1985 12 03 CC2^ +m AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CITY OF LA QUINTA
A regular meeting of the City Council
to be held at City Hall, 78-105 Calle
Estado, La Quinta, California.
December 3, 1985 7:30 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER
A. Flag Salute.
2. ROLL CALL
3. PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the time set aside for citizens to address the Council on matters relating
to City business. When addressing the Council, please state your name and address.
The proceedings of the Council meeting are recorded on tape and comments of each
person shall be limited to three 3) minutes.
Persons wishing to address the Council regarding an Agenda item should use the
form provided. Please complete one form for each Agenda item you intend to address
and return the form to the Secretary prior to the beginning of the meeting.
NOTE: Except for hearings, comments relative to items on the Agenda are limited
to two 2) minutes. Your name will be called at the appropriate time.
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
5. COMMENT BY COUNCIL MEMBERS
6. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of the Minutes of a regular City Council meeting held November 19,
1985.
B. PROPOSED RESOLUTION. * A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEMANDS.
1) Motion for adoption ROLL CALL VOTE)
7. HEARINGS
A. A continued public hearing regarding Street Vacation No. 85-008, consisting of
a portion of Eisenhower Drive between San Vicente east) and Avenida Fernando
south), a request to abandon a 29' portion of the existing Eisenhower Drive
right-of-way to allow for construction of a private frontage road and perimeter
wall; La Quinta Golf Estates Homeowners Association, Applicant.
1) Report from Community Development Director Larry Stevens.
2) Public comment.
3) Council discussion.
4) Resolution for adoption. *
B. A continued public hearing regarding Plot Plan No. 85-186, a request for approval
to construct a private frontage road with access gates and a perimeter wall along
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +mAGENDA City Council
Page 2
December 3, 1985
the Eisenhower Drive frontage of the La Quinta Golf Estates Subdivision,
located on the easterly and southerly side of Eisenhower Drive between
San Vicente Street east) and Avenida Fernando south), La Quinta Golf
Estates Homeowners Association, Applicant.
1) Report from Community Development Director Larry Stevens.
2) Public comment.
3) Council discussion.
4) Resolution for adoption. * 4D
C. A public hearing regarding Plot Plan No. 85-217, a request for approval to
construct an 88,575 square foot commercialloffice plan made up of four
separate structures on 5.58 acres, in conjunction with the Duna La Quinta
Specific Plan No. 83-001, Amendment No. 2; Landmark Land Company, Applicant.
1) Report from Community Development Director Larry Stevens.
2) Public comment.
3) Council discussion.
4) Resolution for adoption. * 5- \*5
8. BUSINESS SESSION
A. Report from City Manager Frank Usher regarding grant consulting services.
1) Motion for adoption.
2) Resolution for adoption.
B. Report from City Manager regarding a claim against the City; James Robert
Grimes, Claimant.
1) Motion for adoption.
C. Report from Community Safety Coordinator Roger Hirdler regarding Landmark
Land Company's request for change of condition pertaining to purchase of the
Van Pelt fire engine.
1) Motion for adoption.
D. Report from Community Safety Coordinator regarding extension of the Fire
Marshal contract for an additional one year period.
1) Motion for adoption.
E. Report from Deputy City Manager Ann Jennings regarding proposal for professional
medical services. Informational)
F. Report from Deputy City Manager regarding Title V Senior Employment Program
Agreement.
4-
1) Resolution for adoption. *
G. Other.
9. ADJOURNMENT
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +m MEMORANDUM
CgTv OF LA QUINTA
To: The *norable M*yor and *!tbers of the City Council
*rom: *ounity Develope*t Director
Date: Dec*tber 3, 1985
Sub*ci: SThEE** WcATI(* *. 85-008
I*cation: *sterly and Southerly Portions of the E*dsting l00-Fbot-Wide
Right-of-*y for Eiseitcwer Drive Between San Vincente East)
and Avenida Fernando South)
Applicant: * QQinta Golf Estates H*wners' Association
*uest: Th Abandon a* Strip of the *istiig Eisenhower Drive Right-of-*y
to Allow for Co*uction of a Private Frontage Road and Peruteter *
C*i b**ber 5, 1985, the City Council conducted a public hearing on the proposed
vacation and approved in concept the revised cross-section presented at the teeeting
E*chibit B distributed in your packet) subject to Staff working out the details
and bringing th*n back for final approval/conditions.
Staff City Engineer and C*rxr':niity Develo*:**nt Director) has itet with Mike Stith
Applicant's Engineer) to review the approved concept and resolve details. F*chibit A
represents the agreettent fran this review process. In general, the main differences
are in lane and medan widths **hidi have been increased to the detrittent of an abandoned
vehicle lane. It is Staff's conclusion that the fre*uency and volurre of use *arr*ts
the wider lanes. The wider curb lanes will also acc*te both pedestrians and
bicycles to a limited degree and could even allow an abandoned vehicle next to the
curb with limited crossing of the lane stripe.
*vised c*xiitions consistent with F*diibit A are attached. The Resolution will be
presented to you at the Study Session.
PLEASE * W*RIAlS * YOUR NOVEMBER 5* PA* * THE MEETINC;.
BY:
La*ence L. Stevens, AICP
Ccttttunity Develo*irent Director
Atch: Revised Conditions
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +mgT*T * *. 85-008
**ITI*S OF APP***L
1. Gaid portions of the public street right-of-way or*red vacat4 and abandoned
are those portions of Eisenhower Drive as shown ofl* E*chibit *`A"*andas
by the following conditions, which conditions shall take precedence in the
event of any conflicts with the provisions of the street vacation plan.
2. The *licant shall c*tply with all conditions of approval for Plot Plan
ND. 85-186.
3. That portion of Eiseneower Drive right-of-way approved for vacation shall
be amended *cfollq** in accordance with L'*- p*:ici** *f * pi*t
Pizi *. C* 13G: z * * A *
3. * * * * nri;c &t * * of r:*n**
* *cuth) i* de1et** f* * **t*3fl 3ppro*3l ird
*`*ll r**in a piili* right 3f *
4. Eisenheeer Drive shall ocoply with the following standards:
*-DE*,J. * JF*:
a. **ovide a mirdn*in *-foot wide right-of-way with a minilnum
*foot curb to curb distance,*o allow for construction of
4) travel lanes, a 1*42-foot wide**terz*di,an*and
wide parkway area
* * Q)ct*io*i* of A'.*nida F*nar* *
at thz intpr*-'t* ion *f Fic*o*r nri**c and * Urcula &t*.
W. Provide additional right-of-way to construct transition
ixrprov*nts as need in the areas beteeen the existing
and T!*di.fied public street alignrrents.
*. A*iziti3* &f *ThLI**1 i**t 3f * * wt*bU:L* *ke or *isenmLP***
Dri;* **ll bc ir* tl'* City * &dication, * *
*t*r * 1I** * plan * * Ll* i**iyn *
nri*'c pur**t * thic p*j*t n****itzte iouuioiti* a* p*rt f *
*licant shall agree to participate in the constcuction of center landcaped
nedian through asses*nt district or similar joint ftz*ding *thod unless
n*dians are constructe** as part of this project.
*. The Applicant shall * engineered street irt*rov**ent plans for Eisenhower
Drive, as a**nded by the requir*nts of this approval and that for Plot
Plan ND. 85-186, to the City *ngineer for review and approval.
a. The plans shall be prepared by a *istered Civil Engineer and a
Registered Traffic Engineer.
b. The plans shall indicate all traffic control devices, including
but not limited to street stripping and traffic signage.
6. * *-k fr'iCf"* * * 67-f*4 *J&
* *a-*.t **`b * e*p* * * * kb* *f * 7),
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +m MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: The Honorable Mayor and M*r*ers of the City Council
From: G*r'runity Develo*xr*nt Director
Date: Decebeer 3, 1985
Subject: pI* * No.85-186
location: Easterly and Southerly Sides of Eisenhower Drive Between San Vincente
Street East) and Avenida Fernando South)
Applicant: Ia Quinta *lf Estates H*wners' Association
*guest: Approval to Construct a Private Frontage Road with Access Gates and a
Perimeter *l1 along the Eisenhower Drive Frontage of the La Quinta
Golf Estates Subdivision
This matter was also continued fr*n *vebeer 5. Staff has revised the conditions
to be consistent with the Street Vacation action.
PI**SE BRING * FR* YO(3R NOVE**BER 5*I* * * *HE MEEIING.
PI*EPARED BY:
la*wrence L. Stevens, AICP
c*r'r*ity Devel**nt Director
Atch: Revised Conditions
*
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +m***ITIONS OF APPF*AL
*wr PL*N No. 85-186
*vi* * * rlarxAng * Action on 10-22 p5
Page 1.
1. The development of this project shall conform t'ascontaint*
with Exhibit
in the *OOunity nevelopment Depar*t's file for Plot Plan No.85-186 and
the following conditions, which conditions shall take precedence in the
event of any conflict with the provisions of the plot plan.
2. Development of this project shall be in accordance with the provisions
of the La CXiinta General Plan.
3. Prior to the i$*&**Ct ** *`; * C4
of *y gridAi*g,buildir* * * the
Applicant shall c*tply with the provisions of Street Vacation No.85-008 and
the street abando**nt shall be recorded and in effect.
4. The approved plot plan shall be used within two years of the approval date;
otherwise, it shall bea** null and void and of no effect whatsoever. By
1use11 is meant the beginning of substantial construction, not includinq
grading, cont*lated by this approvaT which is begun within the two-year
period and is thereafter diligently pursued to c*tpletion.
AND A*ESS GA*
5. Prior to the issuance of any permits for uses cont*lated by this approval,
Eisenhower Drive public street irr*rov*t*nts shall be c***leted, or otherwise
quaranteed, in accordance with the provisions of Street Vacation No. 85-008.
6. The Applicant shall s*t street inproveeent plans for the private frontage
road to the City Engineer for review and approval in accordance with the
following reguir***ts:
a. The frontage road shall have a ninmuirn *-foot-wide cur*t*curb width
to provide adequate area for two*y traffic. Both sides of the
entire frontage road shall be signed and otherwise designated as
No Parking or Stopping".
b. Cul-de-sacs shall have a minimum outside turn radius as shown on
the plan and as otherwise reuuired by the City Fire Marshal.
c. The street and intersections shall be jitproved to City standards.
d. The plans shall indicate all traffic control devices, including
but not l*ted to street striping and traffic signage.
e. The plans shall be prepared by a Fegistered Civil Engineer in
conjunction with a Registered Traffic Engineer.
7. The access gates shall be constructed in accordance with the following
requirements:
a. The Coachella Drive gate may continue to be constructed by the
Applicant under the provisions of the previous approval of
Plot Plan No. 85-105.
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +m*DITI*S OF APP*V7*L
PWT PL* No.85-186
in *
* Pl*U**
Page 2.
b. The Applicant shall su*:itfft plans to the City Engineer for review
and approval c*rplying with the following requireeents for the Avenida
Fernando south) gates:
1) Access to the entire Club La Quinta project fr*n Eisenhower
Drive along Avenida Fernando south) shall be provided unless
that project's Property O**ners' Association notifies the City
in writing that they agree to be included in and have access
through the La QQinta Golf Estates *ounity Association' 5
project as approved under Plot Plan ND. 85-186.
2) The design and construction of access gates and/or cul*e-sac
shall be in accordance with City requir*nts.
3) The access gate along Eiseehower Drive north of Avenida Feriiando
shall be in accordance with City requir*nts.
c. E*rergency access gates shall be provided on the frontage road
cul-de- sacs in accordance with the requir***nts of the City Engineer.
d. All gates shall be eguipped with automatic qate openers activated
by an emergency receiver as required by the City Fire *
e. The plans shall be prepared by a Pegistered Civil Engineer.
f. All required private street Th*rovements, including the provision of
pavement striping and traffic signage, shall be ca*plete, as determined
by the City Engineer, prior to the operation of the access gates.
*ll and Landscaping
8. Prior to the preparation or s'uittal of perureter wall or landscape plans
the Applicant shall contract with an Acoustical Engineer to prepare a site
specific noise analysis for Eisenheeer Drive adjaoent to the project site.
The height, design and location of the perirreter wall shall conform with
the rec*edations of the acoustical study, as approved by the City
*rrkn*ty Developrent Depar*rent.
9. Prior to the issuanoe of building or encroach*nt permits, the Applicant
shall g*t a detailed perirreter wall and landscape plan to the
*unity Developeent Depaement for review and approval. Said plan shall
indicate the following:
a. location and design of perirreter wall as required by Condition ND. 8
of this approval.
b. *pecies, size, location and spacing of all planting materials.
c. Irrigation systems.
d. location and specifications of any exterior lighting proposed.
e. The design and materials of the entry gates.
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +m**DITI*S OF APP*V*
PWI' PLJ*N *. 85-186
*:i*od * p*r rl**1*1* * * lu-22-8*
Page 3.
10. The landscape plan shall include consideration of the following design
aspects:
a. Pelocation, if necessary, of existing palm trees within the public
right-of*y to the new Eisenhower Drive parkway area.
b. Provisions for the installation of 11up lights" at the bases of the
pabti trees.
C. Selection of the type, size and spacing of the planting m*terials
to provide for visual variety and year-round color.
d. Limitation of the height of planting rn*terials to 42-inches in the
corner cutback areas of intersections to prevent blocking of sight
distance for *torists.
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +m MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: The Honorable M*yor and *irbers of the City Council
Ffom: Planning C*Tinission
Dete: Decebber 3, 1985
Subject: PIOT PU* *. 85-217
Location: *rtheast Corner of Calle Tampico and Desert Club Drive
Applicant: Landmark land Oppeny
Request: Approval to Construct Office Building *. 1 of Plaza Tampico" and
Concept Approval of the General *yout of Plaza Tanpico", a 90,000-
S*iare-Foot Floor Area Office and C*rir*rcial Center.
On *v*ter 26, 1985, the Plaiiing C*mission conducted a public hearing on the
proposed project and unaXiTh*usly recatit*ed approval of Office Building ND. 1
and the conceptual site plan subject to the conditions contained in the attached
Staff *port with the following revisions:
11. d) *dian openings on Calle Tampico shall be aliceed at the
**iesterly driveway and at Desert Club Drive. A maxmiurn
of two driveways each on Calle Tampico and Desert Club
Drive shall be permitted.
12. b) A landscaped setba* with an average depth of 15-feet
shall be provided along Calle Tampico. A six-foot-wide
sidewalk shall be incorporated into the parkway. Detailed
plans.....
12. c) Covered parking shall not be allowed along the Calle
Tampico frontage.
17. a) The Applicant shall provide an easement to the District...
The prim** issues discussed by the Planning O*rmission included:
* Desirability of a rndi'an at the project's main entrance.
* Future concern about adequacy of parking as project builds out.
* lpportatce of Calle Tampico as an Image Corridor and a Cer*nial
Street.
Need for landscaped setback to enhance the entrance to the Village
Area.
* Negative visual inpacts of covered parking adjacent to Calle Tampico*i**ico.
M-(
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +
mST* I*EPOR* C*IY *UNCIL
Deceniber 3, 1985
Page 2.
In general, it was the consensus of the Planning O*txnission to appr*ve the pro*ect
with several important changes to assure consistency with the village c*trt*cial
concept and its main Calle Tanpico entry corridor.
Kaye C*andler, Laixbnark Land *pany, and Bruce Cathcart, representing the developer,
appeared requesting approval of the project noting the tixre constraints under which
the developer was operating. They *jected to the 2O*foot, landscaped setback
Condition No. 12.b), requested deletion of the neandering sidewalk Condition No. 12.b),
requested approval of a rnedian opening Condition No. 11.d), and requested retention of
covered parking along Tampico. They indicated concurrence with other recoseended
conditi*s.
Mike *nith, Engineer for the developer, also ai:peared requestir)g clarification of the
width of the CV**D ea*eeent for storm drain purposes.
No one else appeared on the matter.
BY:
Lawrence L. Stevens, MCP
C*TIrIunity Developeent Director
IIS:drrw
Atchs: Planning C*uiission Staff
Report of 11/26/85 with
Revised Conditions
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +m MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: The H*norable Chairm** and *rr*rs of the Planning C*rrnission
From: Ccoonity E*elopeent De*nent
Date: Nov*tber 26, 1985
Subject: PWI PLAN NO. 8*2l7
IDcation: Northeast Corner of Calle Tampico and Desert Club Drive
Applicant: Landmark Land Ccpany
Request: Approval to Construct Office Building No.1 of Plaza Tampico" and
Concept Approval of the General /yout of 1Plaza Tampico", a 90,000-
Square-Foot Floor Area Office *id *mercial Center.
*Y*A*3 *
BACKGROUND
1. General Plan
a. Site: Specific Plan No. 83-001, Duna La Quinta"; Village *arcial.
b. surrounding Area: Village C*ercial to the west, High Density Residential
8-16 Dwelling Units Per Acre) to the east, Village *arcial and * Density
Residential 2-4 Dwelling Units Per Acre) to the south, and Village *mmeecial
and *ium Density Residential 4-8 Dwelling Units Per Acre) to the north
refer to Atta*ir**t No.1; Land Use *p).
c. Streets: Calle Tartpico, pr*viding the main access to the site, is designated
a 1'Prim** Arterial" with a 100' right-of-way. Calle Tampico is also designated
as a Secondary Image Corridor" and a Ceremonial*nial Street" to be treated as an
attractive entiyway into the City's downtown area. Desert Club Drive, south of
the project, is designated as a collector" with a 64' right-of-way.
2. *
a. Site: C-P-S Scenic Highway Oc*rcial) to the west; R-2-4000 *ltiple-Family
Residential) to the east and south; and R-2-3350 Multiple-Family Residential
to the north.
3. *isting Conditions: The site is vacant and generally flat containing native
vegetation including creosote brsssh, tunibleweeds. All areas directly adjacent
to the site are vacant. At the southwest corner of Cal le Tampico and Desert
Club Drive is a small multiple dwelling. Approximately 350 feet to the
west of the site, along Calle Tampico, are several small commercial buildings,
including a restaurant, pharma* and convenience market.
*ter, sewer, electricity and gas services are available to the site.
Calle Tampico, adjacent and to the south of the project site, is currently
maintained with a 60' right-of-way.
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +mSFAFF PEPOR* PLANNING C*4ISSION
Ncv*r*er 26, 1985
Page 2.
4. Environmental *nsiderations: An Environmental Irrpact Report S* #83061305) was
prepared on the overall Specific Plan and was certified on April 10, 1984. This
EIR adequately addresses the environmental jirpacts associated with the proposed
project. Mitigation measures added to the entire Duna La Quinta project, in
addition to those added to this project, respond to all potentially significant
inpacts, including traffic and circulation, air quality, water resources, and
public services and utilities reducing their irrpacts to a level of insignificance.
Pursuant to the State California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, the previous
EIR applies to the proposed project since the circumstances of the project are
essentially the same as those addressed in the EIR. This EIR revieeed iltpacts
associated with Duna La Quinta with the project site developed as cceeercial.
5. Related Actions
a. Specific Plan No.83-001, Duna La Quinta", approval of 1,277 dwelling units
on 266 acres, oriented around the La Quinta Hotel Golf Oourse. Approved
May 15, 1984. subsequent amendments to the specific plan have been made.
*st recently Amendment No.2, approved on Novebber 5, 1985, reduced the
nurr*er of dwelling units approved to 1,146 units and changed alloeed uses of
the site fr*n multiple-family residential to ccccercial uses.
b. General Plan Amendment No.85-007, requesting General C*tit*cial at the
project site. Approved for village Coeeercial on Novebber 5, 1985.
c. Change of Zone No.85-017, requesting a change of zone fram R-3-3350 to C-P-S
to ir*leeent General Plan Amendment No.85-007 and peerit a*ttrercial site
developr*nt. Approved Novebber 19, 1985.
d. *I*ntative Tract No.21123, requesting approval of 20 estate lots for single-
family development on 6.74 acres, within a portion of Duna La Quinta, Phase 3
directly north of the project site). Approved Noveeeer 5, 1985.
e. Change of Zone No.84-006, a Change of Zone to irr*l*ri&it the Duna La Quinta
Specific Plan. Approved May 15, 1984 N*: Zoned site to R-3-3350 for ultimate
condo/apament devel*inent).
f. General Plan * No.84-003, requesting General *srcial at Avenue 50
and *shington Street and at Calle Tampico. Denied May 15, 1984.
g. T*tative Tract No.18767, approved for 77 ccndoiinium units on 77 acres,
Phase 1 of Duna La Quinta. Approved February 2, 1983.
h. *i*ntative Tract No.20158, approval of 54 condciinium units on 8.7 acres,
Phases 2 and 5 of Duna La Quinta. Approved July 17, 1984.
1. Tentative Tract No.20258, approval of 16 cond**ium units on 4.3'acres,
Phase 4 of Duna La Quinta. Approved July 17, 1984.
6. Description of Request: The Applicant is requesting approval to construct a
22,225-square-foot floor area office building Building No.1), a portion of
Plaza La Quinta" *hich is ultimately to include the following:
a 22,225-square-foot floor area office/c*rcial building
No.1 Part of this approval).
o 40, 25*square-foot floor area office/*ercial building
No.2 Future approval).
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +mSI*F* REPORr PL?*NNING C*ISSI*
Nav*r** 26, 1985
Page 3.
o 18, 600-square-foot floor area medical building Future
approval of Design, Use and Siting considered as part
of this approval).
o 7, 500-square-foot floor area restaurant Future approval
of Design, Use and Siting considered as part of this
approval)
The Applicant is also requesting general approval of the site plan, parking lot
layout, specified uses, and off-site i'r*roveeents of the entire Plaza Tampico*ico"
c*rcial/office center. The Applicant has indicated that he intends submitting
separate plot plan applications on the other portions of the project site as
financing bec*tes available. Construction i.e., grading) of this first phase
of Plaza La Quinta" is anticipated during late Dec*tiber, 1985.
7. *ents Received
a. City Engineer: The following catu*ts shall be required of the project:
1) Dedicate public street right-of-way for Calle Tampico and Desert Club Drive
including corner cutoffs). Right-of-way width shall be per City standards
at the ti'r* building permits are issued; however, in no event shall Calle
Tampico be less than 100 feet in total right-of-way width and Desert Club
Drive be less than 60 feet in total right-of-way width. The proposed Desert
Club Drive centerline shall line up1' with the existing centerline at Desert
Club Drive.
2) That the Applicant suhnit street ilr*roveeent plans that are prepared by a
Registered Civil Engineer. Street inproveeents incl*ding street and traffic
signs and markings), raised median islands on Calle I*Tampico), and underground
utilities are required and shall conform to City standards as determined by
the City Engineer.
3) A catplete report of a thorough preliminary engineering geological and soil
engineering investigation showing evidence of a safe and stable developeant
is to be SLuuitted with the grading plans. The reca*dations by the
engineering geologist and soil engineer shall be incorporated into the
grading plan design prior to grading permit approval. The soil engineer
and engineering geologist must certify to the stability of the site prior
to issunnce of any building permits.
Sei*nicity and the probability of seismic effects upon the site and the
proposed developeant shall also be included in any soil engineer or geologic
investigation and shall be incorporated into the grading plan by the design
civil engineer.
4) The grading plan shall be designed by a licensed Civil Engineer who will be
required to supervise the grading and drainage during construction; and
certify that the constructed ccnditions at the rough grade stage are as per
the approved plans and permit prior to issuance of building permits. Certi-
fication at the final grade stage is also required prior to final approval
of the grading construction.
5) The minimum street structural section shall be 3" of asphalt concrete over
4" of Class 2 rock base. All street sections shall be designed for the
following:
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +m F*PORT PLJ*NNING CCWISSI0N
N*ebber 26, 1985
Page 4.
a. subqrade soil strength.
b. Anticipated traffic loading.
C. Design life of 20 years minimum.
6) The development's main entry will be off of Desert Club Drive as the
proposed median island on Calle T*Tampico can only have a median opening
at select street, not driveway, accesses. A maxunurn of two driveways
each on Calle Tampico and Desert Club Drive will be allowed.
7) All utilities will be installed and coa*tion tests made on all trenches
prior to construction of streets. Cost of soil a*r*action and analysis
tests shall be paid by the developer.
8) Drainage disposal facilities shall be provided as approved by the City
Engineer. A detailed hydrology and drainage study per City standards
will be re*uired.
b. City Fire Marshal: With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the
above referenced Plot Plan, the Fire Department recatit*nds the following fire
protection measures be provided in accordance with La Quinta City Ordinances
and/or recognized fire protection standa*.
1) The Fire Departxt*t is renuired to set a miflimum fire flow for the r*todel
or co*struction of all cattrercial buildings.
2) Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 3500 *
fire flow for a 2-hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure.
3) A fire flow of 1000 gpm for a 2-hour duration at 20 psi residual operating
pressure trust be available before any c*ustible material is placed on
the job site.
4) A c*ibination of on-site and off-site Super fire hydrants, 6"x4"x2"x2"),
will be required located not less than 25' or more than 165' from any
portion of the building(s) as measured along approved vehicular travelways.
The required fire flow shall be available from any two adjacent hydrant(s)
in the system.
5) The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit
process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separations,
or built-in fire protection measures.
6) Applicant/Developer shall furnish water system plans to the Fire Department
for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and
spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans
shall be signed/approved by a Registered Civil Engineer and the local water
catpany with the following certification: I certify that the design of
the water system is in accordance with the requir*tents prescribed by the
Riverside County Fire Departnt."
7) Ccoply with Title 19 of the California Adi*istrative Code.
8) Install carplete fire sprinkler systems per *A 13 for the two office
buildings and the medical building. The post indicator valve and fire
department connection shall be located to the front, not less than 25'
fr* the building and within 50' of an approved hydrant.
9) Install fire alarms waterfiow) as required by the Uniform Building Code,
Section 3802(c), for sprinkler systems.
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +mS*I*FT REPORT PLANNING O*ISSION
*vebber 26, 1985
Page 5.
10) Install talr!per alarms on supply valves for sprinkler systems.
11) Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes.
12) Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA, Panphlet #10, but not less
than 2A10BC in rating.
13) Install a Hood DLlct autanatic fire extinguishing syst*n for restaurant
ca**rcial oooking equipeent.
14) The minimum width of interior driveways shall be 24'.
15) If medical building is determined to be a care facility1 luvi *cupancy),
additional life safety requirements as specified in UBC Chapter 10, CAC
Title 19, and *C Title 24 rnust be carplied with.
16) All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions should be referred
to the Fire Depar*t Planning and Engineering Staff.
C. Coachella Valley Water District: This area is shown to be subject to shallow
flooding and is designated Zone *, on Federal Flood Insurance Rate *ps which
are in effect at this time.
The developer shall provide a 40-foot easement to the District parallel to the
west property line for the East La Quinta Stonr**ater Channel buried conduit.
The District will furnish d*stic water and sanitation service to this area
in accordance with the current regulations of this District. These regulations
provide for the payment of certain fees and charges by the subdivider and said
fees and charges are subject to change.
d. General Telephone Coitpany: Telephone facilities exist along the south side
of Calle Tanpico.
e. *ber of Ca**rce: t1Plaza Tampico" looks very exciting. We *ou1d be very
interested in knowing more about the medical building, restaurant and tennnts
for the office buildings. As a Charr**r, r would like to welcome these new
businesses and their principals.
f. The following entitites responded to the project request for occoent with a
statement of * **t":
o Southern California Gas *ooony
o **ity Safety Dep*snt, City of La QLiinta
g. The following agencies, although sent a request for coeeent, did not su*lnit
any *oents:
o Imperial Irrigation District
Riverside County Sheriff1s Department
h. ND written c*rn*ts have been received f*n the public.
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +mS*FF I*EPOR* PLZ*NNING C*MISSION
Neveeber 26, 1985
Page 6.
SIABF *tLN1 *D AN*YSIS
In reviewing this proposal, both General Plan and *ific Plan consistency issues
have been incorporated into the body of this report. The Analysis section of this
report breaks down planning considerations into five categories which include Land Use,
General Design, Parking and Circulation and Miscellaneous Issues. It is urportant to
note that this project has only gained concept approval and not specific design approval.
The Plaza Tampico iv concept plan was approved on November 5, 1985, relative to Specific
Plan No. 83-001, Amendrent No. 2.
L*ND USE CONSIDERATIONS
With regard to Zoning, the project site is within the C-P-S Scenic Highway *rmercial)
Zone. Although the uses of the two large office/c*rercial buildings are not specified
in detail, C-P-S provides for a wide variety of uses. The Applicant has indicated that
the uses of office building No.1 will be all office related while office building No.2
will be prirarily office oriented uses. The proposed restaurant is a permitted use in
the C-P-S Zone. Although medical offices are not specified in the permitted use section
of Municipal Lard Use Ordinance Section 9.50, the specified uses of the building, as
described by the eventual uses of the building, is to be used for general medical office
space refer to letter fran Benton R. Fonner, Attachment No. 2). Offices and businesses
are permitted uses within the C-P-S Zone. Overall, the proposed uses within 1Plaza
Tar[picot1 are consistent with the C-P-S Zone. Further regulation of specified detailed
uses will be done at business license issuance time when Staff is authorized to limit
those uses which are permitted by the *inicipal Land Use Ordinance Refer to Attachment
No.3, C-P-S Zone).
Relative to the General Plan, the project site is located in the village commercial*trrercialt'
area. The uses proposed are consistent with the village COMMERCIAL*rercial1' concept of the
General Plan. The proposed restaurant, at the corner of Desert Club Drive and Calle
Tampico, particularly, will lend itself well to encouraging a pedestrian-oriented
atro*iere. The proposed medical office will provide a needed service to the
cormunity. The overall proposed uses of the project are consistent with the Duna La
Quinta Specific Plan.
Concerning the locations of uses on the site, the medical office is located with 75'
of the easterly propeety which is planned for residential uses. This is also the case
for the north and east properties near the office/*mercial buildings. In terms of
conflicts beteeen the two different uses, an appropriate buffer should be provided.
The site plan indicates a living wall with a 6'-high chain link fence along the bordering
property lines. At the minimum, a 6' high masonry wall should be installed along here to
minimize jir*acts of Plaza Tampico" on adjoining residential properties. This require-
tr*nt is in conformance to the *micipal Parking Regulations, Section 18.12(5) of the
Lard Use Ordinance. Since these buildings are * the view onto the adjoining
residentially planned properties is inevitable. *wever, to minijnize this irrpact, a
minjirurn of one tree every 40 feet should be planted along the c*rrron property line.
These trees should be a minirrrm of 10 feet in height at installation and should be of
a fast growing, spreading variety.
Since the project site is located close to a major street Calle Tampico), a noise
study shall be conducted on the project. This is consistent with Policy 3.25 and 3.26
of the Hazards Element. Of critical concern is the project' 5 irrpact on the nearby
residential areas, particularly with regard to the ambulance service. Based on the
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +mST** I*EPORT PL?*NNING C*ISSION
Nov*r*r 26, 1985
Page 7.
findings of the noise study, additional mitigation rr*asures may be required on the
project.
GE*RAL DESIGN CONSIDERATI*S
a. Site Plan: The proposed locations of the buildings and uses are well distributed
on the site with the restaurant at the main corner and iredical office at the main
project entrance; both highly visible fr* the street. It is irrportant to point
out that the location of the site is at the main gateway entrance into the Village.
The design of this project may, therefore, set significant precedent for designs
of other projects within the Village.
Several aspects of the project will have to be redesigned to iteet General Plan
consistency guidelines. Policy No.6.13 of the General Plan requires that parti-
cular attention be given to encourage a unique pedestrian-oriented atmosphere in
the Village area. The project is clearly autorrobile oriented, dc**a' ted by parking
areas and driveways, and generally lacks any pedestrian-oriented opportunities.
The project needs to incorporate a design for pedestrian orientation and should
consider the following redesign criteria:
o Central landscaped park area, including park benches and other
pedestrian furniture. Ideally, this park area should be
located in the center of the parking area between the restaurant
and medical office.
o A system of walkways within the parking area *hich ties in
pedestrian orientation between the park and all four buildings.
o peduction in parking along building perimeters to allow direct
pedestrian access to all buildings.
The Applicant is encouraged to provide additional amenities to the pedestrian area,
including but not limited to, a central oreaental fountain, designated areas for
bicycle parking, and additional pedestrian openings fr* main perimeter sidewalks
to main buildings and central park.
Another General Plan concern is the project's treatment of building mass, height,
and bulk. Based on Policy 6.34 of the General Plan, along Calle Tampico, designated
as a Ceremonial Street Corridor", the City shall establish appropriate building
height limits to assure a low density character and appearance. The Dnna La Quinta
Specific Plan limits all structures to a maximurn height of 35 feet. Building heights
of the restaurant and particularly the two-story medical building present * con-
cern in this regard. Building heights are not indicated for these buildings. As
indicated previously, separate plot plan approvals will be required fo* the
restaurant and medical building. The Applicant should be aware that a two-story
structure located close to Calle Tampico may not be appropriate.
As discussed in the Land Use Considerations portion of this report, the location
of buildings on the site have taken into account, to the extent feasible, the
residential properties to the north and east of the site. In terms of design,
all two-story structures within Plaza *Tampico" should maintain a minimum sethack
fran the north and east property lines of 75 feet.
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +mSrAFF I*EPORI PlANNING C*MISSION
Novebber 26, 1985
Page 8.
b. Building Design: Since The only buildings to be approved for This plot Plan are
The office/can:ercial building No.1 and The covered parking structures, this
report will focus primarily on these structures.
With regard to office/*mercial building No. 1, The structure contains The
typical mass, bulk, height, and design features of oTher traditional Landmark
buildings as developed or planned in The Duna La Quinta project and * West.
The structure's mass, bulk, height, architectural design, and building materials
proposed are consistent with those prescribed in the Duna La Quinta" Specific
Plan No.83-001. The building materials including plaster exterior sidings,
mission tile roof, and *od trellis details have been attractively designed with
architectural interest. The building height of approximately 29 feet is appropriate
given the building' 5 location on the site. The perimeter covered parking structure,
which has been incorporated into The overall building design, effectively will
reduce the visual density and bulk of the building by providing a ste*up effect.
With regard to the exterior color sch*, the entire 11Plaza Ta*Tampico" project should
incorporate a consistent color and texture The:e throughout. A color and building
material sch* for the entire Plaza Tampico" project should be submitted.
Concerning The design of The covered parking structures in The project, the coll]mn
type construction and oennness of these buildings contain a similar and consistent
design Theme to the office/car*rcial building. * major design problems have
been identified regarding The detached covered parking structures.
A *wntown Architectural Study is currently being conducted by consultants to
determine The architectural guidelines for the Downtown ultimately to be incorporated
into a I*wntown village Specific Plan. Assuming that these guidelines are adcpted
prior to develop'ment, These standards shall take precedence over any of the design
guidelines discussed in this report.
PAF*KING AND CII*UL*IC* C(*SIDERATIONS
a. Off-Site Circulation: The traffic generated by This project will approximately
double existing levels at full occupancy. *wever, Calle Tampico is a designated
Primary Arterial" with a 100' right-of-way in The General Plan. **hen oa"'pletely
improved fran Eisenhower to Washington Street, Calle Tampico will not create a
cumulative circulation problem in the village Area. To be consistent with the
General Plan, the following off-site improvements should be reguired:
o prove Calle Tampico to:
1) Primary Arterial 100' right-of-way Circulation Plan)
2) Secondary Image Corridor C*en Space Carr*ty Facilities Plan)
3) Ceremonial Street *i. Space C*minity Facilities Plan)
o Plaza Tampico shculd be allowed only one median cut at The intersection
of Calle Tampico and Desert Club Drive Minimurn Street Design Standards
for Primary Arterials limits intersection spacing to one very 1200 feet).
o A maxinium of two driveways are permitted on Calle Tampico City Engineer
requirements).
Desert club Drive shall be dedicated and improved as a Local Street with
a minirurn total right-of-way of 60 feet.
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +mS* I*EPOF* PL**ING C*4MISSION
Nov*r 26, 1985
Page 9.
A maximum of two driveways are permitted on Desert Club Drive.
Other General Plan and planning related matters are oonsidered here. Based on
Policy No. 6.35 of the General Plan, large parkways and setbacks are necessary
to assure a high quality and attractive appearance on major streets. Project
frontage along Calle Tampico, a Primary Arterial" shall have a minirrum 20-foot
setback parkway. In addition, the proposed six-foot-wide sidewalk shall be
meandering within this setback. It is anticipated that this parkway will enhance
the pedestrian o*ortunities of the project as well as provide for attractive
streetscape amenities.
Tb carry the 11Village Cati*rcial" concept thraigh the Village, special attractive
paving should be incorporated into the street design at the intersection of Calle
*rpico and Desert Club Drive. With all of these off-site inprovements, the
proposed project is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan.
b. On-Site Circulation: As indicated previously in this report, changes in the
design of this project should be made to accorrrooate pedestrian travel.
In overviewing the entire Plaza Tampico" plan, it can be inferred that the
project is overbuilt to permit both adequate parking and minimum conflicts between
pedestrians and rotorists. It is quite evident that a reduction in buildable floor
area will be required to both allow for adequate parking and circulation flow and
facilitate the Village Commercial" concept. The Applicant has indicated that
redesign of the project to acccrrrodate these interests may involve subterranean
type parking. The following is a distribution of the parking requirements for
the entire Plaza Tampico" project:
Section 18.12 of the *nicipal Land Use Code:
a) General business with 2000-square-feet or over of sales area;
one space for each 150-square-feet of sales display area.
b) Offices, business and professional; one space for each 250-
square-feet of floor area, *cluding public corridors and
stairways.
c) Dining rmcms, restaurants; one space for each 45-square-feet
of serving area.
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +m PEPORT PL*ING Q**SSION
Nov*t**er 26, 1985
Page 10.
Miiuum Parking Requir*r*nts:
Spaces Pequired
o 22,225 Square Feet Office 88.9
Total 88.9
o Building No.2 40,250 Square Feet)
20,125 Square Feet Office 80.50
20,125 Square Feet *c,ercial 134.20
Total 214.70
o *ical Building
18,600 Square Feet Office 74.40
Total 74.40
o *staurant Building
7,500 Square Feet
Estimated 5200 Square Foot Serving Area 115.56
* PIAZA TAMPICO" PAI*KING SPA* * 493.56
F*NDED OFF. 494)
As indicated in the above figures, approximately 494 parking spaces *uld be
required at ultimate buildout of Plaza Tampico" based on available information
regarding proposed uses. Without providing for pedestrian an*nities, the plan
calls for a total of 414 paaking spaces; a descrepancy of 80 spaces. *iile s*r*
joint use of parking may be appropriate, the amount apparently proposed seees
excessive especially since adequate information to fully evaluate the parking
needs of three of the fcur buildings is not available.
With regard to parking lot landscaping, the project c":plies with the ninir
D*inicipal Code standards of periseter and interior landscaping. The proposed
project contains primarily buildings and parking area with little att*t to
incorporate additional landscaping. The Applicant is encouraged to redesign
the parking lot landscaping plan to include more shade trees. As indicated in
the General Plan: 1Although l*scape standards for parking areas have not been
established, this is an inportant part of the City's Urban Design Program. At
a mini, ten percent of the project's interior parking area should be land-
scaped. Since covered parking is provided, the mini** Land Use Ordinance
requireeent of one tree for every parking stall is adequate.
MIS*Li*NEWS CONSIDERATI*S
The proposed project will extend needed infrastructure to the Village which is
consistent with the General Plan, Policy No.6.11: *The City shall aggressively
support jirprcveeent of the Village Area infrastructure as a means of enhancing
potential Village Cc*rcial develo*nt." With the recarr*ded conditions of
approval, the Plaza Tampico" project will benefit the City in terms of attracting
business to the area, st**lating the overall lccal econcoy, and providing a key
gateway into the Village at La Quinta".
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +mS*F*' REPOPT PLANNING CC*4ISSION
Nov***er 26, 1985
Page 11.
Cc**SICNS
1. The concept of Plaza Tanpico11 and office /cco,ercial building No.1, as contained
in the file of Plot Plan No.85-217, is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan
designation of village Cccoercial.
2. The proposed use is in c*liance with the C-P-S Zone.
3. That utility services including water1 sewer, electric, gas, and telephone service
are either presently available or shall be extended to the site which will provide
for the needs of the proposed project.
4. All identified ippacts associated with the project in the related Environeental
Thpact Report, have been mitigated to a level of insignificance.
5. This proposal is consistent with the goals of the overall Duna La Quinta Specific
Plan and will be c*tpatible with the adjacent Oak Tree *st" Specific Plan.
6. Coppatibility of this project is assured by the use of building height and
architectural restrictions included within the conditions of approval.
7. The project will generate additi*al traffic, which will require inproveeents
to adjacent streets and intersections.
8. Building Design and Parking Lot Design will be review* at the tiire of application
for develcpsnt approval to ensure coppatibility with City Standards and other
area develop",ant.
9. That a Doontown Architectural Study and Architectural Guidelines are being
developed and these will take precedence over the conditions of approval, relative
to project design staadards, if adopted before project develo*r*nt.
10. The parking provided for this project off ice/acooercial building No.1) will be
adequately provided on-site.
11. The r*ern style architecture and proposed building materials are cappatible with
existing devel*xr*nt.
FINDINGS
1. Plot Plan No.85-217 is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan as reca*ed
with conditions for approval by the Ccounity Develo*ent Departaent.
2. Plot Plan No.85-217 is consistent with the zoning as recatir*nded for approval by
the C*runity Develo*inent Departt*nt.
3. The project is consistent with Duna La Quinta Specific Plan No.83-001, as arr**ed
on Nov*er 5, 1985.
4. Plot Plan No.85-217 is consistent with the adopted La Quinta Redevel*nt
Project No.1 Plan.
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +mS* F*PORI' PL*NNING C(*ISSI*
* 26, 1985
Page 12.
5. There are no physical constraints *iich would prohibit develo*nt of the site as
proposed.
6. Public Services and utilities can be provided to the devel***nt.
7. Although the project could have significant adverse irrpact on the enviroenent, the
mitigation ir*asures agreed to by the Applicant and incorporated into the conditions
of approval will mitigate these project inpacts to levels of insignificance.
8. The general design of off iceiccocercial building *. 1 is consistent and carpatible
with existing and anticipated area devel**ent.
S*FF PE**DATI*
Based upon the above findings, the C*t*nity Devel*it*nt Deparaaent Staff r*nds
approval of Plot Plan *. 85-217, in accordance with E*iibits A, B and C and subject
to attached conditions:
BY: APP*lVED BY;
Gary w. Pric*e * *
Associate Planner
*WP:*
Atohs: 1. Land Use Plan
2. Letter fran Benton R. Fonner
3. C-P-S Zone Begulations
4. Exhibits A and B
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ + m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +!m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +"m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +#m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +$m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +%m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +&m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +'m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +(m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +)m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +*m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ ++m MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
*ifo*
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Frank M. Usher, City Manager
Date: November 25, 1985
Subject: Grant Consulting Services
The accompanying agreement has been provided by Gene House of Human Service
Consultants, relative to the provision of services in identifying and applying
for public and private grants. The agreement is for a period of 3 months, and
it may be extended on approval by the City Council. It is expected that these
services will significantly assist us in obtaining grants which will be of
benefit to the City. Approval of the accompanying agreement and the resolution
of appropriation is respectfully requested.
FMU/lw
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +,m 4
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
* *
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Frank M. Usher, City Manager
Date: November 25, 1985
Subject: Claim of James Robert Grimes
The subject claim is related to an accident which occurred on the Avenue 52
curve between Washington Street and Avenida Bermudas on September 1, 1985.
No facts are presented which indicate any negligence on the part of the City
of La Quinta. Rather, according to the accident investigation report by the
Riverside County Sheriff's Office, both parties were arrested on suspicion of
drunken driving, and it appears that the accident was caused by the negligence
of one or both of the parties*
Denial of the claim is respectfully recommended.
FMUIlw
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +-m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +.m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +/m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +0m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +1m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +2m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +3m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +4m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +5m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +6m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +7m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +8m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +9m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +:m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +;m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +<m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +=m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +>m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +?m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +@m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Am NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Bm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Cm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Dm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Em NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Fm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Gm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Hm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Im NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Jm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Km NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Lm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Mm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Nm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Om NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Pm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Qm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Rm MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: City Manager Usher and the Honorable City Council
From: Roger Hirdler, Community Safety Coordinator
Date: November 26, 1985
Subject: CONFIRMATION OF FIRE ENGINE REQUIREMENTS MET BY LANDMARK LAND CO.
Landmark Land Company has requested written confirmation from us that they have
satisfied the requirements as stated in Specific Plan Number 83-002, Item 38-D
copy attached).
It was mutually agreed that the new Van Pelt fire engine would meet the needs as
stated in the specific plan.
Staff respectfully recommends approval of the attached agreement.
Roger Hirdler
Community Safety Coordinator
RHibap
Atchs.
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Sm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Tm MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: City Manager Usher and the Honorable City Council
From: Roger Hirdler, Community Safety Coordinator
Date: November 26, 1985
Subject: RENEWAL OF FIRE MARSHAL AGREEMENT
The agreement with Riverside County for fire marshal services has to be renewed
on a yearly basis. The time to renew the agreement is prior to December 31st
for the following fiscal year.
The City has been assigned a fire marshal, however, he is not on board as of
yet. He should be reporting to us within the next week or two.
Staff respectfully recommends renewal of the attached fire marshal agreement
for fiscal year 1986/87.
Respectfully submitted,
Roger Hirdler
Community Safety Coordinator
RHibap
Atch.
2-/
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Um MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: Honorable Mayor and *!nbers of the City Council
From: Ann Jennings, Deputy City Manager
Date: November 27, 1985
Subject: Offer to Provide Professional Medical Services
The Nadridge Medical Corporation
In August, 1985, Dr. Maurice S. Nadridge presented the Council with a proposal to
provide professional medical services to the City. The attached letter from
Dr. Nadridge outlines the various types of services offered. It was the Councilts
action at that time to refer the matter back to Staff for review arid a subsequent
report.
At the present time, the City does not utilize the services of a medical consul-
tant". Required Pre-*nployeent physical examinations are provided by The Parks ide
Physicians Medical Group in Indio, at a cost of $35.00 per exam. Parkside Physicians
also perfouns the majority of any wor]*nan' 5 c*npensation injury exaainations to City
erployees, unless they are of an emergency nature, at which tinie the employee is
taken to the nearest hospital or emergency treatment facility.
Dr. Nadridge is offering a medical packagett, which we can accept all or in part,
or not at all. The Nadridge Medical Corporation provides services to Lv* other
local cities, Palm Desert and Rancho Mirage, and both cities indicate a high level
of satisfaction with the services received. However, Palm Desert and Rancho Mirage
utilize the services quite differently.
In Palm Desert, The Nadridge Medical Corporation performs all employee pre-employ-
ment physical examinations, handles all workman's cempensation cases other than
medical emergencies), acts as a member of their management team" and meets with
the management team for bi-monthly staff meetings, and performs executive physical
examinations for their Council mambers, planning personnel and deparnt heads, as
set forth in their City ordinance.
The City of Rancho Mirage currently uses Dr. Nadridge for pre-employment physical
examinations only.
*lile Staff believes that not all of the proposed services are necessary, such as
medical review of health care related construction projects, other aspects of the
program could be acceptable. It would be the Staff rea*rirrendation that if Council
chooses to enter into an Agreement with Dr. Nadridge for performance of any or all
of these services, it be on a six-month trial basis.
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +VmHonorable Mayor and Council
Nadridge *dical Corp.
Page 2.
There are several alternatives available to the Council regarding this proposal:
1) Accept the proposal as outlined in The attached letter, or irodify it
according to our needs;
2) Continue with our current professional medical services, as provided by
Parkside Physicians;
3) Refer back to Staff for further review and research.
Respectfully suilnitted,
*
Deputy City Manager
Attacheent 1)
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Wm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Xm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Ym NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +Zm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +[m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +\m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +]m MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Ann Jennings, Deputy City Manager
Date: November 26, 1985
Subject:ApProval of Title V Senior Employment Program Agreement for
Fiscal Year 1985-1986.
In May, 1985, the City applied for two 2) Office Assistant I
positions under the Title V Senior Employment Program, funded through
the Riverside County Office on Aging. Criteria established for this
Program stipulate that the applicant be 55 year* of age or older and
low-income according to Federal guidelines. Under the program,
enrollees are limited to a maximum of 20 hrs./week, at a salary not
to exceed $3.51 per hour. Maximum funding under this Program is $3,921.
In late October, we received notification from the Office on Aging
that a request for one 1) position had been approved, for the
1985-86 Fiscal Year. Approval of the Agreement will allow us to
recruit for one additional person to assist the Program Director and
Senior Outreach Worker in on-going outreach activities and associated
office activities.
RECOMMENDATION
It is respectfully recommended that the Council adopt the proposed
Resolution approving the Title V Senior Employment Program agree-
ment between the City of La Quinta and County of Riverside Office
on Aging, for the period beginning July 1, 1985 and ending June 30,
1986, and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of
the City.
Respectfully submitted,
Ann Jenn *ngs
Deputy City Manager
W.
#1<
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +^m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +_m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +`m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +am NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +bm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +cm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +dm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +em NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +fm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +gm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +hm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +im NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +jm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +km NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +lm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02
2^ +mm NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-30-1998-U01
11:10:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
03-U02
1985-U02