Loading...
1990 04 03 CCd_q8 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, California 92253 Regular Meeting April 3, 1990 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Beginning Reso. No. 90-25 Ord. No. 169 a. Pledge of Allegiance b. Roll Call CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA PRESENTATION OF LA QUINTA BEAUTIFUL AWARDS FOR MARCH MOST BEAUTIFUL: Robert & Ellen Pelletier, 54-275 Avenida Obregon MOST IMPROVED: Robert & Elizabeth Powley, 52-690 Avenicia enQozZ ANNOUNCEMENTS PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Continued Public HearinZ on Specific Plan 89-014 for a Commercial Shopping Center with Approximately 618,000 sq. ft. of Floor Area on 60 + Acres and Acceptance of Planning Commission Report of Action for Plot Plan 90-434 to Allow Construction of Phase I & III of the Project Five Major Stores and Retail Shops) in the C-P-S Zone and Confirmation of Environmental Determination. Property is Bounded by Whitewater Storm Channel; Highway 111; Adams and Washington Street. Applicant: Zranspacific Development Co. a) Resolution Action. b) Acceptance of Planning Commission Report of Action. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS BUSINESS SESSION 1. Consideration of Authorization to Enter Into Agreement with BSI Consultants for Engineering Services for City-Wide Lighting and Landscape District. a) Minute Order Action. BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q82. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 167 re: Off-Street Parking Ordinance No. 168 re: Elimination of Zones CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Approval of Demand Register. 2. Approval of Minutes of March 14, 1990. 3. Approval of Final Map 425429 and Approval of Subdivision Improvement Agreement Painted Cove J. P Ministrelli). 4. Approval of Final Map #24890-1 and Approval of Subdivision Improvement Agreement Citrus Course J. M. Peters Co.). 5. Approval of Final Map 424890-2 and Approval of Subdivision Improvement Agreement Citrus Course J.M. Peters Co.). 6. Approval of Final Map #24890-3 and Approval of Subdivision Improvement Agreement Citrus Course J.M. Peters Co.). 7. Approval of Final Map Z24890-4 and Approval of Subdivision Improvement Agreement Citrus Course J.M. Peters Co.). 8. ApprovZl of Appropriation for Contract for Engineering Services. 9. Denial of Claim of David Moore. COUNCIL COMMENT PUBLIC COMMENT CLOSED SESSION a. Discussion of Litigation City of Indio/City of Palm Springs Indio Case No. 57496 Parc La Quinta Indio Case No. 60188 b. Discussion of Land Acquisition Through Eminent Domain Burkett Property Indio Case No. 60203 c. Discussion Regarding Personnel ADJOURNMENT BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 STUDY SESSION AGENDA APRIL 2, 1990 3:00 F.M. 1. Review of Civic Center Master Plan. 2. Discussjon Regarding Waste Management Contract Extension. 3. Discussion Regarding Coachella Valley Mountains Trust. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS a. City Manager b. Assistant City Manager c. Administrative Services Director d. Community Safety Director e. Planning Director. f. Public Works Director. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. Planning Commission Minutes of March 13, 1990. b. Technical Traffic Committee Minutes of March 27, 1990. c. C. V. Recreation and Park District. d. CVAG Committee Reports. NOTICE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS April 2, 1990 CC Study Session 3:00 F.M. April 3, 1990 DEDICATION OF COVE MINI-PARK 10:30 A.M. April 3, 1990 DEDICATION OF COVE PROJ. PHASE I 11:00 A.M. April 3, 1990 CC Regular Meeting 7:00 F.M. April 7, 1990 CC/PC Joint Study Session 9:00 A.M. April 9, 1990 PC Study Session 4:00 F.M. April 10, 1990 PC Regular Meeting 7:00 F.M. April 1Z, 1990 CC Study Session 3:00 F.M. April 17, 1990 CC Regular Meeting 7:00 F.M. April 23, 1990 PC Study Session 4:00 F.M. April 24, 1990 PC Regular Meeting 7:00 F.M. April 30, 1990 CSC Regular Meeting 7:00 F.M. CC City Council PC Planning Commission CSC Community Services Commission DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Saundra L. Juhola, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the City Council meeting of April 3, 1990 was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 78-105 Calle Estado and on the bulletin board at the La Quinta Post OffZe on Friday, March 30, 1990. Date&: March Z ZUNDRA L. JUHOLA,Z lyClerk City of La Quinta, California B BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 7' I CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, California 92253 Regular Meeting April 3, 1990 7:00 M. CALL TO ORDER Beginning Reso. No. 90-25 Ord. No. 169 a. Pledge of Allegiance b. Roll Call CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA PRESENTATION OF LA QUINTA BEAUTIFUL AWARDS FOR MARCH MOST BEAUTIFUL: Robert & Ellen Pelletier, 54-275 Avenida Obregon MOST IMPROVED: Robert & Elizabeth Powley, 52-690 Avenida Nendoza ANNOUNCEMENTS PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Continued Public Hearing on Specific Plan 89-014 for a Commercial Shopping Center with Approximately 618,000 sq. ft. of Floor Area on 60 + Acres and Acceptance of Planning Commission Report of Action for Plot Plan 90-434 to Allow Construction of Phase I & III of the Project Five Major Stores and Retail Shops) in the C-P-S Zone and Confirmation of Environmental Determination. Property is Bounded by Whitewater Storm Channel; Highway 111; Adams and Washington Street. Applicant: Zranspacific Development Co. a) Resolution Action. b) Acceptance of Planning Commission Report of Action. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS BUSINESS SESSION 1. Consideration of Authorization to Enter Into Agreement with BSI Consultants for Engineering Services for City-Wide Lighting and Landscape District. a) Minute Order Action. BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q82. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 167 re: Off-Street Parking Ordinance No. 168 re: Elimination of Zones CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Approval of Demand Register. 2. Approval of Minutes of March 14, 1990. 3. Approval of Final Map Z25429 and Approval of Subdivision Improvement Agreement Painted Cove J. P. Ministrelli). 4. Approval of Final Map Z24890-l and Approval of Subdivision Improvement Agreement Citrus Course J. M. Peters Co.). 5. Approval of Final Map Z24890-2 and Approval of Subdivision Improvement Agreement Citrus Course J.M. Peters Co.). 6. Approval of Final Map Z24890-3 and Approval of Subdivision Improvement Agreement Citrus Course J.M. Peters Co.). 7. Approval of Final Map fl24890-4 and Approval of Subdivision Improvement Agreement Citrus Course J.M. Peters Co.). 8. Approval of Appropriation for Contract for Engineering Services. 9. Denial of Claim of David Moore. COUNCIL COMMENT PUBLIC COMMENT CLOSED SESSION a. Discussion of Litigation City of Indio/City of Palm Springs Indio Case No. 57496 Parc La Quinta Indio Case No. 60188 b. Discussion of Land Acquisition Through Eminent Domain Burkett Property Indio Case No. 60203 c. Discussion Regarding Personnel ADJOURNMENT BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8COUNCIL MEETING DATE: APRIL 3, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ON SPECIFIC BUSINESS SESSION: PLAN 89-014 TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 618,000 SQUARE FOOT SHOPPING CENTER ON CONSENT CALENDAR: 60+ ACRES, CONFIRMATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND ACCEPTANCE OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT OF ACTION FOR PLOT PLAN 90-434 LOCATED ON PROPERTY BOUNDED BY THE WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL, HIGHWAY ill, ADAMS STREET FUTURE) AND WASHINGTON STREET. APPLICANT: TRANSPACIFIC DEVELOPMENT CO. BACKGROUND: This item was continued from the March 20, 1990, hearing at the Applicant' S request. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Move to adopt City Council Resolution 90- approving the Specific Plan 89-014, subject to conditions and accept report of Planning Commission action on Plot Plan 90-434. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY ZANAGER BJ/CC*4/03 F2 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: APRIL 3, 1990, CONTINUED FROM MARCH 20, 1990 SUBJECT: CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ON SPECIFIC PLAN 89-014 TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 618,000 SQUARE FOOT SHOPPING CENTER ON 60+ ACRES, CONFIRMATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND ACCEPTANCE OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT OF ACTION FOR PLOT PLAN 90-434 LOCATED ON PROPERTY BOUNDED BY THE WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL, HIGHWAY 111, ADAMS STREET FUTURE) AND WASHINGTON STREET. BACKGROUND: This item was reviewed by the City Council at the meeting of March 20, 1990. After discussion, at the request of the Applicant, the item was continued to this meeting. This was to allow additional information to be added to the proposed Negative Declaration, as requested by Caltrans. Staff has added that information which includes an expanded project description indicating that the widening and improvement of Highway 111 is a related part of the project. Secondly, the proposed Negative Declaration now indicates that Caltrans is a responsible agency. The archaeological report is being expanded to include an area within the Highway 111 right-of-way. That information will be available to the City Council prior to this hearing. At the last hearing on March 20, 1990, the City Council voiced several concerns regarding the project. The following amended or new conditions address those concerns: 1. No. 8 amended). Preparation...Planning and Development Department. All tree sizes shall be a minimum of 24-inch box or 2-1/2 inch caliper measured 24-inches above ball), all Palm trees shall be 12-feet in height brown trunk). The plans...(CVWD). 2. No. 29 amended). Applicant/Developer...Street. The theme plaza shall be approved...by City. BJ/MEMOSS.024 1 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q83. No. 55.d. The condition as presented in draft resolution is amended as recommended by the Engineering Department; see March 20, 1990, Staff report.) 4. No. 68 amended). The Applicant shall dedicate land for an Imperial Irrigation District substation and CVWD well site prior.. cornrnercial site. These above items should be added to the Conditions of Approval if deemed appropriate by the City Council. Conditions of Approval No. 44 for the Specific Plan and Condition No. 13 of the Plot Plan presently requires a fire protection impact mitigation fee payment of $235,500. If this item is deleted from the Specific Plan, it will also be necessary to delete it from the Plot Plan approval. Attached is the Staff report for the City Council meeting of March 20, 1990. It contains the Planning Commission background, project description, and Staff recommendations which still apply to the project. Attachments: 1. Draft City Council Resolution 2. City Council report dated March 20, 1990 C? BJ/MEMOSS.024 2 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 90- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A COMMERCIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AND ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. CASE NO: SP 89-014 TRANSPACIFIC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, did on the 20th day of March, 1990, hold a duly-noticed Public Hearing and continued to the hearing to the 3rd day of April, 1990, to consider the request of TRANSPACIFIC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY for a commercial shopping center on 60+ acres located on a site bounded by the Whitewater Storm Channel on the north, Highway ill on the south, Adams Street on the east, and Washington Street on the west, more particularly described as: A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, T55, R7E, S.B.B.M. AND PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 19, T55, R7E, S.B.B.M. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta did on the 13th day of February, 1990, continued to the 27th day of February, 1990, hold a duly-noticed Public Hearing and by adopting of Planning Commission Resolution 90-008, recommend approval of said Specific Plan to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, said Specific Plan request has complied with the requirements of YTThe Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" County of Riverside, Resolution No. 82-213, adopted by reference in City of La Quinta Ordinance No. 5), in that the Planning Director has conducted an initial study and has determined that, although the project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, the mitigation measures incorporated into the Conditions of Approval will mitigate those project impacts to levels of insignificance; and, WHEREAS, mitigation of various physical impacts have been identified and incorporated into the approval conditions for Specific Plan 89-014, thereby requiring that monitoring of those mitigation measures be undertaken to assure compliance with them; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following facts and reasons to justify approval of said Specific Plan: BJ/RESOCC.036 1 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q81. The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan and adopted Specific Plan. 2. The Specific Plan is compatible with the existing and anticipated area development. 3. The project will be provided with adequate utilities and public services to ensure public health and safety. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby confirm the conclusion of Environmental Assessment No. 89-150, indicating that the proposed Specific Plan will not result in any significant environmental impacts as mitigated by the recommended Conditions of Approval; 3. That it does hereby approve of the above-described Specific Plan request for the reasons set forth in this Resolution, and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 3rd day of April, 1990, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California BJ/RESOCC.036 2 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 0 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: MARCH 20, 1990 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON SPECIFIC PLAN 89-014 TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 618,000 SQUARE FOOT SHOPPING CENTER ON 60+ACRES, CONFIRMATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND ACCEPTANCE OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT OF ACTION FOR PLOT PLAN 90-434 TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF PHASES I & III OF THE PROJECT IN THE C-P-S ZONE LOCATED ON PROPERTY BOUNDED BY THE WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL, HIGHWAY 111, ADAMS STREET FUTURE) AND WASHINGTON STREET. BACKGROUND: The request before the City Council consists of two applications as follows: 1. Specific Plan 89-014: The commercial specific plan is to allow a 617,595 + square foot commercial center with a variety of uses. The known uses would include a supermarket, drugstore, home impr6vement center, several large retailers, restaurants drive thru and sit down) financial institutions, two service stations with a car wash, a major discounter, retail shops, and as alternatives, a bowling alley, family entertainment center and/or movie complex. The project is described as a three phase endeavor with the west side of the site, up to the home improvement center being Phase 1. Phase II would be the center portion of the site, while Phase III would begin at the east end of the Major B" and include Major A", which would be the largest individual user in the project. 2. Plot Plan 90-434: The Plot Plan request submitted includes Phase 1 and 3 described above. The plans for these phases show a detailed site plan layout for the entire two phases. However, the satellite buildings are only indicated as pad locations. Architectural elevations and details have been provided only for the main buildings along the northern boundary. Therefore, further action through approvals of plot plan or BJ/MEMOSS.023 1 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 conditional use permit applications as required by the C-P-S Zone requirements will be necessary prior to the construction of the satellite pads. The initial construction of these two phases would consist of $303,200 square feet of floor space. The Design Review Board has reviewed the architectural elevations for the main building and conditionally recommended their approval. Their major concern was the easterly major retailer's lack of architectural compatibility with the balance of the project. During the Planning Commission hearings, the Applicant presented revised architectural elevations for that major tenant, which provided some architectural compatibility. The Planning Commission accepted the revised elevations and requested that further changes to increase compatibility be pursued. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REVISION: The Engineering Department has requested an amendment to Condition #55.D. regarding required street improvements on Adams Street. The Condition as approved by the Planning Commission is as follows: Adams Street: From Highway 111 to the Whitewater Channel: half-width street improvements and appurtenant conforms and amenities, plus turning lanes and appropriate transitions as needed at Highway ill intersection. The recommended Condition is as follows: Adams Street: From Highway lii to Westward Ho Drive: half-width General Plan street improvements including all appurtenant conforms and amenities, plus a 14-foot wide northbound travel lane, plus turning lanes and appropriate transitions as needed at the Highway 111 intersection to match the Primary Arterial street improvements on Adams Street south of Highway 111. Staff would recommend that the amended condition be required. The attached draft resolution has the revised Condition 55.D. Should the City Council not wish to impose it, Staff should be instructed to reinsert the original condition. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission reviewed the request on February 13, 1990, and continued the item to the meeting of February 27, 1990, in order to allow some questions regarding the Conditions of Approval to be resolved by Staff. At the February 27, 1990, continued Hearing the Planning Commission again considered the project. The Applicant did request several revisions to the Conditions of Approval. BJ/MEMOSS.023 2 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8On a matter by Commissioner Zelles, seconded by Commissioner Bund, Planning Commission Resolution 90-008 was unanimously adopted, with amendments to Conditions Z4, 26, 27.F., 55.C., and 67. On a motion by Commissioner Zelles, seconded by Commissioner Bund, Minute Motion 90-004 was adopted approving Plot Plan 90-434 subject to conditions. COUNCIL ACTION: Staff recommends the following: 1. Move to adopt City Council Resolution 90- approving Specific Plan 89-014, subject to the attached conditions, and confirming the environmental determination; and, 2. Move to adopt Minute Motion 90- accepting report of Planning Commission action for Plot Plan 90-434. Attachments: 1. Planning Commission Staff report dated February 27, 1990 2. Planning Commission minutes of February 13, & 27, 1990. 3. Conditions of Approval for PP 90-434. 4. Draft City Council Resolution 90- approving Specific Plan 89-014. BJ/MEMOSS.023 3 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 PH-i STAFF REPORT Ai*r. Z PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1990, CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 13, 1990 CASE NO: SPECIFIC PLAN 89-014 PLOT PLAN 90-434 EA 89-150) APPLICANT: TRANSPACIFIC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ARCHITECT: MCCLELLAN/CRUZ/GAYLORD & ASSOCIATES MCG) ENGINEER: SANBORN/WEBB, INC. REQUEST: APPROVAL OF A COMMERCIAL SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER WITH APPROXIMATELY 617,595+ SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA ON 60+ ACRES AND APPROVAL OF A PLOT PLAN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE I AND III OF THE PROJECT FIVE MAJOR STORES AND RETAIL SHOPS) IN THE C-P-S ZONE. LOCATION: AREA BOUNDED BY WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL ON ThE NORTH, HIGHWAY 111 ON THE SOUTH, ADAMS STREET ON THE EAST, AND WASHINGTON STREET ON THE WEST. BACKGROUND: This item was previously considered at the meeting of February 13, 1990. While there was little audience comment, the Applicant had questions regarding a number of the conditions. After discussing a portion of the conditions, it was determined that it would be best to continue the hearing and resolve as many items as possible. Staff has met with the Applicants and as a result, resolved a number of issues. The attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval have been modified as necessary. Attached is the previous Staff Report and description of the proposed project. FINDINGS: The findings necessary to approve this request can be made and are contained in the draft resolution. BJ/STAFFRPT.044 1 C7\ BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8! NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8" NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8# NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8$ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8% NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8& NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8' NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8( NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8) NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8* NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8+ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8, NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8- NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8. NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8/ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q80 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q81 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q82 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q83 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q84 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q85 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q86 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q87 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q88 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q89 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8: NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8; NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8< NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8= NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8> NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8? NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8@ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8A NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8B NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8C NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8D NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8F NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8G NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8H NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8I NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8J NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8K NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8L NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8M NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8N NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8O NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8P NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8Q NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8R NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8S NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8T NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8U NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8V NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8W NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8X NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8Y NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8Z NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8[ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8\ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8] NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8^ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8a NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8b NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8c NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8d NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8e NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8f NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8g NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8h NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8i NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8j NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8k NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8l NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8m NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8n NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8o NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8p NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8q NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8r NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8s NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8t NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8u NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8v NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8w NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8x NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8y NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8z NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 3, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC ZEARING: Authorization to Enter into Agreement BUSINESS SESSION: with BSI Consultants for Engineering Services for City-wide Lighting and CONSENT CALENDAR: Landscape District STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: See attached inemorandum FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: Estimate $20,000 RECOMMENDATION: 1. Authorize City Manager to enter into Agreement 2. Authorize transfer of $20,000 from Acct. No. 16-4700-111-072 to Acct. No. 16-4700-111-052 Approved for submission to 7, Council: RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER FORM#002 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 f-7Q..AAZZZ Z.. MEMORANDUM TO: Ronald L. Kiedrowski, City Manager FROM: Frank Reynolds, Director of Public WorksZZZ City Engineer DATE: March 27, 1990 SUBJECT: City-wide Lighting and Landscape District- Assessment Engineering In order to continue with the subject District, it is necessary under the law to have an Engineer's Report prepared for fiscal year 1990-1991 and have the related exhibits and assessment rolls updated. The initial assessment work a year ago was performed by BSI Consultants at a cost of $21,343.00. Their proposal for the work this year has a cost of $18,500 plus $5.00 per parcel if the total number of parcels ZxcZeds 9,250 parcels. We consider this proposal to be acceptable and recommend that the City Council authorize entering into an agreement with BSI. Further it is requested that the Council authorize an intrafund transfer of $20,000 from the account for the installation of Fred Waring median landscaping to the account for consultant services. The tentative schedule for the work is as follows: ACTION DATE Completion of draft Engineer's report May 1, 1990 Council Approval of Report May 15, 1990 Public Hearing and Resolution June 12, 1990 Submitted to County August 10, 1990 57 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 Business Session No. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 167 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY REPLACING CHAPTER 9.160 WITH NEW REGULATIONS. CASE NO: ZOA 490-012 The City Council of the City of La Quinta, California does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. City of La Quinta Municipal Code Title 9 Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 adopted by reference by this City Council in Ordinance No. 5, operative August 29, 1982) is hereby amended by eliminating Chapter 9.160 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. SECTION 2. There is hereby added to the La Quinta Municipal Code Chapter 9.160 to read as setforth in Exhibit 1A", attached hereto and made part of. SECTION 2. WHEREAS, said Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance has complied with the requirements of The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" County of Riverside, Resolution No. 82-212, adopted Z reference in the City of La Quinta Ordinance No. 5), in that the Planning Director conducted an initial study, and has determined that the Amendment to the zoning Ordinance will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment; and, SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty 30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4. POSTING. The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council; shall certify to the adoption and posting of this ordinance; and, shall cause this ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. The foregoing Ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the City Council held on this 20th day of March, 1990, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BJIORDDRFT.038 1 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 JOHN PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California BJ/ORDDRFT.038 2 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 EXHIBIT A" CHAPTER 9.160 OFF-STREET PARKING SECTIONS: 9.160.005 PURPOSE 9.160.010 OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIRED 9.160.015 DETERMINING AND AMENDING NUMBER OF SPACES REQUIRED 9.160.020 APPROVAL OF PARKING PLAN 9.160.025 GUARANTEES OF CONTINUED AVAILABILITY OF REQUIRED OFF-STREET PARKING FACILITIES 9.160.030 ENTITIES WHO MAY PROVIDE PARKING FACILITIES 9.160.035 JOINT USE AND TIME-SHARE USE OF PARKING 9.160.040 LOCATION OF PARKING FACILITIES 9.160.045 NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES 9.160.050 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 9.160.005 PURPOSE. Vehicular parking is a secondary land use required by all other land uses. The provision of parking is not an end in itself. Rather, parking must be provided to make possible the transition from vehicular to pedestrian modes of movement. Off-street parking is a requirement because it ensures the health, safety, and welfare of the public by preventing the blockage of on-street rights-of-way and off-street fire lanes and pedestrian routes. Requirements for off-street parking are set at a level deemed to be the minimum necessary to accommodate reasonably expected recurrent peaks. To require more parking would increase costs for land, increase paving, compound drainage, reduce open space and landscaping areas, etc. To require less would invite threats to the safety and mobility of the public and/or discourage patronage of the land uses. 9.160.010 OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIRED. Off-Street parking is required for all uses of property, in accordance with this Chapter, with regard to numbers of spaces, locations, design, parking plans, guarantees, who may provide spaces, and development standards. BJ/ORDDRFT.004 1 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 Busiriess Session No. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 168 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE. CASE NO: ZOA #90-013 The City Council of the City of La Quinta, California does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. City of La Quinta Municipal Code Title 9 Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 adopted by reference by this City Council in Ordinance No. 5, operative August 29, 1982) is hereby amended by eliminating the following Chapters: 9.24 R-R Zone Rural-Residential) 9.28 R-R-O Zone Rural-Residential, Outdoor Advertising) 9.36 R-1-A Zone One Family Dwelling-Mountain Resort) 9.40 R-A Zone Residential Agricultural) 9.56 R-3-A Zone General Residential Mountain Resort) 9.64 R-T-R Zone Mobilehome Subdivision-Rural) 9.92 I-P Zone Industrial Park) 9.96 M-I Zone Light Manufacturiny) 9.100 M-4 Zone Medium Industrial) 9.104 M-2 Zone Heavy Industrial) 9.108 M-R Zone Mineral Resources) 9.112 M-R-A Zone Mineral Resources & Related Manufacturing) 9.120 A-P Zone Light Agricultural with Poultry) 9.124 A-2 Zone Heavy Agricultural) 9.128 w-2 Zone Controlled Development Areas) 9.132 R-D Zone Regulated Development Areas) 9.136 N-A Zone Natural Assets) 9.140 W-2-M Zone Controlled Development Area with Mobilehomes) SECTION 2. WHEREAS, said Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance has complied with the requirements of The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" County of Riverside, Resolution No. 82-212, adopted by reference in the City of La Quinta Ordinance No. 5), in that the Planning Director conducted an initial study, and has determined that the Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance eliminating unused zones will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment; and, SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty 30) days after its adoption. BJ/ORDDRFT.037 1 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 SECTION 4. POSTING. The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council; shall certify to the adoption and posting of this ordinance; and, shall cause this ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. The foregoing Ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the City Council held on this 20th day of March, 1990, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California BJ/ORDDRFT.037 2 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 3, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Tract No. 25429 BUSINESS SESSION: Painted Cove,J.P. Ministrelli) CONSENT CALENDAR: Z STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: Tract Map submitted for final approval and acceptance of easements and right of way. Subdivision Improvement Agreement submitted for approval and authorization for City Manager to execute. Map, Agreement and Improvement Plans are in substantial compliance with the tentative map and the Conditions of Approval. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: None RECOMMENDATION: Approve Final Tract Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement Submitted by: Approve or submission to Z Z ROZ KIEDROWSKI, CITY'MANAGER FORM#002 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 3, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Tract No. 24890-1 BUSINESS SESSION: Citrus Course J.M. Peters Co.) ii CONSENT CALENDAR: V STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: Tract Map submitted for final approval and acceptance of easements and right of way. Subdivision Improvement Agreement submitted for approval and authorization for City Manager to execute. Map, Agreement and Improvement Plans are in substantial compliance with the tentative map and the Conditions of Approval. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS; APPROVED BY: None RECOMMENDATION: Approve Final Tract Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement Submitted bZ: Approved for submission to City Council: ZON KIEDROWSKI, CITYZANAGER FORMZ002 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 3, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Tract No. 24890-2 BUSINESS SESSION: Citrus Course J.M.Peters Co.) CONSENT CALENDAR: Z STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: Tract Map submitted for final approval and acceptance of easements and right of way. Subdivision Improvement Agreement submitted for approval and authorization for City Manager to execute. Map, Agreement and Improvement Plans are in substantial compliance with the tentative map and the Conditions of Approval. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: None RECOMMENDATION: Approve Final Tract Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement Submitted by: Approved for subrnission to SignZ Z RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER FORM#002 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 3, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Tract No. 24890-3 BUSINESS SESSION: Citrus Course J.M. Peters Co.) I CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: Tract Map submitted for final approval and acceptance of easements and right of way. Subdivision Improvement Agreement submitted for approval and authorization for City Manager to execute. Map, Agreement and Improvement Plans are in substantial compliance with the tentative map and the Conditions of Approval. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: None RECOMMENDATION: Approve Final Tract Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement Submit teZZby: Approved for submission to Cit signaturZZZ RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANZZGER F0RM4002 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 3, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Tract No. 24890-4 BUSINESS SESSION: Citrus Course J.M.Peters Co.) CONSENT CALENDAR: 7 STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: Tract Map submitted for final approval and acceptance of easements and right of way. Subdivision Improvement Agreement submitted for approval and authorization for City Manager to execute. Map, Agreement and Improvement Plans are in substantial compliance with the tentative map and the Conditions of Approval. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: None RECOMMENDATION: Approve Final Tract Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement Submitted b Approved for submission to CityZouZc ii: ZON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MZAGER FORMZ002 /;2J BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 3, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of Appropriation for BUSINESS SESSION: Contract for Engineering Services CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: City Staff is requesting additional appropriation to provide for contract services to handle increased volume of Engineering Services. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Appropriation of $75,000.00 for the Contingency Fund. APPROVED BY: Z RECOMMENDATION: Appropriate $75,000 to account #001-4311-111-000 of the Engineering Division from account #001-4400-100-000 of the Contingency Fund. Submitted b Approved for submission to City CounZil: RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY ZANAGER 1;'oPMZ001 ALL I;;! BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 C MEMORANDUM OF DATE: March 27, 1990 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Frank R. Reynolds Jifi Director of Public Works/City EngineeZ SUBJECT: Appropriation of Funds for Contract Services to Perform Engineering Services BACKGROUND: The City has experienced a significant increase in the volume of Engineering activity. This increase in Engineering activity has resulted in a significant increase in revenues for the first quarter, as indicated on the Statement of Financial Position for December 30, 1989. As of the aforementioned date, Engineering activity has already received approximately 361 per cent of the revenues projected for the year. Due to the increased volume of Engineering activity it is believed that the current staffing level is inadequate to handle the current Engineering Activity level. As the City Council is aware, the Engineering service process is a fee for service program and, therefore, increases in needs for service will result in increases in revenue. Because of this fact, it is not uncomon for Cities who realize a significant increase in activity to contract for services to handle temporary increases in Engineering activity. The City staff is, therefore, proposing the use of the contract services to handle the increased volume of Engineering activity. To provide for the contract services, it will be necessary for the City Council to appropriate an amount not to exceed $75,000 from the Contingency Fund to the Service and Supplies line item of the Engineering Division. This appropriation would provide for, and is anticipated to be, that amount of time necessary to handle the increased volume of Engineering Activity. FUTURE EVALUATION: Since the need for the proposed contract services are a function of both Engineering activity and Division revenue, the trends in activity and revenue will be monitored $ BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8MEMORANDUM March 27, 1990 Page Two closely by both the Public Works Director and Finance Department. The monitoring of these trends will allow the City to react to the activity levels and reduce the level of contract services if necessary, should Engineering activity decline drastically. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Appropriate $75,000 to account #001-4311-11l-000 of the Engineering Division from account #001-4400-100-000 of the Contingency Fund. contrser. tpg BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 COACHELLA VALLEY JOINT POWERS INSUZANCE AZ]THORiTY 74-133 El Paseo, Suite f2 Palm Desert, California 92260 619) 341-0492 619) 341-3923 CLAIMANT: DATECEINCIDENT: Z /3 Z DATE CLAM MADZ CURFILENO z-Z Z Gentlemen: We have reviewed the above claim which you have reported and request that you take the action indicated below: CLAIM REJECTION: Reject claim in accordance with Government Code. section 913. Z LATE CLAIM: Do NOT reject claim but RETURN it for failure to file within time limit prescribed in Government Code. section 911.2. Transmittal NOT to contain WARNING" required by section 913 but 5hCZ.!Id advise that the recourse is to file Application for Leave to File Late Claim'. as provided in Government Code. section 911.4. This must be returned within 45 days of the date claim mailed or delivered. m INSUFFICIENT CLAIM: Send ncZce of insufficiency for failure to comply with Government Code, section 910 and/or 910.2 and/or 910.4 and cite the following specific insufficiencies: This must be sent within 20 days of your receipt of claim. m AMMENDED CLAIM: Reject cairn as set forth in first paragraph above, CLAIM REJECTION. ITI APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FiLE LATE CLAIM: Reject the Application under Government Code, section 911Z. El OPERATION OF LAW: Defer any wrirten response pending our further advice. Please provide us with a copy of any response reZuesteo above. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Very truly yours. c<7LA;:ZZRM(Y2 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 A E ARM State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company 1733 E A February 2, 1990 fo jZ1 City of La Quinta 78-105 Calle Estrado La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Claim No.: 55-x914-531 Our Insured: David Moore Date of Loss: October 13, 1989 Location of Intersection: Herrera and Madrid Gentlemen: In reference to the above claim, we do have a pending subrogation claim in the amount of $2,239.48. Please be adviZsed that our insured was traveling through the intersection of Herrera and Madrid when they ran over an open manhole. Please be good enough to advise if you need anything else to conclude this matter. Very truly yours, STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY Mabel Ayotte Claim Specialist Consolidated Claims 714) 757-2208 MA: tWW2 Z Z HOME OFFIcE: BLOOMINGTON. ILLINOIS 61710-0001 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 Study Session Itern No. 3 P- I-- I March 1, 1990 Z OFLAiZA Mayor John Pena Members of City Council MAZ-i 1990 City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 WV IIANA6ER La Quinta, CA. 92253 Honorable Body: It is with great pleasure that I address you as President of the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy. As you are aware, we have been in the organizing stage for the past year. Our primary purpose is Preservation of Natural Scenic Views, Protection of Native Plants and Animals, Promotion of Environmental Education and Acquisition of Lands for Conservation. There are over 63,000 acres of critical concern that are privately owned. Lands held in our Conservancy would offer protection for over 600 species of plants, Big Horn Sheep, toads, eagles and many more animals in the endagered stages. A Bill sponsored by Senator Robert Presley created this Conservancy, in an effort to preserve scenic mountains by paying fair market value for lands deemed to be important for their natural and scenic values to the people of the Coachella Valley. We invite you to join the cities of Rancho Mirage and Palm Desert in becoming Charter Members of our organization with a minimum $5,000 one-time only donation. Naturally, a larger donation would be appreciated. We invite you to send a representative to our next Board Meeting on April 4, at 9 a.m. in the Rancho Mirage Council Chambers. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. Sincerely, Ray Baca President BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 Reports & Informational Item: a MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF LA QUINTA A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-105 Calle Estado, La Quinta, California March 13, 1990 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER A. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chairman Walling. The Flag Salute was led by Commissioner Bund. II. ROLL CALL A. Chairman Walling requested the roll call. Present: Commissioners Zelles, Moran, Bund, Steding and Chairman Walling. B. Staff Present: Planning and Development Director Jerry Herman, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, Department Secretary Betty Anthony. III. HEARINGS Chairman Walling turned the meeting over to Vice Chairman Moran due to a possible conflict of interest. Vice Chairman Moran introduced the Public Hearing as follows: A. Tentative Tract 25237; a request of La Quinta Joint Venture to re-subdivde +26.81 acres within recorded Tracts 14496-6 and 14496-7, from 13 condominium lots and 127 units to 54 single family lots for detached custom homes. 1. Planning Director Jerry Herman presented the information contained in the Staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning and Development Department. 2. There being no questions of Staff, Vice Chairman Moran opened the public hearing. BJ/MIN3/13.DFT 1 1;; BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8Planning Commission Minutes March 13, 1990 3. Tom Hill, representing the Applicant, La Quinta Joint Venture, spoke briefly regarding the project and asked the Commission to make modifications regarding Conditions of Approvals *5, 13, 28, and 29. 4. Mr. James Lloyd, Mr. Harry Guise, Mr. Ronald Patton all addressed the Commission on the matter of traffic safety due to number of cars traveling on Obregon through the Mazatlan gate. They stressed the need to have the obregon gate installed now. 5. Vice Chairman Moran closed the public hearing and the Commission questioned the Applicant regarding the excessive traffic, the Obregon gate, and the timing of all the gates. It was stated by the Applicant that the funding for the project and the street gate) improvements were all tied together and they were unable to proceed until there funding was received. 6. Discussion followed regarding the Conditions of Approval. It was recommended that: a. The reference to the Santa Rosa Cove Homeowner's Association contained in Condition *5 be deleted. b. Condition *12.c. be amended as requested by the Engineering Department. c. Condition *13 be amended to reflect prior to Final Map" and address the landscaping. d. Condition *28 be amended to allow two stories and 24-feet in height. e. Condition *29.a. be amended to read 6-months after pulling grading permit". f. Condition *29.b. be amended to read 7-months after pulling grading permit". g. Condition *29.c. be amended to read 3-months after pulling grading permit" and language to the effect that no legal action regarding the gates would prevent the continued construction of the project." 7. Following the discussion, Commissioner Zelles moved to adopt Resolution 90-010 recommending approval of Tentative Tract 25237 subject to the amended conditions. Commission steding seconded the motion and on a roll call vote passed unanimously with Chairman Walling abstaining. BJIMIN3/13.DFT 2 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8Planning Commission Minutes March 13, 1990 Vice Chairman Moran returned the meeting to Chairman Walling who introduced the next public hearing. B. Public Hearing for street name changes for 50th Avenue, 52nd Avenue, and 54th Avenue. A referral of the City Council for consideration Qf possible name changes for the above streets. 1. Planning Director Jerry Herman presented the information contained in the Staff report a copy of which is on file in the Planning and Development Department. 2. Chairman Walling opened the public hearing. The following addressed the Commission in opposition of the street name change: Sharon Kennedy, Richard Moreno, Fred Wolfe, Gary Stone, and Steve Rein. 3. The following addressed the Commission in favor of the street name change: Stormie Fairweather, Mark Simon, Howard Nelson, Fred Rice, Jim Montgomery 4. Chairman Walling closed the public hearing and opened the matter for discussion. Commissioner Moran pointed out that 84 signatures had been received in favor of the name change and only 6 against. She stated that she felt the community was in favor of the name change, and that the suggestions made tonight for streets to be named for historical persons should be considered by the Community Services Commission. 5. Commissioner Zelles stated that he had been in favor of the name change but after listening to those speaking tonight he felt that the name change should not be changed. Other areas should be considered for honoring these men. 6. Commissioner Steding also stated that she was not in favor of changing the names. She felt that there were two movements. One to thank prominent people for contributing their talents for local causes. She felt that everyone in the community owed their time and energy and should not need to have streets named after them. Second, to use public BJ/MIN3/13.DFT 3 BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 Reports & Informational Item: b MEMORANDUM TO: Ron Kiedrowski, City Manager FROM: Frank Reynolds, Director of Public WorksZ City Engineer DATE: March 27, 1990 SUBJECT: Technical Traffic Committee A Regular meeting of the Technical Traffic Committee was held at 11:00 A.M. on Wednesday, March 14, 1990. Attendance included: Members: Lieutenant Ron Dye Riverside County Sheriff's Department, Indio Warren Stallard, Branch Office Manager Riverside County Road Department, Bermuda Dunes Charles Clay, Director of Transportation Desert Sands Unified School District, Indio Roger Hirdler, Comunity Safety Director City of La Quinta Frank Reynolds, Director of Public Works City of La Quinta Staff: Steve Speer, Senior Civil Engineer City of La Quinta Mr. Reynolds brought the meeting to order at 11:00 A.M. Old Business Item #1 Report on Safe Route to School Mr. Reynolds gave a brief review of the City's progress related to implementing the Safe Route to School", which essentially is an 8-foot wide combination bike path/sidewalk in the parkway on the north side of Calle Tampico between Washington Street and Park Avenue and on the west side of Park Avenue between Calle Tampico and Avenue 50. Mr. Reynolds stated that construction of the street and parkway improvements on Calle Tampico and Park Avenue in the subject segments is currently underway and will be BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8Technical Traffic Committee March 14, 1990 Page 2 completed later this spring by the Landmark Land Company. The proposed traffic signal at the intersection of Avenue 50 and Park Avenue will not be installed until late 1990; it is currently being designed by a consultant to the City. Mr. Reynolds suggested that it may be necessary as an interim measure for the school district to man the new intersection with crossing guards during the months following completion of the Park Avenue improvements until the new traffic signal is installed later in the year. New Business Item #1 Consider Request for a 3-Way Stop at Washington Street and Avenue 52. Mr. Reynolds gave a brief history of the request for the 3-way stop and explained the short life of the existing intersection as it relates to the forthcoming realignment of Avenue 52. Mr. Reynolds then yielded the floor to Mr. Speer who provided an oral technical presentation supplemented with data documentation. Along with the data documentation, Mr. Speer presented an analysis of the traffic count data prepared by Newport Traffic Studies. It was stated that Caltrans has established three policy criteria that may warrant installation of a multi-way stop when any of the criteria are meet; Mr. Speer noted that the traffic counts at the intersection meet the traffic volume criteria. Mr. Speer stated that accident data for the intersection, and average vehicle delay, was unavailable for the meeting but could be researched before a final decision was made. Lt. Dye stated that he would research the accident and vehicle delay data and report back within a few weeks. Discussion ensued following the presentation. Although traffic volume at the intersection surpasses the threshold that allows discretionary installation of a multi-way stop, Lt. Dye, Mr. Stallard, and Mr. Clay were decidedly against it citing these reasons: 1. Installation of stop signs can, and often do, cause more accidents than they prevent. The typical problem at a 3-way stop is the through-street traffic Ave 52) fails to stop while traffic on the terminal leg of the intersection Washington St) has a false sense of security caused by the 3-way stop and enter the through-street assuming the oncoming traffic will stop. The result on a high speed through-street such as Avenue 52 is severe right angle collisions. BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8Technical Traffic Committee March 14, 1990 Page 3 2. The perceived primary benefits of the 3-way stop would be: reduced delay for traffic leaving Washington Street and entering Avenue 52, as well as potentially increased safety for the same motorists. However, these benefits would accrue to a relative minority during peak traffic hours at the expense of all traffic utilizing Avenue 52 every hour. On the basis of the forgoing reasons, the consensus of the committee members is the 3-way stop should not be installed unless Lt. Dye's forthcoming research into traffic accidents at the intersection and traffic delay on Washington Street reveals additional evidence that a 3-way stop is warranted. Post-Meeting Research Input 1. Accidents In the 21 months prior to 9/30/89, which is the latest available data, 4 accidents occurred which are potentially attributeable to the lack of a 3-way stop; the accident rate for this time period is 2.3 accidents per year. None of the accidents involved a fatality or a severe injury. 2. Vehicle Delay The SheriffZs Department observed the intersection during a morning and a evening peak hour. The average delay for southbound traffic at the existing stop sign was 11.8 and 7.8 seconds respectively. Please refer to the attached letter from the Sheriff's Department. Recomendation It is recommended that no 3-way stop be installed at this time. The policy criteria related to accidents and vehicle delay compare as follows: 1) five 5) accidents per year is the threshold that may warrant installation of a 3-way stop, and 2) a thirty 30) second average delay per vehicle is the other threshold that may warrant installation of a 3-way stop. Because the accident level and average delay times are significantly below the threshold that may warrant installation of a 3-way stop coupled with the other reasons mentioned earlier, it is recomended that no 3-way stop be installed at this time. In conclusion it can be noted that more than one member of the Committee and perhaps a high percentage of the general population as well perceive the intersection as being BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02 d_q8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 12-22-1998-U01 11:19:38AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 04-U02 03-U02 1990-U02