Loading...
1991 01 15 CCd_ CI Z CZtjZC IL. CHZZZB:ZS 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, California 92253 Regular Meeting January 15, 1991 3:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER a. Pledge of Allegiance Beginning Res. No.91-i b. Roil Call Ord. No. 186 CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA ANNOUNCEMENTS WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS a. Letter from Jane Myers regarding a horseback-biker-hiker trail system. BUSINESS SESSION 1 Tentative Parcel Map 26525 Chuck Strother Report of Planning Commission Action Approval to Subdivide 14 Acres into 3 Single Family Lots Located on South Side of 50th Avenue Between Park Avenue & Jefferson Street Immediately Southeast of Tentative Tract 265214. a) Minute Order Action 2. Consideration of Comprehensive Housing Programs for La Quinta Redevelopment Project Areas No. 1 and No. 2. a) Resolution Action 3. Consideration of Request of Living Desert Reserve for Sponsorship. a) Minute Order Action 4. Consideration of Approval of Agreement with YMCA of the Desert for Lease of the Child Care Center. a) Minute Order Action 1 BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_5. a. Discussion of Concept of Mini-Parks Parks in the Cove. Particularly Along the East Side of Avenida Bermudas and Tecate. b. Report of Cove Mini-Park on Eisenhower and Calle Colima. Presentation by Public Works and Sheriff's Dept.) a) Minute Order Action 6. Consideration of Modification to Design Contract for Civic Center with Gruen and Associates. a) Minute Order Action 7. Appointment of Representative to the Governing Board of the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy. a) Minute Order Action 8. Consideration of Policy Guidelines for Use of Public Financing for the Provision of Public Facilities Mello Roos) in Proposed Development Projects. a) Resolution Action 9. Consideration of Owner Participation Agreement with La Quinta Real Estate Partnership. a) Resolution Action 10. Adoption of Resolution Approving Local Review and Approval Process of Solid Waste Transfer and Recycling Facilities Located in Riverside County. a) Resolution Action 11. Consideration of Participation of $30,000 for CVAG Consultant to Work with Local Communities on Source Reduction and Recycling Elements AB939). a) Minute Order Action 12. Consideration of Approval of Amendment to Sunline Joint Powers Agreement Regarding Taxicab Regulations. a) Minute Order Action 13. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 184 re: Hazardous Waste Facilities Ordinance No. 185 re: Construction Debris Pick-Up BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Approval of Minutes of December 18. 1990 and January 7, 1991. 2. Approval of Demand Register. 3 Acceptance of Subdivision Improvements and Release of Street, Water and Sewer Bonds Williams Development Co. Cactus Flower Tract 22982. 4. Approval of Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 25237 Santa Rosa Cove Tom Hill. 5. Reduction of Performance Security Letter of Credit) Tract 25429 Painted Cove Ministrelli. 6. Approval of Actions Relating to 1991 Bob Hope Chrysler Classic: a. Adoption of Resolution Zstablishing Temporary Traffic Controls at La Quinta Country Club and PGA West for a Specific Event. b. Approval of Waiver of Fees. c. Adoption of Resolution Accepting Guest Badges. 7. Adoption of Resolution of Intent to Vacate a Portion of Avenida Mendoza Between Calle Madero and Avenida Bermudas and Fixing Time and Place of Public Hearing. 8. Approval of Revisions to Program Statement for Assessment/Hook-Up Fee Subsidy Program Per 58 1352 Expansion of Program to Include Project Area. 2. 9. Appropriation Transfers Into Account No. 01-4311-111-000. Contract Services Professional $50,000) and Acct. No. 01-4311-111-001. Contract Services Other $100,000) From the General Fund Reserve. STUDY SESSION ITEMS 1. Discussion of Regulating Smoking in Public Places. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS a. City Manager b. City Attorney c. Assistant City Manager d. Administrative Services Director e. Building and Safety Director f. Planning Director g. Public Works Director REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. Planning Commission Minutes of December 11. 1990 b. CVAG Committee Reports BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECESS AND RECONVENE AT 1:00 P.M. 7:00 P.M. PRESENTATIONS 1991 BEST HOLIDAY DECORATED HOMES: Edwin and Barbara Mclntryre, 53-555 Avenida Alvarado James and Sandra Hardin, 79-755 Fiesta Drive Peter and Cindy Melchor, 53-655 Avenida Alvarado David C. Buck, 53-960 Eisenhower Margaret Muir, 54-055 Avenida Vel asco PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Tentative Tract 25237 Ohio Citizens Investment Corp. for Modification to Condition #29 Regarding Construction of the Avenida Obregon & Avenida Fernando Gates North Side of Avenida Fernando 1/4+ Mile West of Eisenhower Drive. a) Resolution Action 2. Public Use Permit 90-007 La Quinta Civic Center Project Consisting of City Hall, Arts Foundation Building. Senior Center, Library, Retention Basin, and Associated Parking and Landscaping Located at the Southwest Corner of Calle Tampico and Washington Street and Confirmation of Environmental Assessment. a) Minute Order Action 3. Development Agreement 90-002 for Specific Plan 89-014 One Eleven La Quinta Center Located in Area Bounded by Whitewater Storm Channel on the North, Highway III on the South, Adams St. on the East, and Washington Street on the West Applicant: Washington Adams Limited Partnership. Note: To be continued COUNCIL COMMENT PUBLIC COMMENT 4! BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ CLOSED SESSION a. Discussion of On-going Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) Kirkwood lndio Case No. 55695 City of Indio Indio Case No. 62944 b. Discussion of Potential Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b) Fredericks re: Obregon Gate C. Discussion of Negotiations with Transpacific Development Co. Regarding Specific Plan 89-14 Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8. d. Discussion of Personnel Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 ADJOURNMENT to January 29. 1991 at 3.00 P.M. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS January 21.1991 CITY OFFICES CLOSED MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY January 21. 1991 PC Study Session CANCELED January 22, 1991 PC Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. January 28. 1991 CSC Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. February 5. 1991 CC Regular Meeting 3:00 P.M. February 6-10 BOB HOPE CHRYSLER CLASSIC February 11, 1991 PC Study Session 4:00 P.M. February 12. 1991 PC Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. February 19. 1991 CC Regular Meeting 3:00 P.M. February 25. 1991 PC Study Session 4:00 P.M. February 26, 1991 PC Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. CC CITY COUNCIL PC PLANNING COMMISSION CSC COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Saundra L. Juhola, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the City Council meeting of January 15. 1991 was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber. 78-105 CalIe Estado and on the bulletin board at the La Quinta Post Office on Friday. January 11. 1991. Z City of La Quinta. California BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ Z/jtZ 1JZZ6Z WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS ITEM: Z DecZr 14, 1990 Zlayor John Pe"na Z]embers of the City Council City of La Quinta Z P. 0. Zox 1504 La Quinta, CA 9225Z Dear LZyor Pena and Council Members: Coachella Valley is rapidly gaining recognition as a recreational center of tne United States. Before possibilities for Zail Systems disappear is the tZie for their establishment. ZZuld you please consider a horseback-biker- hiker trail system with La Quinta as the possible center; thus connecting the whole valley for local enZoy:ent as well as tourist attraction. The LZtional Geographic, June 1990 pp. 77-99, has a system for bikers and hikers. This article could be an inspiration for a valley plan including horses. Thnnk you for considering this. I am one of the many Senior Citizens who would use this system if it were developed. Sincerely yours, Z Jane B. LZers 822 204 San Jacinto Indio, CA 92201 7 9 BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_0vZ-i% z COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 26525 REPORT OF BUSINESS SESSION: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. SUBDIVISION OF 4 ACRES INTO 3 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS CONSENT CALENDAR: SOUTH OF 50TH AVENUE BETWEEN PARK AVENUE AND JEFFERSON STREET. STUDY SESSION: APPLICANT: CHUCK STROTHER BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission reconsidered this Parcel Map on January 8, 1991, at the request of the City Council at their meeting of December 18, 1990. The City Council requested that the Planning Commission review the Conditions of Approval that restrict pad heights to 3 feet difference with adjacent property. FISCAL IMPLICATION: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: By Minute Motion approve report of Planning Commission action as presented or modifying Condition #18 as recommended by the Planning Commission Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER 7 BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_Z`:Z Z 0 z MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: JANUARY 15, 1991 SUBJECT: REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 26525 RECONSIDERED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission reconsidered this Parcel Map at their meeting of January 8, 1991, as requested by the City Council. The Planning Commission reconsidered the pad height limitations of 3 feet difference with the adjacent properties Condition #18). As you may recall, during the original City Council review on December 18, 1990, the Applicant requested approval of the pad heights shown on the Parcel Map. The heights requested would remove a maximum of 10 feet of earth to achieve the proposed pads and be approximately 23 feet above the adjacent tract to the south. The adjacent developer to the south, J. M. Peters, voiced a concern with the proposed pad heights, but did indicate that a maximum 10 feet height difference would be acceptable. The Planning Commission reviewed the new line of site section viewed by the City Council on December 18, 1990. After a presentation by the Applicant and short discussion, the Planning Commission adopted Minute Motion 91-002 deleting Condition #18 as written, and recommending in it's place that the pad elevations shown on the Parcel Map be approved. The attached Resolution shows Condition #18 as originally approved by the Planning Commission on November 27, 1990. The revised condition as recommended by the Planning Commission would state as follows: The Parcel Map shall be graded as shown on the approved Parcel Map exhibit, subject to the final approval of the City Engineer RECOMMENDATION: By Minute Motion approve the report of Planning Commission action as presented or modifying Condition #18 as recommended by the Planning Commission. MEMOSS.O11 1 2/ BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_! NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_" NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_# NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_$ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_%COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: ITEM TITLE: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSIDERATION OF COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING PROGRAMS FOR LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CONSENT CALENDAR: AREAS NO. 1 AND 2. STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: The attached report outlines four new programs designed to improve existing housing units while maintaining affordability to low and moderate income residents and provides funds for the construction of new low and moderate income units. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Total annual funding will range between $625,000 and $1,255,000. The funding is available from low and moderate housing set-aside funds. APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached Resolution approving the Comprehensive Low and Moderate Income Housing Programs for La Quinta Redevelopment Project Areas No. 1 and 2. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: i)'?Z/j//(/Z(,i; $.,* Signature RONALD L. KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER 77 BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_&DATE: December 18, 1990 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chair and Members of the Redevelopment Agency FROM: Ronald E. Kiedrowski, City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING PROGRAMS FOR LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS NO.1 AND NO.2 BACKGROUND In the spring of this year, the Redevelopment Agency and the City Council authorized staff to move forward and develop a comprehensive program for the expenditure of the Agency's low and moderate income housing funds. The reason for preparing the comprehensive program involves: o Both the Council and Agency members have expressed their desire to take a proactive stance in the maintenance and improvement of the community's supply of affordable housing. o The California Redevelopment Law requires that the Redevelopment Agency set aside up to 20% of available tax increment revenue to improve and increase the supply of housing within the community. o The Redevelopment Agency currently has over $970,000 available in housing set-aside funds and it is projected that an additional $7,860,183 will accrue in Project Area #1 and $513,876 will accrue in Project Area #2 over the next five years total of $8,374,059). o The Community Redevelopment Law further provides that agencies must develop a comprehensive housing program that sets forth how they will expend these set-aside funds when the funds accumulated exceed $500,000. DISCUSSION The Redevelopment Agency is currently funding the Assessment/Hook-up Fee Subsidy Program in Project Area No.1. This program provides assistance to low and moderate income households through the funding of property assessments and hook-up fees for sewer system improvements. To date, 96 property owners have qualified for this program with many more continuing to apply. Based upon the Council/Agency's previous direction, staff proposes to complement this existing program with the BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_'Comprehensive Housing Programs December 18,1990 Page 2 implementation of the four new programs as outlined in Attachment 1. These programs are: o Establishment and funding of a New Construction and Substantial Rehabilitation of existing units) Program. o Establishment and funding of a Self-Help Housing Program. o Establishment and funding of an Owner-Occupied Home Improvement Program. o Establishment and funding of a Rental Unit Rehabilitation Program. These programs are designed to both improve existing housing units while maintaining affordability to low and moderate income residents and to provide funds for the construction of new units. It is anticipated that these programs will annually cost between $700,000 to $1,255,000, however actual program costs will vary depending on economic conditions, property values, construction costs, public interest, etc. Not included in this cost is the annual cost of administering these programs which is estimated to range from 5% to 10% of the total project cost. The variation primarily is a result of the complexity of the programs implemented. Broken down by program, the estimated costs are as follows: New Construction/Substantial Rehab Program $ 500,000 Self-Help Housing Program $ 175,000 225,000 Home Improvement Program 250,000 280,000 Rental Unit Rehab Program 200.000 250.000 Total Annual Funding $ 625,000 $1,255,000 Agency staff proposes to use a combination of County and non-profit housing organizations with the Agency's redevelopment consultant, RSG, to coordinate and administer these programs. It is anticipated that minimum staff time would be involved in this endeavor. This arrangement is currently in use through the provision of the City's Housing Rehab Program through the County Housing Authority, and for the Agency's Assessment/Hook-up Fee Subsidy Program through RSG. To date, both arrangements have worked exceptionally well in furthering affordable housing opportunities and implementing the Housing Element of the General Plan. RECOMMENDATION By motion, adopt the attached Resolutions of the City Council and Redevelopment Agency approving the Comprehensive Low and Moderate Income Housing Programs for La Quinta Redevelopment Projects No.1 and 2. 7C7 \I.qulnZ.\hoZT BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_( NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_) NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_* NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_+ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_, NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_- NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_. NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_/ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_1 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_2 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_3 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_4 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_5 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_6 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF PUBLIC HEARING:________ LIVING DESERT RESERVE FOR SPONSORSHIP. BUSINESS SESSION:Z CONSENT CALENDAR:_______ STUDY SESSION:_________ BACKGROUND On Noveinber 28, 1990, the Living Desert Reserve made a presentation to the Community Services Commission regarding sponsorships which are being sold to government agencies as well as businesses and corporations. Sponsors are then entitled to display their names and logos on the grounds. The Community Services Commission has recommended a $1,000 sponsorship. The City Council heard a presentation by the Living Desert Reserve in Study Session on December 18th and asked that the matter be agendized for consideration. FISCAL INPLICATIONS: $1,000 RECOMNDATI ON: Council 5 pleasure. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED FOR SUBMISSION TO CITY COUNCIL: Z KZZ';L'; Zignature RON KIEDROWSKI, City Manager BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_7 COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 28, 1990 Regular meeting of the Comunity Services Comission was called to order at the hour of 7:00 P.M. by Chairwoman Ladner, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. PRESENT: Commissioners Benedict, Franke, Kennedy, Liewellyn, Molina and Chairwoman Ladner ABSENT: One Vacancy) PUBLIC COMMENT None OLD BUSINESS- None 1. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE REPORT a. Presentation by Michael Daily, Living Desert Reserve Michael Daily, Director of Corporate and Comunity Development with Living Desert Reserve informed the Comissioners of a project the Living Desert has proposed to businesses and Agencies in the Coachella Valley. Corporations and Agencies logos are painted on tiles made at Living Desert and displayed on the grounds in exchange for an annual sponsorship. This annual sponsorship will make it possible for Living Desert to provide visits for school children through the School District free of charge. The Valley school children have first priority. The Living Desert is asking for a $1,000 annual sponsorship. Mr. Daily advised that the Living Desert Reserve has become the largest desert wilderness and wildlife park in the entire world with 1,200 acres of park. In response to Comissioner Franke, Mr. Daily informed that the City of Indian Wells annually gives $10,000. and the City of Palm Desert sponsors the Living Desert through the Bob Hope Desert Classic. F BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_8Community Service Commission 2 November 28, 1990 Minutes Mr. Daily invited the Commissioners to take a tour of the Living Desert grounds. MOTION: It was moved by Commissioners Molina/Liewellyn to recommend to the City Council the Annual Sponsorship of $1,000 to Living Desert Reserve. b. Update on the Soap Box Derby. Continued to January, 1991 meeting. 2. CULTURE & FINE ARTS COMMITTEE REPORT None 3. HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE a. Discussion of Cove Committee Chairwoman Ladner advised that the Cove Committee discussed by the Planning Commission is being dropped. b. Selection of Recipient(s) for LA QUINTA BEAUTIFUL" award for the month of November. MOST BEAUTIFUL 77-500 Potrero MOST IMPROVED 51-286 Velasco Chairwoman Ladner displayed a picture of a Silver Bell from Spiegel that could be given to the recipients of the Most Beautifully-Decorated Holiday Homes. MOTION: It was moved by Mrs. Kennedy, seconded by Ms. Liewellyn to purchase the Silver Bells from Spiegel. Motion carried unanimously. Chairwoman Ladner updated the Commission on the building that houses Coachella Valley Realty. BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_9 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_: NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_; NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_< NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_= NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_> NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_? NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_@ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_A NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_B NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_CCOUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: ITEM TITLE: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT CONSENT CALENDAR: WITH YMCA OF THE DESERT FOR LEASE OF THE CHILD CARE CENTER STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: A report will be given at the Council Meeting. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_DCOUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: ITEM TITLE: BUSINESS SESSION: DISCUSSION OF CONCEPT OF MINI-PARKS IN THE COVE, PARTICULARLY ALONG THE EAST CONSENT CALENDAR: SIDE OF AVENIDA BERMUDAS AND TECATE; REPORT OF COVE MINI-PARK ON EISENOWER/COLIMA STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: A verbal report WIll be given at the Council meeting. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Submitted by: Approved for submission tQ City Council: 7 BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_E Z/# 4Z'('a4ZtZ COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of Modification BUSINESS SESSION:Z to Design Contract for Civic Center with Gruen Associates CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: $242,388.00 APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Council pleasure Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council City Council: $ Z Signa RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER i's? CS/CC#5/15.F1 BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_F MEMORANDUM Ronald L. Kledroswki, City Manager FROM: Frank Reynolds, Director of Public Works City Engineer DATE: January 10, 1991 SUBJECT: Civic Center Architect's Request for a Fee Adjustment Gruen Associates has requested an increase in their fee of $ 242,388.00, making a total fee for architectural services of $1,011,275.00, and time extension of two 2) months to the Construction Document Phase. They arrived at the amount of the increase in the following manner: A. Fee increase for Construction Cost Budget Change $161,213.00 B. Fee increase for Design Development Additional Services 81,175.00 $242,388.00 Item A is fairly straightforwarZ since the original fee was predicated upon certain percentages of estimated construction cost. A number of modifications, not the least of which are an increase in square footage, expanded site development and employee parking lot developments, contributed to the increase in estimated cost. Item B is somewhat more difficult to expla&i and to justify in its entirety. Staff has had discussions with Gruen on this item and they will be prepared to discuss the matter at the Council meeting. 20 BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_G BUSINESS SESSION ZZOE Z0 Z *jZZ4Z'Z COUNIY Q)Z I\IVEi\3ILZL PARKS DEPARTMENT xKm( 4()OO CrQZtmGre R()a(1; P.O. BZ\ 35C7, RiverZ2IdZ, CA 9Z519 * ZZZ14) 2754310 RZuL p RoMEkO Di rQCt()r December 20, 1990 CITY MANAZU,SfNDEiZ Z John J. Pena9 Mayor City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena: In a few short weeks Senate Bill 2861, creating the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy, will be chaptered into law. On behalf of the county and at the request of Senator Presley, I have taken the liberty of researching the conservancy formation process and have tried to identify the issues that need to be addressed by the conservancy at the onset. Our first order of business is the appointment of a governing board in accordance with the legislation. To that extent, I respectfully request that your council appointment the mayor or a council member to represent your city on the governing board. The first organizational meeting will occur in mid-February, which should provide enough time for the Governor, Speaker of the Assembly, and Senate Committee on Rules to make their respective appointments. Many issues need to be addressed at the first meeting, including but not limited to organizational structure, election of officers, future financing, appointment of staff9 accounting procedures, etc. As stipulated in SB 2862, we must observe the Ralph M. Brown Act, which requires appropriate notice of agenda. Consequently, it is extremely important that agenda items be submitted to me prior to February 1, 1991. I anticipate a minimum two weeks notice for the first meeting, accompanied by the agenda and supportive materials. If I can be of any assistance to you or answer any questions about the Conservancy, please call me at your convenience. Thank you for your continuing support. Sincerely, Paul D. Romero Parks Director PDR/21 42M ZTZ) Z(qure. prZZte(-t, deveZ()p, ZZZage Znd nierprel for the InsprrJtIon, uZe Znd enpZyrnent or dZI peopie. ZZeI I-hZiariced ZvZtem Z`t ZredZ of ourZtaodi og Z(:eoiZ reCrCZIZoo Znd h rZturjC ZZportZoZe. BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_HCOUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: ITEM TITLE: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSIDERATION OF POLICY GUIDELINES FOR USE OF PUBLIC FINANCING FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC CONSENT CALENDAR: FACILITIES IN PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: The proposed policies are intended to establish guidelines under which the City staff can operate to implement public financing for proposed Community Facilities Districts CFD). It also establishes a City Administration Fee that recovers staff costs associated with the implementation of the districts. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Approve the policy and procedure guidelines for the application process for developers requesting public finance for proposed projects. Approve the attached Resolution establishing City Administration Fee for monitoring the process. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: 1 1Z RONALD L. KiEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER Si gnaturZ BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_I MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Pamela LiCalsi, Administrative Analyst via Thornas P. Genovese, Assistant City Manager DATE: January 15, 1991 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF POLICY GUIDELINES FOR USE OF PUBLIC FINANCING FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES IN PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS As you are aware, there are a number of Comunity Facilities Districts CFD) and other public projects in process. In order to adequately facilitate and monitor these CFD's, staff has developed policy guidelines and a City Adnimistration Fee for review. The policy guidelines will be the foundation for an application packet that is also being incorporated for use by developers. The City Administration Fee is designed to recover staff costs associated with the implementation of the district. The attached policy guidelines were drafted by Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates and reviewed by staff. The attached Resolution outlines a City Administration Fee that is in line with other nearby agencies. RECOMMENDATION: Adoption of the policy guidelines for use of public financing for the provision of public facilities in proposed development projects. Adoption of the Resolution implementing a City Administration Fee. 7; BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_J RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING AN ADMINISTRATION FEE FOR THE CREATION OF A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT. WHEREAS, Government Code Section 53318 requires the payment of a fee to accompany a written request or petition requesting the creation of a community facilities district CFD) to compensate the legislative body for all costs incurred in conducting proceedings to create a CFD; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 53318 authorizes the City Council to establish the amount of such administration fee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, THAT: SECTION 1: A fee in the amount of fifteen thousand dollars $15,000) is hereby established to compensate the City Council for all costs incurred in creating a CFD pursuant to Government Code Sections 53311 et Zq. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this day of 1991 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California pubfinc res/cj BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_K NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_L NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_M NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_N NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_O NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_P NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_Q NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_R NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_S NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_T NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_UCOUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: ITEM TITLE: BUSINESS SESSION: 1 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH LA QUINTA REAL CONSENT CALENDAR: ESTATE PARTNERSHIP. STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: Attached is the staff report and Owner Participation Agreement between the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency and La Quinta Real Estate Partnership. The Owner Participation Agreement sets forth financial assistance to the Developer for this project which is located on the northwest end of Highway 111. The project entails the development of a restaurant and office complex. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Financial assistance to a maximum of $250,000 of Tax Increment Funds of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency. APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Approve the necessary Resolution and authorize the Chairman to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency. Submitted by: Approved for submis5ion to City Council: Signature RON KIEDROWSKI, City Manager ft BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_V RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND LA QUINTA REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP; DETERMINING THAT THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ADJACENT TO THE SITE IS OF BENEFIT TO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 2 AND THE IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORHOOD IN WHICH THE PROJECT IS LOCATED; DETERMINING THAT THERE ARE NO OTHER REASONABLE MEANS OF FINANCING SAID IMPROVEMENTS; AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF SAID OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency 1Agency") is authorized to carry out the redevelopment of the Redevelopment Project Area No. 2 Project Area"); and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area authorizes and directs the Agency to pay all or part of the value of the construction of certain public improvements; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to enter into an Owner Participation Agreement OPA") with La Quinta Real Estate Partnership the Participant"), substantially in the form presented to the Agency at the meeting at which this resolution was adopted; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the OPA, the Agency shall bear certain costs for Whitewater Channel improvements adjacent to the Site the Channel Improvements") as more particularly described in the OPA; and WHEREAS, the City has previously conducted its environmental review of the activities contemplated by the OPA and has approved a Negative Declaration EA No. 89-129, Case No. PP 89-417) in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, California Health and Safety Code Section 33445 provides that a redevelopment agency may, with the consent of the legislative body, pay all or part of the value of public buildings, facilities, structures or other improvements upon finding that such public improvements are of benefit to the project area or the immediate neighborhood in which the project is located and that BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_Wthere are no other reasonable means of financing such public improvements available to the community. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The City Council hereby approves the form of the OPA presented to the City Council at the meeting at which this resolution was adopted. Section 2: The City Council hereby determines that the acquisition, construction and installation of the Channel Improvements is of benefit to the Project Area and the surrounding neighborhood in which the project is located. Section 3: The City Council hereby determines that it is appropriate to construct and install or cause the construction and installation of the Channel Improvements and that there are no other reasonable means of financing the Channel Improvements. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1991 at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Quinta by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, MAYOR City of La Quinta ATTEST: SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, CITY CLERK City of La Quinta APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN HONEYWELL, CITY ATTORNEY City of La Quinta j;/j BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_X NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_Y NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_Z NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_[ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_\ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_] NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_^ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d__ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_a NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_b NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_c NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_d NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_e NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_f NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_g NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_h NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_i NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_j NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_k NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_l NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_m NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_n NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_o NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_p NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_q NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_r NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_s NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_t NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_u NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_v NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_w NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_x NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_y NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_z NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ OF COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOCAL REVIEW BUSINESS SESSION: AND APPROVAL PROCESS OF SOLID WASTE TRANSFER AND RECYCLING FACILITIES CONSENT CALENDAR: LOCATED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: Assembly Bill 2296 requires Riverside County and its cities to address the method for completing the County-wide review process for solid waste transfer facilities which are designed to recover, reuse, or recycle less than 15% of the total volume recovered. The attached Resolutions support a process which provides an opportunity for the cities and the County to review and approve/disapprove such facilities FISCAL IMPLICATION: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Move to adopt City Council Resolution 91- and 91- recommending approval of a local review and approval process for solid waste transfer facilities designed to recover, reuse, or recycle less than 15% of the total volume received. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: I RON'KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ z MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: JANUARY 15, 1991 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOCAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS OF SOLID WASTE TRANSFER AND RECYCLING FACILITIES LOCATED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY. On September 30, 1990, the Governor signed as an urgency measure Assembly Bill 2296 Siting Solid Waste Facilities during the COSWMP Gap). AB 2296 provides for planning, siting, and approving new or expanded solid waste facilities during the I! gaptZ period. This period occurs when the Riverside County Solid Waste Management Plan COSWMP) ceased to exist January 1, 1991), and when the new County-wide Integrated Waste Management Plans are approved anticipated to be 1995). As part of AB 2296, each county and the cities in it, must decide by February 1 1991) if they want to treat transfer stations/material recovery facilities that are designed to handle less than 15% of the material coming into it, through the review and comment process of the Riverside Solid Waste Management Advisory Council or, through a review and approval process by the County and a majority of the cities with a majority of the population. The attached Resolutions if approved by a majority of the cities with a majority of the population in Riverside County) concur with the review and approval process that requires the County and a majority of the cities with a majority of the population to approve/disapprove facilities that ar designed to handle less than 15% of the material coming into it. Any facility sited within the City will still be required to be consistent with the General Plan. The Resolutions provide for additional local control through a County-wide review process for facilities sited in Riverside County. Disapproval by the city of a facility sited in the County would need to based on findings of significant adverse economic and/or environmental impacts to the City. There are two Resolutions to adopt which provide for: 1. Those facilities that serve only one jurisdiction; and 2. Those facilities that serve more than one jurisdiction. MEMOFB.003 1 jV BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ RESOLUTION NO. 91- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF SOLID WASTE TRANSFER FACILITIES WHICH ARE DESIGNED TO RECOVER FOR REUSE OR RECYCLING LESS THAN 15 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL VOLUME OF MATERIAL RECEIVED BY THE FACILITY AND SERVES ONLY ONE JURISDICTION TO THE COUNTY AND EACH CITY WITHIN THE COUNTY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL'Z. WHEREAS, Riverside County must meet the State mandated goals of 25% of all solid waste diverted from landfill or transformation facilities by January 1, 1995, and 50% by January 1, 2000; and WHEREAS, Riverside County must establish programs and encourage the siting of facilities that will make the achievement of these goals possible; and WHEREAS, section 5000 d) of the California State Public Resources Code requires counties and the majority of the cities in the county containing a majority of the population of the incorporated area of the county to resolve by February 1, 1991, which County-wide review process those solid waste transfer facilities which are designed to, and, as a condition of their permits, shall, recover for reuse or recycling less than 15 percent of the total volume of material received by the facility and which serve more than one jurisdiction will be required to follow; and WHEREAS, a majority of the cities in the county containing a majority of the population of the incorporated area of the county have resolved that the County and each City within the County shall review and approve/disapprove all prospective sitings of said transfer facilities that serve only one jurisdiction; now, therefore NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Council. 2. That the interests of the community are best served by retaining local control over the review process for the siting of new or expanded solid waste facilities. 3. That it hereby concurs that the County and each City within the County shall review and approve/disapprove all prospective sitings of said transfer facilities that serve only one jurisdiction. RESOCC.009/CS 1- BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_0Z COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: FUNDING PARTICIPATION OF $30,000 FOR CVAG BUSINESS SESSION: CONSULTANT TO WORK WITH LOCAL COMMUNITIES ON SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENTS AB 939). CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: To economize on time and money, eight Coachella Valley Association of Governments members are pooling their financial resources to hire CH2M Hill to complete local Source Reduction and Recycling Elements by July 1, 1991. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Expenditure of $30,000 from the General Fund Contingency Account No. 4400100-000) APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: By minute motion, it is recommended that the City Council: 1) participate in the amount of $30,000 for the Coachella Valley Association of Governments to secure and administer a professional services contract with CH2M Hill to complete a Source Reduction and Recycling Element for the City, and 2) transfer $30,000 from the General Fund Contingency Account to the Legislative dues CVAG account No. 01-4110-114-010) Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: /(Z ZZ(?ZI RON ZIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER CC#l/15 F1/CS BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: JANUARY 15, 1991 SUBJECT: FUNDING PARTICIPATION OF $30,000 FOR CVAG CONSULTANT TO WORK WITH LOCAL COMMUNITIES ON SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENTS AB 939) BACKGROUND: Eight Coachella Valley Association of Governments CVAG) are pooling their financial resources to hire a consultant to prepare state mandated Source Reduction and Recycling Elements SRRE). This approach is necessary and beneficial since the issues to be addressed are regional and technical in nature; there is a short time frame required for completion; and pooling resources will save the City money. A CVAG Ad hoc Committee issued a Request for Proposals; they interviewed two firms; and they have selected CH2M Hill to do this work. This is the same consultant that was hired by CVAG cities to conduct the Waste Characterization Study, the first step in the development of the SRRE. The consultant will work on the remaining components of this plan: Source Reduction, Recycling, Composting, Facility Capacity/Siting, Public Education and Awareness, Funding, and Special Waste. There will be a technical working group established with representation from each City to work with the consultants on these components. All cities and the county are required to complete, and adopt as part of their General Plan, a Source Reduction and Recycling Element by July 1, 1991. All jurisdictions must include an implementation schedule targeting 25% waste diversion by 1995 and 50% by 2000. CVAG will administer this contract; the total cost for this work will be approximately $275,000. La Quinta's share of the cost will be $30,000 60% by CVAG formula and 40% on an equal basis). These costs will be partially reimbursed to each city by the County Waste Management Department from tipping fees. La Quinta will be directly reimbursed $6,476 in two equal payments in February and at the completion of the work in July. Total cost to the city for this work will be $23,524. MEMOFB. 010/CS 1- BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: APPROVAL OF ANENDNENT To SUNLINE PUBLIC HEARING:________ JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT ADDING TAXICAB REGULATIONS. BUSINESS SESSION:Z CONSENT CALENDAR:_______ STUDY SESSION:__________ BACKGROUND Attached is an amendment to the Sunline Joint Powers Agreement which will establish taxicab regulations. The actual regulations will be adopted by Sunline following approval of this amendment by all participating agencies. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the amendment. FISCAL INPLICATIONS: None RECOMMENDATION: That the attached amendment to the Sunline Joint Powers Agreement regarding regulation of taxicabs be approved. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED FOR SUBMISSION TO CITY COUNCIL: cl#. &Z4Z( Signature RON kIEDROWSKI, City Manager /73 BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ AMENDMENT TO SUNLINE JOINT POWERS TRANSPORTATION AGENCY AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT this Amendment") is made and entered into by and between the County_ of Riverside and the Coachella Valley cities Which are parties to this Amendment and other public agencies which subsequently become parties to this Amendment. This Amendment is an amendment to the SunLine Joint Powers Transportation Agency Agreement the JPA Agreementli) entered into on or about May 20, 1977. This Amendment is made and entered into with reference to the following background facts and circumstances. RECITALS SunLine is a joint powers agency established pursuant to the provisions of the JPA Agreement. The County of Riverside and the Coachella Valley cities and public agencies which are parties to this Amendment 1Cities") have a mutual interest in regulating, licensing and franchising the business of operating taxicabs and other forms_ of ground transportation available to the public on a for-hire basis Alternative Transportationil). The geographic area to be covered by the terms of this Amendment is the area known as the Coachella Valley, as that term is defined in the JPA AgreemenZZ The County and Cities wish to coordinate regulatory activities as they relate to taxicab operations and Alternative Transportation LAS\121990Z6112\o3JpA.A4 Page 1 BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_within the Coachella Valley area by vesting in SunLine the authority to regulate, license and franchise taxicabs and Alternative Transportation and to establish rates to be charged by operators of taxicabs and Alternative Transportation doing business in the Coachella Valley. This Amendment is made and entered into pursuant to Government Code, sections 6500 et sea. AGREEMENTS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: A. The JPA Agreement is hereby amended by adding to it the following provisions of this Amendment: 1. PURPOSE AND POWERS 1.1 An additional purpose of the JPA Agreement and the joint powers agency established thereby is to regulate, license and franchise taxicabs and Alternative Transportation and to establish rates to be charged by operators of taxicabs and Alternative Transportation doing business in the Coachella Valley. 1.2 Each member and party to this agreement is a government entity with full powers of government in legislative, administrative, financial and other related fields. Each of the parties to this agreement has the powers derived from California LASZlZ1990\6112\O3JpA.A4 Page 2 BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_COUNCIL MEETING DATE:JANUARY 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: ITEM TITLE: BUSINESS SESSION: /Z SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 184 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: The ordinance as revised by the City Attorney Will be presented at the Council meeting. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Submitted by: Approved for submission to City CounciZ: /2> BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ ORDINANCE NO. 185 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 6.04.050 and 6.04.140 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PICK-UP SCHEDULE FOR CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND UNAUTHORIZED COLLECTIONS. The City Council of the City of La Quinta does hereby ordain as follows: Title 6, Chapter 6.04, Section 6.04.050 is hereby amended to read as follows: FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION A. Residential Collection. Every person in charge of a residence or residences, whether single-family or multiple-family1 shall make arrangements with the collector to have removed, not less than once a week, from the property upon which the residence or residences are located, all refuse created, produced or brought upon the premises. B. Commercial and Industrial Collection. Every person in charge of a commercial or industrial building shall, remove or cause to be removed, not less than once a week, from the property upon which the building is located all refuse created, produced or brought upon the premises except restaurants which shall remove or cause to be removed, not less than twice a week, from the property upon which the building is located all refuse created, produced or brought upon the premises. C. Construction Sites. All refuse created, produced or brought upon construction sites shall be removed not less than twice a week. Title 6, Chapter 6.04, Section 6.04.140 is hereby amended to read as follows: UNAUTHORIZED COLLECTORS At such times as there is in force a contract entered into by the city with any Contractor for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage and rubbish of the city or its inhabitants, it shall be unlawful for any reason other than Contractor and his employees to collect any solid waste or recyclable materials within the city. This section shall not, however, be deemed to apply any persons holding a valid City Zusiness License to engage in the nursery or gardening business or to any person removing shrubbery, grass, tree cuttings, tree trimmings or other agricultural debris from any property owned or occupied by such person. BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_REVISED STAFF REPORT Retention Basin Maintenance Bond and Retention Basin LandscapinZ Improveinents are not being recommended for release or acceptance at this time. COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Acceptance of subdivision improvements BUSINESS SESSION: and release of street, water and sewer bonds. CONSENT CALENDAR:_____ Cactus Flower Tract 22982 Williams Development Company STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: In 1988 the developer posted performance and payment bonds in accordance with the Subdivision Improvement Agreement for the street, water and sewer improvements and posted a 10-year maintenance bond for the retention basin. The developer submitted 1-year guarantee bonds covering all improvement work and requested the City to accept the improvements and release the related bonds. In addition, because the development is being assessed under the Lighting and Landscape District, the developer has requested the 10-year maintenance bond to the retention basin be released. The bonded improvement work, which is now complete, has been inspected and determined to be constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. Correspondence from the construction contractor has been received which states they have received payment for all work and a letter from CVWD stating all water and sewer improvements are complete and acceptable has been received. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Accept the streets, onsite storm drainage, and parkway and basin landscaping improvements for City Maintenance. Approve release of street, water, and sewer payments and performance bonds and approve release of the retention basin maintenance bond. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council City Council: Z Zignature RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER CS/CC#5/15 F1 BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ Z44'4Z'%bItZ COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Acceptance of Subdivision improvements BUSINESS SESSION: and release of street, water and sewer bonds. CONSENT Cactus Flower Tract 22982 CALENDAR:ZZ Williams Development Company STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: In 1988 the developer posted performance and payment bonds in accordance with the Subdivision Improvement Agreement for the street, water and sewer improvements and posted a 10-year maintenance bond for the retention basin. The developer submitted 1-year guarantee bonds covering all improvement work and requested the City to accept Zhe improvements and release the related bonds. In addition, because the development is being assessed under the Lighting and Landscape District, the developer has requested the 10-year maintenance bond to the retention basin be released. The bonded improvement work, which is now complete, has been inspected and determined to be constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. Correspondence from the construction contractor has been received which states they have received payment for all work and a letter from CVWD stating all water and sewer improvements are complete and acceptable has been received. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Accept the streets, onsite storm drainage, and parkway and basin landscaping improvements for City Maintenance. Approve release of street, water, and sewer payments and performance bonds and approve release of the retention basin maintenance bond. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council City Council: 1 Znature RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER CS/CC#5/15.Fl BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Approval of Final Map and Subdivision BUSINESS SESSION:_____ Improvement Agreement for Tract 25237, Santa Rosa Cove Tom Hill CONSENT CALENDAR:ZZ STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: The improvement plans for this project are complete and have been approved by the Plan Check engineer and the City. The tract map is substantially complete and the Subdivision Improvement Agreement has been executed by the developer. In addition all required bonds have been received. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Approve Final Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement subject to final completion of the tract map. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council City Council: Z I, Signature RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER CS/CC#5/15 Fl / Z BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ Z44'('a4ItZ COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Reduction of Performance Security BUSINESS SESSION: Letter of Credit) Tract 25429 Painted Cove Peter Ministrelli CONSENT CALENDAR: 1) STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: The developer posted a letter of credit L.O.C.) of $1,600,000.00 to assure construction performance and payment for the improvements as directed in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement S.I.A.) for this tract. Since posting of this L.O.C. the improvements have been substantially completed and the developer has paid to the City, in cash, the amount of $77,100.00 to cover the deferred improvements outlined in the S.I.A. The developer has now requested a reduction in required securities to cover incomplete work, which is estimated at $50,000.00, plus 10% of the original amount $160,000.00) to assure submittal of the one-year maintenance bond upon final acceptance. The total of the new securities submitted equal $210,000.00. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Approve reduction of the required performance security from $1,600,000.00 to $210,000.00. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council City Council: Zj'Z *Zi:; 7:' S--:ignature RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER CS/CC#5/15 F1 BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ UAAAAi(IAZZifZUiMI(ii z MEMORANDUM COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING Bob Hope Chrysler Classic Resolution BUSINESS SESSION For Traffic Controls CONSENT CALENDAR STUDY SESSION BACKGROUND The Bob Hope Chrysler Classic requires a resolution by council granting approval for temporary traffic controls. See attached resolution. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATIONS: Council adopt the attached resolution Submitted by: Approved for submission BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPT. to City Council: Ii Z I Z I ki Z TOM HARTUNG RON KIEDROWSKI DIRECTOR BUILDING & SAFETY CITY MANAGER BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING CERTAIN TEMPORARY NO-PARKING ZONES ON JEFFERSON STREET, 54TH AVENUE, MADISON STREET, ONE SIDE OF ALL INTERNAL STREETS OF PALMER COURSE COMPLEX, EISENHOWER DRIVE, WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 DURING A SPECIAL EVENT TO BE HELD FEBRUARY 6, 1991, THROUGH FEBRUARY 10, 1991 INCLUSIVE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta that pursuant to Section 22507 of the California Vehicle Code, Section 12.32.010 of the La Quinta Municipal Code, the following temporary no-parking zones hereby are established, to be effective during the period of a special event to be held February 6, 1991 through February 10, 1991, inclusive: 1. Jefferson Street, South from the All American Canal, including P.G.A. Boulevard to its termination. 2. 54th Avenue, east from the All American Canal to Madison Street. 3. One side of all streets in the Palmer Course Complex. 4. Designating one-way traffic on Jefferson Street to facilitate the movement of traffic as determined by the City Engineer and Chief of Police of the City of La Quinta, CA. 5. On both sides of Eisenhower Drive, between Washington Street and Avenida Fernando South including all red zones. 6. On both sides of Washington Street, between Eisenhower Drive and Avenue 50. 7. On both sides of Avenue 50, within the red zones, between Eisenhower Drive and Washington Street. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the above parking prohibitions shall be in effect at all times during the day or night when authorized signs are in place giving notice thereof. && BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: DECLARING THE CITY'S INTENTION TO BUSINESS SESSION: VACATE A PORTION OF AVENIDA MENDOZA BETWEEN CALLE MADRID AND AVENIDA CONSENT CALENDAR; fflil BERMUDAS AND FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. STREET STUDY SESSION: VACATION 90-015). BACKGROUND: The Cove" improvements have created excess street right-of-way when certain streets were redesigned. The attached Resolution sets the date and time for a Public Hearing for the proposed street vacation. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: By Minute Motion adopt City Council Resolution 91- declaring the City's intention to vacate a portion of Avenida Mendoza and fixing a time and place for a Public Hearing. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: ZL(' RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER BJ/CC#2/06 F8 i BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE PORTIONS OF CERTAIN STREETS, FIXING A TIME AND PLACE TO HEAR ALL PERSONS INTERESTED, OR OBJECTING TO, THE PROPOSED VACATION, PROVIDING FOR POSTING PURSUANT TO THE STREET VACATION ACT OF 1941 AS CONTAINED IN SECTION 8300 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. CASE NO: STREET VACATION 90-015 NOW, THEREFORE, ZE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to the Street Vacation Act of 1941 and pursuant to Section 8300 et. seq., of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, the City Council of the City of La Quinta declares its intention to vacate a portion of Avenida Mendoza, as described on attached Exhibit SECTION 2. That a Hearing is to be conducted on the 5th day of February, 1991 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. at the La Quinta City Council Chambers, 78-105 Calle Estado, La Quinta, California, at which time all persons interested in or objecting to the proposed vacation will be heard. SECTION 3. Notices of said vacation shall be posted conspicuously along the street or part thereof, proposed to be vacated at least fourteen 14) days before the date set for the Hearing. Said Notices shall be posted not more than 300 feet apart, but at least three shall be posted. Said Notices shall state the passage of this Resolution of Intent and the time and place of hearing. Said Notices shall be posted by the Superintendent of Streets, and thereafter shall file an affidavit of posting with the City Clerk. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall cause this Resolution to be posted within fifteen days after its adoption in three 3) public places established by the City Council. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 15th, day of January, 1991, by the following vote, to wit: 72 RESOCC.042/BJ 1 BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: ITEM TITLE: BUSINESS SESSION: ASSESSMENT/HOOK-Up FEE SUBSIDY PROGRAM REVISIONS TO PROGRAM STATEMENT PER SB 1352 CONSENT CALENDAR: 4 EXPANSION OF PROGRAM TO INCLUDE PROJECT AREA 2. STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: Based on the passage of SB 1352 the program statement for the Assessment/Hook-Up Subsidy Program has been revised and the program has been expanded to include Project Area 2. Attached is a staff report that outlines the changes and a copy of the revised program statement. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached Resolutions approving the Revisions to the Statement of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency for the Assessment/Hook-Up Fee Subsidy Program. Submitted by: Approved for Bubmi5sion to City Council: Signature RONALD L.KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_DATE: December 18,1990 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Chair and Members of the Redevelopment Agency FROM: Ronald E. kiedrowski, City Manager SUBJECT: ASSESSMENT/HOOK-UP FEE SUBSIDY PROGRAM REVISIONS TO PROGRAM STATEMENT PER SB 1352 EXPANSION OF PROGRAM TO INCLUDE PROJECT AREA 2 BACKGROUND Approval was granted for implementation of the Assessment Subsidy Program on February 21,1989. Under the Program established at that meeting, property owners of Very Low, Low and Moderate Income were given assistance in making Assessment Payments levied for Assessment District 88-1. This Program was subsequently expanded by the inclusion of Sewer Hook-Up Fees in Assessment District 88-1 and the implementation of the Assessment/Hook-Up Fee Subsidy Program in Assessment Districts 89-2 and 90-1 Implementation of the Program in the initial three Assessment Districts is in progress. Ninety-six 96) property owners have qualified for the Program to date. On January 1,1991, SB 1352 will become effective as Chapter 1523,1990 statutes. This bill was sponsored by the San Jose Redevelopment Agency and supported by Community Redevelopment Agencies Association CRA) to bring the standards for the administration of low and moderate income housing funds into conformance with several other major housing programs including the Low and Moderate Income Housing Tax Credit, Proposition 77 Rental Rehabilitation Program and existing HUD regulations. It revises the definition of affordable housing cost" for households of specified income levels residing in any owner-occupied housing and the definition of affordable rent" for households of specified income levels residing in any rental housing. While it appears that this bill is primarily directed at other types of housing programs, it does have an impact on the City's Assessment/Hook-Up Fee Subsidy Program the Subsidy Program"). Pursuant to this legislation, modifications must be made to the definition of affordable housing cost" in the Statement of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency Assessment/Hook-Up Fee Subsidy Program the Program Statement") for the purpose of determining eligibility of applicants for the Subsidy Program. Although it is expected that the Department of Housing and Community Development HCD) will issue regulations which may have some effect on the impact of this legislation, they are not expected to be published until the spring of 1991 at the earliest and any impact on the implementation of SB 1352 into our existing Subsidy Program will be evaluated at such time as regulations should become available. pZ,J BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_Revisions to Assessment/Hook-Up Fee Subsidy Program Statement December 18, 1990 Page 2 DISCUSSION In order to grant further financial assistance to eligible property owners while expanding the scope of infrastructure improvements, it is proposed that the Assessment/Hook-Up Fee Subsidy Program be approved for implementation in the future proposed Assessment Districts in Project Areas No.1 and 2. Due to the on-going infrastructure improvements within the Cove community, it is prudent for the creation of additional Assessment Districts and for eligible property owners within the proposed Districts to be given financial assistance identical to that of Assessment Districts 88-1, 89-2 and 90-1. As with the previous Assessment Districts, the Agency's 20% set-aside funds will be used to subsidize the additional assessment and Hook-Up Fees for income-eligible property owners. By granting expansion of the Subsidy Program to the future proposed Assessment Districts in this manner, the Agency and Council will only need to review and approve of substantive changes to the Program Statement which would be required by new legislation. Staff has reviewed the provisions of SB 1352 as it relates to the existing Subsidy Program. Its major impact lies in the formula used to determine affordable housing cost" for both owner-occupied and rental housing. When determining the eligibility of an applicant, one of the provisions for eligibility in the Subsidy Program is that The Household's Total Housing Cost, when combined with the Annual Sewer Assessment Payment and Sewer Hook-Up Fee Payment(s), exceeds the established Affordable Housing Cost for the Household's Gross Income" for households approved prior to January 1, 1991. Presently, affordable housing cost" is defined as not less than 15% and no greater than 25% of the household's gross income for very low income households and 25% of the household's gross income for low and moderate income households. The new legislation liberalizes the amount considered as affordable housing cost" for very low and low income households by increasing the amount which can be considered; therefore more families can qualify. However, for moderate income households, housing costs must be not less than 28% of the household's gross income nor exceed 35% of the allowable median income for the family size. This means that housing costs must be higher to qualify for the Subsidy Program and consequently, households with a low or no mortgage payment who fall in the moderate income category will have a harder time qualifying. Utilities must be included in calculating affordable housing costs. CONCLUSION The expansion of the Program into the future proposed Assessment Districts in Project Areas No.1 and 2 will provide continued financial assistance to those unable to pay for the on-going infrastructure improvements within the Cove community. The attached Statement of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency for the Assessment/Hook-Up Fee Subsidy Program has been revised by the addition of dash lines over removed text and bold type indicating added language to reflect the expansion of the Program and the new criteria for determining affordable housing cost" as provided by SB 1352. Z 2 BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of Appropriation Transfers BUSINESS SESSION: into Account No. 01-4311-111-000, Contract Services Professional $50,000) and CONSENT CALENDAR:Z Account No. 01-4311-111-001, Contract Services other $(100,000) from the General Fund Reservce STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: The first of these two accounts involves plan and map checking costs by outside consultants. The second primarily is for inspection services in subdivisions and City construction projects. Both of these are revenue items and both the revenues and expenditures have exceeded budgeted amounts due to the heavy development and construction activity. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: $150,000.00 APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Amend the budget and appropriate $150,000.00 from the General Fund Reserve. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council City Council: A;;ZZZ N Signa ure RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER CS/CC#5/15 F1 BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ OF COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: TENTATIVE TRACT 25237 OHIO CITIZENS BUSINESS SESSION: INVESTMENT CORP. FOR MODIFICATION TO CONDITION #29 REGARDING CONSTRUCTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR: THE AVENIDA OBREGON AND AVENIDA FERNANDO GATES, NORTH SIDE OF AVENIDA FERNANDO 1/4+ STUDY SESSION: MILE WEST OF EISENHOWER DRIVE. BACKGROUND: The litigation brought on by the Fredericks against the Applicant has been resolved. The Court denied the preliminary injunction and determined that Mr. Fredericks did not have an easement through the Matzalan gates main gate). Based upon the Court decision, it appears that the amendment to Condition #29 is not necessary, at this time. However, rather than recommending a denial of the request, Staff recommended that the matter be tabled. The Planning Commission at the continued hearing of-January 8, 1991, recommended that Council table the request. FISCAL IMPLICATION: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: By Minute Motion table the Applicant's request to modify Condition #29 of Tract 25237. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: ki RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ OF COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: PUBLIC USE PERMIT 90-007 LA QUINTA CIVIC BUSINESS SESSION: CENTER PROJECT CONSISTING OF CITY HALL, ARTS FOUNDATION BUILDING, SENIOR CENTER, CONSENT CALENDAR: LIBRARY, RETENTION BASIN, AND ASSOCIATED PARKING AND LANDSCAPING LOCATED AT THE STUDY SESSION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CALLE TAMPICO AND WASHINGTON STREET BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission on January 8, 1991, recommended Council approval of the Public Use Permit and adoption of the Negative Declaration. FISCAL ZMPLICATION: APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: By Minute Motion adopt the Negative Declaration and approve Public Use Permit 90- 007, Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER CC#1/8.F2/bj BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: JANUARY 15, 1991 SUBJECT: PUBLIC USE PERMIT 90-007 APPROVAL OF A LA QUINTA CIVIC CENTER PROJECT CONSISTING OF CITY HALL, ARTS FOUNDATION BUILDING, SENIOR CENTER LIBRARY, RETENTION BASIN, AND ASSOCIATED PARKING AND LANDSCAPING. BACKGROUND: The property contains approximately 18 acres which will ultimately house the new City Administrative Office, Council Chamber, Library, Arts Foundation and Senior Center, landscaping and parking. The large landscaped open area will serve two functions; 1) it will be a retention area during the rainy season and, 2) a location to conduct the Annual Arts Festival and other activities. Phase one will be the construction of the Administrative Offices and Council Chambers. MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS Street improvements to Calle Tampico, Washington Street, and Avenida La Fonda will be completed as part of this project. Approximately 30 parking spaces will be provided for visitors off Calle Tampico. Staff parking will be located south of the Administrative building, between the building and Avenida La Fonda. The future Library, Arts Foundation, and Senior Center will have parking provided in their general area. A major stormwater swale will be constructed providing stormwater relief to parts of the Cove and Village areas. This swale will be installed along the western and southern property lines with ultimate connection across Washington Street. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing on January 8, 1991. Mr. Garry Davis, who resides on Avenida La Fonda just south of the CityZs property, was concerned about site access and traffic. Staff responded to his concerns by identifying the access locations and traffic flow. After discussion the Commission voted unanimously to approve the Public Use Permit. MEMOJH. 045 BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02 d_ OF COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 15, 1991 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: 3 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 90-002 FOR SPECIFIC BUSINESS SESSION: PLAN 89-014 ONE ELEVEN LA QUINTA CENTER LOCATED IN AREA BOUNDED BY WHITEWATER CONSENT CALENDAR: STORM CHANNEL ON THE NORTH, HIGHWAY 111 ON THE SOUTH, ADAMS STREET ON THE EAST, AND STUDY SESSION: WASHINGTON STREET ON THE WEST APPLICANT: WASHINGTON ADAMS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BACKGROUND: The City Attorney has redrafted the Appilcant's proposed Development Agreement. The developer has not had an opportunity to comment on the revised Agreement. The Planning Commission continued their Public Hearing to January 22, 1991. FISCAL IMPLICATION: APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: By Minute Motion, continue the Public Hearing to February 5, 1991. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council /Z/ZZ7, Z K ZON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER BIB] 01-08-1999-U01 08:35:17AM-U01 BASIC-U01 CC-U02 01-U02 15-U02 1991-U02