1987 04 07 CC8L DECLARATION OF POSTING
I declare under penalty of perjury that I a. employed by the City of
La Quinta, in the Administrative Services Department; and that I
posted the foregoing Agenda on the outside entry to the Council
Chambers of the City of La Quinta Offices at 18-105 Calle Estado and
at th9 Bulletin Board at the La Quinta Post Office on
1q87.
1q87, at La Quinta, California.
Signature
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CITY OF LA QUINTA
A regular meeting of the City Council
to be held at City Hall, 78-105 Calle
Estado, La Quinta, California.
April 7, 1*87 7:30 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER *1:*O
A. Flag Salute. L.*D * *
2. ROLL CALL $L* * Co*,
3. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA.
Q4. PUBLIC COMMENT
g * * cos** * Du*i*6 *
A*4(* P* * * 4*. * /Q** * * 66 /*1%
S. COMMENT BY COUNCIL MEMBERS
L*8Le** *5fAn* * * * *
bie*G*(* * * b * *CAl
*. HEARINGS ma *
A. Public Hearing. *eedIPublic Nuisance Abateuent
APPLICANT: City Initiated
LOCATION: City-Wide
PROIECT: Public Nuisance Abatementi
Lot Clearing Assessment
1) Report from the Public Safety Department.
2) Public comment.
3) Council discussion.
4) Motion to adopt Resolution No. 81-16.
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8LAGENDA City Council
April 7, 1987
Page Two.
7. h'RITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
8. BUSINESS SESSION
A. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 106. AMENDING TITLE 3 REVENUE
AND FINANCE) OF THE IA
*pV* *UINTA MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATIVE TO PURCHASES.
1) Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 106.
9. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 107. AMENDING THE LA QUINTA
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
REGULATION OF DOGS.
1) Report from the City Attorney.*L* *
* Motion to introduce Ordinance No. 101.
C. RESOLUTION NO. 87-17. AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 86-64
RELATIVE TO THE COMPENSATION
OF OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES AND TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT.
AILI U[.
Motion to adopt Resolution No. 87-17.
D. Discussion Support for CVAG Resolution No. 87-1, in
Opposition to Construction of the proposed Colmac
Diomass Plant.
1) Motion for adoption. Council*s pleasure)
E. RESOLUTION NO. 87-18. AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT
WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY CONCERNING THE URBAN COUNTY
CDBG PROGRAM.
1) Report from the Planning Department.
2) Motion to adopt Resolution No. 87-18.
F. Study Session Items Discussion may be made on items from
yesterday*s Study Session, which are:)
1) Recommendation from Community Services Commission for
policy statement regarding non-profit organizations.
Plot Plan No. 86-274, Request for Guidance in
* Building Architecture end Design, *ohn Feld,
Applicant.
3) Discussion Ordinance No. 30, Regulating Use of
Recreational Vehicles in Residential Zones)
Council Member Cox)
* 4)*l987-88 Revenue Budget.
a4I%
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8LAGENDA City Council
April 7, 1987
Pa9e Three.
9. COM*ISSI0NIC0MMITTEE REPORTS
10. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of Minutes City Council. Feb. 25 end March 17,
and March 31, 1987).
B. RESOLUTION ND. 87-19. APPROVING DEMANDS.
C. Support for City of Gridley re9arding passage of
legislation affecting small cities.
D. Award of Bid for City Street Sweeping Services.
E. Acceptance of Public Street and Utility Easement
dedications for Desert Club Drive and Calle Tempico.
Plaza Tampico PP8S-217)
1) Motion to adopt Consent Calendar. ROLL CALL)
11. REPORT OF OFFICERS
Cc*p*. 4L* * * *
A. City Manager * +or *
B. City Attorney
C. Administrative Services Director
1) Community Service Grant Application Form revisions.
D. Community Safety Director
1) Paramedic Service Update.
E. Finance Director
F. Planning Director
12. AD3OURNMENI
NOTICE OF UPCOMING COUNCILICONMISSION MEETINGS
April 9, 1987 CItyIEDC EDC *orILshop 10:00 AM
La quinta Hotel)
April 13, 1987 PC Study Session 3:00 PM
April 14, 1987 PC Regular Meeting 7:00 PM
April 20, 1981 CC Study Session 3:00 PM
April 21, 1987 CC Regular Meeting 7:30 PM
April 27, 1987 CSC Regular Meeting 7:00 PM
April 30, 1987 COC Monthly Mixer 5:30-
7:30 PM
May 1, 1987 City 5th Birthday 6:00
Reception 8:00 PM
May 2, 1987 Birthday Party at 11:00 AM-
La Ouinta ParK 4:00 PM
CC City Council
PC Planning Commission
CSC Community Service. Commission
COC Chamber of Commerce
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L DATE AGENDAITEM#
*PPROVED oDENIED
MEMORANDUM CONTINUEDTO
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: Ron Kiedrowski, City Manager
From; Roger Hirdler, Community Safety Director
Date: April 7, 1987
Subject: WEED ABATEMENT/LOT CLEANING ASSESSMENTS FOR
PLACEMENT ON 1987/1988 PROPERTY TAX ROLL
The purpose of this hearing is to provide the Council the
opportunity to hear and consider all public objections and
protests, if any, to the report filed with the Council containing
a description of each real property parcel cleared or cleaned by
the City of La Quinta.
Notices of tonight's public hearing were sent to each property
owner, advising them of the hearing date. No written
communications have been received regarding this matter.
Following public comment and close of the public hearing, it is
respectfully recommended that the Council take the following
action:
Adopt the proposed Resolution, approving
and adopting the Resolution to place the
cost of cleaning said lots on the 1987/88
property tax roll.
Respectfully submitted,
*
Roger Hirdler
Community safety Director
RH:es
Li
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L3//YI&7
DATE AGENDAITEM# DATE AGENDA ITEM #
4PPROVED oDENlED *PROVED oDENIED
*CONTINUED TO ORDINANCE NO. 106 CONTINUED TO*
*O *
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA
QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 3 REVENUE AND
FINANCE), OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATIVE
TO PURCHASES.
The City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, does
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 3.12.120 of Chapter 3.12 Purchases) of
Title 3 Revenue and Finance) is hereby amended to read as follows:
3.12.120 Formal sealed) bid procedure. Except as otherwise
provided in this chapter, public projects, as defined in Section
37901 of the Government Code, and purchases of supplies and
equipment of an estimated value greater than ten thousand dollars
$10,000.00), shall be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder
pursuant to the formal bid procedure prescribed in this chapter.
Ord. 2, Par. 1, 1982).
SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full
force and effect thirty 30) days after passage.
SECTION 3. POSTING. The City Clerk shall within 15 days
after passage of this ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least
two public places designated by resolution of the City Council;
shall certify to the adoption and posting of this ordinance; and
shall cause this ordinance and its certification, together with
proof of posting, to be entered in the book of ordinances of the
City.
The foregoing Ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting
of *he City Council held on the day of
1987, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
MAYOR
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY MANAGER/CLERK CITY ATTORNEY
I
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L L+J7l**7
DATE AGENDAITEM#
APPROVED DEWIED
*ONTINUEDTO*
ORDINANCE NO.107 *
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA AMENDING THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO REGULATION OF DOGS.
The City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, does
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Sections 10.04.040, 10.04.060, 10.20.090, and
10.24.040 of Title 10 of the La Quinta Municipal Code are hereby
amended to read as follows:
10.04.040. OWNER. Owner" means any person who is the
legal owner, keeper, harborer, possessor or the actual custodian of
any animal. Ownership is also established by a person registering as
the owner on a license or other legal document, or by a person
claiming ownership and taking possession of an animal.
10.04.060. VICIOUS OR DANGEROUS ANIMAL. The term vicious
animal" or dangerous animal" means a dog which:
1. Has behaved in such a manner that the owner thereof knows or
should reasonably know that the dog has tendencies to attack or
bite huinan beings; or
2. Has twice within a forty-eight month period bitten, attacked,
or shown the disposition, tendency, or propensity to attack,
bite, or otherwise cause injury to a person engaged in lawful
activity; or
3. Has once attacked or bitten a person engaged in lawful
activity, causing death or substantial injury; or
4. Has been determined by a doctor of veterinary medicine, after
observation thereof, as posing a danger to humans or domestic
animals if not enclosed or muzzled; or
5. Has attacked, or behaved in such a manner that the owner
thereof knows or should reasonably know that the dog has
tendencies to attack domestic animals without provocation; or
6. Has been trained for fighting for or as an attack dog, except
such dogs which are employed by the Police Department of the City
or the County of Riverside.
Any dog which is outfitted with a training device for fighting or
attack, such as a weighted collar around the neck of the dog,
shall be presumed to be a dog trained as a fighting or attack dog.
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L 4
ORDI*ANCE NO. 107
Page Two.
10.20.090. CONTROL AND IMPOUNDMENT*T OF DANGEROUS OR
VICIOUS ANIMALS.
a. No person owning or harboring or having the care or custody
of a dangerous or vicious dog shall suffer or permit such dog to
go unconfined med on the premises of such person. A vicious dog is
unconfined, as the term is used herein, if such dog is not
securely confined indoors or confined in a securely enclosed and
locked pen or a dog run area upon the premises of said person.
Such *or dog run area must also have either sides six feet
high*a secure top. If the pen or structure has no bottom
secured to the sides, the sides must be imbedded into the ground
no less than one foot.
b. No person owning or harboring or having the care or custody
of a dangerous or vicious dog shall suffer or permit such dog to
go beyond the premises of such person unless such dog is securely
muzzled and restrained with a chain having a minimum tensile
strength of 300 pounds and not exceeding three feet in length.
C. No person shall own or harbor any dog for the purpose of dog
fighting; nor train, torment, badger, bait or use any dog for the
purpose of causing or encouraging said dog to unprovoked attacks
on human beings or domestic animals. Nor shall any person outfit
any dog with a training device for fighting or attack, such as a
weighted collar around the neck of the dog.
d. No person shall possess, with intent to sell, or offer for
sale, breed, or buy or attempt to buy within the City any vicious
or dangerous dog.
e. Any person owning or harboring or having the care of any
dangerous or vicious dog shall maintain a policy of insurance in
an amount not less than $50,000.00 insuring said person against
any claim, loss, damage, or injury to persons, domestic animals,
or property resulting from the acts, whether intentional or
unintentional, of the vicious dog. Such person shall produce
evidence of such insurance upon the request of a law enforcement
officer.
f. Whenever an animal suspected of being dangerous or vicious is
reported, the city manager or his agent may investigate the
circumstances, and if he finds that the animal, by reason of his
acts, propensities, or disposition, is a dangerous or vicious
animal as defined in this title, he may notify the owner or
harborer in writing stating the facts and circumstances.
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L ORDI*ANCE *O. 107
Page Three.
The owner shall be entitled to an administrative hearing before
the city manager to determine whether said dog iB vicious or
dangerous, and, if so, the nature and extent of orders to be
made. If, after said hearing, if requested, it is determined
that the dog is vicious or dangerous, the city manager may
orderthe owner to keep the animal confined as provided in this
section and/or may make such other and further orders as are
reasonable under the circumstances. If restraint or confinement
is impracticable, the animal shall be impounded until the owner
or harborer is able to comply with the city manager's orders.
For any such impoundment, the owner or harborer shall be liable
to the city for payment of fees as prescribed pursuant to Section
10.20.080, and any animal not reclaimed within a reasonable time
after such impoundment shall be subject to destruction. In cases
where the animal is not impounded, and written notification has
been given as herein provided, if the owner or harborer fails to
provide adequate restraint or control of the animal as ordered by
the city manager within a reasonable time, or if he thereafter at
any time fails to maintain the adequate restraint or control, or
comply with other orders of the city manager, the owner or
harborer shall be guilty of a inisdemeanor, and the animal shall
be subject to summary destruction.
10.24.040. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF DOGS. Except for licensed pet
shops and kennels, no persons shall own, keep or harbor, nor shall
the owner or occupant of any premises keep or permit on or in such
premises more than 4 dogs of four months of age or older.
SECTION 2: Section 10.28.070 is hereby added to Title 10,
Chapter 10.28, to read as follows:
20.28.070. PUBLIC NUISANCE. The introduction, ownership,
possession or maintenance of any animal, or the allowing of any
animal to be, in contravention of this title, is, in addition to
being avi**t*9*y declared to be a public nuisance. The
***< cit ana e ty health officer, and peace officers are
hereby authorized, directed and empowered to summarily abate any
such public nuisance independently of any criminal prosecution or
the results thereof of any means reasonably necessary including
but not limited to the destruction of the animal or animals
involved, or by the imposition of specific reasonable conditions
and restrictions for the maintenance of the animal. Failure to
comply with such conditions and restrictions is a misdemeanor.
The owner shall reimburse the city for all costs incurred in
verifying compliance and enforcing the provisions of this
section. The city may also commence proceedings in accordance
with the provisions of Chapter 11.72 relative to abatement
procedures for public nuisances.
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8LORDINANCE NO. 107
Page Four.
SECTION 3. If any section, subsection1 sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid1 such
holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of
this ordinance. The council declares that it would have passed this
ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase
thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections,
subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.
SECTION 4. Any person violating any provision of this
ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction
thereof shall be punished by a fine of not more than $500.00 or by
imprisonment for aperiod of not more than six months, or by both
such fine and imprisonment.
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in
full force and effect thirty 30) days after passage.
SECTION 6. POSTING. The City Clerk shall, within 15 days
after passage of this ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least
three public places designated by resolution of the City Council;
shall certify to the adoption and posting of this ordinance; and
shall cause this ordinance and its certification, together with proof
of posting, to be entered in the book of ordinances of the City.
The foregoing ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of
the City Council held on the day of
1g86, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
MAYOR
ATTEST: APPROVED AS To FORM:
CITy MANAGER/CLERK CI* ATTORNEY
I
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L DATE AGENDAITEM#
MEMORANDUM APPROVED oDENIED
oCONTINUED TO
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: Mayor, Members of the City Council
From: James Longtin, City Attorney
Date: March 19, 1987
Re: Ordinance Regulating Dangerous Dogs
At a City Council meeting in February, the Council considered the
City Attorney' 5 report regarding Regulation of pit bull dogs copy
enclosed).
At that time I recommended that the Council consider the enactment of
an ordinance by redefining vicious dogs and enacting more stringent
regulations relative to the keeping of a vicious dog within the
city. Then, in the event that that did not handle the pit bull
problemD the city could consider enacting certain breed specific
regulations relative to the keeping of pit bulls.
The enclosed ordinance provides the regulation reguested by the
Council redefining a vicious animal and providing more stringent
controls relative to vicious animals. The provisions are self
explanatory. In addition, at the request of the Community safety
Director, we are enclosing a section for the Council to potentially
change the maximum number of dogs allowed in one household. The
current number allowed is four. Mr. Hirdler may have a
recommendation as to a lesser number at the Council meeting.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that, after reading the enclosed ordinance by title
only, further reading be waived and the ordinance be introduced.
pectfully sub$*,
James Longtin 6,
City Attorney
JL/jn
Enclosure
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8
L DATE AGENDAITEM#
/APPROVED oDENlED
RESOLUTION NO. 87-17 CONTINUEDTO
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 86-64
RELATIVE TO THE COMPENSATION OF OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
AND TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT.
WHEREAS, on July 15, 1986, the Council adopted Resolution No.
86-64, establishing the compensation of officers and employees and
setting the conditions and terms of employment; and
WHEREAS, it is now deemed desirable based on the staff
reorganization adopted 12/2/86 to change Sections 1, salary ranges
for personnel positions, to provide title additions, deletions and
reclassifications for certain miscellaneous positions and management
positions and salary designations of Resolution No. 86-64; and
WHEREAS, it is further deemed desirable pursuant to the
Memorandum of Understanding adopted 7/1/86, to change Section 6,
Paragraphs B. and C., maximum sick leave accrual, of Resolution No.
86-64; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta,
California, hereby amends Sections 1 and 6 of Resolution No. 86-64,
to read as follows:
SECTION 1. The following salary ranges and classifications
are approved, retroactive to February 1, 1987, as set forth in the
Schedule of Salary Ranges, Exhibit A", attached hereto.
TITLE RANGE
Account Technician 38
Account Clerk 31
Administrative Services Director 60
Animal Control Officer 38
Associate Engineer 55
Associate Planner 50
Building Inspector I 38
Building Inspector II 46
Building Official 55
City Attorney Unclassified
City Council Unclassified
City Manager Unclassified
Clerk-Receptionist 28
Clerk-Typist I 26
Code Enforcement Officer 38
Community Safety Director 59
Community Services Specialist 39
Department Secretary 38
Development Services Aide 38
Engineering Aide 35
Finance Director 66
Maintenance Worker I 26
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8LRESOLUTION NO. 87-17
Page Two.
Mai*tenan* Worker II 31
4*lanning * p*Ar*J* 45
Planning Director 66
Principal Planner 55
Public Works Director/City Engineer 68
Public Works Supervisor 41
Secretary II 34
SECTION 6. B. A maximum sick leave accrual of sixty 60)
days shall be established, which coincides with long-term disability
benefits as established by the City. After the maximum accrual of
sick leave has been reached, at the end of each fiscal year,
employees shall be reimbursed for the number of sick leave days that
would have been accrued and unused above the maximum during the
fiscal year, according to the formula used for sick leave pay-back
upon employee termination, as above.
C. Long-term disability insurance coverage is hereby provided
which takes effect after an employee absence from work due to illness
or injury of sixty 60) days.
Except as herein amended by this resolution, all other
provisions of Resolution No. 86-64 are hereby reconf irmed and shall
remain in full force and effect.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 7th day of April, 1987.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY MANAGER/CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L g.8.
DATE AGENDAITEM#
MEMORANDUM ARPROVED oDENIED
CITY OF LA QUINTA * CONTINUED TO
* cI*
DATE AGENDAITEM#
To: Mayor and City Council
APPROVED DE*1ED
From: Ron Kiedrowski, City Manager LyCONTINUEDTO*
Date: November 26, 1986
Subject: Continued Discussion Proposed Colmac Biomass Plant
At the Council meeting held November 18th, it was the Council's
decision to continue discussion of CVAG Resolution 87-1, Opposition
to the Construction and Operation of the proposed Colmac Energy
Biomass Plant near Mecca. Pursuant to Council direction, staff has
asked representatives of Colmac to be present Tuesday, December 2, to
clarify concerns or answer any questions the Council may have
pertaining to their proposal.
Please bring the materials regarding this subject which were
distributed in your packets November 18th, to avoid unnecessary
duplication.
DATE A*ENDAITEM#
APPROVED *ENlED
oCONTINUED TO
2-* * *
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L*CVAG
COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION of GOVERNMENTS
* County of Riverside & Cities of
* Coachella * Desert *Hot Springs
October 7, l98* * Indlo * Palm Desert * PalmSprings * Rancho Mirage
* Cathedral City * La Ouinta
8.
DATE AGENDAITEM#
Honorable John Pena, Mayor
City of La Quinta APPROVED DE?*flED
P.O. Box 1504 *CONTlNUEID TO
La Quinta, Ca. 92253
Re: CVAG Resolution No. 87-1: Opposition to the Construction
and Operation of the Proposed Colmac Energy Biomass Plant
Dear Mayor Pena:
During their regularly scheduled meeting on September 29, 1986,
the CVAG Executive Committee unanimously voted to oppose the
construction and operation of the proposed Biomass Power Plant on
the Cabazon Indian Reservation. Enclosed for your information is
a copy of CVAG Resolution No. 87-1 which officially states CVAG's
position on this issue. Copies of the resolution have also been
forwarded to all CVAG member jurisdictions as well as our State
and Federal Representatives.
As currently proposed, Colmac Energy, Inc. is planning to
construct a biomass-fueled electricity power plant near Mecca on
the Cabazon Indian Reservation. The plant, which would produce
45.0 megawatts of electricity annually, would burn 480,000 tons
per year of landfill wastes collected from throughout Riverside
and Imperial County. An initial review of the project by several
CVAG jurisdictions, indicates it may have serious and compelling
environmental impacts on the Coachella Valley.
For these reasons, CVAG respectfully recommends that your City
Council enact a similar resolution in opposition to the biomass
plant. If your Council Concurs, you may also wish to submit
written comments on the project to the Sacramento Area Office of
the Bureau of Indian Affairs as indicated on the enclosed project
description.
With your support and the cooperation, we look forward to a
mutually beneficial resolution of this issue. Thank you for your
assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
DATE AGENDA ITEM#
Walter Snyder oDENIED
Chairman
oCONTINUED TO
WS DS ghc
74-133 El Paseo, Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 e 619) 346-1127
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L q17*37
/DTE AGENDA ITEM #
1% MEMORANDUM*PPROvED D*ED
oCONTINUED TO
CITY OF LA QUINTA * I *
4',
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
VIA: CITY MANAGER
FROM: PLANNING DEPARThENT
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTINUED PARTICIPATION IN THE URBAN
COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BACKGROUND
Correspondence has been received from Riverside County Department of
Economic/Community Development advising the City regarding continued
cooperative agreement for participation in the Urban County CDBG
Program; and the option of withdrawing to separately seek funding
through the State Small Cities CDBG Program.
CONS I DERATI ON
The City has maintained a valuable liaison with the County since its
incorporation. Continued participation in the County program would
seem to be the City's best access to available funds and a
considerable savings in general administrative program management.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt by Resolution the City's intention to continue in the Urban
County CDBG Program, and authorize the Mayor to execute a
three-year agreement with Riverside County.
MC/mr
attachment: Draft Resolution
MEMORESO
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY
CONCERNING THE URBAN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as
amended by the Housing and Urban Rural Recovery Act of 1983, provides
that grant funds may be used for the development of viable urban
communities by providing decent housing and a suitable living
environment and by expanding economic opportunities principally for
persons of low and moderate income; and
WHEREAS, Riverside County represents that it is qualified as an
Urban County" under said Act; and
WHEREAS, Riverside County has extended to the City an opportunity
to enter into a cooperative agreement for participation in an Urban
County Community Development Block Grant Program; and,
WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta, California has previously
engaged in such a cooperative arrangement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of La Quinta, California does hereby elect to enter into a
three-year cooperative agreement with Riverside County for
participation in an Urban County CDBG Program.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor is authorized to execute an
agreement with Riverside County on behalf of the City of La Quinta,
California for the purposes of said Act and Program.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular/special) meeting of
the La Quinta City Council, held on this day of
1987, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
MAYOR
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY MANAGER I CLERK CITY ATTORNEY
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8 L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8!Lq/7,*7
DATE AGENDA ITEM# DATE * AGENDA ITEM I
x POSITION PAPER
APPROVED *DENtED SUBMITTED BY *APPROVED oDEMED
CQNTINUEDTO MARK NORAN oCONTINUED TO
CHAIRMAN:COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
SUBJECT:RECOMMENDATION OF A POLICY
STATEMENT RECOGNIZING THE IMPORTANCE
OF CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AND THEIR
VITAL CONTRIBUTION TO A GROWING CITY.
RECOMMENDED POLICY STATEMENT: THE CITY
OF LA QUINTA RECOGNIZES THAT CHARITABLE
ORGANIZATIONS, DEFINED IN SECTIONS SOl(c)3
OF THE FEDERAL INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
CODE AND IT'S SUBSECTIONS, PROVIDE, OR
CAN PROVIDE,VALUABLE SERVICES TO THE CITY
OF LA QUINTA. IT IS THEREFORE THE POLICY
OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, IT'S ELECTED
OFFICIALS, IT'S APPOINTED COMMISSIONS AND
COMMITTEES AND DIRECTED TO STAFF TO EXTEND
ANY AND ALL COURTESY AND ASSISTANCE TO THE
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED ORGANIZATIONS, WHO,
HAVE PRIMARY RESIDENCE WITHIN THE CITY
LIMITS OR WHO PROVIDE SUBSTANTIAL SERVICES
TO THE CITIZENS OF LA QUINTA.
ASSISTANCE IS DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
COUNCIL, COMMISSION, COMMITTEE AND STAFF
INTERVENTION IN NORMAL CITY GOVERNMENTAL
PROCESS AND PROCEDURE TO SPEED SUCH
PROCESS AND PROCEDURE WHEN POSSIBLE.
THE COUNCIL SHOULD, WHEN POSSIBLE WAIVE
FEES, OR OTHER GOVERNMENTAL CHARGES THAT
ARE A HARDSHIP UPON SUCH AN ORGANIZATION.
FURTHER, AT THE DISCRETION OF THE COUNCIL
IT MAY WAIVE SUCH FEES BASED ON THE
ORGANIZATIONS PAST SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY.
RATIONAL:
For the past four years the City of La Quinta has been growing,
adding to it's community needs by approving developments that
will impact, not only our land use, but our human condition.
The City of La Quinta has, in the past, promoted economic
development through the use of incentives for certain types
of development. I applaud such measures and feel that
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8"L I
PAGE 2.
POSITION PAPER:CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS
such devices should be used to encourage the location and
proliferation of needed human services in the City of La Quinta.
Presently, La Quinta citizens must travel elsewhere to receive
basic counseling for family related problems, child care is
not readily available, services for both young and old are
limited, yet, charitable, not-for-profit organizations exsist
throughout our community who provide the very services that
we wish to encourage. I would hope that a statement of
support and encouragement would act as an incentive to human
service providers to come to La Quinta. In addition, this
stated policy would stroke local efforts that provide valued
services to an under-served population.
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8#L *i8Y *
C DATE AG**OAiT&M1*
MEMORANDUM 4PPROvE*
CITY OF LA QUINTA **NTINUED*
4',!
TO: THE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
VIA: RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
DATE: APRIL 6, 1987
SUBJECT: PP86-274 REQUEST FOR GUIDANCE IN BUILDING
ARCHITECTURE/DESIGN REVISIONS)
BACKGROUND
At their regular meeting of August 26, 1986, the Planning Commission
approved the above-referenced proposal with conditions. The City
Council, however, at their meeting of September 2, 1986, took action
to refer the matter back to the Planning Commission in order to
address the following concerns:
1. Building Setback: Additional setback should be provided at the
northwest corner of Bermudas and Montezuma; no specific
standard was identified.
2. Building Architecture: The architecture of the three buildings
was not considered an appropriate model for the downtown area;
the buildings' exteriors need restudy/revision.
The project is proposed on the north side of Avenida Montezuma,
between Avenida Navarro and Avenida Bermudas immediately
north of the Black Gold" gas station). The applicant, Mr. John
Feld, has requested that his project be presented to the City
Council for guidance relative to desired architectural approach in
the downtown area.
RECENT CONSIDERATIONS
The applicant submitted amended elevations on December 16, 1986, but
not in sufficient detail to fully address the intent of City Council
as identified to the Planning Commission see attachment Nos. 1, 2, 3
& 4). On February 6, 1987, a Development Review Committee meeting
was held, with staff and the applicant in attendance, to discuss any
additional/revised conditions as well as the matter of the
architecture. It was determined that the matter would be scheduled
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8$L I
for a City Council study session to obtain direction in accordance
with the Council*s intent. The current elevations show changes to
window areas, additional railings at stairwells, and stucco trim
edging around each building, but other than these cosmetic
applications, the buildings are as previously presented to the
Council. As some time has passed, the appropriate staff reports have
been attached.
Prepared by Planning Department
Attachment #1: Building 3, Front Elevation
Attachment *2: Building 3, Rear Elevation
Attachment *3: Buildings 1 & 2, Front Elevations
Attachment *4: Buildings 1 & 2, Rear Elevations
Previous Staff Reports
PP86274
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8%L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8&L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8'L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8(L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8)L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8*L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8+L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8,L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8-L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8.L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8/L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
80L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
81L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
82L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
83L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
84L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
85L 6?,*7I*7 * *)
i)ATE AGENDAITEM#
ORDINANCE NO. 30 APPROVFD oDENIED
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY'S ZONING
ORDINANCE BY ADDING THERETO REGULATIONS RELATING
TO HABITATION OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES IN RESIDENTIAL
ZONES.
The city council of the City of La Quinta, California, does
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 which was
adopted by reference by this city council by Ordinance No. 5,
operative August 29, 1982) hereby is amended by adding thereto
a new section, to be numbered SECTION 18.41, and reading as
follows:
SECTION 18.41. RECREATIONAL VEHICLE, TEMPORARY USE.
Except when in a validly established recreational vehicle park,
recreational vehicles may be used for temporary habitation on
residentially zoned property only in accordance with the following
subsections. A recreational vehicle is defined as any vehicle
designed and used for temporary habitation, including motor coaches,
travel trailers and camper shells.
a) Requirements.
1) This temporary accessory use is permitted
only on a residentially zoned lot with an
existing occupied dwelling, provided that
the Director of Community Development may
issue a special permit to use an RV vehicle
at a construction site for supervisory or
guard personnel where it is determined such
use would not adversely affect surrounding
areas.
2) The recreational vehicle shall not be used
as either a primary or accessory dwelling
by the resident or owner of the lot on which
it is parked.
3) The vehicle shall be parked out of the public
right of way on the driveway or in the side-
yard of the dwelling.
4) The vehicle must be self-contained; no water,
sewer or electrical connections are permitted.
The operation of electric generators is not
permitted.
5) A recreational vehicle may remain on a property
a maximum period of fourteen 14) consecutive
days, with the total time any recreational
vehicle may remain at a residence not to exceed
forty-five 45) days within any twelve-month
period.
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
86LORDINANCE NO.
6) Only one 1) recreational vehicle used for
temporary habitation is permitted at any one
time.
7) The use shall comply with all additional
conditions reasonably required by the City
to protect the public's health, safety and
general welfare.
S) The residents of the dwelling located on
the parcel where the recreational vehicle
is parked shall be responsible for ensuring
compliance of the vehicle with the require-
ments of subsections a) and b) and shall
be subject to any and all enforcement actions
by the City for violations of municipal
ordinances and codes relating to such
recreational vehicle use.
b) Permit Procedure.
1) Application. Prior to moving the vehicle
onto the site, the owner of the property or
the vehicle shall obtain a 1temporary use
license" from the City Department of Community
Development. The application shall include
the following information.
a. Address of dwelling where vehicle will
park.
b. Name and address of vehicle owner/user.
c. Number of persons habitating vehicle.
d. Authorization of resident and/or property
owner permitting the temporary use.
e. Description make, model, year and color)
and license number of vehicle.
f. Location on the lot where vehicle will
park.
2) Permit. After review of the application by
the appropriate City Staff, a permit may be
granted for a period not to exceed fourteen
14) consecutive days. False, fraudulent
or misleading information on the application
is grounds for denial. The permit shall be
displayed in open view on the vehicle.
3) Fees. A nonrefundable fee of ten dollars
$10.00) is required at the time of
application.
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
87LORDINANCE NO.
4) *evocation of Permit. A permit can be
revoked if it is determined by the City
that the use as conducted is creating a
nuisance or in violation of the Municipal
codes. The vehicle shall be removed from
the premises within twenty-four 24) hours
of issuance of the notice of revocation.
5) Enforcement. The vehicle shall cease being
used for temporary habitation and be removed
from the property upon expiration or revocation
of the permit, otherwise it shall be in viola-
tion of this ordinance. Every day that a
violation continues to exist, shall be deemed
a separate violation subject to criminal
prosecution or other appropriate legal action.
SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full
force and effect thirty 30) days after passage.
SECTION 3. POSTING. The City Clerk shall within 15 days after
passage of this ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least the 3
public places designated by resolution of the City Council; shall
certify to the adoption and posting of this ordinance; and shall
cause this ordinance and its certification, together with proof of
posting, to be entered in the book of ordinances of this City.
The foregoing ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting
of the City Council held on this 17th day of May 1983,
by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Allen, Cox, Wolff and Mayor Baier.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Council Member Henderso*A*%Ap*
ATTEST:
TY C
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
*TT&N*
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
88L I hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was adopted
by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, at a
meeting held May 17, 1983, and that the Ordinance was posted in at
least three public places specified for such postings by the
City Council.
Frank M. U*er,City Clerk
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
89L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8:L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8;L 4,7,g7
DATE AGENDAITEM#
*PPROVED oDEMED
oCONTINUED TO
RESOLUTION NO. 87-1*
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEMANDS.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta,
California, to approve demands as shown on the Demand/Warrant
Register dated April 7, 1987.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 7th day of April, 1987.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY MANAGERI CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8<L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8=L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8>L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8?L /* *`
*ATE AGENDA ITEM #
MEMORANDUM *APPROVED oDENIED
oCONTINUED TO_______
CITY OF LA QUINTA
*
*&*
To:
Mayor and City Council
From:
Ron Kiedrowski, City Manager
Date: March 20, 1987
Subject: Support of Legislation to Change Public Contracts Code Section
The attached letter from the City of Gridley focuses on a
statutory restriction which faces cities of our size in the
acquisition of Public Works facilities.
The statute doesn't have much effect on the current city mode of
operations in that in-house or force account construction is not a
factor in the city operations. however, as the City grows, force
account minor construction projects may become necessary and may be
the most cost effective method of accomplishing the projects.
Support for the position of the City of Gridley could benefit
the City of La Quinta.
Council's Pleasure
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8@L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8AL * *.
DATE AGFNDAITEM#
MEMORANDUM /APPROVED D*ED
CITYOFLAQUINTA CONTINUEDTO
To: Mayor and Council
From: Ron Kiedrowski, City Manager
Date: March 20, 1987
Subject: Street Sweeping Services
The City currently has a Gentle Persons" agreement with
Palm Desert Disposal for street sweeping services. City streets are
swept twice monthly under the arrangement and the sweepings are
removed by Palm Desert to a disposal site. Current charges for the
Twice monthly sweeping are from about $750.00 to about $1,200.
As part of our program to access existing City services' values
and to obtain the most cost effective services for the City. we
requested proposals for street sweeping from several vendors. The
RFP solicited rates for the current level of services and solicited
rates for a higher level of service, once weekly sweeping.
RFPs were sent to the following vendors:
CLEAN SWEEP ENTERPRISES
PALM DESERT DISPOSAL
ELGIN SWEEPING
M * M SWEEPING
WESTERN WASTE INDUSTRIES
The proposal which was the most favorable to the City was the
proposal submitted by Clean Sweep and was for $785.50 per month which
is less costly than the present agreement for such services and
raises the level of service to the City significantly.
We recommend the Council approve the proposed three year
contract with Clean Sweep Enterprises for street sweeping services.
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8BL ATE
AGENDA ITEM #
MEMORANDUM APPROVED oDENIED
0
CITY OF LA
QUINTA()CONT*NUEDTO
4',
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Ronald Kiedrowski, City Manager
FROM: Robert W. Weddle, City Engineer***
DATE: March 18, 1987
SUBJECT: PP85-217, Plaza Tampico
Re: Public Street Dedication
As a condition of approval No. 11(a)), the Plaza Tampico project was
conditioned to dedicate streetand public utility easements for Desert
Club Drive and Calle Tampico.
This is to request the City Council accept the public street and
utility easements for the east half of Desert Club Drive and the
north half of Calle Tampico where abutting to project site.
Future dedications at additional right-of-way on the west side of the
center line of Desert Club are still being negotiated between the
property owner and Landmark Land Company.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council accept the dedications of public street and
utility easements for Desert Club Drive and Calle Tampico from the
Plaza Tampico PP85-217) development and direct the City Clerk to
have the easement deeds recorded.
RWW:bja
Atch: Easement Documents
cc: John Curtis, P.E., Landmark Land Company
R. Evans, La Quinta Medical/Commercial Plaza, Ltd.
Files, PP85-217, Plaza Tampico
PP85217
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8CL NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8DL NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8EL NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8FL NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8GL NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8HL NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8IL 1I**.(I)
MEMORANDUM ** *
CITY OF LA QUINTA * * *:)L*t**
To: Ron Kiedrowski, City Manager
From: Roger Hirdler, Community Safety Director
Date: April 3, 1987
Subject: Continued Paramedic Information
I have received the following information from the Cove
Communities Safety Commission, and the City of Indio, reporting
the financing of paramedic services.
1. Cove Communities:
The initial start up costs for the Cove Communities is as
follows:
A. One ambulance $60,000.00
b. Equipment $15,000.00
c. Manpower, 6 at $30,000.00 $180.000.00
$255,000.00
The Cove Communities passed an assessment district and each
property owner is currently paying $4.00 to $5.00 per dwelling
unit, and $2.00 to $3.00 per vacant lot. This apparently works
well for them.
2. City of Indio:
The City of Indio has two paramedic units in service at the
present time. The costs ar& as follows:
1. Ambulance $30,000.00 to $50,000.00
2. Equipment $20,000.00
3. Manpower paramedics $40,000.00 x 3
EMT $30,000.00 K 3
Total Manpower $210,000.00
Total Maximum Start Up Expense $280,000.00
4 *
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8JLMemo Continued Paramedic Information
April 4, 1987
Page 2
The City of Indio is currently charging $285.00 per transport,
regardless of the services performed. If they transport to any
facility besides John F. Kennedy Hospital, the charge is $4.00 per
mile. Indio is breaking even at the present time.
The City of La Quinta should probably try to join the Cove
Communities safety Commission, as it would probably be the best
way to finance a program such as this. There are not enough
responses in La Quinta alone to keep paramedics certified.
If the City of La Quinta is desirous of a paramedic transport
system, it could be funded in the following manner:
2,550 dwellings at $50.00 per year $127,500.00
4,000 vacant lots at $25.00 per year $100,000.00
$227.500.00
The above figures are a very rough estimate. The commercial rates
are not figured into the estimate. It would take time and a good
selling job to get it approved.
RH: es
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8KL NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
8LL NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-21-1998-U01
03:32:44PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
07-U02
1987-U02