Loading...
CC Resolution 1988-111^!7O CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 88-111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS, AND APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN 83-002, AMENDMENT *1. PGA WEST SPECIFIC PLAN 83-002, AMENDMENT *1; LANDMARK LAND COMPANY, INC. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Specific Plan No. 83-002, pursuant to Section 65500 et seq. of the California Government Code, and transmitted the same to the City Council in compliance with Section 65502 of said Law; and, WHEREAS, the City Council held at least one Public Hearing on Specific Plan No. 83-002, as required by Section 65503 of the California Government Code; and, WHEREAS, on May 1, 1984, the La Quinta City Council certified the EIR for PGA West Specific Plan No. 83-002 Council Resolution No. 84-28) as adequate and complete, adopting Statements of Overriding Considerations", adopted CEQA Findings and Statements of Facts"; and, WHEREAS, the PGA West Specific Plan No. 83-002 requested and was approved for 400 hotel rooms and 250 apartment/condominiums/hotel rooms, therefore, permitting the Applicant to construct 650 hotel rooms, or up to 250 apartments or condominiums with 400 hotel rooms; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the PGA West Specific Plan No. 83-002 Council Resolution No. 84-31) on May 15, 1984, subject to conditions; and, WHEREAS, a Condition of Approval adopted by the City Council limited the height of the hotel complex and related buildings within the Village Core to a maximum height of four stories; and WHEREAS, Landmark Land Company, Inc. has requested an amendment to said Specific Plan to add 350 additional hotel rooms and increase the hotel height from four stories to six stories; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 23rd day of August, 1988, hold a duly-noticed Public Hearing recommending confirmation of the environmental determination and approval of the requested Specific Plan No. 83-002, Amendment *1 to permit 350 additional 1- BJ/RESOCC. 014 BIB] 07-08-1998-U01 02:44:25PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CCRES-U02 88-U02 111-U02 ^!7Ohotel rooms and increasing the hotel height from four to six stories; and, WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did on the 20th day of September, 1988, hold a duly-noticed Public Hearing to consider the Applicant's request and recommendation of the Planning Commission concerning the environmental determination and Specific Plan No. 83-002, Amendment *1; and WHEREAS, said Specific Plan Amendment complies with the requirements of The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" County of Riverside, Resolution No. 82-213, adopted by reference in City of La Quinta Ordinance No. 5), in that the Planning Director had prepared a supplemental EIR focused on traffic generation/circulation; and, WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and considered the original Environmental Impact Report and supplemental focused EIR; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts and reasons to justify the approval of said Specific Plan Amendment: 1. Specific Plan No. 83-002, Amendment No. 1, is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan in that they encourage the provision for hotel and tourist-related uses. 2. The said Amendment increases the number of hotel rooms by 350 and the height by two stories. 3. The development of the amended project, as conditioned, will be compatible with the surrounding area. 4. The Specific Plan was originally envisioned and considered by the City to function as a major residential, recreational, and resort project oriented around golf and tennis. 5. The Specific Plan approval contained conditions to ensure among other things, consistency with the General Plan and mitigation of environmental consequences. 6. The Specific Plan EIR was certified as adequate and complete. Said certification contained the adoption of Statements of Overriding Considerations" and CEQA Findings and Statements of Facts". 7. The supplemental EIR, focused on traffic generation/circulation, identified circulation impacts 2- BJ/RESOCC.0l4 BIB] 07-08-1998-U01 02:44:25PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CCRES-U02 88-U02 111-U02 ^!7O and mitigation measures which will reduce the potentially significant circulation impacts associated with the proposed amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve the Specific Plan No. 83-002, Amendment No. 1, for reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached conditions Exhibit A). PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 20th day of September, 1988, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Bohnenberger, Cox, Pena, Sniff NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Mayor Hoyle WILLIAM R. HOYLE, Mayor La Quinta, California SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: City of L Quinta, California 3- BJ/RESOCC. 014 BIB] 07-08-1998-U01 02:44:25PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CCRES-U02 88-U02 111-U02 ^!7O CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 88-111 RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL EXHIBIT A AUGUST 23, 1988 1. Condition No. 23: The Applicant/Developer shall prepare a traffic study one year after the opening of the PGA West Hotel the intersection/streets identified in the original EIR shall be addresses). The Traffic Study shall include traffic generated from the total PGA West project i.e. existing residential units, club houses, future residential developments, hotel) and shall contain percentage associated with each impact/improvement. Should the results of the study indicate that traffic signals are warranted, the Applicant/Developer shall pay its share of the signal cost based upon the percentages identified in the Traffic Study. A letter of credit shall be provided, prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, in an amount recommended by the City Engineer to ensure that the traffic study and installation of the traffic signals will be provided. Should the required traffic study indicate that the signal warrants are not met, the Applicant/Developer shall conduct annual warrant studies to determine when the signals are needed. Upon the need for the signals, the Applicant/Developer shall participate in its share of the signal costs as noted above. In addition, when the signal warrants are met at the intersection of Avenue 54 and Jefferson, the Applicant/Developer shall pay for the installation of the signal. The City may establish a reimbursement agreement for this signal. The Applicant/Developer shall pay for an annual 24-hour traffic count program, for each impacted road and intersection with roadway improvements triggered when threshold values are reached. The Applicant/Developer shall pay for its share of the improvement required based upon its project-related traffic generation impact as identified by the percentages in the above mentioned Traffic Study. The implementation of this condition is to be administered by the City Engineer, acting upon his technical discretion. 2. Condition No. 25 of City Council Resolution No. 84-31 is hereby rescinded and deleted. 3. Condition No. 34 of City Council Resolution No. 84-31: Height limitation shall be as specified for the original Specific Plan, except as follows: a. The portion of the area designated for six-story 72 feet) height south of the Airport Boulevard alignment shall be deleted. BJ/CONAPRVL. 009 BIB] 07-08-1998-U01 02:44:25PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CCRES-U02 88-U02 111-U02 ^!7O b. All residential units shall be limited to a maximum of two stories, not to exceed 35 feet. C. The hotel shall be limited to a maximum height of six stories; and the other related buildings, not attached to the hotel, within the Village Core shall be limited to two stories. 4. Condition No. 38.i. of City Council Resolution 84-31 is hereby modified to read as follows: The Applicant shall provide an access road, pursuant to the Uniform Fire Code for the hotel. In lieu of access roads on all sides of the hotel building, the Applicant may provide: o Full access on one complete side of the building, which includes provisions for aerial apparatus operations at strategic locations; and, o Installation of a complete Life Safety Support System1' for high-rise occupancies. NOTE: All of the other conditions of approval for the PGA West Specific Plan still apply unless amended above. BJ/CONAPRVL. 009 BIB] 07-08-1998-U01 02:44:25PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CCRES-U02 88-U02 111-U02