on the Prior to biology and life history of federally Construction listed, state listed, and state special status species in the area. Qualified Construction Contractor Qualified Biologist / Qualified Construction Contractor BIO-2: General Measures for Plants and Wildlife When working in the natural habitat areas, the number of access routes, number and size of staging areas, and the total area of the activity should be limited to the minimum necessary to achieve the project goal. Routes and boundaries outside of normal access roads should be clearly delineated through fencing or flagging. Food, trash, and other solid wastes should be disposed of in Common Raven proof/wildlife proof, covered refuse containers and regularly removed from the various structures and facilities on a daily basis to avoid offsite dispersal of waste and to avoid attracting wildlife onto the Project site. Following covered activity work, all trash and debris should be removed from the work area. Construction work should avoid direct destruction of burrows through chaining (dragging a heavy chain over an area to remove shrubs), disking, cultivation, and urban, industrial, or agricultural development. Project -related excavations greater than 6 inches deep should be secured to prevent wildlife entry and entrapment. Holes and trenches should be back -filled, securely covered, or fenced. Excavations that cannot be fully secured should incorporate appropriate wildlife ramp(s) at a slope of no more than a 3:1 ratio (horizontal: vertical, equivalent to a 33.3 percent or 18.4-degree slope), or other means to allow trapped animals to escape. Personnel on site should be required to check under their vehicles for sensitive species prior to moving them and should exercise caution while driving on the Project site. Before moving, burying, or capping, inspect for wildlife in any construction pipes, culverts, or similar structures that are stored on the site for one or more nights. Alternatively, cap structures before storing on the work site.. BIO-3: Special Status and Migratory Birds Construction should be conducted, if possible, during the fall and/or winter months and outside of the avian nesting season (generally February 1 — August 31) to avoid any direct and or indirect effects to protected nesting birds. Pre -construction surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior. The qualified avian biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the pre -construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 100 feet for passerines and 300 feet for raptors. A smaller or larger buffer may be determined by the qualified biologist familiar with the nesting phenology of the nesting species and based on nest and buffer monitoring results. Construction activities may not occur inside the established buffers, which shall remain on -site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored at least once a week or as needed by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. Conduct pre -construction surveys to check for nesting activity no later than 14 days before Project activities begin. Construction activities and equipment to be kept within designated areas. Proper storage and handling of materials. Pre -construction surveys, If active nests or burrows are found within 500 feet of construction, an ornithologist should mark a buffer around them, and construction should avoid these areas until the young have fledged or nesting activity has ended. Activities that may disturb nesting shall be prohibited from the buffer zone. Prior to and during Construction Prior to and during Construction Qualified Biologist/ Qualified Construction Contractor Qualified Biologist/ Ornithologist BIO-4: Burrowing Owl Surveys No less than 60 days prior to the start of Project -related activities for all projects covered in the MND, a burrowing owl habitat assessment shall be conducted by a qualified biologist according to the specifications of the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (Department of Fish and Game, March 2012 or most recent version) for all projects covered under the MND. If the habitat assessment demonstrates suitable burrowing owl habitat, then focused burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012 or most recent version) prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities. If burrowing owls are detected during the focused surveys, the qualified biologist and Project proponent shall begin coordination with CDFW and USFWS immediately, and shall prepare a Burrowing Owl Avoidance and Monitoring Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall describe proposed avoidance and monitoring actions, including measures necessary to avoid take of burrowing owl individuals, nests, and eggs. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall include the number and location of occupied burrow sites (occupied site means at least one burrowing owl or its sign has been observed within the last three years; may be indicated by owl sign including feathers, pellets, prey remains, eggshell fragments, or excrement at or near a burrow entrance or perch site), acres of burrowing owl habitat that will be impacted, details of site monitoring, and details on proposed buffers and other avoidance measures. If impacts to occupied burrowing owl habitat or burrow(s) or burrowing owl individuals, nests, or eggs cannot be avoided, appropriate California Endangered Species Act (CESA) authorization (i.e., Incidental Take Permit under Fish and Game Code section 2081) should be obtained from CDFW prior to commencement of Project activities. Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Project -related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012 or most recent version). Preconstruction surveys should be repeated when there is a pause in construction of more than 30 days. Preconstruction surveys should be performed by a qualified biologist following the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If the preconstruction surveys confirm occupied burrowing owl habitat, Project activities shall be immediately halted. The qualified biologist shall coordinate with CDFW and prepare a Burrowing Owl Avoidance and Monitoring Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW and USFWS for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities.. BIO-5: Artificial Light Impacts Throughout construction and the lifetime operation of all projects covered in the IS/MND the City and Project proponents shall eliminate all nonessential lighting throughout the Project area and avoid or limit the use of artificial light at night during the hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are most active. The City and Project proponent shall ensure that all lighting for the Project is fully shielded, cast downward and directed away from surrounding open -space and agricultural areas, reduced in intensity to the greatest extent possible, and does not result in lighting trespass including glare into surrounding areas or upward into the night sky (see the International Dark -Sky Association standards at http://darksky.org/). The City and Project proponent shall ensure use of LED lighting, proper disposal of hazardous waste, and recycling of lighting that contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycler. BIO-6: CDFW Lake and Streambed Alteration (LSA) Program Prior to construction and issuance of any grading permit, the Project Sponsor shall obtain written correspondence from CDFW stating that notification under Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code is not required for the Project, or the Project Sponsor should obtain a CDFW-executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement, authorizing impacts to Fish and Game Code Section 1602 resources associated with the Project. Focused burrowing owl surveys prior to Prior to Qualified start of Project activities. Construction Biologist Prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan if burrowing owls are detected during focused surveys. Eliminate all nonessential lighting During Qualified throughout Project area. Construction and Construction Operation Contractor Comply with Section 1602 of the Fish Prior to The City / and Game Code. Construction Qualified Construction Contractor 1131O-7: Project Adherence to the CVMSHCP All Conservation Measures that are applicable within Section 4.4 (Required Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Measures) and Section 9 (Species Accounts and Conservation Measures) of the CVMSHCP should be implemented by the Project to minimize impacts to plant and wildlife species within the HCP's jurisdiction (CVMSHCP, 2016). The Project is outside of a designated Conservation Area, and a Joint Review Project is not required. However, the LDMF to the CVCC is required for development projects. Submission of the LDMF to the CVCC is recommended before building or grading permits are submitted. Prior to construction and issuance of any grading permit for all projects covered in the IS/MND, the City shall ensure compliance with the CVMSHCP and its associated Implementing Agreement and shall ensure the collection of payment of the CVMSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee and transfer of fees, at least quarterly and prior to impacts to Covered Species and their Habitats, to the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission. Prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities, for all project areas covered in the IS/MND that contain suitable habitat for sand -dependent Covered Species, the City will collaborate with the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission to plan and implement a salvage of sand -dependent Covered Species within the Project site. Cultural Resources CRA : Workers Environmental Awareness Program A Qualified Archaeologist who meets or exceeds the Secretary of Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology (NPS, 1983) shall conduct Workers Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) training on archaeological sensitivity for all construction personnel prior to the commencement of any ground -disturbing activities. Archaeological sensitivity training shall include a description of the types of cultural material that may be encountered, cultural sensitivity issues, the regulatory environment, and the proper protocol for treatment of the materials in the event of a find. The WEAP training document shall include materials that convey the information noted above, which shall be maintained in an area accessible to all construction personnel so that it may be reviewed regularly by construction staff. CR-2: Pre- Excavation Agreement Prior to the issuance of Grading Permits, the Applicant/Owner shall enter into a pre -excavation agreement, otherwise known as a Tribal Cultural Resources Treatment and Tribal Monitoring Agreement with consulting Tribal Monitor associated within the area. A copy of the agreement shall be included in building and development plans and permit applications with the City. The purpose of this agreement shall be to formalize protocols and procedures between the Applicant/Owner and the consulting Tribal Monitor associated with the area for the protection and treatment of, including but not limited to, Native American human remains, funerary objects, cultural and religious landscapes, ceremonial items, and traditional gathering areas and tribal cultural resources located and/or discovered through a monitoring program in conjunction with the construction of the proposed project, including additional archaeological surveys and/or studies, excavations, geotechnical investigations, grading, and all other ground disturbing activities. At the discretion of the consulting Tribal Monitor, artifacts may be made available for 3D scanning/printing, with scanned/printed materials to be curated at a local repository meeting the federal standards of 36CFR79. CR-3: Retention of Qualified Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permits, the Applicant/Owner or Grading Contractor shall provide a written and signed letter to the City of La Quinta Planning Division stating that a Qualified Archaeologist and consulting Tribal Monitor have been retained at the Applicant/Owner or Grading Contractor's expense to implement the monitoring program, as described in the pre -excavation agreement. Relevant conservation measures of During Sections 4.4 and 9 of the CVMSHCP Construction will be implemented Conduct WEAP training on archaeological sensitivity for construction personnel. An agreement with consulting Native American Monitor associated with local tribe. A copy must be included in grading permit application. Prior to Construction Prior to Construction A letter sent to City of La Quinta Prior to Planning Division showing retention of Construction qualified archaeologist and Native American Monitor. Qualified Construction Contractor Qualified Archaeologist The City / Qualified Construction Contractor, Qualified Archaeologist, and Native American Monitor The City / Qualified Construction Contractor, Qualified Archaeologist, and Native American Monitor CR-4: Tribal Cultural Monitor Coordination During Ground Disturbing Activities The Qualified Archaeologist and consulting Tribal Monitor shall attend all applicable pre -construction meetings with the Genera Contractor and/or associated subcontractors to present the archaeological monitoring program. The Qualified Archaeologist an consulting Tribal Monitor shall be present on -site full-time during grubbing, grading, and/or other ground altering activities, including the placement of imported fill materials or fill used from other areas of the Project site, to identify any evidence of potential archaeological or tribal cultural resources. All fill materials shall be absent of any and all tribal cultural resources. CR-5: Controlled Grade Procedure To detect important archaeological artifacts and cultural resources during monitoring, a "Controlled Grade Procedure" must be created by a Qualified Archaeologist. This will be done in consultation with the consulting Tribal Monitor, relevant consulting Tribes, and the Applicant/Owner, and needs approval from City representatives. The procedure will set guidelines for machiner work in sensitive areas identified during cultural resource monitoring. It will cover aspects like operating speed, removal increments, weight, and equipment features. A copy of this procedure must be included in the Grading Plan submissions for Grading Permits. CR-6: Discovery of Tribal Cultural Resources The Qualified Archaeologist and consulting Tribal Monitor can stop ground -disturbing activities if undiscovered tribal cult resources or artifacts are found. All work must cease in the vicinity of any archaeological discovery until the Qualified Archaeolo and Tribal Monitor can assess the context of the find, including its significance, potential eligibility for the California Registe Historical Resources (CRHR), and whether the project would have a direct impact on the resource. If buried cultural deposits encountered, the Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor may request that construction halt nearby and must notify a Quali Archaeologist within 24 hours for investigation. Work will be redirected away from these areas for assessment. Minor finds will be documented and secured for later repatriatio items cannot be securely stored on -site, they may be stored off -site. Minor finds include archaeological materials that are isola lack context, and are unlikely to indicate a larger or significant site. If the discovered resources are deemed potentially signific the involved Tribes will be notified for consultation on their respectful treatment. Avoidance of significant resources is preferred, if not feasible, a data recovery plan may be required. The consulting Tribes will be consulted on this plan as well. For resources under a data recovery plan, a proper sample will be collected using professional methods, reflecting tribal valL The Tribal Monitor must be present during any resource collection or cataloging. If the Qualified Archaeologist does not collect resources, the Tribal Monitor may do so. Ground -disturbing work will not resume until the resources are documented an( protected. CR-7: Treatment of Tribal Cultural Resources The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources unearthed during all ground disturbing activities, and from an previous archaeological studies or excavations on the Project site to the affiliated consulting Tribe, as determined through the appropriate process, for respectful and dignified treatment and disposition, including reburial at a protected location on -site, in accordance with the Tribe's cultural and spiritual traditions. All cultural materials that are associated with burial and/or funerary goods would be repatriated to the Most Likely Descendant as determined by the NAHC per California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. No tribal cultural resources shall be subject to curation. CR-8: Tribal Cultural Monitoring Report A monitoring report and/or evaluation report, if appropriate, which describes the results, analysis, and conclusions of the archaeological monitoring program (e.g., data recovery plan) shall be submitted by the Qualified Archaeologist, along with the consulting Tribal Monitor's notes and comments, to the City of La Quinta Planning Division for approval. Timing of Compliance Monitoring or Responsible Verification Monitoring or R-.. Collaboration with consulting Native -.. During Qualified Date American Monitor. Construction Archaeologist and Native American Monitor Qualified Archaeologist and Native Prior to Qualified American Monitor to be present at pre- Construction Archaeologist construction meetings and during and Native ground disturbing activities. American A written "Controlled Grade Procedure" Monitor shall be prepared. During Qualified If archaeological resources are discovered, they shall be evaluated by a Construction Archaeologist / aral qualified archaeologist. Native gist American of Determine eligibility and implement Monitor are i appropriate treatment measures. 1; if ed, ant, but es. the i/or Any unearthed tribal cultural resources During The City of La shall be returned to the affiliated Construction Quinta y consulting Tribe. Qualified Monitoring/evaluation report submitted Prior to to the City of La Quinta Planning Construction Archaeologist Division for approval. and Native American Monitor CR-9: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains As specified by California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, if human remains are found on the Project site during construction or during archaeological work, the person responsible for the excavation, or his or her authorized representative, shall immediately notify the Riverside County Coroner's Office by telephone. No further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the Coroner Medical Examiner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code 5097.98. If such a discovery occurs, a temporary construction exclusion zone shall be established surrounding the area of the discovery so that the area would be protected, and consultation and treatment could occur as prescribed by law. If suspected Native American remains are discovered, the remains shall be kept in -situ, or in a secure location in close proximity to where they were found, and the analysis of the remains shall only occur on -site in the presence of a Tribal Monitor. By law, the Coroner Medical Examiner shall determine within two working days of being notified if the remains are subject to his or her authority. If the Coroner Medical Examiner identifies the remains to be of Native American ancestry, he or she shall contact the NAHC within 24 hours. The NAHC shall make a determination as to the Most Likely Descendent. If human remains are discovered, notify the consulting Tribe's Tribal Historic Preservation Officer. Geology GEO-1: Protect Paleontological Resources during Construction Activities Prior to ground disturbing activities, all field personnel will receive training on paleontological resources, including potential fossils that may be discovered and response steps, while a qualified paleontologist will prepare a Paleontological Resources Monitoring and Mitigation Plan (PRMMP). If fossils (like bones, teeth, or well-preserved plants) are found during construction, the City will stop work within 50 feet and notify a paleontologist to document and assess the find. The paleontologist may allow work to continue or recommend salvaging the fossils if necessary and will suggest appropriate treatment methods. Collected fossils will be sent to an accredited institution for curation and preservation. All earth -moving operations deeper than two feet must have a qualified paleontological monitor. Continuous monitoring is needed if fossil -rich lakebed sediments are found. The monitor can stop work to identify and salvage fossils and may halt equipment for large specimens. A monitoring plan must be submitted to the City before any permits are issued or soil is disturbed. Grading and excavation must comply with La Quinta Code and regulations. After ground disturbing activities and any necessary fossil curation, the project paleontologist will prepare a final report detailing the results of the PRMMP. Hazards HAZ-1: Hazardous Materials Handling and Planning New development projects in the Specific Plan area must comply with local, state, and federal regulations by submitting development plans and permits to the City for review. Projects intending to use or store hazardous materials must prepare a Spill Prevention Countermeasure Contingency Plan (SPCC) outlining spill containment protocols, along with maintaining an onsite SPCC spill kit. Additionally, developments proposing storage and use of hazardous materials above reporting thresholds must create a Hazardous Materials Business Emergency Plan (HMBEP) as per Chapter 6.95 of the California Health & Safety Code and Title 19, Division 2 of the California Code of Regulations. The HMBEP requires approval from the County of Riverside CUPA and the Department of Environmental Health prior to business operation commencement. HAZ-2: Phase I and/or Phase II Site Assessment Projects within the Specific Plan area that involve excavation at locations with recorded Cortese List sites must undergo a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, and where necessary, Phase II sampling. If the Phase I assessment identifies the need for remediation, the project sponsor must adhere to all remediation and abatement directives specified by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), or relevant regulatory agencies. Hydrology and Water Quality If human remains are encountered, halt During construction and follow procedures as Construction appropriate. Notify Riverside County Coroner's Office. Prepare a PRMMP. If fossils are encountered, divert construction activities within 50 feet and follow procedures as appropriate. All earth -moving operations deeper than two feet must have a qualified paleontological monitor. Prepare a SPCCP. Phase I and Phase II sampling required for development areas with recorded Cortese List sites. Qualified Archaeologist and Native American Monitor During Professional Construction Paleontologist Prior to Construction Prior to Construction Qualified Construction Contractor or Geologist Qualified Geologist HWQ-1: Stormwater Management Practices Prior to the issuance of City building permits, all projects within the Specific Plan area that disturb one acre or more of land must prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). This plan shall outline suitable Best Management Practices (BMPs) for managing and treating runoff from future development site(s). The applicant is accountable for both preparing and executing the SWPPP in accordance with NPDES requirements. Additionally, the applicant must submit a Notice of Intent to the State Water Resource Control Board, obtain a Waste Discharge ID Number (WDID), and ensure a copy of the SWPPP is present at the development site throughout the construction phase. HWQ-2: Water Conservation Measures Future development in the Highway 111 corridor must integrate water -saving appliances and fixtures, such as low -flush toilets, low -flow showerheads, and faucets, in compliance with Section 17921.3 of the Health and Safety Code, Title 20 of the California Administrative Code Section 1601(b), and relevant sections of Title 24 of the California State Code. Additionally, the City will enforce its Water Efficient Landscape ordinance, requiring development projects within the Specific Plan area to adopt water - efficient landscaping plans that meet or exceed current criteria. These measures are aimed at conserving water resources while addressing the needs of residents and businesses. Noise N0I-1: Noise Reduction All construction activities shall adhere to the City Construction Hours/Quality Assurance Program for designated construction hours, and equipment with internal combustion engines must be equipped with manufacturer -recommended mufflers. Future development projects shall use noise -reducing paving materials, such as open -grade asphalt, for all road surfacing. Ground disturbance greater than 1 acre must prepare and obtain a SWPPP, outline BMPs, submit an NOI, and obtain a WDID in accordance with NPDES. Copy of SWPPP present at site during construction. Future development shall incorporate water -saving appliances and fixtures as well as conform with City Landscape Ordinance. Construction activities must adhere to City's Construction Hours/Quality Assurance Program. October 1st — April 30th Monday — Friday: 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Saturday: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Sunday: NONE *Government Code Holidays: NONE May 1st — September 30th Monday — Friday: 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Saturday: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Sunday: NONE *Government Code Holidays: NONE Construction work (including setting -up traffic control devices) is not permitted on any arterial street (i.e. any 4 lane street) before 8:00 a.m. or after 4:30 p.m. Work within 500 feet of signalized intersection shall be performed between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., unless prior permission is granted by the City Engineer. Prior to Construction Prior to Construction/ During Construction During Construction Qualified Construction Contractor Qualified Construction Contractor Qualified Construction Contractor Appendix B Biological Resources Technical Memorandum May 8, 2023 Cheri Flores, Planning Manager, City of La Quinta Charles Smith, AICP, LEED AP GHD Business Group Leader, Natural Resources & Impact Assessment Sara Moriarty -Graves, GHD Wildlife Biologist 707-267-2221 Jane Cipra, GHD Botanist La Quinta 15-acre Mixed Use Development — Project no. 11219378 Biological Reconnaissance Site Visit to Support CEQA IS/MND The City of La Quinta (City) is proposing a mixed -use development in La Quinta, California (hereafter Project). To assist with preparation of the Project's Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), GHD evaluated the potential for sensitive biological resources (federal or state listed or state special status plants and wildlife, Sensitive Natural Communities, and wetlands) to occur within the Project area and potential impacts to these resources. Based on occurrence records, habitat availability, and the reconnaissance -level site visit, special status wildlife species have a potential to occur in the Project area. Special status plants may have the potential to occur but would require protocol -level surveys in appropriate blooming seasons to determine presence/absence. No impacts to jurisdictional wetlands or waters, or Sensitive Natural Communities are expected. Regards, Sara Moriarty -Graves Wildlife Biologist The Power of Commitment 11219378 1. Introduction The City of La Quinta (City) is proposing a mixed -use development in La Quinta, California (hereafter Project; Appendix A, Figure 1). The proposed Project plan includes development of up to 280 low-income apartment units along the north side of the parcel, and a commercial development on the south side of the parcel, along Highway 111. As part of the development, Corporate Center Drive would be extended to be continuous and separate the residential and commercial portions of the Project area. The 280 residential units are proposed to be a mix of one, two and three bedrooms and would require approximately 350-375 parking spaces. The average unit would be about 850 square feet in area. The residential buildings would be four stories with the units accessed off of a central interior hallway. Each story would have approximately 62 or 63 units. The parking spaces would be provided in three levels of parking (two story structure with parking on the roof). Bridges would be provided to link the 2nd and 3rd levels of parking to the corresponding residential level. The complex would include common amenities such as a swimming pool, play structures, common areas, operational and maintenance offices, and trash rooms. The commercial development would provide an approximate 85,000 square foot large retail building and 15,000 square foot separate drive through building. The sizes and configuration may vary based on the final commercial establishments. GHD evaluated the potential for sensitive biological resources (federally or state listed or state special status plants and wildlife, Sensitive Natural Communities [SNCs], and wetlands) to occur within the Project Study Boundary (PSB) and Biological Study Area (BSA; defined as the PSB and a 100-foot buffer to account for associated impacts from the Project; Appendix A, Figure 2). In addition, potential Project impacts to these resources were evaluated. Special status species and resources are the primary focus of this evaluation. Common species or resources without special protections are not considered. The purpose of this biological reconnaissance technical memorandum is to document the results of the February 4, 2023, site visit and provide information to support the Project's Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to provide a programmatic -level review of potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Project. 1.1 Project Location and Existing Setting The BSA is located in the City of La Quinta, which is in the County of Riverside, in between Highway 111 and the Whitewater River (Appendix A, Figure 2). Land cover is classified as shrub/scrub and is surrounded by open developed space to high level of intensity (USGS 2016). The City is located in the Coachella Valley, which is in between the Santa Rosa Mountains and Jacinto Mountains (to the west), Joshua Tree National Park (to the east), and approximately 40 miles from the Salton Sea (to the southeast). The BSA is located within the Whitewater River Watershed. The PSB is 15 acres, and is surrounded by retail stores, businesses, Highway 111, and other roads. The northern section of the BSA borders the Whitewater River. The landscape surrounding the BSA is highly urbanized and developed, with high amounts of vehicular traffic. 2. Survey Methods The following subsections summarize the desktop and field methods utilized to produce this technical memorandum. 2.1 Database Searches (CNDDB, CNPS, EFH, IPaC, NOAA Critical Habitat, and NWI) A database search for sensitive biological resource records in the Project vicinity was conducted by GHD on January 24, 2023. Database searches (Appendix B) included the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB; CDFW 2023a), California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Inventory of Rare and Endangered 11219378 Vascular Plants (CNPS 2023), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC; USFWS 2023), National Oceanic and Atmospheric (NOAA) Fisheries Essential Fish Habitat (EFH; NOAA 2023a), and NOAA Critical Habitat (NOAA 2023b). The search encompassed the La Quinta U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle and surrounding eight quads (Rancho Mirage, Cathedral City, Myoma, West Berdoo Canyon, Indio, Valerie, Martinez Mountain, and Toro Peak). Appendix A, Figure 3 shows all special status species records tracked by the CNDDB that are known to occur within a three-mile radius of the Project. A search of the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) for the Project vicinity was completed on January 24, 2023 (Appendix A, Figure 4; USFWS 2023b). 2.2 Field Survey A reconnaissance field survey was conducted by Sara Moriarty -Graves, GHD Wildlife Biologist, on February 4, 2023, from 09:30 to 11:00. Weather conditions were clear and with light air (Beaufort scale 1), about 60 to 65 degrees Fahrenheit. The survey included walking the entire PSB (Appendix A, Figure 2). The BSA was assessed visually from the public street right-of-way. The survey methods were intended to assess the potential for special status resources and habitats that occur within the BSA. The survey involved a physical search of the area, including visual inspections of the ground, holes, and vegetation for the presence of any wildlife species, special status plant species, or SNCs. Additionally, the bark of vegetation and the ground layer under vegetation were visually inspected for evidence of wildlife species, such as feathers, pellets, whitewash, scat, tracks, etc. No protocol -level surveys for wetlands, SNCs, special status plants, or wildlife were conducted. 3. Results The following sub -sections summarize the results of the desktop research and field survey performed for this technical memorandum. 3.1 Summary of General Biological Resources The PSB is a vacant lot located within the city of La Quinta and is surrounded by commercial businesses. There was litter, and signs of foot traffic and vehicle use observed within the BSA. The dominant vegetation within the PSB consisted of creosote (Larrea tridentata). The BSA is bordered to the north by the channelized Whitewater River. No flowing water and minimal moisture within the riverbed was observed. Commercial businesses surround the BSA to the east, south, and west. The other side of the Whitewater River is also developed. Although the BSA is within a developed landscape, there are shrubs and dune habitat that may support special status species. Many small mammal burrows were observed within the BSA, which can be used by other taxa such as birds and reptiles. The BSA also supports common avian species protected by the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code (FGC). Photos from the site visit are included in Appendix C (Site Visit Photos). Lists of all species observed within the BSA are provided in Appendix D, Tables D1 to D4. 3.2 Wetlands and Waters The Whitewater River is adjacent to the northern portion of the BSA. The section of river adjacent to the BSA is classified as a riverine intermittent streambed that is intermittently flooded (USFWS 2023b). However, the Whitewater River in the Project vicinity is channelized and is highly modified from its original form. To reduce sedimentation and maintain flows, it is frequently maintained by the Coachella Valley Water District (City of La Quinta 2017). It is characterized as having a mixture of earthen and concrete bottom and slopes and supports some vegetation growth. The channel conveys surface storm water runoff during rain events (City of La Quinta 2017). During the site visit, there was limited puddled water observed within the river (Appendix C, Site Visit Photos). No flowing water was observed, and there were signs of vehicular use within the riverbed. 11219378 The Project does not involve alteration of the Whitewater River, including the channel and floodplain. There will be no impact to the Whitewater River or jurisdictional wetlands. 3.3 Sensitive Natural Communities (SNCs) A query of CNDDB returned multiple locations of Desert Fan Palm Oasis Woodland (Washingtonia filifera) SNC (G3, S3.2) in the nine quads surrounding the PSB; however, the nearest Desert Fan Palm Oasis to the PSB is over five miles to the northeast. No native fan palms are present in the PSB. The PSB is mainly vegetated by Creosote Bush Scrub (Larrea tridentata), a natural community which is not considered sensitive by CDFW (G5, S5). The Project would not impact any SNCs, as none are present 3.4 Habitat Conservation Plans and Natural Community Conservation Plans Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) and Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs) are site -specific plans to address effects on sensitive species of plants and animals. The BSA is within the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP), which is an HCP and NCCP implemented by the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission (CVCC; CDFW 2023b, CVCC 2023). The City of La Quinta has been a participant in the CVMSHCP since 1996. If the project qualifies, the signatories to the CVMSHCP are able to obtain coverage for incidental take for the 21 wildlife and plant species that the CVMSHCP covers (CVCC 2023). The Project is outside of a designated Conservation Area, and a Joint Review Project is not required. However, the Local Development Mitigation Fee (LDMF) to the CVCC is required for development projects. Submission of the LDMF to the CVCC is recommended before building or grading permits are submitted. 3.5 Critical Habitat The BSA does not overlap any federally designated critical habitat (Appendix B, IPaC Report). No impact would result. 3.6 Habitat Connectivity and Access Wildlife corridors refer to established migration routes commonly used by resident and migratory species for passage from one geographic location to another. Maintaining the continuity of established wildlife corridors is important to: a) sustain species with specific foraging requirements, b) preserve a species' distribution potential, and c) retain diversity among many wildlife populations. Therefore, resource agencies consider wildlife corridors to be a sensitive resource. The Project is approximately seven miles from the nearest "essential connectivity area" and one mile from a "natural landscape block" and "small natural landscape area" identified by the California Habitat Connectivity Project (CDFW 2022c). The BSA is surrounded by existing development, Highway 111, and the highly modified Whitewater River. Due to the level of development existing surrounding the BSA, there would be no impact to the habitat access, connectivity, or migratory corridors of wildlife species. Habitat in the Project vicinity is highly fragmented. No new barriers to terrestrial wildlife movement would result from the Project, and the Project would not substantially interfere with migratory birds, bats, or other species. 3.7 Special Status Plants The database scoping detailed in Section 2.1 produced a total of 66 plant species known to occur in the nine USGS quads surrounding the PSB. Based on species specific habitat requirements and habitat availability within the PSB, three species have a low potential to occur, and seven have a moderate potential to occur (Table 1). Due to the disturbed and isolated nature of the habitat in the PSB, no special status plant species have a high potential to occur. No special status plant species were observed during the site visit on February 4, 2023; however, no protocol level surveys have been conducted and the site visit was outside of the blooming season for some 11219378 plant species with potential to occur in the PSB. Protocol level surveys will be required to determine if special status plants are present. A list of all plant species detected during the reconnaissance -level site visit are presented in Appendix D, Table D1. 11219378 Table 1 Potential for Special Status Plants to Occur in the PSB Scientific Name Common Name Abronia villosa var. aurita chaparral sand -verbena 1 B.1 Acmispon haydonii pygmy lotus 1 B.3 Astragalus bicristatus Astragalus hornii var. hornii Astragalus lentiginosus var borreganus Astragalus lentiginosus var coachellae Astragalus leucolobus Astragalus preussii var laxiflorus Astragalus sabulonum crested milk -vetch 4.3 Horn's milk -vetch 1 B.1 Borrego milk -vetch 4.3 Coachella Valley milk -vetch FE, 1 B.2 Chaparral, Coastal scrub, Desert dunes, Sandy Pinyon and juniper woodland, Sonoran desert scrub, Rocky Lower montane coniferous forest, Upper montane coniferous forest, Carbonate (usually), Rocky (sometimes), Sandy (sometimes) Meadows and seeps, Playas, Alkaline, Lake Margins Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert scrub, Sandy Desert dunes, Sonoran desert scrub (sandy) Big Bear Valley woollypod 1 B.2 Lower montane coniferous forest, Pebble (Pavement) plain, Pinyon and juniper woodland, Upper montane coniferous forest, Rocky Lancaster milk -vetch 1 B.1 Chenopod scrub gravel milk -vetch 2B.2 Desert dunes, Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert scrub, Flats, Gravelly (sometimes), Roadsides, Sandy (usually), Washes No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (245 - 5250 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (1705 - 3935 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (5580 - 9005 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (195 2790 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (100 2935 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (130 2150 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (3610 - 9465 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (2295 - 2295 feet). Moderate potential. Suitable habitat is present in the PSB. Occurrence data is not available. The Power of Commitment 11219378 6 Astragalus tricarinatus Ayenia compacta Bursera microphylla Calochortus palmeri var munzii Calochortus palmeri var palmeri Caulanthus simulans Chaenactis parishii Chorizanthe leptotheca Chorizanthe xanti var leucotheca Cuscuta californica var apiculata triple -ribbed milk -vetch California ayenia little -leaf elephant tree San Jacinto mariposa -lily Palmer's mariposa -lily Payson's jewelflower Parish's chaenactis Peninsular spineflower white-bracted spineflower pointed dodder FE, 1 B.2 Joshua tree "woodland", Sonoran desert scrub, Gravelly (sometimes), Sandy (sometimes) 2B.3 Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert scrub, Rocky 2B.3 1 B.2 1 B.2 4.2 1 B.3 4.2 1 B.2 9 Sonoran desert scrub (rocky) Chaparral, Lower montane coniferous forest, Meadows and seeps Chaparral, Lower montane coniferous forest, Meadows and seeps, Mesic Chaparral, Coastal scrub, Granitic, Sandy Chaparral (rocky) Chaparral, Coastal scrub, Lower montane coniferous forest, alluvial fan, Granitic Coastal scrub (alluvial fans), Mojavean desert scrub, Pinyon and juniper woodland, Gravelly (sometimes), Sandy (sometimes) Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert scrub, Sandy No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (1475 - 3905 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (490 - 3595 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (655 - 2295 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (2805 - 7220 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (2330 - 7840 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (295 - 7220 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (4265 - 8205 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (985 - 6235 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (985 - 3935 feet). Moderate potential. Suitable habitat is present in the PSB. Occurrence data is not available. 11219378 7 Delphinium parishii ssp. subglobosum Dieteria canescens var ziegleri Ditaxis claryana Colorado Desert larkspur 4.3 Ziegler's aster glandular ditaxis Ditaxis serrata var. californica California ditaxis Draba saxosa Eremothera boothii ssp. boothii Eriastrum harwoodii Erythranthe diffusa Eschscholzia androuxii Euphorbia abramsiana Southern California rock draba Booth's evening -primrose Harwood's eriastrum Palomar monkeyflower Joshua Tree poppy Abrams' spurge 1 B.2 2B.2 3.2 1 B.3 2B.3 1 B.2 4.3 4.3 2B.2 Chaparral, Cismontane woodland, Pinyon and juniper woodland, Sonoran desert scrub Lower montane coniferous forest, Upper montane coniferous forest Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert scrub, Sandy Sonoran desert scrub Alpine boulder and rock field, Subalpine coniferous forest, Upper montane coniferous forest, Rocky Joshua tree "woodland", Pinyon and juniper woodland Desert dunes Chaparral, Lower montane coniferous forest, Gravelly (sometimes), Sandy (sometimes) Joshua tree "woodland", Mojavean desert scrub, Desert washes, Flats, Gravelly, Rocky, Sandy, Slopes, Washes Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert scrub, Sandy No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (1970 - 5905 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (4500 - 8200 feet). Moderate potential. Suitable habitat is present in the PSB. A CNDDB occurrence from an unknown date is mapped to an uncertain location in the PSB. No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (100 3280 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (8005 - 11810 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (2675 - 7875 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (410 - 3000 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (4005 - 6005 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (1920 - 5530 feet). Low potential. Suitable habitat is present in the PSB; however, this species was last seen in 1968 11219378 8 Euphorbia arizonica Euphorbia platysperma Euphorbia revoluta Funastrum crispum Galium angustifolium ssp gracillimum Galium angustifolium ssp jacinticum Heuchera hirsutissima Horsfordia alata Horsfordia newberryi Arizona spurge flat -seeded spurge revolute spurge wavyleaf twinvine slender bedstraw San Jacinto Mountains bedstraw shaggy -haired alumroot pink velvet -mallow Newberry's velvet -mallow Hulsea vestita ssp. callicarpha beautiful hulsea approximately 3.5 miles northwest of the PSB. 2B.3 Sonoran desert scrub (sandy) No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (165 - 985 feet). 1 B.2 Desert dunes, Sonoran desert No potential. The PSB is outside of the scrub (sandy) elevational range for this species (215 - 330 feet). 4.3 Mojavean desert scrub (rocky) No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (3595 - 10170 feet). 2B.2 Chaparral, Pinyon and juniper No potential. The PSB is outside of the woodland elevational range for this species (3820 - 6035 feet). 4.2 Joshua tree "woodland", Sonoran No potential. The PSB is outside of the desert scrub, Granitic, Rocky elevational range for this species (425 - 5085 feet). 1 B.3 Lower montane coniferous forest No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (4430 - 6890 feet). 1 B.3 Subalpine coniferous forest, Upper No potential. The PSB is outside of the montane coniferous forest, elevational range for this species (4985 Granitic, Rocky - 11485 feet). 4.3 Sonoran desert scrub (rocky) No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (330 - 1640 feet). 4.3 Sonoran desert scrub (rocky) Moderate potential. Suitable habitat is present in the PSB. Occurrence data is not available. 4.2 Chaparral, Lower montane No potential. The PSB is outside of the coniferous forest, Granitic, elevational range for this species (3000 Gravelly (sometimes), Rocky - 10005 feet). (sometimes) 11219378 9 Jaffueliobryum raui Johnstonella costata Johnstonella holoptera Rau's jaffueliobryum moss ribbed cryptantha winged cryptantha Juncus acutus ssp. leopoldii southwestern spiny rush Juncus cooperi Leptosiphon floribundus ssp hallii Lilium parryi Lycium torreyi Marina orcuttii var. orcuttii Matelea parvifolia Cooper's rush Santa Rosa Mountains leptosiphon lemon lily Torrey's box -thorn California marina spear -leaf matelea 213.3 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.3 1 B.3 1 B.2 4.2 1 B.3 213.3 Alpine dwarf scrub, Chaparral, Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert scrub, Carbonate, Dry, Openings, Rock crevices Desert dunes, Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert scrub, Sandy Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert scrub Coastal dunes (mesic), Coastal scrub, Marshes and swamps (coastal salt), Meadows and seeps (alkaline seeps) Meadows and seeps (mesic, alkaline or saline) Pinyon and juniper woodland, Sonoran desert scrub Lower montane coniferous forest, Meadows and seeps, Riparian forest, Upper montane coniferous forest, Mesic Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert scrub, desert valleys, Rocky, Sandy, Streambanks, Washes Chaparral, Pinyon and juniper woodland, Sonoran desert scrub, Rocky Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert scrub, Rocky No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (1610 - 6890 feet). Moderate potential. Suitable habitat is present in the PSB. Occurrence data is not available. No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (330 - 5545 feet). No potential. No marshes, swamps or seeps are present in the PSB. No potential. No marshes, swamps or seeps are present in the PSB. No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (3280 - 6560 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (4005 - 9005 feet). Moderate potential. Suitable habitat is present in the PSB. Occurrence data is not available. No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (3445 - 3805 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (1445 - 3595 feet). 11219378 10 Mirabilis tenuiloba Nemacaulis denudata var gracilis Penstemon californicus Penstemon clevelandii var connatus Petalonyx linearis Phaseolus filiformis Pseudorontium cyathiferum Saltugilia latimeri Sedum niveum slender -lobed four o'clock 4.3 slender cottonheads California beardtongue San Jacinto beardtongue narrow -leaf sandpaper - plant slender -stem bean Deep Canyon snapdragon Latimer's woodland-gilia Davidson's stonecrop 213.2 1 B.2 4.3 213.3 213.1 213.3 1 B.2 4.2 Sonoran desert scrub Coastal dunes, Desert dunes, Sonoran desert scrub Chaparral, Lower montane coniferous forest, Pinyon and juniper woodland, Sandy Chaparral, Pinyon and juniper woodland, Sonoran desert scrub, Rocky Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert scrub, canyons, Rocky (sometimes), Sandy (sometimes) Sonoran desert scrub Sonoran desert scrub (rocky) Chaparral, Mojavean desert scrub, Pinyon and juniper woodland, Granitic (often), Rocky (sometimes), Sandy (sometimes), Washes (sometimes) Lower montane coniferous forest, Subalpine coniferous forest, Upper montane coniferous forest, Rocky No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (755 - 3595 feet). Moderate potential. Suitable habitat is present in the PSB. This species was observed approximately 0.5 mile west of the PSB in 1978. No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (3840 - 7545 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (1310 - 4920 feet). Low potential. Suitable habitat is present in the PSB; however, the nearest occurrence is mapped to an uncertain location over 5 miles to the southwest. No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (410 - 410 feet). Low potential. Suitable habitat is present in the PSB; however, the nearest occurrences are over 5 miles to the southwest. No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (1310 - 6235 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (6810 - 9845 feet). 11219378 11 Selaginella eremophila Senna covesii Sidotheca emarginata Stemodia durantifolia Streptanthus campestris Thysanocarpus rigidus Tragia ramosa Xylorhiza cognata desert spike -moss Cove's cassia white -margined oxytheca purple stemodia southern jewelflower rigid fringepod desert tragia Mecca -aster 213.2 213.2 1 B.3 213.1 1 B.3 1 B.2 4.3 1 B.2 Chaparral, Sonoran desert scrub No potential. The PSB is outside of the (gravelly, rocky) elevational range for this species (655 - 4250 feet). Sonoran desert scrub, Dry, sandy No potential. The PSB is outside of the desert washes and slopes, Dry, elevational range for this species (740 - Sandy, Slopes, Washes 4250 feet). Chaparral, Lower montane coniferous forest, Pinyon and juniper woodland Sonoran desert scrub (often mesic, sandy) Chaparral, Lower montane coniferous forest, Pinyon and juniper woodland, Rocky No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (3935 - 8205 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (590 - 985 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (2955 - 7545 feet). Pinyon and juniper woodland, Dry, No potential. The PSB is outside of the Rocky, Slopes elevational range for this species (1970 - 7220 feet). Chenopod scrub, Pinyon and juniper woodland, Rocky Sonoran desert scrub Footnotes: Rankings from CNDDB (January 2023). 2 General habitat, and microhabitat column information, reprinted from CNDDB (January 2023). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (2955 - 6105 feet). No potential. The PSB is outside of the elevational range for this species (65 - 1310 feet). Status Abbreviations: CRPR: CNPS rankings for rare plants (CNPS 2023a) - 1A = Plants presumed extinct in California; 1 B = Plants rare, threatened or endangered in California and elsewhere; 2 = Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California, but more common elsewhere; 3 = Plants about which more information is needed (a review list); 4 = Plants of limited distribution (a watch list); n/a = not applicable; Threat Code extensions and their meanings: ".1 - Seriously threatened in California (over 80% of occurrences threatened / high degree and immediacy of threat); .2 — Moderately threatened in California (20-80% of occurrences threatened / moderate degree and immediacy of threat); .3 — Not very threatened in California (<20% of occurrences threatened / low degree and immediacy of threat or no current threats known)" (CDFW 2023a). 11219378 12 Potential to Occur: No potential: Habitat in and adjacent to the PSB is clearly unsuitable for the species requirements (cover, substrate, elevation, hydrology, plant community, site history, disturbance regime). Low potential: Few of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present, and/or the majority of habitat on and adjacent to the site is unsuitable or of very poor quality. The species is not likely to be found in the PSB. Moderate potential: Some of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present, and/or only some of the habitat on or adjacent to the site is unsuitable. The species has a moderate probability of being found in the PSB. High potential: All of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present and/or most of the habitat on or adjacent to the site is highly suitable. The species has a high probability of being found on in the PSB. 11219378 13 3.8 Special Status Wildlife The database scoping detailed in Section 2.1 returned a total of 86 species (Table 2). The potential for sensitive wildlife species to occur was determined based on existing data and the reconnaissance level site visit. Special status species are federally and/or state listed, a CDFW Species of Special Concern, CDFW Fully Protected, on the CDFW Special Animals List, or any combination of these. The Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard (federally threatened and state endangered) is a listed reptile species with a moderate potential to occur within the BSA based on recent nearby observations (Naturalist 2023). In addition, there is one special status rodent species (Coachella Valley Round -tailed Ground Squirrel), six bird species, one other reptile species (Flat -tailed Horned Lizard), and one insect (Coachella Valley Giant Sand Treader Cricket) with a moderate potential to occur (Table 2). The Burrowing Owl is a covered species under the CVMSHCP, but is afforded additional protections under FGC and the MBTA and would require additional minimization measures. According to the CVMSHCP, authorization of take for all species with a moderate potential to occur, except the six bird species, can be obtained through compliance with the CVMSHCP and the LDMF paid to the CVCC (CVCC 2023). Minimization measures to reduce impacts to bird species are included in Section 5. Although compliance with the CVMSHCP authorizes take for the covered species, state and federal regulations could require additional minimization measures in subsequent review of CEQA documents. Terrestrial wildlife observed on site are included in Appendix D, Table D2. A lizard and ground squirrel were briefly observed during the site visit and were not able to be identified to species. A list of all bird species detected during the site visit and their associated breeding codes are presented in Appendix D, Tables D3 and D4. As many neotropical avian species have migrated south by fall, Table D4 is not a comprehensive list of all species that could occur throughout the breeding season. In addition, no protocol - level surveys have been conducted. Based on existing habitat and available data, the BSA may support special status species and does support common species. With implementation of the proposed avoidance and minimization measures (Section 5), in addition to compliance with the CVMSHCP, impacts to special status wildlife species would be less than significant. The Power of Commitment 11219378 14 Table 2 Special Status Wildlife Species Potential to Occur within the Project Study Boundary (PSB) and Biological Study Area (BSA) Mammals Antrozous Pallid Bat None None SSC Deserts, grasslands, shrublands, pallidus woodlands and forests. Most common in open, dry habitats with rocky areas for roosting. Roosts must protect bats from high temperatures. Very sensitive to disturbance of roosting sites. Bassariscus Southern None None FP Exploit a variety of habitats such as dry, astutus octavus California rocky, brush -covered hillsides or riparian Ringtail areas, typically not far from an open water source. Dens most often in rock crevices, boulder piles, or talus, but also tree hollows, root cavities, and rural buildings. Rarely use same den for more than a few days. Chaetodipus Dulzura Pocket None None SSC Chaparral, coastal scrub, valley & foothill californicus Mouse grassland. Variety of habitats including femoralis coastal scrub, chaparral and grassland in San Diego County. Attracted to grass - chaparral edges. Chaetodipus Northwestern None None SSC Coastal scrub, chaparral, grasslands, fallax fallax San Diego sagebrush, etc. in western San Diego Pocket Mouse County. Sandy, herbaceous areas, usually in association with rocks or coarse gravel. Chaetodipus Pallid San None None SSC Desert wash, pinon & juniper woodlands, fallax pallidus Diego Pocket Sonoran desert scrub. Desert border areas Mouse in eastern San Diego County in desert wash, desert scrub, desert succulent scrub, pinyon -juniper, etc. Sandy, herbaceous areas, usually in association with rocks or coarse gravel. Low potential. There are no suitable rocky areas for roosting. Additionally, the BSA is highly disturbed. Low potential. There is not suitable habitat available for this species in the BSA. Low potential. The preferred habitat types are not present within the BSA. Low potential. There is no suitable habitat within the BSA for this species. Also, the BSA is not within San Diego County. Low potential. There is not suitable habitat within the BSA for this species. Also, the BSA is not within San Diego County. The Power of Commitment 11219378 15 Dipodomys Earthquake None None - Chaparral, coastal scrub. Known only from Low potential. No chaparral or merriami Merriams San Diego and Riverside counties. coastal scrub habitat available for collinus Kangaroo Rat Associated with riversidean sage scrub, this species. chaparral, and non-native grassland. Need sandy loam substrates for digging of burrows. Eumops perotis Western Mastiff None None SSC Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal Low potential. The BSA does not californicus Bat scrub, valley & foothill grassland. Many contain suitable roosting habitat. open, semi -arid to and habitats, including conifer and deciduous woodlands, coastal scrub, grasslands, chaparral, etc. Roosts in crevices in cliff faces, high buildings, trees and tunnels. Lasiurus Western Yellow None None SSC Found in valley foothill riparian, desert Low potential. Although the BSA is in xanthinus Bat riparian, desert wash, and palm oasis proximity to limited riparian habitat habitats. Roosts in trees, particularly palms. within the Whitewater River, there is Forages over water and among trees. no palm trees available for roosting. Neotoma Colorado Valley None None - Sonoran desert scrub. Low-lying desert Low potential. The BSA does not albigula venusta Woodrat areas in southeastern California. Closely contain succulent plants, or beaver - associated with beaver -tail cactus and tail cactus for foraging. mesquite. Intolerant of cold temps. Eats mainly succulent plants. Distribution influenced by abundance of nest building material. Neotoma lepida San Diego None None SSC Coastal scrub of Southern California from Low potential. No moderate to dense intermedia Desert Woodrat San Diego County to San Luis Obispo canopy, or coastal scrub present in County. Moderate to dense canopies the BSA. preferred. They are particularly abundant in rock outcrops, rocky cliffs, and slopes. Nyctinomops Pocketed Free- None None SSC Joshua tree woodland, pinon & juniper Low potential. There is not femorosaccus tailed Bat woodlands, riparian scrub, Sonoran desert woodland, scrub, or rocky areas with scrub. Variety of arid areas in Southern high cliffs habitat types available in California; pine -juniper woodlands, desert the BSA for this species. scrub, palm oasis, desert wash, desert riparian, etc. Rocky areas with high cliffs. 11219378 16 Ovis canadensis Desert Bighorn None None FP Alpine, alpine dwarf scrub, chaparral, nelsoni Sheep chenopod scrub, Great Basin scrub, Mojavean desert scrub, Montane dwarf scrub, pinon & juniper woodlands, riparian woodland, Sonoran desert scrub. Widely distributed from the White Mtns in Mono Co. to the Chocolate Mts in Imperial Co. Open, rocky, steep areas with available water and herbaceous forage. Ovis canadensis Peninsular FE ST FP Eastern slopes of the Peninsular Ranges nelsoni pop. 2 Bighorn Sheep below 4,600 ft elevation. This DPS of the DPS subspecies inhabits the Peninsular Ranges in southern California from the San Jacinto Mountains south to the US -Mexico International Border. Optimal habitat includes steep walled canyons and ridges bisected by rocky or sandy washes, with available water. Perognathus Palm Springs None None SSC Desert wash, Sonoran desert scrub. Desert longimembris Pocket Mouse riparian, desert scrub, desert wash and bangsi sagebrush habitats. Most common in creosote -dominated desert scrub. Rarely found on rocky sites. Occurs in all canopy coverage classes. Perognathus Los Angeles None None SSC Coastal scrub. Lower elevation grasslands longimembris Pocket Mouse and coastal sage communities in and brevinasus around the Los Angeles Basin. Open ground with fine, sandy soils. May not dig extensive burrows, hiding under weeds and dead leaves instead. Taxidea taxus American None None SSC Most abundant in drier open stages of most Badger shrub, forest, and herbaceous habitats, with friable soils. Needs sufficient food, friable soils and open, uncultivated ground. Preys on burrowing rodents. Digs burrows. No potential. There is no suitable habitat available within the BSA. The proximity to roads and human development is not suitable. No potential. There is no suitable habitat available within the BSA. The proximity to roads and human development is not suitable. Low potential. There is suitable creosote habitat for this species. However, there are no recorded observations nearby (CDFW 2022, iNaturalist 2023). Low potential. Coastal scrub is not present within the BSA. The BSA is outside of the Los Angeles Basin. Low potential. The BSA does not contain suitable habitat for this species, and the fragmentation is not suitable. 11219378 17 Xerospermophil us tereticaudus chlorus Birds Accipiter cooperii Accipiter striatus Aquila chrysaetos Ardea albs Palm Springs Round -tailed Ground Squirrel Coopers Hawk Sharp -shinned Hawk None None None Golden Eagle None Great Egret None None None None None None SSC WL r� Chenopod scrub, Sonoran desert scrub. Restricted to the Coachella Valley. Prefers desert succulent scrub, desert wash, desert scrub, alkali scrub, and levees. Prefers open, flat, grassy areas in fine -textured, sandy soil. Density correlated with winter rainfall. Cismontane woodland, riparian forest, riparian woodland, upper montane coniferous forest. Woodland, chiefly of open, interrupted or marginal type. Nest sites mainly in riparian growths of deciduous trees, as in canyon bottoms on river flood -plains; also, live oaks. Cismontane woodland, lower montane coniferous forest, riparian forest, riparian woodland. Ponderosa pine, black oak, riparian deciduous, mixed conifer, and Jeffrey pine habitats. Prefers riparian areas. North -facing slopes with plucking perches are critical requirements. Nests usually within 275 ft of water. FP I WL Rolling foothills, mountain areas, sage - juniper flats, and desert. Cliff -walled canyons provide nesting habitat in most parts of range; also, large trees in open areas. Brackish marsh, estuary, freshwater marsh, marsh & swamp, riparian forest, wetland. Colonial nester in large trees. Rookery sites located near marshes, tide -flats, irrigated pastures, and margins of rivers and lakes. Moderate potential. The BSA contains some of the preferred habitat types. There is an observation on the CNDDB 0.25 miles of the BSA from 2002 (CDFW 2022). The BSA is within 0.25 miles of areas predicted to have occupancy from a habitat suitability model (CVAG 2022). Moderate potential. There are observations nearby (within 0.5 miles; eBird 2023). However, there is no nesting habitat available within the BSA for this species. The species may occur in riparian habitat areas in and around the Whitewater River. Low potential. There is not suitable forested or riparian habitat available within the BSA. Low potential. No canyons or large trees available for nesting within the BSA. Low potential. There is not suitable habitat within the BSA for this species. 11219378 18 Ardea herodias Asio otus Athene cunicularia Botaurus lentiginosus Great Blue None Heron Long-eared Owl None Burrowing Owl American Bittern None None None None None None SSC SSC Brackish marsh, estuary, freshwater marsh, marsh & swamp, riparian forest, wetland. Colonial nester in tall trees, cliffsides, and sequestered spots on marshes. Rookery sites in close proximity to foraging areas: marshes, lake margins, tide -flats, rivers and streams, wet meadows. Cismontane woodland, Great Basin scrub, riparian forest, riparian woodland, upper montane coniferous forest. Riparian bottomlands grown to tall willows and cottonwoods; also, belts of live oak paralleling stream courses. Require adjacent open land, productive of mice and the presence of old nests of crows, hawks, or magpies for breeding. Coastal prairie, coastal scrub, Great Basin grassland, Great Basin scrub, Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert scrub, valley & foothill grassland. Open, dry annual or perennial grasslands, deserts, and scrublands characterized by low -growing vegetation. Subterranean nester, dependent upon burrowing mammals, most notably, the California ground squirrel. Brackish marsh, freshwater marsh, salt marsh. Freshwater and slightly brackish marshes. Also in coastal saltmarshes. Dense reed beds. Low potential. There is not suitable habitat within the BSA for this species. Low potential. There is not suitable habitat within the BSA for this species. Moderate potential. There are recorded observations within 0.5 miles of the BSA (eBird 2023). In La Quinta, there are public observations at three locations from the years 2017 and 2018 (eBird 2023). Additionally, ground squirrels and many burrows were present, which provide habitat for this species. The BSA is considered to have highly suitable habitat (CDFW 2016). The nearest records on the CNDDB are approximately three miles away, and are from 1927 to 2007 (CDFW 2022). No potential. No suitable marsh habitat available. 11219378 19 Buteo regalis Ferruginous None None WL Great Basin grassland, Great Basin scrub, Hawk Pinon & juniper woodlands, valley & foothill grassland. Open grasslands, sagebrush flats, desert scrub, low foothills and fringes of pinyon and juniper habitats. Eats mostly lagomorphs, ground squirrels, and mice. Population trends may follow lagomorph population cycles. Calypte costae Costas None None - Desert riparian, desert and and scrub Hummingbird foothill habitats. Chaetura vauxi Vauxs Swift None None SSC Redwood, Douglas -fir, and other coniferous forests. Nests in large hollow trees and snags. Often nests in flocks. Forages over most terrains and habitats but shows a preference for foraging over rivers and lakes. Charadrius Mountain Plover None None SSC Chenopod scrub, Valley & foothill montanus grassland, Short grasslands, freshly plowed fields, newly sprouting grain fields, and sometimes sod farms. Short vegetation, bare ground, and flat topography. Prefers grazed areas and areas with burrowing rodents. Chlidonias niger Black Tern None None SSC Freshwater marsh, Great Basin standing waters, wetland. Freshwater lakes, ponds, marshes and flooded ag fields. At coastal lagoons and estuaries during migration. Breeding range reduced. Breeds primarily in Modoc Plateau region, with some breeding in Sacramento and San Joaquin valleys. Low potential. Marginally suitable habitat available for this species within the BSA. Observations are approximately five miles away (eBird 2023). Moderate potential. There is an observation within a vacant lot within 0.25 miles of the BSA (eBird 2023). Low potential. There is no suitable forested habitat within the BSA for this species. Low potential. There are no grazed areas within the BSA. No observations nearby (eBird 2023). Low potential. There is no suitable aquatic habitat present within the BSA. 11219378 20 Circus Northern Harrier None None SSC Coastal scrub, Great Basin grassland, hudsonius marsh & swamp, riparian scrub, valley & foothill grassland, wetland. Coastal salt and freshwater marsh. Nest and forage in grasslands, from salt grass in desert sink to mountain cienagas. Nests on ground in shrubby vegetation, usually at marsh edge; nest built of a large mound of sticks in wet areas. Contopus Olive -sided None None SSC Lower montane coniferous forest, redwood, cooperi Flycatcher upper montane coniferous forest. Nesting habitats are mixed conifer, montane hardwood -conifer, Douglas -fir, redwood, red fir and lodgepole pine. Most numerous in montane conifer forests where tall trees overlook canyons, meadows, lakes or other open terrain. Egretta thula Snowy Egret None None - Marsh & swamp, meadow & seep, riparian forest, riparian woodland, wetland. Colonial nester, with nest sites situated in protected beds of dense tules. Rookery sites situated close to foraging areas: marshes, tidal -flats, streams, wet meadows, and borders of lakes. Empidonax Little Willow None SE - Meadow & seep, riparian woodland. traillii brewsteri Flycatcher Mountain meadows and riparian habitats in the Sierra Nevada and Cascades. Nests near the edges of vegetation clumps and near streams. Empidonax Southwestern FE SE - Riparian woodlands in Southern California. traillii extimus Willow Flycatcher Low potential. There is not suitable foraging or nesting habitat within the BSA for this species. Low potential. There is no suitable nesting habitat within the BSA. Low potential. There is not highly suitable habitat available within the BSA for this species. Low potential. There is not highly suitable habitat available within the BSA for this species. Low potential. No suitable habitat available within the BSA for this species. No observations nearby (eBird 2023). 11219378 21 Eremophila California None None WL alpestris actia Horned Lark Falco Prairie Falcon None None WL mexicanus Falco American Delisted Delisted FP peregrinus Peregrine anatum Falcon Hydroprogne Caspian Tern None None - caspia Icteria virens Yellow -breasted None None SSC Chat Lanius Loggerhead None None SSC ludovicianus Shrike Marine intertidal & splash zone communities, meadow & seep. Coastal regions, chiefly from Sonoma County to San Diego County. Also main part of San Joaquin Valley and east to foothills. Short - grass prairie, "bald" hills, mountain meadows, open coastal plains, fallow grain fields, alkali flats. Great Basin grassland, Great Basin scrub, Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert scrub, valley & foothill grassland. Inhabits dry, open terrain, either level or hilly. Breeding sites located on cliffs. Forages far afield, even to marshlands and ocean shores. Low potential. The BSA does not contain suitable habitat for this species. Low potential. There is no cliff habitat for breeding, or preferred foraging habitats within the BSA. Near wetlands, lakes, rivers, or other water; Low potential. No suitable aquatic on cliffs, banks, dunes, mounds; also, habitat within or nearby the BSA. human -made structures. Nest consists of a scrape or a depression or ledge in an open site. Nests on sandy or gravelly beaches and shell banks in small colonies inland and along the coast. Inland freshwater lakes and marshes; also, brackish or salt waters of estuaries and bays. Riparian forest, riparian scrub, riparian woodland. Summer resident; inhabits riparian thickets of willow and other brushy tangles near watercourses. Nests in low, dense riparian, consisting of willow, blackberry, wild grape; forages and nests within 10 ft of ground. Broken woodlands, savannah, pinyon - juniper, Joshua tree, and riparian woodlands, desert oases, scrub and washes. Prefers open country for hunting, with perches for scanning, and fairly dense shrubs and brush for nesting. Low potential. No suitable aquatic habitat within or nearby the BSA. Low potential. The BSA does not contain suitable riparian habitat for this species. Low potential. The BSA does not provide highly suitable habitat for this species. Recent observations nearby are sparse (eBird 2023). 11219378 22 Larus California Gull None californicus Leiothlypis Lucys Warbler None luciae Melozone aberti Aberts Towhee None Numenius Long -billed None americanus Curlew Pandion Osprey haliaetus Passercu/us Bryants sandwichensis Savannah alaudinus Sparrow Passerculus Large -billed sandwichensis Savannah rostratus Sparrow None None None None None None None None None None WL Littoral waters, sandy beaches, waters and shorelines of bays, tidal mud -flats, marshes, lakes, etc. Colonial nester on islets in large interior lakes, either fresh or strongly alkaline. SSC Riparian woodland. Primarily along lower Colorado River Valley and the washes and arroyos emptying into it, with occasional occurrences throughout the Sonoran and Mojave deserts. Partial to thickets of mesquite, riparian scrub and even stands of tamarisk. - Desert wash, riparian woodland. Desert riparian and desert wash habitats in the lower Colorado River Valley, also the Imperial and Coachella valleys. Frequents dense vegetation, thickets of willow, cottonwood, mesquite, and saltcedar. WL Great Basin grassland, meadow & seep. Breeds in upland shortgrass prairies and wet meadows in northeastern California. Habitats on gravelly soils and gently rolling terrain are favored over others. WL Riparian forest, Ocean shore, bays, freshwater lakes, and larger streams. Large nests built in tree -tops within 15 miles of a good fish -producing body of water. SSC Open fields, meadows, salt marshes, prairies, dunes, shores. Over most of range, found in open meadows, pastures, edges of marshes, alfalfa fields, pastures; also tundra in summer, shores and weedy vacant lots in winter. SSC Wetland. Breeds along the Colorado River delta in Mexico; winters at the Salton Sea. Saline emergent wetlands at the Salton Sea and southern coast. Low potential. No suitable aquatic habitat within or nearby the BSA. Low potential. The BSA does not contain suitable riparian habitat for this species. Moderate potential. There are recorded public observations within 0.5 miles of the BSA (eBird 2023). Low potential. The BSA does not provide suitable habitat for this species. No potential. There is no suitable aquatic habitat needed for foraging within or nearby the BSA. Low potential. No suitable habitat types are present. Low potential. No wetland habitat available for this species within the BSA. 11219378 23 Piranga rubra Summer None None SSC Riparian forest. Summer resident of desert Tanager riparian along lower Colorado River, and locally elsewhere in California deserts. Requires cottonwood -willow riparian for nesting and foraging; prefers older, dense stands along streams. Polioptila Coastal FT None SSC Coastal bluff scrub, coastal scrub. Obligate, californica California permanent resident of coastal sage scrub californica Gnatcatcher below 2500 ft in Southern California. Low, coastal sage scrub in arid washes, on mesas and slopes. Not all areas classified as coastal sage scrub are occupied. Polioptila Black -tailed None None WL Mojavean desert scrub, Sonoran desert melanura Gnatcatcher scrub. Primarily inhabits wooded desert wash habitats; also occurs in desert scrub habitat, especially in winter. Nests in desert washes containing mesquite, palo verde, ironwood, acacia; absent from areas where salt cedar introduced. Pyrocephalus Vermilion None None SSC Marsh & swamp, riparian forest, riparian rubinus Flycatcher scrub, riparian woodland, wetland. During nesting, inhabits desert riparian adjacent to irrigated fields, irrigation ditches, pastures, and other open, mesic areas. Nest in cottonwood, willow, mesquite, and other large desert riparian trees. Rallus obsoletus Yuma Ridgways FIE ST FP Freshwater marsh, Marsh & swamp, yumanensis Rail Wetland. Nests in freshwater marshes along the Colorado River and along the south and east ends of the Salton Sea. Prefers stands of cattails and tules dissected by narrow channels of flowing water; principal food is crayfish. Low potential. The BSA does not contain cottonwood -willow riparian habitat. Low potential. There is not coastal habitat available within the BSA for this species. Moderate potential. The BSA contains desert scrub habitat. There are public observations recorded within 0.75 miles of the BSA (eBird 2023). Moderate potential. There are recorded observations within 0.5 miles of the BSA, with the most recent being in January 2023 (eBird 2023). No potential. No marsh habitat available within the BSA. 11219378 24 Selasphorus Rufous None None rufus Hummingbird Setophaga Yellow Warbler None None SSC petechia Spinus Lawrences None None lawrencei Goldfinch Spizella breweri Brewers None None Sparrow Toxostoma Crissal None None SSC crissale Thrasher North coast coniferous forest, old growth. Breeds in Transition life zone of northwest coastal area from Oregon border to southern Sonoma County. Nests in berry tangles, shrubs, and conifers. Favors habitats rich in nectar -producing flowers. Riparian plant associations in close proximity to water. Also nests in montane shrubbery in open conifer forests in Cascades and Sierra Nevada. Frequently found nesting and foraging in willow shrubs and thickets, and in other riparian plants including cottonwoods, sycamores, ash, and alders. Broadleaved upland forest, chaparral, pinon & juniper woodlands, riparian woodland. Nests in open oak or other and woodland and chaparral, near water. Nearby herbaceous habitats used for feeding. Closely associated with oaks. East of Cascade -Sierra Nevada crest, mountains and high valleys of Mojave Desert, and mountains at southern end of San Joaquin Valley. For nesting they prefer high sagebrush plains, slopes and valley with Great Basin sagebrush and antelope brush. Riparian woodland. Resident of southeastern deserts in desert riparian and desert wash habitats. Nests in dense vegetation along streams/washes; mesquite, screwbean mesquite, ironwood, catclaw, acacia, arrowweed, willow. Low potential. There is not suitable habitat for this species within the BSA. Low potential. There is not suitable riparian habitat available for this species within the BSA. Low potential. The preferred habitat types are not available for this species within the BSA. Low potential. The BSA does not contain suitable mountainous or valley habitat for this species. Low potential. The BSA does not contain suitable riparian habitat for this species. 11219378 25 Toxostoma Le Contes None None SSC Desert wash, Mojavean desert scrub, lecontei Thrasher Sonoran desert scrub. Desert resident; primarily of open desert wash, desert scrub, alkali desert scrub, and desert succulent scrub habitats. Commonly nests in a dense, spiny shrub or densely branched cactus in desert wash habitat, usually 2-8 feet above ground. Vireo bellii Least Bells FE SE - Riparian forest, riparian scrub, riparian pusillus Vireo woodland. Summer resident of Southern California in low riparian in vicinity of water or in dry river bottoms; below 2000 ft. Nests placed along margins of bushes or on twigs projecting into pathways, usually willow, Baccharis, mesquite. Vireo vicinior Gray Vireo None None SSC Dry chaparral; west of desert, in chamise- dominated habitat; mountains of Mojave Desert, associated with juniper and Artemisia. Forage, nest, and sing in areas formed by a continuous growth of twigs, 1-5 ft above ground. Xanthocephalus Yellow -headed None None SSC Marsh & swamp, wetland. Nests in xanthocephalus Blackbird freshwater emergent wetlands with dense vegetation and deep water. Often along borders of lakes or ponds. Nests only where large insects such as Odonata are abundant, nesting timed with maximum emergence of aquatic insects. Reptiles Low potential. The BSA may contain suitable shrub habitat for this species. There are no recent or nearby recorded observations (eBird 2023). Low potential. There are observations from 2022 approximately 4.5 miles west of the BSA (eBird 2022). The BSA does not contain riparian habitat. Low potential. The BSA does not contain suitable habitat or features for this species. No potential. The BSA does not contain wetland habitat for this species. 11219378 26 Anniella Southern None None SSC Broadleaved upland forest, chaparral, Low potential. The BSA does not stebbinsi California coastal dunes, coastal scrub. Generally contain the suitable habitat types for Legless Lizard south of the Transverse Range, extending this species. to northwestern Baja California. Occurs in sandy or loose loamy soils under sparse vegetation. Disjunct populations in the Tehachapi and Piute Mountains in Kern County. Variety of habitats; generally in moist, loose soil. They prefer soils with a high moisture content. Aspidoscelis Coastal Whiptail None None SSC Found in deserts and semi -arid areas with Low potential. This subspecies' tigris stejnegeri sparse vegetation and open areas. Also range is closer to the coast, which is found in woodland and riparian areas. outside of the BSA (California Herps Ground may be firm soil, sandy, or rocky. 2023). Coleonyx San Diego None None SSC Chaparral, coastal scrub. Coastal and Low potential. No rocky outcrops in variegatus Banded Gecko cismontane Southern California. Found in coastal scrub or chaparral habitats abbotti granite or rocky outcrops in coastal scrub available within the BSA. and chaparral habitats. Crotalus ruber Red -diamond None None SSC Chaparral, woodland, grassland, and desert Low potential. The BSA contains Rattlesnake areas from coastal San Diego County to the only marginally suitable habitat for eastern slopes of the mountains. Occurs in this species. There are no rocky rocky areas and dense vegetation. Needs areas present. rodent burrows, cracks in rocks or surface cover objects. Gopherus Desert Tortoise FT ST - Joshua tree woodland, Mojavean desert Low potential. There was a juvenile agassizii scrub, Sonoran desert scrub. Most common shell found in 2017 approximately in desert scrub, desert wash, and Joshua 0.25 miles from the BSA (iNaturalist tree habitats; occurs in almost every desert 2023). There are other recent habitat. Require friable soil for burrow and observations surrounding the vicinity nest construction. Creosote bush habitat of the BSA (iNaturalist 2023). with large annual wildflower blooms Records on the CNDDB are preferred. generally more northwest to southeast, though the nearest are seven to 11 miles in either direction (CDFW 2023). No sign of Desert Tortoise was observed during the site visit. The level of human 11219378 27 Phrynosoma Coast Horned None None SSC Frequents a wide variety of habitats, most blainvillii Lizard common in lowlands along sandy washes with scattered low bushes. Open areas for sunning, bushes for cover, patches of loose soil for burial, and abundant supply of ants and other insects. Phrynosoma Flat -tailed None None SSC Desert dunes, Mojavean desert scrub, mcallii Horned Lizard Sonoran desert scrub. Restricted to desert washes and desert flats in central Riverside, eastern San Diego, and Imperial counties. Critical habitat element is fine sand, into which lizards burrow to avoid temperature extremes; requires vegetative cover and ants. Salvadora Coast Patch- None None SSC Coastal scrub. Brushy or shrubby hexalepis nosed Snake vegetation in coastal Southern California. virgultea Require small mammal burrows for refuge and overwintering sites. disturbance and Common Raven presence is not suitable for this species, and it is unlikely for them to occur. Low potential. The BSA does not contain highly suitable habitat. Observations recorded over five miles away (iNaturalist 2023). Moderate potential. There are many observations within the vicinity of the Project, the nearest one is approximately 0.5 miles from the BSA (iNaturalist 2023). Suitable habitat is present within the BSA for this species. Low potential. There is not coastal scrub habitat within the BSA. 11219378 28 Uma inornata Coachella FT SE - Desert dunes, desert wash. Limited to Moderate potential. The BSA Valley Fringe- sandy areas in the Coachella Valley, contains loose, windblown sand, with toed Lizard Riverside County. Requires fine, loose, widely spaced desert shrubs. The windblown sand (for burrowing), BSA is outside of critical habitat, and interspersed with hardpan and widely- population centers are known to be spaced desert shrubs. The species' habitat more north of the BSA and closer to is characterized by active dunes, the 1-10 (Vandergast et al. 2015). surrounded by stabilized dunes and desert However, there are many recent scrub (Vandergast et al. 2015). observations surrounding the BSA within urban developed areas (iNaturalist 2023). The most recent observation is from February 2023 approximately 1.5 miles from the BSA (iNaturalist 2023). Additionally, there are records on the CNDDB from the late 1960's to 1970's (CDFW 2023). Amphibians ir Batrachoseps Desert Slender FE SE - Desert wash, limestone, talus slope. Known Low potential. The BSA does not major aridus Salamander only from Hidden Palm Canyon and provide suitable dampened habitat Guadalupe Creek, Riverside County, in for this species. barren, palm oasis, desert wash, and desert scrub. Occurs under limestone sheets, rocks, and talus, usually at the base of damp, shaded, north and west -facing walls. Lithobates Lowland None None SSC Were found along the Colorado River and in No potential. No suitable aquatic yavapaiensis Leopard Frog streams near the Salton Sea. habitat available for this species. Fish -- Cyprinodon Desert Pupfish FIE SE - Aquatic, artificial flowing waters, artificial No potential. No aquatic habitat macularius standing waters, Colorado River basin within the BSA. flowing waters, Colorado River basin standing waters. Desert ponds, springs, marshes and streams in Southern California. Can live in salinities from freshwater to 68 ppt; can withstand temps from 9 - 45 C and dissolved oxygen levels down to 0.1 ppm. 11219378 29 Insects Bombus crotchii Danaus plexippus Dinacoma caseyi Euparagia unidentata Euphydryas editha quino Habropoda pallida Hesperopsis gracielae Crotch Bumble Bee Monarch Butterfly — California Overwintering, Pop. 1 Caseys June Beetle Algodones Euparagia Wasp Quino Checkerspot Butterfly White Faced Bee Macneills Sootywing None CE FC None FE None None None FE None None None None Coastal California east to the Sierra - Cascade crest and south into Mexico. Food plant genera include Antirrhinum, Phacelia, Clarkia, Dendromecon, Eschscholzia, and Eriogonum. Fields, roadside areas, open areas, wet areas or urban gardens. This species only lays eggs on milkweed. Overwintering tree habitat includes eucalyptus, Monterey pine, Monterey cypress, western sycamore, coast redwood, and coast live oak trees. Desert wash, Mojavean desert scrub. Found only in two populations in a small area of southern Palm Springs. Found in sandy soils; the females live underground and only come to the ground surface to mate. Desert dunes. Endemic to the Algodones Dunes in Imperial County. Chaparral, coastal scrub. Sunny openings within chaparral and coastal sage shrublands in parts of Riverside and San Diego counties. Hills and mesas near the coast. Need high densities of food plants Plantago erecta, P. insularis, and Orthocarpus purpurescens. Desert dunes. Endemic to the Algodones Dunes in Imperial County. None - Found in well -watered lowland areas along the Colorado River and extending west into the Coachella Valley. Atriplex lentiformis is the only known host plant. Low potential. The BSA does not provide suitable habitat for this species. No potential. There are no suitable overwintering trees within the BSA. Low potential. There is an observation approximately 1.5 miles north of the BSA (iNaturalist 2023). The BSA is outside of the range (USFWS 2022). Low potential. Only marginally suitable dune habitat present. Low potential. The BSA is not near the coast. Low potential. The BSA is not within Imperial County. Low potential. There are Atriplex lentiformis observations on the edges of the PSB from 2019 (iNaturalist 2023). However, the BSA is not well -watered. 11219378 30 Juniperella Juniper Metallic None None - Larvae develop in juniper in Santa Rosa No potential. The BSA is not within mirabilis Wood -boring Mts. in Southern California. the Santa Rosa Mountains, and Beetle there's no juniper in the BSA. Macrobaenetes Coachella Giant None None - Desert dunes. Known from the sand dune Moderate potential. There is an valgum Sand Treader ridges in the vicinity of Coachella Valley. observation within 0.25 miles of the Cricket Population size regulated by amount of BSA (iNaturalist 2023). annual rainfall; some spots favor permanent habitation where springs dampen sand. Oliarces clara Cheeseweed None None - Sonoran desert scrub. Inhabits the lower Low potential. The larval host Owlfly Colorado River drainage. Found under species (Larrea tridentata) is (Cheeseweed rocks or in flight over streams. Larrea documented within the PSB Moth Lacewing) tridentata is the suspected larval host. (iNaturalist 2023). There is an observation approximately 6 miles from the BSA (iNaturalist 2023). Habitat within the BSA is marginally suitable. Stenopelmatus Coachella None None - Desert dunes. Inhabits a small segment of Low potential. The BSA contains cahuilaensis Valley the sand and dune areas of the Coachella marginally suitable habitat, but is not Jerusalem Valley, in the vicinity of Palm Springs. in close proximity to Mt San Jacinto. Cricket Found in the large, undulating dunes piled up at the north base of Mt San Jacinto. Mollusks Anodonta California None None - Aquatic. Freshwater lakes and slow -moving No potential. No aquatic habitat californiensis Floater streams and rivers. Taxonomy under review within the Project footprint. by specialists. Generally in shallow water. Eremarionta Thousand None None - Information on this species is very limited. Low potential. No suitable millepalmarum Palms Desert snails typically exist in areas with temperature refugia available for this Desertsnail habitat to escape temperatures higher than species. 93 degrees Fahrenheit, such as under rocks or in the mountains. Footnotes: 1 Rankings from CNDDB (January 2023). 2 General habitat, and microhabitat column information, reprinted from CNDDB (January 2023). 11219378 31 Other Statuses (other federal or state listings may include): CDFW FP (CDFW Fully Protected Animal): "This classification was the State of California's initial effort to identify and provide additional protection to those animals that were rare or faced possible extinction. Lists were created for fish, amphibians and reptiles, birds and mammals. Most of the species on these lists have subsequently been listed under the state and/or federal endangered species acts." (CDFW 2023c); CDFW SSC (CDFW Species of Special Concern): "It is the goal and responsibility of the Department of Fish and Wildlife to maintain viable populations of all native species. To this end, the Department has designated certain vertebrate species as 'Species of Special Concern' because declining population levels, limited ranges, and/or continuing threats have made them vulnerable to extinction. The goal of designating species as 'Species of Special Concern' is to halt or reverse their decline by calling attention to their plight and addressing the issues of concern early enough to secure their long-term viability" (CDFW 2023c); CDFW WL (California Department of Fish and Wildlife Watch List): "The CDFW maintains a list consisting of taxa that were previously designated as "Species of Special Concern" but no longer merit that status, or which do not yet meet SSC criteria, but for which there is concern and a need for additional information to clarify status" (CDFW 2023c). Potential to Occur: No potential: Habitat in and adjacent to the PSB is clearly unsuitable for the species requirements (cover, substrate, elevation, hydrology, plant community, site history, disturbance regime). Low potential: Few of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present, and/or the majority of habitat on and adjacent to the site is unsuitable or of very poor quality. The species is not likely to be found in the PSB. Moderate potential: Some of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present, and/or only some of the habitat on or adjacent to the site is unsuitable. The species has a moderate probability of being found in the PSB. High potential: All of the habitat components meeting the species requirements are present and/or most of the habitat on or adjacent to the site is highly suitable. The species has a high probability of being found on in the PSB. Present: Detected or documented on -site. 11219378 32 4. Discussion Based on the reconnaissance -level site visit on February 4, 2023, and review of existing data, the BSA may provide suitable habitat for special status wildlife species. In addition, several common avian species were observed on -site that are protected by the MBTA and FGC (Appendix D, Table D2 and D4). Vegetation within and directly adjacent to the BSA could provide suitable nesting habitat for migratory bird species, and other common terrestrial species. No special status plant species were observed during the site visit on February 4, 2023 (Appendix D, Table D1); however, no protocol level surveys have been conducted and the site visit was outside of the blooming season for some plant species with potential to occur in the PSB. Protocol level surveys will be required to determine if special status plants are present. No SNCs were observed during the site visit. Since the Project is within the CVMSHCP's boundaries, and within an authorized take area, mitigation for four special status species would be accounted for with compliance with the CVMSHCP and through purchase of LDMF's from the CVCC (CVCC 2023). However, the CVMSHCP does not cover the six special status bird species with a moderate potential to occur, nor birds protected by the MBTA and FGC. Additional measures are recommended in Section 5 for these bird species. 5. Proposed Avoidance and Minimization Measures All Conservation Measures that are applicable within Section 4.4 (Required Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Measures) and Section 9 (Species Accounts and Conservation Measures) of the CVMSHCP should be implemented by the Project to minimize impacts to plant and wildlife species within the HCP's jurisdiction (CVMSHCP 2016). Specifically, species with a moderate potential to occur that are encompassed within the CVMSHCP include: Palm Springs Round -tailed Ground Squirrel, Burrowing Owl, Flat -tailed Horned Lizard, Coachella Valley Fringe -tailed Lizard, and the Coachella Giant Sand Treader Cricket (CDFW 2023b). In addition, the following measures are recommended for implementation to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. 5.1 Measure 1310-1: Worker Environmental Awareness Training An environmental training program should be developed and presented by a qualified biologist to all crew members prior to the beginning of all Project construction. The training should describe special -status plant and wildlife species and sensitive habitats that could occur within the BSA, protection afforded to these species and habitats, and avoidance and minimization measures required to avoid and/or minimize impacts from the project. All new construction personnel should receive this training before beginning work on this project. A copy of the training and training materials should be provided to construction crew for review and approval at least 30 days prior to the start of construction. As needed, in -field training should be provided to new on -site construction personnel by the qualified biologist or a qualified individual who should be identified by the qualified biologist, or initial training should be recorded and replayed for new personnel. 5.2 Measure 1310-2: Protect Special Status Plants Avoidance measures for special status plant species are addressed collectively for all species. Impacts to special -status plant species present or likely to be present onsite shall be minimized, avoided, and (if necessary) compensated by complying with the following: - Seasonally appropriate pre -construction surveys for special status plant species should occur prior to construction within the planned area of disturbance for the project, during the appropriate blooming time (spring and summer) for the target species. Survey methods should comply with CDFW rare plant survey protocols and should be performed by a qualified field botanist. Surveys The Power of Commitment 11219378 33 should be modified to include detection of juvenile (pre -flowering) colonies of perennial species when necessary. Any populations of special status plant species that are detected should be mapped. Populations should be flagged if avoidance is feasible and if populations are located adjacent to construction areas. - The locations of any special status plant populations to be avoided should be clearly identified in the contract documents (plans and specifications). - If special status plant populations are detected where construction would have unavoidable impacts, a compensatory conservation plan should be prepared and implemented in coordination with CDFW. Such plans may include salvage, propagation, on -site reintroduction in restored habitats, and monitoring. 5.3 Measure Bio-3: General Measures for Plants and Wildlife - When working in the dune habitat areas, the number of access routes, number and size of staging areas, and the total area of the activity should be limited to the minimum necessary to achieve the project goal. Routes and boundaries outside of normal access roads should be clearly delineated through fencing or flagging. - Food, trash, and other solid wastes should be disposed of in Common Raven proof/wildlife proof, covered refuse containers and regularly removed from the various structures and facilities on a daily basis to avoid offsite dispersal of waste and to avoid attracting wildlife onto the project site. Following covered activity work, all trash and debris should be removed from the work area. - Construction work should avoid direct destruction of burrows through chaining (dragging a heavy chain over an area to remove shrubs), disking, cultivation, and urban, industrial, or agricultural development. - Project -related excavations greater than 6 inches deep should be secured to prevent wildlife entry and entrapment. Holes and trenches should be back -filled, securely covered, or fenced. Excavations that cannot be fully secured should incorporate appropriate wildlife ramp(s) at a slope of no more than a 3:1 ratio (horizontal: vertical, equivalent to a 33.3 percent or 18.4-degree slope), or other means to allow trapped animals to escape. - Personnel on site should be required to check under their vehicles for sensitive species prior to moving them and should exercise caution while driving on the Project site. - Before moving, burying, or capping, inspect for wildlife in any construction pipes, culverts, or similar structures that are stored on the site for 1 or more nights. Alternatively, cap structures before storing on the work site. 5.4 Measure Bio-4: Special Status and Migratory Birds Potential Project impacts to six special status birds and common birds protected by the MBTA and FGC during construction may include visual disturbance, habitat destruction, and noise disturbance. The following measures are proposed to avoid potential impacts. Construction should be conducted, if possible, during the fall and/or winter months and outside of the avian nesting season (generally February 1 — August 31) to avoid any direct effects to protected birds. A qualified ornithologist should conduct pre -construction surveys within the vicinity of the BSA, to check for nesting or burrowing activity of native birds and to evaluate the site for presence of raptors and special status bird species. The ornithologist should conduct at minimum a one -day pre -construction survey within the seven-day period prior to construction activities beginning. If construction work lapses for seven days or longer during the breeding season, a qualified ornithologist should conduct a supplemental avian pre -construction survey before Project work is reinitiated. - If active nests or burrows are detected within the construction footprint or up to 500 feet from construction activities, the ornithologist should flag a buffer around each nest (assuming property access). Construction activities should avoid nest or burrows sites until the ornithologist determines 11219378 34 that the young have fledged or nesting activity has ceased. If nests or burrows are documented outside of the construction (disturbance) footprint, but within 500 feet of the construction area, buffers would be implemented as needed (buffer size dependent on species). Buffer sizes for common species would be determined on a case -by -case basis in consultation with the CDFW and, if applicable, with USFWS. Buffer sizes would consider factors such as: • (1) noise and human disturbance levels at the construction site at the time of the survey and the noise and disturbance expected during the construction activity; • (2) distance and amount of vegetation or other screening between the construction site and the nest; and • (3) sensitivity of individual nesting species and behaviours of the nesting birds. If active nests or burrows are detected during the survey, the qualified ornithologist should monitor all nests or burrows at least once per week to determine whether birds are being disturbed. Activities that might, in the opinion of the qualified ornithologist, disturb nesting activities (e.g., excessive noise), should be prohibited within the buffer zone until such a determination is made. If signs of disturbance or distress are observed, the qualified ornithologist should immediately implement adaptive measures to reduce disturbance. These measures may include, but are not limited to, increasing buffer size, halting disruptive construction activities in the vicinity of the nest until fledging is confirmed or nesting activity has ceased, placement of visual screens or sound dampening structures between the nest and construction activity, reducing speed limits, replacing and updating noisy equipment, queuing trucks to distribute idling noise, locating vehicle access points and loading and shipping facilities away from noise -sensitive receptors, reducing the number of noisy construction activities occurring simultaneously, and/or reorienting and/or relocating construction equipment to minimize noise at noise -sensitive receptors. If Burrowing Owls are detected, buffers following guidance from Section 4 of the CHMSHCP would be adopted. The buffer distance during the non -breeding season is 160 feet, and 250 feet during the breeding season. Buffers would be staked and flagged. No Project work would be permitted within the established buffered distances. No development or operation and maintenance activities would be permitted within the buffer until the young are no longer dependent on the burrow. If the burrow is unoccupied, the burrow could be made inaccessible to owls, and the Covered Activity may proceed. 6. Conclusion Based on occurrence records, habitat availability, and the reconnaissance -level site visit, special status wildlife and plant species may occur within the BSA. With compliance with the CVMSHCP (see Section 3.4), and the recommended minimization measures in Section 5, impacts are expected to be less than significant. The minimization measures are recommended to be implemented within the Project's IS/MND document and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 7. References California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2012. Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. State of California Natural Resources Agency. March 7, 2012. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentlD=83843 California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2016a. California Wildlife Habitat Relationships Predicted Habitat Models. State of California, Natural Resources Agency, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, California Interagency Wildlife Task Group, Sacramento, California, USA. https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CWHR (2/28/2023) 11219378 35 California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2023a. California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) QuickView Tool. State of California, Natural Resources Agency, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Biogeographic Data Branch, Sacramento, California, USA. https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Maps-and-Data#43018410-cnddb-quickview-tool (1/24/2023) California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2023b. NCCP Plan Summary — Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. State of California, Natural Resources Agency, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Habitat Conservation Planning Branch, Sacramento, California, USA. https://wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Planning/NCCP/Plans/Coachella-Valley (2/27/2023) California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2023c. Metadata - Description of CNDDB fields. State of California, Natural Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Wildlife Biogeographic Data Branch, Sacramento, California, USA. https://apps.wiIdIife.ca.gov/rarefind/view/RF_FieldDescriptions.htm (3/1/2023) California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2023. CNPS Inventory of Rare Plants. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, California, USA. https://www.cnps.org/rare-plants/cnps-inventory-of-rare-plants (1/24/2023) City of La Quinta. 2017. Dune Palms Road Low Water Crossing Replacement Project — Initial Study with Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration. December 2017. Coachella Valley Conservation Commission (CVCC). 2023. Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan - Plan Documents. https://cvmshcp.org/plan-documents/ (2/28/2023) Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP). 2016. Species Accounts and Conservation Measures. Final Major Amendment to the CVMSHCP, Section 9.0. August 2016. https://cvmshcp.org/plan-documents/ iNaturalist. 2023. Observations. iNaturalist Department, California Academy of Sciences and National Geographic Society, San Francisco, California, USA. https://www.inaturalist.org (2/03/2023) Marczak, S., C. L. Wisinski, S. M. Hennessy, M. Stevens, S. Perez, D. Angel, R. R. Swaisgood, L. A. Nordstrom. 2018. Advancing Burrowing Owl conservation in San Diego County through mitigation measures using science and adaptive management. Prepared for Metropolitan Airpark, LLC. San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego, California, USA. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2023a. Essential Fish Habitat Mapper. https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/application/efhmapper/index.htmi (1/24/2023) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries. 2023b. National ESA Critical Habitat Mapper. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/map/national-esa-critical- habitat-mapper (1/25/2023) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023. IPaC - Information for Planning and Consultation. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office, Arcata, CA, USA. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/ (1/24/2023) U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023b. National Wetlands Inventory. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. https://data.nal.usda.gov/dataset/national-wetlands-inventory (1/24/2023) U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2016. National Land Cover Database Land Cover (California). https://map.dfg.ca.gov/metadata/NLCD_2016_Land_Cover CA_20190424_WM.html (1/30/2023) Vandergast, A. G., D. A. Wood, A. R. Thompson, M. Fisher, C. W. Barrows, and T. J. Grant. 2016. Drifting to oblivion? Rapid genetic differentiation in an endangered lizard following habitat fragmentation and drought. Diversity and Distributions 22:344-257. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/l 0.1111 /ddi.12398 Zarn, M. 1974. Habitat management series for unique or endangered species: burrowing owl, Report 11. Department of the Interior, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Denver, Colorado, USA. 11219378 36 Appendix A Figures • Desert Hot Springs ,Palm Springs 0101 • Cathedral City Rancho Mirara\lm.D-� —Indio La Quint, • Bermuda Dunes Palm Desert 74 r� LUX Legend Project Study Boundary Highways Indian Wells I Indio La Quinta W Paper Size ANSI A City of La Quinta Project No. 11219378 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 N Highway 111 Form Based Revision No. - Code Planning Services Date Feb 2023 Miles m-'D Map Projection: Mercator Auxiliary Sphere h. Horizontal Datum: WIGS 1984 Grid: WIGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere Vicinity Map FIGURE 1 1lghdnet ghdlUSlSacramento- 2200 Data sours: World Hillshade: Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, FEMA; World Topographic Map - labelless: Loma Linda University County of Riverside, California State Parks, Esri, HERE, Garman, SafeGraph, FAO, 21 stlpmjects15611112193781GISIMapslDelinmblesTio_Resources_15acr Pacrmi.apm.11219378_g01_Vdnity METIMASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS; World Topographic Map- labelless: Loma Linda Universary, County of Riverside, California Stale Parks, Esn, HERE, Gamin, SafeGmph, Print date: 23 Feb 2023 -09:27 GeoTechnologies, Inc, METIINASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA; World Hillshade: Esn, CGIAR, USGS. Created by: jlopi Legend O Project Study Boundary r i Biological Study Area (BSA 100ft Buffer) 1 ` x�drKbl��f� •� I I APN: 600-390-024 t I , I ' • . ,.r It • ` ` .40 to EL ,.k 6=-G"W Paper Size ANSI A City of La Quinta Project No. 11219378 0 50 100 150 200 N Highway 111 Form Based Revision No. - Code Planning Services Date Feb 2023 Feet , Map Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic Horizontal Datum: North American1983 Project Study Boundary & Grid: NAD 1983 StatePlane California VI HIPS O406 Feet Biological Study Area FIGURE 2 \\ghdnabghd\l1S\Sacramento-220021st\Projects\561\112193781GIS\Maps\Deliverables\BIO_Resources_15acrePacrcel.aprx- 11219378_005_Fil_BSA Data source: Tiled service layer'.@ OpenStreetMap(and) contractors, CC -BY -SA Print date'. 27 Feb 2023- 09:55 World_Transportatlon'. City of Riverside, County of Riverside, Ear, HERE, iPC. Created by: jlopez4 f 1 _C I Air All v 1 A . Legend O Project Study Boundary Le Conte's Thrasher Vermilion Flycatcher 3 mile PSB buffer Palm Springs Round- Western Yellow Bat Animals- Common Name tailed Ground Squirrel Plants- Common Name American Badger Black -tailed Coachella Valley milk- Gnatcatcher vetch Casey's June Beetle Burrowing Owl _ Coachella Valley chaparral sand - J Fringe -toed Lizard Flat tailed Horned verbena Coachella Giant Sand Lizard glandular ditaxis Treader Cricket Pocketed Free -tailed gravel milk -vetch Bat Crissal Thrasher Prairie Falcon slender cottonheads Paper Size ANSI A City of La Quinta Project No. 11219378 0 0.5 1 IN Highway 111 Form Based Revision No. - Code Planning Services Date Feb 2023 Miles , Map Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic Horizontal Datum: North American1983 CNDDB Occurrences Grid: NAD1983StatePlaneCalifornia VIHIPS O406Feet within 3 mile radius FIGURE 3 \\ghdnet\ghd\US\Sacmmento - 2200 21 st\Projects\561\112193781GIS\Maps\Deliverables\Bio_Resources_ 15donsPecrcel.oprx - 11219378_006_FIG3_CNDDB Data source: Tiled service layer: @ OpenatreetMap (and) contributors, CC -BY -SA Created by: jlopez4 Print date'. 27 Feb 2023 - 09'.54 Legend O Project Study Boundary r i Biological Study Area (BSA 100ft Buffer) National Wetlands Invetory (NWI) 1M Riverine 4ufp C °fir°f Or Paper Size ANSI A City of La Quinta Project No. 11219378 0 100 200 300 N Highway 111 Form Based Revision No. - Code Planning Services Date Feb 2023 Feet , Map Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic Horizontal Datum: North American 1983 Grid: NAD1983StatePlaneCalifornia VIFIPSO406Feet National Wetlands Inventory FIGURE 4 \Ighdnat�ghdlUS\Sacramento-220021stTmjects1561111219378\GISWaps0elivembleslBio_Resources_15acmPacml.apm-11219378_007_FIG4_NWI Data source: Tiled service layer @OpenStreei(and) contributors, CC-BY-SA Print date: 27 Feb 2023 -09:59 World —Transportation: City of Riverside, County of Riverside, Earl, HERE, iPC. Created by:llopai Appendix B Database Search Results (CNDDB, CNPS, EFH, IPaC, NOAA Critical Habitat) 1/24/23. 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table ElementType Scientific Name Common Name Element Code Federal —Status State —Status CDFW_Status CA —Rare —Plant —Rank Quad —Code Quad —Name Data Status Taxonomic —Sort _ Animals Batrachoseps desert slender AAAAD02042 Endangered Endangered - 3311653 MARTINEZ Mapped Animals - Amphibians major aridus salamander MTN. Amphibians - Plethodontidae - Batrachoseps major aridus - Animals - Animals - Batrachoseps desert slender AAAAD02042 Endangered Endangered 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped and Amphibians major aridus salamander Unprocessed Amphibians - Plethodontidae - Batrachoseps major aridus SSC 3311662 INDIO Unprocessed Animals - Animals - Lithobates lowland leopard AAABHO1250 None None Amphibians yavapaiensis frog Amphibians - Ranidae - Lithobates yavapaiensis WL 3311662 INDIO Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Animals - Accipiter cooperii Coopers hawk ABNKC12040 None None Birds Accipitridae - Accipiter cooperii WL 3311672 WEST Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Animals - Accipiter cooperii Coopers hawk ABNKC12040 None None Birds BERDOO Accipitridae - CANYON Accipiter cooperii Animals - Accipiter cooperii Coopers hawk ABNKC12040 None None WL 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds Accipitridae - Accipiter cooperii Animals - Accipiter cooperii Coopers hawk ABNKC12040 None None WL 3311654 TORO PEAK Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds Accipitridae - Accipiter cooperii Animals - Accipiter cooperii Coopers hawk ABNKC12040 None None WL 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds Accipitridae - Accipiter cooperii Animals - Accipiter striatus sharp -shinned ABNKC12020 None None WL 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds hawk Accipitridae - Accipiter striatus Animals - Accipiter striatus sharp -shinned ABNKC12020 None None WL 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds hawk Accipitridae - Accipiter striatus Animals - Accipiter striatus sharp -shinned ABNKC12020 None None WL 3311672 WEST Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds hawk BERDOO Accipitridae - CANYON Accipiter striatus None FP WL 3311663 LA QUINTA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Animals - Aquila chrysaetos golden eagle ABNKC22010 None Birds Accipitridae - Aquila chrysaetos golden eagle ABNKC22010 None Aquila chrysaetos Animals - None FP WL 3311664 RANCHO Mapped and Animals - Birds - Birds MIRAGE Unprocessed Accipitridae - Aquila chrysaetos Aquila chrysaetos Animals - golden eagle ABNKC22010 None None FP WL 3311654 TORO PEAK Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds Accipitridae - Aquila chrysaetos Animals - Aquila chrysaetos golden eagle ABNKC22010 None None FP WL 3311653 MARTINEZ Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds MTN. Accipitridae - Aquila chrysaetos Animals - Buteo regalis ferruginous ABNKC19120 None None WL 3311662 INDIO Mapped Animals - Birds - Birds hawk Accipitridae - Buteo regalis Animals - Circus hudsonius northern harrier ABNKC11011 None None SSC 3311672 WEST Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds BERDOO Accipitridae - https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 1/24 1/24/23. 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table CANYON Circus hudsonius Animals - Circus hudsonius northern harrier ABNKC11011 None None SSC 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds Accipitridae - Circus hudsonius Animals - Circus hudsonius northern harrier ABNKC11011 None None SSC 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds Accipitridae - Circus hudsonius Animals - Eremophila California ABPAT02011 None None WL 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds alpestris actia horned lark Alaudidae - Eremophila WEST alpestris actia Animals - Eremophila California ABPAT02011 None None WL 3311672 Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds alpestris actia horned lark BERDOO Alaudidae - CANYON Eremophila alpestris actia Animals - Eremophila California ABPAT02011 None None WL 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds alpestris actia horned lark Alaudidae - Eremophila alpestris actia Animals - Chaetura vauxi Vauxs swift ABNUA03020 None None SSC 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds Apodidae - Chaetura vauxi Animals - Chaetura vauxi Vauxs swift ABNUA03020 None None SSC 3311672 WEST Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds BERDOO Apodidae - CANYON Chaetura vauxi Animals - Chaetura vauxi Vauxs swift ABNUA03020 None None SSG 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds Apodidae - Chaetura vauxi Animals - Ardea alba great egret ABNGA04040 None None - 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds Ardeidae - Ardea alba Animals - Ardea herodias great blue heron ABNGA04010 None None - 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds Ardeidae - Ardea herodias Animals - Ardea herodias great blue heron Animals - Birds - ABNGA04010 None None - 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Birds Ardeidae - Ardea herodias Animals - Botaurus American bittern ABNGA01020 None None - 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds lentiginosus Ardeidae - Botaurus lentiginosus Animals - Egretta thula snowy egret ABNGA06030 None None - 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds Ardeidae - Egretta thula Animals - Piranga rubra summer tanager ABPBX45030 None None SSC 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds Cardinalidae - Piranga rubra Animals - Piranga rubra summer tanager ABPBX45030 None None SSC 3311662 INDIO Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds Cardinalidae - Piranga rubra Animals - Charadrius mountain plover ABNNB03100 None None SSC 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds montanus Charadriidae - Charadrius montanus Animals - Falco mexicanus prairie falcon ABNKD06090 None None WL 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds Falconidae - Falco mexicanus https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 2/24 1/24/23, 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table Animals - Falco mexicanus prairie falcon ABNKD06090 None None WL 3311653 MARTINEZ Mapped Animals - Birds - Birds MTN. Falconidae - Falco mexicanus Animals - Falco mexicanus prairie falcon ABNKD06090 None None WL 3311664 RANCHO Mapped and Animals - Birds - Birds MIRAGE Unprocessed Falconidae - Falco mexicanus Animals - Falco mexicanus prairie falcon ABNKD06090 None None WL 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped and Animals - Birds - Birds Unprocessed Falconidae - Falco mexicanus Animals - Falco mexicanus prairie falcon ABNKD06090 None None WL 3311674 CATHEDRAL Mapped and Animals - Birds - Birds CITY Unprocessed Falconidae - Falco mexicanus Animals - Falco mexicanus prairie falcon ABNKD06090 None None WL 3311673 MYOMA Mapped and Animals - Birds - Birds Unprocessed Falconidae - Falco mexicanus Animals - Falco mexicanus prairie falcon ABNKD06090 None None WL 3311672 WEST Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds BERDOO Falconidae - Falco CANYON mexicanus Animals - Falco peregrinus American ABNKD06071 Delisted Delisted FP 3311662 INDIO Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds anatum peregrine falcon Falconidae - Falco peregrinus anatum Animals - Falco peregrinus American ABNKD06071 Delisted Delisted FP 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds anatum peregrine falcon Falconidae - Falco Spinus lawrencei Lawrences ABPBY06100 None Unprocessed peregrinus anatum Animals - None - 3311652 VALERIE Animals - Birds - Birds goldfinch Fringillidae - Spinus lawrencei Lawrences ABPBY06100 WEST Unprocessed Spinus lawrencei Animals - None None - 3311672 Animals - Birds - Birds goldfinch BERDOO Fringillidae - CANYON Spinus lawrencei Animals - Spinus lawrencei Lawrences ABPBY06100 None None - 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds goldfinch Fringillidae - Spinus lawrencei Animals - Xanthocephalus yellow -headed ABPBXB3010 None None SSC 3311662 INDIO Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds xanthocephalus blackbird Icteridae - Xanthocephalus yellow -headed ABPBXB3010 None xanthocephalus Animals - Xanthocephalus None SSC 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds xanthocephalus blackbird Icteridae - Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus Animals - Icteria virens yellow -breasted ABPBX24010 None None SSC 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds chat Icteriidae - Icteria virens Animals - Lanius loggerhead ABPBR01030 None None SSC 3311673 MYOMA Mapped and Animals - Birds - Birds ludovicianus shrike Unprocessed Laniidae - Lanius ludovicianus Animals - Lanius loggerhead ABPBR01030 None None SSC 3311672 WEST Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds ludovicianus shrike BERDOO Laniidae - Lanius CANYON ludovicianus Animals - Lanius loggerhead ABPBR01030 None None SSC 3311674 CATHEDRAL Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds ludovicianus shrike CITY Laniidae - Lanius ludovicianus Animals - Lanius loggerhead ABPBR01030 None None SSC 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds ludovicianus shrike Laniidae - Lanius ludovicianus Animals - Chlidonias niger black tern ABNNM10020 None None SSC 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds Laridae - https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 3/24 1/24/23. 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table Chlidonias niger Animals - Hydroprogne Caspian tern ABNNM08020 None None - 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds caspia Laridae - Hydroprogne caspia Animals - Larus californicus California gull ABNNM03110 None None WL 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds Laridae - Larus californicus Animals - Toxostoma Crissal thrasher ABPBK06090 None None SSC 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds crissale Mimidae - Toxostoma crissale Animals - Toxostoma Crissal thrasher ABPBK06090 None None SSC 3311653 MARTINEZ Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds crissale MTN. Mimidae - Toxostoma crissale Animals - Toxostoma Crissal thrasher ABPBK06090 None None SSC 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped Animals - Birds - Birds crissale Mimidae - Toxostoma crissale Animals - Toxostoma Crissal thrasher ABPBK06090 None None SSC 3311662 INDIO Mapped and Animals - Birds - Birds crissale Unprocessed Mimidae - Toxostoma crissale Animals - Toxostoma Crissal thrasher ABPBK06090 None None SSC 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds crissale Mimidae - Toxostoma crissale Animals - Toxostoma Le Contes ABPBK06100 None None SSC 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds lecontei thrasher Mimidae - Toxostoma lecontei Animals - Toxostoma Le Contes ABPBK06100 None None SSC 3311672 WEST Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds lecontei thrasher BERDOO Mimidae - CANYON Toxostoma INDIO Mapped lecontei Animals - Toxostoma Le Contes ABPBK06100 None None SSC 3311662 Animals - Birds - Birds lecontei thrasher Mimidae - Toxostoma lecontei Animals - Toxostoma Le Contes ABPBK06100 None None SSC 3311674 CATHEDRAL Mapped and Animals - Birds - Birds lecontei thrasher CITY Unprocessed Mimidae - Toxostoma Le Contes ABPBK06100 None lecontei Animals - Toxostoma None SSC 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped Animals - Birds - Birds lecontei thrasher Mimidae - Toxostoma lecontei Animals - Toxostoma Le Contes ABPBK06100 None None SSC 3311654 TORO PEAK Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds lecontei thrasher Mimidae - Toxostoma lecontei Animals - Toxostoma Le Contes ABPBK06100 None None SSC 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds lecontei thrasher Mimidae - Toxostoma lecontei Animals - Pandion haliaetus osprey ABNKC01010 None None WL 3311672 WEST Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds BERDOO Pandionidae - CANYON Pandion haliaetus Animals - Leiothlypis Iuciae Lucys warbler ABPBX01090 None None SSC 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds Parulidae - Leiothlypis Iuciae https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 4/24 1/24/23, 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table Animals - Setophaga yellow warbler ABPBX03010 None None SSC 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds petechia Parulidae - Setophaga petechia Animals - Setophaga yellow warbler ABPBX03010 None None SSC 3311672 WEST Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds petechia BERDOO Parulidae - CANYON Setophaga petechia Animals - Setophaga yellow warbler ABPBX03010 None None SSC 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds petechia Parulidae Setophaga petechia Animals - Setophaga yellow warbler ABPBX03010 None None SSC 3311674 CATHEDRAL Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds petechia CITY Parulidae - Setophaga petechia Animals - Melozone aberti Aberts towhee ABPBX74050 None None - 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds Passerellidae - Mclozone aberti Animals - Passerculus Bryants ABPBX99011 None None SSC 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds sandwichensis savannah Passerellidae - alaudinus sparrow Passerculus sandwichensis alaudinus Animals - Passerculus large -billed ABPBX9901 D None None SSC 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds sandwichensis savannah Passerellidae - rostratus sparrow Passerculus sandwichensis rostratus Animals - Passerculus large -billed ABPBX9901 D None None SSC 3311672 WEST Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds sandwichensis savannah BERDOO Passerellidae - rostratus sparrow CANYON Passerculus sandwichensis rostratus Animals - Passerculus large -billed ABPBX9901 D None None SSC 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds sandwichensis savannah Passerellidae - rostratus sparrow Passerculus sandwichensis rostratus Animals - Spizella breweri Brewers sparrow ABPBX94040 None None - 3311672 WEST Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds BERDOO Passerellidae - CANYON Spizella breweri Animals - Spizella breweri Brewers sparrow ABPBX94040 None None - 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds Passerellidae - Spizella breweri Animals - Polioptila coastal ABPBJ08081 Threatened None SSC 3311674 CATHEDRAL Mapped Animals - Birds - Birds californica California CITY Polioptilidae - californica gnatcatcher Polioptila californica californica Animals - Polioptila black -tailed ABPBJ08030 None None WL 3311662 INDIO Mapped and Animals - Birds - Birds melanura gnatcatcher Unprocessed Polioptilidae - Polioptila melanura Animals - Polioptila black -tailed ABPBJ08030 None None WL 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds melanura gnatcatcher Polioptilidae - Polioptila melanura Animals Polioptila black -tailed ABPBJ08030 None None WL 3311672 WEST Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds melanura gnatcatcher BERDOO Polioptilidae - CANYON Polioptila melanura https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 5/24 1/24/23, 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table Animals - Polioptila black -tailed ABPBJ08030 None None WL 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds melanura gnatcatcher Polioptilidae - ABPBJ08030 None Mapped and Polioptila melanura Animals - Polioptila black -tailed None WL 3311654 TORO PEAK Animals - Birds - Birds melanura gnatcatcher Unprocessed Polioptilidae - Polioptila melanura Animals - Polioptila black -tailed ABPBJ08030 None None WL 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped Animals - Birds - Birds melanura gnatcatcher Polioptilidae - Polioptila melanura Animals - Polioptila black -tailed ABPBJ08030 None None WL 3311664 RANCHO Mapped Animals - Birds - Birds melanura gnatcatcher MIRAGE Polioptilidae - Polioptila melanura Animals - Rallus obsoletus Yuma Ridgways ABNME0501A Endangered Threatened FP 3311662 INDIO Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds yumanensis rail Rallidae - Rallus obsoletus yumanensis Animals - Numenius long -billed ABNNF07070 None None WL 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds americanus curlew Scolopacidae - Numenius americanus Animals - Asio otus long-eared owl ABNSB13010 None None SSC 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds Strigidae - Asio otus Animals - Athene burrowing owl ABNSB10010 None None SSC 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds cunicularia Strigidae-Athene cunicularia Animals - Athene burrowing owl ABNSB10010 None None SSC 3311653 MARTINEZ Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds cunicularia MTN. Strigidae-Athene burrowing owl ABNSB10010 None cunicularia Animals - Athene None SSC 3311664 RANCHO Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds cunicularia MIRAGE Strigidae-Athene burrowing owl ABNSB10010 cunicularia Animals - Athene None None SSC 3311662 INDIO Mapped and Animals - Birds - Birds cunicularia Unprocessed Strigidae-Athene cunicularia Animals - Athene burrowing owl ABNSB10010 None None SSC 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped and Animals - Birds - Birds cunicularia Unprocessed Strigidae-Athene cunicularia Animals - Athene burrowing owl ABNSB10010 None None SSC 3311674 CATHEDRAL Mapped and Animals - Birds - Birds cunicularia CITY Unprocessed Strigidae - Athene cunicularia Animals - Athene burrowing owl ABNSB10010 None None SSC 3311672 WEST Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds cunicularia BERDOO Strigidae - Athene CANYON cunicularia Animals - Athene burrowing owl ABNSB10010 None None SSC 3311673 MYOMA Mapped and Animals - Birds - Birds cunicularia Unprocessed Strigidae-Athene cunicularia Animals - Calypte costae Costas ABNUC47020 None None - 3311672 WEST Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds hummingbird BERDOO Trochilidae - CANYON Calypte costae Animals - Calypte costae Costas ABNUC47020 None None - 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds hummingbird Trochilidae - Calypte costae Costas ABNUC47020 None Calypte costae Animals - None - 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds hummingbird Trochilidae - Selasphorus rufus rufous ABNUC51020 None Calypte costae Animals - None - 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds hummingbird Trochilidae - https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 6/24 1/24/23. 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table Selasphorus rufus Animals - Selasphorus rufus rufous ABNUC51020 None None - 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds hummingbird Trochilidae - Selasphorus rufus Animals - Selasphorus rufus rufous ABNUC51020 None None - 3311672 WEST Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds hummingbird BERDOO Trochilidae - CANYON Selasphorus rufus Animals - Contopus cooped olive -sided ABPAE32010 None None SSC 3311672 WEST Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds flycatcher BERDOO Tyrannidae - CANYON Contopus cooped Animals - Contopus cooped olive -sided ABPAE32010 None None SSC 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds flycatcher Tyrannidae - Contopus cooperi Animals - Empidonax traillii little willow ABPAE33041 None Endangered - 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds brewsteri flycatcher Tyrannidae - Empidonax traillii brewsteri Animals - Empidonax traillii southwestern ABPAE33043 Endangered Endangered - 3311673 MYOMA Mapped and Animals - Birds - Birds extimus willow flycatcher Unprocessed Tyrannidae - Empidonax traillii southwestern ABPAE33043 extimus Animals - Empidonax traillii Endangered Endangered - 3311664 RANCHO Mapped Animals - Birds - Birds extimus willow flycatcher MIRAGE Tyrannidae - Empidonax traillii extimus Animals - Pyrocephalus vermilion ABPAE36010 None None SSC 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped and Animals - Birds - Birds rubinus flycatcher Unprocessed Tyrannidae - Pyrocephalus vermilion ABPAE36010 rubinus Animals - Pyrocephalus None None SSC 3311662 INDIO Mapped Animals - Birds - Birds rubinus flycatcher Tyrannidae - Pyrocephalus rubinus Animals - Vireo bellii least Bells vireo ABPBW01114 Endangered Endangered - 3311663 LA QUINTA Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds pusillus Vireonidae - Vireo bellii pusillus Animals - Vireo vicinior gray vireo ABPBW01140 None None SSC 3311654 TORO PEAK Unprocessed Animals - Birds - Birds Vireonidae - Vireo desert pupfish AFCNB02060 Endangered LA QUINTA Mapped and vicinior Animals - Fish Cyprinodon Endangered - 3311663 Animals - Fish - macularius Unprocessed Cyprinodontidae - Cyprinodon macularius Animals - Fish Cyprinodon desert pupfish AFCNB02060 Endangered Endangered - 3311664 RANCHO Mapped Animals - Fish - macularius MIRAGE Cyprinodontidae - Cyprinodon desert pupfish AFCNB02060 Endangered Endangered macularius Animals - Fish Cyprinodon - 3311673 MYOMA Mapped and Animals - Fish - macularius Unprocessed Cyprinodontidae - Cyprinodon macularius Animals - Bombus crotchii Crotch bumble IIHYM24480 None Candidate - 3311664 RANCHO Mapped Animals - Insects - Insects bee Endangered MIRAGE Apidae - Bombus crotchii Animals - Habropoda white faced bee IIHYM88010 None None - 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Insects - Insects pallida Apidae - Habropoda pallida https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 7/24 1/24/23, 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table Animals - Habropoda white faced bee I IHYM88010 None None - 3311674 CATHEDRAL Unprocessed Animals - Insects - Insects pallida CITY Apidae - juniper metallic IICOLX9010 None Habropoda pallida Animals - Juniperella None - 3311653 MARTINEZ Mapped Animals - Insects - Insects mirabilis wood -boring MTN. Buprestidae - beetle Juniperella mirabilis Animals - Juniperella juniper metallic IICOLX9010 None None - 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Animals - Insects - Insects mirabilis wood -boring Buprestidae - beetle Juniperella mirabilis Animals - Hesperopsis MacNeills IILEPQ6030 None None - 3311662 INDIO Unprocessed Animals - Insects - Insects gracielae sootywing Hesperiidae - Hesperopsis gracielae Animals - Oliarces clara cheeseweed IINEU04010 None None - 3311673 MYOMA Mapped Animals - Insects - Insects owlfly Ithonidae - (cheeseweed Oliarces clara moth lacewing) Animals - Oliarces clara cheeseweed IINEU04010 None None - 3311664 RANCHO Mapped Animals - Insects - Insects owlfly MIRAGE Ithonidae - (cheeseweed Oliarces clara moth lacewing) cheeseweed IINEU04010 Animals - Oliarces clara None None - 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped Animals - Insects - Insects owlfly Ithonidae - (cheeseweed Oliarces clara moth lacewing) Animals - Euphydryas quino IILEPK405L Endangered None - 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Insects - Insects editha quino checkerspot Nymphalidae - butterfly Euphydryas editha 3311654 TORO PEAK quino Unprocessed Animals - Insects - Animals - Euphydryas quino IILEPK405L Endangered None - Insects editha quino checkerspot Nymphalidae - butterfly Euphydryas editha quino Animals - Macrobaenetes Coachella giant IIORT22020 None None - 3311674 CATHEDRAL Mapped Animals - Insects - Insects valgum sand treader CITY Rhaphidophoridae cricket - Macrobaenetes valgum IIORT22020 None None - 3311662 INDIO Mapped Animals - Macrobaenetes Coachella giant Animals - Insects - Insects valgum sand treader Rhaphidophoridae cricket - Macrobaenetes valgum Animals - Macrobaenetes Coachella giant IIORT22020 None None - 3311673 MYOMA Mapped and Animals - Insects - Insects valgum sand treader Unprocessed Rhaphidophoridae cricket - Macrobaenetes valgum Animals - Macrobaenetes Coachella giant IIORT22020 None None - 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped and Animals - Insects - Insects valgum sand treader Unprocessed Rhaphidophoridae cricket - Macrobaenetes valgum Animals - Macrobaenetes Coachella giant IIORT22020 None None - 3311664 RANCHO Mapped Animals - Insects - Insects valgum sand treader MIRAGE Rhaphidophoridae cricket - Macrobaenetes valgum Animals - Dinacoma caseyi Caseys June IICOLX5010 Endangered None - 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped Animals - Insects - Insects beetle Scarabaeidae - Dinacoma caseyi https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 8/24 1/24/23, 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table Animals - Dinacoma caseyi Caseys June IICOLX5010 Endangered None - 3311674 CATHEDRAL Mapped and Animals - Insects - Insects beetle CITY Unprocessed Scarabaeidae - Dinacoma caseyi - Animals - Insects - Animals - Stenopelmatus Coachella Valley IIORT26010 None None 3311674 CATHEDRAL Mapped Insects cahuilaensis jerusalem cricket CITY Stenopelmatidae - Stenopelmatus cahuilaensis Animals - Euparagia Algodones IIHYMBC010 None None - 3311662 INDIO Mapped Animals - Insects - Insects unidentata euparagia Vespidae - Euparagia unidentata Animals - Ovis canadensis desert bighorn AMALE04013 None None FP 3311672 WEST Mapped and Animals - Mammals nelsoni sheep BERDOO Unprocessed Mammals - CANYON Bovidae - Ovis canadensis nelsoni Animals - Ovis canadensis Peninsular AMALE04012 Endangered Threatened FP 3311674 CATHEDRAL Unprocessed Animals - Mammals nelsoni pop. 2 bighorn sheep CITY Mammals - DPS Bovidae - Ovis canadensis nelsoni pop. 2 Animals - Ovis canadensis Peninsular AMALE04012 Endangered Threatened FP 3311663 LA QUINTA Unprocessed Animals - Mammals nelsoni pop. 2 bighorn sheep Mammals - DPS Bovidae - Ovis canadensis nelsoni pop. 2 Animals - Ovis canadensis Peninsular AMALE04012 Endangered Threatened FP 3311664 RANCHO Mapped and Animals - Mammals nelsoni pop. 2 bighorn sheep MIRAGE Unprocessed Mammals - DPS Bovidae - Ovis canadensis nelsoni pop. 2 Animals - Ovis canadensis Peninsular AMALE04012 Endangered Threatened FP 3311653 MARTINEZ Mapped and Animals - Mammals nelsoni pop. 2 bighorn sheep MTN. Unprocessed Mammals - DPS Bovidae - Ovis canadensis nelsoni pop. 2 Animals - Ovis canadensis Peninsular AMALE04012 Endangered Threatened FP 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Mammals nelsoni pop. 2 bighorn sheep Mammals - DPS Bovidae - Ovis canadensis nelsoni pop. 2 Animals - Ovis canadensis Peninsular AMALE04012 Endangered Threatened FP 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped and Animals - Mammals nelsoni pop. 2 bighorn sheep Unprocessed Mammals - DPS Bovidae - Ovis canadensis nelsoni pop. 2 Animals - Neotoma albigula Colorado Valley AMAFF08031 None None - 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Animals - Mammals venusta woodrat Mammals - Cricetidae - Neotoma albigula venusta Animals - Neotoma albigula Colorado Valley AMAFF08031 None None - 3311664 RANCHO Mapped Animals - Mammals venusta woodrat MIRAGE Mammals - Cricetidae - Neotoma albigula venusta Animals - Neotoma lepida San Diego AMAFF08041 None None SSC 3311672 WEST Mapped Animals - Mammals intermedia desert woodrat BERDOO Mammals - CANYON Cricetidae - https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 9/24 1/24/23. 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table Neotoma lepida intermedia Animals - Neotoma lepida San Diego AMAFF08041 None None SSC 3311673 MYOMA Mapped and Animals - Mammals intermedia desert woodrat Unprocessed Mammals - Cricetidae - Neotoma lepida intermedia Animals - Chaetodipus Dulzura pocket AMAFD05021 None None SSC 3311672 WEST Unprocessed Animals - Mammals californicus mouse BERDOO Mammals - femoralis CANYON Heteromyidae - Chaetodipus californicus femoralis Animals - Chaetodipus Dulzura pocket AMAFD05021 None None SSC 3311653 MARTINEZ Unprocessed Animals - Mammals californicus mouse MTN. Mammals - femoralis Heteromyidae - Chaetodipus californicus femoralis Animals - Chaetodipus northwestern AMAFD05031 None None SSC 3311653 MARTINEZ Unprocessed Animals - Mammals fallax fallax San Diego MTN. Mammals - pocket mouse Heteromyidae - Chaetodipus fallax fallax Animals - Chaetodipus pallid San Diego AMAFD05032 None None SSC 3311653 MARTINEZ Mapped Animals - Mammals fallax pallidus pocket mouse MTN. Mammals - Heteromyidae - Chaetodipus fallax pallidus Animals - Chaetodipus pallid San Diego AMAFD05032 None None SSC 3311664 RANCHO Mapped and Animals - Mammals fallax pallidus pocket mouse MIRAGE Unprocessed Mammals - Heteromyidae - Chaetodipus fallax pallidus Animals - Chaetodipus pallid San Diego AMAFD05032 None None SSC 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped Animals - Mammals fallax pallidus pocket mouse Mammals - Heteromyidae - Chaetodipus fallax pallidus Animals - Chaetodipus pallid San Diego AMAFD05032 None None SSC 3311673 MYOMA Mapped Animals - Mammals fallax pallidus pocket mouse Mammals - Heteromyidae - Chaetodipus fallax pallidus Animals - Chaetodipus pallid San Diego AMAFD05032 None None SSC 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped and I Animals - Mammals fallax pallidus pocket mouse Unprocessed Mammals - Heteromyidae - Chaetodipus fallax pallidus Animals - Dipodomys Earthquake AMAFD03144 None None - 3311654 TORO PEAK Unprocessed Animals - Mammals merriami collinus Merriams Mammals - kangaroo rat Heteromyidae - Dipodomys merriami collinus Animals - Dipodomys Earthquake AMAFD03144 None None - 3311673 MYOMA Mapped and Animals - Mammals merriami collinus Merriams Unprocessed Mammals - kangaroo rat Heteromyidae - Dipodomys merriami collinus https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 10/24 1/24/23, 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table Animals - Perognathus Palm Springs AMAFDO1043 None None SSC 3311673 MYOMA Mapped and Animals - Mammals longimembris pocket mouse Unprocessed Mammals - bangsi Heteromyidae - Perognathus longimembris bangsi Animals - Perognathus Palm Springs AMAFDO1043 None None SSC 3311672 WEST Mapped and Animals - Mammals longimembris pocket mouse BERDOO Unprocessed Mammals - bangsi CANYON Heteromyidae - Perognathus longimembris bangsi Animals - Perognathus Palm Springs AMAFDO1043 None None SSC 3311674 CATHEDRAL Unprocessed Animals - Mammals longimembris pocket mouse CITY Mammals- bangsi Heteromyidae - Perognathus longimembris bangsi Animals - Perognathus Palm Springs AMAFDO1043 None None SSC 3311662 INDIO Mapped Animals - Mammals longimembris pocket mouse Mammals- bangsi Heteromyidae - Perognathus longimembris bangsi Animals - Perognathus Palm Springs AMAFDO1043 None None SSC 3311663 LA QUINTA Unprocessed Animals - Mammals longimembris pocket mouse Mammals- bangsi Heteromyidae - Perognathus longimembris Palm Springs AMAFDO1043 None bangsi Animals - Perognathus None SSC 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Animals - Mammals longimembris pocket mouse Mammals- bangsi Heteromyidae - Perognathus longimembris bangsi Animals - Perognathus Los Angeles AMAFDO1041 None None SSC 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Animals - Mammals longimembris pocket mouse Mammals- brevinasus Heteromyidae - Perognathus longimembris brevinasus Animals - Perognathus Los Angeles AMAFDO1041 None None SSC 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Mammals longimembris pocket mouse Mammals- brevinasus Heteromyidae - Perognathus longimembris brevinasus Animals - Eumops perotis western mastiff AMACD02011 None None SSC 3311662 INDIO Mapped Animals - Mammals californicus bat Mammals - Molossidae - Eumops perotis californicus Animals - Eumops perotis western mastiff AMACD02011 None None SSC 3311653 MARTINEZ Unprocessed Animals - Mammals californicus bat MTN. Mammals - Molossidae - Eumops perotis californicus Animals - Nyctinomops pocketed free- AMACD04010 None None SSC 3311653 MARTINEZ Unprocessed Animals - Mammals femorosaccus tailed bat MTN. Mammals- hftps://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 11/24 1/24/23. 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table Molossidae - Nyctinomops femorosaccus Animals - Nyctinomops pocketed free- AMACD04010 None None SSC 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped Animals - Mammals femorosaccus tailed bat Mammals - Molossidae - Nyctinomops femorosaccus Animals - Taxidea taxus American AMAJF04010 None None SSC 3311662 INDIO Mapped Animals - Mammals badger Mammals - Mustelidae - Taxidea taxus Animals - Taxidea taxus American AMAJF04010 None None SSC 3311654 TORO PEAK Unprocessed Animals - Mammals badger Mammals - Mustelidae - Taxidea taxus Animals - Bassariscus southern AMAJE01011 None None FP 3311664 RANCHO Unprocessed Animals - Mammals astutus octavus California ringtail MIRAGE Mammals - Procyonidae - Bassariscus astutus octavus Animals - Bassariscus southern AMAJE01011 None None FP 3311653 MARTINEZ Unprocessed Animals - Mammals astutus octavus California ringtail MTN. Mammals - Procyonidae - Bassariscus astutus octavus Animals - Xerospermophilus Palm Springs AMAFB05161 None None SSC 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped and Animals - Mammals tereticaudus round -tailed Unprocessed Mammals - chlorus ground squirrel Sciuridae - Xerospermophilus tereticaudus chlorus Animals - Xerospermophilus Palm Springs AMAFB05161 None None SSC 3311662 INDIO Mapped and Animals - Mammals tereticaudus round -tailed Unprocessed Mammals - chlorus ground squirrel Sciuridae - Xerospermophilus tereticaudus chlorus Animals - Xerospermophilus Palm Springs AMAFB05161 None None SSC 3311674 CATHEDRAL Mapped and Animals - Mammals tereticaudus round -tailed CITY Unprocessed Mammals- chlorus ground squirrel Sciuridae - Xerospermophilus tereticaudus chlorus Animals - Xerospermophilus Palm Springs AMAFB05161 None None SSC 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Mammals tereticaudus round -tailed Mammals- chlorus ground squirrel Sciuridae - Xerospermophilus tereticaudus chlorus Animals - Xerospermophilus Palm Springs AMAFB05161 None None SSC 3311672 WEST Unprocessed Animals - Mammals tereticaudus round -tailed BERDOO Mammals- chlorus ground squirrel CANYON Sciuridae - Xerospermophilus tereticaudus chlorus Animals - Antrozous pallid bat AMACC10010 None None SSC 3311663 LA QUINTA Unprocessed Animals - Mammals pallidus Mammals- hftps://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 12/24 1/24/23. 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table Vespertilionidae - Antrozous pallidus Animals - Antrozous pallid bat AMACC10010 None None SSC 3311653 MARTINEZ Unprocessed Animals - Mammals pallidus MTN. Mammals - Vespertilionidae - Antrozous pallidus Animals - Lasiurus western yellow AMACC05070 None None SSC 3311653 MARTINEZ Unprocessed Animals - Mammals xanthinus bat MTN. Mammals - Vespertilionidae - None None SSC 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Lasiurus xanthinus Animals - Animals - Lasiurus western yellow AMACC05070 Mammals xanthinus bat Mammals - Vespertilionidae - Lasiurus xanthinus Animals - Lasiurus western yellow AMACC05070 None None SSC 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped Animals - Mammals xanthinus bat Mammals - Vespertilion idae - Lasiurus xanthinus Animals - Lasiurus western yellow AMACC05070 None None SSC 3311664 RANCHO Mapped Animals - Mammals xanthinus bat MIRAGE Mammals - Vespertilionidae - Lasiurus xanthinus Animals - Lasiurus western yellow AMACC05070 None None SSC 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Mammals xanthinus bat Mammals - Vespertilion idae - Lasiurus xanthinus Animals - Lasiurus western yellow AMACC05070 None None SSC 3311674 CATHEDRAL Mapped Animals - Mammals xanthinus bat CITY Mammals - Vespertilionidae - Lasiurus xanthinus Animals - Lasiurus western yellow AMACC05070 None None SSC 3311662 INDIO Mapped Animals - Mammals xanthinus bat Mammals - Vespertilionidae - Lasiurus xanthinus Animals - Eremarionta Thousand Palms IMGASB9060 None None - 3311672 WEST Unprocessed Animals - Mollusks Mollusks millepalmarum desertsnail BERDOO - CANYON Helminthoglyptidae - Eremarionta INDIO Unprocessed millepalmarum Animals - Anodonta California floater IMBIV04220 None None - 3311662 Animals - Mollusks Mollusks californiensis - Unionidae - Anodonta californiensis Animals - Anodonta California floater IMBIV04220 None None - 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Mollusks Mollusks californiensis - Unionidae - Anodonta californiensis Animals - Anniella stebbinsi Southern ARACC01060 None None SSC 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Animals - Reptiles Reptiles California - Anniellidae - legless lizard Anniella stebbinsi Animals - Salvadora coast patch- ARADB30033 None None SSC 3311654 TORO PEAK Unprocessed Animals - Reptiles Reptiles hexalepis nosed snake - Colubridae - virgultea Salvadora Coleonyx San Diego ARACD01031 None hexalepis virgultea Animals - None SSC 3311662 INDIO Unprocessed Animals - Reptiles Reptiles variegatus abbotti banded gecko - Gekkonidae - Coleonyx variegatus abbotti https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 13/24 1/24/23, 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table Animals - Phrynosoma coast horned ARACF12100 None None SSC 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped and Animals - Reptiles Reptiles blainvillii lizard Unprocessed - Phrynosomatidae - Phrynosoma blainvillii Animals - Phrynosoma flat -tailed horned ARACF12040 None None SSC 3311662 INDIO Mapped Animals - Reptiles Reptiles mcallii lizard - Phrynosomatidae - Phrynosoma mcallii Animals - Phrynosoma flat -tailed horned ARACF12040 None None SSC 3311674 CATHEDRAL Mapped and Animals - Reptiles Reptiles mcallii lizard CITY Unprocessed - Phrynosomatidae - Phrynosoma mcallii Animals - Phrynosoma flat -tailed horned ARACF12040 None None SSC 3311673 MYOMA Mapped and Animals - Reptiles Reptiles mcallii lizard Unprocessed - Phrynosomatidae - Phrynosoma mcallii Animals - Phrynosoma flat -tailed horned ARACF12040 None None SSC 3311672 WEST Mapped Animals - Reptiles Reptiles mcallii lizard BERDOO - Phrynosomatidae CANYON - Phrynosoma mcallii Animals - Phrynosoma flat -tailed horned ARACF12040 None None SSC 3311664 RANCHO Mapped and Animals - Reptiles Reptiles mcallii lizard MIRAGE Unprocessed - Phrynosomatidae - Phrynosoma mcallii Animals - Phrynosoma flat -tailed horned ARACF12040 None None SSC 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped and Animals - Reptiles Reptiles mcallii lizard Unprocessed - Phrynosomatidae - Phrynosoma mcallii Animals - Uma inornata Coachella Valley ARACF15010 Threatened Endangered - 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped and Animals - Reptiles Reptiles fringe -toed lizard Unprocessed - Phrynosomatidae ARACF15010 Threatened Endangered - Uma inornata Animals - Uma inornata Coachella Valley - 3311664 RANCHO Mapped and Animals - Reptiles Reptiles fringe -toed lizard MIRAGE Unprocessed - Phrynosomatidae Coachella Valley ARACF15010 Threatened Endangered - Uma inornata Animals - Uma inornata - 3311652 VALERIE Mapped and Animals - Reptiles Reptiles fringe -toed lizard Unprocessed - Phrynosomatidae - Uma inornata Animals - Uma inornata Coachella Valley ARACF15010 Threatened Endangered - 3311653 MARTINEZ Mapped and Animals - Reptiles Reptiles fringe -toed lizard MTN. Unprocessed - Phrynosomatidae - Uma inornata Animals - Uma inornata Coachella Valley ARACF15010 Threatened Endangered - 3311672 WEST Mapped and Animals - Reptiles Reptiles fringe -toed lizard BERDOO Unprocessed - Phrynosomatidae CANYON - Uma inornata Animals - Uma inornata Coachella Valley ARACF15010 Threatened Endangered - 3311673 MYOMA Mapped and Animals - Reptiles Reptiles fringe -toed lizard Unprocessed - Phrynosomatidae - Uma inornata Animals - Uma inornata Coachella Valley ARACF15010 Threatened Endangered - 3311674 CATHEDRAL Mapped and Animals - Reptiles Reptiles fringe -toed lizard CITY Unprocessed - Phrynosomatidae - Uma inornata Animals - Uma inornata Coachella Valley ARACF15010 Threatened Endangered - 3311662 INDIO Mapped and Animals - Reptiles Reptiles fringe -toed lizard Unprocessed - Phrynosomatidae - Uma inornata Animals - Aspidoscelis tigris coastal whiptail ARACJ02143 None None SSC 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Reptiles Reptiles stejnegeri - Teiidae - Aspidoscelis tigris stejnegeri Animals - Aspidoscelis tigris coastal whiptail ARACJ02143 None None SSC 3311654 TORO PEAK Unprocessed Animals - Reptiles Reptiles stejnegeri - Teiidae - https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 14/24 1/24/23. 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table Aspidoscelis tigris stejnegeri Animals - Gopherus desert tortoise ARAAF01012 Threatened Threatened - 3311662 INDIO Unprocessed Animals - Reptiles Reptiles agassizii - Testudinidae - Threatened Threatened - 3311672 WEST Mapped and Gopherus agassizii Animals - Gopherus desert tortoise ARAAF01012 Animals - Reptiles Reptiles agassizii BERDOO Unprocessed - Testudinidae - ARAAF01012 Threatened Threatened CANYON Gopherus agassizii Animals - Gopherus desert tortoise - 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Reptiles Reptiles agassizii - Testudinidae - Threatened Threatened Gopherus agassizii Animals - Gopherus desert tortoise ARAAF01012 - 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Reptiles Reptiles agassizii - Testudinidae - Gopherus agassizii Animals - Gopherus desert tortoise ARAAF01012 Threatened Threatened - 3311664 RANCHO Mapped and Animals - Reptiles Reptiles agassizii MIRAGE Unprocessed - Testudinidae - Gopherus agassizii Animals - Gopherus desert tortoise ARAAF01012 Threatened Threatened - 3311663 LA QUINTA Unprocessed Animals - Reptiles Reptiles agassizii - Testudinidae - Gopherus agassizii Animals - Crotalus ruber red -diamond ARADE02090 None None SSC 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped and Animals - Reptiles Reptiles rattlesnake Unprocessed - Viperidae - Crotalus ruber Animals - Crotalus ruber red -diamond ARADE02090 None None SSC 3311664 RANCHO Mapped and Animals - Reptiles Reptiles rattlesnake MIRAGE Unprocessed - Viperidae - Crotalus ruber Animals - Crotalus ruber red -diamond ARADE02090 None None SSC 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Animals - Reptiles Reptiles rattlesnake - Viperidae - Crotalus ruber Animals - Crotalus ruber red -diamond ARADE02090 None None SSC 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Animals - Reptiles Reptiles rattlesnake - Viperidae - red -diamond Crotalus ruber Animals - Crotalus ruber ARADE02090 None None SSC 3311674 CATHEDRAL Unprocessed Animals - Reptiles Reptiles rattlesnake CITY - Viperidae - Crotalus ruber Animals - Crotalus ruber red -diamond ARADE02090 None None SSC 3311654 TORO PEAK Unprocessed Animals - Reptiles Reptiles rattlesnake - Viperidae - Crotalus ruber Community - Desert Fan Palm Desert Fan Palm CTT62300CA None None - 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Community - Terrestrial Oasis Woodland Oasis Woodland Terrestrial - Desert Fan Palm Oasis None None - 3311674 CATHEDRAL Mapped Woodland Community - Community - Desert Fan Palm Desert Fan Palm CTT62300CA Terrestrial Oasis Woodland Oasis Woodland CITY Terrestrial - Desert Fan Palm Oasis Woodland Community - Desert Fan Palm Desert Fan Palm CTT62300CA None None - 3311673 MYOMA Mapped Community - Terrestrial Oasis Woodland Oasis Woodland Terrestrial - Desert Fan Palm Oasis Desert Fan Palm Desert Fan Palm CTT62300CA None Woodland Community - None - 3311672 WEST Mapped Community - Terrestrial Oasis Woodland Oasis Woodland BERDOO Terrestrial - Desert CANYON Fan Palm Oasis Woodland Community - Desert Fan Palm Desert Fan Palm CTT62300CA None None - 3311653 MARTINEZ Mapped Community - Terrestrial Oasis Woodland Oasis Woodland MTN. Terrestrial - Desert Fan Palm Oasis Woodland https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 15/24 1/24/23, 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table Community - Desert Fan Palm Desert Fan Palm CTT62300CA None None - 3311664 RANCHO Mapped Community - Terrestrial Oasis Woodland Oasis Woodland MIRAGE Terrestrial - Desert Fan Palm Oasis Woodland Community - Desert Fan Palm Desert Fan Palm CTT62300CA None None - 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped Community - Terrestrial Oasis Woodland Oasis Woodland Terrestrial - Desert Fan Palm Oasis Woodland Plants - Jaffueliobryum Raus NBMUS97010 None None - 213.3 3311653 MARTINEZ Mapped Plants - Bryophytes raui jaffueliobryum MTN. Bryophytes - moss Grimmiaceae - Jaffueliobryum raui Plants - Funastrum wavyleaf PDASCOF020 None None - 213.2 3311653 MARTINEZ Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular crispum twinvine MTN. Apocynaceae - Funastrum crispum Plants - Funastrum wavyleaf PDASCOF020 None None - 213.2 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped and Plants - Vascular - Vascular crispum twinvine Unprocessed Apocynaceae - Funastrum crispum Plants - Matelea parvifolia spear -leaf PDASCOA0J0 None None - 213.3 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular matelea Apocynaceae - spear -leaf PDASCOA0J0 None Matelea parvifolia Plants - Matelea parvifolia None - 213.3 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular matelea Apocynaceae - spear -leaf PDASCOA0J0 None Matelea parvifolia Plants - Matelea parvifolia None - 213.3 3311664 RANCHO Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular matelea MIRAGE Apocynaceae - Chaenactis None - 113.3 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Matelea parvifolia Plants - Vascular - Plants - Parishs PDAST200DO None Vascular parishii chaenactis Asteraceae - Chaenactis parishii Plants - Dieteria Zieglers aster PDAST640132 None None - 1 B.2 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular canescens var. Asteraceae - ziegleri Dieteria canescens var. ziegleri Plants - Hulsea vestita beautiful hulsea PDAST4Z074 None None - 4.2 3311654 TORO PEAK Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular ssp. callicarpha Asteraceae - Hulsea vestita ssp. callicarpha Plants - Xylorhiza cognata Mecca -aster PDASTA1010 None None - 1 B.2 3311672 WEST Mapped and Plants - Vascular - Vascular BERDOO Unprocessed Asteraceae - CANYON Xylorhiza cognata Plants - Xylorhiza cognata Mecca -aster PDASTA1010 None None - 1 B.2 3311673 MYOMA Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular Asteraceae - Xylorhiza cognata Plants - Johnstonella ribbed PDBOROAOMO None None - 4.3 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular costata cryptantha Boraginaceae - Johnstonella costata Plants - Johnstonella ribbed PDBOROAOMO None None - 4.3 3311674 CATHEDRAL Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular costata cryptantha CITY Boraginaceae - Johnstonella costata Plants - Johnstonella ribbed PDBOROAOMO None None - 4.3 3311662 INDIO Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular costata cryptantha Boraginaceae - Johnstonella costata https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 16/24 1/24/23, 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table Plants - Johnstonella ribbed PDBOROAOMO None None - 4.3 3311663 LA QUINTA Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular costata cryptantha Boraginaceae - Johnstonella costata Plants - Johnstonella ribbed PDBOROAOMO None None - 4.3 3311653 MARTINEZ Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular costata cryptantha MTN. Boraginaceae - Johnstonella PDBOROA180 None costata Plants - Johnstonella winged None - 4.3 3311663 LA QUINTA Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular holoptera cryptantha Boraginaceae - Johnstonella holoptera Plants - Johnstonella winged PDBOROA180 None None - 4.3 3311664 RANCHO Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular holoptera cryptantha MIRAGE Boraginaceae - Johnstonella holoptera Plants - Johnstonella winged PDBOROA180 None None - 4.3 3311674 CATHEDRAL Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular holoptera cryptantha CITY Boraginaceae - Johnstonella holoptera Plants - Johnstonella winged PDBOROA180 None None - 4.3 3311654 TORO PEAK Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular holoptera cryptantha Boraginaceae - Johnstonella holoptera Plants - Caulanthus Paysons PDBRAOMOHO None None - 4.2 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped and Plants - Vascular - Vascular simulans jewelflower Unprocessed Brassicaceae - Caulanthus simulans Plants - Draba saxosa Southern PDBRA110Q2 None None - 113.3 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped and Plants - Vascular - Vascular California rock Unprocessed Brassicaceae - draba Draba saxosa Plants - Streptanthus southern PDBRA2GOBO None None - 113.3 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular campestris jewelflower Brassicaceae - Streptanthus campestris Plants - Thysanocarpus rigid fringepod PDBRA2Q070 None None - 1 B.2 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped and Plants - Vascular - Vascular rigidus Unprocessed Brassicaceae - Thysanocarpus rigidus Plants - Bursera little -leaf PDBUR01020 None None - 213.3 3311653 MARTINEZ Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular microphylla elephant tree MTN. Burseraceae - Bursera microphylla Plants - Bursera little -leaf PDBUR01020 None None - 213.3 3311652 VALERIE Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular microphylla elephant tree Burseraceae - Bursera microphylla Plants - Cuscuta pointed dodder PDCUS01071 None None - 3 3311674 CATHEDRAL Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular californica var. CITY Convolvulaceae - apiculata Cuscuta californica var. apiculata Plants - Sedum niveum Davidsons PDCRAOAORO None None - 4.2 3311654 TORO PEAK Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular stonecrop Crassulaceae - Ditaxis claryana glandular ditaxis Sedum niveum Plants - PDEUP080LO None None - 213.2 3311662 INDIO Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular Euphorbiaceae - Ditaxis claryana https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 17/24 1/24/23, 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table Plants - Ditaxis claryana glandular ditaxis PDEUP080LO None None - 213.2 3311653 MARTINEZ Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular MTN. Euphorbiaceae - Ditaxis claryana PDEUP080LO None Ditaxis claryana Plants - glandular ditaxis None - 213.2 3311664 RANCHO Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular MIRAGE Euphorbiaceae - Ditaxis claryana Plants - Ditaxis claryana glandular ditaxis PDEUPO80LO None None - 213.2 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular Euphorbiaceae - Ditaxis claryana Plants - Ditaxis serrata California ditaxis PDEUP08050 None None - 3.2 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular var. californica Euphorbiaceae - Ditaxis serrata var. californica Plants - Euphorbia Abrams spurge PDEUPOD010 None None - 213.2 3311664 RANCHO Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular abramsiana MIRAGE Euphorbiaceae - Euphorbia abramsiana Plants - Euphorbia Abrams spurge PDEUPOD010 None None - 213.2 3311673 MYOMA Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular abramsiana Euphorbiaceae - Euphorbia abramsiana Plants - Euphorbia Abrams spurge PDEUPOD010 None None - 213.2 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular abramsiana Euphorbiaceae - Euphorbia abramsiana Plants - Euphorbia Arizona spurge PDEUPODO60 None None - 213.3 3311673 MYOMA Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular arizonica Euphorbiaceae - Euphorbia arizonica Plants - Euphorbia Arizona spurge PDEUPOD060 None None - 213.3 3311674 CATHEDRAL Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular arizonica CITY Euphorbiaceae - Euphorbia arizonica Plants - Euphorbia flat -seeded PDEUP0D1X0 None None - 1 B.2 3311674 CATHEDRAL Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular platysperma spurge CITY Euphorbiaceae - Euphorbia platysperma Plants- Euphorbia flat -seeded PDEUP0D1X0 None None - 1B.2 3311673 MYOMA Mapped Plants- Vascular - Vascular platysperma spurge Euphorbiaceae - Euphorbia platysperma Plants - Euphorbia revolute spurge PDEUPOD230 None None - 4.3 3311654 TORO PEAK Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular revoluta Euphorbiaceae - Tragia ramosa desert tragia PDEUP1 D090 None Euphorbia revoluta Plants - None - 4.3 3311654 TORO PEAK Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular Euphorbiaceae - Acmispon pygmy lotus PDFAB2AOHO None Tragia ramosa Plants - None - 1113.3 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular haydonii Fabaceae - Acmispon haydonii Plants - Astragalus crested milk- PDFAB0F1A0 None None - 4.3 3311654 TORO PEAK Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular bicristatus vetch Fabaceae - Astragalus bicristatus Plants - Astragalus hornii Horns milk -vetch PDFABOF421 None None - 113.1 3311674 CATHEDRAL Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular var. hornii CITY Fabaceae - Astragalus hornii var. hornii https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 18/24 1/24/23, 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table Plants - Astragalus hornii Horns milk -vetch PDFABOF421 None None - 113.1 3311664 RANCHO Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular var. hornii MIRAGE Fabaceae - Astragalus hornii var. hornii Plants - Astragalus Borrego milk- PDFABOFB95 None None - 4.3 3311663 LA QUINTA Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular lentiginosus var. vetch Fabaceae - borreganus Astragalus lentiginosus var. borreganus Plants - Astragalus Borrego milk- PDFABOFB95 None None - 4.3 3311674 CATHEDRAL Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular lentiginosus var. vetch CITY Fabaceae - borreganus Astragalus lentiginosus var. borreganus Plants - Astragalus Borrego milk- PDFABOFB95 None None - 4.3 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular lentiginosus var. vetch Fabaceae - borreganus Astragalus lentiginosus var. borreganus Plants - Astragalus Coachella Valley PDFABOFB97 Endangered None - 1 B.2 3311673 MYOMA Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular lentiginosus var. milk -vetch Fabaceae - coachellae Astragalus lentiginosus var. coachellae Plants - Astragalus Coachella Valley PDFABOFB97 Endangered None - 1 B.2 3311674 CATHEDRAL Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular lentiginosus var. milk -vetch CITY Fabaceae - coachellae Astragalus lentiginosus var. coachellae Plants - Astragalus Coachella Valley PDFABOFB97 Endangered None - 1 B.2 3311662 INDIO Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular lentiginosus var. milk -vetch Fabaceae - coachellae Astragalus lentiginosus var. coachellae Plants - Astragalus Coachella Valley PDFABOFB97 Endangered None - 1 B.2 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular lentiginosus var. milk -vetch Fabaceae - coachellae Astragalus lentiginosus var. coachellae Plants - Astragalus Big Bear Valley PDFABOF4TO None None - 1 B.2 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular Ieucolobus woollypod Fabaceae - Astragalus Ieucolobus Plants - Astragalus Lancaster milk- PDFABOF721 None None - 113.1 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular preussii var. vetch Fabaceae - Iaxiflorus Astragalus preussii var. Iaxiflorus Plants - Astragalus Lancaster milk- PDFABOF721 None None - 113.1 3311653 MARTINEZ Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular preussii var. vetch MTN. Fabaceae - laxiflorus Astragalus preussii Lancaster milk- PDFABOF721 var. Iaxiflorus Plants - Astragalus None None - 113.1 3311662 INDIO Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular preussii var. vetch Fabaceae - Iaxiflorus Astragalus preussii var. Iaxiflorus Plants - Astragalus gravel milk -vetch PDFABOF7RO None None - 213.2 3311662 INDIO Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular sabulonum Fabaceae - Astragalus sabulonum https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 19/24 1/24/23, 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table Plants - Astragalus triple -ribbed PDFABOF920 Endangered None - 1B.2 3311673 MYOMA Mapped and Plants - Vascular - Vascular tricarinatus milk -vetch Unprocessed Fabaceae- Astragalus tricarinatus Plants - Astragalus triple -ribbed PDFABOF920 Endangered None - 1 B.2 3311653 MARTINEZ Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular tricarinatus milk -vetch MTN. Fabaceae- Astragalus tricarinatus Plants - Marina orcuttii California marina PDFAB2F031 None None - 1113.3 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular var. orcuttii Fabaceae - Marina orcuttii var. orcuttii Plants - Marina orcuttii California marina PDFAB2F031 None None - 1113.3 3311664 RANCHO Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular var. orcuttii MIRAGE Fabaceae - Marina orcuttii var. orcuttii Plants - Marina orcuttii California marina PDFAB2F031 None None - 113.3 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped and Plants - Vascular - Vascular var. orcuttii Unprocessed Fabaceae - Marina orcuttii var. orcuttii Plants - Phaseolus slender -stem PDFAB330PO None None - 213.1 3311652 VALERIE Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular filiformis bean Fabaceae - Phaseolus filiformis Plants - Senna covesii Coves cassia PDFAB491XO None None - 213.2 3311652 VALERIE Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular Fabaceae- Senna covesii Plants - Senna covesii Coves cassia PDFAB491XO None None - 213.2 3311664 RANCHO Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular MIRAGE Fabaceae- Senna coves!! Plants - Senna covesii Coves cassia PDFAB491XO None None - 213.2 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular Fabaceae- Senna covesii Plants - Juncus acutus southwestern PMJUN01051 None None - 4.2 3311662 INDIO Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular ssp. Ieopoldii spiny rush Juncaceae - Juncus acutus ssp. Ieopoldii Plants - Juncus acutus southwestern PMJUN01051 None None - 4.2 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular ssp. Ieopoldii spiny rush Juncaceae - Juncus acutus ssp. Ieopoldii Plants - Juncus cooped Coopers rush PMJUN010TO None None - 4.3 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular Juncaceae - Juncus cooperi Plants - Calochortus San Jacinto PMLILOD121 None None - 1 B.2 3311664 RANCHO Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular palmed var. mariposa -lily MIRAGE Liliaceae - munzii Calochortus palmed var. munz!! Plants - Calochortus San Jacinto PMLILOD121 None None - 1 B.2 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular palmed var. mariposa -lily Liliaceae - munzii Calochortus palmed var. munzii Plants - Calochortus Palmers PMLILOD122 None None - 1 B.2 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular palmed var. mariposa -lily Liliaceae - palmed Calochortus palmed var. palmed Plants - Lilium parryi lemon lily PMLIL1A0J0 None None - 1 B.2 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular Liliaceae - Lilium parry! https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 20/24 1/24/23, 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table Plants - Petalonyx linearis narrow -leaf PDLOA04010 None None - 213.3 3311664 RANCHO Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular sandpaper -plant MIRAGE Loasaceae - Petalonyx linearis None - 213.3 3311673 MYOMA Mapped Plants - Vascular - Plants - Petalonyx linearis narrow -leaf PDLOA04010 None Vascular sandpaper -plant Loasaceae - Petalonyx linearis Plants - Ayenia compacta California ayenia PDSTE01020 None None - 213.3 3311664 RANCHO Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular MIRAGE Malvaceae - Ayenia compacta Plants - Ayenia compacta California ayenia PDSTE01020 None None - 213.3 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular Malvaceae - Ayenia compacta Plants - Ayenia compacta California ayenia PDSTE01020 None None - 213.3 3311653 MARTINEZ Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular MTN. Malvaceae - Ayenia compacta Plants - Horsfordia alata pink velvet- PDMALOJ010 None None - 4.3 3311663 LA QUINTA Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular mallow Malvaceae - Horsfordia alata Plants - Horsfordia alata pink velvet- PDMALOJ010 None None - 4.3 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular mallow Malvaceae - Horsfordia alata Plants - Horsfordia alata pink velvet- PDMALOJ010 None None - 4.3 3311653 MARTINEZ Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular mallow MTN. Malvaceae - Horsfordia alata Plants - Horsfordia alata pink velvet- PDMALOJ010 None None - 4.3 3311662 INDIO Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular mallow Malvaceae - Horsfordia Newberrys PDMALOJ020 None Unprocessed Horsfordia alata Plants - None - 4.3 3311662 INDIO Plants - Vascular - Vascular newberryi velvet -mallow Malvaceae - Horsfordia newberryi Plants - Horsfordia Newberrys PDMALOJ020 None None - 4.3 3311653 MARTINEZ Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular newberryi velvet -mallow MTN. Malvaceae - Horsfordia newberryi Plants - Horsfordia Newberrys PDMALOJ020 None None - 4.3 3311652 VALERIE Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular newberryi velvet -mallow Malvaceae - Horsfordia newberryi Plants - Abronia villosa chaparral sand- PDNYC010P1 None None - 1113.1 3311652 VALERIE Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular var. aurita verbena Nyctaginaceae - Abronia villosa var. aurita Plants - Abronia villosa chaparral sand- PDNYC010P1 None None - 113.1 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular var. aurita verbena Nyctaginaceae - Abronia villosa var. aurita Plants - Abronia villosa chaparral sand- PDNYC010P1 None None - 1113.1 3311662 INDIO Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular var. aurita verbena Nyctaginaceae - Abronia villosa var. aurita Plants - Abronia villosa chaparral sand- PDNYC010P1 None None - 113.1 3311673 MYOMA Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular var. aurita verbena Nyctaginaceae - Abronia villosa var. aurita Plants - Abronia villosa chaparral sand- PDNYC010P1 None None - 113.1 3311674 CATHEDRAL Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular var. aurita verbena CITY Nyctaginaceae - https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 21/24 1/24/23. 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table Abronia villosa var. aurita Plants - Mirabilis tenuiloba slender -lobed PDNYCOA150 None None - 4.3 3311653 MARTINEZ Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular four oclock MTN. Nyctaginaceae - PDONA03052 None Mirabilis tenuiloba Plants - Eremothera Booths evening- None - 213.3 3311673 MYOMA Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular boothii ssp. primrose Onagraceae - boothii Eremothera boothii ssp. boothii Plants - Eschscholzia Joshua Tree PDPAPOAOEO None None - 4.3 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular androuxii poppy Papaveraceae - Eschscholzia androuxii Plants - Erythranthe Palomar PDSCR1 BOZO None None - 4.3 3311664 RANCHO Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular diffusa monkeyflower MIRAGE Phrymaceae - Erythranthe diffusa Plants - Penstemon California PDSCR1 L110 None None - 1 B.2 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular californicus beardtongue Plantaginaceae - Penstemon californicus Plants - Penstemon San Jacinto PDSCR1 L1 D2 None None - 4.3 3311654 TORO PEAK Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular clevelandii var. beardtongue Plantaginaceae - connatus Penstemon clevelandii var. connatus Plants - Pseudorontium Deep Canyon PDSCR2R010 None None - 213.3 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular cyathiferum snapdragon Plantaginaceae - Pseudorontium cyathiferum Plants - Stemodia purple stemodia PDSCR1 U010 None None - 213.1 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular durantifolia Plantaginaceae - Stemodia durantifolia Plants - Stemodia purple stemodia PDSCR1 U010 None None - 213.1 3311664 RANCHO Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular durantifolia MIRAGE Plantaginaceae - Stemodia durantifolia Plants - Stemodia purple stemodia PDSCR1 U010 None None - 213.1 3311674 CATHEDRAL Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular durantifolia CITY Plantaginaceae - Stemodia PDPLM030B1 None None - 1 B.2 3311653 MARTINEZ Mapped durantifolia Plants - Vascular - Plants - Eriastrum Harwoods Vascular harwoodii eriastrum MTN. Polemoniaceae - Eriastrum harwoodii Plants - Leptosiphon Santa Rosa PDPLM090J3 None None - 113.3 3311653 MARTINEZ Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular floribundus ssp. Mountains MTN. Polemoniaceae - hallii leptosiphon Leptosiphon floribundus ssp. hallii Plants - Leptosiphon Santa Rosa PDPLM090J3 None None - 1 B.3 3311652 VALERIE Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular floribundus ssp. Mountains Polemoniaceae - hallii leptosiphon Leptosiphon floribundus ssp. hallii Plants - Leptosiphon Santa Rosa PDPLM090J3 None None - 113.3 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped and Plants - Vascular - Vascular floribundus ssp. Mountains Unprocessed Polemoniaceae - hallii leptosiphon Leptosiphon https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 22/24 1/24/23. 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table floribundus ssp. hallii Plants - Saltugilia latimeri Latimers PDPLMOH010 None None - 1 B.2 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular woodland-gilia Polemoniaceae - Saltugilia latimeri Plants - Chorizanthe Peninsular PDPGN040DO None None - 4.2 3311664 RANCHO Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular leptotheca spineflower MIRAGE Polygonaceae - Chorizanthe leptotheca Plants - Chorizanthe Peninsular PDPGN040DO None None - 4.2 3311663 LA QUINTA Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular leptotheca spineflower Polygonaceae - Chorizanthe white-bracted PDPGN040Z1 None leptotheca Plants - Chorizanthe xanti None - 1 B.2 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular var. leucotheca spineflower Polygonaceae - Chorizanthe xanti var. leucotheca Plants - Nemacaulis slender PDPGNOG012 None None - 213.2 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular denudata var. cottonheads Polygonaceae - gracilis Nemacaulis denudata var. gracilis Plants - Nemacaulis slender PDPGN0O012 None None - 213.2 3311674 CATHEDRAL Mapped and Plants - Vascular - Vascular denudata var. cottonheads CITY Unprocessed Polygonaceae - gracilis Nemacaulis denudata var. gracilis Plants - Sidotheca white -margined PDPGNOJ030 None None - 113.3 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped and Plants - Vascular - Vascular emarginata oxytheca Unprocessed Polygonaceae - Sidotheca Colorado Desert PDRAN0131A3 None emarginata Plants - Delphinium None - 4.3 3311654 TORO PEAK Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular parishii ssp. larkspur Ranunculaceae - subglobosum Delphinium parishii ssp. subglobosum Plants - Galium slender PDRUBON04B None None - 4.2 3311654 TORO PEAK Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular angustifolium ssp. bedstraw Rubiaceae - gracillimum Galium angustifolium ssp. gracillimum Plants - Galium San Jacinto PDRUBON04C None None - 113.3 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular angustifolium ssp. Mountains Rubiaceae - jacinticum bedstraw Galium angustifolium ssp. jacinticum Plants - Heuchera shaggy -haired PDSAXOEOJO None None - 113.3 3311654 TORO PEAK Mapped and Plants - Vascular - Vascular hirsutissima alumroot Unprocessed Saxifragaceae - Heuchera hirsutissima Plants - Selaginella desert spike- PPSEL010GO None None - 213.2 3311674 CATHEDRAL Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular eremophila moss CITY Selaginellaceae - Selaginella eremophila Plants - Selaginella desert spike- PPSEL010GO None None - 213.2 3311663 LA QUINTA Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular eremophila moss Selaginellaceae - Selaginella eremophila Plants - Selaginella desert spike- PPSEL010GO None None - 213.2 3311664 RANCHO Mapped Plants - Vascular - Vascular eremophila moss MIRAGE Selaginellaceae - https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 23/24 1/24/23. 1:53 PM Bios6 Print Table Selaginella eremophila Plants - Lycium torreyi Torreys box- PDSOLOGOKO None None - 4.2 3311674 CATHEDRAL Unprocessed Plants - Vascular - Vascular thorn CITY Solanaceae - Torreys box- PDSOLOGOKO Lycium torreyi Plants - Vascular - Plants - Lycium torreyi None None - 4.2 3311673 MYOMA Unprocessed Vascular thorn Solanaceae - Lycium torreyi https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/table.html 24/24 1/24/23. 2:04 PM CNPS Rare Plant Inventory I Search Results CNPS Rare Plant Inventory Search Results 66 matches found. Click on scientific name for details Search Criteria: 9-Quad include[3311663:3311672:3311673:3311652:3311653:3311662:3311664:3311674:3311654] ♦ SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME FAMILY LIFEFORM Abronia villosa chaparral sand- Nyctaginaceae annual herb var. aurita verbena ON�� CALIFOKNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY CA RARE BLOOMING FED STATE GLOBAL STATE PLANT CA DATE PERIOD LIST LIST RANK RANK RANK ENDEMIC ADDED (Jan)Mar-Sep None None G5T2? S2 1B.1 2001- 01-01 Acmispon pygmy lotus Fabaceae perennial herb Jan -Jun None None G3 S3 1 B.3 1994- haydonii 01-01 Astragalus crested milk- Fabaceae perennial herb May -Aug None None G3 S3 4.3 Yes 1974- bicristatus vetch Astragalus hornii Horn's milk- Fabaceae annual herb var. hornii vetch Astragalus Borrego milk- Fabaceae annual herb lentiginosus var. vetch borreaanus 01-01 May -Oct None None GUT1 S1 1 B.1 2006- 12-01 Feb -May None None G5T5? S4 4.3 1974- 01-01 Astragalus Coachella Valley Fabaceae annual/perennial Feb -May lentiginosus var. milk -vetch herb coachellae Astragalus Big Bear Valley Fabaceae perennial herb May -Jul leucolobus woollypod Astragalus Lancaster milk- Fabaceae perennial herb Mar -May preussii var. vetch laxi florus Astragalus gravel milk- Fabaceae annual/perennial Feb -Jun sabulonum vetch herb Astragalus triple -ribbed Fabaceae perennial herb Feb -May tricarinatus milk -vetch Ayenia compacta California ayenia Malvaceae perennial herb Mar -Apr Bursera little -leaf microphylla elephant tree Calochortus San Jacinto palmeri var. mariposa -lily munzii Calochortus Palmer's palmeri var. mariposa -lily palmeri Caulanthus Payson's simulans jewelflower FE None G5T1 S1 1 B.2 Yes None None G2 S2 1 B.2 Yes None None G4T2 S1 1 B.1 None None G4G5 S2 2B.2 FE None G2 None None G4 Burseraceae perennial Jun -Jul None None G4 deciduous tree Liliaceae perennial Apr -Jul None None G3T3 bulbiferous herb Liliaceae perennial Apr -Jul bulbiferous herb Brassicaceae annual herb (Feb)Mar- May(Jun) S2 1 B.2 Yes S3 2B.3 S2 2B.3 S3 1 B.2 Yes None None G3T2 S2 1 B.2 Yes None None G4 S4 4.2 Yes 1984- 01-01 1974- 01-01 1988- 01-01 2011- 10-19 1974- 01-01 1974- 01-01 1980- 01-01 1974- 01-01 1994- 01-01 1974- 01-01 https://rareplants.cnps.org/Search/result?frm=T&qsl=9&quad=3311663:3311672:331l673:3311652:3311653:3311662:3311664:3311674:3311654:&elev=:m:o 1 /4 1/24/23, 2:04 PM CNPS Rare Plant Inventory I Search Results Chaenactis Parish's Asteraceae perennial herb May -Jul None None G3G4 S3 1 B.3 parishii chaenactis Chorizanthe Peninsular Polygonaceae annual herb May -Aug None None G3 S3 4.2 leptotheca spineflower Chorizanthe white-bracted Polygonaceae annual herb Apr -Jun None None G4T3 S3 1 B.2 Yes xanti var. spineflower leucotheca Cuscuta pointed dodder Convolvulaceae annual vine Feb -Aug None None G5T3 S3? 3 ornica var. calif (parasitic) apiculata Delphinium Colorado Desert Ranunculaceae perennial herb Mar -Jun None None G4T4 S4 4.3 parishii ssp larkspur subalobosum Dieteria Ziegler's aster Asteraceae perennial herb Jul -Oct None None G5T1 S1 1 B.2 Yes canescens var. zLegleri Ditaxis claryana glandular ditaxis Euphorbiaceae perennial herb Oct -Mar Ditaxis serrata California ditaxis Euphorbiaceae perennial herb Mar -Dec var. californica Draba saxosa Southern Brassicaceae perennial herb Jun -Sep California rock draba None None G3G4 S2 2B.2 None None G5T3T4 S2? 3.2 Yes None None G2G3 S2S3 1 B.3 Yes Eremothera Booth's Onagraceae annual herb Apr -Sep None None G5T4 S3 2B.3 boothii ssp. evening- boothii primrose Eriastrum Harwood's Polemoniaceae annual herb Mar -Jun None None G2 harwoodii eriastrum Erythranthe Palomar Phrymaceae annual herb Apr -Jun None None G4 di f fusa monkeyflower Eschscholzia Joshua Tree Papaveraceae annual herb Feb-May(Jun) None None G3 androuxii poppy Euphorbia Abrams' spurge Euphorbiaceae annual herb (Aug)Sep-Nov None None G4 abramsiana Euphorbia Arizona spurge Euphorbiaceae perennial herb Mar -Apr None None G5 arizonica Euphorbia flat -seeded Euphorbiaceae annual herb Feb -Sep None None G3 platysperma spurge Euphorbia revolute spurge Euphorbiaceae annual herb Aug -Sep None None G5 revoluta Funastrum wavyleaf Apocynaceae perennial herb May -Aug None None G4 crispum twinvine Galium slender Rubiaceae perennial herb Apr-Jun(Jul) None None G5T4 an ustifolium bedstraw ssp_gracillimum S2 1 B.2 Yes S3 4.3 S3 4.3 S2 2B.2 I•'SINEWa:#3 I•Yiil:�a S1 2B.2 S4 4.2 Yes Galium San Jacinto Rubiaceae perennial herb Jun -Aug None None G5T2? S2? 1 B.3 Yes angustifolium Mountains ssp 1acinticum bedstraw https://rareplants.cnps.org/Search/resu It?frm=T&qsl=9&quad=3311663:3311672:3311673:3311652:3311653:3311662:3311664:3311674:3311654:&elev=: m:o 1974- 01-01 1994- 01-01 1994- 01-01 2007- 06-13 1974- 01-01 1980- 01-01 1974- 01-01 1974- 01-01 2001- 01-01 1980- 01-01 2008- 07-22 1974- 01-01 2014- 12-17 2001- 01-01 1980- 01-01 1980- 01-01 2001- 01-01 2016- 12-29 1994- 01-01 1994- 01-01 2/4 1/24/23, 2:04 PM CNPS Rare Plant Inventory I Search Results Heuchera shaggy -haired Saxifragaceae perennial (May)Jun-Jul None None G3 S3 1 B.3 Yes hirsutissima alumroot rhizomatous herb Horsfordia alato pink velvet- Malvaceae perennial shrub Feb -Dec None None G5 S4 4.3 mallow Horsfordia Newberry's Malvaceae perennial shrub Feb -Dec None None G5 S4 4.3 newberry_i velvet -mallow Hulsea vestita beautiful hulsea Asteraceae perennial herb May -Oct None None G5T4 S4 4.2 Yes ssp. callicarpha Jaffueliobryum Rau's Grimmiaceae moss None None G4 S2 213.3 raui jaffueliobryum moss Johnstonella ribbed Boraginaceae annual herb Feb -May None None G4G5 S4 4.3 costata cryptantha Johnstonella winged Boraginaceae annual herb Mar -Apr None None G4G5 S4 4.3 holoptera cryptantha Juncus acutus southwestern Juncaceae perennial (Mar)May-Jun None None G5T5 S4 4.2 ssp. Ieopoldii spiny rush rhizomatous herb Juncus cooperi Cooper's rush Juncaceae perennial herb Apr-May(Aug) None None G4 S3 4.3 Leptosiphon Santa Rosa floribundus ssp. Mountains hallii leptosiphon Lilium parry_i lemon lily Polemoniaceae perennial herb May-Jul(Nov) None None G4T1T2 S1 S2 113.3 Yes Liliaceae perennial Jul -Aug None None G3 bulbiferous herb S3 1 B.2 Lycium torrey_i Torrey's box- Solanaceae perennial shrub (Jan-Feb)Mar- None None G4G5 S3 4.2 thorn Jun(Sep-Nov) Marina orcuttii California Fabaceae perennial herb May -Oct None None G2G3T1T2 S2? 1B.3 var. orcuttii marina Matelea spear -leaf Apocynaceae perennial herb Mar-May(Jul) None None G5 S3 213.3 parvifolia matelea Mirabilis slender -lobed Nyctaginaceae perennial herb (Feb)Mar-May None None G5 S4 4.3 tenuiloba four o'clock Nemacaulis slender Polygonaceae annual herb (Mar)Apr-May None None G3G4T3? S2 213.2 denudata var. cottonheads 9racilis Penstemon California Plantaginaceae perennial herb May-Jun(Aug) None None G3 S2 1 B.2 californicus beardtongue Penstemon San Jacinto Plantaginaceae perennial herb Mar -May None None G5T4 S3 4.3 clevelandii var. beardtongue connatus Petalonyx linearis narrow -leaf Loasaceae perennial shrub (Jan-Feb)Mar- None None G4 S3? 213.3 sandpaper -plant May(Jun-Dec) Phaseolus slender -stem Fabaceae annual herb Apr None None G5 S1 213.1 filiformis bean Pseudorontium Deep Canyon Plantaginaceae annual herb Feb -Apr None None G4G5 S1 213.3 cyathiferum snapdragon 1974- 01-01 2001- 01-01 2001- 01-01 1994- 01-01 2014- 05-15 1974- 01-01 1980- 01-01 1988- 01-01 1974- 01-01 1988- 01-01 1974- 01-01 2015- 05-05 1984- 01-01 1974- 01-01 1974- 01-01 1994- 01-01 1974- 01-01 1984- 01-01 2016- 09-16 1984- 01-01 1980- 01-01 https://rareplants.cnps.org/Search/result?frm=T&qsl=9&quad=3311663:3311672:331l673:3311652:3311653:3311662:3311664:3311674:3311654:&elev=:m:o 3/4 1/24/23, 2:04 PM CNPS Rare Plant Inventory I Search Results Saltuailia Latimer's Polemoniaceae annual herb Mar -Jun None None G3 S3 1 B.2 Yes 2004- latimeri woodland-gilia 01-01 Sedum niveum Davidson's Crassulaceae perennial Jun -Aug None None G3 S3 4.2 1974- stonecrop rhizomatous herb 01-01 Selaginella desert spike- Selaginellaceae perennial (May)Jun(Jul) None None G4 S2S3 213.2 1994- eremophila moss rhizomatous herb 01-01 Senna covesii Cove's cassia Fabaceae perennial herb Mar-Jun(Aug) None None G5 S3 213.2 1980- 01-01 Sidotheca white -margined Polygonaceae annual herb (Feb)Apr- None None G3 S3 1 B.3 Yes 1980- emarginata oxytheca Jul(Aug) 01-01 Stemodia purple stemodia Plantaginaceae perennial herb (Jan)Apr-Dec None None G5 S2 213.1 2001- duranti folia 01-01 Streptanthus southern Brassicaceae perennial herb (Apr)May-Jul None None G3 S3 1 B.3 1994- campestris jewelflower 01-01 Thysanocarpus rigid fringepod Brassicaceae annual herb Feb -May None None G1G2 S2 1B.2 2011- roidus 03-17 Tragia ramosa desert tragia Euphorbiaceae perennial herb Apr -May None None G5 S4 4.3 2001- 01-01 Xylorhiza Mecca -aster Asteraceae perennial herb Jan -Jun None None G2 S2 1 B.2 Yes 1980- c_gnata 01-01 Showing 1 to 66 of 66 entries Suggested Citation: California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program. 2023. Rare Plant Inventory (online edition, v9.5). Website https://www.rareplants.cnps.org [accessed 24 January 20231. https://rareplants.cnps.org/Search/result?frm=T&qsl=9&quad=3311663:3311672:331l673:3311652:3311653:3311662:3311664:3311674:3311654:&elev=:m:o 4/4 `W,MGM 161.1ISdy EFH Report EFH Data Notice EFH Mapper Report Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) is defined by textual descriptions contained in the fishery management plans developed by the regional fishery management councils. In most cases mapping data can not fully represent the complexity of the habitats that make up EFH. This report should be used for general interest queries only and should not be interpreted as a definitive evaluation of EFH at this location. A location -specific evaluation of EFH for any official purposes must be performed by a regional expert. Please refer to the following links for the appropriate regional resources. Query Results Degrees, Minutes, Seconds: Latitude = , Longitude = Decimal Degrees: Latitude = , Longitude = The query location intersects with spatial data representing EFH and/or HAPCs for the following species/management units. EFH No Essential Fish Habitats (EFH) were identified at the report location. Salmon EFH No Pacific Salmon Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) were identified at the report location. HAPCs No Habitat Areas of Particular Concern (HAPC) were identified at the report location. EFH Areas Protected from Fishing No EFH Areas Protected from Fishing (EFHA) were identified at the report location. https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/apps/efhmapper/efhreport/ 1/1 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Carlsbad Fish And Wildlife Office 2177 Salk Avenue - Suite 250 Carlsbad, CA 92008-7385 Phone: (760) 431-9440 Fax: (760) 431-5901 In Reply Refer To: Project Code: 2023-0037535 Project Name: La Quinta PW HWY 111 Planning and Engineering Project January 24, 2023 Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list. The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat. A biological assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological 01/24/2023 evaluation similar to a biological assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a biological assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12. If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found at the Fish and Wildlife Service's Endangered Species Consultation website at: https://www.fws.gov/endangered/what-we-do/faq.html Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php. The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan (when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to- birds.php. In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/ executive-orders/e0-13186. php. We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office. 01/24/2023 Attachment(s): ■ Official Species List 01/24/2023 Official Species List This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action". This species list is provided by: Carlsbad Fish And Wildlife Office 2177 Salk Avenue - Suite 250 Carlsbad, CA 92008-7385 (760) 431-9440 01/24/2023 Project Summary Project Code: 2023-0037535 Project Name: La Quints PW HWY 111 Planning and Engineering Project Project Type: Commercial Development Project Description: Development project in La Quinta, California. Project Location: Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https: www.google.com/maps/(a)33.70934705,-116.28066559956517,14z a Counties: Riverside County, California Blackhaak La Oubfn High school — 01/24/2023 Endangered Species Act Species There is a total of 8 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce. See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. 1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. Mammals NAME STATUS Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Ovis canadensis nelsoni Endangered Population: Peninsular CA pop. There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat. Species profile: htWs:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4970 Birds NAME STATUS Least Bell's Vireo Vireo bellii pusillus Endangered There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat. Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5945 Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Empidonax trailhi extimus Endangered There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6749 01/24/2023 4 Reptiles NAME STATUS Coachella Valley Fringe -toed Lizard Uma inornata Threatened There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat. Species profile: htWs:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2069 Desert Tortoise Gopherus agassizii Threatened Population: Wherever found, except AZ south and east of Colorado R., and Mexico There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat. Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4481 Fishes NAME STATUS Desert Pupfish Cyprinodon macularius Endangered There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat. Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7003 Insects NAME STATUS Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743 Flowering Plants NAME STATUS Coachella Valley Milk -vetch Astragalus lentiginosus var. coachellae Endangered There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat. Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7426 Critical habitats THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION. 01/24/2023 IPaC User Contact Information Agency: GHD Name: Sara Moriarty -Graves Address: 718 3rd Street City: Eureka State: CA Zip: 95501 Email sara.moriarty-graves@ghd.com Phone: 7072672221 1/24/23, 2:00 PM about:blank row NOAA Critical Habitat Report Area of Interest (AOI) Information Area : 0.19 km2 Jan 24 2023 14:00:30 Pacific Standard Time r stop Q33tt = _ L M i 9h�av 1'1q `H,ghNaY 111/_' - e _ JI , '' Ater � �h.. » �J• e 1:4,614 0 0.03 0.06 0.12 m 0 0.06 0.1 0.2 km Es l COIM-e ny Map. C10b,* n. Luna Inds L--MV, QG ky d Rwm,i. Ca4 .a S,au Pa+.x. Fa Opar&—M.ap Mw—cft 1— HERE C—n 5aleG h. G—Tadrsv q- tm METVMSA. USGS. 0— & Lard Msrmg.n m EPA WS, US C—su 8—au. USDA, Source Ev, about:blank 1/2 1/24/23. 2:00 PM Summary about:blank Name Count Area(km2) Length(m) All Critical Habitat Polyline 0 N/A 0 All Critical Habitat Polygon 0 0 N/A about:blank 2/2 Appendix C Site Visit Photos 0 271°W (T) '0 33°42'31 "N,116°16'49"W ±13ft ♦ 81ft } Ki Figure 1 View of a portion of the southern BSA, facing towards commercial businesses. Signs of vehicular traffic through dune habitat can be seen. 11219378 40 Figure 2 Z" 310°NW (T) O 33°42'32"N,116°16'46"W ±19ft ♦ 68ft View from the center of the BSA, facing northwest. Creosote plants and dune habitat are present. 11219378 41 00 910E (T) Jib 3304238"N,116016'51"W ±9ft A 65ft Figure 3 The highly modified Whitewater River, classified by the National Wetlands Inventory as riverine, near the edge of the PSB. 11219378 42 :4 282OW (T) 33042'37"N,116016'49"W ±13ft ♦ 65ft WOOL- (• A t Figure 4 Habitat near the northern border of the PSB, with more hardpacked soil. 11219378 43 Ct 2°N (T) �k 33042'31 "N,116°16'49"W ±39ft ♦ 83ft �. •' -` '�^TAT Aim .- §— � %�O- 46 :K.,-...�ti..s,:. Figure 5 View of the northern portion of the PSB from near the center. The buildings seen are on the other side of the Whitewater River. 11219378 44 00, 2550W (T) O 33042-28"N,116016-50"W ±75ft ♦ 73ft Figure 6 Larger creosote bushes observed within the southern portion of the PSB. 11219378 45 01130SE (T) OO 33042'34"N,116016'53"W ±9ft ♦ 69ft Figure 7 Example of one of the many burrows observed within the PSB. 11219378 46 Appendix D Species Observed On -site Table D1 Plant Species Observed On -site Abronia villosa Ambrosia salsola Acacia linifolia Camissonia claviformis Chilopsis linearis Cryptantha sp. Eriophyllum sp. Geraea canescens Larrea tridentate Nerium oleander Parkinsonia florida Pennisetum setaceum Plantago ovata Rosmarinus officinalis Salsola tragus Schismus arabicus Tamarix aphylla Desert sand verbena Cheesebush White wattle Brown -eyed evening primrose Desert willow Popcorn flower woolly daisy Desert gold Creosote Oleander Palo verde Fountain grass Desert plantain Rosemary Russian thistle Arabian grass Tamarisk Table D2 Terrestrial wildlife observed on -site Scientific Name Sciuidae family Ground Squirrel Lacertidae family Lizard Nyctaginaceae Asteraceae Fabaceae Onagraceae Bignoniaceae Boraginaceae Asteraceae Asteraceae Zygophyllaceae Apocynaceae Fabaceae Poaceae Plantaginaceae Lamiaceae Amaranthaceae Poaceae Tamaricaceae Observed Observed native native non-native native native non-native native native native native native non-native native non-native non-native non-native non-native None Not determined Table D3 List of breeding codes, associated bird behavior, and breeding status (the highest-ranking code was recorded for each species during the survey). 1 N Active nest Breeding 2 M Carrying nesting material Breeding 3 F Carrying food or fecal sac Breeding 4 D Distraction display/feigning Breeding 5 L Local young fed by parents Breeding 6 Y Local young incapable of sustained flight Breeding 7 C Copulation or courtship observed Breeding 8 T Territorial behaviour Unconfirmed 9 S Territorial song or drumming heard Unconfirmed 10 E Encountered in study area Unconfirmed 11 O Encountered flying over the study area Unconfirmed 11219378 48 Table D4 Bird Species Detected On -site ANHU Anna's Hummingbird Calypte anna Encountered in E FGC/MBTA study area CORA Common Raven Corvus corax Encountered flying O FGC/MBTA over the study area GRRO Greater Roadrunner Geococcyx californianus Encountered in the E FGC/MBTA study area HOFI House Finch Haemorhous mexicanus Territorial song or S FGC/MBTA drumming heard MGWA MacGillivray's Warbler Geothlypis tolmiei Territorial song or S FGC/MBTA drumming heard MODO Mourning Dove Zenaida macroura Encountered in E FGC/MBTA study area RTHA Red-tailed Hawk Buteo jamaicensis Encountered flying over the study area O FGC/MBTA Definitions: FGC = protected by California Fish and Game Code MBTA = protected by the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act 11219378 49 Appendix C Cultural Resources Appendix C CHRIS Records Search City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0418 (951) 827-5745 - eickw@ucr.edu Inyo, Mono, and Riverside Counties January 22, 2024 EIC-RIV-ST-7321 Ryder Burliss GHD Inc. 2305 Historic Decatur Rd, Suite 102 San Diego, CA 92106 Re: Cultural Resources Records Search for City of La Quinta Highway I I I Corridor Specific Plan Proiect Dear Ryder Bwliss, We received your request on November 28, 2023, for a cultural resources records search for the City of La Quinta Highway l I I Corridor Specific Plan project, located in Sections 19, 30, 29, and 28, T.5S, R.7E, SBBM, in the southern area of the Whitcwatcr River in the City of La Quinta in Riverside County. We have reviewed our maps, records, and reports against the project area defined on the map you provided. Our records indicate that 92 cultural resource studies have been conducted within your project area. Fifty-six cultural resource properties are recorded within the boundaries of the project area. Additional sources of information consulted are identified below. National Register of Historic Places (NRHP): no listed properties are located within the boundaries of the project area. California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP), Archaeological Resources Directory (ARD): One property is listed as determined eligible for listing in the NRHP (P-33-001178 [CA-RIV-001178] La Quinta Evac. CH. AD.) California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP), Built Environment Resources Directory (BERD): Two properties are listed as recognized as a historically significant by local government (P-33-007263, PT. Happy Ranch and P-33-023955, PT. Happy Ranch). One property is listed as not eligible for listing or designation as specified (P-33-017259, Coachella Valley Stonnwater Channel). One property is listed as not evaluated for NRHP or CRHR or needs revaluation (P-33-007264, 46370 Cameo Palms Dr). Note: not all properties in the California Historical Resources Information System are listed in the OHP ARD and BERD; the ARD and BERD comprise lists of properties submitted to the OHP for review. The 1941 USGS Toro Peak 15' minute series, 1959 USGS La Quinta 7.5' minute series, and 1959 USGS Palm Desert 15' minute series topographic maps show about 30 historical structures or features present within the boundaries of the project area. Based on the information reviewed, 56 cultural resources properties have been recorded within the boundaries of the project area, thus additional cultural resources may be present within the boundaries of the project area. It is recommended that these resources undergo an evaluation of their significance to determine appropriate mitigation measures. However, this assessment does not rule out the possible presence of previously unidentified cultural resources, thus, it is recommended that the project area be examined systematically by a cultural resource professional to identify all historical, archaeological, and cultural heritage resources that have not been recorded, and to provide recommendations regarding their significance and management prior to any development of the project area. Persons involved in development of the project area should be sensitive to the significant and irreplaceable nature of cultural resources. A statewide list of cultural resources consultants can be found online at http://chrisinfo.org. State and federal law requires that if any cultural resources are found during construction, work is to stop and the lead agency and a cultural resources professional be consulted to determine the importance of the find and its appropriate management. Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submitted to the Office of Historic Preservation are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area. Additionally, Native American tribes have historical resource information not in the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) Inventory, and you should contact the California Native American Heritage Commission for information on local/regional tribal contacts. The California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) contracts with the California Historical Resources Information System's (CHRIS) regional Information Centers (ICs) to maintain information in the CHRIS inventory and make it available to local, state, and federal agencies, cultural resource professionals, Native American tribes, researchers, and the public. Recommendations made by the IC coordinators or their staff regarding the interpretation and application of this information are advisory only. Such recommendations do not necessarily represent the evaluation or opinion of the State Historic Preservation Officer in carrying out the OHP's regulatory authority under federal and state law. Eulices Lopez Information Officer Appendix C NAHC Sacred Lands File Search City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan W^Ij NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION 1"• March 8, 2024 '18��' Ryder Burliss GHD Inc. CHAIRPERSON Reginald Pagaling Via Email to: Ryder. Burliss@and.com Chumash VICE -CHAIRPERSON Re: La Quinta Highway I I I Corridor Specific Plan Project, Riverside County Buffy McQuillen Yokayo Porno, Yuki, Nomlaki To Whom It May Concern: A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) SECRETARY was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The Sara Dutschke Miwok results were negative. However, the absence of specific site information in the SLF does not indicate the absence of cultural resources in any project area. Other sources of cultural resources should also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites. PARLIAMENTARIAN Wayne Nelson Attached is a list of Native American tribes who may also have knowledge of cultural resources Luiseno in the project area. This list should provide a starting place in locating areas of potential adverse impact within the proposed project area. I suggest you contact all of those indicated; COMMISSIONER if they cannot supply information, they might recommend others with specific knowledge. By Isaac Bojorquez contacting all those listed, your organization will be better able to respond to claims of failure to Ohlone-Costanoon consult with the appropriate tribe. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the Commission requests that you follow-up with a telephone call or email to COMMISSIONER ensure that the project information has been received. Stanley Rodriguez Kumeyaay If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify me. With your assistance, we can assure that our lists contain current information. COMMISSIONER Laurena Bolden If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email Serrano address: Andrew.Green@nahc.ca.aov. COMMISSIONER Sincerely, Reid Milanovich Cahuilla COMMISSIONER Vacant Andrew Green Cultural Resources Analyst EXECUTIVE SECRETARY Raymond C. Attachment Hitchcock Miwok, Nisenan NAHC HEADQUARTERS 1550 Harbor Boulevard Suite 100 West Sacramento, California 95691 (916) 373-3710 nahc@nahc.ca.aov NAHC.ca.gov Page 1 of 1 Appendix C Tribal Consultation Letter Sample City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan ta Qaixra tAt H,R\IA - March 14, 2024 Michael Garcia, Vice Chairperson Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians 4054 Willows Road Alpine, CA, 91901 SUBJECT: SP2022-0002 HIGHWAY 111 SPECIFIC PLAN: SB 18 and AB 52 CONSULTATION Dear Michael Garcia, Vice Chairperson, Your organization has been identified by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) as having traditional lands or cultural places located within our City boundaries. In accordance with Government Code Section 65352.3 (SB 18) and Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1 (b) (AB 52), this letter is to notify you of the impending above -named proposal, and to initiate the SB 18 and AB 52 consultation processes. California Government Code Section 65352.3 and Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1 (b) provide that tribal organizations must specifically request consultation with the City, within 30 days of receiving notice of a project for AB 52 consultation and 90 days for SB 18 consultation. As your input in the planning process is important, we encourage your participation. If you desire consultation, you will need to provide a letter specifically requesting consultation with the City, within these time frames. However, in the interest of expediting review and meeting other state -mandated deadlines, we ask that you respond in writing to this correspondence at your earliest convenience. The City of La Quinta is committed to a productive consultation process and a positive working relationship with Tribal governments. Should you have questions regarding this letter, please contact me at 760-777-7067 and/or CLFlores(-alaquintaca.gov Sincerely, USN d Cheri Flores Planning Manager Design and Development Department Enclosure: Project Description and Vicinity Map Hiahwav 111 SP Proiect Description The project area is located in the City of La Quinta and spans the Highway 111 corridor from approximately Washington Street on the west end to Jefferson Street on the east; and from a Whitewater flood control channel/wash on the north to Avenue 47, and Vista Coralina Lane on the south. Development along Highway 111 in the project area comprises a mix of uses, principally commercial (e.g., big box retail, strip center, grocery, restaurants, auto dealers) and large surface parking lots. Some residential uses are located to the south. There are a few vacant parcels scattered throughout the project area. Landscaping consists of street trees and other ornamental xeriscape. Transportation facilities are largely improved with a full street network, curbs and sidewalks, and crosswalks at major intersections. The proposed Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan provides guidance for implementing development within the planning area. The Specific Plan furthers the objectives of the City of La Quinta General Plan (hereinafter "General Plan") by providing a more detailed planning document for development of specific sites and streetscape improvements. -it4 L-.,r9 71� Audit Appendix C Native American Heritage Commission Contact List City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan Native American Heritage Commission Tribe Name Fed (F) Contact Person Contact Address Phone # Fax # Email Address Cultural Counties Last Non -Fed (N) Affiliation Updated Agua Caliente Band F Lacy Padilla, THPO 5401 Dinah Shore (760) 333-5222 (760) 699-6919 ACBCI-THPO@aguacaliente.net Cahuilla Imperial, Riverside, San Bernardino, 1/11/2024 of Cahuilla Indians Operations Manager Drive San Diego Palm Springs, CA, 92264 Augustine Band of F Tribal Operations, 84-001 Avenue 54 (760) 398-4722 Cahuilla Imperial, Riverside, San Bernardino, 11/30/2023 Cahuilla Indians Coachella, CA, 92236 San Diego Cabazon Band of F Doug Welmas, 84-245 Indio Springs (760) 342-2593 (760) 347-7880 jstapp@cabazonindians-nsn.gov Cahuilla Imperial, Riverside, San Bernardino, Mission Indians Chairperson Parkway San Diego Indio, CA, 92203 Cahuilla Band of F Erica Schenk, 52701 CA Highway (951) 590-0942 (951) 763-2808 chair@cahuilla-nsn.gov Cahuilla Imperial, Riverside, San Bernardino, 2/1/2024 Indians Chairperson 371 San Diego Anza, CA, 92539 Cahuilla Band of F Anthony Madrigal, 52701 CA Highway (951) 763-5549 anthonymad2002@gmail.com Cahuilla Imperial, Riverside, San Bernardino, 6/28/2023 Indians Tribal Historic 371 San Diego Preservation Officer Anza, CA, 92539 Cahuilla Band of F BobbyRay Esaprza, 52701 CA Highway (951) 763-5549 besparza@cahuilla-nsn.gov Cahuilla Imperial, Riverside, San Bernardino, 6/28/2023 Indians Cultural Director 371 San Diego Anza, CA, 92539 Los Coyotes Band of F Ray Chapparosa, P.O. Box 189 (760) 782-0711 (760) 782-0712 Cahuilla Imperial, Riverside, San Bernardino, Cahuilla and Cupeno Chairperson Warner Springs, CA, San Diego Indians 92086-0189 Morongo Band of F Ann Brierty, THPO 12700 Pumarra (951) 755-5259 (951) 572-6004 abrierty@morongo-nsn.gov Cahuilla Imperial, Kern, Los Angeles, Riverside, Mission Indians Road Serrano San Bernardino, San Diego Banning, CA, 92220 Morongo Band of F Robert Martin, 12700 Pumarra (951) 755-5110 (951) 755-5177 abrierty@morongo-nsn.gov Cahuilla Imperial, Kern, Los Angeles, Riverside, Mission Indians Chairperson Road Serrano San Bernardino, San Diego Banning, CA, 92220 Quechan Tribe of the F Manfred Scott, P.O. Box 1899 (928) 210-8739 culturalcommittee@quechantribe.com Quechan Imperial, Kern, Los Angeles, Riverside, 5/16/2023 Fort Yuma Acting Chairman - Yuma, AZ, 85366 San Bernardino, San Diego Reservation Kw'ts'an Cultural Committee Quechan Tribe of the F Jill McCormick, P.O. Box 1899 (928) 261-0254 historicpreservation@quechantribe.com Quechan Imperial, Kern, Los Angeles, Riverside, 5/16/2023 Fort Yuma Historic Preservation Yuma, AZ, 85366 San Bernardino, San Diego Reservation Officer Quechan Tribe of the F Jordan Joaquin, P.O.Box 1899 (760) 919-3600 executivesecretary@quechantribe.com Quechan Imperial, Kern, Los Angeles, Riverside, 5/16/2023 Fort Yuma President, Quechan Yuma, AZ, 85366 San Bernardino, San Diego Reservation Tribal Council Ramona Band of F John Gomez, P. O. Box 391670 (951) 763-4105 (951) 763-4325 jgomez@rmona-nsn.gov Cahuilla Imperial, Riverside, San Bernardino, 8/16/2016 Cahuilla Environmental Anza, CA, 92539 San Diego Coordinator 03/08/2024 04:11 PM 1of2 Native American Heritage Commission Tribe Name Fed (F) Contact Person Contact Address Phone # Fax # Email Address Cultural Counties Last Non -Fed (N) Affiliation Updated Ramona Band of F Joseph Hamilton, P.O. Box 391670 (951) 763-4105 (951) 763-4325 admin@rmona-nsn.gov Cahuilla Imperial, Riverside, San Bernardino, Cahuilla Chairperson Anza, CA, 92539 San Diego Santa Rosa Band of F Lovina Redner, P.O. Box 391820 (951) 659-2700 (951) 659-2228 Isaul@santarosa-nsn.gov Cahuilla Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Cahuilla Indians Tribal Chair Anza, CA, 92539 Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego Soboba Band of F Jessica Valdez, P.O. Box 487 (951) 663-6261 (951) 654-4198 jvaldez@soboba-nsn.gov Cahuilla Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, 7/14/2023 Luiseno Indians Cultural Resource San Jacinto, CA, Luiseno Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego Specialist 92581 Soboba Band of F Isaiah Vivanco, P.O. Box 487 (951) 654-5544 (951) 654-4198 ivivanco@soboba-nsn.com Cahuilla Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, 7/14/2023 Luiseno Indians Chairperson San Jacinto, CA, Luiseno Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego 92581 Soboba Band of F Joseph Ontiveros, P.O. Box 487 (951) 663-5279 (951) 654-4198 jntiveros@soboba-nsn.gov Cahuilla Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, 7/14/2023 Luiseno Indians Tribal Historic San Jacinto, CA, Luiseno Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego Preservation Officer 92581 Torres -Martinez F Gary Resvaloso, TM P.O. Box 1160 (760) 777-0365 grestmtm@gmail.com Cahuilla Imperial, Riverside, San Bernardino, 10/30/2023 Desert Cahuilla MILD Thermal, CA, 92274 San Diego Indians Torres -Martinez F Alesia Reed, Cultural P.O. Box 1160 (760) 397-0300 Iisareed990@gmail.com Cahuilla Imperial, Riverside, San Bernardino, 10/30/2023 Desert Cahuilla Committee Thermal, CA, 92274 San Diego Indians Chairwoman Torres -Martinez F Mary Belardo, P.O. Box 1160 (760) 397-0300 belardom@gmail.com Cahuilla Imperial, Riverside, San Bernardino, 10/30/2023 Desert Cahuilla Cultural Committee Thermal, CA, 92274 San Diego Indians Vice Chair Torres -Martinez F Abraham Becerra, P.O. Box 1160 (760) 397-0300 abecerra@tmdci.org Cahuilla Imperial, Riverside, San Bernardino, 10/30/2023 Desert Cahuilla Cultural Coordinator Thermal, CA, 92274 San Diego Indians Torres -Martinez F Thomas Tortez, P.O. Box 1160 (760) 397-0300 (760) 397-8146 thomas.tortez@tmdci.org Cahuilla Imperial, Riverside, San Bernardino, 10/30/2023 Desert Cahuilla Chairperson Thermal, CA, 92274 San Diego Indians Twenty -Nine Palms F Nicolas Garza, 46-200 Harrison (760) 863-2486 nicolas.garza@29palmsbomi-nsn.gov Chemehuevi Imperial, Inyo, Riverside, San Bernardino 11/15/2023 Band of Mission Cultural Resources Place Indians Specialist Coachella, CA, 92236 Twenty -Nine Palms F Christopher Nicosia, 46-200 Harrison (760) 863-3972 christopher.nicosia@29palmsbomi- Chemehuevi Imperial, Inyo, Riverside, San Bernardino 11/15/2023 Band of Mission Cultural Resources Place nsn.gov Indians Manager/THPO Coachella, CA, 92236 Manager Twenty -Nine Palms F Sarah O'Brien, Tribal 46-200 Harrison (760) 863-2460 sobrien@29palmsbomi-nsn.gov Chemehuevi Imperial, Inyo, Riverside, San Bernardino 11/15/2023 Band of Mission Archivist Place Indians Coachella, CA, 92236 This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section Record: PROJ- 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. 2024-001373 Report Type: List 03/08/2024 04:11 PM 2of2 Appendix C Tribal Consultation Letter Responses City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIAM TRIBAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION March 19, 2025 [VIA EMAIL TO:clflores@laquintaca.gov] City of La Quinta Ms. Cheri Flores 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: Highway 111 Specific Plan - SP2022-0002 Dear Ms. Cheri Flores, 03-003-2025-002 The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) appreciates your efforts to include the Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) in the Highway 111 Specific Plan project. The project area is not located within the boundaries of the ACBCI Reservation. However, it is within the Tribe's Traditional Use Area. A records check of the ACBCI registry identified previous surveys in the area that were positive for the presence of cultural resources. In consultation, the ACBCI THPO requests the following: * Please send all consultation letters to ACBCI-THPO@aguacaliente.net. * Instead of "Traditionally and Culturally Affiliated" Native American monitor, consulting Native American monitor would make sense for tribes in consultation requesting their own monitors. * There are several TCR's within the project boundary: CA-RIV-8835 is within DJN-I, CA-RIV-5832 is adjacent to DJS-I, CA-RIV-6190 and CA-RIV-2936 is partially within AND-01, CA-RIV-4752 is within ADS-2. Those are counting for the undeveloped areas within the project. * Please send us a copy of the Archaeological report from recent surveys if there were any and include consulting tribes into surveys for projects. Again, the Agua Caliente appreciates your interest in our cultural heritage. If you have questions or require additional information, please call me at (760) 883-1137. You may also email me at ACBCI-THPO@aguacaliente.net. Cordially, Luz Salazar Cultural Resources Analyst Tribal Historic Preservation Office AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS 5401 DINAH SHORE DRIVE, PALM SPRINGS. CA 92264 T 760!69916600 F 760/699/692.4 WWW.AGUACALIENTE-NSN.GOV AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIAM TRIBAL HISTORIC PPIESERVATION 5401 DINAH SMURE DRIVE, PALM SPRINGS, CA 92264 T 7601699,6000 6 760)69916924 WWW AGUACALIENTE-IVSN GOV From: Tribal Historic Preservation Office To: Cheri Flores Cc: Ann Briertv; Laura Chatterton Subject: City of La Quinta SB18AB52 SP2022-0002 Date: Tuesday, April 30, 2024 12:16:15 PM You don't often get email from thpo@morongo-nsn.gov. Learn why this is im op rtant EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. The Morongo Band of Mission Indians (Tribe/MBMI) Tribal Historic Preservation Office received your letter regarding the above referenced Project. The proposed Project is not located within the boundaries of the ancestral territory or traditional use area of the Cahuilla and Serrano people of the Morongo Band of Mission Indians. Thank you for notifying the MBMI about this project. MBMI encourages your consultation with tribes more closely associated with the lands upon which the project is located. Respectfully, Laura Chatterton Cultural Resource Specialist Tribal Historic Preservation Office Morongo Band of Mission Indians 12700 Pumarra Road Banning, CA 92220 O: (951) 755.5256 M: (951) 663.7570 CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail may contain Privacy Act Data/Sensitive Data which is intended only for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable laws. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution or copy of this email is strictly prohibited. The information contained in this communication is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. For your safety, the contents of this email have been scanned for viruses and malware. Appendix D Public and Agency Comments Public and Agency Comments The City of La Quinta, serving as the CEQA Lead Agency, prepared a Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan Project. CEQA requires a 30-day public review period for the Draft IS/MND document. The public comment period allows public agencies and interested parties the opportunity to review and comment on the document. The Draft IS/MND was released for public comment on May 19, 2025, and the review period closed on June 19, 2025. In accordance with the requirements of CEQA, the City of La Quinta provided a Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration to the public, responsible agencies, and the San Diego County Clerk. The City of La Quinta published a notice in The Desert Sun (a newspaper of general circulation in the area affected by the proposed Project). The Draft IS/MND was submitted to the State Clearinghouse for review by state agencies, and to responsible and trustee agencies with jurisdiction by law over resources affected by the Project. The Draft IS/MND was made available for public review at www.laquintaca.gov/111 corridor. CEQA Guidelines Section 15074(b) states that prior to approving a Project, the Lead Agency must consider the proposed IS/MND together with any comments received during the public review process. Written responses to comments are not required; however, the City of La Quinta, as Lead Agency, has prepared a written response to the comments received for consideration by the Planning Commission and/or City Council. At the end of the 30-day public review period, a total of four comments were received. The table below identifies a number for each comment letter received, the author of the comment letter, and the date received. Public and Agency Comments Received Comment Letter Number Commenter Date Received 1 Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District May 23, 2025 2 Justin Marlles June 6, 2025 3 Gregory Gurszecki June 9, 2025 4 Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians June 16, 2025 5 California Department of Fish and Wildlife June 23, 2025 6 Caltrans June 23, 2025 The comment letters and responses follow. The comment letters have been numbered sequentially and each separate issue raised by the commenter, if more than one, has been assigned a number. The responses to each comment identify first the number of the comment letter, and then the number assigned to each issue (Response 1-1, for example, indicates that the response is for the first issue raised in Comment Letter 1). Responses are provided in this IS/MND as a matter of public disclosure and transparency. Based on the evaluation in the IS/MND, the City of La Quinta, as Lead Agency, has determined that all potential environmental impacts associated with the Project are less than significant with incorporation of identified mitigation measures. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared and will be implemented for the Project. Therefore, the City of La Quinta has determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration in accordance with CEQA is the appropriate environmental document for the Project. Comment Letter #1 Comment 1-1 JASON E. UHLEY General Manager -Chief Engineer City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Attention: Cheri Flores �o�Nrr r[oo ~\oE Oroy� � o V y Q RYA110v'�S~ RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT May 22, 2025 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 951.955.1200 951.788.9965 FAX www.rcflood.org 262120 Re: Highway III Corridor Specific Plan and Development Code, SP 2022-0002, Approximately two miles along Highway 111 between Washington Street on the west, Jefferson Street on the east, the Whitewater Wash on the north and Avenue 48 on the south The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check City land use cases or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided. The District's review is based on the above -referenced project transmittal, received May 19, 2025. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail, and the following comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety, or any other such issue: ❑X This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities, nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. The project is located within Coachella Valley Water District's (CVWD) jurisdiction. CVWD is the responsible agency to review and comment on regional flood control drainage systems within their jurisdictional limits. ❑ This project involves District proposed Master Drainage Plan facilities, namely, The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request by the City. The Project Applicant shall enter into a cooperative agreement establishing the terms and conditions of inspection, operation, and maintenance with the District and any other maintenance partners. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. All regulatory permits (and all documents pertaining thereto, e.g., Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plans, Conservation Plans/Easements) that are to be secured by the Applicant for both facility construction and maintenance shall be submitted to the District for review. The regulatory permits' terms and conditions shall be approved by the District prior to improvement plan approval, map recordation, or finalization of the regulatory permits. There shall be no unreasonable constraint upon the District's ability to operate and maintain the flood control facility(ies) to protect public health and safety. ❑ This project proposes channels, storm drains larger than 36 inches in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension a District's facility, the District would consider accepting ownership of such facilities on written request by the City. The Project Applicant Comment 1-2 City of La Quinta - 2 - May 22, 2025 Re: Highway I I I Corridor Specific Plan and Development Code, SP 2022-0002, 262120 Approximately two miles along Highway 111 between Washington Street on the west, Jefferson Street on the east, the Whitewater Wash on the north and Avenue 48 on the south shall enter into a cooperative agreement establishing the terms and conditions of inspection, operation, and maintenance with the District and any other maintenance partners. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. The regulatory permits' terms and conditions shall be approved by the District prior to improvement plan approval, map recordation, or finalization of the regulatory permits. There shall be no unreasonable constraint upon the District's ability to operate and maintain the flood control facility(ies) to protect public health and safety. ❑ An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right of way or facilities, namely, . If a proposed storm drain connection exceeds the hydraulic performance of the existing drainage facilities, mitigation will be required. For further information, contact the District's Encroachment Permit Section at 951.955.1266. ❑ The Districts previous comments are still valid. GENERAL INFORMATION The project proponent shall bear the responsibility for complying with all applicable mitigation measures defined in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document, and/or Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and with all other federal, state, and local environmental rules and regulations that may apply, such as, but not limited to, the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), Sections 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act, California Fish and Game Code Section 1602, and the Porter Cologne Water Quality Control Act. The District's action associated with the subject project triggers evaluation by the District with respect to the applicant's compliance with federal, state, and local environmental laws. For this project, the Lead Agency is the agency in the address above, and the District is a Responsible Agency under CEQA. The District, as a Co- permittee under the MSHCP, needs to demonstrate that all District related activities, including the actions identified above, are consistent with the MSHCP. This is typically achieved through determinations from the CEQA Lead Agency (if they are also a Co-permittee) for the project. For the MSHCP, the District's focus will be particular to Sections 6.1.2, 6.1.3, 6.1.4, 6.3.2, 7.3.7, 7.5.3, and Appendix C of the MSHCP. Please include consistency determination statements from the Lead Agency/Co-permittee for the project for each of these sections in the CEQA document. The District may also require that an applicant provide supporting technical documentation for environmental clearance. This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped floodplain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans, and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation, or other final approval of the project and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy. EM:bs Very truly yours, AMY MCNEILL Engineering Project Manager Response to Comment Letter #1, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, May 23, 2025 Comment 1-1: The City appreciates the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District's (District) comments and the information provided regarding the proposed project. The City agrees with the District's assessment that the proposed development outlined in the IS/MND for the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities and does not propose facilities of regional interest. The City acknowledges that the project is located within the jurisdiction of the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD), which is the appropriate agency to review and provide input on regional flood control and drainage systems. The City, along with any future development within the Specific Plan area, will coordinate with CVWD, as appropriate, to ensure consistency with applicable flood control and drainage requirements. Comment 1-2: The City appreciates the District's detailed comments and guidance regarding regulatory compliance. Through this IS/MND, the City advises that future projects and development within the Specific Plan area refer to and follow the applicable mitigation measures, as well as comply with all relevant federal, state, and local environmental regulations identified in the comment. Future development within the Specific Plan area, as outlined in this IS/MND, will be required to meet the applicable requirements of the District and the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP). The City understands that future development may also be required to provide consistency determinations to demonstrate compliance with the provisions of the CVMSHCP. In addition, supporting technical documentation or supplemental environmental studies may be required to satisfy environmental clearance requirements. The Biological Resources section of the IS/MND addresses the Coachella Valley MSHCP, identifies potentially occurring covered species, and outlines relevant conservation measures. Additionally, the City recognizes that any future development in the Specific Plan area may require permits such as NPDES or FEMA-related documentation and will ensure those requirements are addressed prior to project approvals. Comment Letter #2 Comment 2-1 (cont.) From: Justin Marlles To: Kathleen Fitzpatrick Cc: Cheri Flores; Jennifer Nelson; Monika Radeva Subject: Re: Nobody Wants an "Urban" La Quinta Date: Monday, June 9, 2025 10:20:40 AM EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Some people who received this message don't often get email fromjmarl@protonmail.com. Learn why this is important Councilwoman Fitzpatrick, Thank you for your reply. The plan clearly calls for not just increased density but increased vertical density, which is the very definition of urban. To throw some street trees into the mix is like putting lipstick on a pig. Indeed, the levels of density that this plan and the code changes would allow for are unlike anything presently along Highway 111 and are entirely out -of -character for La Quinta if not the desert as a whole. To replace empty parking lots with an 'El Paseo' or an 'Old Town' type low density 2-story commercial development would be one thing, but that is not what is contained in this plan. As for the affordable housing elements of the plan, La Quinta is only required to meet the requirements of the RHNA by not standing in the way of affordable housing --no less and no more. The RHNA certainly does not require the city to purchase land to build public housing on a mass scale; it seems the only way that things have gotten this far is that the city started this process in 2022 during the Covid years when residents' attention was focused elsewhere. As for mass transit, I have personally experienced the supposed benefits of such where my neighbors and I have been forced to repeatedly call the city to complain about shopping carts ditched at Sunline bus stops, and for homeless individuals making their way from the commercial corridor who decide to camp in them. There is zero question that this plan to fundamentally alter the 111 corridor would exacerbate these kinds of issues in the neighborhoods of North La Quinta. I assure you that as word gets out, you will find more and more residents contacting council about this attempt to turn La Quinta into Los Angeles. Sincerely, Justin Marlles On Monday, June 9th, 2025 at 8:49 AM, Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov> wrote: Justin, Your letter will become part of the public record but I just wanted to acknowledge it and encourage you to look more closely at the plan during the coming presentations. The plan, I believe, takes into account existing conditions that could be greatly improved to be LESS urban, less paving for parking, more landscape and better circulation, tying the areas of north La Quinta to those areas south of 111. Yes, it does call for additional housing but it is incumbent on the city to help in the development of more "work force" housing. That housing needs to be where public transportation exists. Again, not arguing your point just expressing another way to look at the whole picture while we review the plans. Comment 2-1 I appreciate your comments and I am really glad that you're taking the time to review and respond to environmental assessment. Residents like you are important to the future of the city. I hope you'll come to Council and participate further in the discussion. Kathleen Fitzpatrick Councilmember City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. 760.777.7030 From: Justin Marlles <jmarl@protonmail.com> Sent: Friday, June 6, 2025 10:26 PM To: Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov>; Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov>; Deborah McGarrey <dmcgarrey@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov> Cc: Jennifer Nelson <jnelson@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Nobody Wants an "Urban" La Quinta EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Some people who received this message don't often get email fromjmaO@protonmail.com. Learn why this is important Mayor Evans, Members of Council, and Ms. Flores: After reviewing La Quinta's Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan as well as the draft Highway 111 Development Code along with the city's Notice of Intent and draft Mitigated Negative Declaration, it's now plain that the city leadership has lost touch with its own residents. Nobody wants an "urban" La Quinta. Indeed, to the contrary, many of us left cities such as Los Angeles and San Diego to escape dense urban environments and everything that comes with it. Yet, in what is plainly the result of some city planner's fever dream, the entire purpose of the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan and the proposed Highway Highway 111 Development Code is to create a newly dense and "urban" La Quinta complete with hundreds of low income housing units which presumably will be built on city land. As a resident of North La Quinta who lives just down Adams Street from this proposed new urban La Quinta, I assure you that nobody here wants to see our small city disfigured with numerous 6 story tall buildings (CSP pgs. 27 and 34), high density city -owned public housing (CSP pgs. 33, 43), or massive mixed -use developments (CSP pgs. 27, 42, 49, and DG pgs. 5, 15-19) more suitable for LA -or perhaps Orange County where you hired your engineering team- than La Quinta. Indeed, it seems the engineering company that authored this totally unsuitable plan is happy to feather its nest by offering an expensive "on -call architect/urban designer" who can help destroy La Quinta (CSP pg. 116). Comment 2-1 (cont.) It is likewise absurd for the city to claim, as it does in its Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, that this plan "will not have a significant effect on the environment" or that adequate mitigating measures have somehow been included. Increasing density in such a severe manner is not only like to lead to stresses on limited regional water supplies, but could also result in significant traffic issues throughout the Highway 111 corridor such that emissions will be increased rather than decreased. As a result, a full Environmental Impact Review would appear more appropriate and the city's failure to conduct one is of significant concern. This communication, on which Ms. Cheri Flores has been included, stands as a written comment from the public in opposition to the project that has been submitted within the public review period. The residents of La Quinta are not going to sit by and let city planners with delusions of grandeur accompanied by out-of-town engineering company destroy the character of our city. Highway 111 may need a facelift but turning La Quinta into LA isn't it. You must reject this ill-considered and unsuitable plan. Respectfully, Justin Marlles 7870 Bayberry Lane La Quinta, CA 92253 Response to Comment Letter #2, Justin Marlles, June 6, 2025 Comment 2-1: The Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan is a long-range planning tool meant to guide future development that supports La Quinta's evolving needs while preserving its unique character. It does not call for immediate or large-scale densification, nor does it propose city -built high-rises. Instead, it supports gradual, infill development to create more diverse and attainable housing options. Public improvements, like better streetscapes, pedestrian and bike access, and open spaces, often rely on a stronger residential and business base to be economically viable. A more balanced mix of uses helps support local businesses and community investment. The Specific Plan is a flexible guide, not a fixed blueprint. It reflects community input and sets a framework for thoughtful, context sensitive growth. The IS/MND was prepared in accordance with CEQA guidelines and supported by technical analyses. Regarding traffic and utilities, the IS/MND includes analysis based on current data and regional planning forecasts, confirming that infrastructure and resource capacity can support the proposed development in line with the City's General Plan. Comment Letter #3 Comment 3-1 Comment 3-2 From: Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 6:46 PM To: Planning WebMail <PlanningCa@laquintaca.gov> Cc: City Clerk Mail<cityclerkmail(a)laquintaca.gov> Subject: Gurszecki, Gregory 2025-06-09 Comments Hwy 111 Corridor Specific Plan: The Urbanization Project is a Mistake! Forwarding to Planning to include the comments below from citizen Gregory Gurszecki to the project file. Thank you. Monika Radeva, MMC I City Clerk City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 Tel: (760) 777-7035 MRadeva@laquintaca.gov From: Gregory Gruszecki <gregory@palmcoastlegal.com> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2025 1:58 PM To: Kathleen Fitzpatrick <kfitzoatrick@laquintaca.gov>; clfores@laquintaca.gov; Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov>; Jennifer Nelson <jnelson@laquintaca.gov>; Linda Evans <Levans@laquintaca.gov>; John Pena <jpena@laquintaca.gov>; Deborah McGarrey <dmcgarrey@laquintaca.gov>; Steve Sanchez <ssanchez@laquintaca.gov> Cc:'nkinstle@icloud.com' <nkinstle@icloud.com> Subject: RE: The Urbanization Project is a Mistake! Dear Mayor Evans and City Counsel Members, I have been a supporter of your campaign for the bulk of your tenure, and I implore you to take a very careful look at this new Urbanization Project —which will destroy the heart of La Quinta to the detriment of loyal nearby residents. After my teams' review of the "Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan;' the draft "Highway 111 Development Code;' and the associated environmental notices, it is with great concern that I am writing to express my strenuous opposition to this project. The vision of an "urban" La Quinta, as detailed in these documents, is a fundamental betrayal of the city's character and the beautiful nature surrounding it. La Quinta is a culturally rich city with a view and atmosphere that is unrivaled in many parts of the world. It is a honeymoon resort town, and many of us chose to make La Quinta our home to escape the crux of what this project intends to bring and create. The proposal seeks to erect six -story buildings in an area surrounded by beautiful mountain scenery, and wishes to introduce high - density housing, and communities for the impoverished. While all this is fine and well in the right place, La Quinta is not it. This is a radical departure from the suburban, resort -style community we love and cherish deeply. The notion that this will not have a significant negative impact on our property values is, frankly, also unbelievable. The unique character of our city is a primary driver of its desirability; eroding that character will inevitably lead to a decline in property values for those of us who invested in a different vision for La Quinta. Furthermore, the plan completely disregards the impact it will have on our already strained infrastructure. It is a known fact, reported in the news as recently as this past February, that La Quinta's electrical substations are at or near capacity. [Emphasis Added]. Building a large and exceptionally dense project of homes with shops will only result in further fracturing of our fragile power grid and water supply. Comment 3-2 (cont.) Comment 3-3 In July of 2024 alone, over 1,000 homes in the La Quinta and Indio area experienced power outages because there was not a stable power supply during the hot summer months. Our valley reached record highs for multiple days and even hit 126 degrees on some days as a regular occurrence. This power outage number also does not reflect the planned power outages by the electrical company used to conserve resources and maintain the grid. In the summer of 2022, the valley had various "Conserve Alerts" for both electricity and water use. The Imperial Irrigation District has not been shy about admitting they are underfunded and needing more infrastructure. IID even backed away from cost -sharing solutions for necessary upgrades. To add hundreds of new residential units and significant commercial development to this already fragile system is very irresponsible and invites more frequent and prolonged power outages, while further stressing our water supply for existing residents. The assertion in the Mitigated Negative Declaration that this project will not have a significant effect on the environment is simply not credible, and frankly laughable. A project of this magnitude, with its focus on dramatically increasing density, will undoubtedly lead to increased traffic congestion, a greater strain on our precious water resources, heightened crime, and a decline in our quality of life. A full Environmental Impact Report is not only warranted but essential to fully understand the detrimental consequences of this plan. I simply cannot support this measure. It will ruin our town and appears to be nothing more than a deeply concerning money grab for the contractors and those involved. While I appreciate the heart for progress, this is not the right kind of progress for La Quinta. This correspondence serves as a formal public comment in opposition to the "Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan." We, the residents of La Quinta, will not stand idly by while our city is transformed into a pale imitation of the urban centers many of us left behind. Highway 111 may need revitalization, but this ill-conceived and unwanted urbanization is not the answer. We implore you to listen to your constituents and reject this plan. Thank you, Gregory Gruszecki Palm Coast Legal 555 South Sunrise Way, Unit 204-D Palm Springs, California 92264 Direct: (760) 668-2814 CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION: The information contained in this email message is legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the receiver of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email message is strictly prohibited and may violate the legal rights of others. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply email or telephone and return the message to Gregory Gruszecki at 555 South Sunrise Way, Unit 204-D, Palm Springs, California 92262. Response to Comment Letter #3, Gregory Gurszecki, June 9, 2025 Comment 3-1: The City appreciates this comment and acknowledges concerns about the potential impact of the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan on La Quinta's character. To clarify, the Specific Plan does not significantly increase development intensity beyond what was established under the City's 2016 zoning overlays. Rather, it provides updated guidance for future development that aligns with patterns already emerging in surrounding communities in the Coachella Valley. The Specific Plan will not increase building height limits and will maintain a 50-foot (4-story) cap in the proposed Highway Mixed Use Zone. Since 2016, the City's Mixed Use Overlay has allowed similar or greater heights, and base zoning has long permitted 2- to 4-story buildings in parts of the Specific Plan area. This ensures future development remains consistent with La Quinta's existing character. While the Plan allows for greater density than what currently exists — such as big -box stores and large surface parking lots — it does not significantly alter the City's development pattern. A shift in the land use mix, informed by real estate market analyses, prioritizes housing over retail, resulting in denser building types like stacked flats and rowhouses. These may have more bulk than older low-rise retail and office buildings but still conform to the established height limits. The Specific Plan also supports the public realm improvements frequently mentioned by the community — such as signage, lighting, landscaped parkways, pedestrian amenities, and plazas or patios near new retail. These improvements often depend on infill development to be economically feasible. Increasing the availability of housing, including more affordable and diverse options, helps create the residential base needed to support local businesses and justify investments in the public realm. A Specific Plan that ties these improvements to anticipated development helps make them more achievable. While the Specific Plan outlines potential building heights and long-term development capacity, full build -out across the entire corridor is not expected. The Specific Plan also improves planning flexibility over time rather than represent guaranteed or immediate changes. Comment 3-2: The City acknowledges concerns regarding infrastructure capacity, including electrical and water systems. The Specific Plan references publicly available information and planning guidance from the Imperial Irrigation District (IID) and Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD), and is designed to align with the scope and scale of development outlined in the City's General Plan. The General Plan, which underwent its own environmental review, provides the long-range framework for growth and infrastructure planning. It is important to note that future development under the Specific Plan will be subject to additional project -level review to confirm that adequate utility infrastructure is available prior to construction. While IID has acknowledged regional infrastructure challenges, it continues to implement phased improvements and long-term planning efforts to meet growing demand. Additionally, all new development must comply with current State energy efficiency and water conservation standards, which help reduce overall resource use compared to older buildings. The Specific Plan includes policies to support infrastructure planning and long-term sustainability. The level of growth proposed is consistent with regional forecasts, and the City will continue working with utility providers to ensure services are maintained and upgraded as needed. Comment 3-3: The IS/MND thoroughly evaluates potential environmental impacts associated with the development and implementation of the Specific Plan, including traffic, water resources, public safety, and community character. Where impacts were identified as potentially significant, the IS/MND includes mitigation measures for future development projects to reference to reduce these effects to less -than -significant levels, consistent with CEQA requirements. It is important to note that this Specific Plan itself does not constitute or approve any development; rather, it serves as a guidance document to help shape future growth as the City evolves. All individual development projects proposed under the Specific Plan will be reviewed against CEQA requirements as applications are received.,. Regarding traffic and utilities, the IS/MND includes analyses based on current data and regional planning forecasts to confirm that infrastructure capacity and resource availability can support the proposed development, consistent with the City's General Plan. The Specific Plan focuses on enhancing the Highway 111 Corridor by improving the community's overall aesthetic and promoting safe, walkable neighborhoods. It plans for items including pedestrian and bicycle lanes, pocket parks, and open spaces for public gatherings, while creating opportunities for local businesses to grow. Additionally, the Specific Plan offers diverse potential housing options with a variety of configurations, supporting residents who live and work within the City. CEQA sets clear guidelines for when an EIR is needed, based on evidence of significant impacts. In this case, the City determined that the IS/MND with mitigation is appropriate and sufficient. The City remains committed to a transparent planning process for the Specific Plan and encourages continued public participation to ensure all community voices are heard. Comment Letter #4 AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA 1NDIAM TRIBAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION 03-003-2025-002 June 16, 2025 [VIA EMAIL TO:clflores@laquintaca.gov] City of La Quinta Ms. Cheri Flores 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: Highway 111 Specific Plan - SP2022-0002 Dear Ms. Cheri Flores, The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) appreciates your efforts to include the Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) in the Highway 111 Specific Plan project. We have reviewed the documents and have the following comments: Comment 4-1 * Please review the attachment with my comments. Some sentences need to be rephrased and consistency in mentioning Tribal Monitors. * Please include "and" when mentioning both Qualified Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor's power to halt construction and assessment. * If human remains are encountered onsite, please notify the consulting Tribe's THPO. Again, the Agua Caliente appreciates your interest in our cultural heritage. If you have questions or require additional information, please call me at (760) 883-1137. You may also email me at ACBCI-THPO@aguacaliente.net. Cordially, •-r'" ..-ire �---- Luz Salazar Cultural Resources Analyst Tribal Historic Preservation Office AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS 5401 DINAH SHORE DRIVE, PALM SPRINGS. GA 92264 7 760i699�6800 F ?60iG9916924 WWVV.AGUACALIENTE-NSN (�IJV Environmental Analysis — Cultural Resources 3.5 Cultural Resources Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuan § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Historic Overview J t% La Quinta is nestled amidst the Santa Rosa Mountains and is situated on the base of the CV. Achieving City status on May 1, 1982, La Quinta has witnessed continuous development, particularly along the Highway 111 Corridor, fueled by a steadily increasir�q population that peaks during the winter season (City of La Quinta, 2024b). La Quinta is also home to thel'�riginal settlers of th�,area, the Desert Cahuilla Indians. The Cahuilla people have inhabited the Martinez Canyon area of the CInce the early 1800s and lived near an area known today as Point Happy. Th Desert Cahuilla Indians were hunter and gatherers and one of the few Native American Tribes to dig wellNoint Happy held significant importance for the Cahuilla people due to its role as a 'tal access point to water sources. [ llotably, within a distance of less than 300 yards from Point Happy, a dell was excavated, serving as a pivotal resource for the community. This well later lent its name to the present-day City of Indian Wells (City of La Quinta, 2024b; SCTCA, 2024). For centuries, the Cahuilla people were the sole inhabitants of the CV, maintaining a permanent presence. It wasn't until the early 19th century that Europeans started journeying through the valley. Spanish, and later Mexican explorers, soldiers, and missionaries arrived with the sole aim of swiftly crossing the challenging desert terrain (La Quinta Historical Society, 2017). Record Search This analysis is based on a cultural records investigation conducted at the California Historical Resources Inventory System (CHRIS) Eastern Information Center (EIC) located at the University of California, Riverside. The examination of records took place on January 22, 2024, encompassing a review of maps, records, and reports from the EIC pertaining to the Project area. The assessment involved a review of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 1959 La Quinta 7.5 minute series quadrangle map, 1941 Toro Peak 15 minutes series, and 1959 Palm Desert 15 minute series topographic map to assess the Project site. In addition, the California Points of Historical Interest, California Historical Landmarks, California Register of Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), the California State Historic Resources Inventory, and historic topographic maps were reviewed. The findings revealed that there have been 92 studies on cultural resources conducted within the approximately 410 acres of the proposed Project area. A total of 56 cultural resource properties are documented within the Project area boundaries. According to the NRHP, there are no listed properties located within the bounds of the Project area. Per results from the California Office of Historic City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-51 Summary of Comments on Highway I I I Corridor Specific Plan Page: 1 NINumber: 1 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Comment on Text Date: 6/13/2025 9:03:51 AM I would exclude this since Tribes resided here since time immemorial. 01 Number: 2 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Comment on Text Date: 6/13/2025 9:02:26 AM From what source? There are sites that predates that. =INumber: 3 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Highlight Date: 6/13/2025 9:20:38 AM EiNumber: 4 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Comment on Text Date: 6/13/2025 9:25:46 AM Point Happy is a community right? I would just reference it as "the area was significant..." Also mention the wash being nearby. 0j Number: 5 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Comment on Text Date: 6/13/2025 9:26:21 AM Environmental Analysis — Cultural Resources Cultural Resources Mitigation Measures Implementation of mitigation measures CRA through CR-9 would reduce potential impacts to a less -than - significant level during future construction activities. Appropriate pre -construction training and a data recovery plan (if needed) would be implemented to address potential discovery of unanticipated archaeological resources and to preserve and/or record those resources consistent with appropriate laws and requirements. Proposed mitigation measures for future development are outlined below. • CR-1: Workers Environmental Awareness Program A qualified archaeologist who meets or exceeds the Secretary of Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology (NPS, 1983) shall conduct Workers Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) training on archaeological sensitivity for all construction personnel prior to the commencement of any ground -disturbing activities. Archaeological sensitivity training shall include a description of the types of cultural material that may be encountered, cultural sensitivity issues, the regulatory environment, and the proper protocol for treatment of the materials in the event of a find. The WEAP training document shall include materials that convey the information noted above, which shall be maintained in an area accessible to all construction personnel so that it may be reviewed regularly by construction staff. • CR-2: Pre -Excavation Agreement Prior to the issuance of Grading Permits, the Applicant/Owner shall enter into a pre -excavation agreement, otherwise knovW as a Tribal Cultural Resources Tre tment and Tribal Monitoring Agreement with consulting Wative American Monitor associated 14ith local tribes. A copy of the agreement shall be included in building and development plans and permit applications with the City. The purpose of this agreement,§hall be to formalize prot cols and procedures between the Applicant/Owner and the consultingl4ative American Monitor Ussociated with local tribes for the protection and treatment of, including but not limited to, Native American human remains, funerary objects, cultural and religious landscapes, ceremonial items, and traditional gathering areas and tribal cultural resources located and/or discovered through a monitoring program in conjunction with the construction of the proposed project, including additional archaeological surveys and/or studies, excavations, geotechnical ipvestigations, grading, and all other ground disturbing activities. At the discretion of the consulting %tive American Monitor, artifacts may be made available for 3D scanning/printing, with scanned/printed materials to be curated at a local repository meeting the federal standards of 36CFR79. • CR-3: Retention of Qualified Archaeologist and Ulative American Monitor Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permits, the Applicant/Owner or Grading Congctor shall provide executed contracts or agreements with a Qualified Archaeologist and consultinggative American Monitor, at the Applicant/Owner or Grading Contractor's expense, to implement the monitoring program, as described in the pre -excavation agreement. • CR-4: Tribal Cultural Monitor Coordination During Ground Disturbing Activities Fl The Qualified Archaeologist and consultinggative American Monitor shall attend all applicable pre - construction meetings with the General Contractor and/or associated subcontra5ors to present the archaeological monitoring program. The Qualified Archaeologist and consulting 9 ative American Monitor shall be present on -site full-time during grubbing, grading, and/or other ground altering activities, including the placement of imported fill materials or fill used from other areas of the Project City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-54 Page:2 Number: 1 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Comment on Text Date: 6/13/2025 9:49:45 AM I would keep it consistent, Tribal is fine. JNumber: 2 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Comment on Text Date: 6/13/2025 9:51:39 AM within the area (if changed to Tribal Monitor) *Number:3 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Highlight Date: 6/13/2025 9:52:05 AM Number: 4 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Highlight Date: 6/13/2025 9:52:22 AM JNumber: 5 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Highlight Date: 6/13/2025 9:53:08 AM JNumber: 6 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Highlight Date: 6/13/2025 9:56:39 AM JNumber: 7 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Highlight Date: 6/13/2025 9:56:45 AM JNumber: 8 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Highlight Date: 6/13/2025 9:56:52 AM MINumber: 9 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Highlight Date: 6/13/2025 9:57:06 AM Environmental Analysis — Cultural Resources site, to identify any evidence of potential archaeological or tribal cultural resources. All fill materials shall be absent of any and all tribal cultural resources. • CR-5: Controlled Grade Procedure To detect important archaeological artifacts and cultural resources during monitoring, a "Controlled Grade Procedure" [qust be created by a Qualified Archaeologist. This will be done in consultation with the consulting4-0ative American Monitor, relevant consulting Tribes, and the Applicant/Owner, and needs approval from City representatives. The procedure will set guidelines for machinery work in sensitive areas identified during cultural resource monitoring. It will cover aspects like operating speed, removal increments, weight, and equipment features. A copy of this procedure must be included in the Grading Plan submissions for Grading Permits. • CR-6: Discovery of Tribal Cultural Resources Fi The Qualif d Archaeologistur consulting dative American Monitor can stop ground -disturbing activities if9nknown tribal cultural resources or ifacts are foV5E d. All work must cease in the vicinity of any archaeological discovery until theUrchaeologistn assess its significance and potential eligibility for the (�qlifornia Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). If buried cultural deposits are encountered, LAe monitor may request that construction halt nearby and must notify a qualified archaeologist within 24 hours for investigation. Fi Work will be redirected away from these areas for assessment. Winor finds laill be documented and secured for later repatriation; if items cannot be securely stored on -site, they may be stored off -site. If the discovered resources are deemed potentially significant, the involved Tribes will be notified for consultation on their respectful treatment. Avoidance of significant resources is preferred, but if not feasible, a data recovery plan may be required. The consulting Tribes will be consulted on this plan as well. Ur resources under a data recovery n, a proper sample will be collected using professional methods, reflecting tribal values. The 11 tive American Monitor must be present durin ny resource 1z collection or cataloging. If the Qualified Archaeologist does not collect the resources, 13 Monit may do so and ensure they are treated respectfully according to tribal traditions. Ground -disturb work will not resume until the resources are documented and/or protected. • CR-7: Treatment of Tribal Cultural Resources 15 e landowner shall relinquish or hip of all tribal cultural resourc _ 14 rthed during the cultural resource mitigation monitor �ucted during all ground disturbing�L"tivities, and from any previous archaeological stuor excavations on the Project site to the affiliated consulting Tribe, as determined through the appropriate process, for respectful and dignified treatment and disposition, including reburial at a protected location on -site, in accordance with the Tribe's cultural and spiritual traditions. All cultural materials that are associated with burial and/or funerary goods would be repatriated to the Most Likely Descendant as determined by the NAHC per California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. No tribal cultural resources shall be subject to curation. • CR-8: Tribal Cultural Monitoring Report A monitoring report and/or evaluation report, if appropriate, which describes the results, analysis, and conclusions of the archaeological monitoring program (e.g., da recovery plan) shall be submitted by the Qualified Archaeologist, along with the consulting 17 tive American Monitor's notes and comments, to the City of La Quinta Planning Division for approval. City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-55 Page:3 JNumber: 1 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Highlight Date: 6/13/2025 9:57:44 AM JNumber: 2 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Comment on Text Date: 6/13/2025 1:02:30 PM Replace it with "and." Number: 3 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Highlight Date: 6/13/2025 1:01:43 PM JNumber: 4 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Comment on Text Date: 6/13/2025 1:03:12 PM I wouldn't put unknown. JNumber: 5 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Comment on Text Date: 6/13/2025 1:09:35 PM Is this necessary to add? If resources were to be encountered, the steps are trying to assess the context whether its a major site and the project's direct impact. JNumber: 6 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Comment on Text Date: 6/13/2025 1:04:00 PM Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor JNumber: 7 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Comment on Text Date: 6/13/2025 1:10:14 PM Both Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor umber: 8 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Comment on Text Date: 6/13/2025 3:49:07 PM (hat consists of "minor finds"? JNumber: 9 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Highlight Date: 6/13/2025 3:47:19 PM JNumber: 10 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Comment on Text Date: 6/13/2025 1:47:09 PM What does this mean? TCR's that are not useful? Number: 11 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Highlight Date: 6/13/2025 1:45:17 PM Number: 12 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/13/2025 3:52:58 PM Take out the "ensure they are treated respectfully according to tribal traditions:' The Tribal Monitors know their traditions very well so I don't know why this was put here as if they don't. Please be specific about which Monitor. JNumber: 13 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Highlight Date: 6/13/2025 3:52:38 PM Number: 14 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/13/2025 3:49:54 PM put all cultural resources. JNumber: 15 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Highlight Date: 6/13/2025 3:52:31 PM Number: 16 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/13/2025 3:52:09 PM Just say during ground disturbing activities. Exclude the wordiness of cultural resource mitigation monitoring. PINumber: 17 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Highlight Date: 6/13/2025 3:55:24 PM Environmental Analysis — Cultural Resources • CR-9: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains As specified by California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, if human remains are found on the Project site during construction or during archaeological work, the person responsible for the excavation, or his or her authorized representative, shall immediately notify the Riverside County Coroner's Office by telephone. No further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the Coroner Medical Examiner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code 5097.98. If such a discovery occurs, a temporary construction exclusion zone shall be established surrounding the area of the discovery so that the area would be protected, and consultation and treatment could occur as prescribed by law. If suspected Native American remains are discovered, the remains shall be kept in -situ, or in a secure location in close proximity to here they were found, and the analysis of the remains shall only occur on -site in the presence of aCive American Monitor. By law, the Coroner Medical Examiner shall determine within two working days of being notified if the remains are subject to his or her authority. If the Coroner Medical Examiner identifies the remains to be of Native American ancestry, he or she shall contact the NAC within 24 hours. The NAHC shall make a determination as to the Most Likely Descendent. � 2 City of La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan 3-56 Page: 4 miNumber: 1 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Highlight Date: 6/13/2025 3:57:05 PM ,Number: 2 Author: Luz Salazar Subject: Sticky Note Date: 6/13/2025 3:58:57 PM Please include contact to the consulting Tribe's THPO immediately if human remains were to be encountered. Response to Comment Letter #4, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, June 16, 2025 Comment 4-1: The City has reviewed the comments submitted by the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians on the IS/MND and has revised the document to incorporate the suggested edits and ensure consistent references to tribal monitors throughout. Comment Letter #5 loState of California — Natural Resources Agency GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director Inland Deserts Region x" 3602 Inland Empire Boulevard, Suite C-220 Ontario, CA 91764 www.wildlife.ca.gov June 23, 2025 Sent via email Cheri Flores Planning Manager City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 clflores laguintaca.gov Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan and Development Code Project (PROJECT) Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) SCH# 2025050964 Dear Cheri Flores: The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) received a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration from the City of La Quinta (City) for the Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines.' Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments and recommendations regarding those activities involved in the Project that may affect California fish and wildlife. Likewise, we appreciate the opportunity to provide comments regarding those aspects of the Project that CDFW, by law, may be required to carry out or approve through the exercise of its own regulatory authority under the Fish and Game Code. CDFW ROLE CDFW is California's Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources and holds those resources in trust by statute for all the people of the State. (Fish & G. Code, §§ 711.7, subd. (a) & 1802; Pub. Resources Code, § 21070; CEQA Guidelines § 15386, subd. (a).) CDFW, in its trustee capacity, has jurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and habitat necessary for biologically sustainable populations of those species. (Id., § 1802.) Similarly, for purposes of CEQA, CDFW is charged by law to provide, as available, biological expertise during public agency environmental review efforts, focusing specifically on Projects and related 'CEQA is codified in the California Public Resources Code in section 21000 et seq. The "CEQA Guidelines" are found in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, commencing with section 15000. Conseriving Cafifornia's Wi(d(fe Since 1870 Cheri Flores City of La Quinta June 23, 2025 Page 2 activities that have the potential to adversely affect fish and wildlife resources. CDFW is also submitting comments as a Responsible Agency under CEQA. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21069; CEQA Guidelines, § 15381.) CDFW expects that it may need to exercise regulatory authority as provided by the Fish and Game Code. As proposed, for example, the Project may be subject to CDFW's lake and streambed alteration regulatory authority. (Fish & G. Code, § 1600 et seq.) Likewise, to the extent implementation of the Project as proposed may result in "take" as defined by State law of any species protected under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) (Fish & G. Code, § 2050 et seq.), the Project proponent may seek related take authorization as provided by the Fish and Game Code. PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY Proponent: City of La Quinta Objective: The Project proposes the development of a Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan and Highway 111 Development Code. The Highway 111 Corridor (Corridor) consists of a roughly two-mile stretch of businesses located along the La Quinta portion of Highway 111, between Washington and Jefferson Streets. The Highway 111 Development Code is a land use policy that establishes development standards for the Corridor's expansion, incorporating location -specific guidelines like active frontage, and offering detailed information on qualifying uses, as well as additional requirements and permissions for future growth. The MND has been prepared in accordance with CEQA to provide a programmatic -level review of potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan and provides guidance for implementing development within the Project area. Economically feasible buildout under the Specific Plan could result in the following additional square footages (sf): • Residential: 1,464,000 to 1,837,000 sf • Retail: 107,000 to 194,000 sf • Office: 82,000 sf • Hotel: 150,000 to 250,000 sf The proposed Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan would enable proposed future projects to consider this impact analysis when evaluating their potential environmental impacts. As a programmatic -level document, however, this CEQA analysis is not anticipated to provide sufficient detail to fully address the project -specific impacts of all future development. It is anticipated that additional environmental technical studies or CEQA documentation may be needed for future projects. It is anticipated that CEQA compliance for future projects would be tiered from this document. Cheri Flores City of La Quinta June 23, 2025 Page 3 Location: The Project is located along Highway 111 within the City of La Quinta, California, in the County of Riverside. The Project encompasses two miles along Highway 111 between Washington Street on the west, Jefferson Street on the east, the Whitewater Wash on the north, and Avenue 48 on the south. The Project area is just over approximately 410 acres (-0.64 square miles). Timeframe: The MND proposes build -out of projects over the course of 20 to 25 years. COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CDFW has jurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and habitat necessary for biologically sustainable populations of those species (i.e., biological resources). CDFW offers the comments and recommendations below to assist the City in adequately identifying and/or mitigating the Project's significant, or potentially significant, direct and indirect impacts on fish and wildlife (biological) resources. The MND has not adequately identified and disclosed the Project's impacts (i.e., direct, indirect, and cumulative) on biological resources and whether those impacts are reduced to less than significant. CDFW's comments and recommendations on the MND are explained in greater detail below and summarized here. CDFW is concerned that the MND does not adequately identify or mitigate the Project's significant, or potentially significant, impacts to biological resources. CDFW requests that additional information and analyses be added to a revised MND, along with avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures that avoid or reduce impacts to a level less than significant. Comment 5-1 1 Existing Environmental Setting Compliance with CEQA is predicated on a complete and accurate description of the environmental setting that may be affected by the proposed Project. CDFW is concerned that the assessment of the existing environmental setting has not been adequately analyzed in the MND. CDFW is concerned that without a complete and accurate description of the existing environmental setting, the MND may provide an incomplete analysis of Project -related environmental impacts. The MND lacks a complete and appropriate assessment of biological resources within the Project site and surrounding area specifically as it relates special -status species (see Assessment of Biological Resources Section), burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), and the Lake and Streambed Alteration Program. A complete and accurate assessment of the environmental setting and Project -related impacts to biological resources is needed to both identify appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures and demonstrate that these measures reduce Project impacts to less than significant. Mitigation Measures Comment 5-1 (cont.) Comment 5-2 Cheri Flores City of La Quinta June 23, 2025 Page 4 CEQA requires that an MND include mitigation measures to avoid or reduce significant impacts. CDFW is concerned that the mitigation measures proposed in the MND are not adequate to avoid or reduce impacts to biological resources to below a level of significance. To support the City in ensuring that Project impacts to biological resources are reduced to less than significant, CDFW recommends revising the mitigation measure for burrowing owl, nesting birds, and artificial nighttime lighting, and adding mitigation measures for an assessment of biological resources and, as it relates to a the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP), the local development mitigation fee and salvage of sand -dependent covered species. 1) Assessment of Biological Resources Page 1-2 of the MND states that the "proposed Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan would enable proposed future projects to consider this impact analysis when evaluating their potential environmental impacts. Where sufficiently addressed herein, future development may be considered `within the scope' of this environmental analysis. As a programmatic -level document, however, this CEQA analysis is not anticipated to provide sufficient detail to fully address the project -specific impacts of all future development. Indeed, it is anticipated that additional environmental technical studies or CEQA documentation may be needed for future projects once sufficient details are known. In such cases, the necessary environmental studies and documentation may be conducted at the time of proposal. It is anticipated that CEQA compliance for future projects would be tiered from this document." CDFW is concerned about the adequacy of analysis in this MND to establish baseline conditions for biological resources, identify impacts to biological resources, and determine appropriate avoidance, minimization and mitigation measures for development projects covered in this MND. For example, page 3 of the Technical Memorandum, dated May 8, 2023 (Special -Status Species Report), for the MND did not include any protocol -level surveys for special -status wildlife. Also, note that CDFW generally considers biological field assessments for wildlife to be valid for a one-year period, and assessments for rare plants may be considered valid for a period of up to three years. Given the uncertainty in timelines for the implementation of the various projects covered in this MND (over a period of 20-25 years per page 3-89 of the MND)—and the ability for biological resources to change during intervening periods—CDFW recommends that additional assessments of biological resources, including, but not limited to, focused surveys for special -status species that have the potential to occur on these project sites, are conducted and the results circulated to the public in subsequent CEQA documentation to establish environmental baselines, inform avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures, and allow CDFW to conduct a meaningful review and provide appropriate biological expertise. To ensure impacts to biological resources associated with the projects covered in this MND are adequately assessed and reduced to a level less than significant, CDFW recommends the following mitigation measure is added to a revised MND: Mitigation Measure BIO-[A]: Assessment of Biological Resources Comment 5-2 (cont.) Comment 5-3 Cheri Flores City of La Quinta June 23, 2025 Page 5 Prior to Project construction activities for all projects covered in this MND, a complete and recent inventory of rare, threatened, endangered, and other sensitive species located within the Project footprint and within offsite areas with the potential to be affected, including California Species of Special Concern (CSSC) and California Fully Protected Species (Fish and Game Code § 3511), will be completed. Species to be addressed should include all those which meet the CEQA definition (CEQA Guidelines § 15380). The inventory should address seasonal variations in use of the Project area and should not be limited to resident species. Focused species -specific surveys, completed by a qualified biologist and conducted at the appropriate time of year and time of day when the sensitive species are active or otherwise identifiable are required. Acceptable species -specific survey procedures should be developed in consultation with CDFW and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, where necessary. Note that CDFW generally considers biological field assessments for wildlife to be valid for a one- year period, and assessments for rare plants may be considered valid for a period of up to three years. Some aspects of the proposed Project may warrant periodic updated surveys for certain sensitive taxa, particularly if the Project is proposed to occur over a protracted time frame, or in phases, or if surveys are completed during periods of drought. Pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines, section 15097(f), CDFW has prepared a draft mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP) in Attachment 1 for recommended revisions to MM BIO-3, MM BIO-4, MM BIO-5 and CDFW-recommended MM BIO-[A], MM BIO-[B], and MM BIO-[C]. Nesting Birds It is the Project proponent's responsibility to comply with all applicable laws related to nesting birds and birds of prey. Fish and Game Code sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513 afford protective measures as follows: section 3503 states that it is unlawful to take, possess, or needlessly destroy the nest or eggs of any bird, except as otherwise provided by Fish and Game Code or any regulation made pursuant thereto. Fish and Game Code section 3503.5 makes it unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the orders Falconiformes or Strigiformes (birds -of -prey) or to take, possess, or destroy the nest or eggs of any such bird except as otherwise provided by Fish and Game Code or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto. Fish and Game Code section 3513 makes it unlawful to take or possess any migratory nongame bird except as provided by rules and regulations adopted by the Secretary of the Interior under provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, as amended (16 U.S.C. § 703 et seq.). With regard to the CVMSHCP, per its associated Implementing Agreement (IA) and Permits from CDFW and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (the Wildlife Agencies), Take associated with Covered Activities will not be in violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and will be consistent with Fish and Game Code sections 3503 and 3503.5-1 therefore, all Covered Activities within and outside Conservation Areas must undertake Cheri Flores City of La Quinta June 23, 2025 Page 6 measures to avoid the take of individuals, nests, and eggs of nesting birds. The CVMSHCP includes a general conservation measure that applies to all bird species to avoid impacts to habitat for nesting birds during the nesting season (CVMSHCP Section 9.7). Per IA Section 13.2, the City is obligated to ensure the projects to which it confers Take Authorization under the CVMSHCP comply with all terms and requirements of the CVMSHCP, the Wildlife Agencies' Permits that create the CVMSHCP, and the IA, including compliance with laws that protect nesting birds. Pages 3-16 of the MND indicates that "the entire Project area may support migratory and nesting birds." CDFW concurs that all the project locations covered in this MND contain habitat for nesting birds due to the presences of shrubs on the undeveloped vacant parcels and presence of landscaping trees and shrubs in the developed parcels. Although the MND includes Mitigation Measure BIO-3 for nesting birds, CDFW considers the measure inadequate in scope to reduce impacts to nesting birds to a level less than significant. For example, CDFW considers proposed buffer distances for burrowing owls, 160 feet during the non -breeding season and 250 feet during the breeding season, to be inadequate. (See Burrowing Owl Section below for a burrowing owl -specific measure recommended by CDFW.) To support the City in reducing impacts to nesting birds to a level less than significant Comment for all projects covered in the MND, CDFW recommends that the City revise Mitigation 5-3 (cont.) Measure BIO-3 with the following additions in bold and removals in strike+hreu h: Mitigation Measure 131O-3: Nesting Birds Regardless of the time of year, nesting bird surveys shall be performed by a qualified avian biologist no more than 3 days prior to all vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities for all projects covered in this MND. Pre -construction surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior. The qualified avian biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the pre -construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A smaller or larger buffer may be determined by the qualified biologist familiar with the nesting phenology of the nesting species and based on nest and buffer monitoring results. Construction activities may not occur inside the established buffers, which shall remain on -site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. potential ❑rOjeGt imnaGts to siv snorial status birds and rnmmen hiriJs Cheri Flores City of La Quinta June 23, 2025 Page 7 lip .. ■ . and, appliGable, ....whether bords are Comment 5-4 Cheri Flores City of La Quinta June 23, 2025 Page 8 ,ii nxl - - 2) Burrowing Owl On October 10, 2024, the Fish and Game Commission determined that western burrowing owl warrants protection as a candidate species under the California Endangered Species Act (Fish & G. Code, § 2050 et seq.). During the candidacy period, western burrowing owl will be afforded the same protection as threatened and endangered species under CESA. If Project activities, including relocation, could result in take, appropriate CESA authorization (i.e., Incidental Take Permit under Fish and Game Code section 2081) should be obtained prior to commencement of Project activities. Take of individual burrowing owls and their nests or eggs is defined by Fish and Game Code section 86, and prohibited by sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513. Take is defined in Fish and Game Code section 86 as "hunt, pursue, catch, capture or kill, or attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture or kill." Fish and Game Code sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513 afford protective measures as follows: section 3503 states that it is unlawful to take, possess, or needlessly destroy the nest or eggs of any bird, except as otherwise provided by Fish and Game Code or any regulation made pursuant thereto. Fish and Game Code section 3503.5 makes it unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the orders Falconiformes or Strigiformes (birds -of -prey) or to take, possess, or destroy the nest or eggs of any such bird except as otherwise provided by Fish and Game Code or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto. Fish and Game Code section 3513 makes it unlawful to take or possess any migratory nongame bird except as provided by rules and regulations adopted by the Secretary of the Interior under provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, as amended (16 U.S.C. § 703 et seq.). With regard to the CVMSHCP, the CDFW Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) Permit #2835-2008-001-06 does not provide Take Authorization for burrowing owl individuals, nests, or eggs. To the contrary, section 3.5.6 of the NCCP Permit states burrowing owl "pairs or individuals will not be Taken" and reiterates that the "HCP/NCCP does not authorize Take of [burrowing owl] nests [or] eggs[.]" Therefore, throughout the CVMSHCP area —both within and without Conservation Areas— Permittees must ensure that activities occurring within their jurisdictions do not result in Comment 5-4 (cont.) Cheri Flores City of La Quinta June 23, 2025 Page 9 the take, possession, or destruction of burrowing owl individuals, nests, or eggs. Any activity occurring within the CVMSHCP area that results in the take of burrowing owl individuals, nests, or eggs would be unlawful and would not be a Covered Activity under the CVMSHCP. Per IA Section 13.2, the City is obligated to ensure the projects to which it confers Take Authorization under the CVMSHCP comply with all terms and requirements of the CVMSHCP, the Wildlife Agencies' Permits that create the CVMSHCP, and the IA, including compliance with laws that protect burrowing owls. Page 1-2 of the MND states that "as a programmatic -level document, however, this CEQA analysis is not anticipated to provide sufficient detail to fully address the project - specific impacts of all future development. Indeed, it is anticipated that additional environmental technical studies or CEQA documentation may be needed for future projects once sufficient details are known." CDFW agrees that a project -specific analysis of impacts to burrowing owl, which is needed to inform project -specific avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures, is necessary for each of the projects covered in the MND that contain suitable habitat for burrowing owl. Page 19 of the Project's Special -Status Species Report indicates that burrowing owl have a moderate potential to occur for projects covered in the MND. CDFW agrees that the project areas that contain vacant land, including but not limited to potential development areas ADN- 01, DJN-1, DJS-1, WAS-01, and ADS-2 have suitable habitat for burrowing owl. Also, potential development areas ADN-01, DJN-1, WAN-02, and WAN-01 are located adjacent to the Whitewater River, which provides suitable habitat for burrowing owl. Page 19 of the Special -Status Species Report states that the "nearest records on the CNDDB are approximately three miles away, and are from 1927 to 2007 (CDFW 2022)." CDFW adds that unprocessed data from the California Natural Diversity Database include three recent observations, between 2021 and 2023, of burrowing owl using burrows within 0.25 miles of Project site to the east in a channel associated with the Whitewater River. Page 3 of the Biological Report indicates that a reconnaissance field survey was conducted on February 4, 2023, and that "no protocol -level surveys for wetlands, SNCs, special status plants, or wildlife were conducted." A habitat assessment and focused surveys for burrowing owls have not been conducted for the projects covered in this MND. Given the MND's lack of findings from a habitat assessment and recent focused surveys for burrowing owl following the guidelines in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation, the number and locations of suitable and occupied burrows within the project areas covered in this MND are unknown. Given the lack of results from a habitat assessment and focused surveys following recommended protocols and the lack of survey reports, CDFW is limited in its ability to provide biological expertise to support the City in reducing impacts to burrowing owl to a level less than significant for the projects covered in this MND. CDFW recommends a habitat assessment and focused surveys for burrowing owl are conducted for all of the projects covered in this MND and that the survey results, including survey reports, are provided in subsequent CEQA environmental review documents for the public and CDFW to review. Comment 5-4 (cont.) Cheri Flores City of La Quinta June 23, 2025 Page 10 The MND includes a general Mitigation Measure BIO-4 to be applied across projects covered in the MND. CDFW finds Mitigation Measure B1O4 to be insufficient in scope and timing to reduce impacts to burrowing owl to a level less than significant. For example, Mitigation Measure BIO-4 indicates that burrowing owl relocation may be implemented by the Project (page 3-20). Burrowing owl relocation is considered a potentially significant impact under CEQA and should only be considered as a last resort, after all other options have been evaluated. Burrowing owl relocation (i.e., eviction/passive and active relocation) can result in take of burrowing owl individuals, nests, and eggs, which is not authorized under the CVMSHCP. Consultation with CDFW is warranted to determine if an Incidental Take Permit is necessary to avoid a violation of Fish and Game code section 2080. CDFW recommends that the City revise general Mitigation Measure 131O-4 with the following additions in bold and removals in strikethr,,y : Mitigation Measure BIO-4: Burrowing Owl Habitat Assessment and Focused and Pre -Construction Surveys No less than 60 days prior to the start of Project -related activities for all projects covered in the MND, a burrowing owl habitat assessment shall be conducted by a qualified biologist according to the specifications of the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (Department of Fish and Game, March 2012 or most recent version) for all projects covered under the MND. If the habitat assessment demonstrates suitable burrowing owl habitat, then focused burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012 or most recent version) prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities. If burrowing owls are detected during the focused surveys, the qualified biologist and Project proponent shall begin coordination with CDFW and USFWS immediately, and shall prepare a Burrowing Owl Avoidance and Monitoring Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall describe proposed avoidance and monitoring actions, including measures necessary to avoid take of burrowing owl individuals, nests, and eggs. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall include the number and location of occupied burrow sites (occupied site means at least one burrowing owl or its sign has been observed within the last three years; may be indicated by owl sign including feathers, pellets, prey remains, eggshell fragments, or excrement at or near a burrow entrance or perch site), acres of burrowing owl habitat that will be impacted, details of site monitoring, and details on proposed buffers and other avoidance measures. If impacts to occupied burrowing owl habitat or burrow(s) or burrowing owl individuals, nests, or eggs cannot be avoided, appropriate CESA authorization (i.e., Incidental Take Permit Comment 5-4 (cont.) Cheri Flores City of La Quinta June 23, 2025 Page 11 under Fish and Game Code section 2081) should be obtained from CDFW prior to commencement of Project activities. Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Project -related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012 or most recent version). Preconstruction surveys should be repeated when there is a pause in construction of more than 30 days. Preconstruction surveys should be performed by a qualified biologist following the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If the preconstruction surveys confirm occupied burrowing owl habitat, Project activities shall be immediately halted. The qualified biologist shall coordinate with CDFW and prepare a Burrowing Owl Avoidance and Monitoring Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW and USFWS for review and approval prior to commencing Prier Drto the start of Dreler�t aGtiVitiec s icon hi irre�eiORg rend E; ir�ievc Project activities. r� , fen .. ■0*10 If - ... ■ - - .. - _. ._ _ .... .. .. ._ -• a eee -- - - -- - -- .. . rIN1211... - • ol - •ior ........... - i-C 1/ _. .. - NA WIN M' RPM 3) Lake and Streambed Alteration Program Comment 5-5 Comment 5-6 Cheri Flores City of La Quinta June 23, 2025 Page 12 Fish and Game Code section 1602 requires any person, state or local governmental agency, or public utility to notify CDFW prior to beginning any activity that may do one or more of the following: divert or obstruct the natural flow of any river, stream, or lake; change the bed, channel, or bank of any river, stream, or lake; use material from any river, stream, or lake; or deposit or dispose of material into any river, stream, or lake. Note that "any river, stream, or lake" includes those that are episodic (i.e., those that a dry for periods of time) as well as those that are perennial (i.e., those that flow year- round). This includes ephemeral streams, desert washes, and watercourses with a subsurface flow. The MND is a programmatic -level document, and it is anticipated that additional environmental technical studies or CEQA documentation may be needed for future projects associated with this MND once sufficient details are known (page 1-2 of the MND). Four of the projects covered in this MND are located adjacent to the Whitewater River, including potential development areas WAN-01, WAN-02, ADN-01, and DJN-1. Page 4 of the Biological Assessment indicates that the "Project does not involve alteration of the Whitewater River, including the channel and floodplain. There will be no impact to the Whitewater River or jurisdictional wetlands." CDFW is concerned about the validity of this conclusion that projects adjacent to the Whitewater River will have not impacts on fish and wildlife resources subject to Fish and Game Code section 1600 et seq. CDFW notes that the MND lacks details on design plans for projects covered in the MND, and that project -specific design plans are needed to inform if projects will result in impacts on fish and wildlife resources subject to Fish and Game Code section 1600 et seq. The MND includes Mitigation Measure BIO-6, indicating that "prior to construction and issuance of any grading permit, the Project Sponsor shall obtain written correspondence from CDFW stating that notification under Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code is not required for the Project, or the Project Sponsor should obtain a CDFW-executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement, authorizing impacts to Fish and Game Code Section 1602 resources associated with the Project." Importantly, CDFW notes that the MND does not provide information on the projects for which this measure would apply. CDFW recommends that the MND is revised to indicate that for all projects covered in this MND, subsequent CEQA documentation will include a project -specific analysis of potential impacts to fish and wildlife resources subject to Fish and Game Code section 1600 et seq. to inform if a notification of lake or streambed alteration needs to be submitted to CDFW. 4) Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Local Development Mitigation Fee The Project is located within the CVMSHCP Plan Boundary and outside of a Conservation Area and contains habitat for Covered Species and/or conserved natural communities. Page 3-16 of the MND states that the "according to the CVMSHCP, authorization of take for all species with a moderate potential to occur, except the six bird species, can be obtained through compliance with the CVMSHCP and the Local Cheri Flores City of La Quinta June 23, 2025 Page 13 Development Mitigation Fee (LDMF) paid to the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission". Per CVMSHCP Section 5.2.1.1 and IA Sections 12.2.1 and 13.2, the City is obligated to impose a local development mitigation fee for new development within the Plan Area that impacts vacant land containing Habitat for Covered Species and/or conserved natural communities, including small vacant lots within urban areas that contain natural open space, and to transmit collected fees to CVCC at least quarterly and prior to impacts to Covered Species and their Habitats. To document the City's obligation to impose and transmit a Local Development Mitigation Fee for projects covered in this MND, CDFW recommends the City add the following mitigation measure to a revised MND: Mitigation Measure BIO-[B]: CVMSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee Prior to construction and issuance of any grading permit for all projects covered in the MND, the City shall ensure compliance with the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) and its associated Implementing Agreement and shall ensure the collection of payment of the CVMSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee and transfer of fees, at least quarterly and prior to impacts to Covered Species and their Habitats, to the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission. Comment 5-6 (cont.) I Salvage of Sand -Dependent Covered Species Section 6.6.1 of the CVMSHCP (Obligations of Local Permittees) states that within and outside Conservation Areas "on parcels approved for Development, the Permittees shall encourage the opportunity to salvage Covered sand -dependent species in accordance with the Implementation Manual." Page 3-18 of the MND indicates that "Wildlife species covered by the CVMSHCP that have a moderate potential to occur include Palm Springs Round -tailed Ground Squirrel [(Xerospermophilus tereticaudus chlorus)], Burrowing Owl, Flat -tailed Horned Lizard [(Phrynosoma mcallii)], Coachella Valley Fringe -tailed Lizard [(Uta inornata)], and the Coachella Giant Sand Treader Cricket [(Macrobaenetes valgum)]." The Project areas including potential development area DJS-1 contain CVMSHCP modeled habitat for Coachella Valley fringe -toed lizard. To bE consistent with CVMSHCP requirements, CDFW recommends that the City include in a revised MND the following mitigation measure: Mitigation Measure BIO-[C]: Salvage of Sand -Dependent Covered Species Prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities, for all project areas covered in the MND that contain suitable habitat for sand -dependent Covered Species, the City will collaborate with the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission to plan and implement a salvage of sand -dependent Covered Species within the Project site. 5) Artificial Nighttime Lighting Comment 5-7 Cheri Flores City of La Quinta June 23, 2025 Page 14 Several of the projects associated with this MND are located adjacent to the Whitewater River, an area that provides suitable burrowing, nesting, roosting, foraging, and refugia habitat for birds, migratory birds that fly at night, and other nocturnal and crepuscular wildlife. Artificial lighting alters ecological processes including, but not limited to, the temporal niches of species; the repair and recovery of physiological function; the measurement of time through interference with the detection of circadian and lunar and seasonal cycles; the detection of resources and natural enemies; and navigation.2 Many species use photoperiod cues for communication (e.g., bird song3), determining when to begin foraging,4 behavioral thermoregulation,5 and migration.6 Phototaxis, a phenomenon that results in attraction and movement towards light, can disorient, entrap, and temporarily blind wildlife species that experience it.10 Page 3-3 of the MND indicates that "future development facilitated by the Specific Plan may include low -impact lighting fixtures and reflective surfaces that are designed to reduce brightness, which would enhance visual comfort and safety without contributing to light pollution." The MND includes Mitigation Measure 131O-5, requiring that "during Project construction and operation, the City shall eliminate all nonessential lighting throughout the Project area and avoid or limit the use of artificial light during the hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are most active. The City shall ensure that lighting for Project activities is shielded, cast downward, and does not spill over onto the properties or upward into the night sky following International Dark -Sky Association standards." The MND lacks information on project(s) to which this mitigation measure would apply. CDFW recommends the City revise Mitigation Measure 131O-5 with the following additions in bold and removals in strikethro unh: Mitigation Measure BIO-5: Artificial Nighttime Lighting Throughout construction and the lifetime operations of all projects covered in the MND, the City and Project proponents shall eliminate all nonessential lighting throughout the Project area and avoid or limit the use of artificial light at night during the hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are most active. The City and Project proponent shall ensure that all lighting for the Project is fully shielded, cast downward and directed away from surrounding open -space and agricultural areas, reduced in intensity to the greatest extent possible, and does not result in lighting trespass including glare into surrounding areas or upward 2 Gatson, K. J., Bennie, J., Davies, T., Hopkins, J. 2013. The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: a mechanistic appraisal. Biological Reviews, 88.4: 912-927. 3 Miller, M. W. 2006. Apparent effects of light pollution on singing behavior of American robins. The Condor 108:130- 139. 4 Stone, E. L., G. Jones, and S. Harris. 2009. Street lighting disturbs commuting bats. Current Biology 19:1123-1127. 5 Beiswenger, R. E. 1977. Diet patterns of aggregative behavior in tadpoles of Bufo americanus, in relation to light and temperature. Ecology 58:98-108. 6 Longcore, T., and C. Rich. 2004. Ecological light pollution - Review. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2:191-198. Comment 5-7 (cont.) Cheri Flores City of La Quinta June 23, 2025 Page 15 into the night sky (see the International Dark -Sky Association standards at http://darksky.org ). The City and Project proponent shall ensure use of LED lighting with a correlated color temperature of 3,000 Kelvins or less, proper disposal of hazardous waste, and recycling of lighting that contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycler. D irinn DrOj8Gt nE)nctn GtiE)n and aperatiOR the ENVIRONMENTAL DATA CEQA requires that information developed in environmental impact reports and negative declarations be incorporated into a database which may be used to make subsequent or supplemental environmental determinations. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21003, subd. (e).) Accordingly, please report any special -status species and natural communities detected during Project surveys to the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). The CNNDB field survey form can be filled out and submitted online at the following link: https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Submitting-Data. The types of information reported to CNDDB can be found at the following link: https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Plants-and-Animals. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT FILING FEES The Project, as proposed, would have an impact on fish and/or wildlife, and assessment of environmental document filing fees is necessary. Fees are payable upon filing of the Notice of Determination by the Lead Agency and serve to help defray the cost of environmental review by CDFW. Payment of the environmental document filing fee is required in order for the underlying Project approval to be operative, vested, and final. (Cal. Code Regs, tit. 14, § 753.5; Fish & G. Code, § 711.4; Pub. Resources Code, § 21089.) CONCLUSION CDFW appreciates the opportunity to comment on the MND to assist the City in identifying and mitigating Project impacts to biological resources. CDFW concludes that the MND does not adequately identify or mitigate the Project's significant, or potentially significant, impacts to biological resources. CDFW recommends that revised and additional mitigation measures and analysis as described in this letter be added to a revised MND. CDFW personnel are available for consultation regarding biological resources and strategies to avoid and minimize impacts. Questions regarding this letter or further Cheri Flores City of La Quinta June 23, 2025 Page 16 coordination should be directed to Jacob Skaggs, Senior Environmental Scientist Specialist, at jacob.skaggs(a�wildlife.ca.gov. Sincerely, EDocuSigned �by�:,, 84F92FFEEFD24C8... Kim Freeburn Environmental Program Manager Attachment 1: MMRP for CDFW-Proposed Mitigation Measures ec: Heather Brashear, Senior Environmental Scientist (Supervisor), CDFW Heather. Brashear(cD-Wildlife.ca.gov Mary Beth Woulfe, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service marybeth woulfe(aDfws.gov Lory Salazar-Velasquez, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lore salazar-velasguez6a fws.gov Peter Satin, Coachella Valley Conservation Commission psatiN( cvaq.orq Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse, Sacramento state. clearing house6a lci.ca. gov Cheri Flores City of La Quinta June 23, 2025 Page 17 ATTACHMENT 1: MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (MMRP) Mitigation Measures Timing and Methods Responsible Parties Mitigation Measure BIO-[A]: Assessment of Timing: Prior to Implementation: Biological Resources Project City and project construction proponents Prior to Project construction activities for all activities. Monitoring and projects covered in this MND, a complete Methods: See Reporting: City and recent inventory of rare, threatened, Mitigation endangered, and other sensitive species Measure located within the Project footprint and within offsite areas with the potential to be affected, including California Species of Special Concern (CSSC) and California Fully Protected Species (Fish and Game Code § 3511), will be completed. Species to be addressed should include all those which meet the CEQA definition (CEQA Guidelines § 15380). The inventory should address seasonal variations in use of the Project area and should not be limited to resident species. Focused species -specific surveys, completed by a qualified biologist and conducted at the appropriate time of year and time of day when the sensitive species are active or otherwise identifiable are required. Acceptable species -specific survey procedures should be developed in consultation with CDFW and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, where necessary. Note that CDFW generally considers biological field assessments for wildlife to be valid for a one-year period, and assessments for rare plants may be considered valid for a period of up to three years. Some aspects of the proposed Project may warrant periodic updated surveys for certain sensitive taxa, particularly if the Project is proposed to occur over a protracted time frame, or in phases, or if surveys are completed during Cheri Flores City of La Quinta June 23, 2025 Page 18 periods of drought. Mitigation Measure BIO-3: Nesting Birds Timing: No more Implementation: than 3 days prior City and project Regardless of the time of year, nesting bird to all vegetation proponents surveys shall be performed by a qualified removal or ground -disturbing Monitoring and avian biologist no more than 3 days prior to activities. Reporting: City all vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities for all projects covered in this Methods: See MND. Pre -construction surveys shall focus Mitigation on both direct and indirect evidence of Measure nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior. The qualified avian biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the pre -construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A smaller or larger buffer may be determined by the qualified biologist familiar with the nesting phenology of the nesting species and based on nest and buffer monitoring results. Construction activities may not occur inside the established buffers, which shall remain on -site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. Cheri Flores City of La Quinta June 23, 2025 Page 19 Mitigation Measure BIO-4: Burrowing Owl Timing: Habitat Implementation: Habitat Assessment and Focused and Pre- Assessment: No City and project Construction Surveys less than 60 days prior to the start of proponents project -related Monitoring and No less than 60 days prior to the start of activities. Reporting: City and Project -related activities for all projects Focused project proponents covered in the MND, a burrowing owl habitat surveys: Prior to assessment shall be conducted by a vegetation removal or qualified biologist according to the ground -disturbing specifications of the Staff Report on activities. Pre - Burrowing Owl Mitigation (Department of construction Fish and Game, March 2012 or most recent surveys: No less version for all projects covered under the ) p 1 days prior than start to start of Project- MND. related activities and within 24 If the habitat assessment demonstrates hours prior to suitable burrowing owl habitat, then focused ground burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted disturbance and when there is a by a qualified biologist in accordance with pause in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl construction of Mitigation (2012 or most recent version) more than 30 prior to vegetation removal or ground- days. disturbing activities. If burrowing owls are Methods: See detected during the focused surveys, the Mitigation qualified biologist and Project proponent Measure shall begin coordination with CDFW and USFWS immediately, and shall prepare a Burrowing Owl Avoidance and Monitoring Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall describe proposed avoidance and monitoring actions, including measures necessary to avoid take of burrowing owl individuals, nests, and eggs. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall include the number and location of occupied burrow sites (occupied site means at least one burrowing owl or its sign has been observed within the last three years; may be indicated by owl sign including feathers, pellets, prey remains, eggshell fragments, or excrement at or near a burrow entrance or perch site), acres of Cheri Flores City of La Quinta June 23, 2025 Page 20 burrowing owl habitat that will be impacted, details of site monitoring, and details on proposed buffers and other avoidance measures. If impacts to occupied burrowing owl habitat or burrow(s) or burrowing owl individuals, nests, or eggs cannot be avoided, appropriate CESA authorization (i.e., Incidental Take Permit under Fish and Game Code section 2081) should be obtained from CDFW prior to commencement of Project activities. Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Project -related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012 or most recent version). Preconstruction surveys should be repeated when there is a pause in construction of more than 30 days. Preconstruction surveys should be performed by a qualified biologist following the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If the preconstruction surveys confirm occupied burrowing owl habitat, Project activities shall be immediately halted. The qualified biologist shall coordinate with CDFW and prepare a Burrowing Owl Avoidance and Monitoring Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW and USFWS for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. Mitigation Measure BIO-[B]: CVMSHCP Local Timing: Prior to Implementation: Development Mitigation Fee construction and issuance of any City and project proponents Prior to construction and issuance of an Y grading permit. Monitoring and grading permit for all projects covered in the Methods: See Reporting: City MND, the City shall ensure compliance with Mitigation the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Measure Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) and its associated Implementing Agreement and Cheri Flores City of La Quinta June 23, 2025 Page 21 shall ensure the collection of payment of the CVMSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee and transfer of fees, at least quarterly and prior to impacts to Covered Species and their Habitats, to the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission. Mitigation Measure BIO-[C]: Salvage of Timing: Prior to Implementation: Sand -Dependent Covered Species vegetation City and project removal or proponents Prior to vegetation removal or ground- ground -disturbing activities. Monitoring and disturbing activities, for all project areas Reporting: City covered in the MND that contain suitable Methods: See habitat for sand -dependent Covered Mitigation Species, the City will collaborate with the Measure Coachella Valley Conservation Commission to plan and implement a salvage of sand - dependent Covered Species within the Project site. Mitigation Measure BIO-5: Artificial Timing: Implementation: Nighttime Lighting Throughout City and project construction and proponents Throughout construction and the lifetime lifetime operations.Monitoring and operations of all projects covered in the Methods: See Reporting: City MND, the City and Project proponents shall Mitigation eliminate all nonessential lighting Measure throughout the Project area and avoid or limit the use of artificial light at night during the hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are most active. The City and Project proponent shall ensure that all lighting for the Project is fully shielded, cast downward and directed away from surrounding open -space and agricultural areas, reduced in intensity to the greatest extent possible, and does not result in lighting trespass including glare into surrounding areas or upward into the night sky (see the International Dark -Sky Association standards at htt ://darksk .or /). The City and Project Cheri Flores City of La Quinta June 23, 2025 Page 22 proponent shall ensure use of LED lighting with a correlated color temperature of 3,000 Kelvins or less, proper disposal of hazardous waste, and recycling of lighting that contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycler. Response to Comment Letter #5, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, June 23, 2025 Comment 5-1: The City appreciates the California Department of Fish and Wildlife's (CDFW) comments and recommendations on the Draft IS/MND and shares CDFW's commitment to the conservation and protection of biological resources. As a planning -level environmental document, the IS/MND is intended to guide future development within the Specific Plan area. It is supported by a biological technical report based on field investigations and a review of habitat types, species occurrences, and the likelihood of special -status species within the Specific Plan boundaries. The document identifies potential biological impacts at a programmatic level and recommends mitigation measures that future development can reference. Less than one-third of the Specific Plan area housing units will be on undeveloped land, further focusing growth within already disturbed or developed areas. The IS/MND has been revised to incorporate CDFW's suggested avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures, which will help inform and guide project -level environmental review. The City agrees that future development projects should conduct project -specific biological resource assessments to further evaluate potential impacts and develop site -specific measures that avoid or minimize effects on sensitive species and habitats. By incorporating CDFW's recommendations, the IS/MND provides a framework to ensure future development remains consistent with CEQA and avoids or reduces biological impacts to less -than - significant levels. Comment 5-2: The City understands and appreciates CDFW's concerns regarding the adequacy of the biological resources analysis and the importance of maintaining current, site -specific data to support CEQA review. The IS/MND is intended to provide a planning -level understanding of biological resources and habitat conditions within the Specific Plan area. It draws upon field investigations and a biological technical study to inform the analysis and offer a framework to guide future development. However, we recognize that development will occur incrementally over the next 20-25 years, and site conditions may change over time. To address this, the IS/MND has incorporated the recommended mitigation measure related to the Assessment of Biological Resources into the IS/MND to help ensure future projects establish accurate environmental baselines and adequately address potential impacts to biological resources. Comment 5-3: The City appreciates CDFW's detailed comments and recommendations regarding protections for nesting birds and compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Fish and Game Code sections. We understand and appreciate CDFW's concerns and agree that protecting nesting birds and their habitat is essential. In response, the City has revised Mitigation Measure BIO-3 to incorporate CDFW's recommended additions, including updated buffer distances and avoidance measures. These revisions strengthen the mitigation and better ensure that impacts to nesting birds are reduced to less than significant levels. Comment 5-4: Thank you for your comments regarding protections for the western burrowing owl under California Endangered Species Act (CESA), the Fish and Game Code, and the CVMSHCP. The City understands that burrowing owl is now a candidate species under CESA and must be fully protected during the candidacy period and recognizes that take of individuals, nests, or eggs is not authorized under the CVMSHCP and that any relocation or other activity resulting in take would require consultation with CDFW and potentially an Incidental Take Permit under Fish and Game Code Section 2081. In response to CDFW's comments, the City has revised Mitigation Measure BIO-4 to incorporate CDFW's recommended measures. These include requiring a habitat assessment and focused surveys for future development following the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation, applying appropriate avoidance buffers, and ensuring relocation is only considered as a last resort and in coordination with CDFW. Comment 5-5: The City agrees and understands that all future development within the Specific Plan area must evaluate potential impacts to the Whitewater River, particularly for sites adjacent to the river, including WAN-01, WAN-02, ADN-01, and DJN-01. Mitigation Measure BIO-6 emphasizes that future projects should consult with CDFW to determine if a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement is necessary. Comment 5-6: This comment is noted. The City recognizes the significance of adhering to the requirements of the CVMSHCP and ensuring compliance. This includes obligations related to the Local Development Mitigation Fee and the salvage of sand -dependent Covered Species where applicable. The City has adopted Ordinance No. 487 (Chapter 3.34 of the La Quinta Municipal Code) regarding the collection of the LDMF and does collect the LDMF at building permit issuance. The City has revised Mitigation Measure 131O-7 to incorporate the suggested language provided by CDFW regarding both the Local Development Mitigation Fee and salvage of sand -dependent species. This will ensure that future development projects covered under the IS/MND remain consistent with the CVMSHCP. Comment 5-7: The City appreciates CDFW's detailed comments regarding the potential impacts of artificial lighting on wildlife habitat adjacent to the Whitewater River. The City understands the importance of minimizing light pollution to protect nocturnal and crepuscular species and their ecological processes. The IS/MND is consistent with the City's lighting standards as outlined in the Municipal Code and the General Plan, which emphasize responsible lighting practices that reduce impacts on wildlife and preserve night sky quality. In response to your recommendations, the City has revised Mitigation Measure BIO-6 to strengthen the requirements for shielding, directing, and minimizing lighting impacts. These revisions will ensure that future development within the Specific Plan area follows best practices for nighttime lighting to protect sensitive species and habitats near the Whitewater River. Comment Letter #6 CALIFORNIA STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, GOVERNOR California Department of Transportation DISTRICT 8 464 WEST 4TH STREET SAN BERNARDINO CA, 92401 (909) 925-7520 www.dot.ca.gov June 23, 2025 City of La Quinta Planning Division Attn: Cheri Flores 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. C** a6lww. I& Route & Postmile #: SR 10 / 52.094 Cross Street: Multiple GTS ID: 36629 SCH #: 2025050964 Subject: Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan and Development Code MND LDR Response The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Local Development Review (LDR) Branch has completed its review of the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Highway 1 1 1 Corridor Specific Plan and Development Code. This review involved a thorough evaluation of the proposed project's potential impacts on the state transportation system, including considerations related to traffic operations, safety, and compliance with applicable state regulations. Caltrans' assessment ensures that necessary mitigation measures are identified to minimize any adverse effects on regional mobility and public safety as the Specific Plan advances toward implementation. The City of La Quinta is developing a Highway 1 1 1 Corridor Specific Plan and Development Code to transform a key two-mile retail corridor —responsible for 75% of the City's sales tax —into a vibrant, mixed -use area. The plan promotes integrated commercial, residential, and recreational development, supported by improved infrastructure and transportation access, including Highway 1 1 1 and the Coachella Valley Link. The Development Code provides location -specific standards and land use guidelines. Replacing previous plans, this initiative aligns with the City's General Plan and aims to enhance connectivity, encourage economic growth, and improve overall quality of life. We applaud the City of La Quinta for taking proactive and forward -thinking steps to support multimodal and transit -oriented development. By prioritizing integrated transportation options and mixed -use planning, the City is fostering a more accessible, sustainable, and vibrant community. These efforts not only enhance mobility and reduce reliance on single -occupancy vehicles but also promote economic vitality, improve public health, and contribute to a higher quality of life for residents and visitors alike. "Improving lives and communities through transportation" Based on the information provided, we are submitting the following comments and recommendations for your consideration: Loi N Comment 6-1 3 4. 5. Sy. 2. Comment 6-2 3. 0 .Ul VCV=1Vf.J111C111 1%CV1=VV Public Transit - We encourage the City of La Quinta to continue its strong coordination with SunLine Transit Agency to ensure the Highway 1 1 1 Corridor remains accessible and well- connected via public transit. Ongoing collaboration will be essential to developing a truly multimodal transportation network that supports current and future transit needs, reduces traffic congestion, and enhances mobility for all users, including residents, workers, and visitors. Future Developments - We encourage the City of La Quinta to continue supporting future mixed -use and high -density residential development within and around the Specific Plan area. Such efforts are key to reducing VMT and advancing more sustainable, efficient land use patterns that align with regional housing and climate goals. Bicycle Connectivity - We encourage the City of La Quinta to strengthen connections between the Specific Plan area and the existing bike lane network to promote active transportation. Enhancing bicycle infrastructure will support increased ridership among employees and visitors, reduce vehicle dependency, and contribute to a more sustainable and accessible community. Bike Parking and End -of -Trip Facilities - To support and encourage bicycle commuting, the project should incorporate secure bike parking —such as racks and lockers —at key destinations throughout the Specific Plan area. Additionally, providing end -of -trip amenities like showers and changing facilities at workplaces will further promote cycling as a practical and convenient mode of transportation. VMT Mitigation Measures - Property owners, building owners, and tenants are encouraged to implement VMT reduction measures the maximum extent feasible, in order to support sustainability goals and reduce VMT. 01V111 r U1111111 Section 2.0 - Project Description (PDF pp. 19-30) - The Project Description highlights Highway 1 1 1 as a "major arterial corridor," promoting walkability and multimodal improvements. However, no details are provided on how access modifications or development impacts to SR-1 11, especially at key intersections like Jefferson and Washington Streets, will be managed. It is recommended that the MND specify whether access or signal timing will be modified and clarify whether this would require Caltrans coordination. Section 3.17 - Transportation (PDF pp. 154-160); Appendix G - The MND claims VMT reductions due to mixed -use development but fails to quantify VMT or compare against regional significance thresholds, as required under SB 743. A quantified VMT analysis using SCAG or Caltrans screening tools should be included. ---Reference the regional SCAG thresholds and provide modeled estimates, not just qualitative assumptions. Section 2.5 - Mobility & Access Framework (PDF pp. 23-25); Section 3.17 - Transportation (p. 158) - While promoting walkability and CV Link integration, the plan lacks measurable multimodal performance standards. Recommend referencing Caltrans Smart Mobility Framework, LTS indicators for cycling, and Complete Streets design standards such as protected bike lanes or sidewalk coverage targets. Section 2.0 - Project Description (pp. 21-22); Appendix G - Transportation - Freight operations are not addressed despite the corridor's commercial character. The MND should evaluate freight circulation and propose conflict mitigation strategies between trucks and pedestrians. This includes loading zone locations, delivery time restrictions, and any applicable freight "Improving lives and communities through transportation" 5. Comment 6-2 (cont.) Comment 6-3 Comment 6-4 designation on SR-1 11. Appendix G - Cumulative Impacts (Section 21) - Although cumulative impacts are dismissed, the Plan increases urban density and potentially impacts SHS operations. The MND should acknowledge and coordinate with SCAG's Connect SoCal RTP/SCS, CVAG's CV Link Implementation Plan, and Caltrans' DSMP for SR-1 1 1 to assess growth impacts more comprehensively. tquitall Access If any Caltrans facilities are impacted by the project, they must comply with American Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards upon project completion. Additionally, the project must ensure the maintenance of bicycle and pedestrian access throughout the construction phase. These access considerations align with Caltrans' equity mission to provide a safe, sustainable, and uitable transportation network for all users. Caltrans Encroachment Permit Please be advised that any permanent work or temporary traffic control that encroaches onto Caltrans' R/W requires a Caltrans-issued encroachment permit. For information regarding the Encroachment Permit application and submittal requirements, contact: Caltrans Office of Encroachment Permits 464 West 4th Street, Basement, MS 619 San Bernardino, CA 92401-1400 (909) 383-4526 D8.E-permits@dot.ca.gov https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic-operations/ep Important Note: All new permit applications must now be submitted through our new CEPS Online Portal at: https://ceps.dot.co.gov/ At this time, no further review from the LDR Branch is required. Please be advised that LDR's point of contact role will conclude upon the completion of the development entitlement process. Once project is entitled, the Encroachment Permit Office will serve as the primary point of contact moving forward. Thank you again for including Caltrans in the review process. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, or for future notifications and requests for review of new projects, please email LDR-D8@dot.ca.aov or call 909-925-7520. Sincerely, Janki Patel Branch Chief - Local Development Review Division of Transportation Planning Caltrans District 8 "Improving lives and communities through transportation" 3 Response to Comment Letter #6, Caltrans, June 23, 2025 Comment 6-1: The City appreciates Caltrans' comments and support for the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan and its goals to advance sustainable, multimodal, and transit -oriented development. Ongoing coordination with SunLine Transit Agency remains a priority to ensure continued connectivity and accessibility. The Specific Plan emphasizes mixed -use and high -density development, enhanced bicycle infrastructure, and active transportation options to support sustainability, housing, and climate goals. The City also supports incorporating secure bike parking, end -of -trip facilities, and feasible VMT reduction measures to reduce vehicle dependency and promote more sustainable travel choices. Comment 6-2: The Specific Plan will have no impact on the State Highway System. Although the roadway is still referred to as "SR 111" in La Quinta, it is no longer part of the State Highway System, having been relinquished to the City in 2008. The continued use of the "SR 111" designation is due to an agreement between the County of Riverside and the Cities of Cathedral City, Coachella, Indian Wells, Indio, La Quinta, and Palm Desert to maintain the signage for consistency and driver orientation along the original alignment. The nearest segment of SR 111 that remains part of the State Highway System is located in Cathedral City, approximately 13 miles away — well beyond the area where the Specific Plan would have any influence on traffic operations. As this is a planning -level document, specific access or signal modifications are not yet determined. Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b)(4), the selection of VMT thresholds and methodologies is at the discretion of the lead agency. The City has carefully considered its approach and determined that the use of a qualitative analysis is appropriate for this planning -level document. It is important to note that the project area is located within a low VMT area — defined as generating less than 85% of the regional jurisdictional baseline — based on the Riverside County VMT model (see: Riverside VMT Model Webmap). In addition, land use forecasting shows that anticipated development in the corridor will generate less traffic than what is currently assumed in the City's General Plan. The City appreciates Caltrans' recommendations but maintains that the methodology used in the IS/MND is consistent with CEQA and appropriate for this stage of planning. Additionally, the City acknowledges Caltrans' suggestion to incorporate measurable multimodal performance standards and references such as the Smart Mobility Framework, Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) indicators, and Complete Streets design guidance. This feedback is noted for consideration in future planning and project -level design efforts. The City recognizes the suggestion to address freight circulation and potential conflicts with pedestrians along SR-111. While this planning -level document does not include a detailed freight analysis, the recommendation is noted for future project -level planning and design. While the Specific Plan proposes increased urban densities, the City sees this as a positive outcome — consistent with Caltrans' own acknowledgment in Bullet #2 under Local Development Review. Higher -density, mixed -use development supports reduced VMT and more sustainable, multimodal travel. As a planning -level document, the IS/MND evaluates impacts at a programmatic scale. The City acknowledges the recommendation to reference regional plans and will consider these in future project -level efforts. Comment 6-3: The City understands the need to comply with ADA standards for any impacted Caltrans facilities and to maintain bicycle and pedestrian access during construction. These considerations will be addressed in future project planning and implementation. We note, however, that there are no Caltrans facilities in the area affected by the Specific Plan (see response to Comment 6-2 regarding the relinquishment) and we do not anticipate any effects on Caltrans facilities. Comment 6-4: The City acknowledges that any permanent work or temporary traffic control within Caltrans' right-of-way will require a Caltrans-issued encroachment permit. This requirement will be advised for future project implementation. We note, however, that there are no Caltrans facilities in the area affected by the Specific Plan (see response to Comment 6-2 regarding the relinquishment) and we do not anticipate any encroachment onto Caltrans rights -of -way.