Loading...
CC Resolution 1990-075^#=n CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 90-75 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, EXPRESSING OPPOSITION TO PROPOSITION 128-ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT. WHEREAS; Proposition 128, entitled the Environmental Protection Act of 1990 The Hayden Initiative) will appear on the November 6 general election ballot; and WHEREAS; this extremely complex 39 page measure covers a broad spectrum of complex issues including global warming, energy, ozone depletion, water supply and treatment, mandatory stormwater run-off control, food production, timber, refrigeration, air conditioning, off shore oil drilling, establishment of the elected office of Environmental Advocate and many other. issues; and WHEREAS; the initial estimates by the nonpartisan independent Legislative Analyst indicate Proposition 128 would cost nearly $3 billion with additioiial unknown costs" to state and local taxpayers; and whereas nongovernmental independent economic experts estimate taxpayer costs could run as high as $12 billion; and WHEREAS; according to economic reports California consumer prices would increase significantly for energy, transportation, food and water; including a 30% increase in food prices, a 20% increase in electricity rates and up to a 60 cent per gallon increase in the price of gasoline; and WHEREAS; the California economy, consumers and taxpayers cannot afford these increases, especially those on fixed incomes, seniors, small businesses, single parents and the poor who would be hardest hit; and WHEREAS; Proposition 128 would grant broad enforcement authority over all environmental and public health laws to a single individual, independent from the Governor, Legislature and local governments; and WHEREAS; Tom Hayden, an author and campaign chairman is widely reported to be seeking the office of Environmental Advocate; and WHEREAS; Proposition 128 would create the potential for thousands of lawsuits against state and local governments and its bounty provision would allow members of radical groups like EARTH FIRST to personally share in any awards from successful lawsuits at taxpayer's expense; and BIB] 07-29-1998-U01 02:51:42PM-U01 CCRES-U02 90-75-U02 ^#=n RESOLUTION NO. 90-75 WHEREAS; there are too many important complex issues in Proposition 128 to be voted on together we need to take a rational approach1 one that examines issues concerning California's vital natural resources air, water, forests, food and coastline independently; and WHEREAS; protecting the environment is an absolute necessity, but Proposition 128 costs too much, tries to do too much and may cause more problems than it solves; and WHEREAS; a growing coalition of concerned organizations and individuals including the California Chamber of Commerce, Agricultural Council of California, California Taxpayers' Association, American Council on Science and Health, California Manufacturers Association, Association of California Water Agencies, California Municipal Utilities Association, California Cattlemen's Association, California Women For Agriculture, and Mother's Watch and many others are in opposition to Proposition 128; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THE City of La Quinta, California opposes the Proposition 128, The Hayden Initiative Environmental Protection Act of 1990) on the November 6, 1990 ballot. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 2nd day of October, 1990, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council *embers Bohnenberger, Sniff & Mayor Pena NOES: Council r*rnber Rushworth ABSENT: One Vacancy) ABSTAIN: None City of L*Q*'uinta, California *AUNDRA L. JUHOLA,**i*ty Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: Attorney City of La Quinta, California BIB] 07-29-1998-U01 02:51:42PM-U01 CCRES-U02 90-75-U02