RDA Resolution 1995-10^#n/ RESOLUTION RDA 95.10
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LA
QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 95.303
PREPARED FOR STAMKO ACQUISITION OF 57 ACRES LOCATED EAST OF
ADAMS STREET AND NORTH OF 48TH AVENUE
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 95.303
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 20th day of
June, 1995, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the proposed property acquisition from Stamko
Development; and,
WHEREAS, said acquisition has complied with the requirements of *The Rules to Implement the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended) Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quint a City Council)
in that the Community Development Department has prepared Initial Study EA 95-303; and,
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that said land acquisition will not
have a significant adverse effect on *ha d'nvironment and that a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental
impact should be filed; and,
WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested
persons desiring to be heard, said Redevelopment Agency Board did find the following facts, findings, and reasons
to justify certification of said Environmental Assessment:
1. The proposed acquisition will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community,
either indirectly or directly.
2. The proposed acquisition will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory.
3. The proposed acquisition does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the
disadvantage of long-term environmental goals.
4. The proposed acquisition will not result in impacts which are individually limited or cumulatively considerable.
RESOROA.O1O
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ I
Resolution No. RA 95-10
NOW, Therefore, BE IT RESOLVED b* the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Agency for this
environmental assessment.
2. That it does hereby certify the Environmental Assessment 95.303 for the reasons set forth in this resolution
and as stated in the attached Environmental Assessment Checklist and Addendum, labe!ed Exhibit A" and
adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
held on this 20th day of June, 1995, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Board Members Bangerter, Cathcart, Pena, Perkins,
Chairman Sniff
NaES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
STA?*t#*SMF,*
La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
ATTEST:
*SAUNDRA L. JUH A, Secretary
La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
APPROVED TO FORM:
HO
La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
RESORDA.O1O
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ J
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
Environmental Assessment No.95-303
Case No.Date: MAY 16, 1995
Name of Proponent: CITY OF LA QUINTA/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Address: 78-498 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253
Phone: 619-770-7125
Agency Requiring Checklist: CITY OF LA QUINTA
Project Name if applicable): STAMKO LAND ACQUISITION II
ADAMS & 48TH AVENUE
CITY OF LA QUINTA
Community Development Departinent
78-495 Ca* lie Tampico
La Quinta, California 92253
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ I
II. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving
at least one impact that is a Potentially Significant Impact" or Potentially Significant Unless
Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
X Land Use and Planning Transportation/Circulation Public Services
Population and Housing X Biological Resources Utilities
X Earth Resources Energy and Mineral Resources X Aesthetics
X Water Risk of Upset and Human Health X Cultural Resources
Air Quality Noise X Recreation
X Mandatory Findings of Significance
III. DETERMINATION.
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment,
and a NEGATIVE DECLA*ON will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on
the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because
the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the
project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. x
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least,
1) one effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards; and 2) has been addressed by mitigation*n measures based on the earlier analysis as
described on attached sheets, if the effect is a potentially significant impact" or potential
significant unless mitigated. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must
analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
Signature Date
Printed Name and Title: LESLIE J. MOURIQUAND, Associate Planner
For: THE CITY OF LA QUINTA
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ I
P***Ii*ily
5ig*jf,*** ma,
Sig*if***i U*I* 5ig*if*, No
* Mi*j* *CL
3.1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? x
source #(s)
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the
project? x
c) Affect agricultural resources or operations e.g.
impact to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses)? x
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community including a low-income or
minority community)? x
3.2. POPUL*ON AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? x
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly e.g. through projects in an undeveloped
area or extension of major infrastructure)? x
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing? x
3.3. EARTH AND GEOLOGY. Would the project result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? x
b) Seismic ground shaking? x
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? x
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? x
e) Landslides or mudflows? x
f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading or fill? x
g) Subsidence of the land? x
h) Expansive soils?
i) Unique geologic or physical features? x
IL
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ I
P**Wi*iIy
P**rni*ily 5ig*if*t *
5i1nifl** U*'1* 5,1*if*i
Miij* lmp*a
3.4. WATER. Would the project result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff? x
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding? x
c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of
surface water quality e.g. temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity? x
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body? x
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of
water movements? x
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or
through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
capability? x
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? x
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? x
3.5. AIR QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Violate any air quality standard to contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation*? x
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? x
c) Alter air movement, moiswre, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate? x
d) Create objectionable odors? x
AL
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ a.
Po*,**IIy
Po**iialIy 5ignif** * Th*
Sig*ifica,i U*I* 5i*,*ifl**i
CL MiLi* CL CL
3.6. 11*SPORT*ONICIRCUL*ON. Would the project
result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? x
b) Hazards to safety from design features e.g. sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses e.g. farm equipment)? x
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby
uses?
d) Insufficient parking capacity on site or off site? x
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? x
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? x
g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? x
3.7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project result in
in*pacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their
habitats including but not limited to plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds? x
b) Locally designated species e.g. heritage trees)? x
c) Locally designated natural communities e.g. oak
forest, e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? x
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ I
P***I*IIy 5ig*if** I-.. *
U*I* Si**if**
Mm ga*ed Lmp*a
d) Wetland habitat e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal
pool)? x
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
3.8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
project:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner? x
3.9. RISK OF UPSET/HUMAN HEALTH.
Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances including, but not limited to: oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? x
b) Possible interference with an emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazards? x
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards? x
e) Increased fife hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees?
3.10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? x
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? x
3.11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered gover:tnent
services in aity of he following areas:
a) Fire protection? x
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ P*(e*IjaijV * I-. *
MiIiS*t*d * Impaci
b) Police protection? x
c) Schools?
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? x
e) Other governmental services? x
3.12. UTILHIES.
Would the proposal Tesult in a need for new systems, or
substantial alternations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? x
b) Communicatiors Systems? x
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities? x
d) Sewer or septic tanks? x
e) Storm water drainage? x
f) Solid waste disposal? x
3.13. AES*CS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? x
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? x
c) Create light or glare? x
3.14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? x
b) Disturb archaeological resources? x
c) Affect historical resources?
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values? x
e) Restrict existing religious of sacred uses within the
potential impact area? x
Vt
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ I
Po*rn*IIy
Po*,*ij*Iy 5ig*ifl*** *,, Th*
Sig*ifi**i U*I* Sj**if*t
Mitiga*cd * h*p*ei
3.15. RECRE*ON. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional
parks of other recreational facilities? x
b) Affect existing recreational opportLinities? x
4. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the Potential to degrade the
quality of the environmental, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, causc a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important exatnples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory? x
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-
term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental
goals? x
c) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
Cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects). x
d) Does the project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
EARLIER ANALYSES.
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or
more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section
15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets:
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checlilist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed by the earlier document.
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are potentially significant" or potentially significant unless
mitigated,'. describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refmed from the earlier
document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
Ii
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ I
IN*IAL STUDY ADDENDUM
FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 9*3O3
Prepared for:
Purchase and Sale of Real Property
Located near
Adams Street and Avenue 48
La Quinta, California
by and between
Staniko Development Company, a limited partnership
and Kestam Corporation, its general partner, seller
and
La Quinta Redevelopment Agency,
buyer
Prepared by:
City of La*Quinta
Community Development Department
7*495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, California 92253
May 16, 1995
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ I
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section P*ge
INTRODUCTION 4
1.1 Overview of the Proposed Project 4
1.2 Purpose of Initial Study 4
1.3 Background of Environmental Review 5
1.4 Summary of Preliminary Environmental Review 5
2 PROJECT DESCRIFrION 5
2.1 Project Location and Environmental Sening 5
2.2 Physical Characteristics 5
2.3 Operational Characteristics 5
2.4 Objectives 5
2.5 Discretionary Actions 6
2.6 Related Projects 6
3 ENvIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 6
3.1 Land Use and Planning 7
3.2 Population and Housing 8
3.3 Earth Resources 10
3.4 Water 13
3.5 AirQuality 16
3.6 Transportation/Circulation
3.7 Biological Resources 22
3.8 Energy and Mineral Resources 24
3.9 Risk ofUpset/Human Health 24
3.10 Noise 26
3.11 Public Services 27
3.12 Utillties 29
3.13 Aesthetics 31
3.14 Cultural Resources 32
3.15 Recreation 35
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n
/ 3
4 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 35
5 EARLIER ANALYSES 36
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ 4
SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 OVERV[EW OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT
The purpose of this Initial Study is to identif** the potential environmental impacts of the
proposed purchase and fliture development of 50 acres of land located at the northeast
corner of the intersection of Adams Street and Avnue 48. The parcels under consideration
are identified as Assessor Parcel Numbers 649-030-002 south half), 003 south half),
and 005. The parcels are located in the northern section of the City. The Redevelopment
Agency for the City of La Quinta is the prospective buyer of the parcels. If the property
acquisition is approved by the City Council, a lot line adjustment will be processed to
facilitate the purchase.
The La Quinta Redevelopment Agency is the Lead Agency for the project review, as
defined by Section 21067 of the California Environmental Quality Act CE QA). A Lead
Agency is the public agency which has the principal responsibility for carrying out or
approving a project which may have a significant effect upon the environment. The La
Quinta Redevelopment Agency, as the Lead Agency, has the authority to oversee the
environmental review and to approve the proposed acquisition and fliture development.
1.2 PURPOSE OF INfrIAL STUDY
As part of the environmental review for the land acquisition, the City of La Quinta
Community Development Department has prepared this Initial Study. This document
provides a basis for determining the nature and scope of the subsequent environmental
review for the proposed acquisition and development of the land. The purposes of the
InItial Study, as stated in Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines, include the following:
* To provide the Agency with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to
prepare and environmental impact report EIR) or a Negative Declaration for the
acquisition and fliture development;.
* To enable the applicant or the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency to modiiy the
project, mitigating adverse acts before an EIR is prepared, thereby enabling the
project to quality for a mitigated negative declaration of environmental impact;
* To assist the preparation of an EIR, should one be required, by focusing the
analysis on those issues that will be adversely imp acted by the proposed project;
* To facilitate environmental review early in the design of the project;
* To provide documentation for the findings in a negative declaration that the
project will not have a significant effect on the environment;
* To eliminate unnecessary EIR's; and,
* To determine whether a previously prepared EIR could be used with the project.
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ I
5
1.3 BACKGROUND OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed acquisition was deemed subjeet to the environmental review requirements
of CEQA in light of the intended fliture development of the parcels by the La Quinta
Redevelopment Agency. The Environmental Officer for the Commurity Development
Department prepared this Initial Study and addendum for review and certification by the
La Quinta Redevelopment Agency.
1.4 SUMMARY OF PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
This initial study indicates that there is a potential for adverse environmental impacts on
some of the issue areas contained in the Environmental Checklist. Mitigation measures
have been recommended which will reduce potential impacts to insignificant levels. As a
result, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact will be recommended for this
project. An EIR will not be necessary.
SECTION 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The City of La Quinta is a 31. l* square mile municipality located in the southwestern
portion of the Coachella Valley. The City is bounded on the west by the City of Indian
Wells, on the east by the City of hidjo and Riverside County, on the north by Riverside
County, and federal lands to the south. The City of La Quinta was incorporated in 19g2.
2.2 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
The proposed land acquisition will consist of a total of 50 acres of residentially designated
land with the intention of fliture single family and multiple family home development. The
filture project will be financed with government flinds for the construction of low and
moderate homes. This project will contribute to the state's requirement for the City to
provide such housing. The fliture subdivision and development will be able to take
advantage of density credits which will allow a smaller iiilnlmUm lot size and unit size.
2.3 OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
The land acquisition is for the purpose of fliture development oflow- and moderate-
income single family and multiple family homes as planned unit developments.
2.4 OBJECTIVES
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ I
6
The objectives of the proposed land acquisition and fliture residential development is to
create a single and multiple family planned unit development available for purchase by
individuals and families meeting the requirements for lOW and moderate income
households. The filture development will contribute toward the required number of such
housing units withln the City, per state and federal requirements.
2.5 DISC*ONARY ACTIONS
A discretionary action is an action taken by a government agency for this project, the
government agency is the La Quint a Redevelopment Agency) that calls for the exercise of
judgment in deciding whether to approve a project. The proposed land acquisition will
require discretionary approval from the Redevelopment Agency. Future development will
require discretionary approval from the Planning Comrnission and the Redevelopment
Agency.
Tentative Tract Map The proposed project will be required to obtain approval
prior to sub mitting a Final Map for review and approval by the Redevelopment
Agency; and,
* Approval of Final Tract Map The Redevelopment Agency must approve a Final
Map prior to recordation of the map with the County Recorder.
* Architectural Plot Plan Approval The exterior architectural design and materials
must be approved by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of building
permits.
* Certification of the environmental review process and determination for the
project.
2.6 RELATED PROJECTS
There are several existing residential developments in the surrounding area of the
proposed land acquisition. However, there are no related projects to the proposed filture
development to be constructed.
SECTION 3: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
This section analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the acquisition
and fliture development of a single and multiple family development. CEQA issue areas
are evaluated in this addendum as contained in the initial Study Checklist.
Under each checklist item, the environmental setting is discussed, including a description
of conditions as they presently exist within the City and the areas affected by the proposed
project. Thresholds for significance are defined either by standards adopted by responsible
or trustee agencies or by referring to criteria in CEQA Aj,pe*dix G).
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ I
7
3.1 LAND USE AND PLANNING
Regional Environmenial Setting
The City of La Quinta is located in the Coachella Valley, in the eastern portion of
Riverside County. The valley is abundant with both plant and animal life. Topographical
relief ranges from 237 feet below mean sea level msl) to about 2,000 feet above msL The
valley is surrounded by the San Jacinto Mountains, the Santa Rosa Mountains, the
Orocopia Mountains, and the San Bernardino Mountain range. The San Andreas fault
transects the northeastern edge of the valley.
Local Environmental Setting
The proposed acquisition site is located to the east of Adams Street, and north of Avenue
4*. Three parcels are included in the acquisition. The land is vacant, undeveloped sand
dune environment. The sand dunes are stable dunes with mesquite substructures.
A. Would the project conflict with the general plan designation or zoning?
Potentially Signfificant Unless Mitigated. The parcels are zoned R-2-8,000 Multiple
Family Residential), and designated as Mixed/Regional Commercial M/RC) with a
residential overlay on the General Plan. The permitted density is 16 units per one acre.
Anticipated fliture development would be no greater than a density of 10 units per acre.
The current zoning designation may need to be amendment to permit the desired density.
Adjacent land use designtions consist of Low Density Residential LDR), Golf(G), and
Tourist Commercial TC) to the south; Mixed/Regional Commercial M/RC) to the east
and north; and Low Density Residential LDR) and High Density Residential HDR) to
the West. Adjacent zoning designtations consist of Scenic Commercial CPS) to the
north. Single Family Residential RI) to the west, Multiple Faniily residential R-2) to the
south. and Multiple Family Residential with a minimum lot size of 8,000 square feet R-2-
8,000) to the east. The adjacent land use designations and zoning classifications are
compatible with the fliture development.
B. Would the project conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies
adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project?
No Impact. The La Quinta Redevelopment Agency has jurisdiction over this project. The
primary environmental plans and policies related to development on site are identified in
La Quinta's General Plan, the Redevelopment Plan, and the Master Environmental
Assessment for the City.
The property involved in the land acquisition is located within Redevelopment Area #2
which includes all of the northern sector of the' City. The redevelopment plan for the area
relies upon the General Plan to indicate the location and extent ofpermitted development.
As a result, the fliture development plans for the property are consistent with the adopted
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ I
8
Redevelopment Plan. The development envisioned for this property will not exceed the
development standards contained in the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
C Would the project affect agricultural resources or operations e.g. impact to
soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)?
No Impact. No agricultural lands are located on the site. The La QLiinta General Plan
does not contam an agricultural land use designation although there are agricultural land
uses extant in the south and southeastern portion of the Ci?y. Historically, there has been
some farming activity in the northcentral section of the City. The property involved in this
project does not appear to have been disturbed by any type of farming activity. There are
no existing agricultural producing activities within or adjacent to the proposed project
site. Thus, no impact on agricultural resources or operations will result from the proposed
project. Sources: La Quinta General Plan; Zoning Ordinance; Site Survey)
0. Would the project disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community including a low*income minority community)?
No Impact. The project site will be developed with residential units as planned for by the
City's General Plan. The nearest residential land uses are located to the south and west of
the parcels. The fliture development of these parcels will not disrupt or divide this
comrnunity. The fliture development will not affect the physical arrangement of existing
neighborhoods in the northcentral sector of La Quinta. Sources: Site Survey; Proposed
Site Plan)
3.2 POPULATION AND HOUSING
Regional Environmental Setting
Between 1980 and 1990, the population of La QLiinta expanded 125%, as reported by the
U.S. Census, making it the second fastest growing city in the Coachella Valley. The
number of city residents blossomed from 4,992 to 11, 215. La Qtiinta's share of the entire
valley population increased fro, 3.7% in 1980 to 5.1% in 1990. These figures are based
upon information provided by the U.S. Census Bureau, the State Department of Finance,
and the Coacheila Valley Association of Gover:nments CYAG).
The City's population as of January, 1994, is estimated by the State Department of
Finance to be 16,634 persons. This is an increase of 208% in the last ten years. In addition
to perananent residents, the City has approximately 8,000 seasonal residents who spend
three to six months in the City. It is estimated that 30% of all housing units in the City are
used by seasonal residents. The average occupancy is 2.5 person per unit.
The housing stock as of 1993 is listed at 7,755 single family units, 481 multi-family units,
and 247 mobile homes, for a total of 8,483 units.
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ I
9
Etimicity information from the 1980 Census, for the area that is now the City of La Quinta
revealed that 80.8% of the La Quinta resident population as Caucasian, 14.7% as Hispanic,
2.3% as Afro-American, 1.1% as Asian, and 5% as Native American. The results ofthe
1990 census show a nix of 70% Caucasian, 26% Hispanic, 1.6% Afro-American, 1.5 As
Asian, and 1.0% Native Amencan.
The most current information available on employment of La Quint a residents is from the
1980 Census. At that time, almost 57% of the La Quinta work force worked at white
colaar jobs, while 43% were in blue collar occupations. Among those in white collar jobs,
16.4% were professionaI/technical poskions, 13.3% were in managerial positions, 14.0%
were in clerical positions and 13.0% were in sales. For blue collar workers, 15.6% were in
crafts, 4.1% were machine operators, assemblers, and inspectors, 14.2% were in service
dubs, 3.8% were laborers, and 5.6% did farm work. Major employers in La Quinta include
the La Quinta Hotel and Resort, PGA West, Von's, Simon Motors, City of La Quinta,
WaIMart, Albertson's, and Ralph's.
For planning purposes, the Southern California Association of Governments has projected
employment, housing, and population for cities that make up the SCAG region. A key
objective of SCAG's Growth Management Plan isto achieve jobs/housing balance within
each subregion that makes up the larger SCAG planning area. The ideal jobs/housing
balance ratio, according to SCAG is 1.27 jobs for every housing unit in 1984 and 1.22 in
the year 2010. Jobs-rich housing-poor) regions have ratios greater than the regional
average while housing-rich regions have ratios less than the regional average.
Local Environmental Setting
The project site is currently three vacant parcels with no housing units or other structures
on theni
A. Would the project cumulatively exceed official regional or local population
projections?
Less Than Significant Impact. The *ture *evelopment envisioned for the three parcels
will result in a range of 300 to 500 residential imits. Temporary construction jobs will be
created as the homes are built. Source: SCAG Growth Management Plan)
B. Would the project induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly e.g. tlarough projects in an undeveloped area or extension of
major infrastructure)?
No Impact. The fliture development at 10 dwelling units per acre is under the maximum
density permissible with the High Density Residential Overlay zoning designation at 12 to
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ I
10
16 dwelling units per acre. Thus, the intended development for this project will make less
of an hnpact upon the area than pennitted.
C. Would the project displace existing housing, especially affordable housing?
No Impact. No existing residential units are located on the project site. The fliture
development plan is to construct low and moderate income single and multiple *rnily
homes utilizing public fluids. The proposed project would not result in the displacement or
removal of any existing housing units as there are none. Source: Site Survey)
3.3 EARTH RESOURCES
Regional Enyironmental Setting
The City of La Quinta has a relatively flat topography, except for the hlllside area on the
southern portion of the City, and the sloping Cove area. The City has elevations of 1,400
feet above ms1 in the northeastern section. Slopes on the valley area of the City are gentle,
except in the sand dune areas. The alluvial soils that make up most of the City are
underlain by igneous-metamorphic rock, as seen in outcrops in the Santa Rosa Mountains
and the Coral Reef Mountains. Soils on the valley floor are made up of very fine grain
unconsolidated silty sands inmost areas.
Local Environmenlal Sefting
The area where the three parcels are located is in a generally urbanized part of the City. A
review of historical aerial photographs indicates that the site has never been developed.
The average elevation of the site is approximately 120 feet above msl. Rolling sand dunes
provide some local relief There is an inferred fault line transecting the center of the
parcels. There has been no recorded fault activity, thus there is a low probability for such
act*ty. The City of La Quinta lies in a seismically active region of Southern California.
Faults in the area include the San Andreas fault located several miles to the north, and two
inferred faults transecting the southern sectibn*of the City.
A. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving
seismicity: fault rupture?
Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated. There is an inferred fault line transecting the
three parcels. This fault is considered potentially active, although no activity has been
recorded for the last 10,000 years. A major earthquake along the fault would be capable
of generating seismic hazards and strong groundshaking effects in the area. None of the
inferred fliults in La Quinta have been placed in an Mquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone.
All homes developed on the parcels would be constructed to current UBC seismic
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ I
11
standards in order to mitigated this risk to the extent feasible. Source: Riverside County
Comprehensive General Plan; City of La Quinta General Plan; City of La Quinta Master
Environmental Assessment)
B. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving
seismic ground shaking?
Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated. The proposed residential project will be
subject to groundshaking hazards from regional and local earthquake events. The
proposed project will bring people to the site who will be subject to these hazards. The
Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan indicates that the parcels are within
Groundshaking Zone ifi. Any homes constmcted will be required to meet current seismic
standards to reduce, or mitigate to the extent feasible, the risk of structural collapse.
C. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving
seismicity: ground failure or liquefaction?
No Impact. The proposed project site is not anticipated to be subject to ground failure
hazards from earthquake or other events. The La Quinta General Plan indicates that the
project site is not within a recognized liquefaction hazard area. The majority of the City
has a very low liquefaction susceptibility due to the fact that ground water levels are
generally at least 100 feet below the ground surfiice. Source: La Quinta MEA; Riverside
County Comprehensive General Plan)
D. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving
seismicity: seiche or tsunami or volcanic hazard?
No Impact. The City is located inland from the Pacific Ocean and would not be subjected
to a tsunami. Lake Cahuilla, a man-made reservoir located in the southeast portion of the
City, might experience some moderate wave activity as a result of an earthquake and
groundshaking. However, the lake is not anticipated to affect the City in the event of a
levee failure or seiche.
E. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving
landslides or mudslides?
No Impact. The terrain within the project is that of roliing sand dunes and pockets of
relatively flat ground. The parcels are some distance away from hillsides and would not be
impacted by landslides or mudslides, nor cause slides to occur.
F. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving
erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation,
grading or fill?
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ I
12
No Impact. The soils on the site and geotechnical studies done in the project vicinity
show that the site is underlain by ailuvial deposits of Pleistocene age. The soils on the site
consist of Myoma Fine Sand MaD and MaB), and Coachella Fine Sand CpA). The MaD
and MaB soil types are commoniy found on dunes and alluvial fans. Runoff is very 510w
and the erosion hazard is slight. The hazard of blowing soil is high. This soil is used for
homesites, recreation, and agriculture. The taxonomic class for these two soils is mixed,
hyperthermic Typic Torrispamments.
The CpA soil type is found on alluvial fans and flood plains of the Coachella Valley.
Runoff is medium; the erosion hazard is slight. However, the hazard of soil blowing is
high. The Coachella soil series belongs to the taxonomic class called sandy, mixed
hyperthennic Typic Torrifluvents. Source: U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service Soil
Survey of Riverside County, California- Coachella Valley Area)
The fliture project will involve mass and final grading activities which will disturb the
existing topography of the three parcels. Compliance with approved grading plans and
geotechnical studies for the project will ensure structural integrity of development on the
site.
G. Would the project result in or expose people to potenual impacts involving
subsidence of the land?
Less Than Significant Impact. The parcels to be acquired are not located in an area
which is considered to have subsidence hazards, according to the La Quinta MEA.
Dynamic settlement result in geologically seismic areas where poorly consolidated soils
mix with perched groundwater causing dramatic decreases in the elevation of the ground.
The three parcels are not located within the area that has been identified as having this
potential hazard Source: La Quinta MEA)
H. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving
expansive soils?
No Impact. The underlying soils on the parcels do not have a potential for expansion;
thus, construction of residential units is not expected to be subject to problerns from soil
expansion. The City requires cornpliance with the Uniform Building Code and the
recommendations of a soils investigation report prior to approval of building permits.
Sources: USDA Report and General Soils Map for the Coachelia Valley)
L Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving
unique geologic or physical features?
No Impact. The Coral Reef Mountains and the Santa Rosa Mountains represent unique
geologic features in the La Quinta area. Th*se unique geQlogic features are not located in
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ I
13
or near the project site and will not be affected by the proposed project. Sources: USGS
La Quinta Quadrangle; Site survey)
3.4 WATER
Regional Environmental Setting
Groundwater resources in the La Quinta area consist of a system of large aquifers *orous
layers of rock material) and groundwater basins separated by bedrock or layers of soil that
trap or retain groundwater. La Quinta is located above the Coachella Valley Groundwater
Basin which is the major supply of water for the potable water needs of the City as well as
a significant supply for the City's nonpotable irrigation needs. Water is pumped from the
underground aquifer via thirteen wells in the City operated and administered by the
Coachella Valley Water District CVWD).
La Quint a is located primarily in the lower thermal Subarea of the groundwater basin. The
Thermal Subarea is separated into the upper and lower valley sub-basins near Point
Happy, located southwest of the intersection of Washington Street and State Highway
111. CVWD estimates that approximately 19.4 million acre feet of water is stored within
the Thermal Subarea which is available for use. Water pumped from the aquifer is treated
to federal drinking water standards and distributed to users through the existing potable
water distribution systeni Water is also pumped for irrigation purposes to water golf
courses and the remaining agricultural uses in the City. Water supplies are augmented with
surface water from the Colorado River transported via the Coachella Canal.
The quality of water in the La Quinta area is highly suitable for domestic purposes.
However, chemicals associated with agricultural production in nearby areas and the use of
septic tanks in the Cove area affect groundwater quality in the area. Groundwater is of
marginal to poor quality at depths of less than 200 feet. Below 200 feet, water quality is
generally good and water depths of 400 to 600 feet is considered excellent.
Percolation from the tributaries of the Whitewater River flowing into La Quint a from the
Santa Rosa Mountains provide a natural source bf groundwater replenishment. Artificial
recharging of groundwater will be a requirement in the near fi*ture.
Surface water in La Quinta is comprised of Colorado River water supplied via the
Coachella Canal and stored in Lake Cahuilla; lakes in private developments which are
comprised of canal water and/or untreated ground water; and the Whit ewater River and its
tributaries. The watersheds in La Quinta are subject to intense storms of short duration
which result in substantial runoff The steep gradient of the Santa Rosa Mountains
accelerates the runoff flowing in the intermittent streams that drain the mountain
watersheds.
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ 14
Oiie of the primary sources of surface water pollution is erosion and sedimentation from
development construction and operation activities. Without controls total dissolved solids
*IDS) can increase signilicantly from the development activities. The Clean Water Act
requires all communities to conform to standards regulating the quality of water
discharged into streams, including storinwater runoff The National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination/system NPDES) has been implemented as a two-part permitting process, for
which the City of La Quinta is participating in completing permitting requirements.
Local Enyironmenlal Setting
The project site does not have any standing water on it or near it. The nearest stand of
surface water is Lake Cahuilla, located over 5 miles to the southeast of the parcels. The
Whitewater River channel is located to the north of the parcels, but is dry except during
seasonal storms.
The City has limited areas which are subject to storm water flow or flooding. Flood prone
areas within the City are designated with a specffic zoning district Watercourse,
Watershed and Conservation Areas, Wi). The intent of the zoning district is to aHow
development in flood prone areas based upon the submittal of a drainage and stormwater
control plan. The City also implements flood hazard regulations for development within
flood prone areas.
A. Would the project result in changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated. The filture development of residential units
will necessitate the submittal of a drainage plan along with a grading plan in order to
determine the required retention facilities and drainage infrastructure needed for the
project. Since the parcels total more than 5 acres, the project will be subject to the
requirements of NPDES.
B. Would the project result in exposure of people or property to water-related
hazards such as flooding?
Less Than Significant Impact. The site is not within a designated flood hazard area.
The site is protected by the La Quint a Evacuation Channel located to the southeast.
Source: La Quinta MEA; site survey)
C. Would the project result in discharge into surface waters or other alteration
of surface water quaiity e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)?
Less Than Significant Impact.. Runoff from the parcels will be directed into the La
Quint a Evacuation Channel. There are no *odies of surfa*e water on Or adjacent to the
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ 15
parcels. Storinwater that drains into the channel will ultimately empties into the Salt on
Sea. Source: La Quinta MEA)
D. Would the project result in changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body?
No Impact. There are no bodies of surface water on or in the near vicinity of the subject
parcels. Although an increase in nmoffvolume will occur, this increase is not expected to
imp act surface water. The size of the project represents only a very small percentage of
the drainage tributary area for the City. Source: Site Survey)
E. Would the project result in changes in currents, or the course or direction of
water movements?
No Impact. The City of La Quinta does not have any substantial bodies of water or
rivers. There are many small naan-made lakes and ponds on golf courses witliin the City.
The La Quinta Evacuation Channel is a rnan-rnade stormwater channel that is usually dry
except for runoff from seasonal storms. Source: Site Survey, La Quinta MEA)
F. Would the project result in changes in quantity of ground waters, either
through direct *dditions or with drawl, or through interception of an aquifer
by cuts or by excavations?
No Impact. Water supply in the City is derived from groundwater and supplementary
water brought in from the Colorado River. Future development on the three parcels will
consist of residential units. Since the exact number of units to be developed is not known
at this time, water consumption calculations can not be made at this time. When a
development application is submitted for review, these calculations can be made and
assessed at that time, in a revised environmental assessment.
G. Would the project result in altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
No Impact. The acquisition will have no effect on groundwater wells. When development
is proposed it is possible that well facilities may be required by the water district to service
the development. If a well is required, then there will be some impact to the supply of
groundwater. However, it is not anticipated that there will be any alteration to the
direction or rate of flow of the groundwater supply. There will be no deep cuts that would
impact the groundwater supply.
H. Would the project result in impacts to groundwater quality?
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ I
16
No Impact. Future development of the parcels will include concrete and asphalt pavement
ofportions of the project site. This pavement will reduce the absorption abffity of the
ground. Storm water runoff will be discharged into a city storm drain that will be directed
to the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. Crankcase oil, hydrocarbons, and other particulate
and liquid contaminates may be deposited on the pavement from parked vehicles.
Following a heavy rain, these contaminates could be transported into the nearby storm
channel and could contribute to groundwater and/or surface water pollution.
3.5 AIR QUALrl'v
Regional Environmenial Setting
The Coachella Valley is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management
District SCAQMD), and in particular the Southeast Desert Air Basin SEDAB). SEDAB
has a distinctly different air pollution problem than the South Coast Air Basin SCAB). A
discussion of the jurisdictional organization and requirements is found in the La Quint a
MEA.
The air quality in Southern California region has historically been poor due to the
topography, climatological influences, and urbanization. State and federal clean air
standards established by the California Air Resources Board and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency EPA) are often exceeded. The SCAQMD is a regional agency charged
with the regulation ofpollutant emissions and the maintenance of local air quality
standards. The SCAQMD samples air quality at over 32 monitoring stations in and around
the Basin. According to the 1989 South Coast Air Quality Management Plan, SEDAB
experiences poor air quality, but to a lesser extent than the SCAB. Currently, the SEDAB
does not meet federal standards for ozone, carbon monoxide, or particulate mauer. In the
Coach ella Valley, the standards for PM 10 is frequently exceeded. PM- 10 is particulate
mauer 10 microns or less in diameter that becomes suspended in the air due to winds,
grading activity, and by vehicles on unpaved roads, among other causes.
Local Environmen*l Setting
The City of La Quinta is located in the Coachella Valley, which has an arid climate,
characterized by hot summers, mild winters, infrequent and low annual rainfall, and low
humidity. Variations in raiIiThll, temperatures, and localized winds occur throughout the
valley due to the presence of the surrounding mountains. Air quality conditions are closely
tied to the prevailing winds of the region.
The City of La Quinta is subject to the SCAQMD AQMP, a plan which describes
measures to bring the SCAB into compliance with federal and state air quality standards
and to meet California Clean Air Act requirements. The General Plan for the City contains
an Air Quality Element outlining mitigation measures as required by the Regional AQMP.
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ a
17
The City is located within Source Receptor Area SRA) 30, which includes two air quality
monitoring stations, one located in the City of Palm Springs and one in the City of Indio.
The lndio station monitors conditions which are most representative of the La Quinta
area. The station has been collecting data for ozone and particulate since 1983. The Palm
Springs station monitors carbon monoxide in addition to ozone and particulate and has
been in operation since 1985.
A. Would the project violate any afr standard or contribute to an existing or
projected afr quality violation?
Potentially Significant Impact. There will be some pollutants as a result of vehicular
traffic during the construction phases of fliture development and ftom residents of the
fliture development. According to the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, Table 6-
2, single family residential land use threshold is 170 units. The projected density of the
land to be acquired would range between 300 and 500 units. Thus, there would be a
potentially significant air quality impact. The Significance Emission Thresholds established
by the District consist of the following:
55 pounds per day of ROG
55 pounds per day ofNox
274 pounds per day of CO
150 pounds per day ofPMlO
150 pounds per day of Sox
State 1-hour or 8-hour standard for CO
Projects that exceed the above thresholds with**daily operation-related emissions averaged
over a 7-day week) that exceed the above emission thresholds are considered to be
significant. Calculations were rnade for the anticipated fliture development of 500 single
tamly homes, as a worst case scenario. A 180-day construction period for the initial phase
of development was assumed for the following short term construction impact:
ROG 92 lbs/day
Nox 1353.2Ibs.Iday
CO 294.1 lbs.Iday
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ a
is
PMlO 96.Olbs.Iday
Long Term Emissions consis* of the following:
ROG 189.6 Ibs./day
Nox 135.9lbs.Iday
CO 2087.7 11)5./day
PM1O 15.6lbs./day
Long Term Mobile Eniissions consist of the following:
ROG 189.5 lbs/day
Nox 126.3./day
CO 2085.7 lbs./day
PM1O lS.2lbs./day
Total Emissions are as follows:
ROG 1 lbs./day
Nox 9.6 11)5./day
CO 1.7lbs./day
PM1O 3 lbs./day
Percent Over Thresholds:
ROG 252.8%
Nox 135.9%
Co 379.5%
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ 19
PM1O 10.4%
Thus, there is a potential for significant impact from the development of up to 500 single
*mily units. A detailed air quality analysis shall be required to be submitted at the time of
project submittal to the City. The analysis shall include recommended mitigation measures.
B. Would the project expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
Less Than Significant Impact. Sensitive Receptors include schools, day care centers,
parks and recreation areas, medical facilities, rest homes, and other land uses that include
concentrations of individuals recognized as exhibiting particular sensitivity to air pollution.
The adjacent land uses consist of residential and golf development to the south, vacant
commercial land to the north, vacant residential land to the east, and developing residential
land to the west. The closest school is the La Quinta High School located southeast of the
intersection of Dune Palms Road and Westward Ho Drive, which is over I mile to the
north of the parcels. The closest existing park is Palm Royale Park located west of Adams
Street and south of Fred Waring Drive, over a mile and a half to the northwest. There are
no known day care centers, medical facilities, or rest homes in the near vicinity of the
parcels. There is a medical clinic under construction in the One Eleven Center, located
over a quarter mile to the north of the parcels. No significant inipacts are anticipated to
the medical clinic.
C. Would the project alter air movements, moisture, temperature, or cause any
change in climate?
No Impact. The proposed acquisition and fliture development of up to 500 single and
multiple family homes is not anticipated to result in any significant impact upon this issue
area. All proposed homes will be required to meet height and setback requirements,
maintaining the low profile and density of single family homes. Two-story units may be
proosed for construction. Clustering of units is a possibility in order to create larger
pockets of open space on the property, and maintain existing air circulation and
temperature in the project area. Moisture content may increase as yards are planted and
irrigated. Swimining pools would add to the moisture index of the area. There are no
significant climatic changes anticipated with the fliture development of the three parcels.
D. Would the project create objectionable odors?
No Impact. The proposed acquisition and fliture development will not be involved in
activities which may create objectionable odors, such as waste hauling or the chemical
products. Vehicles traveling on nearby streets generate gaseous and particular emissions
that may be noticeable on the project site. Sources: Site Survey)
3.6 *
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ I
20
Regional Environmental Seuing
La Quinta is a desert community of over 16,000 permanent residents. The City is 31.18
square miles in size, with substantial room for development. The existing circulation
system is a combination of early roadwork constructed by Riverside County and new
roadways since incorporation of the City in 1982. Key roadways include State Highway
111, Washington Street, Jefferson Street, Fred Waring Drive, and Eisenhower Drive.
Traffic volumes in La Quinta experience considerable seasonal variation, with the late-
winter, early spring months representing the peak tourist season and highest traffic
volumes. High traffic volumes and out-dated geometrics contribute to the relatively high
incidence of automobile accidents at the intersection of Washington Street and State
Highway 111.
Existing transit service in La Quinta is limited to three regional fixed-route bus routes
operated by Sunline Transit Agency. One bus route along Washington Street connects the
Cove and Village areas with the community of Palm Desert to the west. Two lines operate
along Highway 111 serving trips between La Quinta and other communities in the desert.
There are some existing pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian facilities in La Quinta, however,
these systems are to be completed as the city grows.
Local Environmental Seuing
The subject property is located northeast of the intersection of Adams Street and Avenue
48. Avenue 48 and Adams Street are both designated as primary arterials with a 100-110
foot rights-of-way.
The cunent average daily traffic flows for Adams Street and Avenue 48 in the vicinity of
the subject parcels is not known. The projected buildout volumes for Adams Street is
14,000 and for Avenue 48, 29,600 average daily trips. When a proposed project is
submitted to the City for review and approval, the traffic and circulation impacts will be
reexamined in more specific detail in a revised environmental assessment. A traffic study
will be required for filture development. Source: La Quinta General Plan)
A. Would the project result in increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated. The filture development of up to 500 single
and multiple family units is forecasted to generate a daily average two-way traffic volume
of 5,000 trips in a worst case scenario. The A.M. Generated Peak Hour Total trips is 400,
and the P.M. Generated Peak Hour Total is 500 trips.
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n/ a *
21
B. Would the project result in hazards to safety from design features e.g. sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses e.g. farm
equipment)?
No *mpact. There are currently no hazards from design features in the roadways, and
none are proposed. Automobile and motorcycle traffic are the only two types of vehicles
that typically use the surrounding roadways.
C. Would the project result in inadequate emergency access to nearby uses?
No Impact. The fliture project would not be permitted to obstruct emergency access to
surrounding land uses. This requirement would be made a part of the project conditions of
approval.
D. Would the project result in insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
No Impact. Parking will be provided for each housing unit with a two-car garage and
two tandem parking spaces in the drive way. On-street parking will also be available. For
multiple farnily units, centralized parking areas may be proposed. A detailed parking
analysis will be conducted when development plans are submitted to the City for review
and approval.
E. Would the project result in hazards or barriers for pedestrian or bicyclists?
No Impact. The north bank of the Coachella Valley Storinwater Channel is a designated
bikeway corridor, as is Adarns Street and Avenue 48. The greatest potential for pedestrian
and/or bicycle accidents will involve traffic in the intersection of Adams Street and Avenue
48. Source: La Quinta General Plan)
F. Would the project result in confficts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation e.g. bus turnouts', bicycle racks)?
No Impact. There is no existing City policy that would require that residential
developments be required to install bicycle racks. A bus turn out could be required by the
Sunline Transit Agency. The filture project will be transmitted to the Agency for review
and comment. This issue will be exaniined flirther when development plans are submitted
to the City for review and approval.
* C. Would the project result in rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n / 22
No Impact. There is no rail service in the City of La Quinta. There are no navigable
rivers or waterways, or air travel lanes within the City. Thus, there will be no imp acts
upon these issues.
3.7 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Regional Environmental Setting
The City of La Quinta lies within the Colorado Desert. Two ecosystems are found within
the City, the Sonoran Desert Scrub and the Desert Transition. The disturbed environments
within the City are classified as urban or agricultural. A discussion of these ecosystems is
found in the La Quinta Master Environmental Assessment.
Local Environmental Setting
The parcels are located in the Sonoran Desert Scrub. Typically, undeveloped land within
this ecosystem is rich in biological resources and habitat. The Sonoran Desert Scrub
ecosystem is the most typical environment in the Coachella Valley. It is generally
categorized as containing plants which have the ability to economize water uses, go
dormant during periods of drought, or both. Cacti are very common in these areas due to
their ability to store water. Odler plants root deeply and draw upon water from
considerable depths. The variations of desert vegetation result from differences in the
availability of water. The most dense and lush vegetation in the desert is found where
groundwater is most plentiflil.
The Sonoran Scrub areas are considered habitat for a number of small mammals. These
animals escape the summer heat through their nocturnal and/or burrowing tendencies.
Squirrels, mice and rates are all common rodent species in this environment. The black-
tailed hare is a typical mammal. Predator species include kit fox, coyote, and mountain
lion in the higher elevations. The largest mammal species found in this area is the
Peninsular Big Horn sheep which is found at the higher elevations of the Santa Rosa and
San Jacinto Mountain ranges. Birds and arnphibians/reptiles can also be found in the
Sonoran Scrub area.
The three parcels are vacant. There is a sparse scattering of vegetation ocotillo, pencil
cholla, greasewood, and grasses) on the parcels that is typical of the natural area. The La
Quinta MEA indicates that the property is within the habitat of the Coachella Valley
Fringe Toed Lizard. The Coachella Valley Fringe Toed Lizard has been listed as
endangered by the California Fish and Game Commission and a threatened species by the
US Fish and Wildlife Service, since 1980. The species is highly adaptable to loose,
windblown sand and is able to rapidly run over the sand. The mapped description of the
lizard's habitat includes the sand dunes north of Avenue 50. To mitigate the loss of the
lizard's habitat due to development, there is a development fee' which is used to acquire
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n!/ a
23
and maintain habitat areas in a Habitat Conservation Preserve near Thousand Palms. The
City of La Quinta participates in this fee program as mitigation for habitat loss.
A. Would the project result in impacts to endangered, threatened or rare
species or their habitats including but not liinited to plants, fish, insects,
animals, and birds)?
Potential Significant Uuless Mitigated. The parcels are located within the Coachella
Valley Fringe Toed Lizard habitat. To mitigate the loss of habitat, the applicant will be
required to pay the mitigation fee at the current amount prior to submitting an application
for a grading permit. Source: La Quinta MEA)
B. Would the project result in impacts to locally designated species e.g. heritage
trees)?
No Impact. There are no locally designated biological resources within the City of La
Quinta. All significant biological resources are designated by the California Department of
Fish and Game or the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Sources: La Quinta MEA; Site
Survey)
C. Would the project result in impacts to locally designated natural
communities e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)?
No Impact. There are no locally designated natural communities found on or near the
parcels. Some of the surrounding parcels are developed with homes, a golf course, or
roadways. The parcels have had some disturbance, such as by off-road vehicles and trash
dumping.
D. Would the project result in impacts to wetland habitat e.g. marsh, riparian,
and vernal pool)?
No Impact. There are no wetlands, marshes, riparian communities, or vernal pools on the
subject parcels or nearby. Thus, there is no impact to these*issue areas. Source: La Quinta
MEA; Site Survey)
E. Would the project result in impacts to wildlife dispersal or migration
corridors?
No Impact. Their are no known wildlife corridors on or adjacent to the parcels. Source:
La Quinta MEA)
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n"/ I
24
3.8 ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES
Region at Environmenial Setting
The City of La Cuinta contains both areas of insignificant and significant Mineral
Aggregate Resource Area SMARA), as designated by the State Department of
Conservation. There are no known oil resources in the City. Major energy resources used
in the City come from the Imperial irrigation District Ill)), Southern California Gas
Company, and gasoline companies.
Local Environmental Setting
There are no oil wells or other fliel or energy producing resources on the proposed project
site. While the parcels are undeveloped, they are not a source of soil or gravel. The parcels
are located within MRZ- I, a designation for those areas where adequate info rination
indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present or where it is judged that little
likelihood exists for their presence. Source: La Quinta MEA)
A. Would thc project conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
No Impact. The City of La Quinta does not have an adopted energy plan. However, the
City does have a Transportation Demand Management ordinance in place that focuses on
the conservation of fliel. The Housing Element contains requirements for efficiency in
housing construction and materials, thus reducing energy consumption. Future
development will be required to meet Title 24 energy requirements. No other mitigation is
required for this issue.
B. Would the project use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient
manner?
Less Than Significant Impact. Natural resources that may be used by this fliture project
include air, mineral, water, sand and gravel; timber, energy, and other resources needed
for construction. Future development will be required to meet Title 24 energy
requirements for energy conservation. Any landscaping will also be required to comply
with the landscape water conservation ordinance as well as the requirements of the
Coachella Valley Water District. Soil resources include Myoma Fine Sand and Coachella
Sand and Loa* Source: La Quinta MEA)
3.9 RISK OF UPSETIHUMAN IEALTH
Regional Environmental Setting
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n#/ 25
Recent growth pressure has dramatically increased the City's exposure to hazardous
materials. Such exposure to toxic materials can occur through the air, in drinking water, in
food, in drugs and cosmetics, and in the work place. Although large scale, hazardous
waste generating employment is not located in La Quinta, the existence of chemicals
utill7ed in dry cleaning operations, agricultural operations, restaurant kitchen cleaning,
landscape irrigation and exposure to large scale electrical facilities may pose significant
threats to various sectors of the population. Currently, there are no hazardous disposal
waste sites located in Riverside County, although transportation of such materials out o*
and around, La Quinta takes place.
Local Environmental Setting
In order to comply with AB 2948-Hazardous Waste: Management Plans and Facility
Siting Procedures, the City of La Quinta adopted Ordinance 184 consisting of a
Hazardous Waste Management Plan. The parcels have not been used for any type of
manufacturing in the recent past. However, they are located adjacent to a major arterial
and a secondary arterial, both impacted by frequent high traffic volumes.
A. Would the project involve a risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals,
or radiation)?
Less Than Significant hnpact. There is a minimal risk from pool chemicals and
pesticides that may be used by residents of the fliture development. No other risks are
anticipated by the land acquisition or possible fliture development of the land.
B. Would the project involve possible interference with an emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Less Than Significant Inpact. Construction activities will be confined to the parcels,
except for minimal off-site work as is necessary for project accesses, curbs and gutters.
These activities will not interfere with emergency responses to the site or surrounding
areas nor will it obstruct emergency evacuationofthe area.
C. Would the project involve the creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazards?
No Impact. There are no anticipated health hazards associated with projected fliture
development of the parcels.
D. Would the project involve exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards?
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n$/ I
26
No Impact. There are no existing health hazards on the three parcels. The projected
filture development of the parcels is not expected to create any health hazards. Future
development will be required to conform to zoning standards and all applicable health and
safety codes.
3.10 NOISE
Regional Environmenial Setting
Noise levels in the City are created by a variety of sources in and near the City. The major
sources include vehicular noise on City streets and Highway 111, and temporary
construction noise. The ambient noise levels are dominated by vehicular noise along the
highway and major arterials in the City.
Local Environmental Setting
The ambient noise level at the subject parcels is dominated by vehicle traffic noise from
Washington Street, Jefferson Street, and Adams Street. When road improvements are
completed on Avenue 4* east of Adams Street, then there will be additional traffic noise.
Residential areas are considered nois*sensitive land uses, especially during the nighttime
hours. The nearest residential use to the three parcels is located on the west side of Adams
Street. Also, south of Avenue 48, is the Lake La Quinta residential project that is currently
under construction. Source: Site Survey)
A. Would the project result in increases in existing noise levels?
Less Than Significant Impact. The increase in vehicle noise resulting from fliture
development of the parcels will contribute to the level of noise in the immediate area. This
noise can be mitigated to a level that is less dim siguificant by the construction of
periiineter block walls, setbacks, and landscape buffers.
Staff has determined that the proposed project is most compatible with Single Family,
Townhouse, Apartment land use category in Table 6.3 of the La Quinta MEA. Table 6.3,
Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Equivalent Levels CNEL), indicates that
residential land uses have a normally acceptable CNEL range of 60 to 65. Below this
range is clearly acceptable, and above this range is unacceptable. In order for the fliture
development to have a less than significant noise impact, the operational noise levels will
not be able to exceed 65 CNEL. Construction materials and design should take noise
containment and reduction into account for the development.
B. Would the project result in exposure of people to severe noise levels?
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n%/ 27
Ies* Than Significant Impact. The La Quinta General Plan regulates excessive noise
and vi'bration in the City by establishing allowable noise levels for various land uses.
Residential land uses should have a maximum exterior noise level of up to 65 CNEL. If
the ambient noise level is higher than this standard, then it will serve as the standard.
The fliture development of the parcels will result in short-term imp acts associated with
construction activities. During construction, heavy machinery will be capable of generating
periodic peak noise levels ranging ftom 70 to 95 dBA at a distance of 50 feet from the
source. Source: LA Quint a General Plan)
3.11 PUBLIC SERVICES
Regional Environmental Setting
Law enforcement services are provided to the City through a contract with the Riverside
County Sheriff's Department. The Sheriff's Department extends service to the City from
existing facilities located in the City of lndio. The Department utilizes a planing standard
of 1.5 deputies per 1,000 population to forecast additional public safety personnel
requirements in the City at buildout. Based on this standard, the City is currently
underserved.
Fire protection service is provided to the City by Riverside County Fire Department. The
Fire Department administers two stations in the City; Station #32 on Avenue 52, west of
Washington Street, and Station #70, at the intersection of Madison Street and Avenue 54.
The Fire Department is also responsible for building and business inspections, plan review,
and construction inspections. Based upon a planning standard of one paid firefighter per
1,000 population, the City is currently underserved. The Fire Department has indicated
that a need exists for a third fire station in the northern part of the City between
Washington Street and Jefferson Street.
Structural fires and fires from other man-mad*features are the most significant fire threats
to the City. Hillside and brush fires are minimal as the hlllside area are barren and scattered
brush on the valley floor is too sparse to pose a serious fire threat.
Desert Sands Unified School District and the Coachella Valley Unified School District
serve the City. There is one elementary school, one junior high school, and one high
school within the City. The City is also within the College of the Desert Community
College District.
Library services are provided by the RiversideCounty Library System with a branch
library located in the Village area of the City. The existing facility opened in l9g* and
contams 2,065 square feet of space and approximately 1 8,O0oyolumes. The County
unadopted planning standards of 0.5 squa* feet per capita and 1.2 volumes per capita to
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n&/ I
28
forecast filture facility requirements to serve the City. Utilizing this standard, in 1992, the
City was underserved in space but overserved in terms of volumes.
Health care services are provided in the City through JFK Memorial Hospital in Indlo, and
the Eisenhower Immediate Care Facility located in the Plaza La Quinta Shopping Center.
The Eisenhower Immediate Care Facility is a satellite clinic of the Eisenhower Medical
Center, located in Rancho Mirage. The Riverside County Health Department administers a
variety of health programs for area residents and is located in lndio. Paramedic service is
provided to the City by Springs Ambulance Service.
Local Environmenial Setting
The nearest fire station of the project site is Station #32 located approximately 2 miles
southwest of the parcels. Governmental services in La Quinta are provided by city staff at
the Civic Center and by other County, state, and federal agency offices in the desert area.
The parcels are served by Truman Elementary School, La Quinta Middle School, and by
La Quinta High School.
A. Would the project have an effect upon, or result in the need for new or
altered governmental services in relation to fire protection?
Less Than Significant Impact. The development of the parcels will increase the need
for fire protection due to the Construction of up to 500 single and multiple family homes.
Development shall comply with the fire flow and fire safety building standards of the
Riverside County Fire Code to prevent fire hazard on- site and to mininiize the need for
fire protection services. Unobstructed fire access will be required. Other code
requirements such as sprinkler Systems, construction materials, etc.) will be required. A
detailed assessment of this issue will be conducted when development plans are submitted
to the City for review and approval.
fl. Would the project have an effect UpQn, or result in the need for new or
altered government serviees in relation to police protection?
Less Than Significant Impact. Comments have not been solicited by the Sheriff's
Department as development plans have not been prepared for the fliture development.
There will be a cumulative imp act upon police protection services, however, it is not
anticipated that there will be any siguificant adverse impact upon police protection
services from fliture development of the parcels. When development plans are submitted
to the City for review and comment, the Sheriff's Station will be given an opportunity to
respond with comments.
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n'/ a
29
C. Would the project have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered
government services in relation to school services?
Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated. The anticipated fliture development of up to
500 single and multiple family houses will generate approximately 80.15 students at
0.0001145013 students per square foot assumuag a minimum square footage of 1,400
square feet per unit). School impact fees will reduce this potential impact to the Desert
Sands Unified School District.
D. Would the project have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered
government services in relation to the maintenance of publlc facilities,
including roads?
Less Than Significant Impact. The parcels are currently served by existing
infrastructure, including public roadways such as Adams Street and Avenue 48 pavement
stops east of the interesection with Adams Street). The anticipated fliture development
will not require new or altered government services for the maintenance of roadways and
other public facilities. The developer will be required to construct road improvements as
part of the conditions of approval for any development approved of the subject parcels.
E. Would the project have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered
government services in relation to other governmental services?
Less Than Significant Impact. Building, engineering, and planning services needed for
the project will be partially offset by permit and inspection fees charged to the developer.
3.12 UTILfrIES
Regional Environmental Sen'ices
The City of La Quinta is served by the Imperial Irrigation District I'D) for electrical
power supply and the Southern California Gas Company SCG) for natural gas service.
Existing power and gas lines and substations are found throughout the City. H) has four
substations in La Quint a, with electricity generated by a steam plant in El Centro and
Hydroelectric power generated by the All American Canal. General Telephone Exchange
GTE) provides telephone services for the City. Colony Cablevision serves the area for
cable television service.
The Coachella Valley Water District CVWD) provides water service to the City. CVWD
obtains its water from underground aquifers and from the Colorado River. CVWD
operates a water system with potable water pumped from 13 wells in the City. The wells
range in depth from 500 to 900 feet. Potable water is stored in five reservoirs located in
the City.
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n(/ a
30
The City's storniwater drainage system is administered by the CVWD, which maintains
and operates a comprehensrve system to collect and transport flows through the City. The *
City is served by Waste Management of the Desert for solid waste disposaL
Nonhazardous, mixed municipal solid waste is taken to three landfills within the Coachella
Valley.
Local Environmental Setting
There is an existing water trunk line 12" to 18") along Avenue 48 that extends to just
west of the intersection of Adams Street and Avenue 48. There are two existing water
wells, one located south of Avenue 48, west of Adams Street and one located west of
Adams Street, approximately 2,000 feet north of the intersection of Adams and Avenue
48. Source: La Quinta General Plan)
A. Would the project result in a need for new Systems, or substantial alterations
to power and gas services?
Less Than Significant Impact. Power, sewer, and gas lines have been brought in to the
general vicinity of the three parcels. Anticipated fliture development will require sewer,
electricity, water, and natural gas utilities. It is not anticipated that the project will require
a significant level of electricity or natural gas to result in the need for new systems or
alterations to existing systems. The project developer will have to coordinate with Ill),
CVWD, and SCG for the timely provision of utilities.
The projected electrical consumption for a maximum of 500 units has been calculated to
be 8,330 kWH per day. Natural gas Consumption is calculated at 109,622 cubic feet per
day for 500 units.
B. Would the project result in a need for new systems, or substantial
alteration to communication Systems?
Less Than Significant Impact. The antivipated fliture development of the parcels will
require service from GTE for telephone communication. The developer will be required to
coordinate the installation of telephone service hiftastructure with General Telephone
Company.
C. Would the project result in a need for new Systems, or substantial alterations
to local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities9.
Less Than Significant Impact. The anticipated fliture development will require water *
service. It is not anticipated that the development will result in a significant adverse impact
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n)/ a
31
upon the water resources of CVWD. Water consumption is calculated at 156,000 gallons
per day for the project with a maximum of 500 residential units.
D. Would the project result in a need for new Systems, or substantial
alterations to sewer services or septic tanks?
Less Than Significant Impact. The anticipated fliture development will generate sewage
which will have to be transported and treated by CVwD. The developer will be
responsible for the cost of connection to the sewer systeni Sewage generation is
calculated at 130,000 gallons per day for the project with a maximum of 500 units.
E. Would the project result in a need for new systems, or substantial alteration
to storm water drainage?
Less Than Significant Impact. The subject parcels are currently vacant and unpaved.
The anticipated filture development of the parcels will result in substantial pavement and
landscaping. Thus, storm runoff will be directed into the existing storm drain facility
located to the southeast of the property, namely, the La Quinta Evacuation Channel.
F. Would the project result in a need for new systems, or substantial alteration
to solid waste disposal?
Less Than Significant Impact. The anticipated development will require solid waste
disposal services from Waste Management of the Desert, the current purveyor of solid
waste collection. Solid waste may be transported to the three existing landfills in the
Coachella Valley. These landfills are reaching capacity and may be closed in the near
filture. Development must comply with the City's Source Reduction and Recycling
policies. Any on-site programs will be coordinated with Waste Management. Solid waste
generation is calculated as 5,000 lbs. per day for 500 units.
3.13 AESTIIETICS
Regional Environmental Setling
The City of La Quinta is partially located within a desert valley cove. There are hillsides to
the west and south of the City. Views of the desert and surrounding mountains are visible
on clear days throughout most of the City.
Local Environmenial Seuing
The subject parcels are located in a residential area in the northern portion of the City.
Height restrictions must be met for all developments, with a n*aximum of 28 feet for a
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n*/ I
32
single filmily unit. Two-story units may be proposed. Color schemes typically consist of
neutral, soft-toned desert colors. Views from the parcels consist of the San Bernardino
Mountains to the f* north, the Santa Rosa and Coral Reef Mountains to the south, and
the cove residential development to the south and southwest.
A. Would the project affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
Less Than Significant Impact. The parcels are not located within a designated
viewshed. The parcels are within a Native Vegetation community with high sensitivity for
impact. There is low visual screening and vacant land in the area. Point Happy, located
southwest of the intersection of Washington Street and Highway 111 is designated as a
Unique Geologic Feature in the General Plan. The vistas from the parcels have been
somewhat impacted by previous and current development in the area. Source: La Quinta
MEA; Site Survey)
B. Would the project have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
Less Than Significant Impact. While actual development plans have not been prepared,
the anticipated development will be required to comply with architectural and landscaping
policies and ordinances of the City. Thus, there should not be a significant adverse impact
upon the aesthetic qualities of the surrounding area.
C. Would the project create light or glare?
Potentiaily Significant Unless Mitigated. The anticipated development will include
exterior security and landscaping lighting which will cumulatively contribute to the
existing light and glare in the City. All such lighting fixtures shall be required to comply
with the Dark Sky Ordinance and other policies of the City, in order to reduce the impact.
3.14 CULTURAL RESOURCES
Regional Environmental Setting
The history of the La Quinta area extends back to an era when much of the Coachella
Valley was inundated by ancient Lake Cahuilla. Early inhabitants of the Colorado Desert
were people who had migrated across the Bering Strait more than 20,000 years ago. As
their migration progressed, they passed through the Colorado Desert on their way to
Central America.
As time passed, the Coachella Valley became the home to a band ofpeopk that have
come to be known as the Cahuilla Indians. The Cahuilla followed a hunting and gathering
life style as they lived along the ancient lakeshore and cove areas in the Valley. The
archaeological record, as it is known today, extends back almost 6,000 years.
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n+/ 33
The Cahuilla were divided into three geographic areas of the Valley; Western or Pass
Cahuilla within Agua Caliente Palm Springs area), Desert Cahuilla from Palm Springs
east to the Salton Sea), and the mountain Cahuilla south of San Jacinto Peak in the Santa
Rosa Mountains).Traveling across boundaries to explore seasonal resources for
ceremonial purposes was a part of their annual life cycle. Alfred Kroeber estimated that
the original population 2500 individuals) has been reduced to about 750 by 1923.
The most likely locations ofprehistoric cultural resources in La Quinta are along the
foothills. These resources are likely associated with the availability of water and food
resources. Temporary campsites can be found near game trail, springs, mesquite groves,
grass stands, bedrock outcrops near food or water resources, marshy areas, or along the
ancient lake shore. Isolated milling features, sparse lithic scatters, and isolated pottery
scatters can be found almost anywhere in the City.
hi 1540, the first European explorer, Captain Hernando de Alarcon, entered Southern
California at the Yuma crossing, which is located to the southeast of La Quint a.
Approximately 100 years later, Spanish missionaries visited the area. A trail was
established by the Cocomaricopa Indians across the Valley in 1821 as they carried mail
through the San Gorgonio Pass between Tucson and Mission San Gabriel.
White settlement in the Valley did not occur to any degree until the transcontinental
railroads were constructed. The construction of the railroads brought with it the
technology to drill water wells deep enough to sustain settlement in the valley. The
Bradshaw Trail brought in settlers and freight both before and after tile construction of the
railroad. The Coachella Valley was the site of the most popular immigration rout to the
southwest via the Southeni Immigrant Trail. The Bradshaw Trail route passed tbrough the
Valley until 1915 when a graded gravel road was developed for automobile travel.
The settling of the La Quinta area has been chronicled by the La Quinta Historical Society
in several publications and museum exhibits. There are 13 historical structures and sites
recorded on the California Historic Resources Inventory. These resources are listed in the
La Quinta General Plan.
La Quinta experienced rapid growth in the late 1970's which lead to incorporation of the
City in 1982. The City has grown from a population of approximately 5,400 in 1982 to
over 16,000 in 1994. The incorporated boundaries currently include over 31 square miles
of area.
Local Environmenial Setting
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n,/ 34
The subject parcels are located in the nortltcentral portion of the City. There is a recorded
historic trail CA-Riv475 5-H) transecting the property. Adjacent to the east is another
recorded historic site, CA-Riv-4747-H
Prehistoric archeological sites are numerous in the City. The subject parcels have been
surveyed by archaeologists, with several archaeological sites being discovered during the
survey. It is highly posst*ble that there are additional surface and sub s**ce cultural
deposits in the form of prehistoric artifacts, habitation and resource areas.
A. Would the project disturb paleontological resources?
less Than Significant Impact. No significant paleontological resources have been
found in the near vicinity of the subject parcels. The parcels are located higher in elevation
60 ft. above rnsl) than the highest extent of the ancient Lake Cahuilla lakeshore, which
has been determined to be at 42 foot above nisi. Source: U.S.G.S. Quad Map-La Quinta)
B. Would the project affect archaeological resources?
Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigated. There are numerous archaeological
resources within a one mile radius of the subject parcels. Both insignificant sites and
significant sites have been recorded in this area. Dtirlng an archaeological survey of the
parcels, there were four prehistoric archaeological site observed on the property. These
sites were recorded with the Eastern Information Center. Future grading and trenching
will require archaeological monitoring, including off-site improvements. Additional testing
for significance may be required prior to site disturbance. Any fill material imported to the
project site must be certified to have come from a source that is sterile of archaeological
materials. Source: Eastern Information Center)
C. Would the project affect historical resources?
Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated. The subject parcels are vacant desert
land and do not contain any extant historical structures. A review of the historical
records and survey documents will be required in order to determine the extent of
survey work completed and the necessary testing and mitigation to be conducted.
When development plans have been submitted to the City for review and approval,
a detailed mitigation report and plan shall be prepared for execution. Source: La
Quinta General Plan; Archaeological Survey Report #3738)
D. Would the project have the potential to cause a physical change which would
affect unique ethnic cultural values?
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n-/ a
35
No Impact. The subject parcels do not represent an ethnic cultural value and the *ture
development will not affect any known ethnic cultural value.
E. Would the project restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential inipact area?
No Impact. There are no known religious uses or scared uses on the subject parcels.
source: Site Survey; La Quinta General Plan)
3.15 RECREATION
Regio*al Environmenial setling
The City of La Quinta has an adopted Parks and Recreation Master Plan that assesses the
existing resources and facilities and the fliture needs of the City. The City contains
approximately 28.7 acres of developed parkland for Quimby Act purposes. The 845.0 acre
regional Lake Cahuilla Park is not included in this count. There are also bike and
equestrian pathways within the City and designated pedestrian hiking trails.
Local Environmenial Seujug
The subject parcels are vacant.
A. Would the project increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks
or other recreational facilities?
Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated. Future anticipated development of the parcels
wili impact the existing park and recretion facilities. Park fees in lieu ofparkland
dedication will be required by the City at the time of development of the parcels. The
Parks and Recretion Master Plan will guide the development of fliture park facilities.
Future development may be required to provide on- site recreation facilities, especially for
the multiple farnily area(s).
B. Would the project affect existing recreational opportunities?
Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated. The anticipated fliture development will
affect existing parks and recreation facilities through additional users. Paynient of park
fees will contribute toward the mitigation of this issue.
SECTION 4: MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n./ I
36
The initial Study for the proposed land acquisition and fliture anticipated development
will not have significant adverse impacts on the environment issues addressed in the
checklist. Some of the issue areas could have a potential sig(rificant impact if appropriate
mitigation measures are not implemented. The following flndihgs can be made regarding
the mandatory findihgs of significance set forth in Section 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines
and based on the results of this environmental assessment:
* The proposed land acquisition and filture anticipated development will not
have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, with the
implementation of mitigation measures.
* The proposed land acquisition and fliture anticipated development will not
have the potential to achieve short term goals to the disadvantage of long
term goals, with the successfiil implementation of mitigation.
* The proposed land acquisition and filture anticipated development will not
have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable
when considering planned or proposed development in the immediate
vicinity.
* The proposed land acquisition and fliture anticipated development will not
have environmental effects that will adversely affect humans, either directly
or indirectly, with the implementation of mitigation.
SECTION 5: EARLIER ANALYSES
2. Earlier Analyses Used. An archaeological survey was conducted over an area
that included the subject parcels. The report of this survey is filed with the Eastern
hiformation Center at the University of California, at Riverside. The report is designated
as report # 3738. The La Quinta Master Environmental Assessment was also used
extensively in preparation of this assessment.
A prior development application that included the three subject parcels was Specific Plan
91-021 submitted by The Tucker Company. The application was a 1.8 million square
fooot retail and office complex on 160 acres. A Draft EIR was prepared for the project,
but was not certified as the project was not approved and put on hold.
b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Potential impacts were identified in the above
referenced DEIIL The commercial project was very different that the anticipated fliture
residetial development assessed by this document. When a project is submitted to the City
for review and approval a more detailed environmental assessment will be required to
address project-specific issues and impacts.
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02
^#n// E
37
C. Mitigation Measures. Mitigation measures are discussed in this addendum
where possible. However, until a detailed project description and site plan are prepared,
there is too little information at present to consider the preparation of a detailed mitigation
plan. When a project application is submiued to the City for review and approval, this
environmental assessrnent will be revised according to the detailed plans. At that tilne a
mitigation monitoring plan can be prepared for approval.
BIB]
11-03-1997-U01
02:20:07PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDARES-U02
95-U02
10-U02