CC Resolution 1992-059^"Bp U
RESOLUTION 92-59
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA
QUINTA, CALIFORNIA FINDING THAT THE CITY OF LA
QUINTA HAS NO ASSISTED HOUSING UNITS AT RISK OF
LOSING USE RESTRICTIONS.
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65583, as amended by Chapter
1451, Statutes of 1989, and Chapter 889, Statutes of 1991, requires cities and
counties to prepare an analysis and program efforts by July 1, 1992, for the
preservation of use controls on assisted housing developments; and
WHEREAS, the City staff has reviewed and analyzed all potential units
in the City at risk of losing use restrictions, and pursuant to such review and
analysis has contacted the United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development, California Department of Housing and Community Development
1'HCD"), Riverside County Housing Authority and Economic Development Agency,
appropriate City staff, private developers and managers of assisted housing in the
City of La Quinta; and
WHEREAS, as a result of such review and analysis the City has
determined that twenty-three single family housing units in the City have
restrictions imposed in connection with FmHA Section 515 and HUD Section 8 contract
subsidies, including six single family housing units which were identified and
brought to the attention of the City by HCD; and
WHEREAS, the City is not required pursuant to Government Code
Section 85583 to make any analysis or program efforts with respect to single family
housing units; and
WHEREAS, the City has not issued mortgage revenue bonds, has not
approved any housing units pursuant to a density bonus, does not have an in-lieu
housing fee or inclusionary housing program, and has not assisted multi-family
housing with funds from the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency or Community
Development Block Grant program; and
WHEREAS, the City has completed the analysis checklist which was
submitted to the City by HCD, and which is attached hereto as Attachment A, and
finds as a result thereof that there are no units at risk of losing use restrictions
pursuant to Government Code Section 65583 A) 8); and
WHEREAS, the City has been informed by HCD, in its pubilcation
entitled Housing Element Analysis: Preservation of Assisted Units", dated
November 15, 1991, that in the event the City has no affected units the City must
adopt either an amendment to the Housing Element of the City's General Plan or a
finding adopted by resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Councfl of the City
of La Quinta as follows:
RESOCC. 054 1
BIB]
08-04-1998-U01
02:41:40PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
92-U02
59-U02
^"Bp 1
Section 1. The City Council finds that there are no subsidized housing
units at risk of losing use restrictions within the meaning of Government Code
Section 65583.
Section 2. The basis for the above finding shall be reexamined at the
time of the next periodic update of the Housing Element of the City's General Plan,
and if still valid, shall be incorporated into the Housing Element at that time.
Section 3. The City Clerk and the Planning Director shall transmit a
copy of this resolution to the California Department of Housing and Community
Development.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La
Quinta City Council, held on this 16th day of June, 1992, by the following vote, to
wit:
AYES: Council Members Franklin, Sniff and Mayor Pena
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Members Bohnenberger & Rushworth
ABSTAIN: None
JO yor
City of La Quin a, California
A
Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM
DAWN HONEYWELL, *ity Atto?ney
City of La Quinta, California
RESOCC. 054 2
BIB]
08-04-1998-U01
02:41:40PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
92-U02
59-U02
^"Bp * a
ATTACHMENT A"
CHECKLIST TO CONFIRM LACK OF AT-RISK UNITS
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65583(A) 8)
Jurisdiction: City of La Quinta Date: June 16, 1992
1. HUDpro*ams;
Section 8 Lower-Income Rental Assistance project-based programs:
New Construction
Substantial or Moderate Rehabilitation
Property Disposition
Loan Management Set-Aside
Section 101 Rent Supplements
Section 213 Cooperative Housing Insurance
Section 221(d) 3) Below-Market Interest-Rate Mortgage Insurance Program
Section 236 Interest Reduction Payment Program
Section 202 Direct Loans for Elderly or Handicapped
X There are no such units for our jurisdiction listed in the Inventory of
Federally Subsidized Rental Units At Risk of Conversion, 1990 or
subsequent updated information made available by HPD. * 1)
Units for our jurisdiction in the above inventory are not at risk during
the ten-year analysis period; no units are at risk until year).
2. Community Development Block Grant program CDBG)
Jurisdiction has not used CDBG funds
x Jurisdiction has not used CBDG funds for multifamily rental units
Although CDBG funds have been used for multifamily rental
rehabilitation, staff responsible for this program indicate there are no
affected units because
3. Redevelopment pro*rams
Jurisdiction does not have a redevelopment agency
x Redevelopment funds have not been used on multifamily rental units;
or
RESOCC. 054 3
BIB]
08-04-1998-U01
02:41:40PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
92-U02
59-U02
^"Bp 5
Although redevelopment funds have been used for multifamily rental
units, staff responsible for this program indicate there are no affected
units because:
a. Income-restrictions for occupancy were not required for existing
units, or
b. Otherreasons:
4 FmHA Section 515 Rural Rental Housing Loans
Jurisdiction has not been located in a qualifying rural FmHA area.
x According to information made available by HPD, there are no such
eligible projects reported by FmHA within the community or
unincorporated area
FmHA staff checked the status of development(s)
and reported that it is not eligible for prepayment or not eligible for
prepayment within the ten year analysis period.
5. State and local multifamily revenue bond programs
No bond financed units eligible to terminate affordability controls within
the next ten years were reported in the following publication: 1990
Annual Summary: The Use of Housing Revenue Bond Proceeds,
California Debt Advisory Commission and
x Local housing authority staff indicate there are no such units within the
community.
6. Local in-lieu fee pro*rams or inclusionary programs
Jurisdiction has not had an in-lieu fee or inclusionary program
x Staff responsible for these programs indicate no affected units
7. Developments which obtained a density bonus and direct government
assistance pursuant to Government Code Section 65916.
Jurisdiction has no projects approved pursuant to this law
x Staff responsible for this program indicate no affected units
8 Additional comments related to any of the above:
* 1) Those units identified by HPD are a* single family units.
REsocc. 054 4
BIB]
08-04-1998-U01
02:41:40PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
92-U02
59-U02