The URL can be used to link to this page

SP 1983-002 PGA West (2008) - Amendment 6PGA WEST APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON ci(- 'j - 0'5 BY -i o uorf .. 0ATE R0 2VO s 2 -c - NO, -00 Z- "i SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT VI Eden Rock @ PGA West CROWNE POINT PARTNERS, LLC 8905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON, OR 97008 THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVED BY PLANNYING COMMISSION ON--o� By .W�w..DATE RESO k _. _z -co -3 CASE kill November 5, 2007 May 2, 2008 P.O. Box 1504 LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92247-1504 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO (760) 777-7000 LA QUIN`fA, CALIFORNIA 92253 FAX (760) 777-7101 Mr. Louis Swart Pacific Santa Fe Corporation 8905 SW Nimbus Avenue, Suite 400 Beaverton, OR 97008 SUBJECT: City Council Action of 4/15/08, on Eden Rock at PGA West Project Dear Mr. Swart: This is to formally notify you that on April 15, 2008, the La Quinta City Council did grant approval of the subject item. This action was taken via the following: • Adoption of Resolution 2008-24, by a 3-1 vote, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Eden Rock at PGA West project; • Adoption of Resolution 2008-25, by a 4-0 vote, approving General Plan Amendment 2006-107, from TC to RMU; • Adoption of Ordinance 456, by a 4-0 vote, approving Zone Change 2006-127, from CT to CT/RSP; • Adoption of Resolution 2008-26, by a 4-0 vote, approving Specific Plan 83-002, Amendment #6; • Adoption of Resolution 2008-27, by a 4-0 vote, approving Tentative Tract 33226; • Adoption of Resolution 2008-28, by a 4-0 vote, approving Site Development Permit 2006-852, and; • Adoption of Ordinance 457, by a 4-0 vote, approving Development Agreement 2006-011. These actions were taken subject to the staff -recommended modifications to conditions as previously adopted by the Planning Commission for Specific Plan 83-002, Amendment #6, Tentative Tract 33226, and Site Development Permit 2006-852. The final approval conditions, as adopted by the City Council via these actions, are enclosed. Signed copies of the adopting Resolutions should be available through the City Clerk's Office within one week from the date of this letter. Please be advised that the City will file the Notice of Determination for the EIR (SCF! #2007061056) along with the AB 3158 fee (pursuant to Fish and Game Code 711.4) which you previously provided, upon completion of the Development Agreement, as stipulated in the adopting Resolutions and record of project action. Please also note that, as per the adopting Resolutions, this approval is not effective until such time as the Development Agreement (Ordinance #457) has been executed by all parties, and recorded with the Riverside CountyRecorder's Office. At present, Ordinances 456 (Zone Change) and 457 (DA) are now scheduled for 2"d readings before the City Council on May 20, 2008, pending a final Development Agreement. Should you have any questions regarding this information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 760-777-7069, or via email at wnesbit(a-)_la-quinta.orq. Very truly yours, 61c./G6 I/- _I&1 - Wallace Nesbit Principal Planner WN/wn Enclosure c: Mr. George Robertson, Pacific Santa Fe Corp. Mr. Chris Hentzen, GMA, Inc. Mr. Chris Bergh, MDS Consulting Mr. Gavin Adamson, Scheurer Architect Mr. Rick Zeilenga, Stowell, Zeilenga, Ruth, Vaughn & Treiger, LLP Les Johnson, Planning Director Ed Wimmer, Principal Engineer City Clerk's Office Case files: GPA 2006-107; ZC 2006-127; SPA 83-002 #6; TT 33226; SDP 2006-852; DA 2006-011 FILE COPY RESOLUTION NO. 2008-026 EXHIBIT "A" CONDITIONS OF APPPOVAL - FINAL SPECIFIC PLAN 83-002, AMENDMENT NO. 6 EDEN ROCK AT PGA WEST APRIL 15, 2008 GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Specific Plan 83-002, Amendment No. 6, for the Eden Rock at PGA West project, shall be developed in compliance with these conditions, and the associated Specific Plan Amendment No. 6 document. In the event of any conflicts between these conditions and the provisions of said document, these conditions shall take precedence. The Amendment No. 6 document applies only to the Eden Rock site within Planning Area III, as previously established in the provisions of Specific Plan 83-002, Amendment No. 4 as approved. The provisions of Amendment No. 4 shall remain in effect for the balance of the PGA West Specific Plan area. 2. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta (the "City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Specific Plan or any application thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. 3. All changes to the Specific Plan which are required under these conditions shall be made in a revised document to ensure consistency. All other applicable conditions of approval as listed in Condition No. 4, shall be incorporated into the final Specific Plan document for SP 83-002, Amendment No. 6 as appendices. The document shall be accompanied by a complete itemized listing of every change made to the document, citing the location in the document where the change occurs, and showing both the previous condition and its revision. The project proponent shall submit five (5) copies of the final Specific Plan documents within 30 days .of City Council approval of the Specific Plan, or prior to issuance of a grading permit, whichever occurs later. 4. Specific Plan 83-002, Amendment No. 6, shall comply with all applicable conditions and/or mitigation measures for the following related approvals: • Subsequent EIR; SCH #2007061056 • Tentative Tract Map 32266 • Site Development Permit 2006-852 • Development Agreement 2006-011 Resolution No. 2008-026 Conditions of Approval - FINAL Specific Plan 83-002, Amendment #6 Crowne Pointe Partners. LLC April 15, 2008 Page 3 E. Revise Table 3, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, p. 27, to reflect revised project characteristics, to include reduction in story and building heights, revisions to Village unit count and plan/building configurations, parking space totals and per-unit spaces provided, elimination of Garden House and addition of two common pool lots and recreation Lot N. F. Exhibit 13, Page 32 shall be revised to show the Private Street as 29 feet in ROW width, consistent with TT 33226. G. Revise Parking Requirements section, p. 33 and 34, to reflect the project revisions. The January 24, 2007 RK Engineering parking study shall be incorporated into the document appendices. H. Replace Village Home elevation and information on p. 38. Replace "Multifamily" heading with "Village Townhomes" or similar identifier. 1. Revise Section 3.2.3, p. 39 and 40, to reflect elimination of Garden House and addition of two common pool lots and recreation Lot N. J. Table 5, Page 41 - The Phoenix Robeleni (Pygmy Date Palm) is under quarantine and may be used only if supplied from a local nursery. Include an approval of the master plant list from the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner's office and CVWD as part of the plant listing in the final Specific Plan Amendment document. K. Revise Section 4.2, p. 51, to reflect revisions to number of golf cart spaces and revise Section 4.3, p.51, to reflect revised open space provisions. Revise Section 4.4, p. 51, to reflect revise recreational amenities and removal of Garden House. L. Revise p. 52, Energy and Mineral Resources, to add that the project developer shall work with City staff to identify and incorporate enhanced energy conservation and efficiency measures, toward exceeding the minimum provisions of California Building Standards Code, Title 24. Resolution No. 2008-026 Conditions of Approval - FINAL Specific Plan 83-002, Amendment N6 Crowne Pointe Partners. LLC April 15, 2008 Page 4 M. Revise Appendix exhibits to reflect revised project approval for 264 units and revisions to the site and building plans. Additional appendices shall be incorporated into the Specific Plan Amendment document, as follows: • Final approved Development Agreement (DA 2006-011) • City Declaration of CC&R's; final signed version • Developer CC&R's; final signed version • Specific Plan Amendment No. 4 document (SP 83-002, Amendment No. 4), as approved October 3, 2000 All revisions shall be incorporated into the final specific plan document, to be submitted to the Planning Department for review and final acceptance by the Planning Director under the terms of Condition 3 preceding. 7. The final landscape plans shall reflect a significant effort to reduce the use of turf areas in all landscaping, common and private. Specifically, plans shall minimize or eliminate all turf areas adjacent to sidewalks and roadways. 8. All architectural design revisions to any residential or common area structure shall be reviewed through the ALRC and Planning Commission as a non- public hearing business item, unless determined otherwise by the Planning Director based on significance of the design revision. The Entry Gate and Guard House, and a revised Manor one-story duplex building plan, are specifically remanded back to the Planning Commission for further review and possible revision, prior to the building plan check process. The Manor one-story duplex building plan shall consider more architectural detailing and enhancement, particularly with respect to the front elevation. 9. The project developer shall work with City staff to identify and incorporate enhanced energy conservation and efficiency measures, toward exceeding the minimum provisions of California Building Standards Code, Title 24. Such measures shall be considered in all aspects of project implementation, from initial grading construction to landscaping installations. Planning t Landscape Architecture Entitlement t Environmental Specializing in Golf and Resort cornmunities March 24, 2008 City of La Quinta Community Development Department 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: Specific Plan `Amendment VI EdenRock at PGA West' November 5, 2007 Supplemental Letter This supplemental letter has been prepared due to time constraints to revise the Specific Plan Document and highlights the revision items. Due to the reduction of village home town -home units from 128 to 102 and site plan modifications the following table itemizes the Specific Plan Document revisions. Page # Section Existing SPD November 5, 2007 10 2.2.1 Table 1 290 Units 13 2.2.3 290 Units 16 Table 2 290 7 DU/AC 18 Exhibit 9 Site Plan 18 2.6 30.9% Open Space 27.9 % Active Main Pool and Clubhouse 19 Exhibit 10 Site Plan with Open Space Exhibit Table 3 Development 27/28 STDS. 32 Exhibit 13 Parking and 33 Requirements 34 Table 4 38 Multi -Family 39/40 3.2.3 51 4.3 Appendix Max Height 33743' Clock Tower Number of Stories 3 Open Area 30% Village Home Floor Plan and Unit S.F. 848 Total Spaces Covered 580 Guest 268 2.9 Spaces per Unit Parking Summary Village Homes Front Elevation Club Facility Site Planning Guidelines 31 % Open Space 28% Active Tentative Tract Map Exhibits 2700 Hewpor t t3hld_ Ste 190 He�t,pc,r t Hc<ic h, CA 92663 Phone: (919) 675 9.559 fan (919) 675 9552 e - rn,arl grnaDGAlAint1 net � Wehr7te: WVW G tftl inti nc.t Chanaes to SPD 264 Units 264 Units 264 6.3 DU/AC Updated Site Plan 28.5% Open Space 30.2% Active 2 Areas with Pools and Spas, No Clubhouse Updated Site Plan with Revised Open Space Calculations 29' No Clock Tower 2 Stories 28.50% Revised Floor Plan and Unit S.F. 756 Total Spaces Covered 477 Guest 279 2.86 Spaces per Unit Updated Parking Summary Village Homes Revised Front Elevation Remove section 28.5% Open Space 30% Active Updated Tentative Tract Map Exhibits Significant revisions include the following: • Page #18 Open Space Calculation 30.9% open space to 28.5% open space 27.9% active open space to 30.2% active open space The clubhouse facilities have been reduced at the main pool area and a secondary pool/recreation area has been incorporated into the project. • Page #27,28 Table 3 Development Standards Max height 33' with 43' clock tower to 29' max height, no clock tower Number of stories 2 to 3 stories max. • Page #33 Parking Requirements The Village Homes parking has been modified by proposing 2 bedroom units with 1 covered space with a golf cart space and 3 or more bedroom units with 2 covered spaces per unit. The parking proposed conforms to the RK Engineering Parking Study of August 14, 2007. The Parking Table on the following page illustrates the proposed parking for the EdenRock project. The revisions stated above will be incorporated into the Specific Plan Document as required in the conditions of approval. Sincerely, GMA aristzen Vice President PFiC}VDED P,W EPACS (PEER SPECIFIC MES COVERED SPACES(.GARAGE) 2 SPACES PER UNIT 83 UNITS x 2 -166 COVERED SPACES CLUM / OF Rk 2 UNIT PLAN 1 PIAN 2 3 PLAN 3 3 PLAN 4 3 SUBTOTAL PLAN 3A PLAN 1x/11IR 3 PLAN A3 3 PLAN A4 3 SUBTOTAL CL. sTo I PLAN 1X 1%R } � B. PLAN A3 3 PLAN A4 3 SUBTOTAL TOTAL COURTYARD HOMES i � r• ray T 7 14 7 14 7 14 7 14 -W / OCONERIED _ 15 30 7 14 7 14 _W_ f OF_COVERED i3 26 7 14 6 12 / � GUS 0 0 D 0 f OF GUEST SPACE 6 2 4 �OF fDNGUEST DRME4IAY� 2 2 0 T8 MNIR/rl HOLM COVERED SPACES (GARAGE) -TWO BEDROOMS 2 COVERED SPACES PER UNIT -THREE OR MORE BEDROOMS 2 COVERED SPACES PER UNIT 79 UNITS x 2 =158 COVERED SPACES f OF_Cgym_ OF GUEST SPACE PLAN 1 3 27 54 0 PLAN 2 3 27 54 0 PLAN 3 3 25 50 58 SUBTOTAL 79 T59 T6 COVERED SPACES (GARAGE) -TWO BEDROOMS 1.5 COVERED SPACES PER UNIT THREE OR MORE BEDROOMS 2 COVERED SPACES PER UNIT 128 UNITS x 2 =256 COVERED SPACES 511 PLAN 1A # OF B.R. 2 PLAN 1B 2 PLAN 1C 2 PLAN 2A 3 PLAN 2B 3 PLAN 3A 3 SUBTOTAL j OF COVERED 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 34 17 34 17 34 _Tw -T53' ri07A C =Bi2> QW I OF COVERED SPACES f OF GUEST SPACE f N OBBO Y) f OF GUEST PARKING BLDG. TYPE J OF UNDS COURTYARD HOMES 83 166 16 58 71 51 MANOR HOMES 79 VILLAGE HOMES 102 158 153 0 83 TOTAL. -2U47- X17 m TOTAL NUMBER OF 477 COVERED PARKING TOTAL NUMBER OF WEST PARKING 279 GRAND TOTAL PROVIDED 756 (756 SPACES/264 UNITS -2.86 SPACES PER UNIT) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...............................................................................1 1.2 PURPOSE AND INTENT................................................................................1 1.3 PROJECT REGIONAL SETTING....................................................................4 1.4 PROJECT LOCAL SETTING..........................................................................4 1.5 PROJECT HISTORY........................................................................................5 1.6 ENABLING LEGISLATION............................................................................6 1.7 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT COMPLIANCE ........... 6 2 PLANS, PROGRAMS AND GUIDELINES 2.1 COMMUNITY CONCEPT...............................................................................7 2. 1.1 Planning Area Breakdown.......................................................................... 8 2.1.2 HOA Structure.........................................................................9 2.2 LAND USE.....................................................................................................10 2.2.1 Land Use/General Plan Context.................................................................10 2.2.2 Existing General Plan/Land Use................................................................11 2.2.3 Proposed General Plan/Land Use...............................................................12 2.3 ZONING.........................................................................................................13 2.3.1 Existing Zoning.........................................................................................13 2.3.2 Proposed Zoning.......................................................................................14 2.4 THE MASTER PLAN OF LAND USE...........................................................14 2.4.1 Land Use By Planning Area......................................................................14 2.5 CIRCULATION PLAN..................................................................................17 2.5.1 Offsite Improvements................................................................................17 2.5.2 Onsite Improvements................................................................................17 2.5.3 Project Entry Concepts........................................................................18 2.6 CONSERVATION, OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PLAN ...................18 2.7 INFRASTRUCTURE.....................................................................................20 2.7.1 Water........................................................................................................ 20 2.7.2 Sanitary Sewage........................................................................................21 2.7.3 Storm Water Drainage...............................................................................21 2.7.4 Public Utilities...........................................................................................22 2.7.5 Refuse Collection......................................................................................22 2.7.6 Schools......................................................................................................22 2.7.7 Law Enforcement......................................................................................23 2.7.8 Fire Protection...........................................................................................23 2.7.9 City Administration...................................................................................23 2.7. 10 Library Facilities.....................................................................................24 3 ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 3.1 SPECIFIC PLAN OVERLAY DISTRICTS....................................................25 3. 1.1 Planning Area III — Eden Rock..................................................................26 3.2 PGA WEST COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES...................................35 11-05-07 3.2.1 General Architectural and Site Guidelines.................................................36 3.2.2 Planning Area III- EDEN ROCK Residential Guidelines ...........................36 3.2.3 Club Facility Site Planning Guidelines......................................................39 3.2.4 Landscape Guidelines................................................................................41 3.2.5 Landscape Plant Material Palette...............................................................41 3.3 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS................................................................47 3.3.1 Specific Plan Amendment Procedures.......................................................47 3.3.2 Specific Plan Amendment Enforcement.....................................................48 4 GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY 4.1 LAND USE ELEMENT..................................................................................49 4.2 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION ELEMENT................................................50 4.3 OPEN SPACE ELEMENT..............................................................................51 4.4 PARK AND RECREATION ELEMENT........................................................ 51 4.5 NATURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT........................................................... 52 4.6 INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC SERVICES ELEMENT ........................ 53 4.7 ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS ELEMENT ................................................ 54 4.8 CULTURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT.........................................................55 5 APPENDIX Existing site and Topography Boundary..............................................1 PGA Boulevard Proposed Building Setback Exhibit...............................2 SiteSections.................................................................................3 PhasingPlan.................................................................................4 OpenSpace Exhibit........................................................................5 Pedestrian Access Exhibit................................................................ 6 ParkingPlan..................................................................................7 16-Plex Parking Court Exhibit............................................................8 9 Potential Private Pool Location Exhibit..................................................9 10 Turning Movements (clockwise)......................................................10 1 I Turning Movements (counter-clockwise).............................................11 Technical Site Plan.......................................................................12-18 TentativeTract Map.......................................................................19-25 11-05-07 EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit 1 Regional Vicinity Map.................................................................................4 Exhibit2 Site Vicinity Map.........................................................................................5 Exhibit 3 Planning Area Breakdown............................................................................ 8 Exhibit 4 Existing General Plan Land Use.................................................................11 Exhibit 5 Proposed General Plan Land Use................................................................12 Exhibit6 Existing Zoning..........................................................................................13 Exhibit7 Proposed Zoning.........................................................................................14 Exhibit 8 Planning Area III Land Use........................................................................15 Exhibit 9 Project Entry Concept Graphic...................................................................18 Exhibit10 Open Space................................................................................................19 Exhibit 11 a Courtyard Home Setbacks and Plotting......................................................29 Exhibit 1 lb Courtyard Home Setbacks and Plotting......................................................30 Exhibit 12 Manor Home Setbacks and Plotting..............................................................31 Exhibit 13 Village Home Setbacks and Plotting.............................................................32 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Changes in Land Use/Changes in Zoning......................................................3 Table 2 Planning Area I — Land Use.........................................................................16 Table 3 Development Standards...............................................................................27 Table 4 Parking Requirements.................................................................................34 Table 5 Suggested Plant Material Palette.................................................................41 11-05-07 1 Introduction 1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The PGA West Specific Plan is organized into four sections: Section 1 - Introduction: This section provides an overview of the document, project setting and history, the legislative authority for the Specific Plan and the method of compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Section 2 - Plans, Programs and Guidelines: This section provides the organization and framework of the Land Use Plan and related plan exhibits. This section of the Specific Plan establishes the land use policy for the overall PGA West Specific Plan area and provides the design guidelines, which set design and development criteria and direction for Planning Area III — Eden Rock within the specific plan boundary. Section 3 - Zoning and Development Regulations: This section establishes the zoning applicable to land within the PGA West Specific Plan area boundary. Amended development regulations are presented for Planning Area III — Eden Rock - within the Specific Plan boundary. Section 4 - General Plan Consistency: This section uses the key land use issues statement of each element of the City of La Quinta General Plan as the basis to evaluate the consistency of the PGA West Specific Plan with the City of La Quinta General Plan. 1.2 PURPOSE AND INTENT This document constitutes the PGA West Specific Plan for Planning Area III, as originally adopted by the City of La Quinta on May 15, 1984, and as subsequently amended. The purpose of this document, as proposed under Amendment VI, is to maintain the current zoning designations for the completed portions of the PGA West Specific Plan area, while proposing new land use development standards for Planning Area III, the last remaining vacant land within PGA West. The intent is to continue administration of the original zoning for the existing residential areas in conformity with past approvals, while implementing an amended land use concept and development regulations for the Eden Rock project, and guide its future development under Planning Area III. The Specific Plan is intended to ensure that Eden Rock is a quality development consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City of La Quinta 11-05-07 I General Plan and the goals of Crowne Pointe Partners, LLC, developer of the property. SUMMARY OF CHANGES Development of the Eden Rock project requires a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to allow the proposed residential use as contemplated. The current land use designation for the 42 - acre site is Tourist Commercial (TC), with a corresponding zoning designation of Tourist Commercial (CT). It is proposed that the La Quinta General Plan be amended to designate the 42 -acre project site as Resort Mixed Use (RMU), with a corresponding zone change to Tourist Commercial, Residential Specific plan overlay (CT/RSP). There are no changes proposed that affect existing developed areas or modify the original land area of the Specific Plan. The only changes involve Planning Area III, the proposed Eden Rock project site. The overall PGA West Specific Plan area remains at 1,687 acres, and retaining all land uses as approved and constructed under the Specific Plan to date. Due to their build -out conditions, Planning Areas I, II, IV and V are not specifically addressed in this amended version of the PGA West Specific Plan. The land use and development standards for those Planning Areas shall be as set forth in, and hereby incorporated by reference to, the PGA West Specific Plan Amendment #4 document, as approved by the La Quinta City Council on October 3, 2000. This document has been prepared to reflect that the PGA West project area has essentially built - out, with the exception of Planning Area III (Eden Rock site). The information presented herein is provided as updated and/or corrected information and do not constitute a modification to any Planning Area or other aspect of the specific plan, beyond the amendment to Planning Area III for the Eden Rock project. The most significant of these changes is to update density provisions and unit count approvals to reflect the build out conditions of the PGA West project area. These changes are addressed in Section 2.2 — Land Use. Changes to the overall Specific Plan land use allocations, based on the Eden Rock proposal, are reflected in Table 1. 11-05-07 2 TABLE 1 CHANGES LAND USE DESIGNATION IN PGA WEST LAND USE, BY ACRES EXISTING SPECIFIC AMENDMENT VI PLAN (AMDT IV) EDEN ROCK LDR 940 940 MDR 22 22 TC 65 23 RM U 0 42 CC 0 0 G 648 648 OS HC 12 12 TOTAL 1687 1687 CHANGES IN PGA WEST ZONING, ZONING EXISTING SPECIFIC AMENDMENT VI DESIGNATION PLAN (AMDT IV) EDEN ROCK RL 940 940 RM 22 22 CT 65 23 CT/RSP 0 42 CC 0 0 GC 648 648 OS HC 12 12 TOTAL 1687 1687 11-05-07 1.3 PROJECT REGIONAL SETTING The site of PGA West is approximately 105 miles from the city of Los Angles and the Pacific coast and approximately 240 miles from the Phoenix/Scottsdale metropolitan region (Exhibit 1). The plan area is located on the gently sloping floor of the Coachella Valley in the general vicinity of Palm Springs and is located within the corporate limits of the City of La Quinta in Riverside County. Desert Hot "' •"`" " To Los Angeles Springs `— � z� 17 20 r Ps 1 \ Springs •'� % t5 � \ San Jacinto Mtn. �Raneho % 10 Mei,''' r' \ Cathederal Indian �1 Ctty Wo!!$ Indio \ 1.4 PROJECT LOCAL SETTING 1 j �i o Phoenix 'r��Salton Sea Exhibit 1 The Specific Plan boundary is within the City of La Quinta, a 35 square mile municipality located in the southeastern portion of the Coachella Valley (Exhibit 2). The City is bounded on the west by mountainous land and by the City of Indian Wells, on the east, by the City of Indio and unincorporated Riverside County, on the north by Riverside County, and federal and county 11-05-07 4 lands to the south. The City of La Quinta was incorporated on May 1, 1982. PGA West is accessible from Interstate 10 by way of Jefferson Street which becomes PGA Boulevard as you enter the project at the northerly boundary. Madison Street defines a portion of the easterly property boundary; the southern boundary is defined by Avenue 58, and the westerly by the San Jacinto Mountains. SITE VICINITY N T.S F 1.5 PROJECT HISTORY Exhibit 2 The PGA WEST Specific Plan (SP 83-002) was approved by the City Council on May 15, 1984, with the project EIR certified on May 1, 1984. Subsequent amendments are as follows: • September 20, 1988; Amendment #1 approved to allow an increase in hotel room count, from 650 to 1,000 rooms. • June 6, 1989; to add 22 acres to the Specific Plan area for additional golf and residential development. • August 6, 1996; updated development/design standards and land use conformity. • October 3, 2000; amended the 22 acre commercial site at Avenue 54 and Jefferson to Medium Density Residential, for the Residence Club project. 11-05-07 Specific Plan Amendment V was denied by the City Council on April 18, 2006. Specific Plan Amendment VI provides for a land use/zone change for the 42 -acre parcel located northerly and easterly of PGA West Boulevard, west of the Stadium Clubhouse and south of the TPC Stadium Course. This land currently has within its boundary one underlying zone: Tourist Commercial (CT). 1.6 ENABLING LEGISLATION • The authority to prepare, adopt, and implement the PGA WEST Specific Plan is granted to the City of La Quinta by the California Government Code (Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8, Sections 65450 through 65457). • As with General Plans, the Planning Commission must hold a public hearing before it can recommend to the City Council, the adoption of a specific plan or an amendment thereto. The City Council of La Quinta may adopt a Specific Plan and/or an amendment to the Specific Plan by either ordinance or resolution. • The PGA WEST Specific Plan as amended is a regulatory document that, once adopted, will serve as the Land Use Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Development Code for the entire PGA West Specific Plan area. Therefore, the adopted plan, once incorporated by reference, must be consistent with the La Quinta General Plan. 1.7 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT COMPLIANCE An environmental impact report was prepared in conjunction with the original Specific Plan approval and was certified by the City Council on May 1, 1984. Supplemental Environmental Assessments were prepared and certified in conjunction with subsequent amendments to the Specific Plan; a focused EIR was certified for Amendment #1 on September 20, 1988 (change in hotel room count from 650 to 1,000), and an addendum to the original EIR was certified on October 3, 2000, for Amendment #4 (land use and zoning change from Community Commercial to Medium Density Residential on 22 acres). There have been no substantive alterations in the original plan or its amendments and no resulting change in the environmental consideration. An Environmental Assessment is being prepared for the Eden Rock project, based on the amending requests to the General Plan and Zoning. 11-05-07 6 2 Puns Pro rams and Guidelines 2.1 COMMUNITY CONCEPT The PGA West community is defined on three sides by the existing major circulation system which establishes its perimeter boundaries, specifically, Avenue 54 on the north, Madison Street on the east, and to a lesser extent, Avenue 58 on the south. The Santa Rosa Mountain range to the west provides both a physical boundary and a visual backdrop to the community. From the community entry at Jefferson Street and Avenue 54, PGA Boulevard serves as a privately -maintained, four -lane thoroughfare, with landscaped parkways and median, providing primary access to the residential areas, the four golf courses within the specific plan area and the Weiskopf Signature course to the south, as well as the central golf and tennis clubhouse facilities. The Eden Rock site is located in this central area, where it can take advantage of the amenities located there through the PGA West membership program. 11-05-07 7 2.1.1 Planning Area Breakdown The Specific Plan for PGA WEST is broken down into five distinct Planning Areas, each with corresponding site driven development criteria and design development regulations. These five planning areas are depicted in the Exhibit 3 shown below 0� j Lays Density Residential II Golf corir'e open Space III Tourist Conur_ercbl and Re,an bLxed Use Iv El biedituu Dens,:y Rid,.-ial V M Open Space Hillside Conservati on Overlay rr Exhibit 3 Planning Areas within the PGA WEST Specific Plan Community Planning Area I is characterized by residential lots linked by the internal residential street layout, and is all but built -out, with exception of 15-20 scattered residential lots. Planning Area II is a series of four championship golf courses, Stadium Course public clubhouse, and associated supporting functions and amenities; everything within this Planning Area is completed. Planning Area III, which includes the proposed Eden Rock site, is currently defined by the Palmer Private golf course/clubhouse, and tennis facilities, which comprise the developed areas of the remainder 11-05-07 8 of Planning Area III. Planning Area IV consists of the Residence Club project, a 31 -unit single family development. Planning Area V encompasses 12 acres of land within the Specific Plan area designated as open space. Due to their build -out conditions, Planning Areas I, 11, IV and V are not addressed in this amended version of the PGA West Specific Plan. The land use and development standards for those Planning Areas shall be as set forth in, and hereby incorporated by reference to, the PGA West Specific Plan Amendment #4 document, as approved by the La Quinta City Council on October 3, 2000. 2.1.2 HOA Structure The home owners at PGA WEST are organized into four Home Owners Associations (HOAs) they are as follows: The Master HOA includes representatives of three subordinate HOAs and addresses matters concerning the entire PGA WEST Community. PGA West is divided into three communities, each represented by it's own HOA. They are as follows: • PGA West One Residential Association • PGA West Two Residential Association • Fairways Eden Rock has been assigned to the Fairways HOA. It will have its own CC&Rs, which will be subject to approval by the Master HOA. In addition, there will be no onsite rental office. The developer is required to purchase thirty (30) Premier Golf Memberships for resale to homebuyers. Additional memberships, including Social Memberships, may be acquired by homebuyers on a per unit basis. Following approval an Eden Rock HOA will be farmed. It will stipulate to all Conditions of Approval required by the City of La Quinta. The Eden Rock HOA will be part of the Fairways HOA, which is one of the four HOA's operating at PGA WEST. The HOA CC&R's will include provisions of the approved Development Agreement, to insure that the HOA properly monitors and transmits the annual TOT mitigation payments to the City. Also included in the CCR/HOA requirements will be that delivery of materials and furnishings with any WB -62 highway trucks shall be made per specific directions by the gate attendant and/or appropriate signing. 11-05-07 2.2 LAND USE 2.2.1 Land Use/General Plan Context The Land Use Plan depicts the types, locations and general organization of land uses at PGA West. For purposes of the Specific Plan in relation to its physical development status, this section presents the built -out land use as it exists for the entire PGA West area, and addresses the final remaining significant vacant parcel, based on the Eden Rock project within Planning Area I11. The Land Use Plan is intended to promote a balanced and functional mix of land uses consistent with the City of La Quinta's General Plan, including goals for orderly, attractive, high quality golf -oriented resort development. As such, the Land Use Plan establishes a comprehensive pattern of land uses and densities compatible with the site's setting and the goals and objectives of the PGA West community. The Specific Plan for PGA West provides for a range of residential housing types consistent with the Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential designations established for the property under the City of La Quinta General Plan. PGA West is currently planned under Amendment #4 to accommodate a maximum of 3,936 residential dwelling units along with golf courses and open space uses, resulting in a density of 2.4 dwelling units per gross acre. That amendment was approved in October of 2000; since that time the PGA West project has essentially achieved build -out, with the exception of the Eden Rock site. The Land Use Summary below shows a revised breakdown of build -out land use and acreage, based on the existing built environment and the proposed Eden Rock project. It reflects build -out of Planning Area IV as the Residence Club, and the proposed Eden Rock project within Planning Area III. A Actual LDR land use build -out is approximately 2,600 units. This figure has been retained for consistency with the Amendment IV approval. 11-05-07 10 LAND USE Low Density Residential ZON E RL ACRES RESIDENTIAL 940 UNITS 3,760 A Medium Density Residential RM 22 32 Golf Course GC 648 --- Tourist Commercial CT 23 --- Resort Mixed Use TC/RSP 42 290 Open Space OS 12 --- TOTALS --- 1687 4,052 A Actual LDR land use build -out is approximately 2,600 units. This figure has been retained for consistency with the Amendment IV approval. 11-05-07 10 The PGA West Specific Plan implements the City of La Quinta General Plan by bringing detailed policies and regulations together into a focused development plan for the Specific Plan Area. The PGA West Specific Plan is a regulatory document which, when adopted by the City Council of La Quinta, governs all facets of project development including the distribution of land uses, location and sizing of supporting infrastructure, as well as development standards and regulations for the plan area. The PGA West Specific Plan serves as a link between the La Quinta General Plan guidelines and subsequent development proposals for individual planning areas within the PGA West community. The PGA West Specific Plan implements the City's General Plan by: • Specifying the land uses in the plan area; • Delineating standards for land use compatibility with the City's goals and policies; and • Providing the framework for development in an orderly and profitable manner. 2.2.2 Existing General Plan/Land Use — Eden Rock The existing General Plan/Land Use for the project area defines the currently approved land use for the property. The existing land use designation of Tourist Commercial, as shown on the City's General Plan, is illustrated in Exhibit 4. Exhibit 4 11-05-07 11 2.2.3 Proposed General Plan/Land Use The proposed General Plan/Land Use designation for the project area would change from Tourist Commercial to Resort Mixed Use (RMU). The proposed General Plan/Land Use designation for the project area is illustrated in Exhibit 5. The Eden Rock project will be supported in the La Quinta General Plan and PGA West Specific Plan through the General Plan Amendment (GPA) and Specific Plan Amendment (SPA), affecting only the eastern 42 -acre portion of Planning Area III. The west 23 acres of Planning Area III, which is not part of the Eden Rock project, remains as Low Density Residential in accordance with the existing La Quinta General Plan designation, and remains zoned as Tourist Commercial under the Specific plan zoning. The GPA will change the 42 -acre site designation from Tourist Commercial (TC) to Resort Mixed Use (RMU). The RMU designation permits mixed-use developments that include single and multi- family residential, condominium development, as well as uses designated under the Tourist Commercial land use designation. The intent of this GPA is to retain the commercial land use designation and character for the site, while allowing for the transition from hotel/commercial resort uses to higher density residential uses. RM LJ Exhibit 5 Residential Land Uses — Planning Area III The permitted dwelling types, lot size, height limits and other site development standards are established for Planning Area III — Eden Rock in Section 3, Zoning and Development Standards, of this Specific Plan document. Typical residential land uses may include the following: 11-05-07 12 • Single Family Detached Units • Single Family Attached Units • Condominiums Planning Area III is planned to contain a range of clustered single-family homes and condominiums. Also included are recreational uses consisting of private golf and tennis facilities. Golf cart access is provided along the northern perimeter of the Eden Rock parcel, and on PGA West Blvd., providing connections to the Palmer Private Clubhouse to the Stadium Course Driving Range/Clubhouse. Planning Area III includes up to a maximum of 290 units in any combination of single-family homes or condominium units. The complete list of permitted uses and the development regulations for Planning Area III is established by the Tourist Commercial regulations found in Section 3.1.3 of this Specific Plan. 2.3 ZONING 2.3.1 Existing Zoning The existing Tourist Commercial zoning designation for the Eden Rock project area is illustrated in Exhibit 6. 11-05-07 13 Exhibit 6 2.3.2 Proposed Zoning The proposed Tourist Commercial/Residential Specific Plan zoning for the project area is illustrated in Exhibit 7. The City Zoning Map will be amended to change the zoning on the 42 - acre Eden Rock site, modifying the existing zoning of Tourist Commercial (CT) to add the Residential Specific Plan (RSP) overlay district to the site. The use of this overlay is appropriate, in conjunction with the Specific Plan amendment, to facilitate the residential amenity proposed and the integration of the residential land use component into the existing tourist commercial zoning. The west 23 acres, which is not part of the Specific Plan Amendment request, remains under the CT zoning of the Specific Plan. Exhibit 7 2.4 THE MASTER PLAN OF LAND USE 2.4.1 Planning Area III Land Use A range of land use categories are provided for Planning Area III Eden Rock within the PGA West Specific Plan boundary. Planning Area III contains approximately 65 acres centrally located in PGA West, and includes the 42 -acre site that will be the Eden Rock at PGA West community. Planning Area III also includes the Palmer Private Course clubhouse facilities, and the tennis club facilities. 11-05-07 14 The 42 -acre Eden Rock project provides for a variety of housing types at approximately 7 units per acre. Typical residential land uses include single family detached dwellings on medium and small lots and/or single family attached, townhome, or multi -family condominium dwellings with open space. The Eden rock site was originally approved for 650 hotel units, and was later amended to allow up to 1,000 hotel units. The project site will be designated Resort Mixed Use under the La Quinta General Plan. The RMU designation permits mixed-use developments that include single and multi -family residential, condominium development, as well as uses designated under the Tourist Commercial land use designation. The intent of the General Plan Amendment is to retain the commercial land use designation and character for the site, while allowing for the transition from hotel/commercial resort uses to higher density residential uses. Planning Area III also includes approximately 23 acres of Tourist Commercial use, on the west side of PGA West Boulevard. This land is designated by the City General Plan and zoning as Low Density Residential, but is designated in the Specific Plan for PGA West as Tourist Commercial, as it contains the existing private tennis and golf facilities associated with the Palmer Private Course. The designation is not inconsistent with the City General Plan and zoning designations, in that these types of recreational facilities are appropriate as part of residential or commercial projects. This 23 acres of property is not a part of the Eden Rock project, and no change to the current designation of the property is proposed. 11-05-07 15 Exhibit 8 TABLE 2 PLANNING AREA III- EDEN ROCK - LAND USE SPECIFIC PLAN/LAND USE ZONE ACRES UNITS DENSITY RMU - Resort Mixed Use CT/RSP 42 TC — Tourist Commercial CT 23 TOTAL 290 7 DU/AC 65 290 11-05-07 16 2.5 CIRCULATION PLAN The overall internal circulation system for the PGA West Specific Plan has been completed, in conformance with applicable provisions of the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. The existing system provides a hierarchy of vehicular traffic ways with pedestrian - ways segregated within the plan area. The circulation alignment is defined by the golf course and ties to perimeter streets within PGA West and the Planning Area III boundary. With the exception of the Eden Rock site within Planning Area, all internal streets to the PGA West Specific Plan have been completed. The Eden Rock project is on a vacant, "stand-alone" site in that no circulation improvements that are integral to the overall Specific Plan circulation system are needed, beyond connection with existing street and golf cart path improvements at PGA Boulevard. Gated entries areas along PGA Boulevard, as ahown in Exhibit 9, are provided for the Eden Rock project , and will provide adequate line of sight and promote optimum access for the Eden Rock project. 2.5.1 Offsite Improvements PGA West off-site improvements have, for the most part, been completed as the project has approached build out. However, it is recognized that certain improvements may not have been completed, for any number of reasons. A significant concern is due to ongoing sale of land in PGA West over time and transfer of responsibilities for certain improvements not being carried over with those property transfers. The City of La Quinta Public Works Department has been investigating this issue, and will address through conditional requirements any deficiencies that the Eden Rock project may be responsible for. 2.5.2 Onsite Improvements Eden Rock will develop all on-site improvements as part of the design for Tentative Tract 32266, and all associated approval conditions. All roads internal to the project will be developed in accordance with the design standards specified in the La Quinta General Plan, and structural standards in effect at the time of tentative map approval. All roadways within the specific plan area shall remain private. The internal roads may have a minimum pavement width of 28 feet provided that the applicant demonstrates that adequate provision has been made for off-street parking. 11-05-07 17 2.5.3 Project Entry Concept Eden Rock will be accessed by a security gate along PGA Boulevard and also an emergency access along PGA Boulevard. These entry point locations are diagrammatically illustrated below. till air ' - ►�: Entrance Ir t . � `t ' < Emergency Entrance Exhibit 9 2.6 CONSERVATION, OPEN SPACE, AND RECREATION PLAN Eden Rock is providing 564,330 (12.96 a.c.; 30.9%) s.f. of open space/common area. This area includes all areas accessible by two or more units. It does not include slopes over 20% or private gated yards. Of the total open space area Eden Rock provides approximately 157,562 (3.62 a.c.; 27.9%) s.f of active recreation. Centrally located is a large main pool facility, children's pool, spa/Jacuzzi and clubhouse facility. Common open area and active recreation for Eden Rock is shown on Exhibit 10. Meandering walkways provide access throughout the site for walking or jogging, and large turf areas provide adequate space for ball play. Additional amenities such as 11-05-07 18 BBQ areas, putting greens and Bocci ball could be incorporated as resident needs are identified. 11 Iil .S OPPPH SPA C ARE,% SQm%%gv Mwr_s C�'Ev sF�t� x w 115 L —E\ 9'4C- Ami . 1136 M=AE'm'.3Y F$C LEI SM A,EA it 35 ACK (I a ;3'2 sS-� FETYMI ppU WAE ?1 I I f •(27 9% CF IDUL OFEn WALE) v'r1 a �] II v F I i @r!i• 14- � WM` a Exhibit 10 11-05-07 19 2.7 INFRASTRUCTURE The infrastructure system which serves the Eden Rock project is described below. It is designed to provide a coordinated system of infrastructure and public services to adequately serve the plan area at full buildout. The Eden Rock project will be developed in coordination with the existing infrastructure, and will be require to provide the necessary connections to accomplish this. 2.7.1 Water Potable Water The potable water system of the city is operated and administered by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD), which extends service based upon approved designs and improvements constructed by the private developer. The CVWD assesses new developments a fee per connection to tap into the potable water distribution system. CVWD operates from system wide master plan that provides the City with potable water which is pumped from an underground aquifer through wells located throughout the City. Wells range from 325 to 1400, plus or minus, feet in depth. Potable water pumped to the surface is stored in seven reservoirs located within the City. These reservoirs provide high quality water to five pressure zones in the City. Eden Rock is within a pressure zone supplied by one well with a capacity of ten million gallons. The potable water distribution system transports water to residential and commercial users via an underground system with lines ranging in size from 4 to 36 inches. Although the City is blessed with ground water, the CVWD is continuing to take preventative measures to conserve this precious resource for its existing and future customers. These measures include the use of a lush and water efficient plant material approval policy, implemented through a landscape review committee and a water management specialist on CVWD staff entrusted to promote the mutual goals of the agency and the policies of the developer. The district will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to Eden Rock Specific Plan area in accordance with the current regulations of this district. These regulations provide for the payment of certain fees and charges by the subdivider and said fees and charges are subject to change. 11-05-07 20 Irrigation Water The primary supply of water for greenbelt irrigation shall be provided by CVWD from the Coachella Canal. 2.7.2 Sanitary Sewage The sanitary sewage collection and treatment system for the City is operated and administered by CVWD, which extends service based upon approved designs and improvement constructed by the private developer. CVWD assesses new development per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) to provide comprehensive wastewater collection and treatment. The current capacity of the Mid - Valley Water Reclamation Plant is 7.0 million gallons per day (MGD). This facility serves numerous Coachella Valley communities including La Quinta. The CVWD has indicated that the sewage treatment plant is scheduled for expansion of 9.9 million gallons per day (MGD) in the future to serve additional demand, including the demand of La Quinta encompassing the Eden Rock plan area. The sanitary sewer system shall be installed in accordance with District regulations. The area shall be annexed to Improvement District No. 55 and Improvement District No. 82 for sanitation service. 2.7.3 Storm Water Drainage The master grading and drainage concept of the development works within the character of the rolling topography and landforms to provide an effective system of drainage and storm water management while conserving and enhancing the open space feel of the PGA West project. In general, runoff from the developed areas at higher elevations will be directed to lower areas of the site where the fairways of the golf course are routed, maximizing the opportunity for the recharge of groundwater resources while using the natural lay of the land to direct storm flows. Nuisance flows within the Eden Rock project site shall be retained onsite through the use of open space areas and/or dry well systems. Storm flows will be controlled onsite through the use of swales and/or area drains and will be conveyed to either the private streets or underground storm drain lines. Storm flows will be collected onsite and conveyed through underground storm drains to the existing golf course lakes and low lying areas of the golf course lying south of PGA Boulevard. 11-05-07 21 2.7.4 Public Utilities All overhead public utility transmission lines for cable television, electricity and telephone are routed around the perimeter of PGA West Specific Plan site and do not traverse the internal project area. All permanent power and telecommunications distribution lines internal to the project are placed underground. Electricity Electrical power is provided to the site as well as surrounding development from Imperial Irrigation District (IID) substations in La Quinta. Natural Gas Southern California Gas provides service to the site from its service main along Highway 111 north of the property boundary. Telephone Land-based telephone services are provided by General Telephone Company to the project area. Lines will be extended to the site as needed. Regionally, cellular service providers are in abundance. 2.7.5 Refuse Collection Refuse collection within the City limits is provided by Burrtec, through contract the City of La Quinta for this purpose. Refuse collection occurs in accordance with a schedule established by the contractor and the City. Eden Rock residential areas are served through the contract currently in place at PGA West. Prior to regularly scheduled pick-up and removal, refuse will be contained in designated refuse areas to await removal. 2.7.6 Schools School services for the specific plan area are facilitated by the Desert Sands Unified School District and the Coachella Valley Unified School District. 11-05-07 22 2.7.7 Law Enforcement Law enforcement services are provided to the City (and Eden Rock) through a contract with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. The Sheriff's Department extends service to the City from existing facilities located in the City of La Quinta and City of Indio. The existing agreement between the City and Sheriffs Department provided protection on a 24-hour basis, seven days per week. The Department utilizes patrol deputies which provide five minute response times to the Eden Rock plan area. Additional deputies which comprise its target team are also contracted by the City and work 40 hours each. The Sheriffs Department utilizes a standard of 1.5 deputies/1,000 population to adequately serve the City. The PGA West Specific Plan area is further protected by a private security force. 2.7.8 Fire Protection Fire protection service is provided to the City by the Riverside County Fire Department. The Fire Department administers three stations in the City: Station #32 on Avenue 52, west of Washington Street; Station #93 on Adams Street; and, Station #70 at the intersection of Madison Street and Avenue 54 within the PGA WEST project area. The Fire Department also operates additional stations in surrounding communities. The Department currently exhibits an Insurance Services Office (ISO) public protection class rating of four, based on a descending scale from one to ten, with first -in -response times ranging form two to six minutes. The ISO established its rating system based on the provision of manpower/staffing, communication facilities, water system for suppression, automatic sprinkler/alarm systems, response times, and building standards. Paramedic services are provided by Riverside County Fire Department Medic/Fire Engines 32, 70, and 93 and American Medical Response (AMR) 2.7.9 City Administration City administration facilities in La Quinta currently include offices of approximately 33,000 square feet (with an expansion project having started construction in Fall 2006) for City departments (i.e., Mayor and City Council, City Manager, City Clerk, Finance Department, Planning and Community Development Department, Engineering and Public Works Department). These public resource outlets are housed in the municipal complex at the southwest corner of Calle Tampico and Washington Street. The complex provides space for all 11-05-07 23 City administration staff and ancillary facilities. Given the current level of developer backed participation funding current growth within the City, this new facility provides adequate space for City functions projected to suffice a growing population well into the future. 2.7.10 Library Facilities The City of La Quinta is served by a public library which is administered by the Riverside County Library System. The new facility contains approximately 20,000 square feet and includes approximately 28,000 volumes. The new facility is adjacent to the senior center on Calle Tampico, west of the Civic Center campus area. The County utilizes an unadopted standard of 0.5 square feet per capita and 1.2 volumes per capita to serve the City. Based on this standard the City is currently under -serviced in space, but contains a surplus of volumes. 11-05-07 24 3 Zoning and Development Regulations 3.1 SPECIFIC PLAN OVERLAY DISTRICTS A. Purpose. To provide flexible regulations via the specific plan process, thereby allowing the use of land planning and design techniques to create master -planned developments incorporating coordinated building design, integrated greenbelts, private recreation facilities (such as golf course, etc.), emphasizing a separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic, and an overall increase in residential and recreational amenity. The regulations presented herein are pursuant to Article 8 -Authority and Scope of Specific Plans of the state Planning and Zoning Law of the Government Code, Section 65000 et seq. and are in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and amend Title 9 of the City of La Quinta Zoning Code. The specific plan overlay district allows variations in residential land uses as provided by Section 9.40.030 (per General Plan Policy 2-1.1.9). Specific plan densities, development standards and other features must be consistent with the General Plan. B. Permitted Uses. The PGA West Specific Plan identifies the permitted uses within the plan area boundaries defined within Planning Areas I through V. Uses are tailored to the individual site location within the PGA West plan boundary, the existing topography, and other characteristics, and are consistent with the General Plan. The land use and development standards for Planning Areas I, Il, IV, and V shall be as set forth in, and hereby incorporated by reference to, the PGA West Specific Plan Amendment #4 document, as approved by the La Quinta City Council on October 3, 2000. C. Zoning Designation. The PGA West Specific Plan specifies overlay zoning adopted in conjunction with approval of, or amendments to, the Specific Plan document. The PGA West Specific Plan constitutes the zoning for all property within the plan boundary and becomes the official zoning for the City of La Quinta. Property zoning shall consist of the base district symbol followed by the specific plan symbol in parentheses; for example, CT/RSP. 11-05-07 25 Zoning and Development Regulation and Standards: Planning Area III Planning Area III contains the last large vacant property within the PGA West Specific Plan Area, which is proposed for development as the Eden Rock project. Zoning and Development Regulation and Standards are presented here for Planning Area III, as delineated in Exhibit 3. 3.1.1 Planning Area III- Eden Rock Description of Uses in Planning Area III- Eden Rock Within Planning Area III, Eden Rock is a 42 acre parcel centrally located in PGA West. Planning Area III has within its boundary one underlying zone —Tourist Commercial. The Eden Rock site is proposed to incorporate a Residential Specific Plan (RSP) zoning overlay, in conjunction with the underlying Tourist Commercial (CT) zoning designation. The use of this overlay is appropriate, in conjunction with the Specific Plan amendment, to facilitate the residential amenity proposed and the integration of the residential land use component into the existing tourist commercial zoning. In the context of the PGA West Specific Plan, incorporation of the CT/RSP zoning designation mandates that residential use of the site will only be permitted with approval of a Development Agreement that ensures a funding mechanism to be in place, to financially offset the conversion of potentially revenue -generating property to residential. A Specific Plan Amendment is required. This Planning Area also provides for the preservation of 23 acres of Tourist Commercial (TC) which encompasses the existing Palmer Private Golf and Tennis Club facilities as ancillary PGA West supporting recreational uses. Tourist Commercial/RSP - Specific Plan Uses and Standards The following section establishes the permitted land uses and development standards for the Eden Rock property designated as Resort Mixed Use (RMU) on the Land Use Plan (Exhibit 6), and zoned Tourist Commercial/RSP within Planning Area III; specifically, the 42 -acre Eden Rock site. A. Purpose. To facilitate the integration of proposed residential uses and amenities into the existing tourist commercial zoning, retaining the commercial land use designation and character while allowing for the transition from hotel/commercial resort uses to higher density residential 11-05-07 26 uses. Any determination on a proposed use whether listed or unlisted herein may be either internally reviewed by the Community Development Director or designee, or referred to the Planning Commission as a non -hearing item. B. Permitted Uses. Permitted uses for lands designated as Tourist Commercial/RSP (CT/RSP) include single-family detached dwellings, single-family attached dwellings, townhomes, condominiums, and includes residential, clubhouse, recreation facilities, retail and office uses, generally within mixed-use developments that include single and multi -family residential, condominium development, as well as other uses designated under the Tourist Commercial land use designation. Clubhouses, recreation buildings, game courts, and similar facilities related to residential and/or commercial facilities are also permitted. C. Temporary & Interim Uses. Temporary outdoor event staging and parking facilities and on- site sales, construction and site guard offices, including mobile or modular buildings. D. Development Agreement Required. Residential uses will only be permitted with approval of a Development Agreement that ensures a funding mechanism to be in place, to financially offset the conversion of the original hotel/resort site to residential. E. Development Standard. The following development standards apply to the Eden Rock property within Planning Area III. TABLE 3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Tourist Commercial/Residential Specific Plan (CT/RSP) Zoning Minimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Frontage Maximum Structure Height Maximum No. of Stories Minimum Front Yard Setback 3,000 sq ft 50 ft. 35 ft. (43' clock tower)' 3 see exhibits 11-13 11-05-07 27 Minimum Garage Setback Maximum Lot Coverage Minimum Interior/Exterior Side Yard Setbacks Minimum Rear Yard Setback Minimum Livable Floor Area (attached excluding garage) Minimum Common Open Area Minimum Active Recreation Minimum Landscape Setbacks Adjacent to Perimeter PGA Boulevard ROW Zoning Code Footnotes see exhibits 11-13 60% see exhibits 11-13 see exhibits 11-13 1,090 s.f 30%' 25% varies from min 10' -max 78' from 12'-17' EdenRock Clock Tower - The forty three foot clock tower is an architectural feature that will provide view opportunities from its third floor. The fourth floor level contains the clock's mechanical internals and is not considered a story, as it provides no usable floor area and is inaccessible except to maintenance personnel. `' Common open area and perimeter landscape requirements do not apply to single-family detached projects unless a specific plan is required. Common open area equals percent of net project area. See section 9.60.240 and additional landscape/open area standards 11-05-07 28 COURTYARD HOMES SETBACKS COURTYARD HOMES CLUSTERS 1-111 FRONT: (TO LOT LINE) BLDG, 20' MIN. PATIO: 15' MIN. GARAGE 15' MIN. SIDE: (TO LOT LINE) INTERIOR: 4' MIN. EXTERIOR: 10' MIN. BLDG. TO BLDG: 8' MIN. REAR: (TO LOT LINE) BLDG: 10' MIN. PATIO: 5' MIN. GARAGE: GARAGE TO GARAGE: 30' MIN. DRNEWAYS 20' MIN. OR 5' OR LESS NOTE: PROPOSED COURTYARD HOMES MIX IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE BY THE APPLICANT/ DEVELOPER PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL. TYPICAL PLOTTING COURTYARD HOMES (CLUSTER 1) PI AN 1 7 HOMES TOTAL: 2,184 SF 1ST FLOOR: 1,618 SF GARAGE: 566 SF PLAN 2 7 HOMES TOTAL: 2,665 SF IST FLOOR: 1,535 SF 2ND FLOOR: 566 SF GARAGE: 574 SF PLAN 3 7 HOMES TOTAL: 2,955 SF 1ST FLOOR: 1,411 SF 2ND FLOOR: 937 SF GARAGE: 607 SF PLAN 4 7 HOMES TOTAL: 3,069 SF 15T FLOOR: 1,516 SF 2ND FLOOR: 946 SF GARAGE: 607 SF Exhibit 11a 11-05-07 29 TYPICAL PLOTTING COURTYARD HOMES (CLUSTER II) PLAN WAR PLAN A.3 PLAN A4 15 HOMES 7 HOMES 7 HOMES TOTAL: 2,469 SF TOTAL: 2,955 SF TOTAL: 3,069 SF IST FLOOR: 2,010 SF 1ST FLOOR: 1,411 SF 1ST FLOOR: 1,516 SF GARAGE: 459 SF 2ND FLOOR: 937 SF 2ND FLOOR: 946 SF GARAGE: 607 SF GARAGE: 607 SF TYPICAL PLOTTING COURTYARD HOMES (CLUSTER III) PLAN WAR PLAN 3 PLAN 4 13 HOMES 7 HOMES 6 HOMES TOTAL: 2,469 SF TOTAL• 2,955 SF TOTAL: 3,069 SF 1ST FLOOR: 2,010 SF 1ST FLOOR: 1,411 SF 1ST FLOOR: 1,516 SF GARAGE: 459 SF 2ND FLOOR: 937 SF 2ND FLOOR: 946 SF GARAGE: 607 SF GARAGE: 607 SF Exhibit llb 11-05-07 30 (E MANOR HOMES FRONT: (TO LOT LINE) TYPICAL PLOTTING MANOR HOMES (TRIPLEX) z ME -3 NTRY) PLAN 1 27 HOMES TOTAL: 2,834 SF 1ST FLOOR: 2,245 SF GARAGE: 589 SF PLAN 2 27 HOMES TOTAL: 2,842 SF 1 ST FLOOR: 2,292 SF GARAGE: 550 SF PLAN 3 27 HOMES TOTAL: 3,469 SF 1ST FLOOR: 161 SF 2ND FLOOR: 2,678 SF GARAGE: 630 SF Exhibit 12 11-05-07 31 BLDG. 25' MIN. PATIO: 25' MIN. GARAGE 15' MIN. SIDE: (TO LOT LfNE) INTERIOR: 5' MIN. EXTERIOR: 10' MIN. PATIO TO BLDG: 15' MIN. PATIO TO PATIO 10' MIN. REAR: (TO LOT LINE) BLDG: 10' MIN. PATIO: 5' MIN. GARAGE: GARAGE TO GARAGE: 30' MIN. DRIVEWAYS: 20' MIN. OR 3' OR LESS. NOTE: PROPOSED MANOR HOMES MIX IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE BY THE APPLICANT/ DEVELOPER PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL. TYPICAL PLOTTING MANOR HOMES (TRIPLEX) z ME -3 NTRY) PLAN 1 27 HOMES TOTAL: 2,834 SF 1ST FLOOR: 2,245 SF GARAGE: 589 SF PLAN 2 27 HOMES TOTAL: 2,842 SF 1 ST FLOOR: 2,292 SF GARAGE: 550 SF PLAN 3 27 HOMES TOTAL: 3,469 SF 1ST FLOOR: 161 SF 2ND FLOOR: 2,678 SF GARAGE: 630 SF Exhibit 12 11-05-07 31 (EN TYPICAL PLOTTING_ VILLAGE HOMES (16-PLEX) VILLAGE HOMES FRONT: (TO LOT LINE) PLAN B PLAN C REAR: (TO LOT LINE) BLDG. 8' MIN. BLDG: 10' MIN. PATIO: 5' MIN. PATIO: 5' MIN. GARAGE 10' MIN. GARAGE: SIDE: (TO LOT LINE) GARAGE TO GARAGE: 45' MIN, INTERIOR: 10' MIN. DRIVEWAYS 18' MIN, OR 10' OR LESS EXTERIOR: 10' MIN. NOTE: PROPOSED VILLAGE MIX SUBJECT EXTERIOR (STREET): 15' MIN. TO CHANGE BY THE APPLICANT/ DEVELOPER 15T FLOOR: 110 SF 20' MIN. PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL. BLDG. TO BLDG: GARAGE: 449 SF GARAGE: 454 SF PATIO: 5' MIN. (EN TYPICAL PLOTTING_ VILLAGE HOMES (16-PLEX) PLAN C-1 16 HOMES TOTAL: 1,714 SF IST FLOOR: 1,168 SF GARAGE: 546 SF PLAN F 16 HOMES TOTAL: 2,697 SF 15T FLOOR: 1,056 SF 2ND FLOOR: 760 SF 3RD FLOOR: 433 SF FAY) Exhibit 13 11-05-07 32 L (ENTRY) _PLAN A PLAN B PLAN C 16 HOMES 16 HOMES 16 HOMES TOTAL: 1,140 SF TOTAL: 2,144 SF TOTAL: 1,595 SF IST FLOOR: 1,090 SF IST FLOOR: 148 SF IST FLOOR: 1,168 SF GARAGE: 506 SF 2ND FLOOR: 1,159 SF GARAGE: 427 SF 3RD FLOOR: 329 SF GARAGE: 508 SF PLAN D PLAN E PLAN E-1 16 HOMES 16 HOMES 16 HOMES TOTAL: 1,873 SF TOTAL: 2,246 SF TOTAL: 2,239 SF 1ST FLOOR: 101 SF 1ST FLOOR: 122 SF 15T FLOOR: 110 SF 2ND FLOOR: 1,349 SF 2ND FLOOR: 1,675 SF 2ND FLOOR: 1,675 SF GARAGE: 423 SF GARAGE: 449 SF GARAGE: 454 SF PLAN C-1 16 HOMES TOTAL: 1,714 SF IST FLOOR: 1,168 SF GARAGE: 546 SF PLAN F 16 HOMES TOTAL: 2,697 SF 15T FLOOR: 1,056 SF 2ND FLOOR: 760 SF 3RD FLOOR: 433 SF FAY) Exhibit 13 11-05-07 32 Parking Requirements - Planning Area III — Eden Rock. The parking plan summary in Table 4 includes the number of garaged, on street, off street driveway and guest spaces provided per product type. The Eden Rock development proposes 848 total residential parking spaces; 580 garaged parking spaces, 164 garaged golf cart spaces and 268 uncovered guest parking spaces. A parking study dated January 24, 2007 by RK Engineering is included as an appendix to this Specific Plan Amendment. The findings show that Eden Rock automobile parking is generously provided when compared against public agency requirements in the Coachella Valley, Riverside County and the guidelines suggested by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Parking for Eden Rock has been designed to conform to the RK Engineering study and actually provides 33% more parking than base recommendations to ensure adequate parking and eliminate on and off site congestion issues. In addition to enhanced automobile parking allocations 164 garaged spaces for golf carts are also provided at Manor Homes and Courtyard Homes. Access to the Eden Rock Neighborhood, Garden House, the PGA West community and golf courses can easily and safely be reached by golf cart. This will greatly reduce the need for home owner and guest parking, enhance the community feel and reduce the carbon footprint of the development. Eden Rock is an active adult community that has been designed to be pedestrian friendly. The layout of the community encourages exercise, pedestrian traffic and community activities. The integration of 564,330 square feet of green space has been engineered into the community to accentuate the sites natural beauty and entice residents to be active in it. 15,310 feet of walking paths adds to the allure of the community and makes it more practical and efficient to reach destinations on foot. Residents will be a mix of people who live year round in La Quinta and those who use their properties as second homes. Part time residents are more likely to transport and drive a single vehicle to their second home. Community design, use and resident profile all reduce parking requirements and decrease on site congestion. Eden Rock has a multi -amenity club house (Garden House) that contains pools, fountains, gym, billiards area, refreshment area, fire pit, kitchen and community gathering room. The Garden House has been centrally located to allow 70% of residents to walk from their homes in three minutes or less. A full 93% of residents are within a five-minute walk of the Garden House. Parking for the Garden House is designed to conform to the findings of the parking study dated August 14, 2007 by RK Engineering, included as an appendix to this Specific Plan Amendment. 11-05-07 33 TABLE 4 PROVM PAWJNQ SPACES (PER SPECIFIC PLAN) CVLKFIAW HOLES COVERED SPACES (GARAGE) 2 SPACES PER UNIT 83 UNITS x 2 =166 COVERED SPACES CLNO l m I i OF COVERED i OF GUEST SPACE PLAN 1 2 7 t4 0 PLAN 2 3 7 14 0 PLAN 3 3 7 14 0 PLAN 4 3 7 14 0 SUBTOTAL -21F -W _T CLUSTER 1 If OF COVERED # OF GUEST SPACE PLAN 1X/1XR 3 15 30 6 PLAN A3 3 7 14 2 PLAN A4 3 7 14 4 SUBTOTAL -22v -W �F alUTOB.R- j OF UN # OF COVERED # OF GUEST SPACE UNIT TYP i OF SPACES (ON DRNEWAYI PLAN 1X 1XR 3 13 26 2 PLAN A3 3 7 14 2 PLAN A4 6 12 0 SUBTOTAL 3 -Z� 3T _1F TOTAL COURTYARD HOMES F3 To T6 MANOR HOMES COVERED SPACES (GARAGE) -TWO BEDROOMS 2 COVERED SPACES PER UNIT -THREE OR MORE BEDROOMS 2 COVERED SPACES PER UNIT 79 UNITS x 2 =158 COVERED SPACES UNIT f OE-ELH. OF INQ� SE�� i (DIV DRNEWAYIACE PLAN 1 3 27 54 0 PLAN 2 3 27 54 0 PLAN 3 3 25 50 58 SUBTOTAL 79 Ts 38 COVERED SPACES (GARAGE) 83 -TWO BEDROOMS MANOR HOMES 2 COVERED SPACES PER UNIT 158 58 51 -THREE OR MORE BEDROOMS 128 2 COVERED SPACES PER UNIT 128 UNITS x 2 =256 COVERED SPACES UNIT TYPE OF S.R. i OF LIN ffS OF COVER SPACES W If PLAN A 2 16 32 PLAN B 2 16 32 PLAN C 2 16 32 PLAN C-1 2 16 32 PLAN D 2 16 32 PLAN E 3 16 32 PLAN E-1 3 16 32 PLAN F 3 16 32 SUBTOTAL _8- PROV[)M PARKM SUMMARY I OF COVERED 8 OF GUEST SPACE / OF GUEST COURTYARD HOMES 83 166 16 71 MANOR HOMES 79 158 58 51 VILLAGE HOMES 128 256 0 32 HOUSE NA TOTALGARDEN _l 30 %; TP TOTAL NUMBER OF 580 COVERED PARIONG TOTAL NUMBER OF GUEST PARKING 268 (268 SPACES/290 UNITS -0.92 GUEST SPACES PER UNIT) GRAND TOTAL PROVIDED B48 11-05-07 34 Zoning Code - Tourist Commercial A. Purpose and Intent. To provide for the development and regulation of a range of specialized commercial uses oriented to tourist and resort activity, located in areas designated on the General Plan and PGA West Specific Plan. Representative land uses include destination resort hotels, conference oriented hotels and motels, eating and drinking establishments, accessory retail and personal service shops, and supporting recreational uses as part of either a residential or commercial operation. B. Permitted Uses A variety of uses are allowed by right, including restaurants, retail commercial, golf, hotels and motels, Resort Residential and Time Share facilities (defined in the La Quinta Municipal Code), and common ancillary uses thereto. Townhomes and multi -family dwellings as a primary use are not allowed in the base Tourist Commercial district, except when the RSP overlay designation is applicable. Non -transient residential uses will only be permitted with approval of a Development Agreement that ensures a funding mechanism to be in place, to financially offset the conversion of Tourist commercial uses to residential. Final determination on any uses not clearly identified herein will rest with the La Quinta Community Development Director or designee. 3.2 PGA WEST COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES Throughout the build -out period for PGA West, the concepts and character of desert architecture within the project area were applied based on a range of such styles as Early California and Spanish Colonial, some of which were more effective than others. The Eden Rock project strives to retain an "Old World" flavor and maintain a consistent design character with it's PGA West neighbors. While it would be commendable to continue to address detailed guidelines for the overall PGA West community, it is unnecessary at this point in the project build -out, with only a handful of individual lots remaining and several active HOA's monitoring additions and other improvements which require only building permits through the City. 11-05-07 35 The Eden Rock Community Image The Eden Rock project will be compatible with the PGA West community image, including landscaped perimeter setbacks for privacy and exclusivity for the community. The master landscape plan makes all structures on the interior of the project unobtrusive and at the same time, enhances the views from these structures to the surrounding greenbelts and mountain vistas. The use of Date Palm, Citrus, and other species typically seen throughout the desert provides a regional context to the plant palette for PGA West. A full list of plant material recommended as suitable for the landscape theme is provided in the Table 3, Suggested Plant Material Palette on Section 3.2.5. 3.2.1 General Architectural and Site Guidelines The architectural theme for Planning Area III—Eden Rock may include Spanish Mission, Spanish Mediterranean, Tuscan, Southwest Adobe, Pueblocontempo and other compatible "desert architecture" styles. 3.2.2 Planning Area III — Eden Rock Residential Design The general character of Eden Rock — Planning Area III residential development areas shall reflect a neighborhood scale in which the building massing does not overwhelm the street scene. Typically, residences shall be low-rise in nature to create a pleasant neighborhood environment and street scene. FRONT ELEVATION A`FLEEAH IV 11-05-07 36 Eden Rock — Manor Homes Building wall planes, particularly on the front elevation, shall be staggered to create interest along the street scene, to provide a desirable human scale, and to avoid visual monotony. • Single -story plate lines are encouraged on the front elevation by stepping back the second -story wall planes to effectively break up the building mass and provide a reduced scale along the street scene. • Single -story plate lines with second -story wall setbacks are encouraged on side and rear elevations where feasible. • Side elevations shall provide the same level of articulation and detail as the front elevations where feasible. • Articulated roofscapes shall be created through the use of a variety of roof forms. • Repetitious gable ends along front and rear elevations shall be minimized. FOUR UNIT CLUSTER FRONT ELEVATION 'A' ELEVATION Eden Rock — Courtyard Homes Single -Family Attached The following concepts shall be incorporated into the design of Single-family Attached neighborhoods: 11-05-07 37 • Neighborhood entry roadways shall focus onto an amenity or a community open space feature or landmark, where feasible. The street layout within residential neighborhoods shall provide view corridors to the Open Space and other special community features and landmarks, where feasible. In addition, the view corridors should also provide physical access to these community features, where feasible. • The design of streets shall be pedestrian oriented. The use of parkways is encouraged in the design of neighborhood streetscapes, where feasible. rRONT e1 FVATInx Eden Rock — Village Homes Multifamily The general site planning concepts established for the Single-family Detached and Single family Attached neighborhoods apply to the multifamily neighborhoods. In addition, the following concept shall be incorporated into the design of multifamily neighborhoods. • In order for the buildings to form a strong neighborhood edge, parking areas shall not be located along perimeter streets. Parking areas shall be screened from view from private or quasi -public edges by being placed behind buildings or within court conditions when possible. 11-05-07 38 • The impact of parking areas shall be minimized through the use of auto courtyards featuring enhanced paving, plant material, and other landscape features. 3.2.3 Club Facility Site Planning Guidelines The site design and planning of the club facility will incorporate elements which respond to the desert climatic conditions in much the same manner as the residential components of the plan. Elements include generous patios, spacious courtyards, arcades, plazas, and paseos. Other planning guidelines are listed below: • Prominent buildings shall be sited in key landmark locations and be easily accessible and convenient. • Service areas shall be sited in little -used areas and effectively screened. • Pedestrian access routes between adjacent uses shall be incorporated into the club facility site design, where feasible. • Mixed-use areas shall be site planned as large pieces and individual uses integrated to provide functional and cohesive mixed-use zones. • Pedestrian spaces shall be provided by creating plazas, courtyards, and promenades linking use areas. • Parking shall be oriented to permit pedestrian flow without having to cross numerous traffic aisles. • Pedestrian courts are encouraged, especially to accent open area access point or primary vehicular entry. • The use of landscape areas and green space to separate vehicular traffic from the club area and from service traffic is encouraged. • Within Planning Area III—Eden Rock the shared use of service areas, parking, access, etc., shall be integrated into the design. • Orient private or quasi -public entrances to be visible from entry streets. 11-05-07 39 • Roof equipment shall be architecturally screened where feasible. • Pedestrian access to adjacent uses shall be provided. The Eden Rock community emulates a Tuscan village with its smooth stucco and old world stone walls, arched doorways, distressed wood panel doors, intimate courtyards and barrel tile roofs. Historically, Tuscan and Castilian villages were built around a town square with the cathedral as a focal point. The clock tower simulates the church steeple in an effort to capture old world authenticity. It is central to the site in order to minimize impact from view points exterior to the site. 3.2.4 Landscape Guidelines The underlying theme of the landscape architecture at Planning Area III—Eden Rock is the creation of a lush desert character of visual variety and textural interest consistent with this goal. Use of lush plant material is a primary consideration in the development of the plant palette to further promote this theme in the prevailing landscape image. 3.2.5 Landscape Plant Material Palette To provide guidance to the builders and designers of future residential projects within Planning Area III—Eden Rock, a plant material palette is suggested. Species in addition to those listed are to be considered in order to provide diversity; however, the plant material in the list provided is relatively successful in the unique soil and climatic conditions of PGA West. TABLE 5 SUGGESTED PLANT MATERIAL PALETTE BOTANICAL NAME COMMONNAME Trees Acacia craspedocarpa Acacia penatula Leather Leaf Acacia Sierra Madre Acacia 11-05-07 40 Acacia saligna Willow Acacia Acacia salicina Weeping Wattle Acacia smallii Sweet Acacia Acacia stenophylla Shoestring Acacia Acacia Willardiana Palo Blanco Bauhinia sp. Orchid Tree Cedrus deodara Deodar Cedar Ceratonia siliqua Carob Cercidium microphyllum Littleleaf Palo Verde Cercidium floridum Blue Palo Verde Cercidium praecox Sonoran Palo Verde Chamaerops humillus Mediterranean Fan Palm Chorlsia speciosa Silk Floss Tree Cinnamomum camphora Champhor Tree Citrus sp. Cupressus glabra Arizona Cypress Cupressus sempervirens Italian Cypress Cycas revoluta Sago Palm Eucalyptus camaldulensis Red Gum Eucalyptus microtheca Eucalyptus Eucalyptus spathulata Swamp Malee Fraxinus udeil Majestic Beauty Ash Fraxinus velutina Arizona Ash Geijera parviflora Australian Willow Grevil lea. robusta Silk Oak Juniperus chinensis 'Torulosa' Hollywood Juniper Lysiloma thornberi Feather Bush Magnolia grandiflora var. Southern Magnolia Olea europea Olive Parkinsonia aculeata Mexican Palo Verde Phoenix dactylifera Date Palm Phoenix roebelenii Pygmy Date Palm Pinus brutia Calabrian Pine Pinus canariensis Canary Pine Pinus eldarica Mondell Pine Pinus halipensis Aleppo Pine Pinus monophylla Single -leaf Pinon Pine 11-05-07 41 Pinus roxburghii Chir Pine Pithecellobium flexicaule Texas Ebony Pittosporum phillyraeoides Willow Pittosporum Podocarpus macrophylla Yew Pine Populus nigra 'Italica' Lombardy Poplar Prosopis chilensis Mesquite Prosopis glandulosa var. Texas Honey Mesquite Prunus caroliniana Carolina Cherry Quercus ilex Holly Oak Quercus suber Cork Oak Quercus virginiana Southern Life Oak Rhos Lancea African Sumac Schinus molle California Pepper Tree Schinus terebinthifolius Brazilian Pepper Tree Syagrus romanzoffianum Queen Palm Thevetia Peruvians Yellow Oleander Vitex agnus-castus Chaste Tree Washingtonia filifera California Fan Palm Washingtonia robusta Mexican Fan Palm Shrubs Agapanthus africanus Lily -of -the -Nile Asparagus densiflorus Asparagus Bougainvillea sp. Bougainvillea Buxus microphylia japonica. `Greem Beauty' Caesalpinia mexicana Mexican Bird of Paradise Carissa grandiflora Natal Plum Carissa macrocarpa 'Tuttle' Natal Plum Cassia artemisioldes Feathery Cassia Cassia nemophylla' Bushy Senna Cassia phyllodinea Desert Cassia Chrysanthemum frutescens Marguerite Cocculus laurifolius Cocculus Cordia Parvifolia Anacahuita Mexican Olive Dalea. frutescens 'Sierra Negra' Black Dalea Dalea, pulchra Indigo Bush Dietes vegeta Fortnight Lily 11-05-07 42 Dodonea viscosa Encilia famosa Euphorbia milli Euryops virides Hesperaloe parviflora Ilex vomitoria Juniperus sp. 'Prostrata' Juniperus Sabina Tameriscifolia' Juniperus var. 'Seagreen' Justica callfornica Lantana camara Leucophyllum candidurn Leucophyllum frutescens; Leucophyllum laevigatum Leucophyllum lagmaniae 'Rio Bravo' Leucophyllum pruinosum'Sierra Bouquet' Leucophyllum zygophyllum Ligustrum japonicum Liriope japonica Muhlenbergia dumosa Muhlenbergia rigens Myrtus Communis 'compacta' Nandina domestica Neriurn oleander 'Petite' Ophlopogan japonicus Penniseturn setaceum Penniseturn setaceurn cupreum Philodendron sellourn Phormium tenax Photinia frazeri Pittosporurn tobira'Wheeler's Dwarf Plumbago scandens Pyracantha sp. Rhaphiolepis indica Rosmarinus officinally Rosa sp. Ruellia peninsularis Green Hop Bush Brittle Brush Corwn of Thorns Green Euryops Red Yucca Stokes Holly Prostrate Juniper Tam Juniper Seagreen Juniper Chuperosa Bush Lantana `Silver Cloud' Texas Ranger `Green Cloud', `White Cloud' Chihuahuan Sage Rio Bravo Sage Sierra Bouquet Sage Blue Ranger Wax Leaf Privet Giant Lily Turf Giant Mulee Dwarf Mulee Compact Myrtle Heavenly Bamboo Dwarf Oleander Mondo Grass Fountain Grass Purple Fountain Grass Philodendron New Zealand Flax N.C.N. Wheeler's Dwarf (Variegated) Summer Snow Firethorn India Hawthorne Rosemary Rose Baja Ruella 11-05-07 43 Sa1Via. greggli Red Salvia Simrnondsla chinensis Jojoba Tecoma stang Yellow Bells Tecoma stang; augustata Hardy Yellow Trumpet Flower Tecomaria capensis Cape Honeysuckle Thevetia peruviana Yellow Oleander Vitex angus-castus Chaste Tree Xylosma oongestum Xylosma Yucca pendula Pendulous Yucca Vines Bignonia violacea Violet Trumpet vine Bougainvillea spp. Shrub form 'Barbara Karst' Bougainviilea spp. ground cover `Centennial' Ficus pumila Creeping Fig Gelsemium sempervirens Carolina Jessamine Lonicera japoinca halliana Hall's Honeysuckle Macfadyena unguis-cati Cat's Claw Parthenocissus triscuspidata Boston Ivy Rosa banksiae Lady Banks' Rose Tecomaria capensis Cape Honeysuckle Trachelospermum jasminoides Star Jasmine Wisteria sinensis Chinese Wisteria Ground Cover Acacia redo lens prostrata Prostrate Acacia Apten cordifolia Red Apple Baccharis sarothroides `Centennial' Carissa macrocarpa `Boxwood Beauty' Flower carpet Rose Ground Cover Fragaria chiloensis Ornamental Strawberry Gazania spp. South African Daisy Hedera spp. Ivy Lantana montevidensis Purple Trailing Landana Lippia repens Lippia Lonicera japonica'Halliana' Hall's Honeysuckle Oenothera berlandieri Mexican Evening Primrose 11-05-07 44 Polygonum capitatum Pink Clover Blossom Potentilla verna Spring Cinquefoil Rosmarinus o. prostratus Prostrate Rosemary Salvia clevelandii Chaparral Sage Trachelospermum jasminoides - staked or Star Jasmine ground cover Little Bursage Verbena peruviana Peruvian Verbena Verbena tenuisecta Moss Verbena Desert Accents Acacia aneura Mulga Acacia smallii Sweet Acacia Agave deserti Desert Agave Agave parryi Parry's Agave Agave vilmoriniana Octopus Agave Ambrosia deltoidia Little Bursage Aristida purpurea Purple Three Awn Atriplex Saltbush Baileya multiradiata Desert Marigold Caesalpinia puJcherrima Red Bird of Paradise Cassia nemophila Green Cassia Cercidium floridium Blue Palo Verde Cercidjum hybrid Dalea greggii Trailing Indigo Bush Dalea spinosa Smoke Tree Dasylirion wheeleri Desert Spoon Encilia farinosa Brittle Bush Ericameria laricifolia Turpentine Bush Fouquieria splendens Ocotillo Hesperaloe parviflora Red Yucca Justicia californica Chuparosa Leucophyllum laevigatum Texas Sage Lantana 'Trailing Purple' Lantana Lantana 'Gold Mound' Gold Lantana Larrea tridentata Creosote Bush Oenothera berlandieri Mexican Evening Primrose Oenothera caespitosa White Evening Primrose 11-05-07 45 Olneya testoa Olive Penstemon parryi Parry's Penstemon Phormium New Zealand Flax Prosopis chilensis Chilean Mesquite Prosopis glandulosa Honey or Texas Mesquite Salvia greggii Red Sage Tagetes lemmonii Mountain Marigold Verbena gooddingii Verbena Yucca elata Soaptree Yucca 11-05-07 46 3.3 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS 3.3.1 Specific Plan Amendment Procedures Minor modifications to the approved Specific Plan are allowed at the discretion of the Planning Director or designee. Modifications to the Specific Plan must be consistent with the purpose and intent of the (then) current approved Specific Plan. A. Changes That Do Not Require a Specific Plan Amendment. It may be that certain detail changes are appropriate in refinement of the Specific Plan, therefore it is intended that the Specific Plan Document provide flexibility with respect to the interpretation of the details of project development as well as those items discussed in general terms in the Specific Plan. If and when it is determined that changes or adjustments are necessary or appropriate, these changes or adjustments may be made as an administrative approval by the Planning Director or designee. After such administrative change has been approved, it shall be attached to the Specific Plan as an addendum and may be further amended from time to time as necessary. Any such administrative changes do not require a Specific Plan Amendment. The following changes to the Specific Plan may be made without any formal amendment to the Specific Plan: • The addition of new information to the Specific Plan maps or text that do not change the effect of any regulation. The new information may include more detailed, site specific information. If this information demonstrates that Planning Area boundaries are inaccurately designated, based upon the Goals of the Specific Plan, said boundaries may be adjusted or redesignated to reflect a more accurate depiction of onsite conditions, without requiring a Specific Plan Amendment. • Changes to the community infrastructure such as drainage systems, roads, water and sewer systems, etc., which do not have the effect of increasing or decreasing capacity in the project area beyond the specified density range nor increase the backbone infrastructure construction or maintenance costs. B. Changes That Require a Specific Plan Amendment. If it has been determined that a proposed change is not in conformance with the intent of the current Specific Plan approval, the Specific Plan may be amended in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 9.240 of the City of La Quinta Zoning Code. 11-05-07 47 C. Conflicts. Where there is a potential conflict between the Specific Plan and Zoning Code, the Planning Director shall review pertinent information and make a determination as to which code or standard applies. All such determinations shall be incorporated within the specific plan as part of the document. D. Appeals. Appeals of Planning Director decisions and determinations shall be to the Planning Commission and shall be handled in accordance with Section 9.200.120 LQMC. 3.3.2 Specific Plan Enforcement The enforcement of the provisions of this specific plan shall be by the following: • The City of La Quinta Planning Department shall enforce the site development standards and guidelines set forth herein. • The Planning Commission may review the appeal of any administrative interpretation of this Specific Plan. Likewise, any decision by the Planning Commission is subject to appeal to the City Council per 9.200.120 LQMC provisions. • The City of La Quinta shall administer the provisions of this Specific Plan in accordance with the State of California Government Code, Subdivision Map Act, the City of La Quinta General Plan, and the City's Municipal Code. • The Specific Plan development procedures, regulations, standards, and specifications shall supersede the relevant provisions of the City's Municipal Code, as they currently exist or may be amended in the future. • All regulations, conditions, and programs contained herein shall be deemed separate distinct, and independent provisions of this Specific Plan. In the event that any such provisions is held invalid or unconstitutional, the validity of all the remaining provisions of this specific plan shall be affected. Any development regulation and building requirement not addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to all relevant City of La Quinta ordinances, codes 11-05-07 48 4 General Plan Consistency California Government Code (Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8, Section 65450 - 65457) permits the adoption and administration of specific plans as an implementation tool for elements contained in the local general plan. Specific plans must demonstrate consistency in regulations, guidelines and programs with the goals and policies set forth in the general plan. The City of La Quinta General Plan contains the following elements: Land Use, Circulation, Open Space, Parks and Recreation, Environmental Conservation, Infrastructure and Public Services, Environmental Hazards, Air Quality and Housing. Each element of the General Plan contains a summary of key issues which direct and guide that element's goals and policies. The summary of key issues is used in this Specific Plan Amendment for Eden Rock as the basis for evaluating the Specific Plan's consistency with the City's General Plan. Applicable key issues are stated below followed by a statement of how the Eden Rock Specific Plan conforms thereto. 4.1 LAND USE ELEMENT • GENERAL LAND USE GOALS; GOAL 2: High quality development which promotes the City's image as "The Gem of the Desert" o The Eden Rock community emulates a Tuscany village with its smooth stucco and old world stone walls, arched doorways, distressed wood panel doors, intimate courtyards and barrel tile roofs. Recreation and open space amenities are provided in the project, and other recreational opportunities are available within PGA West as well. • RESIDENTIAL GOALS; GOAL 2: A broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City o Eden Rock provides an alternative type of residential product to that typically seen at PGA West, or in the City at the present time. It provides the opportunity for clustered, courtyard living as opposed to the typical single family attached or detached development that is prevalent in La Quinta. • GOAL 2; Policy 1: The City shall encourage the preservation of neighborhood character 11-05-07 49 and assure a consistent and compatible residential land use pattern. • GOAL 2; Policy 2: Encourage compatible development adjacent to existing neighborhoods and infrastructure. o Eden Rock is a residential project that will essentially be a neighborhood in itself, with its own unique character and amenities. It is of a similar density to other existing areas in PGA West, when compared excluding golf course uses in PGA West. As a residential, year-round resort residential project, Eden Rock is compatible with the residential resort nature of the overall PGA West development. It is supported by existing and required infrastructure, as outlined in Section 2.7, Infrastructure. • GOAL 2; Policy 4: Density transfers may occur in Specific Plans when common area amenities and open space are provided. o Density transfers have been permitted in the PGA West Specific Plan since original approval in 1984. The Eden Rock project combines open space and common area amenities based on the development standards of this Specific Plan Amendment. 4.2 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION ELEMENT • Program 2,10: Within subdivisions, private streets may be designed to a width of 28 feet with restricted parking, subject to City Engineer and Fire Department approval. o The road system in the Eden Rock subdivision has been reviewed with the Public Works and Fire Departments for the City. Both have accepted the internal street design sections, none of which provide less than a 28 foot wide street width. • Policy 6: Develop and encourage the use of convenient and continuous bicycle routes and multi -use trails to places of employment, recreation, shopping schools and other high activity areas with potential for increased bicycle, equestrian, golf cart and other non- vehicular uses. o Alternatives to vehicular use are incorporated in the circulation plan for Eden Rock and accommodated on the roadway and pedestrian systems. Eden Rock will 11-05-07 50 connect and link with existing facilities within PGA West and other areas of the City. The circulation system promotes the use of golf carts, pedestrian paths and shuttles as a means of minimizing vehicular traffic. 164 covered golf cart parking stalls are provided within the project, to further aid in reduction of auto traffic within the site and PGA West. 4.3 OPEN SPACE ELEMENT • Policy 6: Develop a comprehensive multi-purpose trails network to link open space areas. o While this policy applies more on a City-wide basis, the Eden Rock project does provide internal linkage of the project residential and recreation areas through a system off pedestrian paths, circulating in and between common open areas. Multi-purpose trails do not exist and are not required within the PGA West development. Policy 7: The City shall encourage the preservation of open space in privately owned development projects. o Development standards for Eden Rock are delineated in Section 3, Zoning and Development Regulations, within this document for open space/common open area requirements. The project provides approximately 31% common open area, and of that, approximately 28% is designed for active recreation. 4.4 PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT • Park and recreation uses should be located in proximity to residential uses to facilitate pedestrian access, and should include the provision of appropriate facilities. o The master plan for development within Eden Rock has, as a primary focus, recreation amenities, community pool, clubhouse, casual pedestrian facilities, etc. PGA West golf and tennis facilities will be available to residents of Eden Rock on a membership basis. 11-05-07 51 4.5 NATURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT • AIR QUALITY — GOAL 1; Land use and development patterns that contribute to the improvement of local and regional air quality. o Policy 5; Program 5.1 - Eden Rock provides ample opportunities for walking, bicycling and golf cart use, which will reduce trips and contribute to improved air quality. • GOAL 3; Participation in regional efforts to improve air quality in the Coachella Valley. o Policy 6, Programs 6.1, 6.2 - Eden Rock will comply with SCAQMD and local regulations, in regard to PM10 and other pollutants as regulated by the various respective agencies. • ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES — GOAL 1; The efficient use and management of valuable energy resources. o Eden Rock will comply with local Building Code requirements for energy efficiency, in both design and construction. • PALEONTOLOGIC RESOURCES — GOAL: The identification and preservation of significant paleontologic resources which occur in the City. o Policy 1; Program 1.3, Policy 2 - Eden Rock has prepared a paleontologic study as part of the application process. The project will conform to all required mitigation as stipulated by City staff and the Historic Preservation Commission. • WATER RESOURCES — GOAL: Careful management and conservation of the City's water resources. o Eden Rock will comply with the City and CVWD requirements for any water conservation programs and procedures, through compliance with local codes and landscape design. 11-05-07 52 4.6 INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC SERVICES ELEMENT • EMERGENCY SERVICES GOAL: A high level of public safety services provided to City residents, businesses and other public and private properties. o All structures shall be built to comply with the Uniform Building Code standards as in effect for the City of La Quinta, which implement safe construction in design, materials and practices. The project will pay into the Development Impact Fee program as required, to assist in funding various City public safety programs and services. • EDUCATION FACILITIES GOAL: Educational facilities and services that are adequate and convenient to all City residents and enhance the quality of life within the community. o Policy 3 — Eden Rock will pay all required school district mitigation fees, at the time building permits are requested. • SURFACE WATER AND STORM DRAINAGE GOAL: Adequate defense against the potential hazards associated with storm water and surface water flooding. o The Eden Rock project is designed to tie in with the existing overall PGA West storm water drainage system. Curbs and gutters will be provided on roads to collect and convey storm and nuisance water to appropriate storm water drainage facilities. The project will pay into the Development Impact Fee program as required, to assist in funding City-wide storm drain improvements. • SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT GOAL: Reduction of the amount of solid waste generated by City residences and businesses. o The Eden Rock project will pay into the Development Impact Fee program as required, to assist in funding City-wide solid waste programs. Eden Rock will be served under the existing solid waste and recycling contract as in effect. • DOMESTIC WATER GOAL: Domestic water facilities and services which adequately serve the existing and long-term needs of the City. 11-05-07 53 o The Eden Rock project will comply with the City and CVWD requirements for required water service improvements, as well as water conservation programs and procedures, through compliance with local codes. The project will pay into the Development Impact Fee program as required, to assist in funding City-wide water system improvements. • PUBLIC UTILITIES GOAL: A broad range of public utilities that provide for the existing and long-term needs of the community. o The Eden Rock project will comply with the City and all utility purveyor's requirements for required utility service improvements, connections, extensions and conservation programs, through compliance with local codes and responsible agency requirements. The project will pay into the Development Impact Fee program as required, to assist in funding City-wide utility improvements. 4.7 ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS ELEMENT • EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS o Policy 4; Program 4.1: All structures shall be built to comply with the Uniform Building, Fire, and other Code standards as in effect for the City of La Quinta, which implement safe construction in design, materials and practices. The project will pay into the Development Impact Fee program as required, to assist in funding various City public safety programs and services. • GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS GOAL: Protection of the health and safety of the community and its property from geologic and seismic hazards. o Policy 1 — 5, and 9: All structures shall be built to comply with the Uniform Building, Fire, and other Code standards as in effect for the City of La Quinta, which implement safe construction in design, materials and practices. A soils and geologic report is required for the project, and all recommendations shall be followed as prescribed. The project will be required to prepare a PM10 mitigation plan, pursuant to Chapter 6.16 of the Municipal Code. The project will pay into the Development Impact Fee program as required, to assist in funding various City public safety programs and services. 11-05-07 54 + FLOODING AND HYDROLOGY GOAL: Protection of the general health, safety and welfare of the community from flooding and associated hydrologic hazards. o The project is not located in a 100 -year flood zone. The Eden Rock project is designed to tie in with the existing overall PGA West storm water drainage system. Curbs and gutters will be provided on roads to collect and convey storm and nuisance water to appropriate storm water drainage facilities. The project will pay into the Development Impact Fee program as required, to assist in funding City-wide storm drain improvements. • NOISE GOAL: A healthful noise environment which complements the City's residential and resort character, and the mix of land uses provided in the City. o The project is not located on any major roadway which requires a noise analysis under the General Plan. All structures shall be built to comply with the Uniform Building Code standards as in effect for the City of La Quinta, which implement noise reduction standards for interior and exterior living spaces in design, materials and practices. The project will comply with construction noise reduction requirements such as hours of construction. 4.8 CULTURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT • GOAL 1: The identification and inventory maintenance of all cultural resources within the City. o The Eden Rock project is required to go through SB 18 review for cultural resources. A cultural resources survey has been provided as part of the project application. The project will comply with requirements for mitigation of any cultural resources, to include identification, inventory and curation, which may be uncovered during project construction. 11-05-07 55 5 Appendix 11-05-07 56 OAK TREE /— (SINGL E-FAi\j11LY RESIDENTIAL) N 59.30'1 I" E 277.64' I _ II , I tl I'o PAfZEL 7 P.i\il. 204126 (GOLr COURSE) I� tip. tl y t i •� I I (GOLF COUF{Sr) PARCEL 1 III i i I P.1`1L 2J425 III 11 I2pr8 (GOLF COURSE �,8• k 55�54'STa' EC 105��6'33. _ M grSd'a2" [ Iea s2° ,5g sem' Ir �S• hyr P.M. 2490 PARCEL 4 •M1+`Y X44 J NORTH 1/4 CORNER, SECTION 21 a PARCEL 2 (GOLF COURSE EXIST,f iG _ - - - - - - - - - \- --T - II — -------- ---- — — ___—_—=---------~-------------------------_—__ a r I rX1STIINIG I lay l P 7rNINIS CL US �i r —__--- --------------_- -- TRACT 28669-1 1i 1 1111 1 I I I (SIMil E-FAINAI .Y I I I RF �\\y� wu KSI '' ALAll�� N 1o•.1a'1o� EASEMENTS Q -INDICATES A 10.00 FOOT EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT 2❑ - INDICATES A 10.00 FOOT EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DED'�CATEO TO CITY OF LA DUINTA EASEMENT FOR A WATER PIPE LINE, IN FAVOR OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RECORDED JUNE 9, 1949 IN BOOK 1081, PAGE 288 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS EASEMENT FOR A WATER PIPE LINE AND APPURTENANCES, IN FAVOR OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 23, 1949 IN BOCK 1110, PAGE 270 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPE LINES, IN FAVOR OF KE ENSI_OW, RECORDED NOVEMBER 16, 1951 IN BOOK 1319, PAGE 507 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. t` EASEMENT FOR AN ANCHOR, IN FAVOR OF IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT, RECORDED JANUARY 26, 1952 IN BOOK 1337, PAGE 102 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RECORDED MARCH 7, 1452 IN BOOK 1348, PAGE 62 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS r - N EASEMENTS, CONDIEGNS AND RESERVATIONS IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF LA GUINEA, RECORDED APRIL 19, 1985 AS INSTRUMENT/FILE NO 62629 CF OFFICIAL RECORDS AEASEMENT FOR A PIPE LINE, IN FAVOR OF COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED q NOVEMBER 6, 1985 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 250850 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, EASEMENT FOR A PIPELINE, IN FAVOR OF COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED NOVEMBER 6, 1985 AS INSTRUMENT NO 253262 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS 9 EASEMENT FOR VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AND INGRESS AND EGRESS, IN FAVOR OF LANDMARK LAND COMPANY, RECORDED AUGUST 15, 1990 AS INSTRUMENT NO,. 304012 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS (BLANKET IN NATURE) 10 EASEMENTS IN FAVOR OF KSL DESERT RESORTS, INC, PER DEEDS RECORDED APRIL 8, 1996 AS INSTRUMENT NOS. 125662 AND 125663 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (BLANKET IN NATURE) A11EASEMENTS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS, IN FAVOR OF CENTER HOMES, RECORDED OCTOBER 28, 1998 AS INSTRUMENT NO 465909 CF OFFICIAL RECORDS EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC. UTILITIES IN FAVOR OF GTE CALIFO�R�`YA INCORPORATED, RECORDED JUNE 7, 2000 AS INSTRUMENT NO, 2000-216815. OF OFFICIAL RECORDS S 138'20 E 37.58' -- — — ----- _— __6 II I� I C�USE II FRAC i 2J42 -1I (GOLF COURSr- 1 CLUB'HOUs'r) R„81. , I asa. • 1 I�B�3X” / R40` A 'f i • ` �' TRACT -' t/Lo_r 31 Ili° 23JJ "!TRACT J (S11f'1d�LE-FAM l �IESlD�1TttALI ( ` 41 %-'j CaI �_E 1 ` sw. D-�9 'tea �iaa�L. sGa- - Sk'r 4 LAKE FiES1UF�+iTWI)---------------____________ ______ ; /TRACT 2D X42-1 (G0Lr COURSE) TEN-rATNE" PARCEL MAP 32752 (GO LF CO1 iRSY) If.) ,.\ 14 I (GOLF COURSE) I I C I I I I ,�• I 2 li 0 40 SO ,GG 320 APPLICANT / DEVELOPER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 8905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97000 ATM.LOUIS SWART PHONE: 15 03) 670-9300 `M: 503) 670-9400 NE CCROOWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 8905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON. OREGON 97008 ATM: LOUIS SWART PHONE: 150]1 6]0-9J00 670-9400 O R S E ISbW Awruen S bO LOT 36 �2 GHRH GA� r1 ��)) � eo-,,,.os FRAC r -10 X43 � S C H M L T Z FAJC 10P77-7] PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS EDENKOCK , r �. a W 1% i PLANNING AREA III TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 EXISITING SITE TOPOGRAPHY AND BOUNDARY Date Prepared: JANUARY 31, 2007 CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT SHEET 1 OF 11 November 07 - - I:\56362\!R+xE\I1-17-0e\EDaRocx\o9NEJ\69962\I'q[Lw\a�Nce.910/10/07 PERIMETER WALL SETBACK DIMENSIONS NOTE: SETBACK IS MEASURED FROM EXITING FACEOPX 703 S:VGILfAfA,7 TO RPROPOSEDN PERIME€RTW LLL ACRD PZ rTW MINIMWALL SETBACK: 12� MAXIMUUM M WALL SETBACK 45' I ~' PARCEL p AVERAGE WALL SETBACK: 18.7' i 1 PM 2149 1GNLF COURSE) 1 l 84 � . '4 PIDf!~ nVER4G1: 5EIH+tGx GkLC4LA710V I' - tf00' r 12'= 13.200 SF � I I I ( @ 141!4' 17'. 23.894 Sf 200' . 22'= 4.490 SF 00' . 42'= 16.000 SF 1 1 \ 58,200 SF 1 1 lrI _ ' 1 H 58,200 SF (TOTAL AREA) 1 31,OD LF (TOTAL LINEAR FRONTAGE) 16'7 0 40 RO 1(b 720 t BUILDING SETBACK SUMMARY 1 I� 4fr - (ALF Apy} NOTE: SETBACK IS MEASURED FROM EXITING CURB FACE ON PGA WEST BOULEVARD TO PROPOSED BUILDING FACE PARCFI. 7 Poi 2749 4T (GOLF COURSF) November 07 PARI 2 PA 2MIM 1 LOT 2 TRACT 28421 (GOLF COURSE CLUBHOUSE) 1WILS1 LOT 6UNDINR Na. MINIMUM IAAX1111111 AVERAGE $ET@ACK SE7$ACK SETBACK 2 +XR BB' >3B' ria' 3 ix 79' 87' 11:5' 6 IXR 79' 85' 82" 7 Ix 75 84' 79.E 10 tXR 77' 82' 79,-i 11 7x 85' 86' 85.5 14 lxst 85' 86' 05 a 15 tx 63' $8' S5.5 18 1xR 85 91' as: 19 Ix 83' 88"84. ti 22 1.R 84' 91' 675' 23 1 K 87' 90' 68.5' 25 IXA! 10392' ' 109'+.48' 148" 28 Ix 100' 29 IxR 87' 115' 101' 31 1x B7' 92' 89 5" 32 1XR 87' 94' 94.a' 35 1x 87' 94 90.5" 36 7XR 87' 94" 905' 67 tx 90' 91` 90.5' 68 1XR 97• 120` 7965• 71 Ix 89' 10094.5' 72 1xR B9' 102' 95.5' 75 Ix 92' 918' 94` 76 1 104' 112° 106' 79 Ix 91' 80 IXR 91' 98' 94.5` B3 7X 99' LOB' 702-5 84 2 92' 93" 92.5` OVERALL MINIMUM WALL SETBACK.75' OVERALL MAXIMUM NALL SETBACK: 120" OVERALL AVERAGE WALL SETBACK: 975' i LOT 86 TRACT 21643 APPLICANT / DEVELOPER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 8905 S.W NINBUS AVENUE SO ITT 900 BEAVERTON OREGON 97006 ATTN: LOUIS SWART PHONE t501� 6]0-9300 FAX. (s03 6]0-9400 OWI CCROOWNEE POINTE PARTNERS, L.LC. 8905 SW NVBUS AVENUE SO ITT 400 BEAVERTON OREGON 97008 ATTN: LOUIS SWART PHONE 501 6]0-9100 FAX'. 501 670-9400NZ 0 • 30KICH -Gra G n63 —713 SC HU L TZ — X07° PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS TRACT 2990 ` LLDENPLOCK . 1Y 1 11• PLANNINi1PG(A AREA 111 TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 PGA BOULEVARD PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK EXHIBIT Date Prepared: JULY 12, 2006 CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT SHEET 2 OF 11 -\w302\W...HE\II-17-06\EDMMK\0 -1\5102\FWUM\B-SEB10Ndq 10/10/07 _ EXISTING GOLF COURSE _ LOT 186 �� 'B u L07 1$7 LOT $1 (PAD EL 502.0) (PAD EL: 502.1) (PAD EL: 491 B) PROPOSED TENTA7(VE TRACT -71 SLOPE REALIGNED BOUNDARY GOLF CART PROPOSED PATH PROPOSED E+ EXISTING RETAINJNG PROPOSED (PAD EL: 498.5) I PERIMETER WALL GROUND _ WALL (0.0'-5.5') FIN. GRADE VARIABLE-- SLOPE ARIABLE SLOPE �— - - - -AI - EXISTING PROPQ 0 ORN"E-\ SYIALE VARABLE sLaPEs PROPOSED 8' PERIMETER WAL PROPOSED 8' 111 MEAND. SIDEWALK EXISTING GROUND LOT 75 (PAD EL 492.3) SECTION 'B' -'B' SCALE H: 4.20' V 1'.20' LOT 74 (PATI EL' 4921 2:1 SLOPE\ 'ROPOSE0�+1 tETAtNING VALL (0, 0'-5-0') LOT 20 (PAD EL 487 7) GRADING Ig Ire 1 _ _ ]u LTa_ November 07 SECTION 'C'= C' SCALE: H: 1"-20' V: 1'=20' LOT 19 LOT 'A' 7 EL: 488.2) (OPEN SP+M EL 65 LOT 44' ST�iA�£T LOT 21 487.2) (PAD EL: 486.,5) _ (PAD EL: 486. 1 SLOPE LOT 87 LOT 91 _ (PAD EL '503.1) (PAD EL: 492.1) PROPOSED 2:1 SLOPE GRADING --EXISTING _ _ ^ _ GROUND SECTION 'E ,F SCALE H: I'=20' V: I"=20' LOT 87 LOT 91 (PA6 EL 503,11 (PAD Et. +192:1) 2:1 SLOPE PRaPOSED R17AJNING WALL cRauNp PROPOSED ° F - NUN CS SECTION 'F= F SCALE. H: " 1=20' V: 1'=20' EXISTING PGA BLVD. Lor 97 1 LOT ss (PAD EL' 4$21) (PAO EL: 498.6) PROPOSED �L1R GRADING 2:} SLOPE = 77 -" STING _D DRAINAGE SWALE fn1 19 E UND PROPOSED 6' Z PERIMETER WALL - - SECTION 'a -'a SCALE N: ,1"=20' V: "=20' LOT 22 µI, LOT 'A'_ 1_EXISITNc DEL 486.9) j (flPEM SPACE)_ TENTATIVE TRACT BOUNDARY PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE (VARIABLE SLOF PROPOSED 6' PERIMETER WALL SECTION INDEX APPLICANT / DEVELOPER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 8905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 ATTN: LOUIS SWART PNONE (503) 6]0-9300 FAX: (503) 67 0-9400 NE CCROOWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 8905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 ATM' LOUIS SWART PHONE (503) 670-9300 FAX: (503) 670-9400 ]6800 A IT O SW 0E RI C N Le 0iM4e,G0]353 d ib6111-3 0LT2 _11— FRIORIE EERS SURVEYORS EDENRLOCK P CIA w 1 i 1 - PLANNING AREA III EDEN ROCK AT PGA WEST TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 SITE SECTIONS Revised Date: APRIL 19, 2007 Date Prepared: APRIL 6, 2006 CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBITS SHEET 3 OF 11 1��}ftVRrAL1�,-TF•x1[akwcntT�ci.hw>a�Aavu�-: ucey 1g7w,h' - R1 E November 07 `OAK TREE (SING Lr-_FAA\il1L Y r�r SIDENTIAL) 5 rte"_ --� i PARCEL 1 99 --� �P.lAil. 201,6 caLr ueT I i r,�GOT, F' C 0 U R r Il iI II ��. ll. f f i L 83 82 II $Li 8 1 LOT 84 (GOLF COURSE) PARCEL ., �J-f�r' r / P.l\il. c� Ili 1 I i 79 78 `, (GOLF' COURSE ij 1 77 ,� J %� +�76 74 r rti' 75 1 t % \ LOT 85 �f LAT 'K'� – 72 0 r IF71 P M M. LJOT 89 f,� 58 fig Exi571I e 67 66 vl r TEN 11[S CL UBLOT 9 PARKIGN LOT LOT 90 LOT 91 LOT 94 LOT V OB lea OPEN SPACE o,Rar' 0 W aG 190 310 PARCEL P.i\jl. 22333 (GOLF- COURSE DRIVING RANGE) 64 oLeEOiPTsPAM � y ., TRACT 2D4121 (GOLF- CJUAFS A ' p 52 12 10 RACT a, fi'r 51No1. EE —F X11 Y, sllrll r 3hh r d. LOT 4 '+' r � Y ��(TRACT 7042'1 a (CJl r CJUFtSr) PLOTTING MIX SUMMARY MANOR LOT 'JL— OPEN Q SPACE Sri .a 0 PHASE xWMOPouEs HOMES�—�Np,g3A'O MOI LOT 'N'--1 IL- sEr [6 OPEN SPACE 36 37_ LCAT 92 h, LOT 93 cX157iNG 9 35 34 0 Tl NHS CLUB ! , 1 I 32 33 - 0 11t +I' 31 �I 30 3 40 4 s 39 45 46 49 5Q-' TRACT 2,3-3-w-1 i, i ; ti: — 44 4$ 51 (Sl]\CLE–rA\iIILY ', 27 0 \\ 29 14"2i' 3 aG J ,zG 17 f6 \\4 f i TRACT 2�419D-*" 001KIYAND HOWN Oq USTIM M (Sli�lG r -FAMILY III R.W I PLAN ,2 PLAN US RAW 3 ITAM b 'RAN A3 AKS RAN A4 YODU T (GOLF COURSE) L0T OPa SPACE 1VI 327452 (GOLF COURS0 0 W aG 190 310 PARCEL P.i\jl. 22333 (GOLF- COURSE DRIVING RANGE) 64 oLeEOiPTsPAM � y ., TRACT 2D4121 (GOLF- CJUAFS A ' p 52 12 10 RACT a, fi'r 51No1. EE —F X11 Y, sllrll r 3hh r d. LOT 4 '+' r � Y ��(TRACT 7042'1 a (CJl r CJUFtSr) PLOTTING MIX SUMMARY APPLICANT / DEVELOPER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 8905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97009 ATTN: LOUIS SWART PHONE: (503) 6]0-9300 FAX: (503) 6]0-9400 OWNER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 8905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SURE 400 BEAVERTON. OREGON 97008 ,LOUIS LOUIS SWART PHONE: 3 6 SO (06]]00--90 Y D R e E BumIY'� A-47 .a:DDKILN G92233 V 74�7T,.3 R C H D L T Z 71p,,,,D73 PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS A EDENR.00K T P G A W' I S T• PLANNING AREA III TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 PHASING PLAN Date Revised: JUNE 18, 2007 Date Prepared: APRIL 6, 2006 CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT SHEET 4 OF 11 sn.n�YmulcT,�_IT_nR\DKwrrx\nRA[ \sOvn\PRO w\PIugW: d.o IOIIU107 M MANOR ILLAGE S PHASE xWMOPouEs HOMES�—�Np,g3A'O MOI HOMES MUSTERS I -O)1 raonsh°� PI'f 11H#flf ,NN FLS TOTAL 73 3 1 t. 1 7f -- - - 2 24 0 37 032 0 97 3 27 0 20 0 64 0 1,1 _ 8/0 0 0 0 0 8 0 a TOTAL 7e 3 aG J ,zG a 290 PLOTTING MIX 001KIYAND HOWN Oq USTIM M III R.W I PLAN ,2 PLAN US RAW 3 ITAM b 'RAN A3 PIAN A RAN A4 YODU WAL s c 24 TOTAL i 13 1 14 1 I4 a 13 a 3 tiTms tY.tlECi PNg Crs „3 N a , PLOTTING MIX VLLAGE M0I689 (18-PLDO RINSE RAN A RAN 1 1 RAN C I RMI C PIAN 0 PIAN E PINI E1 I RAN F YODELS 70TA1 3' 2 1 7 1 1 1-1, : 1 2 rt 0 i4 64 3 8 B a —` 8 1a- I 0 a T„rAL IS Is ,s ,s 13 15 1 15 1 ,s 1 a 10 PLOTTING MiX MANIOR w } _MLEX_ PNA3E PIAN 1 nAN 2 RMI 3 MODELS TOTAL t A A T 3 1d 2 e a 9 0 24 3 9 9 9 0 E7 Toru 2e 2e ¢a 3 71 LEGEND v^J� 101 •'AE-- 'ED xm�s n nY x DI 20 PROPOSED TELPORARY YODEL COMPLEX PARKING PR;—AD EUUDQUI O PROPOSED PHASE BOUNDARY PHASE PIV& 2 - PHASE 3 - APPLICANT / DEVELOPER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 8905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97009 ATTN: LOUIS SWART PHONE: (503) 6]0-9300 FAX: (503) 6]0-9400 OWNER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 8905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SURE 400 BEAVERTON. OREGON 97008 ,LOUIS LOUIS SWART PHONE: 3 6 SO (06]]00--90 Y D R e E BumIY'� A-47 .a:DDKILN G92233 V 74�7T,.3 R C H D L T Z 71p,,,,D73 PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS A EDENR.00K T P G A W' I S T• PLANNING AREA III TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 PHASING PLAN Date Revised: JUNE 18, 2007 Date Prepared: APRIL 6, 2006 CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT SHEET 4 OF 11 sn.n�YmulcT,�_IT_nR\DKwrrx\nRA[ \sOvn\PRO w\PIugW: d.o IOIIU107 M � � • 1' . ': 'i uu:.i �� IIA" • r r ••o ' •• r rur r•• ' r r • r. r •. •• . NOI�•. •.'r r •• :�� • :aa r r •.• �oN p "1 .. ••_-� ��"�� '� ' �rt"tea ,"�.��1- � �� tJ �.._�4 moria _../ ��i�,Ji � �4 �r -.A O _ ♦ r . IS IM, FM ' •1i� i � �w�\i�w\\ � � ` • ? �• aux su.,u�\D\ �/ .,ggg \ �\v� „ i • .we`d �1:. . ,�.. IC X11+7• r Yy •MINOR .,•�'�. fir; Y +� \�►MONS November 07 5 November 07 I �NOM 1 ADA ACCESSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL I SHALL JOIN EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK AT NORTHWEST CORNER \ OF PROJECT SITE. k 1. LOT 83 .. 1 ` � LOT 82 I`` LOTS'4 S, I ! LOT St w -'(x j LOT 80 (y 1 LCYI79 Lor n .,r. 1 ! I _ LOT 77 e LOT 76 � ! � LOT 75 LOT 74 ' ,\ ' s i�• S t ��`� `, f � - `\ •\ t -OT TP LOT 68 L4T71 \ � � WT,71is LOT 68 { LO' 67 f LOT fib ' s. LOT 90 LOT 91 k LOT 94 ' l - 1 % A, fes, v $�`% 1 LOT 916 k J I u � i00, 1.4 e -------------- LOT 65 LOT *7 � LOT 64 J LOT sx I ` LOT I 30.1 --� _ , a LOT 92 I J LOT 93 _ •.'. - I ,�. LOT 67 `. LOT 63 b ' I I r LOT�35 c .� 4 GARDEN HOUSE LOT 56 LOT 6n {/ I LOT 34 i� ARID RECREATION LOT ... � � •: . �,..� • n � , AREA TQ � i` FULLY ACCESSIBLE LOT 67 Lorsa / LOT4 LOT L07 33I I LOT 32. LOT SI LOT56 LOT 41r LOT 42. L®T3 LOT 45 LOT LOTt53 " LOT 5 0 LOT 31 .- � F . - � ,. LOT 48 LOT 49 �.�- LOT 00 �, LOT 391 LOT 43 � "11 � LOT 55 '� � LOT 6 LO- rAL[T7T44 ; Lai 52 ! LOT8 J !LOT 47LOT49 � LOT � I � ��% '� ✓ - j\ -ti. LOT 7 - -(- - INDICATES ADA ACCESSIBLE ACCESS ROUTES INDICATES PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES INDICATES ACCESSIBLE GROUND FLOOR UNITS NOTE. ALL RECREATION AMENITIES, MODEL HOMES AND THE ENTIRE GARDEN HOUSE SITE SHALL BE ADA ACCESSIBLE. APPLICANT / DEVELOPER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 9905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SUIT aao BEAvERTOu OREGON .97009 ATTN LOUIS SWART PHONE (so]) S7o 9300 FA%: 503 6]0-9400 OWNER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 9905 SW. NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97000 ATT&LOUIS SWART RIBPHONE: 503 670-9300 503 670 9400 NORSE ]&WD Menu 7 D O K Ill0 OMY CA 9u53 Eervn - ]E1-3 SCHULT= Ax — PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS rLo'`n LOT LOT PB r_�--- -�-_ - _.� -_� `, � f �,'f PLANNING AREA III rLCIT 12 LOT 10 ? ✓/ / 1 °= TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 �OT -� 1 LOT 24 ; " LOT 21 I ioTn- } I`ILOT Lor S y t Lori 1` [ , �� f' LOT 25:_ f -Loan ll i ,1 1 Loth. , - ,, PEDESTRIAN LOT >4 1� 1 rf / LOT 2i i LOT A �% 4u - . ,, -- Lor 4�,s LOT ff ACCESS EXHIBIT Date Revised: AUG. 23, 2007 Date Prepared: JANUARY 31, 2007 ' J = CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA �EXHIBIT SHEET 6 OF 11 In LOT 'l(' OPEN SPACE ep�.tyS QAC 49(�} ` l M♦♦ 9Af2CtLfNIL 5lll; ri, r -r ,1'1 t PARr IGIIN 11-f {U I 0i I I- I� E-1 November 07 I. L— ti j STREET 'D NOTES: DRIVEWAY COURTYARD MANUEVERING AREA EXCEEDS THE AREA OF ASTANDARD CUL-DE-SAC STREET "E" SATISFIES THE REQUIREMENTS FROM THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR A HAMMERHEAD TURNAROUND. v I ' APPLICANT / DEVELOPER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 8905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE400 BFAVESOON. OREGON 97009 ":LOUIS SWART PHONE (504 6]0-9400 FAX: (1104 6]0-9400 OWNER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 8905 SW, NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE AGO r� BEAVERTON. OREGON 97008 AM LOUIS SWART PHONE (50]) 6]0-9100 FAX (501) 6]0-9400 OOK W-4 [tR[0.0.p[REERS SRRVEYOR9 EDENPLOCK T PLANNING AREA III TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 16-PLEX PARKING Date Revised: AUG. 23, 2007 Date Prepared: DECEMBER 21, 2006 CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT SHEET 8 OF 11 I:\SO40t\141\E\11-I7-Ofi\E0FH40G(\O. \50402\PR[LW\ICGESS EXHd.9 10/10/07 1 i i� i LOT 83 L: )T 82 L.O1 81 LOT M LOT 79 i d L.)T 78 ,�f77 . \ Laf 76 4. - LOT 88 r i :A N ��'N `.SOT 71, '� . 4 Lu' 73 , LOT 95 \\V • :.OTT, _ �- 1 Ll I; fig LOT 68 LOT 67 i i_.')T 66 w ll I LOT 40 IAT:9t LOT 94 LOT'D' r LATTa ' I `" L0798 LO 3°1 � N I LOT 36 L OT I LOT 43 II L-A u < III Lc - 33 - I LAT 92 II LOT M r �' ■ Lw 42 LAT z R J LOT 60 LOT 31 Lsi� � LOT 43 II Lf)T 30 LOr W "T 4a y . + LAT `A • U! 44 or,- 1 OT NO 1 4 LCT f Lrr 291 L1'r Zf LAT 28 k cFr S J ! 1p 25 I LOT 24 Lar0 LOT ZO LDT 7 ! L fj� LOT t3 � v '+ VIT 2.1 IDT 22 LAT I November 07 LCT V LOS: i ur r2 LTV +r/ LOl 1' LA 14 % f,/J POTENTIAL PRIVATE POOL SUMMARY: INDICATES POTENTIAL PRIVATE POOL LOCATION 53 POTENTIAL PRIVATE POOLS AT MANOR HOMES 63 POTENTIAL PRIVATE POOLS AT COURTYARD HOMES 118 TOTAL POTENTIAL PRIVATE POOLS + 2 COMMUNITY POOLS AT THE GARDEN HOUSE 120 TOTAL POTENTIAL POOLS APPLICANT / DEVELOPER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 9905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE A 400 0E ATTN TOO OREGON 97009 ATTN: LOUIS SWART PHONE: (503) 670-9300 fi]0-9400 OWNER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. j/ 8905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE 5UITE 400 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97058 ATTN: LOUIS SWART PHONE: (5031 670-9300 FAX. (503) 670-9400 MORSE ]&800 A-47 • e�WY OONILN ,CA OT253 ]]66111 013 — 6LHUEii FA%0]3 RPIANS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS EDENROCK A l r G A 4V [ s l PLANNING AREA III TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 POTENTIAL PRIVATE LLOCATION EXHIBIT Date Prepared: JANUARY 19, 2007 CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT SHEET 9 OF 11 9 November 07 TURNING MOVEMENTS (CLOCKWISE DF CTIOM) DIRECTION OF TRAVEL RECOMMENDED NO PARKING NOTES VILLAGE HOMES (STREET D, E, F, G. H & I NOT ACCESSIBLE TO AASHTO W1362, THESE STREETS ARE FULLY ACCESSIBLE TO A MH45 OR RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE TRUCK II A II tl , 1 I Y a a )0 W 10 N0 APPLICANT / DEVELOPER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, L.1 -C. 5905 S W NIMBUS AVENUE SURE 400 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 ATTN: LOUIS SWART PHONE:(6]0-9]00 FPX: 503 6]0-9400 OWNER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 8905 SW. NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 ATTN: LOUIS SWART PHONE: (5W) 7D 9300 FA%: (sO3)) 6]0-9400 EDENR-OCK A T P C: A H E S T PLANNING AREA III r TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 TURNING MOVEMENTS 1 y ..'�' Date Revised AUGUST 23, 2007 _ _ _ — Date Prepared: JANUARY 17, 2007 -� � CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA -_ ------ = ��` ________�_________ �� EXHIBIT SHEET 10 OF 11 I:\s939z\IRS+E\�i-�z-�\B>aeacs\aalvE�\somz\PRvu\TURn:sc-fizai io/io/m 10 c November 07 TURNING MOVEMENTS (COUNTER -CLOCKWISE DIRECTION) AASHTO W13-62 Mw-voll-. DIRECTION OF TRAVEL RECOMmFNDED NO PARXINC ZONES NOTM SOUTHBOUND TRUCKS MAY HAVE DIFFICULTY WITH INTIAL CURVES EAST OF ENTRANCE GATE GATE ATTENDENT WILL RECOMMEND A NORTHBOUND LOOP rr I I a � � f I I 1 j 1 { VI II I II Il II If � II II VILLAGE HOMES (STREE1 D, E, F, G, H & I NOT ACCESSIBLE TO AASHTO WB62. Tri#.SE STREETS ARE FULLY ACCESSIBLE TO A MH45 OR RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE TRUCK APPLICANT / DEVELOPER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 8905 5 W N VETS AVENUE SUITE a6D B EAV<RTON, OREGON 97006 ATTN: LOUIS SWART PHONE: ((6U3 670-9300 F. (50J 670-9400 OWNS CROWNE PARTNERS, LLC. 8905 SW NIVBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON,OREGON 970D8 A7N: LOUIS SWART PHONE: (503) 6]D -930D 6D3 s7D-9aaD . M n D 0KIC N ; °" SC HULT2 FA% ;'. ; i0]S PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS iEDENR-OCK A T P L: A N E N T" r,\ `• ; ,-,' PLANNING AREA III \� ••• j / f f r r ` " , 'F-;�.. TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 TURNING MOVEMENTS Date Revised AUGUST 23, 2007 ``•,r — — — — _ _ _ _ _ _ — — — Date Prepared: JANUARY 17, 2007 _� _______________�y_r --- ---` y ��: CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA r _ — - EXHIBIT SHEET 11 OF 11 �w.'a#11�+x�r,..,,.LwucL.nwx�,�u.,rn�m�P•sa•m +wlNo, II AK TREE (SYRiOLE-r AAM➢LY RESIDENTIAL) $ 9W AMT II l • } � � • - L I 80 B1 l ,7 i8 78 ow sw `ti 1 P.M. Z 'a 4 PARCEL 4 ) --�a1 TENNIS CLUf'St ) , PARKING LOT I m LOTI 0.11 k LOFDM SPAM 1 R 206 AC ) OM LOT F/ ! 0.09 AC I !! I TENNISe I TYPICAL PLOTTING TYPICAL PLOTTING TYPICAL PLOTTING BUILDING HEK*ff SETBACKS COUMYAW HOMES (CUMMM D OOUi(YAa Hwwce (CBTM CAHwnco (CL ER 10 Hierx hgM PLANA 32'-6' - Yiiy HOMES ( %�ff� _PLAN B 32 6" FRCNr. (TO LOT UNE 6 -`�. • - Y -- 111N PIAN J: 24-9' PAN C ']0• >_. p J2 6 - BLOC.20' N Y I7 -J1.4!} PlA4 9: 29 -0' - PIAIR C1 32 6• - PATIO: 15' V4 GARAGE 15' MN COlFMWD HOLE$ (CUU8i9i D Pu4 D PAYE 32 fi' ^ SOE F6Mx '.sr 1x9 a.y. Ix Ax u_ (To L°OR T uNE) PAN 3ELAN % 24 9' ^ PAY F.1 J2 6' ^ E%TEROR4' M42_i"'R)'1 7�' {'Ty {' BLDG TO SLOG: B N�1'Zl H' I 1. '7• k' IS' .. it ��f IIll 1, R]1XR '}9 PlA4 9: 24-0' ��y�p �yy�p REAR: (TO LOT LINE) i"L;• :f V j :"j�'ASD HO� ( ImLDQJyp®d[ FLUE ID' VN An 3 - L1, SC, s' u:N. 1 pl. >� �' .'' )` R _ _ ' w>w �YF'jEF1Cy k•, 1 11L e w3 f Il - FA4 oPLAN x 24' 9' ^ PIAN 2 z6' -s' - CAPRI pATlo: �' ^ #-� i ,r-..-� � ,L i g PIAN 4: 24-0' - FIAY 3. 26'-9• ^ GARAGE TO GARAGE' 30' MAY n R _ ' [Jor.OF*. =I.'5- ( "`" oa��twArs 20 N 4 OR s' ON Loss PRIVATE 5ER{EI � � [III + NOTE PROPOSED COURTYARD Ha4Es MIX IS ( PRIVATE R�^ 51TI[E7 Pi11YAP[ STS{7 UNIT SUMMARY SUCROSE TO CHANGE BY THE APPLICANT/ DEVELOPER w COIfiffAflQ HOMER (CLUST i D PROP To FINAL APPROV . PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 3 PLAN 4 PLAN 1X/1XR PLAN A3 PLAN A4 PLAN 1X/1X9 PLAN 3 PLAN 4 PAN I: 2 BR/25 BA HOMES 289 7 HOMES 7 HOMES 7 HOMES 7 HOMES 15 HOMES 7 HOMES 7 HOMES 13 HOMES 7 HOMES 6 HOMES PAN 2: 3 BR/25 BA 7 HOMES zs% Ilr � 0w imm TOTAL 2;104 SF TOTAL. 2,665 SF TOTAL 2,955 SF TOTAL: 3,069 5F TOTAL: 2,469 IF TOTAL 2,955 IF TOTAL 3,069 IF TOTAL: 2.469 IF TOTAL: 2,955 IF TOTAL: 3,069 SF PAY 3: 3 OR/35 BA 1 HOMES 251 ✓r,"r (M LOT FKo IT FLOOR: 1,610 IF IST FLOOR: 1,535 IF IST FLOOR: 1,411 IF 15T FLOOR: 1,516 IF IST FLOOR: 2,010 IF 1ST FLOOR: 1,411 SF 1ST FLOOR 1,516 SF IST FLOOR: 2,010 IF IST FLOOR: 1,411 IF FIT FLOOR: 1,516 IF PLAN 9: l BR/3.5 BA ] H011E5 251 GARAGE 566 SF 2ND FLOOR: 566 IF 2ND FLOOR 937 IF 2ND FLUOR: 946 IF GARAGE 459 IF 2ND FLOOR: 937 SF END FLOOR: 946 IF GARAGE 459 IF 2ND FLOOR: 937 SF 2ND FLOOR: 946 IF TOTAL 28 HOMES 100% RAOQ VM. GARAGE 574 IF GARAGE 607 IF GARAGE: 607 IF GARAGE 607 SF GARAGE 607 IF GARAGE 607 IF GARAGE 607 IF "" V YY. AFD HOMES (CLUS(Hi b ITOsco b vN TYPICAL PLO`MNG PUN IX/IXR 3 BR/25 BA 15 HOMES 51.69 50E M lAT M <1 M Ne. ,�,�� y� PAN A]: 3 OR BA ] HOMES 241% hSERdI Ir' V.R. MANOR HOMES [TFF YI PIAN A4 8R /JS BA 7 HOMES 24.19 E93LJM� Or VN, -� } P f FRC JI / TOTAL 29 HOMES 100% mE�� r 1 ` y aac To eLstc 70' vB. !,.)�/�. 20426 nE n a 1f '1130 �H��M PATIO: 5 ON, t (GO J, r 3- u_N.; - �) 1 3 / / REAR. (Tc LOT uNEI 10' u:v. (rVL r rJUT� r ENTRY 2 PUN IX IAA: J BR 25 BA HOMES SOD% _ ( ) I I 1 (ENTRY) BLDG PARCEL �(7ry/•1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1� PAN J: 3 BR/3.5 BA 7 HOMES 2691 PATIO: I. VN 26 HOMES . ~'' J 1,S4CJ :TI IL(=I M4 ` olu-2MNi f 202 N'N OT.('a��(A�R/OM�(CL�M1--M 3 GAR GE OitiEWGAYS IHa'To NGN OR 10' OR LESS Pf Y� FYI ,I i R O` ( NOTE PROPOSED VLIAGF NX SUBJECT 1Q I`1� �V CIGUHSE If I - _ M�iS nF �1 z J i PAY 1%: I5 HOMES IB 1% TO CHANGE BY 1H` APFUCANT/ DEVELOPER )LF J V .7 _ _ ,� i , ; `. _ PLAN 1XNE 15 HCVES IB 1R PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL J - r3y�1•}y1 ��irJ rAiK A$F9 f8 - PAN 1 6 HavEs 3 PRIVATE STAIE.V PAN z s HCMEs 72' MANM% 1_ I` PAY 6 HOMES ]23 - I PAY Aa- s HOMES 7. v. TO (Tc Lor LINE) 1_ __ _ PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 3 PAY 3' 15 HOMES III BLDG s' NR 1 i 27 HOMES 27 HOMES 27 HOMES PIAN 4: 14 HOMES 100% PATIa. 2s u.4. I T TOTAL. 2,834 IF TOTAL 2,842 IF TOTAL: J,469 SF TOTI�' BJ HONES 1009. GARAGE Is' VN Xl �� ` ay�� 19 IST FLOOR: 2,245 IF IST FLOOR: 2,292 IF IST FLOOR 161 SF SEE (TO LOT LINE) •,4y,. --� I S 9 4, GARAGE 589 IF GARAGE 550 IF 2ND FLOOR: 30 I IF INTEROP 5 N4 �� T• 1A y GiWGE 6]0 IF PAY I: ] BR/35 BA 27 HOMES 342% EATER OR 10' N`L GA 2, LAN 2 � HOMES 0 T TOTAL 3 B R IR/2 3 s BA 2s noueg 3i 0% (TO 7a BLca 10RN Is N,. PATIO TYP AL NG 7s HOMES 1c09 RAR TD LOT AYE) N VLL -PUM BLDG 10' LE Z1` -�� - PAN B: 2 OR 2 BA Ifi HGVES 125% G0.TRACE TO GARAGE: 30 M4 ) - { I _7 Y _ - -�- PAN A 2 BR/2 BA Ifi ROVES 125% GARAGE 5 NY �TuS 4 ILoT 4- R�; f .;p,* -_�,, , -• i t - ---- --- ,� PLAN C-, 2 ED 12 RA ,6 HOMES 1252 4 POR AN c 2 ED12 BA I6 HOMES ,zs9 �a OR LESS. y }l d y� oRREWAYS: • i -J - -flj - , ., ~ A%j PIAN 0 2 RR (2 BA I6 HOMES 125X KCTE: PROPOSED MA405 HOMES NIX Is SUS.IECT �___......!!! Ste- A iii 1 uF A C E - F E I Xl^ p PILAN EAN F 1 3 RR/4/25 BAA 1216HHOMES 1125% PRIOR TO BY THE APPLICANT/ DEVELOPER O CH GE OXIES % 2_9_ I 0 FINAL APPROVAL LOT AREA SUMMARY t -I n_nrs t Tdo A$ ,c n au srET rr p d' , E Ri `' LEGEND - 5 266 A J .t ' SOLE ALY ATTACHED RES. (LOTS 0-97) 1G_E-FAV LY ATTACHED AES, (LOB 84-89) 10.4] AC ` I✓04a1 R .. 1.35 Ac F(1 � i� �• 'r I (ENTRY) PROPOSED LOT LINE NULP-FAM LY ATTACHED RES (LOTS 90-9]) 6.95 AC RECRAi104 SITE (LOT 98) 1 1 •i y M OPEN SPACE (LOTS 'J' -'N') 2 E Ac J �'(�'j{ y Y PROPOSED LOT NUMBER ZD NIFTY)LOCAL PRNATE STREETS (LOTS 'A'-'1') 5.43 AC s v. w~ T ILT ' F I C t FROP SED BU GOLF CART PATH (LOT 99) 0.29 AC N-47. R E DU NUMBER S 95 Ac p ' �Q L07 98 .•�• Ae "• t4 r G ;' " 1 AVD wLACE HcuEs) TOTAL 2 ij .fr dE - _ �r _ LOT 2 A-' l E C -I C A 1 ja PROPOSED UODEIs M LAND USE SUMMARY .FnGT01T _ ',-/r^'iry4j�Fc�-r�ry�I�y@FI^ j�µ ,1, ° { _2�" _ I - , 41.95 AG SVE f /`1 (GOLF a_"t,flJlq.T[_ A C � � y PROPOSED TEMPORARY © GROSS ACTS 97 ,F i oE� voDEL ccWLE% PARKS\c NO OF LOOS. A . JL �_ ; W - ,�� , •�Q :•; ; ?.. x '" 14^ I'. r �},�j � J 1 6( IL. ' - (ENTRY) (ENTRY) PROPOSCD RU1LDOUT O No of (GROSS) Iso • ~ DO OF 1175 ). 691 DU/AC (ENTRY) (ENTRY) PLAN A PLAN B O6AHOMES TO HOMES r 1 39 . 411•- �p a Y 5+� ,r ",4 x`.�' ., 1sr RAGE 06 S IF 1sr FLOC:: 115 sF I R 2\r r 29650-� ((I . ` - ` --_ - �7 7p I = ( .'� ^ h ` - . ,% f GARAGE 506 SF 2ND FLOOR: 1,159 SF (]INGJLr S AMIIJL� ` i 1 r RD PGE: 8 5F GARAGE: 508 IF 1 $9 27J 28 a _ j i'` I,-�� PLAN D PLAN E 16 HOMES 16 HOMES r ' • -. 16 13 ! /7°rZE1C-f '�F�7 ''! •�. ` ��+8 IST 167 o1 IF ,Sr FL 2,246 F 1 20 t 1 A /1 J71741 _ Y -r rLYl � IF 2ND FL004 1,349 IF 2ND FLOOR 1,675 IF `4 X y { GARAGE 423 IF GARAGE 449 IF N. f '22 1gj 1� L�� T- /. r ° kiESl[]CN'ir- �� 4 � �„✓✓ t BUILDING LOT COVERAGE rrtAc r > > ,�� ''� . `LOT 4 - (Sf1�1GLrACT 2Fi42'l [AT r,A~ 0 90 100 200 400 November 07 ( PLAN C PLAN C-1 16 HOMES 16 HOMES TOTAL: 1,595 SFTOTAL: IST FLOOR: 1,168 IF 1,714 IF 1ST FLOOR: 1,16B IF GARAGE 427 IF GARAGE 546 IF PLAN E-1 PLAN F 16 HOMES 16 HOMES NOTAL, 2239 IF IST FLOOR 110 IF TOTAL 1697 SF IST FLOOR 1,0565F 2ND FLOOR 1,675 SF GARAGE 459 IF 2ND FLOOR. 760 IF 310 FLOOR: 433 5F VCNITY MAP NTS APPLICANT / DEVELOPER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, L.L.C. 8905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 ALIN LOUIS SWART PHONE (5 03) 670-9300 FAA SU3 6]U-9400 OWNER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, L.L.C. 8905 SW. NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 aEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 AUN: LOUIS SWART PHONE (SOJ) 670-9300 FAX: 503 670-94GO •grrA. Mainr aaar -rz-- .o,X9rrrr raRVlre.", EDENR.00K P (, A W I S I PLANNING AREA III TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 TECHNICAL SITE PLAN Date Revised: AUG. 23, 2007 Date Prepared: APRIL 6, 2006 CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 1 OF 7 6\50312\,W,iE\11-17-06\EDEA K\DR5£J\50302\PRBIM\TECH-0TCF9 B/23/07 12 EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE y y ; LOT 99 -i REALIGNED y :,l_ •5 GOLF CART 9_ I ACCESS I EXISITNG 40' ►I CVWD SEWER I I AND WATER I l EASEMENTS I I I � I EXISTING I I FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED 21 I ^ SLOPE y PROPO0 4' DRAINAGE I I EASEMENT I II in 1 I m I PROPOSED 24' -I ACCESS AND I I DRAINAGE I I EASEMENTS I I II CONSTRUCT I I APPROXIMATELY --:I I 110 LF. OF 6° CURB AND GUTTEFL iA PROPOSED 8' GOLF CART PATH REALIGNMENT _ \ f LOT 'K' OPEN SPACE -- 0.43 AC (PROPOSED ARIABLEISLOPE) NAGE WALE/ n AV MCC IAINAGE =MENT �\ PROPOSED 24' ACCESS AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ti P,j\il, 2 II�JS >)A.RCr , 41 4' DRAINAGE' / EASEMENTS November 07 (,.I\Irll r -r, AN 111 Y EXISTING 6' BLOCK WALL PROPOSED 8' GOLF CART PATH REALIGNMENT PARC r'L 7 P.i\jl, >J%%6 (GDLr CJ r�S"') PROPOSED VARIABLE WIDTH OFF-SITE GRADING EASEMENT l SE -F' SI -IM' IVO. s WOLF COURS�'-_J VARIABLE SLOPE PROPOSEU LOT NUMBER 4 PROPOSED RETAN'NG WALL TENTATIVE TRACT BOUNDARY PROPOSED 1:1 SLOPE PROPOSED VARIABLE SLOPE PROPOSED CENTERLINE RADIUS R=300' PRVATE STREET LOT STREET 'A' PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY 7Z EASEMENT EASEMENT PROPOSED PRVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT PROPOSED MANOR HOMES AND VILLAGE HOMES BLDG NUMBER Q APPLICANT / DEVELOPER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 8905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 900 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 ATTN: LOUIS SWART PHONE: (s03) 670-9300 F.: s03 670-9500 OWNER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, L.L.C. 8905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97000 ATTN: LOUIS SWART PHONE: (5033) ) 667070-93-990000 (50 �' M G R i f TBbbO Mmue 51 DOM �. 5L` GOR +W S C H U LT S 1 7B6Pt�01, a� PLANNERS ENGINEERS 4U NV K" P. EDENKOCK Awes . rjl PLANNING AREA III L TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 :CH NICAL SITE PLAN Date Revised: AUG. 23, 2007 Date Prepared: APRIL 6, 2006 CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 2 OF 7 I:\50.101\IWNE\II-I7-05\En K\0 l\50]02\PREAVECH-02a,g 10/I0/07 13 'w. PROPOSED \ 4' DRAINAGE EASEMENT PROPOSED 24' ACCESS AND--�-� DRAINAGE ,. EASEMENT OPEN SPACE 1 LOT IK' 0.43 AC �{1 "C Ii�#O f 1 (PROPOSE DRAINAGE i SWALE�YAF{IABLE�} S OPe]] 1tii�It,J I (� L' I.I PROPOSED— LEFTHAND TURN POCKET I 1 OPEN SPACE 1 I II LOT'J' 2.06 AC LH i (PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE/ } I I I �I "LE SLOPE) i To ;mI I �I la I 1� II Ir 1 1 �I I 1 I I I I I III I I I I II I I � PROPOSED - 1 4' DRAINAGE I i 1 EASEMENT I I I V ' II AlPROPOSED 24' ACCESS AND I DRAINAGE 1 �I EASEMENTS I PROPOSED - 2' DRAINAGE EASEMENTS November 07 SCS 5r,+�E.T J�IO, rd x 4 53 Y) SO 1 5 ° PROPOSED 101 NUMBER PROPOSED RETAINING WALL TENTATIVE TRACT BOUNDARY PROPOSED 2:1 SLOPE PROPOSED VARIABLE SLOPE PROPOSED CENTERLINE HAO'.US PRIVATE STREET LOT PROPOSED PUBLIC UPUTY EASEMENT PROPOSED PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT PROPOSED MANOR HOMES AND V.LLAGE HOMES BLDG, NUMBER 4 R=300' STREET 'A' EIT I�ZI77� 14 APPLICANT /DEVELOPER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 6905 S.W. N VBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 8ENWITUGN, OREGON 97008 ATR4: LOUIS SWABT PHONE 150]) 670-9300 FAX::..nn 50] 670-9490 OWN0 CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. l 6905 S.W_ NVBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BFAVERTCN, OREGON 97006 ATTN: LOUIS SWART PHONE: 503 670-9300 FAX: 503 670-9400 ZI Sf TPB00 A�u4T 6 `w M . a D RICH L,�Q84.- PROPOSED 24' :,°°T11�°" R S n V L S I EA% Tf6T11a0i] (� T/''�(}f� 1 ACCESS- AND `STORM PLARNERS RNG,NEFRN SURVEYORS DRAIN EASE -HENT EDENROCK A I P C A N I S f' PLANNING AREA III TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 CHNICAL SITE PLAN Date Revised: AUG. 23, 2007 Date Prepared: APRIL 6, 2006 CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 3 OF 7 ,'W.YT�j'RlNL'1,11-,r�x_nr,uzvR,.n -n •urlwro+ 14 I I " GII r I xr r w I I I I I II PROPOSED 2' DRAINAGE I I 4 i S II EASEMENT 1 I II it i t 1 t 11 1 t 11 rl 11 1 1� it i 5 tti `y It PROPOSED 24' ACCESS AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT ` 1\ 1 , SEE S[EFE " Pb.. �3 I .SEr SPEEr Iii. 0 =—`— PROPOSED 24' Y 46 .Y �I ACCESS AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS LOT 'J' OPEN SPACE 2.06 AC �� ♦ �� — (PROPOSE D DRAINAGE SWALE/ VARIABLE/ SLOPE) � ti � � ` °^? as s,• a_, �� Ai� 1 f�' lJ �f •...^.j \� �` -, -ATB. 00' ��- (GOLF C OUM- E) November 07 PROPOSED- 4' DRAINAGE EASEMENT r P.O. PROPOSED 15— STROM DRAIN EASEMENT BOULEVARD PROPOSED PROPOSED 24' - 4' DRAINAGE ACCESS AND__ �- EASEME� -� DRAiMNAG� - LOT 'J' EASEMENTS - OP-EWSPACE 2.06 AC_ - 1 (PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE/ I VARIABLE SLOPE) 32762 k�: a _ 1 APPLICANT / DEVELOPER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 8905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 AM: (LOUISS SWART MOE� (503) 610-9400 OWNER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, L.L.C. 8905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 ATTN: LOUIS SWART PHONE (503) 610-9)00 sOJ 610-9400 ORAE T —11 • 0 K I C H Le pimh.G9�259 M� ;�;;;; PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS EDENKOC_K A x 1' 4; A W IT 5 1 =I PLANNING AREA III TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 All, TECHNICAL SITE PLAN Date Revised: AUG. 23, 2007 Date Prepared: APRIL 6, 2006 CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 4 OF 7 113GA�1�1.a'aC11s 1T mL:zn.r...:.1lai;;, �V,,Yd1P�O.V�EPI 0.r-; :U,:II 15 PROPOSED 4' DRAINAGE EASEMENTS '20t] '17 = - - _ ----,; 1b LE(END b s PROPOSED LOT NUMBER ,. 4 PROPOSED RETAINING WALL TENTATIVE TRACT BOUNDARY 1 PROPOSED 2:1 SLOPE 24, PROPOSED VARIABLE SLOPE 10, PROPOSED CENTERLINE RADIUS Rwjpd' PRIVATE STREET LOT 8TFUMf •A• PUBLIC ULUTY 1 ECT -Z/ zIczea 9' EASEMEND M- 11` - PROPOSED PRIVATE DRAINAGE 1_ -' "1�•'- -� EASEMENT PROPOSED MANOR HOMES AND - -- -+-- VI LEASE HOMES BLDG NUMBER Q - — R.l a,5.77' lwS7s. iY1- I BOULEVARD PROPOSED PROPOSED 24' - 4' DRAINAGE ACCESS AND__ �- EASEME� -� DRAiMNAG� - LOT 'J' EASEMENTS - OP-EWSPACE 2.06 AC_ - 1 (PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE/ I VARIABLE SLOPE) 32762 k�: a _ 1 APPLICANT / DEVELOPER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 8905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 AM: (LOUISS SWART MOE� (503) 610-9400 OWNER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, L.L.C. 8905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 ATTN: LOUIS SWART PHONE (503) 610-9)00 sOJ 610-9400 ORAE T —11 • 0 K I C H Le pimh.G9�259 M� ;�;;;; PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS EDENKOC_K A x 1' 4; A W IT 5 1 =I PLANNING AREA III TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 All, TECHNICAL SITE PLAN Date Revised: AUG. 23, 2007 Date Prepared: APRIL 6, 2006 CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 4 OF 7 113GA�1�1.a'aC11s 1T mL:zn.r...:.1lai;;, �V,,Yd1P�O.V�EPI 0.r-; :U,:II 15 November 07 PROPOSED VARIABLE WIDTH OFF-SITE GRADING EASEMENT VARIABLE SLOPE P.M, 20426 (GOLD` couRsrJ A. PROPOSED •j . 101 WATER EASEMENT kx . PROPOSED VARIABLE WIDTH OFF-SITE GRADING EASEMENT APPLICANT / DEVELOPER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 6905 SW NIUBUS AVENUE Y SLATE 400 BEAV<RTON, OREGON 97008 `y ATTN: LOUIS SWART PRO(503) 6]0-9300 FAX (503) 6]0-94C0 �? CCROOWNNEE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 1 ,$ 8905 SW -BUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON, OREGON 9700B ALLEN: LOUIS SWART PHONE (503) 610-9300 FAX: (503) 6]0-9400 R' . ORSE � �wnn4i aRlcx �a,ac oV I�13 � LT ]E0.]]1�r3 41 PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS 1 y 1 N, EDENR.00K ] A I P G A NY r N r- / PLANNING AREA III TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 TECHNICAL SITE PLAN Date Revised: AUG. 23, 2007 Date Prepared: APRIL 6, 2006 CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 5 OF 7 16 PROFOSED LOT OLIDER 4 ///♦♦♦��/ PROPOSED RFAIN:NG WALL TENTATIVE TRACT TRACT BOUNDARY 11010 ED 2 I SLOPE ✓r PROPOSED VARIABLE SLOPE • _} PROPOSED CENTERLINE RAD',US PR�vATE sTREEr Lor REE STREET 'A' ` PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY �T�� EASEUENT PROPOSED PRIVATE DRWNAGE / EASEMENT PROPOSED MANOR HOMES ANO O / VLIAGS H04E5 BLDG. N'J4EER APPLICANT / DEVELOPER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 6905 SW NIUBUS AVENUE Y SLATE 400 BEAV<RTON, OREGON 97008 `y ATTN: LOUIS SWART PRO(503) 6]0-9300 FAX (503) 6]0-94C0 �? CCROOWNNEE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 1 ,$ 8905 SW -BUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON, OREGON 9700B ALLEN: LOUIS SWART PHONE (503) 610-9300 FAX: (503) 6]0-9400 R' . ORSE � �wnn4i aRlcx �a,ac oV I�13 � LT ]E0.]]1�r3 41 PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS 1 y 1 N, EDENR.00K ] A I P G A NY r N r- / PLANNING AREA III TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 TECHNICAL SITE PLAN Date Revised: AUG. 23, 2007 Date Prepared: APRIL 6, 2006 CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 5 OF 7 16 November 07 EE .Sr T D' /4Fl FJ $r~E 11 1, J\j0. f/— LOT 'L' =:N SPACE 0.11 AC D 15 30 oa 120 EXISTING CLUBHOUSE PARKING LOT (REVISED PARKING LAYOUT) hPROPOrS'ED LO�T 0=19' 56'47' R=1445 00' Ld03 05' �° ,� r •� ~ f s �ROPD -------------------- - 4 DRAINAGE �y EASEMENTS _ — _ "' r DOSED 24' ACCESS AND -� DRAINAGE s _ — — — — — — — — — — EASEMENTS . 0'� 1/ 11 \ ` ,PROPOSED 24' ACCESS AND Y DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ,f1 V l S!r•La� 1 �'. ! ..,Til ��. f , PROPOSED(�INGL,F.-rAivlll -Y ,r _ 4 DRAINAGE iq 511I GAI._7, r'+ IT /1" ,,� f EASEMENTS ` ttt •� rF tR / re' ' f OPEN SPACE 2.06 AC (PROPOSED DRAINAGE $WALE/ VARIABLE SWALE) ; I'f?j1CT 2D42'I , APPLICANT / DEVELOPER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, L.L.C. 0905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97006 ATTNLOUIS SWART PUO, E: R, 6]0-9300 (503 6]0-9400 OWNER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, L.L.C. 0905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SURE 400 O EAVERTON,OREGON 97006 ATTN: LOUIS SWART PION E s03 67000 FAX 1503 6]0-94-9300 O R S E ZOOp�wxe4r • O K I G X Le Ounl, CA 41TSI A- 8 C X B L TZEA>< PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS -4461111111.- EDENKOCK A T P G A \V E S T - PLANNING AREA III TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 CHNICAL SITE PLAN Date Revised: AUG. 23, 2007 Date Prepared: APRIL 6, 2006 CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 6 OF 7 17 v s Y 4atm�N 97 PROPOSED RUNNING WALLL� TENTATIVE TRACT BOUNDARY�- qq. PROPOSED 2:1 SLOPE ;*d ff9 P PROPOSED VARIABLE SLOPE -If--- 41 T-$1_-_ P ----R ' ! ` PRaPosco cervrERuuE RaDus R-300' J 4 RAINAGE ��77 y ` Rq a r' d �, PR NATE STREET LOT STREET 'A' 9_ -F EASEMENTS s� Y SY i j#• d ' /` f y 6 'p saso6 _ '"� _ r�-- PEnRSEUEM Pueuc unun PROPOSED PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT �LT7ZTZT.� " HOMES AND PR LED MANOR MLI -AGE 0=19' 56'47' R=1445 00' Ld03 05' �° ,� r •� ~ f s �ROPD -------------------- - 4 DRAINAGE �y EASEMENTS _ — _ "' r DOSED 24' ACCESS AND -� DRAINAGE s _ — — — — — — — — — — EASEMENTS . 0'� 1/ 11 \ ` ,PROPOSED 24' ACCESS AND Y DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ,f1 V l S!r•La� 1 �'. ! ..,Til ��. f , PROPOSED(�INGL,F.-rAivlll -Y ,r _ 4 DRAINAGE iq 511I GAI._7, r'+ IT /1" ,,� f EASEMENTS ` ttt •� rF tR / re' ' f OPEN SPACE 2.06 AC (PROPOSED DRAINAGE $WALE/ VARIABLE SWALE) ; I'f?j1CT 2D42'I , APPLICANT / DEVELOPER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, L.L.C. 0905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97006 ATTNLOUIS SWART PUO, E: R, 6]0-9300 (503 6]0-9400 OWNER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, L.L.C. 0905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SURE 400 O EAVERTON,OREGON 97006 ATTN: LOUIS SWART PION E s03 67000 FAX 1503 6]0-94-9300 O R S E ZOOp�wxe4r • O K I G X Le Ounl, CA 41TSI A- 8 C X B L TZEA>< PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS -4461111111.- EDENKOCK A T P G A \V E S T - PLANNING AREA III TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 CHNICAL SITE PLAN Date Revised: AUG. 23, 2007 Date Prepared: APRIL 6, 2006 CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 6 OF 7 17 PROPOSED VARIABLE WIDTH OFF-SITE GRADING EASEMENT k :bdS,y I November 07 PROPOSED 10'WATER z';,- PROPOSED 10' OFF-SITE GRADING EASEMENT P'k /T309 DRN1110 RAi�E) OPEN SPACE `— LOT 'L' 0.11 AC 1C -- p PROPOSED LOT NUVBER 4 PROPOSED RELA'N' NG WAI L TENTATIVE TRACT BOUNDARY PROPOSED 2:1 SLOPE PROPOSED VARIABLE SLOPE PROPOSED CENTERLINE RA9:US R=700' PRNATE STREET LOT STREET 'A' PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED PRNATE DRA'NAG' EASEVENT PROPOSED MANOR HOMES AND VILLAGE HOMES BLDG NUMBER Q EXISTING CLUBHOUSE APPLICANT / DEVELOPER PARKING LOT CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. (REVISED PARKING LAYOUT) 8905 SW NMBUS AVENUE SUITE 40D BEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 ATTN: LOUIS SWANT PHONE 50.1 6]0-9]00 FAX' 503 6]0-9900 OWNER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. 8905 SW N'MBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 ATTN: LOUIS SWART PHONE (503) 6]0-9800 FAX. (503) 6]0-9400 MORSE '/6800 Arorcn al oOHICM LWIY, CA PTE3 � Mum 86111019 C D — FAX: 166 PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS EDENR.00K A L P G A NY F I I PLANNING AREA III TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 CHNICAL SITE PLAN Date Revised: AUG. 23, 2007 Date Prepared: APRIL 6, 2006 CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 7 OF 7 Ir. OAK TREE EXISTING PGA BOULEVARD (WEST OF JACK NICKLAUS) (PUBLIC) SCALE r"1a (ClNr:( r_V-&IkA61-Y R 1 ux pA ,Y Y, N PROPOSED STREETS A' +'B' (PRIVATE) La'CALE r 0 R is ay1 t1' IS as M 4El 11R PROPOSED STREET D' (PRIVATE) ..T. K 2Y. tx' f j PROPOSED COMMON DRIVEWAY EASEMENT (PRIVATE) VILLAGE HOMES NB rpr ...CUT - - - RLL - (r 122,891 CY 67.800C Y FILL DVEREX R 4' 107,807 CY 129,368 CY SHRINKAGE (207) SUSSDEN'CE (0.2') -2.•570 Cy -I1.]4p GT. 0 C.Y. 8,769 C.Y. NET TOTALS 194,380 CY 205,945 SY IMPORT +1 i91I y Epi VICINR"Y MAP November 07 LOT AREA 3UMdARY FIESEENTUlill- LOT AREA SULAAARY OPEN SPACE iR7 K 0.4E AG 0.t0 A{ '0 6116 AC P.1C rr LOT AREA SUMMARY RECREATION GOLF ACCESS Lill 029 AC TOTAL EXCAVATION AREA = 41.95 ACRES ONSITE AND 195 ACRES OFFSITE ENTIRE PROJECT WILL BE GRADED IN ONE CONTINUOUS CRAD:NG OPERATION WITH AN EXPECTED DURATION OF 60-90 DAYS. ' NOTE AN ADJUSTMENT LOWERING THE SITE APPROXIMATELY 02 FEET WILL RESULT IN A BALANCED SITE, IT 15 REQUESTED THAT THE ELELVATIONS SHOWN HEREON BE USED AS MAXIMUM ELEVATIONS AND THAT THE FINAL ELEVATIONS MAY BE LOWER, BIR CAN NOT BE HIGHER THAN THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON, LOT, SUMMARY LOTS 1-83 MINIMUM LOT SIZE 4,391 OF (COL RTYARD HOMES) 2.236 OF AVERAGE LOT SIZE M M LOT SIZE 16,663 SF LOTS B4-119 VN MUM LOT SIZE 1.40 AC (MN'OR HOMES) AC AVERAGE LLOTOT SIZE 209 AC LOTS 90-97 MNWUM LOT SIZE 0.98 AC (VLLACE HOMES) MAXIMUM LOT SIZE 1 40 AC AVERAGE LOT SIZE 1.27 AC PROPOSED STREET 'C' (AT GATED ENTRY) (PRIVATE) RCALE -P�b' QI CONSTRUCT 3- AC OVER 4 1/2" CAB (D CONSTRUCT 6' CONCRETE CURB AND CUTTER PER DETAIL HEREON. Q3 CO N5TRUCT 6" CONCRETE CURB (NO GUTTER) PER DETAIL HEREON - CONSTRUCT 2 1/2" AC OVER 4" CAB ,p15rN Eg1N i�`q nc; roan wL5 t T-1 1%Y r 6' CONCRETE CURB D�gE�TAIL n EXISTING STREET ELEVATION EXISTING STORM TRAIN EXISTING SEWER SYSTEM EXISTING WATER SYSTEM EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED STREET ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM PROPOSED SEWER SYSTEM PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM PROPOSED PAD ELEVATION PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION PROPOSED LOT NUMBER PFA)POFEA) WA444 1p El E. TENTATIVE TRACT BOUNDARY PROPOSED 2:1 SLOPE PROPOSED VARIABLE SLOPE PROPOSED CENTERLINE RADIUS PRIVATE STREET LOT PROPOSED PUBLIC UTNTY EASEMENT PROPOSED PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT HIGHEST NO RESIDENTIAL LOT PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT V PROPOSED COMMON DRNEWAY EASEMENT (PRIVATE) (COURTYARD HOMES) Nra W {' NS rc s' plI% i PROPOSED STREETS E' 'F' 'G'H' + T (PRIVATE) W. CONCRETE CUSS 560-C-1500 NRH OM V 10- 6' CONCRETE CURB ONLY \4i - rc r�°r.rrrrr • PAD -720 0 FF=720 5 4 An R=3oD' STREET 'A' v 1/=/= GENERAL R1IFORMATION 1 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN: PCA SPECIFIC PLAN (AMENDMENT IV) 2PROPOSED GENERAL PIAN: PGA SPECIFIC PEAK (AMENDMENT V) 3 EXISTING ZONING TOURIST COMMERICAL TO. RSP) 4 PROPOSED ZONING MEDIUM DENSITY RES!DENPAL (RM) 5. EXISTING LAND USE. VACANT 6. PROPOSED LAND USE ATTACHED AND DETACHED S'N'CLE-FAMILY RES -DENTAL 7 ADJACENT LAND USE: No RT IT GOLF COURSE/S,NGLE-FAVILY RESIDENTIAL SOUTH: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIOENTAL, GOLF COURSE AND FACIUUES FAST. GOLF COURSE AND GOLF CLUB HOUSE FACILITIES WEST: SINGLE-FAM:LY RESIDENDAL 8. ALL GRADED SLOPES WILL BE A MAXIMUM OF 2:1, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN AND APPROVED. 9. THE APPUCANT/OEVELO PER RESERVE THE RIGHT fM FILE MULTIPLE FINAL MAPS FOR THE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP, PURSUANT TO SECTION 66456.1 10, ALL LOCAL STREETS AND DRIVEWAYS PROPOSED AM PRIMATE AND MAINTAINED BY AN APPROVED HOVEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION. II PAD AND FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON MAY BE ADJUSTED PLUS 0.3 FEET OR MINUS 40 FEEL 12PARK REQUIREMENTS TO BE MEF BY PAYING THE CII IN UEU FEES 11 THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT I4 ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: CUT: 235,000 CY FILL 235,000 Cy 15, THERE ARE NO EXISTING HABITABLE STRUCTURES WITHIN THE TENTATIVE TRACT BOUNDARY 16. MINIMUM PRIVATE STREET GRACE IS 0.5% 17 THE APPLICANT/DEVELOPER RESERVES THE FORT TO MERGE LOTS ON THE FINAL MAP(S). 18. THE EXISTING WELL ON-SITE HAS BEEN ABANDONED BY THE COACHELIA VALLEY WATER DISTR.CT 19. ALL IMPROVEMENTS REQU:RED BY THE GUY OF LA OU:NTA SHALL BE INSTALLED TO ME SADSFACE ON DF THE CITY ENGINEER. 20 PROPOSED PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT HAVE DIRECT ACCESS ONTO PGA BOULEVARD 21ALL PROPOSED LOT DIMENSIONS ARE APPRQ%!MATE 22 THE AERIAL TOPOGRAPHY WAS FLOWN AND COMPILED PLUTOGRAMMET-ALLY BY DON READ CORP ON 11/3/2004. 'A' 23. PROPOSED OPEN SPACE LOTS -'E' ARE PRIVATE AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED AN APPROVED HOMEOWNER'S. ASSDCIATION 24 THE PROPOSED PRIVATE RECREATION SITE, LOT 90, SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY THE DEVELOPER AND MAINTAINED BY A HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION 25 SCHOOL DISTRICT: EI SCHOO�L DESERTESERT �SANDSIII U UNIFIEDSCHIHOIL DISTRICT OOLSCHHOOL DISTRICT 26. ME PREUMINARY GEOTHECHN:CAL/SOILS REPORT WAS PART OF THE PGA WEST N,CKLAUS DYE REPORT, PREPARED BY BUENA ENGINEERS INC., DATED 4/1]/1986. AN UPDATED 1, HNII REPORT WAS PREPARED BY SIAD DEN ENCIh'EERING, DATED 10/14/2004. 27 PROPOSED GOLF CART PATH, LOT 99 WILL BE MAINTAINED BY OWNER'S OF THE EXISTING GOLF COURSE UTLJTY PFIOVIE)ERS WATER: COACHELLA VALLEY WATER O;STRICT 5EWFIR COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT GAS: SOUTHERN CALIFORNAGAS COMPANY ELECTRO: IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRCT TELEPHONE: VERIZON WIRELESS CABLE TV: TIME WARNER ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUS 775-220-014-1 775-370-002-09 7]5-220-012-4 LAND USE SUMMARY LOT NO LAM VSE ACREACCE(AC) PERCENT(%) 1 - 83 SINGLE -FAM LY ATTACHED RES. 1266 AC 30.18% COURTYARD HOMES (CLUSTERS 1-111) 84 - 09 SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL 10.47 AS 24,95% MANOR HOMES 90 - 97 MULTI -FAMILY RE50ENTIAL 8.95 AC 2133% VILLAGE HOMES q8 RECREATION SITE 1.35 AC 3.22% (COMMUNNY CREAT HOUSE) gg GOLF CART PATH 0 29AC 0697 'A' -'i LOCAL STREETS 5.43AC 12,95% NOPEN SPACE 290 AC 6.699. ��p L M'1 SUBTOTAL 4'106- 100.0% 1.1� LEGAL PARCEL 1 LOT 1 AND LETTERED LOT L OF TRACT NO. 29421, IN THE CITY OF LA GUINEA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ON FILE IN BOOK 297, PAGE(S) 54 THROUGH 57 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCIz PARCEL 7 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 20426 IN THE CITY OF LA OUATA AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 129, PAGES) 49 THROUGH 55, INCLUSNE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALFORNM. EXCEPTING THERE FROM THAT PORTION SAID PARCEL 7 ABOVE CONVEYED TO PGA WEST ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A CAIJFORN'A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RECORDED NOVEMBER 7, 19119, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 308530 OF OPTICAL RECORDS, AS APPROVED BY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 89-084 LOT UNE ADJUSTMENT FOR PARCEL 2, NO 2004-411, RECORDED ON OCTOBER B, 2004, AS INSTRUMENT NCO- 2200004-OBD3272 VARIA4I�+E.g NONE REQUESTED TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 33M NUMBER OF LOTS 113 SINGLE-FAVILY ATTACHED RES. (COURTYARD HOMES) Al MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED RES (V:LIAGE HOMES) B SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED RES. (MANOR HOMES) 6 RECREATION SITE 1 LOCAL STREETS 'A' -'I' B OPEN SPACE 'J' -'N' S COLE CART PATH 1 GROSS ACREAGE: 41.95 AG TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR INTERVAL 1 FOOT FINAL MAP WILL INCLUDE LOTS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. FINAL MAP MAY BE RECORDED IN MULTIPLE PHASES APPLICANT / DEVELOPER OWNER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, L.LI 8905 SIM W. NIMBUS AVENUE 8905 SW, NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 SUITE 400 aEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 9LAVERTON, OREGON 97008 ATTN: LOUIS SWART ATTN: LOUIS SWART PHONE (503) 6]0-9300 PHONE '(503) 6]O-93BO FAX 50J 670-9400 FAX. (503) 670-9400 ® PREPARED RY ? def[ lAMOAru - i " EDENR-OCK s c I� M P T T P nz prittww'A A r c n w T + r - PLANNERS EM61NElRE Si,*VIiYPR! PLANNING AREA III EDEN ROCK AT PGA WEST TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP Date Revised: AUG. 23, 2007 ° SD '°° 200 AN Date Prepared: APRIL 6, 2006 CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 1 OF 7 1:\50102\IW,IE\11-17-86\EDETROC+'\D7nv\50]02\PREUM\TENT-01 dq 10/10/07 19 ...CUT - - - RLL - MASS EXCAVATION 122,891 CY 67.800C Y FILL DVEREX R 4' 107,807 CY 129,368 CY SHRINKAGE (207) SUSSDEN'CE (0.2') -2.•570 Cy -I1.]4p GT. 0 C.Y. 8,769 C.Y. NET TOTALS 194,380 CY 205,945 SY IMPORT 11,565 C.Y` TOTAL EXCAVATION AREA = 41.95 ACRES ONSITE AND 195 ACRES OFFSITE ENTIRE PROJECT WILL BE GRADED IN ONE CONTINUOUS CRAD:NG OPERATION WITH AN EXPECTED DURATION OF 60-90 DAYS. ' NOTE AN ADJUSTMENT LOWERING THE SITE APPROXIMATELY 02 FEET WILL RESULT IN A BALANCED SITE, IT 15 REQUESTED THAT THE ELELVATIONS SHOWN HEREON BE USED AS MAXIMUM ELEVATIONS AND THAT THE FINAL ELEVATIONS MAY BE LOWER, BIR CAN NOT BE HIGHER THAN THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON, LOT, SUMMARY LOTS 1-83 MINIMUM LOT SIZE 4,391 OF (COL RTYARD HOMES) 2.236 OF AVERAGE LOT SIZE M M LOT SIZE 16,663 SF LOTS B4-119 VN MUM LOT SIZE 1.40 AC (MN'OR HOMES) AC AVERAGE LLOTOT SIZE 209 AC LOTS 90-97 MNWUM LOT SIZE 0.98 AC (VLLACE HOMES) MAXIMUM LOT SIZE 1 40 AC AVERAGE LOT SIZE 1.27 AC PROPOSED STREET 'C' (AT GATED ENTRY) (PRIVATE) RCALE -P�b' QI CONSTRUCT 3- AC OVER 4 1/2" CAB (D CONSTRUCT 6' CONCRETE CURB AND CUTTER PER DETAIL HEREON. Q3 CO N5TRUCT 6" CONCRETE CURB (NO GUTTER) PER DETAIL HEREON - CONSTRUCT 2 1/2" AC OVER 4" CAB ,p15rN Eg1N i�`q nc; roan wL5 t T-1 1%Y r 6' CONCRETE CURB D�gE�TAIL n EXISTING STREET ELEVATION EXISTING STORM TRAIN EXISTING SEWER SYSTEM EXISTING WATER SYSTEM EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED STREET ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM PROPOSED SEWER SYSTEM PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM PROPOSED PAD ELEVATION PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION PROPOSED LOT NUMBER PFA)POFEA) WA444 1p El E. TENTATIVE TRACT BOUNDARY PROPOSED 2:1 SLOPE PROPOSED VARIABLE SLOPE PROPOSED CENTERLINE RADIUS PRIVATE STREET LOT PROPOSED PUBLIC UTNTY EASEMENT PROPOSED PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT HIGHEST NO RESIDENTIAL LOT PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT V PROPOSED COMMON DRNEWAY EASEMENT (PRIVATE) (COURTYARD HOMES) Nra W {' NS rc s' plI% i PROPOSED STREETS E' 'F' 'G'H' + T (PRIVATE) W. CONCRETE CUSS 560-C-1500 NRH OM V 10- 6' CONCRETE CURB ONLY \4i - rc r�°r.rrrrr • PAD -720 0 FF=720 5 4 An R=3oD' STREET 'A' v 1/=/= GENERAL R1IFORMATION 1 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN: PCA SPECIFIC PLAN (AMENDMENT IV) 2PROPOSED GENERAL PIAN: PGA SPECIFIC PEAK (AMENDMENT V) 3 EXISTING ZONING TOURIST COMMERICAL TO. RSP) 4 PROPOSED ZONING MEDIUM DENSITY RES!DENPAL (RM) 5. EXISTING LAND USE. VACANT 6. PROPOSED LAND USE ATTACHED AND DETACHED S'N'CLE-FAMILY RES -DENTAL 7 ADJACENT LAND USE: No RT IT GOLF COURSE/S,NGLE-FAVILY RESIDENTIAL SOUTH: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIOENTAL, GOLF COURSE AND FACIUUES FAST. GOLF COURSE AND GOLF CLUB HOUSE FACILITIES WEST: SINGLE-FAM:LY RESIDENDAL 8. ALL GRADED SLOPES WILL BE A MAXIMUM OF 2:1, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN AND APPROVED. 9. THE APPUCANT/OEVELO PER RESERVE THE RIGHT fM FILE MULTIPLE FINAL MAPS FOR THE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP, PURSUANT TO SECTION 66456.1 10, ALL LOCAL STREETS AND DRIVEWAYS PROPOSED AM PRIMATE AND MAINTAINED BY AN APPROVED HOVEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION. II PAD AND FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON MAY BE ADJUSTED PLUS 0.3 FEET OR MINUS 40 FEEL 12PARK REQUIREMENTS TO BE MEF BY PAYING THE CII IN UEU FEES 11 THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT I4 ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: CUT: 235,000 CY FILL 235,000 Cy 15, THERE ARE NO EXISTING HABITABLE STRUCTURES WITHIN THE TENTATIVE TRACT BOUNDARY 16. MINIMUM PRIVATE STREET GRACE IS 0.5% 17 THE APPLICANT/DEVELOPER RESERVES THE FORT TO MERGE LOTS ON THE FINAL MAP(S). 18. THE EXISTING WELL ON-SITE HAS BEEN ABANDONED BY THE COACHELIA VALLEY WATER DISTR.CT 19. ALL IMPROVEMENTS REQU:RED BY THE GUY OF LA OU:NTA SHALL BE INSTALLED TO ME SADSFACE ON DF THE CITY ENGINEER. 20 PROPOSED PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT HAVE DIRECT ACCESS ONTO PGA BOULEVARD 21ALL PROPOSED LOT DIMENSIONS ARE APPRQ%!MATE 22 THE AERIAL TOPOGRAPHY WAS FLOWN AND COMPILED PLUTOGRAMMET-ALLY BY DON READ CORP ON 11/3/2004. 'A' 23. PROPOSED OPEN SPACE LOTS -'E' ARE PRIVATE AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED AN APPROVED HOMEOWNER'S. ASSDCIATION 24 THE PROPOSED PRIVATE RECREATION SITE, LOT 90, SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY THE DEVELOPER AND MAINTAINED BY A HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION 25 SCHOOL DISTRICT: EI SCHOO�L DESERTESERT �SANDSIII U UNIFIEDSCHIHOIL DISTRICT OOLSCHHOOL DISTRICT 26. ME PREUMINARY GEOTHECHN:CAL/SOILS REPORT WAS PART OF THE PGA WEST N,CKLAUS DYE REPORT, PREPARED BY BUENA ENGINEERS INC., DATED 4/1]/1986. AN UPDATED 1, HNII REPORT WAS PREPARED BY SIAD DEN ENCIh'EERING, DATED 10/14/2004. 27 PROPOSED GOLF CART PATH, LOT 99 WILL BE MAINTAINED BY OWNER'S OF THE EXISTING GOLF COURSE UTLJTY PFIOVIE)ERS WATER: COACHELLA VALLEY WATER O;STRICT 5EWFIR COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT GAS: SOUTHERN CALIFORNAGAS COMPANY ELECTRO: IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRCT TELEPHONE: VERIZON WIRELESS CABLE TV: TIME WARNER ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUS 775-220-014-1 775-370-002-09 7]5-220-012-4 LAND USE SUMMARY LOT NO LAM VSE ACREACCE(AC) PERCENT(%) 1 - 83 SINGLE -FAM LY ATTACHED RES. 1266 AC 30.18% COURTYARD HOMES (CLUSTERS 1-111) 84 - 09 SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL 10.47 AS 24,95% MANOR HOMES 90 - 97 MULTI -FAMILY RE50ENTIAL 8.95 AC 2133% VILLAGE HOMES q8 RECREATION SITE 1.35 AC 3.22% (COMMUNNY CREAT HOUSE) gg GOLF CART PATH 0 29AC 0697 'A' -'i LOCAL STREETS 5.43AC 12,95% NOPEN SPACE 290 AC 6.699. ��p L M'1 SUBTOTAL 4'106- 100.0% 1.1� LEGAL PARCEL 1 LOT 1 AND LETTERED LOT L OF TRACT NO. 29421, IN THE CITY OF LA GUINEA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ON FILE IN BOOK 297, PAGE(S) 54 THROUGH 57 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCIz PARCEL 7 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 20426 IN THE CITY OF LA OUATA AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 129, PAGES) 49 THROUGH 55, INCLUSNE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALFORNM. EXCEPTING THERE FROM THAT PORTION SAID PARCEL 7 ABOVE CONVEYED TO PGA WEST ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A CAIJFORN'A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RECORDED NOVEMBER 7, 19119, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 308530 OF OPTICAL RECORDS, AS APPROVED BY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 89-084 LOT UNE ADJUSTMENT FOR PARCEL 2, NO 2004-411, RECORDED ON OCTOBER B, 2004, AS INSTRUMENT NCO- 2200004-OBD3272 VARIA4I�+E.g NONE REQUESTED TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 33M NUMBER OF LOTS 113 SINGLE-FAVILY ATTACHED RES. (COURTYARD HOMES) Al MULTI -FAMILY ATTACHED RES (V:LIAGE HOMES) B SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED RES. (MANOR HOMES) 6 RECREATION SITE 1 LOCAL STREETS 'A' -'I' B OPEN SPACE 'J' -'N' S COLE CART PATH 1 GROSS ACREAGE: 41.95 AG TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR INTERVAL 1 FOOT FINAL MAP WILL INCLUDE LOTS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES. FINAL MAP MAY BE RECORDED IN MULTIPLE PHASES APPLICANT / DEVELOPER OWNER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, L.LI 8905 SIM W. NIMBUS AVENUE 8905 SW, NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 SUITE 400 aEAVERTON, OREGON 97008 9LAVERTON, OREGON 97008 ATTN: LOUIS SWART ATTN: LOUIS SWART PHONE (503) 6]0-9300 PHONE '(503) 6]O-93BO FAX 50J 670-9400 FAX. (503) 670-9400 ® PREPARED RY ? def[ lAMOAru - i " EDENR-OCK s c I� M P T T P nz prittww'A A r c n w T + r - PLANNERS EM61NElRE Si,*VIiYPR! PLANNING AREA III EDEN ROCK AT PGA WEST TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP Date Revised: AUG. 23, 2007 ° SD '°° 200 AN Date Prepared: APRIL 6, 2006 CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 1 OF 7 1:\50102\IW,IE\11-17-86\EDETROC+'\D7nv\50]02\PREUM\TENT-01 dq 10/10/07 19 EXISTING SEWER MANHOLJ II 1 II I y II °I I LOT 99 1 0.28 AC REALIGNED y 12! ; - GOLF CART y__1 y ACCESS I I y 1 4 r EXISITNG 40' CVWD SEWER 1 ti AND WATER EASEMENTS 1 I EXISTING 1 4 f y e� ' FIRE HYDRANT �4 PROPOSED 2:1 i 1 SLOPE PROPOSED 1 4' DRAINAGE I EASEMENT y 1 y i o 1 I 1 m 1 V PROPOSED 24' y 4 ACCESS AND y I DRAINAGE I I EASEMENTS I t II I CONSTRUCT y APPROXIMATELY I 110 LF. OF 60 CURB AND GUTTEFL i OAK TREE (Vf+1 Lr- FAQ? LY - -r---- g--ir,----- g -----r-----, „r � I �I1 :'i �- snrcr ra, ,f r � �I � _ �� b�� 11 m Ir FF.yil 1k IV, y 0.17 AC I Al Ir +�. I r --- , I 'LOTU: qi� I4a rc tc pi r ,. 1 Kk67 S9ifa 1 i 11 i� 4'r � LOT -79"'_ 10.21 AC t p}Ln 1 1 PROPOSED 1 ' ; 8' GOLF ILS' CART PATH REALIGNMENT LOT IK' OPEN SPACE 0.43 AC \ (PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE/ \ VARIABLE SLOPE) PROPOSED- 'a 4' DRAINAGE EASEMENT PROPOSED 24' ` ``• ACCESS AND DRAINAGE �\ EASEMENTS M, 24006 PARCEL 4 PROPOSED 7�10 4' DRAINAGE EASEMENTS November 07 - rF.44ca P � LOT P. 14 I `, fG k 1 ; T 42 I L7T 81 4I -11I 0.15 AC 3 � f•�9f.1 I 1s:- w' 1.a rLx-r1i r fF.3f35 f 1 LOTJ 7■8 I il r �A e S 011j 77 LOT,76 0.21 AC ' EXISTING 6' r BLOCK WALL PROPOSED --- , 8' GOLF CART PATH REALIGNMENT s=- PAIRCE, -11 P.1\). 20426 AN " 1 A �� PROPOSED VARIABLE WIDTH ," �/ OFF-SITE GRADING EASEMENT VARIABLE �.a ,r`We A_ b f SLOPE S IV 1 ,+lL�,D3O AC !6 M1 dip 0.'9'{Ny + +i Z4, lE""w1•l`�.�� J f /R 1P C% 1" LOT 74 �\ 0.13 AC LOT 0.16°c `' -� T=OT ; 0.15 J PLOT 12,E , 0.15 AC n 4Sti' , LOT �.� 0.17 AC ✓ I. s rw LOT 68 L-_ _ 1 ` . -Ae" W k, "- �L IR L& 69 fr.tsns rd:ti;°s 0.13 AC ZIA SE StYLF-C Alb. .3 EE 17� 0 15 30 00 120 ! LEGEND_ Ex STING STREET ELEVATION EXISTING STORM DRAIN -- - SA EXISTING SEWER SYSTEM EXISTING WATER SYSTEM EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED STREET ELEVATION —F�— PROPOSED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM PROPOSED SEWER SYSTEM SS PROPoS ED WATERssrEM w c 0 PROPOSED PAD ELEVATION PID-7A.D PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION FF -7205 �� VARIABLE PROPOSED LOT NUMBER 4 SLOPEPROPOSED RETAINING WALL TENTATIVE TRACT BOUNDARY ` PROPOSED 2.1 SLOPE r PROPOSED VARIABLE SLOPE ! ,14 CV, `+` PROPOSED CENTERLINE RADIUS R=300' 1 PRIVATE STREET LOT STREET 'A' PROPOSED Puauc urluTr Z�� ` EASEMENT ,` q. � f ' a •' EASEMENPROPOSED PRIVATE D4A'\ACE HIGHEST NO RESIDENTII LOT PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT ? �l`i,mAPPLICANT / DEVELOPER Ye - �s•� 00POINTE PARTNERS, L.L.C. SUR5 SW E 4 0 N N NBUS AVENUE 7008 ATTR:E TO Sq SWDAUT PHONE (50]) fi]0-93C0 FAX 503 6]0-9400 OWNER CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, L.L.C. 5905 SW NIMBUS AVENUE SUITE 400 BEAVERTON OREGON 97008 &� • �' a � i{] ATTN. Loins swART PHONE: (503) 6]0-93oD C 1w'`"F.L j.�1' �ronYroTnj FAX: 503 670-94ED LOT 8a°'`;<�+4 1.59 AC `� �.` R.3r,. 0 I CH uGG rn / / • � �)✓Lj SCHULTZ FAIL ,B6]I,d0T9 PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS Ily 2 `vJ p7, I `rr 41 y Y �- DEN 'ROCK A T rL.A W c S 1 '~ PLANNING AREA III y --` TEifT.�rTIVE TRACT No. 33226 r TENTATIVE TRACT MAP i . Date Revised: AUG. 23, 2007 P^° lzwiDate Prepared: APRIL 6, 2006 CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA u SHEET 2 OF 7 1\%N2\WA.-�\11-I7-05\EDN.WOCK\DP:VE_I\WM2\PWLIuvENr-02e.q 10/10/07 20 V h \ 1� PROPOSED 4PROPOSED 24! E DRAINAGE ACCESS ANDD DRANAGE '��• `� ' EASBefr '1 OPEN SSPrLOTACE 0.43 AC EXISTING— (P%TAf ffW-rDM CWE3 I 1 I PARKM d .OYENMMFMM P9 - ! PROPOSED GATED ��AI� PE 1 PROPOSED li WATER LIQ T WAC T �T0 EM I NG I I OF RAISED MEDIAN PROPOSED LEFTHAND TURN POCKET. CONSM.IICT APPROMATELY 25(Y LF. Il EXISTING C V.WD. WELL I BE RBAOVED I I OPEN SPACE LTA 1 1 IBdIOVE APPROXINlA II MMM EXISTING r ri 7 iyhl� Y 1 i 11 ' 1 PROPOSED 24' — ACCESS ANDDRAINAGE EASBd NS I I YI PROPOS2 DRAINAGE EASEMENT i e w, i'RA(-'T 03560-.1 11 (SING Ll--'—!:AlvflLY 1 November 07 SEE SIA5E7 Ab. 2 EXISTING Ir y T WATS LINELT 68 TO EE REMOVED �\A AIV 0.18O1 i�kC Li I WO F :y I�'7iiJ7 MORSE .musty • 0 0 K I L M .Im, LA B]25a c t�k J �/��S AN ACCESS ANI)STOW PLRN NERS ENGINEERS SU RVEV OflS A DRAIN EASBANM • ti c-:77-77 �7-' E D E N R O C K f r LOT 46_ WI AC � PLANNING AREA III 0.13 Ac t TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 TENT A TRACT MAP Date Revised AUCx 23, 2007 Date Prepared APRIL 6, 2006 CITY OF COUNTY OF IMSME, STATE OF CALF0FHA - SI-EET 3 OF 7 09.1 AM LOT M I 0.19 Ac r LOT 29 0.211 AC r !I/ -- 1 ,;art► I' LOT 0.11 AC L 40J Ac i a� Arc s,5E : ,kLcE'7' Ab. 4 t aAV v —, � _ 1 I LOT 91 Lc fo -V im Ar I t>a.A11 S.� z fl 0 15 30 5o 170 IiE.111A 6 rA;V4 j elmna mm C -J Boma aunt saRll —, i• �`E�j��j tmnlo wa mlal --- ctl� — .I Prom= lIMY a1W STSu tiuMaa alert 515181 55 rloo® t55r11 51781 -W PIIOPO® tMD 8lYYEM FRWM �ROM ODOM +� FNWM 1Df � mro® lcw.lo nu IDWO1tS YMOr Immaw FNMqM 2-1 SM . t#OPaS81 rEa8l5E twu5 DAM lwue $FPW lar 8TfEf 'A' ,�f "1Li Mla® nec UMV ¢arZrZn PNOPOW ROM MAKE EVEMBU HlHEFr "M PEEDUM Lar p5oroaa FFE MAW r ' - LOT 96 cwowMe PWR PA1lTAM wc. rI.W AC 11L HN" AM" 11.0 AC r Cwoww POdIIE DART u..c, 21 :y I�'7iiJ7 MORSE .musty • 0 0 K I L M .Im, LA B]25a 224' J �/��S AN ACCESS ANI)STOW PLRN NERS ENGINEERS SU RVEV OflS A DRAIN EASBANM • c-:77-77 �7-' E D E N R O C K f r LOT 46_ WI AC � PLANNING AREA III 0.13 Ac t TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 TENT A TRACT MAP Date Revised AUCx 23, 2007 Date Prepared APRIL 6, 2006 CITY OF COUNTY OF IMSME, STATE OF CALF0FHA - SI-EET 3 OF 7 21 November 07 SIE .SHAT Ab. �rrx+leea - U ! •+LOT 38 LT 4 ;. I w, nnn�F L._0.16 AC' LOT A1 l ' i �l�a 7--+A3 9.22 I I I j I EF 4ae8 LOT . ! I� I " 6 ti P.@ -,a.1 0.13 AC PROPOSED I TS I jj ' LOT 31 rt.',e„ _ '" .:,;, I f I 0.1 s AC L T 3'9" 2' DRAINAGE I I ti r��°`"" EASEMENT I { Q „ �,, , 11 LOT D111 Ac LOT 40 I Q.20 AC 0 i 11�:� I L•1�1 *'.I' t 1 , :i ; 1 Y\ },�, 1} If f 9 " r" _Y , t 1 t\ ! LOT 27 f , -v I r tt� �N I'I "+u_.j \ 1, t t \\ LOT 29 Lu, 0.11 AD-- r rOT 26 0.26 AC 0.12 AC LOT 28 7 PROPOSED 24' �\ '\ 1 ','� 1❑ ,. 0.17 Ac'+ LOT 2 ! ;+ ACCESS AND \ �� b, _! 0.20 AC DRAINAGE A , --��-� , EASEMENTN NN CONSTRUCT APPROXIMATELY 190 L.F. OF CURB LOT 'J'-` t - RAISED MEDIAN OPEN SPACE 2.06 AC (PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE/ VARIABLE SLOPE r�I :SIj-) ';\l -11,/" PROPOSEn 15' SEWER EASEMENT f PROPOSED i 4' DRAINAGE EASEMENTa PROI�OSED 15' r� CONSTRUCT APPROXIMATELY STORM DRAIN 150 LF. OF 6' CURB AND GUTTER j EASEMENT 1 - PROPOSED i - - DRAINAGE INLETS _ PROPOSED 15 ~ j r r STROM DRAIN EASEMENT � I I S,f-EE-f, Aju B - -tea • r �r.3uf __ry i ii LOT 42 _ rr 0.12 Ac; _ LOT 45 0.14 AC if rj rr0T 0.13 AC ' li r LOT 47L, ,t r g ` 1 0.14 AC i W t. DRAINAGE -------- EXISTING STREET ELEVATION EASEMENTS • 1 is r_ 4. 444--377 L -_ �.f r ----r ----------- _------- a 1 1714 �' ` LL ' LOT t� LOT 21 0.13 AC r„ .15 AC I� L" 0.16 AC IE r 4 • L 62. r LOT 2( Ile r - ' J 1 r-+ T r ? LOT 2311, x c' 0.16 AC j LOT 22 I LOT 51 /f a.,t, Ac L P" LOT 19 x 0 0 15 30 00 ti70 s PROPOSED 24' 0.16' AC I LOT 17 ACCESS AND W t. DRAINAGE -------- EXISTING STREET ELEVATION EASEMENTS • 1 is r_ 4. 444--377 L -_ EX15TI\c STORM DRAIN .-OT 49. LOT 50r -' R � "-�1 0.13 AC r„ 0.13AC1L,,J � v u , 4 1 i 4 - R - - -- r-+ T ; EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT L LOT 51 t L 48 s OT ! 0.15 AC LOT 18 L, 0.14 ACI s } } - L AC 1T ------------- r, , Lir " I' �� I1�, 11A�r_ �r,L! .� Z7 7' a scxDLrx ,eo-rr,.or4 - PROPOSED PROPOSED SEWER SYSTEM -- 4' DRAINAGE ��. EASEMENTS _ g --2-1 - I EDENRROCK I' l -)n,i x 0 0 15 30 00 ti70 s SND 0.16' AC I LOT 17 PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM W C ROWNE POUS INTE L.L.C.PARTNERS, L,} 0.15 AC -------- EXISTING STREET ELEVATION 8905 SW. M SUITE ON, OREGON 97008 • 1 is r_ 4. 444--377 L -_ EX15TI\c STORM DRAIN ArTN: (LOUIS) SWART PHO1 FAX `E (503) 6]0-9400 OWNER 4' DRAINAGE ' R � "-�1 EXISTING SEWER SYSTEM -- 4 1 EXISTING WATER SYSTEM - R - - -- r-+ T ; EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT 4 t t PROPOSED STREET ELEVATION --=fi�-- LOT 18 L, PROPOSED RETA'NING WALL PROPOSED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM } } - L AC 1T II I I r, , Lir " I' �� I1�, 11A�r_ �r,L! .� Z7 7' a scxDLrx ,eo-rr,.or4 0.18 _ �a PROPOSED SEWER SYSTEM 55 TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 LAKI", TENTATIVE TRACT MAP Date Revised: AUG. 23, 2007 Date Prepared: APRIL 6, 2006 CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 4 OF 7 :\50]Ot\..PIMENII-11-O6\FDEN50C!(\MtiE-1\5002\PREUYVENT-04d.g 10/10/07 22 0.16' AC I Iy! PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM W C ROWNE POUS INTE L.L.C.PARTNERS, _-- -------- -� � - _�-� �rrr� -� �. 8905 SW. M SUITE ON, OREGON 97008 PROPOSED PAD ELEVATION PAD -M.0 ��- - - _ - ��" --� '_ PRop6s C3 24' - �- -ACCESS AND -a- ArTN: (LOUIS) SWART PHO1 FAX `E (503) 6]0-9400 OWNER 4' DRAINAGE ' R � "-�1 _ - DRANNAOE - PROPOSED FRI. FLOOR ELEVATION FF -]20.5 - ---_-_ -•- _._ ii. _ -. _ -- PROPOSED LOT NUVOER 4 :, I! �; . r 1 2.06 AC (PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE/ 1F-- PROPOSED RETA'NING WALL VARIABLE SLOPE) li } } - DRAIN LINES II I I r, , Lir " I' �� I1�, 11A�r_ �r,L! .� Z7 7' a scxDLrx ,eo-rr,.or4 TENTATIVE TRACT BOUNDARY �--� }1- PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEVOR9 ��. PROPOSED 2:1 SLOPE _ g --2-1 - _ -------- EDENRROCK I' l -)n,i PROPOSED VARIABLE SLOPE A I P G A N' P N IT r -__ PLANNING AREA III - PROPOSED CENTERLINE RAD:US R-300' h LL7J1J PImm Syral Lcrt STREET 'A' rl+---r_------ _50'17`R-1413,00' lW6l.G5'�!��,. iLl PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY Vzz�/� - - - - -..-.moo EASEMENT «- Illy PROPOSED PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT 1TAL LOT RR P N0. REs HYDRANT PROPOSED FARE HYDRANT OS T TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 LAKI", TENTATIVE TRACT MAP Date Revised: AUG. 23, 2007 Date Prepared: APRIL 6, 2006 CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 4 OF 7 :\50]Ot\..PIMENII-11-O6\FDEN50C!(\MtiE-1\5002\PREUYVENT-04d.g 10/10/07 22 APPLICANT / DEVELOPER II II C ROWNE POUS INTE L.L.C.PARTNERS, _-- -------- -� � - _�-� �rrr� -� �. 8905 SW. M SUITE ON, OREGON 97008 PROPOSED �- I r u ��- - - _ - ��" --� '_ PRop6s C3 24' - �- -ACCESS AND -a- ArTN: (LOUIS) SWART PHO1 FAX `E (503) 6]0-9400 OWNER 4' DRAINAGE ' R � "-�1 _ - DRANNAOE - CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, L.L.C. EASEMENT = _ -- - 99D5 S NMBDS AVENUE BEA�ERTON. r' I li , LOT'b, ' ASEMEl V 1 S �� z OPEN -SPACE OREGON 07008 II (OU1S SWART FAX:NE (5031 111 NO -9400 E �G 2-30` yI I! �; . r 1 2.06 AC (PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE/ C.P. STORM i VARIABLE SLOPE) li 30K LR DRAIN LINES II I I r, , Lir " I' �� I1�, 11A�r_ �r,L! .� Z7 7' a scxDLrx ,eo-rr,.or4 PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEVOR9 II EDENRROCK I' A I P G A N' P N IT r PLANNING AREA III TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 LAKI", TENTATIVE TRACT MAP Date Revised: AUG. 23, 2007 Date Prepared: APRIL 6, 2006 CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 4 OF 7 :\50]Ot\..PIMENII-11-O6\FDEN50C!(\MtiE-1\5002\PREUYVENT-04d.g 10/10/07 22 November 07 PROPOSED VARIABLE WIDTH OFF-SITE GRADING EASEMENT VARIABLE fizz4 SLOPE i 2 �• s {Eorp -. rr.y�l PA9 •tea A � Pac.lola � er�Li nI.5n7.G __�a PAd• ! � �� Y 1 �{-& 1 •o,m-Fad 2J%20 (GOL5 0J JJR E) 2 r r'JNA, 2J%20 (GOL5 0J JJR E) ' I (LOFT) I !i't) I 1� 1 PwWs.7 S ('LOFY1 1 1 i OT 87 q .4f AC PROPOSED VARIABLE WIDTH OFF-SITE GRADING EASEMENT 0 O 0 15 JO SO 'zo EXIS�R�LEVATION _. EXISTING STORY DRAW -- EXISTING SEWER SYSTEM -- EXISTING WATER SYSTEM— EXISTING UTILITY EASEVENT ✓%fJ%/i%+ PROPOSEDSTREET ELEVATION ^-_-- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN 5YSTEM PROPOSED SEWER SYSTEM' PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM -� PROPOSED PAD ELEVATION PROPOSED FlNISH FLOOR ELEVATION FF.TM PROPOSED LOT NO' PER 4 PROPOSED RENNING WALL 2. - TENTATIVE TRACT BOUNDARY ,• LSI PROPOSED 2:1 SLOPE '� ♦ f �^-t-1- _ - ---- tt f--£�. \ Gl} OPOSED VARIABLE SLOPE ---- -- PROPOSED CENTERLNE RADUS �'�LN•!07 -T JJ ti+ -1 .4y! 1 -jAll] - Rri4i] rmt 'fs.{p}X •` pp�.yp,p �� 1.�,A y'� i i pbpjp i9�a ,yt.1 ' PEARVAMTEESTREET LOT STREET A " PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY C A C LOT 89 PROPOSED PRIVATE ORANAGE - „m w©n1n p+D.29Ta r F ,It! -,.;y; � ,t - •IYtTr'1. 1 I i. , lRary..d PrAiC.NlppI]�]� d ppp. t.S3 AG 4 EASEMENT 4-x yy9 N 0 RESIDENTIAL LOT 1PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT ' t 'r• E r-`+` o,` tale �r v" E-1 APPLICANT DEVELOPEri a ® `' w n ° f// }T.�eg,$ ` s r I I �, \� , CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. r:-� I FT •,Vt.l ohj aF WS.W, 1 .ull . P/.q-lgsJl 'rr E-1 g -t S' y. 'Z E 400 . SUIT SW. NIMBUS AVENUE —�lilt a AVER TON, OREGON 97000 OT 9h - _ �� - x i. 1 1 a 'fir- \\ 1+ ATTN: LOUIS SWART L.L1 �i r-.- -- • R -, -~� t e9 �, n p {/� PHONE. (503) 610-9-00 1.41 AC0— -5S—_ -.5S R*5' 1 1 B E -t s •` �.'\ \ -r FAX jsD3) 670-saaD C.'�9. `ZI �� OWNER ,/1l �]CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. RPO ED 20, f Sy ` - _ R9o5 SW N VBUS AVENUE '•'"\\R SUITE 400 a �'�-1 / I 4 F ++• B.AVE RTON OREGON 97008 sy+� f �'� 1 ,pa S +m S u �,n `j \ ATTN. LOUIS SWART PR V O ED E 1 r,y Jl•' jy a1�M a q y L y `^.\ PHONE: (503) 670-9-00 P 1 FFrAiYFr" ( SEME ` FAX: i503) fi10-9400 I rme p - rF'w7.5 •G rir.4t%$ C ay.a P,n�,ase vra•�rsE FF:IfT E1 f PA'Nr9 �I �_ i --. - ,� I - _� • o rc c N rn awm w'sma Y Dye PLANNERS ENGINEERS LTZ SURVEYORS � � •f y, DEN ROCK 77 P ry�y •wl lF.— , , (1• A i November 07 PROPOSED VARIABLE WIDTH OFF-SITE GRADING EASEMENT .: PROPOSED 10' OFF-SITE GRADING EASEMENT a re ru' act +� • w—� mss.. }, p %��I�yIr� LEGEND �}'1ji t.V E`j il� E%18TINC STREET ELEVATION-`! R. . �� ¢. '? f (/-�r-•t � 7-" lP-/•T4 IIC3 f_`f:<<. Exlsmc s'CRM ERA" — i)i h„j INK") RANO.. EXISTING SEWER SYSTEM — �\ I� EXISTING WATER SYSTEM '�� 1111 111 uTIUTY EASEMENT LOT88` PROPOSED STREET ELEVATION •\` a L i }O •,�,3 6 � r�.14 a$/ tY;Aa PROPOSED STORM oRATY SYSTEM //JfA_ ..+[[.. )y1• PROPOSED SEWER SYSTEM "- - - - - y"R ♦. ,` ' fy' l/'y) 4 4 PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM �!L p,� 5,.� ! T ' Oj• PROPOSED PAD ELEVATION 7!«x•6 LOT87 ? T • a G y y ' tJ A� PRC?OSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION PT•IJJS 1.41 AC t? b ` PROPOSED LOT NUMBER 4 1 i PROPOSED RETAINING WALL19 - r y,� y] ♦1 ` 4 f D -0 TENTATIVE TRACT BOUNDARY PROPOSED 21 SLOPE �. PROPOSED VARIABLE SLOPE PROPOSED CENTERLINE RADNS eR•cr_��.�" PRIVATE STREET LOT S•�tL3•RIS v ` o _ V• '.� PROPOSED PUB' La is UTUTILITY LAS EVENT cam' I [j L is k ]- __, . - 0 L«O J •i.. N' • 1 9 +iL7 H EASEMENT VAC_ PRa?oseD PRIVATE ORA ♦ orI* H CHEST NO RESIDENTIAL LOT M EXISTING EXISTING PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT T J 4 F sr� r CLUBHOUSE APPLICANT / DEVELOPER PARKING LOT CROWNE POINTE PARTNERS, LLC. LOT 95 y (REVISED PARKING LAYOUT) 5905 8W NIMBUS AVENUE +F.t�r 890E 400 `fy y/ n '� \ ? �` j� N T 36"?tl• E BEAVERTCN. OREGON 97006 S �\ ,vim ATTN: LOUIS SWART 1.•�q AC ' * a . - ")` ,X ! T '�1'S�• PHONE (503) 6]0-9JDO T Sw' � 1 FAX (503) 6]0-9400 yy\� .A yam' CROWNE L.L.C.\1POINTE PARTNERS, 3•['�� y,f N. ` - N \ // /y'el I `,', 8905 SW NVBUS AVENUE y 'ENV aoD VVV BEAVERTov, DREcou 91009 ATTN: LOUIS SWART sia-sago F7.ml �a ' _ . P 6{Ti' �y'fJ •o R c x L. a.w a HB SC FA% 11013 • '�}F¢ '3 f ALF a�. .. y T/�' PLANNERS ENGINEERS LTZ SURVEYORS J $CID � a PR�POSED 2b' 3, � $ ' , =R7lP T i Ai6 -WATER AND I ,�.` T� � EDENROCK Ffr r'J SEIN EASEMENT \!',' $15j;� ` '!l�'y,` " ' �• �Q af3n � '{ A T P t A %y r \ r ss PROPOSED 10' , ' PLANNING AREA III _ /• `�'� . - WATER LOT 65 / TENTATIVE TRACT No. 33226 {1.17 AG ,� `�*. P �I " EASEMENT`"a ;�' �,. , -+, J � SLOT C IVr �• y . �✓� ..� :.: SOT 62 LOT B4OPEN AcTENTATIVE TRACT MAP 0,12 AC 0.17 AC— i s t Date Revised: AUG. 23 2007 • I LOT 7 „�-; /` LOT 53 — I I Date Prepared: APRIL 6, 2006 $• w _. 0.13 AC ��— y CITY OF LA OUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOT 61 , `. ti I I SHEET 7 OF 7 0.13 AC l\/D. J .is1'�T11T++:ti1P-tr•cslDxxsrc[ix•,L-,Iww7H'.afIHVPu-may b/�PNr 25 engineering group, inc. January 24, 2007 Mr. George Robertson CROWNS POINTE PARTNERS, LLC clo PACIFIC SECURITY CAPITAL 8'905 SW Nimbus, 4" Floor Beaverton, OR 97008 transportation planning • traffic engineering acoustical engineering, parking studies Subject: Eden Rock Subdivision (TTM 33226) La Quinta Parking Review Dear Mr. Peterson: Introduction RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. (RK) is pleased to provide this parking review for Rock Subdivision (TTM 33226) in the City of La Quinta. The proposed project would consist of 83 single-family residential attached units (2 to 3 bedrooms), 81 triplex dwelling units (3 bedrooms) and 128 condo dwelling units (2 to 3 bedrooms). The location of the site is shown on the attached Exhibit A, and the existing site plan for the project is shown in Exhibit B. The purpose of the study is to evaluate peak parking demand for the project as according to City of La Quinta parking requirements, review other cities in the Coachella Valley and Riverside County with respect to parking requirements for residential developments, review professional organizations (Le. ITE, ULI, APA, etc.) with respect to parking requirements and develop recommendations for the proposed project. The results of the parking review have been reviewed and the findings of the study are outlined below, Findings . The following findings are provided: 1 RK has reviewed parking requirements for various public agencies throughout Coachella Valley and Riverside County. RK has also reviewed the ITE Parking Standards and APA Parking Standards for rates pertaining to residential units similar to the proposed project. These figures are included in Table 1. 2. The parking requirements for the City of La Quinta are greater than the requirements of most of the agencies RK has reviewed. It should be noted that the City of La Quinta 3991 macarthur boulevard, suite 310 newport beach; california 92660 tel 949:474.0809 fax 949.474.0902 http-J/www.rkengineer.com parking requirements are higher than the cumulative average rates of all agencies. A comparison between the required parking spaces for the proposed project in the City of La Quinta versus the other agencies surveyed can be viewed on Table 2. A graphical depiction of the average rates of all agencies versus the City of La Quinta parking rates can be viewed on Exhibit C. 3. A review of other transportation sources has also indicated a lower requirement than the City of La Quinta. The ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers) recommends lower minimum parking requirements than the City of La Quinta, as shown in Table 1. Parkinq Requirements Survey RK has conducted an extensive review of the parking requirements for agencies in the Coachella Valley and Riverside County. A summary of the parking requirements for these agencies is shown in Table 1. Based upon our survey the average parking requirements for various agencies are as follows' Average; Parking Requirement; (Guest Parking is included) SFR jDuplex) 2 -Bed 3-13ed MFR (Condo) J 2 -Bed 3 -Bed MFR (Triplex) 2 -Bed 3 -Bed 2.19 2.28 1 2.22 2.51 122 2.51 Based on these averages a total of 633 parking spaces would be required for the proposed project. These figures indicate that the City of La Quinta requires :226 more parking spaces than the average of all the agencies surveyed for the proposed project. A graphical depiction can be viewed on Exhibit D. Other Organizations Parking Requirements RK has reviewed other professional organizations with respect to parking requirements. The ITE in their document; Parking Generation 3`6 Edition, includes parking characteristics for various land uses. A copy of the resources used is available in Appendix A. APA (American Planning Association) in their document, Planning Standards; dated November 2002, includes parking rates accumulated from various cities across the United States. A copy of the resources used from this document is also available in Appendix A. Recommendations Upon review of the parking requirements for other agencies in the Coachella Valley and Riverside County area RK has developed parking requirements for the Eden Rock Subdivision (17M 33226) development in La Quinta. RK:rd1RK5363.DOC 2 787:1342-07.01 Based upon the proposed development RK would recommend a minimum average parking rate of 633 total parking spaces for the proposed parking, as shown in Table 2. This figure is calculated when using the average rates of all the agencies studied and multiplying them by the project's respective units, as demonstrated on Table 2. This will adequately accommodate the peak parking demands for the proposed project. 2. It should be noted that after careful consideration and comparative research RK feels that the City of La Quinta parking rates are disproportionately higher than the wide majority of the agencies surveyed. There is a difference of 226 parking spaces when comparing the average rates from all agencies surveyed and the City of La Quinta rates. Conclusions RK has conducted a'parking review of the proposed Eden Rock Subdivision (TTM 33226) in the City of La Quinta. The proposed project would include 83 single-family residential attached units (2 to 3 bedrooms), 81 triplex dwelling units (3 bedrooms) and 128 condo dwelling units (2 to 3 bedrooms). Based upon RK's review of other agencies' parking rates in the Coachella Valley and Riverside County, as well as professional organizations, we would recommend that the proposed Eden Rock Subdivision (TTM33226) would include at least 633 parking spaces. The City of La Quinta parking rate standards would require the project to include at least 859 parking spaces. After careful consideration and comparative research RK feels that the City of La Quinta parking rates are disproportionately higher than the wide majority of the agencies surveyed. difference of 226 parking spaces when comparing the average rates from surveyed and the City of La Quinta rates. There is a all agencies RK appreciates this opportunity to work with the Crown Pointe Partners, LLC on this project. If you have any questions regarding this or need further review, please give us a call at (949) 4740809. Sincerely, RK ENGINEERING C. Robert Kahn, P.E. Principal Rl,*AIRK5383 3 IN -1942-07-01 Sorin Boer Engineer Exhibit A Location Map 54th Avenue N engineering EDEN ROCKSUBDIVISIONgTM3,3236)PARMN6:STUDY, City ofUQuInM Cstlfomia - group, inc. Exhibit B Site Plan N 1942-07,411M) engineering EDEN ROCKSUDDIVIS(ON (TTM 33226) PARFJNG STUDY. City of L2Qblnm cwifomla U3 group, inc. Parking Code Survey a 1. Exhibit C Parking Code Survey N I942.07-Ol tExq engineering EDEN RQCK SUBDIVISION (TTf i 33226) PAWQNG STUDY, Ory of LzQu(umr, CeRfdrnla - group, inc. :a � .�(OtjfecAgenaes) , N sr R.'s-' p 2 -Bed I 3 -Rede 2 -Bed 3 -Bed 2 -Bed 3 -Red - SFR.(DOPIM MR(Condo)2 MER(TdPlex)3 N I942.07-Ol tExq engineering EDEN RQCK SUBDIVISION (TTf i 33226) PAWQNG STUDY, Ory of LzQu(umr, CeRfdrnla - group, inc. 300.0 25010 q. 6 iaa:e I Required Parking for Project 33224) PARK(f fG STUDY. City of La Qulnta, Exhibit G Parking Code Survey engineering group, ine. TABLE 1 Parking Code Rates - - 5 aces Perflwelli .Unit pBenry' La:Qumta Cathie Coachella Indian wells Indo PalmDesent Palm Springs Rancho Mirage Unincorpgrated Riverside IRE Parking Generation 3rd Edition' Reddin,CAFat Source- Gly of La Quinta„ _ . cityaf Cathedral City _ City of Coachella citygf lrcdian Welh Cityof Indio Gly at Palm Desert city of Palm Springs City of Rancho Mirage.__ Countyol Riverside, _ Institute of Transportation Engineers of Redding APA Parking StandSrds. SPH (D Iex1" MFR (Condo MFR Rd lez)a. 2 -Bed 1 2.5_ 2 _. 2.33 Z _- 2.2 2 2.25_ 3. _I 2 1.85_ 2. 3 -Bed. 25..__ _ 2_._ 2 33 2 _ 22 _ 3 2E-- _ 3 __ 2 _.__. I 185_ i 2 23 -Bed 2.5_ _ 3.5- 15 _ I. 15 ___. 2 33 2 33 _ _ 2 2 22_- 2 3 I.75 3 3 225 j_ 1.85 i, ,185 3. t 3 2•Bgd I 3 -Bed 15 2.33 ,_ 2 33 _ 2 _ 3 _— 3 I 3 Average Antes 2:79. 2.2a 2.22 2:57 2.22 2,51 Cr 1V - —• -— , _. _ z 3;,Z; zo'3.31 15r 203.3( zqS:b3 /18 i= Single Faodly, Residence, Attached -(Duplex) - 83 701a t= Multi Family Residence (Dupled - 41.Tataf a = Multi Family Residence (Triplex) -128 Tota(. -° = These figures have been increased by 10%toaccount for any unforeseen dversAY. liriiatileV/K53aaTaik, .. /N:194F017J1! TABLE 2 Project Parking Requirements. Comparison P.04.. Rantdecmcnfc rRodNnnt1a11 Agency Source Spaces Per RWellin -Unit TONAL SFR IDn 19x11 MFR(Condof MFR IT lex)a (7} Z;Bed I (70)9 -led (li) 3 -Red (80) 2-Betl (48) 37BEd M Quota, GIV of La quinta 17.5' 190.0 2815 200.0 I 168.0 859 Cathedral City City of CathedralCity1410 152, 121.5 120.0 72.0. 480 Coachella . - City or.coacheila 16.3 177.1 188.7 188:4 111.0 680 Indian Wells-. ' :ot Indian Wells 141.0- 152.0 T62:0 1600 96.0 _ 594 Indo- OR,61infiio 15.4- 1671 178.2 176.0 105,6 642 Palm 0esed CiN of palm DeseP['- 14.0 228.0 248, 1,W0O 144.0 709 Palm Springs Ci'. of Pai.S nn S 15.8 771.0 202.5 740,0 120.0 649 Rancho Mime City of Rancho Mirage 21.0 228.0. 243.0 240.0 144.0 876 Unincorporated Riverside County of Riverside 14.0 152.0. 222.8 1130.0 132 0 701 ITE Parkin Generation 3rd Edition Insfuute of TranEportaaon:Engineers. 13.0. 140:6 149.9 148.0 88.8. 540 RaJding. APA Parking Standards 14.0 152.0 2430 2400 144:0 793 Average Rates 14 -159 187 163 171 633 '-= Single Family Residence, Attached (Duplex) - 83 Total a = Multi Family Residence (Duple4 • 81 Total a = Multifamily Residence Rdple4 -128 Total iak(ableARKPIUM IN IS42.OY01 Appendices 9.I50060 Spaces required: by use. La ulnta Up Previous Next Mein 11tie9 ZONING ' Chapter 9.150 PARKING httpJ/gcode.uslcodeslinquintalwew:pnp Search Print No Frames llemoytdtigiiGltf�t;-I 9,150.060 Spaces required by Use. A. Land -Uses notListed. If no provisions for the required number of uff-street parking spaces are set €orth in Tables 9-11 or 9-12 of this section or the provisions-ar.e-not clear for a specific use, the decision-maidng authority for the applicable -use or project shall determine the number ofps'ddng spaces required. & Definition of GFA. For purposes of this chapter and this code, gross floor area or GFA means the total square footage of all floors of a building, including the exterior walls but excluding courtyards and other outdoor areas. C. Parldng for Residential Land Uses. 1. Table 941 -following contains the minimum number of parl€iug spaces required for each type of residential landuse, 2. Whenever any commercial or industrial use is located on a building site that is also used for residential purposes, parking facilities shall be provided for the residential use per Table 9-11 in addition to the spaces required for the nonresidential use(s). duplexes. • attutenl airspace condomin t 1 of9 Parking Requirement ;e plus.5 guest spaces out if no on -street ing is available �veredcor uncovered This space shall not in meaus.any habitable room that maybe us Lug purposes other Than a kitchen, bathroom, dining room, or living room. Minimum length shall conform to Section 9.60.060, unit in a All units shall be within 100 feet of the nearest guest 8 guestspaces space. Aperlaug plan will be required as part of development review showing allocation of guest spaces. nit meet snaues.shall be restricted to theuse of guests for Parldng Requirement 1/1872007 3;55 pM 9.150.060 Spaces required by use. httpt//gcode.tdcodestla�taJvjCw.pup"troprc=y-yruv-> =�.v_wv.:. (1) Studio I covered space per unit, for sleeping purposes other than a kitchen, bathroom, plus .5 guest spaces per hallway, dining room, or living room nit For apartments, condominiums, mobilehome parks, (2) One -bedroom 1.2 covered spaces per unit plus .5 guest spaces per senior citizen hotels, and congregate care facilities, unit parking shall be arranged so that all units are within 100 feet of the nearest guest space. A parking plan shall be (3)Two-bedroom 2 covered spaces per wtit plus .5 barest spaces per required as part of development review showing allocation of dwelling unit spaces and guest spaces. All unit guest spaces shall be restricted to the use of guests only (4) Three or more 3, covered spaces per unit bedroom plus .5 covered spaces per each bedroom over three, plus .5 guest spaces per •t obilebomeparks 2 covered 'spaces/anit, which may be in tandem, plus :S spaces per unit Senior group 5 covered spaces per unit housing/senior citizen plus .5 guest spaces per hotels and congregate unit e facilities andbreald'ast One space per guest room inns plus puking for residents as required by this code.. Boardinghouse, I space per sleeping room roominghouse, and. ingle room ccupancy hotels odging and Child Carc Uses Child care centers, 1 space per staff member Smelting analysis may be required to define a drop-off including preschools plus 1 space per 5 children. facility that accommodates at least four cars in a and nursery schools Parking credit may be continuous flow, preferably ane -way, to safely load and given if queuing area for unload children more than 4 cars is provided, but resulting parking shall be not less than 1 per staff member plus 1 per 10 children . I&ecreational Vehicle One automobile parking :arks space on each recreational vehicle lot plus one space per 20 recreationallots. for visitors 1/18/2007 3:55 PM 64hedral (;26p utiisipai code up _ Previous Next h9am, search Ptinti No Frames Title9 PLANNING AND ZONING- Diy(slonII.➢lStrlctReoulatlons Chapter 915 R2 MULYIPI E-fAN¢LY RESiDENTIAC DISTRIGi 91316. 90 Paridgq, In addition to all the requirements of Chapter 9.58, the minimum parking shall be as follows: ' A, One -family dwellings two car parking spaces within a garage. B. Two-family and multiple dwellings up to and including four units on a legal lot, two car parking spaces perunit, at least one of which is to be in a garage, Such parking structures may be entered directly from the street or be side entered. To provide variety, the design shall vary from any existing adjacent development to the satisfaction of the planning commission. C. Multiple dwellings of five units or more on a legal lot: one and one-half car parking spaces per unit, at least one of which is to be in a garage. l3, Location of parking: No parking :spaces shall be located or vehicles parked in any area except within approved garagesi carports, or improved open parking spaces. Driveways and improved parking areas shall not cover more than fifty percent of the required front or street side yard area. (Ord, 263 § 5 (part) 1989) 1/19120071:11 PM Of I 9,18.090 Parking. - littp!/gcode,us/codes/catlicdmlcity/view.p3rpTtapc=9-ii'4_18A_i6... Cathedral City unicipal Code e1 10 Next Main Search Print No Frames TIEIe NNING AND ZONING Dlafslcn TI. Dtsbict Reoulattons .Chapter 9.18 RM MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT: g.18.D9D Parking. in addition to all the requirements of Chapter 9.5 8, the minimum parking shall be as follows: A. Amount one and one-half car parking spaces per unit. B. Coveredparking: at least one space per unit shall be covered. . - d interior side.. and only. Open parking spaces 5i Ibe C, Open parlong; to be located m rear: yards an y constructed of pordand-cement concrete. D, Location of parking. No vehicles shall be parked in any area except within approved garages, carports, or improved open parking spaces. (Ord 263 § 6 (part), IM) 1/19120071:11 PM loft 9 14090 Parking. { �.Cathedrai City Municipal Code I IFrip Previous Next Main Title 9 PLANNING AND ZONING Dlvision.IIn: DisMetR�ulattons ' Chanter 9:.14 R1 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDEIMAL DISTRICIRI SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DIS�RIGT htto://gcode.us/codes/cathedralcity/vieW,php?toplr�o+_-4_149_14... Search Print No Frames 9.14.09()Park U.-- --.---- ----- -- _._�__ In addition to all the requirements of Chapter 9.58, the minimum parking shall be as follows: A Mtifiiltvelling: two car parldng-spaces"tit itiiin a garage; B, GnesfdwtiIing. one car parking -space within a garage;: C. Location of parking: no vehicles shall be parked in any area except within the garage, improved driveway, or improved accessory parking spaces; D. Maximumparking spaces: the maximum number ofparking spaces per lot shall not exceed four covered spaces (two hundred square feet each) and open parking not greater than one thousand square feet excluding driveways. Additional covered parking in lieu of said open parking may be permitted by conditional use permit provided all other applicable district standards can be met; E. Vehicles shall not be parkedor stored in any front or street side, yard area except on driveways or open parking spaces constructed of portland cement concrete. Driveways and improve_ d parking areas shall not cover more than fifty percent of the required front or street side yard area. F. Farkiug lots, in conjunction with commercial uses, are allowed provided that the parking lot: 1. Solely serves an adjacent commercial development that has frontage along Ramon Road; 2. Shares a common property line or alley (not including a public street) with the commercial development; 3. Does not have vehicular access from an adjacent residential street, unless no other suitable options are available as determined by the city planner, 4. Is not located on a lot that fronts on Roundup Road; and S. Is not used for any type of storage activity, sales or other non -parking use at any time. For parking lots meeting the above criterion, the following development standards shall apply:. 1. A solid decorative masonry wall shall be constructed between the parking lot and the adjacent residential properties. The wall shall be a minimum of six feet and a maximum of seven feet in height. Where the wall is adjacent to a residential front yard setback, the wall height shall step down, starting at the setback line to meet the perimeter screen wall height as described below. 2. A solid decorative masonry screen wall shall be constructed between the parking lot and the adjacent residential street(s) that is a minimum of thirty-six inches and a'maximum of forty-eight inches in height. A minimum five foot interior width planter shall be'constructed along both sides of the decorative screen wall. 3. A minimum five foot interior width planter shall be constructed along the perimeter of the lot where the lot is adjacent to residentially zoned properties. 4: All interior planters shall be protected from vehicle overhangs with concrete whed::stops. Exception Vehicles may have atwo foot overbang into t pianterthat has a minimum interior dimension of at least seven feet and concrete wheel stops will not be required: 5.Parking .lots shall have a.minimum of fifty percent shade coverage of the parking area within ten years of construction. Trees should be planted between, every three parking spaces. Arbors, courts and similar shade structures maybe approved by the city planner instead of the tree requircment, provided that their supporting members are setback at least five feet from the.property line that is shared with residentially zoned.properties, 1 oft 1/18/2007 1:52 PM Chapter 17.$4 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/reaiad/l)esKropn;napier ... a. Residential Uses. (1) Single -Family Detached Dwellings. Two spaces per dwelling unit, both to be in an enclosed garage. Single -Family units within the R -O 6000 Overlay zone may reduce this requirement to one space in an enclosed garage so long as all requirements of that zone are met. (2)For Mulfrfamily, Attached Single -Family Dwellings and Duplexes. or in a garage. Plus two-thirds open space per dwelling unit. bedrooms One per dwelling unit, to be covered or in a garage, Plus one and one-third open space per dwelling unit. b: Auditoriums, Churches, Theaters and Places of Assembly. One space per each three seats. Where there are no fixed seats„one space per twenty-one (21) square feet of floor area in places of assembly. Where fixedseats consist of pews or benches,' eighteen (18) lineal inches of pew or bench shall be considered one seat, c, Boardinghouses, Fraternities and Group Living Quarters, One space per resident. d Bowling Alleys, Four spaces per lane. e: Clubs, Discos, Ballrooms, Cabarets, Cocktail Lounges, Dance Halls, Lodges; and Incidental Dancing Areas, and Similar Facilities Where Dancing Is the Principal Use Of the Area. One parking space for every thirty (30) square feet of dance floor area. f. Game Courts, such as Tennis and Racquetball. Two spaces for each court. g. Golf Courses. Four spaces per hole. h, Golf Driving Ranges. One space per tee. I. Hospitals for Acute Care: One space per licensed bed. j. Hospitals, Convalescent and Sanitariums, Nursing Homes, Rest Homes, Retirement Homes and Similar Establishments. One space for each, three licensed beds, k, hotels and Motels. One space per room or suite, plus nne space per every three employees on the largest work shift, plus one space per three persons to the maximum capacity of each public meeting and/or banquet room, plus fifty (50) percent of the spaces otherwiserequired for accessory uses (e.g. restaurants and bars). (.Outdoor Display, Sales and Storage Areas,including but not Limited to, Contractor's Storage Yards; Rental Equiprnent Yards and Outdoor Plant Nurseries. One space per two hundred fifty (250) square feet ofofficelretail floor area plus one space per two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet of outdoor area or one space for every two employees, whichever is greater. m. Restaurants and Other Eating, Drinking and Food Establishments. One space for each forty-five (45) square feet of customer area, plus one space for each two hundred (200) square feet of noncustomer area. n. Schools, Private. (1) Elementary and Junior High. One. space per teacher and staff member, plus one space per two classrooms, (2) SeniorHigh. One space per teacher and staff member on the largest shift, plus five spaces for every classroom; (3) College. One space per staff member on the largest shift, plus ten (10) spaces per classroom; (4) Commercial or Trade Schools. One space' per two students, plus one space per employee (including faculty) at capacity class attendance period; (5) Day Care/Pre-School, One space for each employee plus one space for each ten (10) children the facility is designed to accommodate. o: Vehicle Repair And Service. Three spaces for each service bay, plus one space for each two hundred fifty (250) square feet of office, sales and storage areas. 1/18/2007 3:59 PM 3of8 Erle;/1/Cs/Docnments°laoana'/42-0Settings/rcalnd/DeshtopJchapfecl5... I iihschoolor IFive spaces per classroom l shall be and Single family Two spaces per home in a Homes with four bedrooms .garage, plus two spaces in or less shall haven garage with a minimum of 20 feet a driveway by 20 feet of unobstructed area provided; homes with more than four bedrooms shall have a minimum additional garage space of 10 feet by 20 feet Multi -family One assigned space per unit in a garage, plus one Fifty Percent of all spaces not in a garage shall be in a half space per one covered carport. bedroom unit and one hl addition to the standard space per two or more bedroomunt requirements, one alternatively any additional off street 0 ownership unit requires at paricingo space Per five least a 20 foot by 20 foot units shall be provided and garage space. reserved as guest oparking MoblleJ ome park Two spaces per home in:a Tandem oparking is covered carport permitted Restaurauits, ca f� one space per each 100 A ouroften spaces are required, regardless of cafeterias, bazs, lounges, estaminets, and outer square feet of floor area or one space for each five floor area similar plane; serving food seats or drink Convalescent and nursing One space per each four Resident capacity of the '. home shall be as required homes, homes for the'aged, last homes, children's beads or one space per each residential unit license or permit homes and sanitariums . General retail stores or A minimum of five spaces businesses 165 af2.23 1/19/200712:44 PM •21.20:080 Garages, carports and "parking: blip://gcodeuslcotlesnnd�nnweus/v�ew.yuy,.�y,.�-<-r,_ --_ -•-- Indian Weiis Municipal God Up. Previous. Next Main Search Print No Frames - TT8e21ZONING CDDE Chanter2l20 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. GENERAL 21.20A80 QaTgesLcarporEs and parking, A minimum of two (2) on-site parking spaces, a minimum of ten feet by twenty-two feet (10'X 22) clear, each, shall be provided for each dwelling unit constructed within the City. Generally, required oh -site parking shall be within a legal garage, Specifically, the use of garages and open -to -die -sky parking shall be in accordance with the standards of the zone in which the lot is located. (Refer to Chapters 21.22 through 21.27,) (Ord. 387 § 1,1396) (a) Driveway Width. The;width of all residential driveways shall not exceed twenty (20) percent of the front dimension of such lot up to a maximum driveway width of twenty-eight feet (28)exciuding wings or returns. The measurement of the driveway garages are shallbe made at required to the curb line. Driveways overtwenty (20) feet in width serving two -car (2) de aesthetic relieffor all publicly viewed hardscape as described in Section 12.04.172(x) below. (1) 'Driveways on Lots Less than 100'. Residential lots with a front lot dimension less than one hundred feet (1001, shall be restricted to a maximum driveway width of twenty (20) feet excluding wings or returns. The measurement of'the driveway width shall be made at the curb line. (2) Circular Driveways. Circular driveways shall be restricted to a maximum of twenty (20) feet for the entire driveway including that portion which intersects the street. The measurement of the driveway width shall be made at the curb line. (Ord. 541 § 1 (part), 2003) - (3) Circular Driveways in' Conjunction with Standard Driveways. Combination driveways shall not exceed the prescribed widths for either type of driveway, standard or circular, as outlined within this Section. These prescribed widths do not include the transitional apron used for turning purposes. (4) Driveways SeMng;Three-Car Garages. Driveways serving three (3) car garages for full size passenger vehicles are limited to a maximum width of thirty (30) feet and must Include . - upgraded materials and landscaping as described in. Section 21.20.080(x) below. The measurement of the driveway width shall be made at the curb line. All upgrading materials and landscaping shalt be shown on the landscape plan and approved by the Planning Director. (5) Driveways Serving Four -Car Garages. Driveways serving four (4) car garages for full size passenger vehicles are limited to a maximum width of forty feet (40) and must include upgraded materials and landscaping as described in Section 21.20.080(x) below. The measurement of the driveway width shall be made at the curb line. All upgrading materials and tandscaping shall be shown on the landscape plan and approved by the Planning Director. (6) Driveways Serving Five -Car Garages. Garage driveways serving five (5) full size passenger vehicles or more are subject to the discretionary Approval of the City's Planning Commission. (7) When a garage does not face -a street directly, it shall.have a maximum driveway width of twenty feet (20D. (Ord. 541 § 1(part), 2003; Ord. 527 § 6, 2003) (b) Additional Driveway Width. Additional driveway width may be granted for driveways over . twenty (20) feet In width on lots less than one hundred (100) feet; circular driveways over twenty (20) feet in Width and combination driveways, up to a maximum widthof twenty-eight (28) feet j 1118720072:15PM I l oi'2 17 76.040 NumberrofpaddngSpaces .required, - httPJ/Vm v ordfnLcO /cedes/rancho! DATA/fME17/Chapter ENed"u: se developments Determined b dlscretlona a e'min y ty permit or ome parks 1 covered and 1 aft street guest Spaces sball be clearly marked for gnestparldng only Land Use Types Education, Public Assembly, and , Vehicle Spaces Requited Recreation Churches, synagogues, other 1 space for each 4 seats or 1 space Places of worship and mortuaries for every 30 sq. ft. of gross assembly area, and may be required for fPool and billiard rooms kating rinks i t i I for pubilc use, plus spaces for anc(Ilary uses. Aar eacn zb0 sq. ft. of gross floor an within commercial use. Golf driving ranges Indoor amusement/entertainment 1 space for each fee. centers Arcades 1 space for each 200 sq, ft. of gross floor area. Bowling alleys 4 spaces for each lane, plus require( spaces for ancillary uses. Mealthffltness clu5s 1 space for each 200 sq. ft. of gross oor area. fPool and billiard rooms kating rinks i t i I for pubilc use, plus spaces for anc(Ilary uses. 25.58.280 -Single-family residential districts. hup:fl-,codo,tis/mdealt) almd esert/view.php?topic-25-25_58- 25._58... l � Palm Desert Municipal Coda' � Vp Previous Next hialn Search print No Frames Title 25,ZONI16 CJ adtnr 2S.58 58OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING 25.58.220 Single-family residential districts. It single-family residential districts including conventional detached, cluster housing, or condominium, two of the required parlpng spaces shall be provided within a garage or carport: Each space shall contain ten feet by twenty feet of unobstructed' area. This requirement shall be met by uf313aing the interior dimensions of the garage or carport. (Ord. 98 § 1 (part), 1975: Exhibit A § 25.33-4.01) 1/18/2007 3:49 PM %581v) Muldple family residential atricts. http://gcode.uS/codes/palmdesert(view.php?topic=25-25 58-25 36... t Aaim Desert Municipal Code; Up Previous Next Mala Search Print No Frames iltle 25 ZONING Chapter 25SB OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING 25.8.230MUItIpLelft Kly residential districts, k multiple -family residential districts, including apartments, parking shall b,eprovided as follows: A. One space for each one bedroomunit shall be provided within a garage or carport; & A minimum of one of the required parldug spaces for each two or more bedroom units shall be provided within a garage ora oarport for each living unit; C. Parking development standards contained in Sections 25.58:090 through 25.58.200 shall be applicable. (Ord. 98 § 1 (part), 1975: Exhibit A § 2533-4.02) 93.06.00 Off-stteetpark ng. httpJ/www.geode.usleodes/palmsprings/view.phP?topiczOning_co... 22. Uotar Vehicle Repair Shops. ^L M 4 Fi=f N6 S Four (4) spaces for each service bay or lift or one (1) space per one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area. 23. Plant Nuramies, Building Matenals,Yards and outdoor Display Sales: . One (1) space for every five hundred (500) square feet of gross floor area and/or outdoor display area, plus one (1) space for every company vehicle, 24. Offices; Nonmedical. One (i) space for each two hundred (200) square feet of gross floor area for facilities up to ten thousand (10,000) square feet in floor area. Nonmedical offices with floor area which exceeds ten thousand (10,000) square feet shall provide parldng at one (1) space per two hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross floor area in excess of ten thousand (1-0,000) square feet. 25. Offices, Medical and Dental. One (1) space for each one hundred fifty (150) square feet of gross floor area for facilities up to ten thousand (10,000) square feet in floor arca. Medical and dental offices with a floor area which exceeds ten thousand (10,000) square feet shall, provide paridng at one (1) space ger two hundred (200) square feet of gross floor area in excess of ten thousand (10;000) square feet - 26. Private Park and Recreation Uses: One (1) space for every three persons based upon the approved capacity of the facility. 27. Public Park and Recreation Uses. One (1) spade far each eight thousand (8,000) square feet of active recreational area within a park or playground; plus one (1)spaceper acre of passive recreational' area within a park_ or playground. 28. Places of Public Assembly. Churches, auditoriums, exhibition halls, theatres, convention facilities, meeting roams and other places of public assembly shalt provide one (1) off-streetparking space for every three (3) seats, if seats are fixed; one (1) space for each twenty-four :(24) square feet of assembly area, which does not include foyer, corridors,. restrooms,kitchens, storage and Other areas notused for assembly ofpcople. For churches. off-street parking shall be required for primary seating only. a. Nate. Submitted plans sliall show the number of seats in assembly area; or if no fixed seating, the total gross floor,area of the assembly area. 29. Residential Uses. Note. Submitted plans shall show the number of bedrooms in each unit as well as total number of units. a. Single-family Homes. levo {2) spaces for each dwelling unit, within a garage or carport Trellises, or other construction providing a seventy (76) percent shade factor, may he used b. Condominiums orResidenedWithin aPlannedDevelopmentDistrict (Pb): is Primarypaddhg ( per unit) shall be required as follows; 1/19/2007 12:39 PM 11' of 18. 93.06.00 Off-streetparking.. htt,--.Pw xv.gcode.us/codes/pahnsprings/view.php?topic-=zSni"o,_oo;.. �AGh1 `�'P�tNGS (A) Studio end efficienoy units One (1) primary space I,B)One (1)hedrnnm unit One and one quarter (1 ' granary spaces (C) Two (2)bedreom units One and ane half (I 'A) primary spaces (D) Three (3) or more bedrooms - Three-quarters ('/a) primary space per bedroom (E) While home parks T Two (2) spaces per mobile site ii, Guest Parking: In addition to the primary parking required above, one, (1) desiguated,parking space per each four (4) units shall be provided for guest parking, except that mobile home parksshallprovide designated guest parking at a rate of one (1) space per each seven (7) units, unless'guest parking can be provided on a private street iii. Covered Parking. (A) One (1) covered parking space shall be provided for each unit, Trellises providing a seventy (70) percent shade factor may be used. (B) This requirement. shall not apply to existing lois of record which are substandard in area or dimension .requirements; as established elsewhere in the Zoning Code. c: Apartments. Apartment uses. shall have the: same requirements as condominiums for primary parking and guest parkmg, except that covered or enclosed parking spaces are optional d Booming, Boarding and Fraternity Houses. One, (1) space for each'sleeping room or one (1) space for each two (2) beds, whichever yields the greater number. 30. Restaurants (Etreestanding). One (1),space for each thirty-five (35) square feet of gross floor area where the public is served, or one (1) space for every three (3) seats. a. Restaurants in Lurie Mixed-use Commercial Complexes. Additional parltng need not be provided for restaurants in mixed-use commercial complexes (commercial, office, retail) which have a gross floor area which exceeds twenty thousand (20,000) square feet; provided that; no more than twenty-five (25) of the total floor area of the whole complex is devoted to restaurant use. b. Note. Submitted -pleas shall show the square footage of area where the public is served and/or the amount of proposed seating:. 12 of 18 1/19/200712:33 PM Riverside County Parking Requirements Parking Requirements - Parking is a necessary aspect of any development and can constrain the development of housing. For every parking space that is required, there is that much less land available for development. Excessive parking requirements can thus drive the -cost of development up and the amount of housing down. Parking requirements in the County of Riverside, however, are similar to other counties and are not considered to be so demanding as to prevent development Residential parking requirements for the County are displayed in Table H-37. The County's Land Use Ordinance assigns parking standards with the intent to promote efficient land use as well as reduce street congestion and traffic hazards and promote vehicular and pedestrian safety. To ensure these goals are reached, the County requires a parking plot plan for dwelling units containing more than two families. In the case of mixed land uses, the total required number of parking spaces equals the sum of the requirements for the various uses computed separately, unless approved otherwise. The granting of a shared parking provision (allowing uses with different hours of operation to share parking spaces to satisfy parking requirements) would translate into a reduction in acreage required for parking spaces and an associated reduction in land cost. Shared parking could be used as an incentive to the provision of higher density and affordable housing. i Table H-37 Residential Parking Requirements Type of Residential Development Required Parking Comments " jj Spaces Single -Family 2 spaces/unit ! Second Units 2 spaces/unit May have a carport depending f upon compatibility with !!1 surrounding uses. (Multi-liamily -single bedroom or studio 1.25 spaces/unit -two bedrooms/unit 12.25 spaces/unit -three or more bedrooms/unit 2.75 spaces/unit in.addition, 1 space/employees Planned Residential Development -single bedroom or studio 1.5 spaces/unit -two bedrooms/unit 2;5 spaces/unit senior citizen same as single -and multifamily requirements Mobile Home Parks 2 spaces/travel Spaces may be tandem but must trailer or provide 1 guest space for every { mobile home 8 mobile home spaces Note: Unless otherwise specified, all parking must be within 300 feet of the use served, on the same parcel as the use, or on an adjoining appropriately -zoned parcel. 1 On-site employee parking (e.g., manager, landscaper, etc.) # Source: Land Use Ordinance of Riverside County No. 348 Density Bonus - Beyond local requirements, state law allows for a developer to increase the density of a residential, development by at least 25% if provisions are made to provide 20% of the units to be:aliocated for lower -and moderate -income housing. As well, one additional incentive or financial equivalent (such as modified development standards or waiver/reduction application or development. fees) is granted to all residential development meeting the 20% density bonus requirement for lower -and moderate - income housing. The County of Riverside complies with the Density Bonus provisions required by state law in residential zones when requested by the project applicant. Accessory Units and Manufactured Housing Requirements - For purposes of permit issuance, the County has determined that a mobile home on a foundation system is allowed on all Iots zoned to permit single-family dwellings. The installation of mobile homes, not on foundations, is allowed whenever it is specifically so provided in the various zone classifications, and is subject to the requirements and standards set forth in those zones. A mobile home permitted in the R -R, R -D, W-2, and W -2-M zones must have a floor living area of at least 450 square feet, a lot size of at least 2500 square feet with a width of at least 30 feet, and an opaque skirt screening, the area between the ground level and the floor level of the unit. Mobilehome parks must have a masonry wall six feet in height erected along the perimeter of the park. Mobile homes outside of these zones must comply with the same standards except that they must have a floor living area of at least 750 square feet. The County has amended Ordinance No. 348 to permit second units on residential lots zoned for single family or multi -family residential use, subject to issuance of a second unit permit. This provision was made in response to State of California legislation promoting additional housing opportunities for elderly relatives and rental purposes. Ordinance No. 348 requires: • A second unit permit for both attached and detached units; • Compatibilitywth existing development in the surrounding area; • Minimum parcel size of 7,200 square feet, with specific standards for other size parcels; • Compatible setbacks; • Maximum unit size to ensure the status of the unit as secondary to the main unit; and • Adequate water, sewage disposal and circulation capacities. Land Use Group: 230 Residential Condo Inium/Townhouse Average Peak Period Parking Demand vs: Dwelling Units on a: Weekday Location: Suburban Weekday Suburban Peak Period Parking Demand s- Actual Data Points Instituto; Transportation Engineers 100 200 x = Dwelling Units -- Fitted Curve rail UN .... Average Rate PaWag Ganarallon, 3td Etlilion 400 350-- 300 j 250-- 200 L 150 Co 100 �r 50 0' 0 s- Actual Data Points Instituto; Transportation Engineers 100 200 x = Dwelling Units -- Fitted Curve rail UN .... Average Rate PaWag Ganarallon, 3td Etlilion Land Use Group: 230 Residential Condominum/Townhouse Land Use Description structure. Both condominiums and fiewnhnus -a are included in ResSdential contlominiums{townhouses are defined as ownershi units that have at least one other owned unit within the same building ing Sku king Generation database do not identify whether the condominiums and twnhouses ulseare kowte-rise or high-rise. Database Descriptiondemand at the tion of one urban site. Parking The database consisted of all suburban sites with the excep ed separately. urban site differed from the suburban sites and therefore the data were analyzed Average parking supply ratio: 0.98 spaces per dwelling unit (three study sites). and a weekday. The Saturday (or dwelling unit, which was 19 percent less -than the Ona suburban: site with 255 dwelling units was counted an both Saturday peak parking demand ratio was 0.84 vehicles p weekday peak parking demand at that site. Both ratios were based on single hour counts between 8s 00 and 6:0D a.m: peak parking demand ratio of 0.85 vehicles per asking demand from this site was excluded from The urban site had 136 dwelling units and a Saturday p dwelling unit between 12:00 and 5.00 a.m. The peak p the data plot and analysis. parking demand. . Mast of the study sites provided only a single hourly Observation of Additional Data and condominium, not An evaluation U.S. Census data relating g household ownership (single OR region is presented in, Land including rentall households) and ownership of vehicles in the PorHand, Clse 210 (single-Famlly Detached Housing): Study SiteslYearsCA 1981 Santa Ana, CA (1981); EI Toro; CA (1981); Huntington Beach, CA (1981); Newport Beach,001}; Far Hills, NJ (200 { )� Long Beach, CA (2000); Bernardsville, NJ (2001): Elizabeth, NJ (2 .Parking GeneraQon, 9rtt.EdNoa eo Land Use: 221 Low/Mid-Rise Apartment • Additional research was conducted in the Portland, OR region using 2000 U.S. Census data 4 to relate rental households to the availability of vehicles. These data provided trends in the ratio of vehicles - owned per rental household, While It was recognized that area type was not the only factor affecting vehicle ownership (household income was a very significant factor), this general assessment provided a means of comparison to the survey data submitted to ITE. The following table summarizes the number of vehicles owned per household, based on year 2000 Census data. Note that these data do not include visitor parking demand. SOURCE: DKS Associates. Portland, OR, 2002 (based upon 2000 Census block data). Study 81teshrears Suburban: Skokie, IL (1964); Glendale, CA (1978); Irvine, CA (1981); Newport Beach, CA (1981); Dallas, TX (1982); Farmers Branch, TX (1982); Euless, TX (1985, 1984); Baytown, TX (1984); Syracuse, NY (1987); Devon, PA (2001); Marine del Rey, CA (2001); Milburn, NJ (2001); Parsippany, NJ (2001); Springfield, NJ (2001); Westfield, NJ (2001); Beaverton, OR (2002); Hillsboro, OR (2002); Portland, OR (2002); Vancouver, WA (2902) Urban: Dallas, TX (1982,1983); San Francisco, CA (1982); Syracuse, NY (1984,1987); Santa Barbara, CA (1994); Long Beach, CA (2000); Santa Monica, CA (2001); San Diego, CA (2001) 4 Census f 20D0, U.& Census Bureau, 2002, Table H44. Im-mte of Transportation Engineers parking Conarafim, Srd Eftn Suburban with,1111rbAn prowth boundary) 1.4 Cl�, , 40t Downtown 1.2 Central Business -District (CBD) 0.7 Areaswilthin 1/3 mile of a light rail station and more than 10 miles from CED 1.0-1.3 Areas within 113 mile of a light rail station endless than 10 miles from CBD 0.8-1.2 SOURCE: DKS Associates. Portland, OR, 2002 (based upon 2000 Census block data). Study 81teshrears Suburban: Skokie, IL (1964); Glendale, CA (1978); Irvine, CA (1981); Newport Beach, CA (1981); Dallas, TX (1982); Farmers Branch, TX (1982); Euless, TX (1985, 1984); Baytown, TX (1984); Syracuse, NY (1987); Devon, PA (2001); Marine del Rey, CA (2001); Milburn, NJ (2001); Parsippany, NJ (2001); Springfield, NJ (2001); Westfield, NJ (2001); Beaverton, OR (2002); Hillsboro, OR (2002); Portland, OR (2002); Vancouver, WA (2902) Urban: Dallas, TX (1982,1983); San Francisco, CA (1982); Syracuse, NY (1984,1987); Santa Barbara, CA (1994); Long Beach, CA (2000); Santa Monica, CA (2001); San Diego, CA (2001) 4 Census f 20D0, U.& Census Bureau, 2002, Table H44. Im-mte of Transportation Engineers parking Conarafim, Srd Eftn Land Use. 221 Low/Mid-Rise Apartment Average,Peak Period Parking Demand vs: Dwelling Units On a: Week -day Location: Suburban tEt490 "eaPeriod 2000- 12:00-5:00 a.m. R-u—mberd Study Sites — 19 Average. Size of Study Sites 'I 0UU - 320 dwellin units Avera a Peak Period parking Demand 1,20 vehicles per dwelling unit Standartl Deviafion 0.32 it of Variation 26% Ran a — 0.68-1.94 vehicles per dvivelling unit 85th Peroentlle 33rd Percentile 1.46 VeTIIGJeS per dvvel[inq unit 1.09 vehiclesper dwelling unit Weekday Suburban Peak Period Parking Demand tn 2000- M 'I 0UU - 4) 1000 - 76 M a. 500 - P = 1.43x - 46. R2= 0.93 + + 0 500 1000 1500 x = Dwelling Units Actual Data Points Fitted Curve ---- Average Rate Parking &OeraffoA N FADD Land Use. 221 Law/Mid-Rise Apartment Land Use Descriptionwith at least three le udwelli exes and all types of apartment buildings. The study sites in Low/mldaise apartments are rental dwei[ing units located within the same pull ung s a related use, other dwelling units, for examp q this lane! use have one, two, three, or levels. High-rise apartment (Land Use 222) Database Description demand rates at the suburban ed se aately. The database consisted of a mix of suburban and urban sites. were an sites differed from those at urban sites and therefore the data wererarn� l study sites). This ratio was the Average parking supPlY ratio- 1.4 parking spaces per dwelling • same at both the suburban and urban sites.three study site')- • Suburban, site data: average size of the dwelling unlaces per suburban bedroom study sites was 1 it be an the average parking supply ratio was we parking spaces arking supply Urban site data: average size of the dwelling units was:2.2 bedrooms with an average p • ratio of 0.8 spaces per bedroom (eight study sites). e Saturday parking att' Saturday parking demand data were only provided at twoo unit suburban sites. The area demand at these two sites was 1.13 vehicles perd.dur ng consecutive hours between 1:00 One urban site with 15 dwelling units was counted on a Sunday P.M. and 5:00 a.m. Peak parking demand occurred between 12:00 and 5:00 a.m. and was measured at 1.0o vehicle per dwelling unit. dable housing About half of the urban sites were identified as afforegarding the number of bedrooms in the apartment Several of the suburban study sites provided data regarding sites with an resented only a subset of the a kpl tdemand for land use, they complex. Although these' rep apartment complex reported peak parking demonstrated a correlation between neudmbe'I'n9bedimthe app parking sites with bedroom data. Study average of less than 1.5 bedrooms per arkin demand for all study er dwelling unit reported peak Parking demand at 92 percent of the average peak p g of 2.0 or greater bedrooms per Sites with less than 2.0 but greater than ore 5 at with an average p demand at 96 peFcent of the ark n gdemand at 13 percent greaterthan the average dwelling unit reported peak Parking I s..errtntiA:ASf tmnsaertatlon Engineers /� ParWn9 Gene/sUon, 9n1 Edglan 4B / Land Use: 221 Low/Mid-Rise Apartment For the urban study sites; the parking demand data consisted of single or discontinuous hourly counts and therefore a time -of -day distdbubon was not produced. The following table presents a time -of -day distribution of parking demand at the suburban study sites. ri Bas flb s+an h rir3imig, -r a Heu Beglnhmg t ' `l, Percanfofpeak Penod '' NUmber-oFData,Poirits" 120 4 OO a:m. 100 19 5X10 a.m. 96 - 15 -E00 —a.m. 92 22 7:00 a.m. 74 15 9"Q0a.m..- 0 10:00 a:tn 0 11:00 a.m. — 0 12:00..m: - 0 1:00 P.M. _ 0 2:00 p.m. - 0 3:00 p.m, — 0 4i00 ".m 44 1 5:AA .m: 59 1 6:OA p.m. 59 - 1 7:00--.m. 66 10 8:00 P.M. 75 9 9:00 P.M. 77 11 10:00 :m. 92 26 11:00 p.m. 94 11 " Subset of database Parking studies of apartments should attempt to obtain information on occupancy rate and on the mix of apartment sizes: (in other words, number of bedrooms per apartment and number of units tri"the complex). Future parking studies should also indicate the number of levels contained in the apartment building. Additional Data Apartment occupancy can affect parking demand ratio. In the United States, successful apartment complexes commonly have a vacancy rate between 5 and 8 percent 2 While auto ownership has increased over time, based on the limited data sample, the parking demand ratios for the provided data set did not vary significantly with age. There is a wide range of data from the 19603 to 2000s (primarily from the 19603 to 20005) in the database. In fact, a series of surveys conducted in 1961 and 1963 found a peak parking demand ratio very similar to the data collected in Parking Generation. The study conducted in Hayward, CA3 surveyed 53 apartment complexes with a total o€1,759 dwelling units between the hours of 3:00 and 5:00 a.m. on seven consecutive days in both years. The study found an average of 1.26 parked vehicles per dwelling unit 2 Rental and Homeowner Vacancy Rates for the United States: 1960 to 2001, U.S. Census Bureau. WwW.ci:n,gus:govlhhes/www/housingfhusfg401tabl.htmi I Crommelm, Robert. Planning for Paricing: Residential Requirements, Proceedings of the 16th California Street and }iighway Conference. UG Berkeley. Institute Of Transportation Studies, January 30, 1960 Insgtute- of Transportation Engineers 1 Parking GeamuUm 3rd Editim dump dwelling, muftifumily Minimum; I per 300 square feet of gross floor area Maxfmtmn: l per 200 square: feet of gross floor area (San:Antonio, Tex.,pop. 1,14045) dump (see landfill uses) - duplex (see also dwelling uses; triplex) • 1 covered space perunit; plus 1. other space per unit (Ridding, Calif., pop. 90,865) • 1 per dwelling (Eugene,. Ore,,. pop. 137,893) • I perdwellingunithavingnot more than 950 square feet of floor area (Topeka, Knrrs:, pap: 12,377) . 2. per dwelling unit (Blue Springs, Ma:, pop. 48,080;. Raise, Idaho, pop:. 185,787) . 2 per dwelling; unit; on lot with less. than 20,000 square feet of area, 1 space must be covered (Henderson, No., 175,391) • 3spaces perdwelling uni[(f,enexa, Kans.,.pop. 40,238; Cookeville, Tenn., pop. 23,923) Miininuum 1 per unit Maximum:1 per unit (Pittsburgh, Pa., pop. 334,563;. San Antonio, Tex. „pap. 1;144,646) Minimum: 1 space for each dwelling unit (drive- ways; carports, and garages may be used to fulfill_ Us requirement) Maxinuan:Nomme thari3velurlesowned orleasedby a resident may be parked. outdoors. This does not include velucles parked in garagesor carports with at least3sidesenclosed.(jef Jerson Counhj,Ky, POP. 693,604) Minimum:2 per dwelling Maxiumm: Paved area can'texceed 10 percent of lot (Glenville, N.Y.,pap.(28,183) [Editor's nate: for all dwelling uses listed below, see also condominium, duplex; rowhousa; and towi8iduse) dwelling,apartment (see also dwelling, nudtf fanily uses) • ]per dwelling unit, plus 9.33 per bedroom (Yonkers, N.Y., pop. 196,086) • 1,5o Pa dwelling unit (Rapid City, S. Dot, pop. 59,607) 2 per dwelling. unit (St. Tammany Parish, La:, pop. 191,268) Miniaunn; l per unit Maxi+mtn: 1.9 per unit (San Antonio; Tei., pap. 1;144;646) lhht m ani 1 per unit Maximum; 2;per unit (Pittsburgh, Pa., pop. 334,563) Adi ninntm: 1:5 per. dwelling Maxinnum; 25 per dwelling. (Glenville; N.Y,, pap, levelling; apartment, efficiency unit :l parking space for each efficiency unit (Cuiuberlard, ,Wd., pop. 21,518; Grants Pass, Ore., pop. 23;003) . 12 off-street parking spaces per dwelling unit (San luau Capistrano, Calif., pop. 33;5.26). dwelling, apartment; one bedroom • 1. space per dwelling unit (Grants Pass, Ore., pop. 23,003) •1.25 parking spaces for each 1 bedroom unit (Cumberland, Md.; pop. 21,518) •1:5 off-street parking spaces per -dwelling unit (Huntsville; Sex., pop. 35,078; San. Juan Capistrano, Calif., pop, 33;826; Niagam Falls, N.Y., pop. 55,583) 1.75 enclosed parking spaces per unit (Santo Clarita,: Calif., Pop. 151,089) _ dwelling, aparta ent.two bedrooms 1:5 parking spaces for each 2 -bedroom apartment unit (Cumberland, Md,, pop. 21,518; Grants Pass, Ore-, pop. 23,003) 1.8 off-street parking spaces per dwelling unit (Son .jean Capistrano, Calif., pop. 33,1126) 5 parking spacesper dwelling unit(Huntsoille, Tei., pop. 35,078) • 2 enclosed parking spaces per unit (Sada Claritu, Calif., pop. 151,088) dwelling, apartment, three or more bedrooms - 2 parking spaces (Cumberland, Md., pop. 21,518; San limn Capistrano, Calif., pop. 33,826) - 3.5parldngspacesperdwellingunit(Hu ttmille,Tm,. pop. 35,078) dwelling,apartment; five or more bedrooms • 0.75 spacesperbedroom(GrantsPass, Ora:,pop. 23,003) dwelling, multifamily (see also. dwelling, apartment uses) -:2 per dwelling unit for first 20 units; and 1.5 per dwelling; unit after thefirst20 unitsfor dwelling units not more than 800 square feetof floor area; 2 per dwelling unit having more than 800 square feet of floor area (Topeka, Yus- pop. 122,377) Minimum: 1,5 per unit Maximum: 2 per unit (Sar Antonio, Tex., pop. 1,144,645) District -dependant., Mi nimmnu: 1.5. space for each dwelling unit Maximum: 2.5 spaces for each dwelling unit OR Miuinimn: 1.5 spaces for each dwelling unit Miuimunr:3 spaces for each dwellingunit(Jeffersmn County, Ky., pop. 593,604) Minimum: 1 per unit Marianna: 2 per unit (Pittsburgh, Pa., pop. 334;563) Mininnmc 1.5 per dwelling Wxi nu n:25perdweUing(Glenville, N.Y., pop. 28183) dwelling, multifamily, studio/efficient • 1.5 per, studio (St. Mary's County, Md:, pap.. 86,211 Gurnee, Ill., pop. 28;834) • 1 perefficimcy apartments (Beardy Hills, Cal'f., pop. 33,784) • 1.25: per dwelling unit (El Poo County, Colo., pop. 516;99; Anchorage, Alaska; pop. 26083) Bicycle standard: l space per unit (Gresham, Ore., pop. 90,205) dwelling, multifamily, one bedroom. • 1-9 per dwelling unit (St. Turnmmny Parish, U.,. pop. 191,268; State College, Pa, pap.. 38,400; Grand Rapids Tmonsftip, Mich., pop. 14,056) . 2spacesperl-bedroom dwelling unit(RPei Cola.,pop, 6,7844; Beoerly Hills, Calif, pap:, 33,784) ,,rte Bicycle standard: l space per unit (Greslmm; Ore., pop. 90,205) dwelling, multifamily, live bedrooms. L5 parking spaces per unit (State College,. Pa., pop. 38;420) • 1.5; parking spaces are required for each 2 -bedroom ordij 800 square feet or less; 1.75 parking spaces are. requiredforeach2-bedroom unituver800 squarefeet (Anchorage,: Alaska,. pop. 260,283) • 1.75 per dwelling unit (St. Tagtmany Parish. LA., pop. 191,268; Juneau, Alaska, pop. 30,711) • 2:space%plus 1 guestparkingspace for every 2'units (St.Manj s County.MO., pop. 88;217) 2 per 2 -bedroom dwelling. unit (Beverly Hills, Calif., pop. 33,784; Grand Rapids Tpuntship, Mich.,, pop. 14,056) . 2.5 spaces per 2 -bedroom dwelling unit {Rifle; Colo., pop. 6,784) - COBicycle standard: i space per unit (Greshm , O Ore., pop. 90,205) dwelling; multifamily, three. bedrooms +. 1.75 parking: spaces are required for each3-bedroom unit, 900 square feet or less,, 2.5 parking spaces are requiredforeach 3 -bedroom unit over 900 squarefeet (Anclmrage, Alaska, pop. 260,283) . 2perdwellingunit(St. TaminanyParisk, in.,pap.191,268) • 2 parking spaces, plus 1 parking space per bedroom for each bedroom beyond the third bedroom (State College, Pa, pop. 38,420) 2 spaces, plus.1 guestparkingspace,for every 2 units (St. Mary's County, Md:, pop. 86,211) • 2.25 per dwelling unit (Juneau. Alaska, pop. 30,711) . 2.5 spaces per unit. (Banerly Hills, Calif., pop. 33,782; Rifle, Colo., pop. 6,784) • 2.55 per dwelling unit (El Paso Counhi, Colo., pop. 516,929) Bicycle standard; I space per unit (Greslmm, Ores, pop. 90,205) dwelling; multifamily,. four or more bedrooms • 2perdweklingunit(St,TanmmnyParish,Ga.,ppp.191,268) = 2 parkingspaces, plus 1 parking space per bedroom for each bedroom beyond the third bedroom. (State College, Pa., pap. 38,420) 2.25 per dwelling unit (Juneau, Alaska, pop. 30,711) . 255perdwellingunit (El Paso Counhj,Colo.,pap.516;929) _,(h1 �r ..:: �v_•i4F1 f.'y?l 6, .—�� .. a 99 dwelling; single familydweling, singfc jmaity detrchad j '.r or nrorc b ' • 3 perdweliingunit with4 or. morebedrooms:(8eoerly Hills, Calif.,, pop. 33;784) - 3.5spacesper4ormorebedroomdwellingunit(Rifle, Colo., pop. 6,m) Bicycle standard: l space per unit (Gresham, Om, pop. 90,205) dwelling, sfingie-family • I. per dwelling unit: having notmore than 950 square feet of floor area (Topeka, Knits.,. pop. 12-7,377) . 2 parldngspaees are required for each dwelling unit uptoi;800squarefe LS;parkingspacesarerequired for each dwelling unit over 1,80Q square feet, ,includ- ing any unfinished area which may be converted to living area (Anchorage, Alaska, pop. 260,283) • 3spacesperdrvellingurut(Cook-wt7lc,Tmti,pap.23,923) Minimum:I per 250 square feet of gross floor area Maximum: _l. per 200 square feet of gross floor area (Sart Antanw, Tex., pop, 2,144,646) Located an a lot greater#han 6,000 square feet in size: Minimum: 1 space for each dwelling unit (drive- ways; carports and garages may be: used to fulfill this requirement) Maximum;Nomore than3vduclesownedurleased by a resident may be parked outdoors. This does not include vehicles parked in garages or- carports with at least 3 sides enclosed. Located an a lot between 6,000 and 20,000squarefeelin size: Minimum. 1 space for each dwelling unit (drive- ways, carports and garagesmaybeused to fulfill this requirement) Maxinuuu:Nomore than4vehidesowned orleased by a; resident. may be parked outdoors. This does - not include vehicles parked in garages or -carports with at least 3 sides enclosed, Located an alot greater their 20,000squam feet:insim Mini nu n: I space for each dwelling unit (drive- ways, carports and garages maybe wed to fulfill this requirement) Maximum: No more than 5vehicles owned orleased bya resident may be parked outdoors. This does not hichide veliides parked in garages or carports. with at least sides enclosed (Jefferson County, Ky., pap. 693,604) Minimnm:2 per dwelling Maximiu Paved. area cant exceed l0percentoflot (Glanville, N.Y., pop. 28,183) dwelling; single-family attached (see also rowhawe,, townhouse) • Aminimum of 1 parking space per one-third dwell- fug wit (Le,. 3 parking spaces per dwelling unit). Such :parking spaces can take the. form of private driveways or garagesor common parkinglots,pro- M vided that all puking ,spaces are located within 150 feet of the dwellnrgurritserved. ( West Hempficld Town- ship, Pa., pop. 15,129) . 2.5 spaces per unit (Canton, Ga.; pop. 7,709) Minimum: 3-perAmit Maximum: 4 per unit (Pittsburgh, Pa., pop. 334,563) dwelling, single-family. attached, one bedroom • IIbreach dwellingunit(Memphis, Timm, pop. 650,100) dwelling, single -Family attached two bedrooms - 2forearhdwellingunit(Memphis,Teiin„pop. 650,100) dwelling, single-family attached, three bedrooms • 2foreadi dwelling unit (Memphis, Team., pop. 650,100) dwelling, single -fancily attached, four or more bedrooms • 2forearhdwellingunit(Memphis, Tenm, pop. 650,100) :dwelling, single-family detached • Amia imum of l parking space perone-half dwelling unit (i.e., 2 parking spaces per dwelling unit) (Wat Hempfield Township, Pa., pop. 15,128) - Under3,000square feetof floor area.2garagespaces; 31000 to 3,749 square feet of floor area: 2garage spaces, plus 1 additional space. Additional space maybe uncovered. 3,750 square feet of floor area and above: Requirements above plus 1 additional space for each 750 square feet of floor area. Additional spaces may be uncovered. (San Mateo, Calif., pop. 92,482) - 2spaces in the same lot for each dwelling unit, plus 1 -additional space where a home occupationis permit- ted (Contmy. Ga., pap. 7,709) • 2 off street parking spacesper dwelling unit in a garage (Sar /uan Capistrano Calif., pap. 33,826) • 2 garage spaces, plus 1 additional space.. Additional spacemaybeimcovered. (Sat Mateo,Calif.,pop. 92,482) Minimum: 1. per unit Maximum: 4 per unit (Pittsburgh, Pa., pop. 334,563) dwelling,single-family detached,: one bedroom • 1. for each dwellingunit(Memphis,Tenn., pop. 650,100) dwelling, single-family detached, two bedrooms • lfor eadrdwell ngunit(Mmiphis, Twot.,pop. 650,100) dwelling, single-family detached, three bedrooms •2foreachdwellingunit(Memphis,Temr:,pop.650,100) . dwelling, siugle-family detached, fmar or more bedrooms - 2formclhdwellingunit(Meanphis,Tenn.,pop.650,100) tree c rtting and trfnnnirt service much; tennrig: • 3.3 parkingspaees for each 1,000square feet of gross floor area (Plainfwtd, IlL, pop. 13,038) • 35 per 1, 000 square feet (Hickory, N.C., pop,. 37,222; fakewoad; Ohio, pop. 56;646) • 4 parking spaces per 1,000 squarefeet of floor area (St. Chafes, Ill., pop. 27,896; Spartanburg, S.C., pop. 39,673) d4ininumv l per 350 square feet of gross floor area Maxinuta: 1 pari 250 square feet of gross floor area (Glenville, N.Y., pop. 28,183) tree cutting and trimming service (see also commercial use, unless otherwise specified; lawn caroservice) Mininun: l per 300 square feet of gross floor area Maximum: 1 per 200 square feet of gross floor area (Snit Annado, Tex., pop. 1,I44,646). triplex (see also dnplcr; dwelling uses).. • 1.5 per 2:;covered spaces per dwelling unit (Seaside, Calif., pop. 31,696) truck depot (see trach -terms sal) truck rental. (see also automobile rental establishment, moturvehicle rental establishment) •.1 parkingspacefor each 1,000 square feet of outdoor area (Birmingham, Mich., pop. 19;291) Mininntm: 4spaces per servicebay btnxinnrm: 5 spaces per service bay (Gresham, Ore., .pop. 90,205) 026 Bicycle Parking Standard: 2 spaces or 0.2 space per 1,000 square feet of floor area, whichever is greatest (Gresham, Ore., pap.. 90,205) truck sales facility -1 per 5,000 square feet of lot area, plus 1. per 300 square feet. of floor area (BI Paso County, Colo., pop. 516,929) Minimum: I space per 1,000 square feet of site area Mnximoa: 1:3 spaces per 1,000 square: feet of site area (Cmsiam, Orel, pop. 90,205) GMBicycle Parking Standard: 2, or 0.1 space per 1,000 square feet of site area (Greshmn, Ore.; pop. 90,205) truck stop •.1 truck parking: space. for each 10;000 square feetof site area, plus I vehicle parking space per200 square feet of building, area (Frisco, Tex:, pop. 33,714) 1. per employee, plus truck space parking; plus any panting required in this table when restaurant or motetisincluded (ChatestonComay, S.C.,pop.309,969) .1 per each employee on maximum shift, plus 1 per each vehicle owned or operated by we. (Owensboro, Ky., pop. 54,067) Minimum: l space per 1,000 squnre feet of site area Marianna: 1.3 spaces per1,000 square feet of site - area (Gresham, Ore., pop. 90,205) Bicycle Parking Standard; 2, or 0.1 space per 1,000 square feet of site area (Graham, Ore., pop. 90,205) truck repair establishment (see: also trach stop) Minimum: i per 500 square feet of gross floor area including servicebays, wash tunnels, and retail. areas Maximum 1 per 375 square feet of gross floor area including service bays, wash tunnels, and,retail arms (Sar Antonio,. T'ex., pop. 1,144,646) 1,72, truck step • 1 truck space per 80 square feet (Pelin BeachCoimti, Fla:, pop. 1,131,184) • 5spaces per every gaming position and existing off- streetparking requirement for underlying uses con- tained iuthettuekstop (Baton Rouge, La., pop. 227,818) Miniumns:1 per 500 square feet of gross floor area including service bays, wash tunnels, and retail areas Maximum: l per 375 square feet of gross floor area including service bays, wash funnels, and retail areas (San. Antonio, Tex., pop. 1,144;646) truck terminal (see also transportation terminal) • iparking space for each 3,000 square feet of lot area (Escondido, Calif.,. pop. 133,359) • lspacefor every2,000 square feetofthefirst 100A00 square feetof floor area 1 space additional for every