Loading...
CC Resolution 1988-110^!7I CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 88-110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THAT THE SUPPLEMENTAL FOCUSED EIR PREPARED FOR PGA WEST SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 83-002, AMENDMENT NO. 1, IS RECOGNIZED AS ADEQUATE AND COMPLETE PGA WEST SPECIFIC PLAN NO 83-002, AMENDMENT NO. 1 LANDMARK LAND COMPANY, INC. WHEREAS, a Supplemental EIR focused on traffic generation/circulation has been prepared and circulated, pursuant to the requirement of California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 hereinafter CEQA"), as amended, and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, as amended; and WHEREAS, the City Council certified the original EIR for PGA West Specific Plan No. 83-002 as adequate and complete including the adoption of Statements of Overriding Consideration'11 and CEQA Findings and Statement of Facts" with the adoption of Council Resolution No. 84-28; and WHEREAS, it is the policy of the State of California and the City of La Quinta, in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended Public Resources Code, Section 12000 et seq.), and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, as amended California Administrative Code, Section 15000 et seq.), that the City shall not approve a project unless there is no feasible way to lessen or avoid significant effects; meaning all impacts have been avoided to the extent feasible or substantially lessened and any remaining unavoidable significant impacts are acceptable based on CEQA, Section 15093; and WHEREAS, it is the policy of the State of California and the City of La Quinta, in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et seq.), and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, as amended California Administrative Code, Section 15000 et seq.), that the City shall balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks prior to project approval: meaning that if the benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered acceptable; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta has read and considered all environmental documentation comprising the original EIR and Supplemental Focused EIR, has found that the original EIR and Supplemental EIR considers all 1- BJ/RESOCC.016 BIB] 07-08-1998-U01 11:08:35AM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CCRES-U02 88-U02 110-U02 ^!7Ipotentially significant environmental impacts of the proposed amendment, as complete and adequate and fully complies with all requirements of CEQA, and the State Guidelines for implementation; and WHEREAS, the Supplemental Focused EIR addressed the traffic/circulation issues associated with the proposed amendment to increase the number of hotel rooms from 650 to 1000; and WHEREAS, prior to action on the amendment the City Council has considered all significant impacts, mitigation measures and the original project alternatives identified in the original EIR, has found that all potentially significant impacts on the amendment request have been lessened to the extent feasible; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act and the State CEQA Guidelines provide that no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been completed and which identifies one or more significant effects of the project unless the public agency makes written findings for each of the significant effects, accompanied by a Statement of Facts supporting each finding. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lia Quinta does hereby certify the Supplemental Focused EIR as adequate and complete. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of La Quinta, in addition to findings made in the body of the Final EIR makes the Statements of Overriding Considerations as shown on attached Exhibit A" entitled Statements of Overriding Considerations", which exhibit is incorporated herein as though set forth at length. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on this 20th day of September, 1988, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Bohnenberger, Cox, Pena, Sniff NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Mayor Hoyle z,'*; WILLIAM R. HOYLE, Mayor City of La Quinta ATTEST: 2- BJ/RESOCC. 016 BIB] 07-08-1998-U01 11:08:35AM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CCRES-U02 88-U02 110-U02 ^!7I UNDRA L. JUHOLA, ity Clerk City of La Quint* BR T, City Attorney City of L* Quinta 3- BJ/RESOCC. 016 BIB] 07-08-1998-U01 11:08:35AM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CCRES-U02 88-U02 110-U02 ^!7I EXHIBIT A" CEQA FINDINGS AND STATEMENT OF FACTS BACKGROUND The California Environmental Quality Act CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines Guidelines) promulgated pursuant thereto provide: No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact report has been completed and which identifies one or more significant effects of the project unless the public agency makes one or more of the following written findings for each of the significant effects, accompanied by a statement of facts supporting each finding. The possible findings are: 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR. 2. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. 3. Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR Section 15091 of the Guidelines). The City of La Quinta approved the original PGA West project and the original EIR prepared for the project. The EIR identified certain significant effects which may occur as a result of the project, or on a cumulative basis in conjunction with the project and other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects. The City in approving this project adopted Statements of Overriding Considerations" and CEQA Findings and Statements of Facts". The proposed Amendment to increase the number of hotel units from 650 to 1000 and increase the hotel height from four to six stories was reviewed through the preparation of the initial study. The City identified traffic/circulation as the only environmental impact. This conclusion was based upon the fact that all other environmental impacts were identified, addressed, or mitigated through the original certified EIR. SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS WHICH CANNOT BE AVOIDED IF THE AMENDMENT IS IMPLEMENTED. Traffic/Circulation 4- BJ/RESOCC. 016 BIB] 07-08-1998-U01 11:08:35AM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CCRES-U02 88-U02 110-U02 ^!7IThe Supplemental Focused EIR identified the following circulation impacts: 1. The proposed project will generate an estimated 8,020 average daily two-way motor vehicle trips when completed. 2. The proposed project will generate 800 evening peak hour trips 400 inbound and 400 outbound) when fully occupied. 3. The project will cause a LOS change on 4 of the 29 links analyzed. 4. Only one link State Route 111 west of Jefferson Street) will experience a significant adverse impact i.e., a drop in the daily LOS from D to E) in conjunction with development on-site. 5. Project-related traffic will cause three intersections to experience a drop in the level of service during peak travel hours. 6. The peak hour levels of service at the critical intersections can be mitigated to the extent that LOS D or better is provided with the project is complete. 7. Traffic signal warrants will be met at five intersections with 2003+PGA West+project traffic volumes. 8. Cumulative traffic projections are expected to exceed the LOS C design capacity on one link in the vicinity and the project will contribute incrementally to adverse cumulative impacts on this link as well as others in the vicinity. 9. The proposed project will generate an estimated 40,195 daily vehicle mile so travel when completed. Findings 1. changes, alterations, and other measures have been made in or incorporated into the Amendment, or are otherwise being implemented, which will mitigate these impacts to a level of insignificance. 2. Most significant environmental effects that can be feasibly avoided have been eliminated or substantially reduced by virtue of mitigation measures in the Final Supplemental EIR or otherwise incorporated into the conditions of approval of the Specific Plan. 5- BJ/RESOCC.016 BIB] 07-08-1998-U01 11:08:35AM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CCRES-U02 88-U02 110-U02