1987 07 07 CC<! DECLARATION OF POSTING
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am employed by the City of
La Quinta, in the Administrative Services Department; and that I
posted the foregoing Agenda on the outside entry to the Council
Chambers of the City of La Quinta Offices at 78-105 Calle Estado and
at the Bulletin Board at the La Quinta Post Office on Thursday,
July 2, 1987.
Signed July 2, 1987, at La Quinta, California.
na* *
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CITY OF LA QUINTA
A regular meeting of the City Council
to be held at City Hall, 78-105 Calle
Estado, La Quinta, California.
July 7, 1987 7:30 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER
A. Flag Salute.
2. ROLL CALL
3. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA.
4. PUBLIC COMMENT
5. COMMENT BY COUNCIL MEMBERS
6. HEARINGS
7. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
A. Communication from Desert Communities Hotel and Motel
Association regarding merger of the Greater Palm Springs
Convention and Visitors Bureau and the Desert Resorts
Convention and Visitors Bureau.
8. BUSINESS SESSION
A. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 11Q. AMENDING THE CITY'S
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
BY ADDING CERTAIN REGULATIONS THEREIN RELATING TO PROCEDURES
FOR PARCEL MERGERS.
1) Motion to waive further reading and adopt Ordinance
No. 110. ROLL CALL VOTE)
2) Motion to adopt Resolution No. 87-38.
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<!AGENDA City Council
July 7, 1987
Page Two.
B. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 111. ESTABLISHING THE RATE FOR
INDIVIDUAL RESIDENTIAL
REFUSE PICKUP AND DISPOSAL SERVICE, AND ELECTING TO HAVE
CHARGES PAYABLE FOR SUCH SERVICES COLLECTED ON THE TAX ROLL
PURSUANT TO SECTION 5473 OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE.
1) Report from the Finance Director.
2) Motion to waive further reading and introduce Ordinance
No. 111.
C. RESOLUTION NO. 87-36. APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE
CITY AND THE LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION FOR
1987-88.
1) Report from the City Manager.
2) Motion to adopt Resolution No. 87-36.
D. Progress Report La Quinta Sports Complex. INFORMATIONAL)
1) Report from Richard Beck, DSUSD Facilities Planner.
E. Coachella Valley Transportation Study Concept
Approval.
1) Motion to approve concept.
F. Study Session Items Decisions may be made on items
discussed at the July 6th study session, which are:
1) Proposed 1987-88 Budget.
a. Motion to adopt 1987-88 Budget, as revised.
2) Infrastructure Fee Program.
3) Meisterlin General Plan Amendment request.
4) Bond Discussion Options Bob Haight, Haight & Assoc.
9. CoMMISSION/COMMITTEE REPORTS
10. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of Minutes City Council. 6-8-87)
B. RESOLUTION NO. 87-37. APPROVING DEMANDS.
1) Motion to adopt Consent Calendar. ROLL CALL VOTE)
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<!AGENDA City Council
July 7, 1987
Page Three.
11. REPORT OF OFFICERS
A. City Manager
B. City Attorney
C. City Engineer
D. Finance Director
E. Planning Director
1) village Specific Plan Update.
F. Community Safety Director
1) Weed Abatement Status Report
G. Administrative Services Director
12. ADJOURNME**T
NOTICE OF UPCOMING COUNCIL/COMMISSION MEETINGS
July 6, 1987 CC Study Session 2:00 PM
July 7, 1987 Cc Regular Meeting 7:30 PM
July 13, 1987 PC Study Session 3:00 PM
July 14, 1987 Pc Regular Meeting 7:00 PM
July 20, 1987 CC Study Session CANCELLED)
July 21, 1987 CC Regular Meeting CANCELLED)
July 27, 1987 PC Study Session 3:00 PM
July 27, 1987 CSC Regular Meeting 7:00 PM
July 28, 1987 Pc Regular Meeting 7:00 PM
cc City Council
COC Chamber of Commerce
CSC Community Services Commission
PC Planning Commission
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! *eJe.(e eornmajiitiej DATE AGENDA ITEM U
7otee and *ote6 **oa'atio*i &/*F*RoVED DE*ED
June 16, 1987
To Members of the City Council:
On behalf of the Desert Communities Hotel and Motel Association, I would
like to take this opportunity to bring to your attention the dissatisfact-
ion felt by the Association regarding the status of the merger between the
Greater Palm Springs Convention and Visitors Bureau and the Desert Resorts
Convention and Visitors Bureau.
On Wednesday, May 20, 1987, the general meeting of the DCHMA was held at
Mission Hills Resort Hotel. In attendance were Gil Zimmerman, Walt Snyder,
Eddie Webster and Frank Bogert, along with association hotel general managers.
Both CVB's stated that they would report back to the association with more
slatistics on the merger before the next meeting which is to be held on June
17, 1987. As of late, we have received no response from either of the merging
committees of the two CVB1s.
As the merger will benifit the entire valley, hospitality industry, travel
and tourism, the association has taken a firm position supporting the merger
and has openly stated so for some time.
Please accept this* letter on behalf of the hotels in the Coachella Valley as
a request for support from your city council regarding this issue.
Sincerely,
James A. Smith, C.H.A.
General Manager
Vacation Inn Hotel
DCIIMA, Secretary
JAS/hw
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! g/7,*-) eA(')
DA*E AGENDA;TEM#
ORDINANCE NO.110 DNlED
CONTINUED TO
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY'S
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS BY ADDING CERTAIN REGULATIONS
THEREIN RELATING TO PROCEDtTRES FOR PARCEL MERGERS
The City Council of the City of La Quinta does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1.
Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 which was adopted by reference by
this City Council by Ordinance No. 5, operative August 29, 1982) is
hereby amended by adding a new Section 16.7 to read as follows:
Section 16.7. MERGING OF CONTIGUOUS PARCELS.
A. Notwithstanding the preceding sections, four or fewer
contiguous parcels under common ownership may be merged without
reverting to acreage, provided that the merge is approved by the
Planning Director and an instrument evidencing such merger is
recorded with the County Recorder.
B. Applications to merge contiguous parcels shall be made to
the Planning Director on forms provided by the Planning
Department, and shall be accomplished by a fee as set by City
Council Resolution, and the following:
1. An exhibit, drawn to scale, delineating the existing
parcel boundaries and the location of existing
structures and easements.
2. Copies of grant deeds for the existing parcels.
3. An exhibit, drawn to scale, delineating the boundaries
of the parcel after the merger.
4. A legal description of the new parcel as merged.
5. Preliminary title report.
6. Written consent of all owners of record interest.
C. The Planning Director shall transmit a completed
application to the City Engineer for review and recommendation
and shall grant approval of the request for merger if:
1. The parcels to be merged are, at the time of merger,
under common ownership and written consent has been
obtained from all record owners.
2. The parcel as merged will be consistent with the zoning
of the property.
3. The parcel as merged will not conflict with the
location of any existing structures on the property.
4. The parcel as merged will not be deprived
access as a result of the merger.
5. Access to the adjoining parcels will not be restricted
by the merger.
6. No new lot lines are created through the merger.
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! D. The Planning Director shall submit to the County Recorder
for recordation the new legal description and exhibit after
it has been approved by the Planning Director.
SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force
and effect 30 days after passage.
SECTION 3. POSTING. The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after
passage of this ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least the
three 3) public places designated by resolution of the City Council;
shall certify to the adoption and posting of this ordinance; and
shall cause this ordinance and its certification, together with proof
of posting, to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of this City.
The foregoing ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of
the City Council held on this day of 1987.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER
I hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was adopted by the
City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, at a meeting
held on the day of 1987, and that
the ordinance was posted in at least the three 3) public places
specified for such postings by the City Council.
CITY CLERK
ORDSUBRE
C)
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! DATE AGENDAIT*M*
MEMORANDUM APPR***\ * * D*1*
CONTINUEDTO
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To Ron Kiedrowski, City Manager
From Roger Hirdler, Community Safety Director
Date: June 30, 1987
Weed Abatement Status
Subject.
The weed abatement/lot cleaning program has been aggressive and
staff believes great progress has been made to make the area a
safer place to live, and at the same time, greatly improve the
overall appearance.
The abatement program is reaching the point where, in staff's
opinion, we could proceed to handle weed abatements on a reactive
or on a as needed basis.
With the formation of the Park Maintenance Department, the weed
abatements could be scheduled into the parks program, when the
situation demands it.
Code enforcement would continue to generate the weed abatements,
when they are determined to be a fire hazard or when the situation
constitutes a public nuisance.
The costs of weed abatement/lot cleaning would continue to be
billed back to the property owner.
Staff respectfully requests Council's guidance as to what
direction you would like the weed abatement program to take, in
the coming fiscal year 87/88.
r;)
RH: es
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! DATE AGENDAITEM#
APPROVED DE*flED
ORDINANCE NO. 111 oCONTINUEDJO
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ESTADLISNIN6 THE RATE
FOR INDIVIDUAL RESIDENTIAL REFUSE PICKUP AND
DISPOSAL SERVICE, AND ELECTING TO HAVE CHARGES
PAYABLE FOR SUCH SERVICES COLLECTED ON THE TAX
ROLL PURSUANT TO SECTION 5473 OF THE HEALTH AND
SAFETY CODE.
The City Council of the City of La Quinta does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. This Ordinance is enacted pursuant to
authorization contained in SEctions 5471 and 5473 of the Health and
Safety Code of the State of California.
SECTION 2. The rate and charge for City-furnished garbage and
refuse collection and disposal services for individual residences
curb service, once per week pickup of any combination of six 6)
cans, bags or bundles), is hereby established, prescribed and fixed
at *5.7S per month plus *o.ss per month dump fee surcharge commencing
July 1, 1987 and thereafter.
SECTION 3. The City of La Quinta hereby continues its
election to have all such charges, until such election is
appropriately changed, established for City-furnished garbage and
refuse collection and disposal services for individual residences,
collected on the tax roll and in the same manner, by the same
persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately
from, the general taxes.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall within 15 days after the
passage of this ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least the 3
public places designated by resolution of the City Council,* shall
certify to the adoption and posting of this ordinance, and shall
cause this ordinance and its certification, together with proof of
posting, to be entered in the book of ordinances of this City.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this-------day of 1987, by
the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
MAYOR
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORPi:
CITY MANA6ERICLERK CITY ATTORNEY
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! 7i7,g7 *c-.
DATE A*ENDAITEM#
RESOLUTION NO. 87-36 oDEWIED
1 CONTINUED TO
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A
M*ORANDLIM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA AND THE LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES
ASSOCIATION LQCEA) COMMENCING ON JULY 1, 1987,
AND TERMINATING ON JUNE 30, 1988.
WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta hereinafter referred to as CITY"
and the La Quinta City Employees' Association hereinafter referred t*
as uASSOCIATION* have met and conferred over wages, hours, terms and
conditions of employment pursuant to Government Code 3500, as
amended; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Association have signed a Memorandum
of Understanding for the period commencing on July 1, 1987, and
terminating on June 30, 1988; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY ThE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LA QUINTA, as follows:
SECTION 1. The City does hereby approve, ratify, and authorize
irriplementation of each econom*c and non-economic benefit and right
set forth in the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and
Association, attached hereto and dated July 7, 1987, and incorporated
hereby this reference as Exhibit UIAII, and said to the extent the City
may legally do so in accordance with the time constraints of said
Memorandum of Understanding.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 7th day of July, 1987.
MAYOR
ATTEST;
CITY MANAGER/CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM;
CITY ATTORNEY
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<!
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<!
TIME SCHEDULE
La Quinta Schools and Community Use Complex
198719881989
La Quinta Elementary School Playfields and Hardcourts
La Quinta Middle School Playfields and Hardcourts Sports Complex)
La Quinta Middle School and Community Use/Multi-use Building
La Quinta Middle School and Community Use Amphitheater
Original document is located in the files and has not been destroyed...-Leland Berliner)
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! AGENDAITEM#
**APPRovED * DENIED
MEMORANDUM oCONTINUED TO__________
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: City Manager
From: City Engineer
Date: 1 July 1987
Subject Coachella Valley Area Transportation Study
The Coachella Valley Association of Governments CVAG) has
requested a formal response from each of the general purpose
local governments in the Coachella Valley to the Coachella
Valley Area Transportation Study dated March 1987. It is my
understanding that Council Members have*received copies of
that Study for their review.
Most of the affected agencies have responded in a positive
manner, and those exceptions which have been taken have dealt
primarily with computer model population projections Desert
Hot Springs) and designation of certain regional routes to be
named specifically on the ballot for the proposed sales tax
increase.
With respect to the latter, the original recommendations
cited the widening of Highway 111, improvements to Palm
Drive/Gene Autry Trail, construction of the Mid-Valley
Parkway, and the improvement of Highway 86. Through CVAG
committee actions, the original proposal has been modified to
indicate widening of nortions of Highway 111 requested by
Indian Wells), and to add to the listing Fred Waring Drive
requested by Indian Wells) and Jefferson Street requested
by Indio) t*. give the eastern portion of the Valley
identifiable projects for ballot purposes. The projects
named on the ballot, of course, are only examples of the
improvements to be undertaken. The intent is that all of the
various routes included in the Study will be scheduled for
construction to mitigate existing deficiencies.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council
approve the Coachella Valley Area Transportation Study in
concept.
jY
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! * 2)
DATE AGENDAITEM#
APP*OVED DE*ED
oCONTINUED TO
To: Mayor and Council
From: Ron Kiedrowski, City Manager
Date: June 18, 1987
Subject: Recommended Infrastructure Fees
We have performed an in-depth analysis of the last 496 building permits
which incurred an Infrastructure Fee and have translated the findings
of that analysis to the two scenarios which were presented to you on
June 16, 1987.
The first scenario required a 36/64 ratio of existing development to
future develQpment and the second required a 52/48 ratio of existing
development to future development.
The results of our analysis suggests that the Infrastructure Fee be
raised to at least 2 3/4% or 3 1/2% of Valuation and the fee cap be
extended to $6,000.00 per unit depending on which scenario is adopted.
Scenario I Scenario II
Amount to be Raised $13,811,424.00 $10,391,040.00
Projected Units 3,500.00 3,500.00
Avg. Fee Required Per Unit $3,946.00 $2,969.00
The rates and cap necessary to generate the average fee required for
each scenario is:
Scenario I Scenario II
Average Fee Required $3,946.00 $2,969.00
Rate 3 1/2% of Valuationl 2 3/4% of Valuatjon/
$6,000.00 cap $6,000.00 cap
Pro forma Average Fee $3,885.00 $3,052.00
We recommend the Council select one of the two scenarios presented and
adopt the appropriate rate and cap to match the choice.
MEMO*008 RK
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! 6 I *
D4*E AGENDAITEM#
r' *nchma* ConAu*ti* &r'vIC* APPROVED DENiED
* i*n TO *
K-5 712 Nofl* DIw** Bar Botilevird
O*amo**d Bar. CaIIt*ia g17*
71*5**111
June 18, 1987
Mr. Ron Kiedrowski
City Manager
City of La Qrnnta
P.O. Box 1504
La Quinta, CA 92253
RE: General Plan Amendment No. 86-016
Dear Mr. Kiedrowski:
It is my understanding that the above referenced General Plan Amendment has been
scheduled for hearing before the City Council on July 7, 1987 at 7:30 p.m. It is also my
understanding that the City Council would normally review items on the July 7 Agenda at a
study session on July 6.
Because the property owners are anxious to address the City Councils concerns on the
request, they have asked me to request that the General Plan Amendment hearing be
postponed to the first Council meeting in August. The owners would, however, still ilke to
have the City Council review the case at their July 6 study session. Statutory ilmitations
regarding processing times are hereby waived.
If there is a problem with granting this request, please contact me at 714) 860-3874.
Very truly yours
Benchmark Consultii* Serilces
David G. Schey
DS:mk
Ben*hm*rk. A standard by which others are measured.
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! 1I7/*7
DATE AGENDAITEM#
**APPRQVED DE?**?ED
oCONTINUED TG
RESOLUTION NO. 87-37
A RESOLUTION OF ThE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEMANDS.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta,
California, to approve demands as shown on the Demand/Warrant
Register dated July 7, 1987.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 7th day of July, 1987, by the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
MAYOR
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY MANAGER/CLERK CITY ATTORNEY
2
C-
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02
<! NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-28-1998-U01
09:16:17AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
07-U02
1987-U02