Loading...
1983 07 19 CCE A rqular YUII-iLJ rflLO-tI4 to be held at the La Quinta City l1, 78-105 Calle Estado, La California. July 19, 1983 7:30 p.m. CALL OrDEB A. Invocation B. Flaa Salute 2. ROIL QATI 3. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the tim set aside for Citizens to address the City Council on mattr0 relatin9 to City business. hen addressing the Council, please State Your name and address. The proceedings of the CoL-cil meeting are recorded on tape, arid crocents of each person shall be limited to three 3) minuites. 4. JPIm COMMUNICATIONS A. Communication from the League of Calffornia Cities reqa designation for annual League Conference in October. rding voting delegate 1. otion for adoption 5. BY COUNCIL ML>NERS 6. WARTNS A. A public hearin9 regarding the prosed vacation of a portion of Desert Club Drive. 1. Peport from the Principal Planner. 2. Public hearing. 3. Pesolution for adoption. B. A public hearing regarding the proposed vacation of Avenida Montero and CaIlLS Felipe, Orense, Seama, Huerta and 1. Peport fr the Principal Planner. 2. Public Hearing. 3. ResolutIon for adoption CONSENT CALENDAp A. Approval of the Minutes of the regular rneeting held JulY 5, 1982. B. PROPQSED RBSOLUTION. A SOLUTTON OF IIIF CITY COUNCIL OF L CITY OF LA QL)ThTA, CALIFORNIA, APpPOvThC D1ANDS. nIiEiIilnilIInlIilI nil' BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E B. PRQSED ORDINAN. AN OF ThE CITh COUNCIL OF THE CTY\ OF IA QUINTA, AMENDT sEcr1cj 2.04.050 OF LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL DE PROVTDTNG FOP CONTT AND EMBERS OF IIIL Cim COUNC]1 1. Ordinance for adoption. ROIL CATT.) C. Report from the City Mahaer regarding refuse collection service rates. 1. Resolution far adoption. D. frn the City na9er regarding lease of additional Office sDac&. 1. tion for adoption. E. Report from the Assistant to the Citv ager rental of an storage facility. regarding 1. Resolution for adoption. 2. tion for adot1on. A. fr the City agcr regarding dr?designation. of &- S']'Redevelopment Survey. /-area. Pesolution for aotion. C. Report frm the City iariaqcr regarding engineering Serices relative to &tion and sphere of influence. 1. tion for adoption. H. Other. 9. AOURENT IHIIIInInInInInInInInInInIn HIM II:III:III:III:III:III:III:III:III:III:III:I 111111 11111 liii iIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIiI 1 iiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiIiiiIIlNIllIIIIIIlIIIIIlIIlI I 1111111 I II BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E iii League of California Cities 4 Eu Sacramento, California June 24, 1983 TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL RE: DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATE FOR LEAGUE ANNUAL CONFERENCE Dear City Official: The most important aspect of the Annual Conference is the General Business Session at which time the membership takes action on conference resolutions. It is especially important during these times of uncertainty for California cities to take the initiative in developing positive programs for the future. Annual Conference resolutions will guide cities and the League in our effort to improve the quality, responsiveness and vitality of local government within this state. All cities should be represented at the Business Session on Wednesday morning, October 5 at 10:00 a.m. in the San Francisco Hilton Hotel. To expedite this important policy-making meeting, each City Council should designate a voting representative and an alternate who will be present at the Business Session. The League Constitution provides that each city is entitled to one vote in matters affecting municipal or League policy. A voting card will be given to the city official designated by the City Council on the enclosed voting delegate form.'? If the Mayor or a member of the City Council is in attendance at the Conference, it is expected that one of these officials will be designated as the voting delegate. However, if the City Council will not have a registered delegate at the Conference but will be represented by other city officials, one of these officials should be designated the voting delegate or alternate. Please forward the enclosed voting delegate form" to the Sacramento office of the League at the earliest possible time, so that the proper records may be established for the Conference. The voting delegate may pick up the city's voting card in the League Registration Area, California Room, Ballroom Level, San Francisco Hilton Hotel. If it becomes necessary for the voting delegate and the designated alternate to leave the * Conference, the card may be transferred to another official from the same city, providing the transfer has been cleared with the Credentials Committee, which will be responsible for distributing voting cards. It is suggested that the Mayor and all Council Members from a given city try to sit together at the Business Session so that, if amendments are there may be an exchange of points of view and a consensus arrived at before the city's vote is cast. Your cooperation in returning the attached voting delegate form" as soon as possible will be appreciated. Don Benninghoven Executive Director iIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIiI 1 iiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiIiiiIIlNIllIIIIIIlIIIIIlIIlI I 1111111 I II ii' BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E p r C ji]3v 1 HOUSING LEADERSHIF ROUNUTABLE 1 4,. A Report I attended the Housing Leadership Roundtable in Sacramento, July 7th and 8th. It was sponsored by the League of California Cities, League. of Women Voters and Californians for Housing. The focus for the ninety-participants was on 1) identifying obstacles to 1affordable housing11 2) seeking solutions, and 3) develop Individual work plans for achieving solutions. The par- ticipants were a hetrogeneous group, consisting of elected city officials, governrnent employees dealing with housing issues, and developers in the field, as well as others whose interests or positions relate to this topic. While we had several excellent speakers, most of the action took place in small groups. Some of the major problems which emerged were ****-, Proposition 13 has made housing more expensive for all home-buyers. The increase in various fees causes costs for builders passed on to buyers) which far exceed the higher property taxes which would have been paid if Prop. 13 had not passed. One major obstacle to affordable housing in community is the NIMBY" Not In My Back Yard) perception. Everybody supports inexpensive housing... somewhere else. Developers who want to build affordable housing are seriously hampered by governmental regulations and zoning requirements at local, state and federal levels. These tend to delay building and push up the prices of houses. **- The most general agreement at the conference was that the biggest obstacle to affordable housing is ATTITUDES.... at all levels in our society. Some are based on fear, others on racial bias, some on economic concerns. People don1t want 11those other groups'1 moving into our neighbor- hood; they are afraid of dropping property values; they are concerned about lower housing standards. At state and national levels low cost housing is either not a major concern; or legislation moves very slow; or the funding is very inadequate. A number of actions were recommended for the local level, among thc: Elect people to local offices who are committed to low cost housing and will move on it. 11111 11111111 t II II Iii BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E C C CQ>< industry, elected officials, t.1flr...CS flC other community leaders to provide advocacy anG attitude-changing activities. Conduct local educational programs to develop attitudinal changes The total issue is very complex and diverse. What is affor- dable?in one part of the State is not in another. Local zoning regulations and ordinances vary tremendously, making state-wide planning and leadership very difficult. Thus, we must deal with the issue at the local level.. it's a challenge for all of us, elected and appointed officials, planners and others in local leadership role, to meet the needs of people requiring affordable housing. 11111111 IIIIIIIIEIiiiiiiIIIiiiiiiiii 111111 11111 ii I HIM II:III:III:III:III:III:III:III:III:III:III:I 111111 11111 liii I iIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIiI 1 111111 III" iiii ii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiIiiiIIlNIllIIIIIIlIIIIIlIIlI I 1111111 I II BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E MEMORANDUM 4 CITY OF LA QUINTA oFffi To The Honorable Nayor and nibers of the City Council From Sandra L. Bonner, Principal Planner Dale: July 19, 1983 Subject: PROPOSED VACATION OF THAT PORTION OF DESERT CLDB DRIVE SOUTh OF PAT.T,P. AMIGO: DESERT CLUB OF LA QUINTA, APPLICANT The Applicant is requesting that the City Council vacate the 77i-foot-long section of Desert Club Drive which extends south of Calle ZInigo see attached exhibit). The Applicant has tained approval fr the City for a 54-unit planned residential development along the south side of Calle with the site plan showing the vacation of this excess public right of way. The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed street vacation in conjunction with the review of Tentative Tract Map No.19203, Anended No. 2. As a condition of approval for the tentative tract map, the City Engineer required the alandoneent of that portion of Desert Club Drive contained within the tract boundaries and the reserva- tion of public utility easements for existing facilities with the streets. Southern California Water Corry and General Telephone Coooeny, both of which have existing facilities within the current right of way, have no objection to the proposed vacation provided that their utility easrnts are reserved. The attached resolution provides for this. In addition, Southern California Water Ccry, which ons property adjoining that portion of Desert Club Drive which will be vacated, has no objection. The request is consistent with the City 5 adopted Street and Circulation Elecent of the General Plan copy attached). The street is designated as a local or neighborhood street. Abandoneent of the street will not restrict access to any parcel. In addition, abandonment will not adversely affect area-wide circulation. Although imtorists have extended' the road by driving over the dirt southward towards the fire station, this extension is not a dedicated right of way nor was it included in the street plans of Riverside County Roads Departrrnt. Avenida Bennudas and the new Avenue 52 which generally follows the alignment of Calle Amigo) will adequately provide for the area- wide circulation. An environmental assessment was prepared by staff on Tentative Tract Map No.19203, Amended No. 2, which included consideration of the prQnosed street vacation. Since the City Council adopted the negative declaration statement of no adverse inpact) on June 21, 1983 in conjunction with the tract map, no further action by the City Council on the negative declaration is required. FIND INOS BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E APPOVED MEMORANDUM CONTENT. FOR ClT ETNG CITY OF LA QUINTA OF CITY To: The Hbnorable Mayor and nibers of the City Council From: Sandra L. Bonner, Principal Planner Date: July 19, 1983 Subject: IESOLUTION OF INTENTI for the Vacation of Avenida Montero and Calles Felipe, Orense, Seama, Huerta and Rerr; Montero Estates Asscciation, Inc., Applicant The Applicant has submitted petitions requesting the City Council to vacate the above mentioned existing public streets which provide access to a 66-lot, single family housing subdivision located at the northwest corner of Avenue 50 and Washington Street See attached map). The purpose of the regLiest to turn these streets over to the private ownership is to allow the Montero Estates Association to restrict access and increase security. The application has been reviewed by the City Attorney and has been determined to be complete. The property owners of 55 of the 66 lots have suitted signed petitions supporting the The owners of the rnaining 11 lots have not responded to the proposed change. A concern of staff is that since the request for vacation of streets has not been agreed to by all the property owners, the City may be subject to lawsuit. The Applicant shall be required to obtain insurance that holds the City harmless. The proposed vacation is consistent with the adopted Street and Circulation Flnent of the Ta Quinta General Plan copy attached). All the streets proposed for vacation are designated as local or neighborhood streets. Aside fn Avenida Montero' 5 inter- sections with Washington Street on the east and Avenue 50 on the southwest, Avenida Montero connects with only those cul-de-sacs included in this petition. Vacation of the streets will not restrict public access to other streets or horrs within the vicinity. Since the streets proposed for vacation are used aThst exclusively by the residents included in the petition, vacation of the public right of way will not affect area-wide circulation. The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed vacation and recommends approval. Prior to construction of any inprovanents or gates within the street right of ways, the Applicant shall cly with the City Engineer 5 reguirts as contained within the attached neeorandum, dated June 17, 1983. The following utility companies have notified the City that they have aextiiosntifl facility- ties located within the streets proposed for vacation: Thperial Imperial Distriqt, General Telephone Cany, Coachella valley Television, Southern California Cas Copany and Coachella valley Water District. The utilities have no objection to the proposed III""" BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 ESTAFF rEPO City Council July 19, 1983 Paqe Two. City staff has prepared an environmental assessment and has tentatively detenred that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment. A Negative Declaration statement of no significant effect) has been prepared. Staff recanrners that the City Council adopt the Negative Declaration. CCNCLUSION As stated previously, the proposed vacations are consistent with the La QLiinta General Plan and are supported by the City Engineer and the affected public utilities. A rnaining concern of staff is that the property owners of 11 of the 66 lots have not stinitted petitions agreeing to the vacations. Therefore, there is a possibility that one of these property owners may sue the City for approving the vacation of the pLiblic streets. The Applicant will obtain insurance protecting the City in the case of lawsuits. FINDINGS 1. The regLiest is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan. 2. Approval of the will not adversely affect area-wide circulation. 3. The proposal will not adversely affect the environment. REC(NDAT TON Based upon the above findings, staff recar[rds the approval of the resolution of intention to vacate Avenida Montero and Cal les Felipe, Orense, Seaea, Huerta and Peeo; and adoption of the Negative Declaration for the environmental assessment. HI' HI IHIHIHI iii flIflIflIflIflil n flfl:HIEIRIRIRIRIRIRIRIRIRII niiEiillIlIIIIIlI'1II1 Ii III BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E T A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVIG DEMANDS. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quint, CalL fornia, to approve demands as shown on the Demand/Warrant Recister dated July 19, 1983. APPPOVBD and ADOPTED this 19th day of July, 1983. MAYOR ATffi-ST: CITY CLERK' APT?DVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTBNT. CTTY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER 11111111 IIIIIIIIEIiiiiiiIIIiiiiiiiii 111111 11111 ii I HIM II:III:III:III:III:III:III:III:III:III:III:I 111111 11111 liii I iIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIiI 1 111111 III" iiii ii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiIiiiIIlNIllIIIIIIlIIIIIlIIlI I 1111111 I II BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E I' LV u.u L l\TA MUNICI:.*AL C(:;pHPThLATINC TO PEFLS DISPOSAL. The city cOuncIl o the City of La Quinta does ordain as follows: SECTTO 1. Chapter 6.04 of the La Quinta Municipal Code heroD is amended to read as follows: Chapter 6.04 RFFUSE DISPOSAL Sections: 6.04.010 Pefuso services by cit. 6.0:-. 020 flftlOflS 6.04.030 Pefuse collection service--Mandatory. 6.04 040 Containers--ProvisIon reoui rca--Adequacy. 6.04.050 FreQyencv of collection. 6.04.060 Container specifications. 6.04.070 Improper keeping of refuse as nuisance. 6.04.00 Pemoval prohibited when. 6.04.090 Noncompactible solid waste. 6.04.100 Ulawful use of trash receptacles. 6.04.1.10 BinQ of refuse prohibited. 6.04.120 Sr>Special aickuns. 6.04.130 Bstablishment of rates and i)ickuo. schedule. 6.04.140 Ti-rauthorized collectors. 6.04.150 L'nauthorized removal of rubbish. 6.04.160 Collector and trucks. 6.04.170 Lnauthorized use of containers of another. 6.04.010 Pefuse dj5DO5al services by city. The cit\ shall Drovide for and furnishing services relating to collection, transfer, and disposal of solid waste and rfuse within and throughout the. city. Such services ill be furnished either by city officers and employees directly, or by contract agent or aaents of the citv. 6.04.020 Definitions. For purposes of this chapter: Collector" means the citv's authorized agent when a contract for refuse collection is in force) or the city officer in charge 0 refuse collection sarvices when no such contract exists Garbage' includes all waste accumulations of animal, fruit, vegetable, or other matter that attends or results fro the rreDaration, use, cioking, processing, dealing in or storage of food, meat, fish, fowl, frui-s or vegetables, including same or narts thereof. Pefuse' S comDroheasive term meaning anv and all &L-ste matter and material vd includes garbage and rubbish. Rubbish" Includes all waste matter other than garbage, soil or rock material. HI' HI IHIHIHI iii flIflIflIflIflil n flfl:HIEIRIRIRIRIRIRIRIRIRII niiEiillIlIIIIIlI'1II1 Ii III BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E S V. A OKDIA'.>L Tb Y LOUCIL OF ThY CiTY OF A OUJNTA, CALJFe.?N.., AMFNr)l.v;C SECTJO'; 2.04.050 OF THE LA QUINTA 7]qIpAL CODE PROVIDINC FO COIPENSATlON AND REI;URSEMENT TO IBERS OF THE CITY COUCIL. The city council of the City of La Quinta does ordain as follows: SECTIO 1. Section 2.04.050 of the La Quinta Municipal Code hereby is amended to read as follows: 2.04.050 Compensation and reimbursement. Pursuant to Section 36516 of the Government Code of the State, compensation shall be paid to each member of the city council in the amount of one hundred flftv dollars $150) per month. The c0m4)ensat Jon prescribed herein is and siall be exclusive of any amounts payable to each member of the council as reimbursement for actual and necessary expenses incurred b him or her in the performance of officIal duties for the City of La Quinta; and, accordingly, each member of the council shall receive reimbursement for such actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of official duties for the city, pursuant to the provisions of Section 36514.5 of the Government Code. SECTION 2. EFFECTIvE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force arid effect thirty 30) days after passage. SECTION 3. PQSTIC. The city clerk shall within 15 days after the passage of this ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least the 3 public places designated by resolution of the city council; shall certify to the adoption and posting of this ordinance; and shall cause this ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to ho entered in the book of ordinances of this City. The foregoing ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the city council held this dav of 1983, by the following vote: AYES: OES: AESENT: IAYOR ATTEST: CJTY CLERK AS TO FO: APPROVED AS BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 !E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 "E fig RESOLUTION NO.83 i) RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ifiE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORN[A, ESTABLISHj REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICE RATES FOR CITYFURNISHED REFUSE DISPOSAL SERVICES THROUHOUT THE CITY. WHEREAS, Section 6.O.0IO of the La Quinia Municipal code adopted 983) provides that the City shall provide for and furnish services reIatin to collection, transfer, and disposal of solid waste and refuse throughout the Ciiy; and HPREAS, Section 6.0.l30 o said Code adopted 1983) and th co?trdC o SCA Services, Inc. provide that the Cily Courici hal esTublish rates for such services as provided for and furnished by the City; NO THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta that effective 3uIy 1, 1983, the following schedule of rates for Ciiy4urnished refuse disposal services hereby is established. SERVICE RATES SURCHAPGE For Dur.; Fees) INDIVIDUAL RESIDENTIAL CHARGES I. ASIC RATE Curb 5service) A. Once per week pick up, any combination of 6 cans, bags, or bundles 56.00 per month 35 per n.nth Each additional can $1.00 per month 35 per rrnth for up to 2. WALK IN SERVICE within 60 feet from curb) A. Once per week pick up, any combination of 6 cans, bags, or bundles, Trimmings must be placed out to curb asic rate plus 35 on pick-up day. 3.55 B. Each additional can 1.70 35 for up 10 C. Extra Distance-- Each additional 20 f. or part thereof. 7> BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 #E SERVJ(:! IATL'> SURCHARGE MULT;:<LE DWELLI\GSCENTRAL ONE STOP LOCATION DUPLX, APARTMENTS MOTELS) FIRST NIT ANY COMBINATION OF SIX CANS, BAGS O BUNDLES, THREE EACH ADDITIONAL UNIT. I. CURB SERVICE A First Unit 00 35 B. Each additional unji 3.75 35 2. ALK IN SERVICE A. Firs Uni' 9.30 35 B. Each addiTional unji 10 35 OTHER THAN CENTRAL LOCATION OF TRASH MORE THAN ONE STOP AT ONE ACCOUNT) 1. CURB SERVICE A. FirsT Un.' 7.90 35 B. Each additional unit 3.75 35 2. WALK IN SERVICE A. Firsi Unit 9.30 35 B. Each addrionaI unit 6.10 35 MULTIPLE DWELLI\GS-CENTRAL BILLING YEAR ROUND SERVICE) CONDONIINIUMS COST PER UNIT A. Curb Service 5.10 35 B. Walk In Service 6.40 35 MOBILE HOME PARKS-CENTRAL BILLING FOUR CANS PER UNIT) I. CURB SERVIC Bach Uni $4.35 3 2. WALK IN SER\ICb Each UniT 7.20 iIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIflI 1 111111 III" *iii i ii ill iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiIiiiIIlNIllIIIIIIlIIIIIlIIlI I 1111111 I II BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 $E COMMERCIAL RATES/md. 1. FRONT LOADER BINS TIMES TWO THREE FOUR PER YARD SUR YARD Slik YARD SUR WEEK BIN CHARGE BIN CHARGE BIN CHARGE $36.05 2.90 $ 44.80 4.40 $ 61.45 5.90 2 62.55 5.80 76.80 8.80 95.15 11.80 3 60 8.70 108.05 13.20 130.10 17.70 4 112.55 11.60 136.40 17.60 165.15 23.60 5 137.55 14.50 167.25 22.00 200.05 29.50 6 162.70 17.40 196.80 26.40 230.40 35.40 COMMERCIAL RATES/per each ROLL OFF5(Pickup within one week) SIZE PRICE SURCHARGE 12 YARD $ 61.15 $ 7.10 20 YARD 61.15 7.10 30 YARD 86.40 10.55 40 YARD 120.35 14.20 DELIVERY CHARGE $ 10.60 RENTAL AFTER 7 DAYS-PER DAY 10.25 SPECIAL HAUL SERVICE RATES For first fifteen minutes $16.15 Each dditiona1 five minutes 5.35 HANDLING CHARGE HANDLING FEE IS CHARGED WHEN COLLECTOR MUST MOVE THE 13Ij TO EMPTY IT A. Per pickup, per bin $ 3.60 ill l 11111111 11111 tIlIllIll III" iiii ii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiIiiiIIlNIllIIIIIIlIIIIIlIIlI I 1111111 I II iIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIflI 1 I'll" ill BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 %E START FEES To open a new account, transfer an account into a new name, and/or change of address RESTART FEE Restart Fee Resumed Account when on discontinue will notify") 12.20 BJLKY HOJSEHOLD ITEMS Bulky ITEMS thai, becauQ of their size or weight such as furniture, T.V. s. appliances, etc.) cannot be collected on regular routes shall be collected based on the 5special Haul rate. UNUSUAL CONDITIONS For collections requiring special equipment or otherwise not set forth in this Resolution, rates may be charged as shall be agreed upon by the Collector and the customer. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1983. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: YA TTORNE CITY MANAGER 11111111 IIIIIIIIEIiiiiiiIIIiiiiiiiii 111111 11111 ii I HIM II:III:III:III:III:III:III:III:III:III:III:I 111111 11111 liii Ii illil I 1111111 111111 11111111 111111 IflIllIll 111111 11111111 hilt lillillil 111111 11111 111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIII iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiIiiiIIlNIllIIIIIIlIIIIIlIIlI I 1111111 I II BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 &E MEMORANDUM CITY OF LA QUINTA To: Honorable Mayor and Members of Council From: Frank M. Usher, City Manager Date: July 15, 1983 Subject: Lease of additional office space The accompanying lease amendment provides for the lease of Unit F, in the City Hall building. Funds for lease of this unit provided for in the Fiscal Year 1983-1984 budget. Approval of the lease agreement is respectfully recomr(Lended. 2;L iIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIflI 1 111111 III" *iiii ii ill iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiIiiiIIlNIllIIIIIIlIIIIIlIIlI I 1111111 I II BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 'E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 (E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 )E A??ROVD MEMORANDUM AS.T0C0NTNT CTY C0NO ENG CITY OF LA QUINTA OF k CY wrER To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Ann Jennings, Assistant to the City Manager Date: July 15, 1983 Subjeot: Rental of an Equipment Storage Facility Staff has, in conjunction with the purchase of City vehicles and equipment, been attempting to locate a suitable site for use as an equipment storage and maintenance facility. As you are aware, discussions have been held between the City and officials of General Telephone Company for the use of an area located behind the GTE facility at the intersection of Avenida La Fonda and Desert Club Drive We were informed last week that GTE has determined that they are unable to allow the City the use of this location. The proposed storage facility is necessary for the parking and maintenance of City vehicles and storage of various City Staff has been attempting to locate a site that would provide adequate protection from vandalism and allow the City to erect a metal building for equipment storage. Agreement has been reached between the City and Triad Enterprises for the month-to-month rental of a storage facility located at 77-895 Avenida Montezuma. The proposed site is completely fenced and graveled It also has water available The owner of the property is requesting a monthly rental of $75 $900 per year) and has agreed to a monthly rental commencing July 20, 1983. The adoption of the resolution appropriating $900 for one years rental is therefore necessary, and it is respectfully recommended that Council approve the resolution and rental agreement. Ii III 1111111 KII flIflIflIflIflIflIflIflIflIIIII flIiIEEiIilnilIInlIilI BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 *E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 +E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 ,E MEMORANDUM CITY OF LA QUINTA 01OF To: Honorable Mayor and Members of Council From: Frank M. Usher, City Manager Date: July 15, 1983 Subject: Designation of a Redevelopment Survey Area As the Council is aware, we are beginning the necessary steps to establish a redevelopment project which will enable the construction of flood control improvements for the protection of the entire cove area and other areas to the north and east. Because of the very short schedule which we must follow, it will be necessary to request the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County to permit redevelopment activity of certain unincorporated territory. The resolution before you designates a survey area for a redevelopment project. It also requests the Board of Supervisors to adopt an ordinance authorizing redevelopment of certain unincorporated territory. 7 X/Z p 11111111 IIIIIIIIEIiiiiiiIIIiiiiiiiii 111111 11111 ii I HIM II:III:III:III:III:III:III:III:III:III:III:I 111111 11111 liii iIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIflI 1 111111 III" *iiii ii ill iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiIiiiIIlNIllIIIIIIlIIIIIlIIlI I 1111111 I II BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 -E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 .E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 /E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 0E MFMORANDUM CITY OF LA QUINTA To: Honorable Mayor and Members of Council From: Frank N. Usher, City Manager Date: July 15, 1983 Subject: Engineering services relative to annexation and sphere of influence The Landmark Land Company has requested annexation of the land which they own on the Kennedy Panch to the City of La Quinta. A substantual to the land which they own in this area is already in the City of La Ouinta, and in plannin9 and executing their project is desirable that all of their land be in one jurisdiction. Inclusion of their land within the City and within our proposed redevelopment project is also important in order to provide a sount financial base for the flood control project which will be of benefit to the cove and other areas of the City to the north and east of the cove. To expedite this I am recommending the retention of J. F. Davidson Associates to provide engineering and related services regarding the annexation process of Landmarks land. There are issues to be resolved with the City of Coachella regarding sphere of influence, which we are in the process of doing. Acceptance of the proposal of J. F. Davidson Associates for professional engineering services is respectfully recommended. 7/ BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 1E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 2E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 3E Kaizuollis O;O13 LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PRELIMINARY S C H E D U L E OF A C T I 0 N for the Adoption of a RedevelopTnent Plan for the ropoed LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT POJECT DATE DATE ACCOMPLISHED SCHEDULED ACTION AND DOCUMEbT S) AND D NO. 1. 07/05/83 2nd eading of Ordinance by City Council creating Redevelopinent AgeD- cy. 2. 07/19/83 Agency adopts CEQA Environmental Guidelines. 3. 07//83 City Council adopts designation- Dating Survey Area and requesting Riverside County Board of Supervisors to designate and authorize City to indertake redevelopment of unincor- porated territory within Survey Area. 1. Resolution 2. Survey Area Map 4. 07/20/83 City Manager transmits above resolu- tion to County Board of Supervisors and requests adoption of authorize tion and designation ordinance. 1. Cover Letter 2. ResolutiOn 3. Survey Area Map 4. Proposed County ordinance 5. 07/20/83 Agency and Planning Comirlission taff to gather and analyze data to determine 08/09/82 optimum Proect boundary location, and to formulate Preliminary Plan. 6. On or Riverside County Board of 111111 11111111 11111 111111 111111 11111111111111 11111111 111111 111111111111111 1111111 111111 111111111 111111 11111111 111111 1111111 iIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIiI 1 iiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiIiiiIIlNIllIIIIIIlIIIIIlIIlI I 1111111 I II ill BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 4E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 5E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 6E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 7E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 8E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 9E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 :E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 ;E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 <E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 =E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 >E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 ?E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 @E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 AE NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 BE NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 CE HOUSING LEADERSHIF ROUNDTABLE A Report I attended the Housing Leadership Roundtable in Sacramento, July 7th and 8th. It was sponsored by the League of Californis Cities, League of Women Voters and Californians for Housing. The focus for the ninety-some participants was on 1) obstacles to affordable housing1' 2) seeking solutions, and 3) develop individual work plans for achieving solutions. The par- ticipants were a heterogeneous group, consisting of elected city officials, government employees dealing with housing issues, and developers in the field, as well as others whose interests or positions relate to this topic. While we had several excellent speakers, most of the action' took place in small groups. Some of the major problems which emerged were **-,%`- Proposition 13 has made housing more expensive for all home-buyers. The increase in various fees causes costs for builders passed on to buyers) which far exceed the higher property taxes which would have been paid if Prop. 3 had not passed. One major obstacle to affordable housing in community is the 1NIMBY" Not In My Back Yard) perception. Everybody supports inexpensive housing... somewhere else. Developers who want to build affordable housing are seriously hampered by governmental regulations and zoning requirements at local, state and federal levels. These tend to delay building and push up the prices of houses. *-,\`- The most general agreement at the conference was that the biggest obstacle to affordable housing is ATTITUDES.... at all levels in our society. Some are based on fear, others on racial bias, some on economic concerns. People don1t want 1those other groups" moving into our neighbor- hood; they are afraid of dropping property values; they are concerned about lower housing standards. At state and national levels low cost housing is either not a major concern; or legislation moves very slow; or the funding is very inadequate. A number of actions were recommended for the local level, among them: Elect people to local offices who are committed to low cost housing and will move on it. demonstration r ots iIiinininininininininii liii oIIIeI Iii III El hill BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 DE n C... 333 2 v. I buIlding ndustr & C3,3 officqais iners. ano other community leader to advocacy anc attitude-changing activities. Conduct local educational programs to develop attitudinal changes. The total issue is very complex and diverse. What is affor- dabletin one part of the State is not in another. Local zoning regulations and ordinances vary tremendously, making state-wide planning and leadership very difficult. Thus, we must deal with the issue at the local level.. it!S a challenge for all of us, elected and appointed officials, planners and others in local leadership role, to meet the needs of people requiring affordable housing. Ii illil I 1111111111111 11111111 111111 IflIllIll 111111 11111111 hilt lillillil 111111 11111 111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIII iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiIiiiIIlNIllIIIIIIlIIIIIlIIlI I 1111111 I II BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02 EE NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-24-1997-U01 10:42:40AM-U01 CC-U02 07-U02 19-U02 1983-U02