1986 11 18 CC5? AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CrTY OF LA QUINTA
A regular meeting of the City Council
to be held at City Hall, 78-105 Calle
Estado, La Quinta, California.
NovembeF 18, 1986 7:30 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
A. Flag Salute.
2. ROLL CALL
A. Special Presentation by the Mayor.
3. REPORT OF ELECTION RESULTS SUBJECT TO CERTIFICATION BY
THE COUNTY ELECTION DEPARTMENT).
A. Administration of Oath of Office by City Clerk.
B. Council Reorganization.
4. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA.
5. PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the time set aside for citizens to address the
Council on matters relating to City business. When
addressing the Council, please state your name and
address. The proceedings of the Council meeting are
recorded on tape and comments of each person shall be
limited to three 3) minutes.
Persons wishing to address the Council regarding an
Agenda item should use the form provided. Please
complete one form for each Agenda item you intend to
address and return the form to the Secretary prior to
the beginning of the meeting. NOTE: Except for
hearings, comments relative to items on the Agenda are
limited to two 2) minutes Your name will be called at
the appropriate time.
6. COMMENT BY COUNCIL MEMBERS
7. REARINGS
8. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
9. BUSINESS SESSION
A. Continued discussion of General Plan Amendments, Cycle
III.
1) General Plan Amendment No. 86-012.
2) General Plan Amendment No.86-013.
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?AGENDA City Council
November 18, 1986
Page Two.
3) General Plan Amendment No.86-014.
4) General Plan Amendment No. 86-015.
5) General Plan Amendment No.86-016.
A) Motion for adoption.
B. Discussion CVAG Resolution No. 87-1: Opposition to the
Construction and Operation of the Proposed Colmac Energy
Biomass Plant. INFORMATIONAL)
C. Appointments to various CVAG Standing Committees:
A. Executive Committee
B. Transportation Committee
C. Public Safety Committee
D. Energy & Environment Committee
E. Housing Committee
1) Motions to appoint.
D. Appointment to SunLine Transit Agency Board of Directors
1) Motion to appoint.
E. Elvirita Lewis Foundation Lease Agreement.
1) Motion to authorize Mayor and City Clerk to sign.
F. Other.
10. COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES Minutes or Reports)
A. Planning Commission minutes. October 14, 1988)
11. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of Minutes, City Council. November 4, 1986)
B. RESOLUTION NO.86-94. DESIGNATING AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES
AT SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK.
C. RESOLUTION NO.86-95. DESIGNATING THE WEEK OF NOVEMBER
23-29 AS CALIFORNIA FAMILY WEEK.
1) Motion to adopt Consent Calendar.
12. REPORT OF OFFICERS
City Manager
City Attorney
Finance Director
A. Financial Reports
Community Development & Redevelopment Administrator
Comrnum.ty Safety Director
A. Community Safety Activity Report
Deputy City Manager
A
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?AGENDA City Council
November 18, 1986
Page Three.
Planning Director
A. Building Permit Report.
12. ADJOURNMENT
NOTE: STUDY SESSION DISCUSSION
A. Discussion Re: Subdivision Directory Signs
4$/I
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? 5'
* REGISTRAR OF VOTERS COt;NTY OF RIVERSIDE
N T* 4175 Main Street Ri*'erside* California 92501
7l4* 787-2921 ROBERT G. MORGAN
REGISTRAR
FRANK K. jOHNSON
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRAR OF VOTERS
TO THE RESULTS OF THE CANVASS OF ELECTION RETURNS
State of California)
ss.
County of Riverside)
I, ROBERT G. MORGAN, Registrar of Voters of said County, do
hereby certify that, in pursuance of the provisions of Sections
1* and 17081 of the California Elections Code and the resolution
adopted by the city council, I did canvass the returns of the
vote cast at the General Municipal Election held in the
CITY OF LA QUINTA
as a part of the Consolidated General Election of Noverriber 4,
1986; and I further certify that the Statement of Votes Cast,
to which this certificate is attached, shows the whole number
of votes cast for each candidate for elective public office
at said General Municipal Election, in said City and in each
precinct therein, and that the totals as shown for each candidate
are full, true and correct.
WITNESS my hand this 18th day of November, 1986.
ROBERT G. MORGAN
Registrar of Voters
By
Ass ant Registrar of Voters
I
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? * C. ioI1I*
MEMORANDUM DATE AGENDA ITEM #
CITY OF LA * oDENlED
CONTINUEDTO /o/i7/I*
I.--
4',',
OF *
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members *f the City Council
FROM: Planning Department
DATE: September 30, 1986
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86-012
LOCATION: West of Adams Street between Fred Waring Drive and the
Whitewater River
APPLICANT: J.C.C. Enterprises
REQUEST: Amend the Land Use Plan from Medium Density to High
Density Residential on 27.5 acres to provide the ability
to spread a density of 9.46 dwelling units per acre over
251.5 acres.
BACKGROUND
On April 15, 1986, the Applicant originally submitted a general plan
amendment application under Cycle II with the intention of
redesignating portions of a 251.5-acre site from Low and Medium
Density Residential to High Density Residential for the purpose of
developing a 2,380-unit apartment project oriented around an 18-hole
golf course. The Applicant subsequently amended his application
requesting redesignation of only the southern portion of the project
site 27.5 acres) from Medium to High Density Residential REFER TO
EXHIBIT A). The concept development plan proposes 9.46 dwelling
units per acre on 251.5 acres and with approval of the subject
general plan amendment application, the Applicant proposed to average
the density over the entire area. Staff proceeded to prepare a
report and set the first public hearing for the July 8, 1986 Planning
Commission meeting. The results of a traffic study prepared for the
project concluded that the City's Circulation Plan could not
accommodate any further*density increases in the area. On July 7,
1986, the Applicant withdrew the application from Cycle II and
requested to be further considered in the 1986 Cycle III General Plan
Amendment series. It was the Applicant's intent, at that time, to
submit a full development application to be considered concurrently
with the 1986 Cycle III applications. On September 9, 1986, the
Planning Commission reviewed the subject application for scoping and
made the following comments:
Ioj27*?6
9.A.(i* DATE AGENDA ITEM #
DATE AGENDAITEM# *NRi*NVIEE%To_oDENIED
**RovED DEWED
CONTINUEDIO
I.
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? MEMORANDUM DATE AGENDA ITEM #
0
4PPROVED oDENIED
CgTV OF LA QUINT* CONTINUED TO
*oF *
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Planning Department
DATE: September 30, 1986
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86-013
LOCATION: Generally West of Washington Street along Calle Tampico
APPLICANT: City Initiated
REQUEST: Amend the General Plan Land Use Plan to Lower Residential
Densities along the Calle Tampico Corridor.
BACKGROUND
On June 4, 1986, City Council approved Western Corporation's village
Pointe" apartment project on the east side of the Desert Club Drive
alignment, approximately 450' north of Calle Tampico. Concern was
expressed regarding the increase in dwelling units associated with
the apartment project intensifying an already projected traffic
congestion problem on Washington Street. In an attempt to mitigate
this potential situation, the City Council requested an amendment to
the General Plan to reduce residential land use densities of
properties within the project vicinity.
Reducing densities in these areas would also provide for less intense
development along Calle Tampico and Washington Street, which was the
original intent of the General Plan for the village at La Quinta.
On September 9, 1986, the Planning Commission discussed the overall
scope of the undertaking based on the Planning Department's report
REFER TO ATTACHMENT NO. 1). The report outlined several scenarios
to provide a means of reducing future traffic levels on Washington
Street.
In terms of amendment scope, the Planning Commission concluded that
some properties in the vicinity may indeed require general plan
density reductions; however, there was a desire to recognize
development constraints and patterns of the area. Of particular
concern was the issue of reducing allowable densities on the
northwest corner of Calle Tampico and Washington Street; observing
that this property is in the same vicinity of approved commercial and
apartment projects. Rather than simply redesignating the property to
a lower density category, it was concluded that the property should
be evaluated for reclassification to Medium Density" Residential
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL
September 30, 1986
Page 2.
under a specific plan design concept. The location of this property,
along two major streets, was recognized to initially present certain
development constraints.
The specific plan suffix would allow the City to adopt an overall
design plan for the subject site, limiting access on Washington
Street and Calle Tampico, establishing setbacks and building design
standards, and encouraging all property owners within the area to
work together on a unifying project plan. Use of this concept is
contemplated, ultimately, to both reduce potential traffic levels on
Washington Street and provide for realistic and practical development
opportunities.
Regarding the southwest corner property at Washington Street and
Calle Tampico, the Planning Commission recommended that the City
pursue amending both the Medium" and High Density" Residential
property portions to Low Density". This action is expected to
substantially reduce future traffic levels on Washington Street.
Also, the Low Density" category is expected to accommodate
compatible development with adjacent existing and planned development
to the west; an area also designated for Low Density" Residential
development. PLEASE REFER TO EXHIBIT A"; PLANNING COMMISSION
SCOPING RECOMMENDATION.
At this point, it is important to point out that full mitigation of
traffic impacts on Washington Street from development of the Village
Pointe" apartment project would be an ultimate reduction of 408
dwellings equivalent to roughly 2,500 average daily vehicle trips per
day originating in the area. The Planning Commission' 5
recommendation is expected to result in an ultimate unit reduction of
between 390 and 527 dwellings. Actual traffic mitigation resulting
from this scenario translates to a reduction of between 2,390 and
3,230 average daily vehicle trips.
Atchs: 1. Exhibit A, PC Scoping Recommendation
2. PC Staff Report of 9/9/86 W/Atchs.
S
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?! NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?" NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?# NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?$ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?% NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?& NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?' NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?) NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?* 9.A.(35
DATE AGENDA ITEM #
* DE*D
0
CITY OF LA QUINTA) CONTiNUED TO____________
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members *of th* City Council
FROM: Planning Department
DATE: September 30, 1986
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86-014
LOCATION: Miles Avenue Alignment between Jefferson and
Washington Streets
APPLICANT: City Initiated
REQUEST: An amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element to
reclassify Miles Avenue from a Secondary Arterial to a
Primary Arterial.
BACKGROUND
At the culmination of the General Plan adoption process, it was
concluded that given the land use scenario in the north portions of
the City, Miles Avenue would sufficiently handle traffic loads as a
Secondary Arterial. At that time, the City of Indian Wells had an
approved project, known as"Desert Classic11, which would have closed
Miles Avenue west of Washington Street. It was believed that Fred
Waring and Highway 111 would be the major east/west regional
thoroughfares, and Miles would act as a major collector to distribute
local traffic. To date, the 1Desert Classic" project has not moved
forward and the circulation need for Miles Avenue west of Washington
Street is uncertain. The City of Indian wells is currently updating
its General Plan, and has not determined whether to anticipate the
extension of Miles Avenue. To the east of La Quinta, the County and
City of Indio will maintain in their policy planning this alignment
as a major thoroughfare, east to Indio Boulevard.
Two other general plan amendments along Miles Avenue, now under
consideration in this Cycle III series, have initiated a traffic
study to determine the need to upgrade the City1s northerly arterial
network. These applications include:
J.C.C. Enterprises; GPA No. 86-012
C.W. Meisterlin; GPA No. 86-016
NOTE: Refer to subject scoping reports)
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?+STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL
September 30, 1986
Page 2.
The analysis basically concluded that the planned arterial network
will not adequately service buildout of existing General Plan land
uses, regardless of the proposed amendments. The study focused on
the need to upgrade Miles Avenue to provide relief to traffic
congestion on Highway ill. Subsequent to the completed traffic
study, J.C.C. Enterprises amended their application reducing the
overall acreage proposed for High Density Residential from 198 to
27.5 acres, which may have some bearing on projected design capacity
needs.
On September 9, 1986, the Planning Commission discussed General Plan
Amendment No. 86-014 and generally concurred with Staff regarding the
scope of the project.
GENERAL PLAN CONSIDERATIONS
Viewing this proposal in its broader context that of an amendment to
the City's Circulation Plan) consideration should be given to design
classification of other streets in the immediate vicinity. Referring
to Policy No. 7.5.8. of the Infrastructure Element, it is noted that
a study should be undertaken to determine whether Dune Palms Road
and/or Adams Street should be reclassified in order to function with
48th Avenue as a bypass for Highway 111. of particular concern are
the cumulative travel demands created on Adams Street north of
Highway 111 from the large, acreage of Mixed Use Commercial and
Commercial Park designated land uses along Highway 111. The
M. B. Johnson General Plan Amendment No. 86-011 resulted in
reclassifying Adams Street south of Highway 111 from a Secondary to
a Primary Arterial due to the added travel demands generated by this
commercial project REFER TO MAP EXHIBIT *4). As part of the
overall consideration, it is suggested that a comprehensive traffic
study be prepared for the area, referencing the previous BSI Traffic
Report, with particular focus on a study of Adams and Dune Palms
north of 48th Avenue. This evaluation should also look toward
assuring design compatibility with other adjoining jurisdictions,
including the City of Indian wells if appropriate), the City of
Indio, and Riverside County.
Atchs: 1. Exhibit 1, BSI Traffic Study
2. Exhibit 2, Circulation Plan
3. Exhibit 3, Land Use Plan
4. Exhibit 4, GPA No. 86-0ll-"Exhibit B11
I-.
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?, NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?- NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?. NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?/ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?0 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?1 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?3 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?4 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?5 g.A.*)
DATE AGENDAITEM*
MEMORANDUM P*O"[D *DE*ED
0
CONTINUED
TO*
CITY OF LA QUINTA
OF 1$*
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Planning Department
DATE: September 30, 1986
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86-015
LOCATION: Generally southwest of 54th Avenue, along the west side
of the All-American Canal
APPLICANT: Cody & Brady, Architects
REQUEST: To amend the La Quinta Land Use Policy Map from Open
Space to Low Density Residential 2-4 units per acre)
on 9.6 acres. REFER TO EXHIBIT A)
Description of Request
Applicant requests an amendment of the Land Use Plan from Open Space
to Low Density Residential 2-4 units per acre) in order to facili-
tate processing of the following:
Change of Zone No. 86-024; a request to rezone the
subject acreage from w-2-20 Controlled Development;
One Dwelling Unit per 20 Acres) to R-1-12,000; and
Tentative Tract Map No. 21939; a request to subdivide
the subject acreage into 12 single-family lots.
General Plan Considerations
Although the Open Space designation does not completely preclude any
development activities, it does not specifically provide for a
residential density range; zoning implementing and consistent with
this designation would specify an acceptable development intensity
based on the site's constraints and opportunities. As noted, present
zoning allows for one dwelling unit per twenty 20) acres. The two
larger parent parcels, from which this proposal is drawn, contain in
excess of 125 acres. The request area, presumably, addresses that
portion of the parcel with slopes of less than 20%.
All properties westerly from the canal carry the Open Space land use
designation; the consideration in this amendment request becomes one
of compelling reasons to justify removal from this category and
placement in Low Density Residential. An argument, which could be
advanced, is that the subjedt property is more similar to the Low
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?6STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL
September 30, 1986
Page 2.
Density Residential land use area which exists on the other side of
the canal than to lands lying in the Open Space category. Supporting
information for this type of analysis would include topographic data
and access provision as those subjects are central to the decision to
place/maintain lands in the Open Space category.
Additional Considerations
At their September 9, 1986 meeting, the Planning Commission
determined that General Plan Amendment No. 86-015 was not necessarily
a prerequisite to accommodate the intent of the Change of Zone and
Tentative Tract applications. The Planning Commission indicated that
a Change of Zone over the entire 126.8-acre site, to W-2-10, could
accommodate the project as proposed. This zoning would allow 12.68
total units over the entire site. These units would be located only
on the 9.6-acre portion of the site currently proposed for Low
Density Residential. The Planning Commission indicated that this
site could be appropriate for Low Density Residential development as
it does not meet slope criteria for open space lands as set forth in
the General Plan, and can be considered as similar to lands east of
the canal.
Based on the Planning Commission evaluation, the Applicant has
requested withdrawal of the General Plan Amendment application from
Cycle III SEE ATTACHED LETTER). In addition, he has also requested
that the current application be considered in the 1987 Cycle I in the
event that project zoning cannot be secured. Regardless of whether
or not this request is granted, no additional scoping considerations
need to be addressed at this time.
Atchs: 1. Exhibit A, GPA 86-015
2. Attachment *1, Existing Land Use Plan
3. Letter from Applicant Requesting Withdrawal
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?7 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?8 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?9 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?: NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?; DATE AGENDAITEM#
* * MEMORANDUM()APPRo\(E* oDENlED
CITY OF LA QUINTA()CONTINUEDTO
I.---
4',
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Planning Department
DATE: September 30, 1986
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86-016
LOCATION: Northeast Corner of Miles Avenue and Washington Street
APPLICANT: Carl W. Meisterlin
REQUEST: To Amend the La Quinta General Plan Land Use Policy Map
of the Community Development Element from Low Density
Residential 2-4 Units Per Acre) and Medium Density
Residential 4-8 Units Per Acre) to High Density
Residential 8-16 Units Per Acre), on Approximately
71.42 Acres.
Description of Request
The Applicant requests an amendment of the Land Use Plan fromLow
Density Residential 2-4 units per acre) and Medium Density
Residential 4-8 units per acre) to High Density Residential 8-16
units per acre) over a 71.42-acre site, in order to accommodate an
apartment development proposal at 15.9 units per acre. A preliminary
review of the Applicants conceptual development plan revealed issues
related to drainage and stormwater detention; as a result, the
Applicant is in the process of redesigning the project. A change of
zone application will also be necessary to implement this
proposal.
General Plan Considerations
Surrounding Land Use: This request is one of three 3) related
general plan amendments scheduled for Cycle III SEE ATTACHMENT *l
AND STAFF REPORTS; GPA 86-012 AND GPA 86-014). General Plan
Amendment No. 86-012 concerns the surrounding property to the
northeast, east, and south. The Reflections project exists to the
north, while the westerly properties are under the jurisdiction of
Riverside County. Compatibility of the request with the Reflections
project to the north, as well as with the Low Density Residential
designations to the northeast, needs to be considered. Also of
interest is the General Plan policy of limiting building heights
along Washington Street to assure that a low density character is
visually maintained.
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?<STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL
September 30, 1986
Page 2.
Traffic and Circulation: The subject area was considered in the
initial traffic study conducted for General Plan Amendment No.
86-012. That study reflects the need to upgrade Miles Avenue to a
Primary Arterial, and the City has initiated General Plan Amendment
No. 86-014 in order to do so. Staff also believes that an upgrading
of Adams Street to a Primary Arterial designation is appropriate,
based on these related general plan amendments, as well as recognizing
the relationship of Adams Street to existing High and Medium Density
Residential designations, and the southern Highway 111 bypass route.
Cultural Resources: The general site area contains lands designated
as a neighborhood park location SEE ATTACHMENT *2). It may be
necessary to look at policies in the Cultural Resources Element with
respect to provision of park land or private recreational
opportunities consistent with the intent of the element, specifically
Policy 5.1.1 SEE ATTACHMENT #3).
ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
Staff presented the above noted issues to the Planning Commission at
their 9/9/86 meeting. During the course of discussion, the Planning
Commission further defined and/or identified considerations relative
to the request.
Density Considerations: The Planning Commission, in reviewing the
scope of this request relative to General Plan Amendments Nos. 86-012
and 86-014, felt that the increase in densities in this portion of
La Quinta would result in substantial traffic increases, and more
detailed analysis than the initial study for General Plan Amendment
No. 86-012 should be undertaken REFER TO STAFF REPORT FOR GPA
86-012).
Land Use Considerations: The Planning Commission maintained that
specific development plans should be provided in order to make any
assessment of compatibility with surrounding land uses. As
previously alluded to, the Applicant is working on a revision to the
final project plan addressing an apparent problem with on-site
retention and other drainage criteria.)
A primary topic of Commission discussion was the impact of building
heights and setbacks as they may relate to Washington Street and
Miles Avenue. The Planning Commission, further, believed that a
specific policy regarding building heights should be provided within
the General Plan text.
Recreational Considerations: The Planning Commission indicated that
the provision of recreational amenities normally associated with
apartment developments may provide some public benefit, at least with
respect to the project residents. The scope of review should include
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?=STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL
September 30, 1986
Page 3.
policy direction as to whether or not provision of private
recreational amenities can be interpreted as providing public
recreational benefit.
STAFF COMMENTS
Relative to housing mix and development standards, Policy No. 6.2.4
states:
The City should evaluate and establish
appropriate standards concerning minimum
floor areas for various types of residential
uses in order to assure adequate housing,
particularly for higher density land use
categories.
This project will give the City an opportunity to establish minimum
floor area standards with respect to the type of housing proposed.
Due to anticipated increases in traffic from this proposal, and
General Plan Amendment No. 86-012, it would appear to be necessary to
look at the circulation system in the area in more detail. As per
the Staff recommendation in the report for General Plan Amendment No.
86-012, a combined traffic study for the two proposals, in
conjunction with General Plan Amendment No. 86-014, should be
undertaken. In light of this and the request by J.C.C. Enterprises
to withdraw General Plan Amendment 86-012 from Cycle III
consideration, it may also be appropriate to continue this request to
the 1987 Cycle I General Plan Amendment schedule if it is the desire
of the City Council to allow the J.C.C. request to be withdrawn.
Atchs: 1. Attachment *l, Existing Land Use Plan
2. Attachmetn *2, Open Space/Community Facilities Map
3. Attachment *3, Excerpt from Cultural Resources Element
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?> NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?@ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?ACVAG
COACHELLA VALLEY A9BOCIATION of GOVERNMENTS
* County of Riverside & Cities of
* Coachella * Desert Hot Springs
October 7, 198 * * Indo I Palm Desert e Palm Springs * Rancho Mirage
* Cathedral City * La Ouinta
*. 8.
DATE AGENDAITEM#
Honorable John Pena, Mayor
City of La Quinta *PPROVED oDENIED
P.O. Box 1504 CONT*NUED TO*
La Quinta, Ca. 92253 J
Re: CVAG Resolution No. 87-1: Oppo*ition to the Construction
and Operation of the Proposed Colmac Energy Biomass Plant
Dear Mayor Pena:
During their regularly scheduled meeting on September 29, 198*,
the CVAG Executive Committee unanimously voted to oppose the
construction and operation of the proposed Biomass Power Plant on
the Cabazon Indian Reservation. Enclosed for your information is
a copy Cf CVAG Resolution No. 87-1 which officially states CVAG'
position on this issue. Copies of the resolution have also been
forwarded to all CVAG member jurisdictions as well as our State
and Federal Representatives.
As currently proposed, Colmac Energy, Inc. is planning to
construct a biomass-fueled electricity power plant near Mecca on
the Cabazon Indian Reservation. The plant, which would produce
45.0 megawatts of electricity annually, would burn 48G,000 tons
per year of landfill wastes collected from throughout Riverside
and Imperial County. An initial review of the project by several
CVAG jurisdictions, indicates it may have serious and compelling
environmental impacts on the Coachella Valley.
For these reasons, CVAG respectfully recommends that your City
Council enact a similar resolution in opposition to the biomass
plant. If your Council concurs, you may also wish to submit
written comments on the project to the Sacramento Area Office of
the Bureau of Indian Affairs as indicated on the enclosed project
description.
With your support and the cooperation, we look forward to a
mutually beneficial resolution of this issue. Thank you for your
assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF COVERNMENTS
Zx*
Walter Snyder
Chairman
WS DS ghc
74*133 El Paseo, Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 * 619) 346*1127
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?B NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?C NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?D NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?E NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?F NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?G NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?H NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?I NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?J NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?K NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?M NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?N NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?O NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?P NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?Q NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?R NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?T NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?U NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?V NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?W NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?X NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?Y NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?Z NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?[ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?\ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?] NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?^ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?_ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?` NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?a NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?b NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?c NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?d NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?e NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?f NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?g NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?h NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?i NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?j NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?k NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?l NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?n NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?o NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?p NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?q NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?r NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?s NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?t 7.A.
* DATE AGENDAITEM*
MEMORANDUM \/*PPRovED oDENlED
CITYOFLAQUINTA ONTINUEDTO
DATE AGENDA*EM#
To: Ron Kiedrowski, City Manager APPROVED DE?#IED
F*om: Ann Jennings, Deputy City Manager *CONTINuEDTO
Date: September 4, 1986
Subject: Appointment of Elected Official CVAG
Housing Committee
We have been informed by Dwight Smith, Assistant Director of
CVAG, that the City of La Quinta currently does not have an
elected official representing the City on the CVAG Housing
Committee. Mr. Smith has requested that the Council
designate one of its members to serve on this Committee, to
replace the vacancy created by the resignation of Council
Member Wolff.
The CVAG Housing Committee meets on the first Wednesday of
each month, at 12 Noon, at the CVAG offices in Palm Desert.
RECOMMENDATION
It is respectfully recommended that the City Council
designate a Council Member to serve on the CVAG Housing
Committee, commencing with the October 1, 1986 meeting, and
direct Staff to notify CVAG of said appointment.
*c.
DATE AGENDAITEM#
Ann Jenning
Deputy City Manager /)COPNRi*i**E% TO* DEN?ED
44
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?u q_*
DATE AGENDAITEM#
LEASE *PPROVED oDENIED
oCONTINUED
This lease agreement is entered into by and between the City of
La Quinta, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called Lessor", and
the Elvirita Lewis Foundation, hereinafter called lessee".
WHEREAS1 the City of La Quinta deems it to be in the public
interest to authorize the Elvirita Lewis Foundation to temporarily
operate an Inter generational Child Care Center on a portion of a
proposed public park site to be acquired by City, located adjacent to
the La Quinta Elementary School on Avenida 50 for a period of
approximately three 3) years; and
WHEREAS, the people of the City of La Quinta will benefit from
the operation of such a child care center at said location and this
is a proper public and municipal purpose; and
WHEREAS, Lessee does desire to enter into this lease, affording
Lessee the opportunity to operate its inter generational child care
center at said location on a temporary basis, with continuity, and
security.
NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES AS
FOLLOWS:
1. Lessor does hereby lease to Lessee that portion of certain
real property proposed public park site) located adjacent to La
Quinta Elementary School on Avenida 50 as described in Exhibit 1,
attached hereto. A location map depicting said lease is attached
hereto as Exhibit 2. It is understood and agreed that said real
property is presently owned by The Grove of La Quinta, a California
limited partnership, which owner intends to transfer title to said
property to Lessor City of La Quinta) within the near future. It is
agreed that this lease shall not become effective until such time as
Lessee transmits to Lessor, in form acceptable to Lessor, a written
statement from said owner stating that owner has reviewed this
agreement, and agrees to the contents thereof, and specifically
agrees that Lessee may enter said property, erect necessary temporary
buildings, and commence operations, prior to transfer of title to
Lessor; and owner agrees that Lessor shall not be liable or
responsible to owner for any of the activities of Lessor or Lessee as
contained herein, by way of indemnification or otherwise.
2. Lessee shall pay to Lessor the sum of one dollar per year for
the use of said real property, and the term of this lease shall be
for a period of three years, so long as the property is used for
inter generational child care purposes by the Lessee. Provided
further, that said lease may be extended, for future periods of time,
upon request of Lessee and upon the express written approval of
Lessor as determined by discretionary decision of the City Council of
the City of La Quinta.
3. Inter generational child care purposes are defined as older
persons caring for children at the facilities described herein. It
shall also include the operation of senior employment programs
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?vGranny Nanny Center); the operation of senior volunteer programs
foster grandparent and senior companion programs); and child care
and after school activities.
4. It is understood and agreed that Lessee is authorized to place
and construct portable classrooms on the property for the purpose of
operating an inter generational child care center.*In addition *
thereto, Lessee is authorized to construct a Tot Lot", which sha**
be a permanent facility and shall become the property of Lessor upon**.*
termination of the lease. Upon termination of this lease, Lessee
shall remove all portable classrooms and foundations placed on the
property and shall return the property to a clean earthen condition
similar to the condition at commencement of this lease. Provided,
however, that Lessor sha* *ave the option to purchase said portable
classrooms, in * original cost for the classrooms
only, excluding set-up costs, site preparation and site improvement
costs.
5. All building, construction and other development fees
normally payable as a condition and cost of new construction within
the city of La Quinta, shall be calculated and computed for the
installation of said portable classrooms and other improvements to be
installed by Lessee. Provided, however, that the City of La Quinta
hereby waives the payment of said fees by Lessee for this project,
which waiver shall be personal to Lessee only.
6. Lessee shall provide, at its expense, all utilities for the
premises and Lessor shall have no responsibility whatsoever for the
installation and/or costs of said utility services. Lessee has made
a physical inspection of the premises and accepts the entire premises
in an as is" condition. Lessee hereby assumes the entire
responsibility for all repairs and maintenance to the premises during
the term of this lease and agrees that Lessor shall have no duty to
maintain or repair.
7. Lessor shall not be liable for injury to persons including
Lessee, and its agents or employees, or for property damage, from any
cause, related to Lessees occupancy of the premises during the term
of this lease or any extension thereof. Lessee hereby covenants and
agrees to indemnify Lessor and save Lessor harmless from all
liability, loss, or damage claims or obligations because of or
arising out of Lessee's activities related to and arising out of its
use of this property. Lessee agrees to obtain and keep in force
during the term hereof, at Lessee's expense, liability insurance to
protect against liability incident to the use of or resulting from
any accident occurring in or about the premises, the liability under
such insurance to be in an amount not less than one million dollars
single limit). Said policy shall name the Lessor as an additional
insured and shall insure any contingent liability of Lessor and shall
provide to Lessor a certificate of insurance which shall provide a
thirty day notice of cancellation. Said policy of insurance and
certificate to Lessor shall be deposited with Lessor, in form
satisfactory to Lessor, prior to commencement of this lease.
2-
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?w 8. Lessee shall not have the right to assign, sublet, transfer,
or incumber this lease or any part thereof without the prior written
consent of Lessor.
Dated: November 1986
LESSOR: LESSEE:
CITY OF LA QUINTA ELVIRITA LEWIS FOUNDATION
John J. Pena Steven W. Brummel
Mayor President
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
James Longtin
City Attorney
3-
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?x DATE AGENDAITEM#
A*PROVED DEhnED
oCONTINUED TO
RESOLUTION NO.86-94
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO.86-83, DESIGNATING AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES
AT SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of La Quinta, California, that Section 2 of Resolution No. 86-83 is
amended as follows:
Section 2. Authorized signatures on all accounts and checks
shall be as follows:
William R. Hoyle Mayor
Ronald L. Kiedrowski City Manager
Henry Harvey Finance Director
Becky K. Kochell City Treasurer
On checks, any two of the above signatures must be original.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 1986.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY MANAGER/CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?y RESOLUTION NO. 86-95 DATE AGENDAITEM#
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF * DE*ED
LA QUINTA DESIGNATING THE WEEK OF *
THROUGH NOVEMBER 29, 1986 AS
1986 CALIFORNIA FAMILY WEEK"
WHEREAS, The Family is the primary organization, the cell unit,
of civilization; and
WHEREAS, The Family unit is society's greatest strength and the
cradle for her future generations, the place where young people, who
are the leaders of the next generation, receive their earliest
teachings of self-discipline, the value of honest work, reverence for
life and the Giver of life, respect for others' rights and property,
patriotism, loyalty to the American way of life, and the other values
and virtues upon which the greatness of this nation and state rest;
and
WHEREAS, As the hope for the future well-being and prosperity of
our state and nation rests upon the collective goodness, wisdom, and
honor of our individual citizens, they in turn have been molded much
by the influence of their home life; and
WHEREAS, To encourage wholesome family life, it has become
traditional for the President and Congress of the United States to
proclaim the week in which Thanksgiving Day falls as National Family
Week"; and
WHEREAS, The State of California has been a leader among the
states in proclaiming and encouraging the celebration of 1'Family
Week".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of La Quinta shall
recognize the week of November 23 through 29, 1986, as 1986
CALIFORNIA FAMILY WEEK," and encourage all citizens in the City of La
Quinta to celebrate Family Week" with family reunions, establishing
stronger family ties, reinforcing and instituting family traditions,
feasting, worshiping, and with other appropriate activities.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1986.
MAYOR
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Manag*r/Ci: CL CITY ATTORNEY
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5?z NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? /I//*/* *
DATE AGENDAITEM#
ONTINUEDTO
APPROVED DEP41ED
7B-105 CALLE ESTADO LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 619* 564-2246
September 24, 1986
Eilene Brown, Executive Director
BIA, Riverside County Region
4333 Orange Street, Suite 21
Riverside, CA 92501
SUBJECT: Proposal for Directional Signs Kiosk) Program in the
City of La Quinta
Dear Ms. Brown:
Thank you again for your interest in providing the referenced
program. We would look forward to bringing this item to the
attention of the City Council at their second meeting in November,
or other later date as may be convenient for agenda scheduling.
For the purposes of additional review and discussion, I would invite
you to contact City Manager, Ron Kiedrowski, directly, at the address
and telephone number listed above. Also, I will be pleased to
continue providing any appropriate coordinative support deemed
necessary for this subject.
Very truly yours,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Murrel Crump
Planning Director
MC:dmv
cc: /ity Manager, Ron Kiedrowski
File
MAILING ADDRESS P.O. EOX 1504 LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02
5? 78-105 CALLE ESTADO LA QUINTA. CALIFORNIA 92253 619) 564-2246
September 24, 1986
Dennis Mansfield, President
Psalm One, Inc.
27007 E. 5th Street
Highland, CA 92346
SUBJECT: Proposal for Directional Signs Kiosk) Program in the
City of La Quinta
Dear Mr. Mansfield:
Thank you again for your interest in providing the referenced
program. We would look forward to bringing this item to the
attention of the City Council at their second meeting in November,
or other later date as may be convenient for agenda scheduling.
For the purposes of additional review and discussion, I would invite
you to contact City Manager, Ron Kiedrowski, directly, at the address
and telephone number listed above. Also, I will be pleased to
continue providing any appropriate coordinative support deemed
necessary for this subject.
Very truly yours,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Murrel Crump
Planning Director
MC:dmv
cc: City Manager, Ron Kiedrowski
File
MAIL*NG ADDRESS P.O. BOX 1504 LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253
BIB]
10-19-1998-U01
11:29:04AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
18-U02
1986-U02